12/18/2017-CC-Minutes-Regular•
MINUTES: REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
December 18, 2017, 7:00 p.m.
502 Elm Street, Sanger, Texas
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Thomas Muir, Councilman Bill Boutwell,
Councilman David Clark, Councilman Allen Chick, Councilman Gary Bilyeu,
Councilman Lee Allison
The Mayor and all Council Members were present constituting a quorum.
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Acting City Manager Alina Ciocan, City Secretary Cheryl
Price, Neal Welch, Director of Public Works
1. Call Meeting to Order, Invocation, Pledge of Allegiance.
Mayor Muir called the Regular City Council Meeting to order on December 18, 2017
at 7:31 p.m. Councilman Allison gave the invocation and Councilman Chick led the
Pledge of Allegiance.
2. Citizens Input: (Citizens are allowed 3 minutes to speak. The City Council is
unable to respond or to discuss any issues brought up during this section).
No citizens present who wished to speak.
3. CONSENT AGENDA:
a) Approval of Minutes:
1. City Council Work Session, December 4, 2017
2. City Council Regular Meeting, December 4, 2017
b) Disbursements
Councilman Boutwell had a few questions regarding disbursements which were
answered to satisfaction by Acting City Manager Alina Ciocan.
A motion made by Councilman Boutwell to approve the consent agenda as
presented. The motion was seconded by Councilman Bilyeu. The motion carried
unanimously (5-0 vote).
4. Consider any Items Removed from Consent Agenda.
None.
REGULAR AGENDA
5. Consider, Discuss, and Possibly Act on Approving and Authorizing the Acting
City Manager to Sign Change Order #1 Between the City of Sanger and Felix
Construction Regarding the Contract for the Wastewater Treatment Plan
Construction.
Public Works Director, Neal Welch was recognized to present the change orders.
He noted that some items have been added, subtracted and adjustments made. On
Change Order #1 we take back $64,800 for adjustments that were made at the
wastewater treatment plant. Mayor Muir noted that the discussion will be on both
Items #5 (Change Order #1) and #6 (Change Order #2) but Council will vote on each
item separately.
Public Works Director Neal Welch noted that Change Order #2 is the same thing.
Councilman Bilyeu noted that he saw the financial part, but also noted there were 15
days added and asked for clarification on what the extra time was for, if there was a
completion date.
Jeff Caffey, Alan Plummer and Associates was recognized, and summarized that the
project has three phases. The first phase is rehabilitating Plant 1, building the new
pump station, peak flow storage basin, clarifiers to go in Plant 1, and UV. This is a
major part of the work, which takes approximately 16 months to substantial
completion, and then we have 4 months to rehab plants 2 and 3. We are about 8
months in so we have 260 days left and that is where we add the 15 days. The
timeline includes building everything, starting it up and running it for 30 days before
handing it over. For completion of Phase I, they will probably start it up in about 6
months. Then Phase Il, around July 4th and Phase III, around August 3, 2019.
Councilman Boutwell noted that on Change Order #1 there would be an adjustment
in our favor of $64,800 but in Change Order 2 we would owe more money. Neal
Welch, Public Works Director noted that there are some more changes coming in
our favor but we do not know the exact figures yet. Mr. Caffey noted that there is a
large bid item of $100,000 in reserve for unseen things. Typically, we would use it
first before doing the change orders, but on this project the contractor is rehabbing
Plant 1 and we would like to reserve the $100,000 until we are done with Plant 1.
That is why you are seeing the $122,000, but we would have normally used the
$100,000. Instead you are seeing it first so we can use the bid item later.
Mr. Caffey noted that the contractor is doing a really good job and have been a
pleasure to work with. They have been working with them even to the point of
brainstorming on savings items. One of the credits back was where Felix
Construction got a cut from the manufacturer after they turned in their bid. They
didn't have to tell us about that and could have kept that money to themselves but
they brought it to the table. Councilman Allison noted that these are most difficult
types of contracts to administer and noted he appreciated everybody's involvement
and having this discussion. That it helps keep everyone up to date and
straightforward. It helps the Council be accountable to the public. Councilman
Chick asked if Council could get a summary of the changes.
Mr. Caffey summarized some of the changes in relation to cost and credits. He
noted on cost, the Peak flow basin floor valves (CMRA) $28,000 — when they
realized that costs were going high because they underestimated rock excavation.
They redesigned the peak -flow storage basin and raised it up out of the rock layer.
We were anchoring it down with rock anchors and debated a more expensive
design. When they dug it, it was not consistent at the top it was breaking apart and
we had to go to a more expensive way to relieve the hydrostatic pressure with Pop-
off valves and you have to put rock down to move the water to the pop -off valves, so
it was a little more expensive. The next item, the largest expense is the four -channel
rotary press. It is a dewatering press (sludge press) this was an attempt on their
part to save some money. You need a 4-channel press when you are at design
capacity of 1.86 mgd. Right now, the plant is at about .7 and they thought they could
do two channels now, and add the additional two channels later. But there are trade-
offs with the two -channel press you only have half of the capacity and it has to run
twice as long, more wear and tear, and more labor costs. He noted that Felix
Construction has worked with them in that the cost is mainly from the manufacturer
to add the two channels and that would be cost we would have to pay in the future,
and they are going to have it install it anyway. Since they bid it they have been
running the press full time. With full capacity of the four -channel press, the system
could be run within regular hours. He noted that Felix Construction has not done
any markup on the manufacturers costs except for bond markup which is about 3-
1/2 % and is required by the insurance company. He noted you would not get this
any cheaper, and that is where Felix Construction has been very beneficial.
Councilman Allision noted that he thought there was a typo on the Description of
Change Order No. 2 it says "Per CMR No. 10, Contractor shall provide a four -
channel rotary press in lieu of a two -channel rotary press"; however, on the II.
EFFECT OF CHANGE it says "e. CMR-10 Peak Flow Berm Width Reduction Lump
Sum". Mr. Caffey noted that Councilman Allison was correct and it is a typo and he
will have it corrected. It was noted the amount is correct but the description for
CMR-10 is wrong in the cost amount summary and would be corrected by Alan
Plummer. It was noted that CMR 5 is the Peak Flow Berm Width Reduction (Change
Order 1).
Mr. Caffey summarized the next largest change which is the clarifiers and the
dewatering building. This is his error, and he said that he should have caught it
earlier. Some of the sheets had detail and others did not so they bid it and did not
have the select fill under the structures. They did look at ways to do it without
having it but, but have determined it is necessary.
Mr. Caffey explained the fence grounding. The spec for grounding goes out to about
every 1000 feet but our electrical engineer advised when you have fence running
where there is overhead you need to ground it because you can get discharges from
it. Typically, he does that and in the original design would normally bury the line, but
when Sanger Electric saw it, they told them they could not bury the line because it
still serves a couple of houses down the way. By addendum it was changed but they
did not go back and put the grounding for the overhead in. On the electrical valve
operator, the 12-inch plug valve is an important valve. When they raised up the
storage basin they originally had one line feeding the storage basin by gravity and
one line draining it by gravity. It was a deep line and they had a side gate on the
structure to control flow of coming back in. The slide gate had an actuator on it and
when they raided the valve they could use the same line and were pumping in and
could use it to drain back out. The electrical engineer did not catch to move the
valve and this is a critical path item and takes some extra days. Councilman Clark
asked where the water escaped to. Mr. Caffey stated it does not escape. It is a
pressure controlled valve so when you have hydrostatic pressure underneath it is
going to open up and the water is going flow into the basin. If there is water in the
basin it is going to be closed, so water can escape out but it can not come in. There
will be nine valves in the slab on the floor. There was additional technical discussion
between Mr. Caffey and Councilman Clark.
Mr. Caffey noted that the good news is that they have been through all of the major
equipment. He summarized credits noting that there are three credits that he
currently knows of that will come back to the City. There was a redesign on the UV
structure and they should have that back to them this week which should be
between a $30,000 and $40,000 credit. They allowed them to do shock crete on
the sides of the peak and they are doing the work this week and we should be
getting a price for what they spent on that. They proposed changing some of the
routing on the 24" line (the new line coming in for the pump station) and they are
going to be able to do less bypass pumping related to that tie-in and once they do
that they are going to give us a credit back on bypass pumping. The need to know
how much they actually spend on that before they give us a credit back.
Mayor Muir summarized noting that this all just keeps the process rolling and things
are staying on course for the most part. It was noted with all of the credits coming
that we are pretty close to even right now. He noted that there may still be some
things that will come up. Councilman Chick noted he was impressed that the
contractor came back with some cost savings. Councilman Clark noted that Felix
Construction has a pretty good track record.
A motion was made by Councilman Bilyeu to approve and authorize the Acting City
Manager to sign Change Order #1 Between the City of Sanger and Felix
Construction Regarding the Contract for the Wastewater Treatment Plant
Construction. The motion was seconded by Councilman Boutwell. The motion
carried unanimously (5-0 vote).
6. Consider, Discuss and Possibly Act on Approving and Authorizing the Acting
City Manager to Sign Change Order #2 Between the City of Sanger and Felix
Construction Regarding the Contract for the Wastewater Treatment Plant.
See discussion on Item No. 5 above. Discussion on Items No. 5 and No. 6 were
combined but the motions to approve were made separately.
A motion was made by Councilman Bilyeu to approve and authorize the Acting City
Manager to sign Change Order #2 between the City of Sanger and Felix
Construction regarding the contract for the wastewater treatment plant. The motion
was seconded by Councilman Allison. The motion carried unanimously (5.0 vote).
7. Consider, Discuss, and Possibly Act on Approving and Authorizing the Mayor
to Sign Change Order #1 with Pavecon Construction.
Neal Welch Director of Public Works was recognized and noted this is where the
contractor got the wrong slope on 1100 feet of concrete pavement and it sloped one
way instead of having a crown in the middle. We agreed to allow them to leave it
after the engineer assured us that it would work and not interfere with the structure.
They gave us a $70,000 credit, so with the $70,000 credit we approached them
about using the credit to improve one of our streets and they agreed to do it with an
additional cost. Mayor Muir noted the last time the Council visited on this that there
was discussion on the prep work and it was noted that this has all been addressed.
It was noted that it would be 6 inches of asphalt. Councilman Allision wanted to
know if someone is setting the lines and grades. Mr. Welch advised that they will
have to change the west railroad track and raise it up with the east one which is
going to change all of the grades. The contractor will have to meet the new grade
with the railroad and the existing grade with the concrete. The grades will be
defined and they will have to match them. This is being done so the tractor trailers
do not drag when they are going across the track. Councilman Allison asked if an
engineer would be looking at it for drainage. Mr. Welch advised there should not be
a problem because the asphalt is already higher than the ditch is right now, but we
can get the engineer to look at. There were additional technical questions regarding
the construction. It was noted since we were raising the track that the railroad
would work with us on the flagger which is required by insurance. There was brief
discussion regarding future street construction funding.
A motion was made by Councilman Allison to approve and authorize the Mayor to
sign Change Order #1 with Pavecon Construction in the amount of a net cost of
$88,969.04. The motion was seconded by Councilman Bilyeu. The motion carried
unanimously (5-0 vote).
8. Consider, Discuss and Possibly Act on Approving the Fourth Amendment To
Option To Lease and Water Tower Lease Agreement Between the City of
Sanger and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC.; and, Authorize the Mayor to
Sign Contract.
Alina Ciocan, Acting City Manager summarized the request. This is an agreement
that was actually worked on by Mike Brice. The contracts were sent for signature
and it seemed to have not been approved by the Council nor reviewed by the City
Attorney. The City Attorney, Rob Dillard has reviewed the contract and made some
changes, mainly related to our ability to terminate the agreement. He added a
paragraph which gives us a little more flexibility should we choose to terminate. We
have had this agreement since 1998. They are currently renting space on our water
tower on Acker for their antennas, and have had them there for 20 years. This
agreement is for an initial term of 5 years, with six additional terms, lumped all
together, you are looking at 30 years, if we choose to continue the agreement. It
provides for a rent increase of about 10% more than what we are currently receiving;
and, at the expiration of every 5 years it will go up an additional 10%. It has been
reviewed by Rob Dillard, our legal attorney and he did not have any other concerns.
Councilman Boutwell noted that he read in the contract that it could be paid in one
lump sum or in a monthly rate and asked how is was being paid now. Ms. Ciocan
noted that the previous contract was monthly but would have to check with our
Finance Director to see how we were receiving the payment. It was noted that it
brings the City about $19,586 per year.
Councilman Clark asked what kind of language we had in the contract for when we
go to paint the tower because we have it on our list of projects. He noted concern
regarding the antennas having to be removed and perhaps affecting their service,
etc. Councilman Allision noted we could use the money we get from this trying to
protect the antennas while we are painting. Acting City Manager Alina Ciocan
advised that she would contact AT&T. She noted that they were anticipating the
contract would be completed by the end of the year. The current agreement does
allow for us to continue to get our current payment amount. If we want to terminate
the agreement we have to give them 180 days notice to terminate. It was noted
after lengthy discussion on this item there would be no action taken in order to give
staff and legal time to have discussion with AT&T about the language necessary to
address the concerns brought up and move forward with the contract. No action was
taken.
a) Financial Investment Report
There was no discussion on Information items.
There being no further discussion, Mayor Muir adjourned the meeting at 8:25 p.m.