Loading...
07/01/2004-PZ-Agenda Packet-RegularAGENDA PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THURSDAY, JULY 19 2004 201 BOLIVAR 7:OOPM 1. Call Meeting to Order. 2. Approve Minutes: June 3, 2004 3. Conduct Public Hearing to Consider a Zoning Request Change from Old SF3 (Old Single Family 3)to 2F (Duplex) on property legally described as Sanger Trails, Phase 1 ans Sanger Trails, Phase 2A, Lot 6. Property is located off of Marion Road. 4. Consider and Possible Action Regarding a Zoning Request Change from Old SF3 (Old Single Family 3)to 2F (Duplex) on property legally described as Sanger Trails, Phase 1 and Sanger Trails Phase 2A, Lot 6. Property is located off of Marion Road. 5. Consider and Possible Action on a Final Plat of Laird Addition, Lot 1, Block 1. Property is Located at 301 S.10* Street. 6. Conduct Public Hearing on Proposed Changes to the Zoning Ordinances of the City of Sanger. 7. Consider and Possible Action on Proposed Changes to the Zoning Ordinances of the City of Sanger. 8. Adjourn`.% y % Rosalie Chavez, City Secre t ' ;• �.�'''-• Date and Time Posted This facility is wheelchair accessible and accessible parking spaces are available. Requests for accommodations or interpretive services must be made 48 hours prior to this meeting. Please contact the City Secretarv's office at (940) 458-7930 for further information. • • IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO ATTEND, PLEASE CALL SAM OR ROSE AT 458-7930!! MINUTES: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION JUNE 39 2004 PRESENT: Shelley Ruland, Gail Goodner, Polly Dwyer, Katharine Wordell, Ralph Cain ABSENT: Ken Perry OTHERS PRESENT: City Manager Jack Smith, City Secretary/Assistant City Manager Rose Chavez, Assistant City Secretary/Administrative Assistant Samantha Renz, Allen Bussell, Jerry Jenkins, Teri Voss, Don Jost, Dale Keith Roberts, Carol Martin Roberts 1. Shelley Ruland Called Meeting to Order. 2. Approve Minutes: April 29, 2004 Polly Dwyer moved to approve the minutes as presented. Katharine Wordell seconded. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Conduct Public Hearing to Consider a Zoning Request Change to the PD (Planned Development) Zoning on Property Legally Described as Abstract 1241 in the Henry Tierwester Survey, Tract 87 & 88. Public Hearing opened. Allen Bussell, indicated he revised the plan to include Single Family. The old plan was good for long term, but not for short term. He went over the proposal on the layout. The limit of commercial area is shown on the plan and written in the write up. Discussed assisted living area. Discussed single family area. Mr. Bussell indicated they changed the homes to 2000 square ft. minimum living area. They would like the front yard setback to be 20 feet. They would like the side yard on corner lots to have 15 ft. setbacks. They are proposing to line the street up with Laney Drive. He continued to go through the planned development proposal. Sidewalks will be constructed per code. Parking lot will have trees every 12 spaces maximum, with an island every twelve spaces. Two out of three islands will have a large tree. Everything will have automatic irrigation systems. There will not be any signs on Keaton Road. Discussed landscaping and irrigation. Mr. Bussell indicated there is a two story limit on assisted living. The maximum will be 80 units on assisted living. Don Jost,102 Holt Street, asked if the office and small retail will be two story or one story. Mr. Bussell indicated that would be in the B2 area, and would possibly be two story. Mr. Jost indciated there was parking in the residential area and asked if it was for the assisted living. Mr. Bussell indicated it was not for the assisted living, it was for the homes on that street. It is a courtyard street. Mr. Jost asked about the width of the street. He indicated originally they had a boulevard. He asked if they will still have it. Mr. Bussell indicated they did away with the boulevard. Discussed the street and drainage. Mr. Jost continued to express concerns regarding the proposed development. He felt it should be changed best for the city. Mr. Jost asked if they were going to put in the doctor's office and medical facility. Mr. Bussell indicated they will not have the offices in the West area, it will all be in the B2 area. Mr. Jost expressed concerns regarding the maintenance of the property. Mr. Jost asked about the cost of the homes. Mr. Bussell indicated they will be $140-$160, 000 and up. Dale Keith Roberts, 600 Keaton Rd., indicated he is adjacent on the South side of the subject property. He is in favor of the assisted living, and felt it was a positive thing for the community. The original plan had the road meeting Brooke Lane. This new plan will have the road at his bedroom window. He indicated the detention ponds he has seen are mosquito breeding grounds. If you have a 100 year flood you just store water to breed mosquitos. He has done a lot of landscaping around his home to keep the water from settling to keep the mosquitos away. He indicated he would like to see a controlled intersection, not just a four way stop. Mr. Roberts expressed concerns regarding the speed on Keaton Road. He felt more traffic control should be required. He indicated he would prefer the road meet Brooke Lane. Mr. Roberts expressed concerns regarding increased taxes. He also indicated he would like to see garden areas in the assisted living sections. Teri Voss, 1803 Duck Creek, expressed concerns regarding the differences in the existing planned development and this new plan. 4. Consider and Possible Action Regarding a Zoning Request Change to the PD (Planned Development) Zoning on Property Legally Described as Abstract 1241 in the Henry Tierwester Survey, Tract 87 & 88. Discussion regarding the fence. Polly Dwyer asked if they would be willing to put in an 8 foot fence all the way down the North side. The developers indicated they would. Mr. Bussell indicated it would most likely be six foot in the residential. Shelley Ruland indicated there is no park area. Polly Dwyer asked about the roof pitch. Mr. Bussell indicated it would be consistent with the homes on the North. Mr. Bussell indicated he would be comfortable putting a minimum 6:12 pitch. City Secretary indicated she was pleased they were building bigger homes. She had no objection to this concept plan. Discussion. City Secretary indicated the only concern she had was the drainage issues. Polly Dwyer asked if on the Single Family they would have varying elevations. Discussion. Polly Dwyer asked if these would be front entry garages. Mr. Bussell indicated they will be front or J-entry. Poly Dwyer asked about the 20 ft. front building line. Mr. Bussell indicted he did not like to push it back more than that, this would enable them to have a larger back yard. He liked it closer to the street. The rear yard is minimum 25 feet. Polly Dwyer asked if they will have 2 car garages. Mr. Bussell indicated they will. Discussion regarding setbacks. Discussion regarding traffic on the main street. City Manager indicated there will be no parking on that street. Shelley Ruland indicated she liked that it will take traffic off of Keaton Road. Polly Dwyer asked if there will be a garden plan in the assisted living area. Mr. Bussell indicated it is not in the plan but they will have garden areas. Discussion. Polly Dwyer asked if there was any type of government assistance for this development. Mr. Bussell indicated there was not. Polly Dwyer indicated she would like to put in the PD that a garden area adequate for residents of the assisted living areas will be included. Discussed traffic lights. Mr. Bussell indicated he felt they should require traffic control devices. They need to have traffic combing devices that narrow intersections, or raise the street in the intersections. He recommended the City consider adding this type of requirement to the subdivision regulations. Discussion regarding the main road. Shelley Ruland indicated when they start dealing with water flow the detention situation will really have to be addressed. As they get into this, they do not want to see a detention pond, they want to see the water flow addressed. Ralph Cain indicated that drainage was also his primary concern. He would hate to see the people disappointed on something they approve where the drainage was inadequate. He asked if they had full intention of taking care of the drainage. Mr. Bussell indicated they would. Polly Dwyer moved to approve the Planned Development with the changes as discussed in the meeting, including a minimum 2000 square foot dwelling, no parking on the main street, an 8 foot buffer between the commercial and residential areas, the elevations will vary with ten different plans, they will have 2 car garages, minimum 6:12 roof pitch on homes, garden areas adequate for assisted living, park areas as required by subdivision regulations, all subdivision regulations will be met, and all drainage studies must be approved. Katharine Wordell seconded. Motion carried unanimously. 15. Meeting Adjourned. MEMO June 25, 2004 To: Planning and Zoning Commission Fr: Rose Chavez, City Secretary/Assistant City Manager Re: Sanger Trails Attached is the information on this item. The property owner is requesting to re -zone the first phase of Sanger Trails to Duplex. Attached is a map of the area. ZONING CHANGE REQUEST Date: -a2 - ------- - Name: Address: 17W 1/_�" io-aaft, Phone: 1-4 Z-- I am requesting the pep pr Alocated at ALWiy? and legally described as Z S.9 %Ere_ _fmmn to be considered for a zoning change from >F to The purpose for this zoning request is as follows: AO-I&IXY -,04*1 A!5' *THE METES AND BOUNDS "GAL DESCB21M OF THE PROPERTY IS ATTACHED. 42 Date received Fee $ PD. Rec'd by: 0 4 - EXMIT'A FOR THE REZONING OF PHASE I SANGER TRAILS _ BEGINNING at a "P-K Nail" set in the center of Marion Road (asphalt), being coiaamoe=-=--_- - --- -' with the east line of said 292.163 acre tract, for the northeast corner hereof, fi�gM yyhich a "P-K Nail" set in the center of said Marion Road for the easterly most northeast corner of_.�_ ,. said 292.163 acre tract, said point being common with the southeast corner of the 9.297 - - - - - _ acre tract of land described in deed from H. D. Cooper and wife Vera Lou Cooper to Lou - - Henry Cooper and wife, page Cooper, recorded in Volume 1005, Page 253 of the Real_ Property Records of Denton County, Texas, bears North 000 12'42" West a distance of 1165.57 feet; THENCE with said Marion Road, South 11 ° 12' 42" East, a distance of 80.00 feet to a "P- -. K Nail" set for the southeast corner hereof; THENCE, leaving said Marion Road and entering and continuing through said 292.163 acre tract for the following thirty-eight (38) courses and distances: 1. South 89047' 18" West, a distance of 160.00 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set 2. South 00°12'42" East, a distance of 13.50 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set 3. South 89°47' 18" West, a distance of 50.00 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set 4. North 00012'42" West, a distance of 23.50 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set 5. South 89047' 18" West, a distance of 145.15 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set 6. South 00012'42" East, a distance of 110.00 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set 7. South 89047' 18" West, a distance of 234.85 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set 8. South 00012142" East, a distance of 144.00 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set 9. South 89°47' 18" West, a distance of 110 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set 10. South 00°12'42" East, a distance of 31.55 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set 11. South 89,04711811 West, a distance of 50.00 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set 12. North 00°12'42" West, a distance of 15.50 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set 13. South 89047' 18" West, a distance of feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set 14. North 000 12'42" West, a distance of 50.00 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set 15. North 89047' 18" East, a distance of 15.50 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set 16. North 00°12'42" West, a distance of 110.00 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set 17. South 89°47' 18" West, A distance of 508.32 feet to a 518 inch rebar set ts. South 72022'38" West, a distance of 50.00 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set for the beginning of a non -tangent curve to the left, having a central angle of 2035' 16", a radius of 349.77 feet and chord bearing and distance of North 18055'00" West, 15.80 feet; 19. Northerly with said curve, an arc distance of 15.80 feet to a 518 inch rebar set 2o. South°47' 18" West, a distance of 196.78 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set for the southwest corner hereof 21. North 07053152" East, a distance of 120.60 feet to a 518 in rebar set for the beginning of a non -tangent curve to the left, having a central angle of 0°55'54", a radius of 1030.00 feet and chord bearing a distance of North 82°01'29" West,16.75 feet; 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. Westerly with said curve, an arc distance of 16.75 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set North 08°26'28" East, a distance of 60.00 feet to a 518 inch rebar set for the'_ beginning of anon -tangent curve to the left, having a central angle of -�-"- 2°01'27", a radius of 970.00 feet and chord bearing and distance of South ---- -- 82034' 15" East, 34.26 feet; Northerly with said curve, an arc distance of 476.14 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set - for the beginning of a reverse curve to the left, having a central angle of - - 16°11'09", a radius of 650.00 feet and chord bearing and distance of North -- -- 15°28'41" East,183.01 feet; Northerly with said curve, an arc distance of 476.14 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set for the beginning of a reverse curve to the left, having a cep aal angle of 16°11'09", a radius of 650.00 feet and chord bearing and distance of North 15°28'41" East,183.01 feet; Northerly with said curve, an are distance of 183.62 feet to a 518 inch rebar set North 07023'07" east, a distance of 16.89 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set for the northwest corner hereof 28. South 82036153" East, a distance of 125.00 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set 29. North 17°23'07" east, a distance of 24.41 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set 30. South 82036153" East, a distance of 175.00 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set for the northerly most northeast comer hereof 31. South 07023107" West, a distance of 41.30 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set for the beginning of a tangent curve to the right, having a central angle of 16°11'09", a radius of 950.00 feet and chord bearing and distance of South 15028141" West, 267.48 feet; 32. Southerly with said curve, an arc distance of 268.37 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set for the beginning of a reverse curve to the left, having a central angle of 15010' 17", a radius of 935.00 feet and chord bearing and distance of South 15059'08" West, 246.85 feet 33. Southerly with said curve, an arc distance of 247.58 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set for an interior ell comer 34. North 89°47' 18" East, a distance of 784.36 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set 35. South 000 12'42" East, a distance of 110.00 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set 36. North 89°47' 18" East, a distance of 160.08 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set 37. North 00012142" west, a distance of 10.00 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set 38. North 89°47' 18" East, a distance of 210.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING and containing with said boundaries 1233 acres of land. The basis of bearings for the hereinabove 292.163 acre tract and a % inch rebar found for the westerly most, northwest corner of said 292.163 acre tract as called for in the deed recorded in Denton County Clerk's File No. 96- R0045294 of the Real Property Records of Denton County, Texas. _ ;7 c .. _.. .min . . - June 1892004 ---------= - ---- --- - - TO: Property Owners FR: Rosalie Chavez, City Secretary RE: ---Zoning Request Change The City of Sanger's Planning and Zoning Commission win conduct a Public Hearing at 201 Bolivar, in the Council Chambers.oq_Thursday, July 1, 2004 at 7:00 P.M. to ..- - - •= - Consider a Zoning Request Change from Old SF3 (Old Single Family 3)to 2F (Duplex) on property legally described as Sanger Trails, Phase 1. Property is located off of Marion Road. The City of Sanger's City Council will conduct a Public Hearing at 201 Bolivar in the Council Chambers on Mo_____ . ` �A4 at 7:00 P.M. to Consider a Zoning Request Change from Old SF3 (Old Single Family 3)to 2F (Duplex) on property legally lescribed as Sanger Trails, Phase 1. Property is located off of Marion Road. !attached is a form for you to sign stating whether or not you approve of this request. If for any reason you do not approve, or have any questions regarding this request please plan to attend this public hearing. RC:sr Enclosure soz BOLIVAR STREET SANDER, TEXAS 76266 __:_ 940.45&7930 = _; P-O. BOX t729 -_ _ _ _ : ^94o•459.-41so FAX - ---- - -------- P&Z 07/01/04 CC 07/06/2004 ---ZON1NG-REQUEff----;.— ToConsider.aZoning Request L4C�b"g"o frgperty^Le.Sanger=Traib.-Pbau=--=, ,:.---7-, pOyAWLibe4las 1. Property is located on Mariod-"d. If you_ disapprove thig Request; pWge-Win attendance it the scheduled meetings. Please check. one: I approve of the Request I disapprove Rf the Request Comments: SIGNATURE DATE Please Print Your Name MEMO June 25, 2004 To: Planning and Zoning Commission Fr: Rose Chavez, City Secretary/Assistant City Manager Re: Laird Addition Attached is the engineer's letter on this plat. The structures are already in place on this plat. The property owners on the South built on the Laird's property and the property is being platted so that it can be sold. FROM THE A-LISON FAMILY PHONE NO. 817.380 9431 Jun. 25 2004 06:25PM P2 --` _ Allison Engtneerang ---- — ---- :_ _-- _ _ 611 Pecan Cieek Kitad, Denton, (940) 380-9453 Off/Rome (940) 380-9421 Fax - ---- •�- -- -- Ji me 24, 2004 Mr. Jack Smith _ C ity Manama - ---------- - - — _.. _.. - -- ----..—_. City of Sanger - -- P.O. Box 1729 �amger,Texas76266.------���_-=• -_.--------_._------------------- _. ._ _ ::�� ._�.__ i:e• Laird Addition 1)e" Mr. Smith: _....._..-:.. �_._ ....- -- - - - - ,Utison Engineering recommends.approyal of ihe.fitial plat. -This is an existing lot with ;:n existing house. All of the typical municipal in&astru�cture improvemexits ale in place - --- ~— uzdthe continuance of the use will not have any impact upon the infrastructure. illison Engineering's review of submittals for land development projects is only ntended to establish a reasonable level of confidence that the developer is complying with applicable rules and regulations. Our review is not intended to provide quality ;ontrol not assure anyone that the development is fully compliant. The responsibility for ;ompliaace remains solely with the developer throughout the process; from zoning and flatting through construction and the warranty period. The developer is responsible for correcting all deficiencies, regardless of the time they are discovered. We appreciate the opportunity to continue providing professional services for the City of Sanger. Please call if you have any questions or need any additional information or clarification. Respectfully Submitted, Allison Eng3 8 1 c Lee K.Allison, P.E., NSPE Xc: Brad Shelton Rose Chavez Eddie Branham John Henderson PW1ofl .9las�n eammm"" • 9M1affiLla d6 Gd" dad q#W0 .?brie MEMO June 25, 2004 To: Planning and Zoning Commission Fr: Rose Chavez, City Secretary/Assistant City Manager Re: Change to Zoning Ordinance Staff is proposing a change to the zoning ordinance regarding a maximum coverage of lots with concrete and/or any other structures. We have had a situation, where an individual has covered his entire yard with concrete and caused drainage problems for his neighbors. We would like to prevent this in the future. For all single family zoning categories, the current ordinance states: D. Maximum Lot Coverage: Forty percent (40%) by the main building; Sixty percent (60%) by the main building, accessory buildings, driveways and parking.