Loading...
05/17/2007-PZ-Agenda Packet-RegularAGENDA PLANNING AND ZONING THURSDAY, MAY 17, 2007 7.00 M 201 BOLIVAR 1. Call Meeting to Order. 2. Minutes: May 3, 2007 3. Conduct Public Hearing to Consider Concept Plan relating to a future Zoning Request Change from AG (Agriculture) to PD (Planned Development) on Property Legally Described as Abstract 1024, IL Prather Survey, Tract 4, Being 29373 Acres and Abstract 103, P.S. Black Survey, Tract 18, Being 8301 Acres. Property is Located North of Indian Springs Subdivision and East of Choctaw Ridge Estates. 4. Consider and Possible Action Regarding a Concept Plan relating to a future Zoning Request Change from AG (Agriculture) to PD (Planned Development) on Property Legally Described as Abstract 1024, R. Prather Survey, Tract 4, Being 29.373 Acres and Abstract 103, P.S. Black Survey, Tract 18, Being 8301 Acres. Property is Located North of Indian Springs Subdivision and East of Choctaw Ridge Estates. 5. Consider and Possible Action Regarding a Preliminary Plat for Indian Lane Elementary School. Property is Located on Indian Lane, North of McReynolds Road, and South of Sanger High School. 6. Consider and Possible Action on Ordinances. 7. Adjourn. Rosalie Chavez, City Subdivision and Building & Time Posted This facility is wheelchair accessible and accessible parking spaces are available. Requests for accommodations or interpretive services must be made 48 hours prior to this meeting. Please contact the City Secretary's office at (940) 458-7930 for further information. MINUTES: PLANNING AND ZONING MAY 3, 2007 PRESENT: Paul Edleman, Brian Hutcherson, Gary Bilyeu, Thomas Muir, Russell Martin OTHERS PRESENT: City Manager Jack Smith, City Engineer Rob Woods, Engineering Coordinator Samantha Renz, Thomas Bojanczyk, Carl Sadau, Dennis Morrow, Edsel Sapian 1. Gary Bilyeu Called Meeting to Order. 2. Minutes: April 12, 2007 Thomas Muir indicated the wording in the second paragraph of page 3 should be corrected. Gary Bilyeu indicated that on Item #3 it should be noted that all of the committee members were in agreement with Mr. Jenkins. Committee members indicated they were. Russell Martin moved to approve the minutes as corrected. Brian Hutcherson seconded. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Consider and Possible Action Regarding the Nature and Described Performance of a Proposed Use, being "Outside Display and Sales of Storage Buildings, Carports, and Playground Equipment", and its Compatibility with the Uses Permitted in the Various Districts, and Determining the Zoning District or Districts Within Which Such Use Should be Permitted. Tom Bojanczyk, REJ Land LLC, indicated he would answer any questions they had. Gary Bilyeu indicated if they change the ordinance for this request, there is nothing to prevent someone, in the future, creating a business at this location that may not be handled the same way. He asked staff if this could be done under a planned development. Staff indicated it could, but it would be better to specify it under the B2 zoning classification and require a Specific Use Permit. Discussion followed. City Manager indicated this would add a category to the zoning ordinance, then they would stipulate which zoning districts this category would be allowed in. Discussion followed regarding what items/issues can be addressed within the Specific Use Permit. Staff indicated any stipulations can be made. City Manager indicated they are requesting to put an office in a storage shed, and City ordinance requires a masonry building. Discussed that REJ Land LLC owns this land and they own Smokey's. They will share parking facilities and restroom facilities. Discussed access from the East. Discussion followed regarding a Specific Use Permit and the property. Gary Bilyeu indicated he would like to see an area for parking, fencing around the playground equipment, exact number of finished displays, and the layout be place in the Specific Use Permit. Mr. Bojanczyk indicated they are planning on doing a gravel parking area. Cecile Carson indicated the ordinance states that all parking must be on a paved asphalt or concrete parking space. Paul Edleman indicated he would like to see it be a separate business than Smokey's. He did not like the idea of them sharing facilities. He would rather see them build an office, and put in a restroom and parking facilities. Discussed masonry requirements of office building. Discussed the best category to place this business in. Commission agreed it appeared B2 was the best category. Discussed if this item is passed, REJ Land will still have to come back for a Specific Use Permit. Brian Hutcherson moved to recommend Council add a category for "outside display and sales" under "retail and service type uses" with required approval of an SUP in the zoning category of B2. Russell Martin seconded. Motion carried 4 in favor and 1 abstention. Thomas Muir abstained. 4. Consider and Possible Action on Review of Zoning, Subdivision and Building Ordinances. City Manager indicated the County has an ordinance that allows for a private road when six or less lots are using the road. The ordinance he had given them was amended to line up with the County. This ordinance will also change the minimum lot size from 3.5 acres to 1 acre. Discussed the layout of Carl Sadau's proposed development. Discussed proposed ordinance. Paul Edleman moved to send Ordnance #05-06-07 to the City Council for approval. Brian Hutcherson seconded. Motion carried unanimously. Gary Bilyeu indicated there was still work to be done on the zoning ordinance, and he would like to take a hard look at Specific Use Permits. Discussed appointment of Chair and Vice Chair once new members are appointed. City Manager asked if they had any recommendations for the board. Gary Bilyeu indicated he had an idea, but would need to follow up with the gentleman. Gary Bilyeu indicated they need to push forward with re -writing the ordinances. He indicated he will take over the Single Family portion. Russell Martin indicated he will take over Mobile Homes. Paul Edleman indicated he will take over Industrial. Brief discussion followed. 5. Meeting Adjourned. PLANNING & ZONING COADHSSION AGENDA BRIEFING ed Meeting Date. 5-17-2007 Prepa W.Robert Woods, P.E. Subject: Planned Development - Choctaw Ridge Phase 4 STAFF COMMENTS: Staff has reviewed the submitted documents and offers the following recommendations and reasons. General: Staff believes that this proposed development should not be considered a part of Choctaw Ridge Development for the following reasons: • This would be the only phase covered under the planned development ordinance. • Phases 1 through 3 are situated solely within Denton County's jurisdiction. Infrastructure: Water: This area lies within the Bolivar Water Supply Corp. (BWSC) CCN and the City limits of Sanger. Therefore, this development will be required to provide fire protection. The waiving of this requirement can jeopardize the City's overall insurance rating and can place an undo financial burden upon the citizens of Sanger. BWSC will need to provide documentation to the City of Sanger to insure that their water system can meet the minimum fire protection requirements. Traffic and Roads: This development as shown is to be served by one entrance and that will be off of Choctaw Ridge a county road with a width of approximately twenty-four feet (24') with barrow ditches to handle the storm water runoff. Staff is recommending for a connection to be provided to the east for future connectivity and a future second point of access to the development. Road Standards: The applicant is requesting for an asphalt county road section which would be a minimum of twenty-four feet wide with barrow ditches. Shown below are the city ordinance(s) pertaining to this item. City of Sanger Ordinance — Ch. 10, Section 6, Article 6.02, Section C, paragraph 1, states that: Residential street Daving shall be a minimum of thirty-six feet (367 in width, measured between the faces of curbs. If City Council & P&Z Commission chooses to modify this requirement then Staff would like to recommend that a concrete pavement section be utilized within this development and that the overall street width would be no less than twenty-four feet with barrow ditches to accommodate storm water runoff. This will coincide with the Indian Springs which is adjacent to this proposed development. The City as part of the Capital Improvement Program is replacing existing asphalt pavement section with a concrete pavement section located within Indian Springs. The cost difference between the concrete pavement section and asphalt pavement section is approximately twelve (12%) to fifteen (15%) percent with concrete being slightly higher. The cost comparison was made by utilizing recently obtained bids for the Indian Springs Phase 1 - Capital Improvements Program. Shown below are the city ordinances pertaining to this item. Landscaaino and Sidewalks: Sidewalks: City of Sanger Ordinance — Ch. 10, Section 6, Article 6.03, states that: Sidewalks in indusbial areas and planned developments will be as required by the Driveways: If City Council & P&Z Commission chooses to modify this requirement then Staff would like to recommend that a concrete driveway be constructed within the public right-of-way limits. Shown below are the city ordinances pertaining to this item. City of Sanger Ordinance — Ch. 3 Article 3.1200, Section 4 states that All driveways shall be constructed using 3000 psi concrete with #3 bars at 24' o.c In accordance with NCTCOG standard specifrcatrons latest edition. City of Sanger Ordinance — Ch. 3 Article 3.1200, Section 2 — paragraph E, states that All driveway culverts within the city shall be designed to accommodate 100 year storm events and shall be constructed in accordance with TXDOT standards with minimum 6.1 headwalls • Page 2 Si4naee: The applicant is requesting for four (4) monument signs. Staff recommends two monument signs located at the main entrance. All monument signs will need to be located outside of the public right-of-way. Maintenance of the signs shall be the responsibility of the property owners or the Homeowners Association. PUBLIC HEARING TENTATIVE SCHEDULE: P&Z Meeting May 17, 2007 City Council: May 21, 2007 ATTACHMENTS: Planned Development Ordinance — for 39.15 Acre Tract located P. Black Survey and R. Prather Survey. • Page 3 March 29th, 2007 To: Sanger Planning and Zoning and City Council From: Stephen L. Koch 7125 Hunnington Drive Sanger, Tx. 76266 j/-ec `cC L( -,2 - V `7 �ied�l e c'c. 44 07 F� jacL, RE: Annexation of 29.373 acres in the R. Prather Survey, Abstract #1024A tract 4 Dear City Council Members, I currently am in a contract to purchase the above mentioned 29.373 plus 10 additional acres that ajoin this tract to the west. My intent is to put in 1+ acre tracts with county road specs and septic systems. The water would be supplied by Bolivar water as this parcel is in there CCN. I would like the Council to consider this proposed new sub -division as just a continuation of Choctaw Ridge (Phase 4). Choctaw Ridge is a county spec sub- division le. Blacktop roads and bar ditches, 1+acre lots and aerobic septic systems. I am also proposing for the City of Sanger to annex the remaining 10 acres (if this is possible) so that all of this new sub -division is in the city limits. Thanks in advance for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, Stephen L. Koch is nl "�-'i0r ►:��PMn s . �aao ro wplao cu °`i K :'O"ar ao�ion i : aP�'aaooe�" CURVE OATH: Max w�"uman L=81.48' R=90.00' CN=N 44.22'03'W E' 78.73' uert •as Ivl DELTA=51.52'41' ::.�aw�K�wvi. uc nu uc 0 N 37'35'E 1344.85' ,,, ,,, I>9'vrs6`I , , y •36 ,,, St' 326.67' 200.00' 200.00' 200.00• 309.42 A.22'-- J !4 Lot 3 1.30 A"" 4 1.21o1Acres ^ � ; Lot 5 it o g � Lot 6 g g Lot 7 1.30 Asns•v � 1.21 Acres r 1.21 Acre ' z z z ? Lot 2 1.30 Acres Sleek A 1e Lot 8 1.30 Acres �, 4 2• ss j� 0200.0' ao. 200.00' ws s. 1s99 S 69.37'07'E 239.99' b e aw " �wn ~ s t0' 6,osr ... __N 69.57'3S'E s00.6S--'-----'--� .r w �► 3 86'12'36'f 234.00' ie ♦� t85.02' 185.02, 185.02' 183.02, eh. I ..v Let 9 14 Lot 1 1.12 Acres a _ 1.16 Acres ^ i 3 Lot p 1.235 Lot 3 l" 8 1.248 Acres - „ .9 N °64'00' .Pv Acres n 1.241Lot Acres n u 1.254L ."' o „ 263.99' z z z ' Block A r N 60'39'4Mn L-q0_ _ IN 41 W s. ' p aA.Y. . _ � g Let t0 b 1�j 263.99' I e• $ 1.21 Acres o N .- a. S 89'34'01'E s. �r - 5 89'34'O1'E �0 103.16' 163.16' 163.16' Block B 183.16' lit Let 20 it +r _ 1.19 Acres N �. IN 264.00' Block A N § Lot 6 + r 1.222 flora « Lot 7 'S Lot 6 : $ Lot S # 2s39t'•w w N 1.229 A- : N 1.235 Acres 1. p u r 1.241 Acne N a $ Let 11 $ = 7 N a $ 1.21 Acres P I n r�P Lot 19 - ;+ s I I +•� N 88'31'02'w .,, SS 1.200 flora ^b' ' 181.31' s w 181.31• ar 181.31' a. 181.31' 264.00' • - - _ _ tA. - -- _ro $ 31 f 7a1'g9 ! e P aw .� N 69'0�'02"W 784.St b N 7ppp 200.00' "' 179.84' 1=20.36' Lot 12 Block :110.46' 1.300 Acre Lol 18 s ;+ 1.194 Acres Lai 16 1" j! Lot 1517 Lot 14 H 1.200 Acres $ N 1.208 Acres $ „ 1.214 Acres $ N+, 1.164 Acres $ a Lot 13 fJy n' d1 = = z 1.243 Am z r w 134.49, 105 8' M 89'18 W 'll 89'31 3. .., 239.7T 147.52' 8.71 N 88'13 25-W 191.31• 200.00' 70' .. 133.89' N 8g� 17 3ti'W �' 267.41 .. 9'OS 3 330.12• 464.01 SKETCH PLAT ' STEPHEN KOCH COR14DRAVIOU P.O. BOX 116 JOB : C0701tb-Ol KRUN. TX 76249 DATE: 1 4 5 07 940-482-8723 OFFICE DRAFT: A.C. 940-482-3880 FAX oolncIN. a Uri ORDINANCE #07-21-04 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE AMENDMENT TO THE CENTRAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SANGER, TEXAS, AND PROVIDING FOR A ZONING CHANGE AND A CHANGE TO THE CURRENT PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OR "PD" ZONING CLASSIFICATION SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; AND PROVIDING FOR IMMEDIATE EFFECT. WHEREAS, a Request for Change in Zoning Classification was duly filed with the City of Sanger, Texas, concerning the hereinafter described property; WHEREAS, due notice of hearing was made in the time and manner prescribed by law and the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Sanger, Texas, duly covered and conducted a public hearing for the purpose of assessing a zoning classification change on the hereinafter described property located in the City of Sanger, Texas; and WHEREAS, an additional opportunity for all interested persons to be heard was provided by the City Council of the City of Sanger, Texas, at an open meeting, with proper notice posted; BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANGER, TEXAS: Section 1. That the legal description of the property zoned herein is generally described as follows: 39.15 ACRE TRACT FIELD NOTES to all that certain parcel, lot, or tract of land situated in the R. Prather Survey, Abstract Number 1024, in the City of Sanger, Denton County, Texas, and the P. Black Survey, Abstract Number 103 In Denton County. Section 2. The zoning classification on the hereinabove described property is hereby changed to "PD", Planned Development Zoning and is restricted to the attached development plan described as "Exhibit A" Section 3. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are, to the extent of such conflict, hereby repealed. Section 4. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, phrases and words of this Ordinance are severable and, if any word, phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining portions of this Ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this Ordinance of any such unconstitutional word, phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section. Hays 1 Section 5. Any person, firm, or corporation who shall violate any of the provisions of this article shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be fined in accordance with the general penalty provision found in Section 1.109 of this Code. Section 6. This ordinance will take effect immediately from and after its passage and the publication of the caption, as the law and Charter in such cases provide. DULY PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Sanger, Texas, on this 19m day of July, 2004. ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Mayor "EMIBIT A" Owner: S & T Custom Homes Inc. President: Stephen Koch Mays 2 Choctaw Ridge Phase 4 A Planned Development in Sanger, Texas By: S & T Custom Homes Inc. Hays 3 LOCATION: The area to be rezoned is approximately 39.15-acres, West on FM455 aprox. 1 mile to the Choctaw Ridge Subdivision Then South on Creekview rd. 1/4 of a mile and East on Choctaw Ridge and this property is at end of the cul-de-sac. CURRENT ZONING: The 39.15-acre tract currently contains two zoning classifications: 29.15-acres City limits —Agriculture 10-acres-City ETJ. CURRRENT USE: Agriculture. ALLOWABLE USES AND SIZES: Large country style lots bigger then 1 acre (SF-1) INFRASTRUCTURE ELECTRIC Co-SERV ELECTRIC Water Bolivar Water. Sanitary Sewer Individual Aerobic Septic Systems Drainaue The low points of the property are located on the south west comer. Per City ordinance, downstream improvements and/or detention will be required at comer to maintain the drainage off -site to pre -development levels. Traffic and Roads The area is currently served by a county maintained road (Choctaw Ridge). Hays 4 Road Standards 1. Blacktop roads per county specs and bar ditches to control drainage Landscapina and Sidewalks Public Sidewalks: 1. No sidewalks Fencing: 1. No fencing Landscaping: 2. No Landscaping 3. No Sprinkler Systems 4. No sod yards Driveways: 1. Gravel 2. Blacktop Slanane Four monument type signs are allowed. Signs shall not exceed 60 square feet each in actual sign area — not including columns or masonry trim. Signs shall conform in both style and materials to the architecture of the uses for which they are being built. Buildina Appearance Accessory buildings (Barns and Shops) can be built out of metal that is pre -painted from manufacture Area A Single Family: IIays 5 Page 1 of 1 Denton Central Appraisal District This website currently displays 2006 certified values. Property Detail Sheet (R59738) Aft am GIS Man jt lea. hs eet. FAQ Owner Information Searches Owner ID: 050239 Owner Name: HOLSON, DONALD • Property ID Search Owner Address: 154 LAKE SHORE RD GORDONVILLE,TX 76245-5375 • Account Search Properly Address: • Owner Search • Address Search • Advanced Search Parcel Information Property Data Legal Description: A1024A R. PRATHER, TRACT 4, ACRES 29.373, OLD DCAD TR 2 Acreage: 29.373 • Detail Sheet Cross Reference: A1024A-000-0004-0000 • History Undivided Interest: 100% Exemption Codes: AG (Agriculture Use) • Datasheet Entity Codes: C16 (City Of Sanger) G01 (Denton County) Other S14 (Sanger ISD) • Taxing Units W04 (Clearcreek Watershed Authority) Deed Type: Conversion • Neighborhoods Deed Book: 2641 Deed Page: 862 • Abstracts Map Page: • Subdivisions • Reports • Resources and Forms Click hor to view your 2006 certified values and prior history. • Supplements • Employment • Online Maps/GIS Land D ID Type SPTB Acre Market • GIS Help • 2006 Tax Rates Land1 C2 (Cropland II) D3 (D3 - Farmland) 29.3 Unavailable • Public Notices cerAdnbe ' Adobe Acrobat Reader 5.0 (minimum) is required to view pdf documents. Reader Acrobat Reader is a free program available here. • GIS Data Downloads • Disclaimer http://Www.dentonead.com/AppraisaVPublicAccessIPropertyDetail.aspx?PropertyID=3 86... 04/30/2007 7-1 , -� � - � 7 ƒ CP 04 - - . 4 - -4 - Page 1 of 1 ' Denton Central Appraisal District _- This website currently displays 2006 certified values. '< . -• y Home ' Property Detail Sheet (R59770) General Information RIWACIS Man j� Datasheet News FAQ Owner Information Searches Owner ID: 050239 Owner Name: HOLSON, DONALD • Property ID Search Owner Address: 154 LAKE SHORE RD GORDONVILLE,TX 76245-5375 • Account Search Property Address: • Owner Search • Address Search • Advanced Search Parcel Information Property Data Legal Description: A0103A P.S. BLACK, TRACT 18, ACRES 8.301, OLD DCAD TR# 2 Acreage: 8.301 • Detail Sheet Cross Reference: A0103A-000-0018-0000 • History Undivided Interest: 100% Exemption Codes: AG (Agriculture Use) • Datasheet Entity Codes: G01(Denton County) S14 (Sanger ISD) Other W04 (Clearcreek Watershed Authority) • Taxing Units Deed Type: Conversion Deed Book: 2641 • Neighborhoods Deed Page: 862 Map Page: • Abstracts • Subdivisions • Reports Click he to view your 2006 certified values and prior history. • Resources and Forms • Supplements • Employment Land V • Online Maps/GIS ID Type SPTB Acre Market • GIS Help Land1 C2 (Cropland II) D3 (D3 - Farmland) 8.30 Unavailable • 2006 Tax Rates --- --- c ,+ dolma• * Adobe Acrobat Reader 5.0 (minimum) is required to view pdf documents. • Public Notices Acrobat Reader is a free program available here. • GIS Data Downloads • Disclaimer http://www.dentonead.com/AppraisalIPublicAccessIPropertyDetail.aspx?PropertyID=386... 04/30/2007 } § a \ � � k � ƒ k ` � k � � ■ ; - ! § % Sanger Code of Ordinances SECTION 27 "PD" PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT General Purpose and Description: The Planned Development District "PD" prefix is intended to provide for combining and mixing of uses allowed in various districts with appropriate regulations and to permit flexibility in the use and design of land and buildings in situations where modification of specific provisions of this ordinance is not contrary to its intent and purpose or significantly inconsistent with the planning on which it is based and will not be harmful to the community. A "PD" District may be used to permit new and innovative concepts in land utilization. While great flexibility is given to provide special restrictions which will allow development not otherwise permitted, procedures are established herein to insure against misuse of the increased flexibility. 27.1 Permitted Uses: Any use specified in the ordinance granting a Planned Development district shall be permitted in that district. The size, location, appearance and method of operation may be specified to the extent necessary to insure compliance with the purpose of this ordinance. Development Standards: 1. Development standards for each separate PD District shall be set forth in the ordinance granting the PD District and may include but shall not be limited to: uses, density, lot area, lot width, lot depth, yard depths and widths, building height, building elevations, coverage, floor area ratio, parking, access, screening, landscaping, accessory buildings, signs, lighting, management associations, and other requirements as the City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission may deem appropriate. 2. In the PD District, the particular districts to which uses specified in the PD are most similar shall be stated in the granting ordinance. All PD applications shall list all requested variances from the standard requirements set forth throughout this ordinance (applications without this list will be considered incomplete). 3. The ordinance granting a PD District shall include a statement as to the purpose and intent of the PD granted wherein A specific list is required of variances in each district or districts and a general statement for citing the reason for the PD request. 4. The Planned Development district shall conform to all other sections of the ordinance unless specifically exempted in the granting ordinance. Sanger Code of Ordinances 5. The minimum acreage for a planned development district shall be three (3) acres. 27.2 In establishing a Planned Development district in accordance with this section, the City Council shall approve and file as part of the amending ordinance appropriate plans and standards for each Planned Development District. During the review and public hearing process, the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council shall require a conceptual plan and a development plan (or detail site plan). 1. Conceptual Plan: This plan shall be submitted by the applicant. The plan shall show the applicant's intent for the use of the land within the proposed planned development district in a graphic manner and shall be supported by written documentation of proposals and standards for development. a. A conceptual plan for residential land use shall show general use, thoroughfares and preliminary lotting arrangements. For residential development which does not propose platted lots, the conceptual plan shall set forth the size, type and location of buildings and building sites, access, density, building height, fire lanes, screening, parking areas, landscaped areas and other pertinent development data. b. A conceptual plan for uses other than residential uses shall set forth the land use proposals in a manner to adequately illustrate the type and nature of the proposed development. Data which may be submitted by the applicant, or required by the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, may include but is not limited to the types of use(s), topography and boundary of PD area, physical features of the site, existing streets, alleys and easements, location of future public facilities, building height and location, parking ratios and other information to adequately describe the proposed development and to provide data for approval which is to be used in drafting the final development plan. C. Changes of detail which do not alter the basic relationship of the proposed development to adjacent property and which do not alter the uses permitted or increase the density, building height or coverage of the site and which do not decrease the off street parking ratio, reduce the yards provided at the boundary of the site, or significantly alter the landscape plans as indicated on the approved conceptual plan may be authorized by the building official or his designated representative. If an agreement cannot be reached regarding whether or not a detail site plan conforms to the original concept plan the Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the request and render judgment as to the conformity. 2. Development Plan or Detail Site Plan: This plan shall set forth the final plans for Sanger Code of Ordinances development of the Planned Development district and shall conform to the data presented and approved on the conceptual plan. Approval of the development plan shall be the basis for issuance of a building permit. For any district SF-1 through SF-2, a final plat shall qualify as the development plan. The development plan may be submitted for the total area of the PD or for any section or part as approved on the conceptual plan. The development plan must be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. A public hearing on approval of the development plan shall be required at the Council and Commission level, unless such a hearing is waived pursuant to subsection 3 below at the time of conceptual plan approval in the original amending ordinance. The development plan shall include: a. A site inventory analysis including a scale drawing showing existing vegetation, natural water courses, creeks or bodies of water and an analysis of planned changes in such natural features as a result of the development. This should include a delineation of any flood prone areas. b. A scale drawing 'showing any proposed public or private streets and alleys; building sites or lots; and areas reserved as parks, parkways, playgrounds, utility easements, school sites, street widening and street changes; the points of ingress and egress from existing streets; general location and description of existing and proposed utility services, including size of water and sewer mains; the location and width for all curb cuts and the land area of all abutting sites and the zoning classification thereof on an accurate survey of the tract with the topographical contour interval of not more than five (5) feet. C. A site plan for proposed building complexes showing the location of separate buildings, and between buildings and property lines, street lines and alley lines. Also to be included on the site plan is a plan showing the arrangement and provision of off-street parking. d. A landscape plan showing screening walls, ornamental planting, wooded areas and trees to be planted. e. An architectural plan showing elevations and signage style to be used throughout the development in all districts except single-family and two-family may be required by the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council if deemed appropriate. Any or all of the required information may be incorporated on a single drawing if such drawing is clear and can be evaluated by the building official or his designated representative. 3. All development plans may have supplemental data describing standards, schedules or Sanger Code of Ordinances other data pertinent to the development of the Planned Development District which is to be included in the text of the amending ordinance. The procedure for establishing a Planned Development District shall follow the procedure for zoning amendments as set forth in Section 40. This procedure is expanded as follows for approval of conceptual and development plans. a. Separate public hearings shall be held by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council for the approval of the conceptual plan and the development plan or any section of the development plan, unless such requirement is waived by the City Council upon a determination that a single public hearing is adequate. A single public hearing is adequate when: (1) The applicant submits adequate data with the request for the Planned Development district to fulfill the requirements for both plans; or (2) Information on the concept plan is sufficient to determine the appropriate use of the land and the detail site plan will not deviate substantially from it; and (3) The requirement is waived at the time the amending ordinance is approved. If the requirement is waived the conditions shall be specifically stated in the amending ordinance. b. The ordinance establishing the Planned Development district shall not be approved until the conceptual plan is approved. (1) The development plan may be approved in sections separate approvals by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council for the initial and subsequent sections will be required. (2) An initial development plan shall be submitted for approval within six (6) months from the approval of the conceptual plan or some portion of the concept plan. If the development plan is not submitted within six (6) months, the conceptual plan is subject to reapproval by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. If the entire project is not completed within two (2) years, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council may review the original concept plan to ensure its continued validity. (3) Regardless of whether the public hearing is waived for the development plan, approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council Sanger Code of Ordinances is still required. 27.3 When a PD is being considered, a written report may be requested of the applicant discussing the impact on planning, engineering, water utilities, electric, sanitation, building inspection, tax, police, fire and traffic. Written comments from the applicable public school district, and from private utilities may be submitted to the Planning Commission prior to the commission making any recommendations to the Council. 27.4 All Planned Development districts approved in accordance with the provisions of this ordinance in its original form, or by subsequent amendment thereto, shall be referenced on the Zoning District Map, and a list of such Planned Development Districts, together with the category of uses permitted therein, shall be maintained in the appendix of this ordinance. 27.5 Planned Development Ordinances Continued: Prior to adoption of this ordinance, if the City Council has established various Planned Development Districts, they are to be continued in fill force and effect. The establishing ordinances or parts of ordinances approved prior to this ordinance shall be carried forth in full force and effect and are the conditions, restrictions, regulations and requirements which apply to the respective Planned Development Districts shown on the Zoning Map at the date of adoption of this ordinance. PLANNING & ZONING CO1VMSSION Q . AGENDA BRIEFING Meeting Date. 2-15-2007 Pn�pared by: Robert Woods, P.E Indian Lane Elementary School — Preliminary Plat subject of a 19.23 acre tract located in the Rueben Bebee Survey, Abstract No. 29, located within the city limits of Sanger. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS: The Sanger Independent School District is the applicant for the proposed preliminary plat of Indian Lane Elementary School — Preliminary Plat of a 19.23 acre tract located in the Rueben Bebee Survey, Abstract No. 29, located within the city limits of Sanger. Applicant plans on constructing a elementary school on site. Zoning: Property is currently zoned as agriculture and has been granted a specific use permit (SUP) be granted for this site. Right -of -Way Dedication: Right-of-way has been dedicated by separate instrument document during the time of the building of the current high school. SUMMARY: The proposed preliminary plat appears to satisfy the platting standards contained within the Code of Ordinances of the City of Sanger. PUBLIC HEARING TENTATIVE SCHEDULE: Planning & Zoning May 17, 2007 Commission: City Council: May 21, 2007 Staff recommends approval for the Indian Lane Elementary School — Preliminary Plat. ATTACHMENTS: Plat — Indian Lane Elementary School — Preliminary Plat