09/03/2019-CC-Minutes-Work SessionCITY OF SANGER, TEXAS
MINUTES: WORK SESSION CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Tuesday, September 3, 2019 6:00 PM
502 Elm Street, Sanger, Texas
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT:
Mayor Thomas Muir; Mayor Pro Tem Bilyeu; Councilmember Marissa Barrett; Councilmember
David Clark; Councilmember Allen Chick.
COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT:
Councilmember Dennis Dillon.
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:
City Manager Alina Ciocan; City Secretary Cheryl Price; Finance Director Clayton Gray; City
Engineer Tracy LaPiene; Public Works Director Jim Berman; Director of Development Services
Ramie Hammonds; Planner Muzaib Ruiz.
1.Call Meeting to Order
There being a quorum, Mayor Muir called the Tuesday September 3, 2019 City Council Work
Session to order at 6:02 p.m.
2.Legislative Update
Discuss Recent House Bills Passed by the EightySixth Legislature as They Relate to Development
Services.
Director of Development Services Ramie Hammonds summarized. She noted the House passed
several bills that affect cities and she would summarize a few of them tonight as they relate to
development.
H.B. 2439 Effective September 1, 2019 provides with some exceptions that a governmental
entity including a city may not adopt or enforce a rule, charter provision, ordinance, order, building
code, or other regulation that (1) prohibits or limits, directly or indirectly, the use or installation of a
building product or material in the construction, renovation, maintenance, or other alteration of a
residential or commercial building if the building project or material is approved for use by a national
model code published within the last three code cycles that applies to the construction, renovation,
maintenance, or other alteration of a residential or commercial building if the standard is more
stringent than a standard for the product, material, or aesthetic method under a national model code
published withing the last three code cycles that applies to the construction, renovation, maintenance,
or other alteration of the building.
Ms. Hammonds noted that HB 2439 is known as "The Materials Bill" and basically states that the
City can no longer regulate materials as it pertains to architectural, interior and exterior building
product if the materials are allowed by a national code. She gave an example of 100% masonry
and noted that this or any other percentage of masonry could no longer be required. That basically
any material that meets code can be used in construction and the City has no way to regulate this.
She noted that this also pertains retroactively to any requirements we put into planned developments,
Page 1
CITY OF SANGER, TEXASMINUTES: WORK SESSION CITY COUNCIL MEETINGTuesday, September 3, 2019 6:00 PM502 Elm Street, Sanger, TexasCOUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT:Mayor Thomas Muir; Mayor Pro Tem Bilyeu; Councilmember Marissa Barrett; CouncilmemberDavid Clark; Councilmember Allen Chick.COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT:Councilmember Dennis Dillon.STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:City Manager Alina Ciocan; City Secretary Cheryl Price; Finance Director Clayton Gray; CityEngineer Tracy LaPiene; Public Works Director Jim Berman; Director of Development ServicesRamie Hammonds; Planner Muzaib Ruiz. 1.Call Meeting to OrderThere being a quorum, Mayor Muir called the Tuesday September 3, 2019 City Council WorkSession to order at 6:02 p.m. 2.Legislative UpdateDiscuss Recent House Bills Passed by the EightySixth Legislature as They Relate to DevelopmentServices.Director of Development Services Ramie Hammonds summarized. She noted the House passedseveral bills that affect cities and she would summarize a few of them tonight as they relate todevelopment. H.B. 2439 Effective September 1, 2019 provides with some exceptions that a governmentalentity including a city may not adopt or enforce a rule, charter provision, ordinance, order, buildingcode, or other regulation that (1) prohibits or limits, directly or indirectly, the use or installation of abuilding product or material in the construction, renovation, maintenance, or other alteration of aresidential or commercial building if the building project or material is approved for use by a nationalmodel code published within the last three code cycles that applies to the construction, renovation,maintenance, or other alteration of a residential or commercial building if the standard is morestringent than a standard for the product, material, or aesthetic method under a national model codepublished withing the last three code cycles that applies to the construction, renovation, maintenance,or other alteration of the building.Ms. Hammonds noted that HB 2439 is known as "The Materials Bill" and basically states that theCity can no longer regulate materials as it pertains to architectural, interior and exterior buildingproduct if the materials are allowed by a national code. She gave an example of 100% masonryand noted that this or any other percentage of masonry could no longer be required. That basically
any material that meets code can be used in construction and the City has no way to regulate this.
She noted that this also pertains retroactively to any requirements we put into planned developments,
etc., that they no longer stand. There may be some changes in a few years, but until then we have to
figure out how to address this and make it work in our City.
Ms. Hammonds advised that we currently have some architectural criteria in our Central Core
District which allows the construction of homes on a point system. Summarized how the scoring
criteria worked by giving points for various architectural features (examples: roof pitches,expanded
porches, decorative windows). There was discussion as to the various items that would give points.
She noted that staff is looking at possibly applying the point system to building of homes. There was
brief discussion regarding modular homes and container homes. She noted that this will be market
driven and they will still want to build homes that will sell. This will possibly be more of a problem
on the infill lots where there is one individual coming in to build a home. She reiterated that the City
can not specify materials but can specify architectural requirements. She gave an example that we
could require 40% windows on the front of a home, but can not tell them what windows they have
to use but the product used has to meet code, and if it meets code they can put whatever they
choose to put in.
Ms. Hammonds advised that this also applies to Commercial and provided photos of some of the
buildings allowed in various cities. She noted that if we do not move in a direction that would also
limit architectural design of Commercial Buildings that we may end up with some undesirable
structures along our central corridors.
Ms. Hammonds noted that staff was possibly looking at using the architectural scoring criteria
requirement for the entire City and not just in the Central Core. There was discussion of also
requiring an attached garage. It was noted that the point system with revisions for architectural
features may be a good idea to carry through the whole City, as well as adding the requirement of an
attached garage. If these changes were made, and we find that something is not working or
prohibiting building, that amendments can be made. It was noted that the revisions would have to go
through the Planning and Zoning Commission (P & Z) first, and would then come to City Council.
Ms. Hammonds noted that staff would start working on this and present it as soon as is possible.
She noted that they are attending meetings with other cities on these new bills and if there are any
better ideas out there we can bring those forward to Council and make revisions. Also, applicants
can always bring forward something different in for a variance. In conclusion, Ms. Hammonds
noted that staff will work on putting this together and bring the changes forward to Planning and
Zoning and City Council.
Ms. Hammonds noted another bill that affects Development Services is HB 3167, and is called
"The Shot Clock Bill". This bill says that a plan or a plat has to be approved or denied or
approved with conditions within 30 days. A government is allowed an additional 30 days if there is a
twostep process. The City of Sanger has the two step process with the Planning and Zoning
Commission approval being required before City Council approval. We have conferred with the
City Attorney and we can keep our scheduled submission dates based on our Planning and Zoning
meetings. She summarized the steps that staff would be taking that staff would do a nine day
completeness review and carefully review them and make sure that everything we need is in them.
Once staff accepts them, after the completeness review the clock starts and staff has 30 days to get
them to the Planning and Zoning Commission, and 30 days to get them to Council. The Planning
and Zoning Commission will likely approve with conditions. They will try to work out the conditions
and then the plat will go forward to City Council. If by the time the plat is moved forward to City
Council and the conditions are not met, staff will recommend denial (which is what we already do).
The difference is once the City Council denies the plat the applicant still has the opportunity to
Page 2
CITY OF SANGER, TEXASMINUTES: WORK SESSION CITY COUNCIL MEETINGTuesday, September 3, 2019 6:00 PM502 Elm Street, Sanger, TexasCOUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT:Mayor Thomas Muir; Mayor Pro Tem Bilyeu; Councilmember Marissa Barrett; CouncilmemberDavid Clark; Councilmember Allen Chick.COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT:Councilmember Dennis Dillon.STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:City Manager Alina Ciocan; City Secretary Cheryl Price; Finance Director Clayton Gray; CityEngineer Tracy LaPiene; Public Works Director Jim Berman; Director of Development ServicesRamie Hammonds; Planner Muzaib Ruiz. 1.Call Meeting to OrderThere being a quorum, Mayor Muir called the Tuesday September 3, 2019 City Council WorkSession to order at 6:02 p.m. 2.Legislative UpdateDiscuss Recent House Bills Passed by the EightySixth Legislature as They Relate to DevelopmentServices.Director of Development Services Ramie Hammonds summarized. She noted the House passedseveral bills that affect cities and she would summarize a few of them tonight as they relate todevelopment. H.B. 2439 Effective September 1, 2019 provides with some exceptions that a governmentalentity including a city may not adopt or enforce a rule, charter provision, ordinance, order, buildingcode, or other regulation that (1) prohibits or limits, directly or indirectly, the use or installation of abuilding product or material in the construction, renovation, maintenance, or other alteration of aresidential or commercial building if the building project or material is approved for use by a nationalmodel code published within the last three code cycles that applies to the construction, renovation,maintenance, or other alteration of a residential or commercial building if the standard is morestringent than a standard for the product, material, or aesthetic method under a national model codepublished withing the last three code cycles that applies to the construction, renovation, maintenance,or other alteration of the building.Ms. Hammonds noted that HB 2439 is known as "The Materials Bill" and basically states that theCity can no longer regulate materials as it pertains to architectural, interior and exterior buildingproduct if the materials are allowed by a national code. She gave an example of 100% masonryand noted that this or any other percentage of masonry could no longer be required. That basicallyany material that meets code can be used in construction and the City has no way to regulate this. She noted that this also pertains retroactively to any requirements we put into planned developments,etc., that they no longer stand. There may be some changes in a few years, but until then we have tofigure out how to address this and make it work in our City.Ms. Hammonds advised that we currently have some architectural criteria in our Central CoreDistrict which allows the construction of homes on a point system. Summarized how the scoringcriteria worked by giving points for various architectural features (examples: roof pitches,expandedporches, decorative windows). There was discussion as to the various items that would give points. She noted that staff is looking at possibly applying the point system to building of homes. There wasbrief discussion regarding modular homes and container homes. She noted that this will be marketdriven and they will still want to build homes that will sell. This will possibly be more of a problemon the infill lots where there is one individual coming in to build a home. She reiterated that the Citycan not specify materials but can specify architectural requirements. She gave an example that wecould require 40% windows on the front of a home, but can not tell them what windows they haveto use but the product used has to meet code, and if it meets code they can put whatever theychoose to put in.Ms. Hammonds advised that this also applies to Commercial and provided photos of some of thebuildings allowed in various cities. She noted that if we do not move in a direction that would alsolimit architectural design of Commercial Buildings that we may end up with some undesirablestructures along our central corridors. Ms. Hammonds noted that staff was possibly looking at using the architectural scoring criteriarequirement for the entire City and not just in the Central Core. There was discussion of alsorequiring an attached garage. It was noted that the point system with revisions for architecturalfeatures may be a good idea to carry through the whole City, as well as adding the requirement of anattached garage. If these changes were made, and we find that something is not working orprohibiting building, that amendments can be made. It was noted that the revisions would have to gothrough the Planning and Zoning Commission (P & Z) first, and would then come to City Council. Ms. Hammonds noted that staff would start working on this and present it as soon as is possible.She noted that they are attending meetings with other cities on these new bills and if there are anybetter ideas out there we can bring those forward to Council and make revisions. Also, applicantscan always bring forward something different in for a variance. In conclusion, Ms. Hammondsnoted that staff will work on putting this together and bring the changes forward to Planning andZoning and City Council.Ms. Hammonds noted another bill that affects Development Services is HB 3167, and is called "The Shot Clock Bill". This bill says that a plan or a plat has to be approved or denied orapproved with conditions within 30 days. A government is allowed an additional 30 days if there is atwostep process. The City of Sanger has the two step process with the Planning and ZoningCommission approval being required before City Council approval. We have conferred with theCity Attorney and we can keep our scheduled submission dates based on our Planning and Zoningmeetings. She summarized the steps that staff would be taking that staff would do a nine daycompleteness review and carefully review them and make sure that everything we need is in them. Once staff accepts them, after the completeness review the clock starts and staff has 30 days to getthem to the Planning and Zoning Commission, and 30 days to get them to Council. The Planningand Zoning Commission will likely approve with conditions. They will try to work out the conditionsand then the plat will go forward to City Council. If by the time the plat is moved forward to City
Council and the conditions are not met, staff will recommend denial (which is what we already do).
The difference is once the City Council denies the plat the applicant still has the opportunity to
correct it. Once they correct it and submit it back to staff, the City has 15 days to get it back to
City Council or it is administratively approved. She noted that one of the things staff is going to do is
require a preapplication conference and require them to come in before the project is even
considered so staff can tell them exactly what is expected and what needs to be on the plat and the
issues will hopefully be worked out up front before they submit the plat. One of the checklist items
will be to have approved civil plans because it is hard to get civil plans approved in 30 days and
does fall within this deadline; however, we can ask for a waiver for civil plans, but we can not ask
for a waiver for the plat. The applicant can request a onetime 30 day waiver but the City can not.
It was noted the requirements expected will be noted online, etc. She noted that staff has been in
contact with other cities and TML and some of these suggestions came from TML who also
suggested that require the applicant to have all of their TxDOT permits and CLOMAR/LOMAR
approvals, etc. prior to filing the final plat, which staff is going to do. It was noted that time will tell,
but additional staff may be necessary. There was brief discussion and various scenarios were
discussed. In conclusion Ms Hammonds noted that there were several bills passed this session that
did not affect us as drastically, but there were other bills passed. She noted to the Council that this
has created a lot of work for staff, so if the Council has asked for something, that she wanted them
to know that staff has not forgot about anything that has been asked for, and will work on the items,
it is just going to take a little more time. Ms. Alina Ciocan commended staff for attending meetings
on all of these changes and working with other cities to make sure that we are aligned with what
other areas are doing. Ms. Hammonds noted that staff is working with some groups proactively so
at the next session we have a bigger voice.
3.Update on Public Works Projects
Provide Update on the Peach Street Pipe Bursting Project and the Street Rehabilitation Project.
Mayor Muir noted that Jim Berman with Public Works was present for the next item on the agenda.
There is a resident present that would like to speak on a road issue. Mayor Muir asked if the
resident would like to speak now or during Citizen Participation on the City Council Regular
Agenda.
Mr. Dave McClarin, 132 Shady Grove, was recognized. He noted that he has advised for the third
time that the City is in violation on the striping at 5th and on Keaton because the stop line is past the
crosswalk. The stop line should be before the crosswalk in line with the stop sign. He asked if this
could be corrected. Staff noted that they would look into this issue.
Jim Berman, Director of Public Works provided an update on the Peach Street Pipe Bursting
Project and the road improvements. He provided a quick detailed video presentation of the
completed pipe bursting project and the recent road paving projects.
4.Mobile Food Unit Requirements
Staff Presentation and Discussion on the City of Sanger Mobile Food Unit Requirements.
Ramie Hammonds summarized. She noted that Mayor Pro Tem Bilyeu requested an agenda item
regarding food truck permits. She noted that she included in the agenda packets a list of current
requirements. Basically what has to happen to have a mobile food truck in the City is you have to
have to a commissary that is a licensed commissary which has to be approved and inspected by a
health inspector. It also needs to have a City permit and inspection and provide a copy of the Texas
Page 3
CITY OF SANGER, TEXASMINUTES: WORK SESSION CITY COUNCIL MEETINGTuesday, September 3, 2019 6:00 PM502 Elm Street, Sanger, TexasCOUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT:Mayor Thomas Muir; Mayor Pro Tem Bilyeu; Councilmember Marissa Barrett; CouncilmemberDavid Clark; Councilmember Allen Chick.COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT:Councilmember Dennis Dillon.STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:City Manager Alina Ciocan; City Secretary Cheryl Price; Finance Director Clayton Gray; CityEngineer Tracy LaPiene; Public Works Director Jim Berman; Director of Development ServicesRamie Hammonds; Planner Muzaib Ruiz. 1.Call Meeting to OrderThere being a quorum, Mayor Muir called the Tuesday September 3, 2019 City Council WorkSession to order at 6:02 p.m. 2.Legislative UpdateDiscuss Recent House Bills Passed by the EightySixth Legislature as They Relate to DevelopmentServices.Director of Development Services Ramie Hammonds summarized. She noted the House passedseveral bills that affect cities and she would summarize a few of them tonight as they relate todevelopment. H.B. 2439 Effective September 1, 2019 provides with some exceptions that a governmentalentity including a city may not adopt or enforce a rule, charter provision, ordinance, order, buildingcode, or other regulation that (1) prohibits or limits, directly or indirectly, the use or installation of abuilding product or material in the construction, renovation, maintenance, or other alteration of aresidential or commercial building if the building project or material is approved for use by a nationalmodel code published within the last three code cycles that applies to the construction, renovation,maintenance, or other alteration of a residential or commercial building if the standard is morestringent than a standard for the product, material, or aesthetic method under a national model codepublished withing the last three code cycles that applies to the construction, renovation, maintenance,or other alteration of the building.Ms. Hammonds noted that HB 2439 is known as "The Materials Bill" and basically states that theCity can no longer regulate materials as it pertains to architectural, interior and exterior buildingproduct if the materials are allowed by a national code. She gave an example of 100% masonryand noted that this or any other percentage of masonry could no longer be required. That basicallyany material that meets code can be used in construction and the City has no way to regulate this. She noted that this also pertains retroactively to any requirements we put into planned developments,etc., that they no longer stand. There may be some changes in a few years, but until then we have tofigure out how to address this and make it work in our City.Ms. Hammonds advised that we currently have some architectural criteria in our Central CoreDistrict which allows the construction of homes on a point system. Summarized how the scoringcriteria worked by giving points for various architectural features (examples: roof pitches,expandedporches, decorative windows). There was discussion as to the various items that would give points. She noted that staff is looking at possibly applying the point system to building of homes. There wasbrief discussion regarding modular homes and container homes. She noted that this will be marketdriven and they will still want to build homes that will sell. This will possibly be more of a problemon the infill lots where there is one individual coming in to build a home. She reiterated that the Citycan not specify materials but can specify architectural requirements. She gave an example that wecould require 40% windows on the front of a home, but can not tell them what windows they haveto use but the product used has to meet code, and if it meets code they can put whatever theychoose to put in.Ms. Hammonds advised that this also applies to Commercial and provided photos of some of thebuildings allowed in various cities. She noted that if we do not move in a direction that would alsolimit architectural design of Commercial Buildings that we may end up with some undesirablestructures along our central corridors. Ms. Hammonds noted that staff was possibly looking at using the architectural scoring criteriarequirement for the entire City and not just in the Central Core. There was discussion of alsorequiring an attached garage. It was noted that the point system with revisions for architecturalfeatures may be a good idea to carry through the whole City, as well as adding the requirement of anattached garage. If these changes were made, and we find that something is not working orprohibiting building, that amendments can be made. It was noted that the revisions would have to gothrough the Planning and Zoning Commission (P & Z) first, and would then come to City Council. Ms. Hammonds noted that staff would start working on this and present it as soon as is possible.She noted that they are attending meetings with other cities on these new bills and if there are anybetter ideas out there we can bring those forward to Council and make revisions. Also, applicantscan always bring forward something different in for a variance. In conclusion, Ms. Hammondsnoted that staff will work on putting this together and bring the changes forward to Planning andZoning and City Council.Ms. Hammonds noted another bill that affects Development Services is HB 3167, and is called "The Shot Clock Bill". This bill says that a plan or a plat has to be approved or denied orapproved with conditions within 30 days. A government is allowed an additional 30 days if there is atwostep process. The City of Sanger has the two step process with the Planning and ZoningCommission approval being required before City Council approval. We have conferred with theCity Attorney and we can keep our scheduled submission dates based on our Planning and Zoningmeetings. She summarized the steps that staff would be taking that staff would do a nine daycompleteness review and carefully review them and make sure that everything we need is in them. Once staff accepts them, after the completeness review the clock starts and staff has 30 days to getthem to the Planning and Zoning Commission, and 30 days to get them to Council. The Planningand Zoning Commission will likely approve with conditions. They will try to work out the conditionsand then the plat will go forward to City Council. If by the time the plat is moved forward to CityCouncil and the conditions are not met, staff will recommend denial (which is what we already do). The difference is once the City Council denies the plat the applicant still has the opportunity tocorrect it. Once they correct it and submit it back to staff, the City has 15 days to get it back toCity Council or it is administratively approved. She noted that one of the things staff is going to do isrequire a preapplication conference and require them to come in before the project is evenconsidered so staff can tell them exactly what is expected and what needs to be on the plat and theissues will hopefully be worked out up front before they submit the plat. One of the checklist itemswill be to have approved civil plans because it is hard to get civil plans approved in 30 days anddoes fall within this deadline; however, we can ask for a waiver for civil plans, but we can not askfor a waiver for the plat. The applicant can request a onetime 30 day waiver but the City can not. It was noted the requirements expected will be noted online, etc. She noted that staff has been incontact with other cities and TML and some of these suggestions came from TML who alsosuggested that require the applicant to have all of their TxDOT permits and CLOMAR/LOMARapprovals, etc. prior to filing the final plat, which staff is going to do. It was noted that time will tell,but additional staff may be necessary. There was brief discussion and various scenarios werediscussed. In conclusion Ms Hammonds noted that there were several bills passed this session thatdid not affect us as drastically, but there were other bills passed. She noted to the Council that thishas created a lot of work for staff, so if the Council has asked for something, that she wanted themto know that staff has not forgot about anything that has been asked for, and will work on the items,it is just going to take a little more time. Ms. Alina Ciocan commended staff for attending meetingson all of these changes and working with other cities to make sure that we are aligned with whatother areas are doing. Ms. Hammonds noted that staff is working with some groups proactively soat the next session we have a bigger voice. 3.Update on Public Works ProjectsProvide Update on the Peach Street Pipe Bursting Project and the Street Rehabilitation Project.Mayor Muir noted that Jim Berman with Public Works was present for the next item on the agenda. There is a resident present that would like to speak on a road issue. Mayor Muir asked if theresident would like to speak now or during Citizen Participation on the City Council RegularAgenda. Mr. Dave McClarin, 132 Shady Grove, was recognized. He noted that he has advised for the thirdtime that the City is in violation on the striping at 5th and on Keaton because the stop line is past thecrosswalk. The stop line should be before the crosswalk in line with the stop sign. He asked if thiscould be corrected. Staff noted that they would look into this issue.Jim Berman, Director of Public Works provided an update on the Peach Street Pipe BurstingProject and the road improvements. He provided a quick detailed video presentation of thecompleted pipe bursting project and the recent road paving projects. 4.Mobile Food Unit RequirementsStaff Presentation and Discussion on the City of Sanger Mobile Food Unit Requirements.Ramie Hammonds summarized. She noted that Mayor Pro Tem Bilyeu requested an agenda itemregarding food truck permits. She noted that she included in the agenda packets a list of currentrequirements. Basically what has to happen to have a mobile food truck in the City is you have to
have to a commissary that is a licensed commissary which has to be approved and inspected by a
health inspector. It also needs to have a City permit and inspection and provide a copy of the Texas
Department of Health Inspection. They have to follow all of the guidelines to keep food safe and
follow the rules in the health code. This would be something that the health inspector would be
inspecting. The truck has to be identified with a name and should bear some type of sticker showing
that it is a legal inservice mobile unit. Presently we do not have any licensed units in the City of
Sanger. Staff would like to know how City Council wants to proceed with the ordinance. Currently
a mobile food truck is mobile and does not stay stationary. We have had some requests by some
trucks that would like to sit in one location. We have had some that would like to stay in a
permanent location and be hooked into permanent power and operate daily and some who would
like to park in a location and take the truck away at night. This ordinance needs to be revisited, but
staff needs direction as to what we want with a mobile food unit ordinance. Do we want to allow
them to park in certain areas, do we want to designate as a mobile food truck park. Mobile food
trucks are really popular and staff could move forward in a lot of different ways. It is just a matter of
how do we want to move forward with this. Right now if they set up permanently, it requires an
SUP. She noted an example, that O'Reilly's has agreed to let a food truck park on their property
and leave every day. Currently they could not do this. They currently can only be mobile or have an
SUP to be on a property. She referenced some of the food truck parks in Denton and Argyle. The
parks in Denton she believed were privately owned and there was zoning for the use. Ms.
Hammonds noted that the City does have a temporary permit for events such as the Sanger
Sellabration. There was brief discussion. In conclusion, it was noted that staff continue with the
SUP process for them to park permanently. Also, Mayor Muir noted that if there was an area that
could be designated as a food truck area near downtown to create more traffic and pay daily fee to
be in the park area. Ms. Hammonds noted that staff would explore these options and come back
with some suggestions for Council.
5.Overview of Items on the Regular Agenda
There was no overview of items on the Regular Agenda.
6.Adjourn
There being no further business Mayor Muir adjourned the City Council Work Session at 7:04 p.m.
Page 4