09/17/2018-CC-Agenda Packet-RegularBANGER
*TEXAS
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 17, 2018
7:00 PM
502 ELM STREET
SANGER, TEXAS
1. Call Meeting to Order, Invocation, Pledge of Allegiance.
2. CITIZEN INPUT: (Citizens are allowed 3 minutes to speak. The City Council is unable to
respond or to discuss any issues brought up during this section).
3. CONSENT AGENDA:
a) Approval of Minutes:
1. City Council Work Session, September 4, 2018
2. City Council Regular Meeting, September 4, 2018
4. Consider Any Items Removed from Consent Agenda.
REGULAR AGENDA
5. Consider, Discuss and Act on Ordinance #09-24-18 — Amending Ordinance 909-29-17, Which
Will Amend the Budget For The Fiscal Year And Authorizing Amended Expenditures as
Provided.
6. Consider, Discuss and Act on Ordinance #09-25-18 — Levying A Tax Rate of $0.6791 per $100
Valuation (The Same Rate as 2017-18 Fiscal Year) for the General Government For the Fiscal
Year 2018-2019 and Providing For an Effective Date.
7. Consider, Discuss and Act on Ordinance 409-26-18 — Adopting the Budget Providing for the
Appropriation of Funds for Operating and Capital Expenditures for the Fiscal Year
Beginning October 1, 2018 and Ending September 30, 2019, Providing for the Intra and Inter
Department and Fund Transfers, Providing for Unexpected Revenues Such as Grants,
Donations, and Insurance Proceeds, Providing for an Effective Date, and Providing for
Approval of the Investment Policy.
8. Consider, Discuss and Act on Ordinance 409-27-18 — Approving the 2018 Tax Rolls and
Providing for an Effective Date.
9. Consider, Discuss and Act on Ordinance #09-28-18 — Denying a Proposed Increase Sought by
Atmos Energy-Midtex Division in Connection With the Rate Increase Filing it Made on About
June 1, 2018; Approving an Alternative Increase in Rates; Directing Atmos to File
Conforming Tariffs And to Reimburse the City's Rate Case Expenses; Making Other
Findings and Provisions Related to the Subject; Finding that the Meeting Complies With the
Open Meetings Act; and Declaring An Effective Date.
10. INFORMATION ITEMS:
a. All American Dogs Report — September 2018.
b. Update on the Status of the Solid Waste and Recycling Services Agreement.
c. ATMOS Energy Rider GCR — Rate Filing Under Docket No. 10170.
d. ATMOS Energy Docket Compliance, GUD No. 9400, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex
Division Annual Gas Cost Reconciliation Filing.
11. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: (The purpose of this item is to allow the Mayor and members of
Council to bring forward items they wish to discuss at a future meeting, A Council Member may
inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual
information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited
to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. Items may be placed
on a future meeting agenda with a consensus of the Council or at the call of the Mayot).
12. ADJOURN.
I, the undersigned authority, do hereby certify that this Notice of Meeting was posted on the City
Website, and on the bulletin board, at the City Hall of the City of Sanger, Texas, a place convenient
and readily accessible to the general public at all times. Said notice was posted on the following date
and time: r 1,,�v_ at j . M., and remained posted continuously
for at least 724iours prior tot the scheduleq tjW qpf said meeting and shall remain posted until meeting
is adjourned.
Cheryl ryiV City Secretary
City of SWnger, Texas
This facility. is wheelchair accessible'WJk66 w Tle parking spaces are available. Requests for
accommodations or interpretive services must be made 48 hours prior to this meeting. Please contact
the City Secretary's office at (940) 458-7930 for further information.
CITY OF SANGER, TEXAS
MINUTES: CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
Tuesday September 4, 2018 — 6:00 PM
502 Elm Street, Sanger, Texas
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Thomas Muir; Mayor Pro Tem Gary Bilyeu Councilman Bill
Boutwell; Councilman Lee Allison; Councilman David Clark.
COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: Councilman Allen Chick.
The Mayor and four (4) Council Members were present constituting a quorum.
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: City Manager Alina Ciocan; Finance
Director Clayton Gray; Public Works Director, Neal Welch; Library Director Audrey Tolle; Human
Resources Coordinator, Jeriana Staton; Utility Billing Kristen Wallace; Parks and Recreation Director
Jim Berman; City Secretary Cheryl Price.
1. Call Meeting to Order
Mayor Muir called the Work Session to order at 6:03 PM on Tuesday, September 4, 2018.
2. Discussion Regarding Request for Proposals Submitted for Solid Waste and Recycling Services.
Clayton Gray, Finance Director was recognized by Mayor Muir to provide the presentation. He
introduced the Committee Members: Alina Ciocan, City Manager; Cheryl Price, City Secretary; Jim
Berman, Parks and Recreation Director; Kristen Wallace, Utility Billing (Finance); and, Jeriana
Staton, HR Coordinator. He noted there were representatives from the three proposers. They are not
present to make a presentation, but are available if the Council has any questions. He asked if each
vendor would stand and make an introduction: Greg Raymer and Jason Raymer Community Waste
Disposal; Marty Grant and Brian Culhane, Waste Connections; Bill Osweiler, Tim Henderson, and
John Gustafson, Frontier Waste Solutions. Clayton Gray summarized the reasons for issuing an RFP
which were discussed at a previous City Council meeting. We wanted to see what other vendors could
offer Sanger. The goal is to offer the best mix of price and value both for the City and our customers.
He noted that the City could work with any three of the vendors. He stated that staff has a good
working relationship with our current vendor and we are committed to developing and maintaining a
relationship with whichever one of the vendors is chosen. He noted that from his standpoint, he would
like to make some improvements to our current contract. We have had some ongoing issues with
billing, customer service with calls being routed to the City, not being notified of missed routes until
we make an inquiry and some lack of coordination of delivery and set up with commercial containers.
He also noted the condition of the containers we have right now. He noted the residential containers
are in good shape, some have different names on them but are in good shape. The commercial
containers, some are brand new and some of them are an eyesore. He presented photos of some of the
commercial containers and their condition and it was noted that some of them are very visible and not
in good condition. Also, to be considered is the frequency of collection, doe we want once a week
pick-up or to keep twice a week pick up. A survey was performed by Kristen Wallace in Utility
Billing who contacted 35 cities in a 30-mile radius. Of the thirty-five (35) cities, thirty-one (31) of the
cities have once a week pick up and four (4) (Boyd, Decatur, Rhome and Tioga) have twice a week
pick up. He noted the pros and cons for once a week versus twice a week pick up. With once a week
pick up there could be a reduction of heavy trucks on the streets, it would require citizens to adjust to a
different schedule and depending on which vendor is chosen, may reduce the cost. We received three
(3) RFPs: Waste Connections (current vendor), Community Waste Disposal (CWD), and Frontier
Waste Solutions. Mr. Gray summarized the time and processes the committee spent in scoring the
evaluation criteria and provided a detailed thorough presentation to Council regarding all aspects of
service and pricing for residential, commercial, and city services.
There was a lengthy question and discussion period between staff, Mayor and Councilmembers, and
the three (3) vendors who were each provided equal time to answer any questions that were posed.
CWD noted that they have new vehicles that are 4 axle weight compliant which have cost them an
extra $20,000 and will provide less wear and tear on the streets.
Frontier Waste Solutions, CEO John Gustafson summarized their financial status and noted that they
are stable. Mr. Gustafson stated he has been in the business for 35 years and the company is going to
be in the business for long term.
Mayor Muir questioned the current provider Waste Connections. He noted in the RFP, that the
commercial containers be painted every 2-1/2 years. He questioned if they were chosen, if they were
willing to replace or re -paint the containers in the front end of the contract. Also, the RFP asked for
95-gallon recycle containers for Residential. The Recycling containers are currently 65 gal and would
they be willing to replace the containers to the larger 95-gallon containers at any time the City desires.
Marty Grant with Waste Connections stated they would be willing to change out every commercial
container within the first 60 days of the new contract or even sooner if they were awarded the contract.
As far as the recycle containers they would switch out the containers at any time to the size that the
city desires. He noted they would be willing to change their routes to whatever is best for the city (2
days or 4 days a week).
It was noted that there is an annual standard industrywide price increase allowed to the vendors.
There was discussion regarding the once and twice a week pick up and it was noted that service is as
important as price and that going from twice a week pick-up to once a week pick up would be a
difficult change for the residents. It was noted the residents could obtain extra containers if they did
go to once a week pick up. Also noted that additional trash outside of the container has and will be
continued to be picked up. Resident purchased containers would also be emptied.
Commercial container condition and screening was discussed at length.
Mayor Muir summarized the work session discussion and thanked the committee for all of the details
and concise information to help Council decide on a provider. He stated that even with all of the
information provided, it is still a hard decision for the Council to make.
3. Overview of Items on Regular Agenda.
No items.
4. Adjourn.
There being no further business, Mayor Muir adjourned the Work Session at 7:04 PM.
CITY OF SANGER, TEXAS
MINUTES: REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Tuesday September 4, 2018 — 7:00 PM.
502 Elm Street, Sanger, Texas
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Thomas Muir, Mayor Pro Tern Gary Bilyeu, Councilman
Lee Allison, Councilman Bill Boutwell, Councilman David Clark.
COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: Councilman Allen Chick.
The Mayor and four (4) Council Members were present constituting a quorum.
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: City Manager Alina Ciocan; Finance Director Clayton Gray; Public
Works Director, Neal Welch; Library Director Audrey Tolle; Human Resources Coordinator,
Jeriana Staton; Utility Billing Kristen Wallace; Parks and Recreation Director Jim Berman; City
Secretary Cheryl Price.
Call Meeting to Orderl, Invocation, Pledge of Allegiance.
Mayor Muir called the Tuesday, September 4, 2018 City Council Meeting to order at 7:13 PM.
The Invocation was given by Councilman Allison and the Pledge of Allegiance was led by
Councilman Clark.
2. CITIZEN INPUT: (Citizens are alloived 3 minutes to speak. The City Council is unable to
respond or to discuss any issues brought up during this section).
No citizens approached the podium wishing to speak.
3. CONSENT AGENDA:
a) Approval of Minutes:
Mayor Muir noted that the Consent Agenda will be divided into two votes: Item a) and
Item b) because Councilman Clark was not at the last meeting and would not vote on the
minutes but would like to vote on Item b).
1. City Council Regular Meeting, August 20, 2018
A motion was made by Councilman Boutwell to approve the minutes of the City Council Regular
Meeting of August 20, 2018 as presented. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Bilyeu.
The motion carried with three (3) in favor and one (1) abstention (Councilman Clark abstained
because he was not at the meeting)(Councilman Chick absent).
b) Approve Ratification of the Following Change Orders Related to the I-35 Outfall Sewer
Phase III Project:
Change Order #1 With Dickerson Construction Company, Inc. for Additional
Boring Under View Road for Water and Sewer at a Cost of $42,478.00.
Change Order #2 With Dickerson Construction Company, Inc. for Additional
Boring at a Cost of $16,701.00.
A motion was made by Councilman Allison to approve the ratification of the following change
orders related to the I-35 Outfall Sewer Phase III Project: Change Order #1 with Dickerson
Construction Company, Inc. for additional boring under View Road for water and sewer at a cost
of $42,478.00; Change Order #2 with Dickerson Construction Company for additional boring at a
cost of $16,701.00, as presented. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Bilyeu. The motion
carried unanimously (Councilman Chick absent).
4. Consider Any Items Removed from Consent Agenda.
None.
REGULAR AGENDA
5. Consider, Discuss and Act on a Proposal for Award of Contract for Solid Waste and
Recycling Services: Choosing a Provider; Frequency for Residential Service at One (1) or
Two (2) Times a Week at the Rates Provided in the Request for Proposal (RFP); and, Direct
City Manager to Notify Provider and Negotiate the Solid Waste and Recycling Services
Agreement for Council Award and Approval.
Mayor Muir summarized the City Council Work Session discussion where the staff committee
presented the information to the City Council. Councilman Boutwell advised that Council should
determine once a week or twice a week service. Councilman Allison noted that he did not think
that once or twice a week would reduce the load on the road. There is a certain amount of garbage
to be hauled whether it is once a week or twice a week He noted the more often there are out here
picking up trash may be more often disruption on the roads, but he did not see it being more
detrimental to the roads. Mayor Muir noted that was his concern regarding the streets and that
Councilman Allison may be right that the amount of garbage to remove is the same. There was
lengthy discussion regarding the streets and each provider gave a brief comment on their
observation on the street wear.
John Gustafson with Frontier Waste Solutions was recognized. He stated that it is a big issue to
take communities from twice a week to once a week from a consumer's prospective. In regard to
street wear it is the same amount of garbage being hauled out to the city and it is the issue of the
35,000-pound truck going down the street. He noted the big question is whether twice a week
service is what the City needs and what the residents and voters want. How are you going to
quantify the street wear versus the dollar savings on the table. The additional truck weight, street
wear is immaterial in the grand scheme of things.
Greg Raymer, President of Community Waste Disposal (CWD) was recognized. He pointed out
two things on the street wear and tear. He reminded the Council of their four -axle vehicle that is
weight compliant. It is a really big deal and cost them an extra $20,000 a vehicle and they would
be better for the streets. He noted if they drive the City five days a week they would only come
through the entire town once a week and would have fewer road miles. It makes more sense if
you calculate the miles the truck has to drive down the streets and two day a week service is going
to be more miles. Fewer miles should be better for the truck because they are big and heavy. The
other item he wanted to mention is the recycling. They are the original recycler in DFW and
received their first contract for recycling in 1992 in Euless, Texas and they still do it. He
elaborated on their recycling benefits. Mayor Muir asked about the question at hand, with once
or twice a week pick up and that CWD's proposal was considerably higher on the twice a week
pick up and asked if he had a comment on the difference in pricing at twice a week. Mr. Raymer
advised that it is better utilization of the equipment. If you are going to generate about of 50
pounds per week of trash and if it is picked up twice, they would have to have more equipment
and there is less utilization of their capital. They do 22 municipalities and a lot of them have
switched from twice to once a week. Nobody likes it and it is kind of hard to do but everybody
does it and they get used to it and nobody has switched back.
Marty Grant with Waste Connections was recognized and stated he agreed with CWD on twice
to once a week that the less time you have the vehicles on the streets in front of the homes the
better it is for everyone. What that equates to with damage to the road is a hard thing to tell. He
noted he lives in the City of Fort Worth and the whole City is once a week. He noted that he has
large families living in his neighborhood and it does not seem to be a big issue. He noted that if
there was some extra trash outside of the cart he would promise that it would be moved as long
as it was put out on the day of service. Mayor Muir asked if there was any differential in
cleanliness of the city with the excess trash. Mr. Grant stated that if the trash is put out on the
day of service it would get removed by the trash pick up whether it is in a bag or a container
provided by the resident.
Mayor Pro Tern noted that we are under a time constraint and asked about if we could change
from two to one pick up at a later date in the contract maybe in twelve months. All of the vendors
noted that they would not have a problem with that addition to the contract. City Manager Alina
Ciocan noted that it is a five-year contract. After discussion, Mayor Muir summarized that all of
the vendors agreed that we could sign a multiyear deal with a provision in the contract to go to
once a week anytime during the contract. It was noted that it would be easier to go from twice a
week to once a week. Mayor Muir noted that what he is hearing is that the Council would like
further discussion before going to once a week service and likely start the contract at twice a week
and possibly go to once a week later in the contract or continue the twice a week for the duration
of the contract.
Mayor Pro Tern Bilyeu asked about rate increases and noted the current contractor uses the CPI
for the annual rate increases and it is built into the contract. and asked if that is what the other
contractors use and Frontier noted that it is the standard. CWD noted that they have provided a
comprehensive rate adjustment model in their Proposal which is based on third party numbers
and could be easily calculated. Mayor Muir noted on that point that there were years when the
current Contractor Waste Connections did not propose a CPI rate increase, that they were a good
partner on this issue by not bumping the rate every time they could.
Mayor Pro Tern Bilyeu asked if there were any citizens who wished to speak on this Agenda Item.
Mr. Gustafson was recognized and stated he was sorry and had to step out a minute ago and
realized that he did not answer the Mayors question regarding Frontiers long term prospects. He
noted to be clear he has an agreement with their current shareholders that in the event that they
desire to seek liquidity and choose to go somewhere else, they are prepared buy them out.
Marissa Barrett, 607 South 3rd Street. She noted she has grown up in the City and her parents
still live here. She has a family of four, two little boys that destroy everything in the house every
other day and they only take their trash out once a week now. She noted that she is not speaking
for everyone that lives in Sanger. She noted that she also has friends of the same family size and
they only put their trash out once a week. Part of the time because they forget and part of the time
because there is just not enough garbage in it. She noted everybody in Sanger would like to see
the streets last longer, so if there is any chance of not having as much traffic or as heavy of traffic
on the road once a week would be beneficial.
Joe Strittmatter, Milam Road was recognized and stated that they have trash pick-up once a week.
If it did anything it made them recycle more. There were some weeks they would only have half
full cans and the weeks they had more trash than usual they would just recycle more.
There was additional discussion regarding once or twice a week pick up and the pros and cons of
each.
Councilman Clark noted that each of the providers have things that he likes and a couple have
things that he does not like. The scoring is subjective. He noted he would make a motion.
A motion was made by Councilman Clark to approve Award of Contract for Solid Waste and
Recycling Services to Frontier Waste Solutions. With a beginning frequency of twice a week
service including an option in the contract to go to once a week for Residential Service.at the
Rates Provided in the Request for Proposal (RFP); and, Direct City Manager to Notify Provider
and Negotiate the Solid Waste and Recycling Services Agreement for Council Award and
Approval. The motion was seconded by Councilman Allison. Discussion was called.
Councilman Boutwell noted that if you look at the final scores the motion is not in line with the
final scores and the current provider has been here for years and we know they can do the job.
He noted that they do need to replace the commercial dumpsters, but he has seen them out
replacing the residential containers. He noted that when there is extra trash out that he has spoken
highly of them for picking up everything that is put out so for him they do a very good job for us.
As the Mayor pointed out there were times when they could have increased their existing contract
but did not and gave our citizens a break. Councilman Boutwell stated he is against the motion.
Councilman Clark noted that any score is subjective and he likes the idea of saving the residents
some money. We have increased water and wastewater for five years now and this is a way to
cut some of the cost. Councilman Allision noted that the contract would have a termination clause
which could be terminated during the five-year period. Mayor Muir noted that what Councilman
Allision is saying is that we have raised some issues at this meeting and we should maybe do a
more proactive job managing the contract and level of service to our citizenry — not necessarily
negotiating but setting expectations. Councilman Allison noted that he would like to see the
possibility of small negotiations like just as an example, painting all of the commercial containers
one color during the price increase adjustment periods each year. Mayor Pro Tern Bilyeu asked
each of the vendors a question regarding the recycling and asked if there were carbon credits
associated with the recycling program. All of the vendors noted there were none. There being no
further discussion, motion was called. The vote on the motion was a 2 to 2 vote requiring the
Mayor to vote. (Councilman Clark and Councilman Allison voting in favor and Mayor Pro Tem
Bilyeu and Councilman Boutwell voting against). Mayor Muir voted against the motion breaking
the tie with a 3 against-2 favor vote causing the motion to fail (Councilman Chick absent).
Discussion ensued. Mayor Muir noted that the committee scoring scored the current provider a
little higher and that sometimes we think, the grass is greener on the other side of the fence and
sometimes it is not. He noted that the current provider has offered an improvement of service,
replacement of the containers, and the goodwill of not having bumped the rates every time they
could have during the contracts annual review.
A motion was made by Councilman Boutwell to approve Award of Contract for Solid Waste and
Recycling Services to Waste Connections with a beginning frequency of twice a week service
and including an option in the contract to go to once a week for Residential Service at the Rates
Provided in the Request for Proposal (RFP); and, direct City Manager to notify provider and
negotiate the Solid Waste and Recycling Services Agreement for Council award and approval.
The motion was seconded by Councilman Allison. Discussion was called. Mayor Muir noted
that there were key points brought up that were discussed and need to be handled and dealt with
if the contract is awarded to Waste Connections. Painting or replacing the commercial containers
at the front end of the contract within the first 60 days; corrections to the billing; handling of
customer service calls (which is currently in the current contract); communication on the routes
being missed, etc.; residential recycling container size increased from 65 to 95 gallon.
Councilman Allision noted that staff needs to be cognizant of the negotiation of the contract
regarding the levels of service and items that need to be improved and mentioned in detail in the
contract to assure that the current concerns are eliminated or at least minimized. Mayor Pro Tem
Bilyeu asked if it was an option if the contract could not be negotiated and we could not get what
we are looking for that staff would have the ability to negotiate with the other proposers. It was
noted that the contract needed to be negotiated in a timely manner due to the time constraints.
Marty Grant with Waste Connections noted that if the City needed more time that they are willing
to extend their current contract if that is what the City needs. Mayor Pro Tem Bilyeu noted that
he appreciated Waste Connections offering that. The motion carried with a 3-1 vote Councilman
Clark voting in opposition to the vote (Councilman Chick absent).
6. Conduct a Public Hearing Regarding a Request for a Variance to Allow Open Channel for
Storm Water Runoff Which can be Contained Within two (2) — 60" Pipes; and for Delaying
Construction of the Detention Facility to Return Downstream Discharge to Pre -
Development Conditions, for Proposed Final Plat of Lots 1 & 2, Block A, Lois Business Park
Addition, Being 4.29 Acres and Generally Located South of Lois Road East and
Approximately 1000 Fee East of the Intersection of Lois Road East and I-35 Northbound
Service Road.
Planner Muzaib Ruiz was recognized to summarize the request. The applicant is requesting a
variance to allow and open channel for storm water runoff instead of using two 60-inch pipes and
the second part of the variance is to remove the requirement to build a detention facility for
downstream discharge. The intention of the applicant was to delay the construction of the
detention pond and not to remove it. The applicant and engineer, Earl Escobar was recognized
and stated they are in the process of developing a final plat of a total of four acres with two lots
one being two acres and one being 1.93 acres. They only have development plans for one lot at
this time. They were required to convey offsite drainage to be piped through the development
and since they are only proposing on the one lot a 30,000 square foot warehouse it is cost
prohibitive to extend pipe through the development. They are proposing an earthen channel
which will still accomplish the same end goal to convey all flows. It would be privately owned
and maintained; however, the City would still have access to the property. Drainage details were
discussed between the engineer and City Council. In terms of detention they are not asking for it
to be removed but asking that it be included in future development which in their case would be
the second lot which is the bigger lot. At that point they would build the detention for future
development. If phase two is built the open ditch will remain. It was noted that the City's third -
party engineer was present to answer any questions. Mr. Belcheff was recognized and noted that
they have reviewed the project for the City. He clarified that there are two variances being
requested on the subdivision ordinance. The ordinance requires that all flows be carried in two
60-inch pipes underground and it is an expensive thing to do, but not an unusual request. Their
pipe flows are not enough to fill those two sixty -inch pipes. He noted it would be a mix of
culverts and open channel and they are asking for a variance to leave most of the channels open
except for driveways, etc. that they would have to cross. This is not an unusual request. The
second variance is to delay the detention pond to a future phase. The plat is currently only
proposing one lot and the detention pond requirement should be noted on the plat for a future
phase and/or tied to specific conditions and gave examples as to upon completion of 2/3 of the
development, before building permit, etc.
Mayor Muir opened the public hearing at 8:24 PM and solicited anyone who wished to speak on
this item. There being no persons recognized who wished to speak the public hearing was closed
at 8:25 PM.
7. Consider, Discuss and Act on a Request for a Variance to Allow Open Channel for Storm
Water Runoff Which can be Contained Within two (2) — 60" Pipes; and for Delaying
Construction of the Detention Facility to Return Downstream Discharge to Pre -
Development Conditions, for Proposed Final Plat of Lots 1 & 2, Block A, Lois Business Park
Addition, Being 4.29 Acres and Generally Located South of Lois Road East and
Approximately 1000 Fee East of the Intersection of Lois Road East and I-35 Northbound
Service Road.
Councilman Allison asked Mr. Belcheff if he knew why the City is requiring the pipe instead of
open channels. He noted he personally has a problem with open channels. Mr. Belcheff noted
that it is his concern that it is usually runoff from another property and there is more of a
maintenance issue with open channels. The have offered to put a property owner association that
would maintain this earthen channel. There was discussion between Mr. Belcheff and
Councilman Allision regarding the channels, maintenance and revisions to the ordinance. Mayor
Muir asked if the land around the property develops will the open channel fit with future
development of the other land surrounding it. It was noted the property is right on 1-35 and it is
Industrial Zoning which is an intense zoning and it may into effect future development. Mayor
Muir asked how staff should go about noting the detention pond, by just platting one lot now and
noting it for future development or putting it on the plat. Mr. Belcheff noted that the channel is
on Lot 3 he suggested putting the notes on the plats and it is best to have a development agreement
noting all of the requirements. Once Lot 1 is platted it is going to be hard to make them do
something that is on someone else's property. Councilman Boutwell asked what type of business
they would put on the property. They said anyone that wants to put a business in a 30,000
building. Mayor Pro Tem Bilyeu noted that if the Engineer says that an open channel will suffice
he is good with that, but maintenance needs to be addressed and has to be their responsibility.
The note on the plat will say that the City has the right to access the channel to maintain it and
site the owner and put a lien on the property for maintenance. There are a couple of steps that
the City can take to assure that the channel is maintained. Mayor Pro Tem Bilyeu asked how to
trigger the detention pond since it is on a different lot. Mr. Belcheff noted it does complicate the
issue and that is why a development agreement should be done and it be tied to the entire
development of the tract so that as these pieces are sold off so that it runs with all of the properties.
If it is not documented it could become a problem in the future and he would not encourage it not
being noted. He advised noted that the drainage channel is on Lot 3 and they are not planning on
platting it. He also noted that detention facilities do fail and may not be maintained. Mayor
Muir asked how best is it for the Council to tie the obligation into clarification for a possible
motion how this would be addressed. Mr. Belcheff noted that the channel that they are talking
about is actually offsite of Lot 1 and 2 so it is not even on those two lots which they are trying
not to plat. He suggested putting the notes on the plats for Lot 1 or Lot 1 and 2 or the whole
entire plat but it is best to have a development agreement that memorializes the agreement and
what they are doing in lieu of in exchange for getting the variance and it follows the property as
it sells. He recommended approval of the two variances as presented in the requests contingent
on staff developing a development agreement that the future development of the detention pond
attach to the entire property and the maintenance of the channel is addressed with appropriate
penalties to enforce said maintenance. Staff will deal with what is best as far as if there is an
association formed for maintenance.
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Bilyeu to approve a variance to allow open channel for
storm water runoff with the maintenance being the sole responsibility of the property owner; and
that they be allowed to initially delay the development of the detention pond with a development
agreement developed by staff to implement that detention pond to be developed on the future lots
and immediately place the responsibility of the maintenance of the open channel and the detention
pond to the owners of the property and providing for a remedy if the property is not maintained,
for proposed final plat of Lots 1 & 2, Block A, Lois Business Park Addition, being 4.29 acres and
generally located south of Lois Road East and approximately 1000 feet east of the intersection of
Lois Road East and I-35 Northbound Service Road. The motion was seconded by Councilman
Boutwell. Mayor Pro Tem Bilyeu noted he wanted to add the word allowing for "remedy" if the
property is not maintained. Mayor Muir asked if Councilman Boutwell was ok with adding the
wording to the motion and Councilman Boutwell stated yes (included in motion above). The
motion carried unanimously with a 4-0 vote (Councilman Chick absent).
8. Consider, Discuss and Act on the Final Plat of Lots 1 and 2, Block A, of Red Willow
Addition, Being 9.118 Acres in the R. Bebee Survey A-29, and Being in the Extraterritorial
Jurisdiction (ETJ) of the City of Sanger, Generally Located South of Lake Ray Roberts
Drive and Approximately 375 Feet East of the Intersection of Lake Ray Roberts Drive and
Union Hill Road.
Planner Muzaib Ruiz was recognized to summarize the request. He stated that it a final plat for
Red Willow Addition and they are dividing into two lots. It is in the Lake Ray Roberts Zoning
District. It was originally in Agricultural zoning and they recently got R-4 Zoning approved. The
lots meet the minimum zoning criteria of four acres and they meet the subdivision regulations.
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tent Bilyeu to approve the Final Plat of Lots 1 and 2, Block
A, of Red Willow Addition, being 9.118 Acres in the R. Bebee Survey A-29, and being in the
Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) of the City of Sanger, generally located south of Lake Ray
Roberts Drive and approximately 375 feet east of the intersection of Lake Ray Roberts Drive and
Union Hill Road. The motion to was seconded by Councilman Allison. The motion carried
unanimously with a 4-0 vote (Councilman Chick absent).
Consider, Discuss and Act on the Final Plat of Lake Ridge Estates. Phase 3, Being 11.15
Acres of Land Situated in the Reuben Bebee Survey, Abstract No. 29, an Addition to the
City of Sanger, Generally Located North of the Intersection of McReynolds Road and Lake
Ridge Drive, and North and East of Lake Ridge Phase I.
Planner Muzaib Ruiz was recognized to summarize. He advised the applicant is proposing to
subdivide the property into 54 lots of record within the Lake Ridge Subdivision. The lots meet
the Lake Ridge Planned Development Standards per the Ordinance. A letter of Map revision for
floodplain was issued from FEMA on June 26, 2018. The plat meets the City of Sanger
Subdivision regulations and Planned Development Ordinance #05-06-18 and Staff recommends
approval contingent upon the following conditions:
Off -site easements will be acquired by separate instrument(s) and acknowledged (with
filing information noted on the Plat) by the City prior to Plat filing.
2. Building Permits for individual lots and final acceptance by the City of public facilities
not be provided until after November 9, 2018, the effective date contained in the FEMA
Letter of Map Revision Determination Document.
Mayor Pro Tem Bilyeu asked what prompted the requirement 91. Planner Muzaib Ruiz noted
that there are easements offsite that are not acquired yet and we are asking them to acquire them
by separate instrument and record them on the plat before it is filed. Mayor Pro Tem Bilyeu asked
what if those are not recorded on the plat. Staff noted the plat will not be filed.
Councilman Allison asked why the minimum finished floor elevations were not on the plat. The
developer noted that he took them off because they are no longer in the flood zone. Councilman
Allison stated that they should be on the plat. Councilman Allison noted that the City Ordinance
states that the homes in a subdivision need to be built at least two feet above the base floor
elevation and when issuing the building permits staff looks at the plat and notes the finished floor
elevation and that it has to be met. The City's third -party engineer Mr. Belcheff was recognized
and stated that he agreed with Councilman Allison that they should be on the plat. He also noted
that they would be required to obtain a flood certificate for any lots that are adjacent to or near a
flood plain.
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Bilyeu to approve the final plat of Lake Ridge Estates.
Phase 3, being 11.15 acres of land situated in the Reuben Bebee Survey, Abstract No. 29, an
addition to the City of Sanger, generally located north of the intersection of McReynolds Road
and Lake Ridge Drive, and north and east of Lake Ridge Phase I with the following conditions:
Off -site easements will be acquired by separate instrument(s) and acknowledged (with
filing information noted on the Plat) by the City prior to Plat filing.
2. Building Permits for individual lots and final acceptance by the City of public facilities
not be provided until after November 9, 2018, the effective date contained in the FEMA
Letter of Map Revision Determination Document.
3. Add the Finished Floor Elevations for each lot to the final plat.
The motion was seconded by Councilman Clark. The motion carried unanimously (Councilman
Chick absent).
10. Consider, Discuss and Act on the Final Plat of Estates at Wind Song Hill Addition, being
66.181 Acres in the J.P.B. January Survey, Abstract No. 658, and Being in the
Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) of the City of Sanger, Generally Located North of Kildee
Trail and East of Bob White Way.
Planner Muzaib Ruiz summarized noting the applicant is proposing to subdivide the property into
57 lots of record for single family residential development with a minimum of one acre lots. The
property is located within the ETJ of the City of Sanger. The plat was sent to Denton County for
a courtesy review. Water service will be Bolivar Water, electric will be provided by CoSery
Electric. The plat meets Denton County subdivision regulations. The applicant has also
submitted construction/civil plans to Development Services which are currently being reviewed
by a third -party engineer.
Councilman Allison asked about Flood Plain and was concerned about the plat not having all of
the review comments from the civil engineer. Mayor Pro Tern Bilyeu noted that we are some of
getting these developments in that are not complete and is hard for staff to keep up with all of
this. Planner Muzaib Ruiz noted that the Texas Local Government Code gives us 30 days to
approve the plat and the actual construction plans take more than 30 days. Councilman Allison
said we could do what other cities do and get a waiver or we can always deny it. It does not mean
we have to approve it. Mayor Muir noted that it seems that developers are pushing us to get items
on the agenda before they are complete. Mayor Muir noted that he got a call regarding the
property from adjacent residents and that they said they were moving dirt. Planner Muzaib Ruiz
noted that they were doing that and the City went out and gave them a stop work order. There
was lengthy discussion regarding the review of the plans and other items such as TCEQ septic
requirements.
A motion was made by Councilman Allison to approve the final plat of Estates at Wind Song Hill
Addition, being 66.181 Acres in the J.P.B. January Survey, Abstract No. 658, and being in the
extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) of the City of Sanger, Generally Located North of Kildee Trail
and East of Bob White Way with the following stipulation:
1. Contingent upon the construction plans being completed and review being acceptable by City
staff and all of the easements and right-of-way being accommodated by the plans.
The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Bilyeu. The motion carried unanimously with a 4-
0 vote (Councilman Chick absent).
There was a short four -minute break taken at this point in the meeting. Meeting reconvened at
9:13 PM
11. Consider, Discuss and Act on the Amended Plat of Lots 1-A and 2-A, Block A of Kirkland
Street Addition, Being an Amendment of Lots 1-3, Block A of Kirkland Street Addition,
Being 0.473 Acres in the R. Bebee Survey A-29, an Addition to the City of Sanger, Generally
Located Southwest of the Intersection of Kirkland Street and Sims Street.
Planner Muzaib Ruiz was recognized to provide a summary of the project. The final plat was
platted about a month ago and initially was platted into three lots and the applicant would like
to replat the lots into two lots. The applicant is proposing to amend the existing plat of Lots 1-3,
Block A of Kirkland Street Addition to decrease the total number of lots from 3 to 2 lots. The
property is zoned SF-10 and meets all SF 10 zoning standards.
A motion was made by Councilman Boutwell to approve the final plat of the amended plat of
Lots 1-A and 2-A, Block A of Kirkland Street Addition, being an amendment of Lots 1-3, Block
A of Kirkland Street Addition, being 0.473 Acres in the R. Bebee Survey A-29, an addition to
the City of Sanger, generally located southwest of the Intersection of Kirkland Street and Sims
Street. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Bilyeu. The motion carried unanimously
with a 4-0 vote (Councilman Chick absent).
12. Conduct the Second Public Hearing on a Proposal to Increase Total Tax Revenues From
Properties on the Tax Roll in the Preceding Year by 12.70% with the Proposed Tax Rate of
$0.6791 per $100 of Assessed Valuation (Tax Rate is Proposed to Remain the Same as the
Preceding Year's Tax Rate of $0.6791 per $100). Schedule and Announce Meeting Date
and Time to Adopt Tax Rate (3-14 Days From This Date).
Mayor Muir read the above caption noting that at the Monday September 17th 2018 City Council
Meeting would be the Meeting Date for final adoption of the proposed budget, the tax rate, and
approving the tax rolls. Mayor Muir opened the Public Hearing at 9:17 PM to hear fiom anyone
who wished to speak on the proposed tax rate. Mayor Muir noted that the tax rate is staying the
same. The property valuations as they go up produces additional revenue as the City is a growing
City and we produce additional revenue as we grow so we are holding the tax rate at the same
rate.
There being no one approaching the podium who wished to speak, the Public Hearing was
closed at 9:18 PM.
13. Consider, Discuss and Possibly Act on Approving and Authorizing the City Manager to
Execute Amendment #5 With Alan Plummer Associates, Inc. in the Amount of $47,923 for
Additional Resident Project Representation Fees Related to the Sanger Wastewater
Treatment Plan Improvement Project.
Public Works Director Neal Welch was recognized and stated if the Council has any questions
he would be glad to answer them. Mayor Muir noted that Jeff Caffey with Alan Plummer is
present at the meeting. There was discussion regarding the item and Mayor Muir noted that this
puts extra representation for the City on the ground for this project with inspections. Mr. Jeff
Caffey with Alan Plummer noted that time and material is completed and there is no more
structural work and most of the work is above ground and can be inspected and addressed in two
days a month. He noted that there was some discussion of having a Class A Plant Operator on -
site on the start up of plant one to make sure it goes well, and this item is not included in this
amendment. Mr. Caffey explained the inspection process for the concrete and underground
piping.
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Bilyeu to approve and authorizing the City Manager to
execute Amendment #5 with Alan Plummer Associates, Inc. in the amount of $47,923 for
additional resident project representation fees related to the Sanger Wastewater Treatment Plan
Improvement Project. The motion was seconded by Councilman Boutwell. The motion carried
with a 3-1 vote. Councilman Clark voting in opposition (Councilman Chick absent).
14. Consider, Discuss and Possibly Act on Approving and Authorizing the City Manager to
Execute Change Order No. 3 Between the City of Sanger and Felix Construction Company
Related to the Sanger Wastewater Treatment Plan Improvement Project Which Includes
($390.48) in Credit and Seventy (70) Additional Days of Contract Time.
Public Works Director Neal Welch was recognized and stated there were several things that made
up Change Order #3 (noted below) and summarized each item for Council.
PCM-08 — Delete one channel of the UV facility. This was a redundant channel that was
originally included in the expansion for the future.
PCM-09 — Requires the contractor, Felix Construction to provide heat tract tape, heat trace
junction boxes, additional insulation and additional air release valves.
CMR —12 — Requires the contractors to utilize shotcrete in place of concrete on the east and
west slopes of the peak flow storage basin
CMR — 13 — Additional steel tank repairs on Plant #1 that were not planned and discovered
when the plant was emptied
CMR-14- Additional cost for Hydrotank
Councilman Allison asked about PCM-08 and the redundant channel for the UV and if it was for
when one channel is out the other could be in operation. He noted that it says something about
future expansion. Mr. Welch noted that if there is an occasion where we to need to do that we
can add the channel real easy. We could add a second channel without a whole lot of work if we
ever need it. Councilman Allison asked why we needed a hydrotank if we were tied into City
water. Mr. Caffey noted that the plant is on City water but they are using plant recycled water.
It is for washing out the storage basin and spray water on the clarifiers. Through questioning by
Councilman Clark it was noted that the UV Channel was easy maintenance with a plug and play
system and the heat trace tape was an add -in.
Mayor Pro Tem Bilyeu asked what the trigger points of the project are now with the timeline
changes. Mr. Caffey noted that the Start up of Plant 1 is going to be completed during the second
week of October. At that point they will start introducing sludge into Plant 1 and starting the
treatment process. It was noted the rotary press is already operational. October 15th is the start
of the testing date and November 15th will be the handover date.
Mayor Muir noted as an FYI that there are discussions regarding extra personnel that should be
on -site during the start-up of the plant and it is not budgeted and will be something we see in the
future. Councilman Clark asked about the plant operators licenses the city has. It was noted
that we have an A, B and C Licensed Plant Operators.
Mayor Pro Tern Bilyeu voiced his concerns regarding the contract amount for the wastewater
plant. It was noted that the project being an 11-million-dollar project that we are over
approximately $73,000. City Manager Alina Ciocan noted that we do still have about a year to
go.
Councilman Allison voiced his concern regarding the future upkeep and maintenance of the
wastewater plant.
A motion was made by Councilman Allison approving and authorizing the City Manager to
execute Change Order No. 3 between the City of Sanger and Felix Construction Company
related to the Sanger Wastewater Treatment Plan Improvement Project Which includes
($390.48) in credit and seventy (70) additional days of contract time. The motion was seconded
by Councilman Boutwell. The motion carried unanimously with a 4-0 vote (Councilman Chick
absent).
15. Consider, Discuss and Possibly Act on Approving and Authorizing the City Manager to
Execute Change Order No. 2 for the McReynolds Road Project with Pavecon Public
Works, LP for a Reconciliation for the Total Project with a Projected Reduction in Cost of
$222,202.04 Before Considering Additional Change Orders.
Mayor Muir noted that Item #16 is an additional $33,978 additional to this amount.
Public Works Director Neal Welch summarized. This is a reconciliation to begin to finalize the
numbers and reconcile to date. There will be some additional change orders that will change
this amount. The net result is that we are still below the contract amount. We are approximately
$11,000 in the positive.
Councilman Bilyeu asked if the fence was included in this. Mr. Welch noted that the barbed
wire fence is a better fence, however the corners and the tie-in posts need to be improved and
they are looking at an updated cost to reinforce the fencing to make the homeowners happy.
They were done to TxDOT specifications and need to be done to NRCS specifications. The
fence itself meets the specifications but the corner posts and tie-in need to be improved to meet
those specifications. There was discussion and concern as to why the specified TxDOT fence
for the cattle and what improvements need to be made to improve and beef up the fence structure
bracing to meet NRCS specifications and satisfy the property owners.
Mayor Pro Tern Bilyeu to approve and authorizing the City Manager to execute change Order
No. 2 for the McReynolds Road Project with Pavecon Public Works, LP for a reconciliation for
the total project with a projected reduction in cost of $222,202.04 before considering additional
change orders. The motion was seconded by Councilman Clark. The motion carried
unanimously with a 4-1 vote (Councilman Chick absent).
16. Consider, Discuss and Possibly Act on Approving and Authorizing the City Manager to
Execute Change Order No. 3 for the McReynolds Project with Pavecon Public Works, LP
for an Additional Cost of $33,978.00 for Changing a Typical Wing Wall for a Storm Water
Structure to a Parallel Wing Wall.
Director of Public Works Neal Welch summarized. One of the structures toward the east end of
the project is a wing wall that would go over the top of an ATMOS gas line and ATMOS does not
want any concrete over their line. They are changing the structure to a Parallel Wing Wall to
accommodate the request and it will cost and additional $33,978.00. This is a solution to alleviate
the problem.
A motion was made by Councilman Boutwell to approving and authorizing the City Manager to
execute Change Order No. 3 for the McReynolds Project with Pavecon Public Works, LP for an
additional cost of $33,978.00 for changing a typical wing wall for a storm water structure to a
parallel wing wall. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Bilyeu. The motion carried
unanimously with a 4-0 vote (Councilman Chick absent).
17. Update on Capital Projects: The Wastewater Treatment Plant and McReynolds Road
provided by Director of Public Works, Neal Welch.
Director of Public Works Neal Welch provided an updated power point presentation of photos of
the Wastewater Treatment Plant and McReynolds Road projects and there were various questions
posed about some of the photos by the Mayor and Councilmembers.
18. INFORMATION ITEMS:
a. Financial Report — July 2018
b. Capital Projects Recap —August 30, 2018
c. Library Quarterly Report and Update
City Manager Alina Ciocan noted that a few months ago when City Council waived the
latefees for the Library Fines Mayor Pro Tern Bilyeu requested a six-month update from
staff. Library Director Audrey Tolle was recognized to give an update. She there has been
no significant changes; the number of long-term overdues has not increased. One thing that
they have noticed is that it is new patrons that come in and check out books. There used to
be limits for first time check outs and in looking at those numbers we should start limiting
the number to two items for the first time check out and when they are returned the amount
would be increased. The consortium is also planning to do autorenewals. There was a
question as to how many times you can renew. She provided figures regarding the overdues
and there was 298 for the year and there was a jump in the summer when people went on
vacation and now that summer is over some of the books are coming back. They are seeing
more people in the Library and more people are checking out books now that they do not
have the threat of overdues hanging over them.
d. Monthly Disbursement Report — August 2018
Councilman Clark asked a disbursement for dry cleanings of 359 shirts (Page 137). City
Manager Alina Ciocan noted that she would look into it.
19. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: (The purpose of this item is to allow the Mayor and members
of Council to bring forward items they ►vish to discuss at a future meeting, A Council Member
may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific
factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall
be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. Items
may be placed on a future meeting agenda with a consensus of the Council or at the call of
the Mayor).
� : 1 L�1117`►!�
There being no further business Mayor Muir adjourned the meeting at 10:20 PM.
19 lie] MAN 9
BANGER
* T E X A S COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA TYPE ® Regular ❑ Special ❑ Consent Reviewed by
® Yes
❑ Not Applicable
❑ Workshop ❑ Executive ❑ Public Hearing Finance
Reviewed by Legal
❑ Yes
® Not Applicable
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: SUBMITTED BY:
September 17, 2018 Alina Ciocan
City Manager Reviewed/Approval Initials AC, Date
ACTION REQUESTED: ®ORDINANCE ❑ RESOLUTION ❑ APPROVAL
❑ CHANGE ORDER ❑ AGREEMENT ❑ APPROVAL OF BID ❑ AWARD OF CONTRACT
❑ CONSENSUS ❑ REAPPOINTMENTS ❑ OTHER EXPLAIN:
AGENDA CAPTION
Consider, Discuss and Act on Ordinance #09-24-18 — Amending Ordinance #09-29-17, which will amend the
Budget for the 2017-2018 Fiscal Year and authorizing amended expenditures as provided.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
❑N/A ❑GRANT FUNDS ❑OPERATING EXPENSE ❑REVENUE ❑CIP ❑BUDGETED ❑NON -BUDGETED
PRIOR
CURRENT
FUTURE
FISCAL YEAR:
YEAR
YEAR
YEAR(S)
TOTALS
Proposed Expenditure Amount
Encumbered Amount
BALANCE
FUND(S) TO BE USED: General ❑$ Utility
❑ Special ❑ $
BACKGROUND/SUMMARY OF ITEM
1. This budget amendment increases the 2017-2018 budget by $20,000 to provide for necessary expenditures
for Enterprise Fund G/L account 008-54-5360, System Maintenance. These expenditures are necessary for
maintenance of the waste water treatment plant over the amount included in the original budget.
2. The amendment also increases revenues in the Enterprise Capital Projects Fund G/L account 840-00-4982
and expenditures in the 4A Fund G/L account 41-74-7484 by $500,000 (net $0). This amendment incorporates
the expenditure approved by City Council on October 16, 2017 in relation to the IH-35 Sewer Outfall Project
Phase III .
STAFF OPTIONS & RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the ordinance.
List of Supporting Documents/Exhibits Attached:
Prior Action/Review by Council, Boards,
• Ordinance 09-24-18
Commissions or Other Agencies:
• Exhibit A
• Exhibit B
ORDINANCE #09-24-18
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANGER, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS, (BUDGET
AMENDMENT 2) AMENDING ORDINANCE #09-29-17, WHICH WILL AMEND THE
BUDGET FOR THE 2017-2018 FISCAL YEAR AND AUTHORIZING AMENDED
EXPENDITURES AS PROVIDED; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL
ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; PROVIDING FOR A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council approved its budget ordinance for the 2017-2018 Fiscal Year
on September 11, 2017; and
WHEREAS, this amendment was prepared and presented to the City Council and after
consideration, it is the consensus of the City Council to amend the approved budget ordinance; and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SANGER, TEXAS:
Section 1: The annual budget for the 2017-2018 Fiscal Year is hereby amended to increase
expenditures by $20,000 in the Waste Water Department as shown in Exhibit "A".
Section 2: The annual budget for the 2017-2018 Fiscal Year is hereby amended to increase
revenues in the Enterprise Capital Projects fund and expenditures in the 4A Fund by $500,000 as
shown in Exhibit `B";
Section 3: Expenditures during the 2017-2018 Fiscal Year shall be made in accordance with
the amended budget approved herein, unless otherwise authorized by a duly enacted ordinance of the
City and said budget document shall be on file for public inspection in the office of the City Secretary.
Section 4: If any section, article, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this ordinance
or application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of
competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the
ordinance and the City Council hereby declares it would have passed such remaining portions of the
ordinances despite such invalidity, which remaining portions shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 5: This ordinance is effective immediately from and after its passage and the
publication of the caption, as the law and Charter in such cases provide.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Sanger, Denton
County, Texas, on this 17t" day of September 2018.
APPROVED:
Thomas E. Muir, Mayor
ATTEST:
Cheryl Price, City Secretary
EXHIBIT A
SANGER
*TEXAS
PUBLIC WORKS
Date: September 7, 2018
To: Finance
From: Public Works Department
Re: Budget Amendment
Would you prepare a Budget Amendment to cover the possibility of unexpected expenditures
at the Waste Water Treatment Plant? We currently have funds available to cover our
expenditures for this fiscal year, but with 23 days of operation left in this year it concerns me
that we could exceed our budgeted funds for FY 2017-2018.
940.458.7930 1 301 Bolivar I PO Box 1729 1 Sanger, TX 76266 1 www.sangertexas.org
f facebook.com/SangerTexas V (dCityofSanger
. ■_:
CITY OF SANGER, TEXAS
MINUTES: REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
October 16, 2017, 7:08 p.m.
502 Elm Street, Sanger, Texas
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Thomas Muir, Councilman Bill Boutwell,
Councilman David Clark, Councilman Allen Chick, Councilman Gary Bilyeu
COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: Councilman Lee Allison
The Mayor and Four (4) Council Members Were Present Constituting a Quorum.
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Cheryl Price City Secretary
1. Call Meeting to Order, Invocation, Pledge of Allegiance.
The Regular City Council Meeting was called to order by Mayor Muir on Monday,
October 16, 2017 at 7:08 p.m. The Invocation was given by Councilman Chick, and
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Clark.
2. Citizens Input: (Citizens are allowed 3 minutes to speak. The City Council is
unable to respond or to discuss any issues brought up during this section).
There were no citizens who wished to speak.
3. CONSENT AGENDA:
a) Approval of Minutes:
1. City Council Special Meeting, September 11, 2017
b) Disbursements
A Motion was made by Councilman Bilyeu, Seconded by Councilman Boutwell to
approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Motion carried unanimously with a 4-0
vote (Councilman Allison Absent),
4. Consider any Items Removed from Consent Agenda.
None.
REGULAR AGENDA
5. Consider, Discuss and Possibly Approve Recommendation from Pacheco
Koch to Award the North Interstate 35 Outfall Sewer Phase III Project Contract
to the Low Bidder, Dickerson Construction Company, Inc., in the Amount of
$974,490.50, and Authorize the Mayor to Execute Same on behalf of the City.
There was minor discussion regarding funding and location of the Project. Mayor
Muir advised that the Motion should also include the Authorizing of the Funding of
$500,000 from 4A and the balance to be funded by Water and Wastewater Tap
Fees.
A Motion was made by Councilman Bilyeu to Approve Awarding the North Interstate
35 Outfall Sewer Phase III Project Contract to the Low Bidder, Dickerson
Construction Company, Inc., in the Amount of $974,490.60, Authorizing the funding
of $500,000 from 4A with the balance to be funded by Water and Wastewater Tap
Fees; and, Authorize the Mayor to Execute Same on behalf of the City. Motion was
seconded by 'Councilman Boutwell. Motion carried unanimously with a 4-0 vote
(Councilman Allision absent).
6. INFORMATION ITEMS
None.
There being no further business, Mayor Muir adjourned the meeting at 7:16 p.m.
BANGER
* T E X A S COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA TYPE ® Regular ❑ Special ❑ Consent Reviewed by
❑ Workshop ❑ Executive ❑ Public Hearing Finance
Reviewed by Legal
® Yes
❑ Not Applicable
❑Yes
®Not Applicable
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: SUBMITTED BY:
September 17, 2018 Alina Ciocan, City Manager
City Manager Reviewed/Approval Initials h-C Date To 1
ACTION REQUESTED: ®ORDINANCE ❑ RESOLUTION ❑ APPROVAL
❑ CHANGE ORDER ❑ AGREEMENT ❑ APPROVAL OF BID ❑ AWARD OF CONTRACT
❑ CONSENSUS ❑ REAPPOINTMENTS ❑ OTHER EXPLAIN:
AGENDA CAPTION
Consider, Discuss and Act on Ordinance #09-25-18 — Levying a tax rate for the general government for the fiscal
year 2018-2019 and providing for an effective date.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
®N/A ❑GRANT FUNDS ❑OPERATING EXPENSE ❑REVENUE ❑CIP []BUDGETED ❑NON -BUDGETED
FISCAL YEAR:
PRIOR
YEAR
CURRENT
YEAR
FUTURE
YEAR(S)
TOTALS
Proposed Expenditure Amount
Encumbered Amount
BALANCE
FUND(S) TO BE USED: General ❑$ Utility
El$ El $
BACKGROUND/SUMMARY OF ITEM
This Ordinance sets the tax rate for the 2018-2019 fiscal year at $0.6791/$100 valuation, which is the
same rate as the 2017-2018 fiscal year.
STAFF OPTIONS & RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the ordinance.
List of Supporting Documents/Exhibits Attached:
• Ordinance #09-25-18
• Notice of 2018 Tax Year
Proposed Property Tax Rate
Prior Action/Review by Council, Boards,
Commissions or Other Agencies:
ORDINANCE 909-25-18
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANGER, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS, LEVYING
A TAX RATE FOR THE GENERAL GOVERNMENT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2018-
2019 AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Sanger finds that a tax rate of $0.6791 per
$100 valuation for the Fiscal Year 2018-2019, hereinafter levied for current expenses of the City
and general improvements of the City and its property, must be levied to provide the revenue
requirements of the budget for the ensuing year; and
WHEREAS, all statutory and constitutional requirements for the levy and assessment of
ad valorem taxes have been completed in due and correct time and all requirements of the Sanger
Charter have been met;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SANGER, TEXAS:
SECTION 1: That the City Council does hereby levy and adopt the tax rate on $100
assessed valuation for the City for maintenance and operation of the City government for the tax
year 2018-2019, as follows:
$0.571004/$100
SECTION 2: That the City Council does hereby levy and adopt the tax rate on $100
assessed valuation for the City for debt service for City government for the tax year 2018-2019 as
follows:
$0.108096/$100
SECTION 3: This ordinance is effective upon its adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Sanger,
Texas on this 17th day of September 2018.
APPROVED:
Thomas E. Muir, Mayor
ATTEST:
Cheryl Price, City Secretary
• A
A tax rate of $0.679100 per $100 valuation has been proposed by the governing body of CITY OF SANGER. This
rate exceeds the lower of the effective or rollback tax rate, and state law requires that two public hearings be held by
the governing body before adopting the proposed tax rate.
The governing body of CITY OF SANGER proposes to use revenue attributable to the tax rate increase for the
purpose of street improvements.
PROPOSED TAX RATE
PRECEDING YEAR'S TAX RATE
EFFECTIVE TAX RATE
ROLLBACK TAX RATE
$0.679100 per $100
$0.679100 per $100
$0.639033 per $100
$0.680797 per $100
The effective tax rate is the total tax rate needed to raise the same amount of property tax revenue for CITY OF
'ANGER from the same properties in both the 2017 tax year and the 2018 tax year.
The rollback tax rate is the highest tax rate that CITY OF SANGER may adopt before voters are entitled to petition
for an election to limit the rate that may be approved to the rollback rate.
YOUR TAXES OWED UNDER ANY OF THE ABOVE RATES CAN BE CALCULATED AS FOLLOWS:
property tax amount = (rate) x (taxable value of your property) / 100
For assistance or detailed information about tax calculations, please contact:
Michelle French
Denton County Tax Assessor -Collector
1505 E. McKinney Street Denton, TX 76209
940-349-3500
property.tax@dentoncounty.com
tax. dentoncounty. com
You are urged to attend and express your views at the following public hearings on proposed tax rate:
First Hearing: 08/20/2018 7:00 PM at Sanger City Hall 502 Elm Street Sanger, TX 76266
Second Hearing: 09/04/2018 7:00 PM at Sanger City Hall 502 Elm Street Sanger, TX 76266
BANGER
* T E X A S COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA TYPE ® Regular ❑ Special ❑ Consent Reviewed by
® Yes
❑ Not Applicable
❑ Workshop ❑ Executive ❑ Public Hearing Finance
Reviewed by Legal
❑Yes
®Not Applicable
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: SUBMITTED BY:
September 17, 2018 Alina Ciocan, City Manager
City Manager Reviewed/Approval Initials Date g
ACTION REQUESTED: ®ORDINANCE ❑ RESOLUTION ❑ APPROVAL
❑ CHANGE ORDER ❑ AGREEMENT ❑ APPROVAL OF BID ❑ AWARD OF CONTRACT
❑ CONSENSUS ❑ REAPPOINTMENTS ❑ OTHER EXPLAIN:
AGENDA CAPTION
Consider, Discuss and Act on Ordinance #09-26-18 — Adopting the budget providing for the appropriation of
funds for operating and capital expenditures for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2018 and ending September
30, 2019, providing for the intra and inter department and fund transfers, providing for unexpected revenues such
as grants, donations, and insurance proceeds, providing for an effective date, and providing for approval of the
investment policy.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
®N/A ❑GRANT FUNDS ❑OPERATING EXPENSE ❑REVENUE ❑CIP ❑BUDGETED ❑NON -BUDGETED
FISCAL YEAR:
PRIOR
YEAR
CURRENT
YEAR
FUTURE
YEAR(S)
TOTALS
Proposed Expenditure Amount
Encumbered Amount
BALANCE
FUND(S) TO BE USED: General ❑$ Utility
❑ $ ❑ $
BACKGROUND/SUMMARY OF ITEM
This Ordinance adopts the 2018-2019 Official Budget for the City. In addition, it approves the City's
investment policy for the coming year. No changes have been made to the investment policy.
STAFF OPTIONS & RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the ordinance.
List of Supporting Documents/Exhibits Attached:
Prior Action/Review by Council, Boards,
• Oridinance #09-26-18
• 2018-2019 Proposed Budget
0 Investment Policy
Commissions or Other Agencies:
• Budget workshops
0 Budget hearing
ORDINANCE 909-26-18
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANGER, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS,
ADOPTING THE BUDGET PROVIDING FOR THE APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FOR
OPERATING AND CAPITAL EXPENDITURES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1, 2018 AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2019, PROVIDING FOR THE INTRA
AND INTER DEPARTMENT AND FUND TRANSFERS, PROVIDING FOR
UNEXPECTED REVENUES SUCH AS GRANTS, DONATIONS, AND INSURANCE
PROCEEDS, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, AND PROVIDING FOR
APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT POLICY.
WHEREAS, pursuant to the laws of the State of Texas and the City Charter, the budget
covering proposed expenditures for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2018 and ending
September 30, 2019 was filed with the City Secretary; and
WHEREAS, budget workshops were conducted by the City Council on the proposed
budget at which time the proposed budget was fully considered; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of the City Charter and the Local
Government Code, the City Council of the City of Sanger, Texas published notice of public hearing
on the budget on August 9, 2018 and conducted a public hearing on August 20, 2018; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 2256 of the Texas Government Code, commonly known as the
"Public Funds Investment Act," requires the City to review its investment policy and investment
strategies not less than annually; and
WHEREAS, the Public Funds Investment Act requires the governing body to adopt a
written instrument by rule, order, ordinance, or resolution stating that it has reviewed the
investment policy and investment strategies and that the written instrument shall record any
changes made to either the investment policy or investment strategies; and
WHEREAS, the attached City of Sanger Investment Policy is in compliance with the
Public Funds Investment Act and requires no changes to either the investment policy or investment
strategies; and
WHEREAS, The City has implemented Governmental Accounting Standards Board
Statement 54, Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions (GASB 54) and
Fund balance categories under GASB 54 are Nonspendable and Spendable and classifications
under the Spendable category are Restricted, Committed, Assigned, and Unassigned and these
classifications reflect not only the nature of funds, but also provide clarity to the level of restriction
placed upon fund balance.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SANGER, TEXAS:
Section 1. That the City Council adopts the budget for the City of Sanger, Texas, a copy
of which is on file in the office of the City Secretary and which hereinafter referred to as the
"Budget" for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2018 and ending September 30, 2019.
Section 2. That the budget presented by the City Council and reviewed during the public
hearing is hereby approved and adopted for the Fiscal Year 2018-2019.
General Fund
$7,822,200
Debt Service Fund
$917,551
Enterprise Fund
$11,994,966
Internal Service Fund
$2,031,065
4A Fund
$264,673
4B Fund
$302,500
Capital Projects Fund
$300,000
Enterprise Capital Projects Fund
$4,250,000
Special Revenue Funds
$39,322
Section 3. That the City Manager be authorized to make intea and inter department fund
transfers during the fiscal year as becomes necessary in order to avoid over expenditure of any
departments total budget.
Section 4. That the City Manager be authorized to increase the budget for items received
during the year that have a corresponding revenue and expenditure such as Grants, Donations, and
Insurance Proceeds received for property damage.
Section 5. That the City Manager be authorized to contract for expenditures under $50,000
for services and projects authorized in the budget.
Section 6. That the City of Sanger has complied with the requirements of the Public Funds
Investment Act and the City Council has reviewed the investment policy and investment strategies
and there are no changes to either the investment policy or investment strategies.
Section 7. In circumstances where an expenditure is to be made for a purpose for which
amounts are available in multiple fund balance classifications, the order in which resources will
be expended is as follows: restricted fund balance, followed by committed fund balance, assigned
fund balance, and lastly unassigned fund balance. When it is appropriate for fund balance to be
assigned, the City Council hereby delegates the authority to the City Manager. The following fund
balances are committed: Equipment Replacement Funds, Library Building Expansion Funds,
Beautification Board Funds, all Donated Funds, and Capital Projects Funds.
Section 8. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Sanger,
Texas on this 17th day of September 2018.
APPROVED:
Thomas E. Muir, Mayor
ATTEST:
Cheryl Price, City Secretary
BANGER
.rExa=
PROPOSED ANNUAL BUDGET
OCTOBER 1, 2018 - SEPTEMBER 30, 2019
In accordance with Local Government code Sec. 102.005(b):
This budget will raise more total property taxes than last year's
budget by $493,671 (12.70%), and of that amount $182,034 is
tax revenue to be raised from new property added to the tax
roll this year.
ON THE COVER
Built in 1902 and donated to the City in 1987, the Sanger
Presbyterian Church has a rich history. Once used as a library,
the building was retired in 1995 and sat in disrepair for 20
years. The building was fully refurbished in 2016 thanks to the
Sanger Area Historical Society and the City. A jewel of Sanger,
this beautiful building now serves as an events venue.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
GENERALFUND..................................................................................................................................3
ENTERPRISEFUND..........................................................................................................................27
INTERNALSERVICE FUND...............................................................................................................41
DEBTSERVICE FUND.......................................................................................................................53
CAPITALPROJECTS FUNDS............................................................................................................59
CapitalProjects Fund.........................................................................................................61
Enterprise Capital Projects Fund......................................................................................65
Capital Projects Summary 2017-2023...........................................................................72
4ACORPORATION FUND.................................................................................................................73
4BCORPORATION FUND.................................................................................................................81
SPECIALREVENUE FUNDS..............................................................................................................87
Hotel/Motel Tax Fund........................................................................................................89
BeautificationFund............................................................................................................93
LibraryRestricted Fund.....................................................................................................96
ParklandDedication Fund................................................................................................98
RoadwayImpact Fee Fund............................................................................................
101
CourtSecurity Fund.........................................................................................................104
CourtTechnology Fund...................................................................................................107
ChildSafety Fund............................................................................................................110
PoliceDonations Fund....................................................................................................
113
FireDonations Fund........................................................................................................
116
ParkDonations Fund......................................................................................................119
LibraryDonations Fund..................................................................................................
122
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget
BANGER
.rExA=
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget
BANGER
*TEXAS
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget
9-11-2018 02:55 PM
!-GENERAL FUND
REVENUES
CITY OF SANGER
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: AUGUST 31ST, 2018
TAXES
U0_-4M0 PROPERTY TAX
00-4311 DELINQUENT PROPERTY TAXES
00-4321 PENALTY & INTEREST
00-4325 SALES TAX REVENUE
00-4350 MIXED DRINK TAX
TOTAL TAXES
FRANCHISE FEES
00-4460 MUNICIPAL FEES -CENTURY LINK
00-4461 FRANCHISE FEES-ATMOS ENERGY
00-4465 FRANCHISE FEE-SUDDENLINK
00-4470 FRANCHISE FEES-COSERVE DCEC
00-4480 ROW FEES-CEBRIDGE
00-4483 FRANCHISE FEES-SANGER WATER
00-4484 FRANCHISE FEES-SANGER SEWER
00-4485 FRANCHISE FEES-SANGER ELECTRIC
00-4489 FRANCHISE FEES -GARBAGE
00-4490 FRANCHISE FEE -WASTE CONNECTION
00-4495 RIGHT-OF-WAY FEES
TOTAL FRANCHISE FEES
SOLID WASTE
00-4190-SANITATION BILLINGS
00-4191 SANITITATION PENALTIES
TOTAL SOLID WASTE
LICENSES & PERMITS
4510 BUILDING PERMITS
4511 ZONING AND PLATS
,v-4513 CIVIL PLAN REVIEW FEES
00-4515 STREET CUT PERMIT
00-4520 HEALTH PERMITS
00-4545 FIRE ALARM/FIRE SPRINKLER
00-4550 AC & MECHANICAL LICENSE FEES
00-4555 IRRIGATION & BACKFLOW LICENSE
00-4575 RV PARK ANNUAL PERMIT FEE
00-4581 BEER & WINE PERMIT FEES
TOTAL LICENSES & PERMITS
EIT
00-4603 JUDICIAL FEE-COUNTY-JFCT
00-4604 JUDICIAL FEE -CITY
00-4607 STATE TRAFFIC FEE
00-4608 CONSOLIDATED COURT COST04
00-4609 STATE JURY FEE-SJRF
00-4615 CHILD SAFETY COURT COST
00-4617 INSURANCE & DISMISSAL FEES
PAGE
BUDGET
3,598,116
15,000
18,000
900,000
5,000
4
7,000
48,000
42,000
77,000
2,400
107,342
106,109
403,217
50,400
8,000
00
668
840,000
10.500
850,500
250,000
32,500
57,500
1,000
500
1,500
1,000
1,370
_ 500
0
520
3,040
336
9,840
22,504
2,256
2,648
80
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget
9-11-2018 02:55 PM
'.-GENERAL FUND
REVENUES
CITY OF SANGER PAGE
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: AUGUST 31ST, 2018
BUDGET
00-4620
SPECIAL EXPENSE FEE
20,000
00-4621
TRUANCY PREVENTION FUND
1,120
00-4625
FINES
35,440
00-4627
WARRANT FEES - FTA
2,880
00-4628
ARREST FEES
2,400
00-4637
TRAFFIC CODE
1,440
00-4639
CIVIL JUSTICE FEE
48
00-4640
DEF.DRIVING. DDC (COURT)
592
00-4643
TIME PAYMENT LOCAL
576
00-4645
MUNICIPAL SERVICE BUREAU
3,880
00-4646
TIME PAYMENT STATE
560
00-4648
TRUANCY DEFENSIVE FD.
1,120
00-4651
TLFTAI-STATE
480
00-4652
TLFTA2-OMNI
136
00-4653
TLFTA3-CITY
_ 104
TOTAL
FINES & FORFEITURES
112,000
FIRE & AMBULANCE
DD---47-4-0FIRE-DENTON
CO. INTERLOCAL
10,000
00-4750
AMB-DENTON CO. INTERLOCAL
250,000
00-4765
FIRE - GRANT FUNDING
191,877
00-4772
EMERGICON REVENUE - AMBULANCE
325 000
776,877
TOTAL
FIRE & AMBULANCE
POLICE & ANIMAL CONTROL
-4 5
ANIMAL CONTROL FINES & FEES
1,250
00-4055
MOWING FEES
6,000
00-4056
POLICE FEES & FINES
3,000
00-4057
SANGER ISD/RESOURCE OFFICER
40,716
(1- 4058
STATE REIMBURSEMENTS
1,200
TOTAL POLICE & ANIMAL CONTROL
5�,6
PARKS &
RECREATION
00-4032
COMMUNITY CENTER FEES
15,000
00-4033
PARKS & BALLFIELD REVENUE
10,000
00-4034
TOURNAMENT FEES
2,000
00-4035
SPECIAL EVENTS
3,000
00-4036 CHURCH RENTAL FEES
TOTAL PARKS & RECREATION
3 500
,5
LIBRARY
00-418D
LIBRARY MISCELLANEOUS
75
00-4181
LIBRARY FINES
1,000
00-4182
LIBRARY COPIES
3,000
00-4183
INTER LIBRARY LOAN
1,500
00-4184
LIBRARY CARDS
75
00-4185
LOST LIBRARY BOOKS
400
00-4186
YOGA CLASS CHARGES
3,500
00-4189
LIBRARY - DENTON CO. INT/LOCAL
15,800
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget
9-11-2018 02:55 PM
!-GENERAL FUND
CITY OF SANGER
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: AUGUST 31ST, 2018
REVENUES
TOTAL LIBRARY
INTEREST
0�$-0INTEREST INCOME
TOTAL INTEREST
MISCELLANEOUS
00-4900 RENTAL INCOME
00-4910 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME
00-4946 INSURANCE -DAMAGE REIMB
TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
00-4009 PROCEEDS FROM SALE OF ASSETS
TOTAL OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
TRANSFERS
00-4980 TRANSFER FROM ENTERPRISE FUND
00-4987 TRANSFER FROM DSF
TOTAL TRANSFERS
TOTAL REVENUES
PAGE: 3
BUDGET
25,350
4,000
4,000
22,S00
17,000
13,000
52, 500
I&Igll1I1
85,000
12_239.352
7,897,099
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 7
9-11-2018 02:55 PM CITY OF SANGER PAGE:
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: AUGUST 31ST, 2018
I —GENERAL FUND
POLICE
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
51-SALARIES AND BENEFITS
20-5110 REGULAR SALARIES
20-5111 MERIT INCREASE
20-5117 VACATION COMPENSATION
20-5120 OVERTIME
20-5125 LONGEVITY PAY
20-5129 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCE
20-5130 FICA
20-5140 RETIREMENT
20-5150 HEALTH INSURANCE
20-5160 WORKER'S COMPENSATION
20-5170 T W C
TOTAL 51-SALARIES AND BENEFITS
52-SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
20-5210 OFFICE SUPPLIES
20-5235 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
20-5240 CONFERENCES & TRAINING
20-5255 WEARING APPAREL
20-5260 SAFETY EQUIPMENT
20-5265 DRUG PREVENTION & INVESTIGATIO
20-5266 CHILD SAFETY
20-5275 FILING FEES
20-5280 COMPUTERS, PRINTERS, ETC
TOTAL 52-SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
53-MAINTENANCE AND OPERAT
MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL
5325 R & M MOTOR VEHICLE
z-v-5326 R & M MINOR EQUIPMENT
20-5332 OFFICE MACHINE LEASE
TOTAL 53-MAINTENANCE AND OPERAT
54-CONTRACT SERVICES
20-5430 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
20-5431 FORENSIC ANALYSIS SERVICES
20-5450 TECHNICAL SUPPORT
20-5451 ANNUAL SOFTWARE SUPPORT
20-5460 DISPATCH SERVICES
TOTAL 54-CONTRACT SERVICES
BUDGET
839,985
29,400
6,800
35,000
7,544
9,000
70,972
74,404
124,800
42,889
1,530
5,500
500
10,000
11,200
7,000
1:Soo
500
900
15000
52, 3UU
56,000
20,000
1,500
2,500
80;006
40,500
12,000
25,000
22,500
36,234
33
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget
9-11-2018 02:55 PM
1--GENERAL FUND
•POLICE
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
55—UTILITIES
20-5520 CELL PHONE
TOTAL 55—UTILITIES
61—CAPITAL OUTLAY
1 5 COMPUTER HARDWARE
20-6130 VEHICLES
20-6145 POLICE EQUIPMENT
TOTAL 61—CAPITAL OUTLAY
TOTAL 20—POLICE
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 5
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: AUGUST 31ST, 2018
311e�
• 111�
111
77,050
100,772
9,000
186,822
1,703,480
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 9
9-11-2018 02:55 PM CITY OF SANGER PAGE:
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: AUGUST 31ST, 2018
'.-GENERAL FUND
-ANIMAL CONTROL
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES BUDGET
51-SALARIES AND BENEFITS
22-5110
REGULAR SALARIES
38,004
22-5111
MERIT INCREASE
1,330
22-5117
VACATION COMPENSATION
750
22-5120
OVERTIME
1,000
22-5125
LONGEVITY PAY
312
22-5129
CELL PHONE ALLOWANCE
600
22-5130
FICA
3,213
22-5140
RETIREMENT
3,369
22-5150
HEALTH INSURANCE
7,800
22-5160
WORKER'S COMPENSATION
1,495
22-5170
T W C
100
TOTAL 51-SALARIES AND BENEFITS
57,973
52-SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
22-5210
OFFICE SUPPLIES
50
22-5223
CHEMICAL SUPPLIES
250
22-5235
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
100
22-5240
CONFERENCES & TRAINING
900
22-5248
ANIMAL CARE EXPENSE
66,500
22-5250
TOOLS & EQUIPMENT
500
22-5255
WEARING APPAREL
700
22-5260
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
500
TOTAL 52-SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
53-MAINTENANCE
AND OPERAT
22-5320
MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL
4,000
1--.5325
R & M MOTOR VEHICLE
11000
5326
R & M MINOR EQUIPMENT
500
TOTAL
53-MAINTENANCE AND OPERAT
5,500
54-CONTRACT SERVICES
61-CAPITAL OUTLAY
TOTAL 22-ANIMAL CONTROL 132,973
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 10
9-11-2018 02:55 PM
'-GENERAL FUND
FIRE
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
CITY OF SANGER
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: AUGUST 31ST, 2018
51-SALARIES AND BENEFITS
24-SllO REGULAR SALARIES
24-5111 MERIT INCREASE
24-5112 TEMP/PART-TIME SALARIES
24-5117 VACATION COMPENSATION
24-5120 OVERTIME
24-5125 LONGEVITY PAY
24-5126 SPECIAL PAY
24-5129 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCE
24-5130 FICA
24-5140 RETIREMENT
24-5150 HEALTH INSURANCE
24-5160 WORKER'S COMPENSATION
24-5170 T W C
24-5199 GRANT FUNDED PERSONNEL
TOTAL 51-SALARIES AND BENEFITS
52-SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
24-5210 OFFICE SUPPLIES
24-5215 FOOD
24-5223 CHEMICAL SUPPLIES
24-5225 MAPS & SUBSCRIPTIONS
24-5230 ADVERTISING/PUBLIC EDUCATION
24-5235 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
24-5240 CONFERENCES & TRAINING
24-5250 TOOLS & EQUIPMENT
24-5255 WEARING APPAREL
"-.5260 SAFETY EQUIPMENT
5262 EMS SUPPLIES
4,-5280 COMPUTERS, PRINTERS, ETC
24-5285 FURNITURE & FIXTURES
TOTAL 52-SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
53-MAINTENANCE AND OPERAT
24-5320 MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL
24-5325 R & M MOTOR VEHICLE
24-5326 R & M MINOR EQUIPMENT
24-5345 LEASE EQUIPMENT
24-5375 MINOR EQUIPMENT
24-5376 IMMUNIZATIONS
24-5390 RADIOS
TOTAL 53-MAINTENANCE AND OPERAT
PAGE
438,619
15,352
240,000
1,350
56,313
3,072
14"954
600
58,925
39,447
70,200
29,963
3,490
191,877
2,500
2,000
1,250
500
3,250
15,000
5,000
2,500
11,000
33,000
38,500
8,000
5,000
19,000
18,500
11,500
5,000
1,750
1,000
27,000
"T�6
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 11
9-11-2018 02:55 PM
GENERAL FUND
-FIRE
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 8
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: AUGUST 31ST, 2018
54-CONTRACT SERVICES
24-5420 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
24-5430 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE (AMB)
24-5450 TECHNICAL SUPPORT
24-5451 ANNUAL SOFTWARE SUPPORT
24-5453 EMS VENDING MACHINE
24-5460 DISPATCH SERVICES
TOTAL 54-CONTRACT SERVICES
55-UTILITIES
24-5520 CELL PHONE
TOTAL 55-UTILITIES
56-GRANT EXPENSES
24-5610 GRANT EXPENSES
24-5624 GRANT MATCH
TOTAL 56-GRANT EXPENSES
61-CAPITAL OUTLAY
4- 145 FIRE EQUIPMENT
TOTAL 61-CAPITAL OUTLAY
70-DEBT PAYMENTS
4-7 7 NOTE PAYMENTS
24-7099 INTEREST EXPENSE
TOTAL 70-DEBT PAYMENTS
'1TAL 24-FIRE
BUDGET
3,500
15,000
15,500
3,000
4,200
12,905
l� 5
1/
• 111
•• 11
75,589
—228
7�7
1,602,234
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 12
9-11-2018 02:55 PM
1-GENERAL FUND
MUNICIPAL COURT
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
CITY OF SANGER
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: AUGUST 31ST, 2018
51-SALARIES AND BENEFITS
26-5110 REGULAR SALARIES
26-5111 MERIT INCREASE
26-5120 OVERTIME
26-5125 LONGEVITY PAY
26-5130 FICA
26-5140 RETIREMENT
26-5150 HEALTH INSURANCE
26-5160 WORKER'S COMPENSATION
26-5170 T W C
TOTAL 51-SALARIES AND BENEFITS
52-SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
26-5210 OFFICE SUPPLIES
26-5235 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
26-5240 CONFERENCES & TRAINING
26-5280 COMPUTERS, PRINTERS, ETC
26-5285 FURNITURE & FIXTURES
TOTAL 52-SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
53-MAINTENANCE AND OPERAT
26-5332 OFFICE MACHINE LEASE
TOTAL 53-MAINTENANCE AND OPERAT
54-CONTRACT SERVICES
26-5424 COURT SERVICES
26-5425 LEGAL SERVICES
1r-5426 CREDIT CARD FEES
5450 TECHNICAL SUPPORT
TOTAL 54-CONTRACT SERVICES
57-MUNICIPAL FEES
26-5703 JUDICIAL FEE COUNTY JFCT
26-5707 STATE TRAFFIC FEE
26-5708 CONSOLIATED COURT COST 04
26-5709 STATE JURY FEE -SJRF
26-5710 CONSOLIDATED COURT COST
26-5714 JUVENILE CRIME & DELINQUENCY
26-5719 JCPT
26-5721 TPF Fees
26-5725 MUNICIPAL COURT OVER PAYMENTS
26-5731 FUGITIVE APPRENHENSION
26-5733 CTVOC
26-5734 IDF (COURT)
26-5735 CHILD SAFETY &SEAT BELT VIOL.
26-5736 CORR.MGT.INSTIT.CJCF
26-5738 CHILD SAFETY SEATS
26-5739 CIVIL JUSTICE FEES
PAGE:
BUDGET
81,826
2,864
500
1,060
7,624
6,917
15,600
479
319
117,189
1,800
1,100
1,100
1,000
300
5 3��
13,500
8,500
2,500
2.500
3,300
11,600
21,600
2,500
60
18
12
830
16
60
72
990
60
16
32
40
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 13
9-11-2018 02:55 PM CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 10
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: AUGUST 31ST, 2018
001-GENERAL FUND
.MUNICIPAL COURT
26-5745 COLLECTION AGENCY FEE 5,000
26-5746 TIME PAYMENT STATE 900
26-5751 TLFTAI - State 900
26-5752 TLFTA2 - Omni 400
TOTAL 57-MUNICIPAL FEES 48,406
61-CAPITAL OUTLAY
TOTAL 26-MUNICIPAL COURT
199,095
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 14
9-11-2018 02:55 PM CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 11
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: AUGUST 31ST, 2018
1-GENERAL FUND
-DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES BUDGET
51-SALARIES AND BENEFITS
28-5110
REGULAR SALARIES
230,274
28-5111
MERIT INCREASE
8,060
28-5120
OVERTIME
2,000
28-5125
LONGEVITY PAY
592
28-5129
CELL PHONE ALLOWANCE
1,800
28-5130
FICA
18,416
28-5140
RETIREMENT
19,307
28-5150
HEALTH INSURANCE
31,200
28-5160
WORKER'S COMPENSATION
1,613
28-5170
T W C
360
TOTAL
51-SALARIES AND BENEFITS
52-SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
28-5210 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,600
28-5230 ADVERTISEMENT 1,500
28-5235 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 3,500
28-5240 CONFERENCES & TRAINING 4,000
28-5255 WEARING APPAREL 400
28-5275 FILING FEES 1,500
28-5280 COMPUTERS, PRINTERS, ETC 2.000
TOTAL 52-SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS �500
53-MAINTENANCE
AND OPERAT
28-5320
MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL
1,300
28-5325
R & M MOTOR VEHICLE
600
28-5332
OFFICE MACHINE LEASE
940
10--5345
LEASE EQUIPMENT
150
TOTAL 53-MAINTENANCE AND OPERAT
2,996
54-CONTRACT
SERVICES
28-5426
CREDIT CARD FEES
1,500
28-5430
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
65,000
28-5440
HEALTH INSPECTIONS
10,000
28-5450
TECHNICAL SUPPORT
4,500
28-5451
ANNUAL SOFTWARE SUPPORT
10,740
TOTAL 54-CONTRACT SERVICESs74�
61-CAPITAL OUTLAY
TOTAL 28-DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 422,852
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 15
9-11-2018 02:55 PM
"I —GENERAL FUND
STREETS
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
CITY OF SANGER
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: AUGUST 31ST, 2018
51-SALARIES AND BENEFITS
30-5110 REGULAR SALARIES
30-5111 MERIT INCREASE
30-5117 VACATION COMPENSATION
30-5120 OVERTIME
30-5125 LONGEVITY PAY
30-5129 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCE
30-5130 FICA
30-5140 RETIREMENT
30-5150 HEALTH INSURANCE
30-5160 WORKER'S COMPENSATION
30-5170 T W C
TOTAL 51-SALARIES AND BENEFITS
52-SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
30-5223 CHEMICAL SUPPLIES
30-5240 CONFERENCES & TRAINING
30-5250 TOOLS & EQUIPMENT
30-5255 WEARING APPAREL
30-5260 SAFETY EQUIPMENT
TOTAL 52-SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
53-MAINTENANCE AND OPERAT
30-5320 MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL
30-5325 R & M MOTOR VEHICLE
30-5326 R & M MINOR EQUIPMENT
30-5360 SYSTEM MAINTENANCE
-5380 STREET SIGNS
TOTAL 53-MAINTENANCE AND OPERAT
54-CONTRACT SERVICES
30-5420 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
TOTAL 54-CONTRACT SERVICES
55-UTILITIES
3 -551-5 ELECTRIC
TOTAL 55-UTILITIES
61-CAPITAL OUTLAY
30-6113 SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS
30-6120 BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS
30-6130 VEHICLES
30-6145 STREETS EQUIPMENT
TOTAL 61-CAPITAL OUTLAY
PAGE: 12
BUDGET
191,868
6,715
1,600
500
1,532
1,200
15,562
16,314
31,200
081
2,000
2,000
1,500
4,000
2,200
12,000
12,000
4000
225:000
12,500
50,000
10,000
7,000
5.000
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 16
9-11-2018 02:55 PM
GENERAL FUND
STREETS
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
70—DEBT PAYMENTS
30-7006 LEASE PAYABLE (TCB)
30-7099 INTEREST EXPENSE
TOTAL 70—DEBT PAYMENTS
TOTAL 30-STREETS
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 13
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: AUGUST 31ST, 2018
BUDGET
42,301
9,235
51,536
748,689
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 17
9-11-2018 02:55 PM
—GENERAL FUND
-PARKS
CITY OF SANGER
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: AUGUST 31ST
PAGE: 14
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES BUDGET
51—SALARIES AND BENEFITS
32-5110
REGULAR SALARIES
188,270
32-5111
MERIT INCREASE
6,590
32-5117
VACATION COMPENSATION
1,300
32-5119
STANDBY PAY
3,512
32-5120
OVERTIME
61000
32-5125
LONGEVITY PAY
1,936
32-5128
AUTO ALLOWANCE
6,000
32-5129
CELL PHONE ALLOWANCE
600
32-5130
FICA
16,387
32-5140
RETIREMENT
17,180
32-5150
HEALTH INSURANCE
31,200
32-5160
WORKER'S COMPENSATION
91661
32-5170
T W C
433
TOTAL
51—SALARIES AND BENEFITS
52—SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
32-5210 OFFICE SUPPLIES
32-5211 LANDSCAPE MATERIAL
32-5223 CHEMICAL SUPPLIES
32-5230 ADVERTISING
32-5235 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
32-5240 CONFERENCES & TRAINING
32-5250 TOOLS & EQUIPMENT
32-5255 WEARING APPAREL
TOTAL 52—SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
`_ MAINTENANCE AND OPERAT
5320 MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL
��-5325 R & M MOTOR VEHICLE
32-5326 R & M MINOR EQUIPMENT
32-5329 CHRISTMAS LIGHTS & ACCESSORIES
32-5332 OFFICE MACHINE LEASE
32-5333 FLAGS
32-5343 SPORTS FIELD MAINTENANCE
32-5345 LEASE EQUIPMENT
32-5360 SYSTEM MAINTENANCE
TOTAL 53—MAINTENANCE AND OPERAT
54—CONTRACT SERVICES
32-5471 CONTRACT TREE MAINTENANCE
32-5472 CONTRACT MOWING
TOTAL 54—CONTRACT SERVICES
13,000
5,000
3,000
4,000
1,867
1,500
37,000
3,200
1.000
II
11
wzl •11
CMS J :itIo]
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 18
9-11-2018 02:55 PM
-GENERAL FUND
PARKS
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
5S-UTILITIES
S7--SS15 ELECTRIC
32-5520 CELL PHONE
TOTAL 55-UTILITIES
61-CAPITAL OUTLAY
32---61-40 PARK IMPROVEMENTS
TOTAL 61-CAPITAL OUTLAY
TOTAL 32-PARKS
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 15
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: AUGUST 31ST, 2018
BUDGET
24,0000
24,350
37 000
7, -
&*:::
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 19
9-11-2018 02:55 PM
!—GENERAL FUND
RECREATION
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 16
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: AUGUST 31ST, 2018
51—SALARIES AND BENEFITS
34-5110 REGULAR SALARIES
34-5111 MERIT INCREASE
34-5120 OVERTIME
34-5125 LONGEVITY PAY
34-5129 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCE
34-5130 FICA
34-5140 RETIREMENT
34-5150 HEALTH INSURANCE
34-5160 WORKER'S COMPENSATION
34-5170 T W C
TOTAL 51—SALARIES AND BENEFITS
52—SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
34-5Z15 FOOD
34-5230 ADVERTISING
34-5235 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
34-5240 CONFERENCES AND TRAINING
34-5270 PROGRAM SUPPLIES/SPECIAL EVENT
TOTAL 52—SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
53—MAINTENANCE AND OPERAT
4-5 47 VANDALISM REPLACEMENT
34-5360 SYSTEM MAINTENANCE
TOTAL 53-MAINTENANCE AND OPERAT
54—CONTRACT SERVICES
.OTAL 34—RECREATION
F-IllZeil1
41,680
1,459
1,000
08
600
3,446
3,613
7,800
100
60,222
700
1,000
00
500
14 � ;100
250
1,000
— ,Z50
76,172
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 20
9-11-2018 02:55 PM
GENERAL FUND
LIBRARY
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
CITY OF SANGER
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: AUGUST 31ST, 2018
—5110 REGULAR SALARIES
-5111 MERIT INCREASE
-5112 TEMP/PART TIME SALARIES
-5117 VACATION COMPENSATION
-5120 OVERTIME
-5125 LONGEVITY PAY
-5129 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCE
-5130 FICA
-5140 RETIREMENT
-5150 HEALTH INSURANCE
-5160 WORKER'S COMPENSATION
-5170TWC
TOTAL 51-SALARIES AND BENEFITS
52-SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
42-5200 PRINT BOOKS MATERIALS
42-5201 PERIODICALS
42-5202 eB00KS AND eAUDIO
42-5203 AUDIOBOOKS
42-5204 DVDS
42-5205 OTHER ELECTRONIC SERVICES
42-5206 OTHER COLLECTION MATERIALS
42-5207 LIBRARY SUPPLIES
42-5208 PROGRAM SUPPLIES
42-5209 PROGRAM SERVICES
42-5210 OFFICE SUPPLIES
- 5215 FOOD
5235 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
4,-5240 CONFERENCES & TRAINING
42-5280 COMPUTERS, PRINTERS, ETC
42-5285 FURNITURE & FIXTURES
TOTAL 52-SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
53-MAINTENANCE AND OPERAT
4 -5 R M MINOR EQUIPMENT
42-5332 OFFICE MACHINE LEASE
TOTAL 53-MAINTENANCE AND OPERAT
54-CONTRACT SERVICES
42LS420 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
42-5450 TECHNICAL SUPPORT
42-5451 ANNUAL SOFTWARE SUPPORT
TOTAL 54-CONTRACT SERVICES
PAGE: 17
BUDGET
148,147
6,418
35,720
11200
200
1,440
1,200
14,828
12621
23:4400
911
554
_246,639-
9,000
650
3,700
2,000
1,4050
300
1,000
1,200
5,000
2,500
75
1,675
1,750
1,200
Loso
65
700
2,800
3,500
3,050
1,100
3,160
- 7,310
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 21
9-11-2018 02:55 PM
1-GENERAL FUND
`-LIBRARY
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
56-GRANT EXPENSES
61-CAPITAL OUTLAY
TOTAL 42-LIBRARY
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 18
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: AUGUST 31ST, 2018
BUDGET
290,499
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 22
9-11-2018 02:55 PM
',—GENERAL FUND
=SOLID WASTE
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
54—CONTRACT SERVICES
66-5420 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
TOTAL 54—CONTRACT SERVICES
90—BAD DEBT ALLOWANCE
TOTAL 66—SOLID WASTE
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 19
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: AUGUST 31ST, 2018
BUDGET
770.000
77�0
770,000
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 23
9-11-2018 02:55 PM
I. —GENERAL FUND
TRANSFERS.
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
74—TRANSFERS
74-7— 404 T Ito CIP Fund
74-7499 TRANSFER TO ISF
TOTAL 74—TRANSFERS
TOTAL 74—TRANSFERS
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 20
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: AUGUST 31ST, 2018
BUDGET
675,000
609,320
�284, 320
1,284,320
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 24
9-11-2018 02:55 PM
l—GENERAL FUND
-NON—DEPARTMENTAL
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
51-SALARIES AND BENEFITS
CITY OF SANGER
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: AUGUST 31ST, 2018
PAGE: 21
BUDGET
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 25
9-11-2018 02:55 PM
I —GENERAL FUND
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES & USES
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 22
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: AUGUST 31ST, 2018
REVENUES OVER/(UNDER) EXPENDITURES
BUDGET
7,822,200
74,899
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 26
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 27
BANGER
7kTEXA5
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 28
7-30-2018 02:29 PM CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 1
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: JULY 31ST, 2018
'3-ENTERPRISE FUND
REVENUES BUDGET
WATER
OD--4I10 WATER BILLING
1,987,811
00-4112 WATER METER REVENUE
40,000
2,0' 277 811
TOTAL WATER
SEWER
UO-4320 SEWER BILLING
_1 964 975
TOTAL SEWER
4, 75
TAP FEES
ELECTRIC GROUP
00-4140 ELECTRIC INCOME
7,481,930
00-4141 SECURITY LIGHTS
70,000
00-4145 CONSTRUCTION INCOME
125,000
00-4146 POLE CONTACT FEES
20,000
00-4147 SAWSET POLE FEE
5 000
7,7�
TOTAL ELECTRIC GROUP
PENALTIES & FEES
-4 5 PENALTIES BILLED
151,000
00-4152 SERVICE FEES
66,000
— 17,00
TOTAL PENALTIES & FEES
INTEREST
00-4800—INTEREST INCOME
15,000
TOTAL INTEREST
�00
r"-CELLANEOUS
4910 MISCELLANEOUS
10 000
u -4913 CREDIT CARD FEES
56,250
00-4930 RETURN CHECK FEES
2 000
TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS
6-07
TRANSFERS
TOTAL REVENUES 11,994,966
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 29
7-30-2018 02:29 PM
'—ENTERPRISE FUND
-WATER
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
CITY OF SANGER PAGE:
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: JULY 31ST, 2018
51—SALARIES AND BENEFITS
50_-5Il0 REGULAR SALARIES
50-5111 MERIT INCREASE
50-5117 VACATION COMPENSATION
50-5119 STANDBY PAY
50-5120 OVERTIME
50-5125 LONGEVITY PAY
50-5129 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCE
50-5130 FICA
50-5140 RETIREMENT
50-5150 HEALTH INSURANCE
50-5160 WORKER'S COMPENSATION
50-5170 T W C
TOTAL 51—SALARIES AND BENEFITS
52-
-5223 CHEMICAL SUPPLIES
-5230 ADVERTISING (WA. DRINKING REP)
—5235 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
-5240 CONFERENCES & TRAINING
-5250 MINOR TOOLS
-5255 WEARING APPAREL
-5260 SAFETY EQUIPMENT
TOTAL 52—SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
53—MAINTENANCE AND OPERAT
MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL
5325 R & M MOTOR VEHICLE
-5326 R & M MINOR EQUIPMENT
50-5335 PERMIT FEES
50-5345 LEASE EQUIPMENT
50-5350 FRANCHISE FEES
50-5360 SYSTEM MAINTENANCE
50-5372 WATER METER & BOXES
50-5373 R & M WATER WELLS
50-5374 R & M SCADA
50-5377 TESTING
50-5385 WATER PURCHASE
50-5386 UTILITY DEMAND CHARGE
TOTAL 53—MAINTENANCE AND OPERAT
BUDGET
249,889
8,746
4,000
2,677
26,000
2,136
600
22,495
23,583
46,800
17,063 0
1,500
6,000
1,300
3,000
200
5,000
3,000
-�500
00
15,000
7,500
5,000
34,500
800
107,342
100,000
65,000
30,000
10,000
10,000
75,000
2-�,875
�11
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 30
7-30-2018 02:29 PM
3—ENTERPRISE FUND
-WATER
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
54—CONTRACT SERVICES
50-5430 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
50-5450 TECHNICAL SUPPORT
TOTAL 54—CONTRACT SERVICES
55—UTILITIES
5 _9-55-5ELECTRIC
50-5520 CELL PHONE
TOTAL 55—UTILITIES
61—CAPITAL OUTLAY
50-6145 WATER EQUIPMENT
TOTAL 61—CAPITAL OUTLAY
71—DEPRECIATION
70—DEBT PAYMENTS
90—BAD DEBT ALLOWANCE
TOTAL SO —WATER
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 3
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: JULY 31ST, 2018
BUDGET
1 111
411
150,400
1l •11
1� •11
1,369,657
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 31
7-30-2018 02:29 PM
8—ENTERPRISE FUND
-WASTE WATER
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
CITY OF SANGER PAGE:
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: JULY 31ST, 2018
51—SALARIES AND BENEFITS
54-5110 REGULAR SALARIES
54-5111 MERIT INCREASE
54-5117 VACATION COMPENSATION
54-5119 STANDBY PAY
54-5120 OVERTIME
54-5125 LONGEVITY PAY
54-5129 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCE
54-5130 FICA
54-5140 RETIREMENT
54-5150 HEALTH INSURANCE
54-5160 WORKER'S COMPENSATION
54-5170 T W C
TOTAL 51—SALARIES AND BENEFITS
52—SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
54-5223 CHEMICAL SUPPLIES
54-5235 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
54-5250 TOOLS & EQUIPMENT
54-5255 WEARING APPAREL
54-5260 SAFETY EQUIPMENT
54-5270 LABORATORY SUPPLIES
54-5285 FURNITURE & FIXTURES
TOTAL 52—SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
53—MAINTENANCE AND OPERAT
54-5325 R & M MOTOR VEHICLE
-5326 R & M EQUIPMENT
5335 PERMIT FEES
-5350 FRANCHISE FEES
54-5360 SYSTEM MAINTENANCE
54-5377 TESTING
TOTAL 53—MAINTENANCE AND OPERAT
54—CONTRACT SERVICES
54-5430 Pro essiona Services
54-5450 TECHNICAL SUPPORT
TOTAL 54—CONTRACT SERVICES
55—UTILITIES
54-5515 ELECTRIC
54-5535 SOLID WASTE
TOTAL 55—UTILITIES
BUDGET
137,075
4,798
1,900
4,073
10,000
1:132
600
12,208
12,798
23400
6:064 60
214,408
30,000
1,500
1,500
1,140
2,000
1,500
500
— 38,140
1,000
00
10,000
106,109
150,000
20,000
�-, 609
3,000
500
3,500
1 111
1 111
111
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 32
7-30-2018 02:29 PM CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 5
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: JULY 31ST, 2018
' 3—ENTERPRISE FUND
WASTE WATER
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
61-CAPITAL OUTLAY
71-DEPRECIATION
90—BAD DEBT ALLOWANCE
TOTAL 54—WASTE WATER
BUDGET
713,657
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 33
7-30-2018 02:29 PM CITY OF SANGER PAGE:
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: JULY 31ST, 2018
`8-ENTERPRISE FUND
-ELECTRIC
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES BUDGET
51-SALARIES AND BENEFITS
58-5110
REGULAR SALARIES
453,130
58-5111
MERIT INCREASE
15,860
58-5117
VACATION COMPENSATION
6,000
58-5119
STANDBY PAY
12,410
58-5120
OVERTIME
7,500
58-5125
LONGEVITY PAY
6,064
58-5128
AUTO ALLOWANCE
6,000
58-5129
CELL PHONE ALLOWANCE
1,800
58-5130
FICA
38,921
58-5140
RETIREMENT
40,803
58-5150
HEALTH INSURANCE
54,600
58-5160
WORKER'S COMPENSATION
7,951
58-5170
T W C
720
TOTAL
51-SALARIES AND BENEFITS
52-SUPPLIES
AND MATERIALS
58-5210
OFFICE SUPPLIES
2,000
58-5215
FOOD
58-5230
ADVERTSING
900
58-5235
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
7,500
58-5240
CONFERENCES & TRAINING
7,500
58-5250
TOOLS & EQUIPMENT
12,000
58-5255
WEARING APPAREL
81600
58-5260
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
_ 8,000
TOTAL
52-SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
— -MAINTENANCE AND OPERAT
-5320
MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL
15,000
,o-5325
R & M MOTOR VEHICLE
20,000
58-5326
R & M MINOR EQUIPMENT
4,000
58-5329
CHRISTMAS DISPLAY
3,800
58-5330
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
3,000
58-5340
HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL
1,000
58-5345
LEASE EQUIPMENT
1,500
58-5347
VANDALISM REPLACEMENT
1,000
58-5350
FRANCHISE FEES
404,024
58-5355
METER MAINTENANCE
14,500
58-5360
SYSTEM MAINTENANCE
125,000
58-5365
TRANSFORMERS
49,000
58-5384
TRANSMISSION COSTS
882250
58-5385
WHOLESALE UTILITY PURCHASE
41101:268
58-5390
RADIOS ELECTRIC
2,000
TOTAL 53-MAINTENANCE AND OPERAT6�
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 34
7-30-2018 02:29 PM
4—ENTERPRISE FUND
ELECTRIC
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
CITY OF SANGER
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: JULY 31ST, 2018
54—CONTRACT SERVICES
58-5430 Pro essiona Services
58-5440 ENGINEERING ARCHITECTURAL
58-5450 TECHNICAL SUPPORT
58-5451 ANNUAL SOFTWARE SUPPORT
58-5470 CONTRACT UTILITY WORK
58-5471 CONTRACT TREE MAINTENANCE
58-5472 CONTRACTURAL SERVICES
TOTAL 54—CONTRACT SERVICES
55—UTILITIES
58-5520 CELL PHONE
TOTAL 55—UTILITIES
61—CAPITAL OUTLAY
58-6140 ELECTRIC IMPROVEMENTS
TOTAL 61—CAPITAL OUTLAY
71—DEPRECIATION
70—DEBT PAYMENTS
5 -7 NOTE PAYMENT —PRINCIPAL
58-7099 INTEREST EXPENSE
TOTAL 70—DEBT PAYMENTS
90—BAD DEBT ALLOWANCE
--QTAL 58—ELECTRIC
PAGE: 7
3/1Ze1m
40,000
6,000
5,600
2,000
46,500
28,600
25,000
300
111�
i&MKI 1]
54,847
1,617
56,464
6,558,565
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 35
7-30-2018 02:29 PM
�—ENTERPRISE FUND
-DEBT SERVICE
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 8
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: JULY 31ST, 2018
/ v-ur-D 1 r/i T MCIV I J
70-7025 2007 CO & REV BOND PRINCIPAL
70-7026 2007 CO & REV BD INTEREST
70-7028 2012 GO REFUNDING BONDS PRINCI
70-7029 2012 GO REFUNDING BOND INTERES
70-7030 CO 2013 PRINCIPAL
70-7031 CO 2013 INTEREST
70-7035 2015 CO PRINCIPAL
70-7036 2015 CO INTEREST
70-7037 REFUNDING 2016 PRINCIPAL
70-7038 REFUNDING 2016 INTEREST
70-7040 GO 2017 INTEREST
70-7080 BOND ADMINISTRATION FEES
TOTAL 70—DEBT PAYMENTS
72—NON DEPARTMENTAL
TOTAL 70—DEBT SERVICE
BUDGET
59,400
28,460
207,200
16,688
154,000
128,370
115,000
192,350
270,000
33,804
366,600
1,750
1,573,622
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 36
7-30-2018 02:29 PM
,8—ENTERPRISE FUND
'TRANSFERS
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
CITY OF SANGER
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: DULY 31ST, 2018
74—TRANSFERS
74-7 S�SFER WW CIP
74-7458 TRANSFER EL STORM RECOVER
74-7480 TRANSFER —PILOT
74-7499 TRANSFER TO ISF
TOTAL 74—TRANSFERS
TOTAL 74—TRANSFERS
PAGE: 9
BUDGET
156,800
115,920
85,000
1,421,745
,77 ,4 5
1,779,465
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 37
7-30-2018 02:29 PM
S—ENTERPRISE FUND
-NON—DEPARTMENTAL
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
S1—SALARIES AND BENEFITS
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 10
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: JULY 31ST, 2018
BUDGET
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 38
7-30-2018 02:29 PM
8-ENTERPRISE FUND
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES & USES
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 11
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: 3ULY 31ST, 2018
BUDGET
... 0
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 39
BANGER
.rExA=
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 40
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 41
BANGER
*rExA=
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 42
7-30-2018 02:29 PM CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 1
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: 7ULY 31ST, 2018
I -INTERNAL SERVIC
REVENUES BUDGET
TRANSFERS
00-498 ransfer from Ent Fund 1,421,745
00-4981 Transfer from GF 609,320
TOTAL TRANSFERS -�1�b65
TOTAL REVENUES 2,031,065
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 43
7-30-2018 02:29 PM
''0—INTERNAL SERVIC
-MAYOR AND COUNCIL
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 2
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: 3ULY 31ST, 2018
51-SALARIES AND BENEFITS
-5 WORKER S COMPENSATION
TOTAL 51-SALARIES AND BENEFITS
52-SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
- 5 FOOD
10-5230 ADVERTISING
10-5235 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
10-5240 CONFERENCES & TRAINING
10-5280 COMPUTERS, PRINTERS, ETC
TOTAL 52-SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
54-CONTRACT SERVICES
10-541S ACCOUNTING SERVICES
10-5425 LEGAL SERVICES
10-5430 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
10-5450 TECHNICAL SUPPORT
TOTAL 54-CONTRACT SERVICES
61-CAPITAL OUTLAY
10-6120 IMPROVEMENTS
TOTAL 61-CAPITAL OUTLAY
TOTAL 10—MAYOR AND COUNCIL
BUDGET
200
26
500
3,500
4,000
2,000
2.000
27,000
50,000
15,000
18.000
1 /11
1 111
152,200
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 44
7-30-2018 02:29 PM
I —INTERNAL SERVIC
-ADMINISTRATION
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 3
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: JULY 31ST, 2018
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
BUDGET
51-SALARIES AND BENEFITS
15-5110 REGULAR SALARIES
245,921
15-5111 MERIT INCREASE
81607
15-5120 OVERTIME
15-5125 LONGEVITY PAY
708
15-5128 AUTO ALLOWANCE
6,000
15-5129 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCE
1,800
15-5130 FICA
20,138
15-5140 RETIREMENT
21,112
15-5150 HEALTH INSURANCE
23,400
15-5160 WORKER'S COMPENSATION
270
15-5170 T W C
TOTAL 51-SALARIES AND BENEFITS
328,828
52-SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
5-5 5 DUES SUBSCRIPTIONS
4,250
15-5240 CONFERENCES & TRAINING
5,000
15-5280 COMPUTERS, PRINTERS, ETC
2,000
15-5285 FURNITURE & FIXTURES
1.500
- 2,750
TOTAL 52-SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
53-MAINTENANCE AND OPERAT
5-5 5 CONTINGENCY RESERVE
10,000
TOTAL 53-MAINTENANCE AND OPERAT
10,000
54-CONTRACT SERVICES
15-5450 TECHNICAL SUPPORT
5,000
TOTAL 54-CONTRACT SERVICES
506
u-'-CAPITAL OUTLAY
71-DEPRECIATION
TOTAL 15-ADMINISTRATION
356,578
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 45
7-30-2018 02:29 PM
I -INTERNAL SERVIC
PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
CITY OF SANGER PAGE:
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: JULY 31ST, 2018
51-SALARIES AND BENEFITS
18-5110 REGULAR SALARIES
18-5111 MERIT INCREASE
18-5117 VACATION COMPENSATION
18-5120 OVERTIME
18-5125 LONGEVITY PAY
18-5128 AUTO ALLOWANCE
18-5129 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCE
18-5130 FICA
18-5140 RETIREMENT
18-5150 HEALTH INSURANCE
18-5160 WORKER'S COMPENSATION
18-5170 T W C
TOTAL 51-SALARIES AND BENEFITS
52-SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
18-5210 OFFICE SUPPLIES
18-5215 FOOD
18-5230 ADVERTISING
18-5235 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
18-5240 CONFERENCES & TRAINING
18-5275 FILING FEES
18-5280 COMPUTERS, PRINTERS, ETC
18-5285 FURNITURE & FIXTURES
TOTAL 52-SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
53-MAINTENANCE AND OPERAT
OFFICE MACHINE LEASE
TOTAL 53-MAINTENANCE AND OPERAT
54-CONTRACT SERVICES
18-5426 CREDIT CARD FEES
18-5430 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
18-5440 ENGINEERING/ARCHTECTURAL
18-5450 TECHNICAL SUPPORT
18-5451 ANNUAL SOFTWARE SUPPORT
TOTAL 54-CONTRACT SERVICES
61-CAPITAL OUTLAY
45 OTHER EQUIPMENT
TOTAL 61-CAPITAL OUTLAY
BUDGET
175,562
6,145
1,950
300
1,396
6,000
1,200
14,731
15,443
23,400
6,202
93
3,000
600
3,310
21554
500
2,000
00
-2.564F
1.584
, 582F
1,000
2,500
75,000
12 ,13 5
6,900
/11
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 46
7-30-2018 02:29 PM CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 5
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: JULY 31ST, 2018
O—INTERNAL SERVIC
PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
71-DEPRECIATION
TOTAL 18-PUBLIC WORKS
BUDGET
365,905
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 47
7-30-2018 02:29 PM
O—INTERNAL SERVIC
FINANCE
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 6
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: DULY 31ST, 2018
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
BUDGET
51—SALARIES AND BENEFITS
19-5110 REGULAR SALARIES
272,918
19-5111 MERIT INCREASE
91553
19-5117 VACATION COMPENSATION
850
19-5125 LONGEVITY PAY
996
6,000
19-5128 AUTOMOBILE ALLOWANCE
600
19-5129 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCE
22,256
19-5130 FICA
23,332
19-5140 RETIREMENT
39,000
19-5150 HEALTH INSURANCE
1,397
19-5160 WORKER'S COMPENSATION
19-5170 T W C
459
TOTAL 51—SALARIES AND BENEFITS
52—SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
7,750
19-5210 OFFICE SUPPLIES
1,000
19-5235 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
19-5240 CONFERENCES & TRAINING
7,500
19-5280 COMPUTERS, PRINTERS, ETC
_ 3.000
TOTAL 52—SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
9,,250
54—CONTRACT SERVICES
56,250
19-5426 CREDIT CARD FEES
1,000
19-5429 MVBA COLLECTION FEES
15,000
19-5450 TECHNICAL SUPPORT
30,500
19-5451 ANNUAL SOFTWARE SUPPORT
_
—02~750
TOTAL 54—CONTRACT SERVICES
CAPITAL OUTLAY < $5K
52,000
_j-6025 COMPUTER HARDWARE
_
—52600
TOTAL 60—CAPITAL OUTLAY < $5K
71—DEPRECIATION
TOTAL 19—FINANCE
551,361
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 48
7-30-2018 02:29 PM CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 7
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: 7ULY 31ST, 2018
Q0-INTERNAL SERVIC
-FLEET SERVICES
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES BUDGET
51-SALARIES AND BENEFITS
36-5110
REGULAR SALARIES
52,583
36-5111
MERIT INCREASE
1,840
36-5120
OVERTIME
500
36-5125
LONGEVITY PAY
156
36-5129
CELL PHONE ALLOWANCE
600
36-5130
FICA
4,260
36-5140
RETIREMENT
4,465
36-5150
HEALTH INSURANCE
7,800
36-5160
WORKER'S COMPENSATION
2,422
36-5170
T W C
95
TOTAL
51-SALARIES AND BENEFITS
52-SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
36-5223 CHEMICAL SUPPLIES
1,200
36-5235 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
500
36-5245 MECHANIC SHOP SUPPLIES
1,200
36-5250 TOOLS & EQUIPMENT
2,300
36-5252 MECHANIC SUPPLIES
500
36-5255 WEARING APPAREL
2,200
36-5260 SAFETY EQUIPMENT
500
TOTAL 52-SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
8,400
53-MAINTENANCE AND OPERAT
36-5320 MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL
1,200
36-5321 OIL & LUBRICANTS
5,500
36-5325 R & M MOTOR VEHICLE
1,700
�F-5326 R & M MINOR EQUIPMENT
1,000
5345 LEASE/PURCHASE EQUIPMENT
600
TOTAL 53-MAINTENANCE AND OPERAT
54-CONTRACT SERVICES
36-5451 ANNUAL SOFTWARE SUPPORT
3,400
3,400
TOTAL 54-CONTRACT SERVICES
61-CAPITAL OUTLAY
71-DEPRECIATION
TOTAL 36-FLEET SERVICES 96,521
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 49
7-30-2018 02:29 PM
'40—INTERNAL SERVIC
FACILITIES
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 8
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: JULY 31ST, 2018
52-SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
98-5212 WATER DELIVERY
98-5245 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
TOTAL 52-SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
53-MAINTENANCE AND OPERAT
98-5310 R&M BUILDING
TOTAL 53-MAINTENANCE AND OPERAT
54-CONTRACT SERVICES
98-5437 JANITORIAL SERVICES
98-5438 HVAC CONTRACT
98-5439 PEST MANAGEMENT CONTRACT
TOTAL 54-CONTRACT SERVICES
55-UTILITIES
98-5510 TELEPHONE
98-5515 ELECTRIC
98-5516 GAS SERVICE
TOTAL 55-UTILITIES
61-CAPITAL OUTLAY
98-6140 IMPROVEMENTS
TOTAL 61-CAPITAL OUTLAY
TOTAL 98-FACILITIES
BUDGET
2,000
15.000
17,000
40,000
4,000
11,000
55,006
21 1//
85 111
111
114 111
• /11
WEENFIR11
246,000
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 50
7-30-2018 02:29 PM
'RO-INTERNAL SERVIC
NON—DEPARMENTAL
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 9
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: JULY 31ST, 2018
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
BUDGET
51—SALARIES AND BENEFITS
99-5150 HEALTH INSURANCE
10,000
99-5183 SAFETY & INCENTIVE
12.000
TOTAL 51—SALARIES AND BENEFITS
22YO00
52—SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
99-5220 POSTAGE
— 34,000
TOTAL 52—SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
4,00
53—MAINTENANCE AND OPERAT
99-5332 OFFICE MACHINE LEASE
5,000
99-5397 DAMAGE CLAIMS — REIMBURSE
10,000
TOTAL 53—MAINTENANCE AND OPERAT
�0
54—CONTRACT SERVICES
99-5410 TML INSURANCE
110,000
99-5420 TAX COLLECTIONS
30,000
99-5430 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
43,750
99-5435 MEDICALS/PHYSICALS
2,000
99-5436 BACKGROUND CHECKS
750
99-5452 WEBSITE HOSTING FEES
5,000
�''-�0
TOTAL 54—CONTRACT SERVICES
60—CAPITAL OUTLAY < $5K
TOTAL 99—NON—DEPARMENTAL
262,500
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 51
7-30-2018 02:29 PM CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 10
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: 3ULY 31ST, 2018
"'0—INTERNAL SERVIC
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES & USES
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
BUDGET
2,031,065
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 52
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 53
BANGER
.rExA=
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 54
7-30-2018 03:49 PM CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 1
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: JULY 31ST, 2018
' 3-DEBT SERVICE FU
REVENUES BUDGET
TAXES
OD--4310 AD VALOREM TAXES - CURRENT _ 695.056
TOTAL TAXES 695,056
INTEREST
$00—Interest Income 100
TOTAL INTEREST -10
MISCELLANEOUS
TRANSFERS
00-498 RANSFER FROM 4B 212.500
TOTAL TRANSFERS 23�0
TOTAL REVENUES 907,656
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 55
7-30-2018 03:49 PM
'3-DEBT SERVICE FU
-DEBT SERVICE
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
CITY OF SANGER
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: JULY 31ST, 2018
70-DEBT PAYMENTS
70-7023 PRINCIPAL - 2007 CO
70-7024 INTEREST - 2007 CO BONDS
70-7026 PRINCIPAL - 2009 BOND
70-7027 INTEREST - 2009 BONDS
70-7028 2012 GO REFUNDING BOND PRINCIP
70-7029 2012 GO REFUND BOND INTEREST
70-7030 CO 2013 PRINCIPAL
70-7031 CO 2013 INTEREST
70-7037 REFUNDING 2016 PRINCIPAL
70-7038 REFUNDING 2016 INTEREST
70-7080 BOND ADMINISTRATION FEES
TOTAL 70-DEBT PAYMENTS
TOTAL 70-DEBT SERVICE
PAGE: 2
BUDGET
30,600
14,661
190,000
78,225
162,800
13,112
21,000
17,505
230,000
28,796
1,500
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 56
7-30-2018 03:49 PM
3—DEBT SERVICE FU
-TRANSFERS
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 3
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: JULY 31ST, 2018
74-TRANSFERS
74- 7401 TRANSFERS TO GENERAL FUND
TOTAL 74-TRANSFERS
80—OTHER USES
TOTAL 74-TRANSFERS
BUDGET
135
129,352
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 57
7-30-2018 03:49 PM
—DEBT SERVICE FU
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES & USES
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
CITY OF SANGER
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: JULY 31ST, 2018
REVENUES OVER/(UNDER) EXPENDITURES
PAGE: 4
BUDGET
917,551
( 9,895)
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 58
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 59
BANGER
*TE%AS
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 60
9-11-2018 02:55 PM
I —CAPITAL PROJECT
REVENUES
CITY OF SANGER
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: AUGUST 31ST, 2018
STREET REVENUE
DD_-4_"4 CIP—INTERLOCAL DENTON COUNTY
TOTAL STREET REVENUE
INTEREST
MISCELLANEOUS
TRANSFERS
00-4981 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL FUND
TOTAL TRANSFERS
TOTAL REVENUES
PAGE: 1
BUDGET
111 111
111 111
• 111
• 11/
1,675,000
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 61
9-11-2018 02:55 PM
'—CAPITAL PROJECT
STREET CIP
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 2
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: AUGUST 31ST, 2018
65-CAPITAL PROJECTS
30-6511 MCREYNOLDS ROAD RECONSTRUCTION
TOTAL 65-CAPITAL PROJECTS
TOTAL 30-STREET CIP
BUDGET
11 111
ill 111
300,000
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 62
9-11-2018 02:55 PM
+—CAPITAL PROJECT
TRANSFERS
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
74—TRANSFERS
CITY OF SANGER PAGE:
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: AUGUST 31ST, 2018
BUDGET
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 63
9-11-2018 02:55 PM
'—CAPITAL PROJECT
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES & USES
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 4
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: AUGUST 31ST, 2018
REVENUES OVER/(UNDER) EXPENDITURES
BUDGET
300,000
1,375,000
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 64
9-11-2018 02:55 PM CITY OF SANGER
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: AUGUST 31ST, 2018
0—ENT, CAPITAL PR
REVENUES
TAP FEES
—4 1 WATER TAPS
00-4132 SEWER TAPS
TOTAL TAP FEES
GRANTS
INTEREST
a�=4$(S6—Interest Income
TOTAL INTEREST
TRANSFERS
b-0=�9BU Transfer From Ent Fund
TOTAL TRANSFERS
TOTAL REVENUES
PAGE: 1
BUDGET
260,000
340 000
272 720
1* • E
The City of Sanger, Texas
2018-2019 Proposed Budget 65
9-11-2018 02:55 PM CITY OF SANGER PAGE:
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: AUGUST 31ST, 2018
I —ENT. CAPITAL PR
-PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
65-CAPITAL PROJECTS
BUDGET
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 66
9-11-2018 02:55 PM
—ENT. CAPITAL PR
-WATER
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
54-CONTRACT SERVICES
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 3
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: AUGUST 31ST, 2018
65-CAPITAL PROJECTS
50-6526 FM 455 RELOCATION OF UTILITIES
50-6527 PLUM STREET WATER LINES
TOTAL 65-CAPITAL PROJECTS
TOTAL 50—WATER
BUDGET
150,000
_ 75.000
225,000
225,000
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 67
9-11-2018 02:55 PM
" I -ENT. CAPITAL PR
WASTE WATER
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
54-CONTRACT SERVICES
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 4
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: AUGUST 31ST, 2018
65-CAPITAL PROJECTS
54-6520 New Sewer Plant
54-6523 RAILROAD LIFT STATION
54-6525 WWTP OUTFALL PIPELINE
54-6526 FM455 RELOCATION OF UTILITIES
54-6527 PLUM STREET WASTE WATER
TOTAL 65-CAPITAL PROJECTS
TOTAL 54-WASTE WATER
BUDGET
3,200,000
100,000
500000
150:000
75,000
4,025,000
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 68
9-11-2018 02:55 PM
')—ENT. CAPITAL PR
-DEBT SERVICE
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
54-CONTRACT SERVICES
70—DEBT PAYMENTS
72—NON DEPARTMENTAL
CITY OF SANGER PAGE:
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: AUGUST 31ST, 2018
BUDGET
5
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 69
9-11-2018 02:55 PM
—ENT. CAPITAL PR
-TRANSFERS
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
74—TRANSFERS
CITY OF SANGER PAGE:
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: AUGUST 31ST, 2018
BUDGET
C.
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 70
9-11-2018 02:55 PM
`°'O—ENT. CAPITAL PR
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES & USES
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 7
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: AUGUST 31ST, 2018
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUES OVER/(UNDER) EXPENDITURES
BUDGET
4,250,000
( 3,371,030)
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 71
N N
U N
N
Q N
L O
N
N N
V N
0) r,
O N
L O
Q� N
.a r-
W N
N
0
O N
L O
a N
-a
o
+:
o
N
t1
cV
o�
O
Nch
O
o
t2
N
N
�
�
Q
N
m
LU
00
O
H
_
m
N
♦�
QU)
U
U
(W�
tV
LLJ
°r°
Z
U-
4
F-U) LU
O
N
W
(D
a
ti
)
W
00
N
Q
Ui
U
N
0
4.
(0
Q
w
N
d
O p
O o0
O
O O
O
LO
� 69
LO O O LO
-LO
O_ � LO
O O Cf> -
N O V3 00
LO O — CD
0 d' C1 O
r
� 69
O O
O �
p O
(D o
O O
� 69
O O
O G
C) O
O O
LO �?
ER �
O i p
O O
O
CD O
O O
(Y) M
Efl 6ri
O i i i i p
Ch M
00 00
CO to
00 00
Ir &0
� M
d'
O
O
N' (V
69-
Q)
O U a
(6
.0 0 v`O- O to
C c_- a
c '� caa tn H
O CCS p U)
U- N a Co U-
U) Ca6 a. U) (a N
V O X Cn -cor U N U
d Ui
.O ) a O O
O cu
n �o Q.
U af De- or� :D U
0
0
0
C6
LO
ti
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 72
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 73
BANGER
*TEXAS
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 74
6-28-2018 01:23 PM
-1 -4A CORPORATION
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 1
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: DUNE 30TH, 2018
REVENUES
BUDGET
TAXES
UO--4-325 STATE SALES TAX
385 000
-- $�W
TOTAL TAXES
GRANTS
INTEREST
ab 4$��INTEREST INCOME
TOTAL INTEREST
RENTAL INCOME
TRANSFERS
�986Transfer from 4B
-- 25.000
TOTAL TRANSFERS
411,750
TOTAL REVENUES
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 75
6-28-2018 01:23 PM
Al -4A CORPORATION
-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
CITY OF SANGER PAGE:
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: DUNE 30TH, 2018
51-SALARIES AND BENEFITS
4 - REGULAR SALARIES
46-5111 MERIT INCREASE
46-5125 LONGEVITY PAY
46-5128 AUTO ALLOWANCE
46-5129 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCE
46-5130 FICA
46-5140 RETIREMENT
46-5150 HEALTH INSURANCE
46-5160 WORKER'S COMPENSATION
46-5170 T W C
TOTAL 51-SALARIES AND BENEFITS
52-SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
46-5210 OFFICE SUPPLIES
46-5215 FOOD
46-5226 MARKETING & PROMOTION
46-5235 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
46-5240 CONFERENCES AND TRAINING
46-5280 COMPUTERS, PRINTERS, ETC
TOTAL 52-SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
53-MAINTENANCE AND OPERAT
-5 R M BUILDING
46-5332 OFFICE MACHINE LEASE
TOTAL 53-MAINTENANCE AND OPERAT
54-CONTRACT SERVICES
.5430 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
5450 TECHNICAL SUPPORT
46-5451 ANNUAL SOFTWARE SUPPORT
TOTAL 54-CONTRACT SERVICES
55-UTILITIES
4 - 51 ELECTRIC
46-5516 GAS SERVICE
TOTAL 55-UTILITIES
56-GRANT EXPENSES
IINMINl
94,779
3'318
48
6,000
600
8,024
8,413
7,800
504
90
800
300
10,000
2,000
4,000
00
45,000
1,500
--SO
4� '756
1,750
350
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 76
6-28-2018 01:23 PM
,'l -4A CORPORATION
-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
60-CAPITAL OUTLAY < $5K
61-CAPITAL OUTLAY
CITY OF SANGER PAGE:
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: TUNE 30TH, 2018
70-DEBT PAYMENTS
46=7M7 NOTE PAYMENTS - WAREHOUSE
46-7099 INTEREST EXPENSE
TOTAL 70-DEBT PAYMENTS
TOTAL 46-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
BUDGET
3
48,176
—_613, ,091
26
264,673
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 77
6-28-2018 01:23 PM CITY OF SANGER PAGE:
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: DUNE 30TN, 2018
Al —4A CORPORATION
TRANSFERS
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
74—TRANSFERS
BUDGET
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 78
6-28-2018 01:23 PM
-4A CORPORATION
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES & USES
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 5
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: TUNE 3OTH, 2018
REVENUES OVER/(UNDER) EXPENDITURES
BUDGET
264,673
147,077
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 79
BANGER
.rExa=
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 80
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 81
BANGER
.rExAs
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 82
6-28-2018 01:23 PM
42 —4B CORPORATION
REVENUES
TAXES
W—-325 STATE SALES TAX
TOTAL TAXES
INTEREST
00-4800 INTEREST INCOME
TOTAL INTEREST
TOTAL REVENUES
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 1
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: JUNE 30TH, 2018
BUDGET
385,000
—00
1,000
1,000
C:• 1/1
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 83
6-28-2018 01:23 PM
42 —4B CORPORATION
"-TRANSFERS
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
74—TRANSFERS
74-7403 TRANSFER TO DSF
74-7441 TRANSFER TO 4A (ADMIN)
TOTAL 74—TRANSFERS
TOTAL 74—TRANSFERS
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 2
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: TUNE 30TH, 2018
212,500
25.000
71500
237,500
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 84
6-28-2018 01:23 PM CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 3
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: JUNE 30TH, 2018
—4B CORPORATION
-4B FUND
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
52—SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
54—CONTRACT SERVICES
61—CAPITAL OUTLAY
5 SPECIAL PROJECTS
76-6116 COMMUNITY PROJECTS
TOTAL 61—CAPITAL OUTLAY
65—CAPITAL PROJECTS
70—DEBT PAYMENTS
74—TRANSFERS
TOTAL 76-4B FUND
BUDGET
15,000
50 000
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 85
6-28-2018 01:23 PM
42 —4B CORPORATION
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES & USES
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 4
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: JUNE 30TH, 2018
REVENUES OVER/(UNDER) EXPENDITURES
BUDGET
302,500
83,500
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 86
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 87
BANGER
.rExas
The City of Sanger, Texas
2018-2019 Proposed Budget 88
6-28-2018 03:25 PM
0-9—HOTEL OCCUPANCY
REVENUES
CITY OF SANGER
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: TUNE 30TH, 2018
TAXES
D-0--74330 HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX REVENUE
TOTAL TAXES
TOTAL REVENUES
PAGE: 1
BUDGET
_ 23,�0�060
20,000
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 89
6-28-2018 03:25 PM CITY OF SANGER
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: DUNE 30TH, 2018
050-HOTEL OCCUPANCY
°''-HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
54-CONTRACT SERVICES
50-5420 CONTRACTURAL SERVICES
TOTAL 54-CONTRACT SERVICES
TOTAL 50-HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX
PAGE: 2
BUDGET
12,000
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 90
6-28-2018 03:25 PM CITY OF SANGER PAGE:
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: JUNE 30TH, 2018
-0—HOTEL OCCUPANCY
TRANSFERS
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
74—TRANSFERS
BUDGET
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 91
6-28-2018 03:25 PM CITY OF SANGER
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: DUNE 30TH, 2018
-0—HOTEL OCCUPANCY
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES & USES
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUES OVER/(UNDER) EXPENDITURES
PAGE: 4
BUDGET
12,000
8,000
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 92
6-28-2018 03:25 PM
?-BEAUTIFICATION
REVENUES
32-PARKS
aO 4117 Park Revenue
TOTAL 32-PARKS
TOTAL REVENUES
CITY OF SANGER
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: TUNE 30TH, 2018
PAGE: 1
BUDGET
500
5O6
500
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 93
6-28-2018 03:25 PM
432-BEAUTIFICATION
PARKS
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 2
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: JUNE 30TH, 2018
52-SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
32-5271 BANNER ACCOUNT
TOTAL 52-SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
TOTAL 32-PARKS
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 94
6-28-2018 03:25 PM
JQ2—BEAUTIFICATION
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES & USES
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 3
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: TUNE 30TH, 2018
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUES OVER/(UNDER) EXPENDITURES
BUDGET
6,000
( 5,500)
The City of Sanger, Texas
2018-2019 Proposed Budget 95
6-28-2018 03:25 PM
442-LIBRARY RESTRIC
REVENUES
LIBRARY
oo-42-4-7 LIBRARY REVENUE
TOTAL LIBRARY
INTEREST
00-4800-INTEREST INCOME
TOTAL INTEREST
MISCELLANEOUS
00-4900 Rent Income
TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL REVENUES
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 1
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: TUNE 30TH, 2018
BUDGET
Soo
200
• /11
• 111
9,700
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 96
6-28-2018 03:25 PM
- 2-LIBRARY RESTRIC
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES & USES
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 2
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: TUNE 3OTH, 2018
REVENUES OVER/(UNDER) EXPENDITURES
BUDGET
9,700
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 97
6-28-2018 03:25 PM
450-PARKLAND DEDICA
REVENUES
LICENSES & PERMITS
00-4524 PARKLAND DEDICATION FEE
TOTAL LICENSES & PERMITS
INTEREST
TOTAL REVENUES
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 1
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: TUNE 30TH, 2018
BUDGET
65,000
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 98
6-28-2018 03:25 PM CITY OF SANGER PAGE:
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: JUNE 30TH, 2018
450-PARKLAND DEDICA
'W S
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
61-CAPITAL OUTLAY
BUDGET
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 99
6-28-2018 03:25 PM
-0-PARKLAND DEDICA
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES & USES
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 3
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: TUNE 30TH, 2018
REVENUES OVER/(UNDER) EXPENDITURES
BUDGET
65,000
The City of Sanger, Texas
2018-2019 Proposed Budget 100
6-28-2018 03:25 PM
^cl—ROADWAY IMPACT
REVENUES
LICENSES & PERMITS
bb-fT5 5 ROADWAY IMPACT FEES
TOTAL LICENSES & PERMITS
INTEREST
TOTAL REVENUES
CITY OF SANGER
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: JUNE 30TH, 2018
PAGE: 1
BUDGET
100 000
100,000
The City of Sanger, Texas
2018-2019 Proposed Budget 101
6-28-2018 03:25 PM CITY OF SANGER PAGE:
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: TUNE 30TH, 2018
"1.—ROADWAY IMPACT
EETS
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
61-CAPITAL OUTLAY
BUDGET
The City of Sanger, Texas
2018-2019 Proposed Budget 102
6-28-2018 03:25 PM
'`-!-ROADWAY IMPACT
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES & USES
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 3
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: TUNE 30TH, 2018
REVENUES OVER/(UNDER) EXPENDITURES
BUDGET
100,000
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 103
6-28-2018 03:25 PM CITY OF SANGER
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: JUNE 30TH, 2018
'0-COURT SECURITY
REVENUES
FINES & FORFEITURES
00-4blb COURT SECURITY FEES
TOTAL FINES & FORFEITURES
TOTAL REVENUES
PAGE: 1
BUDGET
--- 500
b-
1,500
2018-2019 Pro osed Budget 104
The City of Sanger, Texas P
6-28-2018 03:25 PM
'O-COURT SECURITY
MUNICIPAL COURT
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 2
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: TUNE 30TH, 2018
51-SALARIES AND BENEFITS
2b-5115 COURT SECURITY
TOTAL 51-SALARIES AND BENEFITS
TOTAL 26-MUNICIPAL COURT
BUDGET
1500
�50�
1,500
The City of Sanger, Texas
2018-2019 Proposed Budget 105
6-28-2018 03:25 PM CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 3
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: TUNE 30TH, 2018
'()—COURT SECURITY
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES & USES
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
BUDGET
1,500
The City of Sanger, Texas
2018-2019 Proposed Budget 106
6-28-2018 O3:2S PM
'I -COURT TECHNOLOG
REVENUES
FINES & FORFEITURES
00-4bZ4 COURT TECHNOLOGY FEE
TOTAL FINES & FORFEITURES
TOTAL REVENUES
CITY OF SANGER
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: TUNE 30TH, 2018
PAGE: 1
BUDGET
2,000
The City of Sanger, Texas
2018-2019 Proposed Budget 107
6-28-2018 03:25 PM CITY OF SANGER
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: ]UNE 30TH, 2018
''1_—COURT TECHNOLOG
MUNICIPAL COURT
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
54—CONTRACT SERVICES
57—MUNICIPAL FEES
—5 4 TECHNOLOGY FUND EXPENSE
TOTAL 57—MUNICIPAL FEES
TOTAL 26—MUNICIPAL COURT
PAGE: 2
BUDGET
The City of Sanger, Texas
2018-2019 Proposed Budget 108
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 3
6-28-2018 03:25 PM BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: DUNE 30TH, 2018
-1-COURT TECHNOLOG
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES & USES
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
BUDGET
2,000
The City of Sanger, Texas
2018-2019 Proposed Budget 109
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 1
6-28-2018 03:25 PM BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: TUNE 3OTH, 2018
-5—CHILD SAFETY FE
REVENUES
FINES & FORFEITURES
00-4U51 CHILD SAFETY FEES
TOTAL FINES & FORFEITURES
TOTAL REVENUES
BUDGET
7 500
7,500
The City of Sanger, Texas
2018-2019 Proposed Budget 110
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 2
6-28-2018 03:25 PM BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: JUNE 30TH, 2018
'5—CHILD SAFETY FE
POLICE
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
57—MUNICIPAL FEES
T CHILD TALW—MUNICIPAL FEES
EE EXPENSES
FEES
TOTAL 20—POLICE
BUDGET
7 500
7,5
7,500
111
The City of Sanger, Texas 201 B-2019 Proposed Budget
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 3
6-28-2018 03:25 PM BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: DUNE 30TH, 2018
'=5-CHILD SAFETY FE
BUDGET
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES & USES
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget
112
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 1
6-28-2018 03:25 PM BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: TUNE 30TH, 2018
,0-POLICE DONATION
REVENUES
DONATIONS
police Donations
TOTAL DONATIONS
TOTAL REVENUES
BUDGET
2500
� 5��
2,500
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget
113
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 2
6-28-2018 03:25 PM BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: TUNE 30TH, 2018
-0-POLICE DONATION
POLICE
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
52-SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
20-5ZOI OTHER
TOTAL 52-SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
53-MAINTENANCE AND OPERAT
TOTAL 20-POLICE
BUDGET
2 500
2,500
114
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 3
6-28-2018 03:25 PM BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: TUNE 30TH, 2018
">-0-POLICE DONATION
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES & USES
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
BUDGET
2,500
The City of Sanger, Texas
2018-2019 Proposed Budget 115
6-28-2018 03:25 PM
,4-FIRE DONATIONS
REVENUES
DONATIONS
ATIONS
bb Fire Donations
TOTAL DONATIONS
TOTAL REVENUES
CITY OF SANGER
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: TUNE 30TH, 2018
PAGE: 1
BUDGET
1,000
116
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget
6-28-2018 03:25 PM
4—FIRE DONATIONS
-FIRE
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
CITY OF SANGER
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: TUNE 30TH, 2018
52—SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
4-5 OTHER
TOTAL 52—SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
TOTAL 24—FIRE
PAGE: 2
BUDGET
22
'7 5
2,275
117
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget
6-28-2018 03:25 PM
14—FIRE DONATIONS
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES & USES
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
CITY OF SANGER
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: JUNE 30TH, 2018
REVENUES OVER/(UNDER) EXPENDITURES
PAGE: 3
BUDGET
2,275
( 1,275)
118
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 1
6-28-2018 03:25 PM BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: DUNE 30TH, 2018
-'2—PARK DONATIONS
REVENUES
DONATIONS
bbE�2 Park Donations
TOTAL DONATIONS
TOTAL REVENUES
BUDGET
2500
— 5
2,500
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget
119
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 2
6-28-2018 03:25 PM BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: TUNE 30TH, 2018
'2-PARK DONATIONS
-PARKS
BUDGET
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
52-SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
120
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget
6-28-2018 03:25 PM
'12-PARK DONATIONS
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES & USES
CITY OF SANGER
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: TUNE 30TH, 2018
REVENUES OVER/(UNDER) EXPENDITURES
PAGE: 3
BUDGET
2,500
The City of Sanger, Texas
2018-2019 Proposed Budget 121
6-28-2018 03:25 PM CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 1
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: 3UNE 30TH, 2018
F42-LIBRARY DONATIO
REVENUES
LIBRARY
UG--4--2-4-7 Library Donations
TOTAL LIBRARY
TOTAL REVENUES
BUDGET
500
5
500
The City of Sanger, Texas
2018-2019 Proposed Budget 122
6-28-2018 03:25 PM
"`�—LIBRARY DONATIO
LIBRARY
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
CITY OF SANGER
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: DUNE 30TH, 2018
52—SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
42-5227 BOOK EXP FR GEN DONATIONS
TOTAL 52—SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
TOTAL 42—LIBRARY
PAGE: 2
BUDGET
1,000
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 123
6-28-2018 03:25 PM
-42—LIBRARY DONATIO
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES & USES
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
CITY OF SANGER PAGE: 3
BUDGET LISTING
AS OF: DUNE 30TH, 2018
REVENUES OVER/(UNDER) EXPENDITURES
1,000
( 500)
The City of Sanger, Texas 2018-2019 Proposed Budget 124
BANGER
INVESTMENT POLICY
POLICY STATEMENT
It is the objective of the City of Sanger, Texas ("City") that the administration of its funds and the investment
of those funds shall be handled in the highest public trust. Investments shall be made in a manner which will
provide the maximum security of principle invested through limitations and diversification while meeting the
daily cash flow needs of the city and conforming to all applicable federal, state, and local statutes, rules and
regulations governing the investment of public funds. The receipt of a market rate return will be secondary to
the requirements for safety and liquidity, The earning from investments shall be used in a manner that best
serves the public trust and interest of the City, This policy serves to satisfy the statutory requirements of
defining and adopting a formal investment policy and shall be reviewed annually for modifications. It is the
intent of the City to be in compliance with local law and the provisions of Public Funds Investment Act of the
Texas Government Code Chapter 2256.
SCOPE
This Investment Policy applies to the investment activities, all financial assets and funds held by the City of
Sanger, Texas. Funds covered and managed by this Investment Policy include:
A. General Fund — Used to account for resources traditionally associated with government, which are not
required to be accounted for in another fund.
B. Debt Service Fund — Used to account for resources to be used for the payment of principle, interest
and related costs on debt.
C. Enterprise Fund — Used to account for operations that are financed and operated in a manner similar
to private business enterprises.
D. Capital Improvement Fund — Used to account for resources to enable the acquisition or construction
of major capital facilities which are not financed by enterprise funds, internal service funds, or trust funds.
E. Special Revenue Funds — Used to account for proceeds from specific revenue sources which are
restricted to expenditures for specific purposes.
1.4A Fund
2.4B Fund
3. Employee Benefits Fund
INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES AND STRATEGY
It is the policy of the City that all funds shall be invested in conformance with state and federal regulations,
applicable bond ordinance requirements, and adopted Investment Policy. In accordance with the Public Funds
Investment Act, the following prioritized primary objectives, in accordance with the Texas Government Code
Section 2256.005(d) apply to the City's investment strategy. Listed in order of their priority, these objectives
encompass:
11 The City of Sanger, Texas Investment Policy
A. Suitability — Understanding the suitability of the investment to the financial requirement of the City is
important, Any investment eligible in the Investment Policy is suitable for all City funds.
B. Safety — Preservation and safety of principal are the primary objectives of the Investment Policy.
Investments of the City shall be undertaken in a manner that seeks to insure the preservation of
capital in the overall portfolio. To obtain this goal, diversification is required in the portfolio's
composition. The suitability of each investment decision will be made on the basis of these
objectives. The City prefers to invest in money market accounts, certificates of deposits, and United
States government backed agency discount notes.
C. Liquidity — The City's investment portfolio will remain sufficiently liquid to meet operating
requirements that might be reasonably anticipated. The City's investment portfolio will remain
sufficiently liquid and enable it to meet all operating requirements which might be reasonably
anticipated.
D. Diversification — Investment maturities shall be staggered throughout the budget cycle to provide
cash flow based on the anticipated needs of the City. Diversifying the appropriate maturity structure
will reduce market cycle risk. Diversification of the portfolio will include diversification by maturity
and market sector and will include the use of a number of brokers/dealers for diversification and
market coverage. Competitive bidding will be used on each sale and purchase.
E. Yield —Attaining a competitive market yield, commensurate with the City's investment risk constraints
and cash flow characteristic of the portfolio, is the desired objective. The City's investment portfolio
shall be designed with the objective of attaining a market rate of return throughout budgetary and
economic cycles, taking into account the City's risk constraints and the cash flow of the portfolio.
"Market rate of return" may be defined as the average yield of the current three-month U.S. Treasury
Bill or such other index that most closely matches the average maturity of the portfolio. The City's
objective shall be a reasonably safe yield rate in accordance with payment schedules and other
investment goals,
Effective cash management is recognized as essential to good fiscal management. Cash management is
defined as the process of managing monies in order to ensure maximum cash availability, The City shall
maintain a comprehensive cash management program which includes collection of accounts receivable,
prudent investment of its available cash, disbursement of payments in accordance with invoice terms and the
management of banking services. The City staff will follow the "Prudent Person" statement relating to the
standard of care that must be exercised when investing public funds as expressed in the Texas Government
Code Section 2256.006(a-b). The Investment Officers shall avoid any transactions that might impair public
confidence in the City's ability to govern effectively. The governing body recognizes that in diversifying the
portfolio, occasional measured unrealized losses due to market volatility are inevitable, and must be
considered within the context of the overall portfolio's investment return, provided that adequate diversification
has been implemented. The prudence of the investment decision shall be measured in accordance with the
tests set forth in the Texas Government Code Section 2256.006(b).
It shall be the policy of the City not to invest in speculative instruments such as derivatives.
LEGAL LIMITATIONS, RESPONSIBILITIES AND AUTHORITY
Direct specific investment parameters for the investment of public funds in Texas are found in the Public
Funds Investment Act of the Texas Government Code Section 2256. The Interlocal Cooperation Contracts,
2 1 The City of Sanger, Texas Investment Policy
Section 791, of the Texas Government Code authorizes local governments to participate in public funds
investments in conjunction with other local governments and agencies of the state of Texas. Section 791
along with Section 2256 of the Texas Government Code provides authorization for participation in investment
pools to invest public funds jointly with objectives of preservation and safety of principal, liquidity, and yield.
DELEGATION OF INVESTMENT AUTHORITY
The City Manager and the Finance Director acting on behalf of the City Council are designated as the
Investment Officers of the City and are responsible for investment management decisions and activities. The
Council is responsible for considering the quality and capability of staff, investment advisors, and consultants
involved in investment management and procedures. All participants in the investment process shall seek to
act responsibly as custodians of the public trust.
The Investment Officers shall develop and maintain written administrative procedures for the operation of the
investment program which are consistent with the investment policy. Procedures will include reference to
safekeeping, wire transfers, certificates of deposit, and fund accounts. Additional procedures will be
documented for the performance of wire transfer agreements; banking services contracts, and other
investment related activities.
The Investment Officers shall be responsible for all transactions undertaken and shall establish a system of
controls to regulate the activities of subordinate officials and staff. The Investment Officers shall designate a
staff person as a liaison/deputy in the event circumstances require timely action and the Investment Officers
are not available.
No officer or designee may engage in an investment transaction except as provided under the terms of this
policy and the procedures established by the Investment Officers and approved by the City Council.
PRUDENCE — STANDARD OF CARE
The standard of prudence to be used in the investment function shall be the "prudent person" standard and
shall be applied in the context of managing the overall portfolio. The Texas Government Code Section
2256.006(a) states Investments shall be made with judgment and care, under prevailing circumstances, that
a person of prudence, discretion, and intelligence would exercise in the management of the person's own
affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of capital and the probable
income to be derived.
Limitation of Personal Liability
The Investment Officers and those delegated investment authority under this policy, when acting in
accordance with the written procedures and this policy and in accordance with the written procedures and this
policy and in accord with the Prudent Person Rule, shall be relieved of personal responsibility and liability in
the management of the portfolio provided that deviations from expectations for a specific security's credit risk
or market price change or portfolio shifts are reported in a timely manner and that appropriate action is taken
to control adverse market effects.
3 1 The City of Sanger, Texas hravestrnerat Policy
INTERNAL CONTROLS
The Investment Officers shall establish a system of written internal controls which will be reviewed annually
with the independent auditor of the City. The controls shall be designed to prevent losses of public funds
arising from fraud, employee error, misrepresentation by third parties, unanticipated changes in financial
markets, or imprudent actions by employees or Investment Officers of the City.
Cash Flow Forecasting
Cash flow forecasting is designated to protect and sustain cash flow requirements of the City. Supplemental
to the financial and budgetary systems, the Investment Officers will maintain a cash flow forecasting process
designed to monitor and forecast cash positions for investment purposes. Cash flow will include the historical
researching and monitoring of specific cash flow items, payables, and receivables as well as overall cash
position and patters.
AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS
Acceptable investments under this policy shall be limited to the instruments listed below. The investments
shall be selected in a manner which promotes diversity of the market sector and maturity. The selection of
high-grade government investments and high-grade money market instruments is designed to assure the
marketability of those investments should the need for liquidity arise.
A. Obligations of the United States Government, its agencies and instrumentalities, and government
sponsoring enterprises, not to exceed two years to stated maturity;
B. Fully insured or collateralized certificates of deposit from a bank doing business in the State of Texas
and under the terms of a written depository agreement with that bank, not to exceed three years to
the stated maturity;
C. Money market funds authorized by the Public Funds Investment Act of the Texas Government Code
Chapter 2256.
D. Texas Local Government Investment Pools authorized by the Public Funds Investment Act of the
Texas Government Code Chapter 2256.
Additional types of securities approved for investment of public funds by Texas state statutes are not eligible
for investment by the City until this Investment Policy has been amended and the amended version approved
by the City Council authorizing investment of these additional types of securities.
Competitive Bidding Requirements
All securities, excluding certificates of deposit, will be purchased or sold after three (3) offers/bids are taken
to verify that the City is receiving fair market value/price for the investment.
Delivery versus Payment
All security transactions, including collateral for repurchase agreements, entered into by the City, shall be
conducted on a delivery versus payment (DVP) basis.
SAFEKEEPING AND COLLATERALIZATION
The laws of the State and prudent treasury management require that all purchased securities be bought on a
delivery versus payment basis and be held in safekeeping by either the City, an independent third party
financial institution, or the City's designated depository.
4 1 The City of Sanger, Texas Investment Policy
All safekeeping arrangements shall be designed by the Investment Officers and an agreement of the terms
executed in writing. The third -party custodian shall be required to issue safekeeping receipts to the City listing
each specific security, rate, description, maturity, cusip number, and other pertinent information. Each
safekeeping receipt will be clearly marked that the security is held for the City or pledged to the City.
All securities pledged to the City for certificates of deposit or demand deposits shall be held by an independent
third -party bank domiciled in Texas. The safekeeping bank may be written within the same holding company
as the bank, from which the securities are pledged.
Collateralization
Collateralization shall be required on all public funds of the City over the FDIC insurance coverage limit, and
in order to anticipate market changes and provide a level of additional security for all funds, the collateralized
level required will be 102% of the market value of the principal accrued interest,
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND REPORTING
The Investment Officers shall submit quarterly and annual reports to the City Council containing a written
report of investment transactions and investment positions as of the date of report. The report will be prepared
jointly by all involved in the investment activity and be signed by the Investment Officer(s).
DEPOSITORIES
The City will designate one banking institution through a competitive process as its central banking service
provider. This institution will be used for normal banking services including disbursements, deposits, and
lockbox, As a matter of ensuring liquidity and security should the funds deposited with the designated bank
be temporarily unavailable, the City will maintain an emergency reserve in another qualified bank.
INVESTMENT POLICY ADOPTION BY CITY COUNCIL
The City's Investment Policy shall be formally approved and adopted by resolution of the City Council and
reviewed annually in accordance with the provisions of the Public Funds Investment Act of the Texas
Government Code Chapter 2256.
AMENDMENT
In the event Texas state law changes and the City cannot invest in the investments described by this policy,
this policy shall automatically be conforming to existing law.
5 1 The City of Sanger, Texas Investment Policy
SANGER
*TEXAS
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA TYPE ® Regular ❑ Special ❑ Consent Reviewed by
® Yes
❑ Not Applicable
❑ Workshop ❑ Executive ❑ Public Hearing Finance
Reviewed by Legal
❑ Yes
® Not Applicable
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: SUBMITTED BY:
September 17, 2018 Alina Ciocan, City Manager
City Manager Reviewed/Approval Initials Date U
ACTION REQUESTED: ®ORDINANCE ❑ RESOLUTION ❑ APPROVAL
❑ CHANGE ORDER n ❑ AWARD OF CONTRACT
❑❑
OTH:APPROVAL
❑ CONSENSUS ❑ REAPPOINTMENTS S PLAID
AGENDA CAPTION
Consider, Discuss and Act on Ordinance #09-27-18 — Approving the 2018 tax rolls and providing for an effective
date.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
®N/A ❑GRANT FUNDS ❑OPERATING EXPENSE ❑REVENUE ❑CIP ❑BUDGETED ❑NON -BUDGETED
FISCAL YEAR:
PRIOR
YEAR
CURRENT
YEAR
FUTURE
-YEAR(S)
TOTALS
Proposed Expenditure Amount
Encumbered Amount
BALANCE
FUND(S) TO BE USED: General ❑$ Utility
❑ $ ❑ $
BACKGROUND/SUMMARY OF ITEM
This Ordinance approves the 2018 tax rolls as certified by the Appraisal Review Board of the Denton
County Appraisal District.
STAFF OPTIONS & RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the ordinance.
List of Supporting Documents/Exhibits Attached: Prior Action/Review by Council, Boards,
• Ordinance #09-27-18 Commissions or Other Agencies:
• 2018 Certified Totals
ORDINANCE #09-27-18
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANGER, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS,
APPROVING THE 2018 TAX ROLLS AND PROVIDING AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANGER HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. The City Council hereby approves the 2018 tax rolls of the City of Sanger,
Texas, as certified by the Appraisal Review Board of the Denton Central Appraisal District, which,
with amounts of tax as approved by the governing body, will result in a tax levy in the amount of
$4,366,602 based on the Certified Appraisal Roll.
SECTION 2: This ordinance is effective upon its adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Sanger,
Texas on this 17th day of September 2018.
APPROVED:
Thomas E. Muir, Mayor
ATTEST:
Cheryl Price, City Secretary
As of Certification
DENTON County 2018 CERTIFIED TOTALS
C16 - SANGER CITY OF 7/14/2018 3:35:05PM
Property Count: 4,197
ARB Approved Totals
Non Homesite:
Ag Market:
Timber Market:
58,455,562
34,801,534
0 Total Land
Value
Improvement
306,888,539
Homesite:
108,391,508
Non Homesite:
Count
Value
Non Real
378
47,854,438
Personal Property:
0
Mineral Property:
0
0
0
Autos:
Non Exempt
Exempt
Ag
Total Productivity Market:
34,801,534
0
0
467,162
Ag Use:
0
0
Timber Use:
0
Productivity Loss:
34,334,372
APPROXIMATE TOTAL LEVY = NET TAXABLE * (TAX RATE / 100)
3,935,540.97 = 579,523,041 . (0,679100 / 100)
0
Tax Increment Finance Value: 0.00
Tax Increment Finance Levy:
Total Improvements
Total Non Real
Market Value
Productivity Loss
Appraised Value
Homestead Cap
Assessed Value
Total Exemptions Amount
(Breakdown on Next Page)
Net Taxable
(+) 192,281,121
(+) 415,280,047
(+) 47,854,438
655,415,606
0 34,334,372
621,081,234
0 10,159,558
610,921,676
0 31,398,635
579,523,041
True Automation, Inc.
C16/652971 Page 197 of 1994
DENTON County
2018 CERTIFIED TOTALS
As of Certification
C 16 - SANGER CITY OF
ARB Approved Totals
7/14/2018 3:36:31PM
Property Count: 4,197
Exemption Breakdown
Exemption
Count
Local
= State
0
Total
500,000
DP
26
500,000
0
90,000
90,000
DV1
11
0
70,500
70,500
DV2
7
7,500
7,500
DV2S
1
0
82,000
82,000
DV3
8
0
223,200
223,200
DV4
29
48,000
48,000
DV4S
5
0
2,669,525
2,669,525
DVHS
16
0
174,934
174,934
DVHSS
1
8,240
8,240
EX
1
Q
4,406
4,406
EX -XL
1
0
1,005,030
1,005,030
EX-XU
8
0
12,597,578
12,597,578
EX-XV
171
0
21,810
21,810
EX-XV (Prorated)
4
0
4,045
4,045
EX366
EX
18
1
1,345,836
0
1,345,836
FIR
407
11,586,031
0
11,586,031
32
960,000
0
960,000
OV65S
Totals
14,391,867
17,006,768
31,398,635
C16/652971 Page 198 of 1994 True Automation, Inc.
DENTON County 2018 CERTIFIED TOTALS As of Certification
C16 - SANGER CITY OF 7/14/2018 3:35:05PM
Property Count: 14 Under ARB Review Totals
Non Homesite:
,
23
307,623
Ag Market:
0
Total Land
(+) 460,145
Timber Market:
Value
Improvement
216,179
Homesite:
249,262
Total Improvements
(+) 465,441
Non Homesite:
Non Real
Count
Value
6
70,689,855
Personal Property:
0
Mineral Property:
0
0
Total Non Real
(+) 7,6,
Autos:
0
Market Value
41
= 71,615,441
Ag
Non Exempt
Exempt
Total Productivity Market:
307,623
0
0
Productivity Loss
(-) 300,240
Ag Use:
7,383
0
0
Appraised Value
=
71,315,201
Timber Use:
0
Productivity Loss:
300,240
Homestead Cap
(') 0
Assessed Value
= 71,315,201
Total Exemptions Amount
H 7,839,799
(Breakdown on Next Page)
Net Taxable
= 63,475,402
APPROXIMATE TOTAL LEVY = NET TAXABLE
` (TAX RATE / 100)
431,061.45 = 63,475,402 " (0.679100 / 100)
0
Tax Increment Finance Value:
Tax increment Finance Levy:
0.00
True Automation, Inc.
Page
199 of 1994
C16/652971
DENTON County 2018 CERTIFIED TOTALS As of Certification
C 16 - SANGER CITY OF
Property Count: 14 Under ARB Review Totals 7/14l2018 3:36:31 PM
Exemption Breakdown
�A[ State Total
EX366 0 7,839,407
FR 1 7,839,407
Totals 7,839,407 392 7,839,799
C16/652971 Page 200 of 1994 True Automation, Inc.
As of Certification
DENTON County
2018 CERTIFIED TOTALS
C 16 - SANGER CITY OF
7/14/2018 3:35:05PM
Grand Totals
Property Count: 4,211
Value
Land
99,111,471
Homesite:
58,520,638
Non Homesite:
35,109,157
(+) 192,741,266
Ag Market:
0
Total Land
Timber Market:
Value
Improvement
Homesite:
307,104,718
108,640,770
Total improvements
(+) 415,745,488
Non Homesite:
Count Value
Non Real
384 118,544,293
Personal Property:
0
Mineral Property:
0
0
Total Non Real
+ 118,544,293
(_)
Autos:
0
Market Value
— 727,031,047
Non Exempt Exempt
Ag
Total Productivity Market:
0
35,109,157 0
Productivity Loss
() 34,634,612
Ag Use:
474,545
0
Appraised Value
692,396,435
Timber Use:
0
0
Productivity Loss:
34,634,612
Homestead Cap
010,159,558
Assessed Value
= 682,236,877
Total Exemptions Amount
(-) 39,238,434
(Breakdown on Next Page)
Net Taxable
= 642,998,443
APPROXIMATE TOTAL LEVY = NET TAXABLE' (TAX RATE / 100)
4,366,602.43 = 642,998,443 " (0.679100
/ 100)
0
Tax Increment Finance Value:
0.00
Tax Increment Finance Levy:
True Automation, Inc.
Page 201 of 1994
C16/652971
As of Certification
DENTON County 2018 CERTIFIED TOTALS
C 16 - SANGER CITY OF
Property Count: 4,211 Grand Totals 7/14/2018 3:36:31 PM
Exemption Breakdown
'. Local
State
I Mal
Exemption
.Count
500,0000
0
500,000
DP
90,000
90,000
DV1
11
0
70,500
70,500
DV2
7
0
7,500
7,500
DV2S
1
0
82,000
82,000
DV3
8
0
223,200
223,200
DV4
29
0
48,000
48,000
DV4S
5
0
2,669,525
2,669,525
DVHS
16
0
174,934
174,934
DVHSS
1
0
8,240
8,240
EX
1
0
4,406
4,406
EX -XL
1
0
1,005,030
1,005,030
EX-XU
8
0
12,597,578
12,597,578
EX-XV
171
p
21,810
21,810
EX-XV (Prorated)
4
4,437
4,437
EX366
20
9,185,243
0
9,185,243
FIR2
4
11, ,0
0
11,586,031
OV65
32
32
60,000
960
0
960,000
OV65S
Totals
22,231,274
17,007,160
39,238,434
C16/652971
Page 202 of 1994 True Automation, Inc.
DENTON County 2018 CERTIFIED TOTALS As of Certification
C 16 - SANGER CITY OF
Property Count: 4,197 ARB Approved Totals 7/14/2018 3:36:31PM
State Category Breakdown
State Code '
Description
Count
Acres New Value Market
Market Value
A
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
2,582
$22,732,954
$404,086,510
B
MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE
61
$1,109,634
$30,660,570
C1
VACANT LOTS AND LAND TRACTS
394
$0
$10,630,949
D1
QUALIFIED AG LAND
101
4,068.0558 $0
$34,801,534
D2
NON -QUALIFIED LAND
18
$0
$591,037
E
FARM OR RANCH IMPROVEMENT
87
425.7344 $0
$7,749,947
F1
COMMERCIAL REAL PROPERTY
178
$2,069,116
$99,270,067
F2
INDUSTRIAL REAL PROPERTY
3
$0
$1,093,255
J1
WATER SYSTEMS
1
$0
$102,430
J2
GAS DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
1
$0
$2,309,020
J3
ELECTRIC COMPANY (INCLUDING CO-OP
4
$0
$1,539,453
J4
TELEPHONE COMPANY (INCLUDING CO-
16
$0
$1,818,223
J5
RAILROAD
5
$0
$896,440
J7
CABLE TELEVISION COMPANY
6
$0
$1,302,000
L1
COMMERCIAL PERSONAL PROPERTY
312
$10,000
$36,045,172
L2
INDUSTRIAL PERSONAL PROPERTY
9
$0
$2,052,188
M1
TANGIBLE OTHER PERSONAL, MOBILE H
213
$437,770
$1,636,532
O
RESIDENTIAL INVENTORY
88
$445,767
$3,364,161
S
SPECIAL INVENTORY TAX
8
$0
$1,825,009
X
TOTALLY EXEMPT PROPERTY
203
$0
$13,641,109
Totals 4,493.7902 $26,805,241 $655,415,606
C16/652971 Page 203 of 1994 True Automation, Inc.
As of Certification
DENTON County 2018 CERTIFIED TOTALS
C 16 - SANGER CITY OF
7/14/2018
3:36:31 PM
Under ARB Review Totals
Property Count:
14
State Category Breakdown
Count Acres
New Value Market
" Market Value
State Code
D escription
$0
$301,125
A
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
5
$0
$307,623
D1
QUALIFIED AG LAND
2 123.0490
$0
$161,754
D2
NON -QUALIFIED LAND
1
1.0000
$0
$2,500
E
FARM OR RANCH IMPROVEMENT
1
$0
$152,584
F1
COMMERCIAL REAL PROPERTY
1
$0
$70,689,463
L1
COMMERCIAL PERSONAL PROPERTY
4
$0
$392
X
TOTALLY EXEMPT PROPERTY
2
Totals 124.0490
$0
$71,615,441
C161652971
Page 204 of 1994 True Automation, Inc.
DENTON County 2018 CERTIFIED TOTALS As of Certification
C 16 - SANGER CITY OF
Property Count: 4,211 Grand Totals 7/14/2018 3:36:31PM
State Category Breakdown
State Code Description Count Acres New Value Market Market Value
A
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
2,587
$22,732,954
$404,387,635
B
MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE
61
$1,109,634
$30,660,570
C1
VACANT LOTS AND LAND TRACTS
394
$0
$10,630,949
D1
QUALIFIED AG LAND
103 4,191.1048
$0
$35,109,157
D2
NON -QUALIFIED LAND
19
$0
$752,791
E
FARM OR RANCH IMPROVEMENT
88 426.7344
$0
$7,752,447
F1
COMMERCIAL REAL PROPERTY
179
$2,069,116
$99,422,651
F2
INDUSTRIAL REAL PROPERTY
3
$0
$1,093,255
J1
WATER SYSTEMS
1
$0
$102,430
J2
GAS DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
1
$0
$2,309,020
J3
ELECTRIC COMPANY (INCLUDING CO-OP
4
$0
$1,539,453
J4
TELEPHONE COMPANY (INCLUDING CO-
16
$0
$1,818,223
J5
RAILROAD
5
$0
$896,440
J7
CABLE TELEVISION COMPANY
6
$0
$1,302,000
L1
COMMERCIAL PERSONAL PROPERTY
316
$10,000
$106,734,635
L2
INDUSTRIAL PERSONAL PROPERTY
9
$0
$2,052,188
M1
TANGIBLE OTHER PERSONAL, MOBILE H
213
$437,770
$1,636,532
O
RESIDENTIAL INVENTORY
88
$445,767
$3,364,161
S
SPECIAL INVENTORY TAX
8
$0
$1,825,009
X
TOTALLY EXEMPT PROPERTY
205
$0
$13,641,501
Totals 4,617.8392 $26,805,241 $727,031,047
C16/652971 Page 205 of 1994 True Automation, Inc.
DENTON County 2018 CERTIFIED TOTALS
C 16 - SANGER CITY OF
Property Count: 4,197 ARB Approved Totals
As of Certification
7/14/2018 3:36:31 PM
CAD State Category Breakdown
State Code
Description
Count - Acres
New Value Market
Market Value
1
$0
$74,344
A
A017
BUILDER HOME PLANS - REFERENCE ON
1
$0
$0
$0
$0
A018
BUILDER HOME PLANS - REFERENCE ON
1
$0
$0
A019
BUILDER HOME PLANS - REFERENCE ON
35
$22,732,954
$403,686,544
Al
REAL, RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY
2,543
$0
325622
$098,276
A2
REAL, RESIDENTIAL, MOBILE HOME
5
$0
$,,
B1
REAL, RESIDENTIAL, APARTMENTS
19
$1,109,634
$5
5,56262,294
B2
REAL, RESIDENTIAL, DUPLEXES
42
$0
$6,355,806
C1
REAL, VACANT PLATTED RESIDENTIAL L
317
$0
$4,073,012
C2
COMMERCIAL VACANT LOT
72
$0
$202,131
C3
REAL VACANT LOT OUTSIDE CITY
5
101 4,068.0558
$0
$34,801,534
D1
D2
QUALIFIED AG LAND
FARM AND RANCH IMPSS ON QUALIFIED O
18
$0
$591,037
3
$0
$558
E
E1
LAND AND IMPROVMENTS (NON AG QUA
25
$0
$0
630
$4,470,759
E4
VACANT NON QUALIFIED NON HOMESITE
62
$2,069,1$0
95,828,366
$$1,093,255
F1
REAL COMMERCIAL
173
$0
$1,441,701
F2
REAL, INDUSTRIAL
3
$0
$3,10 ,430
F3
REAL - COMMERCIAL MH PARKS
5
$0
$109,020
J1
REAL & TANGIBLE PERSONAL, UTILITIES,
1
$0
$1,539,453
J2
REAL & TANGIBLE PERSONAL, UTILITIES,
1
$0
$1,818,223
J3
REAL & TANGIBLE PERSONAL, UTILITIES,
4
$0
$
J4
REAL & TANGIBLE PERSONAL, UTILITIES,
16
$0
$896,440
$302,000
J5
REAL & TANGIBLE PERSONAL, UTILITIES,
5
$0
$1,302,000
J7
REAL & TANGIBLE PERSONAL, UTILITIES,
6
$10,000
$21,833,320
L1
BPP TANGIBLE COMERCIAL PROPERTY
209
$0
$2,052,188
L2
BPP TANGIBLE INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY
9
$0
$14,211,852
L3
BPP TANGIBLE COMMERCIAL LEASED E
103
$437,770
$1,598,925
M1
NON INCOME PRODUCING PERSONAL P
212
$0
$37,607
M3
OA1
MOBILE HOMES
INVENTORY, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMI
1
6
$378,879
$829,565
OB2
INVENTORY, DUPLEX
1
$66,888
$0
$99,342
$2,435,254
OC1
INVENTORY, VACANT PLATTED LOTS/TR
81
$0
$1,825,009
S
SPECIAL INVENTORY
8
$0
$13,641,109
X
203
Totals 4,068.0558
$26,805,241
$655,415,606
C16/652971 Page 206 of 1994 True Automation, Inc.
DENTON County 2018 CERTIFIED TOTALS
As of Certification
C16 - SANGER CITY OF
Property Count:
14 Under ARB Review Totals
7/14/2018 3:36:31 PM
CAD State Category Breakdown
State Code
Description Count Acres
New Value Market
Market Value
Al
REAL, RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY 5
$0
$301,125
D1
QUALIFIED AG LAND 2 123.0490
$0
$307,623
D2
FARM AND RANCH IMPSS ON QUALIFIED O 1
$0
$161,754
E1
LAND AND IMPROVMENTS (NON AG QUA 1
$0
$2,500
F1
REAL COMMERCIAL 1
$0
$152,584
L1
BPP TANGIBLE COMERCIAL PROPERTY 2
$0
$70,048,042
L3
BPP TANGIBLE COMMERCIAL LEASED E 2
$0
$641,421
X
2
$0
$392
Totals 123.0490
$0
$71,615,441
C16/652971 Page 207 of 1994 True Automation, Inc.
DENTON County 2018 CERTIFIED TOTALS
C16 - SANGER CITY OF
Property Count: 4,211 Grand Totals
CAD State Category Breakdown
As of Certification
7/14/2018 3:36:31 PM
State Code
Description
Count Acres
New Value Market
Market Value
A
1
$0
$74,344
A017
BUILDER HOME PLANS - REFERENCE ON
1
$0
$0
A018
BUILDER HOME PLANS - REFERENCE ON
1
$0
$0
$0
A019
BUILDER HOME PLANS - REFERENCE ON
35
$0
Al
REAL, RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY
2,548
$22,732,954
$403,987,669
A2
REAL, RESIDENTIAL, MOBILE HOME
5
$0
$325,622
B1
REAL, RESIDENTIAL, APARTMENTS
19
$0
$25,098,276
B2
REAL, RESIDENTIAL, DUPLEXES
42
$1,109,634
$5,562,294
C1
REAL, VACANT PLATTED RESIDENTIAL L
317
$0
$6,355,806
C2
COMMERCIAL VACANT LOT
72
$0
$0
$4,073,012
$202,131
C3
REAL VACANT LOT OUTSIDE CITY
5
103 4,191.1048
$0
$35,109,157
D1
D2
QUALIFIED AG LAND
FARM AND RANCH IMPSS ON QUALIFIED O
19
$0
$752,791
E
3
$0
$558
E1
LAND AND IMPROVMENTS (NON AG QUA
26
$0
$3,281,130
E4
VACANT NON QUALIFIED NON HOMESITE
62
$0
$4,470,759
F1
REAL COMMERCIAL
174
$2,069,116
$95,980,950
F2
REAL, INDUSTRIAL
3
$0
$0
$1,093,255
$3,441,701
F3
REAL - COMMERCIAL MH PARKS
5
$0
$102,430
J1
REAL & TANGIBLE PERSONAL, UTILITIES,
1
J2
REAL & TANGIBLE PERSONAL, UTILITIES,
1
$0
$2,309,020
J3
REAL & TANGIBLE PERSONAL, UTILITIES,
4
$0
$1,539,453
J4
REAL & TANGIBLE PERSONAL, UTILITIES,
16
$0
$1,818,223
J5
REAL & TANGIBLE PERSONAL, UTILITIES,
5
$0
$896,440
J7
REAL & TANGIBLE PERSONAL, UTILITIES,
6
$0
$1,302,000
Ll
BPP TANGIBLE COMERCIAL PROPERTY
211
$10,000
$91,881,362
L2
BPP TANGIBLE INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY
9
$0
$2,052,188
L3
BPP TANGIBLE COMMERCIAL LEASED E
105
$0
$14,853,273
M1
NON INCOME PRODUCING PERSONAL P
212
$437,770
$1,598,925
M3
OA1
MOBILE HOMES
INVENTORY, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMI
1
6
$0
$378,879
$37,607
$829,565
OB2
INVENTORY, DUPLEX
1
$66,888
$99,342
OC1
INVENTORY, VACANT PLATTED LOTS/TR
81
$0
$2,435,254
S
SPECIAL INVENTORY
8
$0
$1,825,009
X
205
$0
$13,641,501
Totals 4,191.1048
$26,805,241
$727,031,047
C16/652971 Page 208 of 1994 True Automation, Inc.
DENTON County 2018 CERTIFIED TOTALS As of Certification
C16 - SANGER CITY OF
Property Count: 4,211 Effective Rate Assumption 7/14/2018 3:36:31 PM
New Value
TOTAL NEW VALUE MARKET: $26,805,241
TOTAL NEW VALUE TAXABLE: $26,597,320
New Exemptions
Exemption
Description Count
I
EX-XU
11.23 Miscellaneous Exemptions 2
2017 Market Value
$150,747
EX-XV
Other Exemptions (including public property, r 4
2017 Market Value
$63,984
EX366
HB366 Exempt 5
2017 Market Value
$598
ABSOLUTE EXEMPTIONS VALUE LOSS
$215,329
Exemption
Description
Count
Exemption Amount
DP
Disability
2
$40,000
DV1
Disabled Veterans 10% - 29%
1
$12,000
DV2
Disabled Veterans 30% - 49%
3
$22,500
DV3
Disabled Veterans 50% - 69%
4
$40,000
DV4
Disabled Veterans 70% - 100%
6
$72,000
DVHS
Disabled Veteran Homestead
2
$149,834
OV65
Over 65
45
$1,320,000
PARTIAL EXEMPTIONS VALUE LOSS
63
$1,656,334
NEW EXEMPTIONS VALUE LOSS
$1,871,663
Increased Exemptions
Exemption Description Count Increased Exemption —Amount
INCREASED EXEMPTIONS VALUE LOSS
TOTAL EXEMPTIONS VALUE LOSS $1,871,663
New Ag / Timber Exemptions
New Annexations
Count Market Value Taxable Value
$1,184,086 $1,102,849
New Deannexations
Average Homestead Value
Category A and E
Count of HS Residences Average Market Average HS Exemption Average Taxable
1,464 $171,663 $6,940 $164,723
Category A Only
Count of HS Residences Average Market Average HS Exemption Average Taxable
1,453 $171,711 $6,964 $164,747
C16/652971 Page 209 of 1994 True Automation, Inc.
DENTON County 2018 CERTIFIED TOTALS As of Certification
C16 - SANGER CITY OF
Lower Value Used
Count of Protested Properties Total Market Value Total Value Used
14 $71,615,441.00 $63,469,417
C16/652971 Page 210 of 1994 True Automation, Inc.
SANGER
+ T E X A S COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA TYPE ® Regular ❑ Special ❑ Consent by Finance
❑ Yes
® Not Applicable
❑ Yes
® Not Applicable
ERevieEwed
❑ Workshop ❑ Executive ❑ Public Hearingby Legal
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: SUBMITTED BY:
September 17, 2018 Alina Ciocan, City Manager
City Manager Reviewed/Approval Initials Date 013R
ACTION REQUESTED: ®ORDINANCE ❑ RESOLUTION ® APPROVAL
APPROVAL OF BID❑AWARD OF CONTRACT
❑ CHANGE ORDER �APPO�INTIMENTS ❑[—]OTHER
❑ CONSENSUS ❑ EXPLAIN:
AGENDA CAPTION
Consider, Discuss and Act on Ordinance #09-28-18 — Denying a Proposed Increase Sought by Atmos Energy-
Midtex Division in Connection With the Rate increase Filing it Made on About June 1, 2018; Approving an
Alternative Increase in Rates; Directing Atmos to File Conforming Tariffs And to Reimburse the City's Rate
Case Expenses; Making Other Findings and Provisions Related to the Subject; Finding that the Meeting
Complies With the Open Meetings Act; and Declaring An Effective Date.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
�N/A ❑GRANT FUNDS ❑OPERATING EXPENSE ❑REVENUE ❑CIP ❑BUDGETED ❑
NON -BUDGETED
PRIOR
CURRENT
FUTURE
FISCAL YEAR:
YEAR
YEAR
YEAR(S)
TOTALS
Pro osed Expenditure Amount
Encumbered Amount
BALANCE
FUND(S) TO BE USED: General ❑$ Utility ❑ $ Special ❑ $
BACKGROUND/SUMMARY OF ITEM
See attached Agenda Information Sheet provided by Herrera Law & Associates, Inc.
STAFF OPTIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends approval of Ordinance 909-28-18
List of Supporting Documents/Exhibits Attached:
Prior Action/Review by Council, Boards, Commissions or
• Ordinance #09-28-18
Other Agencies:
0 Agenda Information Sheet
None
ORDINANCE NO.09-28-18
ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF SANGER, TEXAS ("CITY")
DENYING A PROPOSED INCREASE SOUGHT BY ATMOS
ENERGY-MIDTEX DIVISION IN CONNECTION WITH THE
RATE INCREASE FILING IT MADE ON ABOUT JUNE 1, 2018;
APPROVING AN ALTERNATIVE INCREASE IN RATES;
DIRECTING ATMOS TO FILE CONFORMING TARIFFS AND
TO REIMBURSE THE CITY'S RATE CASE EXPENSES;
MAKING OTHER FINDINGS AND PROVISIONS RELATED TO
THE SUBJECT; FINDING THAT THE MEETING COMPLIES
WITH THE OPEN MEETINGS ACT; AND DECLARING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE
WHEREAS, Atmos Energy ("Atmos Energy," "Atmos," or "Company") filed a
Statement of Intent with the City on or about June 1, 2018, to increase its annual revenue
by approximately $4.5 million in the cities known as Atmos Texas Municipalities
("ATM"), which equates to an increase in annual revenue of approximately 8.0 percent,
and is the equivalent of an increase of about $46.0 million on a system -wide basis; and
WHEREAS, the City is a regulatory authority under the Gas Utility Regulatory
Act ("GURA") and under Chapter 104, § 103.001 et seq. of GURA has exclusive original
jurisdiction over Atmos's rates, operations, and services within the municipality; and
WHEREAS, in order to maximize the efficient use of resources and expertise in
reviewing, analyzing and investigating Atmos's rate request and its changes in tariffs it is
prudent to coordinate the City's efforts with a coalition of similarly situated
municipalities; and
WHEREAS, the City, in matters regarding applications by Atmos to change
rates, has in the past joined with other local regulatory authorities to form an alliance of
cities known as Atmos Texas Municipalities ("ATM"), and hereby continues its
participation in ATM; and
1 of 6
Atmos MidTex 2018 Statement of Intent
Final Action
WHEREAS, Atmos's rate request consists of a voluminous amount of
information including Atmos's rate -filing package, exhibits, schedules, and workpapers;
and
WHEREAS, Atmos's rate application is the Company's first general rate case
since about 2012, and follows annual increases approved under the now -expired tariff
known as the "Rate Review Mechanism" ("RRM"); and
WHEREAS, Atmos proposed July 6, 2018, as the effective date for its requested
increase in rates; and
WHEREAS, the City previously suspended Atmos' proposed effective from July
6, 2018, to October 4, 2018; and
WHEREAS, the City, exercising its duties as a local regulatory authority with
regard to Atmos' rates, services, and operations, through ATM engaged the law firm of
Herrera Law & Associates as Special Counsel and rate experts from the consulting firms
of the Garrett Group, LLC, GDS and Associates, Inc., and J. Randall Woolridge, Ph.D, to
review Atmos' rate filing package; and
WHEREAS, Atmos failed to establish the need for an increase of about $46
million and the specific rates Atmos proposed; and
WHEREAS, merits at most an increase of about $12.81 million, which is
approximately an increase of $1.25 million in the ATM cities, and the specific rates set
forth in Exhibit A to this Ordinance, and made a part of this Ordinance as if fully set out
in its body; and
WHEREAS, Atmos failed to establish the reasonableness of its proposed rate
design; and
WHEREAS, a reasonable rate design is as set forth in Exhibit A;
►0 00
Atmos NlidTex 2018 Statement of Intent
Final Action
WHEREAS, Atmos failed to establish the reasonableness of its proposed cost of
capital, including Atmos' proposed capital structure; and
WHEREAS, a reasonable cost of capital and capital structure is as set forth in
Exhibit A to this Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Gas Utility Regulatory Act § 103.022, cities have a
statutory right to recover their reasonable rate case expenses.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SANGER, TEXAS THAT:
Section I. The findings set out in the preamble are in all things approved and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth.
Section 2. Atmos failed to establish that its requested increase in revenue of about
$46 million, and its proposed changes in rates as set forth in its Statement of Intent
submitted to the City on about June 1, 2018, result in just and reasonable rates, and are
therefore, hereby DENIED.
Section 3.
An increase
of about $12.81 million as shown in Exhibit A, and
as
detailed in
Exhibit B to
this Ordinance, each of which is hereby incorporated
by
reference_ and the rates shown below, are hereby APPROVED, to wit:
Approved Increase in Annual Revenue (System Wide — MidTex Division)
$12,807,858
APPROVED RATE
Customer Class/Rate
Rate R - Residential
$17.89
Customer Charge per month
Consumption Charge (per CCF)
$0.16052
Rate C - Commercial
3 of 6
Atmos MidTex 2018 Statement of Intent
Final Action
Customer Charge per month
$37.85
Consumption Charge (per CCF)
$0.10081
Rate I & T — Indus. & Transp.
Customer Charge per month
$619.85
Consumption Chrg - First 1,500 MMBTU
$0.3655
Consumption Chrg - Next 3,500 MMBTU
$0.2908
Consumption Chrg - Over 5,000 MMBTU
$0.0761
Section 4. A rate -case -expense surcharge ("RCE Surcharge") as shown below to
allow Atmos to recover the City's rate case expenses is hereby APPROVED, said
surcharge per class to be in effect for a period of five (5) years:
Rate Class RCE Surcharge
Residential $0.00030 per ccf
Commercial $0.00011 per ccf
Industrial & Transportation $0.0001 per MMbtu
Section 5. Atmos is hereby ordered to submit to the City a report detailing the rate -
case expenses recovered through the RCE Surcharges, said report to be filed by October
1 of each year until full recovery of the rate case expenses and in no event is Atmos
permitted to recover in excess of the rate case expenses approved by this Ordinance.
Section 6. Atmos' requested return on equity of 10.50% and its proposed capital
structure of 60.18% equity and 39.82% long-term debt, are hereby DENIED.
Section 7. A return on equity of 9.80%; a cost of long-term debt of 5.45%; and a cost
of short -tern debt of 1.68%, are hereby APPROVED.
Section 8. A capital structure of 53.81% equity; 38.98% long-term debt; and 7.21%
short-term debt, yielding a weighted cost of capital of 7.5189%, are hereby
APPROVED.
4 of 6
Atinos MidTex 2018 Staternent of Intent
Final Action
Section 9. Atmos is hereby ordered to reimburse the City's rate case expenses
incurred as a member of the Atmos Texas Municipalities ("ATM") through August 31,
2018, as set forth in Exhibit B, by no later than thirty (30) days from the effective date of
this Ordinance.
Section 10. Atmos is hereby ordered to reimburse the City's rate case expenses
incurred after August 31, 2018, for the City's reasonable costs associated with the City's
continued activities related to this rate review or related to proceedings involving Atmos
in proceedings before the City or any ATM city, the Railroad Commission of Texas, or
any court of law, and that Atmos shall do so on a monthly basis and within 30 days after
submission of the City's invoices to Atmos.
Section 11. Atmos is directed to submit to the City a set of tariffs modified to
correspond to the rates approved by this Ordinance and that it do so by no later than
fifteen (15) calendar days after the effective date of this Ordinance, said submittal to be
accompanied by an affidavit from an officer of Atmos Energy attesting that the rates
presented in the modified tariffs are in accordance with the rates approved by this
Ordinance.
Section 12. The City shall continue its participation in a coalition of cities known as
the Atmos Texas Municipalities ("ATM"), and authorizes intervention in proceedings
related to Atmos' Statement of Intent before the Railroad Commission of Texas and
related proceedings in courts of law that may have an impact on rates within the City; and
Section 13. Subject to the right to terminate employment at any time, the City
continues its engagement of and authorizes the law firm of Herrera Law & Associates,
PLLC to act as Special Counsel with regard to rate proceedings involving Atmos before
the City, the Railroad Commission of Texas, or any court of law, and to retain such
experts as may be reasonably necessary for review of Atmos's rate application in such
proceedings and subject to approval by the steering committee of the ATM.
5 of 6
Atinos MidTex 2018 Statement oflntent
Final Action
Section 14. Any relief not expressly granted or approved by this Ordinance is
expressly denied.
Section 15. A copy of this Ordinance shall be sent to Mr. Alfred R. Herrera, Herrera
Law & Associates, PLLC, 816 Congress Ave., Suite 950, Austin, Texas 78701, and a
courtesy copy to Atmos's local representative.
Section 16. Atmos shall implement the rates approved by this Ordinance beginning
October 4, 2018, for service rendered on and after that date.
Section 17. To the extent of an inconsistency between this Ordinance and a prior
ordinance or resolution related to Atmos' rates, this Ordinance governs and supersedes all
prior ordinances or resolutions related to Atmos' rates.
Section 18. The meeting at which this Ordinance was approved was in all things
conducted in strict compliance with the Texas Open Meetings Act, Texas Government
Code, Chapter 551.
Section 19. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 17t" day of September, 2018.
ATTEST:
City Secretary, Cheryl Price
6 of 6
Mayor, Thomas E. Muir
Atmos MidTex 2018 Statement of Intent
Final Action
EXHIBIT A
EXHIBIT A
osed Increase in Annual Revenue ATM City Approved Increase in Annual Revenue
Atmos Prop (System Wide —MidTex Division)
(System Wide —MidTex Division) $12,807,858
$45,993,529
ATMOS: ATM CITY
PROPOSED APPROVED
RATE RATE
Customer Class/Rate CURRENT
Rate R - Residential $17 89
$18.35 $20.21
Customer Charge per month 0 16052
Consumption Charge (per CCF) $ 0.13734 $0.15701 $
Rate C - Commercial $37.85
$41.95 $41.85
Customer Charge per month $0.08746 $0.07729 $0 10081
Consumption Charge (per CCF)
Rate I & T — Indus. & Transp. 619.85
$752.00 $752.00 $
Customer Charge per month $0.3655
0.2390
Consumption Chrg - First 1,500 MMBTU $0.3172 $ 0 2908
Consumption Chrg - Next 3,500 MMBTU $0.2322 $0.$ 0.0761
Consumption Chrg - Over 5,000 MMBTU $
0.0498 $0.0498 $
Cost of Capital and Capital Structure
Atmos Requested ATM City Approved
°
Return on Equity
10.50% 9.80 0
Cost of Long -Term 5.45% 5.45%
Debt
Cost of Short- 1 68°/ 1.68%
Term Debt
Capital Structure Ratios
Atmos Requested ATM City Approved
60.18 /°
Equity °
39.82% 7.21/0
Long -Term Debt 0 0% 38.9870
Short -Term Debt
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (aka, Rate of Return)
Atmos Requested ATM City Approved
5189%
Weighted Cost 8.3876/°
Pre -Tax Weighted °
Cost 10.0674% 8.9207
tmos MidTex 2018 Statement of Intent — June 1, 201.8 — Approved Change in Revenue, Rates, Cost of
A Capital and Capital Structure
2
EXHIBIT B
REVENUE REQUIREMENT
SCHEDULES
Line No. Description
1 Test Year Revenue Requirement
2 Revenue at Present Rates
ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TD(DIV ISION
ATM COALITION REVENUE REQUIREMENTSUMMARY
TEST YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2017
Atmos Proposed (Note a)
Ref. Rate Base/BOB Operating Income
Ihl (e) (d)
3
4 GCR
5
6 Operation and Maintenance Expenses
7
8 Taxes Other than IncomeTax -Non-Revenue Related
9
10 Revenue Related Taxes
it
12 Depreciation and Amortization Expense
13
14 Interest on Customer Deposits
14.
15 Rate Base
16 Atmos Rate of Return
17 ATM Rateof Return
1g Return Requirement
19
20 Income and Other Taxes
21
22 Revenue Requirements
25
26 Base Revenue Deficiency(excluding revenue taxes)
27
28 Amortization of Excess ADTT-with RevenueTaxes
29
30 Proposed Cost of5ernce-Systemwide Adjusted for Excess ADIT
ATM Adjustments ATM Proposed A
(See Schedule B) Operating Income
(e) (f)
1,494,918,603
$ 1,494,918.603 $
-
5 1,494,918,603
heduleA
-
816,965,570
$ 816,965,570
$ 816,965,570
-
187,342,844
S 188,642,689 $
(1,299,845)
$ 187,342,844
Schedule F-1
-
43,711,991
43,711,991
$ 43,711,991
Schedule F-5
- 94,200,861
96,255,692
(2,054,831)
$ 94,200,861
- 144,321,772
$ 144,321,772
Schedule F-3
144.321,772
- 117,764
$ 117,764
Schedule F-7
117,764
- 2,572,673,972
(830,856)
2,572,673,972
ScheduleS
$ 2,573,504,828
7.19
ScheduleG
8.388%
7518s%
- 437,246
193,3,
g 215,855,775 $
(22,418,528)
$ 193,437,246
- 40,517,489
47,913,915
(7,396,426)
40,517,489
Schedule F-6
- 1,520,615,537
553,785,168
$ 1,$
1693
(33 .,630)
S 1,520,615,538
L. 3L. 20
...
2-1,616,134
g 58,866,565 $
(33,1 99,6301
S 25,696,934
L22-L2
_ 12,889,076
12,873,035
16,041
12,889,076 _-------
$
$ 45,993.529
(33,185-671)
$ 12,807.858
5
Exhibit MG-2 Summary
ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION
ATM RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY
TESTYEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2017
Equity/
Pre -Tax
Rate
Line
Description
ROE
Reference
Rate Base
ROR
Change
No.
$ 2,573,504,828
10.0674%
$ 45,993,529
Requested Amounts
MG-2.4
$ (20,861)
10.0674%
(2,100)
Pension and OPEB Regulatory Asset
MG-2.1
$ (66,472)
10.0674%
(6,692)
Cash Working Capital
MG-2.4
(464,794)
10.0674%
(46,792)
Adjustment toADIT- SEBPAdjustment
MG24
(278,730)
10.0674%
(28,061)
SEBP EDIT Liability Net Adjustment
10.0674%
'
Excess ADIT Liability, Net ofADIT
10.0674%
-
NOL ADIT Regulatory Adjustment
10.0674%
NOL EDIT Liability Net Adjustment
$ (830,856)
$ (83,645)
Total Rate Base Adjustments
53.81%
MG-2.10
$ 2,572,673,972
-1.1467%
(29,499,831)
Capital Structure and ROE
9.80%
(29,499,831)
Total Cost of Capital Adjustments
(306,458)
Incentives- Restricted Stock Units
MG-2.2
(488,558)
Incentives - Annual Incentive Plan
MG-2.3
(37,089)
Non -Qualified Retirement Plans
MG-2.4
(216,667)
Injuries and Damages
MG-2.5
(251,073)
Bad Debt Expense
MG-2.1
(2,054,831)
Taxes Other Than IncomeTax
MG-2.1
(231,477)
Gross Margin Tax
MG-2.1
(15,047)
EDIT Amortization SEBP
MG-2.4
EDIT Amortization @ 12-31-17
-
EDIT Amortization NOL
(994)
EDIT Amortization Flow Through
MG-2.1
$ (3,602,194)
Total Revenue and Expense Adjustments
$ (33,185,671)
Toral Revenue Requirement Adjustments
$ 12,807,858
Rate lncease(Decrease)
6
Exhibit MG-2.10
ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION
COST OF CAPITAL
TESTYEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2017
Atmos Cost of Capital (Schedule Gl
Pre -Tax
Capital
Cost of Weighted
Tax
Weighted
Line
No.
Structure
Capital
Cost
9MLS-U-2
Cost
1
Debt
39.82%
5.20%
2.0686%
1
2.0686%
2
Equity
60. 88%
10.50%
6.3 9909/6
1.2658228
7.99889/-
3
100.00%
8.3876%
10.0674%
ATM Recommended Capital Structure
Pre -Tax
Capital
Cost of Weighted
Tax
Weighted
Structure
Capital
Cost
amas-ula
Cost
4
LT Debt
38.98%
5.45%
2.1244%
1
.1244%
2.1211
5
STDebt
7.21%
1.68%
0.1211%
1
%
6
Equity
53.81%
9.80%
5.2734%
1.2658228
6.6 5529/b
7
100.00%
7.5189 %
8.9 0070/-
-1.1467%
8
Difference
ATM Recommended ROE and Capital Structure
P re -Tax
Capital
Cost of
Weighted
Tax
Weighted
Structure
Capital
Cost
Gross-Um9MLS-Um
Cost
4
LT Debt
38.98%
5.45%
2.1244%
1
.1244 %
2.121%
5
ST Debt
7.21 %
1.68%
0.1211
1
6
Equity
53.81%
9.80%
5.2734%
1.2658228
6.6752%
7
100.00%
7.5189 %
8.9207
0.0000%
8
Difference
----
7
COST ALLOCATION
AND
RATE DESIGN SCHEDULES
ATMOS ENERGY CORP- MIDJU DIV ISION
COMPARISON OF BASE RATE CHARGES
Atmos Proposed (See Note 11
ATM Proposed (See Note 1)
Incr./(Derr.)
Incr./(Decr.)
Incr./(Derr.)
Incr./(Decr.)
Line
Rate
from Current-$
from Current
Rate
from Current-$
from Current-%
No.
Rate Description
Current Rate
le)
(f)
Igl
1 1
lal
Ib)
Icl
Idl
i
Rate R-Residential
$
1B.35 $
20.21
$ 1.86
10.14%
$
17.89 $
(0.46)
-2.52%
2
Customer Charge(per Bill)
0.13734
0.15701
0.01967
14.32%
0.16052
0.02318
16.88%
3
Consumption Charge (per Cct)
4
RateC -Commercial
$
41.95 $
41.85
$ (0.10)
-0.24-A
$
37.85 $
(4.10)
-9.78%
5
Customer Charge (per Bill)
0.07729
(0.01017)
-11.63%
0.10081
0.01335
15.26%
6
Consumption Charge(per[ctj
0.08746
7
Rates l and T- Industrial&Transportation
$ (1.93)
-0.26%
$
619.85 $
(132.15)
-17.57%
8
Meter Charge
$
752.00 $
750.07
0.2390
(0.0782)
.24.65%
0.3655
O.0483
15.21%
9
Consumption Charge-0 to 1,500 MMBtu
0.3172
0.1901
(0.0421)
48.13%
0.2908
0.0586
25.23%
10
Consumption Charge -Next 3,500 MMBtu
0.2322
0.00%
0.0761
0.0263
52.90%
11
Consumption Charge -All Additional MMBtu
0.0498
0.0498
-
Note 1: All proposed charges exclude gascosts, ridersand Atmos' proposed Rate Case Expense Surcharge
9
ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION
ATM RECOMMENDED RATE CASE EXPENSE SURCHARGE
- Incurred to Date
ATM Consulting
Garrett Group
$
43,050
GDS Associates, Inc.
33,753
J. Randell Woodridge
2,600
Total ATM Consulting
79,403
ATM Legal
Herrera Law & Associates, PLLC
36,654
Total ATM Legal
36,654
Total Rate Case Expenses to be Recovered
$
116,057
Recovery Period (Years)
5
Annual Recovery
$
23,211
Volumetric Billing
Ave rage Monthly Average Monthly
ATM Base
Rate Revenue
Req.
ATM RCEAIIocation
Determ ats(1)
RCESurcharge
Usage Bill Impact
Ra[e Class
$
497,923,762 $
18,825
63441015 $
0.00030
34.60 $ 0.01
Residential
103,088,213
3,897
35:426:746
0.00011
273.30 $ 0.03
Commercial
12,932,750
489
3,554,341
0.0001
4,114.00 $ 0.57
Industrial and Transportation
Total
$
613,944,726 $
23,211
(1) Residential and Commercial volumetric billing determionts amCcf, 1&Tdeterminants are MMBtu.
10
ATMOS ENERGY CORP -MID-TEX DIV ISION
COMPARISON OF REVENUE DISTRIBUTION TO CUSTOMERS
Atmos Proposed
ATM Proposed
Incr./(Decr.)
Incr./(Derr.)
Line
Incr./(Deer.)
Incr./(Derr.)
from Current-%
Revenue
from Current-$
RomC(h,ent-
No.
Rate Description
Current Revenue
Revenue
from Current-$
(d)
(el
Itl
l61
--
(a)
(6)
$ 447,851,269 $
(c)
497,926,227
$ 50,074,958
11.18%
$ 458,255,829
$ 10,404,560
1,149,303
2.32%
1.06%
1
Rate R-Residential
108,705,970
103,089,082
(5,616,888)
-5.17%
109,855,273
14,703,776
460,559
3.2396
2
3
Rate C-Commercial
Rates l and T- Industrial&Transportation
14,243,218
12,932,618
(1,310,600)
-9.20;5
$ 582,814,879
$ 12,014,422
2.10%
4
Total
$ 570,800,457 $
613,947,927
$ 43,147,470
7.56%
ATMOS ENERGY CORP -MID-TD( DIVISION
COMPARISON OF MONTHLY BASE RATE BILL IMPACTS
Atmoz Proposed lSee Note 1)
ATM Proposed (See Note 1)
Base Rate
Incr./(Deer.)
Incr./(Oecr.)
Base Rate
Incr./(Derr.)
Incr./(Deer.)
Line
Current Base
Bill Total
from Current -$
from Current -%
Bill Total
from Current -$
from Current-%
No.
Rate Description &Usage Level
Rate Bill Total
le)
)f)
(a)
I I
lal
(6)
Ic)
)4)
1
Rate R- Residential
$
20.21
$ 1.86
10.14%
$ 17.89
$ (0,46)
-2.52%
2
0Ccf
$ 18.35
23.35
2.25
10.68%
21.10
0.00
0.01%
3
20 Ccf
21.10
28.06
2.84
11.28%
25.91
0.70
2.76%
4
50 Ccf
25.22
31.20
3.24
11.59%
29.12
1.16
4.15%
5
70 Ccf
27.96
35.91
3.83
11.93%
33.94
1.86
5.78%
6
100 Ccf
32.08
39.05
4.22
12.12%
37.15
2.32
6.66%
7
120 Ccf
34.83
45.33
5.01
12.42%
43.57
3.25
8.05%
8
160 Ccf
40.32
48.47
5.40
12.54%
46.78
3.71
8.61%
9
180 Ccf
43.07
51.61
5.79
12.65%
49.99
4.17
9.11%
30
200 Ccf
45.82
11
Rate C-Commercial
$ 41.95 $
41.85
$ (0.10)
0.24%
$ 37.85
$ (4.10)
-7.41
12
0Ccf
46.32
45.71
(0.61)
-1.31%
42.89
(3.43)
-.%
13
50 Ccf
50.70
49.58
(1.12)
-2.20%
47.93
(2.77)
-5.46%
14
100 Ccf
59.44
57.31
(2.13)
-3.59%
58.01
(1.43)
-2.41%
15
00 Ccf
65.04
(3.15)
-4.62%
68.09
(0.10)
-0,14%
16
300 Ccf
68.19
72.77
(4.17)
-5.42%
78.17
1.24
1.61%
17
400 Ccf
76.93
80.50
(5.19)
-6.05%
88.25
2.57
3.00%
18
500 Ccf
85.68
129.41
119.14
(10.27)
-7.94%
138,65
9.24
7.14%
19
1,000 Ccf
173.14
157.79
(15.36)
-8.87-A
189.06
%
20
1,500 Ccf
216.87
196.43
(20.44)
-9.43%
23%46
22.59
22.59
10.42%
0.4
21
2,000 Ccf
260.60
235.08
(25.53)
-9.79%
289.86
29.26
11.23%
22
2,500 Ccf
Note 1: All Proposed charges eaci.de gas costs,
riders and Atmo.s proposed Rate Case Expense Surcharge
12
ATMOS ENERGY CORP -MID-TEX DIVISION
REVENUE REQUIREMENT ALLOCATION TO CUSTOMER CLASSES -AT CLASS COST OF SERVICE
Line
No.
Revenue Require mentComponent
Total
Residential
Commercial
I&T
1
Operating and Mai nten an ce Expenses
$ 187,342,844 $
148,585,126 $
33,873,802 $
4,883,916
3,575,042
2
Depreciation Expense
144,321,772
113,626,539
34,337,668
27,120,191
8,259,964
1,114,360
3
Taxes Other than Income
43,711,991
117,764
83,481
34,283
4
Interest on Customer Deposits
193,437,246
151,754,188
36,747,735
4,935,323
5
Return on Investment
40,517,490
31,786,530
7,697,204
1,033,756
6
IncomeTaxes
$ 609,449,107 $
480,173,532 $
113,733,178 $
15,542,396
7
Total Cost of Service
8
Revenue Credits
14,543,619
11,458,645
(9,481,039)
2,714,077
(2,302,608)
370,897
(306,962)
9
Amortization ofADFIT
(12,090,609)
10
Total Revenue Requirement
$ 582,814,879 $
459,233,848 $
108,716,493 $
14,864,538
13
ATM OS ENERGY CORP -MID-TEX DIVISION
RATE BASE ALLOCATION TO CUSTOMER CLASSES
Line
No.
Revenue Requirement Component
Total
Residential
Commercial
I&T
-
(a)
(b)
w
(d)
(e)
1
Gross Plant
$ 4,532,029,129
$ 3,559,151,661
$ 858,973,880 $
113,903,588
2
Accumulated Depreciation
1,323,023,298
1,042,759,772
247,831,547
32,431,979
3
Net Plant
3,209,005,831
2,516,391,889
611,142,333
81,471,609
4
Cash Working Capital
(26,580,445)
(21,081,449)
(4,806,059)
(692,936)
5
Materials and Supplies
1,053,524
835,570
190,490
27,465
6
Prepayments
17,841,836
14,150,695
3,226,015
465,126
7
Pension Expense Regulatory Asset
941,167
746,457
170,174
24,536
8
Customer Deposits
(12,941,103)
(9,173,792)
(3,767,311)
-
9
Injuries and Damages Reserve
(2,002,505)
(1,588,225)
(362,077)
(52,204)
10
ADFIT&Regulatory Liabilities
(603,948,499)
(473,595,620)
(115,019,577)
(15,333,302)
11
Rate Base Adjustments
(10,695,834)
(8,387,305)
(2,036,979)
(271,550)
12
Total Rate Base
$ 2,572,673,971
$ 2,018,298,220
$ 488,737,009 $
65,638,742
14
AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET
ITEM NO. 9
DENIAL OF ATMOS ENERGY'S PROPOSED INCREASE IN RATES
AND APPROVAL OF AN ALTERNATIVE INCREASE IN RATES
BACKGROUND
On or about June 1, 2018, Atmos Energy Corporation ("Atmos" or "Company") filed a
Statement of Intent with members of the coalition of cities known as the Atmos Texas
Municipalities ("ATM) comprised of about 50 cities, of which the City is a member, to
increase rates by approximately $4.5 million, which equates to an increase of about 8% in
annual non -gas -cost revenue in the ATM cities. On a system -wide basis, Atmos's
proposed increase would be the equivalent of about $46.0 million; this equates to an
increase in annual revenue of about 7.3%.
The City, as part of the ATM coalition of cities, engaged the law firm of Herrera Law &
Associates as Special Counsel to review Atmos' application. On behalf of ATM, Herrera
Law & Associates engaged rate experts to assist in reviewing Atmos' application.
Special Counsel and the consulting firms of the Garrett Group, LLC; GDS and
Associates, Inc.; and J. Randall Woolridge, Ph.D., recommend that the City deny Atmos'
request to increase rates by $46 million (system wide), and instead approve the rates
shown in "Exhibit A" to this Agenda Information Sheet and a corresponding increase of
about $12.81 million, the details of which are presented in the schedules attached as
"Exhibit B" to this Agenda Information Sheet.
Atmos proposed an effective date of July 6, 2018 for its change in rates. In prior action
the City suspended Atmos's proposed effective date for the statutory time period of 90
days, to October 4, 2018.
The City must take final action on Atmos' proposed rates and must do so by no
later than October 4, 2018.
CITY JURISDICTION TO SET ATMOS'S RATES
Unless a city ceded its original jurisdiction to the Railroad Commission of Texas, the Gas
Utility Regulatory Act § 103.001 grants a city exclusive original jurisdiction over a gas
utility's rates, services, and operations within the city limits. But even if a city has ceded
its jurisdiction, to the Railroad Commission, the Gas Utility Regulatory Act § 103.023,
grants a city the statutory right to participate in rate proceedings before the Railroad
Commission.
1 of 5
Atmos MidTex 2018 Statement of Intent
Final Action
ATMOS TEXAS MUNICIPALITIES
The Atmos Texas Municipalities ("ATM") was organized by a number of municipalities,
served by Atmos. Alfred R. Herrera with the law firm of Herrera Law & Associates,
PLLC, has previously represented the City as part of ATM in rate cases involving Atmos.
The ATM cities are:
Austin
Fredericksburg
Jacksboro
Ranger
Balch Springs
Gatesville
Kerens
Rice
Bandera
Glen Rose
Lampasas
Riesel
Bartlett
Goldthwaite
Lancaster
Rockdale
Belton
Granbury
Leander
Rogers
Blooming Grove
Greenville
Lometa
Round Rock
Burnet
Groesbeck
Longview
San Angelo
Cameron
Hamilton
Marble Falls
Sanger
Cedar Park
Heath
Mart
Somerville
Clifton
Henrietta
Mexia
Star Harbor
Commerce
Hickory Creek
Olney
Trinidad
Copperas Cove
Hico
Point
Whitney
Corsicana
Hillsboro
Pflugerville
Electra
Hutto
Princeton
OVERVIEW OF ATM'S SPECIAL COUNSEL RECOMMENDATION
ATM's Special Counsel and rate experts, the Garrett Group, LLC and GDS Associates,
Inc., and Dr. Woolridge (collectively referred to as "Special Counsel"), recommend that
the ATM cities approve an increase in Atmos Energy's annual revenue of about $12.81
million (on a system -wide basis), which equates to an increase of about $1.3 million for
the ATM cities and represents an increase of about 2% in annual revenue.
Additionally, Special Counsel recommends that the ATM cities approve a surcharge to
recover the ATM cities' rate case expenses incurred through August 31, 2018, which
total about $116,000.00, as allowed under the Gas Utility Regulatory Act § 103.022. The
tables below show the details of Special Counsel's recommendations, including a
comparison of Special Counsel's recommendations to Atmos Energy's proposed changes
in revenue and rates.
Special Counsel further recommends that the rates approved by the City have an effective
date Oct. 4, 2018, for service rendered on and after that date; that the City direct Atmos to
file tariffs conformed to the rates shown in Attachment A; that in addition to rate case
2of5
Atmos MidTex 2018 Statement of Intent
Final Action
expenses incurred through August 31, 2018, the City direct Atmos to reimburse the
City's rate case expenses, as part of ATM, incurred after August 31, 2018.
COMPARISON OF CHANGE IN BILLS:
Class of Customer
ATMOS: Change in
Average Bill (excluding
cost of as
ATM: Change in Average
Bill (excluding cost of gas)
Residential — Rate R
11.15% increase
1.47% increase
Commercial — Rate C
4.22% decrease
0.69% decrease
Industrial — Rate I
12.39% decrease
5.09% increase
Transportation — Rate T
12.39% decrease
5.09% increase
Class of Customer
ATMOS: Change in
Average Bill (including
cost of as
ATM: Change in Average
Bill (including cost of gas)
Residential — Rate R
4.82% increase
0.76% increase
Commercial — Rate C
1.35% decrease
0.22% decrease
Industrial — Rate I
2.14% decrease
2.32% increase
Transportation — Rate T
2.33% decrease
2.32% increase
COMPARISON OF ATMOS' PROPOSED F RULIN I AUE UHAiv UE llr
REVENUE TO ATM'S PROPOSED CHANGE IN REVENUE:
Class of Customer
ATMOS: Change in
Revenue (excluding cost of
as)
ATM: Change in
Revenue (excluding cost of
eas
Residential — Rate R
11.18% increase
2.32% increase
Commercial — Rate C
0.14% decrease
1.06% increase
Industrial — Rate I
9.20% decrease
3.23% increase
Transportation —_Rate T
9.20% decrease
3.23% increase
COMPARISON OF ATMOS' PROPOSED RATES TO ATM'S PROPOSED
nAr11VQ
ATMOS:
ATM:
$$ and %
Proposed
$$ and %
Proposed
Change
Customer Class/Rate
Current
Rate
Change
Rate
Rate R - Residential
$1.86 /=
$17.89
<$0.46> /
Customer Charge per month
$18.35
$20.21
10%
<2.52%>
$0.01967 /
$0.16052
$0.02318 /
onsumption Charge (per CCF)
$ 0.13734
$0.15701
14.32%
,%
16.88%
3 of 5
Atinos MidTex 2018 Statement of Intent
Final Action
C - Commercial
<$.10> / $37.85 <$4.10> /
Customer Charge per month $41.95 $41.85 <0.24% <9.78%>
<$0.01017> /77,71$0.10081 $0.01335 /
Consumption Charge (per CCF) $0.08746 $0.07729 <11.63%> 15.26%
Rate I & T - Indus. & Transp.
<$1.93> /
$619.85
<$132.15> /
Customer Charge per month
$752.00
$752.00
<0.26%>
<17.57%>
Consumption Chr First 1,500
p g -
<$0.7820> /
<24.65%>
$0.3655
$0.0483 /
15.21%
MMBTU
$0.3172
$0.2390�
Consumption Chr Next 3,500
p g -
<$0.0421> /
<18.13%>
$0.2908
$0.0586 /
25.23%
MMBTU
$0.2322
$0.1901.
Consumption Chr Over 5 000
p g
No change
$0.0761
$0.0263 /
52.90%
MMBTU
$0.0498
$0.0498
Atmos requested recovery of its rate case expenses. However, it did not provide the
requisite information to support its request; thus the proposed resolution/ordinance does
not address Atmos Energy's rate case expenses. As noted above, cities have a statutory
right to recover their reasonable rate case expenses under Gas Utility Regulatory Act §
103.022. Below are shown the monthly surcharges to recover the ATM cities' rate -case
expenses for an average customer:
Residential: $0.01 per month (based on a surcharge of $0.00030/ccf)
Commercial: $0.03 per month (based on a surcharge of $0.00011/ccf)
Industrial & Transportation: $0.57 per month (based on a surcharge of $0.0001/MMbtu)
Special Counsel has submitted its and the consultants' invoices to the the City of
Longview for review. The City of Longview's City Attorney's Office has served in this
review/coordinating role for over 10 years. Following that review, the invoices are
forwarded to Atmos Energy for reimbursement and provided to all ATM cities for their
review.
Finally, Special Counsel recommends that the City approve the following elements to
determine Atmos Energy's cost of capital and to determine Atmos Energy's rates.
Cost of Ca ital
Atmos
Regnested
ATM City
Approved
Return on Equity
10.50%
9.80%
Cost of Long -Term Debt
5.45%
5.45%
Cost of Short -Term Debt
1.68%
1.68%
4of5
Atmos MidTex 2018 Statement of Intent
Final Action
Capital Structure Ratios
Atmos
Requested
ATM City
Approved
Equity
60.18%
53.81%
Long -Term Debt
39.82%
7.21`%
Short -Term Debt
0.0%
38.98%
Weighted Average Cost of Ca ital aka, Rate of Return
Atmos
Requested
ATM City
Approved
Weighted Cost
8.3876%
7.51890/)
Pre -Tax Weighted Cost
10.0674%
8.9207%
ACTION REQUIRED BY October 4, 2018
The City must take action on Atmos's Statement of Intent no later than October 4,
2018. Absent such action, Atmos's rates are deemed approved by operation of law.
RECOMMENDATION
ATM's Special Counsel and ATM's rate experts recommend that the City adopt the
attached resolution or ordinance, as the case may be, which if approved will deny Atmos
Energy's proposed increase about $46 million and approve a lesser increase of about
$12.81 million; that the City approve the rates that correspond to such an increase,
including approval of recovery of the ATM's rate case expenses.
The City must take action no later than October 4, 2018. If the City does not take
action by October 4, 2018, Atmos's proposed rates will be deemed approved by
operation of law, subject to the City's right to hold a hearing to address Atmos's
rate application.
5 of 5
Atmos MidTex 2018 Statement of Intent
Final Action
EXHIBIT A
EXHIBIT A
Atmos
Proposed Increase in Annual Revenue
(System Wide - MidTex Division)
ATM City
Approved Increase
(System Wide -
$12,807,858
ATMOS:
MidTex
in Annual Revenue
Division)
ATM CITY
$45,993,529
PROPOSED
APPROVED
tomer Class/Rate
[Rate
CURRENT
RATE
RATE
R - Residential
Customer Charge per month
$18.35
$20.21
$17.89
Consumption Charge (per CCF)
$ 0.13734
$0.15701
$0.16052
Rate C - Commercial
Customer Charge per month
$41.95
$41.85
$37.85
Consumption Charge (per CCF)
$0.08746
$0.07729
$0.10081
Rate I & T - Indus. & Transp.
Customer Charge per month
$752.00
$752.00
$619.85
Consumption Chrg - First 1,500 MMBTU
$0.3172
$0.2390
$0.3655
Consumption Chrg - Next 3,500 MMBTU
$0.2322
$0.1901
$0.2908
Consumption Chrg - Over 5,000 MMBTU
$0.0498
$0.0498
$0.0761
Return on Equity
Cost of Long -Term
Debt
Cost of Short -
Term Debt
Cost of Capital and
Atmos Requested
10.50%
tquiry
Long -Term Debt
Short -Term Debt
Weighted Cost
Pre -Tax Weighted
Cost
5.45 %
1.68%
Capital Structure
ATM City Approved
9.80%
5.45 %
1.68%
Capital Structure Ratios
Atmos Requested ATM City Approved
60.18% 53.81%
0
39.82% 7.21 0
0.0% 38.98%
Cost of Capital (a
Atmos Requested
8.3876%
10.0674%
ka, Rate of Return)
ATM City Approved
7.5189%
8.9207%
Atmos MidTex 2018 Statement of Intent - June 1, 2018 - Approved Change in Revenue, Rates, Cost of
Capital and Capital Structure
2
EXHIBIT B
REVENUE REQUIREMENT
SCHEDULES
Line No. Description
i
2
4
6
7
8
10
11
12
13
14
14a
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
25
26
27
28
29
30
ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MIDJEX DIVISION
ATM COALITION REVENUE R—IREMENTSUMMARY
TESTYEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2017
At mosProposed (Note a)
Ref. Rate Base %BOB Operating income
(a) (b) (c) (dl
Test Year Revenue Requirement:
Revenue at Present Rates
GCR
Operation and Maintenance Expenses
Taxes Other than lncomeTax-Non-Revenue Related
Revenue Related Taxes
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
Interest on Customer Deposits
Rate Base
Atmos Rateof Return
ATM Rate of Return
Return Requirement
Income and Other Taxes
Revenue Requirements
Base Revenue Deficiency(excluding revenue taxes)
Amortization of Excess ADIT-with Revenue Taxes
Proposed Cost ofSe ice -Systemwide Adjusted for ExcessADIT
ATM Adjustments ATM Proposed
(See Schedule B) Operating income
le) (0
ScheduleA
$
1,494,918,603 $
-
S
1,494.918,603 -
1,494,918,603
$
816,965,570
$
816,965,570
- 816,965,570
Schedule F-1
$
188,642,669 $
(1,299,845)
5
187,342,844
- 187,342,844
Schedule FS
43,711,991
$
43,711,991
- 43,711,991
96,255,692
(2,054,831)
$
94,700,861
- 94,200,861
Schedule F-3
144,321,772
$
144,321,772
- 144,371,772
Schedule F-7
117,764
$
117,764
- 117,764
Schedules
$ 2,573,504,828
(830,856)
2,572,673,972
- 2,572,673,972
ScheduleG
8.38896
$
215,855,775 $
(22,418,528)
S
193,437,246
- 193,437.246
Schedule F-6
47,913,915
(7,396,426)
40,517.489
- 40,517,489
L. 3... L. 20
$
1,553,785,168 $
(33,169,630j
S
1,520,615,538
- 1,520,615,537
L.22-L.2
$
58,866,565 $
(33,169,630)
S
25,696.934 $
$ 25,696,934
12,873,035
16,041
12,889,076
- 12,889,076
$
45,993,529
(33,185,671)
S
12,807,858 $
- $ 12,807,858
5
Exhibit MG-2 Summary
ATMOS ENERGYCORP., MID-TEX DIVISION
ATM RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY
TESTYEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2017
Line
Equity/
Pre -Tax
Rate
No, Description
ROE
Reference
Rate Base
ROR
Change
Requested Amounts
$
2,573,504,828
10.0674%
$ 45,993,529
Pension and OPEB Regulatory Asset
MG-2.4
$
(20,861)
10.0674%
(2,100)
Cash Working Capital
MG-2.1
$
(66,472)
10.0674%
(6,692)
Adjustment to ADIT-SEBP Adjustment
MG-2.4
(464,794)
10.0674%
(46,792)
SEBP EDIT Liability Net Adjustment
MG-2.4
(278,730)
10.0674%
(28,061)
Excess ADIT Liability, Net ofADIT
10.0674%
NOL ADIT Regulatory Adjustment
10.0674%
NOL EDIT Liability Net Adjustment
10.0674%
-
Total Rate Base Adjustments
$
(830,856)
$ (83,645)
Capital Structure and ROE
53.81%
MG-2.10
$
2,572,673,972
-1.1467%
(29,499,831)
9.80%
(29,499,831)
Total Cost of Capital Adjustments
Incentives- Restricted Stock Units
MG-2.2
(306,458)
Incentives -Annual Incentive Plan
MG-2.3
(488,558)
Non -Qualified Retirement Plans
MG-2.4
(37,089)
Injuries and Damages
MG-2.5
(216,667)
(251,073)
Bad Debt Expense
MG-2.1
(2,054,831)
Taxes Other Than Income Tax
MG-2.1
(231,477)
Gross Margin Tax
MG-2.1
(15,047)
EDITAmortization SEBP
MG-2.4
EDIT Amortization @ 12-31-17
EDIT Amortization NOL
(994)
EDIT Amorti zati on Flow Through
MG-2.1
$ (3,602,194)
Total Revenue and Expense Adjustments
$ (33,185,671)
Toral Revenue Requirement Adjustments
$ 12,807,858
Rate lncease(Decrease)
6
Exhibit MG-2.10
ATMOS ENERGYCORP., MID-TEX DIVISION
COST OF CAP ITAL
TESTYEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2017
Atmos Cost of Capital (Schedule G)
Pre -Tax
Line
Capital
Cost of
Weighted
Tax
Weighted
No.
Structure
Capital
Cost
Gross Up
Cost
1
Debt
39.82%
5.20%
2.0686%
1
2.0686%
2
Equity
60.18%
10.50%
6.3190%
1.2658228
7.99889/o
3
100.00 /
8.3876%
10.0674%
ATM Recommended Capital Structure
P re -Tax
Capital
Cost of
Weighted
Tax
Weighted
Structure
Capital
Cost
Gross Up
Cost
4
LT Debt
38.98%
5.45%
2.1244%
1
2.1244%
5
ST Debt
7.21 %
1.68%
0.1211 %
1
0.1211 %
6
Equity
53.81%
9.80%
5.2734%
1.2658228
6.6752%
7
100.00%
7.5189%
8,9207%
8
Difference
-1.1467%
ATM Recommended ROE and Capital Structure
Pre -Tax
Capital
Cost of
Weighted
Tax
Weighted
Structure
Capital
Cost
Gross Up
Cost
4
LT Debt
38.98%
5.45%
2.1244%
1
2.1244%
5
ST Debt
7.21 %
1.68%
0.1211 %
1
0.1211 %
6
Equity
53.81%
9.80 /
5.2734%
1.2658228
6.6752%
7
100.00%
7.5189%
8.9207%
8
Difference
0.0000510,
COST ALLOCATION
AND
RATE DESIGN SCHEDULES
ATMOS ENERGY CORP-MID-TEX DIVISION
COMPARISON OF BASE RATE CHARGES
Atmos Proposed (See Note 1)
ATM Proposed (See Note 1)
Incr./(Derr.)
Incr./(Deer.)
Incr.ADecr.)
Incr./(Derr.)
Line
Current Rate
Rate
from Current -$
from Current-%
Rate
from Current -$
from Current -%
No.
Rate Description
(d)
(el
If)
Iel
Ibl
(a)
Ibl
Irl
1
Rate R-Residential
$
18.35
$ 20.21
$ 1.86
10.14%
$
17.89
$ 10,461
-2.52%
2
Customer Charge(per Bill)
0.13734
0.15701
0.01967
14.32%
0-16052
0.02319
16.88%
3
Consumption Charge (per Cct)
4
Rate C-Commercial
$
41.95
$ 41.85
$ (0.10)
-0.24°6
$
37.85
$ (4,10)
-9.78%
5
Customer Charge(per Bill)
0.08746
0.07729
(0.01017)
-11.63%
0.10081
0,01335
15.26%
6
Consumption Charge (per Ccf)
7
Rates l and T-Industrial&Transportation
$ 750.07
$ (1.93)
.0.26%
$
619.85
$ (132,15)
-17.57%
8
Meter Charge
$
752.00
0.3172
0.2390
(0.0782)
-24.65%
0.3655
0.0483
15.21%
9
Consumption Charge-0 to 1,500 MMBtu
0.1901
(0.0421)
-19.13%
0.2908
0.0586
25.23%
10
Consumption Charge -Next 3,500 MM0tu
0.2322
0.00%
0.0761
0.0263
52.90%
11
Consumption Charge -Ali Additional MMBtu
0.0498
0.0498
-
Note 1:AII proposed chargesexclude gascosts, ridersand Atmoe proposed Rate Case Expense Surcharge
9
ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION
ATM RECOMMENDED RATE CASE EXPENSESURCHARGE
Costs Incurred to Date
ATM Consulting
Garrett Group
$ 43,050
GD5 Associates, Inc.
33,753
1, Randell Woodridge
2,600
Total ATM Consulting
79,403
ATM Legal
Herrera Law & Associates, PLLC
36,654
Total ATM Legal
36,654
Total Rate Case Expenses to be Recovered
$ 116,057
Recovery Period (years)
5
Annual Recovery
$ 23,211
ATM Base Rate Revenue
Volumetric Billing
Average Monthly Average Monthly
Rate Class
Req.
ATM RCE Allocation
Determinants(1)
RCESurcharge
Usage Bill Impact
$ 497,923,762 $
18,825
63,441,015 $
0.00030
34.60 $ 0.01
Residential
103,088,213
3,897
35,426,746
0.00011
273.30 $ 0.03
Commercial
Industrial and Transportation
12,932,750
489
3,554,341
Om001
4,114.00 $ 0.57
Total
$ 613,944,726 $
23,211
(1)Residential and Commercial volumetric billing determiantsare Ccf, 1&Tdeterminants are MMBtu.
10
ATMOS ENERGY CORP -MID-TEX DIVISION
COMPARISON OF REVENUE DISTRIBUTION TO CUSTOMERS
Atmos Proposed
ATM Proposed
Incr./(Decr.)
In<r./(Oecr.)
incr./(Decr.)
Inc,./(Dec,.)
Line
Current Revenue
Revenue
from Current-$
from Current-96
Revenue
from Current-$
from Current-%
No.
Rate Description
(cl
(d)
(a)
(f)
(s)
(h)
1
(a)
Rate R-Residential
(6)
$ 447,851,269 $
497,926,227
$ 50,074,958
11,18%
$ 458,255,829
$ 10,404,560
2.32%
2
Rate C-Commercial
108,705,970
103,089,082
(5,616,888)
-5.17%
109,855,273
1,149,303
1.06%
3
Rates l and T- Industrial 8, Transportation
14,243,218
12,932,618
11,310,600)
-9.20%
14,703,776
460,559
3.23%
4
Total
$ 570,800,457 $
613,947,927
$ 43,147,470
7.56%
$ 582,814,879
$ 12,014,422
2.10%
ATMOS ENERGY CORP -MID-TEX DIVISION
COMPARISON OF MONTHLY BASE RATE BILL IMPACTS
Atmos Proposed (See Note 1)
ATM Proposed (See Note 11
Current Base
Base Rate
Incr-ADxr.)
Incr./(Deco)
Base Rate
Incr./(D-)
Incr./(Decr.)
Line
No.
Rate Description & Usage Level
Rate Bill Total
Bill Total
from Current-$
from Current-%
Bill Total
from Current -$
from Current-%
-
Ial
Ibl
Icl
(d)
le)
(f)
lal
Ihl
1
Rate R-Residential
$ 18.35 $
20.21 $
1.86
10.14%
$ 17.89 $
(0.46)
-2.52%
2
0Ccf
21.10
23.35
2.25
10.68%
21.10
0.00
0.01%
3
20 Ccf
25.22
28.06
2.84
11.29%
25.91
0.70
2.76%
4
50 Ccf
27.96
31.20
3.24
11,58%
29.12
1.16
4.15%
5
70 Ccf
32.08
35.91
3.83
11.93%
33.94
1.86
5,78%
6
100 Ccf
34.83
39.05
4.22
12.12%
37.15
2.32
6.66%
7
120 Ccf
40.32
45.33
5.01
12.42%
43.57
3.25
8.05%
8
160 Ccf
43.07
48.47
5.40
12.54%
46.78
3.71
8.61%
9
180 Ccf
45.82
51.61
5.79
12.65%
49.99
4.17
9.11%
10
200 Ccf
11
Rate C-Commercial
$ 41.95 $
41.85 $
(0.10)
-0.24%
$ $
(3,43)
-7.41%
12
0Ccf
46.32
45.71
(0.61)
-1.31%
42.89
47.93
(3.43)
-7.41%
13
50 Ccf
50.70
49.58
(1.12)
-2.20%
47.93
(2.77)
-5.46°6
14
100 Ccf
59.44
57.31
(2.13)
-3.59%
58.01
(1.43)
-2.411A
i5
200 Ccf
68.19
65.04
(3.15)
-4.62%
68.09
(0.10)
.0.14%
16
300Ccf
76.93
72.77
(4.17)
-5.42%
78.17
1.24
1.61%
17
400 Ccf
85.68
80.50
(5.19)
-6.05%
8&25
2.57
3.00%
18
500 Ccf
129.41
119.14
(10.27)
-7.94%
138.65
9.24
7.14%
19
1,000 Ccf
173.14
157.79
(15.36)
-8.87%
189.06
15.92
9.19%
20
1,500 Ccf
216.87
196.43
(20.44)
-9.43%
239.46
22,59
10.42%
21
2,000 Ccf
235.08
(25.53)
-9.79%
289.86
29.26
11.23%
22
2,500 Ccf
260.60
Note 1: All proposed charges exclude gas costs, riders and Atmos' proposed Rate Case Expense Surcharge
12
ATMOS ENERGY CORP -MID-TEX DIVISION
REVENUE REQUIREMENTALLOCATION TO CUSTOMER CLASSES -AT CLASS COSTOF SERVICE
Line
No.
Revenue Requirement Component
Total
Residential
Commercial
I&T
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
1
Operating and Maintenance Expenses
$ 187,342,844 $
148,585,126
$ 33,873,802 $
4,883,916
2
Depreciation Expense
144,321,772
113,626,539
27,120,191
3,575,042
3
Taxes Other than Income
43,711,991
34,337,668
8,259,964
1,114,360
4
Interest on Customer Deposits
117,764
193,437,246
83,481
151,754,188
34,283
36,747,735
-
4,935,323
5
Return on Investment
40,517,490
31,786,530
7,697,204
1,033,756
6
7
IncomeTaxes
Total Costof5ervice
$ 609,449,107 $
480,173,532
$ 113,733,178 $
15,542,396
8
Revenue Credits
14,543,619
11,458,645
2,714,077
370,897
9
Amortization ofADFIT
(12,090,609)
(9,481,039)
(2,302,608)
(306,962)
10
Total Revenue Requirement
$ 582,814,879 $
459,233,848
$ 108,716,493 $
14,864,538
13
ATMOS ENERGY CORP -MID-TEX DIVISION
RATE BASE ALLOCATION TO CUSTOM ER CLASSES
Line
No.
Revenue Requirement Component
Total
(a)
(b)
1
Gross Plant
$ 4,532,029,129
2
Accumulated Depreciation
1,323,023,298
3
Net Plant
3,209,005,831
4
Cash Working Capital
(26,580,445)
5
Materialsand Supplies
1,053,524
6
Prepayments
17,841,836
7
Pension Expense Regulatory Asset
941,167
8
Customer Deposits
(12,941,103)
9
Injuries and Damages Reserve
(2,002,505)
10
ADFIT& Regulatory Liabilities
(603,948,499)
11
Rate Base Adjustments
(10,695,834)
12 Total Rate Base $ 2,572,673,971
Residential
Commercial
I&T
(c)
(d)
le)
$ 3,559,151,661
$ 858,973,880 $
113,903,588
1,042,759,772
247,831,547
32,431,979
2,516,391,889
611,142,333
81,471,609
(21,081,449)
(4,806,059)
(692,936)
835,570
190,490
27,465
14,150,695
3,226,015
465,126
746,457
170,174
24,536
(9,173,792)
(3,767,311)
-
(1,588,225)
(362,077)
(52,204)
(473,595,620)
(115,019,577)
(15,333,302)
(8,387,305)
(2,036,979)
(271,550)
$ 2,018,298,220
$ 488,737,009 $
65,638,742
14
AN,
�-rma'
-{
l rn OmO Ommz D
-➢ vi cin
*
-I �
O
mm
* A_rn mmn
rrrnz
D
**i
S x D Z n 0
***
o 0
rrrnT
-➢
m
➢➢n m I -i
Zmc
ZO
D
O Onv v z
-
O O O
mm
O
OO
it
N
*
-i
-4m m O 5 5 n n
G) 0 O 7C 7c 7� n O
7
ommm
Omn�*
CL
o
p
m
wv➢
D�>v --AA G)
O
p
D
z0 n 0
o
*^m Op
O
O➢O
-I
D
O O
* O n C C
�0
-A G) G) G)
0
fD
*
n O O
n
=
*
p Z
fl.
s 0
f
m
o
OOq
N O 3
NJ
A
N
W H N i--` Ql A F--� A
N N
O
� �''., O
�n
O
3 S
v V
CD
o
N
A
N N Ol Ol A A
V W A
z
Ol W N O
�p
N
G
Fa
cn
� F� F' H N V U7 N
V -AW
pp
�
C)
w
A
W F' N
In N W
V N V1 L, z
NJ
lD
F, l--� N Ol N W
Ol 1� Up
99
W N V-� A m
W
N
W N N N Ili W
N NJ
A N NJl0 D
Ul
7J
a)
m
Q\
O N F, O1 N 'O
m
77
D
u,
W
m N A
o o
W u, oo rn
W
OWO
V A N F'
!-� F' O
W Ojl V W z
O
W
uj
C
O r
Uri
li
W W
A A
W p Lrl C
(7)
Ili N
Ul
A
O
O
O A -0
Chris Felan
Vice President
Rates & ReQuIatory Affairs
August 28, 2018
City Official
Re: Rider GCR - Rate Filing under Docket No. 10170
Enclosed is Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division's Statement of Rider GCR applicable
for the September 2018 billing periods. This Statement details the gas cost component
of the residential, commercial, and industrial sales rates for customers within your city.
This filing is for informative purposes only and no action is required on your city's part.
Should you have any questions, please let me know.
Sincerely,
(11) -
uw_ a
Attachment
Atmos Energy Corporation
5420 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1800
Dallas, TX 75240
P 214-206-2568 F 214-206-2126 Christopher.Felan@atmosenergy.com
Z
O O UO
00 Z C� co Z Z
_ Q
Z/3 Q N 0 Y
O > � L
U—o_ d0U
W O E Q
w17w-aZW
Zoe C),p
W� W N W J
i) I- C
O Q�
W Q
Q CD
a
U_
C
N O
N
N ro
LO U�l
m
LO
M
M
O
L' I--
m
CL
i- to
tfj (O
(O
w c
r
ro m
2.2
is iv
m
o 0 0 0
U
M LO 6a LO LO
0
E
�
co
E
OO O
M
O
U
�
N
(L 691
U
(U
N
O
U
ro d
L- N
:3 O
m �
0
U
a)
Q
mo
o ~'t
O
00
O
O O O
000
O
0
rn
co M
N
m`M�
o) M
(o
N
0
It
O O O
d'
N
S 6
M
-
LoMN
N
d'
N
O
OOO
O O O
N
O
C
O
M
o co O co
N N N
'00 OM
N 69�
m
d• U9. V' O (0
M ocN M
CD CD 00 I-T
N N co hN-
o V
U
U
o0 0
61:� O u) LO
co m c> cl
h ti co tl-
N
'Ea
U
U
N � co M ti
M Cl) (O o)
tM0 tM0 r co
r (f? N (O
(tr
o O O
O (o O
co (O
ho)
ON�N
O
O (O
(o co
00 d'
O O
G
t0 (O
O
�
�
co
co
co
V) C
O C
Q1
� U
N
`F+
O
O O
"D
a)
b
J
Vi
(n
C Q
C Q
+
(p
N
U
>
a. o
a
c
a
oo
�0
0WU
p
�U
C�
U
O
�Y�
cn m
,
N O
CU
W
(�
��
O L
O C
o L
0
�°
•
c
o
o
•O
U
o
c"a
pU-
mZ)>N
V�kO;N
o0
U
L'
o
�
��
�0`°�
o
�
o
M
�
row
or
-0 0
0(a
ro
U
�ro
>
0
C)�
LL Qo
N
o C
o
U
vo
ro
c
U
C)_oo
oro
ro
ca
_:m
UU U
U)
Co
Un
0'
40C n 0
ro n O
Cm
N
E
-0 N
N
N
E
"N
in I
0
E
0 7 EN
W
WN
O
o
a UE
E E
E m
E
Ea)N
N
UQ
C1
U) i) N
W W W
O iq O
J W f--
N
W
(5
W
N ro 'O
C� F- Q
N
U'
RS
CL�
X X N
tLL. tL cti A Z
O N
U cv O Z
O
I- w
ZI a
m m m m
:�E � :E �E
:2 2i 2
O "t L
d M t- d
Ncq fl3 6a �
Co ro
G� n,
U U U
U U U
do o do
CD
co It ti
N N It
O O O
V
E
U U U 2
oo co coo > 00
N d0' (O O
co N (O U
O Ci O O
"O
cn
N
Mn
rt"
0
0
`o
U
0
O
to
N
C
O
U
w
CD
Q
m
� N �
N � C
N C N
C_
J � �
O
m U o
c O
_I N
c
� a •o
U � m
n ro o
tL
`o Z voi
c
m
� U �
0
U ro
ro o 0
a°- ro a )
C9
w
c- N M V' LO Co h co o) t cN^
J
OI r �2 T N N N N N N
J '-
Alk jr
AWMMMOS
energy
Chris Felan
Vice President
Rates & Reaulatory Affairs
August 30, 2018
TO THE GOVERNING BODY OF ALL MUNICIPALITIES SERVED BY ATMOS
ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION
On August 30, 2018, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division (the "Company"), filed its
Annual Gas Cost Reconciliation Filing for the twelve month period ended June 30,
2018. This report has been prepared in accordance with the Order of the Railroad
Commission of Texas under Gas Utilities Docket No. 9400. This report reconciles the
Company's expenditures for gas with the billing of those costs to residential,
commercial, and industrial customers for the period noted above. This filing is for
informative purposes only and no action is required on your city's part.
Enclosed is a copy of the schedules filed with the Commission.
Should you have any questions, please contact me at 214-206-2568.
Sincerely,
(SW_-.3
Chris Felan
Vice President, Rates and Regulatory Affairs
Atmos Energy, Mid -Tex Division
Atmos Energy Corporation
5420 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1862
Dallas, TX 75240
P 214-206-2568 F 214-206-2126 Christopher.Felan@atmosenergy.com
ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION ,
ANNUAL GAS COST RECONCILIATION FILING
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2018
PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ORDER OF
THE RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS UNDER
GAS UTILITIES DOCKET NO. 9400
The attached Annual Gas Cost Reconciliation Filing for the period ended June
30, 2018, was prepared by me or under my direct supervision. I hereby certify
that the information contained therein is true and correct and that the Filing was
prepared in accordance with the order of the Railroad Commission of Texas in
Gas Utilities Docket No. 9400.
Chris Felan
Vice President
Rates & Regulatory Affairs
Filed: August 30, 2018
A
energy
Chris Felan
Vice President
Rates & Reoulatory Affairs
August 30, 2018
Ms. Kari French, Director
Railroad Commission of Texas
Gas Services Division
1701 North Congress Avenue
P. O. Box 12967
Austin, Texas 78711-2967
Re: Docket Compliance, GUD No. 9400, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division
Annual Gas Cost Reconciliation Filing
Dear Ms. French:
Attached is Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division's (the "Company") Gas Cost
Reconciliation filing for the twelve month period ended June 30, 2018. This report has
been prepared in accordance with the order of the Railroad Commission of Texas under
Gas Utilities Docket ("GUD") No. 9400.
In response to the Railroad Commission of Texas Audit No. 06-037, Auditor's
Recommendation, the Company has included an additional schedule (Schedule 10) in
the filing to reflect the percentage of Lost and Unaccounted for Gas for the reconciliation
period. The Company has not included the cost of odorant in gas cost as directed by
the Commission; however, the Company again reiterates that it does not agree with this
position. Finally, the gas cost portion of bad debts written off has been included in
accordance with the system -wide application of the Rider GCR (Gas Cost Recovery)
provisions.
The Company is requesting an exception to the Final Order issued in GUD 9400,
Finding of Fact 121, which directs the Reconciliation Factor to be determined for the
"succeeding October through June billing months." In this filing, the Company is
requesting the Reconciliation Factor be determined using the months of November
through March. The Company has included the standard calculation of the
Reconciliation Factor over the nine (9) month period designated in GUD 9400 of
($0.1024) and an alternative calculation of the Reconciliation Factor over a five (5)
month period of ($0.1309). The Company will refund the over collection over a five (5)
month period.
Atmos Energy Corporation
5420 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1862
Dallas, TX 75240
P 214-206-2568 F 214-206-2126 Christopher.Felan@atmosenergy.com
Atmos Energy
Page 2
Included in this filing is my certification, a Table of Contents that provides a listing and
description of each document, and all of the reconciliation schedules and workpapers
listed on the Table of Contents. Copies of this filing are being provided to all
incorporated municipalities served by Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division.
Should there be any questions related to this filing, please call me at 214-206-2568.
Sincerely,
Chris Felan
Vice President, Rates and Regulatory Affairs
Atmos Energy, Mid -Tex Division
Attachments:
cc:
Mr. Mark Evarts, Railroad Commission of Texas
Mr. Alexander Schoch, Railroad Commission of Texas
Mr. Edward D. Abrahamson, Railroad Commission of Texas
�J
Z C)
0 Z 00
J
LLL
> Z O
0 0 M
W UJ
Q Z
Z
J 5
� U �
,pw
WWz
0 UJ
�U)0
�Ow
wv)o-
uj03:
O Q w
�ZO
aQ
rn
C/)
n -(0
0 E U0
Z3 0 0
a46 L�z
z0 r L,:D m
Z L)
2 U) 0 U)
o 00 0 > 0
tC)
0 4- f))
LL LL C) r- -
> Z a) C .2 (1) rn
❑ — ry
o 0 a) 0 M
E r- 0
_0
0 Li-
LLI -0
X U) L)
w17 M a) a)
z F-
0
z ❑ 0 m E
b �o -0 (D a)
0
w W (1) (1) E >- 0
15; z 0� 0> "" L 0 >
-0 z D n
o C) (.)
C� 0 r 0 -Fu > 0
ry W Z C) .2 L, (-) -0 L, ::D M
w U) U) C/) a) _0 -6
U. 0 0 0 — m w 0 a�
0 E C) 0 C) E E <'
0
" E
CEwwmEa)z--E'c cn(D
0 U) 0 LLI
c) u) (D (D CD u) 5 uj u) -j CD -j
W
w U) a-
z < uj
LLI (D
U)
C)
o U)
� 1 0 0
f- Z U- CD 0
p (Y) -'t m (D r-- 00 m , U) a)
wwowwwwwow wl�
-:5 -:5 -5 -:5 n -5 CD -FD
O 0 _0 -a _0 _0 -a _0 _0 -a _0
E 0 w 0 0 w w 0 0 0 (D
_r_ _K-_ -r- J-7 _r_ _r_ 3-- -r- r-
0
a
i
.- �..- a
Lf) O M (YJ M — Cb c- CO M h
N N� CO CO M, h co CO LO N r h
O Lc) It O CO d' -I --I G N N a t`
C U �������� � 2 M
E
O
U
m r m, co co r r- C), m m m
4: Lo �t O ' Lo Lo r Lo 1- O m M N M
_ LO 00 M r` r Cfl LO C q �- O r Lc) 00
µ(0+ V M O N O oo Ln V d r MCD h
O } O CO CO Co N r Lc) O M d O O M
S� U h M CON r O Lf) N M C� CD CD ti
rt d d L n 6i CN N r r cr
I I
� r
LO O m r• O LO N r Lc) O M CO N
to N fSf O 00 Lc) r co M O O CO M h co w
CO LO N O m M V' M h
r r co CD N O CO O M M CD CO LO
co N N N co T CO N N N O N
a 'a M
N
as
E (O LO CO 'V' CO d r M CO N
a O LO N O) O d CY) Cfl r r I- LO
O LD Iq" t T N CO Cfl LO t'-CD LO O
V .--.. f CT CO U G (9 r- Cb Lf) C''� 00 C h
N v Q M 00 N I- M 00 LO r (O It CO C) LO
a c�C Lf) CO LO r 1- C9 C7 O Lc) Cfl -t CO M
CC NNNC, '"gCDCOCO MNui
I(l tin
00 Q- N LO T CO CO �t LO rn d' M
d" O N 00 N M r CO (fl LO T Lf) T-
0� M C� CA r Cfl r N Lf) M Lf) t
N Lf) co co m O M O M O M w
a) V v Lo O �J- M r O N N N N N O It
O Cfl CA CV O O h 0A LO 't M N T
N e r C�j LO M e- r O CO M N M
N r r 00
d LO r t- r r d' M O d' r M M "t
U) LON[•t-r Nd ooMrr ' LA
LOr- NOWMNWMMLf)N't
V 4- Lc) 00 M ';' M N r CO M O LO -f t-
o r M .O c CA N CO r- CO r r 'I' N
a v M Lf) d O r- Lc) ()) N N � O r Co
0. d Ct Ct r O LO N N N c CD LO dmo
' 'd'
r
z
co
a)co =co
41 ��� CO co
o aEi� E E CO
o W Q W n o
-5QU)oz❑u...�Q�—�H
6
z t- N M -,t LO C9 r- M O CD N M
C
_i
f
N
N
O
J
T-
0�
Ln
LL
CV
�
ZO
O
o
W
Q
UJ
Z
W
H
J
U
ui
O
W
z
W
z
W
OLLJ
U)0
O
W
LL
ONN
W
u)
°-
w�=
1 i
¢
E
-I
o
E--
¢
Z
U-
U)
¢
5
�1
0
0
m
}
Ve S
L c
a E
Z<
0
ZF
a>
rn
d'
LO
S co
O
i�
U
c
m
0
U
u'
�t N
LO Lfl
(h o6
O d
O
N —
"r --
U) w
crs
C� F0-
c- N (h d' LO (o
(Y) d Co O
il- LO M
Ln M to
Co M
N I Cl)
(`LO
) v°� rn
L6 O
O O 00
(o M
N I M
iL
0
o
.�
L
E
0
o
a)
�
c
O
U
U)
�
o
Q
o
E
Q
U
m'
z
o
F-
O — N CO
M
a)
a)
U
CO O O N i N d'
to
N
It
ti
w I- It N N w 0
to
a)
O
CD
OM d � I v�
M
d
+,
O
co
0C) ODvNCM9d'
C)r
00
C)
O
U
�t
d
E
d
Q
a
d
U
U)
ZZ
O J T-
LL N
Z O
a)
C�Och
�O
W Q Z
F
W
U) m
U
J =
C) �
�ZD
=
a L s c(D
N
�
W
"�
V
O
cn a) = .0 4-
a)� O 0 LE5 — O
LL
a)
a V 0
Z
Q
L
m
m a) 0 a) O
''
O
LU
O
Uh-0
fn
O
a)
_ L
0-n�o °0).��
a�
�
O
i'
U
ag o= o
�
a)
E
0
0 O �
�
� aai.� cn
a)_J•E E � O65
V W
Q
�U
= "O O W n3
c
�
M
w cn n-
O
LL O
°' �, cu(a o =moo m
U)
Z Q LLI
t.t_ U i- m t- c
O
E
O
w0
CL oO
U
U
-� ~
ca ns ro ca a) >
C7 CD C� C7 = a)
m
0
.U)
F6 (DcOE
t�-o
ca
Ow
n m:3-5 a)
�a
w
Z
aZ
cn w w
s X c� ro ca
o
m
Q
zzzzOW><00 �F-
r
�
o
F-
U
LO
w
o
o�o�wCD wwcooC)C)mw
co
LL
U
Q
CD
C
O
O r
r N M r r
N M
r r
c1 LO
r r
CD Il-
r r
�I
z
ZO
O J ,
U) LL N
❑ O Cl)
WQz
❑ U �
�pCL
u❑1
0 W W
O
yU U) 0
O O E
wU UJ
(j) CL
w O _
U) ..J
n ❑ O
Q z W
z
cO
G
m
LLI
LY
U
z
1-
O
U
Q
0
U
w
W
LL
n
O
z
N h M o N o N
N cM cO c ch
Ifj t(j LL7 CO O O N
o N coi �N
O)
(f7 M 'd' m� 'd' O <t
Oni
vLiclNr Oro N
cr0
v O N (OO
rn
v
N
Vim' .:lc'c-� 16- N-O L
M O V ham- S O LO
O N 1- U) N
T r N
0) am iZ, W O O
4 O N' (m0 V) O N
tr cO o m � o Lo
m r m m (D n
m m N
d'
O a
G N O m
m
N N
(0 C)
m
m
O f`
M
mom_
T
O N m
v
v
n
c0C
0Nom
0)
o o
r� o m
(D
P7
.O r
(I (Lo
V
•N-•
m
m
- I �
f7
m
a)
rn
m
o`
U
a �
c c
aw N
a E O
m a -
a)
U ❑ n
a 00 w oC�
o cC7t�
m m c o
0 ro `o o
ai D-
rnUow orO2E•(cmLL
w
mN
J >
7U
w
m
d (0 0 7 Z N
' a)
v) O. Q.
O
�� N9995
._ of N N (�
E o = E E
O 65 o o
-°
m
m .0 r
= J N w w w w
LL O C) C)
E
-a c
a) m m o 0 0
cE-Lva
Sap m m
i
C
�iiC91-�>>> m
2 E c c
c aw w
L) awi
w w w w a- d n. (L ()
a> O 0 0
L�
at J
CD(D0(7mmmmm�oNNuw
o c o
m
E E
w w Z w w
V m U
m
7 7>> a) N N ID L
irs m m mLL.cL �C70
m m C C
m m m
m m
zzzzO0OOu�S
C7F-I-
'E
(9 C)
I
N
ro m m
O N Cl) 'n cO (O LLJ (0
O o 0 0 0 0 O O 0
W M N m m
O O t l
O O O
m m m c0 m m m m m
m m m m
r N m
OrT�V u�m�
r
mrnO N
N N N
V N
Z Z
O J_ �
LL N
>_z
0 O M
w¢Z
� U �
Z W
O 0
0 LLJ
W
rn O
U O 2
U Ul
W U) n-
W (D _
O O
I— Z LL
Q Q
Rf
F
o
I—
Z
O
co
m (C
W
0`
M
U
Z
U
O IL
U
U)
Q
0
W
C
R
o o (D o o o O o N (n N o V'
to
N
' (oD
� N,I:' N N O O N(D
(MD
h
D)
m Il- M m N O 0
(D
O
O)
O V'I-vrn(nN
M 'V' (O V'
in
O
co
v N m cM M
O
C m
M
(D Vv
�!
v
69
(R
Efl
N
(D
(D h V) r O M
I� O (D M c O
tD
(D
o
c0
o I` Lo N o t-
t1'
(D
o) h (D
o0 M
V'
N
v
64
(fl
o
oc o N M o
0 0 `"' �- o O N
�
of
N
O o
r (D V' r tD
w
N
O
M
(D M
O
69
6%
(n
(n m rn o co o rn
oo
m
rn
v_
o v co co o o)
t�(orn(omorn
co
O
M
M
o ci y' N o LO
<t
N I� tD
._. O M
m
co
1`
'v
c'i dam'
m
N
t4
(fl
l�
oc oC.N (OD Oo (M
h
o_
N
«i «i m N o m
(o
(D
M
r O (D w r (D (o
r c (n N
cM
c
V'
`-'
(O
47 r
m
jN
`-' `-'
c4
69
�
co ti m (YJ o (D
N
N
(ry
oon(~D�ow
o
w
N
:SZ; NNON--((oo u)
�M N c `,N
r
((DD
N
c0
o v
N
_ m
ti
69
(»
<r
mn(D(n000
(D
o
o
N rn (D rn N Oo col
(�
rn
c
t(i 1l- N 'Ito +-
o
(n
o
N
rI— ItTr(D W
�-' (D (o `-' N
M
<t
v
O)
O
Ol
c0
O
U N
a �
c �
N (6
N O
n - N
aNi o- 0 Ups
.c
O N N N CO
n 20 o(9 m C 9cq
N a O
N D' - O O
N N (D Rf Zu Z. N
Ern a)oo
d
ro
(U
m (D a)OU O N N
O= cm 0,
Q mCo�z a ink•
0
c
C U �2wwwwEL
O (n D O O
N N N N N
= J N
N N@ N N
N E
O I- a a
0 763aOmm
E (7 F- >> m m c c
0 (n
(� (a, w
m N ..CLft. 0-O U o 0 o
c
N
(0 (6 lE c6 •O
(D C9 0 (D c' '> U N E E
O O
ca
7>> j N N N N 2- (6 (6 C C
m o m m c c L X
R •n m
z zzz000Ow C9{--I-
U` E 0r
o N
(6
O 0 (n (D 0 (D w m N m m
o M
ommOMmmm ow
Y y
m mm mm�oo
F- F-F•
CC, T O N
N N N
Z V
Z
O J T-
U) LL. N
❑ O M
W Z
Z
F- --�
❑ U
_ O w
W W Z
O W. LLJ
U) 0
O ER
W
w U) a
Uj U' _
U) ._j
0 re
: ❑ O
F- Z LL.,
Q Q
d
CO cM M N O N N M M LO r u
N N' (fl d7 O � t- Lc7 r- CO CO C
O O (D LO a) I- N (O r r O u
OON-NmOMON -I-w
Mph-NN�Nr•rncON�
"qt0m00'IT 114-rnr rnrc
N c') C� r O N N co (Y) CD c
6 �— r- N N" O M M C7 c- c
bly
O O N M u
CO M O (O r m m m LO LO O r
41
m
O N r f (6 (6 c,� 'xi, c, �
00 a) a7 (Y) LO CO M M r• 00 � C
r Nr NNM'tCONNN�
N' M � LO c� N' M N' r- r• c� r
Lc>N N N �NcgCDLC)r rnu
V
-, O C LO of (O r Co LLB C, C6 a
CO M N r M M M r- M N M C
LC) co m r r co co M LO M Nr a
U
(�
NNNC'-C6 i 606( fC'0
d
ca
1
M N' N L>o d M c (O T LO O c
'It O N M N M (o M LO q u
It m co m m r CO r N LO M u
r N Lo CO O M O M M W M 0
LO M N m I,- O N N N N N C
O (O O N O O r C7 LO "t (Y) C
n C\F C' L6 C6 - f-- O (o co c
N — �
vt
co
M
co
r
N;
LO
d'
r
M
00
r M
I` E N E E
M cif r cor
D N O O N (D Q O
�<U)0zo ALL F-
c- N (y) d' LLB CO I` M O O N c*> N'
c9
a)
a)
Z
U
>
N
C
E
U
Z CD
Z 10
p J -
() LL N
0 O M
W Q Z
F J
� U �
p W
0
0 W
rto0
0 O R
U
w(na
W C9 =
O a w
F- Z OLL
as
't M <t o o (o m (O It m O h
amNLOMaoh"trn'tMIt
h (O M O h 0 (O O '-t h O h
M d' h (f) C') O L O N r r r
M (O 00 00 rt N lqt (O Lf) (O O O
Cl) h N 'It (O h CO 0) O M (O
r r r r r r N N N N
,It 0) r (0 O (O N h 0) .; 't Cot -
o
w N m (O W (O "t (n O O d'
h cch (O h M (O M <t N oO h
M O N W h aJ V N ) O
M M N O (O h N N O O r rM
CO d- (O (0
N
N G� (O (n N N CO W i O a 0
O (0 N O m V O h (O O) (O
M N V c0 00 M O O) O r N N (O
c- O c; O w
<t'TLOornrhmmv(n�trn
m ;L-1 ;L-1 aim is i::�, rn Fl� o m
O 'ct M O w 't It O O (O N
a N oc h LO O N h 0: O h (O
pp O w W W V h CO O (O N N co
N LL N CD
���L� (D''
O CU
Z
W
H
O '
`- O �a
F N N +
U) >� y V
7 C t
< O fV II
0 ap O
(O 00 r O (O (O h M N r O CD
(0 00 wO 0) 00 O (D M N
O (O 0) �t (O O M M M O (O
(O N 0) r M 'ct O d' 0) Oi W W U)
(n h <t (o h o (O rn rn h O co
rnrhrnhmh(om(ohh(n
r r O
r
W •�
F-
to
rn
LLO
O
rN- r V' M N O M h d' M h I-M
O (O CDh M LO CD M CO dt
r
F-
yC
O
W (Si 0) 0) h O r C6 c) N(6
CM- T
O
N
Q LL
co N
CDF-
(n Q
a o
C
d
Y
i+
i? U
.0
C
O
N M M M (O LO r M OO O ItN
'tN t,- (O M M O O O (O W
O cc cc N (O (O (O O O O (!> cc M
W LO N (0 h <t O M V' LO W
't O V' M N N N O (O (O N (O O)
(O (O r CO (O 'V' (O LO (h LO LO M r
r h
O O N t`` r N OL,) (O N O W th
N (O � (D CD M (O O N W ce)
0) t- "I cc (C M N M O I 0) O
hhWW0SW=LON(mOio
O) (O (O LO f Cfl � d' N h
M "I LO NCO N M c-
m cl
r r r 00
L r,- L 00 r
(6 h 0 ..0 -0 iL — 00
N cu 00 r a) _15- O
Q) U O a) N n O
�Q(n0Zo-�LL2Q2i 7F-
r N M d" LO (O h W O Or r cM-
Z0
Z
O J C
U) C)
�_
f�OM
W aw
Z
F J �5
� U �
O W
� wz
0 C� W
�vU)0
O w
Z a W
WC92
O
Z LL
Q Z
a
(ON (Oc;O h O m O W r M CO COr Nti O C r
O r "I cO r M r (O V• (O r r- M c- M h m N
M
co
W W V:vr V'r tON MM 6) O Li tO CONO
r
z- r N h
a)
CG
G C
O
to
60.
6f3
O
p
L
_
M'V'(NON a)
It
a.
N ai V: h M
t�
> O C➢
� ocpoN O
lq
crD
.�+
r 1 _ V: Co
M
G m
L O CU C
p E Q i
N
G
�
O
Oh(fl rtoO tohr-V' V' V' V'V'M[Orm
r 0rrrr O CO CO -cor aphh ht_h to try r_co
O>
p
O V'CA a) (D c0 (O L6 m M Cr M "r
M tOM h V• CON h(OO hto ID CO M COO N(M Cl
i
N L
m
(O [ O O r M N r r V' M r V' (M c M M c N r C n t o
rvr NM CO M coN N M MMMMMN O>vN
N 'IT M
vvvv`.vvv
(n
O =3 E
m N COO_h CO mc) W
O <t co N ( 2 to V' M r r M CO N N N N V' h h
rF
U O
oV'vr_rhrN
'VCDq-1 v5
.d
L
G h U
O L N
rrV'NhNOr r0�(O vNv
a
O N .Ch
(n C d
C O N
O (U
fl — E C
� � C
(DN � h
N ro
Z d
O 4
h N N N N
E t c
37 N O
m
rn M O 'n CO tL7 N
(b
h
O
p m
r M
o Cn
o E ro
o C =
OO V'O� (NO COO O'J
>
O y0„ N
O
N
v
v m O) m (O o) r
.O () N p .Q
a)
(.�
N ._.
M
a)
U
o > =3
U)
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0
E
s E o M
� j,� ,�..�
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl (D CD O
C.� C- E w0
NN
w )�" N'O
co co co co Co co m v)(o to to to v) to to to to to tO to to to to Lo to
tO to IC) tO to'n O O O 00000000 00 000000
E
to O U w E
N
0 0 0 0 0 0 r
N x ,.•O., O
O x
Z
U v V O
= r C C
>,(fl
0 u ro E ro m
L
_ _ _
co ti r N O to -t M to W W W
OhMrtoOr to h CO r co V' V'V' V'MM MMMO
O C O C
D
N
rorr<-ro tO tOv rcc hly h t�l_(o coN r_ to h c\ '
'd'
.
= CM U co
O
>
p
O rt o) o) (O W (O LL7 [A (O M h r M h
M tO M h V' CO N h (O O h m CO CO CO M to tO r In h O r rY
.p O O N
E Si a7
LL' N
M M M M CO m 0 0 M -, N M
81
d
Q.
U
v
r v r N (n M co W N N M M M CM M N r O v V' v �-
v .� ........ N .d. M v
'O
C .0 C +-, Lo
(a L
.0 T r
o o .o c) c) o
Eo-o aE()U)
E
C
- >• roa U.fl .fl
(i
•O N N N
N}
N U
N ,C O •O 'O Z7
o mm Lo rY m 00 m W m to co M
r Cr O o O N(11M o) CL h h
rt
C_ C O 'O y T 'o 'o
E -•c
_ a)t ro
> d
>
O O M Lo O tCj m`d' N m� to
0
tOr cc
CD O Lq
m
r
w C C� C
O
D
(MO v (fl h N
M
N O U E O C E
E E
M
7 . � >, (D >.
U0 d'.O ro.q �..0
N E O
O
c x'��
off( m c
U n- E Eh
O O
(n (D T C C
nn oo r
(n
C7 m - —
o y
.d.0 oro o o�6o�T
to •o a) E x o a) m
ro ro a)m m `ro mm 75
E
'O (D ro o r T Y a) N
.0 L
U Z N UL U U
CO c o
ro n o
m °`sro Ewa m O
G G C
' h t M W CO ' ' (n
C a J T 4)
in a) a)
N O ro ro W
S r N
`- N N i N m r O a) a)
L N O
N 2
(�L) — 7
j 7) N V O N, �. N= N= 7 N C� N ro �. N=
t6
O
fy U)C LL M U
O
wN O p'Oj
)¢uJOz� ,tL�Q� �m )<U) z )u �Q��
t-
zr ci i�r u66
m
C O
JZ
rNM V'to (flhMmOrNM V to CO t�(b CnO NM V'tO(Oh
r r r <- r r r �- • r r N N N N N N 04 N
Z O
O Z� co
❑ O M
W Q W
Z
❑ U -1
- o W
0 w W
�. fn O
O
U
U W
wcnn-
w 0
(n J t--
= O
I-- Z U-
aa
JIM
IN
i
W
75
O
z
0
1--
s0
0
U)
0
E
m
0
a�
rn
c
rn
w
0o
c
LL
o
r
I` O O r M (y) CC> r M
T
c' r r. O (l h 1� Lr
M
E
M N I` r I— r r r M
T
OL
r r N LO CD M LO O M
to
4-
Cl00 C cl N r M CA N
to
O
,( 00 m 00 m m r M (D
a
r N N r
a)
T
�
0
-O
(1)
U)
0
IL
rn
0
(Ii
0
00 00
r r 0)00 y� r
Cif
i
0J
L
N
.Q r o) Ci)
°
i
U!
p N N N
0 >O 0 O `
R5
+'
N O
. U)
C
0z0�LL �<�E
1-
z�
r N (Y) d- LO to Il- 00 (T CD r
r r
co
-j
CD
+
LO
(D
-f
a)
0)
0
(1)
C)
U
Cl)
co
c
0
C)
C\l
42
�
Z
E
0
0
>
0
z
0
z
U)
0
(D
E0
C)
Cf)
D-
C13
0
c!)
>
M
a)
0
OL
.0
5--
CL
-0
w
(3)
LO
U-
co
CY)
CY)
Cl)
co
N
C\l
C5
L6
C6-
W�
C\l
o')
rl-
a)
kE0
0
<
LLJ
uj
0
z
n
ry
LLI
T
>
0
:3
0cn
LL
>
0
co
E
re
E
0
0
U)
D
4--
C)
>0
0
cu
U)
(DC)
cn
a)
:3
cu
0
C)
U)
w
U)
4—
(D
a)
-a
_0
0
C,
(D
:3
(D
ry
0
>
E
0
(D
0
.r
0
E
<
z
a)
C\J
CO 14,
LO (D f-
a
z p
p z 00
J_
LL N
oo�
LU UJ
z
z
.J
0 U
p ui
0LUw
O_O
C7Ory
UUJ
LU U) C .
LLu
oar
QZo
a
co co co
r r r
J
O 76 O 70
z
C�i
UUU C:
r
O_
i
U
U U U
N
a)
j
U
(DCZ
V
J J J r
c}•
�5
�0)r--0o
.I
(> cn f` co
M
'
r
V ccti 00_
�
a)ti
Imo- r h-
T-
L
m ti (Y) r
a
Qi
_
C�
d r `�
L
L.
��
OU.
r r
O
a
uJ
F-
z
D
O
(D
a
Eo
O
N - >
°
o)
U)
>
a
o
� U)
L
f�
J_-
L
0O
—�
u) (D (7
C9
a) a)
D
6
z
C
a
Z
O Z �
J r
U) � C,
N
oOi�
Z
7 J
=
Cl U
m
Z
^0w
w
N
L1.. W Z
0�W
.J
-�
�U)0
F-
V LU
0 U
w
V d
W U` =
Q
0 Q w
0
F-
0
Z
as
E
O
m M V' C7 cNo m � TO M M
CO u) N y
N m (D m m h N (�0 m uu
O O It N M O N O N 't m u)
M m h N N u) N !h m (c) N h
V' O m O (Cl V' V' m h m h O
cam- N V' o) m N M rM --
N O h m 00 (0 N N h M
m r 'MV W O 0�0 N Oct(m0
((00 w(m0
V' v d' u) m �2 N h r h vi
M N r
L
m (0 M O M M u) (0
h N M u)
Cl)
MO m
h N N N m M hV
m
64
W m h m m 0 ( jm O r-
ul M O (fl h O M M O M m O
� N N N Cl) � M N N N
❑ "
N r N N N N
CIS h m u) O V' N r O h 6
N Or M chI (h0 h O M �_ N h
N m N V' h M W CO N
v w o v m m io n v
= h (() O M N O
M N N
Q
W 7 VN_ 'md'_ N cM') (D Ili ^ m N
O M M N h m (O u) m V (D m
E u) M u) h h m M m (n m r rfl
_ N N N N M o co (0 V M N
m N m m m N N V r} 't N
O N u) h
co h u) m r} N N m N u o ((00
N N m M M (p c0 r, M
C o rW N r N n (D N o �
M OJ
3 O N d' O m u) (0 O Clm
O U c0 w m h (D u) N u) N r N ui
N E m n M
Q
,q O N M N M (0 M u7 u)
� m M m m h (p h N u) M u)
O (O m N O O � m u) <} M N
y m
0 v Q (i 0 Z -) lL Q 2
°II
N
C Z r N M. u) (0 h M m� �N' � r Mr m N N N N N N
J