The URL can be used to link to this page

04/06/1992-CC-Agenda Packet-RegularCITY COUNCIL AGENDA MONDAY, April 6, 1992 201 BOLIVAR STREET, CITY HALL 7:00 P.M. 1. Call to Order, Invocation, and Pledge to the Flag 2. CONSENT AGENDA a). Approve Minutes&Workshop - 3/ 11/92 b). Disbursements AGENDA 3. Citizen's Input 4. Consider and Passible Action Requesting Authorization for Bids - Water System Improvements - 12' Water Supply Line 5. Consider and Possible Action Requesting Authorization for Bids - 200,000 Gallon Elevated Water Storage Tank 6. Consider and Possible Action Requesting Authorization for Bids - 300 GPM Water Supply Well 7. Consider and Possible Action Requesting Authorization for Bids - Sewer Line Improvements - Ward/Willowood Addition 8. Consider and Possible Action Requesting Authorization for Bids - Municipal Swimming Pool 9. Consider and Possible Action Requesting Authorization for Bids - Acker Street Improvements 10. Consider and Possible Action Requesting Authorization for Bids - Keeton Road Improvements 1 1. Consider and Possible Action Requesting Authorization to Advertise Sale of Surplus Property 12. Consider and Possible Action Regarding Land Donation -Lot 2, Slack 46, Original Town 13. Consider and Possible Action Regarding Amended Contract with Upper Trinity Water District 14. Consider and Passible Action Regarding Application to Texas Railroad Commission -Recyclable Materials 15. Consider and Possible Action Regarding Proposed Salary Step -Plan 16. City Administration Report 17. Any Other Such Matters 18. Adjournment Rosalie Garcia City Secretary MINUTES: w s • ■ 1 f layort • i « e i . . •'.. • CaUnciimari Eerndt ' r i, i� a iI • «' i1 ` i •� « i « a • tY Secretary Rosalie Garcia, - wi engineers With Hunter fe - Upper Trinity City of Denton the it • pile. agreement to construct. pipelinei.. -. i.to serve Sanger. Items discussed were: (a) Cast (b) Capacity requirements ( c) Line will be scheduled to be in service by June 1, 1993. (d) District will design, construct and awn the line. • i' � i s M , s• "work.r out Sanger. .. !. :• ,. � • � i • it -• � :� « iot be obligated to pay forl Allisonalso gave a brief summaryismatter. DiSCUSSlonr CC Workshop 3/ 11/92 Page 2 {a) Cost projections per (b) Debt Service ( c) Operation Cost ( d) Maintenance Cost Discussion. 1,f?C30 gallons of well water (A) Mayor Armstrong asked 'Travis Roberts, City Engineer, what is the City going to do concerning sewer line on First Street. (a) Easements were discussed to extend sewer line from 5th Street to Sewer Plant. Council decided to put this item on the agenda for Monday night MINUTES. City Council Meeting March 16, 1992 MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Nel Armstrong, Councilwoman Margie Branton, Councilman Wendell Thomas, Councilman John Berndt, Councilman Tommy Kincaid and Councilman Jerry Jenkins ®TREKS PRESENT: City Manager John Hamilton, City Secretary Rosalie Garcia, Electric Superintendent Larry Yoast, Public Works Superintendent Chuck Tucker, Craig Waggoner, Billye Hollingsworth, Garland Thornton, C. G. McNeill, Lucille Trail, Judy Hoops, Burl Bourland, Viola Brookshier, Betty Talley, Chris & Stephanie Roach, Ben weatnerall, Betty Johnson - Sanger Courier, Elaine Schad - Denton Record Chronicle, and Ken Howard 1. Mayor Armstrong called the meeting to order, gave the invocation which was followed by the pledge to the flag. 2. Consent Agenda: a). Approve Minutes b). Disbursements c). Proclamation (#P2-92) for Clean -Up Day - April 4, 1992 Motion was made by Councilman Thomas to approve Consent Agenda. Seconded by Councilman Jenkins. Motion carried. 8. Citizen's Input -none 4. Conduct Public Hearing for honing Change Request for Gene Hughes From SF-4 to 2-F - 18f?3 Melinda Myrl Mayor Armstrong declared the Public Hearing open. Property owners speaking against the zoning request were: Roger Kincaid - 1866 Melinda Myrl Chris Roach - 817 Carmen Court Lucille Trail - 820 Carmen Court Discussion. Mayor Armstrong declared the Public Hearing closed. RegardingConsider and Possible Action zoning • HughesGene 3ene Hughes from SFA to 2�F at 1803 Melinda Myrl be denied. 3econded by Councilman Thomas. Motion carriect constructingwith a water line from Denton in cooperation with the Jpper Trinity Regional Water District or to construct a new 300 gpm water well. water well project onthe site that hasbeen selected of cemetery. Seconded by Councilman Kincaid, Motion carried. 76 (10). Consider and Possible Action Regarding Proposed Sewer Line Ward/Willowood Addition Motion was made by Councilman Jenkins to instruct staff to proceed with proposal to obtain RON, easement for the sewer line for Ward, Willowood Addition by first contacting landowner and negotiating the R.O.W, easement and if not negotiable, to proceed with the eminent domain proceedings. Seconded by Councilman Kincaid. Motion carried. 8. (6}. Consider and Passible Action Regarding Bids) for Pole Mounted Puller Unit -Electric Department isted below. echline, Inc. ; ; f ! f i mount of $8,806.00 and the $806 over�budget to be funded out tility Fund Equipment Replacement Seconded by Councilman Motion carriecL CC Min. 3/ 16/92 Page 3 9. (7). Consider and Possible Action Regarding Bids) for Skid Unit For Grass Truck - Fire Department eld at ## ! on ! 1992o The followingbids • •.f ## Equipment3ims Fire !' f f (alternate4 Equipment3ims Fire •#' ff 811037400 qeal & Associates for $8,037,00 to purchase the Skid Unit for Grass Cruck for the Fire Department Seconded by Councilman Kincaid. •_ * • Municipal Swimming Pool Staff requested to table this item. 11. City Administration Report a). City Manager had no news on the marina project. b). The Board of Adjustment at, Thursday night and approved request by Donald Tuttle and Rannie Jones to construct anew single family residence, 50 X 100' lot. 12. Any Other Such Matters: Vol our indoor substation causing a shortage and quite a bit of damage. We lost 3 out of 4 main breakers. gettingork at tatiorL Estimated cost to ### ! to the Keaton ork will be $12,000 to CC Alin 3/ 16/92; Page 4 Council consensus to proceed with his recommendations. CITY OF SRNGc:R VtNDOR INV NO AF' OPEN! ITEM L.I ST INV D'CE Pa NUM COMPANY 100 4/03/92 PAGE 09 o 52 DUE DTE PURCH AMT DISC. AMT �75 (1-i RENTAL P.O.=•1'i1A 7078 CONCRETE/GRINDER 667-06 3/18/92 9402 4/07/92 4204. 0500 184. 48 TOTAL', 33iC} E-tRKEFF � Ti'lYLt3R i:Cl�il"'ANY F'O I:sai 75c66 ONE BOOK 28370827 3/09/92 9370 4/07/92 TOTAL, 3786 ESOLIVAR Sr-�ECIiII_TY 1='RaDUCT 55 GAL. OTL 1594 3/02/` 2 419„ (?300 2'3, 54 ,t 19. 1 �t_:0 23. 54 419. 1200 23. 54 rt 19. 2000 023. 54 419. 1700 23.54 456. q9t t7 :- 3.54 419. 0500 23„ 54 419. Ufa00 % 3. 54 419.0700 23.54 t 19a 0800 :=3. 54 CASE 2 CYC.0IL/T 1604 3/27/92= 456. U900 4, 02 419. l lOO 4. O2 419. 0500 h . 02 419. 0600 4. 02 %+19.01:.ati 4. Cy; 419. 0800 4, 0 a 419. 0300 2. 15 419. l lCaty 2u 15 419. 17C" 2. 15 419, 0500 c. 15 419. 0600 , . 15 419. 0700 2m15 419.08(4*40 2.10 TOTAL 416t? EtU'T'TERWORTHS F'UC-tLISHERS 4 30m 0100 28. 83 TOTAL'. 433E 4/07/9c 955� 4/t�7/9c' 96SC� DATA BUSINESSFORt=159 INC. 163-16'7 HOWEt_L 4�Rll �ROCE��-.'Ei/BAR 1E"c='195 �;/17I9E' 9%�9c: 4/t:77f9c: 441. 19{ 0 152. 69 T OTAi 1)500 DEALERSDEALERSELECTRIC SUPPLY Pao. F•:It�.F;C:LAS CUTOUT 861683C� 3,/�=:Cy/9�: ":�`::;:; ri/C}7/9E' It Iva C mvv 54Cr, VU TOTAL'_ 184. 48 184.48 1Cy„ 1+3 EtOX �88 L35. 40 �71+. 5Cy 61}3 �'8.83 67 EcOX 5653 15�I'. 69 1 tic. 69 �+aX �676 54Cf. tjCl 13C iC lt] C r. �rY OF DENTON, ACC. MUNICIPAL Fi1J I LD I NG 215 EAST MCt, I NNF_.Y rOL'11ECIRh! TESTING CaL.41,r1 �;/3C�/92 '��,31 4/07/92 +56. 0 C �C� . GCS Cu? . ilia) . rt7 UG CaCa CITY OF SANGE.EP AP OPEN ITEM LIST COMPANY JA00 4/03/92 PAGE 09 u 5r_' VENDOR INV NO INV DTE PO NUM DUE DTE PURCH AMT DISC. AMT TOTAL600 t 0 . i o (:'.�'j0 DAVIS CONCRETE: COMP141 vy CONCRETE 01VISION p. ON BOX 840583 CONCRETE RAMPS/C 270613 3/ 19/92 9406 4/07/92 270m 00 moo r t. , 0500 270400 T0.1' )L 270m 00 .00R 20251 HALPRIN SUPPLY CO. 3804 90. BROADWAY PLACE HOSE-6Wv 5"/750 057114 3/i9/92 eq5 4f0711962' 41j726.50 Soo 4.77. 1100 0 41 726. 5() TOTAAL 417E:6. 5O . oo 20325 HARBOR FREIGHT SALVAGE CO 3491 MISSION OAKS BLVD. P.O. BOX 6013 HAMMER DQlLLtcWI 0010534 3/1V92 9443 h/6*01`4J92 149.33 ,trt) 4214a 0500 119499 TOTAL 149. 33 moo 0350 HARCROS CHEMICALS BOX 419038 DEPT 060 12 CHLeO�•'.•rd- CYLI 0315141 3/19 92 95i 1 ti /!+// 92 15044. OO woo TO•I•AL 1, 044. 00 goo 22000 HILT_ -SNIDER CHEV., INC. P'. 0. BOX 88 PLATES 10()3242 3/06/9F 9310 4/07/1'2 E8.7O 400 419.0500 28.70 TOTAL 28. 70 , oo 26000 KR I Z DAVIS CO. P.O. BOX 2500 543.25 416339 3.� 1 `7 /•'?r 9191 44 /07/9E: 543.25 . oo 470. 0800 543. c5 TOTAL 543, G5 .00 R75tat:� l_AW EhlFORCEMEN T 0Y:3TEI;18 I P.O. EsOX 1835 442. O3OO 142. 95 TOTAL 14E:. 95 woo �''7510 i_AWSON PRODUCTS INC, F•' 0 BOX 300012 nLUGS/LOivkS,i(rJI�CE F611�5 3I j�,`'1' �4�-3 t� /y•r`J9c: 65.79 . t�y�a 419. 05t 0 8. 85 41'=. 0600 3. 1!615 419. 0700 8. 85 .41 ` a 0800 8. 3 419. 1100 5.58 419 a 0300 5. 53 41901200 5.58 419, 2000 5. 58 419. 0300 8. o7 TOTAL 65n 79 . 00 27535 LAWN LAND 714 DALLAS DRIVE FERTILIZER SPREA 15530 3/�'W/9i 94i /w:o/07 92 170a 05 , oo 478. 0900 170a 05 TOTAL 170,, 05 � 00 G ITY OF SANGER VENDOR INV NO 28000 LEMONS NEDWSOPAPERq INC MARCH NOTICES 537 436. 1400 436. 1500 TOTAL. AP OPEN ITEM LIST COMPANY 100 4/03/92 PAGE 09a5E: INV DTE PO NUM DUE DTE PURCH AMT DISCp AMT F'.Op BOX 68 3/30/92 107. 50 107. 50 ?9601 MACM I LLAN PUEsL I SH is NG COMA' BOOK L609712 3/E:3/9c 475. tr2OO 34p 8'7 TOTAL ��9750 MGMAHAN OIl_ COt1PAhlY MOTOR '.VEHICLE FU 0507012 414. 1200 414p 0500 414. 0300 414, 0800 414p 0600 414p 0700 414. 14700 TOTAL 959V 4/t17/9 t_15, 00 15a tatr P.O. BOK 7777 118'775 9483 4/07/92 34p87 41 � EtELL. AVEN(JE 3/17/92 9531 31200 98, 30 603u 34 488.49 409,08 69, oo lop 70 3ii5inj Jp t_, MATTHEWS COp q INC. 6c0 WEST FELIK C;UBBI=F, GLUVES/BA 05701 it13119i 418. 0800 144a 80 TOTAL 3�4•. 87 P.O. DRAWER J. 4l07/92 1 q 709. 91 1 q 7C19.91 P, O, BOX 6f+L,4 8707 4/tr7/9c 144.80 31L5i) MISSISSIPPI TOOL � SUPPLY F'.0. B0K cC14 GL.OVkS/FIRST AID 018837 3/19/9c 9514 4/t77/9c 418. E;200 107. 97 TOTAL 3c:tyCrCt NORTHWEST TRAI�ISFORtY1ER COp 8 SOUTHWEST c:9 'TR(1;�!SFORMEP, TRANSFORMER CONS CONS �0816 47i_a, i_a8i)t.r 20826 3117/9E: 3/17/92 393. tlta TRANSFORMER CONS 470, 0800 20822 3/17/92 393800 TRANSFORMER CONS 470p 0800 20835 /17/92 393, OO TRANSFORMER TRANSFORMER TRANSFORMER CONS CONS CONS 4 70p 0800 21004 470, 0800 20840 470, 08t_ 0 20836 3/17/92 3/17/92 3/17/92 519, 393p 393. 00 00 00 TRANSFORMER CONS 470m 0800 20992 3/17/92 519, 00 TRANSFORMER TRANSFORMER CONS CONS 470v 0800 20994 470, 0800 20828 3/17/92 3/17/92 393p 393p 00 00 470, O8O 1 TOTAL 519. 00 95v9 4ft_)7/9�' 95tr9 4•/Cr7/9c 95t�9 4lt.a7/9� 9509 4I07/9 95C)9 4l07/92 9509 4I07192 9509 4fCr7/9E' 9509 4/tj7/9c: 9509 4ft_r7f9E: 144.8G 107p 97 107.97 393, 00 393. 00 93000 19000 393. 00I ,93, 0 5190 00 393, 00 393p 00 519. 00 4q 08000 , tj0 3E800 PARTS PLUS 9L0 Bp DALLAS DR. SET DIE.°K TJR(1KE F' Crtj545t) 3117/9E: 9441 •4/t?7/9c Era, 0.,:; , c;:r0 Vl�'NDOR INV NO AF' OF'EI�I ITEM L.I ST CrONF'ANY 1 t�ii_; 4 f G3f Gc FACE t;9„ ;;� INV DTE F'O N(.11r1 DUE DTE F'URt�H AN'( RISC. AMT 3u(:;C;c_; f-'AYLESS rA51-RJAYSp ItdC. F.O. BOX E,��Ci.�;�S 1« 1;t4s.ig1 tiEDWOO t:;cE�33t; �:/t;4r'S�' S17ci 4fir'715� 3E,. �C; , Crt:; �+c: i . ta�Crta 3F�. Ct� �= LASWL I t�H'(/SLEF�'J � �'cF,B�'1=5 ;/ 11 !'�c. 9��97 4 f ti7 f'�c' 46. �18 . t:;tr 4�'t+. t;�i;Ci 9. S9 4e i . t':�ti: i 3�,, t�� TOTAL. B3. °;B , t;tj �+�,iC.;t; STt�RY HOtJ"3E CaRF'CiRATIC71�1 EtINDERY I_Ah1E aG E't.'v�;S t:;?4£�98�tr SI�4/`��' 754�'� 4ft?7/SC' '�E,1.'?L�, . t;i; 475. t�i�;i;t; c� 1. '�S TC?Tr;L.�E,1.9L� , t;t�; 4��7ta1 '(ECHLINEp INC. P.O. BOX '��1+9 ftRl'C.STGRSiui.)'TOUT iC�E�'7t? Sf17f'�E 94`:?4 4/t�r7f9�.: 731.5i_; ,t1tj 47Cr. i iBi iC; 7.31.:5�� 15 NF�S �!E:!�DS Oh!L it'7C�4 w�f�;=�/`ac' 91G 4f��7f`��, 517. �;�:r . (=;tj 47t7. Ut�t;i; 517.5i; T C?T�'L. 1 p �4��1. t;ti , t_;(_1 43£�t;;t:; TEEN SUBSCRIBER SERVICES F'O BOX ;�R`�7 E:'UC-!Si":hil!�!'E'ICJ!�! S'�1E4US 3!'�;f9�' 5484 4f(:i7/9�.: 15. �'C ,!";c:; t+wt �, t;C;t:;c:; 1 �Q t�� TOT:?L 15. SG . (_"it.; 4ct;t;tj `(ERAS METER R SEWER CO., HWY. ,:,tJta EA#aT F'. O. BOX it?4ti uG'UF'L.'iC�aSt:'i r4ETER ,a,7G7E� �;/i'3f'��: 54�?7 Oft?7f9�' G8.'?ti . t;t; 4��7. trf�t�G F 9. '3t► CL'';M('C�/V!'LVESfTU S77"�E, .'f.:,1!`�'r""_: 5514 Oft=}7f9�: cC77.�e' .tit:; TCi T ;fit.. 57E,. 1 S . t;i; Otri;C�t:; V1.RNER Ct-iEMICAi_ L.t]R!='. i it"; ST. LUtSE:� IIRIVE E'IRE� t•i��!'i KIL!_ER E�c'6t? �ifC};3/`3c '�18�, 4/t37f9��: '�=:47.7c: ,t;t� 4i.s. t';Stit; A;�. OB TC?'I'>';t. G47.7c: . t;t; ;;;;iit; WEST F'UBL.ISHINC CO. I�'.O. BOX E�+SSE TEXAS !...vi:r;L 'c�C►VT f�55`�4 3/tiGIS�' S411 4/t�a7/'��' ��'. utj . t�atj 445. 1�tji; ;.5. ,ii TC'.T';tL mac:. 5t' . tu:i Su45ta WESTCATE VE'i'E R T NARY I—IOSF' I 4Gt;1 N. MESA r�UT"—IS?ia;;SlGt �'173C; 4/t;i/9�: '34CG 4/ta7f5�� 4S. fit; , i_;t'; 444. Ca3i;C; i+5. �tr 'T'OTAL 4S. Si � . t;Ca 17p �+4�. 6t; . C;tr `(OTAt_ DUE W 11'H D I SCOtJNTS 17p 44�=. F�Ci TOTAL DUE— NG D'i SOOLINT'S 17 p 44�'. E,t; � � �_ �t� ClL. DE'1=sARTMEN'1"S 4�T!MTh!? �;?'P,(:1'!" � CI!t!-L=:H 1 �_'8. Ci.:, CITY OF SANCER VENDOR IIVV NtJ l T 0mi Y POLICE STREE S WATER IJf)STEW E ELECTRIC PARKS FIRE VEHICLE 14AINT—aF (MAYOR & COUNCIL.-GF h1AYOR COUNCIL--E= PUBLIC WORKSEF I?ATf; PROCESSING VEHICLE MAINT-EF rJf7STc—bJ'''CIL.L-EF GENERAL_ FUND EI`JTERF'R'LSJ: FUt�I? AP OPEN ITEM LIST COMPANY 100 0061032 FACE O9e52 TNV DTE PO NUM DUE DTE F'URCH AMT DISC. AMT L u:iLJa 3 859u 36 823v 61 6 1g717.68 T 19C). 1 8 7g312.03 280419 11 47761.79 1 60. 12 14 107. 50 1 130, 00 17 36. 39 19 15u. 69 29. 1 c.L. 629.97 7q c:l+Lt. 6C) h Oq 198. t)t) CITY OF SANGER P.G. BOX 578 SANGER, TEXAS 76266 TC1: Honorable Mayor &Members of the City Council FRflM: John Hamilton, City Manager DATE: April 3, 1992 SUBJECT: Authorize Bids - VLTater System Improvements - 12" Water Supply Line Project Estimate $64,000 Advertisement for Bids is attached for your review. Staff will be available to answer any questions. JH:es Attachments w�. _.. ____ _ P.05 s�cTroz� A ADVERTIS$ME�I'1' �'OR B�IaS ', 1 Sea ed proposals addressed to �het,Mayox� and. City Gounc�,l of the C�,tyaoF� Sanger, .2d1 Bolivar Street, Sanger, Texas, 7626ti, wi,�,l be rece�.ved at the office oP the Mr. �7ohn Hamilton, City Manager until p.m. on �992 , for the following project: WATE�t SYSTEM IMP1�OtTEMEN2'S 12" WATER SUP$l,Y LINE Bidders must submit with their bids a Cashiers Check in the amount !1'�' TiTIC Mt�Y�r.o r�� 1cQ� ..A LLB � • a � _ , -� i�•-� r..��-��4 �.�-�� L 4�,� maximum ainoun� t�3,p, payat�ie w�,thout recourse to the City of Sanger or a Proposal Bond in the same amount from a reliable Surety Company as guarantee that the Bidder wi11 enter into a contract and execute bond and guarantee farms provided within ten (7.0) days after notice of award of contract to him. The successful Bidder must furnish performance and payment bonds each in the amount of 100 percent (100g) of the contract price from an approved Surety Company holding a permit from thc� State of Texas, to act as Surety and be acceptable according to the latest list of companies holding certificates of authority from the Secretary of Treasury of the United states, or other Surety or Sureties acceptable to the Owner. All unit prices must be stated in _both script and figures. The Owner rreserves the right to reject any or a].1 bids and to waive formalities. Tn case of ambiguity or lack of clearness in stating the price in the bids, the ©wrier reserves the z �.ght to consider the most advantageous construct�.on thereof, on to reject the bid. Unreasonab3.e or .unbalanced unit prices will be considered sufficient cause of rejection of any bid or bids. Eidders axe expected to inspect the site of themselves regazd�.ng local cond�,tions and the Work is to be done. Attention is call4 the Acts of the 43rd Legislature of th subsequent amendments concerning the wage prevailing wages specif�,ed. Prevailing established by the city of Sanger fox this the work and to inform conditions under which :d to the px-ovisians of a State of Texas and scale and payment of wage rate wi11 be as project. instructions to Bidders, Proposal T�orr�s, Siaecifications, Plans and contract bocuments, etc., may be examined without charge, or may be obtained at the office t�f �iunter Associafies,. Xnc., Consulting Engineers, F140 Walnut Hill Lane, Suite 5t�p, Dallas, Texas 75231, fox a fee of Thirty Dollars ($ 30.00), non�refundable. AT`.�EST: CITY OF BANGER, TEXAS .< <- . Nel Armstrong, Mayor r,,,• �,F ��...��, CITY' OF SANGER P.O. BOX 578 SANGER, TEXAS 76266 MEMORANDUM # 2429 TO: Honorable Mayor &Members %J the City Council FROM: John Hamilton, City Manager DATE: April 3, 1992 SUBJECT: Authorize Bids - 244,444 Gallon - Elevated Water Storage Tank Project Estimate $ 5,444 Advertisement for Bids is attached for your review. Staff will be available at the meeting to answer any questions. JH:es Attachments `rr =-----------------------------P. 06--'--- .� SEC�"TON �1 AbVERTIB�MENT �QR BIDS �, �' `.sealed proposals addressed to the Mayor and City council of the City of Sanger, 201 Bo�,ivar street, Sanger, Texas, 7�z66, will be received at the office of the Mr. Sohn Hamilton, city Manager until b.m. on 7.992 for the fo].lowingr project: .�Oq,000 GALLON EL$VA'i'ED WATEi� STOfiAGE TANK bidders must submit with their bids a Cashier � s Check in the amount of five percent (5�) of the maximum amount bid, payab2.e without recourse to the city of Sanger or a Proposal sond in the same amount from �, reliable Surety Company as guarantee that the $idder will enter into a contract and execute bond and guarantee forms provided within ten (�.0} days after notice of award of contract to him. The successfuX Bidder must furnish performance and payment bonds each in the amount of 10C� percent (�.q0o) of the contract price from an approved surety Company holding a permit from the State of Texas, to act as Surety and be acceptable according to the ]�atest list of companies holding certificates of authority from the Secretary of Treasury of the United States, or other Surety ar Sureties acceptab�.e to the Owner. A�,�. unit prices must be :fated in both script and figures. The Owner reserves the right to reject any or all bids and to waive formaXities. zn case of ambiguity cr lack of clearness in stating the price in the bids, the Owner reserves the right to consider the most advantageous construction thereof, or to reject the bid. Unreasonable ox unbalanced unit pxzces will be considered sufficient cause of rejection of any bid or bids. sidders are expected to inspect the site of the work and to inform themselves regarding local. Conditions and conditions under wh�.ch. the work is to be done. Attention is called to the provisions of the Acts of the 43rd� Legislature of the State 'of xexas and subsequent amendments concerning the wage scale and payment of prevailing wages specified. prevailing wage rate wil.�, be as e$tablished by the City of Sanger for this project. Instructions to Bidders, Proposal. Forms, apecif'ications, Plans and Contract Documents, etc., may be examined without charge, or may be obtained at the office of Hunter As,ociates, Xnc., Consulting Engineers, $140 Walnut Hill Lane, Suite 500, palXas, Texas 75231, foz a fce of Thl.zty Dollars ($ 30. 00) , non--z•efundable. A`i'TEST CITY OF SA2dGER, TEXAS Nel Armstrong, Mayor City of Banner • , ' • PoOs 7 • 1 + ' TEXAS TC : Honorable Mayor &Members of the City Council FRt7M: John Hamilton, City Manager DATE: April 3, 19�2 SUBJECT: Authorize Bids - 3(70 GPM Water Supply Well Advertisement for Bids is attached for your review. Staff will be available at the meeting to answer any questions. Attachments ;� �� SECTION A biDVERTYSEMENT Fold $CDs ' r� Sealed pzoposals addressed to the Mayor and City Council of the �. City of Sanger, 201 BoXivar street, Sanger, Texas, 762F�6, wild. be recr�ived at the office of the Mr, John Hamilton, City Manager unti], n.m. on 199� ,, fox the fo�,lowing project: 340 GpM t4ATER S[iPP�,Y WELL B�.dders must submit with their bids a Cash�,er � s Check in the amount of five percent (5°�j a£ the maximum amount bid, payable without recourse �o the C`it.t3t �f ��h�er ar a 1�r�paSa? unnd ,;"; f�� ,,,,-, ...�.,..... ..v...auc amount from a reliable Surety Company' as guarantee that the Bidder will enter into a contract and execute bond and guarantee forms provided within ten (10} day$ after notice of awazd of contract to him. The successful Bidder must furnish performance and payment bands each in the amount of 7.40 percent {�.000} of the contract px�,ce from an approved Surety Company holding a permit from the State of Texas, to act as Surety and be acceptable according to the latest list of companies holding certificates of authority from the Secretary of Treasury of the United States, or other Surety or Sureties acceptable to the Owner. All unit prices must be stated in both script and figures. The Owner reserves the right to reject any or all bids and to waive formalit�,es, Tn case of ambiguity or lack of clearness in stating the price in the bids, the Owner reserves the right to consider the most advantageous construction thereof, ox to reject the bid. Unreasonable or unbalanced un�.t prices w�.11 be cons�.dered suffic�.ent cause off' rejection of any bid. or bads. Bidders axe expected to �.nspect the site of the work and to inform themselves regarding local conda:t�,ons and condat�,ans under wh�,ch the work is to be done. Attention is cal�.ed to the prov�.s�.ons of the Acts of the 43rd Legislature of the State of Texas and subsequent amendments concerning the wage scale and payment of preva�,ling wages specified. Freva�.ling wage rate will be as established by the City of Sanger for this project. Instruetaons to Sidciers, proposal Forms, Specifications, plans and Contract pocuments, etc. , may be examined w�.thout charge, or may be obtained at the off�,ce of Hunter Associates, Znc., consulting Engineers, $14o Wa�.nut Hill�>:,zne, Suite 500, Dallas, Texas 75231, for a fee of Twenty Dollars ($ ?.0.00}, non-refundable. ATTEST: C7TX OF SANDER, TEXAS p Net, Axms�.rong, Mayor Ctfs� UP S�n�er i z w �o rn H $ Q o W ( Q 25 v1 � Ks i N V v h H f M CAM ko E" V N CH h N VI (/) N N H N N N Vj lM N V) N H y� pC ��jjN U � W 0 �a a x �O! y V O O O 4v O Q O $ O 8 b Cl h 2S o °: 0ry to H K v, Vi N Vt H Vf N H Vi H N VY oQ fi U d b U O v b O a 3 M W 3 V/ N ✓1 N 16 C� U ,r V A44 H ? 4) V A) V r 1) to b a _y r4 r CITY OF SANDER P. O. BOX 578 BANGER, TEXAS 76266 MEMORANDUM #2023 TO: Honorable Mayor &Members of the City Council FROM: John Hamilton, City Manager DATE: April 3, 1992 SUBJECT: Authorize Bids - Sewer Line Improvements - Ward/Willowood Addition Project Estimate $_ l 0 5, o 0 0. o 0 All easements Dave been signed for this project to construct this sewer collection line to relieve the collection lines through the Ward Addition. Funding for this project is through Wastewater Collection, Sewer Mains, Acct. #475.22, budgeted amount $105,000. ................... .__________ ____ __ P . 0 4 ----- SECTION A ADVERTISEMENT FOR 131D$ Sealed proposals addressed to the mayor Y An� city ,Council of the City of Sanger,-201 Bolivar street, Sanger, Texas, 76266 will be received at the office of the Mr. aohn Hamilton, City Manager until _12 : 00 p. m. on 1992 , for the following project: SANI�'ARY SIaWER iMPROV.EMENT5 WILLOWOOD SEWER LXNE Bidders must submit with their bids a Cashier's Check ire 'the amount of five percent (5%) of the maximum amount bid, payable without recourse to the City of Sanger or a Proposal Bond in the same amount from a reliable Gtvret�, r,,,�r�,,., � _ _ l „ruta� ua guarailiee -chat the Bidder will enter into a contract and execute bond and guarantee forms provided within ten (10) days after notice of award of contract to him. 1 . The successful Bidder must furnish performance ar�d payment bonds each in the amount of 100 percent (loot) of the contract price from an approved Surety Company holding a permit from the State of Texas, to act as Surety and be acceptable according to the latest list of companies holding certificates of authority from the Secretary of Treasury of the United States, or other Surety or Sureties acceptable to the Owner. All unit prices must be stated in both script and figures. The owner reserves the right to reject any or all bids and to waive formalities. In case of ambiguity or lack of clearness in stating the price in the bids, the Owner reserves the right to consider the most advantageous construction thereof, or to reject the bid. Unreasonable or unbalanced unit prices will be considered sufficient cause of rejection of any bid or. bids. Bidders are expected to inspect the site of the work and to inform themselves .regarding local conditions and conditions under which the work is to be done. Attention is called to the provisions of the Acts of the 43rd Legislature of the State of Texas and subsequent amendments concerning the wage scale and payment of prevailing wages specified. Prevailing wage rate will be as established by the City of Sanger for this project. Instructions to Bidders, Proposal Forms, Specifications, Plans and contract Documents, etc, , may be examined without charge, or may be obtained at the office of Hunter Associates, Inc., Consulting Engineers, 8140 Walnut Hill Lane, Suite Soo, Dallas, Texas 75231, for a fee of Thirty Dollars ($ 30. 00) , non�refur)dabl.e. A`I`TEST: CTTV QF BANGER; TEXAS 21e]. Armstrong, Mayor City of Sanger A_1 N91039E MEMORANDUM #2022 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT. CITY OF SANDER P. O. BOX 578 SANDER, TEXAS 76266 Honorable Mayor & John Hamilton, City April 3, 1992 Authorize Bids - Mu Muni Members of the City Council Manager Swimming Pool Pool Estimate Total Project The Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Grants In Aid engineer has authorized the City to proceed with the swimming pool portion of our park improvements. We are still waiting for design approval from the Architectural Barriers Commission on the Bath House and walking trail portion for the park improvements. JH:es SECTION A ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS Sealed proposals addressed to the Mayor and City Council of the City of Sanger, 201 Bolivar Street, Sanger, Texas, 76266, will be received at the office of the Mr. John Hamilton, City Manager until p.m. on 1992 , for the following project: MUNICIPAL SWIMMING POOL & FACILITIES SWITZER PARK Bidders must submit with their bids a Cashier's Check in the amount of five percent (5%) of the maximum amount bid, payable without recourse to the City of Sanger or a Proposal Bond in the same amount from a reliable Surety Company as guarantee that the Bidder will enter into a contract and execute bond and guarantee forms provided within ten (10) days after notice of award of contract to him. The successful Bidder must furnish performance and payment bonds each in the amount of 100 percent (100%) of the contract price from an approved Surety Company holding a permit from the State of Texas, to act as Surety and be acceptable according to the latest list of companies holding certificates of authority from the Secretary of Treasury of the United States, or other Surety or Sureties acceptable to the Owner. All unit prices must be stated in both script and figures. The Owner reserves the right to reject any or all bids and to waive formalities. In case of ambiguity or lack of clearness in stating the price in the bids, the Owner reserves the right to consider the most advantageous construction thereof, or to reject the bid. Unreasonable or unbalanced unit prices will be considered sufficient cause of rejection of any bid or bids. Bidders are expected to inspect the site of the work and to inform themselves regarding local conditions and conditions under which the work is to be done. Attention is called to the provisions of the Acts of the 43rd Legislature of the State of Texas and subsequent amendments concerning the wage scale and payment of prevailing wages specified. Prevailing wage rate will be as established by the City of Sanger for this project. Instructions to Bidders, Proposal Forms, Specifications, Plans and Contract Documents, etc., may be examined without charge, or may be obtained at the office of Hunter Associates, Inc., Consulting Engineers, 8140 Walnut Hill Lane, Suite 500, Dallas, Texas 752311 for a fee of Thirty Dollars ($ 30.00), non-refundable. ATTEST: CITY OF SANGER, TEXAS b , Nel Armstrong,. .Mayor City of Sanger A-1 N91038E MEMORANDUM #2021 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF BANGER P. O. BOX 578 BANGER, TEXAS 76266 I�ionorable Mayor & John Hamilton, City April 3, 1992 Authorize Bids For Members oft e Manage Acker Street Improvements City Council Project Estimate: $ 18 0, 0 0 0 .0 0 The improvements to Acker, Pecan and Elm Streets as designed by our engineers would begin construction following the last day of school and be completed prior to the beginning of the new school year. The funds for this project would be from three sources, Street Improvements, Account #474.05, approximately $40,000, Contingency Fund and a short-term note from GNB - Sanger due March 1, 1993 based on prime + one. JH:es Attachment --------------- ----------- P.02 SEC�'�ON A AbVERTISEM£NT �'OR $ZDS 'R� ,� /� sealed pzopasals addres,ed to the Mayor .and. Caty Council of t}'re C�,ty.of Sanger, 20i Bolivar• Street, Sander, Texas, 762G�, will be received at the of€ice o€ Mx. John Hamilton, C�.ty Manager until ,p.m. _, on �.992 , for the following project. PAVING IMPROVEMENTS ACKER STREET B�.dders must subm�.t with the�,r bids a Cashiers Gizeck in the amount of five percent {50) of the maximum amount b�.d, payable without rar�n»rcc t^ thL amity of �aitC�ey oz' a Proposal Band i.n the same amount from a reliable Surety Company as guarantee that the Bidder will enter into a contract and execute band and guarantee forms provided within ten {10) days after nati.ce of award of contract to him. The successful bidder must furnish performance and payment bonds each in the amount of 100 percent (100oj of the contract price fzom an approved Surety Company holding a permit from the State of Texas, to aat as Surety and be acceptable according to the latest list of companies holding certificates of authority from the secretary of Treasury of the Una,ted states, or other suzety or Sureties acceptable to the Owner, All unit prices Must be stated in bath script and figures. The Owner reserves the right to reject any or all. bids and to waive formalities. Tn case of ambiguity yr lack of clearness in stating the price in the bids, the Owner reserves the night to consider the most advantageous construction thereof, or to reject the bid. _ Unreasonable or unbalanced unit prices will be considered sufficient cause of rejection of any bid or b�.ds. Bidders are expected to �.nspect the site of the work and to inform themselves regarding local condit�.ons and conditions under wh�.ch the work is to be done. Attention �,s called to the provisions of the Acts of the �3rd Legis],ature of the State of �'exas and subsequent amendments concerning the wage sca�.e and payment of prevailing wages specified. Prevailing wage rate will be as established by the City of Sander for this project. Xnstructions to Bidders, Pro��osal Eoxrns, Specifications, P�.ans and Contract Documents, etc., may be examined without charge, or may be obtained at the off�,ce of Hunter Associates, Inc., consult�.nq Engineers, 8],40 G�alnut bill Dane, Suite 500, Dallas, Texas 7�523�., for a fee�of Thirty Dollars ($ 3p,Ob), non-refundable. A2'TEST; CITY OF SANGE�'., TEXAS k, � "' , Nel Armstrong, Mayor - ?—� City of Sanger T)92003F City of Sanger T)92003F Ronald J. Neiman Margaret E. Barnes Neiman & Barnes a prgfessconal cotporation Attorneys At Law 386 W. Main / P.O. Box 777 Lewisville, Texas 75067 March 3, 1992 Mr. John Hamilton, City Manager City of Sanger P. O. Box 578 Sanger, Texas 76266 Dear John: Ph.: 214/436-1558 Fax: 214/436-1349 RE: Bank Loan for Street Improvements You inquire about the City's considering borrowing funds in the form of a promissory note to be given to the bank which serves as a depository for the City. You state that this will be a short- term loan with all principal and interest to be paid shortly after the beginning of the next fiscal year. As I understand the transaction, this would, in essence, be an unsecured promissory note to the bank, with the proceeds to be used for municipal streets or facilities. In my opinion, the City is authorized to borrow such funds under the authority of Section 51.035 and Section 101.005 of the Local Government Code. These statutes provide that the governing body of a city such as Sanger may borrow money based upon.its own credit. In the event a longer term payout is required, you may want to consider other financing methods. At this time, however, the City Council will only need to pass a borrowing resolution stating the amount and purpose for which the proceeds will be used. Please advise if I may be of additional assistance. Sincerely, Ronald J. Neiman � RJN:dmy CITY OF SANGER P.Q. BOX 578 BANGED, TEXAS 76266 MEMORANDUM # 2026 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John Hamilton, City Manager DATE: April 3, 1992 4 SUBJECT: Authorize Bids - Keeton Road mprovements Engineer's Estimate B�,Ooo.00 f7ur engineers have designed the Keeton Road Improvements. These improvements will be funded by Denton County Bond Funds, County Commissioner Don Hill verbally authorized on behalf of the County, our proceeding with the bid process on the project. Staff is hoping that by bidding Keeton and Acker at the same time, we will receive more favorable bids. As we proceed with this project, pay vouchers will be submitted to Renton County for payment. JH:cg e sECT�oN A ADVERTISEMENT FOR SIDS Sealed proposals addressed to ,the Mayor and C3;ty Counci],' of thQ Ca.'ty of Sanger, 201 Bolivax Street, Sanger, Texas, 75266, will be xeceived at the office of Mr. John Hamilton, City Manager until, . .m. on 1992 , for the following project. PAVYNC IMPROVEMENTS ICEATQN ROAD �3idde_r. s rnust etl�,tn�t �qi�-f. �- , � ti: �_ .._ . �•• �-hem,, u�u5 a �:asa�er%s 4i7eck in the amount of five percent (5�) of the maximum amount bid, payable without recourse to the City of Sangex or a proposa3 Bond in the same amount from a reliable Surety Company as guarantee that the �zdder will enter into a contract and execute bond and guarantee foams provided within ten (�,0) days after notice of award of contract to him. The successful bidder must furnish performance and payment bonds each zn the amount of 200 percent (100�) oP the contract price fxom an approved Surety Company holding a permit from the State of Texas, to act as Surety and be acceptable accorda.ng to the latest list of companies holding certificates of authox,i,ty from the Secretary of xreasury off' the United States, ox other Surety or Sureties acceptable to the Owner. All unit prices must be stated in both script and figures. The Owner reserves the right to reject any or alb. bids and to waive formalities, zrt case of amb�,guity ar lack of clearness in stating the price in the bids, the Owner reserves the x�,ght to consider the most advantageous construction thezeof, or to reject the bid. Unreasonable or unbalanced una,t prices will be considered sufficient cause of rejection of any bid or bids. Bidders are expected to inspect the site of the work and to inform themselves regarding local conditions and candit�.ons under' which the wank is to be done. Attention i,s called to the provisions of the Acts of the 43rd Legislature of the State of Texas and subsequent amendments concern�,ng the wage scale and payment of prevail�.ng wages spec�.fied. Prevai.l,ing wage rate will be as established by the Gity of Sanger' for this project. Instructions to D�.dders, Proposal Fozms, Spec�.fications, Plans, and Contract Documents, etc., may be examined without charge, ox may be obtained at the office of Hunter Associates, zn�., Consul.tillg Engineers, $140 Walnut Hill Larie, Suite 5$0, Dallas, Texas 75231, far a fee of Thizty boll.ars {$ 30.00), non-refundable. ATTEST: CITX OF BANGER, TEXAS Nel Armstrong, Mayor MEMORANDUM #2020 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MY OF SANGER P. O. BOX 578 5ANGER, TEXAS 76266 Honorable Mayor &Members of the John Hamilton, City Managerc April 3, 1992 Authorize Sale of Surplus Property City Council Staff requests Council authorize the sale of our accumulated surplus property. Following the required newspaper advertisements, the sale will be conducted at 6:00 p.m„ Thursday, April 16th at the City Yard. The attached list of property details the items to be included in the sale. JH:es Attachment LEGAL NCJTICE The City of Sanger will hold a Surplus and Police Property Roam Sale on Thursday, April 16,1992 at 6:40 p.m., at the City Yard, l st & Bolivar, Sanger, Texas. All surplus will be sold as is. For a complete list of available equipment and property, contact City Hall, 201 Bolivar, Sanger, Texas. Rosalie Garcia City Secretary RUl� Tt�VO TIMES: 1 time on 4/9j92 Ga ._w �2�75 I'�Ei�S `�AI��N �"kOi�I P�OP��"�Y ROOi'� �'O�Z �UCTIU� Pt��IC� i�F�'�RTNt�,�T I��_c �a�o� t�r� %a�� t��ls ��, �aU��' tii'Ll.G7t�UY1 �a1. L E? ha�� el�. .�u��x �rac �i��.��.�c�.c� �a�t� ha��c?. cc�rr�l�� r��:a�� 1�.cara C��, T��r� �� i��; �'�.r�ny vir.�ca camera ar�c� batte��7 �aac�. ��ar�---c�-r�atir car racjir�� mic�l.ar�d. �� v�.�.�:�� a�a�: d�t�ct�r ��c�r�tc�om��y �ICit ��=��it�a V�'� `�'cf��i.ba <;c�ir�r `�i�:c:ca ca��ra �rC�S�a%Clams �('��.c�t �Ui1 �� r�_�7 � j"� �� C,) °,.�° L 1, l,� •,.t � F� l�f 4- Jv b � � �X�. !, L .L �;aar� �c�ck�t: match �r�,c.S�trCt��1t o� k��.ilLcald.� �n1�� oaf hrc�+�r� cab �tri�x�ing :1�3�� c3��v Ca�ric�: v�h,icl�� 1.ac�� a�� wt�it� �'orta}�1 � `�V � � €31 Ci��'�lY �' /U ��; ��r 1 ? ' �v 3 ` G�c-c� � r� � `T a h �v arc%it��r_,t Ta?�1.� C'r�mpt�ter 2ab�c. i7C�mirlr� `!'a�1.t 75 watt I�i�rcur �'�-1 TaY��.ea t��_a�,� �aY�.in.�t Bc� w.it.h �,1 ectri c �,i F'C`��?"C I��1.'.'�t��l�1T Vap��' I�i�ht ��. �. � r . 1-- F'a��r-_- � �p�', �ri�� F �trattc�c� i-- 1��1 Chivy 1!2 tc�� T'/U :�- :3��" Ford �ar�7,�1e�P �itc�� 7itch *� -. k � `. TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT. i � • Po ! BOX i TEXASi +6 Honorable Mayor � John Hamilton, City April 3, 1992 Land Donation - Lo City Council The enclosed letter and Warranty Deed fro2n our Consulting Attorney explains our options on accepting the lot donation from the Catholic Diocese. Staff recommends acceptance and approval. JH:es Enclosures Ronald J. Neiman Margaret E. Barnes Mr. John Hamilton City Manager City of Sanger P. O. Box 578 Sanger, Texas 76266 Dear John: Neiman & Barnes a professional corporation Attorneys At Law 386 W. Main / P.O. Box 777 Lewisville, Texas 75067 March 23, 1992 RE: Lot Donation Fort Worth Ph.: 214/436-1558 Fax: 214/436-1349 by Catholic Diocese of Enclosed please find the original executed Special Warranty Deed concerning Lot 2, Block 46, of the Original Town of Sanger. You will recall that we have had some difficulty. in determining in whom the actual legal title to the property is vested; however, you indicated to me that the City was not contemplating building any structure on the property. Thus, to go to great expense to "cure" the title is not all that important. Accordingly, if the City does want the property, you should place an item on the Council agenda to accept the donation of this lot from the Catholic Diocese, and thereafter,. file this deed in the Denton County Clerk's Office. If I may be of additional assistance, please advise. Sincerely, Ronald J. Neiman RJN:dmy Enclosure �- E �. �. Prepared hjthe State Bar of Texas for use b) la%yers only. Revised 1015. Oiyxs n. Oc Slaw Ba,$4 IV%4% SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED Date: March 1, 1992 Grantor: Catholic Diocese of Fort Worth Grantor's Mailing Address (including county►: 800 West Loop 820 South Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas 76108-2919 Grantee: City of Sanger, Texas Grantee's Moiling Address (including county): 201 Bolivar Street Sanger, Texas 76266 Consideration: Ten Dollars cash, the receipt of which is hereby Property (including any improvements): LOT 2, BLOCK 46, Original Town of Sanger, as the same appears on the map or plat thereof recorded in the office of the County Clerk of Denton County, Texas. Reservations from and Exceptions to Conveyance and Warranty: All easements, covenants, conditions and restrictions as the same appear of record in the office of the County Clerk of Denton County, Texas. Grantor, for the consideration and subject to the reservations from and exceptions to conveyance and warranty, grants, sells. and conveys to Grantee the property, together with all and singular the rights and appurtenances thereto in any wise belonging, to / have and hold it to Grantee, Gramee's heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns forever. Grantor binds Grantor ao"rantor's heirs; execuwr"dminibtraters=and successorrio warrant and forever defend all and singular the property to Grantee and Grantee's heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns against every person whomsoever lawfully claiming or to claim the same or any pan thereof, except as to the reservations from and exceptions to conveyance and warranty, rin by, through or under it, but not otherwise, \A K When the context requires, singular nouns and pronouns include the plural. in 0 �' 1 C f r ,� E (AcknoN Icdgment) STATE (1F TFX A $ COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me on the by CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH BY: Notary Public. State of Texas jr name (printed): Notary's commission expires: (Corporate Acknowledgment) 19 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT This instrument was acknowledged before me on the .3 day of March 19 9 2 by Joseph P. Delaney, Bishop of Catholic Diocese of Fort Worth, oees�, Yxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxaorpnca WK.xmt*W tkadxM&oorPtnmdmmx AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: CITY OF BANGER 201 Bolivar Sanger, Texas 76266-8958 Notary Is6blic, State of Trxas Notary'sname(printed): phyllis P. Constantine Notary's commission expires: 2-11-93 PREPARED IN THE LAW OFFICE OF: NEINIAN & BARNES a professional corporation P. O. Box 777 Lewisville, Texas 75067 le CITY OF SANGER P. O. BOX $78 SANGER, TEXAS 76266 MEMORANDUM #2016 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John Hamilton, City Manager DATE: April 3, 1992 SUBJECT: Amended Contract with Upper Trinity Regional Water District The enclosed contract reflects the figures proposed by the Water District regarding Sanger's projected surface water requirements to the year 2000. Our current contract has a 1,000,000 gallon per day surface water clause. This amended contract should be of benefit to Sanger in two ways: 1 }. Ta insure our status as a participating member of the Upper Trinity Regional Water District which will allow us to purchase surface water whenever our need arises. 2}. The reduction from the 1,000,000 GPD clause tp 200,000 GPD should significantly reduce our annual share of the project and engineering costs to the Water District. This F.Y., based on the 000,000 GPD, our project and engineering costs were $11,121. You should note that this is in addition to our regular dues payment of the Water District based on $,50 per capita of the population estimate formulated by the NCTCOG. Staff recommends approval of the contract amendment. JH:es attachment h March 17, 1992 Mr. John Hamilton City Manager City of Sanger Post Office Box 459 Pilot PPoint, Texas 76259 Dear John: TRINITY Regional Water District THE CITY OF BANGER D MAR 18 1992 SANGER, TEXAS v On March 12 I sent you the proposed First Amendment to the Water Supply Contract. On March 16, the City Council of Corinth approved the Amendment but increased the amount of water from (1.2 mgd to 1.5 mgd). Therefore, I am enclosing a revised copy of the Amendment for consideration by your governing body. Also, the eight original signature pages for execution were inadvertently omitted. After approval, please sign and return the enclosed eight signature pages. Approval of the Amendment at the earliest opportunity will be appreciated. Please call me if you have any questions. in�erely, Tas E. Taylor, P.E. E ecutive Director TET:jlf Enclosures: Revision of First Amendment Eight Original Signature Pages P.O. Drawer 305 •Lewisville, Texas 75067 • 214-219-1228 UPPER TRINITY REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT REGIONAL TREATED WATER SUPPLY SERVICE FIR5T AMENDMENT PARTICIPATING MEMBER CONTRACT THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF DENTON § THIS FIRST cuiEi;DTiui:T TO THE DEGiONAL TREATED WATc.n �UrrLY CONTRACT (the "Contract") made and entered into as of the day of 1992, by and between UPPER TRINITY REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT, (the "District"), a conservation and reclamation District created pursuant to Article XVI, Section 59 of the Constitution of the State of Texas, and the following: City of Corinth City of Highland Village Lake Cities Municipal Utility Authority Town of Northlake City of Pilot Point City of Sanger which parties, collectively or individually, shall be referred to herein as "Participating Members". WI T N E S S WHEREAS, each of the Participating Members is a duly incorporated city, town or other political subdivision of the State of Texas operating under the Constitution and the laws of the State of Texas; and WHEREAS, each of the Participating MembF�:-s executed the Contract which has an effective date of November 13, 1990; and C:/HP51/DDCUHENT/ADDH-PAR.HER Harch 17, 1992 � First Amendment Participating Member Contract Page 2 WHEREAS, two (2) of the parties that executed the Contract may desire to rescind and terminate their role as parties and Participating Members in the Contract, namely, the Town of Northlake and the City of Pilot Point; and WHEREAS, the level of Demand for Northlake and Pilot Point in the Contract is relatively small compared with the other Participating Members; and WHEREAS, before either the Town of Northlake or the City of Pilot Point may rescind and terminate their participation in the Contract, the District must execute a separate agreement with each requesting party to evidence the mutual decision by the District and the requesting party to effect such a change in status; and WHEREAS, the District, the City of Corinth, the City of Highland Village, the City of Sanger and Lake Cities Municipal Utility Authority do agree by the approval and execution of this First Amendment to permit and allow the Town of Northlake and the City of Pilot Point to rescind and terminate their role as parties and Participating Members in the Contract if they execute an appropriate agreement with the District. The remaining parties, the District, the City of Corinth, the City of Highland Village, the City of Sanger and Lake Cities Municipal Utility Authority do C,/HP51/DOCUMENT/ADDN-PAR,MBR March 17, 1992 First Amendment Participating Member Contract Page 3 approveI ratify and reaffirm the Contract as if originally approved and executed without the inclusion of the Town of Northlake and the City of Pilot Point as original parties and Participating Members if such action to terminate is actually taken by Northlake or Pilot Point; and WHEREAS, the City of Corinth, the City of Highland Village, the City of Sanger and Lake Cities Municipal Utility Authority, as well as Northlake and Pilot Point until they execute a separate agreement with the District to effect a change in their status, are hereinafter referred to as the "Participating Members" for the purpose of this Contract and this First Amendment to the Contract; and WHEREAS, the District proposes to construct or develop Phase I of the Regional Water Supply System generally in accordance with Alternatives outlined in the 1992 Engineering Report prepared by Alan Plummer & Associates, Inc., and WHEREAS, District and Participating Members desire to update and modify the water supply requirements as referenced in Exhibit "B" in the Contract. CtJWP51/DOCDHENT/ADON-PAR,MBR March 17, 1992 First Amendment Participating Member Contract Page 4 NOW, THEREFORE, the District and the Participating Members agree as follows: 1. That matters stated in the preamble are found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this First Amendment as if copied in their entirety. 2. To adopt Revised Exhibit "B" attached hereto. District and Participating Members agree that said Revised Exhibit "B" in all respects shall supersede Exhibit "B" incorporated in the Contract. In all other respects the provisions of the Contract shall continue in full force and effect. This First Amendment shall be effective as to each of the parties executing this First Amendment whether or not all parties listed in the Preamble actually execute this First Amendment, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto acting under authority of their respective governing bodies have caused this First Amendment to be duly executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original, all as of the day and year first above written, which is the date of this First Amendment. UPPER TRINITY REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT By: Jim Karlovich, President Board of Directors ATTEST: Tom Harpool, Secretary Board of Directors C;/41P51/DDCDH6HT/ADDN-PAR.HBR Harch 11, 1M First Amendment Participating Member Contract Page 5 (AUTHORITY SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: John F. Boyle, Jr. Counsel for the District C:/NP51/DOCUHENT/ADDN-PAR,HBR March 17, 1992 0 First Amendment - Participating Member Contract Page 6 FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT WITH UPPER TRINITY REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT City of Corinth By Name: Title: ATTEST: Secretary, City of Corinth C:�41PS1�D000HENT�ADDN-PAR,HBR � , Harsh 11, 1992 First Amendment Participating Member Contract Page 7 FIR5T AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT WITH UPPER TRINITY REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT City of Highland Village By: Name: Title: ATTEST: Secretary, City of Highland Village Cc/NPS1/DDCUHENT/ADDH-PAR,NBR ` Karen 17, 1992 First Amendment Participating Member Contract Page 8 FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT WITH UPPER TRINITY REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT Lake Cities Municipal Utility Authority By Name: Title: ATTEST: Secretary, Lake Cities Municipal Utility Authority C:/NP51/DOCUHEHT/ADDN-PAR,HDR Harch 11, 1992 First Amendment Participating Member Contract Page 9 FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT WITH UPPER TRINITY REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT Town of Northlake By: Name: Title: ATTEST: Secretary, Town of Northlake C,/WP�1/DOCUH6HT/ADDN-PAR.HBR Harch 17, 1992 First Amendment Participating Member Contract Page 10 FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT WITH UPPER TRINITY REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT ATTEST: Secretary, City of Pilot Point City of Pilot Point By: Name: Title: C:�41PS1�D0CUHEHT�ADDN-PAR,HBR � � Harch 17, 1992 �£ First Amendment Participating Member Contract Page 11 FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT WITH UPPER TRINITY REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT City of Sanger By: Name: Title: ATTEST: Secretary, City of Sanger Cc�WP51/DOCUHBHT�ADDM-PAR.HBR March 17, 1992 REVISED EXHIBIT B SUPERSEDES EXHIBIT B IN ORIGINAL CONTRACT DATED NOVEMBER 13, 1990 MINIMUM AMOUNT OF SYSTEM CAPACITY BEING COMMITTED FOR EACH PARTICIPATING MEMBER IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 4.04 OF CONTRACT The provisions of this Revised Exhibit B form a part of the Contract and are applicable to the District and to each Participating Member as if set forth in its entirety in the body of the Contract. The provisions of this Revised Exhibit B supersede Exhibit B contained in the Contract between Participating Members and the District dated November 13, 1990. The following quantities constitute minimum Demands in accordance with Section 4.04 of Contract. Said minimum Demands are noted for an "Interim Period" and for "Regular Service". The Interim Period shall apply from date of this Revised Exhibit B until the District implements its permanent plans for Regular Service, after which, the minimum Demands for Regular Service shall apply. Participatina Member City of Corinth` City of Highland Village Lake Cities Mun. Util, Auth. Town of Northlake City of Pilot Point City of Sanger C:/HPS1/DOCUNBHT/PART-EHT,E%B Harch 11, 1442 Minimum Demand (madi Interim Period Reaular Service 1.00 1.50 2.00 4.00 0.75 0.95 0.10 0.30 0.20 0.35 0.20 0.50 h- . Participating Members Revised Exhibit Page 2 In accordance with Section 4.05 of the Contract, the minimum Demand shown for Interim Period shall apply for first Water Year of the Interim Period. Thereafter, the District may adjust the Demand for any Participating Member by mutual agreement.. Furthermore, District and each Member may adjust the Demand for Regular Service by mutual agreement prior to District completing permanent plans for Regular Service. TET:jlf C.�HP5I�D000HENT�PART-EHT.E%8 � ' �� Harch 17, 1992 j O TO: Honorable Mayor Members of the City Council FROM: John Hamilton, City Manage DATE: April 3, 1992 on Railroad Commission Docket #00108SRAlN I Mr. Hollingsworth has requested the City support his enclosed application to the Texas Railroad Commission for hauling recyclable materials. In light A our current contracts with Frontier Waste Management and Southwest Recyclers, I have referred this item to our Consulting Attorney for review and comment. Attachments Representative origins include � nQ(, r" Representative destinations include My company is concerned with the environment and we believe that the continued development of recycling material will greatly enhance the environment and prevent waste of our country's natural a resources. The vast majority of our country's waste stream has previously been destined to landfills but these are rapidly filling. As a result, a large amount of recyclable material is now moving to recycling facilities in a waste reduction effort. My company is committed to this principle. We know of no locally available carriers authorized and capable of providing equipment and service promptly and responsively as needed. The transportation service we need must be available from a local carrier and thus we emphatically support the application of Hollingsworth Grain & Trucking. I am familiar with this applicant and know that it is in a position to serve us on a call and demand basis, 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. Hollingsworth Grain & Trucking, operates suitable equipment in sufficient numbers to supply our needs and demands for service promptly after our request is placed for such services. If the proposed service of Hollingsworth Grain & Trucking becomes available to us, our needs and requirements will be met. Therefore, we urge that the Railroad Commission of Texas grant the involved application at the earliest possible time. n 11 SIGNED this day of , 1992. SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME this ff 19920 My Commission Expires: Notary Public State of Texas -3- BEFORE THE RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS TRANSPORTATION/GAS UTILITIES DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF De, Y) 'fo n DOCKET N0. 00108SRAlN JOHN STEVEN HOLLINGSWORTH a BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared known to me and who being by me first duly sworn upon his oath, deposes and says the following: My name is f o .� and I am employed by in the capacity of . My business address is My company supports John Steven Hollingsworth, in its application for recyclable materials, as follows: (1) scrap glass; (2) scrap metals; (3) scrap polymers; (4) Scrap plastic; (5) Scrap paper; (6) Scrap rubber; (7) Scrap tires; (8) Non -hazardous industrial waste; (9) Non -hazardous municipal waste; (10) Non- hazardous commercial waste between all points in Texas. Specifically, we require transportation of the following recyclable materials: N n J aCL r� 0i,LS (LoImrnefre..ieA� I ,wck.��e 1ncite Co Llitre� F' nlwnSii^.ipa�� 1�5c�S.re BEFORE THE RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS TRANSPORTATION/GAS UTILITIES DIVISION DOCKET NO. 00038SRA1N BILLY JACK HOLLINGSWORTH DBA HOLLINGSWORTH GRAIN & TRUCKING AFFIDAVIT OF STATE OF TEXAS � COUNTY OF Ve nTo r1 § BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared known to me and who being by me first duly sworn upon his oath, deposes and says the following: My name is , and I am employed by ,-,_ car, in the capacity of I My business address is My company supports Hollingsworth Grain & Trucking, in its application for recyclable materials, as follows: (1) scrap glass; (2) scrap metals; (3) scrap polymers; (4) Scrap plastic; (5) Scrap paper; (6) Scrap rubber; (7) Scrap tires; (8) Non -hazardous industrial waste; (9) Non -hazardous municipal waste; (10) Non- hazardous commercial waste between all points in Texas. Specifically, we require transportation of the following recyclable materials: ho,%2 car �o y i�1 (��, �riu 1 �t� 5 fie C.om oyee.rc16L�! A Representative origins include �J V w e f' Representative destinations include /�"79 UU0rt My company is concerned with the environment and we believe that the continued development of recycling material will greatly enhance the environment and prevent waste of our country's natural r resources. The vast majority of our country's waste stream has previously been destined to landfills but these are rapidly filling. As a result, a large amount of recyclable material is now moving to recycling facilities in a waste reduction effort. My company is committed to this principle. We know of no locally available carriers authorized and capable of providing equipment and service promptly and responsively as needed. The transportation service we need must be available from a local carrier and thus we emphatically support the application of Hollingsworth Grain & Trucking. I am familiar with this applicant and know that it is in a position to serve us on a call and demand basis, 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. Hollingsworth Grain & Trucking, operates suitable equipment in sufficient numbers to supply our needs and demands for service promptly after our request is placed for such services. If the proposed service of Hollingsworth Grain & Trucking becomes available to us, our needs and requirements will be met. Therefore, we urge that the Railroad Commission of Texas grant the involved application at the earliest possible time. -2- a SIGNED this day of SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME this , 1992* My Commission Expires: Notary Public State of Texas MEMORANAUM #2a24 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF SANDER P. O. BOX 578 BANGER, TEXAS 76266 Hanorable Mayor & John Hamilton, City April 3, 1992 Proposed Step -Plan Members of the Manage For Full -Time Employees City Council During budget hearings for our current fiscal year, Council instructed staff to develop a step -plan for merit pay and seniority for all full-time employees of the City, The basics of such a plan provide for the following features: 1 }. A written Job Title and Job Description far each identified position. 2}. A set salary schedule that includes each Job Class for the City. 3}. A minimum and maximum salary for each Job Class. The schedule would be adjusted when a cost of living increase was approved by Council. 4). A written annual employee performance review. 5}. Council commitment to annual merit increases based on written evaluations for each employee covered by the Step -Plan, separate and apart from cost -of -living increases. As this is a new experience for the City, a basic plan is proposed by Staff. Attached is a list of eighteen identified, full-time job titles far the City. Each job title has a written job description that has been prepared by our department heads. A per month pay schedule has been formulated to accommodate our existing salary structure and possible expansion of job titles within the City. Each of the 24 pay groups has 10 pay steps. There is a 2.5% difference between the pay groups and a 5% difference between each pay step. The plan would operate under these guidelines: 1 }. The Step Plan is intended not to exceed 7 years from the initial date of hire. (Same employees, based on merit, could reach the maximum salary in less than 7 years), Y j #2024 Proposed Step Plan April 3, 1992 Page 2 2). The maximum allowable increase per employee per fiscal year will be 15% based upon written recommendation of the department head. A more normal annual increase would average 5%. All increases must be approved by the City Manager. 31. written performance evaluations wi11 be prepared on each employee of the City, both full and part-time employees, in March of every year. These evaluations will become part of the employee's permanent personnel file. 4). Entry level for new employees, based on experience, training and other specific qualifications related to the particular job title, will be no higher than Step E. 5). The merit program can be frozen at any time by Council action. 6). Each rating of "unsatisfactory" on the written evaluations would disqualify 5% of any proposed merit increase. (In other words, one unsatisfactory rating would disqualify the effected employee from any merit raise for that particular period.) 7 }. If any employee separates from employment for more than thirty (30) days and returns to City employment, their prior service time shall not be a factor in the Step -Plan. 8). If an employee's position is reclassified, that employee shall never go to a lesser salary. If Council concurs with the basic plan, upon direction, staff will prepare either an ordinance or resolution whichever is preferred and submit it for your consideration at the meeting of April 20, 1992. JH:es attachments t. Clerk I Clerk II Administrative Assistant City Secretary Police Officer Police Supervisor I Police Supervisor II Chief of Police Firefighter Public Works Superintendent Utility Worker I Utility Worker II Wastewater Operator Electric Superintendent Mechanic Electric Worker III City Manager Electric Supervisor Public Works Supervisor Jo titles :.�► + +of 1,QQQ 1,551 5 1,104 19713 1Q 1,249 1,938 23 1,722 Z671 17 1,485 2,304 18 1,522 Z361 2Q 1,599 2,481 23 1,722 Z671 17 1,485 21304 23 1,722 Z671 1 Q 1,249 1,938 13 1,345 2,087 13 1,345 2,087 24 1,765 2,738 13 1,345 29087 15 1,413 2,192 Set 8y Council 17 1,485 2,304 17 1,485 2,3Q4 Proposed Pay Schedule Per Month 5% between steps (A - J) 2.5 % between groups (1 24) A B C D E F G H I J 1 I ,000 1,050 1,103 1,158 1,216 1,276 1,340 11407 15477 1,551 2 1,025 1,076 1,130 11186 11246 1,308 11373 1,442 1,514 1$90 3 1,051 1,104 1,159 1,217 1278 1,342 11409 1,479 1,553 11631 4 1,077 11131 15188 1,247 11309 1,375 11443 1,516 1,591 1,671 5 1,104 1,159 1,217 1,278 1$42 1,409 1,479 15553 1,631 1,713 6 1,131 11188 1,247 1,309 1,375 1,443 1,516 1,591 1,671 1,755 7 11160 1,218 1279 1,343 15410 1,480 1,555 1,632 11714 1,800 8 1,189 1,248 1,311 1,376 1,445 1$17 1,593 1,673 1,757 11845 9 1,218 1279 1,343 11410 11480 1,555 11632 1,714 15780 11890 10 11249 1,311 1,377 1,446 1,518 1,594 1,674 1,757 1,845 1,938 11 1280 1,344 1,411 1,482 1,556 1,634 1,715 1,801 1,891 11986 12 11312 11378 11446 1,519 1,594 1,674 11758 1,846 1,938 2,035 13 1,345 1,412 1,483 15557 1,635 1,717 1,802 1,893 1,987 21087 14 11379 1,448 1$20 1,596 1,676 1,760 1,848 1,940 2,037 2,139 15 1,413 1,484 1,558 1,636 1,718 11803 11894 1,988 21088 2,192 16 1,448 1$20 11596 1,676 1,760 1,848 11940 2,037 2,139 21246 17 1,485 15559 1,637 1,719 1,805 1,895 1,990 2,089 2,194 2,304 18 1,522 1,598 11678 1,762 1,850 1,943 21040 2,142 21249 2,361 19 1,560 1,638 1,720 1,806 1,896 1,991 2,091 2,195 2,305 2,420 20 11599 1,678 11763 1,851 1$944 21041 2,143 25250 21362 2,481 21 11639 1,721 1,807 1,897 1,992 2,092 2,196 2,306 2,422 2,543 22 11680 1,764 11852 1,945 2,042 2,144 2,251 2,364 2,482 2,606 23 1,722 1,808 1,899 1,993 2,093 21198 2,308 2,423 2,544 25671 24 1,765 1,853 1,946 2,043 2,145 2,253 2$66 21484 2,608 2,738 Employee Name Employee No. Date Department Job Title Check One ❑ Scheduled Evaluation ❑ New Employee ElPromotion ❑ Other, Date of hire Date of last review Date employee began present position Date of next review Key to Ratings: E. EXCELLENT -Individual performs all tasks in an exceptional manner. Requires little or no supervision. G. GOOD - Individual performs many tasks well, and all other tasks adequately. Requires little or no supervision. I. RESPONSIBILITIES II. ACCOMPLISHMENTS III. JOB KNOWLEDGE Overall Rating: Comments: S. SATISFACTORY -Individual performs all tasks satisfactorily. Requires normal supervision. F. FAIR - Individual performs most tasks satisfactorily, but not all. Requires more than normal supervision. U. UNSATISFACTORY - Individual fails to perform many tasks well. Requires close and constant supervision, on sheet for complete and nroneruse of this form. Employee possesses clear understanding of the responsibilities and tasks he or she must perform. F ; ( I U I (see key above) IV. JOB PERFORMANCE �QUALITATNE) The neatness, thoroughness, accuracy and overall quality of the employee's work. Overall Rating: E G S F U (see key above) (circle one) Comments: �%. JOB PRODUCTIVITY T�Uk are comlVEted effircni n�l eand effectivel`s a commitment toward achieving results. P ' Y Y• Overall Rating: (circle one) E ri S' FU (see key above) Comments. VI. DEPENDABILITY Employelinessbe relied upon to complete assigned tasks, and is conscientious about their attendance andd Gme Overall Rating: (circle one) F • U (see key above) Comments. _ . Employee demonstrates a willingness to work with associates, subordinates, supervisors and others. VII. COOPERATION Responds willingly to changes in procedure, process, responsibility and assignments. Overall Rating: E G S F U (see key on reverse side) (circle one) Comments: CVIII,INITIATIVE Demonstrates an ability to think and act independently. Originates innovative ideas and methods to improve job or complete tasks better. Overall Rating: E G S F U (see key on reverse side) (circle one) Comments: raintains a safe lows safety IX. WORK ENVIRONMENT AND SAFETY regulations, and actively pleasant cot butesenvirontowards a safe (workplace. Overall Rating: E G S F U (see key on reverse side) (circle one) Comments: X. OVERALL PERFORMANCE Overall appraisal of the employee's job performance. Overall Rating: E G S F U (see key on reverse side) (circle one) Comments: The criteria above is important in order to properly evaluate the employee's performance. The following Action Plan ACTION PLAN: describes the employee's s ecific strengths and weaknesses, and addresses what can be done to improve their position toward continued growth. Major weak points are: These weak points can be strengthened y: Major strong points are: These strong points can be more effectively utilized by: Supervisor Date Reviewing Officer Date Has this report been discussed with employee ? ❑ YES ❑ NO If " NO ", Reason why: If " YES ", Employee's comments: , Employee Date Copyright 1990 Amsterdam Printing and Litho Corp., Amsterdam, N.Y. 12010 Re -order Form #23350 MEMORANDUM #2(725 TO: FROM: DATE. SUBJECT: CITY OF SANGER P.O. BOX 578 SANGER, TEXAS 76266 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Jahn Hamilton, City Manage Py� April 3, 1992 `�� Administration Report 1 }. Absentee (early) voting in person begins Monday, April 18th, and runs through Tuesday, April 28th. �). The Park Board's Annual Easter Egg hunt will be held at 14 a.m., Saturday, April 18th, in our downtown park. 3}. Several months ago, the City applied for a grant through the Governer's Energy Office to .aid in a recycling program The enclosed letter informs us that we were not funded. 4). Electric Superintendent, Larry Yoast, who is out of town at the 37th Annual Municipal Electric Power Conference at Texas A & M, reports that our conversion of transformer in the downtown area is almost complete. The downtown electric substation should be eligible for being taken out of service very soon. Mr Yoast will present a detailed report on this project at our next meeting. 5). Nothing additional to report on the marina 6). Friday, April 17th, is a designated City Holiday (Good Friday), and City Hall will be closed. JH:cg Enclosure CITY OF SANDER P. O. BOX 578 SANGER, TEXAS 76266 MEMORANDUM T4: John Hamilton, City Manag r FROM: Rose Garcia, City Secretary DATE: March 31, 1992 SUBJECT: Billing for 3-15-92 Total Water Gallons 9,017,400 Total Sewer Gallons 9,000,700 Total KWH 1,409,522 Sanitation Billing 13,232.22 Sewer Billing 21,127.99 Water Billing 28,632.60 Total Electric 120,198.97 1241 1604 RG:ca 1473 .01840 1273 1298 i� 92-72 T0: JOHN HAMILTON, CITY MA�AGER FROM: BENNY ERWIN, CHIEF B DATE: 3-24-92 REFERENCE: RICHARD50N, CAMPAIGN SIGNS, BRADLEY AUTO I placed a phone call into Mr. Richardson about his campaign signs being in violation of City Code. He returned my call late in the evening and I explained how he was in violation. He advised that some of the signs were placed at these locations by the owners, not him. He said that he was very sorry for the mix- up and he would get the problem corrected. I went to Bradley's Auto and talked to him again about the Zoning problem. He said that all but three of the vehicles inside the fence belong to customers and he had money against some of them and was waiting for the owner to pay him and pick them up . He stated that he was not running a wrecking yard, he was a repair shop. I advised him that the trailers in the rear of the yard were full of trash and needed to be emptied and that the area inside the fence need to be cleaned up. All vehicles needed to parked in a neat manner. I will send a trash letter and see if this will correct the problem. 1 ANN W. RICHARDS GOVERNOR Mr. John City of Project P.O. Box Sanger., Dear Mr. STATE OF TEXAS O F F I C E O F THE G O V E R N O R Hamilton Sanger 9031-066 578 Texas 76266 Hamilton: AUSTIN, TEXAS 7g71I March 25, 1992 Thank you for responding to our Request for Proposals (RFP) for funding through the Governor's Energy Office Recycling Program (Texas Register, December 11, 1990, Volume 15, page 7131). The Governor's Energy Office evaluation committee, a cooperative effort between this office and other agencies, has completed its review of proposals submitted in response to the RFP. Measuring the proposals against the criteria listed in the RFP, the committee recommended that the Governor's Energy Office fund twenty-eight projects across the state. Although your proposal was not selected for funding, we appreciate your response to the RFP and your interest in the state's efforts to promote energy efficiency. Gale welcome, your response to future requests for proposals. S1nCProl tr l �,�..t_s Christina E. Roitsch Department Manager Alternative Technologies Energy Office CR:kv Christina E. Roitsch Department Manager Alternative Technologies Energy Office CR:kv �_�: POST OFFICE BOX I2�}28 �IJSTIN, TEXAS 7871I (5ta) 463-Z000 Notice to Neighboring Systems and Cities TO: Cl NOTICE OF APPLICATION TO AMEND CERTIFICATE OF CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY (CCN) NO. 11257 WITH THE TEXAS WATER COMMISSION TO PROVIDE WATER UTILITY SERVICE AND TO DECERTIFY PORTION OF CCN NO. 10195 OF THE CITY OF DENTON IN DENTON COUNTY Neighboring System or City P. o. Box 578 (Aaaress) (Address) BANGER (City TEXAS State r Date Notice MARCH 27 78266 Zip) Mailed: 19 92 Bolivar Water Supply Corporation has filed an application to amend CCN No. 11257 with the Texas Water Commission to provide water utility service and to decertify a portion of CCN No. 10195 of the City of Denton in Denton County. The proposed service area is approximately 6 miles northeast of downtown Denton, Texas and generally bounded on the east by Berger Road, on the south by the City of Denton, on the west by Interstate Highway 35, and on the north by Lake Ray Roberts. The total area being requested includes approximately 12,800 acres and 53 current customers. Dual certification will exist with Green Springs WSC, CCN No. 11480. Persons who wish to intervene or comment should write the: Utility Certification and Rate Design Section Water Utilities Division Texas Water Commission P.O. Box 13087, Capitol Station Austin, TX 78711-3087 within thirty (30) days from the date of this publication or notice. No public hearing will be held unless a request for a hearing is received. Only those individuals who submit a written request to be notified of a hearing schedule will receive notice if a hearing is scheduled. March 25, 1992 John Hamilton, City Manager City of Sanger 200 Bolivar Street Sanger, Texas 76266 Dear John, — 817/382-2224 THE CITY OF SgNGER p : �1AR 2 7 I992 �(�[�Q �� GER,TEXAS Recently we had our annual monitoring by the Area Agency on Aging (AAA) of the North Central Texas Council of Governments. For their review of nutrition services they went to Sullivan Senior Center in Sanger. A couple of items concerning the Center appear in the written report. I will pass them along to you in hopes that you can help us with them. Item - Sanger (Sullivan) Center does not have well - marked or easily accessible handicapped parking. The city should be contacted to assist with providing handicapped parking space and easy access to the handicapped entrance. Item - Window sills, baseboards, light fixtures, fans, vent covers, wall decorations and corners were not clean. It would be advised to have a thorough cleaning of the facility. Let me know if you need more information. Sincerely, �-'2�V". Al Murdock Executive Director United Way of Denton County, Inc. f News Release Central Telephone Company Texas A Centel Company P.O. Box 1150 Killeen, Texas 76540.1150 CENTEVEAS - SANGER -- Add One One -party residential customers selecting EAS will have the option of choosing between two plans. One plan requires a monthly recurring charge of $1.50 and provides the customer a 35 percent discount on all long-distance calls to Denton. The other plan, which costs $3 a month, provides customers a 50 percent discount. One -party business customers selecting EAS will also have two options and be charged either a $3 or $6 monthly fee and receive a 35 percent or 50 percent discount respectively on all long-distance calls to Denton. In addition, businesses with key system phones will be charged either $6.00 or $9.00 a month and receive a 35 percent or 50 percent discount respectively. Businesses with PBX systems will pay a monthly fee of $10.50 and receive a 50 percent discount on all long-distance calls to Denton. To help customers decide if CA will save them money, Centel will conduct a polling of customers' long-distance calling to Denton. "We will look at the long-distance calling records of our customers over the past couple months and send them a copy of our findings," explained Doss. "This should help them make an educated decision in determining if the plans are feasible and cost-effective." Centel is the third largest phone company in Texas, providing local telephone service to more than 137,000 customer lines in north, central and south Texas. -More- CENTEUEAS - SANGER -- Add Two It is part of the seven -state telephone operations of Chicago - based Centel Corporation, which provides local phone service to nearly 1.6 million customer lines and operates cellular communications franchises in 42 metropolitan markets and more than 50 rural .service areas. -END- Y CENTEVEAS - BANGER -- Add Three Monthly Charges for EAS Plans ►� I� i. 1 i Residential One -Party Plan A $3.00 50% Plan B $1.50 35 % Business One -Party Plan A $6.00 50% Plan B $3.00 35% Key System Trunks Rotary $9.00 50% Non -rotary $6.00 50% PBX Trunks $10.50 50% *Percent discount applicable to rates charged for a toll call placed from Sanger to Denton. B. J. THOGMARTIN District Manager Mr. John Hamilton City Manager City of Sanger P. O. Box 578 Sanger, TX 76266 Dear Mr. Hamilton: lone Star Gas company 319 West Oak Street • Denton, Texas 76201 March 25, 1992 THE CITY OF SANGER p ' MAR 2 7 1992 SANGER, TEXAS Attached is notice of a main line extension rate change previously approved by the City Council. This rate is applied for extensions to bona fide residential customers beyond the no -charge limit provided in our franchise agreement. A bona fide residential customer uses gas for heating and water heating, or the equivalent Load thereof, at a minimum. Residential customers other than bona fide residential customers shall pay actual cost for main line extensions beyond the free limit. Direct recovery of these extra costs from customers has helped to control the investment in our distribution system and to keep residential rates lower than they otherwise would be. This notice is provided in compliance with our agreement to keep the City informed of the main line extension charge each year. The new charge of $6.20 per foot is the standard rate for computing gas main extensions under cash deposit contracts. This is a decrease from the previous rate of $6.70. The new charge becomes effective on May 1, 1992. Please let me know if you need additional information regarding this matter. There is no need for the City to take additional action on this previously approved charge. 1 BJT: jr Attachment � t�� LONE STAR GAS COMPANY AVERAGE COST OF GAS MAIN EXTENSION 1991 A. Total main extension cost for pipe sizes 6" and smaller: Total footage of main extension pipe 6" and smaller in 1991, Average cost of gas main extensions per foot: Total Main Extension Cost $5.897.401 __ Total Footage 951,079 6. Handy -Whitman trend in cost for 1991: C. The 1992 Distribution Gas Main Extension Cash Deposit Contract price effective May 1, 19920 $ 5,897,401 951,079 feet $ 6.20 per foot $ 6.59 per foot $ 6.20 per foot TO: FROM: DATE: I DENCO AREA 9 - 1 - 1 DISTRICT 250 S. Stemmons, Suite 260, Lewisville, Texas 75067 Phone/TDD (214) 221-0911 FAX (214) 420-0709 Mayors, City Managers and Administrators Mike Pedigo, Executive Director 'i�\ March 23, 1992 Five -Year Plan �� ,,1i�e V%� e'� The Denco Area 9-1-1 District is in the process of developing afive-year plan. The purpose of the plan is to best match the needs of the member jurisdictions within the district with the revenue that will be available over the next five years under the current rate structure. You will note from the enclosed comparison that Denton County has one of the lowest rates in Texas. The Denco Board of Managers is committed to providing the most effective, state-of-the-art 9-1-1 emergency communication system possible and public education and training support for the users of the system without raising the rate to the end user. The Board believes that with proper planning and efficient management, that end can be achieved. Denco is seeking input from its member• cities during this planning process. If you have any requests for additional answering points or equipment or for specific public education or training materials either now or within the next five years, please let us know. I ask that you discuss this with your emergency service providers and anyone else you feel appropriate and send any requests you have by April 15 to: Mike Pedigo, Executive Director Denco Area 9-1-1 District 250 S. Stemmons, Suite 260 Lewisville, TX 75067 If you like, I would be happy to come to your city and discuss any specific needs with you. Please call me at 214-221-0911 and we can set up a time. Thank you for any suggestions. We want to be able to respond to needs throughout the Denco Area 9�-1-1 District. ,��. 0MF ADVISORY COMMISSION ON STATE EMERGENCY COMI I�"I�N�92 REVENUE INFORMATION ON THOSE COUNTIES SHIED BY 9-1-1 EMERGENCY COMMUNICATION DISTRICTS Surcharge Service Fee Rates Monthly Single Line Cost* County" Paid? Actual Maximum Residence Business District Austin No 6.0% 6.0% $0.49 $1.15 Austin County ECD Bexar Yes 2.2% 5.0% $0.22 $0.51 Bexar Metro 9-1-1 Network Brazos . j 6.0% 6.0% $0.54 $2.24 Brazos County ECD Calhoun No 6.0% 6.0% $0.52 $1.01 Calhoun County ECD Cameron Yes 3.0% 6.0% $0.26 $0.52 Cameron County ECD COrnal NO 2.20/0 5_n% !�n 1 R !�n A.`q RaY�r Ailatrn U-1 -1 NAfurnr:r Denton Yes 3.0% 3.0% $0.27 $0.71 Denco Area 9-1-1 Ector No 4.6% 6.0% $0.42 $0.98 ECD of Ector County El Paso Yes 3.0% 6.0% $0.27 $0.64 El Paso County ECD Galveston Yes 3.0% 6.0% $0.46 $1.07 Galveston County ECD Guadalupe No 2.2% 5.0% $0.18 $0.43 Bexar Metro 9-1-1 Network Harris Yes 2.0% 3.0% $0.22 $0.77 Greater Harris County Network Harrison No 6.0% 6.0% $0.51 $1.20 Texas Eastern Network Henderson No 6.0% 6.0% $0.46 $1.00 Henderson County CD Howard No 6.0% 6.0% $0.50 $1.17 Howard County CD Kerr No 6.0% 6.0% $0.41 $1.05 Kerr County Network Lubbock Yes 4.5% 6.0% $0.41 $0.96 Lubbock ECD Mclennan Yes 4.1 % 6.0% $0.37 $0.87 McLennan County EAD Medina No 6.0% 6.0% $0.49 $1.15 Medina County District Midland No 4.0% 6.0% $0.36 $0.85 Midland ECD Montgomery Yes 6.0% 6.0% $0.44 $1.15 Montgomery County ECD so Potter No 3.0% 6.0% $0.27 $0.63 Potter -Randall ECD Randall No 3.0% 6.0% $0.27 $0.63 Potter -Randall ECD Rusk No 6.0% 6.0% $0.49 $1.15 Texas Eastern Network Smith Yes 5.0% 6.0% $0.44 $1.03 9-1-1 Netwrk of East Texas Tarrant Yes 2.0% 3.0% $0.20 $0.46 Tarrant County District Taylor No 4.1 % 6.0% $0.35 $0.57 Abilene/Taylor County District Wichita Yes 5.0% 6.0% $0.46 $1.07 Nortex CD Wilbarger No 5.0% 6.0% $0.41 $0.96 Nortex CD For those counties/districts with more than one rate group an average is shown for the monthly cost. Printed: Dec-91 F �' TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. O. Box 3067 Dallas, Texas 75221-3067 March 30, 1992 Existing Facilities City of Sanger Denton County ROW CSJ 0195-02-038 Account # 9018-5-18 IH 35: At Bolivar Street in Sanger Mr. John Hamilton City Manager City of Sanger P.O. Box 578 Sanger, Texas 75266 Dear Mr. Hamilton: THE CITY OF BANGER A P R 2 1992 r`n�inrr2 TFX�� Qom- l� �� The Texas Department of Transportation is forwarding two sets of Right of Way drawings on the above referenced project. We request that all existing facilities be marked on the copy designated for return to this office. The second copy is to be retained for your future use. All information which pertains to facility dimensions, vertical and horizontal alignment, material type, etc. will be helpful. If "As Built" engineering plans are available for facilities within the above project limits, we also request that a copy be provided. This project is scheduled for a July 1992 letting. Please respond by May 1, 1992. If you have any questions please contact Steve Sims at (214) 320-6678. Your continued cooperation is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, �� For: T. Worthington, Jr., P.E. istrict Right of Way Engineer l , 5 , STW/JPC/ss Enclosure An Equal Opportunity Employer .f rr" . `4' o TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Id DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT 3911 MORSE STREET P,O, 8OX 2816 DENTON, TEXAS 76202 817.566-0904 lYl�lYLJ All Taxing Jurisdictions Joe Rogers, Chief Appraiser March 24, 1992 1991 DCAD Audited Annual Financial Report The Property Tax Code requires an appraisal district to provide each taxing jurisdiction a copy of the annual financial report. Enclosed is ,a copy of DCAD's audited financials for the year ended December 31, 19910 Joq',Roge rs DENTON CENTRAL. APPRAISAL DISTRICT AUDITED FINANCIAL_ STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. Report of Independent Auditor 1 General Purpose Financial Statements: Combined Balance Sheet 2-3 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance Compared to Budget 4 Notes to Financial Statements. 5-8 Supplemental Schedule Independent Auditors' Report on Supplemental Information 9 Schedule of Revenues and Expenditures - Collections Account . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 � 7� MEMBERS TEXAS SOCIETY OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS HANKINS, POWERS, EASTUP, DEATON A Professional Corporation CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 902 NORTH LOCUST • P.O. BOX 977 DENTON, TEXAS 76202.0977 817.387.8563 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT Board of Directors Denton Central Appraisal District Gentlemen: MEMBERS AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF & TO N N CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS We hdVe dUU I I.CU LIIC al'.L Uiltp ally ing l,V inu incu ua i aiiic �ucc� vwe vcii�vivcou Appraisal District as of December 31, 1991, and the related statement of revenues, expenditures and changes in fund balance compared to budget for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the District. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Denton Central Appraisal District as of December 31, 1991, and the results of its operations for the year then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. f . o go Hankins, Powers, East up, Denton & Tonn A Professional Corporation Certified Public Accountants February 11, 1992 1 DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT COMBINED BALANCE SHEET DECEMBER 31, 1991 Governmental Fund Types General Fund ASSETS Cash on hand $ 1,152.00 Cash in bank 43,880.40 Temporary investments (at cost) 541,203.28 Accounts receivable 107260aO4 Other receivables 1,960.69 Prepaid insurance 995.83 Other prepaid costs 169567.02 land, Building and Equipment: Land Building and improvements Computer system Furniture and fixtures Amount to be provided for retirement of general long-term debt Total Assets LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY Current Liabilities: Note payable Capitalized leases payable Accounts payable Deferred revenue Total Current Liabilities Long -Term Liabilities: Note payable - non -current (Note C) Total Long -Term Liabilities Fund Equity: Investment in fixed assets Fund balance unreserved Total Fund Equity Total Liabilities and Fund Equity See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements. $ 616,019.26 $ 11, 723.78 460.69 —12,, 8 44 44 603,834.79 603,834.79 $ 616,019.26 General Fixed Assets $ 169,992.30 557,305.04 496,530.04 212,094.28 $1,435,921.66 $1,435,921.66 43519K. 66 $1,4359921.66 Account 2 UPS General Long -Term Debt $ 367,394.25 $ 367,394.25 $ 29,015.59 505.48 29,521.07 337,873.18 337,873.18 $ 367,394.25 Total (Memorandum Only) $ 1,152.00 43,880.40 541,203.28 10,260.04 1,960.69 995.83 169567.02 169,992.30 557,305.04 496,530.04 2[29094.28 367,394.25 $2,419,335.17 $ 29,015.59 505.48 11,723.78 460.69 41,705.54 337,873.18 337,873.18 1,435,921.66 603,834.79 210399756.45 $21419,335.17 3 DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE COMPARED TO BUDGET FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1991 Revenues: Local support Other services Interest income Tax collection fees Miscellaneous income Total revenues Expenditures: Salaries Longevity pay Professional services - valuations DeeU d►IU Shces Inn u(indL IUn Auto reimbursements Retirement General insurance Payroll taxes Travel, conference and training Hospitalization insurance Telephone and utilities Supplies and materials Postage Accounting and auditing Board of review Computer maintenance Attorney fees and court costs Assets purchased Workmens compensation insurance Equipment maintenance Contingent costs Legal notices and advertising Janitorial and building maintenanc Registration and dues Miscellaneous Printing services Debt service Total expenditures Excess revenues over expenditures Fund balance beginning Fund balance ending General Fund Over Actual Budget (Under) $2,0289569.72 19,487.58 36,148.52 115,107.75 859.72 212009173.29 1,056,098.31 7,908.00 21,750900 19,982.43 1109801.19 52,617.93 6,072.17 73, 397.73 185738.72 97,870.01 58,152.46 53,179.83 64,793.10 4,775.00 16,796.80 66,310.16 103,525.45 72,798.97 23,924.84 99570.66 7,449.04 e 44,845.62 89887.39 12,290.54 419404.30 63,508.87 2,117,449.52 82,723.77 $2,028,675.03 20,000.00 1041464.00 2,153,139.03 1,0841930.35 99508.00 22,650.00 n A f^^ r A 1089553.60 57,129.69 15,492.00 745646.02 24,330.00 97,577.55 53,930.38 469067.80 73,913.93 59275.00 219960.00 889882.47 85,500.00 39,105.00 179938.43 81545.00 41,000.00 5,998.56 2710lOoOO 5,743.45 7,280.96 46,452.30 599088.00 2,1539139.03 ID(105.31 19,487.58 151148.52 10,643.75 859.72 47,034.26 (281832.04) (11600.00) (900000) (4,648.11) 2,247.59 (4,511.76) (91419.83) (19248.29) (5,591a28) 292.46 4,222.08 7,112.03 (9,120.83) (500000) (5,163.20) (22,572.31) 189025.45 33,693.97 59986.41 lt025.66 (419000000) 11450.48 171835.62 3,143.94 51009.58 (5,048.00) 49420.87 351689.51) -0- 82,723.77 5219111.02 521,111.02 $ 603,834.79 See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements. -0- $ 521,111.02 $ 82,723.77 L1 DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 1991 NOTE A - SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES The Denton Central Appraisal District was created under the provisions of the State of Texas. The Appraisal District is responsible for appraising property in Denton County. These appraisals are used by all the taxing jurisdictions in the County to levy their ad -valorem taxes. The District also serves as collection agent for some of these jurisdictions which elect to use the District for a set fee. The revenues of the District come primarily from the jurisdictions which it serves. The accounting policies of the District conform to generally accepted accounting prin- ciples as applicable to state and local governmental units. 1. The Reporting Entity The District, for financial purposes, includes all the funds and account groups which are relevant to the operation of the Denton Central Appraisal nictrirt 2. Fund Accounting The accounts of the District are organized on the basis of funds or account groups, each of which is considered to be a separate accounting entity. The operations of each fund are accounted for by providing a separate set of self - balancing accounts which are compromised of each fund's assets, liabilities, fund equity, revenues and expenditures. Governmental Fund Types General Fund The General Fund is the Account Groups general General Fixed Assets Account Group This account group is established to record the acquisition and posal of the general fixed assets used by the district in governmental fund type operations. Expenditure transactions to acquire general fixed assets occur in the General Fund. General Long -Term Debt Account Group This account group records the principal outstanding on all general long-term debt expected to be financed from governmental funds and is offset by the amount to be provided in future years. 3. Basis of Accounting The modified accrual basis of accounting is used for the Governmental Fund Types. This basis of accounting recognizes revenues in the accounting period in which they become available and measurable, and expenditures in the accounting period in which the fund liability is incurred, if measurable, except for unmatured interest on General Long -Term Debt, which is recognized when due. 5 DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Contintued) DECEMBER 31, 1991 4. Investments Statutes authorize the District to invest in certificates securities are pledged to secure those funds on deposit in an amount of those funds. Investments at December 31, 1991 were as follows: Certificates of Deposit Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Note 5. Total Column Interest Maturity Rate Date Cost 3.70% 1-15-92 5.11% 2-3-92 $ 80,000.00 461,203.28 A�rA1 a�41, nnn cu3. nn cis of deposit; amount equal to the Market Value 463,155.88 Arnn � rr nn The total column on the combined balance sheet is captioned "Memorandum Only" to indicate that it is presented only to facilitate financial analysis. Data in this column does not present financial position in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Neither is such data comparable to a consolidation. 6. The Budget The budget was prepared for adoption for all Governmental Fund Types in 1990. The budget was approved by a majority of the taxing jurisdictions. NOTE B - GENERAL FIXED ASSETS ACCOUNT GROUP The following is a summary of the changes in general fixed assets: L and Building & Improvements Computer System Furniture & Fixtures Balance January I 1991 $ 169,992.30 551,158.91 463,439.59 178,531.89 $11363,122.69 Additions Deletions $ 6,146.13 33,090.45 33,562.39 $ 729798.97 Balance December 31 1991 $ 169,992.30 557,305.04 496,530.04 212,094.28 $1,4359921.66 DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Contintued) DECEMBER 31, 1991 NOTE C - CHANGES IN GENERAL LONG-TERM DEBT ACCOUNT GROUP The following is a summary of the changes in general long-term debt. Interest Balance Balance Rate January 1, 1991 Issues Retirements December 31, 1991 Note -First State Bank 8.5% $395,252.72 $28,363.95 $3669888.77 Lease-Graybar Financial 17.2% 29325.08 1,819.60 505.48 $397,577.80 $30,183.55 $367,394.25 The annual requirements to retire general long-term debt as of December 31, 1991, for each of the next five years, are as follows. Year Ending December 31, Principal 1992 $ 29,521.07 1993 31,580.28 1994 34,371.72 1995 37,409.83 1996 40,716.54 $173,599.44 NOTE D - DEFERRED REVENUE Interest $ 30,086.95 27,507.72 24,716.28 21,678.17 18,371.46 $122,360.58 Total $ 59,608.02 59,088.00 59,088.00 59,088.00 59,088.00 $295,960.02 The District billed jurisdictions for the first quarter of 1992 in December 1991. $460.69 was paid in 1991 for the year 1992 and is shown as def erred rev- enue in the accompanying financial statements. NOTE E -FEDERAL INCOME TAX Since the District is a state agency created by the State of Texas, it is not subject to Federal income taxation, therefore no provisions for Federal income taxes is made. F DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Contintued) DECEMBER 31, 1991 NOTE F - PENSION PLAN The district provides pension, disability, and death benefits for all of its fulltime employees through a nontraditional, joint contributory, defined contribu- tion plan in the state-wide Texas County and District Retirement System (TCDRS), one of over 400 administered by TCDRS, an agent multiple -employer public employee re- tirement system. It is the opinion of the TCDRS management that the plans in TCDRS are substantially defined contribution plans, but they have elected to provide additional voluntary disclosure to help foster a better understanding of some of the nontraditional characteristics of the plan. Under the state law governing TCDRS, the contribution rate of the district is a fixed percent equal to the contribution rate payable by the employee member, which is 5% as adopted by the governing body of the district. This rate is not actuarially determined and is one of the rates that can be adopted in accordance :LV at__ Tnnn e` a.. 11.... L4.. .1i ..r I.......1: 1-.. �..1....+^A 1... 466^ ..1......... .+ 4o 6 .. W 1 L11 Lilt 1 UURJ Mt. t.. nowtviv , t.11t+ fJ 1 QII UI UCilt, i 1 t.� QUUji6au Vy 611C ally IUy Gt UL t.11C time of plan inception and when benefit increases are adopted is limited by statute to what the actuary determines can be adequately financed by the commitment of the employer to contribute the same amount as the employees. The statute specifies that the actuary's determination is based on a maximum period for amortizing the unfunded pension benefit obligation of 30 years. The plan provisions are adopted by the governing body of the district, within the options available in the state statutes governing TCDRS. Members can retire at ages 60 and above with 10 or more years of service or with 30 years regardless of age or when the sum of their age and years of service equals 80 or more. A member is vested after 10 years but must leave his accumulated contributions in the plan. If a member withdraws his personal contributions in a lump -sum, he is not entitled to any amounts contributed by the employer. Benefit amounts are determined by the sum of the employee's contributions to the plan, with interest, and employer -financed monetary credits, with interest. The level of these monetary credits is adopted by the governing body of the district conditioned by the actuarial constraints imposed by statute that the resulting benefits can be expected to be adequately financed by the commitment of the district to contribute the same amount as the member employees. The district's current benefit plan provides for employer -financed monetary credits for service since the plan began of 200% of the employee's accumulated contributions and for employer - financed monetary credits for service before the plan began of 150% of a theoretical amount equal to twice what would have been contributed by the employee, with interest, prior to establishment of the plan. At retirement, the benefit is calcu- lated as if the sum of the employee's accumulated contributions and the employer - financed monetary credits were used to purchase an annuity within TCDRS. The district's total payroll in calendar year 1991 was $1,064,006.31, and the district's contributions were based on a covered payroll of $1,052,358.60. Employer and employee contributions for the year were made as required and. are detailed below. Employee contributions may include the purchase of credits for military or legislative service or the buyback of previously forfeited service credit. There were no related -party transactions. Employee Contributions Employer $52,617.93 E:1 MEMBERS TEXAS SOCIETY OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS HANKINS, POWERS, EASTUP, DEATON A Professional Corporation CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 902 NORTH LOCUST • P.O. BOX 977 DENTON, TEXAS 76202.0977 817w387.8563 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT Denton Central Appraisal District Denton, Texas MEMBERS AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF & TO N N CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS We have audited the general purpose financial statements of the Denton n_._a..��I A....... 1 rN4. 4w 1."*n+ �n.1. +%n %,^n" onrlori rlorcmhcr 11 1001 anti havc l,EMLr"aI AlilJrQIDQI U1S61 iC.t., 101 Loom; yE;d, c11U%6U vc wnu�1 ., 1) 1aJiq u11. 11..... issued our report thereon dated February 11, 1992. Our audit of such general purpose financial statements was made in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, and accordingly, included such tests of the accounting records and such other auditing procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the general purpose financial statements taken as a whole. The accompanying Schedule of Revenues and Expenditures - Collections Account is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the general purpose finan- cial statements. The information in that schedule has been subjected to the same auditing procedures applied in the audit of the general purpose finan- cial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material re- spects in relation to the general purpose financial statements taken as a whole. February 11, 1992 Hankins, Powers, Eastup, Deaton & Tonn A Professional Corporation Certified Public Accountants F] DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT SCHEDULE OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES - COLLECTIONS ACCOUNT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1991 Revenues. Tax collections fees Miscellaneous income Total Revenue Expenditures: Salaries Auto reimbursements Retirement Payroll taxes Hospitalization insurance Telephone and utilities Supplies and materials Postage Accounting and auditing Computer maintenance Assets purchased Workmens compensation insurance Equipment maintenance Legal notices and advertising Building maintenance Miscellaneous Printing services Total Expenditures Excess Revenues over Expenditures $115,Iwo 75 859.72 �5 4) 96T�7 42,840.12 9,000.67 2,142.00 39277.32 3,266.40 1,346.70 8,742.37 16,258970 775.00 5,676.18 2,120.00 248.52 756.33 230.40 473.66 1,532.90 354.00 99,041.27 $ 16,926.20 � ,w •• Box 578 anger, TX 76266 April 3, 1992 Dear Mr. Hamilton I am resigning from the position of Library Director of the Sanger Public Library. The last day I will work will tie Wednesday, May 13. My family is moving to Weatherford, Texas to pursue a business opportunity there. I have enjoyed the time I have served the residents of Sander as the librarian. Sincerely, Victoria Elieson .fHE Ct'N p'F BANGER D. APR 3 1992 SANGER, TEXAS COMMISSIONERS YGNACIO D. GARZA Chairman, Brownsville JOHN WILSON KELSEY Vice•Chairman Houston LEE M.BASS Ft. Worth HENRY C. BECK, III Dallas TERESE TARLTON HERSHEY Houston GEORGE C. 'TIM" HIXON oull Antvl liv CHUCK NASH San Marcos BEATRICE CARR PICKENS Dallas WALTER UMPHREY Beaumont TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT 4200 Smith School Road • Austin, Texas 78744 0 512-3894800 April 2, 1992 Mr. John Hamilton City Manager 201 Bolivar Street Sanger, Texas 76266 Re: Switzer Park II Project Number Dear Mr. Hamilton: THE CITY OF SANGER A P R 6 1992 D: U SANGER, TEXAS The plans and specifications for the swimming pool in referenced above have been reviewed and are approved. of the plans for the remainder of the facilities complete. ANDREW SANSOM Executive Director the project The review is not yet The City may proceed with the solicitation of bids. When documents are available, please submit copies of the bid advertisement, the bid tabulation, and the executed contract for our records. The plans and specifications for the pool, as approved, are being forwarded to Hunter Associates, Sincerely, C. R. Downey, P.E. Staff Engineer Grants -In -Aid Branch cc: with enclosures Hunter Associates COMMISSIONERS YGNACK) D. GARZA Chairman, Brownsville JOHN WILSON KELSEY Vice -Chairman Houston LEE M. BASS Ft. Worth HENRY C. BECK, III Dallas TERESE TARLTON HERSHEY Houston GEORGE C.'TIM' HIXON San Antonio CHUCK NASH San Marcos BEATRICE CARR PICKENS Dallas WALTER UMPHREY Beaumont TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT 4200 Smith School Road • Austin, Texas 78744 a 512-3894800 March 30, 1992 Mr. John Hamilton City Manager P.O. Box 578 Sanger, Texas 76266 Dear Mr. Hamilton: ANDREW SANSOM Executive Director THE CITY OF BANGER D: APR 3 1992 U ri.A�!G.FR, TEXAS The intent of the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LINCF) and the Texas Locai Parks, Recreation and Open Space Fund (LPF) Programs are to preserve, protect, and increase the quality of public outdoor recreation opportunities in Texas. In order to ensure continued compliance with LWCF/LPF Guidelines, the Department reminds you of the following responsibilities which were assumed upon acceptance of grant funds for the projects identified on the attached list. I. YOUR COMMITMENT TO PERPETUAL OUTDOOR RECREATION USE The property described in the project and delineated in the original project boundary map is to be used in perpetuity for public outdoor recreation only. The utilization of all or any portion of a Fund assisted area for other than outdoor recreation use constitutes conversion and is prohibited. II. YOUR COMMITMENT TO OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE Project sites shall be operated and maintained so as to appear attractive and inviting to the public. Public health and safety standards shall be maintained according to State law. All improvements shall be kept in reasonable repair throughout their estimated lifetime to prevent undue deterioration and to encourage public use. Facilities shall be kept open for public use at reasonable hours and times of the year. Fund assisted facilities which have exceeded their life expectancy and are no longer useable may be declared obsolete with Department approval. Facilities which have been declared obsolete must be demolished and removed from the site, but your obligation to perpetual outdoor recreation use of the area continues, as described in Section 1. III. YOUR COMMITMENT TO PROHIBIT OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES The installation of utility lines over any area or serving any facility which has received Fund assistance without prior consenk of the Department constitutes conversion to other than outdoor recreation use and is prohibited. All lines placed within the Fund assisted area after project completion must be underground. (In addition to standard overhead utilities this includes telephone, electric, surveillance, speaker and scoreboard wires.) Mr. John Hamilton March 30, 1992 Page Two IV. YOUR COMMITMENT TO PROHIBIT DISCRIMINATION All sponsors receiving Fund assistance agree to comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, age or national origin. In addition, all promotional materials and programs provided for the public must include information on this non-discrimination policy. All sponsors receiving Fund assistance are also required to be in compliance with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. This Act insures that no qualified handicapped person shall, on the basis of handicap, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subject to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance (43CFR17 - Subpart B). Pursuant to Section 504 of the Act, recipients of federal funds are required to self -evaluate policies, practices and effects of programs which do not meet the requirements of the Act. Section 504 Self -Evaluation Guides are available from the Grants -In -Aid Branch upon request. You are also reminded that all public facilities, whether Fund assisted or not, must comply with State law regarding barrier -free accessibility. V. YOUR COMMITMENT TO PROGRAM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT SIGNAGE A permanent sign or plaque must be maintained at the project site (or sites) in plain view of park visitors which acknowledges federal and/or state Program assistance. Department staff will make periodic inspections to ensure compliance with the referenced guidelines. If you have any questions regarding this information, please contact the Grants-ln- Aid Branch at 512/3894948. The Department appreciates your continued commitment to quality outdoor recreation, and we look forward to future projects in your area of the State. Sincerely, Tim Hogsett, Chief Grants -In -Aid Branch TH:SAB:sb Attachment &. John Hamilton Attachment PROJECT LISTING Sanger Switzer Park 20-00057 Sanger Switzer Park II 4M0997 SANGER POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT MARCH 1992 MONTHLY ANALYSIS YEARLY ANALYSIS INCIDENT THIS LAST % I LAST YR THIS YR PERCENT CATAGORY MONTH MONTH CHANGE TO DATE TO DATE +/- HOMICIDE/SUICIDE 0 0 NC N/A N/A 0 N/A AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 0 1 ON-100.0% N/A 1 N/A ASSAULT 3 2 UP 50.0% N/A 6 N/A AGGRAVATEQ SEXUAL ASSAULT 1 1 NC 0.0% SEXUAL ASSAULT / INDECENCY 2 1 UP 100.0% ROBBERY 0 0 NC N/A BURGLARY/ BUSINESS 2 0 UP N/A BURGLARY/ HABITATION 2 0 UP N/A BURGLARY/ VEHICLE 3 1 UP 200.0% THEFT $0 - $20 4 2 UP 100.0% THEFT $20 - $200 2 3 ON -33.3% THEFT $200 - $750 1 2 ON -50.0% THEFT OVER $750 1 0 UP N/A MOTOR VEHICLES STOLEN 0 0 NC N/A CRIMINAL MISCHIEF $0 - $20 1 0 UP N/A "RIMINAL MISCHIEF $20 - $200 4 2 UP 100.0% �RIMINAL MISCHIEF $200 - $750 2 1 UP 100.0% CRIMINAL MISCHIEF OVER $750 0 0 NC N/A HAZARDOUS CITATIONS ISSUED 26 23 UP 13.0% NON -HAZARDOUS CITATIONS 27 12 UP 125.0% WARNING CITATIONS ISSUED 23 8 UP 187.5% MUNICIPAL WARRANTS SERVED 0 0 NC N/A OTHER WARRANTS SERVED 10 10 NC 0.0% INJURY ACCIDENTS WORKED 3 4 DN -25.0% NON -INJURY ACCIDENTS 4 2 UP 100.0% HIT & RUN ACCIDENTS 0 1 ON-100.0% DWI ARRESTS 2 3 ON -33.3% PUBLIC INTOXICATION ARRESTS 0 1 DN-100.0% MINOR IN POSSESSION ARRESTS 1 0 UP N/A TOTAL ADULT MALE ARRESTS 11 12 ON -8.3% TOTAL ADULT FEMALE ARRESTS 4 4 NC 0.0% MALE JUVENILES DETAINED 5 1 UP 400.0% FEMALE JUVENILES pETAINED 0 0 NC N/A N/A 5 N/A N/A 4 N/A N/A 2 N/A N/A 5 N/A N/A 4 N/A N/A 8 N/A N/A 8 N/A N/A 5 N/A N/A 2 N/A N/A 1 N/A N/A 1 N/A N/A 8 N/A N/A 4 N/A N/A 0 N/A N/A 71 N/A N/A 57 N/A N/A 43 N/A N/A 0 N/A N/A 40 N/A N/A 7 N/A N/A 11 N/A N/A 1 N/A N/A 8 N/A N/A 4 N/A N/A 2 N/A N/A 34 N/A N/A 10 N/A N/A 6 N/A N/A 0 N/A SANGER POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY LOG CALL DATE TIME RECD OFFICERS CALL ADDRESS CALL TYPE CODE 01-Mar-92 02:15 AM 776 I-35 AT RECTOR RD AGENCY ASSIST 21 01-Mar-92 11#51 PM 775 201 BOLIVAR PHONE COMPLAINANT 15 02-Mar-92 07:24 AM 771 I35N AND LOOP 138 SUSPICIOUS PERSONS 9 02-Mar-92 08:14 AM 773 CITY HALL CITY BUSINESS 26 02-Mar-92 02:00 PM 770 603 N.10TH BURGLARY OF HABITATION 29 02-Mar-92 02:50 PM 771 INTERVIEW AT P.D. CRIM MIS 0/20 U/750 43 02-Mar-92 03:15 PM 773 HORIZON/CHEVRON THEFT U/ 20 37 02-Mar-92 04:59 PM 771 815 WOOD ST. HARRASSMENT 45 02-Mar-92 08*21 PM 775 910 CHAPMAN MEET COMPLAINANT 14 03-Mar-92 09:57 AM 771 5TH AND BOLIVAR MOTORIST ASSIST 0 03-Mar-92 11:11 AM 773 G.N.B. BANK AGENCY ASSIST 21 03-Mar-92 01*65 PM 771 S.10TH MEET COMPLAINANT 14 03-Mar-92 02:34 PM 773 123 TAMMIE DOMESTIC DISTURBANCE 13 03-Mar-92 03:10 PM 771 BURRUS MINOR ACCIDENT 5 03-Mar-92 10:09 PM 775 233 JONES DISTURBANCE 1� 03-Mar-92 11:45 PM 775 208 HILLCREST MESSAGE DELIVERY 1Q 04-Mar-92 12043 PM 773 CITY HALL CITY BUSINESS 26 04-Mar-92 04:38 PM 771 HIGH SCHOOL MOTORIST ASSIST 20 04-Mar-92 08:13 PM 775 2031 BENJAMIN ANIMAL COMPLAINT 25 05-Mar-92 12:06 AM 775 301 ELM MEET COMPLAINANT 14 05-Mar-92 01:00 AM 775 304 S 2ND ANIMAL COMPLAINT 25 05-Mar-92 05*41 PM 774 112 STEPHEN 911 HANG UP 47 05-Mar-92 05:45 PM 772 112 PRESTON BURGLARY OF VEHICLE 31 05-Mar-92 08005 PM 776 SANGER PD MEET COMPLAINANT 14 06-Mar-92 01000 PM 774 GNB CITY BUSINESS 26 06-Mar-92 02*25 PM 774 205 E.WILLOW DISTURBANCE 12 06-Mar-92 09030 PM 772 BURRUS MOTORIST ASSIST 20 06-Mar-92 11000 PM 772 S/B I35 LOOP 138 MOTORIST ASSIST 20 06-Mar-92 11:10 PM 776 HORIZON'S THEFT U/ 20 37 06-Mar-92 11:36 PM 772 1109 ELM DISTURBANCE 12 07-Mar-92 12:05 AM 776 165 LYNN ST MESSAGE DELIVERY 19 07-Mar-92 01:58 AM 776 202 PECAN ST APT 5 MESSAGE DELIVERY 19 07-Mar-92 08:28 AM 774 615 S.5TH MOTORIST ASSIST 20 07-Mar-92 03:06 PM 774 203 N.10TH DISTURBANCE 12 07-Mar-92 03:24 PM 774 1100 AUSTIN ASSAULT 33 07-Mar-92 05:40 PM 774 410 N. 3RD MOTORIST ASSIST 20 07-Mar-92 05:48 PM 774 204 11TH MOTORIST ASSIST 20 07-Mar-92 07*25 PM 776 149 SHADY GROVE ST. MEET COMPLAINANT 14 08-Mar-92 12:20 PM 773 HIGH SCHOOL OPEN BUILDING 17 08-Mar-92 01415 PM 771 10TH AND ELM CITY BUSINESS 26 08-Mar-92 05:30 PM 773 TAMMY AND KEETON CITY BUSINESS 26 08-Mar-92 07:36 PM 775 202 PECAN #4 911 HANG UP 47 08-Mar-92 09:42 PM 775 117 S 6TH SUSPICIOUS VEHICLE 10 09-Mar-92 05:15 AM 775 903 N STEMMONS BURGLARY OF BUILDING 30 09-Mar-92 12:30 PM 771 GNB BANK CITY BUSINESS 26 09-Mar-92 02:32 PM 773 603 S.2ND THEFT 0/ 750 39 09-Mar-92 04:39 PM 771 GNB BANK CITY BUSINESS 26 09-Mar-92 07*32 PM 775 117 S 6TH SUSPICIOUS VEHICLE 10 10-Mar-92 12:10 AM 775 200 BLK DIANE ARREST - MISDEMEANOR 2 10-Mar-92 11:23 PM 775 408 N 3RD SUSPICIOUS PERSONS 9 11-Mar-92 08:20 AM 774 PD BURGLARY OF BUILDING 30 11-Mar^92 12*55 PM 774 GNB CITY BUSINESS 26 11-Mar-92 02:09 PM 774 SANGER HIGH SCHOOL JUVENILE COMPLAINT 11 11-Mar-92 05050 PM 774 1005 chuech FIRE CALL ASSIST 7 11-Mar-92 07*15 PM 775 118 PALAMINO JUVENILE COMPLAINT 11 BANGER POL°ICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY LOG 11-Mar-92 08:27 PM 774 GNB CITY BUSINESS 26 11-Mar-92 10:10 PM 775 1603 FAIRFIELD MEET COMPLAINANT 14 11-Mar-92 10:30 PM 775 912 BOLIVAR PHONE COMPLAINANT 15 12-Mar-92 02:42 AM 775 310 N 3RD OPEN BUILDING 17 12-Mar-92 03:10 AM 775 500 N STEMMONS CRIM MI5 0/20 U/750 43 12-Mar-92 12:31 PM 774 GNB CITY BUSINESS 26 12-Mar-92 05:30 PM 774 200 BERRY MINOR ACCIDENT 5 12-Mar-92 06:34 PM 772 HILZ SNIDER CHEV. ALARM CALL 16 12-Mar-92 08:58 PM 776 900 N 5TH ST ASSAULT 33 12-Mar-92 09:50 PM 776 5th and Elm St. ANIMAL COMPLAINT 25 13-Mar-92 06:00 AM 776 BANGER FOOTBALL FD. SUSPICIOUS VEHICLE 10 13-Mar-92 09:20 AM 774 BANGER HIGH SCHOOL JUVENILE COMPLAINT 11 13-Mar-92 05:00 PM 772 COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY BUSINESS 26 13-Mar-92 05:30 PM 774 309 S. 2ND JUVENILE COMPLAINT 11 13-Mar-92 07:30 PM 776 BANGER PD ARREST - MISDEMEANOR 2 13-Mar-92 09:20 PM 772 N/B I35 @ 477 MILE MOTORIST ASSIST 20 13-Mar-92 11:00 PM 776 1100 AUSTIN SI #25 AHtttSi - MISDEMEANOR 2 14-Mar-92 12:35 AM 776 2ND AND BOLIVAR�ST SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES 8 14-Mar-92 02:30 AM 776 MCREYNOLDS RD. AGENCY ASSIST 21 14-Mar-92 06:06 AM 776 119 TAMMY ST SUSPICIOUS PERSONS 9 14-Mar-92 10:55 AM 772 POLICE DEPT. MEET COMPLAINANT 14 14-Mar-92 12:19 PM 772 803 KEATON CRIM MIS U/ 20 42 14-Mar-92 12:55 PM 772 100 WILLOW #B JUVENILE COMPLAINT 11 14-Mar-92 02:05 PM 772 800 S. 8TH MOTORIST ASSIST 20 14-Mar-92 04:07 PM 772 N/B I35 Q LOOP 138 AGENCY ASSIST 21 14-Mar-92 07:15 PM 776 455 AT 6TH ST MEET COMPLAINANT 14 14-Mar-92 07:35 PM 776 6TH ANO CHAPMAN ANIMAL COMPLAINT 25 15-Mar-92 12:07 AM 776 913 N 8TH MEET COMPLAINANT 14 15-Mar-92 02:29 PM 774 512 MARSHALL MEDICAL EMERGENCY 6 15-Mar-92 05:18 PM 773 HORIZON THEFT U/ 20 37 15-Mar-92 08:07 PM 776 BANGER PD PHONE COMPLAINANT 15 15-Mar-92 11:03 PM 776 1ST AND CHERRY OPEN BUILDING 17 15-Mar-92 11:50 PM 776 10TH AND WILLOW CITY BUSINESS 26 16-Mar-92 01:07 AM 776 HOLT AND KEETON RD ANIMAL COMPLAINT 25 16-Mar-92 07:47 AM 771 715 CHURCH ST. BURGLARY OF VEHICLE 31 16-Mar-92 11:07 AM 773 612 N.3RD CRIM MIS 0/20 U/750 43 16-Mar-92 12:01 PM 771 POST OFFICE OPEN BUILDING 17 16-Mar-92 02:35 PM 771 BOURLAND CARPET ANIMAL COMPLAINT 25 16-Mar-92 02;55 PM 773 STADIUM PARKING VIOLATIONS 27 16-Mar-92 03:40 PM 773 AMPCO MAN. CRIM MIS O/20 U/750 43 16-Mar-92 04:14 PM 771 908 CHAPMAN THEFT O/ 20 U/ 750 38 16-Mar-92 04:35 PM 773 GNB BANK CITY BUSINESS 26 16-Mar-92 09:00 PM 776 I-35 AT LOIS RD. ARREST - MISDEMEANOR 2 16-Mar-92 09:00 PM 776 I-35 AT LOIS RD ARREST - MISDEMEANOR 2 17-Mar-92 08:11 AM 771 GNB CITY BUSINESS 26 17-Mar-92 09:35 AM 773 2ND AND PECAN PARKING VIOLATIONS 27 17-Mar-92 01:03 PM 771 GNB CITY BUSINESS 26 17-Mar-92 03:30 PM 773 GND CITY BUSINESS 26 17-Mar-92 04:05 PM 771 COKER CAR WASH 6TH JUVENILE COMPLAINT 11 17-Mar-92 05:27 PM 773 5TH.AND MARSHAL MOTORIST ASSIST 20 17-Mar-92 Q9:19 PM 776 I-35 AT BELZ RD ARREST - MISDEMEANOR 2 18-Mar-92 01:14 AM 776 1900 N STEMMONS 911 HANG UP 47 18-Mar-92 02:51 AM 776 10TH AND MAPLE ARREST - MISDEMEANOR 2 18-Mar-92 03:43 AM 776 1400 N STEMMONS ALARM CALL 16 18-Mar-92 12:06 PM 771 GNB CITY BUSINESS 26 18-Mar-92 12:50 PM 773 DAIRY QUEEN FIRE CALL ASSIST 7 SANGER POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY LOG 18-Mar-92 07:25 PM 776 907 N 8TH MEET COMPLAINANT 14 18-Mar-92 09042 PM 776 511 N 9TH ST MEDICAL EMERGENCY 6 18-Mar-92 11:30 PM 776 MCREYNOLDS RD ARREST - MISDEMEANOR 2 19-Mar-92 01:00 AM 776 907 N 8TH MESSAGE DELIVERY 19 19-Mar-92 03:49 AM 776 615 N 10TH MEET COMPLAINANT 14 19-Mar-92 11:41 AM 772 POLICE DEPT. MEET COMPLAINANT 14 19-Mar-92 01:43 PM 772 BURRUS MINOR ACCIDENT 5 19-Mar-92 06*18 PM 772 HMY 77 @ CLEAR CREEK FIRE CALL ASSIST 7 19-MarT92 06040 PM 772 1008 S. 5TH PARKING VIOLATIONS 27 19-Mar-92 09:38 PM 776 108 FREESE DR MEET COMPLAINANT 14 19-Mar-92 10*20 PM 776 SNAP SHOP # 2 MEET COMPLAINANT 14 20-Mar-92 01*20 PM 774 AMPCO MEET COMPLAINANT 14 20-Mar-92 01*41 PM 774 BUCKHORN MOTORIST ASSIST 20 20-Mar-92 03*07 PM 774 455 & IH-35 FUNERAL ESCORT 22 20-Mar-92 09:40 PM 776 BURRUS 911 HANG UP 47 22-Mar-92 12:18 AM 776 302 S 1ST 911 HANG UP 47 A /' P� f n T A n n T C` T 7 (1 22-Mar-92 07 : 27 PM 775 yUU N 5 i EMMONS MU i UM10 1 M0010 1 22-Mar-92 10:35.PM 775 103 ALLEN SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES 8 23-Mar-92 06*31 AM 775 928 WILLOW MEDICAL EMERGENCY 6 23-Mar-92 06:31 AM 773 928 WILLOW MEDICAL EMERGENCY 6 23-Mar-92 09:19 AM 771 N.TEXAS PLASTICS MEDICAL EMERGENCY 6 23-Mar-92 11:01 AM 773 900 KEATON RD. BURGLARY OF HABITATION 29 23-Mar-92 01*01 PM 771 GNB BANK CITY BUSINESS 26 23-Mar-92 02:30 PM 773 200 CHAPMAN CRIM MIS 0/20 U/750 43 23-Mar-92 07:47 PM 775 700 DENTON CITY BUSINESS 26 23-Mar-92 08*12 PM 775 141 SHADY GROVE HARRASSMENT 45 23-Mar-92 11:12 PM 775 901 N STEMMONS DISTURBANCE 12 24-Mar-92 07:05 AM 771 800 N.7TH MEET COMPLAINANT 14 24-Mar-92 07*33 AM 773 SANGER CARE INN MEDICAL EMERGENCY 6 24-Mar-92 08:40 AM 771 612 CHAPMAN CRIM MIS 0/20 U/750 43 24-Mar-92 12:51 PM 773 GNB BANK CITY BUSINESS 26 24-Mar-92 04:00 PM 771 5TH AND PEACH THEFT 0/ 20 U/ 750 38 24-Mar-92 04:24 PM 773 1ST, AND WILLOW MINOR ACCIDENT 5 24-Mar-92 06@18 PM 771 JAKILU WELFARE CHECK 18 24-Mar-92 08:35 PM 775 S CITY LIMITS I-35 MOTORIST ASSIST 20 24-Mar-92 10*12 PM 775 1107 ELM MEDICAL EMERGENCY 6 24-Mar-92 10:36 PM 775 2000 FM455 SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES 8 24-Mar-92 11*55 PM 775 900 N STEMMONS BURGLARY OF VEHICLE 31 25-Mar-92 04*15 PM 774 117 TAMMY CRIM MIS 0/20 U/750 43 25-Mar-92 05:27 PM 774 405 DENTON MEET COMPLAINANT 14 25-Mar-92 07:06 PM 776 118 PALIMINO MEET COMPLAINANT 14 25-Mar-92 07:54 PM 776 305 E WILLOW ANIMAL COMPLAINT 25 26-Mar-92 02:37 AM 776 106 TAMMY SUSPICIOUS PERSONS 9 26-Mar-92 04*45 AM 776 800 N STEMMPNS SUSPICIOUS PERSONS 9 26-Mar-92 10920 AM 774 COMM.CENTER MOTORIST ASSIST 20 26-Mar-92 03:10 PM 774 302 WOOD MEET COMPLAINANT 14 26-Mar-92 04:45 PM 772 DENTON a WOOD JUVENILE COMPLAINT 11 26-Mar-92 04*46 PM 774 DOC.BITTLE MEDICAL EMERGENCY 6 26-Mar-92 07*54 PM 776 110 PRESTON MESSAGE DELIVERY 19 27-Mar-92 12:20 PM 772 609 N. 6TH MEET COMPLAINANT 14 27-Mar-92 02:39 PM 774 FIRST BAPTIST FUNERAL ESCORT 22 27-Mar-92 04:02 PM 774 203 JACKILU CIVIL STANDBY 24 27-Mar-92 07:45 PM 776 HORIZON'S SUSPICIOUS PERSONS 9 27-Mar-92 10:38 PM 776 906 N 6TH MEET COMPLAINANT 14 27-Mar-92 10:50 PM 776 709 HOUSTON ANIMAL COMPLAINT 25 27-Mar-92 11:35 PM 772 RR SWITCH STATION OPEN BUILDING 17 BANGER POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY LOG 28-Mar-92 12:45 AM 776 211 4TH SUSPICIOUS PERSONS 9 `;,28-Mar-92 12:25 PM 774 102 PRESTON 911 HANG UP 47 '�28-Mar-92 02:34 PM 774 123 ELM JUVENILE COMPLAINT 11 28-Mar-92 0&:11 PM 774 701 2ND MESSAGE DELIVERY 19 28-Mar-92''07:22 PM 776 102 PRESTON 911 HANG UP 47 28-Mar^92. 09:00 PM 772 611 S. 3RD ASSAULT 33 2$-Mar-92 09:42�PM 776 203 N 1oTH MEET COMPLAINANT 14 29-Mar-92 -12:00 AM 776 I-35 AT KEATON RD ANIMAL COMPLAINT 25 29-Mar-92 01:25 AM 776 455 AND 2164 AGENCY ASSIST 21 29-Mar-92 12:20'PM 773 tOTH.AND PECAN ARREST - MISDEMEANOR 2 29-Mar-92 02:26 PM 771 202 PECAN APT.S MEET COMPLAINANT 14 29-Mar-92 10:43 PM 775 100 BLK STEPHEN DR SUSPICIOUS PERSONS 9 29-Mar-92 11:59�PM 775 900 N STEMMONS WELFARE CHECK 18 30-Mar..-92 .02:40 AM 775 909 PEACH MEDICAL EMERGENCY 6 30-Mar-92 01:09 PM 773 GNB BANK CITY BUSINESS 26 30-Mar-92 01:32 PM 771 BANGER BANK MOTORIST ASSIST 20 30-Mar-92 03:58 PM 773 455 AND 35 SVC.ROAD MOTORIST ASSIST 20 30-Mar-92 07:08 PM 775 102 DAVID DR ANIMAL COMPLAINT 25 31-Mar-92 03:11 AM 775 116 S 4TH VACATION WATCH 57