07/01/2002-CC-Agenda Packet-RegularAGENDA
CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, JULY 19 2002
7:00 P.M.
201 BOLIVAR
1. Call Meeting to Order, Invocation, Pledge of Allegiance.
CONSENT AGENDA
2. a) Approve Minutes: June 17, 2002
b) Disbursements
3.
4.
5.
6.
Citizen's Input.
Conduct First Public Hearing on Proposed Annexation of the Front portion of Rising Star
Lane (Street), Being 0.646 acres situated in the Henry Tierwester Survey.
Consider and Possible Action on Presentation from the Keep Sanger Beautiful Board
Regarding Recycling.
Consider and Possible Action on Presentation from the Keep Sanger Beautiful Board
Regarding the TXDOT Grant.
7. Consider and Possible Action on the Preliminary Plat for Quail Run, Being 380 Residential
Lots and 2 Open Spaces out of 82.43 Acres Located off of Cowling Road.
8. Consider and Possible Action on Ordinance #07=19=02 - Regarding the TXU Gas Distribution
Rates.
9. Consider and Possible Action on Ordinance #07-18-02 -Amending Building Permit Fees.
10. Consider and Possible Action on OrdinanceDe-Annexing Property Legally
Described as A1024 R. Prather, Tract 2, Being 12.25 Acres. Property is Located on
11.
fF
13.
Consider and Possible Action on Board Appointments.
EXECUTIVE SESSION: In Accordance with Texas Government Code, Subchapter D,
Section 551.074 to Discuss Personnel.
a) City Manager Evaluation,
RECONVENE into
f
and
Action, if Any, on Items Discussed in
Rosalie Chavez, City
Date &Time Posted
This facility is wheelchair• accessible and accessible parking spaces are available. Requests for
accommodations or interpretive services must be made 48 hours prior to this meeting. Please contact the
City Secretary's office at (940) 458-7930 for fiuther information.
MINUTES: CITY COUNCIL
June 17, 2002
PRESENT: Mayor Tommy Kincaid, Councilman Jimmy Evans, Councilman Joe Higgs,
Councilman Andy Garza, Councilman Glenn Ervin, Councilman Mike James
OTHERS
PRESENT: City Manager Jack Smith, City Secretary/Assistant City Manager Rose Chavez,
Assistant City Secretary Samantha Renz, Electric Superintendent Mike Prater,
Shelley Ruland, Carol Martin -Roberts, Ralph Cain, Dale Keith Roberts, Jack
Richardson, Jane Richardson, Norman Williams, Jack Cannon, Roger Hebard
1. Mayor called meeting to order, Councilman Garza led the Invocation, Councilman
Higgs led the Pledge of Allegiance.
CONSENT AGENDA
2. a) Approve Minutes: June 3, 2002
b) Disbursements
Councilman Garza moved to approve the Consent Agenda, Councilman Higgs
seconded. Motion carried unanimously.
3. Citizen's Input.
None,
4. Appoint Mayor Pro-Tem.
Councilman Higgs moved to nominate Andy Garza, Councilman Evans seconded,
Motion carried unanimously.
5. Appoint Board Members to
Councilman Ervin asked why Jack Richardson was being removed from Planning and
Zoning.
City Secretary indicated she would like to discuss it with him after the meeting.
Councilman Ervin also asked the City Manager.
City Manager explained that staff had been asked to place it on the agenda.
Mayor indicated he asked for him to be removed.
Councilman Ervin asked that Jack Richardson be put back in place 6, in place of Tracy
Murphree.
Mayor explained that in the past when an individual has gone against the City,
Woodrow Barton for example, that person has been removed from the boards.
Councilman Ervin indicated that Mr. Barton had filed a lawsuit against the City and
asked if Mr. Richardson had done so.
Mayor indicated in his opinion, Mr. Richardson had every right to his opinion
regarding the pending lawsuit, but he signed an affidavit that was very damaging to the
City.
Discussion continued regarding the appointment.
Councilman Garza indicated he felt he was not aware of the situation and felt it
shouldn't be discussed if it is regarding current litigation. He felt he should have
received more information and would like
Councilman Ervin moved to postpone the board appointments.
City Secretary asked the Mayor to at least appoint Gail Goodner to replace Mark
Bulger, we need to get one more member on the board, because we have not been able
to get a quorum.
Councilman Higgs moved to put Mike Lawler in her place.
Both motions died for lack of seconds.
Councilman Higgs indicated Janeice Newton and Helen Giese were both recommended
by the Beautification Board the last time there was an opening. He felt Janeice Newton
should be appointed instead of Jennifer Noah.
Discussion.
Mike James moved to approve the appointments with the following changes, that on the
Beautification Board, Janeice Newton be appointed instead of Jennifer Noah and to
appoint only one Planning and Zoning member and that it be Gail Goodner.
Motion died for lack of second.
Councilman James moved to table this until the next meeting. Seconded by Councilman
Ervin.
City Manager asked that they at least appoint one member to the Planning and Zoning
Commission.
Discussion.
Jack Richardson indicated as Chairman of the Planning and Zoning he was aware there
was a need for another member and requested that they appoint at least one member
to the planning and zoning commission.
Motion failed unanimously.
Councilman Garza moved to approve everything with the change to the Beautification
Board and the exception of Place 6 on Planning and Zoning, and discuss it at a later
date. Councilman James seconded. Motion failed 3 to 2. Councilman Ervin, Higgs and
Evans voted No.
Councilman Higgs moved to go as planned except Mike Lawler instead of Gail Goodner
and Janeice Newton instead of Jennifer Noah, and leave Place 6 as is until next time.
Motion died for lack of second.
Councilman Evans asked Jack Richardson if he wanted an answer tonight.
Mr. Richardson indicated it didn't matter to him.
Shelley Ruland, member of the Planning and Zoning Commission, 206 Tejas, indicated
Jack Richardson does a good job on P & Z, he does his homework, shows up for the
meetings, and makes good decisions. He was nominated and each of the Council voted
for him when he was appointed. She felt if they did not reappoint him it should take a
motion out in the open.
Mayor recommended each nomination be voted on individually.
Councilman Garza moved to
Ginger Burt to Place 2 on the Planning and
Zoning Commission, Councilman James seconded. Motion carried unanimously.
Councilman Garza moved to appoint Gail Goodner to Place 3, on the Planning and
Zoning Commission, Councilman James seconded. Motion carried 4 to 19 Councilman
Higgs voted no.
Mayor asked for a vote on Tracy Murphree in Place 6 on the Planning and Zoning.
A motion was not made.
Councilman Ervin asked that Jack Richardson be put back in Place 6.
Mayor indicated Jack Richardson was already there.
Councilman Ervin asked if Jack Richardson would stay in Place 6.
Mayor indicated he would.
Councilman Garza moved to appoint place 2, 4, and 6 as recommended on the Board
of Adjustments, Councilman James seconded. Motion carried unanimously.
Jay Parr -Place 2
Charles Fenoglio - Place 4
Joe Falls - Place 6
Councilman James moved to appoint Rene Escobedo, Place 2 and Reappoint Penny
Juarez, Place 4, on the Parks Board, Councilman Garza seconded, Motion carried
unanimously.
Councilman Higgs moved to appoint Janeice Newton, Place 2 and Reappoint all other
members to the Beautification Board. Councilman Evans seconded. Motion carried
unanimously.
Councilman Higgs moved to reappoint Francille Sullivan, Beverly Howard, and John
Springer to the Library Board. Councilman Evans seconded. Morion carried
unanimously.
Councilman Higgs moved to reappoint all of the Sullivan Center Board Members,
Councilman Evans seconded, Motion carried unanimously.
Mayor advised Jack Richardson was still on the board.
6. Consider and Possible Action on Final Plat for Eagle Park, Phase II. Property is
Located on F.M. 455,
Item Tabled.
7. Consider and Possible Action on the Preliminary Plat for Quail Run, Being 380
Residential Lots and 2 Open Spaces out of 82.43 Acres Located off of Cowling Road.
Item Tabled.
8. Consider and Possible Action on Ordinance #06-15-02 - De -Annexing Property Legally
Described as A1024 R. Prather, Tract 2, Being 12.25 Acres. Property is Located on
F.M. 455.
City Manager indicated the Trusty's came and wanted to put in a subdivision. This is
in Bolivar's CCN, and they have gone to Bolivar and the expense is to great for them
to develop. They have requested to be de -annexed.
Councilman Higgs indicated someone should explain to her that she will not get water
if she is de -annexed.
City Secretary explained that she will be de -annexed eventually. The city cannot
provide her service. She can get it de -annexed if she brings in a petition, she was
voluntarily annexed.
Councilman Higgs asked again that someone speak with her regarding the water
service and advise that there is a better chance of her receiving service if she is in the
city limits.
Discussion.
Item tabled.
9. Consider and Possible Action on Ordinance #06-16-02 -Amending Plat Review Fees
and Establishing a Fee for Review of Construction Plans.
Mayor indicated this was the Engineer's costs, this will cover his review fees.
Councilman Evans moved to adopt Ordinance #06-16-02, Councilman Higgs seconded,
Motion carried unanimously.
10. Consider and Possible Action on Ordinance #06-17-02 -Regulating Portable Buildings.
Councilman James moved to adopt Ordinance #06-17-02. Councilman Evans seconded.
Councilman Ervin indicated he would like to have the City Attorney look at it.
Motion amended to have City Attorney approval, Councilman Evans seconded.
Motion carried unanimously.
11. Consider and Possible Action
the Sewer Easement on Ray Stevens Property.
City Manager indicated instead of $105,000 it calculates to about $77,000.00. He visited
wA th Mr. Stevens and Mr. Stevens' feeling was that $1059000.00 was a reasonable
figure. Mr. Smith indicated that he had called a person that does condemnation work
for another Governmental entity, he said the attorney fees and court fees, along with
the appraisal would be $10,000.00 and he felt that 1.4 acres would probably settle at
$10,000.00 for a total cost of about $20,000.00.
Councilman Evans indicated they should offer him $12,500.00.
Councilman Garza indicated if you offer him $15,000.00 the City will still save
$5,000.00.
Discussion among the Council.
Roger Hebard, indicated he liked the idea of giving Mr. Stevens $15,000.00 or a figure.
He was amazed that Mr. Stevens was reluctant to let the sewer line go in. They would
like them to make a motion to offer him the money, but that if he does not take it to go
ahead and proceed with condemnation.
Discussion.
Councilman James asked what the engineer's recommendation was on the best way to
sewer the property.
City Manager indicated the planned line is the engineer's recommendation.
Discussion
Councilman Evans moved to offer Mr. Stevens $12,500.00 and if he doesn't accept it,
to start the Condemnation. Councilman James seconded. Motion carried 4 to 1,
Councilman Higgs voted no.
12. Consider and Possible Action Regarding an Agreement for Electric Service From Wal-
Mart to the Elevated Storage Tank.
Councilman James moved to accept it, Councilman Evans seconded. Motion carried
unanimously.
13. Meeting Adjourned.
�L�CO�
�'-i, t..L'"T Mrs. S.'?' riOP
.. E.M.=
vf
��D(t i ,p,i f �� wk
1, W{4 .� i'.2 w ._f. _,'" 6.F. »f t..,, �._._:': ( GR
JIL
.`. t;._.
{F0R ::��r�7 t�IvLf'�� ii !(a�.tA_.:.!_f��` L��inE�i� �`,''�anl�.;#
1 '(F.I' ;jk 4nik 65
f_C f?4 f€ {( f jU '_'i"z1.' i
c. r; C rr FUrr'' t r> < LnLs i `� Cifr,k'4 r ,I,';€
(J_i�11JOR TOTALS, Ce�: •.t iS= Fi ..•r. s 1 � U.
AEll lJ'ii `.'7:I
r
[ d.'.Cir''Cil'E? `:Cvt Li���
_ .. ii tip _ �.r IC``;���T1� .v�at�l 0..sr-, .7ry
! 1 E 9!—,, ^I`: i fefl iR Q r : _:r `tC t��r'C:!�.7.'a: ;r�•k,
s'F
i["n97 ;,liy_ .:` - 3 r{{ E NO.
['( �x �i j�"v v i ;ynnTTP P'} tt ';1 3
:„ :tI w'. �i`L i_FE R'UL'.._. EH . iLt Gvf'E •..'f iiM
Cry#_n A1F 1e EE'i I`y'
q9 , EY'vl T-1 SEA[ i
't .�a_G..� :'3. f_�•: tls_� r i'z Ut.�, t'4 11 ,— _;. ��, . � �a_. �. •
5—€{ I 0
. k C fir. C(�C"`� fir# ki,*!"✓r {r}�. ir. —` 't. Ek_t
f:S P,Jle.
iV'=`:f 1 {®1z=1 J; : t: t _j€i:t a i lisG� fi� 1 f I E ,u `E . 1i= .fie HGR
Gm 1(( �'" ji f l 's Ct"r`Eni 1` nj 's U
t;,i,,,r: r.,:r,._='i`7c '"�i'a= #k'. •;:v,xir v,iA..,41�.i,�:!.-f�. P"[z"iM1.'k-;
UPLY
rip;
T�rl
lal°im �rwi:f�tlt`-1T
Vitt f 'k F
ij�i
n0, 4 m
1L_„•�t
lilt?€1rI
�Ctn
97
CLF'ri'
Tj,l
S PPI {.. GQ
'Jv
CLf.7CIN
'NG
S LIL'1 Lv
43
e
li
U EAN
`(
.0
"i,U
i1I., D"
l.z
i:!ril.:t3
VENDOR
TOTALS
e""!z" 0580
C.tNTAS COM
492
#i! 4Jll% jt
'm� DD TOWELS
Yf''i!:!.L
S.e 4141
ab
VENDOR
TOTHALC
w(EDOM SECIL'= NCE
Phil`#t �. Ei�C !"iTti4.IF L:� LIT
of e u=C T
�N�m
E•Jr I JrrL wJ
RCC, CHECK
C44 .. L.. < i 'oil.i t,1T
7RE MT RAT I ON'
a.
S Pier U r:6tJlc .C`tSvle_J ! OUR 'OL..?:L= G vil 910d R
ICA IT
VENDOR TEOT^LLl
J REC. CHECK
a:ll� GUMOH` rp F' ,� rrRl t10
E"FF}{pi�L91 G°�C3 R 7t�'�=�'�
it F�:� IE { rt
a3 it {T
4.1 ?' ii l�F I'C1iS(
r%JI. i
i {i
"
1,{NEFM
Jw1
l f `.,.
c6t°'�Lr
;NY�i��:l O�1i.}R ~RA1o� d -3:7 �
E FF__ ( ii ll'' ((''�� ��(( Clf .t'b 5
41) �,. 1`tt.v� tJ� !i'4 F Yiit�l..itale
a �7a
JJ
{tIfk JMUM
U i
rorl r Lit JflC. RM �
`�'30 CiC:R
i:.l
C f P'MEN I REPORT
1^.}7
DO;t?h¢ VENDOR :;ECOEt'dCE
VENDOR ITEM NOA DESCR{PHON Lf� F; !CHECK `ETffT DiJ" UT GKoQm
DICK DT NILANCE
1Si 1i 45 ffl I f ', t (I�j� r' 1 ,'''7!"
It. RVIA.Ir.f.C_E
ij i L ACCOUNT ENUIUIIN l 0`vil
z;IJ w'9`:la1 i 2wL`0t4!1!t"f `5 CA _._i}a
1�1 t4,},.r..:,n..��.� CARDS VINCE �i,t`.DH
OiL PC:Oi1it4T O10UN1
7 , 0J9 BUSINESS CARD: V INICE
irf Vitt TRIALS'
i_J (tie.,Js 411» 6-t —J
�t¢s�Jk
a 0jC0 CUE:TO i PLAYER DE"G. 01'
!idV M23 !UAL DIB9O P 7fEt2lrii 2 � ljl
,'L C!s;:! OLC° T Pi OI �iT 4C�,"�. 00
'in1 d�. =rc3w.
VENDOR TOT Rl l REO: C-"i l; CC. e 10
DCI, 0Er
O€,TP dUMNMS f Ufiv15 i;'111
,.
' $$;<tr�AN. iL�jU rMl 1f "l". I1'2� 7
L Ill c Ct>tl N T Fit'IOUN i 112
¢
c }. ¢tmi! 113l.d LT5 U11
n,ENIU
CO
D{=ILDE:R } "i't€.Bali `{
A.MV
4f
Klh
f ^`"r er r. ... �i f KH
L:`L ALEOUKa i
HIS IWI-54250
VENDOR TOTALS`
i�r10L!Ni
17, J5 LOIS G PLUNGER
REG, CHECK
Ir'If�!�"c of
PA`t'irfEkill Ut.;Ti`12ING
DiCCUl1%!T
UlcR
40E, O'0CR
7 e C�;tl:R
L t, �vIL•r{ 1,;'i; fjll
Chi' .h•:3 r
VENDOR
D4iN K:
VEt 11ID -
.i Ll i<i:J�t
N F
t�L.i'� i}�iv
N
DESCRIPTION
!f l��t,it_r� 1`a
Ted![! 1C<<i;'t
DU''r.'G
G/L ACCOUNT
001 2 4`1523,5j
VEill D 0R T 0 IT rALG
PAYMENT REPORT
r, ;i Ut{ `•`•i lE"C
NK CHEC€l STAT DU" DT
DISK w T1
A; CUP i,
lcle,'i DUES
!' M CHECK
,1S--i 108 Cth
NV .arj6Z I EG L/NiBLIC NOT ICE 629"' R
tj l L CCCOUNIT 11'ri"JUN i
t 1C 512 'l ?is 'E.G d4 NOTICE
i?i4�r; : �I—:.Ica:�f �{�[ J'�� :.�I�ALiF�,'�L TG
11I0R 'i :.ji'; `i it 1 rrf %_i.: ftif.t C.
VENDOR TOTALS Rr E CHECK
t:_HO170 DIVERSIFIED INSPECTIONS
INIV >.0345+S ANNUAL SAFETY iNS ECTTlONS GRt
G/L ACCOUNT A;. OURl T
a'r —.
rC-: w, IILN,i LL? t UCL H WI CI`t Izi�C C.TIC S €
RU5•`. Rirt'i'IrLN UUiSIH UIN'r
U
SAL4CN DISCOUNT
r �:Cx City
1
i.vFc
,0
iNla
r7?,
`:'E�dia1CR "i`UTR,i 5 REGa 1ai;��L:�{
S 7 u.'.rv:lr !�I'
JWl TOI7
CALL'
IS
ING
1 ':�t!
`.fa�tl;
`•
��}!�
�Pr�'
;'vi-Ci { 61t"iw
SPEAKER
is
VENDOR
1 UTI`,L S
'.3F�_,Vlit
0
'GE
i iWINFUTAL.
INN
"CIE
fGh12 P,
DENTAL
PLAN
GIL
CtUCCLINT
1
j010,M:i lr`4,,i)
ii1 U'i. ti
T'o"'q! S
,tH,ift{
C 'J
PEG, Cr `_ ...
IL KlffAL PLAIl'
RECa .,tiECK
E [ is i_[ �3fIL•ra
�_`aLsi:
�r=•.
C,U S.:
4$. s{rE�;s
•aG:,.R
x
h� F- .. r r !
1-2` " Cilr..4c Pt
n !t
1pypi tit
F v l'' !
Vic, r l i
:v00
VEIIaMilR bW:
Y'3 i''r,Ks
VENDOR
=1 ENC
VENDOR
16 01 f'ioli
i�CCCRIF' ON'
�;�a I
CHECK;
C € �t i DUE D 1
GROSS
CS
DISC DT
irqL Piz CE
Ca- 11100
GOODYEAR
WHC'1.CCALC TIRE
INN�s tit;_!_
t-l.—,•��r, t�p, t- !. 1E� T' R
FC�JICRIUA�i/H�E�'�7"/i�t1,� t id'Eal'3;�
f3`�lGt59
;", —3 'O'E 2R10 i
tS ! F's�C�h.Jk.�L
r`�la..t. rro•:
A�`IV ,�GGJ'
L AC:IaEJtUN{ AMOUNTf
2�_
0 E0I yoP{_®.�^�+'�C�
�_
n.-3
`'i6a
C't.:,`5 01R i
w�
i^
)-p iTIES
ElEAGf i-'t..i.7�.i! f eiRi 7 j I E
u
.Cater,_
VCt= DOR Omr, PLC
REG'
Cliil- ;r,
lbol/L
Al BUNT
3a 810
DUIN`'u' T EH boLi,VICE
VENDOR
TuTALC
REC;.
Ci';rml
LU
INV
11.4750
AN! NU L
T ARL
IGNB
rj'_ii
i`M•iNE:
.!
r;E,,E:C1
tdT;iJlt'i
/y'•aJ
E}
Ni' UAL
IS0FT :ARC.
�i{'�IN
,
Y(
'�i1Rl✓Il
x L L�vt �E,Ei
tLi.JLlla
g ,1 jnCC,L,.rlG1�'LIC CCU,
S tI! -e r—l/ M„JAE j �j UP
Y JG_EJF tf{�dt 4B it
it
-wyl4 ' P
I t`;V I-T tr9%.�v"rvtl .I. iY Ey HI1rL D t NM21
C/j_ PC?"OI IN i itNoU T
t_1 t C7 rw;n - 1 i .lit
liiEtFJICti'3U7 Pib
ul:U�UN i
i t'fl
i'I kA
�lii Ci
t''�CR
€»Ea it=FrE
414a
1�
41f,,1�CR
AIF' RAYMFNT REPORT
�ArE; G
VENDOR L Tslll
i111lfu+i l { t1 d3
—,, r-
4�C'+� cr_:•_�i';L�
µv1 iJ4t�..4A»z�
VENDOR TA N Af 4`s
l aDOR SEQUENCE
RAH1; CFiE U% C;TAI LIUL C] I
RgSCDT
C, LA!
U. 07
iCRCtvE
ALAa CE
REea. Ci" C{. fi 'q L(�'t�t, C`P
� p •KA t 4
M 57FARtj20 SEAL BEAM, HEADLIGHTNER" R 7/01 o {f
El
6;'tt+,'10 JC - i id t
tin w�irG682+ rf i_ STEERING P IN.rl./FIi•=, s IB,;';
�.I•:`i ,J ::.�.!a. �. �-`�:�LR �J{Lhi?'; i�ti" �. i,'r: tinRF�L�4�.�% Ci__
GIL ACCOUNTA'r11�J(T C�`q i_=Ae:'r;
it �jif "`(=,_.i .•-,r. err` M POWER=STEERI ``= PuE ,IlYmi%fl1R{'I0P C
VEM'Mi, f. R { V f YYI.. ram! '.:i EEi;lt
L j e 'I.t
`E _
(�
E�M-: ��?t't}tit'd
'r,t �^11.t !! a:y -'r• t,w �•="•-R,dr
�t�i'il.}C:.�F
F t P�,�.s
=?M''rM�:3
P
�
t`%
i.'AC..
,.1`'d GC
::�KU�:i7�T/RAR
_`
GIL
ACCLUNT,
A 0U N {
�_ib�3u
�4i....7lss1C
titi
CIIH�.MCAE='
L..L
L�...L+E4i{rtt�lE.�l..•liti{%L�`ri
VENDOR flUTALS
RE;,
CHEC=:
iM` Y C °0, M=1ULCH/CFAAE MURiM_E5
7it� ACC NT
C J
VEMdi;1OR TOTALS
AM�C'�MdT
'0� !LIU CH/CIR orb i°; J':Eiro�:?
REGa CHECK
R'AY(iE'i'�T
�ISCCE�NT
�uu: ar��Cc
Lill
lTCIAND1NG
Ji, 4�is�
fNir..L Im' 61c r'i'i I./P PPY' ENT PFFJF)ri
VENDOR CET t C#....
F•{!,(C'%_y1, (({�G'i il�"r,�,'= �}Ct.I (( IUC{'�i! ("' 4
YV I' Ll Lm IiLr i � li 1.',1:l iit 4i�lL[r(t =' fT 'UE +I
tiHC DT
'i��,0 LOU"' v ClM! Ft.liu, #
IPU CC 4 L i /t1iECtL/CLl`��i'i�' i f102t`
G/L ACCF IJtt1T F, i i ii T
V5 fl� �=l rM1 etl.a^ {'L i i rr
t _ 5 5L.. _ 1 i E z LCi &t : ,� {TERCC� EI C �
VEND t'R T0TALrot CCC. CHECK
vA I` ,iETC.CFLEX QLI �!�EYIi f`;
rd" t T U i'€ E lEx"IDtEi'aC mi R is %;m
r /L AICC '`! NT IA'i!' i I
L' —�4 ,, ' 07='5 UI ILI TY MC;OIB T
I1lfs ; I f 7 LEGAL
FOR "a'. 51 EN' EME��T t"ii'IB� f i' r a/L? �1;,
C/L ACCCUN I Cai OUINI T
t. i_iJF;L FOR J 1 EA � K IN .»N
c.•7: T..(U ii !� LW III L
I'! 'e�34`i
L=t 4ifl_l7 Irsh'_ GN
G/L ACCiO1UINIi FII'�lE�`vE 't l'
`{!i.jl '7 wle• ( UiN Ir-IK
MOM TOTAL b CEC, CHECK
Cr`L ACCULiT
�t I t"34"503a:
4tE11�t�C T�J`€ ICL'C
Fri i0L�F1 I
t a i aw,33 POOL G_:-Px S
Ice •€t
CEC: _�L.•M1t
vita#T��i !'ik''q D i. iit_7
ALCs�IEE C)Isc0tltil
14
Ji=!lII
i;'tlwaY=4I:�`a ia�i�_r=�=Ia�CC
IyiGa!=.111='E
7Lt,
Jf='
7 v.
vi4�ti
r'.aa
..14
7•�,
,� i�,�a
m1�:C�
ij F:ulaC�t
ya= ;lyl
M1? x I�F1
(' AGG
VFNDO
i
tJBIDlr 1Ttiir011r, DESCRIPTION DA P
CIaC
I T11 6; t E [ I)i
if V .,.J334 >WLl7fli., clLil't 11_•E 1.71qMI
' 101 i — Z4i„'.�_5 F t9 e 66 LEGAL ',ER iY bC
ll ! �` 4e t c 47 is CT]RIV r
VENDOR TOT AL.54
.✓�-b�`�`',Ui i�� .: CA TIL}.J
lVIDICE MAIL GNIB99 R 7/02 2"1"iNT'
`=,=F e"Jir. � �.�J J. 7G_r FdOKE 114 tZL
00 VOIL it
F LS; RE
u r = Cu
1. cH ,:_ UNMII �Pos i WI_E i'.: �C H INE '0160T �l{,I,,..'3 R ?
NT
;:`Ki.} I.'},.,,,ah,1J—,t„i ! LEASE !j.5 I Liisi i.3L V'I�iG�'1�.IiC.UENIDOH TOTALS; REPEt CHECK
"f, F
�'f E...:'�i:'"�
f,k. -�1D LCiAi_ MvUA1`F`
tyi �:3 -r1I0 1 s.
1) E IN D0 R I0 T Five;
Uj9—i02'1410 RADIO
SHACK
HO)
56821
BATTERY *2,:,.v94`t
�33ii IJIII
L
[;�ii'�l4di.,.f
,t8t I�Z'
�v.if
REG,
u•EiEC!l
f?Y �LtJ� it f f!:.iLf L�f'vtr
�c :tr BFii IERY r. --144
GriC`RJ
I10E_�lNCE
c
C
itgEt'"r�;Fly
-•� � t�F.i tZ c �r�
Cif€
GI CtJUI~!T
lci j
4t���:%Ell4.l
i_'e art a�rft
rrq�R.T AGE
�....21, i U,i,r 02a 4t. PiTI fbT I-ri i i i0Kff i"e._�
r
BAttl¢(€ VENDORVENDOR�>=�rn,
Lli.t!F�;E
i t!a . cC € U BAtdit CHECK ECK `TAT D11E U E GRID Co aAYt` T O E T STA '1C NU
DISE DT BALANCE CrSGCutit °€
VENDOR TOTAU.3 Uc 9
c.rG 3Vr0121
3T-0842"_'i RELIABLE <.;i F CE S;LIF'1-'L1EU
qq pl'iy 3IGGEt: iyy']]'',1f. €� {{ i1'AIyIR} G('. ic�yy``}} i�"„' 'j "/2' 1: 47 7 R
L E'i� u1`i.tl',iV.t L�.iYI�14..i� i,l tt'{.L t1 4]�L?7� Yt i��LJ!.�FjL ..#S�`K� �te cif �w It
G/L ACCCUNi z47
G1 iril L111 1. fi LE? EEIR �,HH1
�V YlOL70t�ttn �1? R CR r41,'! P� i i V
IF;4 u:,..+ LJ.UP/TiA„P�iti,T�E. ; ,r_r,fCrit GRL�U A
L ACCUJC' I !'it'':iiulff ryry(} i ¢ r [) p I 1i sElu
EIf0CI 156--521�'s 17Z „pT= DI bill A" tt�'(`kj`U PAF'EFdrlCHAIR
1'E DOH i €.T {LS REG: tA I'CCK 2 ja'C uu;a 4 R 2Ea
w:,C"% C,LL=
oG uc2 cR1Ny 24 S I,RE riGg CLAMPS sES yN1 U i 102/=002 Go
j-,t �fE ?I,s: C.i: .ri F\vLi JIUZ I L.�I ir3 vC:`t17
t t D 0 if,n(S R�jE �Li Ir i;=F
,i�: :l T..t E:"!.mu (IL.»z f.ei �iE�l�Y :`+.JaDiv L�
LI vRf Jv
3✓-IL.l..r .. 71r:� E GL�.!`!t t tt i
it�J 17 71 9 SUr IWr;FtEv MAT ER DEPT. FUGES0 U GN239 R 7! a2/E�0 0 b UG'E�,16�
i'�a is hiu'_,I�Q.?�
�ar t^.0 LIVi, Vt ...® ! ;5 {r i LF'�•2' t^1Crt"' i_!
s u ad= o; emu; IF;At t I' n F i s /. utES i,....
f"ESE,. 1 n, : €t t:.fiRL WATER Dc{- f , r t L1SEo CiCk_
VE��D0R, T0TALSit REiz (a=iECtt }Ct�,1m= 5E 9: iGCR
14
t ! 70 51.RiLCHTE 1 iNi EIR i RE'N' JIB
jl iS ''p /GfCi lrt .1 ri Eta S_ esi C°' G "4l i w C
'282 AL1111 F al,.E it/CAC FUNIT CAR G U° �ti 7/_�/E�_ irv1,1G l ti, b
G/L AC`UGU`CI AMOUNT 1912 IG
i1 e.,Ccui 191,IG PALM PRINTER/CFi'wn F'%INI CARDb
VE
u1LEn lei l_U �LEUZ �i1Lt,Yi bC i31=lb 1'�a:lIR l ivl
4
PAP P€iYMFMT REPOR!
l'Iv(4IMI GEC'UPNCE
K. }1t'�IiUf !IL{'1 ItUii ilLbUf4W1SUN
fit'•
Ef: i
{{--i�"k_4"`
}•[�'f�5'�
i4lL
PcLi1i t'd
'Et4 5.11 S„f
t
k
1
"i'�• � i�'
{i
Div
{
TO
: ti-1C10
r}UrC}f6L� �l` f PL �
W(p�lj, f� 'f! E��/'i E{ SS T
L'f'�tV(i Eat (C..kwkl J ri P UL L! E
DISK E°i
Fii'iu!1r: i
88
LUING
ID I%` i:ilaUL
ate!:
i 15
8 t`
LOtd1. ll�
DI%mJI
L ,44lu,g
I ':
L t fG
1 MINCE
1NC
E.gEs
GG
wU� i,7
�.Id `li"iti3C
Ent:l
C:
L.D,NG
C}iviAhk'CF:
13
L Gf it
JI4il 1 iaall
__s
Li NG
CE
li r,Nt,
}A
! ONG
MSTANCE
^,11
nr,
"-•(,fro
-,tIIJ
1eCG
P'rt.Ei'3E
Ctas91
! tflKS
at
,t`-tIHUN� 1
uEe
41
PHONES
c a
`<
<'HUNIEc
i
� M1
?had=
r�L�Il� �+; t- t� t-
141 jl: `UL1C't"i C_,r' :tip t 41i... s.�0NL�}iu f'}EFAL4'jM ST RA �D}ED tiU
L.��s Ui��r`ll�h`3i< :i�.SL3 i��';}�7� t� Et ;r'?!ir:��Usv
G(L i}LL�i€�lu� 'ii�fl�,T
11u'. G}n} URG I{EUiE ND SHOES
Y.€tNt V t.i&38 ;p ecii`Ar'1,11r11~E
TlAn.snCr-n -=f,
UlI99
friFz-;`•i?�..f•G�:;t(�•-:
G.
G/L PC}�,�gJrk�i
P?�iC}Ci�li
00un c'C__-c7b
{.S EW v.EC,! •iJ}JJ
'ii
L.fl T ..l'
�r �L76jf, ri'kJ,+'S 7ttfl.4rF}D' t
,.t z •J{S`4 fi 1E"E:tivJE I t5t l'.:.fl i-7C ,i.Ait
r'Fly M"3I
r
_ ;
E�_
1iEieu?�
�k1GeC;t� Git�:E,uiiR
U� Fw`IflNEli t'<ti
�v %E1t
� i t
V EV1DOR SET
BANIU% zr
PAYMENT EFFORT
7
Ci:! .t:TPTlO'! n€r,=J': Cu`JrfK S T A i DlJE .va
DISC F
TiFxlj:s.E4 �_.4i It�'u ,rI'!i_Y EAY1�EEtF? 1 (7IA J CII�1 In af1'L}%
Gi! fICCOUN!i AliouIN
w: �, ..Sv i S0" Hpo ;rA 4 ONLY gat rI{ IRFa"t
L.::r d_.e t!i"'J Ei� J'}'ik,"i lad il�e..
r iE Y i 1� zsC r.+. r`I n
?f4 Ui, t,`Wf i�t� ��tf ULU�*5 „' �7r# Ci�'�_ R 7
c Jr t FC4 wri1}�C40CJ
iji�"..L:�»I•";�� ir-:hY'f� i'71
iC�iE�
Ni `t` yyiiit
��t,�'�
C��p
2Eii4-id ft
y- t
�rsiLE
�,�C:
iP lYia tii
t
idl�i}?
.�;�'vrr'��..;6''ii7Ce
.t, 0
.s
u!}.
t /L
H%•C0fFJC
I
f��tCiT
Srf'.,
yitj'"vii
�'t�.S.{.�j
ii_'"S Y"IIN
"}.itGLE
FSi IRS€- MTR
fl EMIDIJ}i
/?
T� ff { I":?
24`'J�`{'t!i
Ili?V
R E T
f.C'ni
TMRS;
1i
G (
Pi:EaOUNT
•:
0'G
5 14 ry
..322,
i.I �!f �
tlti44. 4 E �{•{�
I MD
}
i
(dffl
uJ
OUN e.
1
47 42:
tf
T(( it R' i
y
51 t"i
2,7
T Jl
tJ
6
l "M R"
fp'IRS
80
T 111R3
..may
...
ij
Old
z
i`:irm'
04
Tfi(5
MKC
tJo
i J
M1�4fC
'A'`T
QQ r
if`fit:.t
347x
ry
jt'j
1
ELFNCE
i,.r;Jr'ifvl
sv'u�iY �b�
3,n
.. ml..i....."r1
fp}C v Li
l�- Ftii�
iJCf { •� { H l .? [j d Inter
nrr ' PAYMENT REPORT
IIWII,R r'iI t?I1f
L Al tJ?u` `i
�iL •
�c^ir
AU {f_�
G
r�J
PLUGS
IJi uTM
R
)( / �•`'1�{
Li'fwL
!IH'sr
IlVU
t.F ,:,;'ARR
[Sj_LI
.f+9
G; E
ACCOUNT
AMUUN T
73
SPA.,
-k��3
Y'MU115
:Silt
:
fir
.1 s
I tm
'dsp�';iG�°i
€CiAiwC
{cC.
CrELft
e!
aOtL
DEP
rR
A US
..y F'
4 J tP?
Ji tin
Lt.
`.
u
t ! L A :E.CUUKI
Air1CUIN
--y,-.-
�,.+��%f,
t
Jlu_�t��
11r
V ND0R
I0TAL
RECx
CHEk R
54
01
r
- r r
EPAIR A
C..-__
R
10C. €�_:.
i"tla�.J
¢ J.,it
iE.fF
s_
..:9i
:J�+�ttA
TRANSFORMERVENDOR
=JJJ JO"`JJv:)
:�Pi]: •:r _+
¢+, f,rl-{'}tt
TOTALS
itt ltlll�it
R.'K':.7 •JU �..
Ill It ...:
i"1ltL
t 4.{_•a
.�_
V ZYBo'1R
EC`4ALE
tEC.
!:1Fi€4
rt LN T CU 131 HNIt) I 4G
AI: i;sCaG NT
11 E':C: R G ilk
0CA
!1, i±ikl
4l: 4li<'
�i:t: �.'�� w�i: ��•iW i.�
r,.. .-: t cis, ✓ PM
UTJ
PAYMENT RPORT
46F1 EjOG }EGLiE ! f.
MINI k142,7't 01(my VOLUME C44AH /DDIANIE CHARGE GUR99 R 7/ta0/c G
t L ACCOUNT
n „+!>.
v VOLUME '4.[iAi4€..�C.f Hk11€ NI` C:IPME..
fFt( {b / DEli'A€` D CMA G"
!)FN =iOR TOTALS IE Gz Id L.
zitJ � i�d•`
URGE SfJG BE GOi' L /rl I®w";sl
GIL
i'{i:ta0UNIT
h!'tUuINI
;r i:.'..+G,R
i7
f
-t
5ti`!`=
�
i€
C�
L:'E
€.7� �N w
..�a
aiG!b
fwx
PAS
tJrivaty
Binll.7
Lt_
!1Ot;c_
;:aG:"JGC�
�.
CAGE
BUG
BE
GONE
n!t jR
Br
t„�i,i�;i�'.
�a!
..3
Pt
�v.•' i
�i":._ 4J
Acte.j
?•ai 1.
f�1.a€�
__�.
GUN!"
JWNt
k;:
:jJ,- rLI
W�
fCIM C
,LilG
K
Gsli L
.t:i.
LiL ii
v
GOME
'Y
'•fir
rl7 ' E . Hr ;t
li
x+
't =mii
:.�, �•
4C,'�li ALL+
?i t'
t t
G={
C`!"+>"•
,URI
t, s
f~4i�i
{'ti,''••��yt[
*� i f S:
IimR!�GL_?Li"tGRi'ii
t ! trn Ott=
zr=�t
wad.
C.GtiYiL
€1E!:<<4i'i
TOTEiLS
n
ir~fi E I(A! R`�_
t. i AILS
I ��Ll:.tl
k i..F
�iUt I
if IN i
i'i.`
LLFi i i IL
i�-E I
iTS
{.
1001
z w
LEATHER
OCH'Al
1MINT
c
A R,
t w�reJ
_! .arr �znE
R?
d€,
tiROSS
1:i-�Lf�t�GC
€€�GGG313
G; tG t, 1G
i n—
i�
II
?Cio E�L`t
rr� .�a C�1 Ji w.•ki
,fa,, ti eJ1EaiY
£• w
CiLi e "eu
Vie 1�?!1
t
F:— °P, ?litV.';' t4ir� !�(P F'AYi�EiiT nrrEfT'±
tg
TUMOR SEQUENCE
E {'�eF IT
t pp ( '['y('- -1 jE; r-'t "�' i r i-tW g''tW CIE F {"oCi
V14NDOM ITCM NUN DE•kJCt, PTIGNI Loh :i. V � ,T ilJ�. ill GROS ' L f7 t. �.i...:
"n `lm; 1 �' AUTU P:
r_r
ma>YS �t ji5 7/0cei_"L w .__w• c
'i ua 14 Ji.r e iL` Ei, Ei_�EU^::
of •'t€• OIL i"?LTL..i'{ :CaT€JW 4
VIC i CA I. 74l� €E l Pi U iL�
k'4! ,c w €b 16 (, �i'i f a i) iryi (EJI't�t
lu
I�ii_ rvk! I
OIL TER RESTO
:wt,_• ;.,r t t1 rT E RI
RESTOCK
c r-�•w^� �rP s r^ ��'r . i
'..jt?I,`"• tlL`L�v<<1L:.P �;;r? '€(I !"1E f��.R Rr•,.,;it��}
v •��n +. tLP—..- t try— rt:�rF} r^ ^imt .7w: E. I 7 t t x^;
Al"NV t:; rY R.®•JfS0t K 0 f f _: i.".I t•I. LTEa;`S Gftirrlfiir..?�: c:.^v
._.... ;} IN!
T i1Jui?!-®eV'L:
tl ,o Lt —J i
;n R L M' C1� (:1t IE'laEL r,� c.
:?. :t`.awJ Jitli-t( i"~T�1:kJ '
� Vi700?_15-.tifJ b8:(LSIC.ILlgUUi L IVIC `•C._ml Lid ,:a #1 .wo.:,•� C., _v! [tLs.#ft.tLft L€1L: reClf'UfvL i'f.L j%iv
sCi REUI€IjL €CiLf ltt(ELEfvL i SLTURS
�# ry (('''''' —1 EE 3 . 'Al '' �• S TS, 4 rr.
t�l t!_iE! u^t-.1 vx.E a?/L.•.i i s F_ FtGiJ ! � el.•I l �Jl! t C'"iv i' LL i" L L_ Lh`6
it t jVVC i _ w((c•mr c: 'a'E LUiS%,i? €rtj{ -CI o' f t.. V, r�Li Q
C�.�S.? ri?`..:1L:3 l•e.J tf L�'..• f l 7.i Le :'d i*j. UG.- i dLTE.(ie�.1
r€wn .�;A;— m _a"sCtW4 E If ?svrL�c}: rk! I:.
t'L(i fit {lTNL`:,i REC, CHECK 5Ec, tt nFca t®is.{} €a3,f;,ylCC
l= i�;f� CCLI.E COLTER
.n 3d
:: (tat. •
f =i a itl3
�+t L
f Ufa 4J�
FU
I' ` .L1T t ��t1 iaHl1L i 71f C
IL
f_N T E ik- Ci?I..�t_
CHECK4 Kul
rrriINr.lr t+ is1H
rralk'��ls:t �!ii`�+i �i''�.E tiv,j
IF III r
HNP
mHr s i:• %.iE. ttl t Li. i�i i t1e 4.?it
UY;� rr n
® +..
LA I
ALL K rub. f`C tCg/r / "i v'1:'u63
tFu Lcut�e f yC.
i'
TOTE" E'117.11S TO PRUIT,
IU lot
n— 1,1i
C{zstVRu: ��s lt,l;taI zGc,p �l
June 28, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Fr: Rosalie Chavez, City Secretary/Assistant City Manager
Re: Item #4
This is the first Public Hearing on this annexation.
This is the front portion of Rising Star Lane.
��t�u
June 28, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Fr: Rosalie Chavez, City Secretary/Assistant City Manager
The Keep Sanger Beautiful Board has two presentations to make to the Council.
Helen Geise along with John Hogue would like to address the Council regarding Recycling, and
placing recycling bins around the City.
Nel Armstrong, along with Tony Lucido would like to address the Council regarding the TXDOT
Grant.
June 28, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Fr: Rosalie Chavez, City Secretary/Assistant City Manager
Re: Quail Run
Attached is the information on this plat, you should have a copy of the plat in with your last packet.
The Planning and Zoning unanimously denied the plat based on the density and rear setback.
GENERAL CIVIL CONSULTING ENGINEER
June 102 2002
Mi. Jack Smith
City of Sanger
P.O. Box 1729
Sanger, Texas 76266
Re: Quail Run —Preliminary Plat, Preliminary Utility Layout, and Preliminary. Drainage Study
380 Residential Lots
Sanger, Texas
Final Review
Dear Ivir. Smith:
Per your request I have completed a final review of a Preliminary Plat, Preliminary Utility
Layout, and Preliminary Drainage Study as prepared and submitted by Crannel,.Crannel &
Martin Engineering for the project referenced above. My review comments are as follows:
In accordance with the current City's Park Ordinance a total of 7.60 acres of park space is
required. The plat shows a total of 9.40 acres if the City allows the developer to utilize detention
pond area as park space. This would be acceptable under the condition that the detention ponds is
designed to minimize water depth and facilitate access to adjacent park space.
In general the Preliminary Plat, Preliminary Utility Layout, and Preliminary Drainage Study
complies with City ordinances and with standard engineering practices and principles.
Before approval of the final plat for any phase of the project by Town Council, I would
sewer be evaluated relative to the potential impacts this project will have and to insure capacity
to service this subdivision.
If you have any questions or need any further information, please call me at (940) 391-4845.
Sincerely;
ark T. Owens, P.E.
General Civil Consulting Engineer
Cc: Jeff Crannel — Crannel, Crannel &Martin Engineering
9127 KING AATHUR DRIVE • DALLAS, TEXAS 75247
(214) 630.5200 •FAX (214) 630-8110
June 6, 2002
Mr. Mark Owens, P.E.
City Engineer
City of Sanger
Hand delivery to City of Sanger
�Ir. Jack Lewis, City Manager
City of Sanger
P.O. Box 1729
Sanger, Texas 76266
Ref: Quail Run Addition
Preliminary Plat
1 S` Review
Dear ✓lark,
Our office received your comments dated May 29, 2002 on June 4, 2002. tiVe revised the
drawings as follows:
General
1. i`,'o chances required
2. I�ro changes required
Preliminary Plat
1. No changes required.
2. Our detention pond is designed for 3' of water depth. There is a 1.3' freeboard
from the proposed 100 year water surface elevation to the top of spillway. We
could reduce or increase the freeboard if necessary.
:. Lot 19, Block C was adjusted to be 60' wide.
4. �Ve har•e located the water lines approximately on the drawing and dimensioned
to the property line. tiVe ruin need to excavate and exactly locate the lines during
final engineering plan preparation. �Ve will reduce the 30' wide easement once V
the lines are visually located.
�. The requested note w•as added to the plan.
6. The heavy dashed line on Lot 29, Block N has been removed. A drainage line
into the detention pond is proposed in this location.
7. Utility easements are now shown all on one lot. Some lot widths were adjusted to
account for the loss of side yard.
t��yC25
Mr. Mark Owens
VIr. Jack Lewis
June 6, 2002
Page Two
Preliminary Utility Layout
1. We will prepare a study on the existing sanitary sewer lift station. We would
prefer to make this study at the time of final engineering plan preparation. The
developer will agree to upgrade the existing lift station, upgrade the existing force
main if necessary. The developer will also agree to construct a lift station within
this development and, if possible, extend the force main too the east under the
railroad track thereby bypassing the existing lift station.
2. Water line dimensioned to the property line as measured from above ground
evidence.
Preliminary Drainage Plan
1. Line weights adjusted to provide clarity. Phase line removed from the plan.
2. Offsite drainage area map revised to show US contours.
3. Drainage table on the plan shows each drainage subarea, time of concentration,
Q100, etc. The pre -developed flow as compared to the post -developed flow is
shown on the attached "Detention Pond Design" sheet.
4. Detention pond sizing information shown on the attached "Detention Pond
Design" sheet.
The revised drawings should address all of your comments. Please review and contact
this office with any questions or other revisions. We would request that the Preliminat
Plat be placed on the next P&Z agenda.
Sincerely,
Jeff D. Crannell, P.E.
Pres., Crannell Engineering
DETENTION POND DESIGN (100yr.Storm)
PRESENT CONDITIONS
C
0.35
C1XA
1.00
i 100
7.60
Tc
20.00
Area lac)
68.00
Q100
180.88
FUTURE CONDITIONS
C
0.50
•
C1XA
1.00
i 100
7.60
Tc
15.00
Area ac)
80.40
Q 100
305.52
STORM DURATIONS
Minutes
1100
Q100 cfs)
20
7.60
305.52
30
6.00
241.20
40
5.20
209.04
50
4.60
184.92
60
4.20
168.84
70
3.80
152.76
80
3.50
140.70
90
3.20
128.64
MAXIMUM STORAGE
15 min. •Storm
Inflow
15
305.52
60
=
274,968.00
CF
Outflow
0.5
30
180.88
60
=
162.792.00
CF
Stora e
=
112,176.00
CF
20 min. Storm
Inflow
20
305.52
60
=
366,624.00
CF
Outflow
05
35
180.88
60
-- =
189,924.00
-CF
Stora e
-
176,700.00
CF
30 min. Storm
Inflow
30
241.20
60
=
434,160.00
CF
Outflow
0.5
45
180.88
60
=
244,188.00
CF
Stora e
=
189,972.00
CF
40 min. Stcrm
Inflow
40
209.04
60
=
501,696.00
CF
Outflow
0.5
55
180.88
60
=
298,452.00
CF
Stora e
=
203,244.00
CF
50 min. Storm
Inflcw
50
184.92
60
=
554,760.00
CF
Outflow
0.5
65
180.88
60
=
352,716.00
CF
Stora e
=
202,044.00
CF
60 min. Storm
Inflow
60
168.84
60
=
607,824.00
CF
Outflow
0.5
75
180.88
60
=
406,980.00
CF
Stora e
=
200,844.00
CF
70 min. Storm
Inflow
70
152.76
60
=
641,592.00
CF
Outflow
0.5
85
180.88
60
=
461,244.00
CF
Stora e
=
180,348.00
CF
80 min. Storm
Inflow
80
140.70
60
=
675,360.00
CF
Outflow
0.5
95
180.88
60
=
515,508.00
CF
Stora e
=
159,852.00
CF
90 min. Storm
Inflow
90
128.64
60
=
694,656.00
CF
Outflow
0.5
105
180.88
60
=
569,772.00
CF
Stora e
=
124,884.00
CF
�L�at
., ,. „ „ .
MARK '1 * UWES, P.E.
GENERAL CIVIL CONSULTING ENGINEER
May 29, 2002
Mr. Jack Smith
City of Sanger
P.O. Box 1729
Sanger, Texas 76266
Re: Quail Run — Preliminary Plat
380 Residential Lots
Sanger, Texas
1 sc Review
Dear Mr. Smith:
Per your request I have completed a first review of a Preliminary Plat, Preliminary Utility
Layout, and Preliminary Drainage Study as prepared and submitted by Crannel, Crannel &
Martin Engineering for the project referenced above. As you may recall a preliminary plat with
the same name was previously submitted and brought before council by a different devloper for
the same piece of property. The previous plat was never approved be cause the developer
withdrew it because the City was not going to grant a variance for 5' sideyard setbacks. My
review comments are as follows:
General
1. It is my understanding that the original zoning classification for this property before the
current zoning ordinance was adopted was SF-3 or 6,000 square foot lots and thma v
the new ordinance was adopted this property retained a 6,000 square foot lot zoning
. . .. •r nor+ n ._.
lot area of 6,000 square feet. Consequently the lot sizes shown in this plat are in
conformance with the ordinance.
accordance with the current City's Park Ordinance a total of 7.60 acres of park spac is
required. The plat shows a total of 9.40 acres if the City allows the developer to utilize
detention pond area as park space under the condition that the detention ponds is
designed to minimize water depth and facilitate access to adjacent park space.
Preliminary Plat
1. Contrary to the previous plat 8' sideyard setbacks are provided.
2. The drainage plan indicates that the detention pond is a little over 7 feet contrary to what
is shown on the plat.
MARK T. OWENS, P.E.
GENERAL CIVIL. CONSULTING ENGINEER
3. The frontage at the buminimum of line should be a minimuof 60 feet. Lot 19 Block C appears
not to meet this requirement.
4. A 30-foot permanent easement is shown along the north side of Block A. I realize that
there are two (2) existing water lines (12" Upper Trinity feed line and 12" city line)
located somewhere close to or within the proposed easement. The plat should show the
location of these two (2) lines to verify that the proposed easement will accommodate
future maintenance of these lines. A 30-foot easement may or may not be required
5. A note should be placed on the plat stating that the 20' ingress/egress easement will be
abandoned when Quail Crossing and Primrose Drives are constructed.
6. There is heavy dashed line along the south side of Lot 29 Block N that has not been
defined and which needs to be defined.
7. Three 15-foot utility easements are shown crossing Block G. Utility easements cannot be
split onto two lots and should be contained entirely within one lot. Apparently these
easement are to be used for drainage purposes.
Preliminary Utility Layout
1. Before approval of the preliminary plat by Town Council, I would recommend that an
evaluation of the capacity of lift station, forcemain and existing downstream sewer be
evaluated relative to the potential impacts this project will have and to insure capacity to
service this subdivision. I see no problem sending the plat to planning and zoning for
their review but prior to placing this plat on the Town Council agenda, I would require
that the impact study be completed per Eddy's and my satisfaction.
as previously stated the 12" waterlines should be accurately shown.%There is a 7'
dimension shown but it is difficult to determine what the dimension is referring to.
Preliminary Drainage Study
1. It hard to differentiate between phase lines and drainage area delineation lines. It help my
evaluation if this could be clarified.
2. An offsite drainage area map is shown. The offsite drainage area should be shown to
scale at a much larger scale than shown. It should also show at least USGS contour
intervals with drainage area delineations to assist in evaluating the drainage calculations.
3. A table showing drainage calculations is provided. It should show the time of
concentration utilized in the calculations. It should also show a comparison of development and and post development stormwater flow projections.
tfc:pan ..t .. .;aIJL: f:K:
MARK I 4WENS, P.E.
GENERAL CIVIL CONSULTING ENGINEER
4. All calculations should be shown for sizing the proposed detention pond. A Q in and Q
out are shown but not how the flows were derived.
If you have any questions or need any further information, please call me at (940) 391-4845.
Sincerely;
Mark T. Owens, P.E.
General Civil Consulting Engineer
Cc: Jeff Crannel — Crannel, Crannel &Martin Engineering
June 28, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Fr: Rosalie Chavez, City Secretary/Assistant City Manager
Re: TXLT Gas Rates
Attached is the proposed ordinance and a copy of the original memo regarding the settlement offer.
June 24, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Fr: Rosalie Chavez, City Secretary/Assistant City Manager
Re: TXU Rates
Rick Allen with TXU came by and brought this settlement offer for the City Council to review.
First of all they originally came with 8.01 % overall increase. Now they are asking for us to
consider a 3.92% average increase. Rick did advice me that the City of Denton has refused to accept
their offer and there will probably be other cities that will join them in the coalition$ however, when
they go with their case to P.U.C., they will be asking for the full percent on all their original filings.
Rick advised that the last time they went to P.U.C. they were granted the full percentage requested.
Rick is asking the Council to please consider the settlement offer that is attached. It will be on your
agenda for the July 1, 2002 meeting. If you have any questions, please contact Jack or myself.
North Texas Metroplex Distribution System
Sanger, Texas Settlement Offer
June 14, 2002
Impact of Rate Filing in North Texas
Residential Revenue
Commercial Revenue
Industrial
Service Charges
Total Revenue Change
Impact of Rate Filing in Sanger
Residential Revenue
Commercial Revenue
Industrial
Service Charges
Total Revenue Change
Per Original Filin
$24,788,358 or 9.07%
$ 6,398,973 or 4.89%
$ 2,661,765 or 18.67%
$ 4614 or 0.12%
$33,853,710 or 8.01
Per Original Filing
$ 43,754 or 13.26%
$ 6,937 or 5.43%
$ 0 or 0.00%
$ 0 or 0.00%
$ 50,690 or 10.93%
Per Offer
$ 9,565,799 or 4.48%
$ 1,603,512 or 1.63%
$ 1,500,000 or 3.85%
$ 3,773 or 0.12%
$12,673,084 or 3.92%
Per Offer
$ 22,164 or 612%
$ 2,239 or 1.75%
$ 0 or 0.00%
$ 0 or 0.00%
$ 24,404 or 5.26%
Impact of Settlement on Typical Customer Bills in Sanger
• Typical residential customer using 6 MCF per month will realize an increase of approximately
$2.21 per month
• Although the commercial customer class is receiving an increase, the typical commercial
customer using 30 MCF per month will realize a decrease of approximately $0.90 per month
Number of Customers in Sanger
• 1,096 total customers
➢ 112 commercial customers
Note
• Residential base rates offered are consistent with residential base rate currently being charged
in the City of Fort Worth
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ,TEXAS FINDING,
AFTER REASONABLE NOTICE AND HEARING, THAT TXU GAS
DISTRIBUTION'S RATES AND CHARGES WITHIN THE CITY SHOULD
BE CHANGED; DETERMINING JUST AND REASONABLE RATES;
ADOPTING GENERAL SERVICE RATES INCLUDING RATE
ADJUSTMENT PROVISIONS AND MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE
CHARGES TO BE CHARGED FOR SALES AND TRANSPORTATION OF
NATURAL GAS TO RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL
CUSTOMERS; PROVIDING FOR RECOVERY OF RATE CASE EXPENSES;
PRESERVING REGULATORY RIGHTS OF THE CITY; PROVIDING FOR
REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE
WHEREAS, the City of ("City"), acting as a regulatory authority, has
previously suspended the effective date of TXU Gas Distribution's ("Company") application to
increase rates in the City in order to study the reasonableness of that application;
WHEREAS, the City or a consultant retained by the City evaluated the merits of the
Company's application;
WHEREAS, the City in a reasonably noticed public hearing considered the Company's
application;
WHEREAS, the City has determined that the Company's rates within the City should be
changed and that the Company's application should be granted, in part, and denied, in part;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ,TEXAS:
On ._March._ 1
2002, TXU Gas
a division of TXU Gas
Company ("Company") filed with the Governing Body of this municipality a Statement of Intent
to Change Residential, Commercial and Industrial Rates charged to consumers within this
municipality. Also filed was the Tariff for Gas Service in the North Texas Metroplex
Distribution System ("Tariff for Gas Service") and the supporting Cost of Service Schedules
("Schedules").
SECTION 2. That the existing rates and charges of TXU Gas Distribution are hereby
found, after reasonable notice and hearing, to be unreasonable and shall be changed as
hereinafter ordered. The changed rates resulting from this Ordinance are hereby determined to
be just and reasonable rates to be observed and in force within the City.
SECTION 3. The Company has agreed to modify the rates proposed in its Statement of
Intent and the modified rates are reflected in the revised Tariff for Gas Service attached hereto as
Exhibit A.
t.
SECTION 4. The maximum general service rates for sales and transportation of natural
gas rendered to residential, commercial and industrial consumers within the city limits of
Texas by TXU Gas Distribution, a division of TXU Gas Company, a Texas
corporation, its successors and assigns, are hereby fixed and approved as set forth in the revised
Tariff for Gas Service attached hereto as Exhibit A. The rates reflected in the attached Rate
Schedules entitled Residential Service, Commercial Service, Industrial Sales, Industrial
Transportation and Industrial Sales & Transportation are found to be reasonable. Nothing
contained herein shall limit the right of industrial and transportation customers with competitive
options to negotiate rates with the Company that differ from approved tariffs.
SECTION 5. All electric generation customers are included as Industrial Transportation
customers under the applicable transportation rate schedule.
SECTION 6. The Rate Adjustment and Surcharge Provisions set forth in the revised
Tariff for Gas Service attached hereto as Exhibit A and entitled Gas Cost Adjustment, and Tax
Adjustment, are approved.
SECTION 7. The Company shall have the right to collect such reasonable charges as are
necessary to conduct its business and to carry out its reasonable rules and regulations. Such
miscellaneous service charges are identified in Rate Schedules 9001 through 9008 of the
attached revised Tariff for Gas Service.
SECTION 8. Cities' rate case expenses are found to be reasonable and shall be
reimbursed by the Company. The Company is authorized to recover the rate case expenses
reimbursed to Cities and the Company's rate case expenses through a per Mcf surcharge as set
forth in the Rider entitled Surcharges in the attached revised Tariff for Gas Service.
SECTION 9. The aforesaid rate schedules and riders herein approved shall be effective
for bills rendered on or after approval of this Ordinance;
SECTION 10. The rates set forth in this Ordinance may be
and amended by
either the City or Company in any other manner provided by law. Service hereunder is subject to
the orders of regulatory bodies having jurisdiction, and to the Company's Rules and Regulations
currently on file with the City.
SECTION 11. Unless otherwise noted herein, other than TXU Gas Distribution (a named
party), no person or entity has been admitted as a party to this rate proceeding.
SECTION 12. It is hereby found and determined that said meeting at which this
ordinance was passed was open to the public, as required by Texas law, and that advance public
notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given.
SECTION 13. This Ordinance shall be served on TXU Gas Distribution by U.S. Mail to
the Company's authorized representative, Autry Warren, Rates Manager, TXU Business
Services, 1601 Bryan Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-3411.
SECTION 14. Nothing contained in this Ordinance shall be construed now or hereafter
in limiting or modifying, in any manner, the right and power of the City under law to regulate the
rates and charges of TXU Gas Distribution,
SECTION 15. All ordinances, resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with this
Ordinance are repealed to the extent of such conflict. Examples of such ordinances or
resolutions that are deemed repealed are all ordinances or resolutions concerning Military Rates-
N, Cost of Service Adjustments, Plant Investment Cost Adjustments, and Weather Normalization
Adjustments. To the extent Public Authority Rates, Commercial Contract Rates or Military
Rates-N are in effect in the city those rates are specifically repealed as they are now a part of the
Commercial rates and are calculated in accordance with the revenue requirement for Commercial
customers.
SECTION 16. The rate schedules included in the Tariff for Gas Service supersede and
replace all other tariffed services provided by TXU Gas Distribution except as expressly
contained within the Tariff for Gas Service.
PASSED AND APPROVED, this the day of , 2002.
ATTEST: APPROVED:
June 28, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Fr: Rosalie Chavez, City Secretary/Assistant City Manager
Re: Building Permits
Attached is the information that Ken Wilson has gathered regarding building permits, along with
two proposed ordinances. The two ordinances outline the two different proposals.
Building Permit Fees
The City of Sanger currently has a building permit fee of $0.30 per square foot regardless of the
size or cost of the building. Following is the estimated cost to get a building permit in other
nearby towns.
City %# Denton
The City of Denton does not charge by the square foot for building permits. They charge by the total
valuation of the building. Please see the following table explaining their building permit fees.
Total Valuation
Fee
$411 for the first $50,000 plus $3 for each
$1 to $100,000
additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$561 for the first $100,000 plus $2 for each
$100,000.01 to $500,000
additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$1361 for the first $500,000 plus $5 for each
additional $1000 or fraction thereof, to and
$500,000.01 to $110001000
including $110001000
$5141 for the first $1,000,000 plus $3.25 for
$1,000,000.01 and up
each additional $11000 or fraction thereof
Separate Electrical, Plumbing and Mechanical permits shall not be required.
Separate Fees for Landscaping, A Single Drive Approach, Certificate of
Occupancy & Temporary Utilities shall not be required.
City of Corinth
The City of Corinth does not charge per square foot for a building permit either. They charge by the
estimated cost of construction.
Example: A 20,000 square foot warehouse will cost $200,000 to build. Building permit fees are as
follows:
$1,553.75 Building Permit Fee
$1,009.93 Plan Review Fee (Charge a % of the Building Permit Fee)
City of Gainesville
The City of Gainesville has an $80 flat permit fee and then they charge $0.10 per square foot. This is
regardless of the size or value of the building. Although if the building is over 50,000 square feet they will
need to review the plans.
*Therefore, a 20,000 square foot warehouse with an estimated value, or cost of construction, of $200,000
would have a building permit fee of:
$761.00 in the City of Denton
$2,563.68 in the City of Corinth
$2,080.00 in the City of Gainesville
$6,000.00 in the City of Sanger
Proposed Building Permit Fees
The current building permit fee in Sanger is $0.30 per square foot regardless of the size of
the building. There is a 55,000 square foot building that is possibly going to be built in
Sanger. 18,000 square feet of this building will be office space and 37,000 square feet will
be warehouse space. The proposed building permit fees shown below are comparable to
nearby towns and are a more reasonable cost to the builder.
Current Building Permit Fee:
55,000 square feet X $0.30 per square foot:
Total Building Permit Fee:
Proposal #1:
18,000 square feet of office space X $0.30 per square foot:
37,000 square feet of warehouse space X $0.10 per square foot:
Total Building Permit Fee:
Proposal #2:
Plan Review Fee(Flat Charge):
55,000 square feet X $0.10 per square foot:
Total Building Permit Fee:
$16,500.00
$16,500.00
$5,400.00
$3,700.00
$y,1 UU. UU
$1,500.00
$5,500.00
$%,UUU.UU
J( D oSo.Q tr��
CITY OF SANGER, TEXAS
ORDINANCE No. #07-18-02
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANGER, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS,
AMENDING CHAPTER 3, ARTICLE 3.200, AND APPENDIX ARTICLE 2.000(a),
OF THE CITY OF SANGER CODE OF ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING FOR
THE REPEAL OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, OF THE CITY OF SANGER, TEXAS:
SECTION I
THAT CHAPTER 3, ARTICLE 3.200 AND APPENDIX ARTICLE 2.000(a), OF THE CITY OF
SANGER CODE OF ORDINANCES IS BEREBY AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:
(a) Building Permits
1. All building permits for Residential buildings will be .30 cents per square
foot.
2. Commercial Buildings up to 10,000 square feet will be .30 cents per square
foot.
3. Commercial Buildings over 10,000 square feet will be charged a rate of .30
cents per square foot, with the exception of open warehouse space, which
will be charged a rate of. 10 cents per square foot.
SECTION II
All Ordinances or parts of Ordinances in conflict herewith are, to the extent of such conflict,
hereby repealed.
SECTION III
It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the sections, paragraphs,
sentences, clauses, and phrases of this Ordinance are severable and, if any phrase, clause, sentence,
paragraph, or section of this Ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgement
or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the
remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs, and sections of this Ordinance, since the same
would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this Ordinance of any
such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section.
SECTION IV
This Ordinance will take effect immediately from and after its passage and the publication
of the caption as the law in such cases provides.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 13t day of July, 2002, by the City Council of the City of
Sanger, Texas.
APPROVED:
Tommy Kincaid, Mayor
ATTEST:
Rosalie Chavez, City Secretary
k J Z�
roe 0 S CAJ
CITY OF SANGER, TEXAS
ORDINANCI 110. #07-18-02
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANGER, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS,
AMENDING CHAPTER 3, ARTICLE 3.200, AND APPENDIX ARTICLE 2.000(a),
OF THE CITY OF SANGER CODE OF ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING FOR
THE REPEAL OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, OF THE CITY OF SANGER, TEXAS:
SECTION I
THAT CHAPTER 3, ARTICLE 3.200 AND APPENDIX ARTICLE 2.000(a), OF THE CITY OF
SANGER CODE OF ORDINANCES IS HEREBY AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:
(a) Building Permits
1. All building permits for Residential buildings will be .30 cents per square
foot.
2. All building permits for Commercial Buildings will be charged a plan review
fee of $1500.00 and a rate of .10 cents per square foot.
SECTION II
All Ordinances or parts of Ordinances in conflict herewith are, to the extent of such conflict,
hereby repealed.
SECTION III
It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the sections, paragraphs,
sentences, clauses, and phrases of this Ordinance are severable and, if any phrase, clause, sentence,
paragraph, or section of this Ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgement
or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the
remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs, and sections of this Ordinance, since the same
would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this Ordinance of any
such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section.
SECTION IV
This Ordinance will take effect immediately from and after its passage and the publication
of the caption as the law in such cases provides.
PASSED AND APPROVED this lst day of July, 2002, by the City Council of the City of
Sanger, Texas.
Tommy Kincaid, Mayor
ATTEST:
Rosalie Chavez, City Secretary
June 28, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Fr: Rosalie Chavez, City Secretary/Assistant City Manager
Re: De -Annexation
Attached is the proposed ordinance on this item. Also attached is the detail sheet from the appraisal
district showing the appraised value. They do not have this designated as AG; therefore, they are
paying a high amount of taxes. They wish to be de -annexed.
CITY OF SANGER, TEXAS
ORDINANCE #06-15-02
AN ORDINANCE ORDERING DISANNEXATION OF THE HEREINAFTER
DESCRIBED TERRITORY FROM THE CITY OF SANGER, TEXAS, AND
ALTERING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY TO EXCLUDE SAID
HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PROPERTY FROM THE CITY.
WHEREAS, sparsely populated and uninhabited areas in Home -Rule municipalities
may be disannexed under the provisions of V.T.C.A., Local Government Code, Section 43.144'
WHEREAS, said territory consists of at least ten (10) acres which are contiguous to the
municipality and contains fewer than one occupied residence or business structure for every
two acres and fewer than three occupied residences or business structures on any one acre and
therefore qualifies as a sparsely populated area; and
WHEREAS, the governing body of the City of Sanger deem it in the best interest of the
City to discontinue such territory as part of the City of Sanger.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF
SANGER, TEXAS:
Section 1. That the following described territory is hereby disannexed from the City, and that
the boundary limits of the City of Sanger, Texas, are hereby amended to exclude said territory
from the territorial limits of said City:
Abstract 1024 R. Prather, Part of Tract 2 & 3
ALL THAT CERTAIN TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED
IN THE RANSOM PRATHER SURVEY ABSTRACT No. l U249 lll�;N'1'UlV CUUlV'1'Y9'1'LXA�
AND BEING PART OF TRACT I, AS DESCRIBED IN A DEED FROM JACK R. SIELEY,
ET UX TO WILLIAM T. BRADY, ET UX, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1051, PAGE 265,
DEED RECORDS OF DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS.
BEGINNING at a'/2 inch iron rod set at a fence corner net at the Southeast corner of said
tract I, deeded to William T. Brady, which is the southwest corner of a tract deeded to Randy
R. Sliger et al, recorded in county clerks instrument number 95-R0022228, real property
records of Denton County, Texas, and also being on the North line of a tract deeded to Don
olson, recorded i Hn Volume 2641, page 862, real property records of Denton County, Texas;
THENCE South 88 degrees 49 minutes 00 seconds West with the South line of said Brady tract
and the North line of said Holson tract, along and near a fence, a distance of 443.14 feet to a
1/2 inch iron rod set for corner;
THENCE North 00 degrees 02 minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 12.04,36 feet to a 72 inch
rod set on the South Right of Way of F.M. Road 455, (having a Right of Way 80.00 feet at his
point);
THENCE North 89 degrees 07 minutes 44 seconds East with the South Right of Way of F.M.
455, a distance of 391.56 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set for corner;
THENCE North 00 degrees 52 minutes 16 seconds West with the South Right of Way of F.M.
Road 455, a distance of 10.00 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set for corner,
THENCE North 89 degrees 07 minutes 44 seconds East with the South right of Way of F.M.
455, a distance of 51.70 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set for corner at the Northeast corner of said
tract I, being the Northwest corner of said Sliger tract,
THENCE South 00 degrees 02 minutes 30 seconds West, with the East line of said tract I and
the West line of said Sliger tract, a distance of 1211.95 feet to the point of beginning and
containing in all 12.25 acres of land.
Section 2. That the City Secretary is hereby directed to file with the County Clerk and other
appropriate officials and agencies, as required by state and federal law on city annexation and
disannexation procedures, a certified copy of this ordinance.
PASSED and ORDERED by the Governing body of the City of Sanger, Texas this 1s` day of
July, 2002.
APPROVED:
Mayor Tommy Kincaid
ATTEST:
City Secretary
Page 1 of 1
' Property Detail Sheet (R59711)
History � Datasheet wo View Sketch
This property is currently under ARB review.
Owner Information
Owner ID
Owner Name
Owner Address
Property Address:
Parcel Information
Legal Description:
Acreage:
Cross Reference:
Undivided Interest:
Exemption Codes:
Entity Codes:
Deed Type:
Deed Book:
Deed Page:
Value Breakdown
448997
TRUSTY, KELBY & SHARI ETAL
6825 ROCKRIDGE TRL
AUBREY, TX 76227ZO62
W FM455
A1024A R. PRATHER, TRACT 2, ACRES 12.25, OLD DCAD TR 1
12.25
G01 (DENTON COUNTY)
S14 (SANGER ISD)
C16 (CITY OF SANGER)
KO
00-91269
Land HS:
Land NHS: $93,094 +
Improvement HS: $6,408 +
Improvement NHS: $0 +
Ag Market: $0
Ag Use: $0 +
Timber Market: $0
Timber Use: $0 +
Assessed: $107,777 =
Improvements
ID Type SPTB Segs Value
Imp 1 C (COMMERCIAL) E1 (FARM &RANCH IMPROVEMENTS) 1 $ti,408
Land
ID Type SPTB Acres Market
Land 1 1 (HOMESITE) E1 (FARM & RANCH IMPROVEMENTS) 1 $8,275
Land 2 3 (PASTURE) D2 (NON AG USE ACREAGE) 11.25 $93,094
Copyrighl8 1999 The So(Mrare Group, Inc.
All rights reserved.
http://www.dentoncad.com/property.asp7propertyId=R59711 6/I`�J`20�02
June 28, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Fr: Rosalie Chavez, City Secretary/Assistant City Manager
Re: Board Appointments
We left off one of the members on the Planning and Zoning that was up for reappointment at the
last meeting, Shelley Ruland , Place 4.
We also need to reappoint Jack Richardson, Place 6 for another two year term.
June 28, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Fr: Rosalie Chavez, City Secretary/Assistant City Manager
Re: City Manager Evaluation
This agenda item was requested by Councilman Ervin.
.=�.�r5�