04/01/2013-CC-Agenda Packet-Regulargeh
a�TE-AS
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, APRIL 1, 2013
7:00 PM
502 ELM STREET
1. Call Meeting to Order, Invocation, Pledge of Allegiance.
2. Citizens Input:
(Citizens are allowed 3 minutes to speak. The City Council is unable to respond or to discuss any issues
brought up during this section).
CONSENT AGENDA
3. a) Approval of Minutes: March 18, 2013 -Work Session
March 18, 2013 - Council
b) Disbursements
4. Consider any Items Removed From Consent Agenda.
REGULAR AGENDA
5. Consider, Discuss and Possibly Approve Appointing the Following to the Planting and
Zoning Commission: Ramie Hammonds, Place 1
Dennis Dillon, Alternate
6. Consider, Discuss and Possibly Approve an Extension of the Existing Agreement With
First United Bank as the Depository Through December 31, 2013.
7. Consider, Discuss and Possibly Approve Advertising for Bids on the Freese Drive
Paving and Sidewalk Improvements.
8. Consider, Discuss and Possibly Approve the Expenditure of $300,000 in 4A Industrial
Funds for Engineering and Construction of Wastewater Lines Along I-35.
9. Consider, Discuss and Possibly Approve a Consultant Services Agreement With
Pacheco -Koch for the Design of Water and Wastewater Improvements for I-35 North
Interceptor Line.
10. Adjourn.
I, the undersigned authority, do hereby certify that this Notice of Meeting was posted on the
bulletin board, at the City Hall of the City of Sanger, Texas, a place convenient and readily
accessible to the �general public at all tirt�PAIIV "Sajil notice was posted on the following date
and time: l '! l�.�i S406 L.m. and shall remain
posted until meeting is adjourned. �� .• <�
Tami Taber, City Secretary
City of Sanger, Texas ��'o, T ...C, .`'
MINUTES: CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION
March 18, 2013
PRESENT: Mayor Thomas Muir, Councilman Billy Ezell, Councilman Russell Martin,
Councilman Scott Stephens, Councilman Gary Bilyeu
ABSENT: Councilman Allen Chick; City Secretary, Tami Taber
OTHERS
PRESENT: City Manager, Mike Brice; Deputy City Secretary, Cheryl Price; Finance
Director, Cheryl Davenport; Director of Development Services, Joe Iliff,
Kimberly Knox, Weaver and Tidwell LLP; Joyce Herzog
1. Call Meeting to Order.
Mayor Muir called the meeting to order at 6:01 p.m.
2. Overview of Audit for Fiscal Year End 2011/2012 by Weaver and Tidwell, L.L.P.
Kimberly Knox of Weaver and Tidwell LLP was recognized and provided copies of
the September 30, 2012 Independent Auditors Report and Financial Statements.
She noted good news that the Independent Auditors Report states that the City of
Sanger received an unqualified opinion, which is the highest level of assurance that
they can give.
Ms. Knox gave a brief overview and summary of the report and discussed material
weaknesses and significant deficiencies.
There was no material weaknesses noted this year.
There were two significant deficiencies noted. One being yearend review and
reconciliation of the financial statements. Ms. Knox noted that the transition to the
new Finance Director Cheryl Davenport who was employed October 1, probably did
not allow sufficient time to complete and review financial reports before the audit.
The other item was moved down from material weakness to significant deficiency
having to do with fixed assets and ensuring they are recorded in the proper fund.
She noted that Finance Director Cheryl Davenport provided a written response to
the deficiencies and procedures, which are being revised to correct all of the issues,
identified.
Mayor Muir asked if Ms. Knox, that since their firm performs audits on several
other cities, if she could give a general idea of how Sanger compares financially to
other similar Cities
Ms. Knox advised that hiring CPA for your Finance Director says a lot and shows a
commitment to wanting to get it right. She noted that as far as compared to other
cities that site would think that Sanger has a strong financial system in place; and, is
definitely in a healthy place based on statistics.
City Manger Mike Brice, summarized charts provided to Council by Finance
Director Cheryl Davenport comparing Sanger in Debt and Sales Tax to other cities.
There was brief discussion regarding the information provided.
3. Update and Discussion on Proposed Amendments to Sanger's Architectural
Standards for the Historical Core, Allowing Additional Exterior Materials and
Requiring Architectural Character.
Joe Iliff, Director of Development Services summarized history and possible actions
for Council discussion based on the comments of the Historic Preservation
Commission, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the public.
1. Create a Central Core Overlay District (CCOD). The district would be the area
where the modified architectural standards would apply. The balance of the city
limits (all the area on within the CCOD) would be unaffected and the existing
architectural standards would apply. The CCOD would have no affect on any
covenants, codes, or restrictions applied by a homeowners association or deed
restriction.
2. Fo• new single-family houses within the CCOD, permit the use of non -masonry
materials for exterior facades. This could be as simple as having no requirement
(beyond the building code) or by expanding the list of allowed materials.
3. For new single-family homes within the CCOD, require their design to include a
minimum number of architectural elements that create a more ornamented,
complex character. This being achieved by setting a minimum score that a house
design must meet based on an objective criteria.
4. For new single-family homes within the CCOD, allow designs that do not meet
the objective criteria described in #3 with the approval of City Council. This
allows a property owner to innovate and be creative in how they contribute to tine
neighborhood character. City council would approve the design if they find it
equal to or better than the objective standard.
5. For all other construction (multi -family, commercial, etc.) the CCOD would
encourage the property owner seek Council's approval to use architectural
alternatives, as already provided for in the existing standards.
Direction and feedback were requested on the following questions:
1. Are the proposed boundaries of the CCOD appropriate?
2. How does the Council want to expand the allowable materials?
3. Based on the Scoring criteria, what would be the minimum score required for
approval?
After considerable discussion between Joe Iliff and Councilmembers, it was
consensus of the Council that 2nd, 5th, and Bolivar Streets should be required to
have a higher minimum score than other streets in the CCOD. More than a flat
roof and and front porch should be required for an all brick construction and the
construction materials would be left to staffs discretion.
Joe Iliff advised he had the direction he needed and would make revisions and bring
the item back to the Council for further consideration.
4. Overview of Items on Regular Agenda.
No Summary.
5. Adjourn.
Mayor Muir adjourned the worksession at 7:06 p.m.
MINUTES: CITY COUNCIL MEETING
March 18, 2013
PRESENT: Mayor Thomas Muir, Councilman Billy Ezell, Councilman Russell Martin,
Councilman Scott Stephens, Councilman Gary Bilyeu
ABSENT: Councilman Allen Chick; City Secretary, Tami Taber
OTHERS
PRESENT: City Manager, Mike Brice; Deputy City Secretary, Cheryl Price; Finance Director,
Cheryl Davenport; Director of Development Services, Joe Iliff; Sam Alexander;
Joyce Herzog; Tony Featherstone; Margaret Duncan; Kimberly Knox, Weaver and
Tidwell LLP
1. Call Meeting to Order, Invocation, Pledge of Allegiance.
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Muir at 7:10 p.m. Councilman Stephens led the
Invocation, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Councilman Martin.
2. Citizens Input:
(Citizens are allowed 3 minutes to speak. The City Council is unable to respond or to
discuss any issues brought up during this section).
Sam Alexander, 3219 McReynolds Road, was recognized and voiced his concern regarding
citations being issued to residents when their dogs were at large. He felt that the city should
give at least one warning before giving a resident at ticket. He also felt the City needed to
redo the ordinances with all of the new Animal Control changes and to reflect the correct
fees.
Joyce Herzog, 2017 Brooke Drive, was recognized and voiced her concern regarding her
street signs. She advised that the signs were spelled and referenced differently (Brooke
Street - Brook Drive) at each end of her street and requested the city please correct this.
CONSENT AGENDA
3. a) Approval of Minutes: March 4, 2013 - Work Session
March 4, 2013 - Council Meeting
b) Disbursements
c) Approve Proclamation #03-18-13 - Poison Prevention Week
d) Approve Resolution #1103-06-13 - Authorizing the Award of a Professional Service
Provider Contract Covering Surveying Services Pertaining to the Community
Development Block Grant
A Motion was made by Councilman Ezell to approve the Consent Agenda as drafted. The
Motion was seconded by Councilman Martin. Motion carried unanimously. (4-0,
Councilman Chick Absent).
3. Consider any Items Removed From Consent Agenda.
None.
REGULAR AGENDA
5. Consider, Discuss and Possibly Act on Approving Audit for Fiscal Year End 2011/2012
by Weaver and Tidwell LLP.
Mayor Muir noted that Council just had a worksession with the Auditor who gave a review
of the Audit. They advised the Council that the City of Sanger received an unqualified
opinion, which is the highest level of audit that you can get. He noted they had a few
suggestions in it, which we will make adjustments to do, as we are always trying to improve.
Overall, it came out very well.
A motion was made by Councilman Stephens Approving the Audit for Fiscal Year End
2011/2012 by Weaver and Tidwell LLP as presented. The motion was seconded by
Councilman Martin. The motion carried unanimously (4-0, Councilman Chicle absent).
6. Consider, Discuss and Possibly Approve Soliciting Request for Proposals (RFP) for a
Standby Contract for Emergency Response, Management and Recovery Services.
City Manager Brice advised that this is the topic, which was discussed in the Council
Worksession a few weeks ago. This contract is to have someone on standby so if we ever
have a disaster we only have to make one phone call and we will have people here to help us
manage it, who will be dedicated to as. Staff has put the RFP together and is ready to put it
out to different vendors for them to bid on. Responses to the RFP will be assessed and
brought back to Council for approval.
Councilman Ezell prompted brief discussion regarding debris, staging locations and
disposal sites. It was noted the contractor would contract for debris disposal at a landfill,
clean up the staging disposal sites and the City has several locations throughout the City
that could be used for that purpose, which would not cost anything because it is our
property.
City Manager Brice advised that this contract would not cost the City anything until the
work is initiated. We would also know what prices we would be charged up front. FEMA
has a process that needs to be followed and these type companies are familiar with the steps
that need to be taken. Having this contract should speed up the process of getting help
when we need it.
A Motion was made by Councilman Bilyeu to approve soliciting Request for Proposals for a
Standby Contract for Emergency Response, Management, and Recovery Services. The
Motion was seconded by Councilman Stephens. The motion carried unanimously (4-0,
Councilman Chick absent).
7. Conduct a Public Hearing Regarding Ordinance #03-03-13 - Amending the
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Central Zoning Map by Granting a Specific Use
Permit for a Snow Cone Stand (Sno2Go) Into a 770 Square Feet (Approximate)Paved Area
of the Northeast Coiner of the Parking Lot Located at 701 N. Stemmons.
Mayor Muir opened the Public Hearing at 7:25 p.m and solicited anyone who wished to
speak either for or against.
Tony Featherstone and Margaret Duncan, 1809 Sandstone Drive, Sanger Texas were
recognized. Mr. Featherstone advised that Margaret owns the Sno2Go Business. The
business used to be across the street at the gas station. They opted to move to the Grocery
Store across the street because the location they were in was not a safe location. They plan
to keep it at that site and operate it approximately 8 to 9 months of the year. They plan to
keep up the site year round.
Margaret Duncan noted that she was always concerned that someone would get hurt at the
old location. There was no place to park and the cars would be going by to get to Jack in
the Box and she was concerned someone would get run over. She said they would do
everything they need to do to make this a safe location. In addition, it was dangerous for
customers who would cross FM 455 to get to the gas station location.
Mayor Muir noted that the Council did receive an e-mail from Cleetus Beanhouse in
opposition to the request.
There being no further citizens who wished to speak either for or against, Mayor Muir
closed the Public Hearing at 7:29 p.m.
8. Consider, Discuss and Possibly Approve Ordinance #03-03-13 - Amending the
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Central Zoning Map by Granting a Specific Use
Permit for a Snow Cone Stand (Sno2Go) Into a 770 Square Feet (Approximate) Paved Area
of the Northeast Corner of the Parking Lot Located at 701 N. Stemmons.
It was noted the hours would be from early afternoon to store closing time.
A Motion was made by Councilman Stephens approving Ordinance 03-03-13 Amending the
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Central Zoning Map by Granting a Specific Use
Permit for a Sno Cone Stand (Sno2Go) into a 770 square foot (approximate) paved area of
the northeast corner of the parking lot located at 701 N. Stemmons. The Motion was
seconded by Councilman Ezell. The motion carried unanimously (4-0, Councilman Chick
absent).
9. Consider, Discuss and Possibly Approve the Final Plat of Lot 1R of the DATCU Sanger
Addition, Being a Re -plat of a Portion of Block 15, J.R. Sullivan West Addition, 1.246 Acres
of the Rueben Bebee Survey.
Joe Iliff, Director of Development Services was recognized to present the plat. He advised
that the plat is to include 25' of abandoned ROW into the lot. He noted it is already
dedicated by prescriptive dedication, but needs to be platted. He noted they are in
compliance.
A Motion was made by Councilman Bilyeu approving the Final Plat of Lot IR of the
DATCU Sanger Addition, Being a Re -plat of a Portion of Bloch 15, J.R. Sullivan West
Addition, 1.246 Acres of the Rueben Bebee Survey. The Motion was seconded by
Councilman Martin. The motion carried unanimously (4-0, Councilman Chicle absent).
10. INFORMATION ITEMS:
a) Financial and Investment Reports - February
b) Library Report- February
c) All American Dogs Report - February
11. Adjourn.
There being no further business, Mayor Muir Adjourned the meeting at 7:40 p.m.
3/21/2013 11:21 AM
REFUNDS
CHECK REGISTER
PAGE:
1
PACKET:
05686 US - Refund
VENDOR
SET: 99 AP VENDOR SET
BANK:
POOL POOLED CASH ACCOU14T
CHECK
CHECK
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
---- ----------------
I.D. NAME
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
TYPE
DATE
DISCOUNT
AMOUNT
------------------------------
N04
AMOUNT
1
EXCEL REALTY
I-000201303215010 EXCEL REALTY
R
3/21/2013
8.82
053262
8.82
1
EXCEL REALTY
I-000201303215011 EXCEL REALTY
R
3/21/2013
0.90
053263
0.90
1
EXCEL REALTY
I-000201303215012 EXCEL REALTY
R
3/21/2013
4.65
053264
4.65
1
FANNIE ME
I-000201303215013 FANNIE ME
R
3/21/2013
4.80
053265
4.80
** B A N K T O T A L S **
NO4
DISCOUNTS
CHECK ME
TOTAL
APPLIED
REGULAR CHECKS:
4
0.00
19.17
19.17
HANDWRITTEN CHECKS:
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
PRE -WRITE CHECKS:
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
DRAFTS:
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
VOID CHECKS:
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
NON CHECKS:
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
CORRECTIONS:
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
BANK TOTALS:
4
0.00
19.17
19.17
3/21/2013 11:27 AM A / P CHECK REGISTER
PACKET; 05685 Regular Paynen[s 3/21/13 CF
VENDOR SET: 99
BANK POOL POOLED CASH ACCOUNT
PAGE: i
CHECK CHECK
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
NAME / I.D.
DESC
TYPE
DATE
DISCOUNT AMOUNT
NOS
M4OUNT
19050
6E CAPITAL RETAIL BANK / AMAZON
C-194595302362
DVDS
R
3/21/2013
2.97
053266
I-194591591162
DVDS
R
3/21/2013
16.99CR
053266
I-194593462460
DVDS
R
3/21/2013
31.98CR
053266
I-194598359016
DVDS
R
3/21/2013
19.96CR
053266
I-267780048227
DVDS
R
3/21/2013
38.98CR
053266
1-267781543489
DVDS
R
3/21/2013
45.79CR
053266
I-267782324168
DVDS
R
3/21/2013
11.93CR
053266
162.66
25410
HINKLEY 6 BARFIELD -
CLP, INC
I-9731
NEW BELZ ENT INTERLOCAL
R
3/21/2013
13,080.000R
053267
13,080.00
15100
BISHOP, SOSHUA
I -BISHOP ARSO 2013
INSIDE QUALIFY AMMO
R
3/21/2013
49.78CR
053268
49.78
22720
BWI
I-11743941
CHEMICALS
R
3/21/2013
697.85CR
053269
697.85
22300
CARD SERVICE CENTER
I -CATERING BOB 2/9/1
GAMING DAY SUPPLIES
R
3/21/2013
60.000R
053210
I-0O2kSMJNITY 2/21/13
COMMUNITY COFFEE - CITY
R
3/21/2013
83.94CR
053270
I-DSHS WELBORN 2013
RENEWL - E14T WELBORN
R
3/21/2013
96.000R
053270
I-IKEA 2/1/13
PICTURE FRAMES-MA'l0R PICK
R
3/21/2013
239.76CR
053270
I-INT PARTY 2/19/13
RABBIT COSTUME
R
3/21/2013
116.94CR
053270
I -ORIENTAL 2/19/13
EASTER EGGS FOR HUNT
R
3/21/2013
304.000R
053270
I -PREMIER 2/21/13
COPIES OF MAPS
R
3/21/2013
15.30CR
053270
I -SPORTS 2/15/13
SPORTS AUTH. -ELLIPTICAL
R
3/21/2013
1,109.98CR
053270
I -SPORTS 3/12/13
SPORTS AUTH. TREADMILL
R
3/21/2013
1,119.97CR
053270
I-TNL 2/5/13
TNL-BUILDING OFF. DUES
R
3/21/2013
50.000R
053270
I -TRACTOR 2/15/13
RUBBER MATS -TRACTOR SUPP
R
3/21/2013
119.97CR
053210
I-TRISTATE 2/26/13
STUDY EXAM
R
3/21/2013
249.95CR
053270
I-YIAINART 2/27/13
EASTER CANDY/DECOR
R
3/21/2013
192.14CR
053270
I-WALMART 217113
WALMART - VINEGAR
R
3/21/2013
21.42CR
053270
3,779.97
`VOID'
VOID CHECK
V
3/21/2013
053271
• VOID"
00520
CASCO INDUSTERIES, INC.
I-123506
CASCO BOOTS - BRAD BELL
R
3/21/2013
362.000R
053272
362.00
02490
CENTURYLINK
1-3/10-4/10113
PHONE 3/10-4/10/13
R
3/21/2013
1,384.94CR
053273
1,384.94
3/21/2013 11:27 AM A / P CHECK REGISTER
PACKET: 05685 Regular Paynents 3/21/13 OF
VENDOR SET: 99
BANK POOL POOLED CASH ACCOUNT
PAGE: 2
CHECK CHECK
CHECK
CHECK
VENEOR
NAND / I.D.
DESC
TYPE
DATE
DISCOUNT MOUNT
NOt
AMOUNT
24170
CIS SEWER EQUIP.NENT CO.
INC.
I-13728
JET TRUCK PARTS
R
3/21/2013
1,658.23CR
053274
1,658.23
00050
CONLEY SAND & GRAVEL
I-9805
FLEX BASE -WATER LINE
R
3/21/2013
475.00CR
053275
475.00
08880
COOPER'S COPIES
I-102271
SIGN FOR CITY HALL -HOURS
R
3/21/2013
17.50CR
053276
17.50
23620
COTE'S MECHANICAL
I-CN2013144
ICE MACHINE RENTAL
R
3/21/2013
354.000R
053277
354.00
11570
CULLIGAN
I-03092013
WATER BOTTLE SRV 2013
R
3/21/2013
9.000R
053278
9.00
08460
DELL COMPUTERS, LLP
I-XJ3PX47X5
DELL PRINTER INK
R
3/21/2013
746.79CR
053279
746.79
18190
DEPARTN NT OF INFORMATION RESOURCE
I-13021026N
LONG DISTANCE 2/1-2/28/13
R
3/21/2013
27.06CR
053280
27.06
17640
DOLLAR GENERAL - CHARGED SALES
I-1000181447
COFFEE CHEAPER, CLEANIIIG
R
3/21/2013
95.45CR
053281
1-1000182112
JANITORIAL & COFFEE
R
3/21/2013
53.85CR
053281
149.30
22400
DUNN, REECE
I-DUNN AMMO 2013
MIMS QUALIFY AM10
R
3/21/2013
100.00CR
053282
100.00
25530
EPIC SPORTS
I-356581
FIELD LINE FIELD MARKERS
R
3/21/2013
477.56CR
053283
477.56
1
EUBANKS, LORI
I-EUBANKS 3/17/13
DEPOSIT
R
3/21/2013
100.000R
053284
100.00
1
FACTEAU, JA IME
I-FACTEAU 3/8/13
➢EPOSIT
R
3/21/2013
100.000R
053285
100.00
19270
FAMILY DOLLAR
I-990743402585801577
TOILET PAPER, COFFEE
R
3/21/2013
45.80CR
053286
1-990743402585901577
TOILET PAPER, COFFEE
R
3/21/2013
46.000R
053286
I-990743402586201577
TOILET PAPER, COFFEE
R
3/21/2013
49.75CR
053286
1-990743402586301517
TOILET PAPER, COFFEE
R
3/21/2013
46.000R
053286
187.55
3/21/2013 11:27 AM
A / P
CHECK REGISTER
PAGE: 3
PACKET:
05685 Regular Payments 3/21/13 OF
VENDOR
SET: 99
BANK
POOL POOLED
CASH ACCOUNT
CHECK CHECK
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
UMM / I.O.
DESC
TYPE
DATE
DISCOUNT AMOUNT
N09
AMMUT
18430
FIRST UNITED BANK
I-03/15/2013
RESEARCH FEES
R
3/21/2013
24.50CR
053287
24.50
18790
EUELMAN
I-NP37428432
VEHICLE FUEL 3/4-3/10/13
R
3/21/2013
2,423.49CR
053288
I-NP37470710
VEHICLE FUEL 3/11-3/17113
R
3/21/2013
2,594.76CR
053288
5,018.25
1
GEROS, KASSANDRA
I-GEROS 3/16/13
DEPOSIT
R
3/21/2013
100.000R
053289
100.00
11730
ICC
I-INVO259359
UPDATE CODE HOOKS
R
3/21/2013
646.13CR
053290
646.13
20220
INGRA24
I-70940524
BOOKS
R
3/21/2013
135.25CR
053291
135.25
01240
INLAND TRUCK PARTS,
INC.
I-18-68242
INSPECTIONS 41/ AIR BRAKE
R
3/21/2013
62.000R
053292
62.00
15780
ITRON
1-281674
MAINTENANCE 4/1-5/31/13
R
3/21/2013
1,059.75CR
053293
1,059.75
01380
KARL-KLEMENT FORD,
INC.
I-327302FOWG
FUEL GASKET
R
3/21/2013
3.81CR
053294
I-FONG326358
TRANSMISSION COOLER LINE
R
3/21/2013
13.83CR
053294
17.64
08020
KINNEY, RONALD
I-KINHEY AM!0 2013
REIMB QUALIFY AM-0
R
3/21/2013
58.38CR
053295
58.38
25060
LEMMNS PUBLICATIONS
IKC
I-1055
FEB SHS SPORTS PAGE
R
3/21/2013
55.000R
053296
55.00
1
MCDANIEL, GLENDA
I-MCDANIEL 3/10/13
DEPOSIT
R
3/21/2013
100.000R
053297
100.00
20450
PARKER, CARL
I -PARKER AM!O 2013
REIMB QUALIFY ffiO:0
R
3/21/2013
75.98CR
053298
75.98
19200
PATEMARK TRAFFIC PRODUCTS OF TEXAS,INC.
I-0080650-Ill
PARK SIGHS
R
3/21/2013
47.80CR
053299
47.80
02050
PITNEY BOWES, INC.
I-1350363 MR13
POSTAGE METER RENTAL
R
3/21/2013
540.000R
053300
540.00
3/21/2013 11:27 AN A
/ P CHECK REGISTER
PAGE: 4
PACKET:
05685 Regular Paynenta 3/21/13 CV
VENDOR
SET: 99
BANK
POOL POOLED CASH ACCOUNT
CHECK CHECK
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
NAME / I.D. DISC
TYPE DATE
DISCOUNT
AMOUNT
N09
AMOUNT
02170
REINERT PAPER L CHEMICAL, INC.
I-295523 TOILET TISSUE, SOAP,
SPRA
R 3/21/2013
56.61CR
053301
56.61
12820
RICOH USA, INC
1-5025393729 PRINTER MAINT. 2012-2013
R 3/21/2013
664.74CR
053302
664.74
06750
RILEY, MICHAEL
I-RILEY AMz!0 2013 REIDIB QUALIFY AM:O
R 3/21/2013
57.98CR
053303
57.98
02370
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
I-5302-7 4 GALLONS INDUSTRIAL
ENAM
R 3/21/2013
91.20CR
053304
91.20
09550
SOUTHWEST CHEMICAL, I NO.
I-96680 CHLORINE CYLINDERS
R 3/21/2013
1,597.50CR
053305
1,597.50
23530
TEXAS DEPT OF ROTOR VEHICLE
I-3/20/13 SCOFFLAW SCOFFLAW ESCROW ACCT
R 3/21/2013
500.000R
053306
500.00
07700
VEST, JOSHUA
I -VEST AMMO 2013 RANG QUALIFY AM:O
R 3/21/2013
58.38CR
053307
58.38
* ' T 0 T A L S ' *
N04
DISCOUNTS
CHECK ART
TOTAL APPLIED
REGULAR CHECKS:
41
0.00
34,886.28
34,886.28
HANDWRITTEN CHECKS:
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
PRE -WRITE CHECKS:
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
DRAFTS:
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
VOID CHECKS:
1
0.00
0.00
0.00
NON CHECKS:
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
CORRECTIOUS:
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
REGISTER TOTALS:
42
0.00
34,886.28
34,886.28
TOTAL ERRORS: 0 TOTAL EARNINGS: 0
amgeh
*TEXAS
BOARD AND COMMISSION APPLICATION
NAME: ,� g . L DATE:
ADDRESS: �01 a- 11(c 61— �CCi2ZV, K lI a(F p
HOME PHONE:
EMAIL: (
OCCUPATION: (If retired, describe former occupation or profession)
(
ffi`J�J15�ClilY d i QI'1�-4q
PRIOR SERVICE ON A CITY BOARD/COMMISSION? YES (
IF YES, PLEASE DESCRIBE:
PLEASE NUMBER EACH BOARD/COMMISSION YOU ARE INTERESTED IN SERVING ON
WITH 1 FOR FIRST PREFERENCE, 2 FOR SECOND PREFERENCE, ETC.. LEAVE BLANK ANY
BOARD/COMMISSION YOU WOULD NOT LIKE TO BE CONSIDERED FOR.
2
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
KEEP SANGER BEAUTIFUL BOARD
LIBRARY BOARD
PARKS BOARD
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
4A BOARD
4B BOARD
OTHER
LIST QUALIFICATIONS INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES THAT
MAKE YOU A GOOD CANDIDATE FOR THE ABOVE POSITION(S): I f\aV e, Vjor Ktct fW 44
Ci cA A: S P jU rty, i n 4 DZV- .l %Mk r�k Dk Q rjrr eri�c �x -ttk I u st 5 y ec rE>
b�cx�'aoe, T (G
S KObki n WC SCE-ev) U r+i6 00-(-i on 3 reb:6 a� 40 hL � tc I� CecLe , j.
� hC>.�L ,521'Uec,� on -tGiz �ou�tti�pLYts i�rds, a5 t�ei'.e as mare, 5cha�l) A�t�fiC� hazy
Do you understand that attendance and active support is required for each appointee? gYes ❑ No
Signature AL Ud �Q/13 Date: 3
RETURN COMPLETED APPLICATION TO:
Office of the City Secretary
City of Sanger
PO Box 1729 - 502 Elm Street
Sanger, Texas 76266
This information will become a public record.
BOARD AND COMMISSION APPLICATION
TEXAS
a F)0 i'l I : )/ - �
NAME: �' DATE:
ADDRESS: / 4OZ
HOME PHONE:
EMAIL
OCCUPATION: (If retired, describe former occupation or profession)
_
PRIOR SERVICE ON A CITY BOARD/COMMISSION? YES NO
IF YES, PLEASE DESCRIBE:
PLEASE NUMBER EACH BOARD/COMMISSION YOU ARE INTERESTED IN SERVING ON
WITH 1 FOR FIRST PREFERENCE, 2 FOR SECOND PREFERENCE, ETC.. LEAVE BLANK ANY
BOARD/COMMISSION YOU WOULD NOT LIKE TO BE CONSIDERED FOR.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
KEEP SANGER BEAUTIFUL BOARD
LIBRARY BOARD
PARKS BOARD
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
4A BOARD
4B BOARD
OTHER
LIST QUALIFICATIONS INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES THAT
MAKE YOU A GOOD CANDIDATE FOR THE ABOVE POSITIONN((S):
f / �'l
Do yoG Understand that attendance and active support is required for each appointee? Yes D No
Signature: Date:
RETURN COMPLETED APPLICATION TO:
Office of the City Secretary
- City of Sanger - _
PO Box 1729 - 502 Elm Street
Sanger, Texas 76266 e
This Information will become a public record.,
March 14, 2013
City of Sanger Depository Contract
City of Sanger
P.O. Box 1729
Sanger, TX 76266
Attention: Mr. Mike Brice
Dear Sir:
Extension of Existing Contract
This document is submitted as a proposal to serve as an extension of the existing agreement as the
depository for City of Sanger Funds and to provide banking services from January 1, 2013 to
December 31, 2013.
This bank agrees to the existing contract terms with the following changes in terms:
Now Account -Public Funds Interest at .05 % to be adjusted by agreement.
Money Market — Public Funds Interest at .20% to be adjusted by agreement.
Paragraph 2) To pay interest on funds of the City of Sanger designated as "time deposits" or
certificates of deposit of not less than:
(a). Interest at 0.15% per annum 7 to 89 days . 3 months
(b) Interest at 0.20% per annum 90 to 179 days 6 months
(c) Interest at 0.40% per annum 180 to 269 days 9 months
(d) Interest at 0.40% per annum 270 to 359 days 1 year
(e) Interest at 0.70% per annum 360+ days 2 years
These rates do not apply past January 1, 2014.
Maximum aggregate balance not to exceed $15,000,000.00. Additional deposits above this
amount will be negotiated.
Thank you for selecting First United Bank and Trust Company as your depository bank. Your
business is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
dames F. Adams
President
First United Bank & Trust
jfa
Acknowledgment:
Mike Brice
City Manager
City of Sanger
Box 1250 • Sanger, TX 76266 - 940.458.2001 • Fax: 940.458.2006
MQ
TEXl1S COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA TYPE ❑ Regular ❑ Special ® Consent Reviewed by Finance
❑ Workshop ❑ Executive ❑ Public Hearing Reviewed by Legal
❑ Yes
® Not Applicable
-�s
Not Applicable
Council Meeting Date: April 1, 2013 Submitted By: Robert Woods
City Manager Reviewed/Approval Initials ��.� Date
ACTION REQUESTED: ❑ORDINANCE # ❑ RESOLUTION ® APPROVAL
❑ CHANGE ORDER ❑ AGREEMENT ❑ APPROVAL OF BID ❑ AWARD OP CONTRACT
❑ CONSENSUS ❑ REAPPOINTMENTS
AGENDA CAPTION
Discussion and possible action on the Advertisement for Bids on Freese Drive Paving and Sidewalk
Improvements.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
❑N/A ❑GRANT FUNDS ❑OPERATING ESPENSF. ❑REVENUE ❑CI P M13UDOFTFD []NON -BUDGETED
FISCAL YEAR:
PRIOR
YEAR
CURRENT
YEAR
FUTURE
YEARS
TOTALS
Proposed Expenditure Amount
$250,000
Encumbered Amount
BALANCE
FUND(S) TO BE USED: General M$ 250,000 Utility ❑ $= Special ❑ $
BACKGROUND/SUMMARY OF ITEM
Staff is recommending advertising for bids on April 14, 2013 for construction of Freese Drive Paving and
Sidewalk Improvements. The proposed sidewalk will be constructed on the west side Freese Drive. This segment
of sidewalk will provide a pedestrian path connecting Swisher Park to the local residential area along with
connecting to the Fifth (5°i) Street segment of the Trail and Sidewalk master plan.
STAFF OPTIONS & RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends advertising for bids on April 14, 2013.
List ofsupporting I)ocuments/EsbibitsAttached:
Prior Action/Review byCouncil, Boards,Commissions orOther
Agencies:
SGR13MA43-
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA TYPE ® Regular ❑ Special ❑ Consent Reviewed by Finance
❑ Workshop ❑ Executive ❑ Public Hearing Reviewed by Legal
❑ Yes
® Not Applicable
❑ Yes
Lj Not Applicable
Council Meeting Date: April 1, 2013 Submitted By: Mike Brice
City Manager Reviewed/Approval Initials Date 3 _ gz -
ACTION REQUESTED: ❑ORDINANCE ❑ RESOLUTION ® APPROVAL
❑ CHANGE ORDER ❑ AGREEMENT ❑ APPROVAL OF BID ❑ AWARD OF CONTRACT
❑ CONSENSUS ❑ REAPPOINTMENTS
Consider, Discuss and Possibly Approve the Expenditure of $300,000 in 4A Industrial Development
Funds for Engineering and Construction of Wastewater Lines Along Interstate I-35.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
®N/A ❑GRANT FUNDS []OPERATING EXPENSE []REVENUE❑CI P []BUDGETED❑NON-BUDGETED
FISCAL YEAR:
PRIOR
YEAR
CURRENT
YEAR
FUTURE
YEAR(S)
TOTALS
Proposed Expenditure Amount
Encumbered Amount
BALANCE
FUND(S) TO BE USED: General ❑$ Utility ❑ $ Special ❑ $
BACKGROUND/SUMMARY OF ITEM
On March 18, 2013 the 4A board approved $300,000 for engineering and construction of wastewater
lines along the east side of I-35 from South of Betz Road North to View Road and on the West Side of
I-35 from Betz Road South toward FM 455. These funds will allow us to start engineering and expedite
construction once a funding method is decided upon.
STAFF OPTIONS & RECOMMENDATION
List of Supporting Documents:
Prior Action/Review by Council, Boards, Commissions or Other
Agencies:
ST
Rgeh
TE}MAS COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA TYPE ❑ Regular ❑ Special ® Consent Reviewed by Finance
® Workshop ❑ Executive ❑ Public Hearing Reviewed by Legal
❑Yes
❑ Not Applicable
M Yes I
Ll Not Applicable
Council Meeting Date: April 1, 2013 Submitted By: Mike Brice
City Manager Reviewed/Approval Initials �— 1,-� Date
ACTION REQUESTED: ❑ORDINANCE # ❑ RESOLUTION ® APPROVAL
❑ CHANGE ORDER ❑ AGREEMENT ❑ APPROVAL OF BID ® AWARD OF CONTRACT
❑ CONSENSUS ❑ REAPPOINTMENTS
AGENDA CAPTION
Recommendation of Award to Pacheco -Koch contract for design of Water and Wastewater
Improvements for Interstate 35 North— Interceptor Line.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
❑N/A ❑GRANT FUNDS ❑OPERATING EXPENSE [—]REVENUE ❑CIP ❑BUDGETED ❑NON -BUDGETED
FISCAL YEAR:
PRIOR
YEAR
CURRENT
YEAR
FUTURE
YEAR(S)
TOTALS
Proposed Expenditure Amount
Encumbered Amount
BALANCE
FUND(S) TO BE USED: General ❑$ Utility ❑ $ Special ❑ $
BACKGROUND/SUMMARY OF ITEM
Pacheco -Koch was one of the five engineering firms approved by City Council at the October 15, 2012 council meeting.
Staff selected Pacheco Koch feeling that they have the appropriate staffing level and knowledge in dealing with these types
of projects.
STAFF OPTIONS & RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends award of contact to Pacheco -Koch for the amount of the $294,465 dollars.
List of Supporting Documents/Exhibits Attached:
Pacheco Koch Engineering Contract
Prior Action/Review by Council, Boards, Commissions or Other
Agencies:
CITY OF SANGER
CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT
This agreement ("Agreement') is made by and between the City of Sanger, Texas ("City")
and Pacheco Koch, LLC (the "Consultant") acting by and through their authorized
representatives.
Recitals:
WHEREAS, the City desires to engage the services of Consultant as an independent
contractor and not as an employee in accordance with the terns and conditions set forth in this
Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Consultant desires to render Consultant services for the City in
accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement in connection with North
Interstate 35 Outfall Sewer, Phases I, I1, HI & 1V (the "Project");
NOW THEREFORE, in exchange for the mutual covenants set forth herein and other
valuable consideration, the sufficiency and receipt of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties
agree as follows:
Article I
Term
1.1 The term of this Agreement shall begin on the last date of execution hereof (the
"Effective Date") and continue until the services are completed unless sooner terminated as provide
herein.
1.2 Either party may terminate this Agreement by giving thirty (30) days prior written
notice to the other party. In the event of such termination the Consultant shall be entitled to
compensation for any services completed to the reasonable satisfaction of the City in accordance
with this Agreement prior to such termination.
Article II
Scope of Services
2.1 The Consultant agrees to provide the Professional Consultant services for the
Project as set forth in Exhibit "A". Deviations fi•om the scope may be authorized in writing from
time to time by the City.
2.2 The parties acknowledge and agree that any and all opinions and cost estimates
provided by the Consultant represent a professional opinion consistent with the standards of the
industry.
2.3 All materials and reports prepared by the Consultant in connection with this
Agreement are "works for hire" and shall be the property of the City. The City shall have the right
to publish, disclose, distribute and otherwise use such materials and reports in accordance with the
Consultant Practice Act of the State of Texas. Consultant shall upon completion of the services, or
earlier termination, provide the City with a complete set of 22" x 34" blackline completed drawings
plus a compact disc or flash drive containing all construction plan sheets in scanned 22" x 34"
black & white "PDF" images at 400 dpi.
Agreement for Consulting Services Page - 1 -
Article III
Schedule of Work
The Consultant agrees to commence services upon written direction from the City and to
complete the required services in accordance with a work schedule as set forth in Exhibit `B" (the
"Work Schedule").
Article IV
Compensation and Method of Payment
4.1 The City shall compensate the Consultant for the services by payment of fees as set
forth in Exhibit "C". Unless otherwise provided herein, payment to the Consultant shall be
monthly based on the Consultant's monthly progress report that shows the total amount of fees
earned to date and the amount due and payable as of the current statement, in a form reasonably
acceptable to the City. The monthly invoices shall be submitted on or before the 15"' day of each
calendar month. The City shall pay such monthly statements within thirty (30) days after receipt
and City verification of the services and expenses unless otherwise provided herein. The final
payment of the fee shall be made after satisfactory completion of the services and City acceptance
of the services and the submittal of record drawings as applicable.
4.2 Unless otherwise provided in Exhibit "C" the Consultant shall be responsible for all
expenses related to the services provided pursuant to this Agreement including, but not limited to,
travel, copying and facsimile charges, telephone, internet and email charges.
Article V
Devotion of Time; Personnel; and Equipment
5.1 The Consultant shall devote such time as reasonably necessary for the satisfactory
performance of the work under this Agreement. Should the City require additional services not
included under this Agreement, the Consultant shall make reasonable effort to provide such
additional services at mutually agreed charges or rates, and within the agreed time schedule and
without decreasing the effectiveness of the performance of services required under this Agreement.
5.2 To the extent reasonably necessary for the Consultant to perform the services under
this Agreement, the Consultant shall be authorized to engage the services of any subcontractors
agents, assistants, persons, or corporations that the Consultant may deem proper to aid or assist in
the performance of the services under this Agreement with the prior written approval of the City.
The cost of such personnel and assistance shall be borne exclusively by the Consultant.
5.3 The Consultant shall furnish the facilities, equipment, telephones, facsimile
machines, email facilities, and personnel necessary to perform the services required under this
Agreement unless otherwise provided herein.
5.4 The Consultant shall submit monthly progress reports and attend monthly progress
meetings scheduled by the City or more frequently as may be required by the City from time to
time based upon Project demands. Each progress report shall detail the work accomplished and
special problems or delays experienced on the Project during the previous report period, and the
planned work activities and special problems or delays anticipated for the next report period.
Agreement for Consulting Services Page - 2 -
5.5 The Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for
employment because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, or disability.
Article VI
Miscellaneous
6.1 Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the sole and only agreement between
the parties and supersedes any prior understandings written or oral agreements between the parties
with respect to this subject matter.
6.2 Assignment. lent. The Consultant may not assign this Agreement in whole or in part
without the prior written consent of City. In the event of an assignment by the Consultant to which
the City has consented, the assignee shall agree in writing with the City to personally assume,
perform, and be bound by all the covenants, and obligations contained in this Agreement.
6.3 Successors and Assigns. Subject to the provisions regarding assignment, this
Agreement shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the parties to it and their respective heirs,
executors, administrators, legal representatives, successors and assigns.
6.4 Governing Law. The laws of the State of Texas shall govern this Agreement; and
velure for any action concerning this Agreement shall be in the State District Court of Denton
County, Texas. The parties agree to submit to the personal and subject matter jurisdiction of said
court.
6.5 Amendments. This Agreement may be amended by the mutual written agreement of
the parties.
6.6 Severability. In the event any one or more of the provisions contained in this
Agreement shall for any reason be held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, such
invalidity, illegality or unenforeeability shall not effect any other provisions, and the Agreement
shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision had never been contained
in it.
6.7 brdependent Contractor. It is understood and agreed by and between the parties that
the Consultant in satisfying the conditions of this Agreement, is acting independently, and that the
City assumes no responsibility or liabilities to any third party in connection with these actions. All
services to be performed by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall be in the capacity of an
independent contractor, and not as an agent or employee of the City. Consultant shall supervise the
performance of its services and shall be entitled to control the manner and means by which its
services are to be performed, subject to the terms of this Agreement. There is no intended third
party beneficiary to this agreement.
6.8 Right -Of -Access. The City will furnish right -of -access on the land for the
Consultant to perform the required surveys, or other necessary investigations. The Consultant will
take reasonable precautions to minimize damage to the land in the performance of such surveys and
investigations. The City will explain to landowners that some damage to vegetation may be
unavoidable when obtaining access to the site, and in performance of the survey and investigation
activities.
Agreement for Consulting Services Page - 3 -
6.9 Notice. Any notice required or permitted to be delivered hereunder may be sent by
first class mail, overnight courier or by confirmed telefax or facsimile to the address specified
below, or to such other party or address as either party may designate in writing, and shall be
deemed received three (3) days after delivery set forth herein:
If intended for City - Representative:
Robert Woods, P.E.
Director of Public Works / City Engineer
City of Sanger
201 Bolivar Street, PO Box 1729
Sanger, Texas 76266
Telephone: 940-458-2059
Facsimile: 940-458-4180
If intended for Consultant - Representative:
Brian D. O'Neill, P.E.
Principal
6000 Western Place, Suite 625
Fort Worth, Texas 76107
Telephone: 817-412-7155
Facsimile: 817-412-7156
6.10 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed by the parties hereto in separate
counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be an original, but all such
counterparts shall together constitute one and the same instrument. Each counterpart may consist
of any number of copies hereof each signed by less than all, but together signed by all of the parties
hereto.
6.11 Exhibits. The Exhibits A, B and C, attached hereto are incorporated herein and
made a part hereof for all purposes.
6.12 Indemnification. Consultant shall release, indennrify and hold harmless City and its
officers, agents and employees fi-om and against all damages, injuries (including death), claims,
property damages (including loss of Ilse), losses, demands, suits, judgments and costs, including
reasonable attorney's fees and expenses, in any way arising out of, related to, or resulting fi•mn the
services provided by Consultant to the extent caused by the negligent act or omission or intentional
wrongfitl act or omission of Consultant, its officers, agents, employees, subcontractors, licensees;
invitees or any other third parties for whom Consultant is legally responsible.
6.13 Audits and Records. The Consultant agrees that during the term hereof the City and
its representatives may, during normal business hours and as often as deemed necessary, inspect,
audit, examine and reproduce any and all of the Consultant's records relating to the set -vices
provided pursuant to this Agreement for a period of one year following the date of completion of
services as determined by the City or date of termination if sooner.
6.14 Conflicts of Interests. The Consultant represents that no official or employee of the
City has any direct or indirect pecuniary interest in this Agreement.
Agreement for Consulting Services Page - 4 -
6.15 Insurance.
(a) Consultant shall during the term hereof maintain in fall force and effect the
following insurance: (1) a policy of insurance for bodily injury, death and property
damage insuring against all claims, demands or actions relating to the Consultant's
performance of services pursuant to this Agreement with a minimum combined
single limit of not less than $1,000,000 Dollars per occurrence for injury to persons
.(including death), and for property damage; (2) policy of automobile liability
insurance covering any vehicles owned and/or operated by Consultant, its officers,
agents, and employees, and used in the performance of this Agreement; and (3)
statutory Worker's Compensation Insurance covering all of Consultant's employees
involved in the provision of services under this Agreement.
(b) All insurance and certificate(s) of insurance shall contain the following provisions:
(1) name the City, its officers, agents and employees as additional insureds as to all
applicable coverage with the exception of Workers Compensation Insurance; (2)
provide for at least thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City for cancellation,
non -renewal, or material change of the insurance; (3) provide for a waiver of
subrogation against the City for injuries, including death, property damage, or any
other loss to the extent the same is covered by the proceeds of insurance.
(c) All insurance companies providing the required insurance shall be authorized to
transact business in Texas and be rated at least "A" by AM Best or other equivalent
rating service.
(d) A certificate of insurance evidencing the required insurance shall be submitted to the
City prior to commencement of services.
Executed in two 2 counterparts, each of which is deemed to be an original and as of the day and
date first written in this Contract.
EXECUTED this day of 2013.
CITY OF SANGER: CONSULTANT:
By:
Name:
Title:
0
Name: Mark A. Pacheco, P.E., R.P.L.S.
Title: President
Agreement for Consulting Services Page - 5 -
EXHIBIT A to Agreement between the
City of Sanger, Texas (CITY) and
Pacheco Koch LLC, (CONSULTANT)
for Consulting Services
EXHIBIT `A' — SCOPE OF SERVICES
NORTH INTERSTATE 35 OUTFALL SEWER, PHASES I, II, III & IV
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The project consists of alignment determination and preparation of construction plans
and bid documents for the North Interstate 35 Outfall Sewer, Phases I, II, III & IV. The
project generally consists of a sanitary sewer outfall main to serve the north end of the
City generally from the existing sewer adjacent to the railroad north to View Road. The
total length of the project is approximately 17,100 linear feet.
BASIC SERVICES:
A. Project Management, Coordination & Permitting
Manage the Team:
• Lead, manage and direct design team activities
• Ensure quality control is practiced in performance of the work
• Communicate internally among team members
• Task and allocate team resources
Communications and Reporting:
• Attend a pre -design project kickoff meeting with CITY staff to
confirm and clarify scope, understand CITY objectives, and
ensure economical and functional designs that meet CITY
requirements
• Conduct review meetings with the CITY at the end of each design
phase
• Prepare invoices and submit monthly in the format requested by
the CITY.
• Prepare and submit monthly progress reports
• Prepare and submit baseline Project Schedule initially and Project
Schedule updates
• Coordinate with other agencies and entities as necessary for the
design of the proposed infrastructure and provide and obtain
information needed to prepare the design
• With respect to coordination with permitting authorities,
CONSULTANT shall communicate with permitting authorities such
that their regulatory requirements are appropriately reflected in the
designs. CONSULTANT shall work with regulatory authorities to
obtain approval of the designs, and make changes necessary to
meet their requirements as part of the design scope.
1/2912013 Page 1
EXHIBIT A to Agreement between the
City of Sanger, Texas (CITY) and
Pacheco Koch LLC, (CONSULTANT)
for Consulting Services
3. Survey Coordination & Conversion:
CONSULTANT will review an on the ground survey of the project
prepared by others and provided by the CITY. If required pursuant to a
review of the survey, CONSULTANT will prepare a letter of review
comments and will submit this letter to the CITY to obtain necessary
survey revisions, additional information or clarification. Included in this
item are two (2) reviews of the survey with the purpose of the second
review being to verify that the comments and any additional information
required have been addressed. Also included in this item is the
conversion of supplied digital information to standard Pacheco Koch CAD
layering format and drafting standards.
TxDOT & Railroad permit preparation:
CONSULTANT will provide coordination with the Railroad and TxDOT for
Permitting of the proposed wastewater crossing. Included in this item
are:
• Coordination of submittal of Application for License Agreement.
• Research and provide TxDOT or Railroad design specifications.
• Coordination for final plan approval.
• Up to three (3) coordination meetings, if required.
• Application and Permitting fees and special insurance premiums
are not included.
5. GeotechnicalInvestigation:
• Soil investigations, including field and laboratory tests, borings,
related engineering analysis and recommendations for
determining soil conditions will be made. In addition to the above
investigations, borings and appropriate field and laboratory
analysis will be made at reasonable intervals along the project
alignment.
Constructability Review:
• Prior to the 60 percent review meeting with the CITY, the
CONSULTANT shall schedule and attend a project site visit with
the CITY Project Manager and Construction personnel to walk the
project. The CONSULTANT shall summarize the CITY's
comments from the field visit and submit this information to the
CITY in writing.
7. Utility Clearance:
• The CONSULTANT will consult with the CITY public utilities,
private utilities and government agencies to determine the
approximate location of above and underground utilities, and other
facilities (current and future) that have an impact or influence on
the project. CONSULTANT will design CITY facilities to avoid or
minimize conflicts with existing utilities, and where known and
possible consider potential future utilities in designs.
112912013 Page 2
EXHIBIT A to Agreement between the
City of Sanger, Texas (CITY) and
Pacheco Koch LLC, (CONSULTANT)
for Consulting Services
B. Conceptual Design (30% Submittal) —
The Conceptual Design shall be submitted to CITY per the approved Project
Schedule. The purpose of the conceptual design is for the CONSULTANT to
• Study the project,
• Identify and develop alternatives that enhance the system,
• Present (through the defined deliverables) these alternatives to
the CITY,
• Recommend the alternatives that successfully addresses the
design problem, and
• Obtain the CITY's endorsement of this concept.
CONSULTANT will develop the conceptual design of the infrastructure as
follows.
Data Collection
• In addition to data obtained from the CITY, CONSULTANT will
research proposed improvements in conjunction with any other
planned future improvements known by the CITY that may influence
the project.
• The CONSULTANT will also identify and seek to obtain data for
existing conditions that may impact the project including but not
limited to; utilities, agencies (TxDOT and railroads), City Master Plans,
and property ownership as available from the Tax Assessor's office.
• The data collection efforts will also include conducting special
coordination meetings with affected property owners and businesses as
necessary to develop sewer re-routing plans.
2. The Conceptual Design Package shall include the following:
• Technical memorandum containing graphic exhibits and written
summary of alternative design concepts considered strengths and
weaknesses of each, and the rationale for selecting the recommended
design concept.
• Proposed phasing of any water and sanitary sewer work that is
included in this project documented in both the project schedule and
narrative form.
• Documentation of key design decisions.
• Opinions of probable construction cost.
1/29/2013 Page 3
EXHIBIT A to Agreement between the
City of Sanger, Texas (CITY) and
Pacheco Koch LLC, (CONSULTANT)
for Consulting Services
C. Preliminary Design (60% Submittal) —
Prepare preliminary construction plans. Prepare the following sheets at
the engineering scale indicated:
• Cover Sheet
• Quantity sheet and General Notes
• Project Layout & Control Sheet
• Detail sheets
• Sewer plan and profile sheets for improvements. Scale 1" = 40'
Horizontal; 1" = 4' Vertical
• Traffic Control Plan
• Erosion control plans
Information required can be combined on sheets if the information can be
clearly shown and is approved by the City of Sanger project manager.
2. Assemble City of Sanger standard construction contract documents and
modify special technical specifications, if needed, for the project (if any).
3. Prepare an estimate of construction quantities and develop the
preliminary opinion of probable construction costs.
4. Submit three (3) 22"x34" sets of preliminary 60% plans, one (1) set of
construction contract documents, special conditions and preliminary
opinion of probable construction costs to the CITY for review. One (1) set
of half size (11"x17") plans will be submitted with the 60% plan submittal.
5. Meet with City of Sanger staff to discuss CITY comments on preliminary
plans, contract documents, and opinion of construction cost.
D. Final Design (95% & 100% Submittals) —
1. Revise preliminary plans incorporating comments from the City of Sanger.
2. Finalize construction plans for proposed improvements.
3. Finalize construction contract documents including City of Sanger
standard specifications, special technical specifications and special
conditions (if any).
4. Estimate of final construction quantities and final opinions of construction
cost.
5. Submit three (3) sets of final plans (95% plans), City of Sanger contract
documents. One (1) set of half size (11"x17") plans will be submitted with
the 95% plan submittal.
6. Incorporate CITY final comments into the plans and bid documents.
1 /29/2013 Page 4
E.
F
EXHIBIT A to Agreement between the
City of Sanger, Texas (CITY) and
Pacheco Koch LLC, (CONSULTANT)
for Consulting Services
7. Submit (1) sealed proof set of final plans (100% plans), specifications for
CITY approval.
8. Once approved by the City of Sanger submit:
• Thirty (30) bound copies of the bid documents (Plans &
Specifications)
• Three (3) half -sized sets of the final plans.
• An additional ten (10) sets of Plans and Specifications will be
provided as needed.
Bid Phase Services —
CONSULTANT will support the bid phase of the project as follows.
Plan Distribution:
The CONSULTANT shall sell contract documents and maintain a plan
holders list of documents sold.
Bidder Assistance:
• The CONSULTANT will develop and implement procedures for
receiving and answering bidders' questions and requests for
additional information. The procedures shall include a log of all
significant bidders questions and requests and the response thereto.
The CONSULTANT will provide technical interpretation of the contract
bid documents and will prepare proposed responses to all bidders'
questions and requests, in the form of addenda.
Attend the prebid conference in support of the CITY.
Attend the bid opening in support of the CITY.
3. Bid Analysis:
Tabulate and review all bids received for the construction project,
assist the CITY in evaluating bids, and recommend award of the
contract.
Assist the CITY in determining the qualifications and acceptability of
prospective contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers.
Incorporate all addenda into the contract documents and issue
conformed sets.
Construction Administration —
1. The CONSULTANT shall attend the preconstruction conference.
2. After the pre -construction conference, the CONSULTANT shall provide
project exhibits and attend public meeting, if any, to help explain the
proposed project to residents. The CITY shall select a suitable location
and mail the invitation letters to the affected customers.
1/29/2013 Page 5
EXHIBIT A to Agreement between the
City of Sanger, Texas (CITY) and
Pacheco Koch LLC, (CONSULTANT)
for Consulting Services
3. The CONSULTANT shall visit the project site at requested intervals as
construction proceeds to observe and report on progress.
4. Prepare construction "Record Drawings" based upon mark-ups and
information provided by the construction contractor(s). Submit one (1) set
of the record drawings (with "record drawing stamp" bearing the signature
of the Engineer and the date) to the City on a CD-ROM disk or flash drive
containing scanned 22"x34" black and white PDF images.
Services not included in Basic Services for this contract:
• Construction inspection services
• As -built surveys of constructed improvements
• Public hearings or City Council/Commission meetings
• Attend a utility coordination meeting to start relocation process with affected
franchise utilities. Distribute copies of final plans and proposed schedule for bid
letting and construction to affected franchise utilities
• Provide periodic site visits (monthly) by the design engineer with a written
inspection report submitted to the City for each visit
• Prepare and process change orders
• Reset property comer monumentation disturbed or removed during or after
construction
• Required Application and permitting fees or special insurance premiums are not
included
END OF EXHIBIT 'A'
1/29/2013 Page 6
EXHIBIT B to Agreement between the
City of Sanger, Texas (CITY) and
Pacheco Koch, LLC (CONSULTANT)
for Consulting Services
EXHIBIT'B' — SCHEDULE
NORTH INTERSTATE 35 OUTFALL SEWER, PHASES I, II, III & IV
Phase I: Water & Sanitary Sewer from Lois Road to View Road
Activity
Estimated
Duration
(weeks)
Estimated
Completion
N.T.P.
Notice -To -Proceed
Conceptual Design Submittal 30%
4
4 Weeks
Preliminary Design Submittal 65%)
8
12 Weeks
Preliminary City Review Complete
1
13 Weeks
Final Design Submittal 95%)
4
17 Weeks
Final Cit Review complete
1
18 Weeks
Final Plans Complete 100%
4
22 Weeks
Receive Bids
4
26 Weeks
Contract Award
4
30 Weeks
Begin Construction
2
32 Weeks
Compete Construction
22
54 Weeks
Record Drawings
2
56 Weeks
Phase II: Sanitary Sewer from BNSF Railroad to Interstate 35 Crossing;
Phase III: Sanitary Sewer from Interstate 35 Crossing to Lois Road; and
Phase IV: Sanitary Sewer from West end of Interstate 35 Crossing to South
Activity
Estimated
Duration
(weeks)
Estimated
Completion
N.T.P.
Notice -To -Proceed
Conceptual Design Submittal 30%
4
4 Weeks
Preliminary Design Submittal 65%
16
20 Weeks
Preliminary City Review Complete
2
22 Weeks
Final Design Submittal 95%
8
30 Weeks
Final City Review Complete
2
32 Weeks
Final Plans Complete 100%)
8
40 Weeks
The CONSULTANT is not responsible for delays beyond it's' control.
END OF EXHIBIT'B'
1/29/2013 Page 1
EXHIBIT C to Agreement between the
City of Sanger, Texas (CITY) and
Pacheco Koch, LLC (CONSULTANT)
for Consulting Services
EXHIBIT'C' — COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT
NORTH INTERSTATE 35 OUTFALL SEWER, PHASES I, II, III & IV
COMPENSATION:
For all professional engineering services included in EXHIBIT'A', Scope of Services, the
CONSULTANT shall be compensated a lump sum fee of $ 294,465.00 as summarized
below. The total lump sum fee shall be considered full compensation for the services
described in EXHIBIT A, including all labor materials, supplies, and equipment
necessary to deliver the services.
Phase I: Sewer from Lois Road to View Road
Basic & Special Services
A.
Project Management, Coordination & Permitting
$ 1,635
B.
Conceptual Design / Alignment Study (30% Submittal)
4,670
C.
Preliminary Design (60% Submittal)
15,070
D.
Final Design (90% & 100% Submittals)
8,540
E.
Bid Phase Services
1,585
F.
Construction Administration
2,930
G.
Reimbursable Expense (Not to Exceed)
739
H.
Field Survey (')
3,300
1.
Permanent Easement Preparation
0
J.
Geotechnical Investigation
2,756
Total Not to Exceed
$ 41,225
Phase I: Water from Lois Road to View Road
Basic & Special Services
A.
Project Management, Coordination & Permitting
$ 2,075
B.
Conceptual Design / Alignment Study (30% Submittal)
5,035
C.
Preliminary Design (60% Submittal)
19,860
D.
Final Design (90% & 100% Submittals)
10,265
E.
Bid Phase Services
1,800
F.
Construction Administration
3,085
G.
Reimbursable Expense (Not to Exceed)
785
H.
Field Survey (1)
4,620
I.
Permanent Easement Preparation
0
J.
Geotechnical Investigation
2,757
Total Not to Exceed
$ 50,282
3/6/2013 Page 1
EXHIBIT C to Agreement between the
City of Sanger, Texas (CITY) and
Pacheco Koch, LLC (CONSULTANT)
for Consulting Services
Phase II: Sanitary Sewer from BNSF Railroad to Interstate 35 Crossing
Basic & Special Services
A.
Project Management, Coordination & Permitting
$ 3,380
B.
Conceptual Design / Alignment Study (30% Submittal)
6,625
C.
Preliminary Design (60% Submittal)
26,075
D.
Final Design (90% & 100% Submittals)
15,085
E.
Bid Phase Services
3,385
F.
Construction Administration
5,680
G.
Reimbursable Expense (Not to Exceed)
1,278
H.
Field Survey t'r
3,960
I.
Permanent Easement Preparation
5,500
J.
Geotechnical Investigation
3,308
Total Not to Exceed $ 74,276
Phase III: Sanitary Sewer from Interstate 35 Crossing to Lois Road
Basic & Special Services
A.
Project Management, Coordination & Permitting
$ 3,380
B.
Conceptual Design / Alignment Study (30% Submittal)
6,560
C.
Preliminary Design (60% Submittal)
23,010
D.
Final Design (90% & 100% Submittals)
13,425
E.
Bid Phase Services
3,385
F.
Construction Administration
5,600
G.
Reimbursable Expense (Not to Exceed)
1,237
H.
Field Survey tii
0
I.
Permanent Easement Preparation 0)
0
J.
Geotechnical Investigation
3,308
Total Not to Exceed
$ 59,905
Phase IV: Sanitary Sewer from West end of Interstate 35 Crossing to South
Basic & Special Services
A.
Project Management, Coordination & Permitting
B.
Conceptual Design / Alignment Study (30% Submittal)
C.
Preliminary Design (60% Submittal)
D.
Final Design (90% & 100% Submittals)
E.
Bid Phase Services
F.
Construction Administration
G.
Reimbursable Expense (Not to Exceed)
H.
Field Survey tit
I.
Permanent Easement Preparation
J.
Geotechnical Investigation
Total Not to Exceed
$ 1,280
1,595
9,640
5,575
0
605
374
8,250
6,600
827
$ 34,746
3/6/2013 Page 2
EXHIBIT C to Agreement between the
City of Sanger, Texas (CITY) and
Pacheco Koch, LLC (CONSULTANT)
for Consulting Services
Phase IV: Water from Chapman to Betz
Basic & Special Services
A.
Project Management, Coordination & Permitting
$ 1,130
B.
Conceptual Design / Alignment Study (30% Submittal)
1,900
C.
Preliminary Design (60% Submittal)
9,190
D.
Final Design (90% & 100% Submittals)
7,355
E.
Bid Phase Services
0
F.
Construction Administration
605
G.
Reimbursable Expense (Not to Exceed)
374
H.
Field Survey t'i
8,250
I.
Permanent Easement Preparation t't
4,400
J.
Geotechnical Investigation
827
Total Not to Exceed
$ 34,031
GRAND TOTAL NOT TO EXCEED $ 294,465
(') Provided by City through independent contractor.
METHOD OF PAYMENT:
The CONSULTANT shall be paid monthly payments as described in Article IV of the
AGREEMENT. The cumulative sum of such monthly partial fee payments shall not
exceed the total current project budget including all approved Amendments. Each
invoice shall be verified as to its accuracy and compliance with the terms of this
Agreement by an officer of the CONSULTANT.
Monthly statements for reimbursable services performed by sub consultants will be
based upon the actual cost to the CONSULTANT plus ten percent (10%). Direct
reimbursable expenses for services such as printing, express mail, fees, mileage and
other direct expenses that are incurred during the progress of the project will be billed at
1.1 times the CONSULTANT'S cost.
END OF EXHIBIT'C'
3/6/2013 Page 3
PACHECOKOCH
Project No.: 0100 FEE BUDGET ESTIMATE
Client: City of Sanger BASIC DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
Project Title: North 135 Outfall Sewer, Phase I (Sewer)
Water & Sanitary Sewer from Lois Road to View Road
DESCRIPTION OF WORK TASK
BASIS
OF
MANHOUR
ESTIMATE
TOTAL
MH'S
PER
TASK
TOTAL
FEE
PER
TASK
PROJ
MGR
$215.00
SENIOR
ENGR
$180.00
STR/ELEC/HYD
ENGR
$190.00
PROJECT
ENGR
$120.00
DESIGN
TECH/Err
$95.00
TECH.
CADD
S80.00
OA/OC
REVIEW
$180.00
SECTY
$70.00
QNTY
UNIT
PROJECT MANAGEMENT. COORDINATION & PERMITTING
PROJECTMANAGEMENT
2.0
2.0
$ 430.00
PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE WITH CLIENT/SITE VISIT
1
N/A
0.5
0.5
1.0
$ 167.50
SURVEY COORDINATION & CONVERSION
1
N/A
1.5
0.5
2.0
$ 215.00
CONSTRUCTABILITY REVIEW
1
N/A
0.5
0.5
1.0
$ 150.00
TxDOT& RAILROAD COORDINATION & PERMITTING
1
N/A
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.5
3.5
$ 350.00
UTLITY CLEARANCE COORDINATION
1
EACH
0.5
1.5
0.5
2.5
$ 322.50
SUB -TOTAL=
$ 1,635.00
CONCEPTDESIGN
COLLECT& REVIEW EXISTING DATA
1
NIA
0.5
1.5
2.0
S 287.50
ALIGNMENT & GRADE STUDY
1
N/A
1.0
1.5
12.0
4.0
4.0
0B
1
1 23.0
S 271&00
CONCEPT DESIGN TECHNICAL MEMO
1
EACH
1.5
1.6
5.0
2.5
0.5
11.0
S 1,465.00
CLIENT CONFERENCE/REVIEW MEETING
1
N/A
0.5
0.5
0.5
1S
S 202.50
SITE VISIT
1
EACH
1
0.0
$
SUBTOTAL•
S 4,670.00
PRELIMINARY DESIGN 60%SUBMITTAL
COVERSHEET/INDEX
0
SHEET
0.5
0.5
$ 47.50
PROJECT LAYOUTSHEET
1
SHEET
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.5
$ 147.50
QUANTITY/LEGEND/CONTROL SHEET
0
SHEET
0.5
0.5
1
1.0
2.0
$ 230.00
GENERAL NOTES SHEET
1
SHEET
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
2.0
$ 255.00
SANITARY SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS
6
SHEET
2.0
8.0
32.0
36.0
24.0
2.0
104.0
$ 11410.00
WATER PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS
0
SHEET
0.0
S
EROSION CONTROL SHEETS
2
SHEET
0.5
0.5
2.0
2.0
5.0
$ 517.50
TRAFFIC CONTROL SHEETS
2
SHEET
0.5
1.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
7.5
$ 837.50
QUANTITY TAKE -OFF AND OPINION OF COST
N/A
N/A
0.5
1.0
0.5
0.5
2.5
$ 297.50
SPECIFICATIONS
1
BOOK
0.5
1.0
3.0
1.0
1.0
0.5
2.0
9.0
$ 1052.50
SITE VISITS
1
EACH
0.5
0.5
S 107.50
CLIENT CONFERENCE/REVIEW MEETING
1
N/A
0.5
0.5
1.0
S 167.60
SUBTOTALS
$ 15,070.00
FINAL DESIGN (90%& 100%SUBMITTALS
COVER SHEET/INDEX
0
SHEET
0.5
0.5
1.0
$ 100.00
PROJECTLAYOUTSHEET
1
SHEET
0.5
0.5
1.0
$ 87.50
DLANTBY/LEGEND /CONTROL SHEET
0
SHEET
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
2.0
$ 237.50
GENERAL NOTES SHEET
1
SHEET
0.5
0.5
1.0
$ 107.50
DETAIL SHEETS
3
SHEET
0.5
0.5
1.0
2.0
2.0
6.0
$ 667.50
SANITARY SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS
6
SHEET
1.0
4.0
12.0
24.0
8.0
2.0
51.0
5,655.03"
WATER PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS
0
SHEET
0.0
$
EROSION CONTROL SHEETS
2
SHEET
1.0
0.5
1.5
$ 135-0D
TRAFFIC CONTROL SHEETS
2
SHEET
0.5
0.5
1.0
2.0
4.0
S 422.50
OUANTY TAKE-0FF AND OPINION OF COST
WA
WA
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
2.0
$ 237.50
SPECIFICATIONS
1
BOOK
0.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
$ 662.50
SITE VISITS
1
EACH
0.5
0.5
S 60.00
CLIENTCONFERENCE/REVIEW MEETING
1
N/A
0S
0.5
1.0
S 167.50
SUB -TOTAL=
S &540.00
PACHECO KOCH
Project No.: 0100 FEE BUDGET ESTIMATE
Client: City of Sanger BASIC DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
Project Title: North 135 Outfall Sewer, Phase I (Sewer)
Water & Sanitary Sewer from Lois Road to View Road
March 6, 2013
BASIS
DESCRIPTION OF WORK TASK
OF
MANHOUR
TOTAL
TOTAL
PROJ
SENIOR
STR/ELEC/HYD
PROJECT
DESIGN
TECH.
QA/QC
ESTIMATE
MGR
ENGR
ENGR
ENGR
TECH/ER
CADD
REVIEW
SECT'
MH'S
PER
FEE
PER
QNTY
UNIT
5215.00
$180.00
$190.00
$120.00
$96.00
$80.00
$180.00
$70.00
TASK
TASK
BIDDING PHASE
COORDINATE PLAN REPRODUCTION & DISTRIBUTION
1
NIA
0.5
BIDDING ASSISTANCE
1
N/A
0.5
0.5
1.0
1.0
1.5
$ 160.00
BID OPENING
1
N/A
1.0
1.0
0.5
2S
$352.50
BID TABULATION
1
N/A
0.5
0.5
2.0
$ 335.00
RECOMMENDATION OF AWARD
1
N/A
0.5
1.0
2.0
$ 237.50
NOTICE OF AWARD
0
NA
0.5
0.5
$ 202.50
REVIEW&ASSEMBLE CONTRACTS
1
N/A
0.5
�25
$
1.0
1.0
$ 297.50
SUOTAL=
$ 1,585.00
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
NOTICE TO PROCEED
0
N/A
PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE -
1
NA
1.5
1.5
0.0
$
MEETING WITH AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNERS
1
N/A
0.5
1.0
3.0
S 502.50
SHOP DRAWING REVIEW
0
N/A
1.5
1.5
$ 227.50
$
SITE VISITS
4
N/A
4.0
2.0
0.0
TESTREPORTREVIEW
0
N/A
6.0
$ 1100.00
PLAN CLARIFICATIONS/CHANGE ORDERS
0
WA
$
MONTHLY CONTRACTOR'S ESTIMATE
0
N/A
0.0
$
FINAL INSPECTION
0
N/A
0.0
$
CONTRACTOR'S FINAL PAY ESTIMATE
0
N/A
0.0
S
CERTIFICATEOFCOMPLETION
0
N/A
0.0
$ -
RECORD DRAWINGS
15
SHEET
0.5
3.0
9.0
0.5
0.0
13.0
$
$ 1,100.00
SUB -TOTAL-
5 2,930.00
HOURS SUB -TOTALS
23.5
22.0
0.0
90.5
84.5
60.5
5.5
10.0
296.5
$ 34,43D.00
TOTAL LABOR COSTS
5,052.50
3.960400
10.860.00
8,027.O
4,840.00
990.00
700.00
$ 34,430.D0
%OFTOTALHOURS
7.9%
7.4%
0.0%
30.5%
28.5%
20.4%
100.0°0
PRINTING& REPRODUCTION EXPENSES
QUANTITY
UNITPRICE
AMOUNT
ENGINEERING
LABOR COSTS:
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
TOTAL ENGINEERING (Basic Services)
$ 34,430.00
739.00
PRINTING- 11 X 17 PLANSREVIEW SETS
8
SETS
15
PLOTS/SET
120
0.50
60.00
PRINTING 22 X 34 PLANS REVIEW SETS
12
SETS
15
PLOTS/SET
180
1.00
180.00
PRINTING- 22 X 34 PLANS(UTILrrY CLEARANCE SETS
12
SETS
15
PLOTS/SET
160
1.00
18D00
S 35,169.00
PRINTING- 22 X 34 PLANS (BID $ETB)
0
SETS
15
PLOTS/SET
0
1.00
PRINTING- I I X 17 PLANS ID SETS)
4
SETS
15
PLOTS/SET
60
0.50
30.00
OTHER DIRECT COSTS -fSoec al Services)
PRINTING -22X 34 PLANS (AS -BUILT SETS
2
SETS
15
PLOTS/SET
30
1.00
30.00
PDF PREPARATION
0.5
SETS
15
PLOTS/SET
1
8.00
4.00
FIELD SURVEY (1000 LF @S3.00ILF)
$ 3,300.00
SPECIFICATIONS- 8S X 11 PAPER COPIES
4
SETS
100
COPIESISET
460
0.10
40.00
EASEMENT PREPARATION
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
TOTAL ENGINEERING (Spoclal Services)
TOTAL DESIGN FEE
S
$ 2,756.00
SPECIFICATIONS- 8.5 X 11 PAPER COPIES(SID SETS)
0
SETS
100
COPIES/SET
0
0.10
TOTAL PRINTING & REPRODUCTION EXPENSES
is
524.00
$ 6,056.00
at 225.00
DIRECT EXPENSES
PLOTTING- 11 X 17 PAPER PLOTS
6
SETS
15
PLOTS/SE7
90
0.50
45.00
PLOTTING -22X34 PAPER PLOTS
6
SETS
15
PLOTS/SET
90
1.00
90.00
REPRODUCTION- 8.6 X 11 PAPER COPIES
100
COPIES
100
0.10
10A0
DELIVERYSERVICE
1
PKGS
1
15.00
15.00
AUTO EXPENSE
2
TRIPS
50
MI/R21P
100
0.55
55.00
TOTAL PER PHASE DIRECT EXPENSES
$ 215.00
PACHECO KOCH
Project No.: 0100 FEE BUDGET ESTIMATE
Client: City of Sanger BASIC DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
Project Title: North 135 Outfall Sewer, Phase I (Water)
Water & Sanitary Sewer from Lois Road to View Road
DESCRIPTION OF WORK TASK
BASIS
OF
MANHOUR
ESTIMATE
TOTAL
MH-S
PER
TASK
M3fCI1 b, LVlJ
TOTAL
FEE
PER
TASK
PROJ
MGR
$215.00
SENIOR
ENGR
$180.00
STR/ELEC(HYD
ENGR
$190.00
PROJECT
ENGR
$120.00
DESIGN
TECH/ER
S95.00
TECH.
CADD
$80.00
QAA)C
REVIEW
$180.00
SECTY
$70.00
ONTY
I UNIT
PROJECT MANAGEMENT. COORDINATION & PERMITTING
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
2.0
2.0
S 430.00
PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE WITH CLIENT/SITE VISIT
1
N/A
1.0
1.0
0.6
2.5
$ 37D.00
SURVEY COORDINATION & CONVERSION
1
N/A
0.5
1.5
2.0
S 287.50
CONSTRUCTABILITY REVIEW
I
N/A
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.5
$ 186.00
U90T& RAILROAD COORDINATION & PERMITTING
1
N/A
0.5
0.5
1.5
1.0
1.0
0.5
5.0
$ 58].50
UTILITY CLEARANCE COORDINATION
1
EACH
1.5
0.5
2.0
S 215.00
SUB -TOTAL.
$ 2,076.00
CONCEPT DESIGN
COLLECT& REVIEW EXISTING DATA
1
NIA
0.5
1.5
2.0
S 237.50
ALIGNMENT&GRADE STUDY
I
N/A
1.5
1.5
12.0
4.0
4.0
1.0
24.0
$ 2,912.50
CONCEPT DESIGN TECHNICAL MEMO
I
EACH
1.5
1.5
5.0
2.5
1.0
11.5
$ 1.S0D.00
CLIENT CONFERENCE/REVIEW MEETING
1
N/A
OS
0.5
1.0
S 167.50
SITE VISIT
1
EACH
0.5
0.5
1.0
$ 167.50
SUB -TOTAL =
$ 51035.00
PRELIMINARY DESIGN (60 %SUBMITTAL)
COVER SHEET/INDEX
1
SHEET
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
2.0
S 237.50
PROJECTLAYOUTSHEET
0
SHEET
0.5
1.0
1.0
2.5
S 2S5.00
QUANTITY/LEGEND/CONTROL SHEET
1
SHEET
0.5
0.5
1.0
1.5
1.0
540.00
GENERAL NOTES SHEET
0
SHEET
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.6
$ 195.00
SANITARY SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS
0
SHEET
0.0
$
WATER PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS
8
SHEET
2.0
10.0
4p.0
54.0
40.0
2.0
148.0
$ 15720.00
EROSION CONTROL SHEETS
2
SHEET
O.S
2.0
2.0
4.5
Is 41MOD
TRAFFIC CONTROL SHEETS
2
SHEET
0.5
1.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
].5
$ 837.50
QUANTITY TAKE-0FF AND OPINION OF COST
WA
N/A
0.5
0.5
1.0
0.5
0.5
3.0
$ 405.00
SPECIFICATIONS
I
BOOK
0.5
1.0
3.0
1.0
1.0
0.5
2.0
9.0
$ 1052.50
SITE VISITS
1
EACH
0.5
D.5
$ 60.00
CLIENT CONFERENCE/REVIEW MEETING
1
N/A
0.5
OS
1.0
$ 167.50
SUB -TOTAL
$ 191860.00
FINAL DESIGN 90%&1W%SUBMITTAL$
COVER SHEET/INDEX
1
SHEET
0.5
0.5
S 47.50
PROJECT LAYOUTSHEET
0
SHEET
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
2.0
S 237.50
QUANTITY/LEGEND/CONTROL SHEET
I
SHEETI
OS
0.5
0.5
0.5
2.0
$ 25TOO
GENERAL NOTES SHEET
0
SHEET
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.5
$ 1T/.50
DETAIL SHEETS
2
SHEET
0.5
1.0
2.0
2.0
5.5
$ 560.00
SANITARY SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS
0
SHEET
0.0
S
WATER PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS
8
SHEET
1.0
4.0
16.0
28.0
16.0
2.0
67.0
$ 7,155.00
EROSION CONTROL SHEETS
2
SHEET
0.5
0.5
1.0
1.0
3.0
$ 342.50
TRAFFIC CONTROL SHEETS
2
SHEET
0.5
1.0
2.0
3.5
S 315.00
QUANTITY TAKE-0FF AND OPINION OF COST
WA
NIA
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
2.0
S 237.50
SPECIFICATIONS
I
BOOK
OS
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
$ 662.50
SITE VISITS
1
EACH
0.5
0.5
O.5
$ 107.50
CUENTCONFERENCE/REVIEW MEETING
1
N/A
0.5
0.5
$ 167.50
SUB -TOTAL=
$ 10,265A0
PACHECOKOCH
Project No.: 0100 FEE BUDGET ESTIMATE
Client: City of Sanger BASIC DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
Project Title: North 135 Outfall Sewer, Phase I (Water)
Water & Sanitary Sewer from Lois Road to View Road
BASIS
March6.2013
OF
DESCRIPTION OF WORK TASK
MANHOUR
TOTAL
TOTAL
PROJ
SENIOR
STR/ELEC/HYD
PROJECT
DESIGN
TECH.
-FIREVIEW
OAIOC
ESTIMATE
MGR
ENGR
ENGR
ENGR
TECH/ER
CADD
SECTY
MH'S
PER
FEE
PER
pNTY
UNIT
BIDDING PHASE
$215.00
$180.00
$190.00
S120.D0
$95.00
380.00
$190.00
$70.00
TASK
TASK
COORDINATE PLAN REPRODUCTION & DISTRIBUTION
i
N/A
0.5
BIDDING ASSISTANCE
1
- N/A
0.5
0.5
1.0
11 0
.0
1.5
S 160.00
BID OPENING
1
N/A
2.0
.
2.5
$ 352.50
BID TABULATION
1
N/A
0.5
1.0
3.0
$ 550.00
RECOMMENDATION OF AWARD
1
WA
0.5
0.5
1.0
2.0
S 237.50
NOTICE OF AWARD
0
N/A
0.5
0.5
1.5
S 202.50
REVIEW &ASSEMBLE CONTRACTS
1
N/A
0.5
0.0
$
1.0
1.0
2.5
is 207.50
SUB -TOTAL.
$ 1,800.00
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
NOTICE TO PROCEED
0
N/A
PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE
1
N/A
1.5
1.5
00
S
MEETING WITH AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNERS
1
N/A
1.0
3.0
$ 502.50
SHOP DRAWING REVIEW
0
WA
0.5
1.5
$ 275.00
SITE VISTS
4
N/A
4.0
2
0.0
$
TEST REPORT REVIEW
0
N/A
.0
6.0
S 1.100.00
PLAN CLARIFICATIONS/CHANGE ORDERS
0
N/A
MONTHLY CONTRACTOR'S ESTIMATE
0
N/A
FINAL INSPECTION
0
WA
CONTRACTOR'S FINAL PAY ESTIMATE
0
NIA
o.o
$
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
0
N/A
0.0
$
RECORD DRAWINGS
16
SHEET
0.5
0.5
3.0
O.o
s
9.0
0.5
13.5
$ 1,2W.50
SUBTOTALv
$ 3.085.00
HOURS SUBTOTALS
26.0
25.0
0.0
103.5
109.0
86.5
6.5
10.5
369.0
$
TOTAL LABOR COSTS
6,020.00
4,500.00
12,420.00
10.355.00
6.920.00
t.170.00
735.00
$ 42,120.00
42,120.00
%OF TOTAL HOUR$
PRINTING& REPRODUCTION EXPENSES
OUANiTIY
UNIT PRICE
AMOUNT
ENGINEERING
LABOR COSTS:
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
TOTAL ENGINEERING (Seek, Services)
$ 42,120.00
785.00
PRINTING- 11 X 17 PLANS (REVIEW SETS
8
SETS
16
PLOTS/SET
128
0.50
64.00
PRIMING- 22 X 34 PLANSREVIEW SETS
'CLEARANCE
12
SETS
16
PLOTS/SET
192
1.00
192.00
PRINTING-22 X 34 PLANS U-I1U SETS
12
SETS
16
PLOTS/SET
192
1.00
192.00
$ 42,905.00
PRINTING- 22 X 34 PLANS (BID SETS)
0
SETS
16
PLOTS/SET
0
1.00
PRINTING-11 X17 PLANS BID SETS
4
SETS
16
PLOTS/SET
64
0.50
32.X
OTHER DIRECT COSTS - (Seeclal Services)
PRINTING -22X 34 PLANS AS -BUILT SETS
2
SETS
16
PLOTS/SET
32
1.00
32.00
POP PREPARATION
0.5
SETS
16
PLOTS/SET
1
8.00
4.00
FIELD SURVEY(1400 LF@ S3.00/1-F) $ 4.620.00
SPECIFICATIONS.8.5 X 11 PAPER COPIES
4
SETS
100
COPIES/SET
400
0.10
40.00
EASEMENT PREPARATION $
SPECIFICATIONS -B.SX it PAPER COPIES (BID SETS)
0
SETS
100
COPIES/SET
0
0.10
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION $ 2,757.00
TOTAL ENGINEERING (Special Sorvlcos) $ 7,377.00
TOTAL PRINTING & REPRODUCTION EXPENSES
$ 556.00
DIRECT EXPENSES
PLOTTING-11 X 17 PAPER PLOTS
6
S
TOTAL DESIGN FEE 50282.00
16
PLOTS/SET
96
0.50
48.00
PLOTRNG- 22 X 34 PAPER PLOTS
6
16
PLOTS/SET
96
1.00
96.00
REPRODUCTION- 8.5 X 11 PAPER COPIES
is'
J!GS
'.
150
0.10
15.00
DELNERYSERVICE
I
.
1
5.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
AUTO EXPENSE
2
50
MI/IRIP
t00
TOTAL PER PHASE DIRECT EXPENSES
$ 229.00
PACHECO KOCH
Project No.: 0100 FEE BUDGET ESTIMATE
Client: City of Sanger BASIC DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
Project Title: North 135 Outfall Sewer, Phase II
Sanitary Sewer from BNSF Railroad North to 135 Bore at Selz Road
Length =5,400 LF
DESCRIPTON OF WORK TASK
BASIS
OF
MANHOUR
ESTIMATE
TOTAL
MH'S
PER
TASK
TOTAL
FEE
PER
TASK
PROJ
MGR
$215.00
SENIOR
ENGR
$180.00
STWELEC/HYD
ENGR
$190.00
PROJECT
ENGR
$12D.00
DESIGN
TECH/Err
$95.0D
TECH.
CADD
$80.00
ONQC
REVIEW
S180.00
SECTY
$]0.00
ON
UNR
PROJECT MANAGEMENT, COORDINATION & PERMITTING
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
2.5
2.5
S 53].50
PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE WITH CLIENT/SITE VISIT
t
N/A
1.0
1.0
0.5
2.5
S 370.00
SURVEY COORDINATION & CONVERSION
1
N/A
0.5
2.0
5.0
5.0
0.5
13.0
S 1,257.50
CONSTRUCTABILUY REVIEW
1
N/A
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.5
$ 185.00
TMDOT& RAILROAD COORDINATION & PERMITTING
1
NIA
0.5
0.5
2.0
1.0
1.0
0.5
5.5
S 641.50
UTILFTY CLEARANCE COORDINATION
1
EACH
0.5
2.0
0.5
3.0
$ 382.50
SUB -TOTAL=
$ 3,38D.00
CONCEPTOESIGN
COLLECT& REVIEW EXISTING DATA
1
WA
1.0
2.0
3.0
$ 455.00
ALIGNMENT &GRACE STUDY
1
N/A
1.5
2.0
14.0
7.0
7.0
1.0
32.5
$ 376TS0
CONCEPT DESIGN TECHNICAL MEMO
t
EACH
20
2.0
6.0
3.0
1.0
14.0
$ 186&00
CLIENTCONFERENCE/REVIEW MEETING
1
NIA
1.0
1.0
0.5
2.5
S 370.00
SITE VISIT
1
EACH
0.5
0.5
1.0
S 167.50
SUB -TOTAL-
$ 6,625.00
PRELIMINARY DESIGN (60%SUBMITTAL
COVER SHEET/INDEX
1
SHEET
0.5
0.5
1.0
0.5
2.5
$ 285.00
PROJECT LAYOUT SHEET
1
SHEET
0S
1.0
1.5
1 1.5
4.5
$ 4]2.50
QUANTITY/LEGEND/CONTROL SHEET
i
SHEET
0.5
0.5
1.5
t5
2.0
1 6.0
§ 680.00
GENERAL NOTES SHEET
1
SHEET
1.0
OS
1.0
- 1.0
1 3.5
$ 450.00
SANITARY SEW ER PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS
8
SHEET
5.0
12.0
50.0
58.0
32.0
2.0
159.0
S 17665.00
WATER PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS
0
SHEET
0.0
$
EROSION CONTROL SHEETS
4
1 SHEET
0.5
0.5
1.5
5.0
5.0
12S
S 1.252.50
TRAFFIC CONTROL SHEETS
4
SHEET
1.0
2.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
15.0
$ 1675.00
QUANTITY TAKE -OFF AND OPINION OF COST
WA
NIA
0.5
0.5
4.0
2.0
1.5
8.5
$ 987.50
SPECIFICATONS
1
BOOK
1.0
2.0
6.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
4.0
18.0
$ 2105.00
SITE VISRS
1
EACH
0.5
0.5
1.0
$ 167.60
CLIENT CONFERENCEIREVIEW MEETING
1
NIA
1.0
1.0
2.0
$ 335.00
SUB -TOTAL=
$ 26,075.00
FINAL DESIGN (90%& 100%SUBMITTAL$
COVER SHEET/INDEX
1
SHEET
0.5
0.5
0.5
1
1.5
$ 147.50
PROJECT LAYOUT SHEET
t
SHEET
0.5
0.5
1.0
1.0
1
3.0
S 325.00
OUANTTIY / LEGEND / CONTROL SHEET
1
SHEET
1 0.5
0.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
4.0
$ 492.50
GENERAL NOTES SHEET
1
SHEET
0.5
0.5
1.0
0.5
2.5
$ 285.00
DETAIL SHEETS
5
SHEET
0.5
1.0
2.0
4.0
4.0
11.5
$ 1 M7'S0
SANTARV SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS
8
SHEET
25
6.0
26.0
32.0
12.0
2.0
80.5
$ 9097.50
WATER PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS
0
SHEET
0.0
$
EROSION CONTROL SHEETS
4
SHEET
0.5
0.5
2.0
2.0
5.0
S 517.50
TRAFFIC CONTROL SHEETS
4
SHEET
0.5
1.0
1.5
4.0
7.0
§ 690.00
OUANT7YTAKE-0FF AND OPINION OF COST
N/A
WA
0.5
1.0
t0
1.0
0.5
4.0
S 475.00
SPECIFICATIONS
1
BOOK
1.0
2.0
2.6
2.0
1.0
2.0
10.0
$ 1325.00
SITE VISITS
1
EACH
0.5
D.5
1.0
$ 167.50
CLIENT CONFERENCE/REVIEW MEETING
t
WA
1.0
1.0
2.0
$ 335.00
$UB-TOTAL=
$ 15,085.00
PACHECO KOCH
Project No.: 0100 FEE BUDGET ESTIMATE
Client: City of Sanger BASIC DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
Project Title: North 135 Outtall Sewer, Phase 11
Sanitary Sewer from BNSF Railroad North to 135 Bore at Betz Road
Length = 5,400 LF
DESCRIPTION OF WORK TASK
BIDDING PHASE
BASIS
OF
MANHOUR
ESTIMATE
TOTAL
MH'S
PER
TASK
March 6, 2013
TOTAL
FEE
PER
TASK
PROJ
MGR
S215.00
SENIOR
ENGR
$180.00
STR/ELEC/HYD
ENGR
S190.00
PROJECT
ENGR
$120.00
DESIGN
TECH/EIT
S95.00
TECH.
CADD
$80.00
GO
REVIEW
S180.00
SECTY
$70.00
QNTY
UNIT
COORDINATE PLAN REPRODUCTION &DISTRIBUTION
BIDDING ASSISTANCE
BID OPENING
BID TABULATION
RECOMMENDATION OF AWARD
NOTICEOFAWARD
REVIEW BASSEMBLE CONTRACTS
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.0
3.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
2.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
5.0
5.0
4.0
33.0
.0
5.0
S 320.00
$ 705.00
5 8B5.00
$ 4]5.00
$ 4 5.00
$
1 S 595.00
SUB-TOTAL
S 3,385.00
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
NOTICE TO PROCEED
0
N/A
PRECONSTRUCT )N CONFERENCE
MEETING WITH AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNERS
SHOP DRAWING REVIEW
1
1
O
N/A
N/A
N/A
3.0
1.5
3.0
1.5
EMS
SITE VISITS
4
WA
8.0
4.0
D
TEST REPORT REVIEW
0
WA
0.
PLAN CLARIFICATIONS/CHANGE ORDERS
0
N/A
MONTHLY CONTRACTOR'S ESTIMATE
0
N/A
FINAL INSPECTION
D
N/A
0.0
CONTRACTOR'S FINAL PAY ESTIMATE
0
N/A
0.0
$
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
RECORD DRAWINGS
0
25
N/A
SHEET
0.5
1.0
5.0
15.0
0.0
1.0
0.
22.5
$
S 1,972.50
SUB -TOTAL-
$ 5ARD.00
HOURS SUB -TOTALS
TOTAL LABOR COSTS
49.0
10.535.00
36.5
5.570.00
0.0
153.5
18.420.00
143.0
13,585.00
105.5
8,440.00
7.5
t.350.00
19.0
1.330.00
514.0
$ 60,230.00
$ 60.230.00
%pF TOTAL HOUR$
9.5%
].t%
0.0%
29.9%
27.6%
20.5%
1.5%
3.7%
100.0%
PRINTING& REPRODUCTION EXPENSES
QUANTITY
UNITPRICE
I AMOUNT
ENGINEERING
LABOR COSTS:
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
TOTAL ENGINEERING (Basic Services)
$ 60,230.00
1,27800
PRINTING- 11 X 17 PLANS (REVIEW SETS
8
SETS
25
PLOTS/SET
200
o50 1
100.00
PRINTING- 22 X 34 PLANSREVIEW SETS
12
SETS
25
PLOTS/SET
300
1.00
300.00
PRINTING-22XS4 PLANS UTLRYCLEARANCESETS
12
SETS
25
PLOTS/SET
300
1.00
300.00
$ 61,508.D0
PRINTING- 22 X 34 PLANS (BID SETS)
0
SETS
25
PLOTS/SET
0
1,00
PRINTING-11 X17 PLANS BID SETS
4
SETS
25
PLOTS/SET
100
0.50
50.00
OTHER DIRECT COSTS - (Special Services)
PRINTING-22 X 34 PLAINS (AS -BUILT SETS
2
SETS
25
PLOTS/SET
50
1.00
50.00
POF PREPARATION
1
SETS
25
PLOTS/SET
1
8.00
Sm
FIELD SURVEY(1200 LF@S3.00/LF)
EASEMENT PREPARATON(5@$1000/EA)
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
TOTAL ENGINEERING (Special Services)
TOTAL DESIGN FEE
$ 3,960.00
S 51500.00
S 3.308AD
SPECIFICATIONS.8.5 X 11 PAPER COPIES
SPECIFICATIONS -B.SX I PAPER COPIES (BID SETS)
8
0
SETS
SETS
100
100
COPIES/SET
COPIES/SET
800
0
0.10
0.10
80.00
TOTAL PRINTING & REPRODUCTION EXPENSES
$ small
$ 12,768.00
S 74276.00
DIRECT EXPENSES
PLOTTING - I I X 17 PAPER PLOTS
6
PLOTS/SET
150
0.50
75.00
PLOTTING- 22 X 34 PAPER PLOTS
6
PLOTS/SET
150
1.00
150.00
REPRODUCTION- 8.5 X 11 PAPER COPIES
260
ft
250
0.10
25.00
DELIVERY BERVICE
2
2
15.00
30.00
AUTO EXPENSE
4
MIIIRiP
200
0.551
110.00
TOTAL PER PHASE DIRECT EXPENSES
$ 390.00
PACHECOKOCH
Project No.: 0100
Client: City of Sanger
Project Title: North 135 Outfall Sewer, Phase III
Sanitary Sewer f135 Bore at Selz Road to Lois Road
FEE BUDGET ESTIMATE
BASIC DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
Lmgn = 5,600 LF
DESCRIPTION OF WORK TASK
BASIS
OF
MANHOUR
ESTIMATE
TOTAL
MH'S
PER
TASK
TOTAL
FEE
PER
TASK
PROJ
MGR
$215.00
SENIOR
ENGR
$180.00
STR/ELEC/HYD
ENGR
$190.00
PROJECT
ENGR
$120.00
DESIGN
TECH/ER
$95m
TECH.
CADD
$80.00
OAIQC
REVIEW
$180.00
SECTY
$70.00
ONTY
UNIT
PROJECT MANAGEMENT, COORDINATION & PERMITTING
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
2.5
2.5
S 537.50
PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE WITH CLIENT/SITE VISIT
1
N/A
1.0
1.0
0.5
2.5
$ 370.00
SURVEY COORDINATIONS CONVERSION
1
NIA
0.5
2.0
5.0
5.0
0.5
1 13.0
$ 1.257.50
CONSTRUCTABILTIY REVIEW
1
N/A
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.5
$ 185.00
TAROT& RAILROAD COORDINATION & PERMITTING
1
N/A
0.5
0.5
2.0
1.0
1.0
0.5
5.5
$ 647.50
UTILITY CLEARANCE COORDINATION
1
EACH
0.5
2.0
0.5
3.0
$ 382.50
SUB -TOTAL.
$ 3,380.00
CONCEPT DESIGN
COLLECT& REVIEW EXISTING DATA
1
NIA
1.0
2.0
3.0
$ 455.00
ALIGNMENT 8 GRADE STUDY
1
N/A
IS
2.0
12.0
8.0
BD
1.0
32.5
S 3702.50
CONCEPT DESIGN TECHNICAL MEMO
1
EACH
2.0
2.0
6.0
3.0
1.0
14.0
$ 1,865.00
CLIENT CONFERENCEIREVIEW MEETING
1
N/A
1.0
1.0
0.5
2.5
$ 37p.00
SITE VISIT
1
EACH
0.5
0.5
1.0
$ 167.50
SUB -TOTAL
$ 61560.00
PRELIMINARY DESIGN (60%SUBMITTAL
COVER SHEET/INDEX
1
SHEET
0.5
0.5
1.0
0.5
2.5
$ 285.00
PROJECT LAYOUT SHEET
1
SHEET
1 0.5
1.0
2.0
1.5
5.0
S 520B0
OUANTITY/LEGEND /CONTROL SHEET
1
SHEET
0.5
0.5
1.5
1.5
2.0
6.0
$ 680.00
GENERAL NOTES SHEET
1
SHEET
1.0
0.5
1.0
1.0
3.5
450.00
SANITARY SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS
7
SHEET
4.5
10.0
42.0
48.0
26.0
2.0
132.5
$ 16807.50
WATER PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS
0
SHEET
0.0
$
EROSION CONTROL SHEETS
4
SHEET
0.5
0.5
1.5
5.0
55.0
.5
112.
252 W
50 $ 1,
TRAFFIC CONTROL SHEETS
4
SHEET
1.0
2.0
2.0
4.0
.0
$ 125
00
OLIANITfYTAKE-OFFANO OPINION OF COST
N/A
NIA
0.5
0.5
3.0
1.0
1.0
6.0
$ 732.50
SPECIFICATIONS
1
BOOK
1.0
2.0
6.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
4.0
18.0
S 2105.00
SITE VISITS
1
EACH
0.5
0.5
1.0
S 167.50
CLIENT CONFERENCEIREVIEW MEETING
1
WA
1.0
1.0
2.0
$ 335.00
SUE -TOTAL
$ 23.010.00
FINAL DESIGN 90%&100%SUBMITTALS
COVER SHEET/INDEX -
1
SHEET
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.5
$ 147.W
PROJECT LAYOUTSHEET
1
SHEET
0.5
0.5
1.0
1.0
3.0
$ 325.00
QUANTITY/LEGEND/CONTROL SHEET
1
SHEET
0.5
0.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
4.0
S 492.50
GENERAL NOTES SHEET
1
SHEET
0.5
0.5
1.0
0.5
2.5
$ 285.00
DETAIL SHEETS
5
SHEET
0.5
1.0
2.0
4.0
4.0
11.5
$ 1.227.50
SANTARY SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS
7
SHEET
2.5
5.0
20.0
24.0
12.0
2.0
65.5
$ ]437.50
WATER PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS
0
SHEET
0.0
$
EROSION CONTROL SHEETS
4
SHEET
0.5
0.5
2.0
2.0
5.0
$ 517.50
TRAFFIC CONTROL SHEETS
4
HEE71
0.5
1.0
1.5
4.0
7.0
$ 590.00
OUANTIIYTAKE-OFF AND OPINION OF COST
WA
N/A
0.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.5
4.0
$ 475.00
SPECIFICATIONS
1
BOOK
1.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
2.D
10.0
1325DD
SITE VISITS
1
EACH
B5
0.5
1.0
S 16].50
CLIENT CONFERENCE/REVIEW MEETING
1
WA
1.0
1.0
2.0
S 335.00
SUB -TOTAL.
$ 13,425.00
PACHECO KOCH
Project No.: 0100
Client: City of Sanger
Project Title: North 135 Outfall Sewer, Phase III
Sanitary Sewer f135 Bore at Belz Road to Lois Road
FEE BUDGET ESTIMATE
BASIC DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
Len90=5,600 LF
March 6. 2013
BASIS
OF
TOTAL
TOTAL
PROJ
SENIOR
STR/ELEC/HYD
PROJECT
DESIGN
TECH.
OAIQC
DESCRIPTION OF WORK TASK
MANHOUR
MH'S
FEE
ESTIMATE
MGR
ENGR
ENGR
ENGR
TECH/EF
CADD
REVIEW
SECTY
PER
PER
gNTY
UNIT
$215.00
$180.00
$190.00
$120.00
S95.Do
$80.00
$180.00
$70.00
TASK
TASK
BIDDING PHASE
COORDINATE PLAN REPRODUCTION & DISTRIBUTION
1
N/A
1.0
BIDDING ASSISTANCE
1
N/A
1.0
1.0
2.0
.0
22.0
3.0
5.0
6 320.00
$
BID OPENING
1
N/A
3.0
2.0
920.00
BID TABULATION
1
N/A
1.0
1.0
2.0
5.0
4.0
$ 885.00
$ 475.00
RECOMMENDATION OF AWARD
1
N/A
1.0
1.0
NOTICE OF AWARD
0
N/A
1.0
3.0
$ 405.00
REVIEW ASSEMBLE CONTRACTS
i
N/A
1.0
0.0
$
2.0
2.0
5.0
$ 595.00
6UB-70TAL=
$ 3,385.00
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
NOTICE TO PROCEED
0
N/A
0.0
$
PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE
1
N/A
3.0
3.0
6.0
5 1.005.00
MEETING WITH AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNERS
1
N/A
1.6
i5
3.0
$ 502.50
SHOP DRAWING REVIEW
0
N/A
00
$
SITE VISITS
4
WA
8.0
4.0
12.0
$ 2200.00
TEST REPORT REVIEW
0
N/A
0.0
Is
PLAN CLARIFICATIONS/CHANGE ORDERS
0
N/A
0.0
$
MONTHLY CONTRACTOR'S ESTIMATE
0
N/A
0.0
$
FINAL INSPECTION
0
N/A
0.0
S
CONTRACTOR'S FINAL PAY ESTIMATE
0
N/A
0.0
S
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
0
WA
RECORD DRAWINGS
24
SHEET
0.5
1.0
5.0
14.0
1.0
0 0
21.5
$
$ 1,892.50
SUB -TOTAL-
$ 5,600.00
HOURS SUB -TOTALS
48.5
33.5
0.0
136.5
125.5
99.0
7.5
19.0
469.5
$ 55,360.00
TOTAL LABOR COSTS
10.42].50
6,030.00
16.380.00
11,922.50
7.920.00
1,350.00
1,330.00
$ 55,360.00
%OFTOTALHOURS
10.3%
].1%
0.0%
4.0%
100.0%
34
LABOR COSTS: $ 55,360.00
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 1,237.0
TOTAL ENGINEERING (Basle Services) $ S6.597.00
I SURVEY (0 LF @ $3.00/1-F) $
IMENTPREPARATION $
ECHNICAL INVESTIGATION S 3,M&00
TOTAL ENGINEERING (SPoclal Services) $ 3,308.00
PACHECOKOCH
Project No.: 0100 FEE BUDGET ESTIMATE
Client: City of Sanger BASIC DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
Project Title: North 135 Outfall Sewer, Phase IV
Sanitary Sewer 135 Bore (West ROW) at Betz Road to South
(Assumed to bid with Phase 111)
LergM 12,500 LF
DESCRIPTION OF WORK TASK
BASIS
OF
MANHOLE:
ESTIMATE
TOTAL
MH'S
PER
TASK
March 6, 2013
TOTAL
FEE
PER
TASK
PROJ
MGR
$215.00
SENIOR
ENGR
$180.00
STRIELEC/HYD
ENGR
$180.00
PROJECT
ENGR
6120.00
DESIGN
TECH/Err
$95.00
TECH.
CADD
$80.00
OWCC
REVIEW
$180.00
SECIY
570.00
ONTY
UNIT
PROJECT MANAGEMENT, COORDINATION & PERMITTING
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
1.5
1.5
S 322.50
PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE WITH CLIENT/SITE VISIT
1
N/A
0.5
00.5
.5
. $ 0
1075
107.0
SURVEY COORDINATION &CONVERSION
1
N/A
1.0
2.0
2.0
$
CON$TRUCTABILf1Y REVIEW
1
N/A
0.5
0.5
1.0
S 150.00
TxOOT& RAILROAD COORDINATION & PERMITTING
1
N/A
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.5
S 135.00
UTILITY CLEARANCE COORDINATION
1
EACH
0.5
0.5
1.0
S 95.00
SUB -TOTAL =
S 1,280.OD
CONCEPT DESIGN
COLLECT& REVIEW EXISTING DATA
1
N/A
0.6
0.5
$ 60.00
ALIGNMENT& GRADE STUDY
1
N/A
0.5
0.5
2.0
2.0
2.0
0.5
7.5
$ 877.50
CONCEPT DESIGN TECHNICAL MEMO
CLIENT CONFERENCE/REVIEW MEETING
i
1
EACH
NIA
0.5
1.0
2.0
1.0
0.5
5.0
0.0
S 657.50
$
SITE VISIT
1
EACH
0.0
Is
SUB -TOTAL >
$ 1.695.00
PRELIMINARY DESIGN (60%SUBMITTAL)
COVER SHEET/INDEX
0
SHEET
0.0
S
PROJECTLAYOUTSHEET
1
SHEET
0.5
0.5
1.5
1.0
.5
3.
$ 372.50
OUANTITV/LEGEND /CONTROL SHEET
0
SHEET
$
GENERAL NOTES SHEET
0
SHEET
00
S
SANITARY SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS
4
SHEET
2.5
4.0
24.0
24.0
16.0
1.0
71.5
$ 7.8T/.50
WATER PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS
0
SHEET
0.0
S
EROSION CONTROL SHEETS
1
SHEET
0.5
0.5
1.5
1.5
0.5
4.5
$ 50250
TRAFFIC CONTROL SHEETS
0
SHEET
ox
$
QUANTITY TAKEOFF AND OPINION OF COST
N/A
NIA
0.5
0.5
2.0
1.0
1.0
$ 612.50
SPECIFICATIONS
0
BOOK
0.0
$
SITE VISrTS
CLIENT CONFERENCE/REVIEW MEETING
1
1
EACH
N/A
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
$ 10T50
$ 167.50
$UB-TOTAL=
$ 9.64D.00
FINAL DESIGN 90%&1D0%SUBMITTALS
COVER SHEET/ INDEX
0
SHEET
-
0.0
$
PROJECT LAYOUT SHEET
1
SHEET
0.5
1.0
1.0
2.5
$ 235.00
QUANTITY / LEGEND ICONTROL SHEET
0
SHEET
0.0
$
GENERAL NOTES SHEET
0
SHEET
0.0
$
DETAIL SHEETS
0
SHEET
0.0
$
SANITARY SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS
4
SHEET
1.0
2.0
10.0
18.0
S.0
2.0
39.0
$ 4295W
WATER PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS
0
SHEET
0.0
$
EROSION CONTROL SHEETS
1
SHEET
0.5
1.0
1.0
2.5
S 235.00
TRAFFIC CONTROL SHEETS
0
SHEET
0.0
$
OUAN'Rtt TAKEOFF AND OPINION OF COST
WA
N/A
0.5
0.5
1.0
1.0
OS
3.5
$ 415.00
SPECIFICATIONS
0
BOOK
p.
$
E wsrrs
CLIENT
CLIENT CONFERENCEOiEVIEW MEETING
1
1
EACH
N/A
1.0
..5
1
1.00
2.0
$ 60.00
SUBTOTAL=
$ 5.575.D0
PACHECOKOCH
Project No.: 0100 FEE BUDGET ESTIMATE
Client: City of Sanger BASIC DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
Project Title: North 135 Outfall Sewer, Phase IV
Sanitary Sewer 135 Bore (West ROW) at Selz Road to South
(Assumed to bid with Phase 111)
Length =2.500 LF
March 6. 2013
BASIS
OF
TOTAL
TOTAL
PROJ
SENIOR
STR/ELEC/HYD
PROJECT
DESIGN
TECH.
OAIOC
DESCRIPTION OF WORK TASK
MANHOUR
MH'S
FEE
ESTIMATE
MGR
ENGR
ENGR
ENGR
TECH/EIT
CADD
REVIEW
SECTY
PER
PER
QNTY
UNIT
$216.00
$180.00
$180.00
$120.00
$95.00
$80.00
$180.00
$T0.00
TASK
TASK
BIDDING PHASE
COORDINATE PLAN REPRODUCTON 8 DISTRIBUTION
0
N/A
BIDDING ASSISTANCE
0
N/A
0.0
$
BID OPENING
0
N/A
0.0
S -
BIDTABULATION
0
N/A
0.0
$
RECOMMENDATION OF AWARD
1 0
N/A
0.0
$
NOVICE OF AWARD
0
N/A
o.0
5
REVIEW &ASSEMBLE CONTRACTS
0
WA
0.0
$
0.0
$
SUB -TOTAL.
$
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
NOTICE TO PROCEED
0
N/A
PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE
0
N/A
0.0
S
MEETING WITH AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNERS
0
N/A
0.0
$
SHOP DRAWING REVIEW
0
WA
0.0
0.0
$
S
SITE VISTS
0
N/A
TESTREPORTREVIEW
0
N/A
0.0
$
PLAN CLARIFICATIONS CHANGE ORDERS
0
N/A
0.0
S
MONTHLY CONTRACTOR'S ESTIMATE
0
N/A
0 0
$
FINAL INSPECTION
0
N/A
0.0
$
CONTRACTOR'S FINAL PAY ESTIMATE
0
WA
0.0
$
0 00
$
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
0
WA
RECORD DRAWINGS
6
SHEET
0.5
2.0
4.0
0.5
00
7.0
$
1 S 605.00
SUB -TOTAL.
$ 605.00
HOURS SUBTOTALS
9.0
10.0
0.0
48.0
54.0
39.0
4.5
2.0
166.5
S 18.695.00
TOTAL LABOR COSTS
1.935.00
1,800.00
S.T60.00
5,130.00
3.120.00
81D.00
140.00
$ 18,05.00
%OFTOTALNOURS
5.4%
6.0%
0.0%
28.8%
32.4%
23.4%
2.'!%
1.2%
100.0%
LABOR COSTS: $ 18.695.00
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 374,00
TOTAL ENGINEERING (Basic $ervlces) S 19,069.00
SURVEY (2500 LF @ $3.00/LF)
$ 8,250.00
MENT PREPARATION IS@$1000/EA)
S 61600.00
ECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
S 827.00
S 15,677.00
TOTAL ENGINEERING(Spoclal Services)
TOTAL DESIGN FEE
i 8A TAR en
PACHECO KOCH
Project No.: 0100
Client: City of Sanger
Project Title: North 135 Outfall Sewer, Phase IV
Water from Chapman to Belz Road
(Assumed to bid with Phase lin
FEE BUDGET ESTIMATE
BASIC DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
Length =4,000 LF
DESCRIPTION OF WORK TASK
BASIS
OF
MANHOUR
ESTIMATE
TOTAL
MH'S
PER
TASK
Meech 6, 2013
TOTAL
FEE
PER
TASK
PROJ
MGR
S215.00
SENIOR
ENGR
$180.00
STR/ELEC/HYD
ENGR
$180.00
PROJECT
ENGR
$120.00
DESIGN
TECH/ER
$95.00
TECH.
CADD
$80.00
OAIOC
REVIEW
S180.00
SECTY
$70.00
ONTY
UNIT
PROJECT MANAGEMENT, COORDINATION & PERMITTING
PROJECTMANAGEMENT
1.0
1.0
S 21S.00
PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE WITH CLIENT/SITE VISIT
1
N/A
0.5
0.5
1.0
S 167.50
SURVEY COORDINATION & CONVERSION
1
N/A
1.0
2.0
2.0
5.0
S 470.00
CQNSTRUCTABILRY REVIEW
1
N/A
0.0
Is
17x00T& RAILROAD COORDINATION & PERMITTING
1
N/A
0.5
0.5
1 0.5
0.5
2.0
$ 182.50
UTILITY CLEARANCE COORDINATION
1
EACH
0.5
0.5
1.0
$ 95.00
SUB -TOTAL=
$ 1,130.00
CONCEPT DESIGN
COLLECT& REVIEW EXISTING DATA
1
WA
0.5
0.5
S 60.00
ALIGNMENT & GRADE STUDY
1
WA
1.0
1.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
0.5
8.5
S 1,075.00
CONCEPT DESIGN TECHNICAL MEMO
1
EACH
1.0
1.0
2.0
1.0
0.5
SS
$ 765.00
CLIENT CONFERENCE/REVIEW MEETING
1
N/A
0.0
S
SITE VISIT
1
EACH
0.0
S
$UB40TAL-
$ 1,900.00
PRELIMINARY DESIGN(60%SUBMITTAL
COVER SHEET/INDEX
0
SHEET
0.0
$
PROJECT LAYOUTSHEET
0
SHEET
0.5
0.5
1.5
1.0
3.5
S 372.50
QUANTITY/LEGEND/CONTROL SHEET
0
SHEET
0.0
S
GENERAL NOTES SHEET
0
SHEET
0.0
S
SANITARY SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS
0
SHEET
0.0
S
WATER PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS
5
SHEETI
2.0
4.0
20.0
28.0
16.0
1.0
71.0
$ 7670.00
EROSION CONTROL SHEETS
i
SHEET
I
0S
0.5
1.0
1.0
0.5
3.5
$ 415.00
TRAFFIC CONTROL SHEETS
0
SHEET
1
0.0
$
OUANTTIV TAKE -OFF AND OPINION OF COST
N/A
N/A
1
0.5
2.0
1.0
1.0
4.5
S 505.00
SPECIFICATIONS
0
BOOK
1
0.0
$
SITE VISITS
1
EACH
0.5
0.5
S 60.00
CLIENT CONFERENCEIREVIEW MEETING
1
WA
OS
0.5
1.0
$ 167.50
SUS•TOTAl-
$ 9,190.00
FINAL DESIGN 90%&100%SUBMITTALS
COVER SHEET/INDEX
0
SHEET
0.0
S
PROJECT LAYOUT SHEET
0
SHEET
0.5
1.0
1.0
2.5
$ 235.00
QUANTITY/LEGEND/CONTROL SHEET
0 1
SHEET
0.0
S
GENERAL NOTES SHEET
0
SHEET
0.0
$
DETAIL SHEETS
0
SHEET
0.0
$
SANITARY SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS
0
SHEET
1.0
4.0
16.0
20.0
12.0
2.0
55.0
It 6075.00
WATER PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS
5
SHEET
D.0
$
EROSION CONTROL SHEETS
1
SHEET
0.5
1.0
1.0
2.5
$ 236.00
TRAFFIC CONTROL SHEETS
0
SHEET
-
0.0
$
QUANTTIY TAKE -OFF AND OPINION OF COST
N/A
N/A
0.5
0.5
1.0
1.0
0.5
3.5
$ 415.00
SPECIFICATIONS
0
BOOK
0.0
$
SITE VISITS
1
EACH
OS
0.5
$ 60.00
CLIENTCONFERENQE/REVIEW MEETING
1
N/A
1.0
1.0
2.0
$ $3$00
SUB -TOTAL v
$ 7,355.00
PACHECO KOCH
Project No.: 0100
Client: City of Sanger
Project Title: North 135 Outfall Sewer, Phase IV
Water from Chapman to Belz Road
(Assumed to bid with Phase III)
FEE BUDGET ESTIMATE
BASIC DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
Length=4,000 LF
DESCRIPTION OF WORK TASK
BASIS
OF
MANHOUR
ESTIMATE
TOTAL
MH'S
PER
TASK
TOTAL
FEE
PER
TASK
PROJ
MGR
$215.00
SENIOR
ENGR
$180.00
STR/ELECMYD
ENGR
5 180.00
PROJECT
ENGR
$120.00
DESIGN
TECH/ER
$95.00
TECH.
CADD
$80.00
QA/QC
REVIEW
5180.00
SECTY
$70.00
ONTY
UNIT
BIDDING PHASE
COORDINATE PLAN REPRODUCTION S DISTRIBUTION
0
WA
0.0
S
BIDDING ASSISTANCE
0
WA
0.0
S
BID OPENING
O
N/A
0.0
S
BID TABULATION
0
WA
0.0
S
RECOMMENDATION OF AWARD
0
N/A
0.0
S
NOTICE OF AWARD
0
N/A
0.0
S
REVIEW& ASSEMBLE CONTRACTS
D
N/A
0.0
S
SUB -TOTAL=
$
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
NOTICE TO PROCEED
0
N/A
BD
S
PRECONSTRUCTON CONFERENCE
0
NIA
0.0
S
MEETING WITH AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNERS
0
N/A
O.D
S
SHOP DRAWING REVIEW
0
N/A
0.0
S
SrrEVISRS
0
NIA
0.0
S
TEST REPORT REVIEW
0
N/A
0.0
S
PLAN CLARIFICATIONS / CHANGE ORDERS
0
N/A
- O.0
S
MONTHLYCONTRACTOR'S ESTIMATE
0
N/A
0.0
S
FINAL INSPECTION
0
N/A
0.0
$
CONTRACTOR'S FINAL PAY ESTIMATE
0
WA
0.0
S
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
0
WA
0.0
$
RECORD DRAWINGS
6
SHEET
0.5
2.
44.0
7.0
S 605.66
SUB -TOTAL-
$ 605.00
HOURS SUB -TOTAL$
8.0
12.0
0.0
50.5
62.0
42.5
181.5
$ 20,18000
TOTAL LABOR COSTS
1,720.00
2,160.DD
6.060.00
5,890.00
3,400.00
l4.5
N2.0
S 20,180.00
%OFTOTALHOURS
4.4%
6.6%
0.0%
27.8%
34.2%
M.4%
100.0%,
PRINTING S REPRODUCTION EXPENSES
QUANTITY
UNITPRICE
AMOUNT
ENGINEERING
LABOR COSTS:
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
TOTAL ENGINEERING(Baslc Servicos)
$ 20.180.00
374.00
PRINTING-11X17PLANS REVIEWSETS
8
SETS
6
PLOTS/SET
48
0.50
24.00
PRINTING -22 X 34 PLANS(REVIEW SETS
12
SETS
6
PLOTS/SET
72
1.D0
7200
PRINTING- 22 X 34 PLANS(UTIUIY CLEARANCE SETS)
12
SETS
6
PLOTS/SET
72
1.00
72.00
$ 20,554.00
PRINTING- M X 34 PLANS (BID SETS)
0
SETS
6
PLOTS/SET
0
1.00
PRINTING -11 X 17 PLANS (BID SETS)
4
SETS
6
PLOTS/SET
24
0.50
12.00
OTHER DIRECT COSTS -(50eF]al Servfcesl
PRINTING-22 X 34 PLANS(AS-BUILTSETS)
2
SETS
6
PLOTS/SET
12
1.00
12.00
PDF PREPARATION
1
SETS
6
PLOTS/SET
1
8.00
8.00
FIELD SIJRVEY(25DO LF@$3.00t-F)
EASEMENT PREPARATION (4 Q$1000/EA)
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
TOTAL ENGINEERING (Spocial Scrvlces)
TOTAL DESIGN FEE
S 8,250.00
$ 4.400.00
$ 827.00
SPECIFICATIONS- 83 X 11 PAPER COPIES
4
SETS
100
COPIES/SET
400
0.10
40.00
SPECIFICATIONS- 8.5 X 11 PAPER COPIES (BID SETS)
0
SETS
100
COPIES/SET
0
0.10
TOTAL PRINTING & REPRODUCTION EXPENSES
S 240.00
$ 13,477,00
34 031.00
DIRECT EXPENSES
PLOTTING-11 X 17 PAPER PLOTS
6
SETS
6
PLOTS/SET
36
0.50
18.00
S 294.465.00
PLOTTING -M X 34 PAPER PLOTS
6
SETS
6
PLOTS/SET
36
1.00
36.00
REPRODUCTION -8.5X 11 PAPER COPIES
100
COPIES
s.
100
010 1
10.001
DELNERYSERVICE
1
PKGS
:.
1
15.00
15.00
AUTO EXPENSE
- 2
TRIPS
50
MI rrRIP
100
0.55
55.00
TOTAL PER PHASE DIRECT EXPENSES
Is
134.00
• GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING
• ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING
• CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS ENGINEERING
January 22, 2013
Proposal No.: P13.107
Pacheco Koch, Inc.
Mr. Brian O'Neill, P.E,
6000 Western Place, Suite 625
Fort Worth, Texas 76107
Subject: Proposed Geotechnical Study
Sanger Utility Line
Sanger, Texas
Dear Mr. O'Neill:
We are pleased to submit this proposal for subsurface exploration and professional geotechnical
engineering services. The proposed project site is located in Sanger, Texas.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
We understand that Pacheco Koch is preparing a utility design and require subsurface conditions.
There is approximately 17,000 linear feet of sewer lines and 5,000 linear feet of water lines. Currently,
it is expected that the bottom of the pipe will be installed between 5 and 10-feet below existing grades.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The object of this geotechnical investigation will be to obtain subsurface data and a discussion of our
findings. All services provided will be performed in accordance with generally accepted engineering
standards prevailing at the time and in the area that the work is performed.
Field Services
Borings will be drilled at 1,000 foot intervals along the alignment for a total of 22 borings. Twelve
borings be advanced to an approximate depth of 10-feet and ten borings will be advanced to an
approximate depth of 15-feet along the utility alignment.
The borings will be staked by Alliance. It is understood that it will be possible for the borings to be
offset off of existing roads as needed to prevent the need for lane closures, traffic control and flagmen.
If required in any areas, this would result in an additional charge. Alliance will contact Dig Tess and the
City of Sanger for general subsurface utility clearing within the easements. Alliance will not be
responsible for damage to utilities that are not clearly marked.
Ft. Worth • Dallas • Frisco • Austin
3761 N. Beach Street • Ft. Worth, TX 76137
Tel:817.595-4565 Fax:817-595.1033 • www.aggengr.com
Alliance Geotechnical Group Sanger Utility Line
Sanger, Texas
Thin -walled tube samples, split -barrel samples and standard penetration test samples will be collected
as appropriate for the soils encountered. The rock material will be tested in -place using the Texas
Department Cone Penetrometer Test. Groundwater will be recorded during drilling, at completion of
drilling and at the end of day, where practical. After completion of the observations, the borings will be
backfilled with soil cuttings. The samples will be logged in our laboratory by a professional staff
member or engineer.
Note: it is our understanding that a full size drill rig may be utilized on this project. Should this change
and a low clearance rig be needed, the drilling fees will be increased, Also, additional charges would be
required if an ail -terrain marsh buggy is required in some areas.
Laboratory Services
Selected laboratory testing of the obtained samples will be performed to evaluate soil classification,
strength, compressibility, expansiveness and other characteristics of the subsurface materials and
provide data for analysis. These tests include but are not limited to the following,
➢ Moisture content
Y Dry unit weight
Y Sieve analysis
v Atterberg limits
Y Swell at overburden
Alliance Geotechnical Group will retain soil and rock samples for 30 days after completion of laboratory
testing unless other arrangements are made by client.
Engineering Analysis and Report
Data obtained from the field Investigation, laboratory tests and past experience will be used in the
engineering analysis and development of recommendations. Information to be provided is as follows;
A plan of borings mapping the approximate location of each boring
A log of each boring with the boring number, depth of each stratum, material description, soil
classification and groundwater information
Y Generalized soil cross sections
v A brief discussion of the site geology
v A brief discussion of previous construction activity, if encountered
v Outline engineering properties of any existing fills, if encountered
➢ Grading recommendations
➢ Corrosion considerations based on visual soil classification
Y A discussion of subsurface soil and groundwater conditions
r Estimates of expansive soil movement related to settlement and expansive soils
v Discussion for dewatering, if groundwater is encountered
➢ Earthwork recommendations, including material type(s) and backfill requirements
➢ A summary of laboratory test results
v Electronic copies of the report
Page 2
Alliance Geotechnical Group
Sanger Utility tine
Sanger, Texas
CONDITIONS
We respectfully request that Pacheco Koch and/or their representative provide the following:
w Landowner permission, right(s) of entry, permits, easements or other access authorization
required to perform our proposed services.
v Final depths of the pipe
COMPENSATION
Alliance Geotechnical Group proposes to perform the above services for a lump sum of $12,530. This
amount will not be exceeded without prior approval (with the exception of the exceptions noted in the
Field Services). Should subsurface conditions be encountered which warrant significant revisions in this
scope of services, we will contact you prior to initiating the work. If additional services are desired, they
may subsequently be agreed upon in writing and rendered under this agreement for additional,
negotiated compensation.
Please indicate your approval of this proposal by signing below. After you have signed both originals,
please return one copy of the entire document and retain the other for your records. Any modifications
of the language must be accepted by both parties.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide you with our services. If you have any questions or wish to
discuss any aspect of the project, please call us. Following your authorization, we are ready to begin
work and look forward to a successful project.
Sincerely,
Iilance Geotechnical Grou
Kim L. England, C.E.T:
Sr. Project Manager
Page 3
MarkJ. Farrow, E.
Sr. Geotechnical Engineer
i
EXHIBIT ®®2
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PHASE HAND PHASE Ill
KEY TO FEATURES
PROJECT CORRIDOR
- EXISTING S.S.
PROPOSED S.S.
NOTES
BACKGROUND IMAGE FROM
BING AERIALS
Pacheco
DALLAS . FORT WORTH . HOUSTON
1-29-13
DATUM
NAD 1983 TEXAS STATE PLANE
NORTH CENTRAL ZONE FIPS 4202
500 1,000
Feel
N
S