06/01/1992-CC-Agenda Packet-RegularCITY COUNCIL AGENDA
MONDAY, JUNE 1, 1992
201 BOLIVAR STREET, CITY HALL
7:00 P.M.
1. Call to Order, Invocation, and Pledge to the Flag
2. CON SENT AGENDA
a). Approve Minutes
b). Disbursements
c). Proclamation #P6-92 - Pause For The Pledge of Allegiance
1 , t
3. Citizen's Input
4. Conduct Public Hearing to Consider Zoning Change Request
(813 Church) From SF-3 to SF-4 to Construct a Residence,
Lot 5, Block 6 in Hampton Addition
5. Consider and Possible Action Regarding Zoning Change Request
(813 church) From SF-3 to SF-4 to Construct a Residence,
Lot 5, Block 6 in Hampton Addition
6. Consider and Possible Action Regarding Bids for 300 GPM Water
Supply Well
7. Consider and Possible Action Regarding Bids for 200,000 Gallon
Elevated Water Storage Tank
8. Consider and Possible Action Regarding Denton County Interlocal
Agreement Funding (Fire Department) - Fire Chief Bill Murrell
9. Consider and Possible Action Regarding Fuel Spills Policy -
Fire Chief Bill Murrell
10 . City Administration Report
11. Any Other Such Matters
12. Adjournment
Rosalie darcia
City Secretary
MINUTES: City Council Meeting
May 18, 1992
MEMBERS
PRESENT. Mayor Nel Armstrong, Councilwoman Margie Braxton,
Councilman Jerry Jenkins, Councilman Russell Madden,
Councilman Tommy Kincaid and Councilman John Berndt
OTHERS
PRESENT: City Manager John Hamilton, City Secretary Rosalie Garcia,
Electric Superintendent Larry Yoast, Chief of Police
Benny Erwin, Public Works Superintendent Chuck Tucker,
Garland Thornton, Daniel Beck, Dusty Lyon, Rena
Dougherty, Jennifer Rodgers, Carolyn Harrison, Mr. & Mrs.
Brad Lyon, Sariah Heisey, Mr. & Mrs. k1eisey, Beverly
Howard, Damon & Margie Beck, Sandra, Wesley, Eric, and
Rebecca Atchison, Terra Shea DeSpain, Bill Hood, Kim
Clark, and Jay Beavers
1. Mayor Armstrong called the meeting to order, gave the invocation and
led the pledge to the flag.
2. CONSENT AGENDA:
a). Approve Minutes: Correction - # 1. Mayor Pro-Tem Jenkins
called the meeting to order.
b). Disbursements
c). Proclamation #P4-92 - "Buckle Up Americal Week"
d). Resolution #R4-92-Economic Development (SHS Class)
Motion was made by Councilman Jenkins to approve Consent Agenda.
Seconded by Councilman Kincaid. Motion carried.
3. Citizen's Input -None
4. Consider and Possible Action Regarding Designation on Voting
Representative to North Central Texas Council of Governments
Motion was made by Councilman Jenkins to appoint Mayor Armstrong
as Voting Representative to North Central Texas Council of
Governments. Seconded by Councilwoman Braxton. Motion carried.
5. Preview of Economic Development Video
Dusty Lyon introduced the video, Back
High School students produced. After
to Future
CC Min 5/ 18/92 Page 2
Mayor Armstrong stated that they had a Resolution, a plaque has
been ordered for the Class and individual Certificates of Appreciation
for each student which will be awarded to the students on Awards Day,
Thursday morning.
C. City Administration Report
City Manager Hamilton reported on the following items:
a. Mayor Armstrong had contacted Congressman Armey's Offiee
in an effort to expedite the environmental study on Pond Creek
Marina Site.
b. Keeton Road Improvements -Commissioner Don Hill has been
contacted and additional funds have been requested in order
to complete the paving improvements to Brook Glen Drive.
c. The Architectural Barriers Commission has completed the
review of our swimming pool bath/concession building, walking
trail, and picnic tables. Corrective measures are under review by
our engineers.
d. City Hall will be closed Monday, May 25th, Memorial Day.
e. Two copies of draft City Code on Recodification has been
received from G.S.A.; staff is reviewing and making notes.
7. Any Other Such Matters:
Larry Yoast, Electric Superintendent, gave brief reports on cast
far the fallowing projects:
1. Conversion from Accident at Old 4160 Substation
2. Cost of material for Acker Street Underground Work
3. Material returned to stock for Overhead Line -Acker Street
8. Meeting adjourned.
r� r
i,. i.1 Y OF SANGER
VLNDOR INV NO
3i MIDWEST RADAR & Et7UIF'a
ACCURACY CFIECK*R 12156-55
TOTAL.
(wIP OPEN ITEM LIST COMPANY 100 0 5/�:8f 9�: PAGE1
09 ; �4
IhIV DTE• PO NUM DUE DTE F'URCH ANT C1iscu AMT
Pa as >~tax tJJJ
14/`7i=' 9750 6/02/92 90a 00
Son 00
90000
:1��iy(:1 FtAtSk.R �Ri'f1YLGR CCit+C{=+t=3NY F'.Oa C+CIX t;•if,i�r
BOOKS 5481370 5/o5/92 9887 6/OC/9E'
TOTAL
4i:1..'i[.1 sR I SCOE TIRES
'TIRE FOR sACKHOE. 08B319
421 a 0500
4i,'. I a 0E.00
TOTAL
5/1C/92
163. 50
163w 50
'J�;`.::a(:i 4J I I+IF'`r y :� V I DE:C7 �• 5UE(S
VIDEO TAPES 1 +/26/92
4 r 5m t_ri_00 3(_l, tli}
i OTAL
ii?:.;iit:l CiL"•f=11_E:R;� E:L.f_�v'TRIC EsUF'F'L`r'
I L:BOWII+/COUF'L I NGS c:1. 04 r 660
47(), [.1800
418. 0800
WIRE/LOCKS/BOX F` 21050260
470a 0800
STRAPS FOR SW i TC l o35C120
470a GEl00
TOTAL
1.�[:ltril CT.1'Y C(F DG;rdTCttdAGCa
C;ArxKA!31_ L-tA'�S G=;15E'
317. i1400
2N D QUARTER AMBU A008650
447a 3000
1(ITAL
5/
14/9i'
63
47
a
44a
G-O
77 a
05
18/92
198.89
201132
146a
GO
`�846 E;I t:ri::r 9c_
i=:�la u5
�ie:7 a t;.lc.l
vrw I a t„r t:J
4�1� hla aT�:r'itT�araa
v.Cr, t:tt�r
F;. a. saX iw676
'11�523 Es/02/92 185a i
9f��E, E,fticf9i i98a89
9198 6fClc:f9c 14E,a 6t:1
ft1UNI!_IF'AL siJILDItdG F'i.5 EAST' "t�tt�Kl'hIhIE.Y
�•I�4I9� r-r77t_r 6I(.li�f`�c 8t_18.1E,
8{ 1s. 16
5/i=7/9E' 9954 6/02/98 24 �+16. 50
1626t:1 DIxIG: Ua�;aA. IlVCa F'.Oa sax �=+Sri•"�
RI�SUSC. sAGS ::�t?1r-t18 •4I��/9E' 9'751 6/t:lc'I9c:
41 8a 03200 62a 97
TOTAL
165i= 7 EMERGENCY AIR ONE F'a as sox e9
sCst�I REl-'A I I=t 18�.;�' G+f 1 c:/9c
421 a 1100 266m 75
TO•1'AL
10500
DAVIS CatJCRE:7 E COMPANY
i1ClI`aCRtn i-�••-5TH �• l;l i='7F.:`�67
4f0TAL
:t:.c:lt:rt.r 1-;RI "1 DAVIS CO.
CUl'OUT��n.75•�3?(:1
C�� i�`i=:4. 6E�
46t . lei.!
a 75
CONCRETE Dlvr.sloras4(:lIJis3
5/E`7/9iv `:J917 6i{Jc/9i=.' 45(�a iltl , t:lt:r
:t.5iia VV
50m 00 00
._+/1L,/'si=. asc:1 t,f(_ri.'f �C. 1 y i 1��a GCS a t.r•_1 �%�# �..
CITY OF SAN(aER AF4, OPEN IIE14 LIST COMPANY 100 5/`8/9c: PAGE
U'J 0 54
VENDOR INV NO I NV ME PO NUM DUE DTE F'URLH AMT DIt>>Cn Atv1T
470, 0800
11
719.
'c_'
BRACKETS
4.75�� 39-D
1 7t;r, 0800
5/
18/94tv
1.28.
00
PEDLSTPiL
4?53541)
5/20/912,
POLY PAD
470, 0800
47,�;355w�D
5/20/92
440u
t_ltl
47(), i i8()i)
163.
a
TOTAL
7.`_;1tr t..rlllL;ON !='RODUCTS INC.
SCREWS/NUTS/rTlE r 7320606
Er O 80X ;�Uf}ir1c:
5/1c
1411 4. F'Grt.}i}
470, 0801)
24a
62a
Sir
72
4 747. 1.100
97.,
18
4c'4. j0dir
Dn
1i
1+24, 2i 00
7.
46
42,4a 12,00
On
95
470 u i 380o
21000
4 _,4a 1.200
19r,
56
424. 2000
194
156
TOTAL
�'7555 LN?�1N I_r1rdD
BLADE/LINE/ENGIN 14)474•
4 -4. 0900
421. 1200
4' 24. 1.1_00
TOTAL
;�9',:>t_lil LONE. S(�}R C-'IdiNl'INIa
;a•r��TEr?FNr E{OOKS liri){�}
441. 1:00
TOTAL
714 DFILL.r-l;� Drdll�E
Eta 99
•7, ril
59. 75
'59a 15
59. 75
5 a 75
98 :5 01 V"/ :7
rlt=i�'/9c,
cCB,
err, i39
1ri�i9 (>Ik::ST AUSi itd 5-rRE.ET C'.O. I�sOX 1t�>8c:
r1.. 9i
r1.90
irt;;r
t;rt:r
;�'975tr t�1C?V1Fl?-(Mi OIL i104yIDLKIY 41�= E+CLL. �1VEN?.lE 1='.O. DRHt�rR .i.
?�10'T OCt VE!-1Ii::L_E FU ir57;�9�3 5,`;'ii19` 99ir4• rlt�lcl9c' i, 9�;:;. 49 . t,lt)
41.4. 1.200 10o. 64
414. 1100 73a 94
41.4. Q500 1 136 a 01
414, 0800 rt ir. ' l
414. C 600 198080
414. 1700 78. ` l
41.4. Uzi 0 1 c'f,. 37
I CI`i1�L 1 933n 49 , 00
33725 PERRICO TRAIL.E.R AND ITIFi5. Pa On I:OX 7�:8
CHANNEL/SQUARE T 8044-•47 5111/92 9855 6/02/91Z 128.61 . oo
4iD.3. 12oO 1 8m 61
FLAT tG)TEEL 8054 5/19/9c. `• B59 6/0 /92 31,33 moo
419. ir800 3. 33
TO T CAL 131. 94 .00
CITY OF SANG'ER AP OPEN ITEM LIST
VENDOR INV NO INV DIE C}O NULl{
44 TEXAS METER & DEVICE CO.
480V HE:1 E R 42310
TOTAL
1 5t:+9 NEW DALLAS I -II, y .
5It 18/912, 9K7
4C�7i.t:i TOttII'' S GENERAL S'i'ORE
FADRIC PAINT 8344 5/20/92
442. f ai_:OQ 3. 18
1 OTAL
�Cat:az;Ca VE.RnIE:R CI-IE:t�4iCAL GO}SF�'.
SEWER SOI...VEN T /SP 6073
415. 2200
415. 050
1OIAL.
•4/i�4•/9i='
1 5c:. 50
81.40
COMPANY 1t.at.} 5/28It9i_: I -'AGE 3
09 a 54
DUE DTE PORCH AMT DISC. AMT
P. O. BOX 3088
11Ca ST. LUKES DRIVE
9916 6/02/92 533.90
aC}�_6. tj�,��. +=RAIN+�ER, INC. KEPT 19i�:-3i_'r-}35Ca11.9
WELDING WIRE 509534*-9 5/14/92 9800 6/02/92
421. 1200 33X 88
TOTAL
1 AL_
Cat:)
Cai i
5�37'�FiEINERT PAP�R � CHEniI.C�=rL 1��.3i. W. MAIN
HANDLES, WARI_HOU oII9.43 ;3.."c_ti/92 9957 6/02/9c� 31.64 a60
421 . t.a..lt_ O 23. 14
420a 2000 8. 3o
SINGLEFOLD TOWEL. 132C)0 4/ 14/92 9696 6/0; /92 25. t_}O , 00
441.1900 25.O5
TOILET TISSUE 1.1335 4/16/92 9700 6/02/92 29.cJ5 COO
441. 19C 0 29. 95
TOTAL_ 86 a 64 . Oo
11 c:17. 4.4 . 00
TOT CIL DUE WITH DISCOUNTS 1 i ,, 21 7. 44
TOTAL AL.. DUI" NO DISCOUNTS 11421 7. 44
G/L DEPART irIEN 1 S
LIBRARY c 53. 53
POLICE 3 766. 88
SANITATION 4 8o8. 16
STREETS 5 1, 154. C:J
WATER 6 362.3O
WASTEWATER 7 126.. 37
ELECTRIC 8 4, 115. Cab
PARKS 9 34„ 39
1= I RE: 11 43 7. 87
VEHICLE NA I NT*- GF 12 416. 30
PUDLIC WORKS-E.F 17 76.91
DATA PROCESSING 19 1 16. 90
VEHICLE NA I NT--EF ECa 17 �1. Sc1
WASTE-WTR COLT_-E.F 22 152. Uii
AMBULANCE SERVICE-GF 30 c' q 416. 50
GENERAL. FUND 64038. Cab
ENIT-44RF'RISE FUND 511 i29.36
CITY QF SAIVGER, TEXAS
PROCLAMATION #P&92
National Flag Day -June 14, 1992
Annual PAUSE FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE to the Flag
WHEREAS, by Act %J Congress of the United States dated June 140 1777,
the first official Flag of the United States was adopted; and,
WHEREAS, by Act of Congress dated August 3, 1949, June 14 of each year
was designated "NATIONAL FLAG DAY"; and,
WHEREAS, the Congress has requested the President to issue annually a
proclamation designating the week in which June 14 occurs as
NATIONAL FLAG WEEK; and,
WHEREAS, on December 8, 1982, the National Flag Day Foundation was
chartered to conduct educational programs and to encourage all
Americans to PAUSE FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE on Flag Day,
June 14; and,
WHEREAS, by Act of Congress, Public Law 99-54 was passed to have the
PAUSE FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE as part of the celebration
of National Flag Day throughout the nation, and,
WHEREAS, Flag Day celebrates our nation's symbol of unity, a democracy in a
republic, and stands for our country's devotion to freedom, to the rule
of all, and to equal rights for all;
NOW THEREFORE, I, Nel Armstrong, Mayor of Sanger, Hereby Proclaim
June 140 1992 as Flag Day in Sanger, Texas and urge all citizens of
Sanger, Texas to pause at 7:00 P.M. EDT on this date for the thirteenth
annual PAUSE FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE to the Flag and join all
Americans in reciting the Pledge of Allegiance to our Flag and Nation.
DULY PROCLAIMED this lst day of June, 1992.
Nel Armstrong
Mayor, City of Sanger
Rosalie Garcia
City Secretary
�
*
��
NATIONAL FLAG DAY FOUNDATION, INC.
418 South Broadway *Baltimore, Maryland 21231 * (410) 563-FLAG
Mrs. George F3ush Dear Mayor :
Honornr� Nnliannl Clutirworrtan
19gz Parrse for ut� hi�ri�e On behalf of the National Flag Day Foundation Board, I
o� Allc9innre Prnr�rnm
express our deep appreciation to you, your City Council
* and the c�t�z�n� of yo��r cemm,�n�ty for ;o�n�ng all
Prrsl,fri't Americans in the 13th annual national PAU5E FOR THE PLEDGE
Louis V Koerber
President OF ALLEGIANCE on Flag Day, June 14th at 7:00 p.m. EDT.
Budeke•s Paints. I°`. President and Mrs . Bush have been invited to lead all
vfrr Prrsidrrrt Americans in the Pled a of Alle iance at that time.
Richard M. Patterson. CLU. ChFC g g
Massachusetts Mutual Life
Insurance Company George Bush is the 1992 Honorary National Chairwoman
Mrs.
Trrnsurrr
William T. Murray, lii of the PAUSE FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE .
Executive Vice President
Firs[ National bank of MD We are most appreciative of the continuing support of the
Srrrrinr� National Learnte of Cities for this annual tiro ram.
Herbert E. Witz. Esq. 7 �- L� g
Attorney at Law
�irrrtors: This is the 100th anniversary of the writing of the Pledge
George V McGowan
Chairman of the Board of Allegiance by Francis Bellamy. You may want to focus
Baltimore Gas &Electric Co. On this in your community in planning your celebration.
lames Mc�4anus The ceremonies at Fort McHenry on June 14th will be the
Ilim McKayl
spnrtscommentatodlournarst official national 100th anniversary celebration.
ABC Television Network
brooks Robinson We ask your cooperation in several specific ways to help
Baseball Hall of Fame
us with the 1992 program:
Henry A. Rosenberg, Ir.
Chairman of the Board l . Please use the enclosed sample letter as a guide
Crown Central Petroleum for your letter to President Bush. Please send a copy of
Freds�h,vengel your letter to the Foundation for our records.
President, Us. Capitol
Historical Society 2. Please issue an official proclamation from your
Pam shriver city and mail it to the National Flag Day Foundation for
Professional Tennis Player display at our Headquarters.
General John W. Vessey, Ir. 3 . I f you do not currently have a Flag Day Ceremony,
USAIRe[.1 please use the enclosed information in establishing a
Former Chairman, lolnt Chiefs
of staff, The Pentagon program in your city. We received over 400 requests last
Dr. Milton S. Eisenhower year for information regarding a program.
11899-19851
The National Flag Day Foundation thanks you for your
leadership as you help us "Pass the Baton of Patriotism"
to the youth of America. They truly are the future of our
nation.
Sincerely yours,
Richard M. Patterson
Vice President
������ �=nr 1"h� pl�c�"� o� /111n�°�f�C^ � FI_.�(.; [-1�1ti� I ���, .4 �(InE' I,1. 7:�() n.m. FD"t-
�f�`
Fact Sheet
The National Flag Day Foundation, Inc., chartered in December, 1982, is anon -profit
organization that works year-round to educate Americans about the OR and their
national heritage.
The Founciati+�n's IVBission:
� To promote National Flag Day, June 14 and the annual National Pause for the
Pledge of Allegiance.
�r To develop and coordinate National Flag Week activities with school systems, all
levels of government and civic organizations.
� To educate the public, especially children, about the history of the American Flag.
� To teach proper Flag etiquette and disposal.
Fia�Week Activities Include:
*
Annual National Pause for the Pledge of Allegiance: a national ceremony
inviting Americans around the world to simultaneously recite the Pledge of
Allegiance at 7:00 p.m. (EDT) on Flag Day, June 14.
�- Living American Flag: 4,000 students gather to form a Living American Flag at
Fort McHenry, the birthplace of the national anthem.
Parade of Flags: 50 students from across the country parade their state flags at
the Pause for the Pledge of Allegiance at Ft. McHenry and the annual Flag Day
Luncheon.
joanimore,•
At 7:00 p.m. (EDIT on Flag Day, June 14, Americans
all across the nation will pause to recite the Pledge
of Allegiance to our Flag. While most of us know the
words of the Pledge, there are a large number who
do not know of its origin.
Mr. Francis Bellamy, an ordained minister of
Rome, New York is credited with the authorship of
the original Pledge. It was he, who on the eve of the
400th Anniversary of the discovery of America,
initiated a campaign for the establishment of a
national holiday on October 12, 1 0 . to celebrate the
Jay on which Columbus discovered America. In his
concept, he envisioned that flags should be flown
over every schoolhouse and public building from
coast to coast.
In the material which he nationally circulated, he
wroteI "Let the flag float over every school house in
the land and the exercise be such as shall impress
upon our youth the patriotic duty of citizenship" He
also included the original 23 words of the Pledge
which he had developed.
"I pledge allegiance to my flag and the
Republic for which it stands, one nation indivisi-
ble, with liberty and justice for all. it
Thus it was that on Columbus Day in October
1892, the Pledge of Allegiance was repeated by
more than 12 million public school children in every
state in the union.
The wording of the Pledge has been modified
three times. In 1923, the words "the flag of the
United States" were substituted for "my flag." In
1924, "of America" were added. On Flag Day
1954, the words "under God" became a part of
the Pledge. Thus the 23 words
have become 31 words,
The idea of the annual PAUSE FOR THE
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE originated in 1980 at
the Star-Spangled Banner Flag House in Baltimore,
Maryland. Since then the concept has swept across
the country in a grassroots movement supported by
a broad spectrum of individuals, organizations, and
businesses.
The National Flag Day Foundation, Inc. was
created in 1982 "to conduct educational programs
throughout the United States in promotion of
National Flag Day and to encourage national
patriotism by promotion of the PAUSE FOR THE
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE"
On June 20, 1985, the Ninety -Ninth Congress
passed and President Reagan signed Public Law 99-
54 recognizing the PAUSE FOR THE PLEDGE OF
ALLEGIANCE as part of National Flag Day activities.
It is an invitation urging all Americans to participate on
June 14, 7:00 p.m. (EDT) in reciting the Pledge of
Allegiance. The effect of this simple ceremony, which
transcends age, race, religion, national origin, political
and geographic differences, is a stimulating patriotic
experience at home and a sign of unity abroad.
CITY OF BANGER
P. O. BOX 578
BANGER, TEXAS 76266
TO: Honorable Mayor &Members of the City Council
FROM: Jahn Hamilton, City Manager6r
DATE. May 29, 1992
SUBJECT: Public Hearing to Consider Zoning Change Kequest -
813 church (Mr. & Mrs. Chester Wright)
Agenda items 4 and 5 material is enclosed under separate cover far your
review.
JH:es
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT.
CITY OF SANDER
P. O. BOX 578
SANGER, TEXAS 76266
Honorable Mayor &Members of the
John Hamilton, City Manager
May 29, 1992
Consider/Action on 300 GPM Water
City Council
Well
Project Estimate _ 24fl,OQCi.00�
The bid opening on this item is scheduled for Monday, June 1st at 4:30 P.M.
in the City Hall Conference Room. All bids will be evaluated and presented
for your consideration at the regular meeting.
JH:es
attachment
9'A.U�i�V'�a��n�
f
i
1
f
1
W
Q �
'
Wz
�
v���zN
�a��u
a a
O .a
a N
d F
$
�
S
p
ci
S
�
g
g
�
�
g
5�
25
5R�
g
g
a
Lt, �-. v,
.n
v
.r
r
a
�
�
n
b
V1
�O
�
N
N
f'1
p�
H
�
b
�
�"' u
N
N
ve
t�
N
V/
V/
H
N
N
N
N
Vf
N
N
N
Vf
�
H
� �
N
W W W
U
�
W
z
0
(� N
`..�
a
a
z
O
V a p
�
o
g
o
o
$
g
g
$
$
g
�
o
� tt��l-.-
o
�
("" U
,D
v1
�O
0
N
N
M
�
0
�
N
N
N
�
VH
N
N
N
N
H
N
N
fn
H
N
N
H
N
H
.-1 N
z
�+ Gi �
o
�,
�,
�,
New
�
v O
N
1.
W
aao�
g
g
g
8
S
o
Q
S
p�
a Z
N
�
N
O
O
N
N
1/'/
f/f
N
VI
OD
C
.�
u
o m
-�
v
to
y�y
L.1
OD
.0
�
G_
>
L
M
e�
m
O O
]
C
J
m
e
Q
CO
n
V
d
g
.0
>
'�
3
b
�
�
�
�,
o
�
�,
a
•C
u C
O
C
V
'�
u
P�
�Op
dp
E'.I
N
3
U
U
.V+
N
`V
�O
IL
L.
rn
W
�
C7
w (-'
N
t-
t
V
w
1...
x
Lai]
W
z
z
w
Q�z--++
t"
W U
ur �
°a
a�
o `'
� � �I
h A
U � I
Ll$ a
LL.
w
oa
�� I
�z
s w
�a o
N
N
c0
,_
O
a�
a
_^, '' �,
r
N h � '
... W L'
� �% i
CITY OF SANGER
P. O. BOX 578
SANGER, TEXAS 76266
MEMORANDUM #2059
I`O: Honorable Mayor +& Members of the City Council
FROM: John Hamilton, City Manager
DATE: May 29, 1992
SUBJECT: Consider/Action on 2Clt3,t70fl Gallon Elevated
Storage Tank
Project Estimate $275,6C10A0
The bid opening on this item is scheduled for Monday, June lst at 4;Q0 p.m.
in the City Hall Conference Room. All bids will be evaluated and presented
for your consideration at the regular meeting.
JH:es
attachment
l 1
x
�S W
'p�U
z
uozN
u
0 U
a y
..
O ,L
25
$
$
g
$
$
g
g
25
g
25
w�En
r
en
P
O
(.n U
N
N
vPj
r
Q
N
N
N
VI
{n
N
N,
VI
V/
N
N
N
N
N
H
a
W W
� U
W
z
0
a
Q
z
O
IiiiiiiF
U tin
U O ,0, 0
$
$
g
$
$
$
Q
C
0
0
0
o
u
OV
E"` N
n
O
N
N
m
a,,
P
O
m
NO
z
N
N
�n
h
%n
N,
sic)
N
N
N!
Coll
V,
un
N
N
to)
N
N
N
N
N
V
°zz
to,
M
Q pw
1111110 0
N
W
ad
00
8
.aa z
o
$
S
N
N
N
N
N
N
Eb
PiN
C.r
be
•C
C
>
J
C
'�•
in
$
o
•u
V
>
"
�
•o
H
cD
'G
i 4
c
3
��
b
r
v
o
b
�
x
bid
o
m
c
w
V
C
V
.c
u
E�1
bin
N
A
O
a1
z
N
z>�k:
0 L'
CITY OF SANGER
P. O. BOX 578
SANGER, TEXAS 76266
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor &Members %J the City Council
FROM: Bill Murrell, Fire Chief
DATE: May 20, 1992
SUBJECT: Passible Denton County Funding Lass For Fire &EMS
FY 1992/ 1993
As you know last December, the Denton County Commissioner's f:ourt made
the statement that the County would like to reduce or stop funding Fire and
EMS Service in Denton County. The County Commissioners feel that Fire
and EMS are not services mandated by the State. They believe that reducing
or eliminating this funding would avoid a tax increase, freeing money up for
mandated services.
Enclosed is a copy of a letter sent to the Commissioner's Court from a
United Denton County Fire Chiefs Association. We are asking for an increase
in funding.
The City of Sanger benefits from County runs in two ways.
The lass of County funds would have little affect
efforts of the Sanger Volunteer Fire Department.
to the City of Sanger in providing EMS coverage,
advanced life support MICU.
irst
on the Fir ression
The biggest loss would be
as we do not maintain an
Chief John Cook of the Denton Fire Department has stated the loss of County
funds effects the Denton Fire Department EMS coverage. One station would
be lost. The other affect would force the Denton Fire Department to stop
responding outside of their City Limits. At that point, the City of Sanger
would have no advance life support coverage or transporting capabilities.
There are several options to the City of Sanger in providing EMS coverage to
the residents. Each option has several advantages and disadvantages,
According to the contract, Denton only has to provide a 30-day notice of loss
of coverage.
First
Option
City of Denton budgeted $9,666 of income from Sanger EMS Runs. The
Bill Murrell to CC (Denton Co Fd) page 2
County base is $5,000 to the City of Denton. The City of Sanger supplements
this base with an additional 12,000.
The City of Sanger would simply pay to the City of Denton that income that
Denton would have received from the County.
Second Option
Privitization
The Greater Dallas Council of Private Ambulances provided the City of
Sanger Fire Department with two estimates.
Basic Life Support Ambulance -
Advance Life Support Ambulance -
D isadvantag e
$120,Q00 subsidy and each run's
income.
$1$0,000 subsidy and each run's
income.
NOTE: The City of Sanger as a 3rd party to a malpractice suit would
be out from under the $250,000 liab. cap.
fihird Option
City of Sanger Managed:
There are two ways to do this:
First - Separate City Department from the Fire Department.
Second - The Sanger Fire Department manning an ALS MICU.
The cost of purchasing and equipping an MICU is $85,000 - $95,000. The
costJyear to operate an MICU runs 10,000 - 20,OQQ for drugs, etc. whether
it runs or not. To these costs you must add staff. The accepted trend in the
industry is to provide two paramedics. The options for staffing on MICU are
varied.
As you can tell the best option at this point is to maintain County funding.
This is by far the most economical choice for Sanger. Please let your County
Commissioners know how you feel about this issue.
BM: es
Enclosures
MAITON COUNTY FIRE CHIEFS ASSOCIATION
Argyle
Aubrey
Carrollton
Denton
Jouble Oak
Flower Mound
Frisco
Highland Villaae
Justin TOO
Krum
Lake Cities
Lewisville
Little Elm
Mayhiil-C000er Creek
Pilot Point FROM:
Ponder
Roanoke DATE:
Sanger
TheColony
M E M O R A N D U M
The Honorable
The Honorable
The Honorable
The Honorable
The Honorable
30 April, 1992
Jeff Moseley, County Judge
Buddy Cole, Commissioner, Pct. 1
Sandy Jacobs, Commissioner, Pct,
Lee Walker, Commissioner, Pct, 3
Don Hill, Commissioner, Pct, 4
President iv.
SUBJECT:
FY 1992-93 FIRE/EMS BUDGET REQUEST
Trophy Club
2
As requested by the Commissioner's Court, the Denton County Fire
Chiefs Association has reviewed past funding practices in order to
develop the most equitable system possible for providing Fire/EMS
services to the residents of Denton County. In the past, EMS
funding was based solely upon a per capita allocation based upon
popula-tion. Fire funding was based upon a fixed allocation of
$5,000, plus $85 per response. Total 1990-91 funding was
approximately $933,292.
In developing
assumptions:
iation following
our proposal, the Assocmade the
1. Population estimates will continue to be based upon estimates
provided by the NCTCOG. These figures will be adjusted
periodically by the Census Bureau. (See Appendix A for
current population estimates.)
2. Funding will be provided to al.l agencies which provide Fire
and/or EMS services to residents of Denton County. This
allows all residents to receive services in return for their
tax payments. (Appendix A lists the 28 agencies with Fire/EMS
responsibilities.)
3. Fire/EMS allocations have actually decreased in recent years
due to the rollback election and inflation. Actual expenses
per Fire/EMS incident based upon a _county -wide average is
$580.39.
4. County funding is critical to all departments. Funding
reductions will result in service reductions.
5. Reimbursement per call should be based upon submital of a
Tex -Fir on each incident claimed.
30 April, 1992
Jeff Moseley, County Judge
Buddy Cole, Commissioner, Pct. 1
Sandy Jacobs, Commissioner, Pct,
Lee Walker, Commissioner, Pct, 3
Don Hill, Commissioner, Pct, 4
President iv.
SUBJECT:
FY 1992-93 FIRE/EMS BUDGET REQUEST
Trophy Club
2
As requested by the Commissioner's Court, the Denton County Fire
Chiefs Association has reviewed past funding practices in order to
develop the most equitable system possible for providing Fire/EMS
services to the residents of Denton County. In the past, EMS
funding was based solely upon a per capita allocation based upon
popula-tion. Fire funding was based upon a fixed allocation of
$5,000, plus $85 per response. Total 1990-91 funding was
approximately $933,292.
In developing
assumptions:
iation following
our proposal, the Assocmade the
1. Population estimates will continue to be based upon estimates
provided by the NCTCOG. These figures will be adjusted
periodically by the Census Bureau. (See Appendix A for
current population estimates.)
2. Funding will be provided to al.l agencies which provide Fire
and/or EMS services to residents of Denton County. This
allows all residents to receive services in return for their
tax payments. (Appendix A lists the 28 agencies with Fire/EMS
responsibilities.)
3. Fire/EMS allocations have actually decreased in recent years
due to the rollback election and inflation. Actual expenses
per Fire/EMS incident based upon a _county -wide average is
$580.39.
4. County funding is critical to all departments. Funding
reductions will result in service reductions.
5. Reimbursement per call should be based upon submital of a
Tex -Fir on each incident claimed.
30 April, 1992
Page 2
FUNDING FORMULA:
For FY 1992-93, our association is proposing a two-tier system for
funding both Fire and EMS. We feel that our proposal will be more
equitable than prior methods of funding. The first variable in our
proposed formula is the actual population served by the respective
Fire/EMS district. Population determines the potential demand for
service. The greater the population, the greater the potential
demand. Appendix A outlines the populations serviced by each Fire
and EMS district. Appendix B outlines the funding brackets for EMS
and Appendix C outlines the funding brackets for Fire Services.
The second variable in our proposed formmula is call volume, i.e.,
t-ho mimhcar of i nr+i rlant-c rarinnri=r7 i-n 1-vv a Fi rc /FMC rica"art-mcni-
volume directly determines the costs for maintenance, fuel,
supplies, etc.
To determine an individual department's annual funding, it would be
necessary to add the allocation for population to the reimbursement
for incidents as follows:
Annual Budget = Population Factor + [# incidents x $ per call]
Allocation
For example, if a district had 1,000 people and responded to 100
EMS calls, the department would receive the following if EMS calls
were funded at $100 per incident:
Annual Budget Allocation = $3,000 + [1�00 x $100]
$13,000 = $3,000 + $10,000
(Continued on Page 3)
30 April, 1992
Page 3
EMS BASE FIINDING:
Allocations for base funding of EMS districts on a population basis
would be $294,000 and be allocated as follows:
Base Funding
Depts.
Total
$ 2,000
4
$ 8,000
$ 3,000
1
if UUU
$ 6,000
3
$18,000
$ 71000
3
$21,000
$10,000
1
$10,000
$14,000
1
$14,000
$16,000
1
$16,000
$20,000
1
$20,000
$42,000
1
$42,000
$46,000
1
$46,000
$96,000
1
$96,000
TOTALS
17
$294,000
In the past, departments were funded on a per capita ratio only.
We predict that total EMS responses for the County in FY 1992-93
will exceed 11,000. At $580.39 per call, the total allocation
would be $6,384,290. This is obviously much higher than previous
funding. Therefore, we will need to negotiate the actual amount of
our funding formula before it is adopted.
30 April, 1992
Page 4
BASE FIRE FUNDING:
Allocations for base funding of Fire districts on a population
basis would be $150,000 and would be allocated as follows:
ILBase Funding ,# Depts. Total
$ 11000 5 $ 5,000
$ 5,000 2 $10,000
$ 51500 3 $16,500
$ 6,000 6 $31,000
$ 6,500 2 $13,000
$ 7,000 3 $21,000
$ 7,500 1 $ 71500
$ 8,000 1 $ 8,000
$10,000 1 $10,000
$10,500 1 $10,500
$12,500 1 $12,500
TOTALS 26* $150,000
*Fort Worth and Grapevine = $0
In FY 1990-91 Fire funding was $197,510. Less $150,000 leaves a
balance of $47,510. 1,206 calls were responded to in the rural
areas of the County. This would be an average of $40 per call or
6.8% of actual cost per run. Actual costs at $580.39 would be
$699,950.34. Again, this is higher than total previous funding and
will need to be negotiated.
Summary
Appendix D summarizes
contracts. Addition
and/or EMS responses,
amount to be mutually
As previously stated,
response is $580.39,
that point,
the base funding levels .for Fire and EMS
1 funding would be based upon total Fire
Funding per incident will be based upon an
agreed upon during our budget negotiations.
the average County -wide costs per actual
We would like to begin our negotiations at
Should you require any further information, please do not hesitate
to contact me. Please notify me as to the dates and times of our
budget hearings.
Your interest and cooperation is appreciated.
APPENDIX A
NCTCOG 1992 POPULATION ESTIMATES
DENTON COUNTY FIRE/EM3 DISTRICTS
Department Fire EMS
Argyle 11,000 0
Aubrey 4,000 4,266
Carrollton 43,077 43,073
The Colony 21,000 21,574
Cooke County 16 16
Coppell 3 3
Dallas 14,000 14,462
Denton 66,270 97,652
Double Oak 2,000 0
Flower Mound 16,000 16,463
Fort Worth 0 0
Frisco 1,400 1,478
Grapevine 0 0
Highland Village 7,000 9,415
Justin 3,000 3,000
Krum 2,000 0
Lake Cities 11,508 0
Lewisville 45,380 46,903
Little Elm 4,000 4,461
Mayhill-Cooper Creek 4,000 0
Pilot Point 3,337 3,337
Plano 15 15
Ponder 1,500 0
Prosper 52 52
Roanoke 2,500 2,817
Sanger 6,200 0
Southlake 267 267
Trophy Club 4,000 4,271
TOTALS 273,525 273,525
14-(g)
BASE PAY PER POPULATION
SCALE = EMS
Population Base Fundinct
1 - 999 = $ 21000
11000 - 1,999 = $ 3,000
2,000 - 31999 = $ 61000
41000 - 5,999 = $ 7,000
6,000 - 71999 = $ 81000
8,000 - 9,999 = $10,000
10,000 - 11,999 = $111000
12,000 - 13,999 = $12,000
14,000 - 15,999 = $14,000
16,000 - 17,999 = $16,000
18,000 - 19,999 = $18,000
20,000 - 21,999 = $20,000
22,000 - 23,999 = $22,000
24,000 - 25,999 = $24,000
26,000 - 27,999 = $26,000
28,000 - 29,999 = $28,000
30,000 - 31,999 = $30,000
32,000 - 33,999 = $32,000
34,000 - 35,999 = $34,000
36,000 37,999 = $36,000
38,000 - 39,999 = $38,000
40,000 - 41,999 = $40,000
42,000 - 43,999 = $42,000
44,000 - 45,999 = $44,000
46,000 - 47,999 = $46,000
48,000 - 49,999 = $48,000
50,000 - 51,999 = $50,000
Popluation Base Fundinct
52,000 - 53,999 = $ 52,000
54,000 - 55,999 = $ 54,000
56,000 - 57,999 = $ 56,000
58,000 - 59,999 = $ 58,000
60,000 - 61,999 = $ 60,000
62,000 - 63,999 = $ 62,000
64,000 - 65,999 = $ 64,000
66,000 - 67,999 = $ 66,000
68,000 - 69,999 = $ 68,000
70,000 - 71,999 = $ 70,000
72,000 - 73,999 = $ 72,000
74,000 - 75,999 = $ 74,000
76,000 - 77,999 = $ 76,000
78,000 - 79,999 = $ 78,000
80,000 - 81,999 = $ 80,000
82,000 - 83,999 = $ 82,000
84,000 - 85, 999 = $ 84,000
86, 000 - 87,999 = $ 86,000
88,000 - 89,999 = $ 88,000
90,000 - 91,999 = $ 90,000
92,000 - 93,999 = $ 92,000
94,000 - 95,999 = $ 94,000
96,000 - 97,999 = $ 96,000
98,000 - 99,999 = $ 98,000
100,000 - 101, 999 = $100, 000
102 , 000 - 103 , 999 = $102 , 000
104,000 - 105,999 = $104, 000
APPENDI% C
BASE PAY POPULATION
Population Base Funding
999 = $ 1,000
11000 - 11999 = $ 51000
2,000 - 21999 = $ 51500
31000 - 51999 = $ 61000
61000 - 91999 = $ 61500
10,000 - 14,999 = $ 7,000
15,000 - 19,999 = $ 71500
20,000 - 24,999 = $ 81000
25,000 - 29,999 = $ 81500
30,000 - 34,999 = $ 91000
35,000 - 39,999 = $ 91500
40,000 - 44,999 = $10,000
45,000 - 49,999 = $10,500
50,000 - 54,999 = $11,000
55,000 - 59,999 = $11,500
60,000 - 64,999 = $12,000
65,000 - 69,999 = $12,500
70,000 - 74,999 = $13,000
75,000 - 79,999 = $13,500
80,000 - 84,999 = $14,000
85,000 - 89,999 = $14,500
90,000 - 94,999 = $15,000
95,000 - 99,999 = $15,500
100,000 - 104,999 = $16,000
105,000 - 109,999 = $16,500
110,000 - 114,999 = $17,000
APPENDIX D
HA3E FUNDING HA3ED UPON POPULATION
District Fire Allocation EM3 Allocation
Argyle $7,000 0
Aubrey $6,000 7,000
Carrollton $10,000 42,000
The Colony $8,000 20,000
Cooke County $1,000 2,000
C�r�r�Pll fii nnn 2 nnn
L L' T om/ `�' `� , V V V
Dallas $7,000 14,000
Denton $12,500 96,000
Double Oak $5,500 0
Flower Mound $7,500 16,000
Fort Worth 0 0
Frisco $5,000 3,000
Grapevine 0 0
Highland Village $6,500 10,000
Justin $6,000 6,000
Krum $5,500 0
Lake Cities $'7, 0�0 0
Lewisville $10,500 46,000
Little Elm $6,000 7,000
Mayhill-CooperCreek $6,000 0
Pilot Point $6,000 6000
Plano $1,000 2,000
Ponder $5,000 0
Prosper $1,000 0
Roanoke $5,500 - 6,000
Sanger $6,500 0
Southlake $1,000 2,000
Trophy Club $6,000 '7,000
TOTALS $150,000* $294,000*
*Plus allocations for runs.
14 �7)
CITY OF SANGER
P. O. BOX 578
SANGER, TEXAS 76266
MEMORANDUM #2Q64
'ro. Honorable Mayor & Members of the
City
Spills
Fire Chief Bill Murrell will be present to discuss this proposed policy with
Council.
JH:es
Enclosure
CITY OF SANGER
P.O. BOX 578
SANGER, TEXAS 76266
TO: Rosalie Garcia, City Secretary
John Hamilton, City Manager
City Council and Mayor
FROM: Bill Murrell, Fire Chief
DATE: May 11, 1992
SUBJECT: Fuel Spills
Unfortunately due to the controls established by the Texas Water
Commission and United States Environmental Protection Agency, the
Sanger Fire Department will no longer be able to dilute fuel spills with
water to be washed into the drainage systems of City of Sanger.
The policy or the Sanger Fire Department will be to control the fire hazard
potential. Usually this will be to establish a fire line perimeter of 100'.
No entry will be allowed inside this perimeter without personnel
protective attire.
According to the Uniform Fire Code 1991 Edition adopted by the City of
Sanger on Section 79.113 - Flammable and Combustible liquids and
petroleum waste products shall not be discharged or released upon
sidewalks, streets, highways, drainage canals, ditches, storm drains,
sewers, flood control channels, lakes, rivers, tidal water ways or the
ground. Unauthorized discharge or release or such products shall be
handled as set forth in Section 80.105.
Section 80.105 - Unauthorized Discharges
Section 80.105 (a) Records - accurate records shall be kept by the
permittee of the unauthorized discharge or hazardous materials.
(b) Notification - the Chief shall be notified immediately when an
unauthorized discharge becomes reportable under state, federal, or local
regulations.
(c) Prepara i r - Provisions shill be made for controlling and
mitigating unauthorized discharges.
CUNT.
(d) Control- When an unauthorized discharge due to primary
container failure shall be repaired or removed from service.
(e) Resp,sibility_ for Cleanup, - The person, firm, or corporation
responsible for an unauthorized discharge shall institute and complete all
actions necessary to remedy the effects of such unauthorized discharge,
whether sudden or gradual, at no cost to the jurisdiction. When deemed
necessary by the chief, cleanup may be initiated by the Fire Department or
by an authorized individual or firm. Costs associated with such cleanup
shall be borne by the owner, operator, or other person responsible for the
unauthorized discharge.
Upon talking with EPA, the amount of the unauthorized discharge/year
determines how the discharge may be disposed off. Cleanup may be as
simple as sand sprinkled on, allowed to be absorbed and disposed at
landfill.
A reportable unauthorized discharge is the amount necessary to produce a
sheen on a navigable waterway.
13M:cg
'RATION STATE WATER ADMINISTRATION § 26.039
Title 2 Title 'l
y contract approve the plan. If the board does not so find, it may disapprove the plan,
it for the modify the plan as necessary so that it will comply, or return it for further
or federal development and later resubmission to the board, in accordance with the proce,,
e Federal dure in Section 26.036 of this code.
U.S.C,As
must ap• (d) When a water quality management plan has been approved as provided in
.Atty.Gen• this section, the plan may be furnished to the Federal Environmental Protection
Agency, the Federal Water (Zuality Administration, or any other federal official
or agency in fulfillment of any federal water quality management planning
requirement specified for any purpose by the federal government.
to time (e) The board and the commission may use an approved water quality manage-
:u•eas of ment plan or a plan in progress but not completed or approved in reviewing and
making determinations on applications for permits and on applications for finanof
regional vial assistance for construction of treatment works.
'ges and Amended by Acts 1977, 65th Leg., p. 2207, ch. 870, § 1, cliff Sept. 1, 1977.
to assist Derivation: mental agencies. W. Thomas Buckle, 9 St.
revising, Former Section 21,089, as amended by Mary's L.J. 789 (1978).
Acts 1971. 62nd L,eg., p. 1977, ch. 6121
he board art. 1, § 4.
rnments, Law Review Commentaries
•dive and Effective participation in adjudientory
,t time to and legislative functions of Texas envirow
I by the
may be § 26.038. Fiscal Control on Water Quality Management Planning
t exceed In administering the program for making grants and loans to and contracting
. to this with local governments, regional planning commissions, and planning agencies as
tl in the authorized in Subsection (c) of Section 26.036 of this code, the board shall adopt
rules and procedures for the necessary engineering review and supervision, fiscal
Of the
, control, and fund accounting. The fiscal control and fund accounting procedures
Cc
are supplemental to other procedures prescribed by law.
xecutive
Amended by Acts 1977, 65th Leg., p. 2'L07, ch. 870, § 1, eff. Sopt. 1, 1977.
shall be llcrivation9
such as Former Section 21,090, as amended by
recrea- Acts 1971, 62nd Leg., p. 1978, ch. 6121
art. 1, § 4.
26.039. ccidental Discharges And Spills
,_._...
(a) As used in this section:
(1) "Accidental discharge" means an act or omission through which waste or
other substances are inadvertently discharged into water in the state.
(2) "Spill" means an act or omission through which waste or other sub-
stances are deposited where, unless controlled or removed, they will drain,
tificantly seep, run, or otherwise enter water in the state.
•d to the (3) "Other substances means substances which may be useful or valuable
i govern• and therefore are not ordinarily considered to be waste, but which will cause
coed by
tollution if discharged into water in the state.
for the ( V'Whenever an accidental discharge or spill occurs at or from any activity or
lan, a fact ►ty which causes or may cause pollution, the individual operating, in charge
�hether of, or responsible for the activity or facility shall notify the department as soon
i,iven to as possible and not later than l9 hours after the occurrence.
rsons to (c) Activities which are inherently or potentially capable of causing or result-
ing in the spillage or accidental discharge of waste or other substances and
"•ith the which pose serious or significant threats of pollution are subject to reasonable
I, it shall rules establishing safety and preventive measures which the board Inay adopt or
237
ink ? ( �t�,,a.;, •�-,
.:, i
<I"4�-f•.`'of
17
0
(a)
I•;lt AI)111IN[5'rRAx1pN �,
Title 2 ,o
.nl or Area•Wlde System or ��,
20;i' of this code, ente ,�
� ...
system or systerns; design � �:,'
t-aside system or systems; and �:
iection shall be held within the ;,
de system or systems to be '•
�� the filing of a timely and
iced in Subsection (i) of this , :;
of the proposed regional or ' ���
�tiun for the approval of tite ,'•j;
u be operated by the designat• :`
h�� hoard within 30 days of the •'•>+
't, The request shall include a ;'
,u• land within the proposed ;;
�atcd by the county tzx tops• , �;;
;rL•tre ur places for holding the
Mice shall be published once a •��
:,.:, f;cni'r:„ circu�ation in the
:Ie system or systems is to be `,�
�� at least 14 days before the
shall be given to the local' •1;
waste collection, treatment, +;
•ire board may be affected, r ,
10 days before the election �'
The ballots for the election
at the regional or area -wide
nlity.
iudl;c shall make returns of
'1'hr executive dirrctor shall
•niings of the results at the
.:
• 'rtvor• the creation of the
'the designated regional
gem is created and enter the
,t in the election ar•e against
��• systems olmrated by the }
ire that the regional systent
:nation election shall contain
��i shall be filed in the deed
•rriiunal system is located.
�u•iatiuns :Ict, ►nay provide
.i� section. If no funds are
••tint, the election shall be
+Ie system or systems and
�� the effeclivr date of this
:rl or area -wide system or
operate those systems as .
ll.usc regional systerns or
• C a, :aid cJitorially reclassified,
expansion)
j.
�; l�c�."gib � � l_ h. � �_ 1
FATE WAT[�.It ADMINISTKATIt)N § 26.1`l1
' Titk 2
5UBCI-iAPTFR D. PROHIi11TtON AGAINST POLLUTION;
LN�ORCLMBNT
fuse Refrrenres 1'ormit conditions and pretreatment scan -
Local government, enforcement action in lords concernin)� publicly owned treatment
manner provided in ibis subchapter, sce works, applicability of this subchapter, sce
¢ 2G.174. 4 '1f.047.
g 26.121. Unauthorized Discharges Prohibited
Text of section ejjective until ciclryotion of Nf'DGS permit authority
(a) Except as authorized by a rule, permit, or order issued by the department,
p0 person may:
(1) discharge sewage, municipal waste, recreational waste, agricultural
waste, or industrial waste into or adjacent to any water in the strtte;
(�` )>discharge other waste into or adjacent to any water in the state which in
itself or in conjunction with any other discharge or activity causes, continues to
pause, or will cause pollution of any of the water in the state; or
(3) commit any other ace or eng:►},�e in any other activity which in itself or in
conjunction with any other discharge or activity causes, continues to cause, or
will cause pollution of any of the water in the state, unless the activity is under
the jurisdiction of the Parks and Wildlife Department, the General Land
Office, or the Railroad Commission of Texas, in whict► case this subdivision
does npt apply.
' (b) In the enforcement of Subdivisions ('l) ;uui (3) of Subsection (a) of this
section, consideration shall be given to the state of existing technology, economic
feasibility, and the water quality needs of tlic water that might be affected.
(c) No person may cause, suffrr, allow, or permit the discharge of any waste
or the performance of any activity in violation of this chapter or of any rule,
permit, or order of the department.
Amended by Acts 1977, tiCith Leg., p. '1L07, ch. R7U, § 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1977.
For tc�a of scctiuu cffc'ctit�c u.porr. dcicpnliou of NPDI:S permit
authority, sec � ;,'G.IaI, post
A 26.12E hnauthoriaed Dischagxe; Prohihitc-d
Text ojsection ejjective upotr delegation ojNPDES permit authority
(a) Lxcept as authorized by a rule, permit, or order issued by the deparGnent,
no person may:
(1) discharge sewage, municipal waste, recreational waste, agricultural
waste, or industrial waste into or adjacent to any water in the statc.�;
(2) discharge other waste into or adjacent to any water in the state which in
itself or in conjunction -with any other discharge or:tctivity causes, continues to
cause, or will cause pollution of any of the wafer in the state; or •
(3) commit any other act or engage in any other activity which in itself or in
conjunction with any other clisctiarl►e or activity causes, continues to cause, or
will cause pollution of any of the water in the state, unless the activity is under
the jurisdiction of the Parks and Wildlife Department, the Ceneral Land
Office, or the Railroad Commission of Texas, in which case this subdivision
does not apply. '
(b) In the enforcement of Subdivisions (2) and (3) of Subsection (a) of this
section, consideration shall be given to the stale of existing technology, economic
feasibility, and the water quality needs of the water that might be affected.
' 24J
�$�� , ..� , t ,,• ,
�t1�,t , � x , ..
�� �✓
�<�.:�.,
')ti � � r i, � ,.
�y���.,
ti,, „ .
.«
r,
INDEX
CHAPTER 334
UNDERGROUND AND ABOVEGROUND STORAGE TANKS
SUBCHAPTER A: GENERAL PROVISIONS
§334.1
§334.2
§334.3
§334.4
S334.5
§334.6
§334.7
5334.8
'cy334 • �
§334.10
§334.11
§334.12
Purpose and Applicabilit
Definitions or
Statutory Exemptions
Commission Exclusions
General Prohibitions
Construction Notification
Registration
Certification
J Ci l.Cd. 0 Wmk0kr J.V.7 UlW -
Reporting and Recordkeeping
Enforcement
Other General Provisions
SUBCHAPTER H: UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS FEES
§334.21 Fee Assessment
§334.22 Failure to Make Payment
§334.23 Disposition of Fees, Interest and Penalties
SUBCHAPTER C: TECHNICAL STANDARDS
§334.41
§334.42
§334.43
§334.44
§334.45
§334.46
§334.47
§334.48
§334.49
§334.50
§334.51
5334.52
§334.53
5334.54
§334955
Applicability
General Standards
Variances and Alternative Procedures
Implementation Schedules
Technical Standards for New UST Systems
Installation Standards for New UST Systems
Technical Standards for Existing UST Systems
General Operating and Management Requirements
Corrosion Protection
Release Detection
Spill and Overfill Prevention and Control
UST System Repairs -and- Reining-
Reusel:
of Used Tanks
Temporary Removal from Service
Permanent Removal from Service
SUBCHAPTER D: RELEASE REPORTING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION
§334.71
§334.72
§334.73
1334.74
§334.75
§334.76
§334.77
§334.78
Printed:
Applicability
Reporting of Suspected Releases .
Investigation Due to Off -Site Impacts
Release Investigation and Confirmation Steps
Reporting and Cleanup of Surface Spills and Overfills
Initial Response to Releases
Initial
Abatement Measures
and Site Check
Initial
Site Characterization
8/15/91
i�
SS334.71-334.85
than forty-five (45) days after the first obser.
vation of the suspected release or another sched-
ule approved or required by the executive direc-
tor. The owner or operator shall include with
this report a statement which has been signed by
the owner or operator certifying that the re-
quirements of this section have been met.
5334.75. Overfills. Reporting and Cleanup %J Surface Spills and
(a) Owners and operators of UST systems must contain and
up a spill or overfiii, report to the
commission within 24 hours, and begin corrective action
in accordance with 5S334.76-334.81 of this title
(relating to Initial Response to Releases; Initial
Abatement Measures and Site Check; Initial Site Char-
acterization; Free Product Removal; Investigation for
Soil and Groundwater Cleanup; and Corrective Action
Plan) in the following cases:
(1) Spill or overfill of petroleum that results in a
release to the environment that exceeds 25 gal-
lons, or that causes a sheen on nearby surface
water; and
(2) Spill or overfill &of a hazardous substance that
results in a release to the environment that
equals or exceeds its reportable quantity under
CERCLA (40 CFR Part 302).
(b) Owners and operators of UST systems must contain and
immediately clean up a spill or overfill of petroleum
that is less than 25 gallons, and a spill or overfill
of a hazardous substance that is less than the report-
able quantity under CERCLA (40 CFR Part 302). If
cleanup cannot be accomplished within 24 hours, owners
and operators must immediately notify the executive
director.
5334.76. Initial Response to Releases. Upon confirmation
of a release in accordance with 5334.74 of this title (relating
to Release Investigation and Confirmation Steps) or after a
release from the UST system is identified in any other manner,
owners and operators must perform the following initial response
actions within 24 hours of a release:
(1) Report the release to the executive director
(e.g., by telephone or electronic mail);
(2) Take immediate action to prevent any further
release of the regulated substance into the
environment, including shutting down the leaking
UST system as determined necessary; and
(3) Identify and mitigate fire, explosion, and vapor
hazards.
Printed: 9/69 4 17 (d)
SS334.71-334.85
5334.77. Initial Abatement Measures and Site Check.
(a) Unless directed to do otherwise by the executive
director, owners and operators must perform the fol-
lowing abatement measures:
(1) Remove as much of the regulated substance from the
UST system as is necessary to prevent further
release to the environment;
(2) Visually inspect any aboveground releases or
exposed below ground releases and prevent further
migration of the released substance into sur-
rounding soils and groundwater,
(3) Continue to monitor and mitigate --any additional
fire and safety hazards posed by vapors or free
product that have migrated from the UST excavation
zone and entered into subsurface structures (such
as sewers or basements),
(4) Remedy hazards posed by contaminated soils that
are excavated or exposed as a result of release
confirmation, site investigation, abatement, or
corrective action activities. If these remedies
include treatment or disposal of soils, the owner
and operator no;zst comply with applicable state and
local requirements;
(5) Measure for the presence of a release where
contamination is most likely to be present at the
UST site, unless the presence and source of the
release have been confirmed in accordance with the
site check required by S334.74 of this title
(relating to Release Investigation and Confirma-
tion Steps) or the closure site assessment of
5334.55(e) of this title (relating to Permanent
Removal from Service). In selecting sample types,
sample locations, and measurement methods, the
owner and operator must consider the nature of the
stored substance, the type of backfill, depth to
groundwater and other factors .as -appropriate for
identifying the presence and source of the re-
lease; and
(6) Investigate to determine the possible presence of
free product and begin free product removal as
soon as practicable and in accordance with S334.79
of this title (relating to Free Product Removal).
(b) Unless directed to do otherwise by the executive
director, within 20 days after release confirmation,
owners and operators must submit a report to the
executive director summarizing the initial abatement
steps taken under subsection (a) of this section and
any resulting information or data.
5334.78.
Initial Site Characterization.
Printed: 9/B9
5
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT.
CITY OF SANGER
P. O. BOX 578
SANGER, TEXAS 76266
Honorable Mayor &
John Hamilton, City
May 29, 1992
City Administrator's
Members of the
Manager
Report
City Council
1). The pre -construction conference on the AckerjKeeton project is
scheduled for Monday, 6j 1%92, at 3:30 p.m. Hopefully, I will be able tc
report a construction time -line to Council at the regular meeting time.
2}. Don Sable, owner of the Willowood Addition, has had his engineer
contact Hunter Associates. Travis Roberts of Hunter is preparing a
cost estimate which would be the developer's responsibility, on adding
additional improvements to our new WardjWillowood sewer line, to
accommodate the entire Willowood Addition.
3). If you noticed the story in this week's Sanger Courier regarding the
birds behind Ms. Thomas' house, staff has a call in to Larry Holland,
the Parks and Wildlife Biologist in Brownwood, to discuss the situation.
At this time, there is no known City action that can be taken.
JH:es
{l "/
Texas Department of Transportation
Control 195-2
IH 35E and FM
Denton County
P.O. BOX 3067 • DALLAS, TEXAS 75221-3067 • (214) 320-6100
2624 W. Prairie, Denton, Texas 76201
May 20, 1992
and 816-2
455 OFSANGER
THE CITY r! \
Mr. John Hamilton, City Manager
City of Sanger
P.O. Box 578
S�nrrPr Tx 76266
Dear Mr. Hamilton:
1992
M AY 2 2
SANGERs TE)(AS
I have no objection to the City of Sanger's proposed placement and
maintenance of litter barrels at the intersection area of FM 455 and
I-35 subject to the following requirements:
1. Litter barrels will be placed in the area between the outside
edge of the pavement and the right of way line in locations
to be mutually agreed upon between the city and the state.
2. Barrels and any method of anchorage used will be subject to
approval by the state so as not to present a hazard to
vehicles leaving the roadway.
3. Proper safety precautions will be observed by persons
servicing the barrels (as per Texas MUTCD).
4. If lack of maintenance of the barrels becomes a problem the
city will remove them immediately upon request.
If these conditions are acceptable to the city please sign and return
a copy of this letter to indicate the city's acceptance. Mr. Milton
R. Gurecky, Maintenance Supervisor, should be contacted to arrange for
approval of the barrel installations and their locations. He may be
reached at 817-387-1324.
Sincerely,
Claud P. E1som, III, P.E.
Supervising Resident Engineer
W�� I b �641
cc: Milton Gurecky
Accepted for the City of Sanger
Mr. John Hamilton, City Manager
An Equal Opportunity Employer v>'
CONGRESSMAN DICK ARMEY
26TH DISTRICT, TEXAS
130 CANNON HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING
WASHINGTON, DC 20515
(202) 225-7772
COMMITT(ES:
BANKING, FINANCE AND
URBAN AFFAIRS
EDUCATION AND LABOR
JOINT ECONOMIC COMMITTEE
RANKING MINORITY MEMBER
City of Sanger
John Hamilton,
Sanger, Texas
Dear John,
A
J i F MI Ii
ouse of Representanum
� nbington, MSC 20515
City Manager
76266
DISTRICT OFFICES:
250 SOUTH STEMMONS
SUITE 210
LEwISwLLE, TX 75067
(214I 221-4527
1301 SOUTH 6OWEN ROAD
SUITE 422
APLINGTON, TX 76013
(817) 461-2655
(817► 383-3376
(FROM CITY OF DENTON)
Ma y 2 0 , 19 9 2 THE pF SA►VGER
� � AY 2 2 1992
D.
SANGER,TEdS
Thank you for contacting me concerning your questions about
the status of the marina permit in the Sanger area of Lake
Ray Roberts.
Confirming your telephone conversation with the Lewisville
district office. the delays have been caused by several
reasons, among them the change in location of the marina.
Since the new location was on dedicated wildlife management
lands, the Master Plan had to be amended to reflect this
change. This necessitated a decision on either an
Environmental Impact Statement(EIS), or an Environmental
Assessment(EA). It has been determined that an in-house EA
is sufficient, and I have been assured that there will be no
further delays.
A copy of this letter is being sent to your state
representative, the Honorable Ben Campbell. I would
encourage you to contact him to be assured that there will
be no action required by Texas Parks and Wildlife. As soon
as further information is available, I will be in touch with
you.
Si rely,
000004
DICK ARMEY
DA/sjh Member of Congress
cc: The Honorable Nel Armstrong
The Honorable Ben Campbell
PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
John Hall, Chairman
Pam Reed, Commissioner
Peggy Garner, Commissioner
TEXAS WATER COMMISSION
PROTECTING TEXANS' NEALTHAND SAFETYBYPREVEN77NGRND REDUCING POLLUTION
May 18, 1992
The Honorable Nel Armstrong
Mayor of Sanger
P, 04 Rox 578
Sanger, Texas 76266
Subject: Solid Waste - Denton
City Sanger - Permit
1.1 mi
les NE of I-35
Dear Mayor Armstrong:
County
. 1424
No
& FM-455 Int
M AY 2 1 1992
D.
On April 28, 1992, Mr. William P. Dahlin, P.E., of this district office inspected
the subject closed landfill. A review of our field file for the site indicates
the site quit accepting municipal solid waste in April, 1991. The landfill cover
work was completed in about September, 1991 and verified by Mr. Boyd Cole, P.E.,
of this office on October 2, 1991.
The current inspection report indicates that scattered trash is exposed on the
surface of the landfill. This waste material must be collected and disposed at
a Texas Water Commission permitted site or other approved facility.
Post -closure maintenance inspection will be conducted periodically by
representatives of the Commission at least through 1996. The inspections are a
requirement of subsection 325.153(a) of the Commission's Municipal Solid Waste
Management Regulations as follows:
{325.153 Post -Closure Maintenance.
(a) "For at least the first five years after closure, the site operator
shall maintain the right -of -entry and periodically inspect his closed site
and correct as necessary and problems associated with erosion of cover
material, vegetative growth, leachate or methane migration, and subsidence
or ponding of water, on the site. If any of these problems persist for
longer than the first five years, the site operator shall be responsible
for their correction until the Commission determines the problems have been
adequately resolved."
Should you have any questions concerning this letter or if we may be of any
REPLY T0: DISTRICT 4 / 1019 N. DUNCANVILLE ROAD / DUNCANVILLE, TEXAS 75116-2201 / AREA CODE 214/298-6171 / METRO 299-6951
P.O. Box 13087 • 1700 North Congress Avenue • Austin, Texas 78711.3087 • 512/463-7830 r�l �' �
The Honorable Nel Armstrong
Mayor of Sanger
Permit No. 1424
May 18, 1992
Page 2
assistance to you regarding solid waste management, you may contact Mr. Dahlin
or Mr. Boyd M. Cole, P.E. at the District 4 office at 214/298-6171.
Sincerely,
Don C. Eubank
L7avarrinti,a Anr3 Snl i a Waste Program Manaaer
WPD:bb
cc: Texas Water Commission, Austin
.Air. John Hamilton, City Manager,
Texas 76266
TWC, District 4
City
of Sanger, P. 0. Box 578, Sanger,
t\TEL
5-27-92 4�UUP1� DIVISION' OFFICE-� 1627812�3�# 3/ 3
k
t
-� ;�_.�
:. .. :_ ,,
���
CITY OF SANGER
P. O. BOX 578
SANGER, TEXAS 76266
TO: Honorable Mayor &Members of the City Council
FROM: John Hamilton, City Manager
DATE. May 29, 1992
SUBJECT: Consider and Possible Action on Zoning Change Request,
SF-3 to SF4, 813 Church
This is a two part item, a Public Hearing on the request and after the
hearing is closed, your discussion and vote on the item.
At their meeting on May 14th, the five (5} members of the Planning and
Zoning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the request
Mr. Bobby Ramsey was present and spoke against the request.
Enclosed is the information material submitted to the members of the
Planning and Zoning Commission.
Staff recommends approval of the request
Farm and Home financed brick residence
JH:es
Enclosures
If constructed, this will be a
with a single car garage.
CITY OF SANGER
p. O. BOX 578
SANGER, TEXAS 76266
MEMORANDUM #2045
TO: Members of the Planning & Zoning Commission
FROM: John Hamilton, City Manage
n A-rt % IUTnvy 7 1 nary
lJ,c'X A iJ. L71uY ! , AJO iI
SUBJECT; Request For Zoning Change From SF-3 to SF-4
Chester and Mary Evelyn Wright have requested a zoning change on one
vacant lot they own located at 813 Church Street. It is my understanding
that if approved they would construct a residence for another party.
Enclosed are the relevant sections from our zoning code describing SF-3
and SF-4 requirements.
The Consulting City Attorney, Ron Neiman, advised that in this situation'a
zoning change request is appropriate.
In reviewing the appearance and existing homes in the area, staff
recommends approval of the request. Your recommendations will be
presented to the City Council at their meeting June 1, 1992.
3. Minimum Dwelling Size: The minimum floor area of any
dwelling shall be fifteen hundred (1500) square feet,
exclusive of garages, breezeways and porches.
4. Lot Coverage: In no case shall more than forty percent
(40%) of the total lot area be covered by the area ,of
the main buildings. A`maximum of sixty percent 60%) of
the total lot may be covered by accessory buildings,
1.
driveways and parking.
10.4 Parking Regulations: A minimum of two (2).covered, enclosed
spaces shall be provided behind the front yard line. Off-
street parking spaces shall be provided in accordance with
the requirements for specific uses set forth in Section`280 -
IF
SECTION 11
"SF-3" - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT-3
General Purpose and Description This district is designed to
accommodate the standard single family residential development of
the type and density most commonly found in the city. This
district is 'appropriate as a buffer between multi family residen-
tial areas and lower density single family residential areas.
The district can also. be appropriately located in proximity to
certain nei.'ghborhood of local retail and office uses. Densities
in this district will range from 3 to 3.5 units per gross acre.
11.1 Permitted Uses: A building or premise in an "SF-3" District
shall be used only for the following purposes:
1. Any use permitted in the "SF-1" District or "SF-2"
District.
2: Other uses as listed in Section 26 of this ordinance.
The following spec ific'uses shall be permitted in an "SF-3"
District, when granted in accordance with Section 27:
1. Uses as listed in Section 26 of this ordinance.
11.2 Height Regulations: No building shall exceed thirty (30)
feet in height, Accessory uses shall be a maximum` of fif-
teen (15) feet in height.
11.3 Area Regulations:
1. Size of Yards:
a. Front Yard: There hall be a front yard having a
depth of not less than twenty-five (25) feet as
measured from the front building line. Where lots
14
i
have double frontage,' running through one street to
another, -the -required front yard shall be provided
on both streets. No required parking "shall be
allowed within the required front yard. A sixty
(60) foot setback is required for all accessory
uses.
b. Side Yard: There shall be a side yard on each side
of the lot having a width of not less than eight
(8) feet. A side yard adjacent to a side street
shall be not less than twenty (20) feet. No side
yard for allowable non-residential uses shall be
less than twenty-five (25) feet.
c. Rear Yard: There shall be a rear yard with a depth
VL IIVU lC0 a. LoiIQ{! I.W CU 1.y--- ll VG \G✓J 1Gcl.. C1.L I Lldi aril
rear yard for accessory buildings shall be not less
than ten (10) feet.
2. Size of Lot:
a. Lot Area: No building shall be constructed on any
lot of less than eight thousand five hundred (8500)
square feet,
i
b. Lot Width: The width of the lot shall be not less
than sixty (60) feet at the front street building
line.
c. Lot Depth: The average depth of the lot shall be
not less than one hundred (100) feet.
3. Minimum Dwelling Size: The minimum floor area of any
dwelling shall be one thousand two hundred (1200) square
_. feet, exclusive of garages and breezeways and porches.
4. Lot Coverage: In no case shall more than forty percent
(40%) of the total lot area be covered by the main
building. No more than sixty percent (60%) of the total '
lot may be covered by the main structure, accessory
buildings, driveways and parking.
11.4 Parking Regulations: A minimum of two (2) covered, enclosed
parking spaces shall be provided per unit behind the front
yard line. Off-street parking spaces shall be provided
in accordance with the requirements for specific uses set
forth in Section 28. I
SECTION J 2
"SF-4 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT-4
General Purpose and Descriptions This district is designed to
accommodate single family residential development of somewhat
15 . � .
higher density than is most commonly found in the city. This
district is appropriate as a buffer between multi -family residen-
tial areas or even commercial areas and lower density single
family residential areas, Densities in this district will range
from 3.5 to 4.5 units per gross acre.
1.2.1 Permitted Uses A building or premise in the "SF-4"
District sshal-'i Y4)P used onl.•/ for the following purposes:
1. Any use permitted in the "SF-3" District.
2. Other uses as listed in
Section 26 of this ordinance.
The followings sr)Pr•i f t r ilcac cha 1 1 h" „; + a
-----..�.�L V,c LIIL �,.cU in all or-4
District when granted in accordance with Section 27:
1. Uses as listed in section 26 of this ordinance.
12.2 Height Regulations: No building shall
feet in height. Accessory uses shall be
teen (15),feet in height,
12.3 Area Regulations
1. Size of Yards:
exceed
thirty (30)
a maximum of f i f
a. Front Yard:. There shall be a front yard having a
depth of not less than twenty-five (25) feet as
measured from the front building line. Where lots
have double frontage, running through one street to
another, the required front yard shall be provided
on both streets, No required parking shall be
allowed within the required front yard. A sixty
(60) foot setback is required for all accessory
uses
b. Side Yard: There shall be a side yard on each side
of the lot having a width of not less than eight
(8) feet, A side yard adjacent to a side street
shall be not less than twenty (20) feet. No side
yard for allowable non-residential uses shall be
less than twenty-five (25) feet.
� c. .Rear. Yard: There shall be a rear yard with a depth
of not less than twenty-five (25) feet. Minimum
rear yard for accessory buildings shall be not less
than ten (10) feet,
2. Size of Lot: i
a. Lot Area: No buildiing shall be constructed on any
lot of less than six thousand five hundred (6500)
square feetiv,
16
b. Lot Width: The width of the lot shall be not less
than sixty (60) feet at the front street building �I
line.
c. Lot Depth: The average depth of the lot shall be �(
not less than one hundred (100) feet.
3. Minimum Dwelling Size: The minimum floor area of any
dwelling shall be one thousand (1000) square feet,
exclusive of garages and breezeways and porches.
4. Lot Coverage: In no case shall more than forty percent
(40%) of the total lot area be covered by the main
building. No more than sixty percent (60%) of the total
lot may be covered by the main structure, accessory
buildings, driveways and parxitig.
1..
12.4 Parking Regulations: A minimum of two (2) covered, enclosed
parking spaces shall be provided per unit behind the front
yard line. Off-street parking spaces shall be provided
in accordance with the requirements for specific uses set
forth in Section 28,
SECTI'O.N 13
"2F" 0-FAMILY SIDENTZAL (DUPLEX) DIS ICT
Genera], r ose an Descri do The district intended
to provide the oppor unity for evelopmen which is o-family
(duplex) in aracter, ut which e courages dividual o ership
each dwell* unit. he typical duplex to is divide from
fr t to back, us encou ing the s le of eac dwelling un't,
toge her with the land upon hick it i situated, to the occu
pant
13.1 Use e ulations: A building or premis shall be u d for
only t e following rposes:
1. Two- ily residenc (duplex).
2. Other us as listed i Section 26 of- this or nance.
e following specific uses hall be pe mitted in "2F
Di trict when granted in accord co with Se ion 27:
1. U s as listed in Section 26 of his ordina ce.
3.2 Hei ht R ulations: _ No building shal exceed t rty (30)
feet in hd'isqht. Accessor buildings sh 1 not exc d fif�
teen (15) fe in height.
13.3 Ar Re ulations.
17
1
�®
��
_:
,,..a
��.
i �xa�
i
LEGAL NOTICE
PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that the Planning and Zoning will Conduct a Public
Hearing on a Zoning Request from Chester Wright on Lot 5, Block 6,
Hampton Addition, Sanger, Texas, located at 813 Church Street, from SF-3
(single family) to SF"4 (single family).
The Public Hearings will he held in the Council Chambers at I'.n1 Rnillr=r'
Street, 7.00 p.m., May 14, 1992.
Run in paper. 4/30/92
Rosalie Garcia
City Secretary
May 4, 1992
TO: Property Owners'
FROM: Rosalie Garcia, City Secretary 1 �
SUBJECT: Zoning Petition ##Z2-92
Please be advised that on May 14, 1992, at 7:00 P.M. in the Council
Chambers at City Hall, 201 Bolivar, Street, the Planning & Zoning
Commisson of the City of Sanger will conduct a Public Hearing on a zoning
change request from SF-3 to SF-4 for Chester Wright in order to construct a
residence from 1200 sq. ft. plus two car garage to 1003 sq. ft. plus one car
garage.
This property is located as a residential lot described as Lot 5, Block 6, in
Hampton Addition in Sanger, Texas, (813 Church, Street) .
Please complete the attached form and return in the enclosed self -stamped
envelope. If you have any questions, please be in attendance at this meeting
on May 14, 1992. Thank you.
RG: es
attachments
poi BOLtVAR STREET
P.O.807C S76
$ANGER, TE7[AS'6�C66
Siy-4S8-7930
Si7.458-4x8o FA7[
5/ 14/92 (P&L)
ZONING REwUEST
Zoning Request for Lat 5. Block 6, Hampton Addition, (813 Church Street)
to reduce size of residence from 1200 sq. ft plus two car garage to 1003
sq ft. plus one car garage for Chester Wright.
P1eaRP
�l-�eck
nne•
Comments:
I approve of the Zoning Request.
I disapprove of the Zoning Request.
SIGNATURE
DATE..
\o
15 Property Owners
PROPERTY OWNERS TO F2ECEIVE LETT�R5 REGARDING ZONING
- REQUEST BY CHESTER WRIGHT, 813 CHURCH (REQUEST TO BE
PRESENTED 5/ 14/92 TOP & Z)
Zula Knight Blakeley Kelli S. Cardwell
C/O Charles Blakely 311 Oak
$dx 892 Sanger, TX 76266
Sanger, TX 76266
Joe Amos Amyx
Jo Dean Pace 2306 Bolivar
$ox 364 Denton, TX � 76201
Sanger T:X 7�766
Melvin Flowers
Patricia A Miller 505 Denton Street
Box 483 Sanger, TX 76266
Sanger, TX 76266
Vera Harper
J. Z. Hard 506 Denton St
503 Oak St Sanger, TX 76266
Sanger, TX 76266
$ille Coffey
C. W. Rogers Box 172
502 Denton Sanger, TX 76266
Sanger, TX 76266
Rosa DC Sheckells
504 S Denton St.
Sanger, TX 76266
Hiram L, Harper
506 Denton St
Sanger, TX 76266
Mrs. Jesse Lynch
Box 63
Sanger, TX 76266
A. A. Lynch
% Bobby Ramsey
P. O. Box 176
Sanger, TX 76266
J. E, Swindle
P. O. Box 57
Sanger, TX 76266
4
' � �til.('(tY
� V�
m
IN �
� I N
�'m� iD
'' -
1 y
1 .. N
' I r„ _.^...._...
+vAAo _ ..� t _ .I I-.--! �_......
SfNEkT
�y j � ^}
stisti , . __ I [�— l ���
F�14``
cy � � � }9�'..^a
m �- Fii(
G
�4 '� Tj�
��, ti I�i p � �:' m
r; � �� ��
I�
�n �'� n
L V,�
.. �1 l 1 r� . 1 t �.
D _.. L. 1 ,
�LLQ��I _�I� ... I ( i I �
j "la�r -- - � -. I'
� C__, � , ,
i.
wnaQT �. _. (
__ � . � ..
,,
,:
`�
MAA,SNnyt � L _ST.pEE+
..' ._____._� ." ' I
�_CHURc I
o �_.l �___s„+�T.
y -� �__._
`� � : _. ' _
�_._9uSI1N ..; I. _STREtT .
,1 �,____-_,....___
V/C/N/rY MAP
SCALE l' � 600'
REPEAT BLOCK 6, HAMPTON'S ADD/T/ON
CAB. C, �G. 137, P.R.
Lor l Lor 2
AS � I
E T 125.0'
65.0' s� 60.0'
�I 25�BACK YARD L/Nf
z LOT 4
�IO
25' BACK YARD LINE
LOT 5
N 1 I
O O
�I O O J
BLOCK � IQ g �I
rol � 2 Im � I
�_
� �L — _L�
25' BUILOWG LINE
f�• - *—
POlNT-UF
S��
/25.0'
,�"�i'�771^'�7
CHURCH STREET
'�T.LSWORTH SWINDLE
c�
a �.
�*w�r
CITY OF SANGER
P. O. BOX 578
SANGER, TEXAS 76266
MEMORANDUM #2048
TO: Planning & Zoning Commission Members
FROM: John Hamilton, City Manager
DATE: May 12, 1992
SUBJECT: Request Far Zoning Change -Scheduled for Thursday,
May 14, 1992
Enclosed is a map and the assessed v
proximity to the lot in question on th
are copies of the letters City Hall has
the area.
clue of the residences in close
s scheduled hearing. Also enclosed
received from the property owners in
In April, 1992, three (3} single family residential permits were issued. Two
in the Bourland Addition, 1814 and 1816 Melinda Mryl each valued at
$42,000 and one at 216 Southside valued at $32,000. Staff assumes that the
residence Mr. Wright proposes to construct would be a Farm and Home
financed residence which usually are priced between $40,000 and $48,000.
Please make every effort to attend as these are two {2} vacancies and we
need a quorum present.
JH:es
Enclosures
CC: Planning & Zoning Commission
CITY OF SANGER
P. O. BOX 578
SANGER, TEXAS 76266
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Hamilton, City Manager
FROM: Rosalie Garcia, City Secretary ��
Lll l L'
111G�
t
f1,
i.i .i v
SUBJECT: Assessed Property Values within 200' of
Replat of Hampton, Block 6, Lot 5
Enclosed is a list of assessed values for property owners that are within 200'
of the proposed zoning request for Chester Wright
RG: es
Property Owners -Assessed Values of Property (Zoning Request for
Block 6, Lot 5)
Hampton, Blk. 4, Lot W 87' Patricia Miller $32,344
Lot W 87' of N 110 7 of Box 483
(Lot 6) (502 Oak St.} Sanger, TX
Hampton, Blk. 5, Lot NE 1 4
(503 Oak St.)(Lot 1)
Hampton, Blk. 5, Lot Pt W 1 2
of N. 1/2 {Lot 3)
Hampton, Blk. 5, Lot S70'
of N. 140' of W 1 2
Hampton, Blk. 5, Lot S 70'
of W 1 2
Hampton, Blk. 3, Lot W 75'
of S 1 2
Hampton, Blk. 3, Lot NW 1 4
(Lot 2)
Hampton, Blk. 7, Lot (E 118.5
of 5 66' (Lot 6)
Hampton, Blk. 10, Lot 1 (E70'
of S 105') Acres .168
J. Z. Hard
503 Oak St.
Sanger, TX
C. W. Rogers
502 Denton
Sanger, TX
Exemption $10,000
Disability $ 3,000
Assessed $29,079
Taxable $16,079
Exemption $10,000
Assessed $50,749
Taxable $40,749
Rosa D. Sheckells Exempt.
504 S. Denton Assessed
Sanger, TX Taxable
$10,000
$25,835
$15,835
Hiram L. Harper Exempt. $10,000
506 Denton Assessed $37,867
Sanger, TX Taxable $27,867
Jo Dean Pace Assessed $35,764
Box 364
Sanger, TX
Samuel Lester Exempt. $10,000
P. O. Box 1005 Assessed $25,611
Sanger, TX Taxable $15,61 1
Kelli S. Cardwell Assessed $19,138
311 Oak
Sanger, TX
Bille Coffey
Box 172
Sanger, TX
Assessed $44,775
Page 2 Assessed Value Zoning Request 5/ 14/92 P & Z
Hampton, Blk. 10, Lot 1 (E
125' of N 1/ 2)
Hampton, Blk. 10, Lot E
70' of W 140 of S 105)
Hampton, Blk. 6, Lot 1 E 95'
of S 105'
Hampton, Blk. 9, Lot 1
Hampton, Blk. 9, Lot 2, 3
(S 5' of LT)
Hampton, Blk. 9, Lot 3
(N 85' of)
Hampton, Blk. 7, Lot W 91.5'
ofS66' 1
Hampton, Blk. 2, Lot SW 1 4
of (Marshall &Oak St.
(Lot 3)
Hampton, Blk. 5, Lot
SE 1 4 (505 Oak St.
(Lot 6)
Martin R. Cole Assessed
205 N. Roswell
Bryan, TX 77803 �'
$27,182
James A. Hazelwood
903 Church St. Exemption $10,000
Sanger, TX Assessed $34,854
Taxable $24,854
A. A. Lynch
Bobbv Ramsev
F. O. Box 176
Sanger, TX
Melvin Flowers
505 Denton St
Sanger, TX
Larry C. Nance
503 Denton St.
Sanger, TX
Assessed
Assessed
Assessed
$25,339
,!.
$47,885
Vera Harper Exemption $10,000
501 Denton St Assessed $47,533
Sanger, TX Taxable $37,533
Joe Amos Amyx Assessed $ 4,666
2306 Bolivar
Denton, TX 76201
Zula Knight Blakely
C/O Charles Blakely Assessed -
Box 892 $37,583
Sanger, TX
Mrs. Jesse Lynch Exemption $10,000
Box 63 Assessed $55,534
Sanger, TX Taxable $45,534
Page 3 Assessed Value Zoning Request 5/ 14/92 P & Z
Hampton, Blk. 6, Lot
W 50, of S 105' of
Hampton, 131k. 6, Lot
W 65' of
E 160'ofS 106'of
�1L7111rw L V 11, 1�\.. t.J aG �. v • a....a.. �+,
Lot 1
J. E. Swindle
P. O. Box 57
Sanger, TX
J. E. Swindle
P. O. Box 57
Sanger, TX
Assessed $ 40200
Assessed $ 4,$30
Martha T,_ GihSon ExemUt. $10.000
P. O. Box 63 Assessed $34,274
Sanger, TX Taxable $24,274
I!fri A'al f+A.
IPA q IF
rRf , ,'i ,to
t
!tr�0 �i`rlI. j(i.�JIrS 'A' .f ' D T '�` lif,I.
1 4 Q .L,..1
( r1'r,F1'A S ? Offer �II!
.'•r VYJ�Ir��, r> of 4 ,. •y , •,.i �C .6. 4.I .r�l
11
Fill it Am I A
it 4
pjAN too -
if I ,�IF,': :'IF, 1^1u l sy ; I i —75 74 '05•_ ...._.- IO� i.. L ;
,j�..� a�bsoll It .
„ .15 \fir, , MA\ 0IN F
1% I a . • I IN
if
rig" 1 �(to
GIF
of I it
1toggiv o I \ �, ,I AMID or. I
tt
ON t Alf
.I a 65 75 7o M u j.c.r,'�
f, ,:, ,. �; t ;,,� ° rJ a , N II
dit,�ti� iIII title \e ,l}ls't� q Ago,✓' o i 1 ` 13 go goommem
[�A
lay h� IOg M. r,l
11� S}I-'JI�� I I(,N. y1 F. N p
�`f to
,t tin .( ,.; O _ 1 �.
it A
of a
o �B
'P. iIA 00*4
I;;_� o h7
Ali III ,.fI III ell or r (A , 1,, , f , 1 r. moll
7 ra ,' Foff �l0�54
kr%pfl ,I{ r�A IF
it, 12, I /Jl 1°5 lob
IF A Ali 4
to IN
II �`, :,I of Age ' r ,: 1— . r 1 J ? I(/\ Icy ids
Fill AtP. 1for lS ( ,,
AV
114
it I
do
toe
i I it
y-rQS �y jO?� r` 1 5 11 _ IIg,S 1eg
A it
It, I I off rig
I tt For Not
jj r , n ', 'i�� r
T I P
! i l I �..__ _. _ ... .
�� t , rti — .... I b 5 ..._ A
I�.
�j dfr 'j r8f ` 11110 .i el 41^I�Fi+ �d,J •Q 11 �f -
111,'l ,r l d 1 , e 0tAm 4
or I 4
It 3 V yF.fe 1y f+t5. <I( \ �1_"V o
It POP
c All,
lit goomelf-
f 111 list 7Im
5 3 7
%) �'
✓'i�'4i4 N'�, ` 1 IN AN
�n 1l
A Not
Jof c
. I, , .
IN
FAA
Ago
bA
4'8 AN
Al
. p
�t'4 r 105 /O I oil
/— — __
L' 9
TV
11
ipv III— AV,
IVAN
All, '•,uiiloff
IN
;I V ' ► a1 r C joo_..._ _. loq` ..--
.c
to IF V ifs
rh h Not
ANN
stunIry r oil ,%
S
5I 14/92 (PBtZ)
ZONING REgUEST
Zoning Request for Lot 5, Block 6, Ngmpton Addition, (813 Church Street)
to reduce size of residence from 1200 sq. ft. plus two car garage to 1003
sq. ft plus one car garage for Chester Wright
Please check one:
I approve of the Zoning Request.
I_ I disapprove of the Zoning Request.
Comments:
DATE
5/ 14/92 (PBtZ)
ZONING REgUEST
Zoning Request for Lot 5, Block 6, Hampton Addition, (813 Church Street)
to reduce size of residence from 1200 sq. ft plus two car garage to 1003
sq. fr, plus one car garage for Chester Wright
Please check one:
I approve of the Zoning Request.
�_�� I disappro�re of the Zoning Request
Comments:
9•
._._..�
DATE
5/ 14/92 (PBtZ)
ZONING REgUEST
Zoning Request for Lot 5, E31ock 6, Hampton Addition, (813 Church Street)
to rcdi.�ce size of residence from 1200 sq. ft. plus two car garage to 1003
sq ft. plus one car garage for Chester Wright.
Please check one:
Comments:
�j ^pF�.
.R`a
I approve of the Zoning Request.
I disapprove of the Zoning Request
SIGNATURE
.'
DATTr
5/ 14/92 (PBtZ)
ZONING REQUEST
Zoning Request for Lot 5, 131ock 6, Hampton Addition, (S 13 Church Street)
to reduce size of residence from 1200 sq. ft. plus two car garage to 1003
sq. ft. plus one car garage for Chester Wright.
Please check one:
I approve of the Zoning Request,
���'`� I disapprove of the Zoning Request
Comments:
-�—�
SIG A RE
DATE
.,r �-*fl�
,. .,�
n•~!'!
� � '�
� �����
� 5/ 14/92 (P&Z)
ZONING REQUEST
Zoning Request for Lot 5. Hlock 8, Hampton Addition, (813 Church Street)
to reduce size of residence from 1200 sq. ft plus two car garage to 1003
sq. ft plus one car garage for Chester Wright.
Please check one:
�~�� I approve of the Zoning Request.
� _,_._
_, I disapprove of the Zoning Request.
Comments:
f
r,. �., �
14J
7
5/ 14/92 (PBtZ)
ZONING REgUEST
Zoning Request for Lot 5� Block 6. Hampton Addition, (S 13 Church Street)
to reduce size of residence from 1200 sq. ft. plus two car garage to 1003
sq. ft. plus one car garage for Chester Wright.
Please check one:
Comments:
I approve of the Zoning Request.
I disapprove of the Zoning Request.
DATE
5/ 14/92
(P�tZ)
ZONING REgUEST
Zoning Request for Lat 5, Black 6, Hampton Addition, (813 Church Street)
to reduce size of residence from 1200 sq. ft plus two car garage to 1003
sq. ft plus one car garage for Chester Wright
Please check one:
Comments:
��' C
I approve of the Zoning Request.
I disapprove of the Zoning Request
DATE
5/ 14/92 (PStZ)
ZONING REgULST
Zoning Request for Lot' S, Block 6, Hampton Addition, (813 Church Street)
to reduce size of residence from 1200 sq. ft. plus two car garage to 1003
sq ft. plus one car garage for Chester Wright .
Please check one:
I approve of the Zoning Request.
I disapprove of the Zoning Request.
Comments:
SIGNA
� _ � 99°z'
DATE
_�- � , ,
��
I�ti�� .
�� 9��1?
�.,�
-.��,
.,
f�. � �
��
..,t
. _ � 1 ��, 1 p �� r -�
1 _ ''! I .I � ... I
1� I ��1 � L
5/ 14/92
���'�ZO�NING REQUEST
Zoning Request for Lot 5. Slock 8, Hampton Addition, (813 Church Street)
to reduce size of residence from 1200 sq. ft. plus two car garage to 1003
sq ft plus one car garage for Chester Wright.
Please check one:
Comments:
I approve of the Zoning Request.
I disapprove of the Zoning Request
' SIGNATURE
TO:
FROM:
DATE.
SUBJECT:
USAGE
CITY OF SANGER
P. O. BOX 578
SANGER, TEXAS 76266
John Hamilton, City Manager
Rose Garcia, City Secretary fC
June 1, 1992
Billing for 5-15-92
Total Water Gallons
Total Sewer Gallons
Total KWH
BILLING
Sanitation Billing
Sewer Billing
Water Billing
Total Electric
1248
ELECTRIC
METERS
1657
11,776,700
11,746,400
1,686,177
13,2$5.61
23.023.27
34,380.53
140,735.61
• • �� DTI_ :.
1471
RESIDENTIAL
SEWER SA11�fi.
1294 1315
FUEL _
ADJUSTMENT
114 138
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF SANGER
P. O. BOX 578
SANGER, TEXAS 76266
Honorable Mayor &
Rosalie Garcia, City
June 1, 1992
Tax Collections
Members cif �h
Secretary Voog
City Catincil
Listed below are the totals collected for taxes, penalty and interest from
October, 1991 to present:
October
November
December
January
February
March
April
May
As certified on this
Taxes
16,629.63
26,904.96
105,806.61
113,211.20
31,326.35
189511595
5,704.13
8,699.94
326,794.77
13t day of June,
1,094.04
316.91
2,539.12
840.35
693.30
2,308018
1,328.-69
,133.78
10,254.37
1992.
Rosalie Garcia
City Secretary/
Tax Collector