The URL can be used to link to this page

05/02/2016-CC-Agenda Packet-RegularS vg 4 TEXAS AGENDA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING, MONDAY, MAY 2, 2016 7:00 PM 502 ELM STREET 1. Call Meeting to Order, Invocation, Pledge of Allegiance. 2. Citizens Input: (Citizens are allowed 3 minutes to speak. The City Council is unable to respond or to discuss any issues brought up during this section). CONSENT AGENDA 3. a) Approval of Minutes: April 18, 2016 - Work Session April 18, 2016 - Council Meeting b) Disbursements 4. Consider any Items Removed From Consent Agenda. REGULAR AGENDA 5. Consider, Discuss and Possibly Approve Proclamation #05-02-16 — Motorcycle Awareness Month. 6. Consider, Discuss and Possibly Approve Contract No. 2 — Well Site Improvements and Water Lines Bid to Vessels Construction. 7. Conduct a Public Hearing on a Request for Use of Alternative Exterior Building Materials and/or Design for Remodel of a House Located at 817 S. Keaton Road. 8. Consider, Discuss and Possibly Approve the Use of Alternative Exterior Building Materials and/or Design for Remodel of a House Located at 817 S. Keaton Road. 9. Conduct a Public Hearing Regarding Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plan in Preparation for the Adoption of Roadway Impact Fees. 10. INFORMATION ITEMS: None. 11. Adjourn I, the undersigned authority, do hereby certify that this Notice of Meeting was posted on the bulletin board, at the City Hall of the City of Sanger, Texas, a place convenient and readily accessible to the general public at all times, and said notice was posted on the following date and time: /ax� at 4/0"00 A.M. and shall remain posted until eeting is adjourned. OF ` �\ • • , � tip :, V�-��LJC/V Tami Taber, City Secretary City of Sanger, Texas - ►1►te This facility is wheelchair accessible and accessible parking spaces are available. Requests for accommodations or interpretive services must be made 48 hours prior to this meeting. Please contact the City Secretary's office at (940) 458-7930 for further information. MINUTES: CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION April 18, 2016 PRESENT: Mayor Thomas Muir, Councilman Bill Boutwell, Councilman Lee Allison, Councilman David Clark, Councilman Gary Bilyeu and Councilman Allen Chick OTHERS PRESENT: Mike Brice City Manager and Tami Taber City Secretary 1. Call Meeting to Order. Mayor Muir called the meeting to order at 6:03 p.m. 2. Overview of Finance Department, Clayton Gray. Rescheduled for May. 3. 6 Month Financial Update. Rescheduled for May. 4. Overview and Discussion on Utility Rates. City Manager stated that there were a lot of inconsistencies and redundancy in the current utility fee schedule so he cleaned it up. There will be a 7 to 8% increase on the water side as discussed in last year's budget work session and on the sewer side, there will be a 15% increase which was also discussed in last year's work session. Councilman Allison asked about delinquencies. City Manager advised that about 20% of customers always pay late each month. 5. Overview of Items on Regular Agenda. 6. Adjourn. Mayor Muir adjourned the meeting at 6:47 p.m. MINUTES: CITY COUNCIL MEETING April 18, 2016 PRESENT: Mayor Thomas Muir, Councilman Bill Boutwell, Councilman Lee Allison, Councilman Gary Bilyeu and Councilman Allen Chick ABSENT: Councilman David Clark OTHERS PRESENT: Mike Brice City Manager, Tami Taber City Secretary and Tona Batis 1. Call Meeting to Order, Invocation, Pledge of Allegiance. Mayor Muir called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. Councilman Boutwell led the Invocation followed by Councilman Bilyeu leading the Pledge of Allegiance. 2. Citizens Input: (Citizens are allowed 3 minutes to speak. The City Council is unable to respond or to discuss any issues brought up during this section). None. CONSENT AGENDA 3. a) Approval of Minutes: April 4, 2016 - Work Session April 4, 2016 - Council Meeting b) Disbursements Councilman Allison made a motion to approve. Seconded by Councilman Boutwell. Motion carried 3-0. Councilman Bilyeu abstained due to being absent at the last meeting. 4. Consider any Items Removed From Consent Agenda. REGULAR AGENDA 5. Consider, Discuss and Possibly Approve Resolution #R04-03-16 - Nominating Jim Carter to the Denton Area 9-1-1 Board of Managers. Councilman Bilyeu made a motion to approve. Seconded by Councilman Chick. Motion carried unanimously. 6. Consider, Discuss and Possibly Approve Ordinance #04-08-16 - Amending Article 4.000, Utility Related Fees of Appendix A "Fee Schedule" of the Code of Ordinances, Effective May 1, 2016. Councilman Bilyeu made a motion to approve. Seconded by Councilman Chick. Motion carried unanimously. 7. Conduct a Public Hearing Regarding Renovations to the Sanger Presbyterian Church and Related Expenditures to be Incurred by the Sanger Texas Industrial Development Corporation (4A) and Sanger Texas Development Corporation (413). Mayor opened the Public Hearing at 7:09 p.m. Tona Batis, President of the Sanger Historical Society, spoke about how they originally raised money just to get the church painted. To date, they have raised $208,487.03 to go towards the renovations. Councilman Bilyeu asked about furnishings and what it's going to look like inside the church once it's the renovations are complete. Tona Batis replied that an employee at Eikon has drawn up ideas. Mayor Muir closed the Public Hearing at 7:27 p.m. 8. Consider, Discuss and Possibly Approve Funds from 4A in the Amount of $175,000, Funds From 4B in the Amount of $110,000 and Hotel/Motel Funds in the Amount of $40,000 for Renovations to the Sanger Presbyterian Church. Councilman Boutwell made a motion to approve. Seconded by Councilman Bilyeu. Motion carried unanimously. 9. Consider, Discuss and Possibly Approve Awarding a Construction Contract to CIMA General Contractors for the Renovation of the Historic Presbyterian Church in the Amount of $354,321.00 for the Base Bid and Authorizing the City Manager to Approve Change Orders in Accordance With Statutory Limits. Councilman Bilyeu made a motion to approve. Seconded by Councilman Allison. Motion carried unanimously. 10. INFORMATION ITEMS: a) Financial and Investment Report - February 2016 b) All American Dogs Report — March 2016 c) Capital Improvements Update 11. Adjourn. Mayor Muir adjourned the meeting at 7:37 p.m. 4/13/2016 2:57 PI4 A / P CHECK REGISTER PAGE: 1 PACKET: 08068 Regular Payments VENDOR SET: 99 BANK POOL POOLED CASH ACCOUNT `.. NA14E / I.D. *VOID* VOID CHECK *VOID* VOID CHECK *VOID* VOID CHECK *VOID* VOID CHECK *VOID* VOID CHECK *VOID* VOID CHECK *VOID* VOID CHECK *VOID* VOID CHECK *VOID* VOID CHECK *VOID* VOID CHECK *VOID* VOID CHECK *VOID* VOID CHECK *VOID* VOID CHECK *VOID* VOID CHECK *VOID* VOID CHECK *VOID* VOID CHECK VOID CHECK *VOID* VOID CHECK *VOID* VOID CHECK *VOID* VOID CHECK *VOID* VOID CHECK DESC CHECK CHECK TYPE DATE V 4/13/2016 V 4/13/2016 V 4/13/2016 V 4/13/2016 V 4/13/2016 V 4/13/2016 V 4/13/2016 V 4/13/2016 V 4/13/2016 V 4/13/2016 V 4/13/2016 V 4/13/2016 V 4/13/2016 V 4/13/2016 V 4/13/2016 V 4/13/2016 V 4/13/2016 V 4/13/2016 V 4/13/2016 V 4/13/2016 V 4/13/2016 DISCOUNT AI4OUNT CHECK CHECK N04 AMOUNT 062808 **VOID** 062810 **VOID** 062811 **VOID** 062812 **VOID** 062813 **VOID** 062814 **VOID** 062815 **VOID** 062816 **VOID** 062817 **VOID** 062818 **VOID** 062819 **VOID** 062820 **VOID** 062821 **VOID** 062822 **VOID** 062823 **VOID** 062824 **VOID** 062825 **VOID** 062826 **VOID** 062827 **VOID** 062828 **VOID** 062829 **VOID** 4/13/2016 2:57 PM A / P CHECK REGISTER PACKET: 08068 Regular Payments VENDOR SET: 99 BANK POOL POOLED CASH ACCOUNT CHECK CHECK NAME / I.D. DESC TYPE DATE *VOID* VOID CHECK V 4/13/2016 *VOID* VOID CHECK V 4/13/2016 +VOID* VOID CHECK V 4/13/2016 21740 ACQUIRE CCTV I-3/28/16 WATER WAREHOUSE R 4/13/2016 22620 ARAI4ARK UNIFOR11 SERVICE I-1156201120 FLEET UNIFORMS R 4/13/2016 I-1156201721 STREETS UNIFORMS R 4/13/2016 I-1156201722 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES UNIFORMS R 4/13/2016 I-1156201723 WATER UNIFORMS R 4/13/2016 I-1156201724 PARES UNIFORMS R 4/13/2016 01550 ATMOS I-03/2/16-4/l/16 3/2/16-4/l/16 R 4/13/2016 25610 AUSTIN LANE TECHNOLOGIES, INC I-160012A INSTALLATION DELL E5450 LAPTOP R 4/13/2016 26350 C & G ELECTRIC, INC I-29421 CHANGE OUT 4 CONTACT WIRES R 4/13/2016 14560 C & G OHOLES.ALE I-48026 SGT GOLD 4 CORP CHEV R 4/13/2016 22300 CARD SERVICE CENTER C-56897 RADIO TOWERS CREDIT R 4/13/2016 I-002510 STORAGE BAGS, CUPS, PAPER PLAT R 4/13/2016 I-0811452 CHILDREN'S BOOK -AMAZON R 4/13/2016 I-10440 LUNCH W/ F. COLE14AN & D. FRIED R 4/13/2016 I-153-287367 BATTERIES PLUS/BATTERY CHARGER R 4/13/2016 I-19028935 NEW I4EDIC BRUSH TRUCK-AUTOANYT R 4/13/2016 I-201100082 PAPER TOWELS R 4/13/2016 I-201603226043 TLA MEMBERSHIP LAURA KLENKE R 4/13/2016 I-201604126086 ILA CONFERENCE REG-LAURA KLENK R 4/13/2016 I-25137 LOVES GAS FOR C-670 R 4/13/2016 I-26325671 WEBSITE HOSTING (BLUEHOST) R 4/13/2016 I-56897 LOWE'S/SUPPLIES FOR RADIO TOWE R 4/13/2016 I-58135537 KEEP TEXAS BEAUTIFUL (DUES) R 4/13/2016 I-660884345021 BATTERIES/CHARGERS R 4/13/2016 I-6740204 ADULT NONFICTION BOOKS -AMAZON R 4/13/2016 I-742025 TREATS FOR DR. SEUSS PARTY R 4/13/2016 I-8679428 CHILDREN'S BOOK -AMAZON R 4/13/2016 I-97517 GFOAT SPRING REGISTRATION R 4/13/2016 I-CPMJBT6 CP14 PROGRAM -TRACK 6 R 4/13/2016 PAGE: 2 CHECK CHECK DISCOUNT A14OUNT N04 AMOUNT 062830 **VOID** 062831 **VOID** 062832 **VOID** 189.00OR 062801 189.00 31.25CR 062802 30.74CR 062802 8.46CR 062802 64.12CR 062802 28.84CR 062802 163.41 489.83CR 062803 489.83 315.00OR 062804 315.00 439.29CR 062805 439.29 36.94CR 062806 36.94 55.91 062807 13.95CR 062807 4.00OR 062807 11.44CR 062807 38.50CR 062807 362.73CR 062807 5.00OR 062807 145.00OR 0662807 265.00OR 062807 34.25CR 062807 101.88CR 062807 55.91CR 062807 100.00CR 062807 322.18CR 062807 62.52CR 062807 20.00OR 062807 4.00OR 062807 345.00OR 062807 595.000R 062807 2,430.45 4/13/2016 2:57 P14 A / P CHECK REGISTER PAGE: 3 PACKET: 08068 Regular Payments VENDOR SET: 99 BANK POOL POOLED CASH ACCOUNT CHECK CHECK CHECK CHECK ,i..... =- NAI4E / I.D. DESC TYPE DATE DISCOUNT A14OUNT N04 AMOUNT 12930 CLIA LABORATORY PROGRA14 I-45DIO30407 WAIVER 9/3/16-9/2/18 R 4/13/2016 150.00OR 062809 150.00 00050 CONLEY SAND 6 GRAVEL I-10784 10 YARDS R 4/13/2016 985.00OR 062833 985.00 00800 COSERV ELECTRIC I-2/16/16-3/16/16 2/16/16-3/16/16 R 4/13/2016 2,684.35CR 062834 2,684.35 18190 DEPART14ENT OF INFORPIATION RESOURCE I-1603035N MARCH LONG DISTANCE R 4/13/2016 29.94CR 062835 29.94 23010 FIVE STAR SUPPLY CO INC. I-6890 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES PARKS BUIL R 4/13/2016 360.80CR 062836 360.80 18790 FUELMAN I-NP47153491 4/4/16-4/25/16 R 4/13/2016 1,701.77CR 062837 1,701.77 01070 GALLS INC. I-003918766 BATES DURASHOCK BOOTS R 4/13/2016 148.95CR 062838 I-005117364 STRYKE PANTS 770 R 4/13/2016 70.24CR 062838 I-005129701 STRYKE UNIFOP14 PANT 770 R 4/13/2016 70.24CR 062838 289.43 16860 GRAINGER I-906208580 ANCHORS KIT PARKING CURB R 4/13/2016 368.08CR 062839 368.08 27020 KAZ SURVEYING I-30223 KEITH AND 455 R 4/13/2016 750.00CR 062840 350.00 08210 KWIK KAR I-47191 INSPECTION 2014 SILVERADO R 4/13/2016 25.50CR O62841 25.50 LUGIE'S ELECTRIC WORK I-284 ELECTRICAL SERVICES 507 DENTON R 4/13/2016 300.00OR 062842 300.00 05170 NORTHERN SAFETY I-901875936 EAR PLUGS, COOLING NECKBAND R 4/13/2016 82.32r_R 062843 82.32 08690 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS C-273008 BATTERY CREDIT R 4/13/2016 36.00 062844 I-266814 OIL/AIR FILTER R 4/13/2016 0.51CR 24.81CR 062844 I-268677 INTKCLNR R 4/13/2016 0.50CR 24.45CR 062844 I-271310 HARNESS CAPSULE R 4/13/2016 0.30CR 14.62CR 062844 I-271319 TAIL LAMP R 4/13/2016 1.07CR 52.47CR 062844 I-271738 BATTERY R 4/13/2016 5.49CR 268.85CR 062844 I-271986 OIL FILTER R 4/13/2016 0.38CR 18.61CR 062844 I-273390 UNIVERSAL PATCH R 4/13/2016 2.68CR 131.07CR 062844 498.88 4/13/2016 2:57 PI4 A / P CHECK REGISTER PAGE: 4 PACKET: 08068 Regular Payments VENDOR SET: 99 BANK POOL POOLED CASH ACCOUNT CHECK CHECK CHECK CHECK NA14E / I.D. DESC TYPE DATE DISCOUNT A14OUNT NON AMOUNT 02970 OFFICE DEPOT I-829901428001 TRASH BAGS, CLEANER, BLEACH R 4/13/2016 124.13CR 062845 124.13 25830 PACHECO KOCH, LLC I-35140 U]W E PH II BNSF TO 135X R 4/13/2016 754.25CR 062846 I-35141 WW E PH III 135X TO LOIS R 4/13/2016 671.25CR 062846 1,425.50 26380 PIERCY, MEGH.ANN I-201604136089 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT R 4/13/2016 1,000.00CR 062847 1,000.00 04240 PRATER, MIKE I-201604126088 MEALS 61ST ANNUAL TEP CONFER R 4/13/2016 70.000R 062848 70.00 16900 RED THE UNIFORM TAILOR I-OOG16155 30 CRPL CEVRON SILVER/GRY PATC R 4/13/2016 88.50CR 062849 88.50 25970 REPUBLIC I4ETER INC i I-16-1340 CONNECTOR/ ANNTENNA R 4/13/2016 9,612.000R 062850 9,612.00 F 24810 RLC CONTROLS, INC I-5782 RLC CONTROLS, INC R 4/13/2016 5,078.86CR 062851 5,078.86 25020 SANGER HARDWARE I-A86854 BUSHINGS HOSE BRASS R 4/13/2016 29.84CR 062852 I-A86911 QUICKRETE R 4/13/2016 269.46CR 062852 I-B35647 BIT MASONRY RERC R 4/13/2016 28.98CR 062852 328.28 25590 SCHNEIDER ENGINEERING i 1-000000031633 ERCOT TRANSMISSION R 4/13/2016 2,106.70CR 062853 2,106.70 25340 T & T FLOWERS & GIFTS I-201604116085 PLANT FOR SPINDLE SERVICE R 4/13/2016 50.000R 062854 50.00 0-. .; WHITMIRE LINE CLEARANCE, INC I t I-SN16-10004 TREE TRIDPSING R 4/13/2016 2,432.000R 062855 2,932.00 t * * T 0 T A L S * * N04 DISCOUNTS CHECK APfT TOTAL APPLIED REGULAR CHECKS: 31 10.93 34,605.96 34,616.89 (.. HANDWRITTEN CHECKS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 [ PRE -WRITE CHECKS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 DRAFTS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 III VOID CHECKS: 24 0.00 0.00 0.00 !' NON CHECKS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 [ CORRECTIONS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 REGISTER TOTALS: 55 10.93 34,605.96 34,616.89 TOTAL ERRORS: 0 TOTAL WARNINGS: 0 4/20/2016 2:05 PI4 A / P CHECK REGISTER PACKET: 08078 Regular Payments VENDOR SET: 99 BANK POOL POOLED CASH ACCOUNT PAGE: 1 CHECK CHECK '.. '?. NAI4E / I.D. DESC TYPE DATE 07860 ACT PIPE SUPPLY, INC I-156340 STOCK PARTS R 4/20/2016 I-159585 STOCK PARTS R 4/20/2016 I-165356 STOCK PARTS R 4/20/2016 I-165357 STOCK PARTS R 4/20/2016 1-171370 STOCK PARTS R 4/20/2016 25940 ALAN PLU19P4ER ASSOCIATES, INC I-000000038740 PRO41416-002-01 INV435975 R 4/20/2016 I-000000038798 PHASE 1 R 4/20/2016 02610 ANIXTER INC. I-3172275-00 SUPPLIES R 4/20/2016 I-3175359-00 SUPPLIES R 4/20/2016 I-3175467-00 SUPPLIES R 4/20/2016 22620 ARAI4ARK UNIFORI4 SERVICE I-1156213300 FLEET UNIFORMS R 4/20/2016 I-1156213301 STREETS UNIFORMS R 4/20/2016 I-1156213302 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES UNIFORMS R 4/20/2016 I-1156213303 WATER UNIFORMS R 4/20/2016 I-1156213304 PARKS UNIFORMS R 4/20/2016 00390 BILL UTTER FORD, INC. I-159020 TUBE, LEVER, DAMPER, PLUNGE, B R 4/20/2016 00420 BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC I-82105958 E14S 14EDICAL SUPPLIES R 4/20/2016 I-82105959 EMS I4EDICAL SUPPLIES R 4/20/2016 I-82105960 E14S MEDICAL SUPPLIES R 4/20/2016 23°R0 BUREAU VERITAS NORTH AMERICA, INC I-1315679 WALMART-HYDROGEN FUEL SYSTEM R 4/20/2016 I-1315680 CONSULT R 4/20/2016 22300 CARD SERVICE CENTER I-201604196110 TCC (VEHICLE EXTRICATION CLASS R 4/20/2016 I-242142 CHILDREN'S BOOKS EDC/USBORNE R 4/20/2016 I-3073012-A-1 EWING IRRIGATION (HOSE&SWIVEL) R 4/20/2016 I-447BKM TXDMV 2015 TRUCK REGISTRATION R 4/20/2016 I-4920 JYRO SIGNS R 4/20/2016 I-7053 MIG'S (LUNCH FOR INTERVIEWS) R 4/20/2016 I41468733123 SAW BLADES R 4/20/2016 CHECK CHECK DISCOUNT AI4OUNT NO# AMOUNT 945.48CR 062929 1,302.95CR 062929 646.04CR 062929 237.24CR 062929 59.96CR 062929 3,191.67 21,817.78CR 062930 5,966.37CR 062930 27,784.15 602.70CR 062931 2,010.00OR 062931 880.00OR 062931 3,492.70 31.17CR 062932 30.74CR 062932 8.46CR 062932 64.12CR 062932 28.84CR 062932 163.33 124.94CR O662933 124.94 1,132.80CR 062934 23.78CR 062934 166.45CR 062934 1,323.03 2,093.84CR 062935 307.68CR 062935 2,401.52 600.00OR 062936 98.22CR 062936 246.02CR 062936 10.50CR 062936 289.50CR 062936 44.47CR 062936 119.82CR 062936 1,408.53 PAGE: 2 4/20/2016 2:05 P14 A / P CHECK REGISTER PACKET: 08078 Regular Payments VENDOR SET: 99 BANK POOL POOLED CASH ACCOUNT CHECK CHECK R NA14E / I.D. DESC TYPE DATE 1 CHIP MCFERRIN I-201604206112 CC DEPOSIT REFUN R 4/20/2016 25730 DATAPROSE, LLC I-DP1600875 LATE BILLS MAR 2016 R 4/20/2016 30140 DEFENDER OUTDOORS AUBREY 1-1288 2 BLADE TECH BLK GUN HOLSTER R 4/20/2016 22740 DENTON COUNTY AUDITOR I-4/l/16-4/30/16 FY 15 DISPATCH R 4/20/2016 00840 DENTON PUBLISHING CO., INC. I-0000512581 LEGAL NOTICE R 4/20/2016 08190 DISPLAY SALES I-006029 18" ZIP TIES R 4/20/2016 28070 EPP, CINDY I -MAR 2016 YOGA INSTRUCTION FOR MARCH R 4/20/2016 20980 EXPRESS SERVICES, INC. I-13085533-2 GENERAL LABOR R 4/20/2016 I-11104492-8 GENERAL LABOR R 4/20/2016 I-11138501-6 GENERAL LABOR R 4/20/2016 23820 FERGUSON WATERWORKS I-0772020-1 HOLD DOWN NUT WRENCH R 4/20/2016 I-0772020-2 MUSH COVER R 4/20/2016 I-0772774 SAN CO CASTING R 4/20/2016 I-0776717 RAPTOR ADJ, MTR BOX R 4/20/2016 I-0777461 M HOLE REP. R 4/20/2016 I-0779476 2X12 BRS NIP GBL R 4/20/2016 I-0780244 4 ZN FF NBG, SET R 4/20/2016 18340 FIRST ADVANTAGE BACKGROUND SVCS I-55361603 BACKGROUND CHECKS R 4/20/2016 23010 FIVE STAR SUPPLY CO INC. I-6913 CENTERPULL PAPERTOWELS R 4/20/2016 I-6957 CENTERPULL PAPERTOWELS R 4/20/2016 CHECK CHECK DISCOUNT A14OUNT NO# AMOUNT 100.000R 062937 100.00 540.30CR 062938 540.30 78.000R 062939 78.00 3,893.000R 062940 3,893.00 23.40CR 062941 23.40 115.000R 062942 115.00 200.000R 062943 200.00 563.54CR 062944 533.88CR 062944 593.20CR 062944 1,690.62 201.89CR 062945 58.32CR 062945 370.66CR 062945 543.27CR 062945 65.000R 062945 244.08CR 062945 141.98CR 062945 1,625.20 43.50CR 062946 43.50 68.30CR 062947 32.40CR 062947 100.70 PAGE: 3 4/20/2016 2:05 P14 A / P CHECK REGISTER PACKET: 08078 Regular Payments VENDOR SET: 99 BANK POOL POOLED CASH ACCOUNT CHECK CHECK R NP14E / I.D. DESC TYPE DATE 18790 FUEL14MI I-NP47197286 4/11/16-4/17/16 R 4/20/2016 29250 GRAY, CLAYTON I-201604206113 GFOAT CONFERENCE R 4/20/2016 03220 HACH COMPANY, CORP. I-9869022 TCEQ MANDATED R 4/20/2016 25050 HELENA CHEI4ICAL COMPANY I-193018519 FERTILIZER R 4/20/2016 05020 HERCULES INDUSTRIES, INC. I-92652 LOCKS R 4/20/2016 21220 IRBY TOOL & SAFETY I-S009486969.001 4"X90 DEGREE 36/48 RADIUS ELBO R 4/20/2016 25110 KEYSTONE FLEX ADMINISTRATORS, LLC I-APRIL, 2016 DEBIT CARD & ADMIN FEESAPRIL16 R 4/20/2016 08210 KWIK KAR I-47800 STATE INSPECTION 2012 TAHOE R 4/20/2016 26900 THE LANE CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION I-1689734 ASPHALT R 4/20/2016 17060 LEAD 11 EXCELLENCE I-04032016SFD CE FOR JAN-MAR 16 R 4/20/2016 1 LEIANN COPELAND I-201604206111 CC DEPOSIT RE R 4/20/2016 2- , LEMONS PUBLICATIONS INC I-5074 SANGER NEWS R 4/20/2016 28050 LIONS CLUB I-201604046081 ME14BERSHIP 2016 R 4/20/2016 28470 LUBER BROS. INC I-00157222 ROTARY MOWER R 4/20/2016 CHECK CHECK DISCOUNT A14OUNT NO# AMOUNT 1,592.16CR 062948 1,592.16 510.40CR 062949 510.40 1,731.95CR 062950 1,731.95 799.98CR 062951 799.98 196.69CR 062952 196.69 378.90CR 062953 378.90 292.50CR 062954 292.50 25.50CR 062955 25.50 629.28CR 062956 629.28 648.000R 062957 648.00 100.000R 062958 100.00 147.000R 062959 147.00 75.000R 062960 75.00 46,300.000R 062961 46,300.00 4/20/2016 2:05 PI4 A / P CHECK REGISTER PAGE: 4 PACKET: 08078 Regular Payments VENDOR SET: 99 BANK POOL POOLED CASH ACCOUNT CHECK CHECK CHECK CHECK NA14E / I.D. DESC TYPE DATE DISCOUNT AMOUNT N08 AMOUNT 30130 MICHAEL W. AYER I-P27 PARCEL R 4/20/2016 5,359.93CR 062962 5,359.93 19500 NAPA AUTO PARTS I-452048 15W40 R 4/20/2016 746.95CR 062963 746.95 29330 NEEL FIRE PROTECTION APPARATUS, INC. I-2016-0323-004 TFS 2604 SKID UNIT =GRANT R 4/20/2016 22,967.000R 062964 I-2016-0323-005 TFS 2604 SKID UNIT =GRANT R 4/20/2016 500.000R 062964 23,467.00 08690 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 1-1959-273357 OIL FILTER R 4/20/20166 0.08CR 3.91CR 062965 3.91 02970 OFFICE DEPOT C-833216547001 OFFICE DEPOT R 4/20/2016 37.46 062966 I-831895262001 ENVELOPE, COFFEMATE, SUGAR R 4/20/2016 55.66CR 062966 18.20 27600 OMNIBASE SERVICES OF TEXAS LP I-OBS154001356 JAN-14.AR QUARTERLY FEES R 4/20/2016 126.000R 062967 126.00 I 30100 OSLIN NATION CO. I-0117762 NORGAS R 4/20/2016 1,312.70CR 062968 1,312.70 19200 PATHP4ARK TRAFFIC PRODUCTS OF TEXAS,INC. I-016994 FIRE STATION- NO PARKING SIGNS R 9/20/2016 141.86CR 062969 141.86 29830 PERKINS ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. I-3376 ASSISTANCE R 4/20/2016 4,950.000R 062970 4,950.00 05510 PROGRESSIVE WASTE SOLUTIONS OF TX, INC I-1202373391 SLUDGE ROLL OFF R 4/20/2016 99.90CR 062971 99.90 PROGRESSIVE WASTE SOLUTIONS OF TX, INC I-MAR-16 SOLID WASTE MAR 16 R 4/20/2016 53,881.05CR 062972 53,881.05 29160 PYLES WHATLEY CORPORATION 1 I-16-141 TREATMENT PLANT PROJECT R 4/20/2016 1,500.000R 062973 1,500.00 e' 16960 RED THE UNIFORI4 TAILOR ([ I-OG12332A 5 UNIFORM PANTS FOR 777 R 4/20/2016 399.95CR 062974 399.95 1 27450 RICOH USA I-28438522 APRIL LEASE R 4/20/2016 709.97CR 062975 709.97 4/20/2016 2:05 214 A / P CHECK REGISTER PACKET: 08078 Regular Payments VENDOR SET: 99 BANK POOL POOLED CASH ACCOUNT CHECK CHECK NAI4E / I.D. DESC TYPE DATE 12820 RICOH USA, INC I-5041403003 COPIER APRIL 2016 R 4/20/2016 27750 SAMANTHA SPRINGS BOTTLING I-321468 POLICE WATER BOTTLES R 4/20/2016 29400 SAMANTHA SPRINGS BOTTLING I-314824 PUBLIC WORKS WATER R 4/20/2016 I-323414 ANNNUAL APR15-MAR16 R 4/20/2016 I-323912 WATER SURCHARGE R 4/20/2016 30050 SAMANTHA SPRINGS I-314823 FLEET WATER DELIVERY R 4/20/2016 16240 SCHAD & PULTE I-198879 COMPRESSED OXYGEN R 4/20/2016 I-199013 COMPRESSED OXYGEN R 4/20/2016 10470 SIDDONS MARTIN EMERGENCY GROUP I-15400567 STOP WIRE & CABLE R 4/20/2016 26700 SOUTHERN TIRE t4ART, LLC I-480466540 2 P265/60R17 FIREHAWK GT V PUR R 4/20/2016 02510 STATE COMPTROLLER I-3/31/16 QUARTERLY REPORT JAN-PEAR 2016 R 4/20/2016 18620 STERICYCLE I-4006201043 E14S SUPPLIES R 4/20/2016 25340 T & T FLOWERS & GIFTS I-201604186091 FLOWERS FOR SID CAMPBELL'S F R 4/20/2016 05-0 TEXAS EXCAVATION SAFETY SYST I-16-04587 14ARCH MESSAGE FEES R 4/20/2016 19260 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES I-025-150763 APRIL MAINTENANCE R 4/20/2016 I-025-150764 APRIL COURT WEB SUPPORT R 4/20/2016 16550 UNIQUE PAVING MATERIALS I-252573 ASPHALT FOR PATCHING R 4/20/2016 PAGE: 5 CHECK CHECK DISCOUNT AMOUNT N04 AMOUNT 245.18CR 062976 245.18 15.00OR 062977 15.00 24.00OR 062978 57.65CR 062978 2.90CR 062978 84.55 7.90CR 062979 7.90 45.00OR 062980 26.00OR 062980 71.00 71.90CR 062981 71.90 234.72CR 062982 234.72 16,014.07CR 062983 16,014.07 199.76CR 062984 199.76 100.00OR 062985 100.00 63.65CR 062986 63.65 110.00OR 062987 125.00OR 062987 235.00 1,078.00OR 062988 1,078.00 4/20/2016 2:05 PM A / P CHECK REGISTER PAGE: 6 PACKET: 08078 Regular Payments VENDOR SET: 99 BANK POOL POOLED CASH ACCOUNT CHECK CHECK CHECK CHECK '4 NA14E / I.D. DESC TYPE DATE DISCOUNT AMOUNT NO# AMOUNT 26300 UNU14 LIFE INSURANCE C014PANY OF AMERICA I-5/1/16-5/31/16 LTD 5/l/16-5/31/16 R 4/20/2016 737.31CR 062989 737.31 16400 UTA / BUILDING PROFESSIONAL INSTITUTE C-201604186093 LETTER OF CREDIT R 4/20/2016 480.00 0662990 I-201604186094 REGISTRATION FOR ILIFF R 4/20/2016 360.00OR 062990 I-201604186095 REGISTRATION FOR DOUTHITT R 4/20/2016 360.00OR 062990 240.00 23760 VAULTLOGIX I-2608102 INTERNET VAULT -MAR R 4/20/2016 1,114.20CR 062991 1,114.20 03680 WHITMIRE LINE CLEARANCE, INC I-SN16-10005 TREE TRIIh4IING R 4/20/2016 3,040.00OR 062992 3,040.00 * * T 0 T A L S * * NO# DISCOUNTS CHECK MIT TOTAL APPLIED REGULAR CHECKS: 64 0.08 217,996.61 217,996.69 HANDWRITTEN CHECKS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 PRE -WRITE CHECKS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 DRAFTS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 VOID CHECKS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 NON CHECKS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 CORRECTIONS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 I REGISTER TOTALS: 64 0.08 217,996.61 217,996.69 TOTAL ERRORS: 0 TOTAL WARNINGS: 0 PROCLAMATION #05-02-16 WHEREAS, today's society is finding more citizens involved in motorcycling on the roads of our country; and WHEREAS, motorcyclists are roughly unprotected and therefore more prone to injury or death in a crash than other vehicle drivers; and WHEREAS, campaigns have helped inform riders and motorists alike on motorcycle safety issues to reduce motorcycle related risks, injuries, and, most of all, fatalities, through a comprehensive approach to motorcycle safety; and WHEREAS, it is the responsibility of all who put themselves behind the wheel, to become aware of motorcyclists, regarding them with the same respect as any other vehicle traveling the highways of this country; and it is the responsibility of riders and motorists alike to obey all traffic laws and safety rules; and WHEREAS, urging all citizens of our community to become aware of the inherent danger involved in operating a motorcycle, and for riders and motorists alike to give each other the mutual respect they deserve; NOW, THEREFORE I, Thomas Muir, Mayor of the City of Sanger do hereby proclaim the month of May, as Motorcycle Safety and Awareness Month in this city. Further, I urge all residents to do their part to increase safety and awareness in our community. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand and caused the Seal of the City to be affixed this day of May, 2016. Thomas Muir, Mayor Tami Taber, City Secretary 0 PERKINS ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. 800 E. Campbell Suite 221 Richardson, TX 75081 Office: 214-445-4695 Fax: 817-719-0372 www.perkinsconsultants.com April 22, 2016 Mr. Mike Brice, City Manager City of Sanger P.O. Box 1729 Sanger, Tx 76266 Re:Well Site Improvements and Water Lines — Contract No. 2 Bid Tabulation and Recommendations Mike, Please find attached the bid tabulation for the referenced project. The apparent low bidder is Vessels Construction, Sherman, Texas, with a low bid of $622,713.58. As discussed, this bid was significantly over the project budget and we asked Vessels to find areas within the electrical portion of the project to reduce costs. Mr. Vessels provided a project cost reduction of $58,600 and a time reduction from 180 days to 150 days (see attached). Based on this cost and time reduction, we are recommending that the City award the contract to Vessels Construction in the amount of $622,713.58, but subject to Vessels Construction executing Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $58,600.00, which will reduce the contract price to $664,113.58. It is our understanding that the City has previous experience with Vessels Construction and that the experience has been acceptable. I have also included the project budget for your use. Should you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me at 972-550-9154. Sincerely, David B. Hawkins, P.E. Senior Project Manager TBPE Firm No. 8699 Attachments Job# SAN 15-001 D cn O 0 O E T r m O (» J rn [n A W N p OO r (D V D) Cn A W N O M CA p f�Tl - N w N o 0 o N W o 0) W o 0 -zcu -I IO 0 C z O C r 0w r r 0 r Cn r Cn r Cn r Cn jf1 D jjff77 D jj11jj D ((11jj D cn T r -n r -nD ((ff11 ((TT77 D jjff77 D r T -n T -{ z G< G G G< W W N O W W (A N D1 N O m m m m D D-E z z' z z z' Wrrrr-rrrrmm{00z0zz0G)z-0z zzzz;OX 000TW DDG)<-o 0000toCnTzzODm0- - DC)< 0 z wmm-i OmmnO��SOO {�nQ°DD<om Z S S -< O D n r r p r o 0 m m r r j O m z Cn D<< 0 o z OX;u A-- r- m m ��I�CG�� D N Cnnnmmrr-irnw �� 022-Imll zZz-mv mi zU)coW WOO o0o0000�� x x z m m 0 G)(0� o x m m o o o m O O m m A O< Z O O m -oc(nv < x z O m 6� w�w� 69 rna '69! nq cyfn m�3 0 m O V O A O (n O) J A 0 O �n N Eq 69 J O N -• 69 Efl N X N N (n N A N N cn (p N O (A A O V O m Oo w N (n Cn N to CO V V (n W A A .A A 6) N cn W A C"j CO O X 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m A (0 A mO A 0 -' (n N N 0 O 0 A 01 01 W CO Cn ,N.. V C Cn D o O c z m N 6n (O W J 69 -' W w A 6, -' O ",9 O A Cn EA A Cfl N w W w N EA W Efl 0) ds !9 1 EA E9 W ti+ � t o 12 (D � o A (n N co co Cn V -� o N Cn O J m A -� A A m W N A N to N O A O V O O W CO N Cn W C; CO W p � O O w A 0) O (0 O W N 0) A V W Cn O O O O O o o O o ." O O A (n A O Co O) O Co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co N CA O 010 O O O O O -O c 27 z r 'O D O m wrnAC"'J,NrnC`�i,rnFn169 A V J W (O Cn W N W 69 W �n t[n N 0 --A�.ca m <.o= (n 0 m 0 W V 0 V 0 O 0 (0 0 N 0 -P 0 CO 0 O 0 -i 0 w� (n N w A 0) w- OC) J W O W A fA N kn W _ C) 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O N O N O O O A O X 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 00 0 �J O Cn V O O c 0 00)) w 0) A Can N N (n Efl .0 EA w fA CA N &: 60 N (19 V A V w V W O (n W Cn , 0) " CO W V W (n 0 00 0 V O V O O O C O N O A O CA O O O N O 0) O 0) O 8 O J A CO 0 A O N A O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 0 v mZ < 0 D v, n c0 > = o Z w n m N O A c Z -I N o 0 N -i 0 Z �O 6 (-)mv pZ� Z07C cnzz �-my D;a Zz CA G) z n m z Q z m m Z 0 0 O z N C r D Z CITY OF SANGER COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM AGENDA TYPE ® Regular ❑ Special ❑ Consent Reviewed by Finance ❑ Yes ® Not Applicable ❑ Workshop ❑ Executive ❑ Public Hearing Reviewed by Legal ❑ Yes LJ Not Applicable Council Meeting Date: Submitted By: May 2, 2016 Joseph D. Iliff, AICP City Manager Reviewed/Approval Initials Iva Date ��— ACTION REQUESTED: ❑ORDINANCE ❑ RESOLUTION # ® APPROVAL ❑ CHANGE ORDER ❑ AGREEMENT ❑ APPROVAL OF BID ❑ AWARD OF CONTRACT ❑ CONSENSUS ❑ OTHER AGENDA CAPTION Conduct a Public Hearing, Consider, Discuss, and Possibly act a Request From Ronald & Nicole Peters for Approval of Alternative Exterior Building Materials and/or Design for Remodel of the House Located at 817 South Keaton Road. FINANCIAL SUMMARY ®N/A ❑GRANT FUNDS []OPERATING EXPENSE ❑REVENUE ❑CIP ❑BUDGETED ❑NON -BUDGETED BACKGROUND/SUMMARY OF ITEM The properties are zoned SF-8 Single Family Residential District. The applicant is proposing to remove a garage door and install vinyl siding along the exterior wall in its place. The garage door faces south, to an adjoining property, rather than east to Keaton Road. The requested vinyl siding would match the siding used as trim under the gabled roof on the same south side of the house. The City's architectural standards require that "all exterior facades for the first story of a new single- family residence or duplex in any zoning district ... shall be constructed of a minimum of one hundred (100) percent masonry construction, including and limited to: brick, stone, granite, marble, cast stone or stucco. " - §3.2101 (b) Also, "Additions to, or reconstruction of, existing structures must have, at a minimum, the same ratio of masonry to other materials as does the existing structure." - §3.2101 (d) As the house is 100% brick exclusive of the doors and windows, the ordinance would require the replacement of a door or window to be done with a listed material. STAFF OPTIONS & RECOMMENDATION The City Council may approve an alternative to use a different material or design if they find that the material or design meets or exceeds the intent of this article after conducting a public hearing" §3.2101 fl List of Supporting Documents/Exhibits Attached: Prior Action/Review by Council, Boards, Commissions or Other • Pictures of the subject property Agencies: None P Y w k J y¢.rr � Q t G vA , r m ' r ( ff y ! . v ., � i .t♦�:� 1. 5. rl . 3 r�w ♦ f {.- r ✓`rC" CITY OF SANGER COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM AGENDA TYPE N Regular ❑ special ❑ Consent Reviewed by Finance ❑ Yes N Not Applicable ❑ Workshop ❑ Executive ❑ Public Hearing Reviewed by Legal ❑ Yes ❑ Not Applicable Council Meeting Date: Submitted By: May 2, 2016 Joseph D. Iliff, AICP City Manager Reviewed/Approval Initials 4,�6 Date — ��— ACTION REQUESTED: ❑ORDINANCE ❑ RESOLUTION # ❑ APPROVAL ❑ CHANGE ORDER ❑ AGREEMENT ❑ APPROVAL OF BID ❑ AWARD OF CONTRACT ❑ CONSENSUS N OTHER PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA CAPTION Conduct a Public Hearing Concerning Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plan in Preparation for the Adoption of Roadway Impact Fees. FINANCIAL SUMMARY NN/A [—I GRANT FUNDS ❑OPERATING EXPENSE ❑REVENUE ❑CIP ❑BUDGETED ❑NON -BUDGETED BACKGROUND/SUMMARY OF ITEM Roadway impact fees are fees collected by cities on new development for the funding of roadway facilities attributable to the increased traffic demanded by their construction. For a city to adopt roadway impact fees, a study must be prepared projecting the amount of increased traffic demand generated by future development, and identifying the cost of future roadway facilities. The City has prepared such a study, and submitted it to the review of the Planning & Zoning Commission serving as the Capital Improvement Advisory Committee (CIAC). The P&Z conducted a public hearing on September 14th, and recommended approval of the study's findings. The Study establishes three things required for the City to collect roadway impact fees. The first is the projection of future traffic demanded by new development, called the land use assumptions (LUA's). The second is the projected costs of the roadway projects to be constructed within 10 years, the capital improvements plan (CIP). And the third is a ratio between the two, calculating the maximum fee per service unit that the city can collect. Most cities collect less than the maximum impact fee calculated by this study, and the actual amount collected will be determined by City Council at a future meeting. The City Council is to conduct a public hearing on the findings of this study. The required notices have been published inviting comments at this City Council meeting. At the June 6th meeting, the Council can conduct a second public hearing and approve an ordinance setting an amount for a roadway impact fee. STAFF OPTIONS & RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending the Council adopt the land use assumptions and capital improvements plan included in the Roadway Impact Fee study and its proposed findings. List of Supporting Documents/Exhibits Attached:_ Prior Action/Review by Council, Boards, Commissions or Other • 2015 Roadway Impact Fee Study Agencies: On September 14 , the P&Z Commission conducted a • Sample fees from other cities. public hearing (there were no public comments) and unanimously recommended approval of the study and its proposed findings. Roadway Impact Fees Assessed in Selected North Texas Communities City of Denton Roadway Impact Fees Residential Fee $ 612.25 Nonresidential Fee $ 459.19 Land Use type Unit VWDU Fee per Unit SFD Dwelling Dwelling 4.90 $ 3,000.03 Apartment Dwelling 3.04 $ 1,861.24 General Office 1K sqft 8.94 $ 4,105.16 Medical Office 1K sqft 17.60 $ 801.74 Fast Food 1K sqft 46.05 $ 21,145.70 Sit Down Restaurant 1K sqft 17.05 $ 7,829.19 Supermarket 1K sqft 17.00 $ 7,806.23 Light Industrial 1K sqft 5.82 $ 2,672.49 Roadway Impact Fees for Single Family Dwellings Frisco Service Area 1 $ 5,260 Argyle $ 3,926 Frisco Service Area 3 $ 3,816 McKinney (SA's CDEGIJKM) $ 3,800 Prosper $ 3,727 Frisco Service Area 2 $ 3,280 Frisco Service Area 4 $ 2,358 Little Elm Service Area 1 $ 2,310 Little Elm Service Area 2 $ 1,650 Town of DISH $ 1,499 Corinth $ 1,167 City of Sanger, Texas Prepared by: . d`... 4' E j"K 0 " 4N' ARCHITECTURE - ENGINEERING ' PLANNING Texas Registration No. F-12759 1405 W. Chapman Drive Sanger, Texas 76266 940.458.7503 JUNE 2015 b irr 6- Table of Contents I. Executive Summary 2 II. Introduction 3 III. Roadway Impact Fee Calculation Inputs 4 A. Land Use Assumptions 4 B. Impact Fee Service Area 6 C. Future Roadway Improvements 6 IV. Methodology for Roadway Impact Fees 7 A. Service Areas 7 B. Service Units 7 C. Cost Per Service Unit 7 D. Cost of the Improvements 8 E. Service Unit Calculation 9 V. Impact Fee Calculations 12 A. Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit 12 B. Plan For Awarding the Roadway Impact Fee Credit 12 C. Service Unit Demand Per Unit of Development 13 VI. Sample Calculations 14 VII. Conclusion 15 APPENDICES A. Roadway Impact Fee Opinion of Probable Construction Costs B. Roadway Impact Fee Service Units of Supply C. Maximum Allowable Roadway Impact Fee Per Service Unit Calculations D. Land Use/Vehicle-Mile Equivalency Table List of Exhibits Service Area Map List of Tables 1A 2010 Demographics 1B 2011 Estimated Employment in Persons 2A Projected Population, Housing Units, and Employment in Person 2B Projected Population, Housing Units, and Employment in Square Feet 3 Roadway Improvements Plan for the Service Area 4 Level of Use for Proposed and Existing Facilities 5 Transportation Demand Factor Calculations (TDF) 6 Ten Year Growth Projections 7 Maximum Assessable Fee Per Service Unit/Vehicle-Mile Page I1 ' KO I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This study was performed to initiate the City of Sanger Roadway Impact Fees. Roadway improvements necessary to serve the 10-year (2025) system needs were evaluated based on information available from the City of Sanger 2015 Thoroughfare Plan, the 2007 Comprehensive Land Use Plan and the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG). Texas' impact fee law (Chapter 395) allows the recovery of costs for a 10-year planning period. We reviewed the service area (Service Area) created based on the Thoroughfare Plan by site observations along the widening of existing roadways and aerial images of future alignments. The projected cost to construct the infrastructure needed through 2025 is $80,416,924 for the Service Area. Based on the City's 10-year growth projections and the associated demand (consumption) values, 3,295 additional vehicle -miles of capacity will be needed by year 2025 for the Service Area. Based on the additional service units and the recoverable capital improvements plans, the City may assess a maximum of $1,361.21 per service unit in the Service Area. Page 12 J* K INTRODUCTION Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code describes the procedure Texas cities must follow in order to create and implement impact fees. Senate Bill 243 (SB 243) amended Chapter 395 in September 2001 to define an Impact Fee as "a charge or assessment imposed by a political subdivision against new development in order to generate revenue for funding or recouping the costs of roadway improvements or facility expansions necessitated by and attributable to the new development." The City of Sanger has determined based on their 2015 Thoroughfare Plan that assessing impact fees for the continued expansion of the City is valuable and necessary. The City has retained EIKON Consultant Group to provide professional transportation engineering services for the initiation of their Roadway Impact Fees. This report includes the impact fee calculation in accordance with Chapter 395 and the adopted Land Use Assumptions and the Roadway Improvements Plan. This report consists of the methodology for the computation of impact fees. The components of the computation, as outlined by Chapter 395 "must contain specific enumeration" of the following items: 1. A description of the existing capital improvements within the service area and the cost to upgrade, update, improve, expand or replace the improvements to meet existing needs and usage 2. An analysis of the total capacity, the level of current usage, and commitments for usage of capacity of the existing capital improvements 3. A description of all or the parts of the capital improvements and their costs necessitated by and attributable to new development in the service area based on approved land use assumptions 4. A definitive table establishing the specific level or quantity of use, consumption, generation, or discharge of service unit for each category of capital improvements and an equivalency or conversion table establishing the ratio of a service unit to various types of land uses, including residential, commercial, and industrial 5. The total number of projected service units necessitated by and attributable to new development within the service area based on the approved land use assumptions and calculated in accordance with generally accepted engineering or planning criteria 6. The projected demand for capital improvements or facility expansions required by new service units projected over a reasonable period of time, not to exceed 10 years 7. A plan for awarding a credit for the portion of the ad valorem tax generated by new service units during the program period that is used for the payment of improvements or a credit equal to 50 percent of the total projected cost of implementing the capital improvements plan `Paaggee113 III. ROADWAY IMPACT FEE CALCULATION INPUTS A. LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS Per Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code, Land Use Assumptions include changes in land uses, densities, and population in the service area. The Land Use Assumptions used in this report were developed by using employment data, population data, and trends developed by the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG). This information has been approved by the City of Sanger staff to be a reasonable representation of the building growth seen in the recent years and what may be expected in the following ten years. The following population and employment estimates and projections are defined by North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) and utilized by NCTCOG: Housing Units: Number of houses including single and multi -family homes Population: Number of people reported in the City. Employment: Square feet of building area based on retail, service, and basic land uses. Each classification has unique trip making characteristics. Basic/Goods: Land use activities that produce goods and services such as those that are exported outside of the local economy, such as manufacturing, construction, transportation, wholesale, trade, warehousing, and other industrial uses. (NAICS #210000 to #422999) Service: Land use activities which provide personal and professional services such as government and other professional administrative offices. (NAICS #520000 to #928199) Retail: Land use activities which provide for the retail sale of goods that primarily serve households and whose location choice is oriented toward the household sector, such as grocery stores and restaurants. (NAICS #440000 to #454390) To establish the population and employment characteristics for this report, demographic data provided by North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) and the 2010 US Census was used: Paage 14 EIK ON Table 1A. 2010 Demographics US Census Population 6,916 Housing Units 2,427 Table 1B. 2011 Estimated Employment in Persons 2011 Data from NCTCOG Employment Type Number of Persons Good Producing Industries (Basic) 645 Service Producing Industries (Service) 2,178 Retail Industries (Retail) 394 Total 3,217 NCTCOG published population estimates in 2015, which shows on average 1.9% growth in Sanger from 2010 to their estimates for 2014. The percent change for the population estimates for 2014 to 2015 is 1.3%. The population growth anticipated from the City's adopted Comprehensive Land Use Plan (October 2007) predicted an annual growth rate of 3.75% based on historical growth since 1960. In reviewing the recent trend for building permit applications, City Staff anticipates a slower growth than identified in the Comprehensive Plan, which is more congruent with the growth estimated by NCTCOG. For the purposes of this report, a population growth rate of 1.3% was used to project the growth in Sanger up to 2025. In addition, we have assumed that the housing units and employment characteristics will grow at the same rate as the population. The following table summarizes the anticipated population and employment characteristics based on these assumptions: Table 2A. Projected Population, Housing Units, and Employment in Persons 2011 Data from NCTCOG Year Population Housing Units Basic Service Retail 2010 6,916 2,427 - - - 2011 - - 645 2,178 394 2015 7,366 2,585 679 2,291 415 2025 8,265 2,900 762 2,574 466 For the purposes of this report, employment population data is converted to square feet of building area required to create the non-residential square footage within the City. The following conversions rates were used to create Table 213: Basic/Goods: 1,000 square feet Service: 350 square feet Retail: 500 square feet P a g e 15 i Table 26. Projected Population, Housing Units, and Employment in Square Feet 2011 Data from NCTCOG Year Population Housing Units Basic Service Retail 2010 6,916 2,427 - - - 2011 - - 645,000 762,300 197,000 2015 7,366 2,585 679,000 801,940 207,244 2025 8,265 2,900 1 762,000 1 901,039 232,854 B. IMPACT FEE SERVICE AREA Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code defines the service area for roadway facility analysis as an area within the corporate boundaries of the political subdivision that shall not exceed 6 miles. City Staff has determined that one (1) roadway facility service area based upon a six (6) mile limit is adequate and coincides with the capital improvement plans for roadway expansion over the next 10 years. The geographic boundary of the impact fee service area for roadway facilities is shown in Exhibit 1. C. FUTURE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS The City has identified the City -funded roadway projects needed for the projected growth within the City. These facilities are part of the currently adopted Thoroughfare Plan. The table below shows the length of each project as well as the Thoroughfare Plan classification. The future roadway improvements were developed by the City of Sanger staff and represent those projects that will be needed to accommodate the growth projected in this report. Table 3. Roadway Improvement Plan for the Service Area Length Street Name Class Limits (mi) Willow St./ Minor 4 Lanes 5th Street to FM 2164 3.34 McReynolds Rd. Willow St./McReynolds Rd. Indian Ln. Minor 4 Lanes to FM 455 0.88 Marion Rd. Minor 4 Lanes FM 455 to Lois Rd. 1.37 Lois Rd. Minor 4 Lanes Huling Rd. to 1-35 1.68 Belz Rd. Minor 4 Lanes 1-35 SBFR to Metz Rd. 0.97 Metz Rd. Minor 4 Lanes Belz Rd, to FM 455 0.68 Utility Rd. Collector 2 Lanes RR Tracks to Marion Rd. 0.77 Keaton Rd. Collector 2 Lanes Belz Rd. to FM 455 0.67 Future Belz Rd - Indian Minor 4 Lanes 1-35 N13FR to FM 455 L02 Connector Future East-West Minor 4 Lanes Cowling Rd. to FM 2164 3.51 Thoroughfare (at FM 2153) Exhibit 1 maps the roadway alignments described above. Paage 16 EI'` K ON IV. ROADWAY IMPACT FEE METHODOLOGY A. SERVICE AREAS Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code specifies that "the service area is limited to an area within the corporate boundaries of the political subdivision and shall not exceed six (6) miles." One (1) service area was used in this report and is shown in Exhibit 1 and incorporates the anticipated roadway improvement projects within the corporate boundary of the City of Sanger. B. SERVICE UNITS The "service unit" is a measure of consumption or use of the roadway facilities by new development and is defined as a vehicle -mile for transportation purposes. In regards to supply and demand, it is a lane -mile and a vehicle -trip of one -mile in length, respectively. The afternoon peak hour of traffic is the time period used for transportation planning and the estimation of trips from new development. The service volume that is supplied by a lane -mile of roadway facility is another component of the service unit. This volume is a function of the facility type, configuration, number of lanes, and level of service. The hourly service volumes used in this report are based on the hourly capacity for level of service D obtained from the DFW Regional Travel Model Criteria published by the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) and the Highway Capacity Manual. Level of service D roadways represents the minimal acceptable capacity limit for urban roadways. In the absence of providing a traffic study to generate the number of cars currently using the roads within the service area, we have assumed that the hourly capacity of the roads is equal to the number of cars currently using the roads in the peak am hour. Table 4 shows the service volumes as a function of the facility type for the types of roads within the service area. Table 4. Vehicle -Mile Capacities Hourly Vehicle -Mile Capacity Class Median Configuration per Lane -Mile of Roadway Facility Minor 4 Undivided 525 Lanes Collector 2 Undivided 450 Lanes Principal 4 Undivided 650 Lanes C. COST PER SERVICE UNIT The cost for each service unit is the cost for each vehicle -mile traveled or the cost to build a lane -mile for a vehicle -mile of travel at a level of service provided by the City's standards. The cost per service unit is calculated for each project within the service area. The number of service units in the service are is the measure of the presumed growth in the transportation demand projected over a ten-year period. Chapter 395 requires that Impact Fees be assessed only to pay for growth projected to occur within the next ten - years. Page 17 D. COST OF THE IMPROVEMENTS Per Chapter 395, costs that may be included in the cost per service unit are "...including and limited to the: 1. Construction contract price; 2. Surveying and engineering fees; 3. Land acquisition costs, including land purchases, court awards and costs, attorney's fees, and expert witness fees; and 4. Fees actually paid or contracted to be paid to an independent qualified engineer or financial consultant preparing or updating the Roadway improvements plan who is not an employee of the political subdivision." The engineer's opinion of the probable costs of the projects in the service area are based on the typical costs of construction. The roadway alignments identified as part of the roadway improvement projects were visual surveyed. Components required to accommodate the expansions or extensions were noted, such as the number of required lanes and the length of the project. In addition we made note of any other incidental construction items that would be necessary such as bridges or culvert crossings, traffic signals, highway ramps, and drainage structures. These costs were combined into an overall cost. Costs associated with State, Denton County, and developer driven projects in which the City has contributed a portion of the total project cost may be included in the calculations. At the time of this report, the City does not intend to contribute funds to any of these types of roadway projects. To simplify the calculations, we have separated the probable costs into two (2) categories; construction costs and construction allowances, and made several assumptions about the types of roads to be constructed. The roadway construction costs consist of the following items: (1) unclassified street excavation, (2) lime stabilization, (3) concrete pavement, (4) topsoil, (5) curb and gutter, and (6) allotment for turn lanes and median openings. The unit prices for these items are based on recently completed construction projects located in neighboring municipalities. Using the construction cost subtotal, a percentage of this total is calculated to account for major construction component allowances. These allowances include preparation of right-of-way, traffic control, pavement markings/markers, roadway drainage, special drainage structures, water and sewer relocations, turf reestablishment and erosion control, and street lighting. The allowance percentages are also based on values from RS Means and the amount of these types of construction estimated for each individual project. The paving and allowance subtotal is given a six percent (6%) allotment for mobilization and a twenty percent (20%) contingency to determine the construction cost total. To determine the total Impact Fee Project Cost, a percentage of the construction cost total is added to account for engineering, surveying, testing, and contractor mobilization. For alignments that will require right -of way acquisitions, we have assumed the allotment for the acquisitions should be $3 per square foot. Table 4 is a summary of the road improvement project list for the service area with the probable project cost projections. Detailed cost projections for each alignment are provided in Appendix A, Opinion of Probable Costs. Actual costs of construction will vary with time and are dependent on market conditions. Therefore, the cost projections reported in this study should not be utilized for the City's building program or construction CIP. Page 18 s Table 4. Ten Year Roadway Improvements Plan Opinion of Probable Costs Length Total Project Street Name Class Limits (mi) Cost Willow St./ Minor 4 5th Street to FM 2164 3.34 $ 18,147,146 McReynolds Rd. Lanes Minor 4 Willow St./McReynolds Rd. $1,130,328 Indian Ln. Lanes to FM 455 0.88 Marion Rd. Minor 4 FM 455 to Lois Rd. 1.37 $6,995,037 Lanes Lois Rd. Minor 4 Huling Rd, to 1-35 1.68 $8,947,950 Lanes Belz Rd. Minor 4 1-35 SBFR to Metz Rd. 0.97 $5,130,524 Lanes Metz Rd. Minor 4 Belz Rd. to FM 455 0.68 $3,681,822 Lanes Utility Rd. Collector 2 RR Tracks to Marion Rd. 0.77 $3,180,747 Lanes Keaton Rd. Collector 2 Belz Rd. to FM 455 0.67 $2,831,252 Lanes Future Belz Rd - Minor 4 1-35 NBFR to FM 455 1.02 $6,877,083 Indian Connector Lanes Future East-West Minor 4 Cowling Rd. to FM 2164 3.51 $23,495,036 Thoroughfare Lanes (at FM 2153) E. SERVICE UNIT CALCULATION The service unit for the computation of roadway impact fees is the vehicle -mile of travel during the afternoon peak -hour. The roadway demand service units (vehicle -miles) for each service area are the sum of the vehicle -miles "generated" by each category of land use in the service area. All developed and developable land is categorized as either residential or non-residential. For residential land uses, the number of housing units in each service area is multiplied by a transportation demand factor to compute the vehicle -miles of travel that occur during the afternoon peak hour or the average amount of demand caused by the residential land uses in the service area. The square footages calculated using the employment data and conversion units described in Section 2A were used to calculate the vehicle -miles for non- residential land uses. To determine the cost per service unit, the growth in vehicle -miles of travel for the service area is required. The growth in vehicle -miles from 2015 to 2025 is based upon the changes in residential and non-residential growth for the period. This growth has been estimated in Section III.A. of this report. The existing and projected Land Use Assumptions for the dwelling units and the square footage of basic, service, and retail land uses provide the basis for the projected increase Page 19 r h then summed to calculate the total peak hour vehicle -miles of demand for each service area. The transportation demand factors are derived from the iTE Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition and the Regional Origin -Destination Travel Survey performed by NCTCOG. The iTE Trip Generation Manual, 9rh Edition provides variables for the number of trips that are produced or attracted to the land use. The transportation demand factor also includes the length of each trip (L). The average trip length for each category is based on the travel characteristics survey conducted by NCTCOG and the National Household Travel Survey (NHTS). The maximum trip length (Lmax), for land uses which are characterized by longer average trip lengths (primarily residential uses), has been limited to a length based on the nature of the roadway network within the service area, along with consideration of the existing City boundaries. For the purposes of this report, the maximum trip length available is the boundary of the service area, which is six (6) miles. The adjustment made to the average trip length statistic in the computation of the maximum trip length is the origin -destination reduction. This adjustment is made because the roadway impact fee is charged to both the origin and destination end of the trip. For the retail category of land uses, the rate is adjusted because a percentage of retail trips are made by people visiting these locations as part of an existing trip between work and home and are therefore called pass -by trips. The retail trips are then reduced to avoid counting these trips twice. Per the ITE, retail shopping centers have an average pass -by trip percentage of 34%. For the purposes of this report, we have used this value for ato calculate the demand factor for retail areas. The computation of the transportation demand factor is detailed in the following equation: TDF = T * (1- a) * Lmax where Lmax = min(L * OD or SAL) Variables: TDF = Transportation Demand Factor T = Trip Rate (peak hour trips / unit) Fb= Pass -By Discount (% of trips) Lmax= Maximum Trip Length (miles) L = Average Trip Length (miles) SAL = Max Service Area Trip Length (see Table 5) OD = Origin -Destination Reduction (50%) Table 5 shows the derivation of the Transportation DemandFactorfor the residential land uses and the three (3) non-residential land use categories. The values utilized for all variables shown in the transportation demand factor equation are also shown in the table. Page 110 Table 5. Transportation Demand Factor Calculations (TDF) Variable Residential Basic Service Retail T 1.00 0.97 1.49 3.71 Pb 0% 0% 0% 34% L 17.21 10.02 10.92 6.43 Lmax ` 6.00 5.01 5.46 3.22 TDF j 6.00 1 4.86 1 8.14 7.89 * 50% of L is less than Lmax for non-residential land uses; therefore this lower trip length is used for calculating the TDF for non-residential land uses Table 6 shows the vehicle -mile calculations for 2015 and 2025 using the above TDF values. Table 6. Ten Year Growth Projections 2015 Residential Vehicle -Miles Housing Units TDF Vehicle -Miles 2,585 6 15,510 Non -Residential Vehicle -Miles Square -Feet TDF Vehicle -Miles (in 1,000 SQFT) Basic Service I Retail Basic Service Retail Basic Service Retail 679,000 801,940 207,244 4.8 1 8.14 7.8 3,259 6,528 1,617 2015 Total Vehicle Miles = 26,913 2025 Residential Vehicle -Miles Housing Units TDF Vehicle -Miles 2,900 6 17,400 Non -Residential Vehicle -Miles Square -Feet TDF Vehicle -Miles (in 1,000 SQFT) Basic Service I Retail Basic Service I Retail Basic Service Retail 762,000 1 901,039 1 232.854 4.8 8.14 7.8 3,658 7,334 1,816 2015 Total Vehicle Miles = 30,208 Projected Increase in Vehicle -Miles = 30,208 - 26,913 = 3,295 vehicle -miles Page Ill E�KON V. IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS A. MAXIMUM ASSESSABLE IMPACT FEE PER SERVICE UNIT The maximum assessable impact fee is the sum of the eligible Impact Fee Roadway Improvement Project costs for the service area divided by the growth in travel attributable to new development projected to occur within the 10-year period. The documentation for this calculation has been provided in Appendix C. B. PLAN FOR AWARDING THE ROADWAY IMPACT FEE CREDIT Per Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code, the Roadway Impact Fees Program must contain specific enumeration of a plan for awarding the impact fee credit. This is provided in Section 395.014 of the Code and states: "(7) A plan for awarding: (A) a credit for the portion of ad valorem tax and utility service revenues generated by new service units during the program period that is used for the payment of improvements, including the payment of debt, that are included in the capital improvements plan; or (B) In the alternative, a credit equal to 50 percent of the total projected cost of implementing the capital improvements plan..." The max assessable fee has been based on the option of the 50% credit. Table 7 illustrates the computation of the maximum assessable impact fee computed for the service area. The description of how each line has been calculated is provided in Appendix C. Table 7. Maximum Assessable Fee Per Service Unit/Vehicle-Mile Line Description Value 1 Total Vehicle -Miles of Capacity Added by the Roadway Improvement Projects 29,539 2 Total Vehicle -Miles of Existing Demand From the Roadway Improvement Projects 7,709 3 Total Vehicle -Miles of Existing Deficiencies From the Existing Roadway Facilities 141 4 Net Amount of Vehicle -Miles of Capacity Added 21,971 5 Total Cost of the Roadway Improvement Projects $80,416,924 6 Cost of the Net Capacity Supplied $59,814,491 7 Cost to Meet the Existing Needs and Usage $20,602,434 8 Total Vehicle -Miles of New Demand over 10-Years 3,295 9 Percent of Capacity Added Attributable to Growth (Must be Less than or Equal to 100%) 15% 10 Cost of Capacity Added Attributable to Growth $8,970,372 11 50% Credit $4,485,186 12 Max Assessable Fee Per Service Unit/Vehicle Mile $1,361.24 Page 112 K ON C. SERVICE UNIT DEMAND PER UNIT OF DEVELOPMENT The maximum allowable roadway impact fee for development is calculated by multiplying the impact fee rate by the number of service units projected for the proposed development. The Land Use/Vehicle-Mile Equivalency Table (LUVMET) provided in Appendix D provides the service unit multipliers for typical land uses that should be used to calculate the maximum impact assessment. This table lists the most common land uses that may ,occur within the City. All possible categories of development may not be represented, However, in these situations, we suggest using a similar use which will generate similar trip characteristics. The trip rate is the average number of trips generated during the afternoon peak hour by each land use per development unit. The next column is the pass -by rate the lTE Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition. To convert vehicle trips to vehicle -miles, it is necessary to multiply trips by trip length, The NCTCOG trip length values are based on the Regional Origin -Destination Travel Survey performed by the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG). The other adjustment to trip length is the 50% origin - destination reduction to avoid double counting of trips. Based on the State Law, there is a limit on transportation service unit demand. If the adjusted trip length is above the maximum trip length within the service area (for this study, 6 miles is the maximum trip length), the maximum trip length used for calculation is reduced to the corresponding value. The last column in the LUVMET shows the vehicle -miles per development unit calculated by multiplying the trip rate by the maximum trip length. This is the Transportation Demand Factorand should be used to calculate the maximum assessable impact fee. The number of service units is multiplied by the impact fee rate (established by City ordinance) in order to determine the impact fee for a development. Page 113 K VI. SAMPLE CALCULATIONS The following section details two (2) examples of maximum assessable roadway impact fee calculations. Example 1: Development Type - One (1) Unit of Single -Family Housing Roadway Impact Fee Calculation Steps - Example 1 Determine Development Unit and Vehicle -Miles Per Development Unit Step 1 From APX D [Land Use - Vehicle -mile Equivalency Table] Development Type: 1 Dwelling Unit of Single -Family Detached Housing Number of Development Units.- 1 Dwelling Unit Veh-Mi Per Development Unit: 6.06 Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit Step 2 $1,367.27 Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Impact Fee = # of Development Units x Veh-Mi Per Dev Unit x Max. Fee Per Service Unit Step 3 Maximum Assessable Impact Fee = 1 x 6.06 x $1,361.21 $8,248.93 Example 2: Development Type - 25,000 square foot Home Improvement Superstore Roadway Impact Fee Calculation Steps - Example 2 Determine Development Unit and Vehicle -Miles Per Development Unit Step 1 From APX D [Land Use - Vehicle -mile Equivalency Table] Development Type: 25, 000 square feet of Home Improvement Superstore Development Unit: 1,000 square feet of Gross Floor Area Veh-Mi Per Development Unit:3.96 Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit Step 2 $7, 361.27 Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Impact Fee = # of Development Units x Veh-Mi Per Dev Unit x Max. Fee Per Service Unit Step 3 Maximum Assessable Impact Fee = (25,000/1,000) x 3,96 x $1,361.21 $134,759.79 Page 114 yK ON VII. CONCLUSION The City of Sanger has established a process to implement the assessment and collection of roadway impact fees through the adoption of an impact fee ordinance that is consistent with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. This report establishes the maximum allowable roadway impact fee that could be assessed by the City of Sanger within the service area boundary. The maximum assessable roadway impact fees calculated is $1,361.21 This is a guide to the assessment of roadway impact fees pertaining to future development and the City's need for roadway improvements to accommodate that growth. Following the public hearing process, the City Council may establish an amount to be assessed (if any) up to the maximum established within this report and update the Roadway Impact Fee Ordinance accordingly. It is our opinion that the data and methodology used in this report are appropriate and consistent with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code, and the Land Use Assumptions and the proposed Roadway Improvements Plan are appropriately incorporated into the process. Page 115 EIIK ON Roadway Impact Fee Opinion of Probable Costs CITY OF SANGER IMPACT FEE STUDY CONCEPTUAL LEVEL COST PROJECTIONS June 2015 Street Name: Willow St/McReynolds Rd Limits: 5th St to FM 2164 Impact Fee Class: Ultimate Class: Length (LF): 17,635 Existing two lane concrete roadway from 5th St to Jones; two lane asphalt from Jones to FM 2164. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost Unclassified Street Excavation 23,513.33 CY $ 15.00 $ 352,700.00 6" Lime or Cement Subgrade Treatment (27 Ibs/sf) 99,931.67 SY $ 4.00 $ 399,726.67 8" Reinf. Concrete Pvmt with 6" Integral Curb 92,093.89 SY $ 46.00 $ 4,236,318.89 4" Topsoil 19,594.44 SY $ 5.00 $ 97,972.22 4' Wide Concrete Sidewalk 141,080 SF $ 4.00 $ 564,320.00 Turn Lanes and Median Openings SY $ 50.00 $ - Signalized Intersection (at Indian Rd, FM 2164) 2 EA $ 200,000.00 $ 400,000.00 $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal $ 6,051,037.78 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost R.O.W. Preparation 6% $ 363,062.27 Traffic Control During Construction 5% $ 302,551.89 Pavment Markings 3% $ 181,531.13 Roadway Drainage 30% $ 1,815,311.33 Roadway Lighting 6% $ 363,062.27 Special Drainage Structures (bridges and culverts) 7 crossings 6% $ 363,062.27 Minor Water Line Adjustments 6% $ 363,062.27 Minor Wastewater Line Adjustments 4% $ 242,041.51 Erosion Control/Establish Turf 3% $ 181,531,13 Basic Landscaping/Irrigation 3% $ 181,531.13 Franchised Utility Facilities OH -Electric, UG Fiber Optic, Telephone 3% $ 181,531.13 Railroad Crossing Single track between 1st and Railroad 1 3% $ 181,531.13 Tree Mitigation 1 3% $ 181,531.13 Other Bridge west of Ranger Creek Rd 1 0% $ - Allowance Subtotal $ 4,901,340.60 Paving and Allowance Subtotal $ 10,952,378.38 Construction Contingency @ 20% $ 2,190,475.68 Total Construction Cost $ 13,142,854.05 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Construction $ 13,142,854.05 Engineering/Survey/Testing 20% $ 2,628,570.81 Mobilization 6% $ 788,571.24 Previous City Contribution $ - Other $ - R.O.W. and Easement Acquisition For Area from 5th to the RR $3/SF $ 1,587,150.00 Total Impact Fee Project Cost 1 $ 18,147,146.11 PREPARED BY EIKON JUNE 2015 CITY OF SANGER IMPACT FEE STUDY CONCEPTUAL LEVEL COST PROJECTIONS June 2015 Street Name: Indian Ln Limits: Willow St/McReynolds Rd to FM 455 Impact Fee Class: Ultimate Class: Length (LF): 4;641 Existing concrete roadway to remain. Roadway is approx. 37 ft wide for approx. 3472 LF and approx. 25 ft wide for approx. 1169 LF. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost Unclassified Street Excavation 1,054.93 CY $ 15.00 $ 15,823.89 6" Lime or Cement Subgrade Treatment (27 Ibs/sf) 7,360.89 SY $ 4.00 $ 29,443.56 8" Reinf. Concrete Pvmt with 6" Integral Curb 6,329.56 SY $ 46.00 $ 291,159.56 4" Topsoil 4,641.00 SY $ 5.00 $ 23,205.00 4' Wide Concrete Sidewalk 7,432 SF $ 4.00 $ 29,728.00 Turn Lanes and Median Openings SY $ 50.00 $ Signalized Intersection EA $ 200,000.00 $ $ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal $ 389,360.00 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost R.O.W. Preparation 6% $ 23,361.60 Traffic Control During Construction 5% $ 19,468.00 Pavment Markings 3% $ 11,680.80 Roadway Drainage 30% $ 116,808.00 Roadway Lighting 6% $ 23,361.60 Special Drainage Structures (bridges and culverts) 2 culverts 6% $ 23,361.60 Minor Water Line Adjustments 6% $ 23,361.60 Minor Wastewater Line Adjustments 4% $ 15,574.40 Erosion Control/Establish Turf 3% $ 11,680.80 Basic Landscaping/Irrigation 3% $ 11,680.80 Franchised Utility Facilities OH utils on east; switchgear in r.o.w. east side 10% $ 38,936.00 Railroad Crossing 5% $ 19,468.00 Tree Mitigation 3% $ 11,680.80 Other move fence around water tower 2% $ 7,787.20 Allowance Subtotal $ 358,211.20 Paving and Allowance Subtotal $ 747,571.20 Construction Contingency @ 20% $ 149,514.24 Total Construction Cost $ 897,085.44 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Construction $ 897,085.44 Engineering/Survey/Testing 20% $ 179,417.09 Mobilization 6% $ 53,825.13 Previous City Contribution $ - Other $ R.O.W. and Easement Acquisition lNone $3/SF 1 $ Total Impact Fee Project Cost 1 $ 1,130,327.65 PREPARED BY EIKON JUNE 2015 CITY OF SANGER IMPACT FEE STUDY CONCEPTUAL LEVEL COST PROJECTIONS June 2015 Street Name: Limits: Impact Fee Class: Ultimate Class: Length (LF): Marion Rd FM 455 to Lois Rd 7,234 Existing two lane asphalt roadway. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost Unclassified Street Excavation 9,645.33 CY $ 15.00 $ 144,680.00 6" Lime or Cement Subgrade Treatment (27 Ibs/sf 40,992.67 SY $ 4.00 $ 163,970.67 8" Reinf. Concrete Pvmt with 6" Integral Curb 37,777.56 SY $ 46.00 $ 1,737,767.56 4" Topsoil 8,037.78 SY $ 5.00 $ 40,188.89 4' Wide Concrete Sidewalk 57,872 SF $ 4.00 $ 231,488.00 Turn Lanes and Median Openings I SY $ 50.00 $ - Signalized Intersection EA $ 200,000.00 $ $ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal $ 2,318,095.11 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost R.O.W. Preparation 6% $ 139,085.71 Traffic Control During Construction 5% $ 115,904.76 Pavment Markings 3% $ 69,542.85 Roadway Drainage 30% $ 695,428.53 Roadway Lighting 6% $ 139,085.71 Special Drainage Structures (bridges and culverts) 3 culverts 6% $ 139,085.71 Minor Water Line Adjustments 6% $ 139,085.71 Minor Wastewater Line Adjustments 4% $ 92,723.80 Erosion Control/Establish Turf 3% $ 69,542.85 Basic Landscaping/Irrigation 3% $ 69,542.85 Franchised Utility Facilities OH-E on e. side; UG-Fiber/Tel both sides 3% $ 69,542.85 Railroad Crossing 3% $ 69,542.85 Tree Mitigation 3% $ 69,542.85 Other 0% $ - Allowance Subtotal $ 1,877,657.04 Paving and Allowance Subtotal $ 4,195,752.15 Construction Contingency @ 20% $ 839,150.43 Total Construction Cost 1 $ 5,034,902.58 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Construction $ 5,034,902.58 Engineering/Survey/Testing 20% $ 1,006,980.52 Mobilization 6% $ 302,094.15 Previous City Contribution $ - Other $ - R.O.W. and Easement Acquisition I Entire Length at 72 Feet Wide I $3/SF 1 $ 651,060.00 Total Impact Fee Project Cost 1 $ 6,995,037.25 PREPARED BY EIKON JUNE 2015 CITY OF SANGER IMPACT FEE STUDY CONCEPTUAL LEVEL COST PROJECTIONS June 2015 Street Name: Limits: Impact Fee Class: Ultimate Class: Length (LF): Lois Rd Huling Rd to 1-35 8,870 Existing two lane asphalt roadway. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost Unclassified Street Excavation 11,826.67 CY $ 15.00 $ 177,400.00 6" Lime or Cement Subgrade Treatment (27 Ibs/sf) 50,263.33 SY $ 4.00 $ 201,053.33 8" Reinf. Concrete Pvmt with 6" Integral Curb 46,321.11 SY $ 46.00 $ 2,130,771.11 4" Topsoil 9,855.56 SY $ 5.00 $ 49,277.78 4' Wide Concrete Sidewalk 70,960 SF $ 4.00 $ 283,840.00 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 8001 SY $ 50.00 $ 40,000.00 Signalized Intersection EA $ 200,000.00 $ - $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal $ 2,882,342.22 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost R.O.W. Preparation 6% $ 172,940.53 Traffic Control During Construction 5% $ 144,117.11 Pavment Markings 3% $ 86,470.27 Roadway Drainage 30% $ 864,702.67 Roadway Lighting 6% $ 172,940.53 Special Drainage Structures (bridges and culverts) 5 culverts (2 major) 8% $ 230,587.38 Minor Water Line Adjustments 6% $ 172,940.53 Minor Wastewater Line Adjustments 4% $ 115,293.69 Erosion Control/Establish Turf 3% $ 86,470.27 Basic Landscaping/Irrigation 3% $ 86,470.27 Franchised Utility Facilities OH-E s. side; UG-Fiber both sides 5% $ 144,117.11 Railroad Crossing I single track east of Walmart 5% $ 144,117.11 Tree Mitigation 3% $ 86,470.27 Other 0% $ - Allowance Subtotal $ 2,507,637.73 Paving and Allowance Subtotal $ 5,389,979.96 Construction Contingency @ 20% $ 1,077,995.99 Total Construction Cost $ 6,467,975.95 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Construction $ 6,467,975.95 Engineering/Survey/Testing 20% $ 1,293,595.19 Mobilization 6% $ 388,078.56 Previous City Contribution $ - Other $ - R.O.W. and Easement Acquisition Entire Length at 72 Feet Wide $3/SF 1 $ 798,300.00 Total Impact Fee Project Cost 1 $ 8,947,949.69 PREPARED BY EIKON JUNE 2015 CITY OF SANGER IMPACT FEE STUDY CONCEPTUAL LEVEL COST PROJECTIONS June 2015 Street Name: Belz Rd Existing two lane asphalt roadway. Limits: 1-35 SBFR to Metz Rd Impact Fee Class: Ultimate Class: Length (LF): 5,126 Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost Unclassified Street Excavation 6,834.67 CY $ 15.00 $ 102,520.00 6" Lime or Cement Subgrade Treatment (27 Ibs/sf) 29,047.33 SY $ 4.00 $ 116,189.33 8" Reinf. Concrete Pvmt with 6" Integral Curb 26,769.11 SY $ 46.00 $ 1,231,379.11 4" Topsoil 5,695.56 SY $ 5.00 $ 28,477.78 4' Wide Concrete Sidewalk 41,008 SF $ 4.00 $ 164,032.00 Turn Lanes and Median Openings I SY 1 $ 50.00 $ - Signalized Intersection EA $ 200,000.00 $ - $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal $ 1,642,598.22 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost R.O.W. Preparation 6% $ 98,555.89 Traffic Control During Construction 5% $ 82,129.91 Pavment Markings 3% $ 49,277.95 Roadway Drainage 30% $ 492,779.47 Roadway Lighting 6% $ 98,555.89 Special Drainage Structures (bridges and culverts) 2 culverts (one major) 10% $ 164,259.82 Minor Water Line Adjustments 6% $ 98,555.89 Minor Wastewater Line Adjustments 4% $ 65,703.93 Erosion Control/Establish Turf 3% $ 49,277.95 Basic Landscaping/Irrigation 3% $ 49,277.95 Franchised Utility Facilities OH-E on metal poles n. side; OH-E conc 6% $ 98,555.89 Railroad Crossing 3% $ 49,277.95 Tree Mitigation 3% $ 49,277.95 Other 0% $ - Allowance Subtotal $ 1,445,486.44 Paving and Allowance Subtotal $ 3,088,084.66 Construction Contingency @ 20% $ 617,616.93 Total Construction Cost $ 3,705,701.59 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Construction $ 3,705,701.59 Engineering/Survey/Testing 20% $ 741,140.32 Mobilization 6% $ 222,342.10 Previous City Contribution $ - Other $ - R.O.W. and Easement Acquisition Entire Length at 72 Feet Wide I $3/SF 1 $ 461,340.00 Total Impact Fee Project Cost 1 $ 5,130,524.00 PREPARED BY EIKON JUNE 2015 CITY OF SANGER IMPACT FEE STUDY CONCEPTUAL LEVEL COST PROJECTIONS June 2015 Street Name: Limits: Impact Fee Class: Ultimate Class: Length (LF): Metz Rd Belz Rd to FM 455 3,525 Existing two lane asphalt roadway. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost Unclassified Street Excavation 4,700.00 CY $ 15.00 $ 70,500.00 6" Lime or Cement Subgrade Treatment (27 Ibs/sf) 19,975.00 SY $ 4.00 $ 79,900.00 8" Reinf. Concrete Pvmt with 6" Integral Curb 18,408.33 SY $ 46.00 $ 846,783.33 4" Topsoil 3,916.67 SY $ 5.00 $ 19,583.33 4' Wide Concrete Sidewalk 28,200 SF $ 4.00 $ 112,800.00 Turn Lanes and Median Openings I SY I $ 50.00 $ - Signalized Intersection EA $ 200,000.00 $ - $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal $ 1,129,566.67 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost R.O.W. Preparation 6% $ 67,774.00 Traffic Control During Construction 5% $ 56,478.33 Pavment Markings 3% $ 33,887.00 Roadway Drainage 30% $ 338,870.00 Roadway Lighting 6% $ 67,774.00 Special Drainage Structures (bridges and culverts) 3 culverts 10% $ 112,956.67 Minor Water Line Adjustments 6% $ 67,774.00 Minor Wastewater Line Adjustments 4% $ 45,182.67 Erosion Control/Establish Turf 3% $ 33,887.00 Basic Landscaping/Irrigation 3% $ 33,887.00 Franchised Utility Facilities OH-E both sides 10% $ 112,956.67 Railroad Crossing 8% $ 90,365.33 Tree Mitigation 3% $ 33,887.00 Other Site distance issue at FM 455 0% $ - Allowance Subtotal $ 1,095,679.67 Paving and Allowance Subtotal 777 2,225,246.33 Construction Contingency @ 20% $ 445,049.27 Total Construction Cost $ 2,670,295.60 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Construction $ 2,670,295.60 Engineering/Survey/Testing 20% $ 534,059.12 Mobilization 6% $ 160,217.74 Previous City Contribution $ - Other $ - R.O.W. and Easement Acquisition I Entire Length at 72 Feet Wide I $3/SF 1 $ 317,250.00 Total Impact Fee Project Cost 1 $ 3,681,822.46 PREPARED BY EIKON JUNE 2015 CITY OF SANGER IMPACT FEE STUDY CONCEPTUAL LEVEL COST PROJECTIONS June 2015 Street Name: Extension of Utility Rd Limits: RR tracks to Marion Rd (at Huling Rd) Impact Fee Class: Ultimate Class: Length (LF): 4,055 New roadway adjacent to farm and open fields. Roadway to go between two houses at Marion. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost Unclassified Street Excavation 3,754.63 CY $ 15.00 $ 56,319.44 6" Lime or Cement Subgrade Treatment (27 Ibs/sf) 13,967.22 SY $ 4.00 $ 55,868.89 8" Reinf. Concrete Pvmt with 6" Integral Curb 12,165.00 SY $ 46.00 $ 559,590.00 4" Topsoil 3,604.44 SY $ 5.00 $ 18,022.22 4' Wide Concrete Sidewalk 32,440 SF $ 4.00 $ 129,760.00 Turn Lanes and Median Openings I SY $ 50.00 $ - Signalized Intersection EA $ 200,000.00 $ - $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal $ 819,560.56 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost R.O.W. Preparation 6% $ 49,173.63 Traffic Control During Construction 5% $ 40,978.03 Pavment Markings 3% $ 24,586.82 Roadway Drainage 30% $ 245,868.17 Roadway Lighting 6% $ 49,173.63 Special Drainage Structures (bridges and culverts) 6% $ 49,173.63 Minor Water Line Adjustments 6% $ 49,173.63 Minor Wastewater Line Adjustments 4% $ 32,782.42 Erosion Control/Establish Turf 3% $ 24,586.82 Basic Landscaping/Irrigation 3% $ 24,586.82 Franchised Utility Facilities 3% $ 24,586.82 Railroad Crossing I single track 8% $ 65,564.84 Tree Mitigation 3% $ 24,586.82 Other 0% $ - Allowance Subtotal 1 $ 704,822.08 Paving and Allowance Subtotal $ 1,524,382.63 Construction Contingency @ 20% $ 304,876.53 Total Construction Cost $ 1,829,259.16 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Construction $ 1,829,259.16 Engineering/Survey/Testing 20% $ 365,851.83 Mobilization 6% $ 109,755.55 Previous City Contribution $ - Other $ - R.O.W. and Easement Acquisition Entire Length at 72 Feet Wide $3/SF $ 875,880.00 Total Impact Fee Project Cost $ 3,180,746.54 PREPARED BY EIKON JUNE 2015 CITY OF SANGER IMPACT FEE STUDY CONCEPTUAL LEVEL COST PROJECTIONS June 2015 Street Name: Extension of Keaton Rd New roadway adjacent to farm field and signal tower site. Limits: Belz Rd to FM 455 Impact Fee Class: Ultimate Class: Length (LF): 3,527 Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost Unclassified Street Excavation 3,265.74 CY $ 15.00 $ 48,986.11 6" Lime or Cement Subgrade Treatment (27 Ibs/sf) 12,148.56 SY $ 4.00 $ 48,594.22 8" Reinf. Concrete Pvmt with 6" Integral Curb 10,581.00 SY $ 46.00 $ 486,726.00 4" Topsoil 3,135.11 SY $ 5.00 $ 15,675.56 4' Wide Concrete Sidewalk 28,216 SF $ 4.00 $ 112,864.00 Turn Lanes and Median Openings SY $ 50.00 $ - Signalized Intersection EA $ 200.000.00 $ $ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal $ 712,845.89 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost R.O.W. Preparation 6% $ 42,770.75 Traffic Control During Construction 5% $ 35,642.29 Pavment Markings 3% $ 21,385.38 Roadway Drainage 30% $ 213,853.77 Roadway Lighting 6% $ 42,770.75 Special Drainage Structures (bridges and culverts) 10% $ 71,284.59 Minor Water Line Adjustments 6% $ 42,770.75 Minor Wastewater Line Adjustments 49/. $ 28,513.84 Erosion Control/Establish Turf 3% $ 21,385.38 Basic Landscaping/Irrigation 3% $ 21,385.38 Franchised Utility Facilities OH-E on concrete poles e. side; OH-E on west sid 10% $ 71,284.59 Railroad Crossing 3% $ 21,385.38 Tree Mitigation 3% $ 21,385.38 Other 0% $ - Allowance Subtotal $ 655,818.22 Paving and Allowance Subtotal $ 1,368,664.11 Construction Contingency @ 20% $ 273,732.82 Total Construction Cost $ 1,642,396.93 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Construction $ 1,642,396.93 Engineering/Survey/Testing 20% $ 328,479.39 Mobilization 6% $ 98,543.82 Previous City Contribution $ Other $ - R.O.W, and Easement Acquisition Entire Length at 72 Feet Wide $3/SF $ 761,832.00 Total Impact Fee Project Cost $ 2,831,252.13 PREPARED BY EIKON JUNE 2015 CITY OF SANGER IMPACT FEE STUDY CONCEPTUAL LEVEL COST PROJECTIONS June 2015 Street Name: Future Belz Rd - Indian Rd Connector Future roadway through open fields. Limits: 1-35 NBFR to FM 455 Impact Fee Class: Ultimate Class: Length (LF): 5,385 Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost Unclassified Street Excavation 7,180.00 CY $ 15.00 $ 107,700.00 6" Lime or Cement Subgrade Treatment (27 Ibs/sf) 30,515.00 SY $ 4.00 $ 122,060.00 8" Reinf. Concrete Pvmt with 6" Integral Curb 28,121.67 SY $ 46.00 $ 1,293,596.67 4" Topsoil 5,983.33 SY $ 5.00 $ 29,916.67 4' Wide Concrete Sidewalk 43,080 SF $ 4.00 $ 172,320.00 Turn Lanes and Median Openings SY I $ 50.00 $ - Signalized Intersection EA $ 200,000.00 $ - $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal $ 1,725,593.33 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost R.O.W. Preparation 6% $ 103,535.60 Traffic Control During Construction 5% $ 86,279.67 Pavment Markings 3% $ 51,767.80 Roadway Drainage 30% $ 517,678.00 Roadway Lighting 6% $ 103,535.60 Special Drainage Structures (bridges and culverts) 6 stream crossings 30% $ 517,678.00 Minor Water Line Adjustments 6% $ 103,535.60 Minor Wastewater Line Adjustments 4% $ 69,023.73 Erosion Control/Establish Turf 3% $ 51,767.80 Basic Landscaping/Irrigation 3% $ 51,767.80 Franchised Utility Facilities OH-E along n, side of FM 455 10% $ 172,559.33 Railroad Crossing single track 10% 1 $ 172,559.33 Tree Mitigation 3% $ 51,767.80 Other 0% $ - Allowance Subtotal $ 2,053,456.07 Paving and Allowance Subtotal $ 3,779,049.40 Construction Contingency @ 20% $ 755,809.88 Total Construction Cost $ 4,534,859.28 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Construction $ 4,534,859.28 Engineering/Survey/Testing 20% $ 906,971.86 Mobilization 6% $ 272,091.56 Previous City Contribution $ - Other $ - R.O.W. and Easement Acquisition Entire Length at 72 Feet Wide I $3/SF $ 1,163,160.00 Total Impact Fee Project Cost 1 $ 6,877,082.69 PREPARED BY EIKON JUNE 2015 CITY OF SANGER IMPACT FEE STUDY CONCEPTUAL LEVEL COST PROJECTIONS June 2015 Street Name: Future East-West Thoroughfare Future roadway through open fields. Limits: Cowling Rd to FM 2164 (at FM 2153) Impact Fee Class: Ultimate Class: Length (LF): 18,533 Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost Unclassified Street Excavation 24,710.67 CY $ 15.00 $ 370,660.00 6" Lime or Cement Subgrade Treatment (27 Ibs/sf) 105,020.33 SY $ 4.00 $ 420,081.33 8" Reinf. Concrete Pvmt with 6" Integral Curb 96,783.44 SY $ 46.00 $ 4,452,038.44 4" Topsoil 20,592.22 SY $ 5.00 $ 102,961.11 4' Wide Concrete Sidewalk 148,264 SF $ 4.00 $ 593,056.00 Turn Lanes and Median Openings SY $ 50.00 $ - Signalized Intersection (at FM 2164) 1 EA $ 200,000.00 $ 200,000.00 $ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal $ 6,138,796.89 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost R.O.W. Preparation 6% $ 368,327.81 Traffic Control During Construction 5% $ 306,939,84 Pavment Markings 3% $ 184,163.91 Roadway Drainage 30% $ 1,841,639.07 Roadway Lighting 6% $ 368,327.81 Special Drainage Structures (bridges and culverts) 11 stream crossings 35% $ 2,148,578.91 Minor Water Line Adjustments 6% $ 368,327.81 Minor Wastewater Line Adjustments 4% $ 245,551.88 Erosion Control/Establish Turf 3% $ 184,163.91 Basic Landscaping/Irrigation 3% $ 184,163.91 Franchised Utility Facilities OH-E n. side from Cowling to railroad 3% $ 184,163.91 Railroad Crossing single track 3% $ 184,163.91 Tree Mitigation 3% $ 184,163.91 Other Improvements to intersection with Railr, O% $ - Allowance Subtotal $ 6,752,676.58 Paving and Allowance Subtotal $ 12,891,473.47 Construction Contingency @ 20% $ 2,578,294.69 Total Construction Cost $ 15,469,768.16 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Construction $ 15,469,768.16 Engineering/Survey/Testing 20% $ 3,093,953.63 Mobilization 6% $ 928,186.09 Previous City Contribution $ - Other $ R.O.W. and Easement Acquisition Entire Length at 72 Feet Wide $3/SF $ 4,003,128.00 Total Impact Fee Project Cost $ 23,495,035.88 PREPARED BY EIKON JUNE 2015 Roadway Impact Fee Service Units of Supply N l0 (� O V N h N M l0 ej U M O Ol m n N O O ^ O^ O 0 m m W m m V V m b4 tR Hi to to kA 69 H1 tR tp V1 Y y a V y y •— y O N c M co V cp m N Iq _ M O M O (0 NN N O M m m c N to N (V N N W O i US a tMn (\ O m ^ w t^n M V M O M M N V CO m V N m 2 @ wE aEiYF�- a' J O m y R O cq m N N M O N V m w O tp V n ^ m N U N T O 1� N Nl N N 0) L _ a ~ N > f a= v) T m vyYa N N N N ON o N Z N N N N _ FO- � U a u > m m m o o °O °l o 0 0 0 0 mQ c_ 0 X m d aE 0 2 N N N N N N O O N N 0 0 V i N N N N N N m V N N V � Z y m m J t W M co r (0 NO N C E J M O O M y y m N C m J v N C m J v v C m J v N C m J a N C m J v N G m J v C m J N $ C i9 J ry o N c m J v N C m J v O O O O O O U U O O F E F E E O O E E U U W m o o c T- U c J a O' -O a a Q! o U C c u c m 'O y p C rn o' O H Z ry O .a N a, i T Y c O c H W w � in 3 O a E J m Y a N N 3 L N N m v J L LL W N j LL v N U N p o O _ �' N w - 2 N `.0 a N u 2 N N U N U O) ON O n O M 7 N O N W c0 LO N a)co m co M E W 0 (3) M V an co� N to M N O r, r O xUnY>E w N N Y 0. N 61 N O O M N O_ V N N O LO N_ 61 CO w OJ O M O OJ l0 V Ln d1 d1 M O) CO N w n to d' M N (0 O h CO V 10 U N O C N� N N N F N N M W O Ln N W n n M n N M M N O) O O1 h m u) N Ln dl O7 t0 N Ln n O) T_ _ � 7 S N T N H u° Ln in Lo Lo Lo Lo o 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 o n CD CL x LNn n m m uN uN v v v t v v m (oo Ln v v v Lo F° Va U o o a o 0 0 0 o a o o a o 0 0 0 0 W v VI Q C_ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Y N a E Q O w N Ln N m N Ln N o to m N Ln N o Ln O m p to o m o N O w Ln N o to Ln N o Ln O to o to N U i Ln Ln Ln Ln q N Ln d' d' 'I V d' <i' Ln t0 Ln U = Z N N C f0 J N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N E t 10 0] 03 cq n M c0 V Ol h O) O M M O c0 a) N cJ N V O tt1 dl h r l0 L M h n t0 M M O) p� C 0 J M O N O O M (`1 O N (V t0 O N O O c N C N C O C W C `o O C `t N C � N c o Ol c O `o 01 c `o O C `o N C o N C `o O C � W C O m O C � 41 C N C N C N C U `o c o C `o C `o C u `o c 'o c u u u N u u N u 01 o C a 'U o C u N u O u N o c E E F E QI o E E W o N 0 0 N 0 0 o E c E o 0 o F U U U U U U U a U U U E O T u -d ti v a v a Y v C J o Z N O m F Y N N L j 7 LL Maximum Allowable Roadway Impact Fee Per Service Unit Calculations Line Title Description Total Vehicle -Miles of Based on the capacity, length, and number of lanes for each 1 Capacity Added by the project - Vehicle -Mile Supply Peak -Hour Total from Appendix Roadway Improvement B Service Units of Supply Projects Total Vehicle -Miles of The amount of traffic currently on the roads that are planned 2 Existing Demand From the for expansion - Vehicle -Mile Total Demand Peak -Hour Total Roadway Improvement from Appendix B Service Units of Supply Projects Total Vehicle -Miles of Vehicle -Miles of travel that are not accommodated by the 3 Existing Deficiencies From existing roads - Existing Deficiencies Peak -Hour Vehicle -Mile the Existing Roadway from Appendix B Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory Facilities Net Amount of Vehicle -Miles Amount of Vehicle -Miles added by the thoroughfare plan that 4 of Capacity Added will not be utilized by the existing demand = Line 1 - Line 2 - Line 3 5 Total Cost of the Roadway Total of the Opinion of Probable Construction Costs for the Improvement Projects 10-Year Roadway Impact Study Total of the Opinion of Probable Construction Costs for the 6 Cost of the Net Capacity 10-Year Roadway Impact Study prorated by the ratio capacity Supplied added to the total capacity added _ (Line 4/Line 1) x Line 5 Cost to Meet the Existing The Total Cost of the Roadway Improvements minus the Cost 7 Needs and Usage of the Capacity Supplied = Line 5 - Line 6 8 Total Vehicle -Miles of New The Estimate of the Number of Vehicle -Miles growth within Demand over 10-Years the Service Area - based on the TDF Percent of Capacity Added The Total Vehicle -Miles of New Demand over 10-Years divided Attributable to Growth by the Net Amount of Vehicle -Miles of Capacity Added up to 9 (Must be Less than or Equal 100%. Required by Chapter 395 to verify the to 100%) capacity added is from new growth. = Line 8 / Line 4 <= 100% Cost of Capacity Added The Cost of the Net Capacity Supplied multiplied by the 10 Attributable to Growth Percent of Capacity Added Attributable to Growth = Line 6 x Line 9 Per Chapter 395 and the option selected in the report, multiply the Cost of Capacity Added Attributable to Growth 11 50% Credit by 50%, which is the recoverable cost of the projected improvements based on the projected growth = Line 10 x 50% Max Assessable Fee Per The 50% Credit divided by Total Vehicle -Miles of New Demand 12 Service Unit/Vehicle Mile over 10-Years = Line 11 / Line 8 PREPARED BY EIKON JUNE 2015 Land Use/Vehicle-Mile Equivalency Table ITE Trip Pass- NCTCOG Adj. Adj. Trip, Max Veh-Mi Land Use Land Development Gen By Trip Trip For O- Length Trip Per Dev- Category Use Unit Rate Rate Rate Length b (mq Length Unit Code (PM) (ml) (mi) PORT AND TERMINAL Truck Terminal 30 Acres 6.55 6.55 10.02 50% 5.01 5.01 32.82 INDUSTRIAL General Light 110 1,000 SF GFA 0.97 0.97 10.02 50% 5.01 5.01 4.86 Industrial General Heavy 120 1,000 SF GFA 0.68 0.68 10.02 50% 5.01 5,01 3.41 Industrial Industrial Park 130 1,000 SF GFA 0.85 0.86 10.02 50% 5.01 5.01 4.31 Warehousing 150 1,000 SF GFA 0.32 0.32 10.83 50% 5A2 5.42 1.73 Mini -Warehouse 151 1,000 SF GFA 0.26 0.26 10.83 50% 5.42 5.42 1.41 RESIDENTIAL Single -Family Detached 210 Dwelling Unit 1.01 1.01 17.21 50% 8,61 6 6.06 Housing Apartment/Multi- 220 Dwelling Unit 0.62 0.62 17.21 SO% 8.61 6 3.72 family Residential Condominium/ 230 Dwelling Unit 0.52 0.52 17.21 50% 8.61 6 3.12 Townhome Mobile Home Park / 240 Dwelling Unit 0.59 0.59 17.21 50% 8.61 6 3.54 Manufactured Housing Senior Adult 252 Dwelling Unit 0.27 0.27 17.21 50% 8.61 6 1.62 Housing Congregate Care 253 Dwelling Unit 0.16 0.16 17.21 50% 8.61 6 0.96 Facility Assisted Living 254 Beds 0.22 0.22 17.21 50% 8.61 6 1.32 LODGING Hotel 310 Rooms 0.59 0.59 6.43 50% 3.22 3.22 1.90 Motel / Other Lodging 320 Rooms 0.47 0.47 6.43 50% 3.22 3.22 1.51 Facilities RECREATIONAL Driving Range 432 Tees 1.25 1.25 6.43 50% 3.22 3.22 4.02 Golf Course 430 Acres 0.3 0.3 6.43 50% 3.22 3.22 0.96 Health/Rec. Clubs and 495 1,000 SF GFA 2.74 2.74 6.43 50% 3.22 3.22 8.81 Facilities Ice Rink 465 1,000 SF GFA 2.36 2.36 6.43 50% 3.22 3.22 7.59 Miniature Golf 431 Holes 0.33 0.33 6.43 50% 3.22 3.22 1.06 Multiplex Movie 445 Screens 13.64 13.64 6.43 50% 3.22 3.22 43.85 Theater Racquet 491 Courts 3.35FT 3.35 6.43 50% 3.22 3.22 10.77 Tennis Club PREPARED BY EIKON JUNE 2015 ITE Trip Pass- NCTCOG Adj. Adj. Trip' Max Veh-Mi Land Use Land Development Gen Trip Trip FoD Length Trip Pe Category Use Unit Rate Rate at Rate Length (mi) Length nit Unit Code (PM) (mi) (mi) INSTITUTIONAL' Church 560 1,000 SF GFA 0.55 0.55 4.2 50% 2.10 2.10 1.16 Day Care Center 565 1,000 SF GFA 12.34 44% 6.91 4.2 50% 2.10 2.10 14.51 Primary/Middle 522 Students 0.16 0.16 4.2 50% 2.10 2.10 0.34 School (1-8) High School (9- 530 Students 0.13 0.13 4.2 50% 2.10 2.10 0.27 12) Jr / Community 540 Students 0.12 0.12 4.2 50% 2.10 2.10 0.25 College University / 550 Students 0.17 0.21 4.2 50% 2.10 2.10 0.44 College MEDICAL Clinic 630 1,000 SF GFA 5.18 5.18 7.55 50% 3.78 3.78 19.55 Hospital 610 Beds 1.42 1.31 7.55 50% 3.78 3.78 4.95 Nursing Home 620 Beds 0.22 0.22 7.55 50% 3.78 3.78 0.83 Animal Hospital/ Veterinary Clinic 640 1,000 SF GFA 4.72 30% 3.30 7.55 50% 3.78 3.78 12.47 OFFICE Corporate Headquarters 714 1,000 SF GFA 1.41 1.41 10.02 50% 5.01 5.01 7.06 Building General Office 710 1,000 SF GFA 1.49 1.49 10.02 50% 5.01 5.01 7.46 Building Medical/Dental 720 1,000 SF GFA 3.57 3.57 10.02 50% 5.01 5.01 17.89 Office Single Tenant 715 1,000 SF GFA 1.74 1.74 10.02 50% 5.01 5.01 8.72 Office Building Office Park 750 1,000 SF GFA 1.48 1.48 10.02 50% 5.01 5.01 7.41 PREPARED BY EIKON JUNE 2015 ITE Trip Pass- NCTCOG Adj. Adj. Tripe. Max Veh-MI Land Use Land Development Gen Trip Trip For O- Length Trip Per ev- Category Use Unit Rate Rate at Rate Length D (mU Length t Unit Code (PM) (ml) (mi) COMMERCIAL Automobile Related Automobile Care 942 1,000 SF GLA 3.11 40% 1.87 6.43 50% 3.22 3.22 6.00 Center Automobile Parts 843 1,000 SF GFA 5.98 43% 3.41 6.43 50% 3.22 3.22 10.96 Sales Gasoline/Service Vehicle Station w/ Conv. 945 Fueling 13.51 20% 10.81 1.2 50% 0.60 0.60 6,48 Market Positions New and Used 841 1,000 SF GFA 2.62 40% 1.57 6.43 50% 3.22 3.22 5.05 Car Sales Quick Lubrication 941 Servicin 5.19 40% 3.11 6.43 50% 3.22 3.22 10.01 Vehicle Shop itiong Self -Service Car 947 Stalls 5.54 40% 3.32 1.2 50% 0.60 0.60 1.99 Wash Tire Store 848 1,000 SF GFA 4.15 28% 2.99 6,43 50% 3.22 3.22 9.61 Dining Fast Food Restaurant with 934 1,000 SF GFA 33.84 50% 16.92 4.79 50% 2.40 2.40 40.52 Drive-Thru High Turnover (Sit -Down) 932 1,000 SF GFA 11.15 43% 6.36 4.79 50% 2.40 2.40 15.22 Restaurant Quality 931 1,000 SF GFA 7,49 44% 4.19 4.79 50% 2.40 2.40 10.05 Restaurant Other Retail 0.00 Free -Standing 815 1,000 SF GFA 5 44% 2.80 6.43 50% 3.22 3.22 9.00 Retail Store Garden Center 817 1,000 SF GFA 3.8 30% 2.66 6.43 50% 3.22 3.22 8.55 (Nursery) Home Improvement 862 1,000 SF GFA 2.37 48% 1.23 6.43 50% 3.22 3.22 3.96 Superstore Pharmacy/Drugs tore With Drive- 881 1,000 SF GFA 10.35 53% 4.86 6.43 50% 3.22 3.22 15,64 Thru Window Shopping Center 820 1,000 SF GLA 3.73 34% 2.46 6.43 50% 3.22 3.22 7.91 Supermarket 850 1,000 SF GFA 10.5 36% 6.72 6.43 50% 3.22 3.22 21.60 Toy/Children's Supers tore 864 1,000 SF GFA 4.99 30% 3.49 6.43 50% 3.22 3.22 11.23 SERVICES Bank (Walk -In) 911 1,000 SF GFA 12.13 40% 7.28 3.39 50% 1.70 1.70 12.34 Bank (Drive In) 912 Drive-in 27.41 47% 14.53 3.39 50% 1.70 1.70 24.62 Lanes Hair Salon 918 1,000 SF GLA 1.45 30% 1.02 3.39 50% 1.70 1.70 1.72 PREPARED BY EIKON JUNE 2015 Service Area Map , WCN)09 v3av 4t - v, 4` u � t � v chisum �r1 >