03/13/2003-PZ-Agenda Packet-RegularAGENDA
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
THURSDAY, MARCH 13, 2003
201 BOLIVAR
7:00 P.M.
1. Call Meeting to Order.
2. Approve Minutes: February 13, 2003
February 27, 2003
3. Consider and Possible Action on the Final Plat for Sanger Trails, Phase 2A, Being 8
Residential lots and 2 Common Areas.
4. Adjourn.
o���`�rOF S:4�V'�/�ifi
Rosalie Chavez, City tary
Date and Time Posted
PE x
This facility is wheelchair accessible and accessible parking spaces are available. Requests for
accommodations or interpretive services most be made 48 hours prior to this meeting. Please
contact the City Secrete 's office at 940 458-7930 for further information.
MEMO
March 10, 2003
To: Planning and Zoning Commission
Fr: Samantha Renz
Re: Sanger Trails, Phase 2A
Attached is a copy of the review letter, it is the same letter that was in your last packet; however,
the corrections have been made, and this is the resubmittal. The Engineer did review this today;
however, he was pressed for time and did not have a chance to write his approval letter. I will try
ro have something from him prior to the meeting on Thursday. He did indicate that the items had
been addressed on this phase. Phase 2B will be on the agenda for April 3, 2003.
MARK T. OWENS, P.E.
GENERAL CIVIL CONSULTING ENGINEER
February 20, 2003
Mr. Jack Smith
City of Sanger
P.O. Box 1729
Sanger,Texas 76266
Re: Final Plats and Construction Details — Yd Review
Sanger Trails Phase 2A — 8 Residential Lots & 2 Common Areas
Sanger Trails Phase 2B — 50 Residential Lots & 2 Common Areas
Sanger, Texas
Dear Mr. Smith:
Per your request I have reviewed final plats and construction details submitted by Cargill-
Cheshier & Associates for the project referenced above. Comments are referenced by the
Subdivision Ordinance of the City of Sanger, Texas as adopted September 21,1987, Zoning
Ordinance adopted August 3,1987, and Ordinance No. 05-06-01. My review comments are as
follows:
General Comments for Both Phases
1. None of my comments were addressed from my last review in March 2002.
2. All comments received from Public Works, Fire Department and Code Enforcement
should also be addressed prior to final plat approval.
3. The property is generally located north of FM 455 west of Marion Road in the eastern
portion of the City.
4. Per my last review I requested 15-foot utility easement be placed along all street frontage
within the subdivision. In response I was informed by the developer's engineer that
the 15-foot easement was not required for final plat for Phase I of this subdivision. I have
reviewed the final plat for Phase 1 and no 15-foot easement was provided. It is my
recommendation that a 15-foot utility easement be provided in accordance with our
ordinance.
5. A legend needs to be provided to identify all abbreviations used within the construction
drawings. This will clarify the design and help me in my review.
6. The revision date and number should be shown in the title block for each drawing sheet
that has been changed per review comments.
7. I would recommend that approval of these final plats be delayed until offsite
improvements have been completed as proposed in Phase 1 of this project.
Sanger Trails Phase 2A
1. The final plat and construction drawings are in general compliance with the subdivision
ordinance.
P.O. Box 59G
PONDER, TX 76259
PHONE: 940--391.4845
FAX: 940-479-0593
mdintx,ii igJidc.net
MARK T. OWENS, P.E.
GENERAL CIVIL CONSULTING ENGINEER
Sanger Trails Phase 2B
Sheet 5
1. At the end of Silver Spur Drive the proposed grade associated with the grade -to -drain
note should be specified or the maximum allowable grade.
Sheet 7
1. As per my previous review the developer has agreed to hydromulch all disturbed areas
within the proposed detention basin to establish vegetation mainly for bank erosion
control. I am concerned that the proposed 3:1 slopes of the basin banks are to steep for
routine maintenance of the basin and, frankly, looks like a large hole in the ground which
from an aesthetic point of view is not very desirable. I would recommend a minimum of
4:1, preferably 6:1, slopes be utilized to facilitate maintenance and to maintain safety and
aesthetic value of the subdivision. I would also recommend to council that the
subdivision no be accepted until vegetation has been established over the entire area of
the basin.
Sheet 11
1. Need to show a detail for a Type "C" headwall a specified for the Silver Spur Drive cross
culvert.
Sheet 16
1. The manholes located at Stations 0+00 and 2+80.04 of Line "I" have significant drops in
them and have not been specified as drop manholes. I would recommend that the inlet
flowline elevations be dropped to an elevation of 1/10'e of foot higher than the called out
flowline elevation of the outlet. Drops of these types of magnitudes within manholes that
have not been designed as drop manholes tend to have problems with odor and should be
eliminated wherever possible.
If you have any questions or need any further information, please call me at (940) 391-4845.
Sincerely;
/A!
Mark T. Owens, P.E.
General Civil Consulting Engineer
CC: Roger Hebard
P.O. Box 596
PONDER. TX 76259
PHONE: 940-391.4845
FAX: 940-4790593
mdnusta•iS1ide.nct