08-15-16-Ordinance-Establishing Roadway Impact Fees-08/01/2016ORDINANCE #08-13-16
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANGER, TEXAS, ADOPTING ROADWAY IMPACT
FEES PER SERVICE UNIT; ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR THE ASSESSMENT,
COLLECTION, COMPUTATION, EXPENDITURE, REFUND AND GENERAL
ADMINISTRATION OF ROADWAY IMPACT FEES; PROVIDING FOR THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF ACCOUNTS FOR ROADWAY IMPACT FEES; PROVIDING
CONSTRUCTION, SEVERABILITY, AND CONFLICT CLAUSES; AND PROVIDING FOR
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Chapter 395, Tex. Loc. Gov't Code (the "Statute") provides the requirements
and procedures for the adoption of Land Use Assumptions, Roadway Impact Fee Capital
Improvements Plan, and Roadway Impact Fees; and
WHEREAS, the City retained EIKON to prepare a Roadway Impact Fee Study that contains
,and Use Assumptions ("LUA"), a Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan ("CIP") to
identify Capital Improvements or Roadway Facility expansions for which Roadway Impact Fees may
be assessed, and a calculation of the Roadway Impact Fee. The Roadway Impact Fee Study is attached
as Exhibit A hereto and incorporated by reference herein; and
WHEREAS, after notice of public hearing was published as required by the Statute, the City
Council held a public hearing on May 2, 2016; and
WHEREAS, the Capital Improvement Advisory Committee of the City of Sanger ("CIAC"),
created pursuant to Sec. 395.058, Tex. Loc. Gov't Code, filed its written comments on the proposed
Roadway Impact Fees, and
WHEREAS, as required by Section 395.054, Tex. Loc. Gov't Code, the City Council
conducted a public hearing on June 20, 2016 on the adoption of Roadway Impact Fees in which any
member of the public had the right to appear at the hearing and present evidence for or against the
pIan and proposed fee; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to adopt the Roadway Impact Fees and related
administrative process as herein described and finds that it is in the best interest of the citizens of the
City of Sanger; NOW THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANGER HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. Short Title. This Ordinance shall be known and cited as the "Sanger Roadway Impact
Fee Regulations".
SECTION 2. Findings Incorporated. The findings set forth above are incorporated into the body of
this Ordinance as if fully set forth herein and are hereby found to be true and correct factual and
legislative determinations of the City of Sanger, Texas.
SECTION 3. Purpose. This Ordinance is intended to assure the provision of adequate roadway
facilities to serve new development in the City by requiring each development to pay a share of the
costs of such capital improvements or roadway facility expansions necessitated by and attributable to
such new development.
SECTION 4. Authority. This Ordinance is adopted pursuant to Texas Local Government Code
(TLGC) Chapter 395 and the Sanger City Charter. Chapter 395 supplements this Ordinance to the
extent that its provisions may be applicable hereto and, to such extent, its provisions are incorporated
herein by reference. The provisions of this Ordinance shall not be construed to limit the power of the
City to utilize other methods authorized under State law or pursuant to other City powers to accomplish
the purposes set forth herein, either in substitution or in conjunction with this Ordinance. Guidelines
may be developed by ordinance, resolution, or otherwise to implement and administer this Ordinance.
SECTION 5. Applicability. The provisions of this Ordinance apply to all new, non-exempt
development within the corporate boundaries of the City.
SECTION 6. Incorporation of Land Use Assumptions and Roadway Impact Fee Capital
Improvements Plan, The Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan and Land Use
Assumptions, as considered and adopted by the City Council with the Roadway Impact Fee Study
as Exhibit A hereto is incorporated herein by reference for all purposes, including any future
amendments thereto.
SECTION 7. Definitions. In this Ordinance:
A. Assessment means the determination of the amount of the maximum assessable
roadway impact fee per service unit which can be imposed on new development
pursuant to this ordinance.
B. Capital Improvement means a roadway facility with a life expectancy of three or
more years, to be owned and operated by or on behalf of the City.
C. City means the City of Sanger, Texas.
D. Credit means a reduction in the amount of a roadway impact feels), payments, or charges
for approved construction or provision of the same type of capital improvement for which
a fee has been assessed for a new development. this is done by either by a proven decrease
in the number of service units attributable to such development or a decrease in the
amount of roadway impact fees otherwise due, that results from contributions of land,
improvements or funds to construct system improvements in accordance with the City's
subdivision and development regulations, policies or requirements, as determined by the
City.
E. Final plat approval means authorization by the Planning & Zoning Commission
that the final map of a proposed subdivision meets all City standards and conditions in
accordance with the City's subdivision regulations and that the plat may be recorded
in the office of the county clerk of Denton County. The term applies both to original plats
and replats.
F. Impact Fee, or "Roadway Impact Fee", means a fee, charge, or assessment for
roadway facilities imposed on new development by the City pursuant to this Ordinance
in order to generate revenue to fund or recoup all or part of the costs of capital
improvements or facility expansion necessitated by and attributable to such new
development. The term includes amortized charges, lump -sum charges, capital recovery
fees, contributions in aid of construction and any other fee that functions as described by
this Ordinance or the statute. The term is inclusive of both the maximum assessable
roadway impact fee and the roadway impact fee collection rate as herein described.
G. Land Use Assumptions means the description of the service area and the projections of
population and employment growth and associated changes in land uses, densities and
intensities adopted by the City, as may be amended from time to time, upon which the
Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan is based.
H. Land Use Equivalency Table means a table converting the demands for capital
improvements generated by various land uses to numbers of service units, as may be
amended from time to time. The land use equivalency table may be incorporated in a
schedule of impact fee rates, attached as Appendix D of Exhibit A hereto and
incorporated by reference herein.
I. Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee means the impact fee that is established for
each service area computed by calculating the total projected costs of capital
improvements necessitated by and attributable to new development and subtracting a
portion of ad valorem tax revenues to be generated by new service units, including the
payment of debt, associated with the roadway CIP, and then dividing that amount by the
total number of service units anticipated within the Service Area based upon the land use
assumptions. The Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee shall be established and
reflected in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein. The City may adopt a
roadway impact fee collection rate that is less than this amount, but in no instance shall
the roadway impact fee exceed the Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee except by
amendment of this Ordinance.
J. New Development means a project involving the construction, reconstruction,
redevelopment, conversion, structural alteration, relocation, or enlargement of any
structure, or any use or extension of land, which has the effect of increasing the
requirements for Capital Improvements or facility expansions, measured by the number
of service units to be generated by such activity.
K. Recoupment means the imposition of an impact fee to reimburse the City for capital
improvements which the city has previously oversized to serve new development.
L. Roadway Impact Fee Collection Rate means the current amount of roadway impact fee
adopted by Sanger City Council to be paid by the property owner, as may from time to
time be amended, which is the result of a percentage reduction of the adopted Maximum
Assessable Roadway Impact Fee. The adopted Roadway Impact Fee Collection Rate shall
be established and reflected in Exhibit B= attached hereto and incorporated herein. The
adopted Roadway Impact Fee Collection Rate may be further reduced with Credits,
designed to fairly reflect the value of roadway facilities provided by a developer in
accordance with the City's development regulations or requirements.
M. Roadway means any primary and secondary arterial or collector designated in the City's
adopted Thoroughfare Plan, as may be amended from time to time.
N. Roadway Facility means an improvement or appurtenance to a roadway which
includes, but is not limited to, rights -of --way, whether conveyed by deed or easement;
intersection improvements; traffic signals; turn lanes; drainage facilities associated with
the Roadway Facility; street lighting or curbs, and water and wastewater improvements
affected by the Roadway Facility. Roadway Facility also includes any improvement or
appurtenance to an intersection with a roadway officially enumerated in the federal
or Texas highway system, and to any improvements or appurtenances to such federal or
Texas highway, to the extent that the City has incurred capital costs for such facilities,
including without limitation local matching funds and costs related to utility line
relocation and the establishment of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drainage appurtenances
and rights -of --way. Roadway Facility excludes those improvements or appurtenances to
any Roadway which is a site- related facility.
0. Roadway Facility expansion means the expansion of the capacity of an existing roadway
in the City, but does not include the repair, maintenance, modernization, or expansion of an
existing roadway to better serve existing development.
P. Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan, or "Capital Improvements Plan" (CIP)
means the adopted plan included in Exhibit A, as may be amended from time to time,
which identifies the roadway facilities or roadway facility expansions and their costs for
the service area, which are necessitated by and which are attributable to new development,
for a period not to exceed 10 years, which are to be financed in whole or in part through
the imposition of roadway impact fees pursuant to this Ordinance.
Q. Service Area means the roadway service area within the City's corporate boundary, within
which impact fees for roadway capital improvements or roadway facility expansions may
be collected for new development occurring within such area and within which fees so
collected will be expended for those types of improvements or expansions identified in
the Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan applicable to the service area.
R. Service Unit means avehicle-mile. A vehicle -mile shall be defined as one (1) vehicle
traveling a distance of one (1) mile during the afternoon peak hour as calculated herein.
S. Site -related Facility means an improvement or facility which is for the primary use or benefit
of one or more new developments and/or which is for the primary purpose of safe and
adequate provision of roadway facilities to serve the new development, including access
to the development, which is not included in the Roadway Capital Improvements Plan, and
for which the developer (s) or property owner(s) is solely responsible under subdivision or
other applicable development regulations. Site- related Facility may include a roadway
improvement which is located offsite, or within or on the perimeter of the development site.
T. System Facility means a roadway improvement or facility expansion which is designated in
the Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan and which is not a Site -related Facility.
System Facility may include a roadway improvement which is located offsite, or within or
on the perimeter of the development site.
SECTION 8. Roadway Service Area. The City hereby establishes one (I) Roadway Service Areas,
constituting all land within the City's corporate boundaries, as depicted in Exhibit A attached hereto
and incorporated by reference herein.
SECTION 9. Roadway Impact Fees Adopted. The City hereby adopts the Maximum Assessable
Roadway Impact Fee attached and incorporated as Exhibit A, and the Roadway Impact Fee Collection
Rate attached and incorporated as Exhibit B. Each non-exempt new development shall be assessed
the Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee and shall pay the Roadway Impact Fee Collection
Rate, minus any applicable credits, as described herein. Except as herein otherwise provided, the
assessment and collection of a roadway impact fee shall be additional and supplemental to, and not
in substitution of, any other tax, fee, charge or assessment which is lawfully imposed on and due
against the property.
SECTION 10. Roadwa,�pact Fee Required. No final plat for new development shall be released for
filing with Denton County without Assessment of an Impact Fee pursuant to this Ordinance; or, if no
plat is required, then no building permit shall be issued until such assessment is made and paid in
accordance with the assessment and collection procedures indicated herein.
SECTION 1 1 . Assessment o f I m p a c t Fees . Assessment of the Impact Fee for any new
development shall be made as follows:
A. For a new development which has received final plat approval before the effective
date of this Ordinance, assessment %J impact fees shall occur on the effective date of
this Ordinance, and shall be the amount of the Maximum Assessable Roadway
Impact Fee per Service Unit as set forth in Exhibit A. However, the Roadway
Impact Fee Collection Rate shall not be collected on any Service Unit which has
received final plat approval before the effective date of this Ordinance and for which a
valid building permit is issued within one year after the date of adoption of this
Ordinance.
B. For land which is not required to be platted at the time of application for a building
permit pursuant to the City's subdivision regulations prior to development, Assessment
of Roadway Impact Fees shall occur at the time application is made for the building
permit, and shall be the amount of the Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee
per Service Unit as set forth in Exhibit A then in effect.
C. For New Development which is submitted for approval pursuant to the City's
subdivision regulations or which is proposed for replatting on or after the effective
date of this Ordinance, assessment of impact fees shall be at the time of final plat or
r,plat approval, and shall be the amount of the Maximum Assessable Roadway
Impact Fee per Service Unit as set forth in Exhibit A then in effect.
D. Following assessment of the impact fee pursuant to this Section, the amount of the
impact fee assessment per service unit for that development cannot be increased,
unless the owner proposes to change the approved development by the submission of a
new application for final plat approval or other development application that results in
approval of additional service units, in which case a new assessment shall occur at the
Exhibit A rate then in effect for such additional Service Units.
E. The City Manager or his or her designee shall compute the roadway impact fees for
new development by first determining whether the new development is eligible
for credits calculated in accordance with this Ordinance, which would further reduce
Impact Fees otherwise due in whole or in part. The total amount of impact fees for
the new development shall be attached to the development application as a
condition of approval.
F. Approval of an amending plat pursuant to Tex. Loc. Gov't Code, Section 212.016
and the City's subdivision regulations is not subject to reassessment for an Impact
Fee.
SECTION 12. Exemptions to Impact Fees. The following are exempt from the applicability of
this Ordinance:
A. Pursuant to Tex. Loc. Gov't Code Section 395.022, as amended, a public school
district is not required to pay roadway impact fees imposed under this Ordinance
unless the board of trustees of the district consents to the payment of the fees by
entering a contract with the City imposing the fees.
B. A change in use that generates less than 10 times the number of Service Units
attributable to the immediately preceding use is exempt from the payment of impact
fees.
SECTION 13. Collection of Impact Fees. Roadway Impact Fees shall be collected in the following
manner; however, the City has the ability to require construction greater• than the Roadway Impact
Fee Collection Rate for amounts up to the Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee:
A. The Roadway Impact Fee Collection Rate shall be paid at the time the City issues a
building permit for a new development.
B. For properties requiring a plat, the Roadway Impact Fee Collection Rate to be paid
and collected per service unit for new development shall be the amount listed in
Exhibit B in effect at the time of final plat approval for up to a one-year period
following such final plat approval. After the one-year period has expired, the Roadway
Impact Fee Collection Rate shall be paid according to the current amount listed in
Exhibit B then in effect.
C. For properties that do not require the filing of a plat, the Roadway Impact Fee
Collection Rate shall be paid and collected per service unit for new development in the
amount listed in Exhibit B in effect at the time that the building permit is filed.
the building permit for which an impact fee has been paid has expired, and a new
application is thereafter filed, the Roadway Impact Fee Collection Rate shall be
computed using Exhibit B in effect at the time of the new application, with credits
for previous payment of impact fees being applied against the new impact fees due.
E. Whenever the property owner proposes to increase the number of service units for a
development, the additional impact fees collected for such new service units shall be
determined by using Exhibit B in effect at the time of the request, and such additional
fee shall be collected at the times prescribed by this section.
F. The Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee per Service Unit for Roadway
Facilities, as may be amended from time to time, hereby is declared to be an
approximate and appropriate measure of the impacts generated by a new unit of
development on the City's roadway system. To the extent that the Roadway Impact
Fee Collection Rate charged against a new development, as may be amended from
time to time, is less than the Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee per Service
Unit assessed, such difference hereby is declared to be founded on policies unelated to
measurement of the impacts of the new development on the City's roadway system.
The Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee may be used in evaluating any claim
by a property owner that the dedication or construction of a capital improvement
within a service area imposed as a condition of development approval pursuant to the
City's subdivision or development regulations is disproportionate to the impacts
created by the development on the City's Roadway System.
SECTION 14. Credits against Impact Fees. The City Inay credit the contribution of land,
improvements or funding for construction of any system facility that is required or agreed to by the
City, pursuant to rules established in this section or pursuant to administrative guidelines
promulgated by the City with the following limitations:
A. The Credit shall be associated with the plat or other detailed plan of development for
the property that is to be served by the roadway facility.
B. Master Planned Community projects, including subdivisions containing multiple
phases, and whether approved before or after the effective date of these impact fee
regulations, may apply for credits against roadway impact fees for the entire project
based upon contributions of land, improvements or funds toward construction of
system facilities, or other roadway capital improvements supplying excess capacity.
Credits shall be determined by comparing costs of roadway capital improvements
supplied by the project with the costs of roadway capital improvements to be utilized
by development within the project, utilizing a methodology approved by the City. The
credit determination shall be incorporated within an agreement for credits, in
accordance with this Ordinance. The roadway requirements of an agreement for
credits shall not be less than what Is required by the Sanger Subdivision
Ordinance.
C. The City's current policies and regulations shall apply to determine a new
development's obligations to construct adjacent system facilities. The obligation to
construct, however, shall not exceed the Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee
assessed inst the new develunder Exhibit AConstruction required und
agaopment . er
such policies and regulations shall be a credit against the amount of impact fees
otherwise due. If the costs of constructing a system facility in accordance with the
current City policies and regulations are greater than the amount of the Roadway Impact
Fee Collection Rate due, the amount of the credit due shall be deemed to be 100% of
the assessed impact fees and no impact fee shall be collected thereafter for the
development, unless the number of service units is subsequently increased.
D. All credits against roadway impact fees shall be based upon standards promulgated by
the City, which may be adopted as administrative guidelines, including the following
standards:
(1) No credit shall be given for the dedication or construction of site -related
facilities.
(2) No credit shall be given for a roadway facility which is not identified within the
Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan, unless the facility is on or
qualifies for inclusion on the Thoroughfare Plan and the City agrees that such
improvement supplies capacity to new developments other than the development.
paying the roadway impact fee and provisions for credits are incorporated in an
agreement for credits pursuant to this Ordinance.
(3) In no event will the City grant a credit when no roadway impact fees can be
collected pursuant to this Ordinance or for any amount exceeding the
Roadway Impact Fee Collection Rate due for the development, unless expressly
agreed to by the City in writing.
(4) The City may participate in the costs of a system facility to be dedicated to the
City, including costs that exceed the amount of the Impact Fees due for the
development, in accordance with policies and rules established by the City. The
amount of any credit for construction of a system facility shall be reduced by the
amount of any participation funds received from the City.
(5) Where funds for roadway facilities have been escrowed under an agreement that
was executed with the City prior to the effective date of this Ordinance, the
following rules apply:
(a) Funds expended under the agreement for roadway facilities shall first be credited
against the amount of roadway impact fees that would have been due under
Exhibit B for those units of development for which building permits already have
been issued;
(b) Any remaining funds shall be credited against Impact Fees due for the
development under Exhibit B at the time building permits are issued.
E. Credits for construction of capital improvements shall be deemed created when the
capital improvements are completed and the City has accepted the facility, or in the
case of capital improvements constructed and accepted prior to the effective date of this
Ordinance, on such effective date. Credits created after the effective date of this
Ordinance shall expire ten (10) years from the date the credit was created. Credits
arising prior to such effective date shall expire ten (10) years from such effective
date. Upon application by the prope 1 iy owner, the City may agree to extend the
expiration date for the credit on mutually agreeable terms.
F. Unless an agreement for credits, as described herein, is executed providing for a
different manner of applying credits against roadway impact fees due, a credit
associated with a plat shall be applied at the time of application for the first building
permit and, at each building pe 1 mit application thereafter, to reduce impact fees due
until the credit is exhausted.
G. An owner of a new development wh o has constructed or financed a roadway capital
improvement or roadway facility expansion designated in the Roadway Impact Fee
Capital Improvements Plans, or other roadway capital improvement that supplies excess
capacity, as required or authorized by the City, shall enter into an agreement with
the City to provide for credits against roadway impact fees due for the development in
accordance with this paragraph. The agreement shall identify the basis for and the
method for computing and the amount of the credit due and any reduction in credits
attributable to consumption of road capacity by developed lots or tracts served by the
roadway capital improvements. For multi -phased projects, the City may require that
total credits be proportionally allocated among the phases. If authorized by the City,
the agreement also may provide for allocation of credits among new developments
within the project, and provisions for the timing and collection of impact fees.
SECTION 15. Use of Proceeds of Impact Fee Accounts. The roadway impact fees pursuant to these
regulations may be used to finance or to recoup the costs of any roadway improvements or facility
expansions identified in the Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan for the service area,
including but not limited to the construction contract price, surveying and engineering fees, and land
acquisition costs (including land purchases, court awards and costs, attorney's fees, and expert witness
fees). Roadway impact fees may also be used to pay the principal sum and interest and other finance
costs on bonds, notes or other obligations issued by or on behalf of the City to finance such roadway
improvements or facility expansions. Roadway impact fees also may be used to pay fees actually
contracted to be paid to an independent qualified engineer or financial consultant for preparation of
or updating the Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan. Impact fees collected may not be
used to pay for the expenses prohibited by Statute.
SECTION 16. Establishment of Accounts. The Citys Finance Department shall establish an
account to which interest is allocated for each service area for which a roadway impact fee is
imposed pursuant to this Ordinance. Each impact fee collected within the service area shall be
deposited in such account with the following regulations:
A. Interest earned on the account into which the impact fees are deposited shall be
considered funds of the account and shall be used solely for the purposes authorized
in this Ordinance and the Statute.
B. The City's Finance Department shall establish adequate financial and accounting
controls to ensure that roadway impact fees disbursed from the account are utilized
solely for the purposes authorized in this Ordinance and the Statute. Disbursement of
funds shall be authorized by the City at such times as are reasonably necessary to
carry out the purposes and intent of this Ordinance; provided, however, that any
roadway impact fee paid shall be expended within a reasonable period of time, but not
to exceed ten (10) years from the date the fee is deposited into the account.
C. The City's Finance Department shall maintain and keep financial records for
roadway impact fees, which shall show the source and disbursement of all fees
collected in or expended from each service area. The records of the account into
which impact fees are deposited shall be open for public inspection and copying
during ordinary business hours. The City may establish a fee for copying services.
SECTION 17. Impact Fee as Additional and Supplemental Regulation. Roadway impact fees
established by these regulations are additional and supplemental to, and not in substitution of, any
other requirements imposed by the City on the development of land or the issuance of building
permits or certificates of occupancy. Such impact fees are intended to be consistent with and to
further the policies of the City's land use regulations, the Capital Improvements Plan, the zoning
ordinances, subdivision regulations and other City policies, ordinances and resolutions by which the
City seeks to ensure the provision of adequate public facilities in conjunction with the development of
land. This Ordinance shall not affect, in any manner, the permissible use of property, density of
development, design, and improvement standards and requirements, or any other aspect of the
development of land or provision of public improvements subject to the zoning and subdivision
regulations or other regulations and policies of the City, which shall be operative and remain in full
force and effect without limitation with respect to all such development.
SECTION 18. Updates to Plans and Revision of Fees. The City shall update its Land Use
Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plan and make any revision of fees as indicated below:
A. The City shall update its Land Use Assumptions and Roadway Impact Fee Capital
Improvements Plans and shall recalculate the Roadway Impact Fees based thereon in
accordance with the procedures set forth in Texas Local Gov't Code, Ch. 395, or in
any successor statute. However, this does not preclude the City from reviewing its
Land Use Assumptions, Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plans, Roadway
Impact Fees, and other factors such as market conditions more frequently than
provided for herein to determine whether the Land Use Assumptions and Roadway
Capital Improvements Plans should be updated and the Roadway Impact Fees
recalculated accordingly, utilizing statutory update procedures.
B. Exhibit B may be amended without revising the an Use Assumptions and Roadway
Capital Improvements Plans at any time prior to the update provided for in this
Section, provided that the Roadway Impact Fee Collection Rate to be collected
under Exhibit B do not exceed the Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fees
assessed under Exhibit A.
C. If, at the time an update is required as indicated herein and the City Council
determines that no change to the Land Use Assumptions, Roadway Impact Fee
Capital Improvements Plan or Roadway Impact Fees are needed, it may dispense
with such update by following the procedures in Texas Local Gov't Code, Section
395.0575 or its successor statute.
D. The City may amend any other provisions of this Ordinance in accordance with
procedures for ordinance amendments contained in the City's Charter or State law.
SECTION 19. Refunds
A. Upon application, any roadway impact fee or portion thereof collected pursuant to this
Ordinance, which has not been expended within the service area within ten (10) years
from the date of payment, shall be refunded to the record owner of the property for
which the impact fee was paid or, if the impact fee was paid by another governmental
entity, to such governmental entity, together with interest calculated from the date
of collection to the date of refund at the statutory rate as set forth in Sec. 302.002,
Tex. Fin. Code, or its successor statute. The application for refund pursuant to this
section shall be submitted within sixty (60) days after the expiration of the ten-year
period for expenditure of the impact fee. An impact fee shall be considered expended
on a first -in, first out basis.
B. An Impact Fee collected pursuant to this Ordinance shall also be considered
expended if the total expenditures for Capital Improvements or Roadway Facility
expansions authorized within the service area within ten (10) years following the
date of payment exceeds the total fees collected within the service area for such
improvements or expansions during such period.
C. If a refund is due pursuant to Subsections A or B, the City shall divide the difference
between the amount of expenditures and the amount of the impact fees collected by
the total number of service units assumed within the service area for the period to
determine the refund due per service unit. The refund to the record owner shall be
calculated by multiplying the refund due per service unit by the number of service
units for the development for which the fee was paid, and interest due shall be
calculated upon that amount.
SECTION 20. Rebates. If the building permit for a new development for which a roadway impact fee
has been paid has expired, and a modified or new application has not been filed within six (6) months
of such expiration, the City shall, upon written application, rebate the amount of the impact fee to the
record owner of the property for which the impact fee was paid. If no application for rebate pursuant
to this subsection has been filed within this period, no rebate shall become due.
SECTION 21. Appeals. The property owner or applicant for new development may appeal the
applicability or amount of the roadway impact fee or the availability or amount of credits or refunds
to the City Council using the following procedure:
A. The burden of proof shall be on the applicant to demonstrate that relief should be
granted by the City.
B. The applicant must file a written notice of appeal with the City Manager or his/her
designee within thirty (30) days following the decision being appealed. Along with
the notice of appeal, an applicant may request an alternative service unit computation
for land uses not contained with the latest edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual
by submitting a trip generation study demonstrating the appropriateness of the trip
generation rates for the proposed development. An applicant may also include an
alternative service unit calculation.
C. The City Manager or his/her designee ("Manager") may (1) resolve the appeal, if the
applicant agrees with the Manager's decision, or (2) if the applicant does not agree,
refer the matter to the City Council for decision, along with the Manager's
recommendation and any trip generation study provided, if any.
D. If City Council review is requested by the applicant after receiving the Manager's
decision, the City Secretary shall schedule a public hearing at which the applicant
may present testimony and evidence before the City Council. The City Council shall
act on the appeal within sixty (60) days of receipt of the notice of appeal by the City,
unless otherwise agreed by the Applicant.
E. If the notice of appeal is accompanied by a payment or other security satisfactory to
the City Attorney in an amount equal to the original determination of the roadway
impact fee due, the City shall process and may issue a building permit if other
requirements are met while the appeal is pending.
F. If the City Council allows for a different amount of the roadway impact fee due for a
new development under this section to be paid, it may cause to be appropriated from
other City funds the amount of the reduction in the Impact Fee to the account for the
service area.
SECTION 22. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are, to the extent of
such conflict, hereby repealed.
SECTION 23. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the sections,
paragraphs, sentences, clauses, phrases and words of this Ordinance are severable and, if any word,
phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional
by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality
shall not affect any of the remaining portions of this Ordinance, since the same would have been enacted
by the City Council without the incorporation in this Ordinance of any such unconstitutional word,
phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section.
SECTION 24. Any person, firm, or corporation who shall violate any of the provisions of this
article shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be fined in an amount not to exceed
the sum of two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense, and each and every day such offense shall
continue shall be deemed to constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 25. This ordinance will take effect October 1, 2016, as the law and Charter
in such cases provide.
DULY PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Sanger,
Texas, on this lst day of August 2016.
APPROVED:
Mayor Thomas Muir
ATTEST:
City Secretary Tami Taber
EXHIBIT A
ROADWAY IMPACT FEE STUDY
2015 Roadway impact Fee Study
City of Sanger, Texas
Prepared by:
ARCHITECTURE •ENGINEERING •PLANNING
Texas Registration No. F-12759
1405 W. Chapman Drive
Sanger, Texas 76266 �'��e�titQ\��11
940o458e7503 ,��'�" �E °F rF lit
J U LY 2016 KATHYRIYA H. KENNEDY
eeee *:
07/05/2016
Table of Contents
I. Executive Summary 2
II. Introduction 3
III. Roadway Impact Fee Calculation Inputs 4
A. Land Use Assumptions 4
B. Impact Fee Service Area 6
C. Future Roadway Improvements 6
V. Methodology for Roadway Impact Fees 7
A. Service Areas 7
B. Service Units 7
CO Cost Per Service Unit 7
D. Cost of the Improvements 8
E. Service Unit Calculation 9
V. Impact Fee Calculations 12
A. Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit 12
B. Plan For Awarding the Roadway Impact Fee Credit 12
C. Service Unit Demand Per Unit of Development 13
A. Sample Calculations 14
Al. Conclusion 15
APPENDICES
A. Roadway Impact Fee Opinion of Probable Construction Costs
B. Roadway Impact Fee Service Units of Supply
C. Maximum Allowable Roadway Impact Fee Per Service Unit Calculations
D. Land Use/Vehicle-Mile Equivalency Table
List of Exhibits
1 Service Area Map
List of Tables
1A 2010 Demographics
1B 2011 Estimated Employment in Persons
2A Projected Population, Housing Units, and Employment in Person
2B Projected Population, Housing Units, and Employment in Square Feet
3 Roadway Improvements Plan for the Service Area
4 Level of Use for Proposed and Existing Facilities
5 Transportation Demand Factor Calculations (TDF)
6 Ten Year Growth Projections
7 Maximum Assessable Fee Per Service Unit/Vehicle-Mile
Page (1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This study was performed to initiate the City of Sanger Roadway Impact Fees.
Roadway improvements necessary to serve the 10-year (2025) system needs were
evaluated based on information available from the City of Sanger 2015 Thoroughfare
Plan, the 2007 Comprehensive Land Use Plan and the North Central Texas Council of
Governments (NCTCOG).
Texas' impact fee law (Chapter 395) allows the recovery of costs fora 10-year planning
period. We reviewed the service area (Service Area) created based on the Thoroughfare
Plan by site observations along the widening of existing roadways and aerial images of
future alignments. The projected cost to construct the infrastructure needed through
2025 is $45,918,339 for the Service Area.
Based on the City's 10-year growth projections and the associated demand
(consumption) values, 3,295 additional vehicle -miles of capacity will be needed by year
2025 for the Service Area.
Based on the additional service units and the recoverable capital improvements plans,
the City may assess a maximum of $1,304.22 per service unit in the Service Area.
Page I2
I
II. INTRODUCTION
Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code describes the procedure Texas cities
must follow in order to create and implement impact fees. Senate Bill 243 (SB 243)
amended Chapter 395 in September 2001 to define an Impact Fee as "a charge or
assessment imposed by a political subdivision against new development in order to
generate revenue for funding or recouping the costs of roadway improvements or facility
expansions necessitated by and attributable to the new development."
The City of Sanger has determined based on their 2015 Thoroughfare Plan that assessing
impact fees for the continued expansion of the City is valuable and necessary. The City has
retained EIKON Consultant Group to provide professional transportation engineering
services for the initiation of their Roadway Impact Fees. This report includes the impact
fee calculation in accordance with Chapter 395 and the adopted Land Use Assumptions
and the Roadway Improvements Plan.
This report consists of the methodology for the computation of impact fees. The
components of the computation, as outlined by Chapter 395 "must contain specific
enumeration" of the following items:
1. A description of the existing capital improvements within the service area and the
cost to upgrade, update, improve, expand or replace the improvements to meet
existing needs and usage
2. An analysis of the total capacity, the level of current usage, and commitments for
usage of capacity of the existing capital improvements
3. A description of all or the parts of the capital improvements and their costs
necessitated by and attributable to new development in the service area based on
approved land use assumptions
4. A definitive table establishing the specific level or quantity of use, consumption,
generation, or discharge of service unit for each category of capital improvements
and an equivalency or conversion table establishing the ratio of a service unit to
various types of land uses, including residential, commercial, and industrial
5. The total number of projected service units necessitated by and attributable to new
development within the service area based on the approved land use assumptions
and calculated in accordance with generally accepted engineering or planning
criteria
6. The projected demand for capital improvements or facility expansions required by
new service units projected over a reasonable period of time, not to exceed 10 years
7. A plan for awarding a credit for the portion of the ad valorem tax generated by new
service units during the program period that is used for the payment of
improvements or a credit equal to 50 percent of the total projected cost of
implementing the capital improvements plan
Page I3
III. ROADWAY IMPACT FEE CALCULATION INPUTS
A. LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS
Per Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code, Land Use Assumptions include
changes in land uses, densities, and population in the service area. The Land Use
Assumptions used in this report were developed by using employment data, population
data, and trends developed by the North Central Texas Council of Governments
(NCTCOG). This information has been approved by the City of Sanger staff to be a
reasonable representation of the building growth seen in the recent years and what may
be expected in the following ten years.
The following population and employment estimates and projections are defined by North
American Industry Classification System (NAICS) and utilized by NCTCOG:
Housing Units: Number of houses including single and multi -family homes
Population: Number of people reported in the City.
Employment: Square feet of building area based on retail, service, and basic land uses.
Each classification has unique trip making characteristics.
Basic/Goods: Land use activities that produce goods and services such as those that are
exported outside of the local economy, such as manufacturing, construction,
transportation, wholesale, trade, warehousing, and other industrial uses. (NAICS #210000
to #422999)
Service: Land use activities which provide personal and professional services such as
government and other professional administrative offices. (NAICS #520000 to #928199)
Retail: Land use activities which provide for the retail sale of goods that primarily serve
households and whose location choice is oriented toward the household sector, such as
grocery stores and restaurants. (NAICS #440000 to #454390)
To establish the population and employment characteristics for this report, demographic
data provided by North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) and the 2010
US Census was used:
Page I4
Table 1A. 2010 Demographics
US Census
Population
6,916
Housing Units
2,427
Table 1B. 2011 Estimated Employment in Persons
2011 Data from NCTCOG
Employment Type
Number of Persons
Good Producing Industries (Basic)
645
Service Producing Industries (Service)
21178
Retail Industries (Retail)
394
Total
3,217
NCTCOG published population estimates in 2015, which shows on average 1.9% growth in
Sanger from 2010 to their estimates for 2014. The percent change for the population
estimates for 2014 to 2015 is 1.3%. The population growth anticipated from the City's
adopted Comprehensive Land Use Plan (October 2007) predicted an annual growth rate
of 3.75% based on historical growth since 1960. In reviewing the recent trend for
building permit applications, City Staff anticipates a slower growth than identified in the
Comprehensive Plan, which is more congruent with the growth estimated by NCTCOG.
For the purposes of this report, a population growth rate of 1.3% was used to project the
growth in Sanger up to 2025. In addition, we have assumed that the housing units and
employment characteristics will grow at the same rate as the population. The following
table summarizes the anticipated population and employment characteristics based on
these assumptions:
Table 2A. Projected Population, Housing Units, and Employment in Persons
2011 Data from NCTCOG
Year
Population
Housing Units
Basic
Employees
Service
Employees
Retail
Employees
2010
61916
2,427
-
-
-
2011
-
-
645
2,178
394
2015
7,366
2,585
679
21291
415
2025
8,265
2,900
762
23574
466
For the purposes of this report, employment population data is converted to square feet
of building area required to create the non-residential square footage within the City.
The following conversions rates were used to create Table 2B:
Basic/Goods: 1,000 square feet
Service: 350 square feet
Retail: 500 square feet
Page (5
Table 2E5. Projected Population, Housing Units, and Employment in Square Feet
2011 Data from NCTCOG
Year
Population
Housing Units
Basic
(Square
Footage)
Service
(Square
Footage)
Retail
(Square
Footage)
2010
6,916
2,427
-
-
-
2011
-
-
6453000
762,300
197,000
2015
7,366
21585
679,000
801,940
207,244
2025
8,265
2,900
762,000
901,039
232,854
B. IMPACT FEE SERVICE AREA
Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code defines the service area for roadway
facility analysis as an area within the corporate boundaries of the political subdivision
that shall not exceed 6 miles. City Staff has determined that one (1) roadway facility
service area based upon a six (6) mile limit is adequate and coincides with the capital
improvement plans for roadway expansion over the next 10 years. The geographic
boundary of the impact fee service area for roadway facilities is shown in Exhibit 1.
C. FUTURE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
The City has identified the City -funded roadway projects needed for the projected
growth within the City. These facilities are part of the currently adopted Thoroughfare
Plan. The table below shows the length of each project as well as the Thoroughfare Plan
classification. The future roadway improvements were developed by the City of Sanger
staff and represent those projects that will be needed to accommodate the growth
projected in this report.
Table 3. Roadway Improvement Plan for the Service Area
Street Name
Class
Limits
Length <mi)
Willow St./
Minor
4
Lanes
5th Street to City Limits
2.11
McReynolds Rd.
Willow St./McReynolds Rd.
Indian Ln.
Minor
4
Lanes
O 88
to FM 455
Marion Rd.
Minor
4
Lanes
FM 455 to Huling Rd.
0.76
Lois Rd.
Minor
4
Lanes
E. of Melton Rd, to 1-35
0.83
Belz Rd.
Minor
4
Lanes
1-35 SBFR to Metz Rd.
0.97
Metz Rd.
Minor
4
Lanes
Belz Rd. to FM 455
0.67
Utility Rd.
Collector
2 Lanes
RR Tracks to Marion Rd.
0.77
Keaton Rd.
Collector
2 Lanes
Belz Rd. to FM 455
0,67
Future Belz Rd - Indian
Minor
4
Lanes
1-35 NBFR to FM 455
1.02
Connector
Future East-West
Minor
4
Lanes
Cowling Rd. to BNSF RR
0.53
Thoroughfare
Tracks
Exhibit 1 maps the roadway alignments described above.
IV. ROADWAY IMPACT FEE METHODOLOGY
A. SERVICE AREAS
Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code specifies that "the service area is
limited to an area within the corporate boundaries of the political subdivision and shall
not exceed six (6) miles." One (1) service area was used in this report and is shown in
Exhibit 1 and incorporates the anticipated roadway improvement projects within the
corporate boundary of the City of Sanger.
B. SERVICE UNITS
The "service unit" is a measure of consumption or use of the roadway facilities by new
development and is defined as a vehicle -mile for transportation purposes. In regards to
supply and demand, it is a lane -mile and a vehicle -trip of one -mile in length, respectively.
The afternoon peak hour of traffic is the time period used for transportation planning and
the estimation of trips from new development.
The service volume that is supplied by a lane -mile of roadway facility is another
component of the service unit. This volume is a function of the facility type,
configuration, number of lanes, and level of service.
The hourly service volumes used in this report are based on the hourly capacity for level
of service D obtained from the DFW Regional Travel Model Criteria published by the
North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) and the Highway Capacity
Manual. Level of service D roadways represents the minimal acceptable capacity limit for
urban roadways. In the absence of providing a traffic study to generate the number of
cars currently using the roads within the service area, we have assumed that the hourly
capacity of the roads is equal to the number of cars currently using the roads in the peak
am hour. Table 4 shows the service volumes as a function of the facility type for the
types of roads within the service area.
Table 4. Vehicle -Mile Capacities
Hourly Vehicle -Mile Capacity
Class
Median Configuration
per Lane -Mile
of Roadway Facility
Minor 4
Undivided
525
Lanes
Collector 2
Undivided
450
Lanes
Principal 4
Undivided
650
Lanes
C. COST PER SERVICE UNIT
The cost for each service unit is the cost for each vehicle -mile traveled or the cost to build
a lane -mile for a vehicle -mile of travel at a level of service provided by the City's
standards. The cost per service unit is calculated for each project within the service area.
The number of service units in the service are is the measure of the presumed growth in
the transportation demand projected over a ten-year period. Chapter 395 requires that
Impact Fees be assessed only to pay for growth projected to occur within the next ten -
years.
Page 17
D. COST OF THE IMPROVEMENTS
Per Chapter 395, costs that may be included in the cost per service unit are "...including
and limited to the:
1. Construction contract price;
2. Surveying and engineering fees;
3. Land acquisition costs, including land purchases, court awards and costs,
attorney's fees, and expert witness fees; and
4. Fees actually paid or contracted to be paid to an independent qualified engineer
or financial consultant preparing or updating the Roadway improvements plan
who is not an employee of the political subdivision."
The engineer's opinion of the probable costs of the projects in the service area are based
on the typical costs of construction. The roadway alignments identified as part of the
roadway improvement projects were visual surveyed. Components required to
accommodate the expansions or extensions were noted, such as the number of required
lanes and the length of the project. In addition we made note of any other incidental
construction items that would be necessary such as bridges or culvert crossings, traffic
signals, highway ramps, and drainage structures. These costs were combined into an
overall cost.
Costs associated with State, Denton County, and developer driven projects in which the
City has contributed a portion of the total project cost may be included in the
calculations. At the time of this report, the City does not intend to contribute funds to
any of these types of roadway projects.
To simplify the calculations, we have separated the probable costs into two (2)
categories; construction costs and construction allowances, and made several
assumptions about the types of roads to be constructed. The roadway construction
costs consist of the following items: (1) unclassified street excavation, (2) lime
stabilization, (3) concrete pavement, (4) topsoil, (5) curb and gutter, and (6) allotment for
turn lanes and median openings. The unit prices for these items are based on recently
completed construction projects located in neighboring municipalities.
Using the construction cost subtotal, a percentage of this total is calculated to account
for major construction component allowances. These allowances include preparation of
right-of-way, traffic control, pavement markings/markers, roadway drainage, special
drainage structures, water and sewer relocations, turf reestablishment and erosion
control, and street lighting. The allowance percentages are also based on values from RS
Means and the amount of these types of construction estimated for each individual
project. The paving and allowance subtotal is given a six percent (6%) allotment for
mobilization and a twenty percent (20%) contingency to determine the construction cost
total. To determine the total Impact Fee Project Cost, a percentage of the construction
cost total is added to account for engineering, surveying, testing, and contractor
mobilization. For alignments that will require right -of way acquisitions, we have assumed
the allotment for the acquisitions should be $3 per square foot.
Table 4 is a summary of the road improvement project list for the service area with the
probable project cost projections. Detailed cost projections for each alignment are provided
in Appendix A, Opinion of Probable Costs. Actual costs of construction will vary with
time and are dependent on market conditions. Therefore, the cost projections reported in
this study should not be utilized for the City's building program or construction CIP.
Page 18
Table 4. Ten Year Roadway Improvements Plan Opinion of Probable Costs
Length
Total Project
Street Name
Class
Limits
(mi)
Cost
Willow St./
Minor 4
$ 11,320,127
5tn Street to City Limits
211
McReynolds Rd.
Lanes
Minor 4
Willow St./McReynolds Rd.
$1,1301328
Indian Ln,
0088
Lanes
to FM 455
Minor 4
$3,880,244
Marion Rd.
FM 455 to Huling Rd.
0.76
Lanes
Lois Rd.
Minor 4
E. of Melton Rd. to 1-35
0,83
$4,4343456
Lanes
Minor 4
$51130,524
Belz Rd.
1-35 SBFR to Metz Rd.
0.97
Lanes
Minor 4
$3,681,822
Metz Rd.
Belz Rd. to FM 455
O 67
Lanes
Collector 2
$3,1801747
Utility Rd.
RR Tracks to Marion Rd.
0.77
Lanes
Collector 2
$2,8311252
Keaton Rd.
Belz Rd. to FM 455
0.67
Lanes
Future Belz Rd -
Minor 4
1-35 NBFR to FM 455
1.02
$6,877,083
Indian Connector
Lanes
Future East-West
Minor 4
Cowling Rd. to BNSF RR
$3,451,757
Thoroughfare
Lanes
Tracks
0.53
E. SERVICE UNIT CALCULATION
The service unit for the computation of roadway impact fees is the vehicle -mile of travel
during the afternoon peak -hour. The roadway demand service units (vehicle -miles) for
each service area are the sum of the vehicle -miles "generated" by each category of land
use in the service area.
All developed and developable land is categorized as either residential or non-residential.
For residential land uses, the number of housing units in each service area is multiplied by
a transportation demand factor to compute the vehicle -miles of travel that occur during
the afternoon peak hour or the average amount of demand caused by the residential land
uses in the service area. The square footages calculated using the employment data and
conversion units described in Section III.A were used to calculate the vehicle -miles for non-
residential land uses.
To determine the cost per service unit, the growth in vehicle -miles of travel for the
service area is required. The growth in vehicle -miles from 2015 to 2025 is based upon the
changes in residential and non-residential growth for the period. This growth has been
estimated in Table 2B of this report.
The existing and projected Land Use Assumptions for the dwelling units and the square
footage of basic, service, and retail land uses provide the basis for the projected increase
Page 19
in vehicle -miles of travel. A transportation demand factor is applied to these values and
then summed to calculate the total peak hour vehicle -miles of demand for each service
area.
The transportation demand factors are derived from the lTE Trip Generation Manual, 9�h
Edition and the Regional Origin -Destination Travel Survey performed by NCTCOG. The
lTE Trip Generation Manual, 9rh Edition provides variables for the number of trips that are
produced or attracted to the land use.
The transportation demand factor also includes the length of each trip <L). The average
trip length for each category is based on the travel characteristics survey conducted by
NCTCOG and the National Household Travel Survey (NHTS).
The maximum trip length (Lmax), for land uses which are characterized by longer average
trip lengths (primarily residential uses), has been limited to a length based on the nature
of the roadway network within the service area, along with consideration of the existing
City boundaries. For the purposes of this report, the maximum trip length available is
the boundary of the service area, which is six (6) miles.
The adjustment made to the average trip length statistic in the computation of the
maximum trip length is the origin -destination reduction. This adjustment is made because
the roadway impact fee is charged to both the origin and destination end of the trip. For
the retail category of land uses, the rate is adjusted because a percentage of retail trips
are made by people visiting these locations as part of an existing trip between work and
home and are therefore called pass -by trips. The retail trips are then reduced to avoid
counting these trips twice. Per the ITE, retail shopping centers have an average pass -by
trip percentage of 34%. For the purposes of this report, we have used this value for 8to
calculate the demand factor for retail areas.
The computation of the transportation demand factor is detailed in the following
equation:
TDF = T * (1- a) * Lmax
where Lmax = min(L * OD or SAS )
Variables:
TDF = Transportation Demand Factor
T = Trip Rate (peak hour trips / unit)
/1= Pass -By Discount (% of trips)
/-max =Maximum Trip Length (miles)
L =Average Trip Length (miles)
SAL = Max Service Area Trip Length (see Table 5)
OD = Origin -Destination Reduction (50%)
Table 5 shows the derivation of the Transportation Demand Factorfor the residential
land uses and the three (3) non-residential land use categories. The values utilized for
all variables shown in the transportation demand factorequation are also shown in the
table.
Page i10
Table 5. Transportation Demand Factor Calculations (TDF)
Variable
Residential
Basic
Service
Retail
T
1.00
0.97
1.49
3,71
Pb
0%
0%
0%
34%
L
17.21
10.02
10.92
6.43
Lmax `
6.00
5.01
5.46
3.22
TDF
6.00
4.86
1 8.14
7.89
* 50% of L is less than Lmax for non-residential land uses; therefore this lower trip length is
used for calculating the TDF for non-residential land uses
Table 6 shows the vehicle -mile calculations for 2015 and 2025 using the above TDF
values.
Table 6. Ten Year Growth Projections
2015
Residential Vehicle -Miles
Housing Units
TDF
Vehicle -Miles
2,585
1 6
1 15,510
Non -Residential Vehicle -Miles
Square -Feet
TDF
Vehicle -Miles (in 1,000
SQFT)
Basic
Service
Retail
Basic
Service
Retail
Basic
Service
Retail
679,000
801,940
207,244
4.8
814
7.8
3,259
61528
11617
2015 Total Vehicle Miles = 26,913
2025
Residential Vehicle -Miles
Housing Units
TDF
Vehicle -Miles
2,900
6
17,400
Non -Residential Vehicle -Miles
Square -Feet
TDF
Vehicle -Miles <in 1,000
SQFT)
Basic
Service
Retail
Basic
Service
Retail
Basic
Service
Retail
762,000
901,039
232,854
4.8
8,14
7.8
31658
7,334
1,816
2015 Total Vehicle Miles = 30,208
Projected Increase in Vehicle -Miles = 30,208 - 26,913 = 3,295 vehicle -miles
V. IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS
A. MAXIMUM ASSESSABLE IMPACT FEE PER SERVICE UNIT
The maximum assessable impact fee is the sum of the eligible Impact Fee Roadway
Improvement Project costs for the service area divided by the growth in travel
attributable to new development projected to occur within the 10-year period. The
documentation for this calculation has been provided in Appendix C.
B. PLAN FOR AWARDING THE ROADWAY IMPACT FEE CREDIT
Per Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code, the Roadway Impact Fees Program
must contain specific enumeration of a plan for awarding the impact fee credit. This is
provided in Section 395.014 of the Code and states:
"(7) A plan for awarding:
(A) a credit for the portion of ad valorem tax and utility service revenues
generated by new service units during the program period that is used for
the payment of improvements, including the payment of debt, that are
included in the capital improvements plan; or
(B) In the alternative, a credit equal to 50 percent of the total projected cost of
implementing the capital improvements plan..."
The max assessable fee has been based on the option of the 50% credit.
Table 7 illustrates the computation of the maximum assessable impact fee computed for
the service area. The description of now each line has been calculated is provided in
Appendix C.
Table 7. Maximum Assessable Fee Per Service Unit/Vehicle-Mile
Line
Description
Value
1
Total Vehicle -Miles of Capacity Added by the Roadway Improvement Projects
17,604
2
Total Vehicle -Miles of Existing Demand From the Roadway Improvement
Projects
4,274
3
Total Vehicle -Miles of Existing Deficiencies From the Existing Roadway Facilities
141
4
Net Amount of Vehicle -Miles of Capacity Added
13,021
5
Total Cost of the Roadway Improvement Projects
$45,9181339
6
Cost of the Net Capacity Supplied
$33,963,766
7
Cost to Meet the Existing Needs and Usage
$11,954,573
8
Total Vehicle -Miles of New Demand over 10-Years
33295
9
Percent of Capacity Added Attributable to Growth (Must be Less than or Equal
to 100%)
25%
10
Cost of Capacity Added Attributable to Growth
$8,594,812
11
SO% Credit
$4,297,409
12
Max Assessable Fee Per Service Unit/Vehicle Mile
$1,304.22
Page 112
C. SERVICE UNIT DEMAND PER UNIT OF DEVELOPMENT
The maximum allowable roadway impact fee for development is calculated by multiplying
the impact fee rate by the number of service units projected for the proposed
development. The Land Use/Vehicle-Mile Equivalency Table (LUVMET) provided in
Appendix D provides the service unit multipliers for typical land uses that should be used
to calculate the maximum impact assessment. This table lists the most common land
uses that may occur within the City. All possible categories of development may not be
represented. However, in these situations, we suggest using a similar use which will
generate similar trip characteristics.
The trip rate is the average number of trips generated during the afternoon peak hour by
each land use per development unit. The next column is the pass -by rate the lTE Trip
Generation Manual, 9th Edition. To convert vehicle trips to vehicle -miles, it is necessary to
multiply trips by trip length. The NCTCOG trip length values are based on the Regional
Origin -Destination Travel Survey performed by the North Central Texas Council of
Governments (NCTCOG). The other adjustment to trip length is the 50% origin -
destination reduction to avoid double counting of trips. Based on the State Law, there is
a limit on transportation service unit demand. If the adjusted trip length is above the
maximum trip length within the service area (for this study, 6 miles is the maximum trip
length), the maximum trip length used for calculation is reduced to the corresponding
value.
The last column in the LUVMET shows the vehicle -miles per development unit calculated
by multiplying the trip rate by the maximum trip length. This is the Transportation
Demand Factorand should be used to calculate the maximum assessable impact fee. The
number of service units is multiplied by the impact fee rate (established by City
)rdinance) in order to determine the impact fee for a development.
Page i13
VI. SAMPLE CALCULATIONS
The following section details two (2) examples of maximum assessable roadway impact
fee calculations.
Example 1:
Development Tvne - One (1) Unit of Sinale-Familv Housina
Roadway Impact Fee Calculation Steps - Example 1
Determine Development Unit and Vehicle -Miles Per Development Unit
Step 1
From APX D [Land Use - Vehicle -mile Equivalency Table]
Development Type: 1 Dwelling Unit of Single -Family Detached Housing
Number of Development Units: 1 Dwelling Unit
Veh-Mi Per Development Unit: 6.06
Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit
Step 2
$7 304.22
Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee
Impact Fee = # of Development Units x Veh-Mi Per Dev Unit x Max. Fee Per Service Unit
Step 3
Maximum Assessable Impact Fee = 1 x 6.06 x $1,304.22
$7,903.57
Example 2:
Development Type - 25,000 square foot Home Improvement Superstore
Roadway Impact Fee Calculation Steps -Example 2
Determine Development Unit and Vehicle -Miles Per Development Unit
Step 1 From APX D [Land Use - Vehicle -mile Equivalency Table]
Development Type: 25, 000 square feet of Home Improvement Superstore
Development Unit: 7,000 square feet of Gross Floor Area
Veh-Mi Per Development Unit:3.96
Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit
Step 2
$7 304.22
Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee
Impact Fee = # of Development Units x Veh-Mi Per Dev Unit x Max. Fee Per Service Unit
Step 3
Maximum Assessable Impact Fee = (25,000/1,000) x 3.96 x $1,304.22
$129,117,78
Page 14
VII. CONCLUSION
The City of Sanger has established a process to implement the assessment and collection
of roadway impact fees through the adoption of an impact fee ordinance that is
consistent with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code.
This report establishes the maximum allowable roadway impact fee that could be
assessed by the City of Sanger within the service area boundary. The maximum
assessable roadway impact fees calculated is $1,304.22.
This is a guide to the assessment of roadway impact fees pertaining to future
development and the City's need for roadway improvements to accommodate that
growth. Following the public hearing process, the City Council may establish an amount
to be assessed (if any) up to the maximum established within this report and update the
Roadway Impact Fee Ordinance accordingly.
It is our opinion that the data and methodology used in this report are appropriate and
consistent with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code, and the Land Use
Assumptions and the proposed Roadway Improvements Plan are appropriately
incorporated into the process.
Page 15
Roadway Impact Fee Opinion of Probable Costs
CITY OF SANGER
IMPACT FEE STUDY
CONCEPTUAL LEVEL COST PROJECTIONS
JULY 2016
Street Name: Willow St/McReynolds Rd
Limits: 5th St to City Limits
Impact Fee Class:
Ultimate Class:
Length (LF): 11J41
Existing two lane concrete roadway from Sth St to
Jones; two lane asphalt from Jones to City Limits,
Item Description
Quantity
Unit
Unit Price
Item Cost
Unclassified
Street Excavation
14,854,40
CY
$
15.00
$ 2223816.00
6" Lime or Cement Subgrade
Treatment (27 Ibs/sf)
63,131,20
SY
$
4,00
$ 252,524,80
8" Reinf, Concrete Pvmt with 6" Integral Curb
58,179.73
SY
$
46,00
$ 2,676,267.73
4" Topsoil
12,378,67
SY
$
5,00
$ 61J893,33
4' Wide Concrete Sidewalk
89J26
SF
$
4,00
$ 356,505.60
Turn Lanes and Median Openings
SY
$
50,00
$ -
Signalized
Intersection (at Indian Rd)
1
EA
$
200,000.00
$
200,000,00
$
Paving
Construction
Cost Subtotal
3,770,007.47
Item Description
Notes
Allowance
Item Cost
R.O.W. Preparation
6%
$
226,200,45
Traffic Control During Construction
5%
$
188,500.37
Pavment Markings
3%
$
113,100.22
Roadway
Drainage
30%
$
1,131,002.24
Roadway Lighting
6%
$
226,200.45
Special
Drainage Structures (bridges and culverts)
8 crossings
6%
$
2263200,45
Minor Water Line Adjustments
6%
$
226,200,45
Minor Wastewater Line Adjustments
4%
$
150,800.30
Erosion Control/Establish
Turf
3%
$
113,100.22
Basic Landscaping/Irrigation
3%
$
113,100,22
Franchised
Utility Facilities
OH -Electric,
UG Fiber Optic, Telephone
3%
$
113,100.22
Railroad Crossing
Single track
between 1st and Railroad
3%
$
113,100,22
Tree Mitigation
3%
$
113,100.22
Other
Bridge west
of Ranger Creek Rd
0%
$
-
Allowance Subtotal
3,053,706.05
Paving and Allowance Subtotal
$ 6,823,713.51
Construction Contingency @ 20%
$ 1,364,742.70
Total Construction Cost
8,188,456.22
Item Description
Notes
Allowance
Item Cost
Construction
$
8,188,456.22
Engineering/Survey/Testing
20%
$ 1,637,691.24
Mobilization
6%
$ 491,307.37
Previous City Contribution
$ -
Other
$ -
R.O.W. and
Easement Acquisition
For Area from 5th to the RR
$3/SF
$ 1,002,672.00
Total Impact Fee Project Cost
$ 11,320,126.83
PREPARED BY EIKON
JULY 2016
CITY OF SANGER
IMPACT FEE STUDY
CONCEPTUAL LEVEL COST PROJECTIONS
JLILY 2016
Street Name: Indian Ln
Limits: Willow St/McReynolds Rd to FM 455
Impact Fee Class:
Ultimate Class:
Length (LF): 4,641
Existing concrete roadway to remain. Roadway is approx. 37 ft
wide for approx. 3472 LF and approx. 25 ft wide for approx. 1169
LF.
Item Description
Quantity
Unit
Unit Price
Item Cost
Unclassified Street Excavation
11054,93
Cy
$ 15,00
$ 15,823.89
6" Lime or Cement Subgrade Treatment (27 Ibs/sf)
71360,89
SY
$ 4,00
$ 2%443.56
8" Reinf. Concrete Pvmt with 6" Integral Curb
6,329.56
SY
$ 46,00
$ 291J59,56
4" Topsoil
41641,00
SY
$ 5,00
$ 23,205.00
4' Wide Concrete Sidewalk
7,432
SF
$ 4,00
$ 2%728.00
Turn Lanes and Median Openings
SY
$ 50,00
$
Signalized Intersection
EA
$ 200,000.00
$
$
Paving Construction Cost Subtotal
$ 389,360.00
Item Description
Notes
Allowance
Item Cost
R.O.W. Preparation
6%
$
23,361.60
Traffic Control During Construction
5%
$
1%468.00
Pavment Markings
3%
$
11,680,80
Roadway Drainage
30%
$
116,808.00
Roadway Lighting
6%
$
23,361.60
Special Drainage Structures (bridges and culverts)
2 culverts
6%
$
23,361,60
Minor Water Line Adjustments
6%
$ 23,361,60
Minor Wastewater Line Adjustments
4%
$ 15,574,40
Erosion Control/Establish Turf
3%
$ 11,680.80
Basic Landscaping/Irrigation
3%
$ 11,680.80
Franchised Utility Facilities
OH utils on east; switchgear in r.o.w. east side
10%
$ 38,936400
Railroad Crossing
5%
$ 19,468.00
Tree Mitigation
3%
$ 11,680,80
Other
move fence around water tower
2%
$ 71787,20
Allowance Subtotal
$ 358,211.20
Paving and Allowance Subtotal
$
747,571.20
Construction Contingency @ 20%
$
149,514.24
Total Construction Cost
$
8971085A4
Item Description
Notes
Allowance
Item Cost
Construction
$ 897,085.44
Engineering/Survey/Testing
20%
$ 179,417.09
Mobilization
6%
$ 53,825.13
Previous City Contribution
$
Other
$
R.O.W. and
Easement Acquisition
None
$3/SF
$
Total Impact Fee Project Cost
1 $ 1,130,327.65
PREPARED BY EIKON
JULY 2016
CITY OF BANGER
IMPACT FEE STUDY
CONCEPTUAL LEVEL COST PROJECTIONS
JULY 2016
Street Name:
Limits:
Impact Fee Class:
Ultimate Class:
Length (LF):
Marion Rd
FM 455 to Huling Rd.
4,013
Existing two lane asphalt roadway.
Item Description
Quantity
Unit
Unit Price
Item Cost
Unclassified
Street Excavation
53350,40
Cy
$
15,00
$
80,256,00
6" Lime or Cement Subgrade Treatment (27 Ibs/sf)
22,739,20
SY
$
4.00
$
9Q956.80
8" Reinf. Concrete Pvmt with 6" Integral Curb
20,955,73
SY
$
46,00
$
963,963.73
4" Topsoil
4,458.67
SY
$
5,00
$
22,293.33
4' Wide Concrete Sidewalk
32J02
SF
$
4,00
$
128,409.60
Turn Lanes and Median Openings
SY
1$
50,00
$
Signalized
Intersection
EA
$
200s000.00
$
$
Paving Construction
Cost Subtotal
1,285,879.47
Item Description
Notes
Allowance
Item Cost
R.O.W. Preparation
6%
$ 77,152.77
Traffic Control During Construction
5%
$ 64,293,97
Pavment Markings
3%
$
38$76.38
Roadway
Drainage
30%
$
385,763,84
Roadway Lighting
6%
$
77J52.77
Special Drainage Structures (bridges and culverts)
2 culverts
6%
$
77,152,77
Minor Water Line Adjustments
6%
$
77J52.77
Minor Wastewater Line Adjustments
4%
$
51,435,18
Erosion Control/Establish Turf
3%
$
38,576,38
Basic Landscaping/Irrigation
3%
$
38,576,38
Franchised Utility Facilities
OH-E on e. side; UG-Fiber/Tel both sides
3%
$ 38,576,38
Railroad Crossing
3%
$ 38,576,38
Tree Mitigation
3%
$ 38,576.38
Other
0%
$
Allowance Subtotal
1,041,562.37
Paving and Allowance Subtotal
$ 23327,441.83
Construction Contingency @ 20%
$ 465,488.37
Total Construction Cost
2,792,930.20
Item Description
Notes
Allowance
Item Cost
Construction
$
21792,930,20
Engineering/Survey/Testing
20%
$
5583586,04
Mobilization
6%
$ 167,575.81
Previous City Contribution
$ -
Other
$
R.O.W. and Easement Acquisition
Entire Length at 72 Feet Wide
$3/SF
$ 361,152.00
Total Impact Fee Project Cost
$ 3,880,244.05
PREPARED BY EIKON
JULY 2016
CITY OF SANGER
IMPACT FEE STUDY
CONCEPTUAL LEVEL COST PROJECTIONS
JULY 2016
Street Name: Lois Rd
Limits: E. of Melton Rd. to I-35
Impact Fee Class:
Ultimate Class:
Length (LF): 41382
Existing two lane asphalt roadway.
Item Description
Quantity
Unit
Unit Price
Item Cost
Unclassified Street Excavation
51843,20
Cy
$ 15,00
$ 87,648,00
6" Lime or Cement Subgrade Treatment (27 Ibs/sf)
24,833.60
SY
$ 4,00
$ 99,334440
8" Reinf. Concrete Pvmt with 6" Integral Curb
22,885.87
SY
$ 46,00
$ 1,0520749.87
4" Topsoil
41869,33
SY
$ 5.00
$ 24,346,67
4' Wide Concrete Sidewalk
35,059
SF
$ 4,00
$ 140,236.80
Turn Lanes and Median Openings
8001
SY
I
$ 50,00
$ 40,000.00
Signalized
Intersection
EA
1
$ 200,000.00
$ -
$ -
Paving Construction Cost Subtotal
1,444,315.73
Item Description
Notes
Allowance
Item Cost
R.O.W. Preparation
6%
$
86,658.94
Traffic Control
During Construction
5%
$
72,215.79
Pavment Markings
3%
$
43,329.47
Roadway Drainage
30%
$
433,294.72
Roadway
Lighting
6%
$
86,658.94
Special Drainage Structures (bridges and culverts)
1 culvert (major) at Walmart
6%
$
86,658.94
Minor Water Line Adjustments
6%
$
86,658.94
Minor Wastewater Line Adjustments
4%
$
57,772.63
Erosion Control/Establish Turf
3%
$
43,329,47
Basic Landscaping/Irrigation
3%
$
43,329,47
Franchised
Utility
Facilities
OH-E s. side; UG-Fiber both sides
5%
$
72,215.79
Railroad Crossing
I single track east of Walmart
5%
$
720215,79
Tree Mitigation
3%
$
43,329A7
Other
0%
$
-
Allowance Subtotal
1,227,668.37
Paving and Allowance Subtotal
$ 2,671,984.11
Construction Contingency @ 20%
$ 534,396.82
Total Construction Cost
3,206,380.93
Item Description
Notes
Allowance
Item Cost
Construction
$ 3,206,380.93
Engineering/Survey/Testing
20%
$ 641,276,19
Mobilization
6%
$ 192,382.86
Previous City Contribution
$
Other
$ -
R.O.W. and Easement Acquisition
Entire Length at 72 Feet Wide
$3/SF
1 $ 394,416.00
Total Impact Fee Project Cost
$ 4,434,455.97
PREPARED BY EIKON
JULY 2016
CITY OF BANGER
IMPACT FEE STUDY
CONCEPTUAL LEVEL COST PROJECTIONS
JULY 2016
Street Name:
Limits:
Impact Fee Class:
Ultimate Class:
Length (LF):
Belz Rd
135 SBFR to Metz Rd
5,126
Existing two Zane asphalt roadway.
Item Description
Quantity
Unit
Unit Price
Item Cost
Unclassified
Street Excavation
61834,67
CY
$ 15,00
$ 102,520.00
6" Lime or Cement Subgrade Treatment (27 Ibs/sf)
290047,33
SY
$ 4.00
$ 116,189,33
8" Reinf, Concrete Pvmt with 6" Integral Curb
26,769.11
SY
$ 46,00
$ 11231,379,11
4" Topsoil
5,695.56
SY
$ 5,00
$ 28,477.78
4' Wide Concrete Sidewalk
41,008
SF
$ 4,00
$ 164,032.00
Turn Lanes and Median Openings
SY
$ 50,00
$
Signalized
Intersection
EA
$ 200,000,00
$
$
Paving Construction Cost Subtotal
1,642,598.22
Item Description
Notes
Allowance
Item Cost
R.O.W. Preparation
6%
$
98,555,89
Traffic Control During Construction
5%
$
82,129,91
Pavment Markings
3%
$
49,277.95
Roadway
Drainage
30%
$
492,779.47
Roadway Lighting
6%
$ 98,555,89
Special Drainage Structures (bridges and culverts)
2 culverts (one major)
10%
$ 164,259.82
Minor Water Line Adjustments
6%
$ 98,555,89
Minor
Wastewater Line Adjustments
4%
$ 650703,93
Erosion Control/Establish Turf
3%
$ 49,277,95
Basic Landscaping/Irrigation
3%
$ 4%277.95
Franchised Utility Facilities
OH-E on metal poles n. side; OH-E conc
6%
$ 98,555,89
Railroad Crossing
1
3%
$ 49,277.95
Tree Mitigation
3%
$ 49,277.95
Other
0%
$
Allowance Subtotal
10445,486444
Paving and Allowance Subtotal
$ 310883084.66
Construction Contingency @ 20%
$ 617,616.93
Total Construction Cost
3,705,701.59
Item Description
Notes
Allowance
Item Cost
Construction
$
317053701,59
Engineering/Survey/Testing
20%
$
741,140,32
Mobilization
6%
$ 222,342.10
Previous City Contribution
$ -
Other
$
R.O.W. and Easement Acquisition
Entire Length at 72 Feet Wide
$3/SF
$ 461,340.00
Total Impact Fee Project Cost
$ 5J30,524.00
PREPARED BY EIKON
JULY 2016
CITY OF SANGER
IMPACT FEE STUDY
CONCEPTUAL LEVEL COST PROJECTIONS
JLILY 2016
Street Name:
Limits:
Impact Fee Class:
Ultimate Class:
Length (LF):
Metz Rd
Belz Rd to FM 455
3,525
Existing two lane asphalt roadway.
Item Description
Quantity
Unit
Unit Price
Item Cost
Unclassified
Street Excavation
4,700.00
Cy
$
15,00
$
703500.00
6" Lime or Cement Subgrade Treatment (27 Ibs/sf)
19,975,00
SY
$
4.00
$ 7%900.00
8" Reinf, Concrete Pvmt with 6" Integral Curb
18,408.33
SY
$
46,00
$ 846,783,33
4" Topsoil
3,916.67
SY
$
5,00
$ 193583.33
4' Wide Concrete Sidewalk
28,200
SF
$
4.00
$
112,800.00
Turn Lanes and Median Openings
I
SY
I $
50,00
$
-
Signalized
Intersection
EA
$
2003000,00
$
-
$
-
Paving
Construction
Cost Subtotal
1,129,566.67
Item Description
Notes
Allowance
Item Cost
R.O.W. Preparation
6%
$ 673774,00
Traffic Control During Construction
5%
$ 56,478.33
Pavment Markings
3%
$
33,887,00
Roadway Drainage
30%
$ 338,870,00
Roadway Lighting
6%
$ 67,774.00
Special Drainage Structures (bridges and culverts)
3 culverts
10%
$ 1122956,67
Minor Water Line Adjustments
6%
$ 67,774,00
Minor Wastewater Line Adjustments
4%
$ 45,182.67
Erosion Control/Establish Turf
3%
$ 330887,00
Basic Landscaping/Irrigation
3%
$ 33,887,00
Franchised
Utility Facilities
OH-E both sides
10%
$ 112,956.67
Railroad Crossing
8%
$ 902365,33
Tree Mitigation
3%
$ 33,887.00
Other
Site distance issue at FM 455
0%
$
Allowance Subtotal
14095,679.67
Paving and Allowance Subtotal
$ 212252246.33
Construction Contingency @ 20%
$ 445,049.27
Total Construction Cost
2,670,295.60
Item Description
Notes
Allowance
Item Cost
Construction
$ 2,670,295.60
Engineering/Survey/Testing
20%
$ 534,059.12
Mobilization
6%
$ 160,217.74
Previous City Contribution
$
Other
$ -
R.O.W. and Easement Acquisition
Entire Length at 72 Feet Wide
$3/SF
$ 3175250.00
Total Impact Fee Project Cost
$ 3,681,822.46
PREPARED BY EIKON
JULY 2016
CITY OF SANGER
IMPACT FEE STUDY
CONCEPTUAL LEVEL COST PROJECTIONS
JULY 2016
Street Name: Extension of Utility Rd New roadway adjacent to farm and open fields.
Limits: RR tracks to Marion Rd (at Huling Rd) Roadway to go between two houses at Marion.
Impact Fee Class:
Ultimate Class:
Length (LF): 4,055
Item Description
Quantity
Unit
Unit Price
Item Cost
Unclassified Street Excavation
31754,63
CY
$ 15,00
$ 56,319.44
6" Lime or Cement Subgrade Treatment (27 Ibs/sf)
13,967422
SY
$ 4,00
$ 55,868,89
8" Reinf. Concrete Pvmt with 6" Integral Curb
12,165.00
SY
$ 46,00
$ 559,590.00
4" Topsoil
3,604.44
SY
$ 5,00
$ 180022,22
4' Wide Concrete Sidewalk
32,440
SF
$ 4,00
$ 129,760,00
Turn Lanes and Median Openings
I
I SY
I
$ 50,00
$ -
Signalized Intersection
EA
$ 200,000,00
$ -
$ -
Paving Construction Cost Subtotal
819,560056
Item Description
Notes
Allowance
Item Cost
R.O.W. Preparation
6%
$ 49J73.63
Traffic Control During Construction
5%
$ 40,978.03
Pavment Markings
3%
$ 24,586.82
Roadway Drainage
30%
$ 245,868.17
Roadway Lighting
6%
$ 49,173.63
Special Drainage Structures (bridges and culverts)
6%
$ 49J73.63
Minor Water Line Adjustments
6%
$ 49,173,63
Minor Wastewater Line Adjustments
4%
$ 32,782,42
Erosion Control/Establish Turf
3%
$ 24,586.82
Basic Landscaping/Irrigation
3%
$ 24,586.82
Franchised Utility Facilities
3%
$ 24,586,82
Railroad Crossing
single track
8%
$ 65,564.84
Tree Mitigation
3%
$ 242586,82
Other
0%
$
Allowance Subtotal
704,822608
Paving and Allowance Subtotal
$ 1,524,382.63
Construction Contingency @ 20%
$ 304,876.53
Total Construction Cost
1,829,259.16
Item Description
Notes
Allowance
Item Cost
Construction
$ 118293259,16
Engineering/Survey/Testing
20%
$ 3650851,83
Mobilization
6%
$ 109,755.55
Previous City Contribution
$ -
Other
$ -
R.O.W. and Easement Acquisition
1 Entire Length at 72 Feet Wide
I $3/SF
$ 875,880,00
Total Impact Fee Project Cost
$ 31180,746,54
PREPARED BY EIKON
JULY 2016
CITY OF SANGER
IMPACT FEE STUDY
CONCEPTUAL LEVEL COST PROJECTIONS
JULY 2016
Street Name: Extension of Keaton Rd
Limits: Belz Rd to FM 455
Impact Fee Class:
Ultimate Class:
Length (LF): 31527
New roadway adjacent to farm field and signal tower site.
Item Description
Quantity
Unit
Unit Price
Item Cost
Unclassified
Street Excavation
3,265.74
Cy
$ 15,00
$ 48,986,11
6" Lime or Cement Subgrade Treatment (27 Ibs/sf)
12,148,56
SY
$ 4,00
$ 48,594,22
8" Reinf. Concrete Pvmt with 6" Integral Curb
10,581,00
SY
$ 46,00
$ 486,726,00
4" Topsoil
31135,11
SY
$ 5.00
$ 15,675,56
4' Wide Concrete Sidewalk
28,216
SF
$ 4.00
$ 112,864.00
Turn Lanes and Median Openings
SY
$ 50.00
$
Signalized
Intersection
EA
$ 200,000.00
$
$
Paving Construction Cost Subtotal
$ 7123845.89
Item Description
Notes
Allowance
Item Cost
R.O.W. Preparation
6%
$ 42,770,75
Traffic Control During Construction
5%
$ 35,642,29
Pavment Markings
3%
$ 21,385,38
Roadway Drainage
30%
$ 213,853,77
Roadway Lighting
6%
$ 42,770.75
Special Drainage Structures (bridges and culverts)
10%
$ 71,284.59
Minor Water Line Adjustments
69/6
$ 42,770,75
Minor Wastewater Line Adjustments
4%
$ 28,513.84
Erosion Control/Establish Turf
3%
$ 21,385.38
Basic Landscaping/Irrigation
3%
$ 21,385.38
Franchised Utility Facilities
OH-E on concrete poles e. side; OH-E on west sid
10%
$ 71,284.59
Railroad Crossing
3%
$ 21,385,38
Tree Mitigation
3%
$ 21,385,38
Other
0%
$
Allowance Subtotal
$ 655,818.22
Paving and Allowance Subtotal
$
1$68,664.11
Construction Contingency @ 20%
$
273,732.82
Total Construction Cost
$
1,642,396.93
Item Description
Notes
Allowance
Item Cost
Construction
$ 1,642,396.93
Engineering/Survey/Testing
20%
$ 328,479.39
Mobilization
6%
$ 98,543,82
Previous City Contribution
$
Other
$
R.O.W. and
Easement Acquisition
Entire Length at 72 Feet Wide
$3/SF
$ 761,832.00
Total Impact Fee Project Cost
1 $ 2,831,252.13
PREPARED BY EIKON
DULY 2016
CITY OF SANGER
IMPACT FEE STUDY
CONCEPTUAL LEVEL COST PROJECTIONS
JULY 2016
Street Name: Future Belz Rd -Indian Rd Connector
Limits: 1-35 NBFR to FM 455
Impact Fee Class:
Ultimate Class:
Length (LF): 5,385
Future roadway through open fields.
Item Description
Quantity
Unit
Unit Price
Item Cost
Unclassified
Street Excavation
7,180.00
Cy
$
15,00
$
107,700.00
6" Lime or Cement Subgrade
Treatment (27 Ibs/sf)
30,515.00
SY
$
4.00
$
122,060,00
8" Reinf. Concrete Pvmt with 6" Integral
Curb
28,121,67
SY
$
46,00
$
11293,596,67
4" Topsoil
5,983.33
SY
$
5,00
$
29,916,67
4' Wide Concrete Sidewalk
43,080
SF
$
4,00
$
172,320.00
Turn Lanes and Median Openings
I
SY
$
50.00
I
$
-
Signalized
Intersection
EA
$
200,000.00
$
-
$
-
Paving
Construction
Cost Subtotal
1,725,593.33
Item Description
Notes
Allowance
Item Cost
R.O.W. Preparation
6%
$
1030535,60
Traffic Control During Construction
5%
$
863279.67
Pavment Markings
3%
$
51,767,80
Roadway
Drainage
30%
$
5173678,00
Roadway Lighting
6%
$ 103,535.60
Special Drainage Structures (bridges and culverts)
6 stream crossings
30%
$ 517,678,00
Minor Water Line Adjustments
6%
$ 103,535,60
Minor Wastewater Line Adjustments
4%
$ 69,023,73
Erosion Control/Establish Turf
3%
$ 51,767,80
Basic Landscaping/Irrigation
3%
$ 51,767,80
Franchised Utility
Facilities
OH-E along n, side of FM 455
10%
$ 172,559.33
Railroad
Crossing
isingle track
10%
$ 172,559.33
Tree Mitigation
3%
$ 51,767,80
Other
0%
$ -
Allowance Subtotal
2,053,456.07
Paving and Allowance Subtotal $ 3,779,049.40
Construction Contingency @ 20% $ 755,809.88
Total Construction Cost 4,534,859.28
Item Description
Notes
Allowance
Item Cost
Construction
$ 41534,859,28
Engineering/Survey/Testing
20%
$ 906,971.86
Mobilization
6%
$ 272,091.56
Previous City Contribution
$ -
Other
$
R.O.W. and Easement Acquisition
I Entire Length at 72 Feet Wide
$3/SF
I $ 1,163,160.00
Total Impact Fee Project Cost
$ 6,877,082.69
PREPARED BY EIKON
JULY 2016
CITY OF BANGER
IMPACT FEE STUDY
CONCEPTUAL LEVEL COST PROJECTIONS
JULY 2016
Street Name: Future East-West Thoroughfare Future roadway through open fields.
Limits: Cowling Rd to BNSF RR Tracks
Impact Fee Class:
Ultimate Class:
Length (LF): 21798
Item Description
Quantity
Unit
Unit Price
Item Cost
Unclassified Street Excavation
33731,20
Cy
$ 15.00
$ 55,968,00
6" Lime or Cement Subgrade Treatment (27 Ibs/sf)
15,857.60
SY
$ 4.00
$ 63,430,40
8" Reinf, Concrete Pvmt with 6" Integral Curb
14,613,87
SY
$ 46,00
$ 672,237.87
4" Topsoil
31109,33
SY
$ 5,00
$ 15,546.67
4' Wide
Concrete Sidewalk
22,387
SF
$ 4,00
$ 89,548.80
Turn Lanes and Median Openings
SY
$ 50.00
$
Signalized Intersection
EA
$ 200,060.00
$
Paving Construction Cost Subtotal
$ 896,731.73
Item Description
Notes
Allowance
Item Cost
R.O.W. Preparation
6%
$
53,803.90
Traffic Control During Construction
5%
$
44,836,59
Pavment Markings
3%
$ 26,901.95
Roadway Drainage
30%
$
269,019,52
Roadway Lighting
6%
$
53,803,90
Special Drainage Structures (bridges and culverts)
1 stream crossing
35%
$
313,856.11
Minor Water Line Adjustments
6%
$
53,803.90
Minor Wastewater Line Adjustments
4%
$
35,869,27
Erosion Control/Establish Turf
3%
$ 261901,95
Basic Landscaping/Irrigation
3%
$ 26,901.95
Franchised Utility Facilities
OH-E n. side from Cowling to
railroad
3%
$ 26,901,95
Railroad Crossing
single track
3%
$ 26,901.95
Tree Mitigation
3%
$
263901,95
Other
Improvements to intersection
with Railr
O%
$
Allowance Subtotal
$
986,404.91
Paving and Allowance Subtotal
$
1,883,136.64
Construction Contingency @ 20%
$
376,627.33
Total Construction Cost
$
2,259,763.97
Item Description
Notes
Allowance
Item Cost
Construction
$ 2125%763.97
Engineering/Survey/Testing
20%
$ 451,952.79
Mobilization
6%
$ 135,585,84
Previous City Contribution
$
Other
$
R.O.W. and Easement Acquisition
Entire Length at 72 Feet Wide
$3/SF
$ 604,454,40
Total Impact Fee Project Cost
1 $ 3,451,757.00
PREPARED BY EIKON
JULY 2016
Roadway Impact Fee Service Units of Supply
NN
N
N
O1
O
N
a
m
N
a
W
N
U
M
N
a
M
M
1
N
O
1
M
O
O
O
a
O
p)
O
M
In
pp
V
N
M
�
M
M-
l0
m
W
c
a
ro
a
Clw
N
M
M
a`
m
H
a d
N
N
M
O
com
O
a
O
M
pOp
W
W
> f
W CL O'
U =
.D�_
o
rn
o
o
a
a
M
a
a
N
n
U N S y
M
M
M
N
V
N f N Y
F0
M
(0
e0
M
a
m
a
to
U W T O
a
rj
N
n
F
en
N
N
A S Z
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N a S J
M
N
N
N
UI
lf1
a
s
ul
N
> va
u_
Z m
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
N d
o
o
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
O
N Q
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
G_
Y
�a
(9
M
M
N
in
In
In
O
O
t0
to
� O
N
N
N
N
N
V
V
N
U >
VN1
tN(I
U �
=
Z
d
c
a
a
a
a
a
a
N
N
a
a
m
J
L
N
lb
r
m
O)
t0
f�
e0
p
y
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
C3
O
J
v
v
c
c
J
t0
N
N
t0
N
N
-�
t0
N
J
J
J
J
J
J
N
N
J
J
a
a
a
a
a
a
5
o
a
a
V
O
O
O
O
O
O
U
U
O
O
c
c
c
c
c
c
m
a
c
c
E
E
E
E
f
F
o
o
E
E
U
U
o
N
c
r
a
c
o
D 0
O
U
O
T
Z
E
of
O
N
v
1
3
°
m
Y
N
O
N
N
N
W
3
m
v
v
LL
LL
N
O
y U
O
,U
c
N
u
x
LLJ
N �
O Y
a
01
61
O
V
CO
N_
0)
CO
O]
(0
0)
0)
N
mN
r�
T+)
N
O
r
c0
_O
w
O
w
O
0)
d'
0)
0c1'
W
CO
u1 •— N y
O
^
M
to
I�
V)
O
co
M
O
t1)
M
co
n
M
O
V
y
U N
u m
N
N
W U EL 1
Y
()
m
O
M
q
w
N_
m
W
W
(0
0
M
N
N
N
r�M
n. !0
N
(
n
N
_O
W
O
(O
0)OJ
V
0)
00
a+
O
^
M
V
M
r
M
co
M
(0
0)
Ln
M
CO
n
M
O
V'
y p
U (D C O
Nj
N E N
N
> d 2
h
M
d1
r�
m
CO
(n
V00
(O
N
to
N
OJ
CO
N
O)
V
v)
(p
Y—
to
N
M
OJ
(0
N
n
M
CO
M
m
41
M
N
CO
I�
N Q. r
O
al
V
dl
m
O
N
r
M
w
O
r�
O
to
(O
0)
a
H
U w T O
.a:
N
Nj
N/
OS
cV
Cq
1-
0) E aaOf
> >S
" u°
v7
n
n
o
0
0
0
0
0
Lo
O
(n
o
0
0
U N (p Z
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
to
N
to
N
to
M
N
M
N
N
M
M
N
S
(n
(n
u7
u)
�n
(�
)n
V
d'
V
V'
V'
V
(0
(O
U)
<Y
V
V
(O
O
h
> U a
u
wm
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
¢
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
_
0
Y w
o_
U� ?
to
M
to
M
O
Ln
to
O
O
O
o
O
0
to
O
mO
O
O
u)
O O
N
N
N
N
to
N
N
to
to
(n
M
)n
)n
N
v)
N
(n
(n
(n
N
>
(n
N
M
m
V
LO
(n
V
V
<f'
d'
V'
mw
Ln
V'
V'
V
(n
~U
Um
Z
y
C
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
J
E
cO
co
r
0)
O
M
M
0]
N
V
�n
t�
O)
O
r
O
M
m
co
M
�
�
M
O
d'
O
m
�
N
O
dl
r
N
(p
^
M
�
.c
p)
M
O
N
O
O
Ni
cV
O
cV
(V
(0
O
cV
O
G
w
J
w
w
w
W
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
C
w
w
C
G
C
C
C
C
w
C
w
C
C
C
w
'o
v
`0
`0
`o
'o
`o
`�
'o
o
m
o
00
V
`o
'o
o
`o
o
`o
u
u
u
`o
cl
`o
u
u
u
o
u
u
u
u
'u
c_
c_
c_
c_
w
c_
c_
w
w
w
w
w
w
c
c_
w
w
w
c_
E
F
F
o
F
E
o
o
0
o
o
o
E
o
0
o
E
U
U
U
O
U
U
U
0.
U
U
U
U
O
w
C
w
c
i0
a
v
a
o
a
c
m
a
a
�
w
N
m
O
=
cr
Z
>`
c
E
N
01
N
O
y
y
N
N
O
N
N
3
y
C
N
N
'Q
'O
O
N
N
=
io
lfl
0
E
N
N
J
J
Q]
F
U
()
LL
LL
=
FC
O
i
v
C
Y
U
Q
v
=
in
3
D
o
—_
LL
C
Maximum Allowable Roadway Impact Fee Per Service Unit Calculations
Line
Title
Description
Total Vehicle -Miles of
Based on the capacity, length, and number of lanes for each
1
Capacity Added by the
project - Vehicle -Mile Supply Peak -Hour Total from Appendix
Roadway Improvement
B Service Units of Supply
Projects
Total Vehicle -Miles of
The amount of traffic currently on the roads that are planned
2
Existing Demand From the
for expansion - Vehicle -Mile Total Demand Peak -Hour Total
Roadway Improvement
from Appendix B Service Units of Supply
Projects
Total Vehicle -Miles of
Vehicle -Miles of travel that are not accommodated by the
3
Existing Deficiencies From
existing roads - Existing Deficiencies Peak -Hour Vehicle -Mile
the Existing Roadway
from Appendix B Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory
Facilities
Amount of Vehicle -Miles added by the thoroughfare plan that
4
Net Amount of Vehicle -Miles
will not be utilized by the existing demand
of Capacity Added
= Line 1 - Line 2 - Line 3
Total Cost of the Roadway
Total of the Opinion of Probable Construction Costs for the
5
Improvement Projects
10-Year Roadway Impact Study
Total of the Opinion of Probable Construction Costs for the
Cost of the Net Capacity
10-Year Roadway Impact Study prorated by the ratio capacity
6
Supplied
added to the total capacity added
_ (Line 4/Line 1) x Line 5
The Total Cost of the Roadway Improvements minus the Cost
7
Cost to Meet the Existing
of the Capacity Supplied
Needs and Usage
= Line 5 - Line 6
Total Vehicle -Miles of New
The Estimate of the Number of Vehicle -Miles growth within
8
Demand over 10-Years
the Service Area - based on the TDF
Percent of Capacity Added
The Total Vehicle -Miles of New Demand over 10-Years divided
by the Net Amount of Vehicle -Miles of Capacity Added up to
9
Attributable to Growth
100%. Required by Chapter 395 to verify the
(Must be Less than or Equal
capacity added is from new growth.
to 100%)
= Line 8 / Line 4 <= 100%
The Cost of the Net Capacity Supplied multiplied by the
10
Cost of Capacity Added
Percent of Capacity Added Attributable to Growth
Attributable to Growth
= Line 6 x Line 9
Per Chapter 395 and the option selected in the report,
multiply the Cost of Capacity Added Attributable to Growth
11
50% Credit
by 50%, which is the recoverable cost of the projected
improvements based on the projected growth
= Line 10 x 50%
The 50% Credit divided by Total Vehicle -Miles of New Demand
12
Max Assessable Fee Per
over 10-Years
Service Unit/Vehicle Mile
= Line 11 /Line 8
PREPARED BY EIKON
JULY 2016
Land Use/Vehicle-Mile Equivalency Table
ITE
Trip
Pass-
NCTCOG
Adj.
Adj. Trip
Max
Veh-Mi
Land Use
Land
Development
Gen
Trip
Trip
Trip
Category
Use
Unit
Rate
By
Rate
Length
For Om*
Length
Length
Per
Rate
ate
D
(mi)
Unit
Code
(PM)
PORT AND
TERMINAL
Truck Terminal
30
Acres
6.55
6.55
10.02
50%
5.01
5.01
32.82
INDUSTRIAL
General Light
110
11000 SF GFA
0.97
0.97
10.02
50%
5.01
5.01
4.86
Industrial
General Heavy
120
11000 SF GFA
0.68
0.68
10.02
50%
5.01
5.01
3.41
Industrial
Industrial Park
130
11000 SF GFA
0.85
0.86
10.02
50%
5.01
5.01
4.31
Warehousing
150
11000 SF GFA
0.32
0.32
10.83
50%
5.42
5.42
1.73
Mini -Warehouse
151
11000 SF GFA
0.26
0.26
10.83
50%
5.42
5.42
1.41
RESIDENTIAL
Single -Family
Detached
210
Dwelling Unit
1.01
1.01
17.21
50%
8.61
6
6.06
Housing
Apartment/Multi-
220
Dwelling Unit
0.62
0.62
17.21
50%
8.61
6
3.72
family
Residential
Condominium/
230
Dwelling Unit
0.52
0.52
17.21
50%
8.61
6
3.12
Townhome
Mobile Home
Park/
240
Dwelling Unit
0.59
0.59
17.21
50%
8.61
6
3.54
Manufactured
Housing
Senior Adult
252
Dwelling Unit
0.27
0.27
17.21
50%
8.61
6
1.62
Housing
Congregate Care
253
Dwelling Unit
0.16
0.16
17.21
50%
8.61
6
0.96
Facility
Assisted Living
254
Beds
0.22
0.22
17.21
50%
8.61
6
1.32
LODGING
Hotel
310
Rooms
0.59
0.59
6.43
50%
3.22
3.22
1.90
Motel / Other
Lodging
320
Rooms
0.47
0.47
6.43
50%
3.22
3.22
1.51
Facilities
RECREATIONAL
Driving Range
432
Tees
1.25
1.25
6.43
50%
3.22
3.22
4.02
Golf Course
430
Acres
0.3
0.3
6.43
50%
3.22
3.22
0.96
Health/Rec.
Clubs and
495
11000 SF GFA
2.74
2.74
6.43
50%
3.22
3.22
8.81
Facilities
Ice Rink
465
11000 SF GFA
2.36
2.36
6.43
50%
3.22
3.22
7.59
Miniature Golf
431
Holes
0.33
0.33
6.43
50%
3.22
3.22
1.06
Multiplex Movie
445
Screens
13.64
13.64
6.43
50%
3.22
3.22
43.85
Theater
Racquet /
491
Courts
3.35
3.35
6.43
50%
3.22
3.22
10.77
Tennis Club
PREPARED BY EIKON
JULY 2016
ITE
Trip
Pass-
NCTCOG
Adj.
Adj. Trip
Max
Veh-MI
Land Use
Land
Development
Gen
By
Trip
Trip
For 0-
Length
Trip
Per vm
Category
Use;
Unit
Rate
ate
Rate
Rate
Length
D
(mi)
Length
Unit
:Code
(PM)
(mi)
(mi)
INSTITUTIONAL
Church
560
11000 SF GFA
0.55
0.55
4.2
50%
2.10
2.10
1.16
Day Care Center
565
11000 SF GFA
12.34
44%
6.91
4.2
50%
2.10
2.10
14.51
Primary/Middle
522
Students
0.16
0.16
4.2
50%
2.10
2.10
0.34
School (1-8)
High School (9-
530
Students
0.13
0.13
4.2
50%
2.10
2.10
0.27
12)
Jr / Community
540
Students
0.12
0.12
4.2
50%
2.10
2.10
0.25
College
University /
550
Students
0.17
0.21
4.2
50%
2.10
2.10
0.44
College
MEDICAL
Clinic
630
11000 SF GFA
5.18
5.18
7.55
50%
3.78
3.78
19.55
Hospital
610
Beds
1.42
1.31
7.55
50%
3.78
3.78
4.95
Nursing Home
620
Beds
0.22
0.22
7.55
50%
3.78
3.78
0.83
Animal Hospital/
640
11000 SF GFA
4.72
30%
3.30
7.55
50%
3.78
3.78
12.47
Veterinary Clinic
OFFICE
Corporate
Headquarters
714
1,000 SF GFA
1.41
1.41
10.02
50%
5.01
5.01
7.06
Building
General Office
710
12000 SF GFA
1.49
1.49
10.02
50%
5.01
5.01
7.46
Building
Medical/Dental
720
11000 SF GFA
3.57
3.57
10.02
SO%
5.01
5.01
17.89
Office
Single Tenant
715
11000 SF GFA
1.74
1.74
10.02
50%
5.01
5.01
8.72
Office Building
Office Park
750
11000 SF GFA
1.48
1.48
10.02
50%
5.01
5.01
7.41
PREPARED BY EIKON
DULY 2016
ITE
Trip
Pass-
NCTCOG
Adj.
Adj. Trip
Max
Veh-Mi
Land Use
Land
Development
Gen
By
Trip
Trip
For 0-
Length
Trip
Per
Category
Use
Unit
Rate
Ratate
Rate
Length
D
(mi)
Length
t
Unit
Code
(PM)
(mi) ;
(mi)
COMMERCIAL
Automobile
Related
Automobile Care
942
11000 SF GLA
3.11
40%
1.87
6.43
50%
3.22
3.22
6.00
Center
Automobile Parts
843
11000 SF GFA
5.98
43%
3.41
6.43
50%
3.22
3.22
10.96
Sales
Gasoline/Service
Vehicle
Station w/ Conv.
945
Fueling
13.51
20%
10.81
1.2
50%
0.60
0.60
6.48
Market
Positions
New and Used
841
12000 SF GFA
2.62
40%
1.57
6.43
50%
3.22
3.22
5.05
Car Sales
Quick
Lubrication
941
Servicing
S.19
40%
3.11
6.43
50%
3.22
3.22
10.01
Vehicle Shop
Positions
Self -Service Car
947
Stalls
5.54
40%
3.32
1.2
50%
0.60
0.60
1.99
Wash
Tire Store
848
12000 SF GFA
4.15
28%
2.99
6.43
50%
3.22
3.22
9.61
Dining
Fast Food
Restaurant with
934
11000 SF GFA
33.84
50%
16.92
4.79
50%
2.40
2.40
40.52
Drive-Thru
High Turnover
(Sit -Down)
932
11000 SF GFA
11.15
43%
6.36
4.79
50%
2.40
2.40
15.22
Restaurant
Quality
931
11000 SF GFA
7.49
44%
4.19
4.79
50%
2.40
2.40
10.05
Restaurant
Other Retail
0.00
Free -Standing
815
11000 SF GFA
5
44%
2.80
6.43
50%
3.22
3.22
9.00
Retail Store
Garden Center
817
1,000 SF GFA
3.8
30%
2.66
6.43
50%
3.22
3.22
8.55
(Nursery)
Home
Improvement
862
11000 SF GFA
2.37
48%
1.23
6.43
50%
3.22
3.22
3.96
Superstore
Pharmacy/Drugs
tore With Drive-
881
11000 SF GFA
10.35
53%
4.86
6.43
50%
3.22
3.22
15.64
Thru Window
Shopping Center
820
10000 SF GLA
3.73
34%
2.46
6.43
50%
3.22
3.22
7.91
Supermarket
850
1,000 SF GFA
10.5
36%
6.72
6.43
50%
3.22
3.22
21.60
Toy/Children's
864
13000 SF GFA
4.99
30%
6.43
SO%
3.22
3.22
11.23
Supers tore
SERVICES
r72
Bank (Walk -In)
911
19000 SF GFA
12.13
40%
3.39
50%
1.70
L70
12.34
Bank (Drive In)
912
Drive-in
27441
47%
14.53
3.39
50%
1.70
1.70
24.62
Lanes
Hair Salon
918
1,000 SF GLA
1.45
30%
1.02
3.39
50%
1.70
1.70
1.72
PREPARED BY EIKON
JULY 2016
Service Area Map
w
w rz 4
�¢wo
rrN
m�Q�
_? WJ
AMVONn08 V3W 3OY M3S j, ' W j "D a �
- _ Q Lij
ry s �
Ara
IK13 � 's
p tl EI H. I. i rrr vi a i 1
. ®? 1 UIJ It,
C " t
C+
or Rkf 6U)I'4I I now= r oMm. rn
m pkf bulinW
re
o
m
•08 NOIMVPI NI NVIONI
NI NVIOI 11 Muni } W "
o
Elf ta{ua�W ai
cxz
�Z Nt
mum mmwt*
m u OM ON I {M0 *04ft •
L* o HIM
sa /NO1V3M oo
rrhd�tafiitl.rir.rrr.r.rrrrrr.f'Hi$"E An
= � s
FHilfi?gllnS' P4
1�
AMVoNn06 V3MV 3.0A83s h`
a
d'A,
I l }xM sse0l.ue�,
I
z Pif plai) +y
CDa v
YJ
yi
f, _
�- Tp U
ii }I
Chiaum nd
a f7�-0 NI114 lid r
a
EXHIBIT B
Roadway Impact Fee Collection Rate
Residential Fee Per Service Unit $ 247.53
Nonresidential Fee Per Service Unit $ 185.65
Proposed City of Sanger Roadway Impact Fees
Residential Fee Per Service Unit $ 247.53
Nonresidential Fee Per Service Unit $ 185.65
Selected Residential all Unit VM/DU Fee per
Uses Dwelling Unit
SFD Dwelling Dwelling 6.06 $ 1,500
Apartment Dwelling 3.72 $ 921
Townhome Dwelling 3.12 $ 772
Selected Non -Residential Fee per
Land Uses Unit VM/DU Development
Unit
General Office 1,000 sqft 7.46 $ 1,385
Medical Office 1,000 sqft 17.89 $ 3,321
Fast Food 1,000 sqft 40.52 $ 7,522
Sit Down Restaurant 1,000 sqft 15.22 $ 2,826
Quality Restaurant 1,000 sqft 10.05 $ 11866
Light Industrial 1,000 sqft 4.86 $ 902
Heavy Industrial 1,000 sqft 3.41 $ 633
Warehouse 1,000 sqft 1.73 $ 321
Church 1,000 sqft 1.16 $ 215
Day Care Center 1,000 sqft 14.51 $ 2,694
Medical Clinic 1,000 sqft 19.55 $ 39629
Corporate Headquarters 1,000 sqft 8.46 $ 19571
New Car Sales 1,000 sqft 5.05 $ 938
Supermarket 1,000 sqft 21.60 $ 4,010
Discount Store 1,000 sqft 9.00 $ 1,671
Walk4n Bank 1,000 sqft 12.34 $ 2,291
Hotel Room 1.90 $ 353
Motel Room 1.51 $ 280
Note: These are selected examples of land uses from the Roadway
Impact Fee Study. For a comprehensive list, consult the study.
TmasdaXAuguA4,2016• Sanger News
�20 words - $10 a week
en Classifieds
a Call:940-45&8515
� email: sangeliq^lemonsjwbfcatans.com
WEACCEPfALL MAJOR CREDIT CARDS FREE ADS • Lost/Found & Free Pets
Help Wanted I I Help Wanted Garage Sates I I For Rent services I I services
WANTE01
Pert -time
Delivery Driver
Flexible hours- MUST have
valid COL (class A or B).
Piggyback forklift exp pre-
lerred. $15S18 per hour
(dspending on exp and
molivation), Apply in per-
son at BNB Stone, 917 N.
t0th St., Sanger TX 76266.
Help wanted: Full-time
building and lawn main-
tenance. Call 940482-
0186. Located in Krum.
nus 90?sA
ll
Pitying Pearly SalaryModMy Bonuses
Benefit Packages
Holiday & Vacation Pay
.\pph' online
d<ne.vaaa.c
BANGER NEWS
CLASSIFIEDS
Just 410 perweek for
both the weekly
Sanger News and the
weekly Krum News!
Small your ad to; sanger®
lemonspublieations.com
or tall us at
940.45E-5515
STALEV STEEL INC in Pilot
Point, TX has an immediate
opening for the following po-
sns:
Melntenence 7echniclan
• lydrauric Experence re-
quired
• Eledrical Experience re-
quired
• Plumbing Experience re-
quired
• Overhead Crane Mainte-
nance Experience preferred
• HVAC Experience a plus
• Must have own hand tools
• Must be willing to work
overtime as needed
•
oth
Must be willing to work
er duties as assigned by
your supervisor
Grounds Keeper
• Experience using lawn
equipment:
o Zero Turn Mower
o $mail Tractor with brush
oWSad Eaters
• Knowledge of lawn equip-
ment maintenance a plus
• Irrigation system knowl-
edge a plus
• Must be able to work in the
heat
• Must be willing to work
other duties as assigned by
your supervisor
Guaranteed 40 hours per
week. Competitive pay.
Paid healthcare, 401k,den-
tal, vision, paid vacation.
Conlact Danny Bates at
9404i00U864
Or send Resume to
careers®staieysteei.com
Pit Stop In Bolivar Is looking
for an experienced Cook.
Must be dependable antl
flexible with work hours. Ap-
plications are on the count -
at Pit Stop, 6551 FM 455
West.
Legal Notices
Community Garage Sale:
One day only) Multiple
to In the Hunnington
Ridge subdivision will be
part cipating in a communi-
ty wide garage sale Satur-
day, August 6th from Sam
until ?? Too many items to
listll No early birds please)
From Sanger: take 455
West to 2450 North; Hun-
nington Ridge is approxi-
mately 2 miles North of the
intersection of FM 455/FM
2450.
Moving Sale: Everything
must got Furniture, elec-
uonks, tools, clothing. Sat-
urday only, 7am-lpm, 212
Soulhside Dr., Sanger.
In Moving Sale: Come
to front door. 1024 Porter
Place, Sanger. Saturday,
Aug. 6 starting at gam. Ev-
erything priced to sell)
Backyard Sale: next Sat-
urday, Aug. 13, from Bam-
3pm at 615 S. 2nd St.
in Sanger. Freezer, cot,
hoknacks, clothes, and
lots of miscellaneous.
Paying or<r a50,e00
vr,dy sal.ry
merit rim ty Borrow.
Brit fit Package
Holidayk Vacation Pay
Apply Online
r;rnrsenae.ram
ORDINANCE I08.15.16
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BANGER, TEXAS, $ANGER NEW$
ADOPTING ROADWAY IMPACT FEES PER SERVICE CLA$$IFIED$
UNIT; ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR THE AS- Just 410 perweek In
SESSMENT, COLLECTION, COMPUTATION, EXPEN• both the weekly Sanger
DITURE, REFUND AND GENERAL ADMINISTRATION
OF ROADWAY IMPACT FEES; PROVIDING FOR THE News and the weekly
ESTABLISHMENT OFACCOUNTS FOR ROADWAY IM- Krum News!
PACT FEES; PROVIDING CONSTRUCTION, SEVER- 940.45114515
ABILITY AND CONFLICT CLAUSES; AND PROVIDING sanger6lemonspublica
FORAN EFFECTIVE DATE. tionsecom
For Rent: Approximately
600 aq. R. of space ideal
for ofice or retail. Located
on FM 455 just past high
school in Sanger. Call 940-
391-9771 or 940390-9190
for Information.
Office Warehouse for
lease. Garbage, Water
indudad, $750-S800 per
month plus deposit. Call
940.390-9574.
Facty for Rent: Need
a place for a party, wed-
tling reception or reunion?
Large building with beau-
tiful view of Lake Ray
Roberts- Very reasonable
rates. Call 940-466-2862
or 940.595-6326.
Store your boat at Ray
Rebertsl Boat & household
storage. Secure, lock -up
unit. On -site manager. Call
Lyndea at 940458.0233.
RV and Boat Storage.
Enclosed Units, Covered
Units and Outdoor Units.
Competitive rates. Call
940.390-9574,
He for lease: Ponder
3-2, den on one acre
No smoking, no pets
1250,00 rent
1250.00 deposit
By appointment only
940390-9574
SUBSCRIBE
TO THE BANGER
NEWS
AND GET
ONE MONTH FREEI
One-year subscriptions
are just
$23 per year
aM your paper will be
delivered to your malbox
every Thursdayl
Subscribe
now and get
ONE MONTH FREEI
To start your subscription,
cea 940 458-8515, email
IeaRAenanspubiratlms.can
or stop by our office at
412 Bolivar St. in
downtown Sanger
(next door to
Sanger Eye Care).
SUBSCRIBE TODAY
TO THE
BANGER NEWS
AND RECEIVE
ONE MONTH FREE!
When you subscribe to the Sanger News for just
$23 PER YEAR, you'll receive your
hometown newspaper in the mail EVERYTHURSDAY.
PLUS ... you'll SAVE 20% PER YEAR off the newstand price!
PLUS... we'll give you ONE MONTH FREE as
with your new subscription!
To subscribe, fill out the form of right
and mail it to: SANGHRNEW3NBWSUBSCRIPTION
BANGER NEWS
PO BOX 250
SANGER, TX 76266
Or, email us at:
lee@lemonspublications.com,
stop by 412 Bolivar St in downtown
Sanger, or call 458.8515
rtilnr4
lo
Address
City State
Zip Payment Encsed
BIe Me Later
mmaris
We Lawn Service
Bask lawn service.
Honest and reliable.
If it's green, we'll cut it.
Sanger resident.
Call Michael at
940.535.8731
Buy, Sell or trade
Musical Instruments
Guitars, Violins, and
most Musical Instruments.
Call Rick at
940.205.8523
Please leave message
Mike Morris
Cerllrleof Land Specialist
Mossy Oak Properties
of Texas
940.231-7387
grnoss>oai.properees.can
Professlonal Music
Instruction
Guitar, Bass, Banjo,
Mandolin, Piano,
Vocal, and Theory.
940.2063446
victor@ victorgann.com
www.victorgann,com
co DeNO Contracting
All phases of Home
Improvement and
Remodeling. Specializing
in Kitchens and Bath.
Free Estimates
No Job Too Small
Cali: 940391-8669
Home: 9404584992
Lea's
Old Timey
Berber Shop
Downtown Sanger on
the Square. Specializing
in seniors and working
men. Senor discount on
Wednesdays.
94M82-8333
Lawnmower and
Small Engine Repair
Franklin's Fix It
$mall Engine Repair/
Chains & Blades
sharpened
Robert Franklin
940-765.3402
tail57robertQaol.00m
4598 Lois Rd East
Serlger, TX 76266
Full Service Plumbing.
Master Plumber dM-20028,
Licensed and Insured. 25
years experience. Reason-
able rates, free estimates.ww Call 940-231-2598, w.
sangerplumbing,com. Mas-
terCard &Visa accepted.
SUBSCRIBE TO THE
BANGER NEWS AND
GET '1 MONTH FREE[
One-year subscriptions
are just $23 per year)
Subzcnbe now and get
ONE MONTH FREEI
To start, call
940.453-8515, email
uuager�kmmslxablcatiom.com
ors lop by our office at
412 Bolivar St. in
downtown Sanger
�nan t
Ag zl nog) 111 Ap g1
FRANK SCAM, OWNER
940a367a5404 HV.
—
2 Busy and Can't Find The Time?
Keep Us on Your Mindl
Lfierk Ls
mt eo � Sarrdr•a Su•ift
(940) 783.8152
Krum. Texas
Serving North Texas
e meld4ucs.sandraQemall.com
r
Your Source For
Bearings �� Belts
Oil Seals A. Roller Chains
Industrial Bearing Co.
4312 W. Hwy 82 a Gainesville
940-665.6971
FENCE PIPE AND SUPPLIES
23/8-27/8-31/2-41l2-51l2
Domctl Caps &Springs
Syuare & Rectangle'llfbing
All
'1)'pesofSteel �Amlxxi,J
C•Pm•lin iL7fAi
Round Bale Rings Cattle Gnarls
feed Troughs Crcepe Feeders
'ff•ailer Parts &Supplies
940.759.2203 SINCE 1942 MUENSTER, TX