The URL can be used to link to this page

09/20/2015-CC-Agenda Packet-RegularAGENDA CITY COUNCIL MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 21, 2015 7:00 PM 502 ELM STREET 1. Call Meeting to Order, Invocation, Pledge of Allegiance. 2. Citizens Input: (Citizens are allowed 3 minutes to speak. The City Council is unable to respond or to discuss any issues brought up during this section). CONSENT AGENDA 3. a) Approval of Minutes: September 8, 2015 - Work session September 8, 2015 - City Council b) Disbursements 4. Consider any Items Removed From Consent Agenda. REGULAR AGENDA 5. Consider, Discuss and Possibly Approve Ordinance #094745 - Adopting the Budget Providing for the Appropriation of Funds for Operating and Capital Expenditures by Fund for the Fiscal Year Beginning October 1, 2015 and Ending September 30, 2016 and Providing for the Intra and Inter Department Fund Transfers. 6. Consider, Discuss and Possibly Approve OrdinanceLevying a Tax Rate foA the General Government for the Fiscal Year 2015-2016 at a Rate of $0.6795 per $100 Assessed Valuation. 7. Consider, Discuss and Possibly Approve Ordinance #09-19-15 -Approving the 2015 Tax Roll. 8. Conduct a Public Hearing on Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plan in Preparation for the Adoption of Roadway Impact Fees. 9. INFORMATION ITEMS: a) All American Dogs Report —August 2015 b) Sanger Chamber Report January — September 2015 10. Adjourn. I, the undersigned authority, do hereby certify that this Notice of Meeting was posted on the bulletin board, at the City Hall of the City of Sanger, Texas, a place convenient and readily accessible to the general public at all times, and said notice was posted on the following date and time: � ,�,,q,, �at%l 3U X.m. and shall remain osted until meetin is ad'our 'ray. MINUTES: CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION September 8, 2015 PRESENT: Mayor Thomas Muir, Councilman Bill Boutwell, Councilman David Clark and Councilman Allen Chick ABSENT: Mike Brice City Manager, Councilman Russell Martin and Councilman Gary Bilyeu OTHERS PRESENT: Tami Taber City Secretary, Joe Iliff Development Services Director 1. Call Meeting to Order. Mayor Muir called the meeting to order at 6:04 p.m. 2. Presentation by Joe Miff, Development Services Director. Joe Miff presented an overview of his department. Primary responsibilities include: - Planning and Zoning Building Inspections Historic Preservation G.I.S. - Health The Development Services department includes two other employees; a building inspector and an Administrative Assistant. 3. Overview of Items on Regular Agenda. 4. Adjourn. Mayor Muir adjourned the meeting at 6:51 p.m. MINUTES: CITY COUNCIL MEETING September 8, 2015 PRESENT: Mayor Thomas Muir, Councilman Bill Boutwell, Councilman David Clark and Councilman Allen Chick ABSENT: Mike Brice City Manager, Councilman Russell Martin and Councilman Gary Bilyeu OTHERS PRESENT: Tami Taber City Secretary, Joe Miff Development Services Director, Ted Christensen, Ed McBirney, Ann Barton, Gary Sweatman, Dell Phillips, Laura Uzzell, Robert Ashcraft, Howard Ashcraft and Jack Oppel 1. Call Meeting to Order, Invocation, Pledge of Allegiance. Mayor Muir called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Councilman Boutwell led the Invocation followed by Councilman Clark leading the Pledge of Allegiance. 2. Citizens Input: (Citizens are allowed 3 minutes to speak. The City Council is unable to respond or to discuss any issues brought up during this section). None. CONSENT AGENDA 3. a) Approval of Minutes: August 17, 2015 -Work session August 17, 2015 -City Council b) Disbursements c) Consider Appointing the Following to Open Board Positions: Board of Adjustment —Sandra Hensley -Place 4 Eddie Piercy —Alternate Councilman Chick made a motion to approve. Motion carried unanimously. 4. Consider any Items Removed From Consent Agenda. REGULAR AGENDA Seconded by Councilman Clark. 5. Consider, Discuss and Possibly Approve Proclamation #09-08-15 -Blood Cancer Awareness Month. Councilman Chick made a motion to approve. Seconded by Councilman Boutwell. Motion carried unanimously. 6. Conduct the Second Public Hearing on a Proposal to Increase Total Tax Revenues From Properties on the Tax Roll in the Preceding Year by 8.00% (Total Tax Rate Remains Unchanged at 0.6795 per $100 of Assessed Value). Mayor Muir opened the Public Hearing at 7:07 p.m. No one spoke for or against. Mayor Muir closed the Public Hearing at 7:08 p.m. 7. Consider, Discuss and Possibly Approve Resolution #R09-11-15 -Authorizing Publication of Notice of Intention to Issue Certificates of Obligation in a Principal Amount not to Exceed $6,250,000 and Authorizing Certain Other Matters Relating Thereto. Ted Christensen with Government Capital briefly explained the process and will be back in October after the bonds are priced and the ordinance is adopted. Councilman Chick made a motion to approve. Seconded by Councilman Boutwell. Motion carried unanimously. 8. Consider, Discuss and Possibly Approve an Interlocal Agreement Between Denton County and the City of Sanger for Shared Governance Communications and Dispatch Services for Police and Fire. Councilman Chick made a motion to approve. Seconded by Councilman Boutwell. Motion carried unanimously. 9. Consider, Discuss and Possibly Approve an Interlocal Agreement Between TML and the City of Sanger to Provide Medical Insurance Benefits. Councilman Chick made a motion to approve. Seconded by Councilman Boutwell. Motion carried unanimously. 10. Conduct a Public Hearing on Rezoning Approximately 0.33 Acres Located on the Northwest Corner of 6t'' Street and FM455/Chapman Drive (901 N. 6t'') From MF-2 Multi -Family Residential District to B-1 Business District. Mayor Muir opened the Public Hearing at 7:24 p.m. A few questions from the audience were asked about what type of business it would be and who was wanting to rezone. Mayor Muir closed the Public Hearing at 7:30 p.m. 11. Consider, Discuss and Possibly Approve Ordinance #09-14-15 — Rezoning Approximately 0.33 Acres Located on the Northwest Corner of 6t'' Street and FM455/Chapman Drive (901 N. 6t") From MF-2 Multi -Family Residential District to B- 1 Business District. Councilman Boutwell made a motion to approve. Seconded by Councilman Clark. Motion carried 2-1. Councilman Chick voted against. 12. Conduct a Public Hearing on Rezoning Approximately 5.14 Acres Located Approximately 500 Feet West of the Intersection of Sanger Circle Drive and Wagon Wheel Drive, Amending the Boundary Between the ZF Two Family Duplex Residential District and the SF-10 Single Family Residential District. Mayor Muir opened the Public Hearing at 7:40 p.m. No one spoke for or against. Mayor Muir closed the Public Hearing at 7:52 p.m. 13. Consider, Discuss and Possibly Approve Ordinance #094545 - Rezoning Approximately 5.14 Acres Located 500 Feet West of the Intersection of Sanger Circle Drive and Wagon Wheel Drive, Amending the Boundary Between the 2F Two Family Duplex Residential District and the SF40 Single Family Residential District. Councilman Chick made a motion to approve. Seconded by Councilman Boutwell. Motion carried unanimously. 14. Consider, Discuss and Possibly Approve Ordinance #09-16-15 —Changing the Name of Sanger Circle Drive to Bridle Path Lane. Councilman Chick made a motion to approve. Seconded by Councilman Clark. Motion carried unanimously. 15. Consider, Discuss and Possibly Approve Amending the Plat of Sanger Circle: a) Phase 1, 2.45 Acres Located West of Marion Road and South of Sanger Circle Drive b) Phase 2, 5.11 Acres Located West of Marion Road and South of Sanger Circle Drive Councilman Chick made a motion to approve. Seconded by Councilman Clark. Motion carried unanimously. and the Final Plat of Sanger Circle: c) Phase 3, 19.52 Acres Located West of Wagon Wheel Drive and South of Lakepark Drive Councilman Chick made a motion to approve. Seconded by Councilman Boutwell. Motion carried unanimously. 16. Consider, Discuss and Possibly Approve a Development Agreement to Defer the Construction of Public Improvements for the Final Plats of Sanger Circle Phases 1, 2, 3 and 4. Councilman Chick made a motion to approve. Seconded by Councilman Boutwell. Motion carried unanimously. 17. Conduct a Public Hearing on the Use of Alternative Exterior Materials and/or Design for a Proposed Building at Freedom Life Church Located at 1609 Duck Creek Road. Mayor Muir opened the Public Hearing at 8:10 p.m. No one spoke for or against. - Mayor Muir closed the Public Hearing at 8:14 p.m. 18. Consider, Discuss and Possibly Approve the Use of Alternative Exterior Materials and/or Design for a Proposed Building at Freedom Life Church Located at 1609 Duck Creek Road. Councilman Clark made a motion to approve as an accessory church building. Seconded by Councilman Boutwell. Motion carried unanimously. 19. Conduct a Public Hearing on the Use of Alternative Exterior Building Materials and/or Design for a Proposed Commercial Building at Fish and Ski Marine Located at 303 Stemmons. Mayor Muir opened the Public Hearing at 8:29 p.m. No one spoke for or against. Mayor Muir closed the Public Hearing at 8:40 p.m. 20. Consider, Discuss and Possibly Approve the Use of Alternative Exterior Building Materials and/or Design for a Proposed Commercial Building at Fish and Ski Marine Located at 303 Stemmons. Councilman Chick made a motion to approve as presented. Seconded by Councilman Clark. Motion carried unanimously. 21. Consider, Discuss and Possibly Approve the Minor Plat of Montalvo Acres, 2.00 Acres Located on the South Side of McReynolds Road Approximately 0.86 Miles West of FM 2164. Councilman Chick made a motion to approve. Seconded by Councilman Boutwell. Motion carried unanimously. 22. Consider, Discuss and Possibly Approve an Agreement Between the City of Sanger and the Sanger Area Chamber of Commerce for Hotel Occupancy Tax Funds. Councilman Chick made a motion to approve. Seconded by Councilman Clark. Motion carried unanimously. 23. EXECUTIVE SESSION: CLOSED MEETING 24. 25. Pursuant to the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, the City Council will Meet in a Closed Executive Session in Accordance With the Texas Government Code: Section 551.072 —Deliberations Regarding Real Property This item was tabled. RECONVENE: OPEN MEETING No action taken. INFORMATION ITEMS: a) Financial &Investment Report —July 2015 b) Library Quarterly Report — April — June 2015 c) ATMOS Energy Rider GCR — Rate Filing Under Docket No. 10170 d) ATMOS Energy Annual Gas Cost Reconciliation Filing Under Docket No. 9400 26. Adjourn. Mayor Muir adjourned the meeting at M5 p.m. 9/03/2015 9:12 A14 A / P CHECK REGISTER PACKET: 03622 Regular Payments 9/3/15 CF VENDOR SET: 99 BANK POOL POOLED CASH ACCOUNT CHECK CHECK �V. ,R NA14E / I.D. DESC TYPE DATE 25940 ALAN PLUMMER ASSOCIATES, INC I-000000037686 PRO#1416-002-01 INVN35975 R 9/03/2015 29120 ARLINGTON BLUELINE I-33161 COLOR PLOT / MOUNT R 9/03/2015 00420 BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC I-81884206 EMS SUPPLIES R 9/03/2015 26400 CITY OF DENTON-POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAINING ACADEMY I-2015153 HANDGUN ACCURACY 10/1/15 DUNN R 9/03/2015 I-2015156 HANDGUN ACCURACY 10/1/15 PARKE R 9/03/2015 21100 COLE14AN LAW FIRM I-AUG 31, 2015 8/4/2015 PRE-TRIAL R 9/03/2015 08880 COOPER'S COPIES I-200606 SUPPIES R 9/03/2015 22740 DENTON COUNTY AUDITOR I-SEPT 2015 DISPATCH SEPT 2015 DISPATCH R 9/03/2015 28280 EDSUITE I-2087 EDSUITE R 9/03/2015 20980 EXPRESS SERVICES, INC. I-16167035-1 TEMP EMPLOYEES 8/16/15 R 9/03/2015 22990 FOREMOST PROMOTIONS - I-309027 TEACHING AID R 9/03/2015 FUEL14AN I-NP45205474 8/24/15-8/30/15 R 9/03/2015 25560 GARY DILL BACKHOE SERVICE I-1997 BORE & CASE R 9/03/2015 23640 GFOAT I-15583 8/19/15 GFOAT MEMBERSHIP R 9/03/2015 08760 GT DISTRIBUTORS INC I-INVO545330 BIANCHI CUFF CASS R 9/03/2015 I-INVO545651 S/S SHIRT, TROUSERS R 9/03/2015 PAGE: 1 CHECK CHECK DISCOUNT P14OUNT NO# AMOUNT 69,961.67CR 060885 69,461.67 112.SOCR 060886 112.50 31.96CR 060887 31.96 40.000R 060888 40.000R 060888 80.00 300.000R 060889 300.00 411.60CR 060890 411.60 3,972.000R 060891 3,972.00 5,287.SOCR 060892 5,287.50 593.20CR 060893 593.20 904.12CR 060894 904.12 1,778.000R 060895 1,778.00 9,SOO.000R 060896 9,500.00 135.000R 060897 135.00 70.89CR 060898 278.89CR 060898 349.78 9/03/2015 9:12 AI4 A / P CHECK REGISTER PAGE: 2 PACKET: 07622 Regular Payments 9/3/15 CF VENDOR SET: 99 BANK POOL POOLED CASH ACCOUNT '! CHECK CHECK CHECK CHECK �. NAME / I.D. DESC TYPE DATE DISCOUNT AI4OUNT NO# AMOUNT 'A 20220 INGRP24 LIBRARY SERVICES I-87296420 BOOKS FOR CIRCULATING R 9/03/2015 1.38CR 136.16CR 060899 136.16 10870 JOANIE SACKETT R.N. I-17A15 SA EXAM CASE S06071572 R 9/03/2015 500.00CR 060900 500.00 27850 JYRO SIGNS I-4577 NO S140KING SIGNS R 9/03/2015 395.45CR 060901 395.45 27800 KELLEY SAND & EXCAVATION 1-6934 FLOWABLE FILL R 9/03/2015 921.00CR 060902 921.00 28050 LIONS CLUB I-BRICE SEPT 2015 tEMBERSHIP DUES R 9/03/2015 25.00CR 060903 I-CIOCAN SEPT 2015 MEMBERSHIP DUES R 9/03/2015 25.00CR 060903 I -WELCH SEPT 15 MEMBERSHIP DUES R 9/03/2015 25.00CR 060903 75.00 01570 LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC. I-914163 WATER HOSES R 9/03/2015 358.51CR 060904 I-915656 SHEVES FOR THE SHOP R 9/03/2015 166.19CR 060904 524.70 29050 NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERN14ENTS I-INV-0000014396 CRITERIA TECHNICAL R 9/03/2015 120.00CR 060905 120.00 02970 OFFICE DEPOT C-788823910-001 SUPPLIES R 9/03/2015 12.55 060906 I-386863596001 SUPPLIES R 9/03/2015 199.49CR 060906 I-789875096001 SUPPLIES R 9/03/2015 80.02CR 060906 I-789875268001 SUPPLIES R 9/03/2015 21.29CR 060906 288.25 19?nO PATH14ARK TRAFFIC PRODUCTS OF TEXAS,INC. I-013150 PAINT R 9/03/2015 21598.00CR 060907 21598,00 08300 PERKINS, JONATHAN I -MEALS 9/9-9/10/15 2 DAYS MEAL MONEY R 9/03/2015 70.00CR 060908 70.00 1 RANK, STEPHANIE I -RANK 8/22/15 DEPOSIT 8/22 R 9/03/2015 100.000R 060909 100.00 16900 RED THE UNIFORM TAILOR I-OOOG2176 UNIFORMS R 9/03/2015 344.44CR 060910 I-000G2351 UNIFORMS R 9/03/2015 20.00CR 060910 I-OOOG3222 NA14E ON NEW SHIRT R 9/03/2015 30.00CR 060910 I-OOG2176A UNIFORM FOR 6 R 9/03/2015 427.08CR 060910 821.52 9/03/2015 9:12 A14 A / P CHECK REGISTER PACKET: 07622 Regular Payments 9/3/15 CF VENDOR SET: 99 BANK POOL POOLED CASH ACCOUNT CHECK CHECK �. �R NAME / I.D. DESC TYPE DATE 25970 REPUBLIC t4ETER IPIC I-1142 LOW PROFILE METER R 9/03/2015 25020 SANGER HARDWARE I-A68969 SUPPLIES R 9/03/2015 I-A68999 SUPPLIES R 0/03/2015 I-A69478 SUPPLIES R 9/03/2015 I-A69480 14IS SUPPLIES AS NEEDED R 9/03/2015 I-A69618 SUPPLIES R 9/03/2015 I-A70015 TOOLS R 9/03/2015 I-A70104 TOOLS R 9/03/2015 I-A70105 SUPPLIES R 9/03/2015 I-A70529 SUPPLIES R 9/03/2015 I-A70614 SUPPLIES R 9/03/2015 I-A70712 MIS SUPPLIES AS NEEDED R 9/03/2015 I-A70968 TOOLS R 9/03/2015 I-A70981 TOOLS R 9/03/2015 I-A71084 MIS SUPPLIES AS NEEDED R 9/03/2015 I-A71094 MIS SUPPLIES AS NEEDED R 9/03/2015 I-A71198 SUPPLIES R 9/03/2015 I-B26517 SUPPLIES R 9/03/2015 I-B26519 SUPPLIES R 9/03/2015 I-B26532 SUPPLIES R 9/03/2015 I-B26769 SUPPLIES R 9/03/2015 I-B26959 SUPPLIES R 9/03/2015 I-B27035 TOOLS R 9/03/2015 I-B27132 SUPPLIES R 9/03/2015 I-B27406 SUPPLIES R 9/03/2015 I-B27424 14ISC SUPPLIES AS NEEDED R 9/03/2015 I-B27432 SUPPLIES R 9/03/2015 VOID CHECK V 9/03/2015 *VOID* VOID CHECK V 9/03/2015 16240 SCHAD & PULTE I-197218 02 FOR EtdS R 9/03/2015 08030 SOUTHWEST INTERNATIONAL I-MP131138 COOLANT RESERVOIR FOR R 9/03/2015 18620 STERICYCLE I-4005765230 BIO PICK UP R 9/03/2015 PAGE: 3 CHECK CHECK DISCOUNT AMOUNT N04 AMOUNT 2,064.000R 060911 2,069.00 11.68CR 060912 25.97CR 060912 69.81CR 060912 37.99CR 060912 8.45CR 060912 9.99CR 2.99CR 060912 060912 54.99CR 060912 11.99CR 060912 22.79CR 060912 14.87CR 060912 17.17CR 060912 9.19CR 060912 25.15CR 060912 22.98CR 060912 36.57CR 060912 135.88CR 060912 6.75CR 060912 8.86CR 060912 71.88CR 060912 17.07CR 060912 50.98CR 060912 9.96CR 060912 12.99CR 060912 27.98CR 060912 21.37CR 060912 746.30 060913 **VOID** 060919 **VOID** 26.000R 060915 26.00 420.05CR 060916 420.05 192.60CR 060917 192.60 9/03/2015 9:12 A14 A / P CHECK REGISTER PAGE: 4 PACKET: 07622 Regular Payments 9/3/15 CF VENDOR SET: 99 BANK POOL POOLED CASH ACCOUNT CHECK CHECK CHECK CHECK NP14E / I.D. DESC TYPE DATE DISCOUNT A14OUNT NO# AMOUNT -JR 12460 SUPRE14E PARTS WASHERS I-S31564 8/25/15 SERVICE R 9/03/2015 150.000R 060918 150.00 00100 TMRS I-RETPY8.21.15 T14RS R 9/03/2015 151842.50CR 060919 I-RETPY8.7.15 TMRS R 9/03/2015 15,643.14CR 060919 31,485,64 28250 TUFF POWDERCOATING I-10155 HEAD ACHE RACK R 9/03/2015 50.000R 060920 50.00 19260 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES I-025-133031 UB WEB SEPT 2015 R 9/03/2015 110.000R 060921 I-025-133032 COURT WEB SEPT 2015 R 9/03/2015 125.000R 060921 235.00 1 VERDIN, HECTOR I-VERDIN 8/29/15 DEPOSIT 8/29 R 9/03/2015 100.000R 060922 100.00 03440 VEP14EER EQUIP. OF TEXAS I-D21094 STAND FOR CHIPPER TRUCK R 9/03/2015 87.36CR 060923 87.36 24970 WELLSPRING INSURANCE I-1175 SEPT 2015 CONSULTING R 9/03/2015 2,000.00CR 060924 21000,00 27960 YOUNG GUNS AUTO INC I-892 RADIATOR G HEADLIGHT ISSUE R 9/03/2015 454.70CR 060925 454.70 i 00600 CITY OF SANGER I-9/1/2015 7/22/15-8/18/15 D 9/15/2015 34,345.90CR 000000 34,345.90 i C 't * * T 0 T A L S * * NO# DISCOUNTS CHECK AMT TOTAL APPLIED REGULAR CHECKS: 39 1.38 132,479,06 132,480,44 € HANDWRITTEN CHECKS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 PRE -WRITE CHECKS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 DRAFTS: 1 0.00 34,345.90 34,345,90 VOID CHECKS: 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 t NON CHECKS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 CORRECTIONS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 s REGISTER TOTALS: 42 1.38 166,824,96 166,826.34 TOTAL ERRORS: 0 TOTAL WARNINGS: 0 9/09/2015 3:09 PM A / P CHECK REGISTER PAGE: 1 PACKET: 07633 Regular Payments 9.9.15 VENDOR SET: 99 BANK POOL POOLED CASH ACCOUNT CHECK CHECK CHECK CHECK V, JR NAME / I.D. DESC TYPE DATE DISCOUNT AMOUNT N04 AMOUNT 25070 ALL AMERIC.AN DOGS INC I-2281 AUG 2015 SHELTER SERVICE R 9/09/2015 31400.000R 060927 31400,00 22620 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICE I-AUG 2015 UNIFORMS AUG 2015 R 0/09/2015 505.12CR 060928 505.12 02460 AT&T I40BILITY I-7/23/15-8/22/15 7/23/15-8/22/15 R 9/09/2015 640.36CR 060929 640.36 01550 ATMOS I-8/4/15-9/1/15 ATMOS 8/4/15-9/l/15 R 9/09/2015 311.43CR 060930 311.43 00420 BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC I-81891186 E14S SUPPLIES R 9/09/2015 484.58CR 060931 484.58 20410 CARE NOW CORPORATE I-953323 NEW E14PLOYEE TESTING R 9/09/2015 50.000R 060932 I-954390 NEW HIRE & DRUG TEST R 9/09/2015 105.000R 060932 155.00 1 CELMEC ELECTRICAL I-RCPT 00487324 REFUND - ELE R 9/09/2015 35.DOCR 060933 35.00 i 12760 CINTAS, INC. C-492000006 UNIFORMS R 9/09/2015 55.00 060934 I-492396871 UNIFORMS R 9/09/2015 108.93CR 060934 I-492399940 UNIFORMS R 9/09/2015 108.93CR 060934 I-492403076 UNIFORMS R 9/09/2015 108.93CR 060934 I-492407835 UNIFORMS R 9/09/2015 108.93CR 060934 380.72 I E 00800 COSERV ELECTRIC I-7/17-8/17/15 7/17/15-8/17/15 R 9/09/2015 21504.80CR 060935 21504,80 i 0. DCAD I-7018 4TH QTR ALLOCATION 2015 R 9/09/2015 41994.53CR 060936 41994,53 03800 DEMCO I-5660253 SUPPLIES R 9/09/2015 643.01CR 060937 643.01 E 26410 DENTON COUNTY CLERK I -LIENS 9/4/2015 MOWING LIENS R 9/09/2015 90.000R 060938 90.00 00840 DENTON PUBLISHING CO., INC. I-I01452403-08282015 LEGAL NOTICE R 9/09/2015 65.40CR 060939 I-I01446270-08062015 LEGAL NOTICE R 9/09/2015 26.90CR 060939 I-I01446863-08082015 LEGAL NOTICE FOR FISH SKI R 9/09/2015 22.000R 060939 I-I0140130-08092015 2015 TAX RATE NOTICE R 9/09/2015 11260.000R 060939 I-I01449813-08202015 LEGAL NOTICE R 9/09/2015 22.000R 060939 I-I01449821-08202015 LEGAL NOTICE R 9/09/2015 22.000R 060939 11418,30 9/09/2015 3:09 P14 A / P CHECK REGISTER PAGE: 2 PACKET: 07633 Regular Payments 9.9.15 VENDOR SET: 99 BANK POOL POOLED CASH ACCOUNT CHECK CHECK V.. ,iZ NAME / I.D. DESC TYPE DATE 00860 DENTON TROPHY HOUSE I-013460 PLATES R 9/09/2015 08190 DISPLAY SALES I-INV-002658 CHRISTMAS LIGHT R 9/09/2015 18790 FUELMAN I-NP45333363 EDELM.AN 8/31-9/6/15 R 9/09/2015 01070 GALLS INC. I-003931821 SUPPLIES/ UNIFROMS R 9/09/2015 29250 GRAY, CLAYTON I -MILEAGE 9/3/15 14ILEAGE TO WEAVER CONFERENCE R 9/09/2015 02610 HD SUPPLY POWER SOLUTIONS I-2961889-01 BULBS R 9/09/2015 I-2971490-00 METER BATTERIES R 9/09/2015 12970 HICKS PARTNERS TAPPING SERVICE I-194613 WATER TAPS #9 R 0/09/2015 28580 HRM LAND ACQUISTION SOLUTIONS, LLC I-1061 MCREYNOLDS- ACQUISITION R 9/09/2015 19480 HUTHER & ASSOCIATES, INC I-3108 WW TESTING R 9/09/2015 20220 INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES C-88456848 BOOK ORDERS N 9/09/2015 I-85372196 BOOK ORDERS N 9/09/2015 2_ IRBY TOOL & SAFETY I-S009137772.001 PARACHUTES R 9/09/2015 25110 KEYSTONE FLEX ADMINISTRATORS, LLC I-SEPTE14BER 2015 ADMIN & DEBT CARD FEES SEPT15 R 0/09/2015 26900 THE LANE CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION I-1644192 ASPHALT FOR JULY R 9/09/2015 29030 MCCREARY, VESELKA, BRAGG & ALLEN, PC I-110457 AUGUST 2015 COLLECTIONS R 9/09/2015 CHECK CHECK DISCOUNT A14OUNT NO# AMOUNT 36.00CR 060940 36.00 2,563.50CR 060941 2,563.50 1,789.81CR 060942 1,789.81 102.27CR 060993 102.27 11.16CR 060944 11.16 98.80CR 060945 326.50CR 060945 425.30 350.00CR 060946 350.00 8,573.07CR 060947 8,573.07 2,270.00CR 060998 2,270.00 14.93 000000 14.93CR 000000 0.00 238.00CR 060949 238.00 250.50CR 060950 250.50 1,030.37CR 060951 1,030.37 92.40CR 060952 92.40 9/09/2015 3:09 PM A / P CHECK REGISTER PAGE: 3 PACKET: 07633 Regular Payments 9.9.15 VENDOR SET: 99 BANK POOL POOLED CASH ACCOUNT CHECK CHECK CHECK CHECK TV. ,R NAME / I.D. DESC TYPE DATE DISCOUNT P14OUNT NO# AMOUNT 12710 PETTIT MACHINERY, INC I-S27558 PARTS FOR GATOR R 9/09/2015 787.11CR 060953 787.11 04240 PRATER, MIKE I-MESE 9/16-9/18/15 PER DIEM MEALS R 9/09/2015 105.00CR 060954 105.00 22210 PUBLIC AGENCY TRAINING COUNCIL I-197167 OXYGEN FORENSIC SOFbJARE R 9/09/2015 395.00CR 060955 395.00 26770 PUBLIC LIBRARY ADMINISTRATORS OF NORTH TEXAS I-TOLLE 2015 PLANT CONFERENCE R 9/09/2015 680.00CR 060956 680.00 16240 SCHAD & PULTE I-196475 02 FOR E14S R 9/09/2015 19.00CR 060957 I-197321 02 FOR EMS R 9/09/2015 26.00CR 060957 45.00 26700 SOUTHERN TIRE MART, LLC I-48042146 SUPPLIES R 9/09/2015 977.88CR 060958 977.88 21260 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF STATE HEALTH SERVICES I -PARSONS 8/21/15 RENEWAL OF EMS LICENSE R 9/09/2015 870.00CR 060959 870.00 i 05350 TEXAS EXCAVATION SAFETY SYST i I-15-11986 14ESSAGE FEES AUGUST 2015 R 9/00/2015 115.90CR 060960 115.90 * * T 0 T A L S * * NO# DISCOUNTS CHECK AMT TOTAL APPLIED REGULAR CHECKS: 34 0.00 37,271,12 371271.12 HANDWRITTEN CHECKS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 PRE -WRITE CHECKS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 DRAFTS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 VOID CHECKS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 NON CHECKS: 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 I CORRECTIONS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 REGISTER TOTALS: 35 0.00 37,271,12 371271.12 TOTAL ERRORS: 0 TOTAL WARNINGS: 0 9/17/2015 7:44 A14 A / P CHECK REGISTER PAGE: 1 PACKET: 07650 Regular Payments 9.16,15 VENDOR SET: 99 BANK POOL POOLED CASH ACCOUNT CHECK CHECK GL .R NA14E / I.D. DESC TYPE DATE 11690 PITNEY BOGIES - RESERVE ACCOUNT I-20150911-1928 REFILL POSTAGE METER D 9/14/2015 07860 ACT PIPE SUPPLY, INC i I-096450 PARTS FOR STOCK R 9/17/2015 25940 ALAN PLUh24ER ASSOCIATES, INC I-000000037761 PRO41416-002-01 INV435975 R 9/17/2015 06210 ALERT -ALL CORP I-215080682 COLORING BOOKS/STICKERS R 9/17/2015 25610 AUSTIN LANE TECHNOLOGIES, INC I-20150908 SEPT 15 MAINTENANCE & SUPPORT R 9/17/2015 29260 BAKER, RYAN I -BAKER S9 2015 SLOPE AND/OR DRAINAGE EASEMENT R 9/17/2015 21930 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON I-252-1890575 PAYING AGENT CO2006 2015-2016 R 9/17/2015 00390 BILL UTTER FORD, INC. I-149725 SUPPLIES R 9/17/2015 00420 BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC I-81897024 EMS SUPPLIES R 9/17/2015 I-81901336 EMS SUPPLIES R 9/17/2015 17730 BRICE, MIKE I -MEALS 9/27-9/30/15 ICMA ANNUAL CONF R 9/17/2015 BROOKSCARDIEL & COMPANY, PLLC I-SANG.09.08.15 PROGRESS BILLING AUDIT R 9/17/2015 02660 THE CAR CARE CENTER I-000015206 DIAGNOSTIC R 9/17/2015 22300 CARD SERVICE CENTER I -AMAZON 8/13/15 LABEL PRINTER, BARCODE, S R 9/17/201E I -AMAZON 8/14/15 SUPPLIES R 9/17/201E I -AMAZON 8/28/15 TABLET COMPUTERS R 9/17/201E I-DENCHA14BER 8/18/15 BASIC MEMBERSHIP R 9/17/201E I-DENTONCO 8/14/15 VECHICLE REG R 9/17/201E I-DENTONTOOL 8/26/15 BOLTS R 9/17/201E I-DSHS 8/6/15 RENEWAL CODE R 9/17/201E I-EBAY 8/25/15 C014PRESSOR REPLACE14ENT R 9/17/201E I-EBCROSSWORDS 8/18 JIM BERNMAN R 9/17/201E I-GLENNPOLK 8/28/15 REWIRING #2 R 9/17/201E I-GT DIS 8/12/15 STREAM LIGHT BATTERY R 9/17/201`. I-HILTON 8/22/15 REGISTRATION BOAT R 9/17/201`_ I -HOBBY 8/26/15 REDDING EVENT R 9/17/201E I -INDEED 8/31/15 ADVERTIS14ENT R 9/17/201E CHECK DISCOUNT P24OUNT NO# 300.000R 000000 823.62CR 060997 CHECK AMOUNT 300.00 823.62 19,552.23CR 060998 19,552.23 880.000R 060999 880.00 9,913.75CR 061000 9,413.75 SOO.000R 061001 500.00 825.000R 061002 825.00 60.53CR 061003 60.53 113.86CR 061004 31.96CR 061004 145.82 105.000R 061005 105.00 7,000.00CR 061006 7,000.00 80.95CR 061007 80.95 159.98CR 061008 93.86CR 061008 839.97CR 061008 320.000R 061008 30.50CR 061008 8.33CR 061008 156.000R 061008 99.99CR 061008 99.000R 061008 142.16CR 061008 39.95CR 061008 903.41CR 061008 34.12CR 061008 19.75CR 061008 9/17/2015 7:44 A14 A / P CHECK REGISTER PAGE: 2 PACKET: 07650 Regular Payments 9.16.15 VENDOR SET: 99 BANK POOL POOLED CASH ACCOUNT CHECK CHECK CHECK CHECK �. tt DIA14E / I.D. DESC TYPE DATE DISCOUNT A14OUNT NO# AMOUNT I-LIVINGDIRECT8/31/1 KOLDFRONT ICE 14AKER R 9/17/2015 699.00CR 061008 I-NCTCOG 8/28/15 CLASSES FOR J BERN14AN R 9/17/2015 745.00CR 061008 I-NTCAR 8/18/15 COMMERICAL REAL ESTATE R 9/17/2015 15.00CR 061008 I-PARKBRO 8/27/15 LUNCH WITH AG OFFICE R 9/17/2015 33.73CR 061008 I -PSI 8/25/15 MASON GENEAL APPLICATION R 9/17/2015 104.00CR 061008 I-STARTELE 8/19/15 STAR TELEGRAM SUBSRIPTION R 9/17/2015 15.82CR 061008 I-STEELE 8/18/15 STEELE RUBBER R 9/17/2015 304.58CR 061008 I-TXFLOOD 8/19/15 CLASS FOR NEAL R 9/17/2015 275.00CR 061008 I-WALMART 8/20/15 ICE CREAM SOCIAL R 9/17/2015 41.32CR 061008 I-WALMART 8/21/15 SUPPLIES R 9/17/2015 98.12CR 061008 I-WEBRIGG 8/26/15 STRAND TWISTED R 9/17/2015 53.87CR 061008 4,777.46 *VOID* VOID CHECK V 9/17/2015 061009 **VOID** *VOID* VOID CHECK V 9/17/2015 061010 **VOID** 00050 CONLEY SAND & GRAVEL I-10557 FILL SAND R 9/17/2015 450.00CR 061011 450.00 23620 COTE'S t4ECHANICAL I-CM20151918 ZCE t4.ACHINE RENTAL SEPT 2015 R 9/17/2015 359.00CR 061012 359.00 28180 D&D COtR4ERIC.AT, LANDSCAPE t4.ANAGEDiENT I-11457 t4OWING BID #0205-15 R 9/17/2015 1,185.79CR 061013 1,185.79 25730 DATAPROSE, LLC I-DP1502479 AUG & SEPT BILLINGS R 9/17/2015 2,206.66CR 061014 2,206.86 08460 DELL COMPUTERS, LLP I-XJRt4JC7[^]1 NEW CO[4PUTER R 9/17/2015 1,099.46CR 061015 1,099.46 DENTON COUNTY CLERK I-09/10/2015 RELEASE LIEN REED R270801 R 9/17/2015 90.00CR 061016 90.00 00840 DENTON PUBLISHING CO., INC. I-I01434297-06262015 AD 7/5/15 R 9/17/2015 66.00CR 061017 I-I01441583-07232015 AD HEARINGS 8/10/15 R 9/17/2015 37.90CR 061017 I-I01441599-07232015 HEARINGS 8/3/15 R 9/17/2015 31.80CR 061017 I-I01441754-07232015 P&Z HEARINGS R 9/17/2015 26.20CR 061017 161.40 23820 FERGUSON WATERWORKS I-0739178 SUPPLIES FOR METERS R 9/17/2015 995.22CR 061018 995.22 9/17/2015 7:44 A14 A / P CHECK REGISTER PAGE: 3 PACKET: 07650 Regular Payments 9.16.15 VENDOR SET: 99 BANK POOL POOLED CASH ACCOUNT CHECK CHECK �. R NP14E / I.D. DESC TYPE DATE 18340 FIRST ADVANTAGE BACKGROUND SVCS I-5537601508 BACKGROUND CHECK NEW E14PLOYEES R 9/17/2015 18790 FUEL14AN I-NP45372963 FUELMAN 9/7/15-9/13/15 R 9/17/2015 01070 GALLS INC. I-003975138 SUPPLIES/ UNIFRO14S R 9/17/2015 I-003988951 STREAMLIGHT R 9/17/2015 25560 GARY DILL BACKHOE SERVICE I-2003 CONNECT MANHOLES BLINDFIA R 9/17/2015 I-2004 MOVE WATER LINE R 9/17/2015 01240 INLAND TRUCK PARTS, INC. I-18-93621 REPAIR TRUCK R 9/17/2015 1 JENKINS, VICKIE I-JENKINS 9/6/15 DEPOSIT R 9/17/2015 26830 JZ SOUTHERN BOYZ SERVICES LLC I-933 INSTA VALVES R 0/17/2015 08210 KWIK KAR I-39279 INSPECTION ON CLIPPER R 9/17/2015 25060 LEMONS PUBLICATIONS INC I-4365 AUGUST ADS R 9/17/2015 27540 LNV, INC I-19202 NEW WATER SUPPLY WELLS R 9/17/2015 LONE STAR 4X4 I-1707 SEAT COVERS ...ETC R 9/17/2015 16970 LONGHORN, INC. I-S2873420.001 IRRIGATION REPAIR RAILROA R 9/17/2015 17900 LOWER COLORADO RIVER AUTHORITY I-LAB-0002000 WATER SAMPLES R 9/17/2015 08690 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS I-1959220350 DIESEL EXHAUST FLUID R 9/17/2015 I-1959220441 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS R 9/17/2015 I-1959220621 VEHICLE PARTS 14AINTENANCE R 9/17/2015 I-1959221042 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS R 9/17/2015 I-1959221058 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS R 9/17/2015 I-1959221804 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS R 9/17/2015 I-1959221841 BATTERY FOR POLICE VEHICLE R 9/17/2015 I-1959222075 PARTS R 9/17/2015 I-1959222976 PARTS R 9/17/2015 I-1959223077 DIESEL EXHAUST FLUID R 9/17/2015 CHECK CHECK DISCOUNT A14OUNT N04 AMOUNT 43.00CR 061019 93.00 1,889.35CR 061020 1,889.35 82.68CR 061021 113.99CR 061021 196,67 17,S50.00CR Ob1022 1,SOO.00CR 061022 19,050,00 1,765.78CR 061023 1,765.78 100.00CR 061024 100.00 13,600.00CR 061025 13,600.00 7.00CR 061026 7.00 390.00CR 061027 390.00 5,060.00CR 061028 5,060.00 1,509.71CR 061029 1,509.71 1.37CR 67.20CR 061030 67.20 207.70CR 061031 207.70 11.41CR 061032 52.99CR 061032 89.95CR 061032 14.94CR 061032 17.34CR 061032 97.66CR 061032 268.26CR 061032 2.29CR 061032 3.49CR 061032 7.98CR 061032 9/17/2015 7:44 AM A / P CHECK REGISTER PAGE: 4 PACKET: 07650 Regular Payments 9.16.15 VENDOR SET: 99 BANK POOL POOLED CASH ACCOUNT CHECK CHECK CHECK CHECK .R NAME / I.D. DESC TYPE DATE DISCOUNT A14OUNT NO# AMOUNT I-1959223280 PARTS R 9/17/2015 7.49CR 061032 I-1959223845 HITCH R 9/17/2015 403.16CR 061032 I-1959226582 DIESEL EXHAUST FLUID R 9/17/2015 37.25CR 061032 I-1959226682 PARTS R 9/17/2015 29.67CR 061032 1/043688 *VOID* VOID CHECK V 9/17/2015 061033 **VOID** 02970 OFFICE DEPOT I-78517222001 TONER -- OFFICE SUPPLIES R 9/17/2015 69.99CR 061034 I-791104595001 INK CARTRIDGES R 9/17/2015 62.49CR 061034 132.48 09090 PERKINS ENTERPRISE I-2777 2Q2015 AIR ANALYSIS R 9/17/2015 550.00CR 061035 I-2814 3Q15 AIR ANALYSIS R 9/17/2015 150.00CR 061035 700.00 05510 PROGRESSIVE WASTE SOLUTIONS OF TX, INC I-1202122028 ROLL OFF WU R 9/17/2015 11594.84CR 061036 11594,84 05510 PROGRESSIVE WASTE SOLUTIONS OF TX, INC I-AUG-15 AUG 2015 R 9/17/2015 54,086.81CR 061037 54,086.81 18380 R & T MECHANICAL I-31298 NEW AC FOR SENIOR CEN R 9/17/2015 41100.00OR 061038 I-31563 NEW AC FOR SENIOR CEN R 9/17/2015 130.00CR 061038 4,230.00 02170 REINERT PAPER & CHEMICAL, INC. I-334804 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES R 9/17/2015 138623CR 061039 138.23 27450 RICOH USA I-27466439 SEPTE14BER LEASE R 9/17/2015 709.97CR 061040 709.97 RICOH USA, INC I-5037724959 SERVICE 9/1/15-9/30/15 R 9/17/2015 227.85CR 061041 227.85 27750 SAMANTHA SPRINGS BOTTLING I-254200 WATER BOTTLES CITY HALL R 9/17/2015 7.90CR 061042 7.90 25590 SCHNEIDER ENGINEERING I-000000028892 ERCOT TRANS OPERATOR DESIGN R 9/17/2015 387.50CR 061043 387.50 10470 SIDDONS MARTIN EMERGENCY GROUP I-3012065 PUMP REPAIR R 9/17/2015 11225.63CR 061044 11225,63 9/17/2015 7:44 A14 A / P CHECK REGISTER PAGE: 5 PACKET: 07650 Regular Payments 9.16.15 VENDOR SET: 99 BANK POOL POOLED CASH ACCOUNT CHECK CHECK CHECK CHECK NAME / I.D. DESC TYPE DATE DISCOUNT A14OUNT NO# AMOUNT 29010 SOUTHERN AUTOMATION, LLC I-9260 REPLACI4ENTS OF EXTERIOR R 9/17/2015 3,611.00CR 061045 31611,00 29190 STITCHIN' AND MORE CUST0I4 GRAPHICS LLC I-09/09/2015 SWEAT SHIRTS FOR PARKS R 9/17/2015 450.00CR 061046 450.00 28960 TEXAS STERLING CONSTRUCTION I-001 RECYCLED ASPHALT R 9/17/2015 21250.00CR 061047 21250,00 26270 THREE L WELDING SUPPLY & EQUIP. I-183070 HELIUM R 9/17/2015 165.00OR 061048 165.00 26300 UNU14 LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA I-10/l/15-10/31/15 LTD 10/l/15-10/31/15 R 9/17/2015 689.15CR 061049 689.15 23760 VAULTLOGIX I-2332682 INTERNET VAULT AUG 2015 R 9/17/2015 11111.80CR 061050 11111.80 27070 NEAL WELCH I -MEALS 9/22-9/25/15 TAXI/TOLL/PARKING/ MEALS/ R 9/17/2015 140.00CR 061051 140.00 29270 WILDE, KEITH I-WILDE S14 2015 SLOPE/DRAINAGE EASEMENT R 9/17/2015 31281.54CR 061052 31281,54 * * T 0 T A L S * * NO# ➢ISCOUNTS CHECK AMT TOTAL APPLIED REGULAR CHECKS: HANDWRITTEN CHECKS: 53 0 1.37 0.00 165,727,08 0.00 165,728,45 0.00 PRE -WRITE CHECKS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 DRAFTS: 1 0.00 300.00 300.00 VOID CHECKS: 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 NON CHECKS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 CORRECTIONS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 REGISTER TOTALS: 57 1.37 1661027.08 166,028,45 TOTAL ERRORS: 0 TOTAL WARNINGS: 0 ORDINANCE #094745 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANGER, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS, ADOPTING THE BUDGET PROVIDING FOR THE APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FOR OPERATING AND CAPITAL EXPENDITURES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2015 AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2016, PROVIDING FOR THE INTRA AND INTER DEPARTMENT AND FUND TRANSFERS, PROVIDING FOR UNEXPECTED REVENUES SUCH AS GRANTS, DONATIONS, AND INSURANCE PROCEEDS, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, AND PROVIDING FOR APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT POLICY. WHEREAS, pursuant to the laws of the State of Texas and the City Charter, the budget covering proposed expenditures for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2015 and ending September 30, 2016 was filed with the City Secretary; and WHEREAS, budget workshops were conducted by the City Council on the proposed budget at which time the proposed budget was fully considered; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of the City Charter and the Local Government Code, the City Council of the City of Sanger, Texas published notice of public hearing on the budget on August 6, 2015 and conducted public hearings on August 17, 2015 and September 8, 2015; and WHEREAS, Chapter 2256 of the Texas Government Code, commonly known as the "Public Funds Investment Act," requires the City to review its investment policy and investment strategies not less than annually; and WHEREAS, the Public Funds Investment Act requires the governing body to adopt a written instrument by rule, order, ordinance, or resolution stating that it has reviewed the investment policy and investment strategies and that the written instrument shall record any changes made to either the investment policy or investment strategies; and WHEREAS, the attached City of Sanger Investment Policy is in compliance with the Public Funds Investment Act and requires no changes to either the investment policy or investment strategies; and WHEREAS, The City has implemented Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement 545 Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions (GASB 54) and Fund balance categories under GASB 54 are Nonspendable and Spendable and classifications under the Spendable category are Restricted, Committed, Assigned, and Unassigned and these classifications reflect not only the nature of funds, but also provide clarity to the level of restriction placed upon fund balance. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANGER, TEXAS: Section 1. That the City Council adopts the budget for the City of Sanger, Texas, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Secretary and which hereinafter referred to as the "Budget" for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2015 and ending September 30, 2016. Section 2. That the budget presented by the City Council and reviewed during the public hearing is hereby approved and adopted for the Fiscal Year 2015-2016. General Fund $650729370 Enterprise Fund $119553,812 Debt Fund $1,0039324 4A Fund $200,989 4B Fund $2379500 Special Revenue Funds $167,759 Section 3. That the City Manager be authorized to make intra and inter department fund transfers during the fiscal year as becomes necessary in order to avoid over expenditure of any departments total budget. Section 4. That the City Manager be authorized to increase the budget for items received during the year that have a corresponding revenue and expenditure such as Grants, Donations, and Insurance Proceeds received for property damage. Section 5. That the City of Sanger has complied with the requirements of the Public Funds Investment Act and the City Council has reviewed the investment policy and investment strategies and there are no changes to either the investment policy or investment strategies. Section 6. In circumstances where an expenditure is to be made for a purpose for which amounts are available in multiple fund balance classifications, the order in which resources will be expended is as follows: restricted fund balance, followed by committed fund balance, assigned fund balance, and lastly unassigned fund balance. When it is appropriate for fund balance to be assigned, the City Council hereby delegates the authority to the City Manager. The following fund balances are committed: Equipment Replacement Funds, Library Building Expansion Funds, Beautification Board Funds, all Donated Funds, and Capital Projects Funds. Section 7. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Sanger, Texas on this day of September 2015. ATTEST: Tami Taber, City Secretary Thomas Muir, Mayor ORDINANCE #094845 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANGER, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS, LEVYING A TAX RATE , OR THE GENERAL GOVERNMENT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016 AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Sanger finds that a tax rate of $0.6795 per IS valuation for the Fiscal Year 2015-2016, hereinafter levied for current expenses of the City and general improvements of the City and its property, must be levied to provide the revenue requirements of the budget for the ensuing year; and WHEREAS, all statutory and constitutional requirements for the levy and assessment of ad valorem taxes have been completed in due and correct time and all requirements of the Sanger Charter have been met; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANGER, TEXAS: SECTION 1: That the City Council does hereby levy and adopt the tax rate on $100 assessed valuation for the City for maintenance and operation of the City government for the tax year 2015-2016 as follows: 0.513353/$100 SECTION 2: That the City Council does hereby levy and adopt the tax rate on $100 assessed valuation for the City for debt service for City government for the tax year 2015-2016 as follows: 0.166147/$100 SECTION 3: This ordinance is effective upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Sanger, Texas on this day of September 2015. ATTEST: Tami Taber, City Secretary Thomas Muir, Mayor ORDINANCE #094945 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANGER, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS, APPROVING THE 2015 TAX ROLLS AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANGER HEREBY ORDAINS: Section 1. The City Council hereby approves the 2015 tax rolls of the City of Sanger, Texas, as certified by the Appraisal Review Board of the Denton Central Appraisal District, which, with amounts of tax as approved by the governing body, will result in a tax levy in the amount of $3,165,143.81 based on the Certified Appraisal Roll, Section 2. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Sanger, Texas, this day of September 2015. ATTEST: Tami Taber, City Secretary Thomas Muir, Mayor CITY OF SANGER COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM AGENDA TYPE ® Regular ❑ Special ❑ Consent Reviewed by Finance ❑ Yes ® Not Applicable ❑ Workshop ❑ Executive ❑ Public Hearing Reviewed by Legal ❑ Yes ❑ Not Applicable Council Meeting Date: Submitted By: September 21, 2015 Joseph D. Iliff, AICP City Manager Reviewed/Approval Initials , ate ' S ACTION REQUESTED: []ORDINANCE ❑ RESOLUTION # ❑ APPROVAL ❑ CHANGE ORDER ❑ AGREEMENT ❑ APPROVAL OF BID ❑ AWARD OF CONTRACT ❑ CONSENSUS ® OTHER PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA CAPTION Conduct a Public Hearing Concerning Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plan in Preparation for the Adoption of Roadway Impact Fees, FINANCIAL SUMMARY ®N/A ❑GRANT FUNDS []OPERATING EXPENSE [:]REVENUE ❑CIP ❑BUDGETED ❑NON -BUDGETED BACKGROUND/SUMMARY OF ITEM Roadway impact fees are fees collected by cities on new development for the funding of roadway facilities attributable to the increased traffic demanded by their construction. For a city to adopt roadway impact fees, a study must be prepared projecting the amount of increased traffic demand generated by future development, and identifying the cost of future roadway facilities. The City has prepared such a study, and submitted it to the review of the Planning & Zoning Commission serving as the Capital Improvement Advisory Committee (CIAC). The P&Z conducted a public hearing on September 141h, and recommended approval of the study's findings. The Study establishes three things required for the City to collect roadway impact fees. The first is the projection of future traffic demanded by new development, called the land use assumptions (LUA's). The second is the projected costs of the roadway projects to be constructed within 10 years, the capital improvements plan (CIP). And the third is a ratio between the two, calculating the maximum fee per service unit that the city can collect. Most cities collect less than the maximum impact fee calculated by this study, and the actual amount collected will be determined by City Council at a future meeting. The City Council is to conduct a public hearing on the findings of this study. The required notices have been published inviting comments at this City Council meeting. At the October 5th meeting, the Council can act on the study and its proposed findings. STAFF OPTIONS & RECOMMENDATION Staff is requesting the Council give direction on any questions it has about the study or information it would like to have presented at the next City Council meeting. List of Supporting Documents/Exhibits Attached: Prior Action/Review by Council, Boards, Commissions or Other • 2015 Roadway Impact Fee Study (will be sent Agencies: separately, printed copies available at the On September 14t'', the P&Z Commission conducted a meeting.) public hearing (there were no public comments) and unanimously recommended approval of the study and its proposed findings. City of Sanger, Texas Prepared by: ARCHITECT"UP,E • E(VGWEERtNG • PLAIVNIffG Texas Registration No. F-12759 1405 W. Chapman Drive Sanger, Texas 76266 940445847503 JUNE 2015 NS Iwo ' . '�AID Table of Contents I. Executive Summary 2 II. Introduction 3 III. Roadway Impact Fee Calculation Inputs 4 A. Land Use Assumptions 4 B. Impact Fee Service Area 6 C. Future Roadway Improvements 6 V. Methodology for Roadway Impact Fees 7 A. Service Areas 7 B. Service Units 7 C. Cost Per Service Unit 7 D. Cost of the Improvements 8 E. Service Unit Calculation 9 V. Impact Fee Calculations 12 A. Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit 12 B. Plan For Awarding the Roadway Impact Fee Credit 12 C. Service Unit Demand Per Unit of Development 13 VI. Sample Calculations 14 VII. Conclusion 15 APPENDICES A. Roadway Impact Fee Opinion of Probable Construction Costs B. Roadway Impact Fee Service Units of Supply C. Maximum Allowable Roadway Impact Fee Per Service Unit Calculations D. Land Use/Vehicle-Mile Equivalency Table List of Exhibits 1 Service Area Map List of Tables 1A 2010 Demographics 1B 2011 Estimated Employment in Persons 2A Projected Population, Housing Units, and Employment in Person 2B Projected Population, Housing Units, and Employment in Square Feet 3 Roadway Improvements Plan for the Service Area 4 Level of Use for Proposed and Existing Facilities 5 Transportation Demand Factor Calculations (TDF) 6 Ten Year Growth Projections 7 Maximum Assessable Fee Per Service Unit/Vehicle-Mile Page I1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This study was performed to initiate the City of Sanger Roadway Impact Fees. Roadway improvements necessary to serve the 10-year (2025) system needs were evaluated based on information available from the City of Sanger 2015 Thoroughfare Plan, the 2007 Comprehensive Land Use Plan and the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG). Texas' impact fee law (Chapter 395) allows the recovery of costs fora 10-year planning period. We reviewed the service area (Service Area) created based on the Thoroughfare Plan by site observations along the widening of existing roadways and aerial images of future alignments. The projected cost to construct the infrastructure needed through 2025 is $80,416,924 for the Service Area. Based on the City's 10-year growth projections and the associated demand (consumption) values, 3,295 additional vehicle -miles of capacity will be needed by year 2025 for the Service Area. Based on the additional service units and the recoverable capital improvements plans, the City may assess a maximum of $1,361.21 per service unit in the Service Area. Page 12 II. INTRODUCTION Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code describes the procedure Texas cities must follow in order to create and implement impact fees. Senate Bill 243 (SB 243) amended Chapter 395 in September 2001 to define an Impact Fee as "a charge or assessment imposed by a political subdivision against new development in order to generate revenue for funding or recouping the costs of roadway improvements or facility expansions necessitated by and attributable to the new development." The City of Sanger has determined based on their 2015 Thoroughfare Plan that assessing impact fees for the continued expansion of the City is valuable and necessary. The City has retained EIKON Consultant Group to provide professional transportation engineering services for the initiation of their Roadway Impact Fees. This report includes the impact fee calculation in accordance with Chapter 395 and the adopted Land Use Assumptions and the Roadway Improvements Plan. This report consists of the methodology for the computation of impact fees. The components of the computation, as outlined by Chapter 395 "must contain specific enumeration" of the following items: 1. A description of the existing capital improvements within the service area and the cost to upgrade, update, improve, expand or replace the improvements to meet existing needs and usage 2. An analysis of the total capacity, the level of current usage, and commitments for usage of capacity of the existing capital improvements 3. A description of all or the parts of the capital improvements and their costs necessitated by and attributable to new development in the service area based on approved land use assumptions 4. A definitive table establishing the specific level or quantity of use, consumption, generation, or discharge of service unit for each category of capital improvements and an equivalency or conversion table establishing the ratio of a service unit to various types of land uses, including residential, commercial, and industrial 5. The total number of projected service units necessitated by and attributable to new development within the service area based on the approved land use assumptions and calculated in accordance with generally accepted engineering or planning criteria 6. The projected demand for capital improvements or facility expansions required by new service units projected over a reasonable period of time, not to exceed 10 years 7. A plan for awarding a credit for the portion of the ad valorem tax generated by new service units during the program period that is used for the payment of improvements or a credit equal to 50 percent of the total projected cost of implementing the capital improvements plan Page (3 ROADWAY IMPACT FEE GALGULA I IUN INNU 15 A. LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS Per Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code, Land Use Assumptions include changes in land uses, densities, and population in the service area. The Land Use Assumptions used in this report were developed by using employment data, population data, and trends developed by the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG). This information has been approved by the City of Sanger staff to be a reasonable representation of the building growth seen in the recent years and what may be expected in the following ten years. The following population and employment estimates and projections are defined by North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) and utilized by NCTCOG: Housing Units: Number of houses including single and multi -family homes Population: Number of people reported in the City. Employment: Square feet of building area based on retail, service, and basic land uses. Each classification has unique trip making characteristics. Basic/Goods: Land use activities that produce goods and services such as those that are exported outside of the local economy, such as manufacturing, construction, transportation, wholesale, trade, warehousing, and other industrial uses. (NAICS #210000 to #422999) Service: Land use activities which provide personal and professional services such as government and other professional administrative offices. (NAICS 4T520000 to #928199) Retail: Land use activities which provide for the retail sale of goods that primarily serve households and whose location choice is oriented toward the household sector, such as grocery stores and restaurants. (NAICS #440000 to #454390) To establish the population and employment characteristics for this report, demographic data provided by North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) and the 2010 US Census was used: Page i4 Table 1A. 2010 Demographics US Census Population 61916 Housing Units 2,427 Table 1B. 2011 Estimated Employment in Persons 2011 Data from NCTCOG Employment Type Number of Persons Good Producing Industries (Basic) 645 Service Producing Industries (Service) 21178 Retail Industries (Retail) 394 Total 31217 NCTCOG published population estimates in 2015, which shows on average 1.9% growth in Sanger from 2010 to their estimates for 2014. The percent change for the population estimates for 2014 to 2015 is 1.3%. The population growth anticipated from the City's adopted Comprehensive Land Use Plan (October 2007) predicted an annual growth rate of 3.75% based on historical growth since 1960. In reviewing the recent trend for building permit applications, City Staff anticipates a slower growth than identified in the Comprehensive Plan, which is more congruent with the growth estimated by NCTCOG. For the purposes of this report, a population growth rate of 1.3% was used to project the growth in Sanger up to 2025. In addition, we have assumed that the housing units and employment characteristics will grow at the same rate as the population. The following table summarizes the anticipated population and employment characteristics based on these assumptions: Table 2A. Projected Population, Housing Units, and Employment in Persons 2011 Data from NCTCOG Year Population Housing Units Basic Service Retail 2010 61916 21427 - - - 2011 - - 645 21178 394 2015 71366 21585 679 2,291 415 2025 81265 2,900 762 21574 466 For the purposes of this report, employment population data is converted to square feet of building area required to create the non-residential square footage within the City. The following conversions rates were used to create Table 213: Basic/Goods: 1,000 square feet Service: 350 square feet Retail: 500 square feet Page (5 Table 213. Projected Population, Housing Units, and Employment in Square Feet 2011 Data from NCTCOG Year Population Housing Units Basic Service Retail 2010 61916 21427 - - - 2011 - - 645,000 7623300 197,000 2015 7,366 21585 679,000 801,940 207,244 2025 81265 2,900 762,000 901,039 232,854 B. IMPACT FEE SERVICE AREA Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code defines the service area for roadway facility analysis as an area within the corporate boundaries of the political subdivision that shall not exceed 6 miles. City Staff has determined that one (1) roadway facility service area based upon a six (6) mile limit is adequate and coincides with the capital improvement plans for roadway expansion over the next 10 years. The geographic boundary of the impact fee service area for roadway facilities is shown in Exhibit 1. C. FUTURE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS The City has identified the City -funded roadway projects needed for the projected growth within the City. These facilities are part of the currently adopted Thoroughfare Plan. The table below shows the length of each project as well as the Thoroughfare Plan classification. The future roadway improvements were developed by the City of Sanger staff and represent those projects that will be needed to accommodate the growth projected in this report. Table 3, Roadway Improvement Plan for the Service Area Length Street Name Class Limits <mi) Willow St./ Minor 4 Lanes 5th Street to FM 2164 3.34 McReynolds Rd. Willow St./McReynolds Rd. Indian Ln. Minor 4 Lanes to FM 455 0,88 Marion Rd. Minor 4 Lanes FM 455 to Lois Rd. 1.37 Lois Rd. Minor 4 Lanes Huling Rd. to 1-35 1.68 Belz Rd. Minor 4 Lanes 1-35 SBFR to Metz Rd. 0.97 Metz Rd. Minor 4 Lanes Belz Rd. to FM 455 0.68 Utility Rd. Collector 2 Lanes RR Tracks to Marion Rd. 0.77 Keaton Rd. Collector 2 Lanes Belz Rd. to FM 455 0.67 Future Belz Rd - Indian Minor 4 Lanes 1-35 NBFR to FM 455 1.02 Connector Future East-West Minor 4 Lanes Cowling Rd. to FM 2164 3.51 Thoroughfare (at FM 2153) Exhibit 1 maps the roadway alignments described above. Page I6 IV. ROADWAY IMPACT FEE METHODOLOGY A. SERVICE AREAS Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code specifies that "the service area is limited to an area within the corporate boundaries of the political subdivision and shall not exceed six (6) miles." One (1) service area was used in this report and is shown in Exhibit 1 and incorporates the anticipated roadway improvement projects within the corporate boundary of the City of Sanger. B. SERVICE UNITS The "service unit" is a measure of consumption or use of the roadway facilities by new development and is defined as a vehicle -mile for transportation purposes. In regards to supply and demand, it is a lane -mile and a vehicle -trip of one -mile in length, respectively. The afternoon peak hour of traffic is the time period used for transportation planning and the estimation of trips from new development. The service volume that is supplied by a lane -mile of roadway facility is another component of the service unit. This volume is a function of the facility type, configuration, number of lanes, and level of service. The hourly service volumes used in this report are based on the hourly capacity for level of service D obtained from the DFW Regional Travel Model Criteria published by the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) and the Highway Capacity Manual. Level of service D roadways represents the minimal acceptable capacity limit for urban roadways. In the absence of providing a traffic study to generate the number of cars currently using the roads within the service area, we have assumed that the hourly capacity of the roads is equal to the number of cars currently using the roads in the peak am hour. Table 4 shows the service volumes as a function of the facility type for the types of roads within the service area. Table 4. Vehicle -Mile Capacities Hourly Vehicle -Mile Capacity Class Median Configuration per Lane -Mile of Roadway Facility Minor 4 Undivided 525 Lanes Collector 2 Undivided 450 Lanes Principal 4 Undivided 650 Lanes C. COST PER SERVICE UNIT The cost for each service unit is the cost for each vehicle -mile traveled or the cost to build a lane -mile for a vehicle -mile of travel at a level of service provided by the City's standards. The cost per service unit is calculated for each project within the service area. The number of service units in the service are is the measure of the presumed growth in the transportation demand projected over a ten-year period. Chapter 395 requires that Impact Fees be assessed only to pay for growth projected to occur within the next ten - years. Page 17 D. COST OF THE IMPROVEMENTS Per Chapter 395, costs that may be included in the cost per service unit are "...including and limited to the: 1. Construction contract price; 2. Surveying and engineering fees; 3. Land acquisition costs, including land purchases, court awards and costs, attorney's fees, and expert witness fees; and 4. Fees actually paid or contracted to be paid to an independent qualified engineer or financial consultant preparing or updating the Roadway improvements plan who is not an employee of the political subdivision." The engineer's opinion of the probable costs of the projects in the service area are based on the typical costs of construction. The roadway alignments identified as part of the roadway improvement projects were visual surveyed. Components required to accommodate the expansions or extensions were noted, such as the number of required lanes and the length of the project. In addition we made note of any other incidental construction items that would be necessary such as bridges or culvert crossings, traffic signals, highway ramps, and drainage structures. These costs were combined into an overall cost. Costs associated with State, Denton County, and developer driven projects in which the City has contributed a portion of the total project cost may be included in the calculations. At the time of this report, the City does not intend to contribute funds to any of these types of roadway projects. To simplify the calculations, we have separated the probable costs into two (2) categories; construction costs and construction allowances, and made several assumptions about the types of roads to be constructed. The roadway construction costs consist of the following items: (1) unclassified street excavation, (2) lime stabilization, (3) concrete pavement, (4) topsoil, (5) curb and gutter, and (6) allotment for turn lanes and median openings. The unit prices for these items are based on recently completed construction projects located in neighboring municipalities. Using the construction cost subtotal, a percentage of this total is calculated to account for major construction component allowances. These allowances include preparation of right-of-way, traffic control, pavement markings/markers, roadway drainage, special drainage structures, water and sewer relocations, turf reestablishment and erosion control, and street lighting. The allowance percentages are also based on values from RS Means and the amount of these types of construction estimated for each individual project. The paving and allowance subtotal is given a six percent (6%) allotment for mobilization and a twenty percent (20%) contingency to determine the construction cost total. To determine the total Impact Fee Project Cost, a percentage of the construction cost total is added to account for engineering, surveying, testing, and contractor mobilization. For alignments that will require right -of way acquisitions, we have assumed the allotment for the acquisitions should be $3 per square foot. Table 4 is a summary of the road improvement project list for the service area with the probable project cost projections. Detailed cost projections for each alignment are provided in Appendix A, Opinion of Probable Costs. Actual costs of construction will vary with time and are dependent on market conditions. Therefore, the cost projections reported in this study should not be utilized for the City's building program or construction CIP. P a g e 1 8 Table 4. Ten Year Roadway Improvements Plan Opinion of Probable Costs Length Total Project Street Name Class Limits (mi) Cost Willow St./ Minor 4 5th Street to FM 2164 3.34 $ 18,147,146 McReynolds Rd. Lanes Minor 4 Willow St./McReynolds Rd. $11130,328 Indian Ln. Lanes to FM 455 0088 Minor 4 $6,995,037 Marion Rd. FM 455 to Lois Rd. 1.37 Lanes Lois Rd. Minor 4 Huling Rd. to 1-35 1.68 $8,947,950 Lanes Minor 4 $5,130,524 Belz Rd. 1-35 SBFR to Metz Rd, 0,97 Lanes Metz Rd. Minor 4 Belz Rd. to FM 455 0.68 $31681,822 Lanes Utility Rd. Collector 2 RR Tracks to Marion Rd. 0,77 $3,180,747 Lanes Collector 2 $2,831,252 Keaton Rd. Belz Rd. to FM 455 0.67 Lanes Future Belz Rd - Minor 4 I-35 NBFR to FM 455 1.02 $6,877,083 Indian Connector Lanes Future East-West Minor 4 Cowling Rd, to FM 2164 3 51 $23,495,036 Thoroughfare Lanes (at FM 2153) E. SERVICE UNIT CALCULATION The service unit for the computation of roadway impact fees is the vehicle -mile of travel during the afternoon peak -hour. The roadway demand service units (vehicle -miles) for each service area are the sum of the vehicle -miles "generated" by each category of land use in the service area. All developed and developable land is categorized as either residential or non-residential. For residential land uses, the number of housing units in each service area is multiplied by a transportation demand factor to compute the vehicle -miles of travel that occur during the afternoon peak hour or the average amount of demand caused by the residential land uses in the service area. The square footages calculated using the employment data and conversion units described in Section 2A were used to calculate the vehicle -miles for non- residential land uses. To determine the cost per service unit, the growth in vehicle -miles of travel for the service area is required. The growth in vehicle -miles from 2015 to 2025 is based upon the changes in residential and non-residential growth for the period. This growth has been estimated in Section III.A. of this report. The existing and projected Land Use Assumptions for the dwelling units and the square footage of basic, service, and retail land uses provide the basis for the projected increase P a g e 19 in vehicle -miles of travel. A transportation aemana racror is appiiea to mese values ana then summed to calculate the total peak hour vehicle -miles of demand for each service area. The transportation demand factors are derived from the //E Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition and the Regional Origin -Destination Travel Survey performed by NCTCOG. The /TEE Trip Generation Manual, 9rh Edition provides variables for the number of trips that are produced or attracted to the land use. The transportation demand factor also includes the length of each trip (L). The average trip length for each category is based on the travel characteristics survey conducted by NCTCOG and the National Household Travel Survey (NHTS). The maximum trip length (Lmax), for land uses which are characterized by longer average trip lengths (primarily residential uses), has been limited to a length based on the nature of the roadway network within the service area, along with consideration of the existing City boundaries. For the purposes of this report, the maximum trip length available is the boundary of the service area, which is six (6) miles. The adjustment made to the average trip length statistic in the computation of the maximum trip length is the origin -destination reduction. This adjustment is made because the roadway impact fee is charged to both the origin and destination end of the trip. For the retail category of land uses, the rate is adjusted because a percentage of retail trips are made by people visiting these locations as part of an existing trip between work and home and are therefore called pass -by trips. The retail trips are then reduced to avoid counting these trips twice. Per the ITE, retail shopping centers have an average pass -by trip percentage of 34%. For the purposes of this report, we have used this value for ato calculate the demand factor for retail areas. The computation of the transportation demand factor is detailed in the following equation: TDF = T * (1- Fb) *Lmax where Lmax = min(L * OD or SAS ) Variables: TDF = Transportation Demand Factor T = Trip Rate (peak hour trips / unit) �= Pass -By Discount (% of trips) Lmax =Maximum Trip Length (miles) L =Average Trip Length (miles) SAL = Max Service Area Trip Length (see Table 5) OD = Origin -Destination Reduction (50%) Table 5 shows the derivation of the Transportation Demand Factorfor the residential land uses and the three (3) non-residential land use categories. The values utilized for all variables shown in the transportation demand factor equation are also shown in the table. Page 110 Table 5. Transportation Demand Factor Calculations (TDF) Variable Residential Basic Service Retail T 1.00 0.97 1,49 3.71 Pb 0% 0% 0% 34% L 17.21 10.02 10.92 6.43 Lmax * 6.00 5.01 5.46 3.22 TDF 6.00 4.86 8.14 7.89 " 50% of L is less than Lmax for non-residential land uses; therefore this lower trip length is used for calculating the TDF for non-residential land uses Table 6 shows the vehicle -mile calculations for 2015 and 2025 using the above TDF values. Table 6. Ten Year Growth Projections 2015 Residential Vehicle -Miles Housing Units TDF Vehicle -Miles 2,585 6 15,510 Non -Residential Vehicle -Miles Square -Feet TDF Vehicle -Miles (in 1,000 SQFT) Basic Service Retail Basic Service Retail Basic Service Retail 679,000 801,940 207,244 4.8 8.14 7.8 31259 6,528 1,617 2015 Total Vehicle Miles = 26,913 2025 Residential Vehicle -Miles Housing Units TDF Vehicle -Miles 2,900 6 17,400 Nnn-Residential Vehicle -Miles Square -Feet TDF Vehicle -Miles (in 1,000 SQFT) Basic Service Retail Basic Service Retail Basic Service Retail 762,000 901,039 232,854 4.8 8,14 7.8 3,658 71334 11816 2015 Total Vehicle Miles = 30,208 Projected Increase in Vehicle -Miles = 30,208 - 26,913 = 3,295 vehicle -miles Page I11 V. IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS A. MAXIMUM ASSESSABLE IMPACT FEE PER SERVICE UNIT The maximum assessable impact fee is the sum of the eligible Impact Fee Roadway Improvement Project costs for the service area divided by the growth in travel attributable to new development projected to occur within the 10-year period. The documentation for this calculation has been provided in Appendix C. B. PLAN FOR AWARDING THE ROADWAY IMPACT FEE CREDIT Per Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code, the Roadway Impact Fees Program must contain specific enumeration of a plan for awarding the impact fee credit. This is provided in Section 395.014 of the Code and states: "(7) A plan for awarding: (A) a credit for the portion of ad valorem tax and utility service revenues generated by new service units during the program period that is used for the payment of improvements, including the payment of debt, that are included in the capital improvements plan; or (B) In the alternative, a credit equal to 50 percent of the total projected cost of implementing the capital improvements plan..." The max assessable fee has been based on the option of the 50% credit. Table 7 illustrates the computation of the maximum assessable impact fee computed for the service area. The description of how each line has been calculated is provided in Appendix C. Table 7. Maximum Assessable Fee Per Service Unit/Vehicle-Mile Line Description Value 1 I Total Vehicle -Miles of Capacity Added by the Roadway Improvement Projects 29,539 2 Total Vehicle -Miles of Existing Demand From the Roadway Improvement Projects 7 709 3 Total Vehicle -Miles of Existing Deficiencies From the Existing Roadway Facilities 141 4 Net Amount of Vehicle -Miles of Capacity Added 21,971 5 Total Cost of the Roadway Improvement Projects $80,4161924 6 Cost of the Net Capacity Supplied $59,8141491 7 Cost to Meet the Existing Needs and Usage $201602,434 8 Total Vehicle -Miles of New Demand over 10-Years 3,295 9 Percent of Capacity Added Attributable to Growth (Must be Less than or Equal to 100%) 15% 10 Cost of Capacity Added Attributable to Growth $8,970,372 11 50% Credit $4,485,186 12 Max Assessable Fee Per Service Unit/Vehicle Mile $1,361024 Page 112 C. SERVICE UNIT DEMAND PER UNIT OF DEVELOPMENT The maximum allowable roadway impact fee for development is calculated by multiplying the impact fee rate by the number of service units projected for the proposed development. The Land Use/Vehicle-Mile Equivalency Table (LUVMET) provided in Appendix D provides the service unit multipliers for typical land uses that should be used to calculate the maximum impact assessment. This table lists the most common land uses that may occur within the City. All possible categories of development may not be represented. However, in these situations, we suggest using a similar use which will generate similar trip characteristics. The trip rate is the average number of trips generated during the afternoon peak hour by each land use per development unit. The next column is the pass -by rate the lTE Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition. To convert vehicle trips to vehicle -miles, it is necessary to multiply trips by trip length. The NCTCOG trip length values are based on the Regional Origin -Destination Travel Survey performed by the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG). The other adjustment to trip length is the 50% origin - destination reduction to avoid double counting of trips. Based on the State Law, there is a limit on transportation service unit demand. If the adjusted trip length is above the maximum trip length within the service area (for this study, 6 miles is the maximum trip length), the maximum trip length used for calculation is reduced to the corresponding value. The last column in the LUVMET shows the vehicle -miles per development unit calculated by multiplying the trip rate by the maximum trip length. This is the Transportation Demand Factor and should be used to calculate the maximum assessable impact fee. The number of service units is multiplied by the impact fee rate (established by City ordinance) in order to determine the impact fee for a development. Page �13 Vl. SAMPLE CALCULATIONS The following section details two (2) examples of maximum assessable roadway impact fee calculations. Example 1: Development Type - One (1) Unit of Single -Family Housing Roadway Impact Fee Calculation Steps -Example 1 Determine Development Unit and Vehicle -Miles Per Development Unit Step 1 From APX D [Land Use - Vehicle -mile Equivalency Table] Development Type: 7 Dwelling Unit of Single -Family Detached Housing Number of Development Units: 1 Dwelling Unit Veh-Mi Per Development Unit: 6.06 Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit Step 2 $7, 367.27 Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Impact Fee = # of Development Units x Veh-Mi Per Dev Unit x Max. Fee Per Service Unit Step 3 Maximum Assessable Impact Fee = 1 x 6.06 x $1,361.21 $8,248.93 Example 2: Develooment Tvne - 25.000 sauare foot Home Improvement Superstore Roadway Impact Fee Calculation Steps -Example 2 Determine Development Unit and Vehicle -Miles Per Development Unit Step 1 From APX D [Land Use - Vehicle -mile Equivalency Table] Development Type. 25, 000 square feet of Home Improvement Superstore Development Unit.• 7,000 square feet of Gross Floor Area Veh-Mi Per Development Unit: 3.96 Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit Step 2 $7,367.27 Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Impact Fee = # of Development Units x Veh-Mi Per Dev Unit x Max. Fee Per Service Unit Step 3 Maximum Assessable Impact Fee = (25,000/1,000) x 3.96 x $1,361.21 $134,759.79 Page 114 vll C:UNC:LU5IVN The City of Sanger has established a process to implement the assessment and collection of roadway impact fees through the adoption of an impact fee ordinance that is consistent with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. This report establishes the maximum allowable roadway impact fee that could be assessed by the City of Sanger within the service area boundary. The maximum assessable roadway impact fees calculated is $1,361.21 This is a guide to the assessment of roadway impact fees pertaining to future development and the City's need for roadway improvements to accommodate that growth. Following the public hearing process, the City Council may establish an amount to be assessed (if any) up to the maximum established within this report and update the Roadway Impact Fee Ordinance accordingly. It is our opinion that the data and methodology used in this report are appropriate and consistent with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code, and the Land Use Assumptions and the proposed Roadway Improvements Plan are appropriately incorporated into the process. Page (15 Roadway Impact Fee Opinion of Probable Costs CITY OF BANGER IMPACT FEE STUDY CONCEPTUAL LEVEL COST PROJECTIONS June 2015 Street Name: Willow St/McReynolds Rd Limits: Sth St to FM 2164 Impact Fee Class: Ultimate Class: Length (LF): 173635 Existing two lane concrete roadway from 5th St to Jones; two lane asphalt from Jones to FM 2164, Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost Unclassified Street Excavation 23$13.33 CY $ 15,00 $ 3523700,00 6" Lime or Cement Subgrade Treatment (27 Ibs/sf) 99,931.67 SY $ 4,00 $ 399,726467 8" Reinf, Concrete Pvmt with 6" Integral Curb 92,093489 SY $ 46.00 $ 4,236,318,89 4" Topsoil 19$94.44 SY $ 5,00 $ 97,972,22 4' Wide Concrete Sidewalk 141,080 SF $ 4,00 $ 564,320.00 Turn Lanes and Median Openings I SY $ 50,00 $ Signalized Intersection (at Indian Rd, FM 2164) 21 EA 1 $ 2003000,00 $ 4000000,00 $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal $ 62051,037,78 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost R.O.W. Preparation 6% $ 363,062,27 Traffic Control During Construction 5% $ 302155L89 Pavment Markings 3% $ 181,531,13 Roadway Drainage 30% $ 13815,311,33 Roadway Lighting 6% $ 363,062.27 Special Drainage Structures (bridges and culverts) 7 crossings 6% $ 363,062,27 Minor Water Line Adjustments 6% $ 363,062,27 Minor Wastewater Line Adjustments 4% $ 242,041,51 Erosion Control/Establish Turf 3% $ 181,531.13 Basic Landscaping/Irrigation 3% $ 181$31.13 Franchised Utility Facilities OH -Electric, UG Fiber Optic, Telephone 3% $ 181,531.13 Railroad Crossing I Single track between 1st and Railroad I 3% 1$ 181J531,13 Tree Mitigation 3% $ 181,531,13 Other Bridge west of Ranger Creek Rd 0% $ - Allowance Subtotal $ 4,901,340.60 Paving and Allowance Subtotal $ 10,952,378.38 Construction Contingency @ 20% $ 2,190,475.68 Total Construction Cost $ 13,142,854.05 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Construction $ 13,142,854.05 Engineering/Survey/Testing 20% $ 21628,570,81 Mobilization 6% $ 788$71.24 Previous City Contribution $ Other $ R.O.W. and Easement Acquisition For Area from 5th to the RR $3/SF $ 1,587,150.00 Total Impact Fee Project Cost 1 $ 18,147,146.11 PREPARED BY EIKON JUNE 2015 CITY OF BANGER IMPACT FEE STUDY CONCEPTUAL LEVEL COST PROJECTIONS June 2015 Street Name: Indian Ln Limits: Willow St/McReynolds Rd to FM 455 Impact Fee Class: Ultimate Class: Length (LF): 4,641 Existing concrete roadway to remain. Roadway is approx. 37 ft wide for approx. 3472 LF and approx. 25 ft wide for approx. 1169 LF, Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost Unclassified Street Excavation 1,054.93 CY $ 15,00 $ 15,823.89 6" Lime or Cement Subgrade Treatment (27 Ibs/sf) 7,360.89 SY $ 4,00 $ 29,443.56 8" Reinf, Concrete Pvmt with 6" Integral Curb 6,329.56 SY $ 46,00 $ 291,159.56 4" Topsoil 4,641.00 SY $ 5,00 $ 23,205.00 4' Wide Concrete Sidewalk 71432 SF $ 4,00 $ 29,728.00 Turn Lanes and Median Openings SY 1$ 50,00 $ Signalized Intersection EA $ 200,000.00 $ $ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal $ 389,360.00 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost R.O.W. Preparation 6% $ 23,361.60 Traffic Control During Construction 5% $ 19,468,00 Pavment Markings 3% $ 11,680.80 Roadway Drainage 30% $ 116,808.00 Roadway Lighting 6% $ 23,361460 Special Drainage Structures (bridges and culverts) 2 culverts 6% $ 23,361.60 Minor Water Line Adjustments 6% $ 232361,60 Minor Wastewater Line Adjustments 4% $ 15,574.40 Erosion Control/Establish Turf 3% $ 11,680,80 Basic Landscaping/Irrigation 3% $ 11,680.80 Franchised Utility Facilities OH utils on east; switchgear in r.o.w. east side 10% $ 38,936.00 Railroad Crossing 5% $ 19,468.00 Tree Mitigation 3% $ 11,680.80 Other move fence around water tower 2% $ 7,787.20 Allowance Subtotal $ 358,211.20 Paving and Allowance Subtotal $ 747,571.20 Construction Contingency @ 20% $ 149,514.24 Total Construction Cost $ 897,085,44 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Construction $ 897,085,44 Engineering/Survey/Testing 20% $ 179,417.09 Mobilization 6% $ 539825,13 Previous City Contribution $ Other $ R.O.W. and Easement Acquisition None $3/SF I$ Total Impact Fee Project Cost 1 $ 1,130,327.65 PREPARED BY EIKON JUNE 2015 CITY OF BANGER IMPACT FEE STUDY CONCEPTUAL LEVEL COST PROJECTIONS June 2015 Street Name: Limits: Impact Fee Class: Ultimate Class: Length (LF): Marion Rd FM 455 to Lois Rd 7,234 Existing two lane asphalt roadway. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost Unclassified Street Excavation 91645,33 CY $ 15,00 $ 1443680,00 6" Lime or Cement Subgrade Treatment (27 Ibs/sf 40t992,67 SY $ 4,00 $ 163,970.67 8" Reinf. Concrete Pvmt with 6" Integral Curb 37,777.56 SY $ 46.00 $ 1,737,767.56 4" Topsoil 81037,78 SY $ 5,00 $ 40,188.89 4' Wide Concrete Sidewalk 57,872 SF $ 4,00 $ 231,488.00 Turn Lanes and Median Openings I I SY I $ 50,00 $ - Signalized Intersection EA $ 200,000,00 $ - $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal $ 213187095.11 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost R.O.W. Preparation 6% $ 139,085,71 Traffic Control During Construction 5% $ 1153904,76 Pavment Markings 3% $ 69,542.85 Roadway Drainage 30% $ 695,428.53 Roadway Lighting 6% $ 139,085,71 Special Drainage Structures (bridges and culverts) 3 culverts 6% $ 139,085,71 Minor Water Line Adjustments 6% $ 13%085.71 Minor Wastewater Line Adjustments 4% $ 92,723.80 Erosion Control/Establish Turf 3% $ 69,542,85 Basic Landscaping/Irrigation 3% $ 693542,85 Franchised Utility Facilities OH-E on e. side; UG-Fiber/Tel both sides 3% $ 690542,85 Railroad Crossing 1 3% $ 69,542.85 Tree Mitigation 3% $ 69,542,85 Other 0% $ - Allowance Subtotal $ 1,877,657.04 Paving and Allowance Subtotal $ 4,1953752.15 Construction Contingency @ 20% $ 839,150.43 Total Construction Cost $ 5s034,902o58 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Construction $ 5,034,902.58 Engineering/Survey/Testing 20% $ 1,006,980.52 Mobilization 6% $ 302,094.15 Previous City Contribution $ - Other $ R.O.W. and Easement Acquisition I Entire Length at 72 Feet Wide $3/SF $ 651,060.00 Total Impact Fee Project Cost $ 6,995,037.25 PREPARED BY EIKON JUNE 2015 CITY OF SANGER IMPACT FEE STUDY CONCEPTUAL LEVEL COST PROJECTIONS June 2015 Street Name: Limits: Impact Fee Class: Ultimate Class: Length (LF): Lois Rd Huling Rd to 1-35 8,870 Existing two lane asphalt roadway. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost Unclassified Street Excavation 11,826.67 CY $ 15,00 $ 177,400.00 6" Lime or Cement Subgrade Treatment (27 Ibs/sf) 509263.33 SY $ 4.00 $ 201,053,33 8" Reinf. Concrete Pvmt with 6" Integral Curb 461321,11 SY $ 46,00 $ 2,130,771.11 4" Topsoil 9,855.56 SY $ 5,00 $ 49,277,78 4' Wide Concrete Sidewalk 70,960 SF $ 4.00 $ 283,840.00 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 8001 SY $ 50.00 1 $ 40,000.00 Signalized Intersection EA $ 200,000,00 $ $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal $ 2,882,342.22 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost R.O.W. Preparation 6% $ 172,940,53 Traffic Control During Construction 5% $ 144,117.11 Pavment Markings 3% $ 86,470.27 Roadway Drainage 30% $ 864,702.67 Roadway Lighting 69/o $ 1723940,53 Special Drainage Structures (bridges and culverts) 5 culverts (2 major) 8% $ 230,587,38 Minor Water Line Adjustments 6% $ 172,940.53 Minor Wastewater Line Adjustments 4% $ 115,293,69 Erosion Control/Establish Turf 3% $ 86,470.27 Basic Landscaping/Irrigation 3% $ 86,470.27 Franchised Utility Facilities OH-E s. side; UG-Fiber both sides 5% $ 144,117,11 Railroad Crossing I single track east of Walmart 5% $ 144,117.11 Tree Mitigation 37. $ 863470,27 Other 0% $ Allowance Subtotal $ 2,507,637.73 Paving and Allowance Subtotal $ 5,389,979.96 Construction Contingency @ 20% $ 1,077,995.99 Total Construction Cost $ 6,467,975.95 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Construction $ 6,467,975.95 Engineering/Survey/Testing 20% $ 11293,595,19 Mobilization 6% $ 388,078.56 Previous City Contribution $ Other $ R.O.W. and Easement Acquisition Entire Length at 72 Feet Wide $3/SF 1 $ 798$00.00 Total Impact Fee Project Cost 1 $ 8,947,949.69 PREPARED BY EIKON DUNE 2015 CITY OF BANGER IMPACT FEE STUDY CONCEPTUAL LEVEL COST PROJECTIONS June 2015 Street Name: Limits: Impact Fee Class: Ultimate Class: Length (LF): Belz Rd 135 SBFR to Metz Rd 5,126 Existing two lane asphalt roadway. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost Unclassified Street Excavation 6,834.67 Cy $ 15,00 $ 102,520,00 6" Lime or Cement Subgrade Treatment (27 Ibs/sf) 29,047,33 SY $ 4.00 $ 116,189.33 8" Reinf. Concrete Pvmt with 6" Integral Curb 26,769,11 SY $ 46,00 $ 1,231,379.11 4" Topsoil 5,695056 SY $ 5,00 $ 28,477,78 4' Wide Concrete Sidewalk 41,008 SF $ 4,00 $ 164,032.00 Turn Lanes and Median Openings ISY I $ 50,00 $ - Signalized Intersection EA $ 200,000,00 $ $ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal $ 1,642,598.22 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost R.O.W. Preparation 6% $ 98,555.89 Traffic Control During Construction 5% $ 82,129,91 Pavment Markings 3% $ 49,277,95 Roadway Drainage 30% $ 492,779.47 Roadway Lighting 6% $ 98,555.89 Special Drainage Structures (bridges and culverts) 2 culverts (one major) 10% $ 164,259,82 Minor Water Line Adjustments 6% $ 98,555.89 Minor Wastewater Line Adjustments 4% $ 65,703.93 Erosion Control/Establish Turf 3% $ 49,277.95 Basic Landscaping/Irrigation 3% $ 49,277,95 Franchised Utility Facilities OH-E on metal poles n. side; OH-E conc 6% $ 98*555,89 Railroad Crossing 1 11 % $ 49,277,95 Tree Mitigation 3% $ 49,277,95 Other 0% $ - Allowance Subtotal $ 114452486644 Paving and Allowance Subtotal $ 3,088,084.66 Construction Contingency @ 20% $ 617,616.93 Total Construction Cost $ 3,705,701.59 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Construction $ 3,705,701.59 Engineering/Survey/Testing 20% $ 741,140,32 Mobilization 6% $ 2223342410 Previous City Contribution $ Other $ - R.O.W. and Easement Acquisition Entire Length at 72 Feet Wide $3/SF 1 $ 461,340.00 Total Impact Fee Project Cost $ 5,130,524.00 PREPARED BY EIKON JUNE 2015 CITY OF SANGER IMPACT FEE STUDY CONCEPTUAL LEVEL COST PROJECTIONS June 2015 Street Name: Limits: Impact Fee Class: Ultimate Class: Length (LF): Metz Rd Belz Rd to FM 455 3,525 Existing two lane asphalt roadway. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost Unclassified Street Excavation 45700,00 Cy $ 15,00 $ 70,500.00 6" Lime or Cement Subgrade Treatment (27 Ibs/sf) 19,975.00 Sy $ 4,00 $ 79,900,00 8" Reinf, Concrete Pvmt with 6" Integral Curb 18,408,33 Sy $ 46,00 $ 8463783,33 4" Topsoil 3,916.67 Sy $ 5,00 $ 1%583.33 4' Wide Concrete Sidewalk 28,200 SF $ 4,00 $ 112,800.00 Turn Lanes and Median Openings Sy I $ 50,00 $ - Signalized Intersection EA $ 200,000,00 $ - $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal $ 1,129,566.67 Item Description Notes Allowance IteM338,870,00 R.O.W. Preparation 6% $ Traffic Control During Construction 5% $ Pavment Markings 3% $ Roadway Drainage 30% $ Roadway Lighting 6% $ 67,774.00 Special Drainage Structures (bridges and culverts) 3 culverts 10% $ 1121956,67 Minor Water Line Adjustments 6% $ 67,774.00 Minor Wastewater Line Adjustments 4% $ 45,182,67 Erosion Control/Establish Turf 3% $ 33,887.00 Basic Landscaping/Irrigation 3% $ 33,887.00 Franchised Utility Facilities OH-E both sides 10% $ 112,956,67 Railroad Crossing 8% $ 903365,33 Tree Mitigation 3% $ 33,887,00 Other Site distance issue at FM 455 0% $ - Allowance Subtotal $ 1,095,679.67 Paving and Allowance Subtotal $ 2,225,246.33 Construction Contingency @ 20% $ 445,049.27 Total Construction Cost $ 2,670,295.60 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Construction $ 21670,295,60 Engineering/Survey/Testing 20% $ 534,059012 Mobilization 6% $ 160,217.74 Previous City Contribution $ - Other $ - R.O.W. and Easement Acquisition Entire Length at 72 Feet Wide I $3/SF $ 317,250.00 Total Impact Fee Project Cost $ 31681,822646 PREPARED BY EIKON JUNE 2015 CITY OF SANGER IMPACT FEE STUDY CONCEPTUAL LEVEL COST PROJECTIONS June 2015 Street Name: Extension of Utility Rd Limits: RR tracks to Marion Rd (at Huling Rd) Impact Fee Class: Ultimate Class: Length (LF): 4,055 New roadway adjacent to farm and open fields. Roadway to go between two houses at Marion. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost Unclassified Street Excavation 3,754.63 CY $ 15,00 $ 56,319,44 6" Lime or Cement Subgrade Treatment (27 Ibs/sf) 13,967,22 SY $ 4,00 $ 55,868,89 8" Reinf, Concrete Pvmt with 6" Integral Curb 12,165.00 SY $ 46,00 $ 559,590.00 4" Topsoil 3,604.44 SY $ 5,00 $ 18,022.22 4' Wide Concrete Sidewalk 32,440 SF $ 4.00 $ 129,760,00 Turn Lanes and Median Openings I SY I $ 50,00 $ - Signalized Intersection EA $ 200,000.00 $ - $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal $ 8191560,56 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost R.O.W. Preparation 6% $ 49,173.63 Traffic Control During Construction 5% $ 40,978.03 Pavment Markings 3% $ 24$86.82 Roadway Drainage 30% $ 245,868.17 Roadway Lighting 69/o $ 49J73.63 Special Drainage Structures (bridges and culverts) 6% $ 49,173,63 Minor Water Line Adjustments 6% $ 49,173.63 Minor Wastewater Line Adjustments 4% $ 323782,42 Erosion Control/Establish Turf 3% $ 24,586,82 Basic Landscaping/Irrigation 3% $ 24,586,82 Franchised Utility Facilities 3% $ 24,586.82 Railroad Crossing Isingle track 8% $ 65,564.84 Tree Mitigation 1 3% $ 243586.82 Other 0% $ Allowance Subtotal $ 704,822.08 Paving and Allowance Subtotal $ 1,524,382.63 Construction Contingency @ 20% $ 304,876.53 Total Construction Cost 1 $ 1182%259.16 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Construction $ 1,829,259.16 Engineering/Survey/Testing 20% $ 365,851.83 Mobilization 6% $ 109,755,55 Previous City Contribution $ Other $ R.O.W. and Easement Acquisition Entire Length at 72 Feet Wide $3/SF 1 $ 875,880.00 Total Impact Fee Project Cost 1 $ 3,180,746054 PREPARED BY EIKON JUNE 2015 CITY OF SANGER IMPACT FEE STUDY CONCEPTUAL LEVEL COST PROJECTIONS June 2015 Street Name: Extension of Keaton Rd Limits: Belz Rd to FM 455 Impact Fee Class: Ultimate Class: Length (LF): 31527 New roadway adjacent to farm field and signal tower site. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost Unclassified Street Excavation 3,265.74 Cy $ 15.00 $ 48,986.11 6" Lime or Cement Subgrade Treatment (27 Ibs/sf) 12,148.56 SY $ 4.00 $ 481S94,22 8" Reinf. Concrete Pvmt with 6" Integral Curb 10,581,00 SY $ 46.00 $ 486,726,00 4" Topsoil 31135,11 SY $ 5,00 $ 15,675.56 4' Wide Concrete Sidewalk 28,216 SF $ 4,00 $ 112,864.00 Turn Lanes and Median Openings SY $ 50,00 $ Signalized Intersection EA $ 200,000,00 $ $ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal $ 712,845.89 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost R.O.W. Preparation 6% $ 42,770,75 Traffic Control During Construction 5% $ 35,642,29 Pavment Markings 3% $ 21,385,38 Roadway Drainage 30% $ 213,853.77 Roadway Lighting 6% $ 42,770,75 Special Drainage Structures (bridges and culverts) 10% $ 71,284,59 Minor Water Line Adjustments 6% $ 42,770.75 Minor Wastewater Line Adjustments 4% $ 28,513.84 Erosion Control/Establish Turf 3% $ 21,385,38 Basic Landscaping/Irrigation 3% $ 21,385,38 Franchised Utility Facilities OH-E on concrete poles e. side; OH-E on west sid 10% $ 71,284.59 Railroad Crossing 3% $ 21,385.38 Tree Mitigation 39/. $ 21,385.38 Other 0% $ Allowance Subtotal $ 655,818.22 Paving and Allowance Subtotal $ 1,368,664.11 Construction Contingency @ 20% $ 273,732.82 Total Construction Cost $ 1,642,396.93 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Construction $ 1,642,396.93 Engineering/Survey/Testing 20% $ 328,479.39 Mobilization 6% $ 98,543.82 Previous City Contribution $ Other $ R.O.W. and Easement Acquisition Entire Length at 72 Feet Wide $3/SF $ 761,832.00 Total Impact Fee Project Cost 1 $ 2,831,252.13 PREPARED BY EIKON JUNE 2015 CITY OF BANGER IMPACT FEE STUDY CONCEPTUAL LEVEL COST PROJECTIONS June 2015 Street Name: Future Belz Rd -Indian Rd Connector Future roadway through open fields. Limits: 1-35 NBFR to FM 455 Impact Fee Class: Ultimate Class: Length (LF): 5,385 Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost Unclassified Street Excavation 7,180.00 CY $ 15,00 $ 107,700,00 6" Lime or Cement Subgrade Treatment (27 Ibs/sf) 30,515,00 SY $ 4,00 $ 122,060,00 8" Reinf. Concrete Pvmt with 6" Integral Curb 28J21.67 SY $ 46,00 $ 13293,596.67 4" Topsoil 5,983.33 SY $ 5.00 $ 29,916.67 4' Wide Concrete Sidewalk 43,080 SF $ 4,00 $ 172$20.00 Turn Lanes and Median Openings I SY $ 50.00 $ - Signalized Intersection EA $ 200,000,00 $ - $ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal $ 1,725,593.33 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost R.O.W. Preparation 6% $ 103,535,60 Traffic Control During Construction 5% $ 86,279.67 Pavment Markings 3% $ 51J767,80 Roadway Drainage 30% $ 517,678.00 Roadway Lighting 6% $ 103,535.60 Special Drainage Structures (bridges and culverts) 6 stream crossings 30% $ 517,678.00 Minor Water Line Adjustments 6% $ 103$35.60 Minor Wastewater Line Adjustments 4% $ 69,023.73 Erosion Control/Establish Turf 3% $ 51,767.80 Basic Landscaping/irrigation 3% $ 51,767.80 Franchised Utility Facilities OH-E along n. side of FM 455 10% $ 172,559,33 Railroad Crossing I single track 10% $ 172,559,33 Tree Mitigation 3% $ 51,767,80 Other 0% $ - Allowance Subtotal $ 210532456907 Paving and Allowance Subtotal $ 3,779,049.40 Construction Contingency @ 20% $ 755,809.88 Total Construction Cost $ 4,534,859.28 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Construction $ 4,534,859.28 Engineering/Survey/Testing 20% $ 906,971.86 Mobilization 6% $ 272,091.56 Previous City Contribution $ Other $ - R.O.W. and Easement Acquisition Entire Length at 72 Feet Wide $3/SF 1 $ lJ63,160.00 Total Impact Fee Project Cost $ 6,877,082.69 PREPARED BY EIKON JUNE 2015 CITY OF SANGER IMPACT FEE STUDY CONCEPTUAL LEVEL COST PROJECTIONS June 2015 Street Name: Future East-West Thoroughfare Limits: Cowling Rd to FM 2164 (at FM 2153) Impact Fee Class: Ultimate Class: Length (LF): 18,533 Future roadway through open fields. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost Unclassified Street Excavation 24,710.67 Cy $ 15,00 $ 370,660,00 6" Lime or Cement Subgrade Treatment (27 Ibs/sf) 105,020.33 SY $ 4,00 $ 420,081,33 8" Reinf. Concrete Pvmt with 6" Integral Curb 96,783.44 SY $ 46,00 $ 41452,038,44 4" Topsoil 20,592,22 SY $ 5,00 $ 102,961,11 4' Wide Concrete Sidewalk 148,264 SF $ 4,00 $ 593,056,00 Turn Lanes and Median Openings SY $ 50.00 $ Signalized Intersection (at FM 2164) 1 EA $ 200,050.00 $ 2002000.00 $ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal $ 6,138,796.89 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost R.O.W. Preparation 6% $ 368,327.81 Traffic Control During Construction 5% $ 306,939,84 Pavment Markings 3% $ 1843163,91 Roadway Drainage 30% $ 11841,639,07 Roadway Lighting 6% $ 368,327,81 Special Drainage Structures (bridges and culverts) 11 stream crossings 35% $ 2,148,578.91 Minor Water Line Adjustments 6% $ 3683327,81 Minor Wastewater Line Adjustments 4% $ 245,551.88 Erosion Control/Establish Turf 3% $ 184,163,91 Basic Landscaping/Irrigation 3% $ 184,163,91 Franchised Utility Facilities OH-E n. side from Cowling to railroad 3% $ 184,163, 1 Railroad Crossing single track 39,f $ 184,163,91 Tree Mitigation 3% $ 184,163,91 Other Improvements to intersection with Railr 0% $ Allowance Subtotal $ 6,752,676.58 Paving and Allowance Subtotal $ 12,891,473.47 Construction Contingency @ 20% $ 2,578,294.69 Total Construction Cost $ 15,469,768.16 Item Descri tion Notes Allowance Item Cost Construction $ 15,469,768.16 Engineering/Survey/Testing 20% $ 31093,953,63 Mobilization 6% $ 928,186,09 Previous City Contribution $ Other $ R.O.W. and Easement Acquisition Entire Length at 72 Feet Wide $3/SF $ 4,003,128.00 Total Impact Fee Project Cost $ 23,4950035.88 PREPARED BY EIKON DUNE 2015 Roadway Impact Fee Service Units of Supply N tO co O V' N h N M 0 <} O N U M O Oi M M- N. O o ON 1 O m qt m `° C0 W M y rn 'V 'p W cd uj M M N t0 t+l O IL CO N Vi efl H1 !R !R !A fA U) FO- 0 a t00 co m d' V O O NN M y N W y L O/ to N N l0 U U i f W D. d' U S O M W U M M M M N v m M 7: n mi aEiYF� d O Y_ V tD ^ 00 M 0 r 41 m 0 N 0) q M m yam CO m M O v M LO U 0 T O n ry tM hj N N 0/ L'- FXF N > U) T W y U 0.Z m V N U) to m N M M 0 0 m m N N N N N N N N N N N 0 > U u > 39 d v 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 V) Q c Y d a� IN In U) M N N 0 0 to M 0 0 N N U N N IN N M In v v U S U Z y N G V V V V V V N N V V N J L n1 NO C M W M (D 6 LQ Q^ If! y v rn o O O O O- )n J N N N N N N C C C C C C C C J J c c N 10 10 10 f0 N f0 !0 y J J J J J J N N J J y N cr V V V V V i0 V C' U O O O O O O O O V U C_ C_ C_ C C_ 0 N C _C E _C E E F f O O E F U U 0 N N N C L m O U O N C O N T 6 N L O' -0 H Z C C N N O N N ,.. O W N a m J m F Y 3 U) 0 N N N W > m N > N � 0 L J tL LL w 0 0 C.0 d I I I I I I I I I Irz y �' (D X U 0 F W y = � Y a d) 0) O V O_ d' W N_ 61 co c0 LD 0) 0) NU) N N cr y N N W l0 d' O) tD V l0 O 'a aT+ O V N M to N Ln 0) W M W M LO O N M O �f' u2 U N fa N N WUajF Y 0) 0) O M O 7 W N 0) W W l0 0) Ol N N N N M 0. m N N N N O O lfl 'd' 0) (O Ft O W 0 M d' N N Ln co M Ln M OD N M O � 0 Flo N N F N N i N S Y— N M 0) �. N 0) c) Ln c0 LD N LO N c0 c0 LO m <}' Ln tD NU) N M W W N N M w M m m to N M N N N y n• 0 0) V N 0) N OJ N N M c0 O N W N LO U w T O cV I,j nj N N h Fc �: 7 7 S N T N '= y U° n n n n Ln Ln Ln o 0 0 0 0 o n o n o 0 o n ;° —_ Z N N N N N N N Ln M In to N Ln N Ln N to Ln Ln N a 2 --i Ln LO N Ln to Ln Ln %q d' q V V V N t0 LO <1' d' V LO O N F UI nY IF u Z m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � Q o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 2° Y w a E Ln IF Ln Ln O Ln Lo o O o 0 0 o Lo o Ln o 0 o Ln 0 0 N N N N Ln N N N Lo LO LO LO LO N Ln N Ln LO Ln N u > LO LO Lo LO LO Ln 4Y d' N' qq V d' LO LD Lo c}' Ln U u = Z y w C N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N J f 0 O] N V N O M N V V N N LD mN lD M L co N M LD 01 V M O m Wm O M N Ln LD n M O) pl t+i O N O O r<i N O N N LO O N O c w J N w w w w w w w N w w w w w w C C C G C C c w C w C C C w G C C C w C c N N @ w mC N c N C J J J J J J J J Lp J J J y O J N J N J O J N J J N N N N N y v v v v `o `0 `0 a `0 `O `D m o 0 0 0 0 U `0 `o 0 `o u u u o °- `D u u u `0 0` 0 u u u u 'u c c c_ c_ w c_ c w w w w w w c c w w w c F F E E o E E o 0 0 0 0 0 _ c E o 0 0 2: u u u u u u u 0. u u u v w w T .0 'O f0 .0 N J K '0 '0 -0 D' N CL 0af Z LL' K CK •3 Ip _ K O N T O L N m m m - y E 0 v o 0 0 m m D u E 0 v 0 v c J J m D Ln O J LL 3 Maximum Allowable Roadway Impact Fee Per Service Unit Calculations Line Title Description Total Vehicle -Miles of Based on the capacity, length, and number of lanes for each 1 Capacity Added by the project - Vehicle -Mile Supply Peak -Hour Total from Appendix Roadway Improvement B Service Units of Supply Projects Total Vehicle -Miles of The amount of traffic currently on the roads that are planned 2 Existing Demand From the for expansion - Vehicle -Mile Total Demand Peak -Hour Total Roadway Improvement from Appendix B Service Units of Supply Projects Total Vehicle -Miles of Vehicle -Miles of travel that are not accommodated by the 3 Existing Deficiencies From existing roads - Existing Deficiencies Peak -Hour Vehicle -Mile the Existing Roadway from Appendix B Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory Facilities Amount of Vehicle -Miles added by the thoroughfare plan that 4 Net Amount of Vehicle -Miles will not be utilized by the existing demand of Capacity Added = Line 1 - Line 2 - Line 3 Total Cost of the Roadway Total of the Opinion of Probable Construction Costs for the 5 Improvement Projects 10-Year Roadway Impact Study Total of the Opinion of Probable Construction Costs for the Cost of the Net Capacity 10-Year Roadway Impact Study prorated by the ratio capacity 6 Supplied added to the total capacity added _ (Line 4/Line 1) x Line 5 The Total Cost of the Roadway Improvements minus the Cost 7 Cost to Meet the Existing of the Capacity Supplied Needs and Usage =Line 5-Line 6 Total Vehicle -Miles of New The Estimate of the Number of Vehicle -Miles growth within 8 Demand over 10-Years the Service Area - based on the TDF The Total Vehicle -Miles of New Demand over 10-Years divided Percent of Capacity Added by the Net Amount of Vehicle -Miles of Capacity Added up to 9 Attributable to Growth 100%. Required by Chapter 395 to verify the (Must be Less than or Equal capacity added is from new growth. to 100%) = Line 8 / Line 4 <= 100% The Cost of the Net Capacity Supplied multiplied by the 10 Cost of Capacity Added Percent of Capacity Added Attributable to Growth Attributable to Growth = Line 6 x Line 9 Per Chapter 395 and the option selected in the report, multiply the Cost of Capacity Added Attributable to Growth 11 50% Credit by 50%, which is the recoverable cost of the projected improvements based on the projected growth = Line 10 x 50% The 50% Credit divided by Total Vehicle -Miles of New Demand 12 Max Assessable Fee Per over 10-Years Service Unit/Vehicle Mile = Line 11 / Line 8 PREPARED BY EIKON JUNE 2015 Land Use/Vehicle-Mile Equivalency Table ITE Trip Pass- NCTCOG Adj, Adj, Trip: Max Veh-MI Land Use Land Development Gen By Trip Trip For O- Length Trip per Dev- Category Use Unit Rate Rate Rate Length' D (mi) Length Unit Code (PM) (mi) (mi) PORT AND TERMINAL Truck Terminal 30 Acres 6.55 6,55 10,02 50% 5,01 5,01 32.82 INDUSTRIAL General Light 110 11000 SF GFA 0,97 0,97 10,02 50% 5,01 5.01 4,86 Industrial General Heavy 120 11000 SF GFA 0,68 0.68 10,02 50% 5,01 5.01 3,41 Industrial Industrial Park 130 1,000 SF GFA 0,85 0,86 10,02 50% 5,01 5.01 4,31 Warehousing 150 1,000 SF GFA 0,32 0,32 10,83 50% 5,42 5,42 1,73 Mini -Warehouse 151 11000 SF GFA 0,26 0,26 10,83 50% 5.42 5,42 1,41 RESIDENTIAL Single -Family Detached 210 Dwelling Unit 1.01 1.01 17,21 50% 8,61 6 6,06 Housing Apartment/Multi- 220 Dwelling Unit 0,62 0,62 17,21 50% 8,61 6 3,72 family Residential Condominium/ 230 Dwelling Unit 0,52 0,52 17,21 50% 8,61 6 3,12 Townhome Mobile Home Park/ 240 Dwelling Unit 0,59 0,59 17,21 50% 8,61 6 3,54 Manufactured Housing Senior Adult 252 Dwelling Unit 0,27 0,27 17,21 50% 8,61 6 1,62 Housing Congregate Care 253 Dwelling Unit 0.16 0,16 17,21 50% 8,61 6 0,96 Facility Assisted Living 254 Beds 0,22 0,22 17,21 50% 8,61 6 1,32 LODGING Hotel 310 Rooms 0,59 0,59 6,43 50% 3,22 3,22 1,90 Motel / Other Lodging 320 Rooms 0,47 0,47 6.43 50% 3,22 3,22 1,51 Facilities RECREATIONAL Driving Range 432 Tees 1,25 1,25 6,43 50% 3,22 3,22 4,02 Golf Course 430 Acres 0.3 0.3 6.43 50% 3.22 3,22 0,96 Health/Rec. Clubs and 495 11000 SF GFA 2,74 2,74 6,43 50% 3,22 3.22 8,81 Facilities Ice Rink 465 11000 SF GFA 2,36 2,36 6,43 SO% 3,22 3.22 7,59 Miniature Golf 431 Holes 0,33 0.33 6,43 50% 3,22 3,22 1,06 Multiplex Movie 445 Screens 13,64 13,64 6,43 50% 3,22 3,22 43,85 Theater Racquet / 491 Courts 3,35 3,35 6,43 50% 3.22 3,22 10,77 Tennis Club PREPARED BY EIKON JUNE 2015 ITE Trip Pass- NCTCOG Adj. Adj. Trip Max Veh-Mi Land Use Land Development Gen By Trip Trip For O- Length - Trip Per Dev- Category Use Unit Rate Rate R Rate Length D (mi) ' Length Unit :Code (PM) (mi) (mi) INSTITUTIONAL Church 560 11000 SF GFA 0.55 0.55 4.2 50% 2.10 2.10 1.16 Day Care Center 565 1,000 SF GFA 1234 44% 6.91 4.2 50% 2.10 2.10 14.51 Primary/Middle 522 Students 0.16 0.16 4.2 50% 2.10 2.10 0.34 School (1-8) High School (9- 530 Students 0.13 0.13 4.2 50% 2.10 2.10 0.27 12) Jr / Community 540 Students 0.12 0.12 4.2 SO% 2.10 2.10 0.25 College University/ 550 Students 0.17 0.21 4.2 50% 2.10 2.10 0.44 College MEDICAL Clinic 11000 SF GFA 5.18 5.18 7.55 50% 3.78 3.78 19.55 Hospital r6200 Beds 1.42 1.31 7.55 50% 3.78 3.78 4.95 Nursing Home Beds 0.22 0.22 7.55 50% 3.78 3.78 0.83 Animal Hospital/ 640 11000 SF GFA 4.72 30% 3.30 7.55 50% 3.78 3.78 12.47 Veterinary Clinic OFFICE Corporate Headquarters 714 11000 SF GFA 1.41 1.41 10.02 50% 5.01 5.01 7.06 Building General Office 710 11000 SF GFA 1.49 1.49 10.02 50% 5.01 5.01 7.46 Building Medical/Dental 720 11000 SF GFA 3.57 3.57 10.02 50% 5.01 5.01 17.89 Office Single Tenant 715 1$000 SF GFA 1.74 1.74 10.02 50% 5.01 5.01 8.72 Office Building Office Park 750 11000 SF GFA 1.48 1.48 10.02 50% 5.01 5.01 7.41 PREPARED BY EIKON JUNE 2015 ITE Trip Pass- NCTCOG AdJ. Adj, Trip ' Max Veh-Mi Land Use Land Development Gen By Trip Trip For O- Length Trip Per Dev- Category Use Unit Rate Rate Rate Length D (mi) Length Unit Code (PM) COMMERCIAL Automobile Related Automobile Care 942 1,000 SF GLA 3,11 40% 1,87 6.43 50% 3.22 3,22 6,00 Center Automobile Parts 843 11000 SF GFA 5,98 43% 3,41 6,43 50% 3,22 3,22 10,96 Sales Gasoline/Service Vehicle Station w/ Conv. 945 Fueling 13,51 20% 10,81 1.2 50% 0,60 0,60 6,48 Market Positions New and Used 841 11000 SF GFA 2,62 40% 1,57 6,43 50% 3,22 3.22 5.05 Car Sales Quick Lubrication 941 Servicing 5,19 40% 3,11 6,43 50% 3,22 3,22 10,01 Positions Vehicle Shop Self -Service Car 947 Stalls 5.54 40% 3,32 1.2 50% 0,60 0,60 1.99 Wash Tire Store 848 1,000 SF GFA 4,15 28% 2,99 6,43 50% 3.22 3,22 9,61 Dining Fast Food Restaurant with 934 1,000 SF GFA 33,84 50% 16,92 4,79 50% 2,40 2.40 40,52 Drive-Thru High Turnover (Sit -Down) 932 11000 SF GFA 11,15 43% 6,36 4,79 50% 2,40 2,40 15,22 Restaurant Quality 931 11000 SF GFA 7,49 44% 4,19 4,79 50% 2,40 2.40 10,05 Restaurant Other Retail 0,00 Free -Standing 815 11000 SF GFA 5 44% 2,80 6,43 50% 3,22 3,22 9,00 Retail Store Garden Center 817 11000 SF GFA 3.8 30% 2,66 6,43 50% 3,22 3,22 8,55 (Nursery) Home Improvement 862 11000 SF GFA 2.37 48% 1,23 6,43 50% 3,22 3,22 3,96 Superstore Pharmacy/Drugs tore With Drive- 881 11000 SF GFA 10,35 53% 4,86 6,43 50% 3,22 3,22 15,64 Thru Window Shopping Center 820 11000 SF GLA 3,73 34% 2,46 6.43 50% 3,22 3,22 7,91 Supermarket 8SO 1,000 SF GFA 10.5 36% 6,72 6,43 50% 3,22 3,22 21,60 Toy/Children's SF GFA 4,99 30% 3,49 50% 3.22 3,22 11,23 Supers tore SERVICES r861,000 q3,39 Bank (Walk-In)11000 SF GFA 12.13 40% 7,28 50% 1,70 1,70 12,34 Bank (Drive In) 912 Drive-in 27A1 47% 14,53 3,39 50% 1,70 1,70 24.62 Lanes Hair Salon 918 11000 SF GLA 1,45 30% 1,02 3,39 50% 1,70 1,70 1.72 PREPARED BY EIKON JUNE 2015 Service Area Map 111 UL an = U. a. u: ca 0l ul v LLELLE LU lu , a E � v�r n }ev g . �pill iJlHu11141.imiii k"fir rWII ell I ve n , N� n u, " 0 4 ._ 18 FLLB„ r' -;�tIle i ` i # � � aJ vNI'rilo� a; ■ MOM _`' in ■ -� u, Ord IN Pit Pi1J 1V a Q1 i4tt � �tY P Chisunt fir] �I ouilos mill Hd � Q- Ib We_ Cffi c i� E j �--► W -P O O uw O P V� N .P O 1 00 III t i . 00 rsj x 00 O N O cn W cn l0 j co 44 S It z ( � i( I € E }w, O O NI N 01j NI �� { ; ( 0�0 t i i i E _} f I f = F } I �jq, i i ii y N; NI t� O O#OtOI-+(OIt4 �wO€v!( yr o 00 1 t„ � N 00 Lori f O f O N I—, LAJ Cfl F O 00 00 cn F uq N W I - ? 00; . P Co N W un 00 y` y E ! _ = i p ; t 10:54 AM Sanger Area Chamber of Commerce 09/09/15 Profit & Loss ccrual Basis January 1 through September 9, 2015 Jan 1 - Sep 9, 15 Ordinary Income/Expense Income Awards Banquet 21690,00 Hotel / Motel Tax 81413,15 Leads Luncheon Income 279.00 Other Types of Income Miscellaneous Revenue Square 123.01 Miscellaneous Revenue - Other 6.00 Total Miscellaneous Revenue 129.01 Other Types of Income - Other 26.00 Total Other Types of Income 155.01 Over payment 350.00 Program Income Membership Dues 41255,00 Total Program Income 41255,00 Sellabration 91385,00 Spring Vacination Clinic 31434,00 Total Income 28,961,16 Gross Profit 28,961.16 Expense Advertising 240.00 Awards Banquet Expense 41223630 Business Expenses 150.20 Contract Services Outside Contract Services 11308,00 Total Contract Services 11308,00 Cooktoberfest 748.94 Facilities and Equipment Rent, Parking, Utilities 11640,38 Total Facilities and Equipment 11640438 Leads Luncheon Expense 396.30 Operations Books, Subscriptions, Reference 40.00 Postage, Mailing Service 147.03 Printing and Copying 45.50 Supplies 485.15 Telephone, Telecommunications 890.85 Operations - Other 105.00 Total Operations 11713,53 Other Types of Expenses Insurance - Liability, D and O 21406,00 Total Other Types of Expenses 21406,00 Payroll Expenses 6660 Payroll Wage Expense 61900,00 Federal Withholding A49.50 Fica 427.80 Medicare -100.05 Weekly Payroll Taxes 0.00 Payroll Expenses - Other 0.00 Total Payroll Expenses 61222,65 Rabies Clinic Expense 21569,00 Reconciliation Discrepancies 902.45 Reimbursement 237.55 Sellabration Expense 863.92 Square 6.28 10:54 AM 09/09/15 'ccrual Basis Sanger Area Chamber of Commerce Profit & Loss January 1 through September 9, 2015 Uncategorized Expenses Total Expense Net Ordinary Income Other Income/Expense Other Expense taxes Total Other Expense Net Other Income Net Income Jan 1 -Sep 9, 15 175.57 23,804,07 51157,09 11540,05 13540,05 A ,540.05 3,617.04 Page 2 10:54 AM 09/09/15 ;crual Basis Sanger Area Chamber of Commerce Balance Sheet As of September 9, 2016 Sep 9, 15 ASSETS Current Assets Checking/Savings Petty cash 11700,88 Sanger Bank 91279,15 Total Checking/Savings 10,980.03 Accounts Receivable Accounts Receivable 61370,00 Total Accounts Receivable 61370,00 Total Current Assets 17,350.03 Fixed Assets Furniture and Equipment 441.88 Total Fixed Assets 441.88 Other Assets Other Assets 498 Total Other Assets -0.98 TOTAL ASSETS 17,790.93 LIABILITIES & EQUITY Liabilities Current Liabilities Accounts Payable Accounts Payable 5.00 Total Accounts Payable 5.00 Total Current Liabilities 5.00 Total Liabilities 5.00 Equity Opening Balance Equity 4,784.98 Unrestricted Net Assets 9,383,91 Net Income 3,617.04 Total Equity 17,785.93 TOTAL LIABILITIES &EQUITY 17,790.93 Page 1