12/02/2019-CC-Agenda Packet-RegularAGENDA
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
MONDAY, DECEMBER 2, 2019
7:00 PM
502 ELM STREET
SANGER, TEXAS
REVISED AGENDA
1.Call Meeting to Order, Invocation, Pledge of Allegiance.
2.CITIZEN INPUT:
(Citizens are allowed 3 minutes to speak. The City Council is unable to respond or discuss any issues
brought up during this section.)
3.CONSENT AGENDA:
a.Approval of Minutes
1.City Council Work Session Minutes 11042019
Approve City Council Minutes for November 4, 2019 Work Session.
2.City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 11182019
Approve City Council Regular Meeting Minutes for November 18, 2019 Meeting.
4.Consider Any Items Removed from Consent Agenda.
REGULAR AGENDA
5.Neil Harris WWTP Stream Impact/Restoration
Discussion and Presentation by Mr. Neil Harris Regarding Wastewater Treatment Plant, Stream
Impact, and Stream Restoration.
6.Sanger Meadow Addition Phase 2 Preliminary Plat
Consider, Discuss and Act on the Preliminary Plat of Sanger Meadows Addition Phase 2, Being
Approximately 145 Acres of Land, and Generally Located NorthWest of the Intersection of View
Road and Metz Road.
7.521 S Stemmons Street FLUM Amendment
Conduct a Public Hearing and Consider, Discuss and Act on Ordinance # 113419 Regarding an
Amendment of Future Land Use Map (FLUM) from Commercial to Industrial on Approximately
1.952 Acres of property, Generally Located West of I35 and Approximately 300 Feet North of the
Intersection of Duck Creek Road and I35 Service Road.
8.521 S Stemmons Street Rezoning
Conduct a Public Hearing and Consider, Discuss and Act on Ordinance # 103519 Regarding a
Zoning Change From B2 (Business District 2) to I1 (Industrial District) for Approximately 0.959
Page 1
AGENDACITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGMONDAY, DECEMBER 2, 20197:00 PM502 ELM STREETSANGER, TEXASREVISED AGENDA1.Call Meeting to Order, Invocation, Pledge of Allegiance.2.CITIZEN INPUT:(Citizens are allowed 3 minutes to speak. The City Council is unable to respond or discuss any issuesbrought up during this section.)3.CONSENT AGENDA:a.Approval of Minutes1.City Council Work Session Minutes 11042019Approve City Council Minutes for November 4, 2019 Work Session. 2.City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 11182019Approve City Council Regular Meeting Minutes for November 18, 2019 Meeting. 4.Consider Any Items Removed from Consent Agenda.REGULAR AGENDA5.Neil Harris WWTP Stream Impact/RestorationDiscussion and Presentation by Mr. Neil Harris Regarding Wastewater Treatment Plant, StreamImpact, and Stream Restoration.6.Sanger Meadow Addition Phase 2 Preliminary PlatConsider, Discuss and Act on the Preliminary Plat of Sanger Meadows Addition Phase 2, BeingApproximately 145 Acres of Land, and Generally Located NorthWest of the Intersection of ViewRoad and Metz Road.7.521 S Stemmons Street FLUM AmendmentConduct a Public Hearing and Consider, Discuss and Act on Ordinance # 113419 Regarding anAmendment of Future Land Use Map (FLUM) from Commercial to Industrial on Approximately1.952 Acres of property, Generally Located West of I35 and Approximately 300 Feet North of theIntersection of Duck Creek Road and I35 Service Road.8.521 S Stemmons Street Rezoning
Conduct a Public Hearing and Consider, Discuss and Act on Ordinance # 103519 Regarding a
Zoning Change From B2 (Business District 2) to I1 (Industrial District) for Approximately 0.959
Acres of Land, Generally Located West of I35 and Approximately 300 Feet North of the
Intersection of Duck Creek Road and I35 Service Road.
9.2820 FM 455 FLUM Amendment
Conduct a Public Hearing and Consider, Discuss and Act on Ordinance # 113619 Regarding an
Amendment of Future Land Use Map (FLUM) from Urban Low Density Residential to Commercial
on Approximately 1.00 Acre of property, Generally Located 1300 Feet East of the Intersection of
Marion Road and FM 455, and 350 Feet North of FM 455.
10.2820 FM 455 Rezoning
Conduct a Public Hearing and Consider, Discuss and Act on Ordinance # 113719 Regarding a
Zoning Change From A (Agricultural) to B2 (Business District 2) for Approximately 1.00 Acres of
Land, Generally Located 1300 Feet East of the Intersection of Marion Road and FM 455, and 350
Feet North of FM 455.
11.Sanger Circle Phase 6 Batch Plant SUP
Conduct a Public Hearing and Consider, Discuss and Act on Ordinance # 113819 Regarding a
Specific Use Permit for a Temporary Concrete Batch Plant Use for Sanger Circle Phase 6
Development; Generally Located West of Marion Road.
12.FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS:
(The purpose of this item is to allow the Mayor and members of Council to bring forward items they
wish to discuss at a future meeting, A Council Member may inquire about a subject for which notice
has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may
be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a
subsequent meeting. Items may be placed on a future meeting agenda with a consensus of the Council
or at the call of the Mayor).
13.ADJOURN.
I, the undersigned authority, do hereby certify that this Notice of Meeting was posted on the
City Website, and on the bulletin board, at the City Hall of the City of Sanger, Texas, a place
convenient and readily accessible to the general public at all times. Said notice was posted on the
following date and time, and remained posted continuously for at least 72 hours prior to the
scheduled time of said meeting and shall remain posted until meeting is adjourned.
November 27, 2019 at 11:30 a.m.
Cheryl Price City Secretary
City of Sanger, Texas
Date/Time Posted
This facility is wheelchair accessible and accessible parking spaces are available. Requests for additional
accommodations or interpretive services must be made 48 hours prior to this meeting. Please contact the City
Secretary's office at (940) 4587930 for further information.
Page 2
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
AGENDA ITEM NO. a.1.
AGENDA MEETING DATE: December 2, 2019
TO: Alina Ciocan, City Manager
FROM: Cheryl Price
ITEM/CAPTION:
City Council Work Session Minutes 11042019
Approve City Council Minutes for November 4, 2019 Work Session.
AGENDA TYPE: Consent Agenda
ACTION REQUESTED: Approval
BACKGROUND:
Attached for City Council approval are the Minutes from the November 4, 2019 Work Session.
LEGAL/BOARD COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS/CITIZEN NOTICE FEEDBACK:
N/A
FINANCIAL SUMMARY FUNDING/FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
FUNDS:
N/A
STAFF RECOMMENDATION/ACTION DESIRED:
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Upload Date Type
City Council Work Session Minutes 1142019 11/21/2019 Cover Memo
Page 3
CITY OF SANGER, TEXAS
MINUTES: WORK SESSION CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, November 4, 2019 6:00 PM
502 Elm Street, Sanger, Texas
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT:
Mayor Thomas Muir; Mayor Pro Tem Bilyeu; Councilmember Marissa Barrett; Councilmember
Dennis Dillon; Councilmember David Clark, Councilmember Allen Chick.
COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT:
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:
City Manager Alina Ciocan; City Secretary Cheryl Price; City Engineer Tracy LaPiene; Director of
Development Services Ramie Hammonds; Planner Muzaib Riaz; Police Officer Billy Wilson.
1.Call Meeting to Order
There being a quorum present Mayor Muir called the Monday November 4, 2019 Work Session to
order at 6:00 p.m.
2.Presentation and Discussion on a Potential Public Improvement District Known as
Stephens Towne Crossing
Presentation and Discussion by Developer on a Potential Public Improvement District (PID) on
Approximately 428 Acres Located East of BSNF Railroad and West of Marion Rd between FM
455 and Lois Rd.
Ramie Hammonds, Director of Development Services summarized. A few months ago Stephens
Towne Crossing made a presentation to City Council for a Public Improvement District (PID)
proposal. They also made a presentation to the Planning and Zoning Commission which was a little
different than what was brought to City Council. Over the course of working through this there have
been tracts added and tracts that have been removed. The proposal has been narrowed down to
three tracts, two of which Stephens Towne Crossing has under contract and one that belongs to Mr.
Wang, Sanger Land Development. So there will be two separate Professional Services Agreements
on the Regular Agenda tonight. Staff requested that Stephens Towne Crossing come back and
provide the latest information on what their plan is.
Mr. William "Mitch" Mitchell, Kirk Wilson and Associates was recognized. He noted the purpose of
the meeting is to address the Professional Service Agreements (PSA's) and give a concept plan for
the development. He noted the PSA's are simply agreements that allow the City to be reimbursed
for the professional consultants the City chooses to hire so negotiation can begin on the PID. He
stated that the did not want to nail himself down to what exactly they are going to do in the future
because this is the beginning of the negotiation. Primarily, they are thinking this could be possibly
three separate PID's, but could possibly be just one or two. They are representing Stephens Towne
Crossing which is Ken Prater and his group and they are also representing Sanger Land
Development (Jonathan Wang) on their 90acre tract. He asked if the Council had any questions or
what would the Council like to know.
Page 1Page 4
CITY OF SANGER, TEXASMINUTES: WORK SESSION CITY COUNCIL MEETINGMonday, November 4, 2019 6:00 PM502 Elm Street, Sanger, TexasCOUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT:Mayor Thomas Muir; Mayor Pro Tem Bilyeu; Councilmember Marissa Barrett; CouncilmemberDennis Dillon; Councilmember David Clark, Councilmember Allen Chick. COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT:STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:City Manager Alina Ciocan; City Secretary Cheryl Price; City Engineer Tracy LaPiene; Director ofDevelopment Services Ramie Hammonds; Planner Muzaib Riaz; Police Officer Billy Wilson. 1.Call Meeting to OrderThere being a quorum present Mayor Muir called the Monday November 4, 2019 Work Session toorder at 6:00 p.m. 2.Presentation and Discussion on a Potential Public Improvement District Known asStephens Towne CrossingPresentation and Discussion by Developer on a Potential Public Improvement District (PID) onApproximately 428 Acres Located East of BSNF Railroad and West of Marion Rd between FM455 and Lois Rd. Ramie Hammonds, Director of Development Services summarized. A few months ago StephensTowne Crossing made a presentation to City Council for a Public Improvement District (PID)proposal. They also made a presentation to the Planning and Zoning Commission which was a littledifferent than what was brought to City Council. Over the course of working through this there havebeen tracts added and tracts that have been removed. The proposal has been narrowed down tothree tracts, two of which Stephens Towne Crossing has under contract and one that belongs to Mr.Wang, Sanger Land Development. So there will be two separate Professional Services Agreementson the Regular Agenda tonight. Staff requested that Stephens Towne Crossing come back andprovide the latest information on what their plan is. Mr. William "Mitch" Mitchell, Kirk Wilson and Associates was recognized. He noted the purpose ofthe meeting is to address the Professional Service Agreements (PSA's) and give a concept plan forthe development. He noted the PSA's are simply agreements that allow the City to be reimbursedfor the professional consultants the City chooses to hire so negotiation can begin on the PID. Hestated that the did not want to nail himself down to what exactly they are going to do in the futurebecause this is the beginning of the negotiation. Primarily, they are thinking this could be possiblythree separate PID's, but could possibly be just one or two. They are representing Stephens TowneCrossing which is Ken Prater and his group and they are also representing Sanger LandDevelopment (Jonathan Wang) on their 90acre tract. He asked if the Council had any questions or
what would the Council like to know.
Discussion and questions ensued regarding the number of PID's and the fact that there were several
different land owners. Consensus from Council was that it should be one cohesive project. Mr.
Mitchell stated it would be nice to do in one PID on the entire project, but depending on how long it
would take to put in the infrastructure would coincide with whether they are able to do it because
they would have only two years to get the project completed before they start paying interest on the
bonds, He stated that he could tell the Council tonight that before anything happens that Council will
be 100% comfortable with it and the developer will obviously be on board with it. Getting the
PSA's approved is the first step in negotiating everything that is being talked about tonight.
Mr.Brent Murphree, with Kimley Horn, introduced himself. He stated they are the planners and
engineers on the project. They have been working a long time on this project trying to get everything
fine tuned to bring back before Planning and Zoning and City Council. They are working on the
Planned Development and drafting the Planned Development Ordinances for Stephens Towne
Crossing. He noted that the Stephens Town Crossing PD Ordinance is for this piece (pointing to
map) which is a combination of the Stephens, Pruitt, and Miller properties. The middle property
(Mr. Wang's property) is already zoned SF10 and they are going to tie it all together in the
development agreement. Mr. Murphree noted for the bulk of the project the residential uses make
up about 80% of the property and 12% of the property is the town home development and the rest
is the commercial corridor at 8%. Those are the primary land uses that will be detailed in the
planned development. There will be standards and specifications for the streets, buffers,
screening.The bulk of the lots are going to be very similar in size. He noted the minimum house
square footage of 1200 square feet in SF10 zoning and noted that the direction of the Council is
that they want the houses to be bigger. So as part of the Planned Development they are bumping
that up to basically 50% of the homes are over 2,000 square foot and 50% below that square
footage. He noted there are three residential categories which they are proposing for the project (A,
B, C) The bulk of them is going to be SF10 as the base; there is one pocket of about 6 acres
(pointing to map) that they are going to put in townhomes or patio homes which is going to be
located behind the commercial development to provide some diversity. The rest of the residential is
SF10. He noted a table in his presentation that indicated what the are proposing in the Planned
Development. One thing that makes it cohesive is that the property is already zoned SF10. He
noted that the bulk of the residential is SF10. For the type of housing and the size of the housing it is
all the same. Murphree noted the presentation slide for Belz and that at the direction of staff, they
would adjust the plat to keep and dedicate the rightofway for Belz if there is a need and the ability
of the City to spend the money for the railroad crossing.. The key point they will make is that there
is linkage in between so it feels like a cohesive project.
Following Mr. Murphree's presentation, there were questions and discussion regarding the following
items: That SF10 Zoning with a minimum of 1200 sf homes on Sanger Land Development Tract
and if it would be included in the Planned Development. What would be the minimum house sizes?
How the percentages of different home sizes would be tracked by staff within the subdivision.
Ms. Kelsey Smith, Emerson Commercial was recognized noting she is part of the team and wanted
to provide an update on the Commercial. She noted the presentation and pointed to an area she
referred to as "The Depot" noting it is the entertainment space. There is the micro restaurant center
overlooking a dot park, outdoor seating and fire pits, which will be a really great fun environment for
the family and kids to enjoy. She noted an area where there could be three restaurants, a music
venue, restaurant space and convenience store. They are actually talking to several gas stations.
She noted that since FM 455 is expanding some of the gas stations are being affected at 35 and are
there is a lot of interest right now. There are three pad sites for fast food restaurants and they have
Page 2Page 5
CITY OF SANGER, TEXASMINUTES: WORK SESSION CITY COUNCIL MEETINGMonday, November 4, 2019 6:00 PM502 Elm Street, Sanger, TexasCOUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT:Mayor Thomas Muir; Mayor Pro Tem Bilyeu; Councilmember Marissa Barrett; CouncilmemberDennis Dillon; Councilmember David Clark, Councilmember Allen Chick. COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT:STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:City Manager Alina Ciocan; City Secretary Cheryl Price; City Engineer Tracy LaPiene; Director ofDevelopment Services Ramie Hammonds; Planner Muzaib Riaz; Police Officer Billy Wilson. 1.Call Meeting to OrderThere being a quorum present Mayor Muir called the Monday November 4, 2019 Work Session toorder at 6:00 p.m. 2.Presentation and Discussion on a Potential Public Improvement District Known asStephens Towne CrossingPresentation and Discussion by Developer on a Potential Public Improvement District (PID) onApproximately 428 Acres Located East of BSNF Railroad and West of Marion Rd between FM455 and Lois Rd. Ramie Hammonds, Director of Development Services summarized. A few months ago StephensTowne Crossing made a presentation to City Council for a Public Improvement District (PID)proposal. They also made a presentation to the Planning and Zoning Commission which was a littledifferent than what was brought to City Council. Over the course of working through this there havebeen tracts added and tracts that have been removed. The proposal has been narrowed down tothree tracts, two of which Stephens Towne Crossing has under contract and one that belongs to Mr.Wang, Sanger Land Development. So there will be two separate Professional Services Agreementson the Regular Agenda tonight. Staff requested that Stephens Towne Crossing come back andprovide the latest information on what their plan is. Mr. William "Mitch" Mitchell, Kirk Wilson and Associates was recognized. He noted the purpose ofthe meeting is to address the Professional Service Agreements (PSA's) and give a concept plan forthe development. He noted the PSA's are simply agreements that allow the City to be reimbursedfor the professional consultants the City chooses to hire so negotiation can begin on the PID. Hestated that the did not want to nail himself down to what exactly they are going to do in the futurebecause this is the beginning of the negotiation. Primarily, they are thinking this could be possiblythree separate PID's, but could possibly be just one or two. They are representing Stephens TowneCrossing which is Ken Prater and his group and they are also representing Sanger LandDevelopment (Jonathan Wang) on their 90acre tract. He asked if the Council had any questions orwhat would the Council like to know.Discussion and questions ensued regarding the number of PID's and the fact that there were severaldifferent land owners. Consensus from Council was that it should be one cohesive project. Mr.Mitchell stated it would be nice to do in one PID on the entire project, but depending on how long itwould take to put in the infrastructure would coincide with whether they are able to do it becausethey would have only two years to get the project completed before they start paying interest on thebonds, He stated that he could tell the Council tonight that before anything happens that Council willbe 100% comfortable with it and the developer will obviously be on board with it. Getting thePSA's approved is the first step in negotiating everything that is being talked about tonight.Mr.Brent Murphree, with Kimley Horn, introduced himself. He stated they are the planners andengineers on the project. They have been working a long time on this project trying to get everythingfine tuned to bring back before Planning and Zoning and City Council. They are working on thePlanned Development and drafting the Planned Development Ordinances for Stephens TowneCrossing. He noted that the Stephens Town Crossing PD Ordinance is for this piece (pointing tomap) which is a combination of the Stephens, Pruitt, and Miller properties. The middle property(Mr. Wang's property) is already zoned SF10 and they are going to tie it all together in thedevelopment agreement. Mr. Murphree noted for the bulk of the project the residential uses makeup about 80% of the property and 12% of the property is the town home development and the restis the commercial corridor at 8%. Those are the primary land uses that will be detailed in theplanned development. There will be standards and specifications for the streets, buffers,screening.The bulk of the lots are going to be very similar in size. He noted the minimum housesquare footage of 1200 square feet in SF10 zoning and noted that the direction of the Council isthat they want the houses to be bigger. So as part of the Planned Development they are bumpingthat up to basically 50% of the homes are over 2,000 square foot and 50% below that squarefootage. He noted there are three residential categories which they are proposing for the project (A,B, C) The bulk of them is going to be SF10 as the base; there is one pocket of about 6 acres(pointing to map) that they are going to put in townhomes or patio homes which is going to belocated behind the commercial development to provide some diversity. The rest of the residential isSF10. He noted a table in his presentation that indicated what the are proposing in the PlannedDevelopment. One thing that makes it cohesive is that the property is already zoned SF10. Henoted that the bulk of the residential is SF10. For the type of housing and the size of the housing it isall the same. Murphree noted the presentation slide for Belz and that at the direction of staff, theywould adjust the plat to keep and dedicate the rightofway for Belz if there is a need and the abilityof the City to spend the money for the railroad crossing.. The key point they will make is that thereis linkage in between so it feels like a cohesive project.Following Mr. Murphree's presentation, there were questions and discussion regarding the followingitems: That SF10 Zoning with a minimum of 1200 sf homes on Sanger Land Development Tractand if it would be included in the Planned Development. What would be the minimum house sizes?How the percentages of different home sizes would be tracked by staff within the subdivision.Ms. Kelsey Smith, Emerson Commercial was recognized noting she is part of the team and wantedto provide an update on the Commercial. She noted the presentation and pointed to an area shereferred to as "The Depot" noting it is the entertainment space. There is the micro restaurant centeroverlooking a dot park, outdoor seating and fire pits, which will be a really great fun environment forthe family and kids to enjoy. She noted an area where there could be three restaurants, a musicvenue, restaurant space and convenience store. They are actually talking to several gas stations.
She noted that since FM 455 is expanding some of the gas stations are being affected at 35 and are
there is a lot of interest right now. There are three pad sites for fast food restaurants and they have
been negotiating with national retailers who are interested in coming to Sanger. She stated that
Whataburger and a couple of those types are interested. They are also planning an urgent care pad
site and that is is currently negotiating with an urgent care facility. The City has two ambulance
services and there is no place nearby to take people who have any sort of issues there is no
emergency type facility. There is also space for a big grocer and that they are working pretty
actively with a couple of big grocers that are interested. They are currently moving forward with one
that the will hopefully get on paper. She noted retail strip centers to the north which are sold (they
have about 90,000 square foot under contract) and another building at the bottom which has also
sold. There is a lot of movement and a lot of positive reactions from the commercial side. She
the City.
Following Ms. Smith's presentation the following points and questions were discussed: Clarifying
how the projects were sold, it was noted they were sold contingent on the project moving forward;
Signage to be sure all approvals are in order before signage is installed; Why the Commercial is a
part of the PID and would the assessments be higher Mr. Mitchell stated that conceptually, he
would say that the assessments would be the same for the entire piece and that all of the residential
lots would be taxed the same; Amenities location and who would be able to use them.
Landon Huckins, Kimley Horn, one of the Landscape Architects on the project was recognized. He
presented some slides and noted as far as amenities wise, landscape and buffers and everything
associated with that will be specifically mentioned in the planned development and listed out with
what will be provided. So, as an overall project, items that will tie in each piece into the overall
project will be the buffers, the signage, and wayfinding; those elements using similar elements and
materials that will tie the residential and commercial and obviously the scales will be different with
each the different use. The trail system will be developed to link everything together to create a
common thread and create a cohesive development.Other items specifically to the north there will be
open space areas, an amenity center that would be maintained by the HOA for all of the single family to
use; and,it will have a community center, a pool and lawn space. Also, on the connection trails there
will be streetscape lighting and working down into the commercial where there will be patio seating
looking down into the park space. In the park space there will be a mixture of different items, which
they are still looking to incorporate into the amenity center to the north, a community center, a large
pavilion, a pool and associated enhanced plantings and lawn space. In the depot area where the
restaurants are in the lower portion, things incorporated into this area will be the dog park, a great
lawn area to provide the flexibility for events,whether it be a large or small event,as well as a water
feature. Mr. Huckins provided some concept photos of what it may look like, that they were only
examples.
There was additional discussion regarding the amenities and how we insure that they are actually
constructed and who was going to be able to use the amenities. Mr. Mitchell stated that the
developer and the developer agreement will line all of that out, so that the City is protected and the
City knows exactly what is going to be brought in and when. No exact details were revealed at this
time and it was noted that precise details would all be a part of the negotiation. Sanger Circle was
discussed and there was concern expressed that the same developers were involved in this
development Mr. Mitchell stated that this is not similar and he was not familiar with Sanger Circle
and stated that Ken Prater is the developer. Ms. Smith added that there are other partners on the
project as well but Ken is the managing partner for Stephens Town Crossing. Also discussed:
additional discussion regarding the sizes of the homes and the SF10 straight zoning; the road
placement and whose responsibility it would be for construction it was noted this would be part of
the negotiation and set up in the development agreement and discussion regarding the City property
Page 3Page 6
CITY OF SANGER, TEXASMINUTES: WORK SESSION CITY COUNCIL MEETINGMonday, November 4, 2019 6:00 PM502 Elm Street, Sanger, TexasCOUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT:Mayor Thomas Muir; Mayor Pro Tem Bilyeu; Councilmember Marissa Barrett; CouncilmemberDennis Dillon; Councilmember David Clark, Councilmember Allen Chick. COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT:STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:City Manager Alina Ciocan; City Secretary Cheryl Price; City Engineer Tracy LaPiene; Director ofDevelopment Services Ramie Hammonds; Planner Muzaib Riaz; Police Officer Billy Wilson. 1.Call Meeting to OrderThere being a quorum present Mayor Muir called the Monday November 4, 2019 Work Session toorder at 6:00 p.m. 2.Presentation and Discussion on a Potential Public Improvement District Known asStephens Towne CrossingPresentation and Discussion by Developer on a Potential Public Improvement District (PID) onApproximately 428 Acres Located East of BSNF Railroad and West of Marion Rd between FM455 and Lois Rd. Ramie Hammonds, Director of Development Services summarized. A few months ago StephensTowne Crossing made a presentation to City Council for a Public Improvement District (PID)proposal. They also made a presentation to the Planning and Zoning Commission which was a littledifferent than what was brought to City Council. Over the course of working through this there havebeen tracts added and tracts that have been removed. The proposal has been narrowed down tothree tracts, two of which Stephens Towne Crossing has under contract and one that belongs to Mr.Wang, Sanger Land Development. So there will be two separate Professional Services Agreementson the Regular Agenda tonight. Staff requested that Stephens Towne Crossing come back andprovide the latest information on what their plan is. Mr. William "Mitch" Mitchell, Kirk Wilson and Associates was recognized. He noted the purpose ofthe meeting is to address the Professional Service Agreements (PSA's) and give a concept plan forthe development. He noted the PSA's are simply agreements that allow the City to be reimbursedfor the professional consultants the City chooses to hire so negotiation can begin on the PID. Hestated that the did not want to nail himself down to what exactly they are going to do in the futurebecause this is the beginning of the negotiation. Primarily, they are thinking this could be possiblythree separate PID's, but could possibly be just one or two. They are representing Stephens TowneCrossing which is Ken Prater and his group and they are also representing Sanger LandDevelopment (Jonathan Wang) on their 90acre tract. He asked if the Council had any questions orwhat would the Council like to know.Discussion and questions ensued regarding the number of PID's and the fact that there were severaldifferent land owners. Consensus from Council was that it should be one cohesive project. Mr.Mitchell stated it would be nice to do in one PID on the entire project, but depending on how long itwould take to put in the infrastructure would coincide with whether they are able to do it becausethey would have only two years to get the project completed before they start paying interest on thebonds, He stated that he could tell the Council tonight that before anything happens that Council willbe 100% comfortable with it and the developer will obviously be on board with it. Getting thePSA's approved is the first step in negotiating everything that is being talked about tonight.Mr.Brent Murphree, with Kimley Horn, introduced himself. He stated they are the planners andengineers on the project. They have been working a long time on this project trying to get everythingfine tuned to bring back before Planning and Zoning and City Council. They are working on thePlanned Development and drafting the Planned Development Ordinances for Stephens TowneCrossing. He noted that the Stephens Town Crossing PD Ordinance is for this piece (pointing tomap) which is a combination of the Stephens, Pruitt, and Miller properties. The middle property(Mr. Wang's property) is already zoned SF10 and they are going to tie it all together in thedevelopment agreement. Mr. Murphree noted for the bulk of the project the residential uses makeup about 80% of the property and 12% of the property is the town home development and the restis the commercial corridor at 8%. Those are the primary land uses that will be detailed in theplanned development. There will be standards and specifications for the streets, buffers,screening.The bulk of the lots are going to be very similar in size. He noted the minimum housesquare footage of 1200 square feet in SF10 zoning and noted that the direction of the Council isthat they want the houses to be bigger. So as part of the Planned Development they are bumpingthat up to basically 50% of the homes are over 2,000 square foot and 50% below that squarefootage. He noted there are three residential categories which they are proposing for the project (A,B, C) The bulk of them is going to be SF10 as the base; there is one pocket of about 6 acres(pointing to map) that they are going to put in townhomes or patio homes which is going to belocated behind the commercial development to provide some diversity. The rest of the residential isSF10. He noted a table in his presentation that indicated what the are proposing in the PlannedDevelopment. One thing that makes it cohesive is that the property is already zoned SF10. Henoted that the bulk of the residential is SF10. For the type of housing and the size of the housing it isall the same. Murphree noted the presentation slide for Belz and that at the direction of staff, theywould adjust the plat to keep and dedicate the rightofway for Belz if there is a need and the abilityof the City to spend the money for the railroad crossing.. The key point they will make is that thereis linkage in between so it feels like a cohesive project.Following Mr. Murphree's presentation, there were questions and discussion regarding the followingitems: That SF10 Zoning with a minimum of 1200 sf homes on Sanger Land Development Tractand if it would be included in the Planned Development. What would be the minimum house sizes?How the percentages of different home sizes would be tracked by staff within the subdivision.Ms. Kelsey Smith, Emerson Commercial was recognized noting she is part of the team and wantedto provide an update on the Commercial. She noted the presentation and pointed to an area shereferred to as "The Depot" noting it is the entertainment space. There is the micro restaurant centeroverlooking a dot park, outdoor seating and fire pits, which will be a really great fun environment forthe family and kids to enjoy. She noted an area where there could be three restaurants, a musicvenue, restaurant space and convenience store. They are actually talking to several gas stations. She noted that since FM 455 is expanding some of the gas stations are being affected at 35 and arethere is a lot of interest right now. There are three pad sites for fast food restaurants and they havebeen negotiating with national retailers who are interested in coming to Sanger. She stated thatWhataburger and a couple of those types are interested. They are also planning an urgent care padsite and that is is currently negotiating with an urgent care facility. The City has two ambulanceservices and there is no place nearby to take people who have any sort of issues there is noemergency type facility. There is also space for a big grocer and that they are working prettyactively with a couple of big grocers that are interested. They are currently moving forward with onethat the will hopefully get on paper. She noted retail strip centers to the north which are sold (theyhave about 90,000 square foot under contract) and another building at the bottom which has alsosold. There is a lot of movement and a lot of positive reactions from the commercial side. Shethe City.Following Ms. Smith's presentation the following points and questions were discussed: Clarifyinghow the projects were sold, it was noted they were sold contingent on the project moving forward;Signage to be sure all approvals are in order before signage is installed; Why the Commercial is apart of the PID and would the assessments be higher Mr. Mitchell stated that conceptually, hewould say that the assessments would be the same for the entire piece and that all of the residentiallots would be taxed the same; Amenities location and who would be able to use them. Landon Huckins, Kimley Horn, one of the Landscape Architects on the project was recognized. Hepresented some slides and noted as far as amenities wise, landscape and buffers and everythingassociated with that will be specifically mentioned in the planned development and listed out withwhat will be provided. So, as an overall project, items that will tie in each piece into the overallproject will be the buffers, the signage, and wayfinding; those elements using similar elements andmaterials that will tie the residential and commercial and obviously the scales will be different witheach the different use. The trail system will be developed to link everything together to create acommon thread and create a cohesive development.Other items specifically to the north there will beopenspaceareas, an amenity center that would be maintained by the HOA for all of the single family touse;and,it will have a community center, a pool and lawn space. Also, on the connection trails therewill be streetscape lighting and working down into the commercial where there will be patio seatinglooking down into the park space. In the park space there will be a mixture of different items, whichthey are still looking to incorporate into the amenity center to the north, a community center, a largepavilion, a pool and associated enhanced plantings and lawn space. In the depot area where therestaurants are in the lower portion, things incorporated into this area will be the dog park, a greatlawnareatoprovidetheflexibilityforevents,whether it be a large or small event,as well as a waterfeature. Mr. Huckins provided some concept photos of what it may look like, that they were onlyexamples.There was additional discussion regarding the amenities and how we insure that they are actuallyconstructed and who was going to be able to use the amenities. Mr. Mitchell stated that thedeveloper and the developer agreement will line all of that out, so that the City is protected and theCity knows exactly what is going to be brought in and when. No exact details were revealed at thistime and it was noted that precise details would all be a part of the negotiation. Sanger Circle wasdiscussed and there was concern expressed that the same developers were involved in thisdevelopment Mr. Mitchell stated that this is not similar and he was not familiar with Sanger Circleand stated that Ken Prater is the developer. Ms. Smith added that there are other partners on theproject as well but Ken is the managing partner for Stephens Town Crossing. Also discussed: additional discussion regarding the sizes of the homes and the SF10 straight zoning; the road
placement and whose responsibility it would be for construction it was noted this would be part of
the negotiation and set up in the development agreement and discussion regarding the City property
where the road may go through was a landfill at one time and a concern if a road could be built
there.
Norman Williams, Landowner/Partner with Jonathan Wang, Sanger Land Development, was
recognized. He stated that everyone is worried about Ed McBirney being involved and went on to
clarify their relationship with him. Further discussion took place regarding the PID. Mr. Murphree
stated that the whole point is that Mr. Wang and Mr. Williams, Sanger Land Development, was
coming in to get the road done because this does not happen without the road. So they are really
here to be a part of the PID for development of the road, they are not here to be part of the Planned
Development for Stephens Towne Crossing. Once again brought up was the square footage sizes of
the homes and whether Sanger Land Development would be part of the planned development and if
the sizes of the homes would be increased.
There was brief discussion regarding the formation of a committee for the PID which may include
Councilmembers, Planning and Zoning, and School Board Members.
Mayor Pro Tem Bilyeu brough up discussion regarding the termination clause in the PSA and that the
PSA for Sanger Land Development does have a termination clause and it terminates either one of
two ways; the City Received good funds in the amount of $1,000; or in the event the city does not
receive or incur City Expenses related to the Property one (I) year from the Effective Date of this
Agreement. The Sanger Land Development PSA does have some definitive termination language, it
only terminates on one condition, the agreement shall terminate upon closing of the PID Bonds for all
phases of development on the property. There was concern that with this wording it could go on for
years. Further discussion took place regarding the termination clause. It was noted that there would
be further discussion during the Council Meeting and the language in the Sanger Land Development
Agreement should possibly be considered being added into the Stephens Town Crossing
Agreement, "that if we haven't incurred anything in a year, it terminates". Mr. Mitchell stated that
they have agreed with what the City's Attorney requested.
Mayor Muir suggested at this point, there will be more time to talk during the Regular Session during
each of these items in the Regular Meeting, that the Work Session has run over into the Regular City
Council meeting time.
3.Overview of Items on the Regular Agenda
No overview of items on the Regular Agenda.
4.Adjourn
There being no further discussion, Mayor Muir closed the Work Session at 7:07 p.m.
Page 4Page 7
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
AGENDA ITEM NO. a.2.
AGENDA MEETING DATE: December 2, 2019
TO: Alina Ciocan, City Manager
FROM: Cheryl Price, City Secretary
ITEM/CAPTION:
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 11182019
Approve City Council Regular Meeting Minutes for November 18, 2019 Meeting.
AGENDA TYPE: Consent Agenda
ACTION REQUESTED: Approval
BACKGROUND:
Attached for your approval are the Regular Meeting Minutes for the November 18, 2019 City Council Meeting.
LEGAL/BOARD COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS/CITIZEN NOTICE FEEDBACK:
N/A
FINANCIAL SUMMARY FUNDING/FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
FUNDS:
N/A
STAFF RECOMMENDATION/ACTION DESIRED:
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Upload Date Type
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 11182019 11/21/2019 Cover Memo
Page 8
CITY OF SANGER, TEXAS
MINUTES: REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, November 18, 2019 7:00 PM
502 Elm Street, Sanger, Texas
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT:
Mayor Thomas Muir; Mayor Pro Tem Bilyeu; Councilmember Marissa Barrett; Councilmember
Dennis Dillon; Councilmember David Clark, Councilmember Allen Chick.
COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT:
None.
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:
City Manager Alina Ciocan; City Secretary Cheryl Price; City Engineer Tracy LaPiene; Planner
Muzaib Riaz; Shani Bradshaw, Economic Development Director, Police Officer Josh Bishop.
1.Call Meeting to Order, Invocation, Pledge of Allegiance.
There being a quorum present at the November 18, 2019 Regular City Council Meeting, the
meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. The invocation was given by Councilmember Dillon and the
Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilmember Barrett.
2.CITIZEN INPUT:
No citizens approached the podium wishing to speak
3.CONSENT AGENDA:
a.Approval of Minutes
1.City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 11042019
Approve City Council Minutes from the Monday, November 4, 2019 Regular City
Council Meeting.
2.City Council Work Session Minutes for 11042019 Not Submitted For Approval
The Work Session Minutes for November 4, 2019 Will Be Submitted for Approval on
the December 2, 2019 Agenda.
A motion was made by Councilmember Chick to approve Item 1 on the Consent Agenda Minutes
of the Regular Meeting for the November 4, 2019 meeting. The Work Session minutes (as noted in
Consent Agenda Item 2) were not complete and were not included in the motion for approval. The
motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Bilyeu. The motion carried unanimously (50 Vote).
4.Consider Any Items Removed from Consent Agenda.
Tyesha Scott was not present yet so this item was moved to a later on the agenda to allow for her to
arrive to accept the Proclamation.
Page 1Page 9
CITY OF SANGER, TEXASMINUTES: REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETINGMonday, November 18, 2019 7:00 PM502 Elm Street, Sanger, TexasCOUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT:Mayor Thomas Muir; Mayor Pro Tem Bilyeu; Councilmember Marissa Barrett; CouncilmemberDennis Dillon; Councilmember David Clark, Councilmember Allen Chick. COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT:None.STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:City Manager Alina Ciocan; City Secretary Cheryl Price; City Engineer Tracy LaPiene; PlannerMuzaib Riaz; Shani Bradshaw, Economic Development Director, Police Officer Josh Bishop. 1.Call Meeting to Order, Invocation, Pledge of Allegiance.There being a quorum present at the November 18, 2019 Regular City Council Meeting, themeeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. The invocation was given by Councilmember Dillon and thePledge of Allegiance was led by Councilmember Barrett. 2.CITIZEN INPUT:No citizens approached the podium wishing to speak3.CONSENT AGENDA:a.Approval of Minutes1.City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 11042019Approve City Council Minutes from the Monday, November 4, 2019 Regular CityCouncil Meeting. 2.City Council Work Session Minutes for 11042019 Not Submitted For ApprovalThe Work Session Minutes for November 4, 2019 Will Be Submitted for Approval onthe December 2, 2019 Agenda.A motion was made by Councilmember Chick to approve Item 1 on the Consent Agenda Minutesof the Regular Meeting for the November 4, 2019 meeting. The Work Session minutes (as noted inConsent Agenda Item 2) were not complete and were not included in the motion for approval. Themotion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Bilyeu. The motion carried unanimously (50 Vote). 4.Consider Any Items Removed from Consent Agenda.Tyesha Scott was not present yet so this item was moved to a later on the agenda to allow for her to
arrive to accept the Proclamation.
REGULAR AGENDA
5.Proclamation
Approve and Present Proclamation #100619 Proclaiming December 3, 2019 as Giving Tuesday
to Tyhesha Scott, Executive Director of Giving Hope.
The recipient for the Proclamation was not present so this item was moved to later on the agenda to
give them time to show up. The recipient did not show up Item was considered after Item 7 of the
Agenda. There was no discussion.
A motion was made by Councilmember Chick to approve Proclamation #100619 Proclaiming
December 3, 2019 as Giving Tuesday. The motion to approve was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem
Bilyeu. The motion carried unanimously (50 vote).
6.Sanger Meadow Addition Phase 1 Preliminary Plat
Consider, Discuss and Act on the Preliminary Plat of Sanger Meadows Addition, Being 15.928
Acres of Land, and Generally Located NorthWest of the Intersection of View Road and Metz
Road.
City Planner, Muzaib Riaz was recognized to summarize. The applicant is proposing to develop 10
residential lots of a minimum 1 acre each as Phase 1 of a residential development consisting of an
estimated total of 127 oneacre lots on 15.928 acres of land. The property is located in the City of
Sanger Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). The property will be served by Bolivar Water, CoServ
Electric and will have onsite septic for sanitary sewer. All 10 proposed lots have public access
from View Road. The plat has been reviewed by the City of Sanger Staff. All City of Sanger
Planning and Engineering comments as well as Denton County Plat checklists have been provided to
the applicant. The applicant has addressed staff comments for Phase 1 preliminary plat of Sanger
Meadows Addition. The Planning and Zoning Commission approved the preliminary plat at their
October 14, 2019 meeting with a condition that all comments will be addressed before City Council
meeting. Staff recommends approval of the Phase 1 Preliminary Plat with variances from the
following requirements mentioned in the Subdivision Ordinance as follows:
1. Where no existing subdivision controls, the blocks shall not exceed 1000 feet in length nor be
less than 500 feet in length, except in certain instances where topographical features warrant special
consideration; 2. Residential lots shall front on residential class streets.
City Engineer Tracy LaPiene was recognized and explained the variances and the drainage for the
preliminary plat and how the developer was working to improve the drainage in the area. There was
also additional discussion regarding the future phases of the development and some conditions for
future discussion when future phasing of the subdivision is brought forward.
Mr. Tim Fleet, Developer, Fort Worth and Builder Riverside Homes was recognized. He noted he
would like to talk about the whole project rather than just this phase. He explained the drainage
situation in the area and noted that there are some significant drainage issues and summarized how
they were going to address them. He noted in this phase there are 10 lots and two (2) detention
ponds which will help reduce the water flow by over 40%. He noted the pipe size to release the
water out of the detention pond would not be any larger than the pipes under view road now. This
will help eliminate the water going over view road. He noted that they do not sell lots to other
builders and do all of the grading for their lots as they do each phase. He noted that when they met
with the County the Fire Marshal asked them to put a turn around for the fire trucks in the long street
Page 2Page 10
CITY OF SANGER, TEXASMINUTES: REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETINGMonday, November 18, 2019 7:00 PM502 Elm Street, Sanger, TexasCOUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT:Mayor Thomas Muir; Mayor Pro Tem Bilyeu; Councilmember Marissa Barrett; CouncilmemberDennis Dillon; Councilmember David Clark, Councilmember Allen Chick. COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT:None.STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:City Manager Alina Ciocan; City Secretary Cheryl Price; City Engineer Tracy LaPiene; PlannerMuzaib Riaz; Shani Bradshaw, Economic Development Director, Police Officer Josh Bishop. 1.Call Meeting to Order, Invocation, Pledge of Allegiance.There being a quorum present at the November 18, 2019 Regular City Council Meeting, themeeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. The invocation was given by Councilmember Dillon and thePledge of Allegiance was led by Councilmember Barrett. 2.CITIZEN INPUT:No citizens approached the podium wishing to speak3.CONSENT AGENDA:a.Approval of Minutes1.City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 11042019Approve City Council Minutes from the Monday, November 4, 2019 Regular CityCouncil Meeting. 2.City Council Work Session Minutes for 11042019 Not Submitted For ApprovalThe Work Session Minutes for November 4, 2019 Will Be Submitted for Approval onthe December 2, 2019 Agenda.A motion was made by Councilmember Chick to approve Item 1 on the Consent Agenda Minutesof the Regular Meeting for the November 4, 2019 meeting. The Work Session minutes (as noted inConsent Agenda Item 2) were not complete and were not included in the motion for approval. Themotion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Bilyeu. The motion carried unanimously (50 Vote). 4.Consider Any Items Removed from Consent Agenda.Tyesha Scott was not present yet so this item was moved to a later on the agenda to allow for her toarrive to accept the Proclamation.REGULAR AGENDA5.ProclamationApprove and Present Proclamation #100619 Proclaiming December 3, 2019 as Giving Tuesdayto Tyhesha Scott, Executive Director of Giving Hope.The recipient for the Proclamation was not present so this item was moved to later on the agenda togive them time to show up. The recipient did not show up Item was considered after Item 7 of theAgenda. There was no discussion.A motion was made by Councilmember Chick to approve Proclamation #100619 ProclaimingDecember 3, 2019 as Giving Tuesday. The motion to approve was seconded by Mayor Pro TemBilyeu. The motion carried unanimously (50 vote).6.Sanger Meadow Addition Phase 1 Preliminary PlatConsider, Discuss and Act on the Preliminary Plat of Sanger Meadows Addition, Being 15.928Acres of Land, and Generally Located NorthWest of the Intersection of View Road and MetzRoad.City Planner, Muzaib Riaz was recognized to summarize. The applicant is proposing to develop 10residential lots of a minimum 1 acre each as Phase 1 of a residential development consisting of anestimated total of 127 oneacre lots on 15.928 acres of land. The property is located in the City ofSanger Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). The property will be served by Bolivar Water, CoServElectric and will have onsite septic for sanitary sewer. All 10 proposed lots have public accessfrom View Road. The plat has been reviewed by the City of Sanger Staff. All City of SangerPlanning and Engineering comments as well as Denton County Plat checklists have been provided tothe applicant. The applicant has addressed staff comments for Phase 1 preliminary plat of SangerMeadows Addition. The Planning and Zoning Commission approved the preliminary plat at theirOctober 14, 2019 meeting with a condition that all comments will be addressed before City Councilmeeting. Staff recommends approval of the Phase 1 Preliminary Plat with variances from thefollowing requirements mentioned in the Subdivision Ordinance as follows:1. Where no existing subdivision controls, the blocks shall not exceed 1000 feet in length nor beless than 500 feet in length, except in certain instances where topographical features warrant specialconsideration; 2. Residential lots shall front on residential class streets. City Engineer Tracy LaPiene was recognized and explained the variances and the drainage for thepreliminary plat and how the developer was working to improve the drainage in the area. There wasalso additional discussion regarding the future phases of the development and some conditions forfuture discussion when future phasing of the subdivision is brought forward.Mr. Tim Fleet, Developer, Fort Worth and Builder Riverside Homes was recognized. He noted hewould like to talk about the whole project rather than just this phase. He explained the drainagesituation in the area and noted that there are some significant drainage issues and summarized howthey were going to address them. He noted in this phase there are 10 lots and two (2) detentionponds which will help reduce the water flow by over 40%. He noted the pipe size to release thewater out of the detention pond would not be any larger than the pipes under view road now. Thiswill help eliminate the water going over view road. He noted that they do not sell lots to other
builders and do all of the grading for their lots as they do each phase. He noted that when they met
with the County the Fire Marshal asked them to put a turn around for the fire trucks in the long street
going through future phase of the subdivision He noted that they are more than happy to do that on
both streets rather than having a cross street. He noted there will be two entrances into the
subdivision and the lots facing Metz Road will propose to have shared driveways (one driveway for
two houses). They would be happy to put shared driveways along View Road also if that is what
Council desires.
Questions and discussion ensued. There was considerable discussion regarding the future phasing of
the development which did not apply specifically to this request but did include discussion regarding
additional drainage, and a turnaround on the long streets for emergency access and concern
brought up by Councilmember Chick regarding future traffic and access onto the roads with the
future 127 lots. It was noted that there would be additional discussion on the future phase. City
Engineer Tracy LaPiene explained the preliminary plat process and noted that this is a preliminary
plat and the process comes into play with limited engineering and expense to the developer so they
can get a buyin on the overall layout before they spend an extensive amount of money for civil
construction plans. Muzaib Riaz noted that for the Final Plat, there is a checklist which requires that
before a developer can submit the final plat application that they have to have a complete approved
set of Civil Plans for submission with the application. City Engineer noted that there may be more
variances required in the future development as we look at City Ordinance requirements such a road
improvement requirements, allowing overhead electric lines to remain, etc).
There was brief discussion regarding a shared driveway for the lots onto View Road. The applicant
noted that he did not have a problem with that if it is what the Council wants. Councilmember Clark
shared his opinions and noted that he did not like the idea of shared driveways also noting that these
are one acre lots and it defeats the purpose of country living.
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Bilyeu to approve the Preliminary Plat of Sanger Meadows
Addition, being 15.928 acres of land and generally located northwest of the intersection of View
Road and Metz Road with variances from the following requirements:
1. Where no existing subdivision controls, the blocks shall not exceed 1000 feet in length not to be
less than 500 feet in length, except in certain instances where topographical features warrant special
consideration; 2. Residential lots shall front on residential class streets.
The motion was seconded by Councilmember Barrett. The motion carried unanimously (50 vote).
7.PID Advisory Committee Appointment
Consider, Discuss and Possibly Act on Establishing an Advisory Committee and Appointing
Members to Represent the City in Relation to the Stephens Towne Crossing Proposed Public
Improvement District.
Mayor Muir provided a summary on the proposed suggestions for the Advisory Committee for the
Stephens Towne Crossing PID. He noted that he did speak with everyone on the list except for the
Assistant Superintendent, for Sanger ISD, Leann Loyless, who was recommended as an addition
by the Superintendent. He noted that this is a proposed list and is contingent upon City Council's
approval.
Brief discussion ensued in regards to having legal representation at the meetings as well as posting
the committee meetings as public meetings.
Page 3Page 11
CITY OF SANGER, TEXASMINUTES: REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETINGMonday, November 18, 2019 7:00 PM502 Elm Street, Sanger, TexasCOUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT:Mayor Thomas Muir; Mayor Pro Tem Bilyeu; Councilmember Marissa Barrett; CouncilmemberDennis Dillon; Councilmember David Clark, Councilmember Allen Chick. COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT:None.STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:City Manager Alina Ciocan; City Secretary Cheryl Price; City Engineer Tracy LaPiene; PlannerMuzaib Riaz; Shani Bradshaw, Economic Development Director, Police Officer Josh Bishop. 1.Call Meeting to Order, Invocation, Pledge of Allegiance.There being a quorum present at the November 18, 2019 Regular City Council Meeting, themeeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. The invocation was given by Councilmember Dillon and thePledge of Allegiance was led by Councilmember Barrett. 2.CITIZEN INPUT:No citizens approached the podium wishing to speak3.CONSENT AGENDA:a.Approval of Minutes1.City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 11042019Approve City Council Minutes from the Monday, November 4, 2019 Regular CityCouncil Meeting. 2.City Council Work Session Minutes for 11042019 Not Submitted For ApprovalThe Work Session Minutes for November 4, 2019 Will Be Submitted for Approval onthe December 2, 2019 Agenda.A motion was made by Councilmember Chick to approve Item 1 on the Consent Agenda Minutesof the Regular Meeting for the November 4, 2019 meeting. The Work Session minutes (as noted inConsent Agenda Item 2) were not complete and were not included in the motion for approval. Themotion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Bilyeu. The motion carried unanimously (50 Vote). 4.Consider Any Items Removed from Consent Agenda.Tyesha Scott was not present yet so this item was moved to a later on the agenda to allow for her toarrive to accept the Proclamation.REGULAR AGENDA5.ProclamationApprove and Present Proclamation #100619 Proclaiming December 3, 2019 as Giving Tuesdayto Tyhesha Scott, Executive Director of Giving Hope.The recipient for the Proclamation was not present so this item was moved to later on the agenda togive them time to show up. The recipient did not show up Item was considered after Item 7 of theAgenda. There was no discussion.A motion was made by Councilmember Chick to approve Proclamation #100619 ProclaimingDecember 3, 2019 as Giving Tuesday. The motion to approve was seconded by Mayor Pro TemBilyeu. The motion carried unanimously (50 vote).6.Sanger Meadow Addition Phase 1 Preliminary PlatConsider, Discuss and Act on the Preliminary Plat of Sanger Meadows Addition, Being 15.928Acres of Land, and Generally Located NorthWest of the Intersection of View Road and MetzRoad.City Planner, Muzaib Riaz was recognized to summarize. The applicant is proposing to develop 10residential lots of a minimum 1 acre each as Phase 1 of a residential development consisting of anestimated total of 127 oneacre lots on 15.928 acres of land. The property is located in the City ofSanger Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). The property will be served by Bolivar Water, CoServElectric and will have onsite septic for sanitary sewer. All 10 proposed lots have public accessfrom View Road. The plat has been reviewed by the City of Sanger Staff. All City of SangerPlanning and Engineering comments as well as Denton County Plat checklists have been provided tothe applicant. The applicant has addressed staff comments for Phase 1 preliminary plat of SangerMeadows Addition. The Planning and Zoning Commission approved the preliminary plat at theirOctober 14, 2019 meeting with a condition that all comments will be addressed before City Councilmeeting. Staff recommends approval of the Phase 1 Preliminary Plat with variances from thefollowing requirements mentioned in the Subdivision Ordinance as follows:1. Where no existing subdivision controls, the blocks shall not exceed 1000 feet in length nor beless than 500 feet in length, except in certain instances where topographical features warrant specialconsideration; 2. Residential lots shall front on residential class streets. City Engineer Tracy LaPiene was recognized and explained the variances and the drainage for thepreliminary plat and how the developer was working to improve the drainage in the area. There wasalso additional discussion regarding the future phases of the development and some conditions forfuture discussion when future phasing of the subdivision is brought forward.Mr. Tim Fleet, Developer, Fort Worth and Builder Riverside Homes was recognized. He noted hewould like to talk about the whole project rather than just this phase. He explained the drainagesituation in the area and noted that there are some significant drainage issues and summarized howthey were going to address them. He noted in this phase there are 10 lots and two (2) detentionponds which will help reduce the water flow by over 40%. He noted the pipe size to release thewater out of the detention pond would not be any larger than the pipes under view road now. Thiswill help eliminate the water going over view road. He noted that they do not sell lots to otherbuilders and do all of the grading for their lots as they do each phase. He noted that when they metwith the County the Fire Marshal asked them to put a turn around for the fire trucks in the long streetgoing through future phase of the subdivision He noted that they are more than happy to do that onboth streets rather than having a cross street. He noted there will be two entrances into thesubdivision and the lots facing Metz Road will propose to have shared driveways (one driveway fortwo houses). They would be happy to put shared driveways along View Road also if that is whatCouncil desires. Questions and discussion ensued. There was considerable discussion regarding the future phasing ofthe development which did not apply specifically to this request but did include discussion regardingadditional drainage, and a turnaround on the long streets for emergency access and concernbrought up by Councilmember Chick regarding future traffic and access onto the roads with thefuture 127 lots. It was noted that there would be additional discussion on the future phase. CityEngineer Tracy LaPiene explained the preliminary plat process and noted that this is a preliminaryplat and the process comes into play with limited engineering and expense to the developer so theycan get a buyin on the overall layout before they spend an extensive amount of money for civilconstruction plans. Muzaib Riaz noted that for the Final Plat, there is a checklist which requires thatbefore a developer can submit the final plat application that they have to have a complete approvedset of Civil Plans for submission with the application. City Engineer noted that there may be morevariances required in the future development as we look at City Ordinance requirements such a roadimprovement requirements, allowing overhead electric lines to remain, etc). There was brief discussion regarding a shared driveway for the lots onto View Road. The applicantnoted that he did not have a problem with that if it is what the Council wants. Councilmember Clarkshared his opinions and noted that he did not like the idea of shared driveways also noting that theseare one acre lots and it defeats the purpose of country living. A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Bilyeu to approve the Preliminary Plat of Sanger MeadowsAddition, being 15.928 acres of land and generally located northwest of the intersection of ViewRoad and Metz Road with variances from the following requirements:1. Where no existing subdivision controls, the blocks shall not exceed 1000 feet in length not to beless than 500 feet in length, except in certain instances where topographical features warrant specialconsideration; 2. Residential lots shall front on residential class streets.The motion was seconded by Councilmember Barrett. The motion carried unanimously (50 vote).7.PID Advisory Committee AppointmentConsider, Discuss and Possibly Act on Establishing an Advisory Committee and AppointingMembers to Represent the City in Relation to the Stephens Towne Crossing Proposed PublicImprovement District. Mayor Muir provided a summary on the proposed suggestions for the Advisory Committee for theStephens Towne Crossing PID. He noted that he did speak with everyone on the list except for theAssistant Superintendent, for Sanger ISD, Leann Loyless, who was recommended as an additionby the Superintendent. He noted that this is a proposed list and is contingent upon City Council'sapproval. Brief discussion ensued in regards to having legal representation at the meetings as well as posting
the committee meetings as public meetings.
A motion was made by Councilman Chick to approve the proposed list of Advisory Committee
Members for Stephens Towne Crossing PID as follows:
City/City Council:
City Manager: Alina Ciocan
Mayor: Thomas Muir
Mayor Pro Tem: Gary Bilyeu
Sanger Independent School District:
Superintendent Dr. Tommy Hunter
Board President Ken Scribner
Asst. Superintendent Leann Loyless
Planning and Zoning Commission:
Chair: Philip Surles
Member: Shane Stone
Community Members: Bill Boutwell
Jeff Springer
Exofficio Members:
City Engineer: Tracy LaPiene
Dir.Development Services Ramie Hammonds
The motion to approve was seconded by Councilmember Barrett. The motion carried unanimously
(50 vote).
8.Economic Development Update
Economic Development Quarterly Update Provided by Shani Bradshaw, Director of Economic
Development.
Economic Development Director Shani Bradshaw provided an Economic Development update to
the City Council which included current and future projects, update on the 4A and 4B Boards,
conferences attended, and updates of the information received at the Texas Association Conference
in Georgetown which she attended a few weeks ago (she provided a lot of useful information, tools
and grant information which she received at the conference to the Councilmembers). She noted that
the next Texas Association Conference will be held in Denton next year November 1013. She
noted the next conference she will be attending is the IS Some Councilmembers showed interest in
attending. She updated the City Council on the surprise news regarding the BNSF Railway Facility
which was in the Sanger News last Thursday and noted that this was in very preliminary planning
stages. There was brief discussion regarding the Comprehensive Master Plan update and Planner
Muzaib Raiz advised the due date for the RFQ is December 2nd and they will be opened on
December 3rd. On December 15th staff will begin interviewing the selected firms. Staff will make
recommendation to City Council January 10th and anticipate that the process will begin in March
2020 and take approximately one year.
9.INFORMATION ITEMS:
a.Disbursements October 2019
Disbursements for the City of Sanger for October 2019.
Page 4Page 12
CITY OF SANGER, TEXASMINUTES: REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETINGMonday, November 18, 2019 7:00 PM502 Elm Street, Sanger, TexasCOUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT:Mayor Thomas Muir; Mayor Pro Tem Bilyeu; Councilmember Marissa Barrett; CouncilmemberDennis Dillon; Councilmember David Clark, Councilmember Allen Chick. COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT:None.STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:City Manager Alina Ciocan; City Secretary Cheryl Price; City Engineer Tracy LaPiene; PlannerMuzaib Riaz; Shani Bradshaw, Economic Development Director, Police Officer Josh Bishop. 1.Call Meeting to Order, Invocation, Pledge of Allegiance.There being a quorum present at the November 18, 2019 Regular City Council Meeting, themeeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. The invocation was given by Councilmember Dillon and thePledge of Allegiance was led by Councilmember Barrett. 2.CITIZEN INPUT:No citizens approached the podium wishing to speak3.CONSENT AGENDA:a.Approval of Minutes1.City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 11042019Approve City Council Minutes from the Monday, November 4, 2019 Regular CityCouncil Meeting. 2.City Council Work Session Minutes for 11042019 Not Submitted For ApprovalThe Work Session Minutes for November 4, 2019 Will Be Submitted for Approval onthe December 2, 2019 Agenda.A motion was made by Councilmember Chick to approve Item 1 on the Consent Agenda Minutesof the Regular Meeting for the November 4, 2019 meeting. The Work Session minutes (as noted inConsent Agenda Item 2) were not complete and were not included in the motion for approval. Themotion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Bilyeu. The motion carried unanimously (50 Vote). 4.Consider Any Items Removed from Consent Agenda.Tyesha Scott was not present yet so this item was moved to a later on the agenda to allow for her toarrive to accept the Proclamation.REGULAR AGENDA5.ProclamationApprove and Present Proclamation #100619 Proclaiming December 3, 2019 as Giving Tuesdayto Tyhesha Scott, Executive Director of Giving Hope.The recipient for the Proclamation was not present so this item was moved to later on the agenda togive them time to show up. The recipient did not show up Item was considered after Item 7 of theAgenda. There was no discussion.A motion was made by Councilmember Chick to approve Proclamation #100619 ProclaimingDecember 3, 2019 as Giving Tuesday. The motion to approve was seconded by Mayor Pro TemBilyeu. The motion carried unanimously (50 vote).6.Sanger Meadow Addition Phase 1 Preliminary PlatConsider, Discuss and Act on the Preliminary Plat of Sanger Meadows Addition, Being 15.928Acres of Land, and Generally Located NorthWest of the Intersection of View Road and MetzRoad.City Planner, Muzaib Riaz was recognized to summarize. The applicant is proposing to develop 10residential lots of a minimum 1 acre each as Phase 1 of a residential development consisting of anestimated total of 127 oneacre lots on 15.928 acres of land. The property is located in the City ofSanger Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). The property will be served by Bolivar Water, CoServElectric and will have onsite septic for sanitary sewer. All 10 proposed lots have public accessfrom View Road. The plat has been reviewed by the City of Sanger Staff. All City of SangerPlanning and Engineering comments as well as Denton County Plat checklists have been provided tothe applicant. The applicant has addressed staff comments for Phase 1 preliminary plat of SangerMeadows Addition. The Planning and Zoning Commission approved the preliminary plat at theirOctober 14, 2019 meeting with a condition that all comments will be addressed before City Councilmeeting. Staff recommends approval of the Phase 1 Preliminary Plat with variances from thefollowing requirements mentioned in the Subdivision Ordinance as follows:1. Where no existing subdivision controls, the blocks shall not exceed 1000 feet in length nor beless than 500 feet in length, except in certain instances where topographical features warrant specialconsideration; 2. Residential lots shall front on residential class streets. City Engineer Tracy LaPiene was recognized and explained the variances and the drainage for thepreliminary plat and how the developer was working to improve the drainage in the area. There wasalso additional discussion regarding the future phases of the development and some conditions forfuture discussion when future phasing of the subdivision is brought forward.Mr. Tim Fleet, Developer, Fort Worth and Builder Riverside Homes was recognized. He noted hewould like to talk about the whole project rather than just this phase. He explained the drainagesituation in the area and noted that there are some significant drainage issues and summarized howthey were going to address them. He noted in this phase there are 10 lots and two (2) detentionponds which will help reduce the water flow by over 40%. He noted the pipe size to release thewater out of the detention pond would not be any larger than the pipes under view road now. Thiswill help eliminate the water going over view road. He noted that they do not sell lots to otherbuilders and do all of the grading for their lots as they do each phase. He noted that when they metwith the County the Fire Marshal asked them to put a turn around for the fire trucks in the long streetgoing through future phase of the subdivision He noted that they are more than happy to do that onboth streets rather than having a cross street. He noted there will be two entrances into thesubdivision and the lots facing Metz Road will propose to have shared driveways (one driveway fortwo houses). They would be happy to put shared driveways along View Road also if that is whatCouncil desires. Questions and discussion ensued. There was considerable discussion regarding the future phasing ofthe development which did not apply specifically to this request but did include discussion regardingadditional drainage, and a turnaround on the long streets for emergency access and concernbrought up by Councilmember Chick regarding future traffic and access onto the roads with thefuture 127 lots. It was noted that there would be additional discussion on the future phase. CityEngineer Tracy LaPiene explained the preliminary plat process and noted that this is a preliminaryplat and the process comes into play with limited engineering and expense to the developer so theycan get a buyin on the overall layout before they spend an extensive amount of money for civilconstruction plans. Muzaib Riaz noted that for the Final Plat, there is a checklist which requires thatbefore a developer can submit the final plat application that they have to have a complete approvedset of Civil Plans for submission with the application. City Engineer noted that there may be morevariances required in the future development as we look at City Ordinance requirements such a roadimprovement requirements, allowing overhead electric lines to remain, etc). There was brief discussion regarding a shared driveway for the lots onto View Road. The applicantnoted that he did not have a problem with that if it is what the Council wants. Councilmember Clarkshared his opinions and noted that he did not like the idea of shared driveways also noting that theseare one acre lots and it defeats the purpose of country living. A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Bilyeu to approve the Preliminary Plat of Sanger MeadowsAddition, being 15.928 acres of land and generally located northwest of the intersection of ViewRoad and Metz Road with variances from the following requirements:1. Where no existing subdivision controls, the blocks shall not exceed 1000 feet in length not to beless than 500 feet in length, except in certain instances where topographical features warrant specialconsideration; 2. Residential lots shall front on residential class streets.The motion was seconded by Councilmember Barrett. The motion carried unanimously (50 vote).7.PID Advisory Committee AppointmentConsider, Discuss and Possibly Act on Establishing an Advisory Committee and AppointingMembers to Represent the City in Relation to the Stephens Towne Crossing Proposed PublicImprovement District. Mayor Muir provided a summary on the proposed suggestions for the Advisory Committee for theStephens Towne Crossing PID. He noted that he did speak with everyone on the list except for theAssistant Superintendent, for Sanger ISD, Leann Loyless, who was recommended as an additionby the Superintendent. He noted that this is a proposed list and is contingent upon City Council'sapproval. Brief discussion ensued in regards to having legal representation at the meetings as well as postingthe committee meetings as public meetings. A motion was made by Councilman Chick to approve the proposed list of Advisory CommitteeMembers for Stephens Towne Crossing PID as follows:City/City Council:City Manager: Alina CiocanMayor: Thomas MuirMayor Pro Tem: Gary BilyeuSanger Independent School District:Superintendent Dr. Tommy HunterBoard President Ken ScribnerAsst. Superintendent Leann LoylessPlanning and Zoning Commission:Chair: Philip SurlesMember: Shane StoneCommunity Members: Bill BoutwellJeff SpringerExofficio Members:City Engineer: Tracy LaPieneDir.Development Services Ramie Hammonds The motion to approve was seconded by Councilmember Barrett. The motion carried unanimously(50 vote).8.Economic Development UpdateEconomic Development Quarterly Update Provided by Shani Bradshaw, Director of EconomicDevelopment.Economic Development Director Shani Bradshaw provided an Economic Development update tothe City Council which included current and future projects, update on the 4A and 4B Boards, conferences attended, and updates of the information received at the Texas Association Conferencein Georgetown which she attended a few weeks ago (she provided a lot of useful information, toolsand grant information which she received at the conference to the Councilmembers). She noted thatthe next Texas Association Conference will be held in Denton next year November 1013. Shenoted the next conference she will be attending is the IS Some Councilmembers showed interest inattending. She updated the City Council on the surprise news regarding the BNSF Railway Facilitywhich was in the Sanger News last Thursday and noted that this was in very preliminary planningstages. There was brief discussion regarding the Comprehensive Master Plan update and PlannerMuzaib Raiz advised the due date for the RFQ is December 2nd and they will be opened onDecember 3rd. On December 15th staff will begin interviewing the selected firms. Staff will makerecommendation to City Council January 10th and anticipate that the process will begin in March2020 and take approximately one year. 9.INFORMATION ITEMS:a.Disbursements October 2019
Disbursements for the City of Sanger for October 2019.
b.All American Dogs Report
All American Dogs Monthly Report for October 2019.
c.Atmos GCR Rate Filing Docket No. 10170
Atmos Energy Corporation MidTex Division Statement for November 2019 Billing Periods.
Councilmember Dillon had a few questions regarding disbursements. There was no additional
discussion regarding the Information Items.
10.FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS:
Mayor Pro Tem Bilyeu asked about an update on the road improvements which were going to be
done this year or if he could get the revised map provided by Public Works Director Jim Berman.
11.ADJOURN.
There being no further agenda items, Mayor Muir adjourned the meeting at 9:08 p.m.
Page 5Page 13
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.
AGENDA MEETING DATE: December 2, 2019
TO: Alina Ciocan, City Manager
FROM: Cheryl Price, City Secretary
ITEM/CAPTION:
Neil Harris WWTP Stream Impact/Restoration
Discussion and Presentation by Mr. Neil Harris Regarding Wastewater Treatment Plant, Stream Impact, and Stream
Restoration.
AGENDA TYPE: Regular
ACTION REQUESTED: Presentation, Other: Discussion
BACKGROUND:
N/A
LEGAL/BOARD COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS/CITIZEN NOTICE FEEDBACK:
N/A
FINANCIAL SUMMARY FUNDING/FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
FUNDS:
N/A
STAFF RECOMMENDATION/ACTION DESIRED:
N/A
Page 14
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
AGENDA MEETING DATE: December 2, 2019
TO: Alina Ciocan, City Manager
FROM: Muzaib Riaz, Planner, Development Services
ITEM/CAPTION:
Sanger Meadow Addition Phase 2 Preliminary Plat
Consider, Discuss and Act on the Preliminary Plat of Sanger Meadows Addition Phase 2, Being Approximately 145
Acres of Land, and Generally Located NorthWest of the Intersection of View Road and Metz Road.
AGENDA TYPE: Regular
ACTION REQUESTED: Other: Denial
BACKGROUND:
The applicant is proposing to develop 116 residential lots of minimum 1acre each. The property is located in City of
Sanger Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). The property will be served by Bolivar Water, Coserv Electric and will have
onseptic for sanitary sewer. A Phase 1 of Sanger Meadows Addition consisting of 10 lots was approved by the City
Council on November 18th, 2019. City of Sanger Planning and Engineering comments have been provided to the
applicant. Applicant has not addressed any of Staff’s comments at this time. The plat does not meet City of Sanger
Subdivision Regulations. Staff has not received any variance request from any of the Subdivision Regulations at this
time.
LEGAL/BOARD COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS/CITIZEN NOTICE FEEDBACK:
Planning & Zoning Commission Action
The Planning & Zoning Commission approved (50) the preliminary plat on November 11 th, 2019 with a condition that
all staff comments will be addressed before City Council meeting on December 2nd, 2019.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY FUNDING/FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
FUNDS:
N/A
Page 15
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMOAGENDA ITEM NO. 6.AGENDA MEETING DATE: December 2, 2019TO: Alina Ciocan, City ManagerFROM: Muzaib Riaz, Planner, Development ServicesITEM/CAPTION:Sanger Meadow Addition Phase 2 Preliminary PlatConsider, Discuss and Act on the Preliminary Plat of Sanger Meadows Addition Phase 2, Being Approximately 145Acres of Land, and Generally Located NorthWest of the Intersection of View Road and Metz Road.AGENDA TYPE: RegularACTION REQUESTED: Other: DenialBACKGROUND:The applicant is proposing to develop 116 residential lots of minimum 1acre each. The property is located in City ofSanger Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). The property will be served by Bolivar Water, Coserv Electric and will haveonseptic for sanitary sewer. A Phase 1 of Sanger Meadows Addition consisting of 10 lots was approved by the CityCouncil on November 18th, 2019. City of Sanger Planning and Engineering comments have been provided to theapplicant. Applicant has not addressed any of Staff’s comments at this time. The plat does not meet City of SangerSubdivision Regulations. Staff has not received any variance request from any of the Subdivision Regulations at thistime.LEGAL/BOARD COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS/CITIZEN NOTICE FEEDBACK:Planning & Zoning Commission ActionThe Planning & Zoning Commission approved (50) the preliminary plat on November 11 th, 2019 with a condition thatall staff comments will be addressed before City Council meeting on December 2nd, 2019.FINANCIAL SUMMARY FUNDING/FISCAL IMPACT:N/A
FUNDS:
N/A
STAFF RECOMMENDATION/ACTION DESIRED:
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends DENIAL of the phase 2 preliminary plat as it does not meet City of Sanger Subdivision Regulations
and staff comments have not been addressed.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Upload Date Type
Staff Report 11/21/2019 Backup Material
Location Map 11/21/2019 Backup Material
Application 11/21/2019 Backup Material
Letter of Intent 11/21/2019 Backup Material
Preliminary Plat 11/21/2019 Exhibit
Planning Comments 11/21/2019 Backup Material
Engineering Comments 11/21/2019 Backup Material
Page 16
CITY COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: December 2, 2019
Case #: 19SANZON-0041
Case Coordinator: Muzaib Riaz, Planner, Development Services
Request: Consider, Discuss and Act on the Preliminary Plat of Sanger Meadows
Addition Phase 2, Being Approximately 145 Acres of Land, and Generally
Located North-West of the Intersection of View Road and Metz Road.
Applicant: Aimee Bissett, NorthBridge Consultants
______________________________________________________________________________
Case Overview
The applicant is proposing to develop 116 residential lots of minimum 1-acre each. The property
is located in City of Sanger Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). The property will be served by
Bolivar Water, Coserv Electric and will have on-septic for sanitary sewer. A Phase 1 of Sanger
Meadows Addition consisting of 10 lots was approved by the City Council on November 18th,
2019. City of Sanger Planning and Engineering comments have been provided to the applicant.
Applicant has not addressed any of Staff’s comments at this time. The plat does not meet City of
Sanger Subdivision Regulations. Staff has not received any variance request from any of the
Subdivision Regulations at this time.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends DENIAL of the phase 2 preliminary plat as it does not meet City of Sanger
Subdivision Regulations and staff comments have not been addressed.
Planning & Zoning Commission Action
The Planning & Zoning Commission approved (5-0) the preliminary plat on November 11th, 2019
with a condition that all staff comments will be addressed before City Council meeting on
December 2nd, 2019.
Attachments
• Location Map
• Application
• Letter of Intent
• Preliminary Plat
• Planning Review Comments
• Engineering Comments
Page 17
SubjectArea
VIEW RD
METZ RD
/Location Exhibit: Sanger MeadowsPhase 2
0 580 1,160290 Feet
DISCLAIMER:This map was generat ed by GIS data providedby the Sang er GIS Departmen t. Th e City of Sanger do es not guarantee the corre ctness oraccuracy of any features on this map . These mapproducts are for illustration purposes only andare not suitab le for site-specific decision makin g.GIS data is subject to consta nt ch anges, andmay not be complete, accurate or current.Date: 11 /2/2019 4:46:42 PMDoc Name: LocationExhibit_SangerMea dowPh 2Exhibits
Page 18
Page 19
October 16, 2019
City of Sanger
Development Services
201 Bolivar
Sanger, TX 76266
RE: LETTER OF INTENT FOR SANGER MEADOW ADDITION PHASE 2 PRELIMINARY PLAT
On behalf of our client, Riverside Homes, we are submitting a Preliminary Plat
Application for Sanger Meadow Addition Phase 2. This project is a proposed single-
family subdivision located in Sanger’s ETJ at the northwest intersection of Metz and
View Roads with a total of 127 one-acre lots and up. The Phase 1 submittal was made on
September 18, 2019 and included eleven (11) lots ranging in size from one to two acres
(net drainage easements), all of which front View Road. Phase 1 was recommended for
approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission on Monday, October 14th.
Phase 2 includes the remaining 116 lots. Full civil plans for Phase 2 will be submitted
while the preliminary plat is under review.
On behalf of Riverside Homes, I respectfully submit this Preliminary Plat Application for
Sanger Meadow Addition, Phase 2.
Sincerely,
Aimee Bissett
Managing Director
NorthBridge Consultants
Page 20
VIEW ROAD
PAVED SURFACE
P.O.B.
V. 2827, P. 965
O.R.D.C.T.
V. 1041, P. 494
O.R.D.C.T.
LOT 6, BLOCK A
SADDLE RIDGE ESTATES
PC. M, P. 241
P.R.D.C.T.
7.46'
S
0
0
°
1
3
'
2
1
"
W
2
7
5
4
.
0
8
'
S 89°59'41" W 2552.38'
N
0
0
°
1
1
'
1
3
"
E
2
7
5
3
.
8
7
'
N 89°59'24" E 2554.08'
FND. PK
NAIL
FND. PK
NAIL
FND. 1/2"
IRON ROD
CAPPED
2546.62'
10
0
'
T
E
X
A
S
P
O
W
E
R
&
L
I
G
H
T
C
O
M
P
A
N
Y
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
(
V
.
5
5
4
,
P
.
5
7
6
)
ME
T
Z
R
O
A
D
PA
V
E
D
S
U
R
F
A
C
E
FND. 1/2"
IRON ROD
CAPPED
33
0
.
0
0
'
0 150 300 450
TEXAS
SURVEYING
INC.Firm No. 10100000 - www.txsurveying.com
SURVEYOR:
KYLE RUCKER, R.P.L.S.
104 S. WALNUT ST.
WEATHERFORD, TX 76086
817-594-0400
ME
T
Z
R
O
A
D
HW
Y
N
o
.
7
7
SITE
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
TIM FLEET
LACKLAND HOLDINGS, LLC &
VLMC, INC.
OCTOBER 2019
BEING A 161.421 TRACT OF LAND OUT OF THE W. MASON SURVEY,
ABSTRACT NO. 801, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS
CASE No. _______
SANGER MEADOW ADDITION,
PAGE 1 OF 2
AN ADDITION TO THE ETJ OF THE
CITY OF SANGER, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS
PRELIMINARY PLAT
60' DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
37.64' RIGHT OF WAY
DEDICATION
40
'
R
I
G
H
T
O
F
W
A
Y
DE
D
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
LOTS 1 - 68, BLOCK 1; LOTS 1 - 35,
BLOCK 2; LOTS 1 - 24, BLOCK 3,
PHASES 1 & 2
40
'
R
I
G
H
T
O
F
W
A
Y
DE
D
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
30' RIGHT OF WAY
DEDICATION
LOIS ROAD W
VIEW ROAD
HOEHN ROAD
N.T.S.
NT
328.26'218.34'181.74'180.53'146.00'146.00'146.00'146.00'146.00'146.00'146.00'146.00'146.00'291.22'
33
2
.
5
6
'
12
0
.
0
0
'
12
0
.
0
0
'
12
0
.
0
0
'
12
0
.
0
0
'
12
0
.
0
0
'
12
0
.
0
0
'
12
0
.
0
0
'
12
0
.
0
0
'
12
0
.
0
0
'
12
0
.
0
0
'
12
0
.
0
0
'
12
0
.
0
0
'
12
0
.
0
0
'
12
0
.
0
0
'
12
0
.
0
0
'
12
0
.
0
0
'
12
0
.
0
0
'
12
0
.
0
0
'
22
3
.
6
7
'
390.00'
20
5
.
8
6
'
20
5
.
8
6
'
15
0
.
0
0
'
15
0
.
0
0
'
15
0
.
0
0
'
15
0
.
0
0
'
15
0
.
0
0
'
15
0
.
0
0
'
15
0
.
0
0
'
15
0
.
0
0
'
15
0
.
0
0
'
15
0
.
0
0
'
15
2
.
3
6
'
15
0
.
2
5
'
14
9
.
7
2
'
290.00'146.00'146.00'146.00'146.00'146.00'146.00'146.00'146.00'146.00'181.74'181.74'74.55'
72
.
0
4
'
12
0
.
0
0
'
12
0
.
0
0
'
12
0
.
0
0
'
12
0
.
0
0
'
12
0
.
0
0
'
12
0
.
0
0
'
12
0
.
0
0
'
12
0
.
0
0
'
75
.
8
9
'
60
.
1
9
'
12
0
.
0
0
'
12
0
.
0
0
'
12
0
.
0
0
'
12
0
.
0
0
'
12
0
.
0
0
'
12
0
.
0
0
'
12
0
.
0
0
'
22
2
.
3
6
'
309.65'363.00'344.60'344.60'291.00'291.00'
15
0
.
0
0
'
15
0
.
0
0
'
15
0
.
0
0
'
15
0
.
0
0
'
15
0
.
0
0
'
15
0
.
0
0
'
15
0
.
0
0
'
15
0
.
0
0
'
15
0
.
0
0
'
15
0
.
0
0
'
15
0
.
0
0
'
32.18'
121.60'206.94'183.00'133.73'
60
.
5
3
'
13
5
.
0
0
'
13
5
.
0
0
'
13
5
.
0
0
'
13
5
.
0
0
'
13
5
.
0
0
'
13
5
.
0
0
'
13
5
.
0
0
'
13
5
.
0
0
'
13
5
.
0
0
'
13
5
.
0
0
'
13
5
.
0
0
'
13
6
.
3
5
'
15
7
.
0
6
'
15
6
.
0
0
'
15
6
.
0
0
'
15
6
.
0
0
'
17
6
.
2
7
'
15
6
.
8
0
'
15
6
.
8
0
'
15
6
.
8
0
'
15.32'
45
.
0
5
'
15
6
.
8
0
'
15
6
.
8
0
'
15
6
.
8
0
'
15
6
.
8
0
'
15
7
.
7
3
'
15
1
.
1
8
'
15
0
.
0
0
'
15
0
.
0
0
'
15
0
.
0
0
'
15
0
.
0
0
'
15
0
.
0
0
'
20
5
.
8
6
'
20
7
.
0
1
'
13
4
.
2
5
'
13
4
.
2
5
'
13
4
.
2
5
'
13
4
.
2
5
'
13
4
.
2
5
'
15
9
.
2
5
'
13
4
.
2
5
'
13
4
.
2
5
'
13
4
.
2
5
'
13
4
.
2
5
'
13
4
.
2
5
'
15
9
.
2
5
'
15
9
.
2
5
'
13
4
.
2
5
'
13
4
.
2
5
'
14
1
.
0
7
'
13
4
.
5
0
'
13
4
.
5
0
'
13
4
.
4
1
'
S
0
0
°
1
3
'
5
1
"
W
13
4
.
5
0
'
S
0
0
°
1
3
'
5
1
"
W
13
4
.
5
0
'
S
0
0
°
1
3
'
5
1
"
W
N
0
0
°
1
3
'
2
1
"
E
15
0
.
0
0
'
N
0
0
°
1
3
'
2
1
"
E
15
0
.
0
0
'
N
0
0
°
1
3
'
2
1
"
E
15
0
.
0
0
'
N
0
0
°
1
3
'
2
1
"
E
15
0
.
0
0
'
N
0
0
°
1
3
'
2
1
"
E
15
0
.
0
0
'
S
0
0
°
1
3
'
2
1
"
W
2
5
9
.
7
5
'
15
3
.
1
2
'
S 89°59'41" W 312.57'
13
4
.
2
5
'
S
0
0
°
1
3
'
2
1
"
W
13
4
.
2
5
'
S
0
0
°
1
3
'
2
1
"
W
13
4
.
2
5
'
S
0
0
°
1
3
'
2
1
"
W
13
4
.
5
0
'
13
4
.
5
0
'
13
4
.
5
0
'
13
4
.
5
0
'
13
4
.
5
0
'
14
0
.
9
5
'
13
4
.
3
2
'
13
4
.
5
0
'
13
4
.
5
0
'
13
4
.
5
0
'
13
4
.
5
0
'
14
1
.
1
9
'
344.72'
344.60'344.60'
344.60'
344.60'
N 89°59'41" E
344.60'
N 89°59'41" E
344.60'
N 89°59'41" E
344.60'
N 89°59'41" E
344.60'
N 89°59'41" E
344.60'
344.60'
344.60'
344.60'
344.60'
13
4
.
8
8
'
13
5
.
0
0
'
13
5
.
0
0
'
13
5
.
0
0
'
13
5
.
0
0
'
13
5
.
0
0
'
13
5
.
0
0
'
13
5
.
0
0
'
13
5
.
0
0
'
13
5
.
0
0
'
13
5
.
0
0
'
13
5
.
0
0
'
15
6
.
7
0
'
15
6
.
0
0
'
S
0
0
°
1
3
'
2
1
"
W
15
6
.
8
0
'
S
0
0
°
1
3
'
2
1
"
W
16
4
.
3
0
'
S
0
0
°
1
3
'
2
1
"
W
S
0
0
°
1
3
'
2
1
"
W
28
7
.
3
6
'
15
6
.
7
0
'
15
6
.
8
0
'
15
6
.
8
0
'
15
6
.
8
0
'
15
6
.
8
0
'
15
6
.
8
0
'
15
6
.
8
0
'
17
6
.
2
7
'
15
6
.
0
0
'
S 89°59'24" W
290.61'
14
9
.
7
3
'
15
0
.
2
5
'
S
0
0
°
0
0
'
3
6
"
E
2
9
9
.
9
8
'
S
0
0
°
0
0
'
3
6
"
E
29
9
.
9
8
'
S
0
0
°
0
0
'
3
6
"
E
29
9
.
9
8
'
S
0
0
°
0
0
'
3
6
"
E
29
9
.
9
9
'
S
0
0
°
0
0
'
3
6
"
E
29
9
.
9
9
'
S
0
0
°
1
3
'
2
1
"
W
29
9
.
9
9
'
S
0
0
°
0
0
'
3
6
"
E
29
9
.
9
9
'
S
0
0
°
1
3
'
2
1
"
W
30
0
.
0
0
'
S
2
0
°
5
3
'
1
5
"
E
2
9
0
.
4
7
'
S
5
2
°
3
8
'
4
2
"
E
4
6
7
.
4
8
'
S 89°48'47" E
360.13'
S 89°48'47" E
390.00'
S 89°48'47" E
390.00'
S 89°48'47" E
390.00'
S 89°48'47" E
390.00'
S 89°48'47" E
390.00'
S 89°48'47" E
390.00'
S 89°48'47" E
390.00'
S 89°48'47" E
390.00'
S 89°48'47" E
390.00'
S 89°48'47" E
390.00'
390.00'
390.00'
390.00'
360.52'
390.00'
390.00'
390.00'
390.00'
29
9
.
9
9
'
29
9
.
9
8
'
29
9
.
9
8
'
29
9
.
9
8
'
363.00'
S 89°46'39" E
309.46'
S 89°48'47" E
363.00'
S 89°46'39" E
363.00'
S 89°46'39" E
309.15'
S 89°48'47" E
363.00'
S 89°46'39" E
372.89
'
N 68°4
8
'
1
3
"
E
32
8
.
2
7
'
N 2
3
°
5
6
'
4
7
"
E
27
0
.
4
2
'
N
0
0
°
0
0
'
1
9
"
W
30
6
.
0
3
'
N 6
1
°
4
8
'
1
7
"
W
N
0
0
°
0
0
'
1
9
"
W
30
0
.
0
0
'
30
0
.
0
0
'
30
0
.
0
0
'
S 89°46'39" E
363.00'
S 89°48'47" E
308.86'
363.00'
S 89°46'39" E
363.00'
S 89°48'47" E
308.57'
309.55'
363.00'
309.36'
363.00'
309.25'
363.00'
309.06'
308.96'
363.00'
363.00'
308.76'
308.66'
308.47'
308.37'313.01'
N 89°46'39" W
291.00'
N 89°46'39" W
291.00'
N 89°46'39" W
291.00'
N 89°46'39" W
291.00'
N 89°46'39" W
291.00'
N 89°46'39" W
291.00'
N 89°46'39" W
291.00'
N 89°46'39" W
291.00'
N 89°46'39" W
291.00'
N 89°46'39" W
291.00'
N 89°46'39" W
291.00'
N 89°46'39" W
291.00'
N 89°58'31" E
344.68'
N 89°58'31" E
344.54'
N 89°58'31" E
344.64'
N 89°58'31" E
344.50'
N 89°58'31" E
344.58'
291.00'
291.00'
291.00'
291.00'
291.00'
291.00'
291.00'
291.00'
291.00'
291.00'
291.00'
344.62'
344.56'
344.66'
344.52'
344.70'
LOT 34, BLOCK 2,
1.000 ACRES
LOT 35, BLOCK 2,
1.001 ACRES
LO
T
3
3
,
B
L
O
C
K
2
,
1.
0
0
5
A
C
R
E
S
LO
T
3
2
,
B
L
O
C
K
2
,
1.
0
0
5
A
C
R
E
S
LO
T
3
1
,
B
L
O
C
K
2
,
1.
0
0
5
A
C
R
E
S
LO
T
3
0
,
B
L
O
C
K
2
,
1.
0
0
5
A
C
R
E
S
LO
T
2
9
,
B
L
O
C
K
2
,
1.
0
0
5
A
C
R
E
S
LO
T
2
8
,
B
L
O
C
K
2
,
1.
0
0
6
A
C
R
E
S
LO
T
2
7
,
B
L
O
C
K
2
,
1.
0
0
6
A
C
R
E
S
LO
T
2
6
,
B
L
O
C
K
2
,
1.
0
0
6
A
C
R
E
S
LO
T
2
5
,
B
L
O
C
K
2
,
1.
0
0
6
A
C
R
E
S
LO
T
2
4
,
B
L
O
C
K
2
,
1.
2
4
8
A
C
R
E
S
NE
T
1
.
0
4
1
A
C
R
E
S
LO
T
2
3
,
B
L
O
C
K
2
,
1.
2
5
2
A
C
R
E
S
NE
T
1
.
0
4
5
A
C
R
E
S
LO
T
2
2
,
B
L
O
C
K
2
,
1.
0
9
2
A
C
R
E
S
L
O
T
2
1
,
B
L
O
C
K
2
,
1.2
6
8
A
C
R
E
S
LOT 20, BLOCK 2,
1.628 ACRES
LOT 19, BLOCK 2,
1.052 ACRES
LOT 18, BLOCK 2,
1.074 ACRES
LOT 17, BLOCK 2,
1.074 ACRES
LOT 16, BLOCK 2,
1.074 ACRES
LOT 15, BLOCK 2,
1.074 ACRES
LOT 14, BLOCK 2,
1.074 ACRES
LOT 13, BLOCK 2,
1.074 ACRES
LOT 12, BLOCK 2,
1.074 ACRES
LOT 11, BLOCK 2,
1.074 ACRES
LOT 10, BLOCK 2,
1.054 ACRES
LOT 9, BLOCK 2,
1.044 ACRES
LOT 8, BLOCK 2,
1.074 ACRES
LOT 7, BLOCK 2,
1.074 ACRES
LOT 6, BLOCK 2,
1.074 ACRES
LOT 5, BLOCK 2,
1.074 ACRES
LOT 4, BLOCK 2,
1.074 ACRES
LOT 3, BLOCK 2,
1.074 ACRES
LOT 2, BLOCK 2,
1.074 ACRES
LOT 1, BLOCK 2,
1.997 ACRES
NET 1.075 ACRES
LOT 12, BLOCK 1,
1.380 ACRES
LOT 13, BLOCK 1,
1.380 ACRES
LOT 14, BLOCK 1,
1.002 ACRES
LOT 15, BLOCK 1,
1.002 ACRES
LOT 16, BLOCK 1,
1.002 ACRES
LOT 17, BLOCK 1,
1.002 ACRES
LOT 18, BLOCK 1,
1.002 ACRES
LOT 19, BLOCK 1,
1.002 ACRES
LOT 20, BLOCK 1,
1.002 ACRES
LOT 21, BLOCK 1,
1.002 ACRES
LOT 22, BLOCK 1,
1.002 ACRES
LOT 23, BLOCK 1,
1.002 ACRES
LOT 24, BLOCK 1,
1.014 ACRES
LOT 25, BLOCK 1,
1.006 ACRES
LOT 26, BLOCK 1,
1.002 ACRES
LOT 27, BLOCK 1,
1.002 ACRES
LOT 28, BLOCK 1,
1.002 ACRES
LOT 29, BLOCK 1,
1.002 ACRES
LOT 30, BLOCK 1,
1.002 ACRES
LOT 31, BLOCK 1,
1.002 ACRES
LOT 32, BLOCK 1,
1.002 ACRES
LOT 33, BLOCK 1,
1.002 ACRES
LOT 34, BLOCK 1,
1.002 ACRES
LOT 35, BLOCK 1,
1.002 ACRES
LO
T
3
9
,
B
L
O
C
K
1
,
1.
4
2
5
A
C
R
E
S
LO
T
4
0
,
B
L
O
C
K
1
,
1.
2
6
0
A
C
R
E
S
NE
T
1
.
0
0
4
A
C
R
E
S
LO
T
4
1
,
B
L
O
C
K
1
,
1.
3
7
8
A
C
R
E
S
NE
T
1
.
2
3
0
A
C
R
E
S
LOT
4
2
,
B
L
O
C
K
1
,
1.95
6
A
C
R
E
S
NET
1
.
4
7
6
A
C
R
E
S
LOT 4
3
,
B
L
O
C
K
1
,
1.754
A
C
R
E
S
NET 1.3
7
0
A
C
R
E
S
LOT 44, BLOCK 1,
1.125 ACRES
NET 1.032 ACRES
LOT 45, BLOCK 1,
1.125 ACRES
NET 1.032 ACRES
LOT 46, BLOCK 1,
1.125 ACRES
NET 1.032 ACRES
LOT 47, BLOCK 1,
1.125 ACRES
NET 1.032 ACRES
LOT 48, BLOCK 1,
1.125 ACRES
NET 1.032 ACRES
LOT 49, BLOCK 1,
1.125 ACRES
NET 1.032 ACRES
LOT 50, BLOCK 1,
1.125 ACRES
NET 1.032 ACRES
LOT 51, BLOCK 1,
1.125 ACRES
NET 1.032 ACRES
LOT 52, BLOCK 1,
1.125 ACRES
NET 1.032 ACRES
LOT 53, BLOCK 1,
1.125 ACRES
NET 1.032 ACRES
LOT 54, BLOCK 1,
1.125 ACRES
NET 1.032 ACRES
LOT 55, BLOCK 1,
1.130 ACRES
NET 1.037 ACRES
LOT 56, BLOCK 1,
1.113 ACRES
NET 1.004 ACRES
LOT 57, BLOCK 1,
1.108 ACRES
NET 1.001 ACRES
LOT 58, BLOCK 1,
1.108 ACRES
NET 1.001 ACRES
LOT 59, BLOCK 1,
1.252 ACRE
NET 1.002 ACRES
LOT 60, BLOCK 1,
1.113 ACRE
NET 1.005 ACRES
LOT 61, BLOCK 1,
1.113 ACRE
NET 1.005 ACRES
LOT 62, BLOCK 1,
1.112 ACRE
NET 1.004 ACRES
LOT 63, BLOCK 1,
1.114 ACRE
NET 1.001 ACRES
LOT 64, BLOCK 1,
1.112 ACRE
NET 1.004 ACRES
LOT 65, BLOCK 1,
1.111 ACRE
NET 1.003 ACRES
LOT 66, BLOCK 1,
1.111 ACRE
NET 1.003 ACRES
LOT 67, BLOCK 1,
1.111 ACRE
NET 1.003 ACRES
LOT 68, BLOCK 1,
1.113 ACRE
NET 1.005 ACRES
LOT 36, BLOCK 1,
1.176 ACRES
NET 1.002 ACRES
L
O
T
3
7
,
B
L
O
C
K
1
,
1
.
6
7
4
A
C
R
E
S
N
E
T
1
.
3
6
3
A
C
R
E
S
LO
T
3
8
,
B
L
O
C
K
1
,
1.
2
1
4
A
C
R
E
S
NE
T
1
.
1
1
0
A
C
R
E
S
LOT 12, BLOCK 3,
1.064 ACRES
NET 1.002 ACRES
LOT 13, BLOCK 3,
1.063 ACRES
NET 1.001 ACRES
LOT 14, BLOCK 3,
1.064 ACRES
NET 1.002 ACRES
LOT 11, BLOCK 3,
1.064 ACRES
NET 1.002 ACRES
LOT 10, BLOCK 3,
1.064 ACRES
NET 1.002 ACRES
LOT 15, BLOCK 3,
1.064 ACRES
NET 1.002 ACRES
LOT 16, BLOCK 3,
1.064 ACRES
NET 1.003 ACRES
LOT 9, BLOCK 3,
1.064 ACRES
NET 1.002 ACRES
LOT 17, BLOCK 3,
1.064 ACRES
NET 1.003 ACRES
LOT 8, BLOCK 3,
1.064 ACRES
NET 1.002 ACRES
LOT 7, BLOCK 3,
1.115 ACRES
NET 1.050 ACRES
LOT 18, BLOCK 3,
1.117 ACRES
NET 1.052 ACRES
LOT 19, BLOCK 3,
1.062 ACRES
NET 1.000 ACRES
LOT 5, BLOCK 3,
1.062 ACRES
NET 1.000 ACRES
LOT 20, BLOCK 3,
1.062 ACRES
NET 1.000 ACRES
LOT 4, BLOCK 3,
1.062 ACRES
NET 1.000 ACRES
LOT 21, BLOCK 3,
1.062 ACRES
NET 1.000 ACRES
LOT 22, BLOCK 3,
1.062 ACRES
NET 1.000 ACRES
LOT 3, BLOCK 3,
1.062 ACRES
NET 1.000 ACRES
LOT 2, BLOCK 3,
1.062 ACRES
NET 1.000 ACRES
LOT 23, BLOCK 3,
1.062 ACRES
NET 1.000 ACRES
LOT 24, BLOCK 3,
1.260 ACRES
NET 1.000 ACRES
LOT 1, BLOCK 3,
1.260 ACRES
NET 1.000 ACRES
267.00'183.00'206.94'180.68'
C
1
CURVE RADIUS ARC CHORD BEARING CHORD
C1 60.00'70.70'N 26°03'18" W 66.68'
C2
C2 60.00'54.96'N 33°56'42" E 53.06'
C
3
C3 60.00'58.83'N 31°43'30" W 56.50'
C4
C4 60.00'51.03'N 20°43'33" E 49.50'
C5
C5 60.00'60.03'N 73°45'01" E 57.56'
C
6
C6 60.00'49.82'S 53°47'56" E 48.40'
C
7
C7 60.00'96.65'S 13°37'42" E 86.54'
C8
C8 60.00'53.05'S 57°50'58" W 51.34'
C9
C9 60.00'69.97'N 63°24'49" W 66.07'
C10
C10 60.00'115.27'S 85°01'55" W 98.34'
C1
1
C11 60.00'104.88'N 10°08'45" E 92.03'
C1
2
C12 60.00'125.66'S 00°11'13" W 103.92'
20
'
D
R
A
I
N
A
G
E
EA
S
E
M
E
N
T
103.0' DRAINAGE EASEMENT
25' DRAINAGE EASEMENT25' DRAINAGE EASEMENT
20
'
D
R
A
I
N
A
G
E
EA
S
E
M
E
N
T
20
'
D
R
A
I
N
A
G
E
EA
S
E
M
E
N
T
60' DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
30
'
D
R
A
I
N
A
G
E
EA
S
E
M
E
N
T
40.0'
40.0'
30
'
D
R
A
I
N
A
G
E
EA
S
E
M
E
N
T
60.0'
60' DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
37.64' RIGHT OF WAY
DEDICATION 30' RIGHT OF WAY
DEDICATION
50.0'
DRAINA
G
E
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
S
0
0
°
1
3
'
2
1
"
W
N
0
0
°
1
3
'
2
1
"
E
N 89°59'41" E 344.60'
N 89°59'41" E 344.48'
PHASE 2
160.00'160.00'160.00'160.00'160.00'160.00'145.50'145.50'
30
0
.
0
0
'
145.50'145.50'160.00'160.00'160.00'160.00'160.00'
N
0
0
°
1
3
'
2
1
"
E
30
0
.
0
0
'
N
0
0
°
1
3
'
2
1
"
E
30
0
.
0
0
'
N
0
0
°
1
3
'
2
1
"
E
30
0
.
0
0
'
N
0
0
°
1
3
'
2
1
"
E
30
0
.
0
0
'
30
0
.
0
0
'
30
0
.
0
0
'
30
0
.
0
0
'
30
0
.
0
0
'
LO
T
1
,
B
L
O
C
K
1
,
1.
8
0
8
A
C
R
E
S
NE
T
1
.
2
7
4
A
C
R
E
S
LO
T
3
,
B
L
O
C
K
1
,
1.
1
0
2
A
C
R
E
S
LO
T
4
,
B
L
O
C
K
1
,
1.
1
0
2
A
C
R
E
S
LO
T
5
,
B
L
O
C
K
1
,
1.
1
0
2
A
C
R
E
S
LO
T
6
,
B
L
O
C
K
1
,
1.
1
0
2
A
C
R
E
S
LO
T
7
,
B
L
O
C
K
1
,
1.
1
0
2
A
C
R
E
S
LO
T
8
,
B
L
O
C
K
1
,
1.
1
0
2
A
C
R
E
S
NE
T
1
.
0
1
0
A
C
R
E
S
LO
T
9
,
B
L
O
C
K
1
,
2.
0
6
8
A
C
R
E
S
NE
T
1
.
0
3
0
A
C
R
E
S
LO
T
1
0
,
B
L
O
C
K
1
,
1.
0
0
2
A
C
R
E
S
LO
T
1
1
,
B
L
O
C
K
1
,
1.
0
0
2
A
C
R
E
S
DR
A
I
N
A
G
E
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
LO
T
2
,
B
L
O
C
K
1
,
1.
7
1
4
A
C
R
E
S
NE
T
1
.
1
0
1
A
C
R
E
S
262.58'248.80'
262.39'248.80'
25' DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
25' DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
162.60'
DR
A
I
N
A
G
E
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
N
0
0
°
1
3
'
2
1
"
E
N
0
0
°
1
3
'
2
1
"
E
30
0
.
0
0
'
30
0
.
0
0
'
N
0
0
°
1
3
'
2
1
"
E
77.41'88.80'
160.00'300.20'
DR
A
I
N
A
G
E
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
300.20'
30
0
.
0
0
'
30.00'
30.00'SANGER MEADOW LANE - 60' R.O.W.
SA
N
G
E
R
M
E
A
D
O
W
D
R
.
-
6
0
'
R
.
O
.
W
.
S
0
0
°
1
1
'
1
3
"
W
S 89°59'24" W SANGER MEADOW DR. - 60' R.O.W S 89°59'24" W
SA
G
E
M
E
A
D
O
W
C
I
R
.
-
6
0
'
R
.
O
.
W
.
S
0
0
°
1
3
'
2
1
"
W
S 89°59'41" W
SA
G
E
M
E
A
D
O
W
C
I
R
.
-
6
0
'
R
.
O
.
W
.
N
0
0
°
1
3
'
2
1
"
E
S
0
0
°
1
1
'
1
3
"
W
30
.
0
0
'
30
.
0
0
'
30.00'
30.00'
30.00'
30.00'
30
.
0
0
'
30
.
0
0
'
30
.
0
0
'
30
.
0
0
'
30
.
0
0
'
30
.
0
0
'
PHASE 1
N - 2364812.74
E - 7199198.17
N - 2367316.24
E - 7196474.54
AP
P
R
O
X
I
M
A
T
E
CE
N
T
E
R
L
I
N
E
O
F
ME
T
Z
R
O
A
D
APPROXIMATE
CENTERLINE OF
VIEW ROAD
30
'
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
LI
N
E
30
'
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
LI
N
E
30
'
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
LI
N
E
30
'
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
LI
N
E
30
'
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
LI
N
E
30
'
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
LI
N
E
30
'
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
LI
N
E
30
'
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
LI
N
E
30' BUILDING
LINE
30' BUILDING LINE
FND. 1/2"
IRON ROD
FND. 1/2"
IRON ROD
Page 21
GENERAL NOTES:
1) WITH RESPECT TO THE DOCUMENTS LISTED IN TITLE COMMITMENT NO. 240471T THE
FOLLOWING EASEMENTS AND/OR RESTRICTIONS WERE REVIEWED FOR THIS SURVEY:
SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING EASEMENT(S) AND/OR DOCUMENT(S):
V. 554, P. 576(SHOWN); DEED RECORDS, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS.
ACCORDING TO EASEMENT DESCRIPTIONS, VISIBLY APPARENT LOCATION OF UTILITIES IN
THE FIELD, PLAT/MAPS OF RECORD, TEXAS RAILROAD COMMISSION PUBLIC GIS VIEWER,
TEXAS UTILITY LOCATION SERVICES (TEXAS811) AND THE SURVEYOR'S PROFESSIONAL
OPINION.
2) CURRENTLY THIS TRACT APPEARS TO BE LOCATED WITHIN ONE OR MORE OF THE
FOLLOWING AREAS:
OTHER AREAS, ZONE "X" - AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE
FLOODPLAIN.
ACCORDING TO THE F.I.R.M. COMMUNITY PANEL 48121C0065G, DATED APRIL 18, 2011. FOR
UP TO DATE FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION ALWAYS VISIT THE OFFICIAL F.E.M.A. WEBSITE
AT (WWW.FEMA.GOV).
3) ALL CORNERS ARE SET 1/2" IRON RODS CAPPED - TEXAS SURVEYING, INC.), UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED.
4) ALL RESIDENTIAL LOTS SHALL HAVE A FRONT BUILDING LINE OF 25', UNLESS
OTHERWISE SHOWN.
5) THERE SHALL EXIST A 5' UTILITY EASEMENT AROUND THE PERIMETER OF ALL LOT LINES
IN THIS SUBDIVISION.
6) ANY PUBLIC UTILITY, INCLUDING THE CITY OF SANGER, SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO
MOVE AND KEEP MOVED ALL OR PART OF ANY BUILDINGS, FENCES, TREES, SHRUBS,
OTHER GROWTHS OR IMPROVEMENTS WHICH IN ANY WAY ENDANGER OR INTERFERE
WITH THE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, OR EFFICIENCY OF ITS RESPECTIVE SYSTEMS
ON ANY OF THE EASEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLAT; AND ANY PUBLIC UTILITY, INCLUDING
THE CITY OF SANGER, SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT AT ALL TIMES OF INGRESS AND EGRESS TO
AND FROM AND UPON SAID EASEMENTS FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTION,
RECONSTRUCTION, INSPECTION, PATROLLING, MAINTAINING AND ADDING TO OR
REMOVING ALL OR PART OF ITS RESPECTIVE SYSTEMS WITHOUT THE NECESSITY AT ANY
TIME OF PROCURING THE PERMISSION OF ANYONE.
TEXAS
SURVEYING
INC.Firm No. 10100000 - www.txsurveying.com
BEING A 161.421 ACRES TRACT OF LAND OUT OF THE W. MASON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO.
801, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS; BEING ALL OF THOSE CERTAIN TRACTS OF LAND AS
DESCRIBED IN DOC.# __________ AND DOC.# ____________, OFFICIAL RECORDS,
DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS; BEING FURTHER DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD, AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN
TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN V. 1041, P.494, O.R.D.C.T., AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER
OF THAT CERTAIN LOT 6, BLOCK A OF SADDLE RIDGE ESTATES AS RECORDED IN PLAT
CABINET M, PAGE 241, PLAT RECORDS, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS, AT THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN V. 2827, P. 965, O.R.D.C.T.
AND AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID DOC.# 2015-124236, FOR THE NORTHWEST
AND BEGINNING CORNER OF THIS TRACT.
THENCE N 89°59'24" E AT 861.69 FEET PASSING A FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD CAPPED, AT THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID DOC.# 2019-14922 AND AT 2546.62 FEET PASSING A FOUND
1/2" IRON ROD CAPPED AND IN ALL 2554.08 FEET TO A FOUND PK NAIL, AT THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID DOC.# 2019-14922 AND WITHIN METZ ROAD, FOR THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF THIS TRACT.
THENCE S 00°13'21" W 2754.08 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID DOC.# 2019-14922
AND SAID METZ ROAD TO A FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD, AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID
DOC.# 2019-14922 AND AT THE APPROXIMATE INTERSECTION OF VIEW ROAD AND SAID
METZ ROAD, FOR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THIS TRACT.
THENCE S 89°59'41" W AT 1692.19 PASSING A FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD AT THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF SAID DOC.# 2019-14922 AND IN ALL 2552.38 FEET ALONG SAID VIEW ROAD TO
A FOUND PK NAIL, AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID DOC.# 2015-124236, FOR THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THIS TRACT.
THENCE N 00°11'13" E 2753.87 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID DOC.# 2015-124236
TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
BEARINGS, DISTANCES, AND/OR AREAS DERIVED FROM GNSS OBSERVATIONS PERFORMED
BY TEXAS SURVEYING, INC. AND REFLECT N.A.D. 1983, TEXAS STATE PLANE COORDINATE
SYSTEM, NORTH CENTRAL ZONE 4202. (GRID)
SURVEYOR CERTIFICATION:
THAT I, KYLE RUCKER, A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR OF THE
STATE OF TEXAS, REGISTRATION NO. 6444, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE
PLAT HEREON WAS PREPARED FROM AN ACTUAL ON THE GROUND SURVEY OF
THE LEGALLY DESCRIBED PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON AND THAT THIS PLAT
CORRECTLY REPRESENTS THAT SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION.
________________________________
KYLE RUCKER, R.P.L.S. NO. 6444 - JN190328P-PRE
104 S. WALNUT ST., WEATHERFORD, TEXAS
FIELD DATE - JANUARY 2019 - 817-594-0400
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
THAT, _____________________________, BY AND THROUGH THE UNDERSIGNED, DO HEREBY ADOPT THIS PLAT
DESIGNATING THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY AS LOTS 1 - 67, BLOCK 1; LOTS 1 - 35, BLOCK 2; LOTS 1 - 24, BLOCK 3, PHASES
1 & 2; SANGER MEADOW ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SANGER, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS, AND I (WE) DO HEREBY
DEDICATE TO THE USE OF THE PUBLIC FOREVER THE RIGHTS-OF-WAY, (ALLEYS, PARKS) AND EASEMENTS SHOWN THEREON FOR THE
PURPOSE AND CONSIDERATION THEREIN EXPRESSED.
WITNESS MY HAND, THIS THE ______ DAY OF_______________________, 2019.
__________________________________________ ______________
OWNER DATE
STATE OF TEXAS
BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, ON THIS DAY PERSONALLY
APPEARED,____________________________________________________, KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE PERSON(S)
WHOSE NAME(S) IS(ARE) SUBSCRIBED TO THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED
THE SAME FOR THE PURPOSE AND CONSIDERATION EXPRESSED AND IN THE CAPACITY THEREIN STATED, AND AS THE ACT AND DEED
OF SAID TRUST.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE, THIS __________ DAY OF _________________________, 2019.
_________________________________
NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS
APPROVED FOR PREPARATION OF FINAL PLAT
CITY OF SANGER,_____________; DATE______
TEXAS
CITY OF SANGER PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
SURVEYOR:
KYLE RUCKER, R.P.L.S.
104 S. WALNUT ST.
WEATHERFORD, TX 76086
817-594-0400
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
TIM FLEET
LACKLAND HOLDINGS, LLC &
VLMC, INC.
CASE No. _______
PAGE 2 OF 2
PRELIMINARY, THIS DOCUMENT SHALL NOT BE RECORDED FOR ANY PURPOSE AND
SHALL NOT BE USED OR VIEWED OR RELIED UPON AS A FINAL SURVEY DOCUMENT.
OCTOBER 2019
BEING A 161.421 TRACT OF LAND OUT OF THE W. MASON SURVEY,
ABSTRACT NO. 801, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS
SANGER MEADOW ADDITION,
AN ADDITION TO THE ETJ OF THE
CITY OF SANGER, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS
PRELIMINARY PLAT
LOTS 1 - 68, BLOCK 1; LOTS 1 - 35,
BLOCK 2; LOTS 1 - 24, BLOCK 3,
PHASES 1 & 2
APPROVED FOR PREPARATION OF FINAL PLAT
COUNTY JUDGE,_____________; DATE______
DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS
Page 22
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
940.458.2059 | 201 Bolivar St. |PO Box 1729 | Sanger, TX 76226 | www.sangertexas.org
facebook.com/SangerTexas @CityofSanger
DATE: 10/30/2019
1st REVIEW COMMENTS – Preliminary Plat (Sanger Meadows Addition Phase 2)
Request is for a Preliminary Plat of Sanger Meadows Addition Phase 2, being approximately 145
acres of land into 116 residential lots prepared by Texas Surveying submitted on 10/16/2019.
Below are the comments that should be addressed prior to recommendation to City Council for
approval. Resubmit the revised plat along with a response letter addressing all comments.
Planning
1. Fade out Phase 1 lots as Phase 1 preliminary plat has already been submitted and reviewed.
Remove Phase 1 lots and block numbers from the title block.
2. Revise the acreage of phase 2 in title block to exclude phase 1 acreage.
3. Use letters such as A, B, C etc. for block names/numbers.
4. Remove Phase 2 label from Lot 6, Block 3 and provide lot and block numbers as well as
total and net acreage.
5. Show centerline of existing streets. Dimension from centerline to edges of existing and
proposed right-of-way on both sides of the centerline.
6. Blocks shall not exceed one thousand (1,000’) feet in length nor be less than five hundred
(500’) feet in length unless a special topographical features warrant an exception or a
variance is approved by City Council.
7. Lots should be rectangular where practicable. Sharp angles between lot lines should be
avoided. The ratio of depth to width should not exceed two and one-half to one (2.5:1) on
the following lots – Lot 37, Lots 42 – 55, Block 1; Lots 2 – 21, Block 2; and Lots 2 – 6, 8
– 17, 19 – 23, Block 3.
8. Add 30’ building line on lots fronting Metz Road. Minimum building line is 30’. Revise
note 4 accordingly.
9. Provide minimum 15’ of public utility easement along the frontage of all lots fronting any
streets or ROW. Revise note 5 accordingly.
10. Verify with USPS if cluster mailboxes will be required. If so, show a designated location
of cluster mailboxes for the development.
11. Check with Denton County to see if the number of drive approaches from View and Metz
Road is acceptable. A shared driveway between 2 lots is also an option. Verify wit h City
Engineer.
12. A Parkland Dedication fee of in lieu of land is required to be paid for all residential
developments within the ETJ and City limits before filing of the final plat. The fee is
calculated as $274.00 per dwelling unit.
13. Would there be an HOA established for this development?
14. The project will be scheduled for Planning and Zoning Commission on November 11,
2019, and for City Council on December 2, 2019. (Informational Comment)
Page 23
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
940.458.2059 | 201 Bolivar St. |PO Box 1729 | Sanger, TX 76226 | www.sangertexas.org
facebook.com/SangerTexas @CityofSanger
15. Additional comments may be provided upon new information being added to the plat.
(Informational Comment)
Page 24
940.458.2059 | 201 Bolivar St. |PO Box 1729 | Sanger, TX 76226 | www.sangertexas.org
facebook.com/SangerTexas @CityofSanger
ENGINEERING
Memorandum
To: Muzaib Riaz
From: Tracy A. LaPiene, P.E., CFM, City Engineer
Date: 11/11/2019
Re: Sanger Meadow Addn. ‐ Preliminary Plat
Lots 1‐68 Block 1; Lots 1‐35 Block 2; Lots 1‐24 Block 3 Phases 1&2
Engineering Review
The Preliminary Plat application for Sanger Meadow Addn Lots 1‐68 Block 1; Lots 1‐35 Block 2; Lots 1‐24
Block 3 Phases 1&2 has been reviewed. The City of Sanger Engineering Department has the following
comments that should be addressed prior to recommendation to City Council for approval:
The platting process is being run through the City of Sanger. However, all Denton County
requirements shall also apply. The more restrictive code should be applied.
Please review the Denton County plat checklist to ensure all the County requirements are also
shown on the plats. Additional notes and graphics needed.
Submittals for preliminary plats shall include plans, documents, and information adequate for
the review of the provision of public improvements to the properties involved. This includes but
is not limited to streets, water services, wastewater services, franchise utilities, street lighting,
and stormwater detention (ex: preliminary drainage plans, preliminary utility plans, floodplain
study, traffic impact study etc.).
Preliminary civil construction plans have yet to be submitted with the revised plat layout. Water,
Grading & Drainage plans had been received for Lots 1‐11 Block 1 only. Please submit
preliminary civil plans for Phase 2.
Denton County requires Building Setback lines to be shown on Plat. County requires 30’ front
building lines rather than 25’ as stated in general note 4.
Where an existing County road abuts the subdivision, the owner shall set back the subdivision
line (road R.O.W. line) a minimum of one half the total R.O.W. width as established for that
road. Right‐of‐way dedication needs to be determined from existing right of way on opposite
side of street or centerline of roadway if opposite ROW not yet established. The limits of right‐
of‐way dedication shown do not appear to be based off of centerline of existing street. Show
existing right‐of‐way on opposite side of Metz Rd & View Rd and centerline of existing
pavement.
CAD file provided demonstrates that insufficient ROW has been dedicated. Additional ROW
dedication required and lots will need to be adjusted.
Page 25
Page 2 of 4
Per City of Sanger Code of Ordinances Chapter 10 Exhibit A Section 5.04 (D) (1) Residential lots
shall front on residential class streets.
Per County Thoroughfare map View Road is a Minor 2 Lane Arterial and Metz Rd is a Minor 4
Lane Undivided Arterial. Per City Map Metz Rd is classified as a 2 lane Collector.
Residential lot access shall be off of interior streets within the development and lots is not
permitted by Code to front or access off of View Road and Metz Road.
(This comment had not previously been expressed for phase 1.)
Developer may request a variance to allow residential access onto arterial roadway.
If variance approved for residential access onto collector & arterial roadways, shared access
easements may be required by County for shared drives at common lot lines.
Public Access Easement and parking area may be required for common mailbox for
development.
Per Code Chap. 10 Exh. A Section 5.06 B. Where no existing subdivision controls, the blocks shall
not exceed one thousand feet (1,000') in length…
Block A length exceeds maximum of 1000’.
Additional internal streets shall be required or Developer may request a variance to exceed
maximum block length.
Per Code Chap. 10 Exh. A Section 5.04 C. Lot shape: Lots should be rectangular where
practicable. Sharp angles between lot lines should be avoided. The ratio of depth to width
should not ordinarily exceed two and one‐half to one (2‐1/2:1).
A number of lots exceed 2.5:1 general length to width ratio
A variance for lot shape will be required.
Per City Code Visual clearance shall be provided in all zoning districts so that no fence, wall,
architectural screen, earth mounding or landscaping obstructs the vision of a motor vehicle
driver approaching any street, alley or driveway intersection. On any corner lot for which front
and side yards are required herein, no wall, fence, structure, sign, tree, or other planting or
slope terrace or embankment may be maintained higher than three (3) feet above the street
grade so as to cause danger or hazard to traffic by obstructing the view of the intersection from
a point thirty (30) feet back from the right‐of‐way corner.
Therefore, provide a Visibility Easement triangle 30’ from the intersection of ROW lines on all
corner lots.
No wall, fence, structure, sign, tree, or other planting or slope terrace or embankment may be
maintained higher than three (3) feet above the street grade so as to cause danger or hazard to
traffic by obstructing the view of the intersection within visibility easements.
Additional visibility easements may be needed to ensure AASHTO requirements are met at
intersections on View and Metz Roads.
Verify if additional drainage easement needed at intersections.
Page 26
Page 3 of 4
Additional drainage easements may be required to be dedicated along any street frontages if
built‐out sections cannot contain drainage swale within ROW. Per County:
o Ditches shall at all times maintain a minimum thirty‐inch (30″) depth.
o The entire ditch should be contained within the ROW of the road. If the ditch cannot be
contained additional ROW may be required. A second option would be to provide a
minimum sixteen‐foot (16′) drainage easement and the following note on the plat: Note
Drainage easements adjacent to roadways may not be fenced and must be left so that
access can be obtained for maintenance purposes.
Additional utility easements needed outside of ROW along interior & perimeter streets.
I believe Bolivar Water requires exclusive easement for their mains. Please verify with them.
Informational comment: Per County Subdivision Rules & Regulations, when a proposed
subdivision of land abuts both sides of an existing road, street, highway, or drainage easement
that is substandard according to the current Denton County Standard Specifications, the
developer shall be required to improve the existing road and drainage to Denton County
standards.
Residential/Estate street paving shall be a minimum of twenty‐eight feet (28') in width,
measured from edge to edge of pavement. View Rd shall be widened to 14’ from centerline of
road.
Collector Street paving shall be a minimum of forty feet (40') in width. The west side of Metz Rd
shall be widened to meet width requirements.
Drainage channels along View Rd & Metz Rd to be reconstructed with development.
Provide a 16’ wide utility easement parallel to proposed ROW, along frontage of Metz Rd.
Detention. Per County:
o It is the responsibility of all new development to assess downstream conditions and
determine the likelihood that an adverse impact will be created. Where downstream
conditions warrant, it will be the developer’s responsibility to mitigate for increased
peak discharge and increased erosion potential for 2, 5, 10, 25 and 100 return event
storms.
Provide analysis & any justifications. Need to ensure no adverse downstream impacts.
Cannot release more than existing if any downstream impacts. (Includes smaller pipes
downstream).
Existing culverts “3” & “4” appear undersized. They will need to be replaced.
County Experiencing downstream flooding now. An assessment will need to be provided to
determine level of detention, culvert replacements or improvements required. The
proposed runoff to drainage area at culvert “3” is twice existing. County requirement is no
increase in runoff leaving site. May need to detain to all storm events.
Fire hydrants/blow offs shall be required for water quality (flushing) requirements.
The following will be required prior to recommendation of Final Plat approval.
With Final Plats, civil plans shall include drainage design table with minimum driveway culvert
size, slope & capacity required/provided. Table may also be placed on plat.
Full civil construction plans shall be required with Final Plat submittal. Including grading and
prepared at reasonable plan scales. See Denton County Subdivision Rules & Requirements
checklists.
Page 27
Page 4 of 4
Multiple pipe culverts if needed may be required to be made with box culverts. City will need to
verify with County if needed.
Denton County normally requires 6” HMAC on residential street. Provide geotechnical report
with paving recommendations with Final Plat submittal. Widening of Metz shall be more. See
NCTCOG detail 2110 and geotech.
Additional language on drainage and detention easements will be required.
Denton County is performing a courtesy review and additional comments may be forthcoming.
The comments provided are not exhaustive. Additional comments may be provided with additional
reviews. The proposed plans must meet all Denton County and City of Sanger regulations irrespective of
the review comments provided.
The preliminary plats as presented will require variances to
City of Sanger Code of Ordinances Chapter 10 Exhibit A Section 5.04 (D) (1) to allow Residential
lots to front on non‐residential class streets.
Code Chap. 10 Exh. A Section 5.06 B. to exceed Block Length
Code Chap. 10 Exh. A Section 5.04 C. Lot shape: fo Lots to exceed two and one‐half to one (2‐
1/2:1).
Page 28
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
AGENDA MEETING DATE: December 2, 2019
TO: Alina Ciocan, City Manager
FROM: Muzaib Riaz, Planner, Development Services
ITEM/CAPTION:
521 S Stemmons Street FLUM Amendment
Conduct a Public Hearing and Consider, Discuss and Act on Ordinance # 113419 Regarding an Amendment of
Future Land Use Map (FLUM) from Commercial to Industrial on Approximately 1.952 Acres of property, Generally
Located West of I35 and Approximately 300 Feet North of the Intersection of Duck Creek Road and I35 Service
Road.
AGENDA TYPE: Regular, Public Hearing
ACTION REQUESTED: Approval, Ordinance
BACKGROUND:
The applicant is proposing to plat approximately 1.952 acre for industrial use and rezone the approximately 0.959
acres of the subject property from B2 (Business District 2) to I1 (Industrial District) zoning. The purpose of
rezoning is to accommodate an industrial business including storage and manual parts preparation in a 60’ x 81’ steel
insulated structure on the slab. Currently, applicant’s business is located at 201 E. Chapman Drive and is being moved
to the proposed location at 521 S Stemmons Street. Approximately 0.993 acres out of the total 1.952 acres is already
zoned as Industrial District (I1). The applicant is proposing to rezone the remaining 0.959 acres.
LEGAL/BOARD COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS/CITIZEN NOTICE FEEDBACK:
Planning & Zoning Commission Action
The Planning & Zoning Commission APPROVED (50) the proposed FLUM Amendment from Commercial to
Industrial for the subject property.
Notification Response Form
Staff mailed nine (9) public hearing notices to the owners of properties within 200 feet of the subject property. One
response in opposition was received at the time of this report.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY FUNDING/FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
Page 29
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMOAGENDA ITEM NO. 7.AGENDA MEETING DATE: December 2, 2019TO: Alina Ciocan, City ManagerFROM: Muzaib Riaz, Planner, Development ServicesITEM/CAPTION:521 S Stemmons Street FLUM AmendmentConduct a Public Hearing and Consider, Discuss and Act on Ordinance # 113419 Regarding an Amendment ofFuture Land Use Map (FLUM) from Commercial to Industrial on Approximately 1.952 Acres of property, GenerallyLocated West of I35 and Approximately 300 Feet North of the Intersection of Duck Creek Road and I35 ServiceRoad.AGENDA TYPE: Regular, Public HearingACTION REQUESTED: Approval, Ordinance BACKGROUND:The applicant is proposing to plat approximately 1.952 acre for industrial use and rezone the approximately 0.959acres of the subject property from B2 (Business District 2) to I1 (Industrial District) zoning. The purpose ofrezoning is to accommodate an industrial business including storage and manual parts preparation in a 60’ x 81’ steelinsulated structure on the slab. Currently, applicant’s business is located at 201 E. Chapman Drive and is being movedto the proposed location at 521 S Stemmons Street. Approximately 0.993 acres out of the total 1.952 acres is alreadyzoned as Industrial District (I1). The applicant is proposing to rezone the remaining 0.959 acres.LEGAL/BOARD COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS/CITIZEN NOTICE FEEDBACK:Planning & Zoning Commission ActionThe Planning & Zoning Commission APPROVED (50) the proposed FLUM Amendment from Commercial toIndustrial for the subject property.Notification Response FormStaff mailed nine (9) public hearing notices to the owners of properties within 200 feet of the subject property. Oneresponse in opposition was received at the time of this report.FINANCIAL SUMMARY FUNDING/FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
FUNDS:
N/A
STAFF RECOMMENDATION/ACTION DESIRED:
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposed amendment of FLUM from Commercial to Industrial.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Upload Date Type
Staff Report 11/21/2019 Backup Material
Application 11/21/2019 Backup Material
Ordinance # 113419 11/21/2019 Ordinance
Exhibit A Land Use Map Amendment 11/21/2019 Exhibit
Response Form 11/21/2019 Backup Material
Page 30
CITY COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: December 2, 2019
Case #: 19SANZON-0036
Case Coordinator: Muzaib Riaz, Planner, Development Services
Request: Conduct a Public Hearing and Consider, Discuss and Act on Ordinance #
11-34-19 Regarding an Amendment of Future Land Use Map (FLUM) from
Commercial to Industrial on Approximately 1.952 Acres of property,
Generally Located West of I-35 and Approximately 300 Feet North of the
Intersection of Duck Creek Road and I-35 Service Road.
Applicant: Ray Halliburton; Tuff Powder Coating.
______________________________________________________________________________
Case Overview
The applicant is proposing to plat approximately 1.952 acre for industrial use and rezone the
approximately 0.959 acres of the subject property from B-2 (Business District - 2) to I-1 (Industrial
District) zoning. The purpose of rezoning is to accommodate an industrial business including
storage and manual parts preparation in a 60’ x 81’ steel insulated structure on the slab. Currently,
applicant’s business is located at 201 E. Chapman Drive and is being moved to the proposed
location at 521 S Stemmons Street. Approximately 0.993 acres out of the total 1.952 acres is
already zoned as Industrial District (I-1). The applicant is proposing to rezone the remaining 0.959
acres.
In order to change the zoning, the Future Land Use must be amended to match the proposed zoning.
Currently, the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) shows the entire 1.952-acre site to be Commercial.
An amendment of FLUM from Commercial to Industrial is needed before a rezoning of the
property is approved.
According to the Future Land Use Map, the future land use of adjacent parcels is Commercial on
the north and south, Commercial on the east across I-35, and Urban Low Density Residential on
the west.
Elements to Consider
• A companion request for rezoning the subject property from Business District – 2 (B-2) to
Industrial District (I-1) is also on the agenda for consideration.
Page 31
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposed amendment of FLUM from Commercial to
Industrial.
Planning & Zoning Commission Action
The Planning & Zoning Commission APPROVED (5-0) the proposed FLUM Amendment from
Commercial to Industrial for the subject property.
Notification Response Form
Staff mailed nine (9) public hearing notices to the owners of properties within 200 feet of the
subject property. One response in opposition was received at the time of this report.
Attachments
• Application
• Draft Ordinance # 10-34-19
• Exhibit A: Land Use Map Amendment
• Response Form
Page 32
Page 33
ORDINANCE # 10-34-19
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANGER, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS,
AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF APPROXIMATELY 1.952 ACRES OF
TRACTS DESCRIBED AS A1241A TIERWESTER, TR 83, 0.993 ACRES, A1241A
TIERWESTER, TR 84, 0.507 ACRES, AND A1241A TIERWESTER, TR 85A, 0.452
ACRES, FROM COMMERCIAL TO INDUSTRIAL; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL
OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY
CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY OF FINE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
SECTION 1.109 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCE FOR VIOLATIONS; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, due notice of hearings were made in the time and manner prescribed by law
and the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Sanger, Texas, duly covered and
conducted public hearing for the purpose of assessing a request for the amendment of Future Land
Use Map of the described property located in the City of Sanger, Texas;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SANGER, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That the legal description of the tracts is described as follows:
1. A1241A TIERWESTER, TR 83, 0.993 ACRES, OLD DCAD SHT 3, TR 18
2. A1241A TIERWESTER, TR 84, 0.507 ACRES, OLD DCAD SHT 3, TR 17
3. A1241A TIERWESTER, TR 85A, 0.452 ACRES, OLD DCAD SHT 3, TR 16A
SECTION 2. That the Future Land Use of the property described and generally located
west of the I-35 and approximately 300 feet north of the intersection of Duck Creek Road and Ii-
35 Service Road, is amended as shown in Exhibit A.
SECTION 3. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are, to the extent
of such conflict, hereby repealed.
SECTION 4. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the sections,
paragraphs, sentences, clauses, phrases and words of this Ordinance are severable and, if any
word, phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance shall be declared
unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such
unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining portions of this Ordinance, since the same
would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this Ordinance of any
such unconstitutional word, phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section.
SECTION 5. Any person, firm or corporation who shall violate any of the provisions of
this article shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be fined in accordance
with the general penalty provision found in The Code of Ordinances, Section 1.109 General
Penalty for Violations of Code.
Page 34
SECTION 6. This ordinance will take effect immediately from and after its passage and
the publication of the caption, as the law and Charter in such cases provide.
DULY PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Sanger, Texas, on this ____________ day of ________________________, ________.
APPROVED:
_________________________________
Thomas E. Muir, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Cheryl Price, City Secretary
Page 35
ORDINANCE # 10-34-19
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANGER, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS,
AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF APPROXIMATELY 1.952 ACRES OF
TRACTS DESCRIBED AS A1241A TIERWESTER, TR 83, 0.993 ACRES, A1241A
TIERWESTER, TR 84, 0.507 ACRES, AND A1241A TIERWESTER, TR 85A, 0.452
ACRES, FROM COMMERCIAL TO INDUSTRIAL; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL
OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY
CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY OF FINE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
SECTION 1.109 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCE FOR VIOLATIONS; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
DULY PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Sanger, Texas, on this ____________ day of ________________________, ________.
APPROVED:
_________________________________
Thomas E. Muir, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Cheryl Price, City Secretary
Page 36
Urban LowDensity
Com mercia l
Com mercia l
High DensityResidential
Com mercia l
I-35 Service
I
-
3
5
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
I
-
3
5
R
a
m
p Austin St
Church St
Duck Creek Rd
I-3
5
I-
3
5
/Land Use Exhibit - 521 S S temmonsFuture Land Use DISCLAIMER:This map was gene rated by GIS data pro videdby th e Sanger GIS Department. The City of Sange r does n ot guarante e the correctne ss oraccuracy of an y fea tures on this map. The se m approducts are for illustration purposes only an dare not suitable fo r site -specific de cision making.GIS data is subject to co nstant changes, andmay not be complete, accurate or current.
Urba n L o wDensity
Com me rcial Com me rcial
High DensityResidential
Com me rcial
In d ustrial
I-
3
5
S
e
rvi
c
e
I-
3
5
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
I
-
3
5
R
a
m
p Austin St
Church St
Duck Creek Rd
I-3
5
I-
3
5
Current Land Use
Pr oposed Land Use
0 140 28070 Feet
City Limits Exhibits
Page 37
Page 38
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
AGENDA ITEM NO. 8.
AGENDA MEETING DATE: December 2, 2019
TO: Alina Ciocan, City Manager
FROM: Muzaib Riaz, Planner, Development Services
ITEM/CAPTION:
521 S Stemmons Street Rezoning
Conduct a Public Hearing and Consider, Discuss and Act on Ordinance # 103519 Regarding a Zoning Change From
B2 (Business District 2) to I1 (Industrial District) for Approximately 0.959 Acres of Land, Generally Located West
of I35 and Approximately 300 Feet North of the Intersection of Duck Creek Road and I35 Service Road.
AGENDA TYPE: Regular, Public Hearing
ACTION REQUESTED: Approval, Ordinance
BACKGROUND:
The applicant is proposing to plat approximately 1.952 acre for industrial use and rezone the approximately 0.959
acres of the subject property from B2 (Business District 2) to I1 (Industrial District) zoning. The purpose of
rezoning is to accommodate an industrial business including storage and manual parts preparation in a 60’ x 81’ steel
insulated structure on the slab. Currently, applicant’s business is located at 201 E. Chapman Drive and is being moved
to the proposed location at 521 S Stemmons Street. Approximately 0.993 acres out of the total 1.952 acres is already
zoned as Industrial District (I1). The applicant is proposing to rezone the remaining 0.959 acres.
LEGAL/BOARD COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS/CITIZEN NOTICE FEEDBACK:
Planning & Zoning Commission Action
The Planning & Zoning Commission APPROVED (50) the proposed rezoning from “B2” Business District – 2 to “I
1” Industrial District for the subject property.
Notification Response Form
Staff mailed nine (9) public hearing notices to the owners of properties within 200 feet of the subject property. One
response in opposition was received at the time of this report.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY FUNDING/FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
FUNDS:
Page 39
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMOAGENDA ITEM NO. 8.AGENDA MEETING DATE: December 2, 2019TO: Alina Ciocan, City ManagerFROM: Muzaib Riaz, Planner, Development ServicesITEM/CAPTION:521 S Stemmons Street RezoningConduct a Public Hearing and Consider, Discuss and Act on Ordinance # 103519 Regarding a Zoning Change FromB2 (Business District 2) to I1 (Industrial District) for Approximately 0.959 Acres of Land, Generally Located Westof I35 and Approximately 300 Feet North of the Intersection of Duck Creek Road and I35 Service Road.AGENDA TYPE: Regular, Public HearingACTION REQUESTED: Approval, Ordinance BACKGROUND:The applicant is proposing to plat approximately 1.952 acre for industrial use and rezone the approximately 0.959acres of the subject property from B2 (Business District 2) to I1 (Industrial District) zoning. The purpose ofrezoning is to accommodate an industrial business including storage and manual parts preparation in a 60’ x 81’ steelinsulated structure on the slab. Currently, applicant’s business is located at 201 E. Chapman Drive and is being movedto the proposed location at 521 S Stemmons Street. Approximately 0.993 acres out of the total 1.952 acres is alreadyzoned as Industrial District (I1). The applicant is proposing to rezone the remaining 0.959 acres.LEGAL/BOARD COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS/CITIZEN NOTICE FEEDBACK:Planning & Zoning Commission ActionThe Planning & Zoning Commission APPROVED (50) the proposed rezoning from “B2” Business District – 2 to “I1” Industrial District for the subject property.Notification Response FormStaff mailed nine (9) public hearing notices to the owners of properties within 200 feet of the subject property. Oneresponse in opposition was received at the time of this report.FINANCIAL SUMMARY FUNDING/FISCAL IMPACT:N/A
FUNDS:
N/A
STAFF RECOMMENDATION/ACTION DESIRED:
Staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposed rezoning.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Upload Date Type
Staff Report 11/21/2019 Backup Material
Application 11/21/2019 Backup Material
Letter of Intent 11/21/2019 Backup Material
Ordinance # 103519 11/21/2019 Ordinance
Exhibit A Metes and Bounds Description 11/21/2019 Exhibit
Exhibit B Zoning Exhibit 11/21/2019 Exhibit
I1 Industrial District 11/21/2019 Backup Material
Response Form 11/21/2019 Backup Material
Page 40
CITY COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: December 2, 2019
Case #: 19SANZON-0037
Case Coordinator: Muzaib Riaz, Planner, Development Services
Request: Conduct a Public Hearing and Consider, Discuss and Act on Ordinance #
10-35-19 Regarding a Zoning Change From B-2 (Business District - 2) to
I-1 (Industrial District) for Approximately 0.959 Acres of Land, Generally
Located West of I-35 and Approximately 300 Feet North of the Intersection
of Duck Creek Road and I-35 Service Road.
Applicant: Ray Halliburton; Tuff Powder Coating.
______________________________________________________________________________
Case Overview
The applicant is proposing to plat approximately 1.952 acre for industrial use and rezone the
approximately 0.959 acres of the subject property from B-2 (Business District - 2) to I-1 (Industrial
District) zoning. The purpose of rezoning is to accommodate an industrial business including
storage and manual parts preparation in a 60’ x 81’ steel insulated structure on the slab. Currently,
applicant’s business is located at 201 E. Chapman Drive and is being moved to the proposed
location at 521 S Stemmons Street. Approximately 0.993 acres out of the total 1.952 acres is
already zoned as Industrial District (I-1). The applicant is proposing to rezone the remaining 0.959
acres.
Surrounding Land Uses
Direction Land Use Zoning
North
Commercial and Vacant Land B-2 (Business District - 2) PD (Planned
Development)
East
ROW and Restaurant I-35 and B-2 (Business District -2)
South
Vacant Land and Church B-2 (Business District - 2)
West
Residential SF-10 (Single Family Residential District -
10)
Page 41
Elements to Consider
In making its recommendation to the City Council concerning a proposed zoning map amendment,
the Planning and Zoning Commission considered the following factors:
1. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed change will be appropriate in the immediate
area concerned and their relationship to the general area and the City as a whole.
2. Whether the proposed change is in accord with any existing or proposed plans for providing
public schools, streets, water supply, sanitary sewers and other utilities to the area and shall
note the findings.
3. The amount of vacant land currently classified for similar development in the vicinity and
elsewhere in the City, and any special circumstances which may make a substantial part of
such vacant land unsuitable for development.
4. The recent rate at which land is being developed in the same zoning classification as the
request, particularly in the vicinity of the proposed change.
5. The manner in which other areas designated for similar development will be, or are likely
to be, affected if the proposed amendment is approved, and whether such designation for
other areas should also be modified.
6. Any other factors which will substantially affect the public health, safety, morals or general
welfare.
Staff Analysis
The subject site is located at the back of an Industrial zoning and is owned by the same owner as
the industrial zoning parcel. The existing use along the front of the property is Auto Parts and
Accessory Sales use. The property will need to be platted before any development can occur to
ensure access, public utilities, parking, and landscaping etc. The property abuts residential use on
the west. A landscape buffer of minimum 15 feet must be provided along all residential uses.
The I-1 District is established to accommodate uses which are of a non-nuisance type located in
relative proximity to residential areas, and to preserve and protect lands designated on the
comprehensive plan for industrial development and use of land for industrial purpose.
Development in the I-1 District is limited primarily to certain wholesale and jobbing commercial
uses such as the fabrication of materials, and specialized manufacturing and research institutions.
No use or types of uses specifically limited to the I-2 District may be permitted in the I-1 District.
The property is currently not platted and a plat will be required along with associated public
improvements if applicable before development can occur. The public improvements for the site
will include water, sewer, electric, as well as drainage improvements. A site plan of the proposed
development may be required along with civil construction plans. Access to the proposed use will
be required from I-35 Service Road. All development will be required to meet all City of Sanger
and other regulations applicable to the subject site. The subject site does not have floodplain on it.
Staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposed rezoning.
Page 42
Planning & Zoning Commission Action
The Planning & Zoning Commission APPROVED (5-0) the proposed rezoning from “B-2”
Business District – 2 to “I-1” Industrial District for the subject property.
Notification Response Form
Staff mailed nine (9) public hearing notices to the owners of properties within 200 feet of the
subject property. One response in opposition was received at the time of this report.
Attachments
• Application
• Letter of Intent
• Draft Ordinance # 10-35-19
• Exhibit A: Metes and Bounds Description
• Exhibit B: Zoning Exhibit
• “I-1” Industrial District Regulations
• Response Form
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
ORDINANCE # 10-35-19
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANGER, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS,
REZONING APPROXIMATELY 0.959 ACRES OF TRACTS DESCRIBED AS A1241A
TIERWESTER, TR 84, 0.507 ACRES, AND A1241A TIERWESTER, TR 85A, 0.452
ACRES, FROM “B-2” BUSINESS DISTRICT TO “I-1” INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT;
PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING
FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY OF FINE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 1.109 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCE FOR
VIOLATIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Request for rezoning was submitted with the City of Sanger, Texas,
concerning the hereinafter described property;
WHEREAS, due notice of hearings were made in the time and manner prescribed by law
and the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Sanger, Texas, duly covered and
conducted public hearing for the purpose of assessing a request for rezoning from Business District
- 2 to Industrial District on the hereinafter described property located in the City of Sanger, Texas;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SANGER, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That the legal description of the tracts zoned herein is generally described as
follows:
1. A1241A TIERWESTER, TR 84, 0.507 ACRES, OLD DCAD SHT 3, TR 17
2. A1241A TIERWESTER, TR 85A, 0.452 ACRES, OLD DCAD SHT 3, TR 16A
SECTION 2. That the subject property described through metes and bounds in Exhibit
A, and generally located west of I-35 and approximately 300 feet north of the intersection of
Duck Creek Road and I-35 Service Road, is rezoned from Business District – 2 (B-2) to Industrial
District (I-1), as illustrated in Exhibit B.
SECTION 3. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are, to the extent
of such conflict, hereby repealed.
SECTION 4. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the sections,
paragraphs, sentences, clauses, phrases and words of this Ordinance are severable and, if any
word, phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance shall be declared
unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such
unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining portions of this Ordinance, since the same
would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this Ordinance of any
such unconstitutional word, phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section.
SECTION 5. Any person, firm or corporation who shall violate any of the provisions of
this article shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be fined in accordance
Page 46
with the general penalty provision found in The Code of Ordinances, Section 1.109 General
Penalty for Violations of Code.
SECTION 6. This ordinance will take effect immediately from and after its passage and
the publication of the caption, as the law and Charter in such cases provide.
DULY PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Sanger, Texas, on this ____________ day of ________________________, ________.
APPROVED:
_________________________________
Thomas E. Muir, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Cheryl Price, City Secretary
Page 47
ORDINANCE # 10-35-19
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANGER, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS,
REZONING APPROXIMATELY 0.959 ACRES OF TRACTS DESCRIBED AS A1241A
TIERWESTER, TR 84, 0.507 ACRES, AND A1241A TIERWESTER, TR 85A, 0.452
ACRES, FROM “B-2” BUSINESS DISTRICT TO “I-1” INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT;
PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING
FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY OF FINE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 1.109 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCE FOR
VIOLATIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
DULY PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Sanger, Texas, on this ____________ day of ________________________, ________.
APPROVED:
_________________________________
Thomas E. Muir, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Cheryl Price, City Secretary
Page 48
Page 49
S F -1 0SF-1 0
S F -1 0SF-1 0
AA
B -2B-2B-2B-2
B -2B-2
I -1I-1
I -1I-1
B -2B-2PDPD
M F -2MF-2
I
-
3
5
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
I
-
3
5
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
I
-
3
5
R
a
m
p
A u s tinSt
C h u r c hSt
D u c k C r e e k R d
I
-
3
5
I
-
3
5
/Zoning E xhibit - 521 S . StemmonsRezoning DISCLAIMER:This map was gene rated by GIS data pro videdby th e Sanger GIS Department. The City of Sange r does n ot guarante e the correctne ss oraccuracy of an y fea tures on this map. The se m approducts are for illustration purposes only an dare not suitable fo r site -specific de cision making.GIS data is subject to co nstant changes, andmay not be complete, accurate or current.
I
-
3
5
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
I
-
3
5
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
I
-
3
5
R
a
m
p
C h u rc h S t
D u c k C re e k R d
I
-
3
5
I
-
3
5
S F -1 0SF-1 0
S F -1 0SF-1 0
AA B -2B-2
B -2B-2B-2B-2
B -2B-2
I -1I-1
I -1I-1
B -2B-2PDPD
M F -2MF-2
I -1I-1
Current Zoning
Pr oposed Zoning
0 1 5 0 3 0 075 F e e t
City Limits Exhibits
Page 50
SECTION 25
"I-1" INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
General Purpose and Description: The I-1 District is established to accommodate those uses which are of a non-
nuisance type located in relative proximity to residential areas, and to preserve and protect lands designated on the
comprehensive plan for industrial development and use from the intrusion of certain incompatible uses which
might impede the development and use of lands for industrial purpose. Development in the I-1 District is limited
primarily to certain wholesale and jobbing commercial uses and certain industrial uses, such as the fabrication of
materials, and specialized manufacturing and research institutions, all of a non-nuisance type. No use or types of
uses specifically limited to the I-2 District may be permitted in the I-1 District.
25.1 Use Regulations: Uses permitted in the 1-1 District are subject to the following conditions:
1. All business, servicing, or processing, except for off-street parking, off-street loading, display of
merchandise for sale to the public, and establishments of the "drive -in" type, shall be conducted within
completely enclosed areas.
2. All storage within one hundred feet (100') of a residence district, except for motor vehicles in
operable condition, shall be within completely enclosed buildings or effectively screened with screening
not less than six feet (6') nor more than eight feet (8') in height, provided no storage located within fifty
feet (50) of such screening shall exceed the maximum height of such screening.
3. Permitted uses in the I-1 District shall not disseminate dust, fumes, gas, noxious odor, smoke,
glare, or other atmospheric influence.
4. Permitted uses in the I-1 District shall produce no noise exceeding in intensity, at the bounda ry of
the property, the average intensity of noise of street traffic.
5. Permitted uses in the I-1 District shall not create fire hazards on surrounding property.
Permitted uses in the I-1 District include the following:
1. Advertising products, such as signs and billboards (manufacturing of).
2. Ambulance, bus, train, and taxi stations, truck yards;
3. Awnings, Venetian blinds, and window shades (manufacturing of);
4. Bakery, candy, dairy and other food products, but not including fish and meat products, sauerkraut,
vinegar, yeast, alcohol or alcoholic beverages;
5. Building materials yard, contractor's yard, lumberyard;
6. Cameras and other photographic equipment (manufacturing of);
7. Ceramic products, such as pottery, figurines, and small glazed tiles;
8. Ice plants, cold storage plants;
9. Jewelry;
10. Machine shops and fabrication of metal not more than ten (10) gauge in thickness;
11. Metal stamping and extrusion of small products, such as costume jewelry, pins and needles,
razor blades, bottle caps, buttons, and kitchen utensils;
12. Milk and ice cream processing.
13. Mobile home sales.
14. Musical instruments;
15. Orthopedic and medical appliances, such as artificial limbs, braces, suppo rts, and stretchers;
16. Repair of farm, household, office machinery or equipment;
17. Scientific and precision instruments (manufacturing of);
18. Sheet metal shops;
19. Public utility and public service uses as follows:
Page 51
(a) Bus stations, bus terminals, bus turnaround (off-street), bus garages, and bus lots;
(b) Electric substations;
(c) Radio and television towers;
(d) Railroad passenger stations;
(e) Telephone exchanges, microwave relay towers, telephone tran smission equipment buildings and
service yards;
(f) Privately owned water pumping stations and water reservoirs;
20. Radar installations and towers;
21. Radio and television studios and stations;
22. Schools, trade.
23. Storage and warehousing establishments.
24. Storage yards, but not including junkyards;
25. Swimming pool (manufacturing of).
26. Trailer sales and rental, for use with private passenger motor vehicles;
27. Weighing stations;
28. Wholesaling establishments;
29. Accessory uses, including but not limited to temporary buildings for construction purpose for a
period not to exceed the duration of such construction;
30. Other wholesale, light manufacturing, construction or service uses which are similar in character
to those enumerated in this subsection, and which will not be dangerous or otherwise detrimental to
persons residing or working in the vicinity thereof, or to the public welfare, and will not impair the use,
enjoyment, or value of any property;
31. Factory outlet retail or wholesale store for the sales and servicing of goods or materials on the
same premises as the manufacturing company to which they are related, including sales and service in
a separate building or buildings;
32. Other uses as listed in Section 30 of this ordinance.
The following specific uses shall be permitted in the I-1 District when granted in accordance with Section 31:
1. Railroad freight terminals, railroad switching and classificat ion yards, repair shops, and
roundhouses.
2. Stadiums, auditoriums, and arenas.
3. Other uses as listed in Section 30 of this ordinance.
(Ordinance 015-87 adopted 8/3/87)
25.2 Height Regulations: Maximum height of two hundred feet for radio communications towers, and one
hundred (100) feet for all other structures. (Ordinance 08-28-11 adopted 8/1/11)
25.3 Area Regulations:
1. Size of Yards:
a. Front Yard: Minimum required, twenty (20) feet.
b. Side Yard: Minimum side yard of ten (10) feet except a corner lot adjacent to a street shall be
twenty (20) feet. When the industrial district is adjacent to any residential district, a minimum side yard
of twenty (20) feet shall be observed and a six (6) foot solid masonry or wood wall shall be constructed
adjacent to the residential district's property line.
c. Rear Yards: There shall be a rear yard of depth of twenty (20) feet, unless adjacent to a residential
district, in which case a fifty (50) foot rear setback shall be observe d.
2. Size of Lot:
a. Minimum Lot Area: None.
Page 52
b. Minimum Lot Width: None.
c. Minimum Lot Depth: None.
3. Lot Coverage: In no case shall more than fifty (50%) percent of the lot area be covered by the
aggregate area of all buildings constructed on the lot.
25.4 Parking Regulations: Required off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with the specific uses set
forth in Section 32.
Page 53
Page 54
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.
AGENDA MEETING DATE: December 2, 2019
TO: Alina Ciocan, City Manager
FROM: Muzaib Riaz, Planner, Development Services
ITEM/CAPTION:
2820 FM 455 FLUM Amendment
Conduct a Public Hearing and Consider, Discuss and Act on Ordinance # 113619 Regarding an Amendment of
Future Land Use Map (FLUM) from Urban Low Density Residential to Commercial on Approximately 1.00 Acre of
property, Generally Located 1300 Feet East of the Intersection of Marion Road and FM 455, and 350 Feet North of
FM 455.
AGENDA TYPE: Regular, Public Hearing
ACTION REQUESTED: Approval, Ordinance
BACKGROUND:
The applicant is proposing to rezone the subject property of approximately 1.00 acres from Agricultural (A) to
Business District – 2 (B2) zoning. Since B2 is a commercial zoning district, and the designated future land use for the
subject property is Urban Low Density Residential according to the Sanger Comprehensive Land Use Plan, a change
in FLUM from Urban Low Density Residential to Commercial is required before a commercial zoning is approved.
LEGAL/BOARD COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS/CITIZEN NOTICE FEEDBACK:
Planning & Zoning Commission Action
The Planning & Zoning Commission APPROVED (50) the proposed FLUM Amendment from Urban Low Density
Residential to Commercial for the subject property.
Notification Response Form
Staff mailed six (6) public hearing notices to the owners of properties within 200 feet of the subject property. No
responses were received at the time of this report.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY FUNDING/FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
FUNDS:
Page 55
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMOAGENDA ITEM NO. 9.AGENDA MEETING DATE: December 2, 2019TO: Alina Ciocan, City ManagerFROM: Muzaib Riaz, Planner, Development ServicesITEM/CAPTION:2820 FM 455 FLUM AmendmentConduct a Public Hearing and Consider, Discuss and Act on Ordinance # 113619 Regarding an Amendment ofFuture Land Use Map (FLUM) from Urban Low Density Residential to Commercial on Approximately 1.00 Acre ofproperty, Generally Located 1300 Feet East of the Intersection of Marion Road and FM 455, and 350 Feet North ofFM 455.AGENDA TYPE: Regular, Public HearingACTION REQUESTED: Approval, Ordinance BACKGROUND:The applicant is proposing to rezone the subject property of approximately 1.00 acres from Agricultural (A) toBusiness District – 2 (B2) zoning. Since B2 is a commercial zoning district, and the designated future land use for thesubject property is Urban Low Density Residential according to the Sanger Comprehensive Land Use Plan, a changein FLUM from Urban Low Density Residential to Commercial is required before a commercial zoning is approved.LEGAL/BOARD COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS/CITIZEN NOTICE FEEDBACK:Planning & Zoning Commission ActionThe Planning & Zoning Commission APPROVED (50) the proposed FLUM Amendment from Urban Low DensityResidential to Commercial for the subject property.Notification Response FormStaff mailed six (6) public hearing notices to the owners of properties within 200 feet of the subject property. Noresponses were received at the time of this report.FINANCIAL SUMMARY FUNDING/FISCAL IMPACT:N/A
FUNDS:
N/A
STAFF RECOMMENDATION/ACTION DESIRED:
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposed amendment of FLUM from Urban Low Density Residential to
Commercial.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Upload Date Type
2820 FM 455 FLUM Amendment 11/22/2019 Cover Memo
Application 11/21/2019 Backup Material
Ordinance # 113619 11/21/2019 Ordinance
Exhibit A Land Use Map Amendment 11/21/2019 Exhibit
Page 56
CITY COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: December 2, 2019
Case #: 19SANZON-0038
Case Coordinator: Muzaib Riaz, Planner, Development Services
Request: Conduct a Public Hearing and Consider, Discuss and Act on Ordinance #
11-36-19 Regarding an Amendment of Future Land Use Map (FLUM) from
Urban Low Density Residential to Commercial on Approximately 1.00
Acre of property, Generally Located 1300 Feet East of the Intersection of
Marion Road and FM 455, and 350 Feet North of FM 455.
Applicant: Todd Benson; Paxica Security Group LLC.
______________________________________________________________________________
Case Overview
The applicant is proposing to rezone the subject property of approximately 1.00 acres from
Agricultural (A) to Business District – 2 (B-2) zoning. Since B-2 is a commercial zoning district,
and the designated future land use for the subject property is Urban Low Density Residential
according to the Sanger Comprehensive Land Use Plan, a change in FLUM from Urban Low
Density Residential to Commercial is required before a commercial zoning is approved.
The subject property is located along FM 455 corridor within 500 feet of the ROW. It is part of
the properties east of Marion Road and FM 455 intersection that were annexed with the City in
2017. Staff has determined that properties within a 1500’ x 500’ block on the east of FM 455 and
Marion Road intersection is more suitable for commercial development as opposed to residential
development. The subject property falls within this block and faces two major roads and is adjacent
to a major intersection within the City. The comprehensive plan update in the upcoming year will
help determine appropriate locations for commercial land uses in the future for the entire City.
The future land use of the adjacent properties is Urban Low Density Residential on the north, west,
and south of the subject property. The future land use of the adjacent parcel on the east is Rural
Residential.
Elements to Consider
• A companion request for rezoning the subject property from Agricultural (A) to Business
District – 2 (B-2) is also on the agenda for consideration.
Page 57
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposed amendment of FLUM from Urban Low Density
Residential to Commercial.
Planning & Zoning Commission Action
The Planning & Zoning Commission APPROVED (5-0) the proposed FLUM Amendment from
Urban Low Density Residential to Commercial for the subject property.
Notification Response Form
Staff mailed six (6) public hearing notices to the owners of properties within 200 feet of the subject
property. No responses were received at the time of this report.
Attachments
• Application
• Draft Ordinance # 11-36-19
• Exhibit A: Land Use Map Amendment
Page 58
Page 59
ORDINANCE # 10-36-19
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANGER, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS,
AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF APPROXIMATELY 1.00 ACRES OF
TRACT DESCRIBED AS A0029A R. BEEBE, TTR 70D, 70A(1), 1.0 ACRES, FROM
URBAN LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO COMMERCIAL; PROVIDING FOR THE
REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY
CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY OF FINE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
SECTION 1.109 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCE FOR VIOLATIONS; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, due notice of hearings were made in the time and manner prescribed by law
and the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Sanger, Texas, duly covered and
conducted public hearing for the purpose of assessing a request for the amendment of Future Land
Use Map of the described property located in the City of Sanger, Texas;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SANGER, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That the legal description of the tract is described as A0029A R. BEEBE,
TTR 70D, 70A(1), 1.0 ACRES.
SECTION 2. That the Future Land Use of the property described and generally located
1300 feet east of the intersection of Marion Road and FM 455, and 350 Feet North of FM 455, is
amended as shown in Exhibit A.
SECTION 3. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are, to the extent
of such conflict, hereby repealed.
SECTION 4. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the sections,
paragraphs, sentences, clauses, phrases and words of this Ordinance are severable and, if any
word, phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance shall be declared
unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such
unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining portions of this Ordinance, since the same
would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this Ordinance of any
such unconstitutional word, phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section.
SECTION 5. Any person, firm or corporation who shall violate any of the provisions of
this article shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be fined in accordance
with the general penalty provision found in The Code of Ordinances, Section 1.109 General
Penalty for Violations of Code.
Page 60
SECTION 6. This ordinance will take effect immediately from and after its passage and
the publication of the caption, as the law and Charter in such cases provide.
DULY PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Sanger, Texas, on this ____________ day of ________________________, ________.
APPROVED:
_________________________________
Thomas E. Muir, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Cheryl Price, City Secretary
Page 61
ORDINANCE # 10-36-19
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANGER, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS,
AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF APPROXIMATELY 1.00 ACRES OF
TRACT DESCRIBED AS A0029A R. BEEBE, TTR 70D, 70A(1), 1.0 ACRES, FROM
URBAN LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO COMMERCIAL; PROVIDING FOR THE
REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY
CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY OF FINE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
SECTION 1.109 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCE FOR VIOLATIONS; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
DULY PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Sanger, Texas, on this ____________ day of ________________________, ________.
APPROVED:
_________________________________
Thomas E. Muir, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Cheryl Price, City Secretary
Page 62
Urban Low Density
Urba n L o wDensity
Mo derateDensity
RuralResidential
FM 455 W
/Land Use Exhibit - 2820 FM 455Future Land Use DISCLAIMER:This map was gene rated by GIS data pro videdby th e Sanger GIS Department. The City of Sange r does n ot guarante e the correctne ss oraccuracy of an y fea tures on this map. The se m approducts are for illustration purposes only an dare not suitable fo r site -specific de cision making.GIS data is subject to co nstant changes, andmay not be complete, accurate or current.
Urban Low Density
Urba n L o wDensity
Mo derateDensity
RuralResidentia lCommercial
FM 455 W
Current Land Use
Pr oposed Land Use
0 210 420105 Feet
City Limits Exhibits
Page 63
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.
AGENDA MEETING DATE: December 2, 2019
TO: Alina Ciocan, City Manager
FROM: Muzaib Riaz, Planner, Development Services
ITEM/CAPTION:
2820 FM 455 Rezoning
Conduct a Public Hearing and Consider, Discuss and Act on Ordinance # 113719 Regarding a Zoning Change From
A (Agricultural) to B2 (Business District 2) for Approximately 1.00 Acres of Land, Generally Located 1300 Feet
East of the Intersection of Marion Road and FM 455, and 350 Feet North of FM 455.
AGENDA TYPE: Regular, Public Hearing
ACTION REQUESTED: Approval, Ordinance
BACKGROUND:
The applicant is proposing to rezone the subject property of approximately 1.00 acres from Agricultural (A) to
Business District – 2 (B2) zoning. The subject property is located along FM 455 corridor within 500 feet of the
ROW. It is part of the properties east of Marion Road and FM 455 intersection that were annexed with the City in
2017. These annexed properties have a placeholder Agricultural zoning and have not been rezoned to match their
intended land use. Staff has determined that properties within 1500’ x 500’ block on the east of FM 455 and Marion
Road intersection is more suitable for commercial development as opposed to residential development. The subject
property falls within this block and faces two major roads, and is also adjacent to a major intersection within the City.
LEGAL/BOARD COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS/CITIZEN NOTICE FEEDBACK:
Planning & Zoning Commission Action
The Planning & Zoning Commission APPROVED (50) the proposed rezoning from “A” Agricultural to “B2”
Business District for the subject property.
Notification Response Form
Staff mailed six (6) public hearing notices to the owners of properties within 200 feet of the subject property. No
responses were received at the time of this report.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY FUNDING/FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
Page 64
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMOAGENDA ITEM NO. 10.AGENDA MEETING DATE: December 2, 2019TO: Alina Ciocan, City ManagerFROM: Muzaib Riaz, Planner, Development ServicesITEM/CAPTION:2820 FM 455 RezoningConduct a Public Hearing and Consider, Discuss and Act on Ordinance # 113719 Regarding a Zoning Change FromA (Agricultural) to B2 (Business District 2) for Approximately 1.00 Acres of Land, Generally Located 1300 FeetEast of the Intersection of Marion Road and FM 455, and 350 Feet North of FM 455.AGENDA TYPE: Regular, Public HearingACTION REQUESTED: Approval, Ordinance BACKGROUND:The applicant is proposing to rezone the subject property of approximately 1.00 acres from Agricultural (A) toBusiness District – 2 (B2) zoning. The subject property is located along FM 455 corridor within 500 feet of theROW. It is part of the properties east of Marion Road and FM 455 intersection that were annexed with the City in2017. These annexed properties have a placeholder Agricultural zoning and have not been rezoned to match theirintended land use. Staff has determined that properties within 1500’ x 500’ block on the east of FM 455 and MarionRoad intersection is more suitable for commercial development as opposed to residential development. The subjectproperty falls within this block and faces two major roads, and is also adjacent to a major intersection within the City.LEGAL/BOARD COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS/CITIZEN NOTICE FEEDBACK:Planning & Zoning Commission ActionThe Planning & Zoning Commission APPROVED (50) the proposed rezoning from “A” Agricultural to “B2”Business District for the subject property.Notification Response FormStaff mailed six (6) public hearing notices to the owners of properties within 200 feet of the subject property. Noresponses were received at the time of this report.FINANCIAL SUMMARY FUNDING/FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
FUNDS:
N/A
STAFF RECOMMENDATION/ACTION DESIRED:
Staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposed rezoning.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Upload Date Type
Staff Report 11/22/2019 Backup Material
Application 11/21/2019 Backup Material
Letter of Intent 11/21/2019 Backup Material
Ordinance # 113719 11/21/2019 Ordinance
Exhibit A Survey with Metes and Bounds (Tract 2)11/21/2019 Exhibit
Exhibit B Zoning Exhibit 11/21/2019 Exhibit
B2 Zoning District Regulations 11/21/2019 Backup Material
Permitted Land Uses Table 11/21/2019 Backup Material
Page 65
CITY COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: December 2, 2019
Case #: 19SANZON-0039
Case Coordinator: Muzaib Riaz, Planner, Development Services
Request: Conduct a Public Hearing and Consider, Discuss and Act on Ordinance #
11-37-19 Regarding a Zoning Change From A (Agricultural) to B-2
(Business District - 2) for Approximately 1.00 Acres of Land, Generally
Located 1300 Feet East of the Intersection of Marion Road and FM 455,
and 350 Feet North of FM 455.
Applicant: Todd Benson; Paxica Security Group LLC.
______________________________________________________________________________
Case Overview
The applicant is proposing to rezone the subject property of approximately 1.00 acres from
Agricultural (A) to Business District – 2 (B-2) zoning. The subject property is located along FM
455 corridor within 500 feet of the ROW. It is part of the properties east of Marion Road and FM
455 intersection that were annexed with the City in 2017. These annexed properties have a
placeholder Agricultural zoning and have not been rezoned to match their intended land use. Staff
has determined that properties within 1500’ x 500’ block on the east of FM 455 and Marion Road
intersection is more suitable for commercial development as opposed to residential development.
The subject property falls within this block and faces two major roads, and is also adjacent to a
major intersection within the City.
Surrounding Land Uses
Direction Land Use Zoning
North
Residential A (Agricultural)
East
Agricultural (Improved Pasture) Outside of City Limits
South
Commercial A (Agricultural)
West
Commercial A (Agricultural)
Page 66
Elements to Consider
In making its recommendation to the City Council concerning a proposed zoning map amendment,
the Planning and Zoning Commission considered the following factors:
1. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed change will be appropriate in the immediate
area concerned and their relationship to the general area and the City as a whole.
2. Whether the proposed change is in accord with any existing or proposed plans for providing
public schools, streets, water supply, sanitary sewers and other utilities to the area and shall
note the findings.
3. The amount of vacant land currently classified for similar development in the vicinity and
elsewhere in the City, and any special circumstances which may make a substantial part of
such vacant land unsuitable for development.
4. The recent rate at which land is being developed in the same zoning classification as the
request, particularly in the vicinity of the proposed change.
5. The manner in which other areas designated for similar development will be, or are likely
to be, affected if the proposed amendment is approved, and whether such designation for
other areas should also be modified.
6. Any other factors which will substantially affect the public health, safety, morals or general
welfare.
Staff Analysis
B-2 Zoning District allows commercial uses such as quick service food and beverage shop,
restaurants, pharmacy, gift shop, office, motor fuel services, auto laundry (car wash) and other
automobile related uses. B-2 District allows the highest number of retail and commercial land uses
compared to any other commercial zoning district within the City of Sanger. As opposed to B-1
Zoning District B-2 District allows more intense commercial land uses.
The property is currently not platted. The applicant is remodeling the existing building but is not
doing any new construction. Due to this reason a plat will not be required for the site. The property
was being used as a commercial business in the past. The new owner will need to get a certificate
of occupancy from the City. All development will be required to meet all City of Sanger and other
applicable regulations. The subject property does not have any floodplain on it.
Staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposed rezoning.
Planning & Zoning Commission Action
The Planning & Zoning Commission APPROVED (5-0) the proposed rezoning from “A”
Agricultural to “B-2” Business District for the subject property.
Notification Response Form
Staff mailed six (6) public hearing notices to the owners of properties within 200 feet of the subject
property. No responses were received at the time of this report.
Page 67
Attachments
• Application
• Letter of Intent
• Draft Ordinance # 11-37-19
• Exhibit A: Survey with Metes and Bounds Description (Tract 2)
• Exhibit B: Zoning Exhibit
• B-2 Zoning District Regulations
• Permitted Land Uses Table
Page 68
Page 69
October 9, 2019
Paxica Security Group Letter of Intent
2820 FM 455
Sanger, Texas 76266
Good afternoon Paxica Security Group/TMB Investment Holdings is the current owner of the property
located at 2820 FM 455 Sanger, Texas 76266. We are requesting a zoning change for the property to a
B-2 zoning to accommodate our business.
Paxica Security Group – is a low voltage company who specializes in all low voltage needs from camera,
fire alarm, card access just to name a few. Our clientele includes major government entities, medical
hospitals and schools and many more. Paxica request consideration on this zoning change. We are
excited to be a part of the City of Sanger and the involvement with city and community.
If you have any questions, please let me know. Have a great day.
Thank you,
Todd Benson
President
Paxica Security Group
214-909-0841
Page 70
ORDINANCE # 10-37-19
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANGER, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS,
REZONING APPROXIMATELY 1.00 ACRES OF TRACTS DESCRIBED AS A0029A R.
BEEBE, TR 70D, 70A(1), 1.0 ACRES, FROM “A” AGRICULTURAL TO “B-2” BUSINESS
DISTRICT – 2; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN
CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A
PENALTY OF FINE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 1.109 OF THE CODE OF
ORDINANCE FOR VIOLATIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Request for rezoning was submitted with the City of Sanger, Texas,
concerning the hereinafter described property;
WHEREAS, due notice of hearings were made in the time and manner prescribed by law
and the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Sanger, Texas, duly covered and
conducted public hearing for the purpose of assessing a request for rezoning from Agricultural to
Business District – 2 on the hereinafter described property located in the City of Sanger, Texas;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SANGER, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That the legal description of the tracts zoned herein is generally described as
A0029A R. BEEBE, TR 70D, 70A(1), 1.0 ACRES.
SECTION 2. That the subject property described through metes and bounds (Tract 2) in
Exhibit A, and generally located 1300 feet east of the intersection of Marion Road and FM 455,
and 350 feet north of FM 455, is rezoned from Agricultural (A) to Business District – 2 (B-2), as
illustrated in Exhibit B.
SECTION 3. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are, to the extent
of such conflict, hereby repealed.
SECTION 4. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the sections,
paragraphs, sentences, clauses, phrases and words of this Ordinance are severable and, if any
word, phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance shall be declared
unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such
unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining portions of this Ordinance, since the same
would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this Ordinance of any
such unconstitutional word, phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section.
SECTION 5. Any person, firm or corporation who shall violate any of the provisions of
this article shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be fined in accordance
with the general penalty provision found in The Code of Ordinances, Section 1.109 General
Penalty for Violations of Code.
SECTION 6. This ordinance will take effect immediately from and after its passage and
the publication of the caption, as the law and Charter in such cases provide.
Page 71
DULY PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Sanger, Texas, on this ____________ day of ________________________, ________.
APPROVED:
_________________________________
Thomas E. Muir, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Cheryl Price, City Secretary
Page 72
ORDINANCE # 10-37-19
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANGER, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS,
REZONING APPROXIMATELY 1.00 ACRES OF TRACTS DESCRIBED AS A0029A R.
BEEBE, TR 70D, 70A(1), 1.0 ACRES, FROM “A” AGRICULTURAL TO “B-2” BUSINESS
DISTRICT – 2; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN
CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A
PENALTY OF FINE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 1.109 OF THE CODE OF
ORDINANCE FOR VIOLATIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
DULY PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Sanger, Texas, on this ____________ day of ________________________, ________.
APPROVED:
_________________________________
Thomas E. Muir, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Cheryl Price, City Secretary
Page 73
Page 74
AA
P DPD
B -2B-2 AA
F M 4 5 5 W
/Zoning E xhibit - 2820 FM 455Rezoning DISCLAIMER:This map was gene rated by GIS data pro videdby th e Sanger GIS Department. The City of Sange r does n ot guarante e the correctne ss oraccuracy of an y fea tures on this map. The se m approducts are for illustration purposes only an dare not suitable fo r site -specific de cision making.GIS data is subject to co nstant changes, andmay not be complete, accurate or current.
F M 4 5 5 W
AA
P DPD
B -2B-2
AA
AA
B -2B-2
Current Zoning
Pr oposed Zoning
0 2 3 0 4 6 0115 F e e t
City Limits Exhibits
Page 75
SECTION 23
"B-2" BUSINESS DISTRICT - 2
General Purpose and Description: The "B-2" Business district is intended to provide a zoning category similar to
the "B-1" District, except that additional uses are permitted which are not generally carried on completely within a
building or structure, and an expanded range of service and repair uses is permitted.
23.1 Use Regulations: A building or premise shall be used only for the following purposes:
1. Any use permitted in the "B-1" Business District.
2. Building materials sales (no outside storage of lumber, materials or equipment).
3. Lithographic or print shop, retail only.
4. Newspaper or commercial printing.
5. Other uses as listed in Section 30 of this ordinance.
The following specific uses shall be permitted in a B-2 District, when granted in accordance with Section 31:
1. Uses as listed in Section 30 of this ordinance.
23.2 Height Regulations: No building shall exceed one hundred (100) feet in height, except cooling towers, vent
stacks or mechanical equipment rooms may project not more than twelve (12) feet beyond maximum building
height.
23.3 Area Regulations:
1. Size of Yard
a. Front Yard: Minimum required setback shall be twenty (20) feet. Accessory uses must be set back
a minimum of sixty (60) feet.
b. Side Yard: Adjacent to a street, twenty-five (25) feet; minimum required--ten (10) feet.
c. Rear Yard: The minimum rear yard setback shall be twenty (20) feet for any building, or structure.
When an alley is not required, a solid masonry or wood wall of a minimum height of six (6) feet shall be
constructed adjacent to the rear property line to provide a barrier between the adjoining use.
d. Special Side or Rear Yard Requirement: When a nonresidentially zoned lot or tract abuts upon a
zoning district boundary line dividing the lot or tract from a residentially zoned lot or tract, a minimum
side yard of twenty (20) feet shall be provided for on the nonresidential property. A solid masonry or
wood wall having a minimum height of six (6) feet above the average grade of the residential property
shall be constructed adjacent to the common side (or rear) property line.
2. Size of Lot:
a. Minimum Lot Area: None
b. Minimum Lot Width: None
c. Minimum Lot Depth: None
3. Lot Coverage: In no case shall more than fifty percent (50%) of the lot area be covered by
buildings.
23.4 Parking Requirements: Off street parking requirements shall be provided in accordance with Section 32.
Page 76
SECTION 30
USE OF LAND AND BUILDINGS
30.1 Land and buildings in each of the following classified districts may be used for any of the
following listed uses but no land shall hereafter be used and no building or structure shall hereafter be
occupied, used, erected, altered, removed, placed, d emolished or converted which is arranged or
designed to be used for other than those uses specified for the district in which it is located as set forth
by the following schedule of uses:
30.2 LEGEND FOR INTERPRETING SCHEDULE OF USES
Designates use permitted in district indicated
Designates use prohibited in district indicated
S Designates use may be approved as Specific Use permit
For alphabetical list of uses, see Section 42.
PRIMARY RESIDENTIAL USES
A SF-1 SF-2 SF-3 SF-4 SF-4A 2F TH MH-1 MH-2 MF-1 MF-2 B-1 B-2 B-3 RO I-1 I-2
Single Family
Dwelling, Detached S S
Single Family
Dwelling, Attached
Two Family Dwelling
Multiple Family
Dwelling S
Boarding or Rooming
House S S
Mobile Home as a
Fixed Dwelling S
Mobile Home Park S
Mobile Home
Subdivision
Motel or Hotel
Page 77
ACCESSORY AND INCIDENTAL USES
A SF-1 SF-2 SF-3 SF-4 SF-4A 2F TH MH-1 MH-2 MF-1 MF-2 B-1 B-2 B-3 RO I-1 I-2
Accessory Building
Accessory Building
Non-residential
Accessory Building
Farm
Home Occupation S S S
Off-Street Parking
Incidental to Main
use
Stable (private) S
Swimming Pool as
Home Occupation S S S S S S S S S S S S
Swimming Pool
(Private) S S
Tennis Court
(private) S S S S S S S
Temp. Field Office,
Construction Yard or
Office
Subject to temporary permit issued by building official
UTILITY AND SERVICES USES
A SF-1 SF-2 SF-3 SF-4 SF-4A 2F TH MH-1 MH-2 MF-1 MF-2 B-1 B-2 B-3 RO I-1 I-2
Electrical Energy
Generating Plant
S
Electrical Substation,
Bulk Power S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S
Electrical
Transmission Line
(High Voltage
S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S
Fire, Police, or
Municipal Building S S S S S S S S S S
Franchised Private
Utility S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S
Gas Line and
Page 78
Regulating Station
UTILITY AND SERVICES USES
A SF-1 SF-2 SF-3 SF-4 SF-4A 2F TH MH-1 MH-2 MF-1 MF-2 B-1 B-2 B-3 RO I-1 I-2
Local Utility Line
Pub. Bldg Shop or
Yard of Govt.
Agency
S S
Radio, Television or
Microwave Tower S S S S
Radio, or Television
Transmitting Station S S S S
Sewage Pumping
Station
Sewage Treatment
Plant S
Telephone Business
Office
Telephone Exch.,
Switching, Relay
Station
Utility Shops or
Storage Yard or
Building
S
Water Reservoir,
Well or Pump Station
Water Standpipe or
Elevated Water
Storage
Water Treatment
Plant S S S S S S S S S S S S S S
RECREATIONAL AND ENTERTAINMENT USES
A SF-1 SF-2 SF- 3 SF-4 SF-4A 2F TH MH-1 MH-2 MF-1 MF-2 B-1 B-2 B-3 RO I-1 I-2
Amusement,
Commercial
(indoor)
S S S
Amusement,
Commercial
(outdoor)
S S
Page 79
Carnival, Circus or
Tent Service (Temp.) By Resolution of the City Council for Specific periods
Country Club
(private) S S S S S S S S S S
Day Camp for
Children S S
Drag Strip or
commercial racing S
Golf Course,
commercial S S S S S S S S S S S
Handball, Tennis, or
Swim club S S S S S S S S S S
Park or Playground
Playfield or Stadium
(public) S S S S S S S S S S
Private Club S S S S
Rodeo Grounds S
Roller or Ice Rinks
Swimming Pool,
commercial S S
Theater or Playhouse
(indoor)
Theater (outdoor) S
Zoo (private) S
Zoo (public) S S
EDUCATIONAL, INSTITUTIONAL AND SPECIAL USES
A SF-1 SF-2 SF- 3 SF-4 SF-4A 2F TH MH-1 MH-2 MF-1 MF-2 B-1 B-2 B-3 RO I-1 I-2
Art Gallery or
Museum S S S
Cemetery or
Mausoleum S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S
Church or Rectory S S S S S S S S S S
College or University S S S S S S S S S S S
Page 80
Community Center
(Public) S S S S S S
Convent or
Monastery S S S S S S S S S S S
Fairgrounds or
Exhibition Area S S S
Fraternal org., Lodge,
Union Hall S S
Home for Aged,
Residence S S S
Hospital, Acute Care S S S
Hospital, Chronic
Care S S S
Institution for Alcoh.,
Narc., Pychiat. Care S S
Religious, Charitable
or Philanthropic Inst. S S S S S S S S S S S
Kindergarten or
Nursery School S S S S S S S S S S S
School, Business S
School, Commercial
or Trade S
School, Public or
Private S S S S S S S
TRANSPORTATION RELATED USES
A SF-1 SF-2 SF- 3 SF-4 SF-4A 2F TH MH-1 MH-2 MF-1 MF-2 B-1 B-2 B-3 RO I-1 I-2
Airport or Landing
Field
S
Bus Station or
Terminal S
Hauling or Storage
Co.
Heliport, Helistop S
Motor Freight
Terminal S
Parking Lot,
Commercial Auto S
Page 81
Parking Lot, Trucks
and Trailers S
AUTOMOBILE AND RELATED SERVICE USES
A SF-1 SF-2 SF- 3 SF-4 SF-4A 2F TH MH-1 MH-2 MF-1 MF-2 B-1 B-2 B-3 RO I-1 I-2
Auto Glass, Seat
Cover or Muffler
Shop
Auto Laundry (Car
Wash)
Auto Painting, Body
Rebuilding Shop
Auto Parts and
Accessory Sales
(Indoors)
Auto Storage or Auto
Auction
Motor Fuel Service
Station
Motorcycle Sales and
Repair
New or Used Auto
Sales (Outdoor)
New or Used Auto
Sales (Indoor) S S
Repair Garage *
AUTOMOBILE AND RELATED SERVICE USES
A SF-1 SF-2 SF- 3 SF-4 SF-4A 2F TH MH-1 MH-2 MF-1 MF-2 B-1 B-2 B-3 RO I-1 I-2
Tire Retreading or
Capping S
Trailer or Auto
Rental
Wreaking Yard or
Auto Salvage Yard S S
RETAIL AND SERVICE TYPE USES
A SF-1 SF-2 SF- 3 SF-4 SF-4A 2F TH MH-1 MH-2 MF-1 MF-2 B-1 B-2 B-3 RO I-1 I-2
Page 82
Antique Shop S S
Art Supply Store S S
Bakery or
Confectionary Shop
(Retail)
S S
Bank, Saving and
Loan Office * S S
Barber or Beauty
Shop S S
Book or Stationary
Shop or Newsstand S S
Cash Advance or
Payday Loan
Office**
S
Cleaning and
Pressing, Pick-up
Service
S S
Cleaning Plant –
Commercial
Custom Personal
Service Shop S S
Discount or
Department Store S S
Drapery,
Needlework,
Weaving Shop
S S
Drug Store
Pharmacy S S
Florist or Garden
Shop
S S S
RETAIL AND SERVICE TYPE USES
A SF-1 SF-2 SF- 3 SF-4 SF-4A 2F TH MH-1 MH-2 MF-1 MF-2 B-1 B-2 B-3 RO I-1 I-2
Page 83
Food and Beverage
Sales Store * S S
Furniture or
Appliance Store * S S
Greenhouse, Plant
Nursery (Retail) S
Handcraft Shop and
Art Objects Sales S S
Hardware Store or
Hobby Shop S S S
Household
Appliance Service
or repair
* S
Incidental and Acc.
Retail and Service
Uses
S S
Key Shop S S
Laboratory, Medical
and Dental * S S
Laundry and
Cleaning (Self-
Service
S S
Liquor Store
Medical Appliances,
Fitting Sales or
Rental
S S
Modular Building
Sales, Service and
Rental
S S
Mortuary or Funeral
Home S S
Office, General S S
Page 84
Business or
Professional
Office, Medical or
Dental * S S
Outside Display
and Sales S
Pawn Shop S S
Pet Shop S S
RETAIL AND SERVICE TYPE USES
A SF-1 SF-2 SF- 3 SF-4 SF-4A 2F TH MH-1 MH-2 MF-1 MF-2 B-1 B-2 B-3 RO I-1 I-2
Quick Service Food
and Beverage Shop S S S S S
Restaurant or
Cafeteria (Drive-In
Service)
S S S S
Restaurant or
Cafeteria (No Drive-
In)
S
Retail Shop,
Apparel, Gift,
Similar Items
S S
Sexually Oriented
Business
Studio, Decorator,
Artist, Photographer S S
Tavern
Tool Rental * S S S
Travel Bureau or
Travel Consultant S S
Variety Store or
Similar Retail Shop * S S
Page 85
Studio, Health,
Reducing or Similar
Service
S S
Veterinarian, Office
Only (No Animal
Hospital)
S
Veterinarian
Hospital (inside
Pens only)
S S S
Veterinarian
Hospital (outside
Animal Pens)
S
** Such use shall be no closer than 500 feet to another, existing cash advance or payday loan office.
AGRICULTURAL TYPE USES
A SF-1 SF-2 SF- 3 SF-4 SF-4A 2F TH MH-1 MH-2 MF-1 MF-2 B-1 B-2 B-3 RO I-1 I-2
Animal Feed Lot S
Animal Pound
(Public or Private) S S
Farm, Ranch, Garden
or Orchard
Emu Farm
Greenhouse or
Nursery (commercial) S S S
Hatchery, Poultry S S
Kennel S S S S
COMMERCIAL TYPE USES
A SF-1 SF-2 SF- 3 SF-4 SF-4A 2F TH MH-1 MH-2 MF-1 MF-2 B-1 B-2 B-3 RO I-1 I-2
Bakery and
Confectionery
(Wholesale)
Bottling Works
Building Material
Sales *
Page 86
Cabinet or Upholstery
Shop S
Clothing, Similar
Light Manufacturing
Contractor Storage,
Equipment Yard
Dying or Laundry
Plant S
Heavy Machinery
Sales, Storage or
Repair
S
Laboratory
Manufacturing
Laboratory, Scientific
or Research
COMMERCIAL TYPE USES
A SF-1 SF-2 SF- 3 SF-4 SF-4A 2F TH MH-1 MH-2 MF-1 MF-2 B-1 B-2 B-3 RO I-1 I-2
Lithographic or
Print Shop
Maintenance and
Repair Service for
Buildings
*
Milk Depot, Dairy or
Ice Cream Plant
Paint Shop
Plumbing, Heating
and Air Conditioning
Shop
Storage Warehouse
Trailer or Mobile
Home Sales or Rental S S
Welding or machine
Shop
Wholesale Storage
and Sales
NATURAL RESOURCE STORAGE AND EXTRACTION
A SF-1 SF-2 SF- 3 SF-4 SF-4A 2F TH MH-1 MH-2 MF-1 MF-2 B-1 B-2 B-3 RO I-1 I-2
Page 87
Caliche Pit and
Caliche Storage
S S S
Mining and Storage
of Mining Waste
S S S
Petroleum Storage
and Collection
Facilities
S S S S
Sand Gravel
Extraction or
Storage
S S S
Topsoil, Earth or
Stone Extraction or
Storage
S S S
SPECIAL INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES
A SF-1 SF-2 SF- 3 SF-4 SF-4A 2F TH MH-1 MH-2 MF-1 MF-2 B-1 B-2 B-3 RO I-1 I-2
Asphalt or Concrete
Batching Plant
(Perm)
S S
Asphalt or Concrete
Batching Plant
(Temp)
S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S
Brick Kiln or Tile
Plant S S
Sanitary Fill S S S
Slaughter House of
Meat Packing Plant S S
Smelter, Refinery or
Chemical Plant S S
Any use which
could create an
environmental
problem due to
emissions, visual
S S
Page 88
quality, odor, noise,
hazard or similar
factors
(Ordinance 015-87 adopted 8/3/87; Ordinance 10-19-00 adopted 10/2/00; Ordinance 04-08-087, sec. 3,
adopted 4/16/07; Ordinance 07-24-07 adopted 7/2/07; Ordinance 07-27-07 adopted 7/2/07; Ordinance
08-27-11, sec. 1, adopted 8/1/11; Ordinance 01-01-13 adopted 1/22/13; Ordinance 06-11-15 adopted
6/1/15)
GENERAL MANUFACTURING AND INDUSTRIAL USES
See uses as listed in Sections 25 and 26 of this ordinance
*Refer to relevant zoning district regulations and descriptions of permitted uses for further information
regarding this particular use.
30.3 Any dump, excavation, storage, filling or mining operation within that portion of a district having
a Flood Plain, FP, prefix shall be approved in writing by the City Manager or his designated
representative before such operation is begun.
30.4 The fact that land is not within a district having a Flood Plain, FP, prefix shall not be interpreted
as assurance that such land or area is not subject to periodic local flooding and the designation of the
prefix in this ordinance shall not be so interpreted. The City Council by resolution may remove, alter or
change the flood plain boundary or designation on the Zoning District Map for any district.
Page 89
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
AGENDA ITEM NO. 11.
AGENDA MEETING DATE: December 2, 2019
TO: Alina Ciocan, City Manager
FROM: Muzaib Riaz, Planner, Development Services
ITEM/CAPTION:
Sanger Circle Phase 6 Batch Plant SUP
Conduct a Public Hearing and Consider, Discuss and Act on Ordinance # 113819 Regarding a Specific Use Permit
for a Temporary Concrete Batch Plant Use for Sanger Circle Phase 6 Development; Generally Located West of
Marion Road.
AGENDA TYPE: Regular, Public Hearing
ACTION REQUESTED: Approval, Ordinance
BACKGROUND:
The applicant is proposing to set up a temporary concrete batch plant use for a period of 180 days starting December
14, 2019 and ending June 14, 2020. The batch plant will be operational 7AM to 7PM from Monday through Saturday.
Temporary Concrete Batching Plant use is only permitted through SUP in SF10 (Single Family Residential 10)
zoning district, that is the zoning for Sanger Circle Phase 6. The batch plant will have to meet all of TCEQ
requirements. A TCEQ permit application has been submitted by the applicant. The temporary concrete batching plant
will be located at a distance of minimum 300 feet from the nearest residential dwelling unit.
LEGAL/BOARD COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS/CITIZEN NOTICE FEEDBACK:
Planning & Zoning Commission Recommendation
The Planning & Zoning Commission APPROVED (50) the SUP on November 11, 2019.
Notification Response Form
Staff mailed twenty (20) public hearing notices to the owners of properties within 200 feet of the subject property. Two
responses were received at the time of this report, one in support and one in opposition.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY FUNDING/FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
FUNDS:
Page 90
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMOAGENDA ITEM NO. 11.AGENDA MEETING DATE: December 2, 2019TO: Alina Ciocan, City ManagerFROM: Muzaib Riaz, Planner, Development ServicesITEM/CAPTION:Sanger Circle Phase 6 Batch Plant SUPConduct a Public Hearing and Consider, Discuss and Act on Ordinance # 113819 Regarding a Specific Use Permitfor a Temporary Concrete Batch Plant Use for Sanger Circle Phase 6 Development; Generally Located West ofMarion Road.AGENDA TYPE: Regular, Public HearingACTION REQUESTED: Approval, Ordinance BACKGROUND:The applicant is proposing to set up a temporary concrete batch plant use for a period of 180 days starting December14, 2019 and ending June 14, 2020. The batch plant will be operational 7AM to 7PM from Monday through Saturday.Temporary Concrete Batching Plant use is only permitted through SUP in SF10 (Single Family Residential 10)zoning district, that is the zoning for Sanger Circle Phase 6. The batch plant will have to meet all of TCEQrequirements. A TCEQ permit application has been submitted by the applicant. The temporary concrete batching plantwill be located at a distance of minimum 300 feet from the nearest residential dwelling unit.LEGAL/BOARD COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS/CITIZEN NOTICE FEEDBACK:Planning & Zoning Commission RecommendationThe Planning & Zoning Commission APPROVED (50) the SUP on November 11, 2019.Notification Response FormStaff mailed twenty (20) public hearing notices to the owners of properties within 200 feet of the subject property. Tworesponses were received at the time of this report, one in support and one in opposition.FINANCIAL SUMMARY FUNDING/FISCAL IMPACT:N/A
FUNDS:
N/A
STAFF RECOMMENDATION/ACTION DESIRED:
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposed SUP.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Upload Date Type
Staff Report 11/21/2019 Backup Material
Application 11/21/2019 Backup Material
Letter of Intent 11/21/2019 Backup Material
Ordinance # 113819 11/21/2019 Ordinance
Exhibit A Site Location Map 11/21/2019 Exhibit
Batch Plant TCEQ Application 11/21/2019 Backup Material
Response Form 1 11/21/2019 Backup Material
Response Form 2 11/21/2019 Backup Material
Page 91
CITY COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: December 2, 2019
Case #: 19SANZON-0040
Case Coordinator: Muzaib Riaz, Planner, Development Services
Request: Conduct a Public Hearing and Consider, Discuss and Act on Ordinance #
11-38-19 Regarding a Specific Use Permit for a Temporary Concrete Batch
Plant Use for Sanger Circle Phase 6 Development; Generally Located West
of Marion Road.
Applicant: Don Peek; THB Construction.
______________________________________________________________________________
Case Overview
The applicant is proposing to set up a temporary concrete batch plant use for a period of 180 days
starting December 14, 2019 and ending June 14, 2020. The batch plant will be operational 7AM
to 7PM from Monday through Saturday. Temporary Concrete Batching Plant use is only permitted
through SUP in SF-10 (Single Family Residential - 10) zoning district, that is the zoning for Sanger
Circle Phase 6. The batch plant will have to meet all of TCEQ requirements. A TCEQ permit
application has been submitted by the applicant. The temporary concrete batching plant will be
located at a distance of minimum 300 feet from the nearest residential dwelling unit.
Surrounding Land Uses
Direction Land Use Zoning
North
Vacant Land and Residential
Dwelling
Agricultural and Outside of the City Limits
East
Vacant Land and Marion Road Agricultural and ROW
South
Single Family Residential and
Multi-Family Residential
SF-10 Single Family Residential District 10
and MF-2 Multi Family Residential District
– 2
West
City of Sanger Shooting Range
Agricultural
Page 92
Issues for Consideration
In recommending that a specific use permit for the premises under consideration be granted, the
City Council shall determine that such uses are harmonious and adaptable to building structures
and uses of adjacent property and other property in the vicinity of the premises under consideration,
and shall make recommendations as to requirements for the paving of streets, alleys and sidewalks,
means of access to public streets, provisions for drainage, adequate off-street parking, protective
screening and open space, heights of structures and compatibility of buildings.
Notification Response Form
Staff mailed twenty (20) public hearing notices to the owners of properties within 200 feet of the
subject property. Two responses were received at the time of this report, one in support and one in
opposition.
Planning & Zoning Commission Recommendation
The Planning & Zoning Commission APPROVED (5-0) the SUP on November 11, 2019.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposed SUP.
Attachments
• Application
• Letter of Intent
• Ordinance # 11-38-19
• Exhibit A: Site Location Map
• Batch Plant TCEQ Application
• Response Form 1
• Response Form 2
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
ORDINANCE # 11-38-19
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANGER, DENTON
COUNTY, TEXAS, REGARDING A SEPCIFIC USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A
TEMPORARY CONCRETE BATCHING PLANT USE FOR SANGER CIRCLE PHASE 6
DEVELOPMNET ON A TRACT OF LAND GENERALLY DESCRIBED AS A0029A R.
BEEBE, TR 72B(2A), 155.8253 ACRES; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL
ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE;
PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY OF FINE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 1.109 OF
THE CODE OF ORDINANCE FOR VIOLATIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, all Requests for A Specific Use Permit (SUP) were duly filed with the City
of Sanger, Texas, concerning the hereinafter described properties;
WHEREAS, due notice of hearings were made in the time and manner prescribed by law
and the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Sanger, Texas, duly covered and
conducted public hearing for the purpose of assessing a request for a Specific Use Permit (SUP)
on the hereinafter described properties located in the City of Sanger, Texas;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SANGER, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That a Specific Use Permit (SUP) to allow a Temporary Concrete Batching
Plant use is hereby granted for a period of 180 days from December 14, 2019 to June 14. This is
an approximately 0.70-acre site, on property described as A0029A R. Beebe, Tr 72B(2A),
155.8253 acres, and shown in Exhibit A, generally located west of Marion Road.
SECTION 2. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are, to the extent
of such conflict, hereby repealed.
SECTION 3. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the sections,
paragraphs, sentences, clauses, phrases and words of this Ordinance are severable and, if any
word, phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance shall be declared
unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such
unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining portions of this Ordinance, since the same
would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this Ordinance of any
such unconstitutional word, phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section.
SECTION 4. Any person, firm or corporation who shall violate any of the provisions of
this article shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be fined in accordance
with the general penalty provision found in The Code of Ordinances, Section 1.109 General
Penalty for Violations of Code.
Page 97
SECTION 5. This ordinance will take effect immediately from and after its passage and
the publication of the caption, as the law and Charter in such cases provide.
DULY PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Sanger, Texas, on this ____________ day of ________________________, ________.
APPROVED:
_________________________________
Thomas E. Muir, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Cheryl Price, City Secretary
Page 98
ORDINANCE # 11-38-19
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANGER, DENTON
COUNTY, TEXAS, REGARDING A SEPCIFIC USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A
TEMPORARY CONCRETE BATCHING PLANT USE FOR SANGER CIRCLE PHASE 6
DEVELOPMNET ON A TRACT OF LAND GENERALLY DESCRIBED AS A0029A R.
BEEBE, TR 72B(2A), 155.8253 ACRES; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL
ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE;
PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY OF FINE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 1.109 OF
THE CODE OF ORDINANCE FOR VIOLATIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
DULY PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Sanger, Texas, on this ____________ day of ________________________, ________.
APPROVED:
_________________________________
Thomas E. Muir, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Cheryl Price, City Secretary
Page 99
BRIDLEPA T H L N
EL IT E RD
Z
I
N
O
L
N
AVION DR
/Project: S anger CirclePhase 6 SUP
0 100 20050 Feet
DISCLAIMER:This map was generat ed by GIS data providedby the Sang er GIS Departmen t. Th e City of Sanger do es not guarantee the corre ctness oraccuracy of any features on this map . These mapproducts are for illustration purposes only andare not suitab le for site-specific decision makin g.GIS data is subject to consta nt ch anges, andmay not be complete, accurate or current.Date: 11 /2/2019 4:09:24 PMDoc Name: SUP_LocationExhib it_SangerCirclePh6ExhibitsParcels
SubjectArea
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104