09/07/2006-4B-Agenda Packet-Regular·-
AGENDA
4B Sanger, Texas Development Corporation
Thursday, September 7, 2006
7:00 P.M. -201 Bolivar
1. Call Meeting to Order.
2. Approve Minutes: July 13, 2006
August 10, 2006
3. Review Financials.
4. Consider and Possible Action on Proposed Budget 2006/2007.
*Consider Project with University of North Texas
5. Consider and Possible Action on Appointment of Officers as Required in the By-Laws
Section 5.02.
6. List of Future Agenda Items.
7. Adjournment.
This facility is wheelchair accessible and accessible parking spaces are available. Requests
for accommodations or interpretive services must be made 48 hours prior to this meeting.
Please contact the City Secretary's office at (940) 458-7930 for further information.
'
MINUTES: 4B SANGER, TX DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
JULY 13, 2006
MEMBERS
PRESENT: President Nel Armstrong, Glenn Ervin, John Springer, Thomas Muir,
Beverly Branch, Kim Shaw, John Payne.
OTHERS
PRESENT: Jack Smith -City Manager, Cecile Carson -Economic Development Director,
David Pennington -Fire Chief, Paul Edleman -Chairperson Parks Board, Ken
Green, Paula Morales.
1. President Nel Armstrong called meeting to order and led invocation.
2. Approve of Minutes: June 1, 2006
Motion was made by Beverly Branch to approve minutes as presented wit_h one
correction on page 2 -"park" should be changed to "parking". Seconded by Thomas
Muir.
Motion carried unanimously.
3. Discussion and Possible Action for Funding Projects for the Next 1 to 3 Years.
Cecile Carson presented the Board with presentation regarding ideas that the Parks
Board had discussed and addressed. Available funds in the Reserve is $506,791; the
Checking total is $24,898; the total Expendable Income is $223,481.
Project ideas and proposals were as follows:
I. The Quail Run Park Project
A. The pavilion was priced at $17,550
B. The basketball court was priced at $34,463
C. The playground was priced at $33,659
D. The skate park was priced at $95,408.
E. The parking lot approximately consists of 20-25 spaces ranging
in price from $1,500-$2,000; the price per parking was $40,000
F. The total cost for trees was $2,400
G. Hydro-Mulch had no estimate cost due to what phase will be
doing and the square footage.
Approximate total cost for this project is $223, 430.
II. Presbyterian Church project
A. Exterior-$40,000
B. Utilities-$41,000
C. Interior-$54,000
Total for this project is $135,000.
III. Downtown Plan Total-$20,000
IV. Promotion(max 10%); Total-$53,000.
A. Buxton Marketing Analysis Total-$45,000;
B. Retail Marketing Plan Total-$5,000;
V. Economic Development Incentives total $100,000.
Total of all projects is $531,481.
Discussion on getting more state grants and how support has increased.
President Armstrong and John Springer discussed painting the exterior of the building.
John Springer asked how would the restoration of the building be the catalyst for other
things.
Discussion on restoration of the building. By restoring the building, it would be a
community building to have meetings, small weddings, family reunions, art displays,
etc.
Discussion on other historical landmarks.(Landmark Baptist Church in Sanger, TX).
Cecile Carson indicated that representatives from the Texas Historical Commission
visited regarding their Main Street application. They commented on the fact that our
city has so many historical structures.
President Armstrong addressed the desire to have more Sanger historical markers; so
far there are only three.
Discussion followed regarding state grants.
Ms. Carson discussed engineering plans for the sidewalks in the Downtown area to
satisfy the Disabilities Act guidelines. She indicated that 10% of the funding may be
spent on promotion.
Discussion on Buxton Marketing Analysis.
Discussion on Quail Run Park.
•
4. List of Future Agenda Items
a. Soccer Fields
b. Baseball Fields
c. Boys & Girls Club
d. Kid's Water Park.
Discussion about future funding for these items.
Discussion on the Presbyterian Church.
-Discussion of expansion of facilities.
Discussion about Homeland Security.
Discussion on a new fire station
More discussion about the funding for Downtown and Quail Run Park.
5. Meeting adjourned .
•
Minutes:
Members
Present:
Members
Absent:
Others
Present:
4-B Sanger Texas Development Corporation
August 10, 2006
NelArmstrong,BeverlyBranch, Thomas Muir, John Payne, John Springer and
Glen Ervin
Kim Shaw
Jack Smith, City Manager, Rose Chavez City Secretary/Asst. City Manager,
Cecile Carson, Economic Development Director, Brent Chance, Nate and
Wendy Cottle, Kem Green, Michael and Karen Dill
1. President Nel Armstrong called meeting to order.
2. Conduct Public Hearing on Proposed Projects.
President Nel Armstrong de~lared public hearing opened.
Brent Chance, 306 Deer Run, addressed the Board and emphasized that the residents
in that area are excited to finally get a park; however, they want to make it very clear
they are strongly against the skate park. Mr. Chance indicated that the citizens feel
that a skate park benefits only a small group of citizens. Mr. Chance expressed that
they would like the Skate park to go in another designated area. This neighborhood
has lots of small children which is a safety concern. The citizens are also concerned
with traffic and the noise that it would create. Mr. Chance indicated that Denton has
a skate park and it is well supervised and it is there understanding this park will not
be. There are 214 homes in that neighborhood and 103 signatures were on the petition
he presented to the board that were against the skate park. Mr. Chance indicated that
the Park's Board has never contacted the residents in that neighborhood as they have
indicated, on this issue.
John Payne inquired on the ages of the small children in the neighborhood. It was
indicated by Mr. Chance that the children in the neighborhood were less than 10 years
of age.
Discussion on the ages of the children and how old does a child have to be before they
want to pursue skate board roller skating.
Nate Cottle, 309 Deer Run Drive, addressed the board and spoke against the skate
park. He indicated he participated in the collection of the signatures. He advised that
most of the residents that he approached were against the skate park. He also
emphasized the lack of supervision.
Thomas Muir inquired as to how many homes did this petition cover.
Mr. Chance indicated about 50% which is about 110 or 115 homes, currently occupied.
This included Mom and Dad signatures. Discussed that 150 homes were contacted.
Michael Dill, 115 Teal indicated that the Park will be right in front of their home. They
are happy that the park will be in that IQcation; however, he expressed they are against
the skate park for safety concerns and supervision.
Kem Green, 1000 Keaton, indicated she does not live in the neighborhood. She
addressed the board and reported that she has been made aware there are 60 to 100
skate boarders in the city limits and there are 500 soccer players that commute to
Gainesville to play soccer. She emphasized the need to utilize those funds for soccer
fields which accommodates more families. She indicated skate parks are a nuisance.
Her profession in real estate sales does include Quail Run and those streets in that
neighborhood are very crowded. There are also kids who travel to Denton to play
soccer at the YMCA in Denton. Ms. Green emphasized the importance of soccer fields.
John Payne inquired on where did Ms. Green get the statistics that there is around 100
skate boarders in the city and the 500 soccer players.
Ms. Green indicated that from Paul Eddleman ( chairman of the Parks Board) gave her
that information. Her concern lack of supervision and safety.
Karen Dill also advised the Board she participated in getting the signatures. She
expressed that she was against the Skate Board and the noise this would create •• These
kids that do skate board are now doing more dangerous things.
Glenn Jason, 129 Maned Drive, also spoke against the skate park. The main concern
was the residents do not want this in their neighborhood due to the traffic concern.
This is not what the developer told them that the park would be when they bought their
home.
John Springer inquired on the liability issues that the City would incur.
Rose Chavez, City Secretary, advised that she had contacted TML the city's insurance
carrier, and they did advise that the skate park is a liability risk~ They will insurance
the park; however, certain criteria needed to be established for safety issues to keep the
city from being liable for injuries.
Cecile Carson advised that last week in a conference she attended there were 6 cities
addressing Graffti problems. Others had vandalism problems with the skate park.
Thomas Muir indicated that the time frame for the skate park was 2008-2009 and the
Comprehensive Master Plan will be completed by that time and it will address whether
it is appropriate for the size, location and liability.
Cecile Carson indicated stairs recommendation is to implement Phase I on the Park
and the other items for that park be placed on hold until the Comprehensive Master
Plan is completed. This would give the city an opportunity for Park Planning on a
community perspective.
Discussion regarding the Projects in Phase I, II and III. The fund allocation for the
skate park was discussed as well as the need not to remove the project and to research
a better location.
John Payne emphasized that this project can be masked with safety issues and liability
issues. He is questioning the intent of this entire issue, and whether it was due to the
persons who will use the facility. Mr. Payne indicated that 54 of the signatures,on the
petition came from 27 houses. He question the liability concern or whether the real
issue was the class of people. The City has a public pool and that is a liability to the
city.
Discussion continued on not eliminating the Skate park but to find a location that
would be centralized. This would allow time for research.
Cecile Carson indicated there is a lot of needs and issues for Parks in the community.
The Comprehensive Plan process does include a review of what is available and will
include recommendations of what the city needs. This will include surveying the users
to find out needs for a skate park and soccer fields or other park activities. The
development of an implementation strategy on which years to implement which
projects was discussed.
Discussion continued regarding the skate park and how they can succeed. City of
Sherman has a skate park and it is successful.
Cecile advised that at the last Board meeting the members voted to approve funding
these projects, which authorized them to forward their recommendation to City
Council. The state laws require 4B to conduct one Public Hearing.
Discussion and concerns were expressed on the fund request on allowing adequate
funding to complete this project from start to finish and the different phases for each
project.
Discussion from the public regarding not having adequate notice.
Discussion that at the last meeting the board approved the projects and the monies. The
Board did not decide to spend the funds all in one year. There was a request at the last
meeting that staff provide a time line on the completion of projects.
ni
,Jy,
;. ·., J;
;:.;_ ?'•
_iv,,
. ~~•.·•.:-• l;.~• l,..f~
.; ~ !
_.,, :·•
... , .... ~ '
-~l ·,~.~,i: ;·,";.: .... -!: ?;.·•.;
•. ~
• ; 1 ,4' ;"' .-,1:
.'. ~-• , I : .-t .. \ . ~J' i t '
. : .. ,•'t
-; / :''J· _i .. _i: ~· ;,
1-.. ·•Ir "';' • 1 ·.:~ I· •i
, ~·t ,;
l ~ t • ·., .. ,
,.
•.•
f ,~ '.;.', ; ,', • ~
. ·: ~ t
f:,·:
11 r
,,·. ·•·. . ~ Ii If
.• f.! if ., ~'.4 __ .
' .. ':-~--_i,~ J'
,;•··•-,i
Discussion on the time line for the projects, other future project requests, and financing
for other these projects.
Thomas Muir emphasized the importance of the Comprehensive Master Plan.
Citizens continued to express rejection to the skate park in their neighborhood.
President Armstrong continued with the Public Hearing on the Presbyterian ·church.
Kem Green addressed the board in favor of this project. She inquired on the time
frame on the funds allocated and on the bidding process.
Discussion on the bidding process and bidders whose expertise needs tobe renovations
of historical structures. The Board discussed what still needs to completed on the
building.
The last item on the Public Hearing was the analysis from Buxton Marketing.
There was not any one for or speak against this project.
President Armstrong declared public hearing closed.
3. Discus and Consider By-Law Amendments.
Cecile Carson addressed this item and advised that in a review of the bylaws they do
not reflect dates for actions to occur.
Ms. Carson advised that in Section IV -4.05 -it currently indicates a specific date and
time for their meetings. Ms. Carson suggested that this be omitted from the by-laws
since meetings may vary. She also suggested the annual meeting be changed to July
which coincides with the City Council board appointments. The officers who serve for
a one year term would then serve from July through July of each year. The terms of
the member are for two years and can they serve for an unlimited time. Officers serve
one year term.
Discussed officers were appointed last year.
Motion was made by John Payne to adopt the Amendments as recommended.
Seconded by Thomas Muir. Motion carried unanimously.
4. Review Financials
President Armstrong discussed the financials with the members.
5. List of Future Agenda Items
•
a. John Payne indica~ed that if they are paying somebody to take care of this
Board at a $100.00 a month, and that he signs the checks, that the members
need to have in their possession a copy of those minutes from the previous
meeting and financials. He understood that there was a problem with the City
Secretary last month but ;t makes perfect sense to him.
City Secretary indicated that minutes have always been presented to the board
and not having them was due to circumstances. She will make sure every
month that the minutes and financials will be in their packets.
b. John Springer indicated that at the last meeting they had one item that was
deleted, which was $5,000 to UNT. Mr. Springer indicated years ago when he
was with the school system in the department of special education they
contracted with the University of North for services for two years. The benefit
they received in services was excellent. He felt it was wise to spend the $5,000
dollars for a foot in the door at the University. He emphasized that it would
benefit Sanger.
Nel,Armstrong indicated that she understood that this market analysis that
Buxton Marketing was conducting was similar to this.
Cecile Carson indicated UNT was purposing to conduct an analysis on
incentive policies which would be different. There would be an opportunity
to redefine this.
Beverly Branch asked if a representative from the University ~ould come and
visit with the board on what they can do.
Ms. Carson indicated that she can certainly bring someone to discuss this with
the board. She also indicated this would promote free publicity for the city.
Discussion followed on having a City website and possibly posting agendas on
the Chamber Website. Discussed the staff is currently trying ,.to get a City
Website in place and posting agendas on the Chamber Website is not possible
at this time due to staffing .
..
We, the residents of Quail Run Subdivision, are NOT in favor of the skate board portion of the proposed park in
' our neighborhood because of the following reasons:
1. The skate board park should not be in a neighborhood, but be more centrally located in the city for all city
residents to use;
2. The increased vehicle and foot traffic (we have many small children playing in our neighborhood and )
vehicles already line the streets, decreasing visibility);
3. There is no proposed supervision for those using the skate board park;
4. Increased noise;
5. The money allotted for the skate board park in our neighborhood could be better spent on other park facilities
a. North Denton already has a skate boarding park
b. A skate park serves a very narrow section of the community and Sanger has too few facilities for even
the general population.
6. We have been neither officially informed nor asked our opinions concerning the park.
i NAME -First and Last
f: ~d~y--
.-4 M ~ t< 1< 0 t1 oy1J1 /\
[ 5:/ A Nl,.t f\?
1
_;;Ju c/LcY2..-s Ce,._£~,,, / ~c1U,,,(_
19
[20
21
I I ADDRESS
if
3/o Ot=mZ-: J{Lu r0 012_,.
3\~ 17e€./ Q.o" Dr .
3 r 7 Deel? 12. uP?D/l_
3 13 Deer Ru,,., £)r.
We, lhe residents of Quail Run Subdivision, are NOT in favor of the skate board portion of the proposed park in f · our neighborhood because of the following reasons:
1. The skate board park should not be in a neighborhood, but be more centrally located in the city for all city
residents to use;
2. The increased vehicle and foot traffic (we have many small children playing in our neighborhood and )
vehicles already line the streets, decreasing visibility);
3. There is no proposed supervision for those using the skate board park;
4. Increased noise;
5. The money allotted for the skate board park in our neighborhood could be better spent on other park facilities
a.· North Denton already has a skate boarding park
b. A skate park serves a very narrow section of the community and Sanger has too few facilities for even
the general population.
6. We have been neither officially informed nor asked our opinions concerning the park.
I NAME -First and Last I
2
3
c~s _l.L-~,___J_~~~----
6
7
I \ I
/ l 3
, J
. ft? [to. I {J ~ ... ~V, lX 7bU'2
J~,5 1ea1. -f<d . ..£Mg:u, , -d 162kk>
I elJ !Ml... -/d.. ~-ell tX'. 7h2fob
1°5 Teed (Zd. 'X1,Q8£C) rx Jv 7-(e(p
io s f~M 'ed ✓ S~«, 'Tt: J"Z(Q(p
/$?}! s' Gtsf st 59/t ✓Qf,1 TY 76~
{) r/
1so::;. Ev~Jt st_;.;~ ·r-x ¼.zv
I I I I I 1
We, ·the residents of Quail Run Subdivision, are NOT in favor of the skate board portion of the proposed park in
f · our neighborhood because of the following reasons:
1. The skate board park should not be in a neighborhood, but be more centrally located in the city for all city
residents to use;
2. The increased vehicle and foot traffic (we have many small children playing in our neighborhood and )
vehicles already line the streets, decrea~!ng visibility);
3. There is no proposed supervision for those using the skate board park;
4.i_,lncreased noise;
;;. The money allotted for the skate board park in our neighborhood could be better spent on other park facilities
a. North Denton already has a skate boarding park
b. A skate park serves a very narrow section of the community and Sanger has too few facilities for even
the general population.
6. We have been neither officially informed nor asked our opinions concerning the park.
NAME -First and Last I ADDRESS ~
1 °3c>~ Q4c1 I Cu.s..1,ty
6
7
[11
12
13
14
15
16
18 '
We, ·the residents of Quail Run Subdivision, are NOT in favor of the skate board portion of the proposed park in f · our ~eighborhood because of the following reasons:
1. The skate board park should not be in a neighborhood, but be more centrally located in the city for all city
residents to use;
2. The increased vehicle and foot traffic (we have many small children playing in our neighborhood and )
vehicles already line the streets, decreasing visibility};
3. There is no proposed supervision for those using the skate board park;
4. Increased noise;
5. The money allotted for the skate board park in our neighborhood could be better spent on other park facilities
a. North Denton already has a skate boarding park
b. A skate park serves a very narrow section of the community and Sanger has too few facilities for even
the general population.
6. We have been neither officially informed nor asked our opinions concerning the park.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
-~23:__ _________ _
24
25
I ADDRESS i
/2f /'J444<d £>«7 7626"~·
1 z, 1 ma.o ed Q r .San8er ,lti.t,.
I t2 7 ,1(4-rt t'cl 7) /.-., . 54:tt1 4C 7 {pd4
. /J.. tj []7.a l.lJ1(( rr1'vf ~a«;f~ ](fa.t.fl,
I 2--j f U tt: N c o /J /2 , 7 MfE?,16 L 6
/4 24 ffl!i11Gi . 7J r :Jif:#1: 1tJlia
l2-5 ~Vl~l) \)f(. s\q Vlje? ,b?{tt;
) J} (1Af{f' D DI(-(r:lHOvf 7L:xl?
\ Q_ l£i \):::\G 02,\ b:2, S::.nser tle~I,,
_la~ 1110ned Pr, &~_,ec 7~b
/1r.--~4/l/et2 ~·t <,,j,<y,x 2t-~?-?'
/ 2 ') £..1JU<tJJcr.c k 5-r 5nJt)¼Jt-7bZ6b v > i 3,$" f2._,,-.)c-,~;::::. Sr 5,:),-J&G{L 7bl..bb
. , We, the residents of Quail Run Subdivision, are ttQ.! in favor of the skate board portion of the proposed park in
, ' our neighborhood because of the following reasons:
1. The skate board park should not be in a neighborhood, but be more centrally located in the city for all city
residents to use;
2. The increased vehicle and foot traffic {we have many small children playing in our neighborhood and )
vehicles already line the streets, decreasing visibility};
3. There is no proposed supervision for those using the skate board park;
4. Increased noise;
5. The money allotted for the skate board park in our neighborhood could be better spent on other park facilities
a. North Denton already has a skate boarding park
b. A skate park serves a very narrow section of the community and Sanger has too few facilities for even
the general population.
6. We have been neither officially informed nor asked our opinions concerning the park.
I ADDRESS
3
4
5
(6
...!.7~-L~_.L!,Ll..!;~~::::::u;~~J.:.::!~=L---
8
9
[10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
We, the residents of Quail Run Subdivision, are NOT in favor of the skate board portion of the proposed park in
, · our neighborhood because of the following reasons:
1. The skate board park should not be in a neighborhood, but be more centrally located in the city for all city
residents to. use;
2. The increased vehicle and foot traffic (we have many small children playing in our neighborhood and )
vehicles already line the streets, decreasing visibility);
3. There is no proposed supervision for those using the skate board park;
4. Increased noise;
5. The money allotted for the skate board park in our neighborhood could be better spent on other park facilities
a. North Denton already has a skate boarding park
b. A skate park serves a very narrow section of the community and Sanger has too few facilities for even
the general population.
6. We have been neither officially informed nor asked our opinions concerning the park.
r_:,,_1 ~~444---+...PP.~lr'-r----
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
.we; the residents of Quail Run Subdivision, are ttQI in favor of the skate board portion of the proposed park in
•
1
• our neighborhood because of the following reasons:
1. The skate board park should not be in a neighborhood, but be more centrally located in the city for all city
residents to use;
2. The increased vehicle and foot traffic (we have many small children playing in our neighborhood and)
vehicles already line the streets, decreasing visibility};
3. There is no proposed supervision for those using the skate board park;
4. Increased noise; ,
5. The money allotted for the skate board park in our neighborhood could be better spent on other park facilities
a. North Denton already has a skate boarding park
b. A skate park serves a very narrow section of the community and Sanger has· too few facilities for even
the general population.
6. We have been neither officially informed nor asked our opinions concerning the park.
NAME -First and Last I I ADDRESS f 1 '-./1 Su.-v Cc_ 4!, t.
r-=-2 L o l'l-r c c. ~k.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22 -23
24
25
-
MEMO
Date: August 31, 2006
To: 4B Board Members
Fr: Rose Chavez, City Secretary/ Assistant City Manager
Re: CD Renewal
Enclosed is the,interest payment notice indicating that September I, 2006, CD#5006669 will
earn $3,163.39 interest. The renewal rate will be 7.50%. The financial reports do not reflect the
interest.
,·'
SANGER BANK
501 N STEMMONS
SANGER TX 76266
CITY OF SANGER
SANGER TEXAS DEVELOPMENT
BOX 1729
SANGER, TX 76266
INTEREST PAYMENT NOTICE
CUSTOMER ACCOUNT
000005006669 0005006669
OFFICER CK
ACCOUNT NUMBER 0005006669 IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,163.39 WIJ..{ BE
INTEREST EARNED ON YOUR CERTIFICATE OF DEPOS~tJ-S-ftHtt~BER 000005006669
ADDED TO YOUR ACCOUNT BALANCE ON 09/01/06. THE 1tt"AN'e~YOUR ACCOUNT WILL
$533,461.10.
Q 7. J i:J, 1o
BE Q 7. 5D IJ~cJl
-··
CUSTOMER# 000005006669
0005006669
CITY OF SANGER
SANGER TEXAS DEVELOPMENT
l
I
-· ----
NOTICE DATE 08/18/06
BRANCH# 0001
TERM 0030D FREQ 0030D
NEXT MATURES 09/01/06
8-31-2006 04:18 PM
42 -4B CORPORATION
ASSETS
ACCOUNT NO# TITLE
CASH MONEY MARKET
4B CD#6669
RECEIVABLE-OTHER
DUE FROM GEN. FUND
00-1010
00-1012
00-1053
00-1060
00-1062 AMT TO BE PROVIDED ~·OR L-T-D
, LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE
00-2201 N/P GNB
00-3020 FUND BALANCE
REVENUES
EXPENSES
,.
00-4425
00-4800
00-4940
00-4985
76-5200
76-5210
76-5215
76-5220
76-5225
76-5410
76-5420
76-5450
76-6500
STATE SALES TAX
INTEREST INCOME
DONATIONS
TRANFERS OUT TO 4B/PARK EXP
CHECK CHARGES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & REGISTRATIONS
DUES
PUBLICATIONS/SUBSCRIPTIONS
INSURANCE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
ENGINEERING FEES
PROJECTS
***TOTALS***
C I T Y O F S A N G E R
TRIAL BALANCE
AS OF: AUGUST 31ST, 2006
**** MONTH TO DATE****
DEBITS
20,670.68
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
100.00
0.00
27,000.00
47,770.68
CREDITS
20,835.43
24,003.15
2,932.10
47,770.68CR
***** YEAR TO DATE*****
DEBITS
21,930.59
530,297.71
17,704.51
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1,100.00
0.00
177,299.42
748,332.23
CREDITS
508,289.89
212,177.12
27,865.22
748,332.23CR
PAGE: 1
8-31-2006 04:32 PM
42 -4B CORPORATION
C I T Y O F S A N G E R
FINANCIAL STATEMENT
CURRENT
BUDGET
AS OF: AUGUST 31ST, 2006
CURRENT
PERIOD
Y-T-D
ACTUAL
% OF
BUDGET
Y-T-D
ENCUMB.
PAGE: 1
BUDGET
BALANCE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REVENUE SUMMARY
4B REVENUES
*** TOTAL REVENUES ***
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
76-4B EXPENSES
*** TOTAL EXPENDITURES***
** REVENUES OVER(UNDER) EXPENDITURES**
TOTAL OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
-
220,000.00
220,000.00
181,800.00
181,800.00
38,200.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
26,935.25
26,935.25
27,100.00
27,100.00
164. 75)
o.oo
0.00
o.oo
240,042.34
240,042.34
178,399.42
178,399.42
61,642.92
0.00
0.00
0.00
109 .11
109 .11
98.13
98.13
161. 37
0.00
0.00
0.00
o.oo
o.oo
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
20,042.34)
20,042.34)
3,400.58
3,400.58
23,442.92)
0.00
0.00
0.00
8-31-2006 04:32 PM C I T Y 0 F SANG E R PAGE: 2
FINANCIAL STATEMENT
AS OF: AUGUST 31ST, 2006
42 -4B CORPORATION
UES
CURRENT CURRENT Y-T-D % OF Y-T-D BUDGET
BUDGET PERIOD ACTUAL BUDGET ENCUMB. BALANCE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REVENUES
4B REVENUES
00-4425 STATE SALES TAX
00-4800 INTEREST INCOME
00-4940 DONATIONS
TOTAL 4B REVENUES
*** TOTAL REVENUES ***
220,000.00 24,003.15
0.00 2,932.10
0.00 0.00
220,000.00 26,935.25
220,000.00 26,935.25
--------------==========;:;:;===
212,177.12 96.44 0.00 7,822.88
27,865.22 0.00 0.00 27,865.22}
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
240,042.34 109 .11 0.00 20,042.34)
240,042.34 109 .11 0.00 20,042.34}
============== =============---------------
8-31-2006 04:32 PM
42 -4B CORPORATION
1 00-NON-DEPARTMENTAL
TMENT EXPENDITURES
*** DEPARTMENT TOTAL ***
CITY OF SANGER
FINANCIAL STATEMENT
CURRENT
BUDGET
0.00
AS OF: AUGUST 31ST, 2006
CURRENT
PERIOD
0.00
Y-T-D
ACTUAL
0.00
% OF
BUDGET
0.00
Y-T-D
ENCUMB.
0.00
PAGE: 3
BUDGET
BALANCE
0.00
8-31-2006 04:32 PM C I T Y 0 F SANG E R PAGE: 4
FINANCIAL STATEMENT
AS OF: AUGUST 31ST, 2006
42 -4B CORPORATION
76-4B EXPENSES
I
'.TMENT EXPENDITURES
CURRENT CURRENT Y-T-D % OF Y-T-D BUDGET
BUDGET PERIOD ACTUAL BUDGET ENCUMB. BALANCE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
52-SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
76-5200 CHECK CHARGES
76-5210 OFFICE SUPPLIES
76-5215 TRAVEL & REGISTRATIONS
76-5220 DUES
76-5225 PUBLICATIONS/SUBSCRIPTIONS
TOTAL 52-SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
54-CONTRACT SERVICES
76-5410 INSURANCE
76-5420 CONTRACTUAL
76-5450 ENGINEERING
TOTAL 54-CONTRACT
65-PROJECTS
76-6500 PROJECTS
TAL 65-PROJECTS
SERVICES
FEES
SERVICES
*** DEPARTMENT TOTAL ***
*** TOTAL EXPENDITURES***
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
TOTAL OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
*** END OF REPORT***
0.00
200.00
500.00
250.00
200.00
1,150.00
100.00
28,500.00
0.00
28,600.00
152,050.00
152,050.00
181,800.00
181,800.00
0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
100.00 1,100.00
0.00 0.00
100.00 1,100.00
27,000.00 177,299.42
27,000.00 177,299.42
27,100.00 178,399.42
27,100.00 178,399.42
0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.86
0.00
3.85
116.61
116.61
98 .13
98 .13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
200.00
500.00
250.00
200.00
1,150.00
100.00
27,400.00
0.00
27,500.00
25,249.42)
25,249.42)
3,400.58
3,400.58
0.00
MEMO
Date: September 1, 2006
To: 4B Board Members
Fr: Rosalie Chavez, City Secretary/ Assistant City Manager
Re: Proposed Budget 2006/2007
The City Manager failed to add the Economic Development Director's salary to Item #76-5420.
He has been out sick the last two days.
We will have a modified budget with that correction at the next meeting which will reflect changes
in total expenditures and revenues.
7-13-2006 03:48 PM
42•-4B CORPORATION
C I T Y O F S A N G E R
DEPARTMENT HEAD BUDGET
AS OF: JUNE,30TH, 2006
CURRENT
BUDGET
Y-T-D
ACTUAL
PAGE: 1
CITY SECRET ARY
On'Q'f\'AI ~,-
DE]?T. HEAD
BUDGET
"i\l ··,j, ,.-.i.. l..-UPY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
REVENUE SUMMARY
4B REVENUES
*** TOTAL REVENUES ***
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
76-4B EXPENSES
*** TOTAL EXPENDITURES***
* REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXP.*
220,000.00
220,000.00
181,800.00
181,800.00
38,200.00
192,304.17 250,000.00
192,304.17 250,000.00
151,199.42 250,000.00
151,199.42 250,000.00
===============
41,104.75 0.00
t
7-13-2006 03:48 PM
42 -4B CORPORATION
R ~UES
4B REVENUES
00-4425
00-4800
00-4940
STATE SALES TAX
INTEREST INCOME
DONATIONS
'** REVENUE CATEGORY TOTAL**
*** TOTAL REVENUES ***
C I T Y 0 F SANGER
AS OF:
DEPARTMENT HEAD BUDGET
JUNE 30TH,
CURRENT
BUDGET
220,000.00
0.00
0.00
220,000.00
220,000.00
2006
Y-T-D
ACTUAL
170,277.21
22,026.96
0.00
192,304.17
192,304.17
PAGE:
DEPT. HEAD
BUDGET
240,000.00
10,000.00
0.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
2
7-13-2006 03:48 PM
42 -4B CORPORATION
0 )N-DEPARTMENTAL
1 D~~ .. RTMENT EXPENDITURES
C I T Y O F S A N G E R
DEPARTMENT HEAD BUDGET ,
AS OF: JUNE 30TH, 2006
CURRENT
BUDGET
Y-T-D
ACTUAL
PAGE:
DEPT. HEAD
BUDGET
3
. . --
*** DEPARTMENT TOTAL *** 0. 001 0.00 0.00
.7-13-2006 03:48 PM
42 -4B CORPORATION
7 l EXPENSES
D~--.RTMENT EXPENDITURES
C I T Y O F S A N G E R
DEPARTMENT HEAD BUDGET
AS OF: JUNE 30TH, 2006
CURRENT
BUDGET
Y-T-D
ACTUAL
PAGE:
DEPT. HEAD
BUDGET
4
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
52-SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
76-5200, CHECK CHARGES 0.00 0.00 0.00
76-5210 OFFICE SUPPLIES 200.00 0.00 200.00
76-5215 TRAVEL & REGISTRATIO 500.00 o.oo 500.00
76-5220 DUES 250.00 0.00 250.00
76-5225 PUBLI.CATIONS / SUBSCRI 200.00 0.00 200.00
** CATEGORY TOTAL** 1,150.00 0.00 1,150.00
54-CONTRACT SERVICES
76-5410 INSURANCE 100. 00 0.00 100.00
76-5420 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 28,500.00 900.00 1,200.00.:k'
76-5450 ENGINEERING FEES 0.00 0.00 0.00
** CATEGORY TOTAL ** 28,600.00 900.00 1,300.00
65-PROJECTS
76-6500 PROJECTS 152,050.00 150,299.42 247,550.00
** ~l\.TEGORY TOTAL** 152,050.00 150,299.42 247,550.00 ,;
*** DEPARTMENT TOTAL *** 181,800.00 151,199.42 250,000.00
============ =============-
*** TOTAL EXPENDITURES *** 181,800.00 151,199.42 · 250,000.00
*** END OF REPORT***
*** TOTAL EXPENDITURES*** 0.00 0.00 0.00
•
MEMO
Date: September 1, 2006
To: 4B Board Members
Fr: Rose Chavez, City Secretary/ Assistant City Manager
Re: Reappointments
At the August 21, 2006 City Council meeting, the Council reappointed all members for a two
year term .