Loading...
11/04/1991-CC-Agenda Packet-RegularMONDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 1991 I BOLIVAR STREET, CITY -i. j,pproa l rIit t of 1C9/ 1/ I We Disbursements c). Resolution #R 11-91 Casting Votes for Candidate to Denton Central Appraisal Board of Directors AGENDA Citizeds Input Request to Observe November , Thanicsgiving Day, No Trash Pickup rowlUOIRW BIDS RECODIFICATION CITY CODE BOOK NEW POLICE VEHICLE REFUNDING GO BONDS 1986 PRELIMINARY DESIGN OF SEWER INTERCEPTION LINE WARD ADDITION T October 21," : Mayor "Armstrong,Councilwoman . Councilman#John Berndt, and Councilman TommyKincaid WendellkBSENTO. Councilman ThomdI RESENT. Manager John Hamilton, Secretaryt+ Public t+ Works Superintendent a" BennySuperintendent Larry Yoast, Chief of Police Benny Erwin, Frontier Waste Management - Taisey Jones, Helen Johnson, Mae Jones, Garl and Thornton, and Betty Johnson Sanger Courier in Mayor Armstrong called the meeting to #Manager invocation which was followed by the pledge to the flag. . �t2Ylse1lt �4�e$'�C�a: (a). Approve Minutes (10/7/91) (b). Disbursements (c). Proclamation #PB®91 ®'Texas Pharmacy Week drs. Sam Jones spoke in favor of the zoning change and was OTOWilas molnW41 - # - # # . R I r IIIIIIII�ii # # . Base,Asphalt Sand, Gravel (�PIMPOMMMOMM t dcNeill regarding material for asphalt, sand, gravel base, and flex base. ' # ♦ - Councilman Jenkins, Motion carried. sanger Pence Co. $6v4AU*U* iurricane Fence Co. i Co.lein Fence M993400 # #P # #:. # # x. viotion carried with one no vote. • # 1)Iocese of FtWorth, Bishop Joseph PDelaney, who owns a piece )roperty in Sanger that is located on the Southeast corner of Plum and Ith and is 100 X 87.5 ft. He would like to donate this property to the onation. Seconded by Councilman Kincaid. Motion carried. ost that might be incurred in ,situation. Seconded by ilman Jenkins. Motirried f r System Revenue onds, Series 1991 i w �r ohn Berndt ' s ye Vendell Thomas, Councilman Absent Aargle C. Braxton, Councilwoman z, 20,336.45 to Gary Dill of Gainesville and that we enter into the Pro. kata Agreement with ARA Living Centers and with ARA pa ing their — Yi art of $7,965.11. Seconded by Councilwoman Braxton. Motion kgreement with Denton CountySeconded by Councilwoman BraxtorL Wotion carried. is asking for the holiday and to resume trash pickup on Monday. 1 City Manager replied that the U.S. Flag is set up front which �o cilman Berndt also commendedon the recent street patch wc�r. Statutes,Negotiations or Acquisition of Real Prope /9.rv-voc4vvaairL v4,asarerm.crmsrownr� {-lip i"i4cr f"s�vi�ardi3 $rr.rwv �°vor�YYf"iersa acx��vraa°, af'bih04d8 d-b.a bbdh:l4a Vdd bbWVJbdii 4blls ld 466�+ b+d 4� 6s bf [eababad db WatA bdlA�Wla&4av 6. h✓mr hJ kJb�.+at t . 0 p.m. i I •`v !- F}�'! P F+. F-ii i 1.� L �;1_ i :i_ 1i � �'::? i. _ _ . _ y ;-.. ! ,f� i • i !'�,, _PAi }`+ai l } 1° i�l J_ ;: l� } r t4.i�'''t 1?lei.. �! li-. �' !�:P I If It, I. .!i , It _:tom II If "`}I 11[t *1(:i't,"r a'!_ tIiL14_! .IL..'1 • -. ._... tt/,_ it I_.(:.,—}i` i {'�i�l l;. f-"_..,.: C..1 _.. i 3 t... %.-, '�`i i"t `=�i �"' 1 7 t�. _. i `,: t •_ d 1 ii; j:—�� r`a_ ,`:� ,__'. It _7.t _1: C..._�,• :E _! �, ._ r i.- :._.,, J t._F I ){.? � +:: I�! }tiffs' ii!� k-' ' _•I._EI.? t'I_ `t �. !�I'l�fi :.; 11 (,—', •; %,�; '�rl i 1 ,, j. [w'�?vF:'r Ii.i; �:%�`•.lct. it f€ i i-i�+yi•I_: }: ".i`'i �. � v � ::r .i t_':"_`.I.? �:F .I. � �'.� { �_: '_,iJ{`11"I_{S }�;„n I }f I I f . t_ .} t..i l:.i1. .,,, .,_tr ( Ifi L.a;_ I;.itmIt N?s ;ty +L.Ia-Fti'i','!._ct._ C'I:F ...tJ j'_}$': !�''�:1 l.:. •_!z , .� .l. .._I?.., a .4`�_r It t i_..! til. Fi%J r'.i'i-i(ai 'I i'1 .1 �., _ '•., tI , T•_'_ 1`3� - r.... S t._r - (^I,'J(. t_[ ji i It m i``. .i I illy Lii.JL UE �`,r �i�':.:. —±II .,_ i_.!.J ,�.. r' I r_'! tC_' i• i � `1'-' !— t - �( k-,{.'`-:1 Jy, r.; t-:,i.. I ^ '=:''T'P t -�•T"i.: —r-r.r t i_i� i=; 3,_!E�_!E•.! t�:3!.�. •_.� i—�f'. it! : _ € ._.i...,:; t_! �....S I. itii"`f ti''vi• Fl i`I..i°!i'i� !t`'i15i I._ -�_ ._�f _i_l E.iit,. �I, j rz t i ii.•j r t't tW:t_i,_, _. µ— r_. f7.J :•1_!`!/r_..:. .,E-7:=t;.. i_ ._!„ C...a �'1!:: 1 r �!_:!_!, >; �,•, (.:a i�.t ..,I i :,_ (r: i � Il ! i'`.!ii'i' ii_. i_:t.)i�i�:.'•�� ,_! <x'r:•. � t'!r i':!.lr" a`_''`1`_!..'.: � � ';!yi!�'!.0 t:i,;c:u'j At;w, t:Eii Fi �. t_t ItI_li"'i;�-1Y _ �� ?3 ,_rl t_?iahl:l n;tl t_Eat_jr i. :_.E ;.._ I [t: „i•...iC't t_?�`—�! j,i' i i; ' ��jl !-:: ! j 'tl: �`��!. .__ �,:u 30 !r I. , I � (_i)•.j !—:(; iM D'. r':I: t i.,:r: E .�....•i: .'; !._'::� !.lJl : i:.., r'.t. !-'i`:i r_!_• I t �_E• , . 'l—i�.�._ i��_;{ �!•t 1... ]. :'''fl-iti'. Wit!_ _, _ ,_. _• _: f..!C _St1Fry,'`�i iii F i`'G E: 5j± f-,I- c,IIt f j[t - =•I I^E u 'it1 t_f t-1 1 i , L! I 1 A. _. �i�,�_iJ4: 1.TNI, !'•11E zF,i, 1 1-1 1-'f1 1,1�f �!f}I�-. Llt� _f�E_•I: firs: 1}1'.}_,. ,t4!Ii '(. •,i.Y_.l; 1 �f1lf__.1=< fjI`,lI_) f,jl 1.' �- _' ? �`: �•_'.fE.`'; is :..f$_i t'—— -� - — - '•�i-'s � t'1—i:—, :i� � %i�'l�� _.I,!!_I 1 ;-f� F�'�i �:,i"j C!j _„ f h( IIE iliL_ 1?E,.±(r}'t�.i..)ii1i',`F.. i li(?i'�' i i.; ;L_i�'!-`'1_'f �__._•'_tt.} 1 E-t:I':. F 1 7. 1-:i5�C i.:j i ''i .-i 0,F( I,4 �'�%!l.l i'•,. %J '� �'"' !.! ��)�'':�:',i f�' i.'� a �` .� 1.1 'i„!v,i j.1. iu!r. t4i'1 'a..i. , i,, , ! :_i � I . ,-F..r�_ -_ ,. } :_• f'.�.� i._E'�);: ,,, c ._ ..: 1 .tit,i_t :°E(Y j1 i )' goi i .... ,._ . ter..., �.•..; ....... ..Is it st5 _!.. (_j.i I-��._ 7i_ii'� i; it j �•�'� '. 'i_; Id{1_ij`•.1..4 ,:_ .. .` rii„ .:.<<_1 L:.L_C".'_.: I f•..0 C t_! � _ i_!t"t!_! ji•i:. 1"'iElEta.t Ise:J`�u __ i �-- ace T fyi;,t T f'i E_!{ (:i'4E?,_.i {' t.i-"._i'? I. i E.,lafli iii;`i: •`_, ._I''{ ._ i_s � !* _.... i Ei _:_! t,l; ` �!,{ t:ti.:. - • ! � �l.: r?:�+± i.'.!_F l,E,: � ,.i`a',, t� , . S1t`ilhi zi.rsj �bb' tibb j_ F'._:= ,. i/ 1 HI3 f t [.. _ .I 7` l i 1.1lli t.r� ic l.WM_i.-� i +. �. (_�1'7m I,-i-' ,.��_ .144U Q Tom: Hc r c rabte T ayar 1Vierr7bers cif the pity ur eil F ROMS John Hamilton, City Manager DATE. November 1, 1991 BoardDenton Central Appraisal District the voting procecture 'e Directors.Youf f f eleven votes # one candidate divide your among the yy several ." s Y candidates. yo.will t. recall prior action, RESOLUTION 11-91 its intent to > CITY OF SANGER, TEXAS RESOLUTION #R 11-91 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SANGER, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS, CASTING THE CITY COUNCIL'S VOTE FOR CANDIDATES CO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE DENTON COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT. WHEREAS, the Candidates for the Hoard of Directors of the Denton County Central Appraisal District have been nominated, and WHEREAS, voting units must cast their vote by written resolution prior to November 14, 1991, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANGER RESOLVES. TO CAST ELEVEN { 11) VOTES FOR THE FOLLOWING CANDIDATE(S): Resolved this 4th day of November, 1991. Nel Armstrong Mayor ATTEST: Rosalie .Garcia City Secretary DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT JOE D. ROGERSI CTA/RPA/RTA Chief Appraiser JOHN D. BROWN, RPA Deputy Chief Appraiser JOE A. FORSYTHE Deputy Chief Appraiser -Administration T0: 3911 MORSE STREET P.O. BOX 2816 ENTON, TEXAS 76202-2816 817-566-0904 All Taxing Jurisdictions FROM: Joe R. Rogers DATE: October 17, 1991 SUBJECT: Candidates to Board Appraisal District BOARD OF DIRECTORS: JON BECK, Chairman CLARENCE MYERS, Vice -Chairman RICHARD SMITH, Secretary TROY WHITE HORACEBROCK Ci�� OF SANDER_ of Directors - Denton Central Candidates to the Denton Central Appraisal District Board of Directors are listed below alphabetically by each candidates last name. Each voting unit must cast its vote by written resolution and submit it to the Chief Appraiser by November 14th. The unit may cast all its votes for one candidate or may distribute the votes among any number of candidates. Some voting units may have enough votes to select several directors to the Board. To share representation on the Board, several units may wish to vote for the same candidate. The five nominees receiving the most votes will become Board members. A voting unit must cast its votes for a person nominated and named on the ballot. There is no provision for write-in candidates. The Chief Appraiser may not count votes cast for someone not listed on the official ballot. Candidates nominated by taxing Jurisdictions. 1. Beck, Jon 6. Myers, Clarence 2. Brock, Horace 7. Neely, Debbie 3. Clinton, Tracy 8. Preston, Vivian 4. Hughes, Elbert 9. Smith, Richard 5. Moore, Brad 10. Weaver, Dick Joe D. Rogers Chief Appraiser budget/ss/boardl JURISDICTIONS DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT 1992 BUDGET ALLOCATIONS WORKSHEET NUMBER OF VOTES ---------------------------------------- SCHOOL DISTRICTS: ARGYLE ISD AUBREY ISD DENTON ISD KRUM ISD LAKE DALLAS ISD LEWISVILLE ISD LITTLE ELM ISD NORTHWEST ISD PILOT POINT ISD PONDER ISD SANGER ISD SCHOOL DISTS TOTALS DENTON COUNTY: DENTON COUNTY TOTALS 60 27 886 27 106 1,565 39 257 45 18 58 3,088 ------------------- ------------------- 790 budget/ss/boardl CITIES: DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT 1992 BUDGET ALLOCATIONS WORKSHEET CITY OF ARGYLE 6 CITY OF AUBREY 3 TOWN OF BARTONVILLE 1 CITY OF THE COLONY 113 TOWN OF CORINTH 24 CITY OF DENTON 407 CITY OF DOUBLE OAK 5 CITY OF FLOWER MOUND 109 TOWN OF HACKBERRY 1 TOWN OF HICKORY CREEK 7 CITY OF HIGHLAND VLG 56 CITY OF JUSTIN 3 CITY OF KRUGERVILLE 1 CITY OF KRUM 2 CITY OF LAKE DALLAS 12 CITY OF LAKEWOOD VIL 1 CITY OF LEWISVILLE 323 CITY OF LITTLE ELM 4 CITY OF MARSHALL CRK 1 CITY OF NORTHLAKE 1 CITY OF OAK POINT 2 CITY OF PILOT POINT 9 CITY OF PONDER 1 CITY OF ROANOKE 3 CITY OF SANGER 11 CITY OF TROPHY CLUB 17 TOTAL FOR CITIES 1,122 FINAL TOTALS gqg TC�: Fit�nt�rable Mayor � Metx�ber� t�f the City �c�t�neil FROM* John Hamilton, City Manager ATE: November 1, 1991 Thanksgiving Day l� allowed authorizeNovember 28, 199 1. A.ccording to our contract Council will need to +{ ff c rs c %6 1 r Ar & �- �. .♦. ., _Y'vG iv .��=.e_�.,e .'.,. �..___ 4-, _.� _.. 1 _ Y.��Y .,.��-'. viz _.,_a.,.:1,�.J �j �. 7�u. ..��� ✓c_`(', 1ii�i�. a.'.��L .'Oti ... a.✓ci ive .c iGS1.i1C S 11 M G' G !a -1. . -G �incer�ly, ��Ldc l ^cap _I TA4_ s i';ti7iaC�i;i�(�i:i. A 'T'a H��.�rai�le IYlayar �. i�erriber �f the pity ��u�.eil FROM* John Hamilton, City Manager DATE. November 1, 1991 City Code Book t� years,r Legal Nofiice The City of Sanger will accept proposals for the comprehensive recodification of the City of Sanger Code, until 2 p.m., Monday, December 16, 1991, at which time all proposals received prior to 2 p.m. will be opened and publicly read in the Conference Room of City Hall, 201 Bolivar Street, Sanger, Texas 76266. All proposals should be returned in sealed envelopes, clearly amarked "Recodification Proposal", to the Office of the City Secretary. P. O. Box 578, Sanger, Texas 76266 prior to 2.00 p.m., December 16, 1991. All proposals should include twenty-five (25) copies in three ring binder formate. The City of Sanger reserves the right to reject any and all bids and in any case award the bid most favorable to the City. Rosalie Garcia City Secretary Run in local paper: 11/7/91 & 11 j 14J91 a w A ohn k1amilton city manager, 1.uthorize Bids an New Police 7ehicle authorization to bid one (1) replacement police vehicle. These are the samlo ifications used for the last two (2) police car purchases. sped 1 III Mill III iiiiiii III III NEW REQUEST FOR BIDS The City of Sanger is seeking bids on one (1) 1992 our door sedan to be used as a police patrol vehicle. A copy of the specifications can be secured from the City Secretary during normal business hours at City Hall, 201 Bolivar. Bids must be on the official bid sheet and be returned to the City. Secretary in a sealed envelope marked "Police Car Bid' prior to 2.30 p.m., Monday, December 2, 1991, at which time all bids will be publicly opened and read aloud in the City Hall Conference Room, 201 Bolivar, Sanger, Texas. All bids will be presented to the City Council at their regular meeting. December 2. 1991 at 7 n-rn• in the City Cot cil Chnmherfnr thei n� r review and consideration. The City of Sanger reserves the right to reject any and all bids and in any case award the bid in the best interest of the City. Rosalie Garcia City Secretary RUN IN LOCAL PAPER: 11/7/91 & ll/14/91 SPECIFICATIONS FOR POLICE CAR The City of Sanger will accept bids on the following vehicle until 2:30 p.m, Monday, December 2, 1991. Please note any exceptions or explanations to the specifications in the space provided Onc (lj 199z Model Car for the use of the Sanger Police Department as follows: [Use the space at the left to note exceptions.] One [ 1] 1992 Model Four Door Sedan, White in Color UtJhnR•l Rnos. 117.'2 �, to 1l17 K (lvr+rnll T.s.netl, TR1 n to tOR YYL ✓MVY LVV.V 4Y LV f •V, V � Y1 tAtt YYLIG. irLy LV L.V VV LVV.V Automatic Transmission, Three Speed, Column Shift Power Disc Brakes -Anti-Lock Heater and Rear Defroster Factory Install Integral Air Conditioning Heavy Duty Cooling System, Battery, 100 AMP Alternator Split Front Seats -Blue In Color Black Rubber Floor Mats, Front and Rear Intermittent Wipers Left Hand and Right Hand Outside Mirrors Vj8 Engine with EFI or MFI Port Injection VJe Engine 3.0 Liter or Larger All Standard Safety Features Ignition -Electronic -Radio Noise Suppressor Full Gauge Instrument Panel -Oil, Temperature, Amp, Fuel AM -FM Radio Specifications for Police Car Page 2 (12/91) Tires -All Season Steel Belted Radial Tire, (P205/70R-14] Tires - Black Wall, Solid Wheel Coverings Factory Warranty Tilt Steering Wheel SnAre Tire - F»tl 5i e Driver's Side Air Bag Standard Restraint System Minimum Fuel Tank Capacity - 1H Gallons The City of Sanger reserves the right to re jest any and bids and in all causes, award the bid most favorable to the City of Sanger, NAME, BRAND, TYPE VEHICLE BID PRICE $ Signature ofAuthorized Agent Representing City, State, Zip Code CITY OF SANDER P. O. BOX 578 BANGER, TEXAS 76266 MEMORANDUM # 1031 TO: Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council FROM: John Hamilton, City Manager DATE: November 1, 1991 SUBJECT: CansiderJActian on Refunding G.O. Bonds, 1986 (Street Construction) The enclosed FAX from Dan Almon concerns the possible refunding of the G. O. Bonds dated August 4, 1986 at the new favorable average rate of 5.55%. As you can see, the issue could be retired in 1996 and save the City a cumulative total of $51,000 for the life of the bond coupons. If you are interested in pursuing this refunding in addition to those already approved, Mr. Almon stated that it will fit into the current time frame on the Water Well financing project. Staff recommends proceeding with the refunding. Current interest rate on this issue range from 7.25 the year. (A copy of the interest schedule is enclosed). JH:es Enclosure 11% depending on UCT-31-1' 91 14 5© FP.OM SOUTHLJEST SECURITIES DLSL x: i`::.`:"d°` ,s<L.r,.....N„s:, ,•... --: ^ :':• ...ter..°_..::' ::.._ : '.:_:.,>.::,... .... .. .... • ,. ... -.M— .A l::;.tkt::...5.fr»;• • ..P ti1 c4I : t : i ; `"+ C''7 •T ~ 7 w' I sd? c 7 qW M { « en 11 O C6} ! •• •• ^ 1! ti -+ Cam: •--r C7 . r-t ( r+ .—t 1 i ' !1 I I1 t ES , W E r-- s-] Y+i ; -Y* ? (' r ri '', ` +' ` it L it t .' I[t v II L7 (t Q 7 Q is • El ,1 O r"'7- t; CfJ I1 i N O ; ` 31 1'-i r`i it tl1 it a w C `r.E ^ + c F:i d . yQ E•• C1 Tip 7181?45S 1s3 P.©2 , o . ( i-• + 1 C` O sue', E '• CV O 4 if1 i •• f ti cn cv O N >a I 1 PYa 01 t ca C ? c> O 1 G7 0 It p `-. 1 0 G7 O O p i o © 31 M Q : • P Y E rn r0 - n Q n n i' 4 q Cam- Qi r" 1 C°` `—f tr'i J g O O C CCU i C} C i f I ..J — - ' . can, rh + i I! I i ! i O 4 b l rqn, it 1 CS ! C? O O O f i '.,. O CO !i ( ` ry q. :A 3 i Ali C? !a7 ;! w ( w w (! { 07 4i O O d 1 G7 4^ I( p E st I t 1 i 1t . ! c-r ; G;TG o00 CSC7b0 i Ct .V u„ if O t:.a` 7 j OgQO Q QQQO + O+ LC? !d .O-r s;,7 x 3 C? O Q ©© e`'S cea u7 tc7 1 C7 CJ C7 li f 7' i C • ,: qq t[ WUO tflQ4 Il rJ! ~ E i O's G fig• C- J to N N cp CO ii C'> •it1 ! E'. O i P IS Q j t i{ 1 t A t q O C CJ A MG'7Oc'J ( : ? O 47 C7 S.7 L) prj rs t'J y : + W 4' N.J' tSy C' i Q d o 03 Ut tr} 01 t-. t r O N t t_7 :. e ri Q . cn O C? O o a a E E O W d GD O . hi d3 t ;tl :a fs C—+ n C ,.,,{ .art .w • 7 1- ' H H t ; C!2 + p} ! G: ^-j U O A3 Q} I-t ' ' k7 1J: C ca Q J 3 G7 e`, e6S ttj LV :" " +. p 2 E i :J 4 O U © [ C G7 SE 'U •R Cal d 3 C7 © L7 G7 GS f .7 O tE C Q `` ri P . . i id _ F-t I Q © b O O 1 CJ Q li •(-t 1 ! p C .Q" d O 1 O G3 Ei .r{ J C1 - CS w F G Gh C.7 rry 4 O :3 O Ssl r"t I J r^ i Qlw Gs7 ' E-r ' i r s-a r-t r- r1 rl rl t ri ' d1 `", s.l 4 U ' .. E CC tV cX7 C i R? 4ti q N q " > G +' - " 'X. !i.. 'T. ,7,. (S' ' . Q TOTAL P.O GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 1986 ORIGINAL ISSUE - $700,000.00 DATED AUGUST 4, 1988 Fiscal Interest Bonds Interest Total Year Due Due Due 2-1 8-1 8-1 1991-92 $18,975.00 $75,000.00 $16,9?5.00 $108,950.00 1992-93 $14,350.00 $80,000.00 $14,350.00 $108,700.00 1993-94 $11,450.00 $90,000.00 $11,450.00 $112,900.00 1994-95 $8,075.00 $100,000.00 $8,075A0 $116,150.00 1995-96 $4,200.00 $105,000.00 $4,200.00 � 113,400.00 Total $55,050.00 $450,000.00 $55,050.00 $5so, loo.00 Bonds were Issued for the purpose of Street Construction and Improvements. 1009'o Street Hud�et Funded by Sales Tax Revenues and Gen. l+d. Debt ., in annual installments of principal due and payable on August 1 in each of the years, and in the respective principal amounts, as set forth in the following schedule: YEARS AMOUNTS IL $551000 1989 60,000 1990 65,000 1991 70,000 1992 75,000 1993 80,000 1994 90,000 1995 100,000 1996 105,000 and to pay interest, from the date of this Initial Certificate of Obligation,on the balance of each such installment of aid, principal, resp ectivel/from time to time remaining unpaid, at the rates as follows: 11.00 % per annum on the above installment of principal due and payable on August 1, 1988 10. 625 % per annum on the above installment of principal due and payable on August 1, 1989 10.50 % per annum on the above installment of principal due and payable on August 1, 1990 10. 50 % per annum on the above installment of principal due and payable on August 1, 1991 7 . 00 % per annum on the above installment of principal due and payable on August 1, 1992 7 . 25 % per annum on the above installment of principal due and payable on August 1, 1993 7. 50 % per annum on the above installment of principal due and payable on August 1, 1994 7 ,7 55 % per annum on the above installment of principal due and payable on August 1, 1995 8.00 % per annum on the above installment of principal due and payable on August 1, 1996 with said interest being payable on February 1, 1987, and semiannually on each August 1 and February 1 thereafter while this Certificate of Obligation or any portion hereof is outstanding and unpaid. THE INSTALLMENTS OF PRINCIPAL OF AND THE INTEREST ON this Certificate of Obligation are payable in lawful money of the United States of America, without exchange or collection charges. The installments of principal and the interest on this Certificate of Obligation are payable to the registered owner hereof through the services of MBank Dallas, N.A., Dallas, Texas, which is the "Paying Agent/Registrar for this n Certificate of Obligation. Payment of all principal of and interest on this Certificate of Obligation shall be made by the Paying Agent/Registrar to the registered owner hereof on each principal and/or interest payment date by check or draft, dated as of such date, drawn by the Paying Agent/Registrar on, and payable solely from, funds of the Issuer required by the ordinance authorizing the issuance of this Certificateto be Obligation (the "Certificate of Obligation Ordinance") on deposit with the Paying Agent/Registrar for such purpose as hereinafter provided; and such check or draft shall be sent by the Paying Agent/Registrar by United States mail, or „c-nterest n Anh such principal. and/ C CITY OF SANGER R O. BOX 578 SANGER, TEXAS 76266 MEMORANDUM # 1030 TO: Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council FROM: John Hamilton, City Manager DATE: November 1, 1991 SUBJECT: Consider and Possible Action on Preliminary Design of Sewer Interceptor Line - Ward Addition The Wastewater Collection budget authorizes $105,000 for the construction of a new sewer interceptor line to relieve the existing six (6) inch sewer lines that serve not only the Ward Addition, but serves as a transport for a large volume of our sewer effluent for the west side of the City as well as the South -Side Addition. During this recent wet weather, many residents in the Ward Addition have experienced sewer backups. In order to proceed with this needed project, staff is requesting permission to instruct our consulting engineers to proceed with the design and preparation of a bid document for your consideration. A tentative target date for construction to begin is February 1, 1992. Staffs goal is to have the interceptor on-line prior to the Spring rains. JH:es Enclosure I ICI � ' -y %�1 1 -� - � �t �� j � a � } �� - J CK LU S I +a-� . � N = .�`--._..r�� �� _,, ,, �����. !C:�V�i�-�'�II � � a � < 670 0 �n \� is ��� i, � =_ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF SANDER P. O. BOX 578 BANGER, TEXAS 76266 Honorable Mayor &Members of the City Council Jahn Hamilton, City Manager November 1, 1991 rYV Administration Report 1}. I spoke by telephone with Dwight Byrd, P.E., District Engineer far the Texas Transportation Department, and was informed that the pedestrian walkway is currently scheduled for a bid construction date of June, 1992. This walkway will be built across I-35 on a line from the south side of Bolivar Street on the east -side of I-35 to the north curb -line of Bolivar Street on the west side of I-35. 2). Mr. Byrd also informed me that the I-35 R.O.T. is scheduled for mowing in November. I informed him that the City has received numerous complaints regarding the high grass and weeds along the freeway. 3}. The supplemental disability insurance for our volunteer fire-fighters is in effect as of November 1st. This was a budgeted item at $1960. The twelve month premium is $1834.002 JH:es 0 �� CITY OF BANGER P. O. BOX 578 BANGER, TEXAS 76266 MEMORANDUM TO: John Hamilton, City Manage�� _ FROM: Rose Garcia, City Secretary DATE: November 1, 1991 SUBJECT: Billing for 10-15-91 Billings for. 10-15-91 WATER METERS 1233 ELECTRIC TVIETERS 1625 RG: cb Total Water Gallons Total Sewer Gallons Total KWH Total Sanitation Billing Total Sewer Billing Total Water Billing Total Electric Wholesale Electric Costs 10,325,000 10,306,500 1,686,306 1Z836926 21,226.05 31,867.37 146,317.66 78,800.54 NO.OF METERS RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL IN SERVICE SEWER_ ��� �1�� �� 1452 FllEL ADJUSTMENT 1275 1287 116 133 C'itu of Someploce $pnciul DATE: November 10, 1991 Frontier Waste Management P. O. Box 758 Sanger, Texas 76266 Gentlemen: Enclosed is a City of Sanger check in the amount of � 11.396.68 representing payment to Frontier Waste Management for the contract agreement provided for in the City of Sanger/Frontier Waste Management Agreement This payment covers the month of October 1991 and is computed as follows: Total Residential Customers Billed 1212 at $ 7.10 rate per customer Less $0.48 per customer billed as per Contract Total Other Customer Classes Less 796 Franchise Fee Approved for payment Garcia, City Secretary AMOUNT �o� BOLIVAR STREET BANGER, (TEXAS �bat66 8�y,4Stt�793o P.O. ri07[ 57g � a1�•458.4Y8o T'A7C t ti LAW OFFICES M�CALL, PARKHURST � HcaI�TgN c'.Fa50 QNE AMEFi14AN CENTER A�1�TIN. TEXAS 78701-3234 Ie�eviiaNr: $�247tl•�3U06 YF.LECONY: ."il2 47.?•Oa71 Mr, John Hamilton, City Manager Clty of Sanger 2(�1 13oUvar St. Sanger, Texas 7fi?,�5 Dear John: 717 NpRTH HARWOUiU NINTH f'L.bgR L7ALLA�, TEXAS 752o1-6SA7 YC�c PMONa: ai4 c'.rv'c'0oo YELECONY: 214 95M1j.0736 tJctober 2f3, 1�1 City of Sanger, Texas Utility System Refunding and Improvement Revenue Bonds, Series 1�1 402 QNE kIVERWAL.K f'I.ACE: SAN ANTbNIp, TEXAS 7B2q�-3503 •iCL6PNONC: �ia� Z2�•2b00 7F1 Ff,:(1�•y; !'iIP 2'2$.•r S1H/I Attached is one cx�py of the Notice of Intention tea he published in the Sanger C.o�ricr do lJctoher �l, 1�1 and Novemt�er '7, 1991. wk attach menl ON �y14''"`� Since ly, I'etc .Tart Q �: h CYTY d>R' SANGF.It, TEXAS► NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ISSUE UTILITY SYSTEM REVENUE; REFUNDING AND IMPROVEMENT EON�►S, SERIES 1�91, IN THE PRINCIPAi. AMQUNT OF $2,�Op,000 Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Sanger, Texas, intends to consider far passage, at a Regular Meeting to be held at ?;00 P.11ri. on November 18, I999, at their meeting place, at City Hall, Sanger, Texas, an Ordinance authorizing the issuance, sale and delivery of do issue of bonds to be designated as "City of Sanger, Texas Utility System Revenue ltefi'uriding and improvcmcnt Bonds, Series ly�►1", providi�ag $$00,000 in principal amount of bands for the purpose of improving and extending the combined Waterworks, Sewer and Electric System, and providing $1,500,000 in principal amount of bands for the purpose of refunding the outstanding City of Sanger, Texas Utility System Revenue Bonds, Series I�77, Series 1982 and Series 1985, for a total aggregate amount not to exceed $2,3t?0,000, witty such bonds to he payable from and secured hy, a first lien an and pledge of the Net .Revenues of the City's Utility System, being the City's Waterworks, Sewer and) l�ctric System, all ac will be further described, defined and provided in the aforesaid Ordinance. Said bonds will bear interest at maximum rates not to exceed 15% per annum, will be scheduled to mature serially within a maximum of not tc� exceed 30 years from their date, and will be subject to redemption prior to maturity, and will have such other and further characteristics as will be provided in the aforesaid Ordinance, Said bonds will be authorized, issued, sold and delivered pursuant to Articics 1I11 through 1118, V.A.'r'.C,S., and other applicable laws. Nel Armstrong, lvlayor i � City of Sanger 30�iNWE3T SECURIilE3 October 24, 1991 Mr. John Hamilton �, City Manager City of Sanger P.O. Box 578 Sanger, Texas 76266-0578 !1 �'�' � ;; 44G1 V ra a y. .� 141 V � Re: Proposed City of Sanger, Texas Utility .System Revenue and Refunding Bonds, Series 1991 Dear John: - We enclose a Schedule of Events for the City�s bond issue which is self-explanatory. Sincerely, C�✓v�� Dan A. Almon Senior Vice President DAA/cb cc/w/enc: Peter M. Tart MEMBER: NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE. INC. 1 201 ELM STREET, SUITE 43G0 � DALLAS, TEXAS 75270 TELEPHONE (214) 651-1800 CITY OF SANGER, TEXAS i Utility System Revenue Refunding and Improvement Bonds Series 1991 Suggested Schedule of Events Date Action 10/21/91* City Council meeting to review plan of financing, authorize Southwest Securities to proceed and adopt resolution authorizing publication of Notice of Intention to issue revenue bonds 10/23/91 Submit financial information to Southwest Securities 1V/G'tl71 1.U111111C111:C 1JlepQlalloll Ul rlClllti111dl�/ V111Glill �Jld1CIllCitl 10/24/91* First publication of Notice of Intention to issue revenue bonds 10/31/91 Submit Preliminary Official Statement and financing documents to insurance companies and rating agency 10/31/91* Second publication of Notice of Intention to issue revenue bonds 11/11/91 Receive municipal bond rating and insurance commitment 11/11/91 Release Preliminary Official Statement for printing 11/11/91 Distribute Preliminary Official Statement to investment community 11/18/91 Review market conditions, offer bonds for sale 11/18/91 Recalculate refunding issue at current market 11/18/91* Special City Council meeting to approve documents, adopt ordinance authorizing issuance of bonds and execute escrow agreement 11/1$/91 11/20/91 11/25/91 12/05/91 12/10/91 12/18/91 *Key Dates 10/22/91 File Letter of Intent to subscribe to o gvernment securities Submit transcript of proceedings to Attorney General for approval Mail final Official Statement Subscribe to State &Local Government Securities for Escrow Receive escrow verification report from certified public accauntants Refunding bond issue closing F�, hdkZ�Qql iA V HERITAGE SELLABRATiON - True to my prediction in the last newsletter, the 1991. Heritage Sellabration was a tremendous success, despite Mother Nature and her rain Friday evening and Saturday afternoon. Congratulations to Bill Hood and Kim Clarke for their long hours and hard work. It naid off in making this the lareest Sellabration in our thirteen .year history. Special thanks to all our volunteers, without your dedication, our cause would have been a lost one. Congratulations to our new Mr. and Miss Sanger. Little Mr. Sanger is Justin Ray Cox, son of Joria Cox; and Little Miss Sanger is Stephanie Melton, daughter of Johnny and Judy Melton. We wish them much happiness and success during their reign. SAFE SPOOK NIGHT - Once again this year, the Chamber is sponsoring Safe Spook Night from 4 -7 p.m., THURSDAY October 31, 1991. We are asking members who would like to participate to open these special hours for little trick -r-treaters. There will be news releases in the paper, and as last year, we will be targeting young children kindegarten through third grade. Please contact Karen at the Chamber office 4.58=7702 by October 18th to confirm your participation. Don't forget, we have the traveling Ghost Trophy won by Sanger Bank for the best decorated business. Wh0000 will win this year???? The Chamber will also be co -sponsoring the Haunted House with the Lions Club this year. The dates will be October 26, 30th and the 31st. If you are interested in helping with this project, contact Karen at the office, or any Lions Club member. HOMECOMING PARADE - The Chamber was proud to sponsor the Most Original Float in the Homecoming Parade this year. The FFA was this years winner. CRISIS CENTER - In September, we purchased $50.00 worth of groceries for the Bargain Depot/Crisis Center. Please remember they need your help all year round. Stop by and welcome new chamber members, Pam's Dance Workshop, The Fort Dallton Co, Denton, and Sanger Tire and Muffler Center. Election ballots for four board of directors will be coming to you in the mail in November. Please take the time, vote and return ,your ballot to the Chamber. Let your voice be heard. You will also be receiving your ballot for Citizen of the Year. Please fill it out and return it also. Until next month ..... Happy Halloween. Karen � � AGE Regional Solid Waste Management Planning Status Report North Central Texas Council of Governments October 1991 Executive Summary of In June 1991, the Executive Board of NCTCOG adopted the 1991-92 Interim Interim Plan Now Regional Solid Waste Management Plan, This 640-plus-page document consists Available of six strategies for integrated solid waste management and is intended to encourage the development of solid waste management plans by local governments. An Executive Summary of the plan has now been completed and is available for distribution. The Summary consists of an overview of the plan, one page summary bulletins for each of the six key strategies, and the full set of action recommendations from the plan. For a copy of the summary, contact Jaaula [Vial at (oI /)04V-J3uu. Solicitation Underway NCTCOG has issued a Request for qualifications to professional consulting firms for Consultant interested in assisting with the development of the long-range Regional Solid Assistance to the Waste Management Plan for the North Central Texas region. Funding for the Regional Solid Waste consultant contract will derive from NCTCOG's planning grant award from the Management Plan State, of which approximately $200,000 are budgeted for this purpose. A task force of NCTCOG's Resource Conservation Council will review the RFQ responses and is expected to select at least three firms to be invited to submit a response to a Request for Proposal. The RCC task force will review the written responses to the RFP, interview the firms and rank them. NCTCOG will then negotiate a contract with the top -ranked firm. The intent is to engage regional consultant assistance on or about January 1, 1992. Household Hazardous maw# 1 will implement an aggressive public education outreach program for Waste Initiative household hazardous waste as approved by the Texas Water Commission and the EPA. The project will initiate serious efforts to implement the best known methods for managing household hazardous wastes to prevent surface runoff contamination and will identify opportunities for reuse and recycling of used oil. Project activities are tentatively scheduled to begin in the fall of 1991 and continue through the fall of 1993, these will involve orientation of volunteer trainers from local communities and implementation of workshops taught by the volunteer trainers. Key information will be transferred to local governments. Part of the funds (up to $8,000) may be passed through to local organization(s) for delivery of specific services. A panel of experts under the guidance of NCTCOG's Resource Conservation Council will be asked to oversee this effort. For information, contact Elaine Karnes at (817)640-3300. Municipal Recycling A Municipal Recycling Coordinators Roundtable is being held by NCTCOG every Coordinators two to three months to give recycling coordinators in the D/FW Metroplex an Roundtable opportunity to network and exchange ideas. A list of cities offering recycling 1 services has been compiled, including municipal contacts and a description of the services provided by each city. For information or a copy of the list, contact Kathleen Graham at (817)640-3300. OxyChem to Site New Dallas -based Occidental Chemical Corporation announced that construction will Plastics Recycling begin this year in the Dallas area on what will be Texas' largest post -consumer Center plastics recycling plant. A site in the region has not yet been selected, and OxyChem has indicated the availability of local curbside collection of plastic bottles may weigh heavily in the site selection. When completed, the plant will have the capacity to process up to 40 million pounds of the most common household plastic containers, primarily made of PET, HDPE, and PVC (plastic codes 1, 2 and 3). OxyChem will rely on comprehensive collection of plastic containers from municipal recycling programs to provide its feedstock. Following collection from Texas households, plastic containers will be delivered to a handling facility where they will be sorted according to type. They then will be ground, washed, extruded and cut into pellets. While about 30 to 50 jobs will be created locally, the intent is to automate all of the facility's processes, especially sortation. OxyChem is aware of its responsibility to be part of the solid waste solution and feels recycling is one of the most positive and practical solutions to the problem of solid waste management. NCTCOG supports this private industry initiative to provide an urgently needed outlet for household plastics and encourages local collection efforts to provide the necessary feedstock. EPA Standards for USEPA Administrator William Reilly has signed the final Subtitle D Criteria for Municipal Solid Waste municipal solid waste landfills. The requirements, issued under the Resource Landfills -Final Rule Conservation and Recovery Act, include location, design, operating, and closure standards, financial assurance requirements, as well as cleanup requirements for existing contamination. EPA also is requiring groundwater monitoring at all municipal landfills (within a 5 year phase -in period). At new and expanding landfills, EPA is setting liner design standards to protect groundwater further. The standards build on current state efforts to protect groundwater and other natural resources from contamination. Nearly 6,000 municipal solid waste landfills are affected by this rule. Annual costs of compliance nationally are estimated at $330 million, or about $4 a year per household. The states are primarily responsible for the implementation and enforcement of the new rules. The law requires states to incorporate the federal standards into current state waste permitting programs. States with EPA - approved permit programs will be able to vary the design requirements. States without EPA -approved permit programs will not be allowed to grant variances and must apply the design requirements as contained in the Criteria. Texas is expected to apply for EPA approval of its landfill permitting program within a short timeframe. Workshops will soon be held by the State to brief affected entities on details of the new rules. The effective date for most of the Criteria requirements is 24 months from date of publication in the Federal Register (expected at anytime), EPA MITE MITE (Municipal Solid Waste Innovative Technology Evaluation) is requesting Demonstration proposals from project developers. The proposal due -date is expected to be Programs around mid -October, 1991. The goal of MITE is to provide municipal solid waste managers with useful information about costs, effectiveness, and limitations of new or developing technologies and systems for managing municipal solid wastes. The MITE program provides the opportunity for technology and/or systems developers to enter into a joint demonstration effort with the EPA. MITE project developers must be capable and willing. to finance the system or technology/process demonstration. EPA will provide an objective,third party evaluation of MITE projects. Emphasis should be on technologies, equipment, processes, or management techniques that are ready for field -scale demonstration and meet one or all of the following criteria: decrease final volume &/or toxicity of the MSW stream, create a marketable product, increase the marketability of recycled goods, are environmentally sound and economically favorable, are useful to local MSW managers in solvina waste manaaement problems, and have reasonable potential for commercialization. For information, contact Lynnann Hitchens, EPA/Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory, 5995 Center Hill Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45224, (513)569-7672. EPA Environmental The EPA will be seeking applicants for cooperative agreements or grants to Education support projects to design, demonstrate, or disseminate practices, methods, or Presolicitation Notice techniques related to environmental education and training as specified in Section 6 of the National Environmental Education Act (Public Law 101-619). The solicitation for proposals will be published in the Federal Register on or after October 1, 1991. Proposals/applications may be submitted by organizations only. Any local education agency, college or university, State education agency or environmental agency, not -for -profit organization (includes community organizations), or noncommercial educational broadcasting entity may submit an application. Federal funds for projects shall not exceed 75 percent of the total cost of the projects. For information, contact EEG -Solicitation, Office of Environmental Education (A107), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street, SW, Washington, DC 20460, (703)847-3036. Asphalt Recycling A hot mix asphalt recycling conference will be held in Dallas on November 21, Conference 1991 at the LeBaron Hotel at 1055 Regal Row. The Texas Hot Mix Asphalt Pavement Association and the Asphalt Institute will sponsor the event which is designed for all those involved in specifying, testing, using and producing hot mix asphalt. Cities, counties, consulting engineers, commercial laboratories, regulatory agencies and contractors are encouraged to attend this course. The fee for the conference is $35 per person paid in advance, $50 at the door. For information, contact the Texas Hot Mix Asphalt Pavement Association, 611 South Congress Ave., #300, Austin, TX 78704, (512)443-1278. What is NCTCOG? The North Central Texas Council of Governments is a voluntary association of cities, counties, school districts, and special districts within the sixteen -county North Central region. It was established in 1966 to assist local governments in planning for common needs, cooperationg for mutual benefit, and coordinating for sound regional development. For information, contact Saadia Mai, Dept, of Environmental Resources, NCTCOG, P.O. Box 5888, Arlington, TX 76005-5888, (817)640-3300. �"a f �. 3 NCTCOG Resource Conservation Council 1991-92 Clarence Daugherty (Chairman) Director of Public Works Collin County Carolyn Corser Bellah (Vice•Chairman) Executive Director Fort Worth Clean City City of Fort Worth Jim Badgett Fire Marshal Dallas County Tom Morton Councilmember City of Coppell Tom Davis Director of City Services City of Fort Worth Larnr Baker Director of Environmental Services City of Irving Charles Clawson Director of Community Development City of Arlington Laura Nelson Executive Director Keep Mesquite Beautiful, Inc. Nancy Nevii Manager, Solid Waste Dept. City of Plano Steve Moreno +Project Manager McDonald's Corp. Gene Orcutt Regional Land►ill Manager Texas Waste Management, Inc. Attilio Corbo Manager, Sanitation/Landfill City of Carrollton Ken Smith Director of Sanitation City of Garlannd NCTCOG Executive Board 1991-92 President Jim Alexander Council member, Denton Vice President Lynn Spruill Mayor Addison SecretaryTreasurer David Doyle Mayor, DeSoto Past President Bill Lofland '"+.County Judge, Rockwall County Carl Riehn Executive Director North Texas Municipal Water District Mary Scott President, Tarrant Coalition for Environmental Awareness Ken Reneau City Manager City of Weatherford Ivan Johnson Commissioner Kaufman County William McDonald Assistant Director of Streets 8 Sanitation City of Dallas Dennis Burn Director of Public Works Denton County Elizabeth L. Todd Chief, Environmental 8 Related Substances, Institute of Forensic Sciences, Dallas County Eleanor Sutherland league of Women Voters of Dallas Romin Khavari Engineer, Dept. of Public Works City of Grand Prairie Loran "Sonny" Wilson, Jr. Director, Environmental Health City of Waxahachie Bob Pickens Regional Marketing Manager BFI Waste Systems, Inc. Sandy Cook Coalition for the Earth's Environment of Dallas (CEED) Director John Evans Mayor Pro Tem, Dallas Director Jewel Woods Councilmember, Fort Worth Director Dionne Bagsby Commissioner, Tarrant County Director Ed Galligan Councilmember, Grand Prairie Director Gary Slagel Mayor, Richardson Bob Duncan J. G. Duncan Co., Inc. National Solid Waste Mgt. Assn. Jeremy Halbreich Executive Vice-Pres, 8 General Manager Dallas Morning News Bill Vincent President -CEO Southern Tire Recyclers, Inc. David L. Hildreth Regional landfill Manager Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc. Molly Seay Greater Dallas Sierra Club Arnold Gachman Gachman Metals Co. Institute of Scrap Recycling Ind. Bill Hindman Senior Vice -President HDR Engineering, Inc. AD HOC MEMBER: Boyd Cole Solid Waste Program Manager Texas Dept. of Health, Region 5 NCTCOG STAFF SUPPORT: John Promise Director of Environmental Resources Saadia Mai Manager of Resource Conservation Kathleen Graham Environmental Planner 11 Elaine Karnes Environmental Planner I Regional Citizen Representative (urban) Jan CollmerI Dallas Dallas County Regional Citizen Representative (non -metro) Wayne Gent, Kaufman Kaufman County General Counsel Jerry Gilmore Attorney at Law, Dallas Executive Director William J. Pitstick intended for reference ! information. aas requested ry in their contracted water supply amount. possible that with our additional water well, the City could be in the same Cori ♦seeking I. contract modification K Districtand it is my desire to keep you informed of the proceedings in this case. In orcier to become enlective, it is my unclerstancling, I at all contract members of the district, including Sanger, will also hava to officially act on request. M E M O R A N D U M T0: UTRWD Board of Directors FROM: Thomas E. Tay40 l�General.Manager DATE: October 11, 1991 RE: Corinth's Request to Reduce Water Project Participation wwwwwwwwwwww+�w�rwwwwwwwww*w**wwwwwww�rwww�r*wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww,awwww On September 5, Mayor Spellerberg requested that Corinth be allowed to reduce it's participation in the Regional Water Project from 1.9 mgd to 1.0 mgd peak demand. Her request was based on the City's desire to install a water well for peaking purposes. The Mayor explained that Corinth is negotiating with Denton for a corresponding reduction in demand under it's current contract with Denton. On October 3, the Mayor clarified that her request to the District is in no way tied to, or dependent upon, the outcome of negotiations with Denton. This request has broad additional time to think recommendation ahead of, packet. policy implications. about the issues, I am and separate from, the To give you providing my usual meeting In addition, I plan to have a work session on the subject at. the November 15 retreat. Your careful review ahead of the retreat will be appreciated. TET: jlf Enclosure: Report Concerning Corinth's Request C�/WPS1/MEMOS/CORINTN.REO Pigs 1 UPPER TRINITY Regional Water District • .� REQUEST By CITY OF CORINTH TO MODIFY REGIONALN THE •• October 110 1991 The Staff s Analysis of this Request is Based on Certain Facts and Principles: 1. All membership and participation contracts between. the District and its sponsors are bona fide agreements which are binding on both parties. Such agreements can be modified only by written agreement of all signatories. 6. 2. The contract with Corinth was approved by the governing bodies of Corinth, Highland Village, Lake Cities Municipal Utility Authority, Northlake, Pilot Point and Sanger. Any amendment will require approval by all. 3. A similar contract was executed by Argyle, Bartonville and Mustang Water Supply Corporations. 4. The contracts specify that after at least one year of optional experience, "....the District may adjust the Demand for any member by mutual agreement...". 5. The contracts also specify that ...the sum of all Demands for all Customers will be adequate to support the costs and expenses of the District". 6. The contracts outline the Demand being requested for the 1st water year and being committed on behalf of all parties to the contracts. 7. Implementation of the Regional Water System is the highest priority of the District; success of the program requires stability, mutual confidence, and a minimum of political interference. 8. The District desires to honor the requests•of its members, subJect to the terms of its contracts and after considering the effect on other members. 9. The provisions of the District's contract with the City of Denton are still not known and may have a bearing on the proper response of the District to Corinth's request. Cs/MP5i/MEMD9/CDRINTH.ATT EVALUATION REQUEST BY OCTOBER 11, PAGE 2 & RECOMMENDATION CORINTH 1991 10. It is anticipated that the future Demand requirements of the District will exceed the amount currently subscribed by all parties. Consequently, one can expect that there will be a buyer for extra capacity, if any, now under contract to Corinth and others. +ti10 ry+ r,n rnntrari S �nc-1 based on the implementation plan prepared by Alan Plumrre%r and Associates, the granting of Corinth's request (with a corresponding reduction in the size of the project) would reduce Corinth's charges approximately $8,300 per year during the development phase and $143,000 per year after completion of the project. To offset the reduction, cost increases to all other participants could approximate 15% per year. 12. Alternatively, the project could remain at 6.8 mgd with the 0.9 mgd reduction being carried as a District Reserve. If so, the impact on others would be the same -- approximately a 15% increase. It Appears that the Board has Several Available Alternatives You May Want to Consider, Including the Following: 1. Maintain status quo and deny the request. 2. Revise the size of the project; grant the request; and, reapportion cost according to new subscribed quantities. 3. Maintain project size: grant the request; keep the released capacity as a District Reserve; reapportion cost with all participants sharing pro rata in the cost of the District Reserve. 4. Defer a decision until UTRWD concludes a joint contract with Denton. Consider at that time what new alternatives may be available under the terms of that contract. 5. Comply with existing contract terms which provide a process for adjustment of the subscribed demand after one year of operating experience. 6. Take active steps to find a customer who may need additional water supply in the future. If successful, arrange for a transfer. C,/NP51/MEM08/C0R1NTH.ATT EVALUATION REQUEST BY OCTOBER 11, PAGE 3 Discussion: & RECOMMENDATION CORINTH 1991 The issues raised by Corinth's request invite potential conflict; also, the Board's decision may be an important precedent. Consequently, the Board needs to carefully consider all alternatives as well as the probable side effects of its decision. The over-riding concern is that the Board take . . _ _. _ _ _ 1 1 _ 1 1 � _ _ JW L . n . ~ .. 1 T.T� J. ,. TI..... :.. r. �• i, *k1 whatever steps will Q110W unc iScty.1011a, VVQUVI riv�c�•� �v ,,. implemented with a minimum of delay and confusion. I have attempted to evaluate the available alternatives, including any offsetting cost reductions. However, a reduction in Corinth's quantity will not allow any significant reduction in pipe size; neither should any pipeline be deleted. The project cost includes only 4.9 mgd (49%) of the proposed treatment plant. Therefore, reducing the project from 6.8 to 5.9 mgd will not allow a plant reduction. The staff plans to explore during the design phase possible cost reductions by phasing certain pipelines. However, any cost reduction that results from phasing the project is independent of Corinth's request. Consequently, it appears that the Hoard needs to make its decision based on the assumption that the total cost of the project will be affected very little by its decision. It is essentially a question of who pays the cost; what is fair; and, what do the contracts provide? Also, I believe the Board should assume that the District will grow; the water needs of the District's customers will increase; any problem of over- subscription will be a temporary one. Further, the Hoard should assume that each member will take prudent and independent steps to hold down the long-term cost of water to their entity (such as drilling a peaking well or adding additional storage to gain more efficient use of the system). In other words, if a new water well or a new storage tank is cost effective in the long run, it may be a wise step, even if it does involve paying a short-term demand charge until a capacity transfer can be arranged. Another issue for the Board to consider is its desire to manage the affairs of the District without having to seek approval of the respective governing bodies for ordinary activities of the District, such as adjustments in Demand. To seek each governing body's approval of Corinth's request invites political interference in a business matter that should be resolved Ct/MP51/MEMC8/C0RINTH.AT7 EVALUATION REQUEST BY OCTOBER 11, PAGE 4 RECONIl+�lENDAT I UN CORINTH 1991 directly between Corinth and the District. To treat the request as a contract amendment would give each of the governing bodies, in effect, a veto power over the request. That is not a sound way to run a cooperative utility enterprise. Another issue is the matter of project size. Because of the nature of pipeline systems, a reduction in current needs from 6.8 mgd to 5.9 mgd doesn't change the pipeline size. The cost is determined by projected needs over a 20-year period. Accordingly, if down -sizing of the project doesn't reduce cost significantly, it may be more prudent to maintain the same project size. If so, the question relates solely to the allocation of costs to each participant. Another issue is the Denton contract. It is possible that the final contract with Denton will significantly affect how costs are determined and allocated. The requirement under that contract for a demand charge could be different than currently assumed. Alternatively, the Board is still considering the feasibility of an independent course of action. Under either scenario, it may be premature to act on the Corinth request. Another matter concerns timing. Under the current project schedule, an adjustment in subscribed capacity will have little impact prior to 1994 -- the expected first year of operation. In that period of time, a lot can happen among the 28 agencies under District contract that can affect the appropriateness of the request and the best response to it. On the other hand, the Board can appreciate that Corinth would like to aet a decision now that can be factored into their evaluation of whether or when to drill a well. Recommendation: The District has every reason to accommodate the desires of its members. After all, the sole purpose of the District is to meet the needs of its members and customers. The District must take into account the needs of all members and customers; the District wants to maintain stability of its program; and, the District desires to conduct its business within the guidelines agreed to in participation contracts. C�/WP31/MEMOS/CORSNTH.ATT EVALUATION REQUEST BY OCTOBER 11, PAGE 5 & RE .ULTIMENDATI ON CORINTH 1991 Accordingly, I recommend that the Board agree to make the requested adjustment one year after the system becomes operational. At that time, the Board could make other adjustments in subscribed capacities that may be appropriate by mutual agreement. If no one else needs the capacity at that time, the effect would be to carry 0.9 mgd as a District Reserve, available to all on a first -come, first -serve basis upon reimbursement of cost to Corinth and the District. In the meantime, the Board will make a genuine effort to market and transfer the capacity so that Corinth can be relieved of the cost even earlier. Recent update projections for all participants in the project suggest that the requirements for the planning horizon exceed the 5.8 mgd currently subscribed. Therefore, the District will have an excellent opportunity to find a party who needs the water capacity. Adoption of this recommendation can be accomplished within the framework of the existing contract without amendment. Further- more, it provides Corinth with known costs and a "date certain" which can be programmed into budgets and plans over the next few years. And very importantly, the decision allows for flexibility in future years: a future city council may wish to follow a different strategy. In addition, I recommend the matter be reconsidered after the contract with Denton is final to sae if a more advantageous response is possible. Respectfully General TET : j 1 f :6- E. Taylor Manager ted, C�/MPS1/MEM08/CORINTH.ATT ��r v �1�_ HERITAGE SELLABRATION - True to my prediction in the last newsletter, the 1991 Heritage Sellabration was a tremendous success, despite Mother Nature and her rain Friday evening and Saturday afternoon. Congratulations to Bill Hood and Kim Clarke for their long hours and hard work. It paid off in making this the largest Sellabration in our thirteen year ii�stor;'. Spe��..iul thuiii;J tv ull our i'vluiiteer .ci, iv:th vlu t' y�l lur „lerj��«t'�yn' Alu �' cause would have been a lost one. Congratulations to our new Mr. and Miss Sanger. Little Mr. Sanger is Justin Ray Cox, son of Jorja Cox; and Little Miss Sanger is Stephanie Melton, daughter of Johnny and Judy Melton. We wish them much happinEss and success during their reign. SAFE SPOOK NIGHT -Once again this year, the Chamber is sponsoring Safe Spook Night from 4 -7 p.m., THURSDAY October 31, 1991. We are asking members who would like to participate to open these special hours for little trick-r-treaters. There will be news releases in the paper, and as last year, we will be targeting young children kindegarten through third grade. Please contact Karen at the Chamber office 458-7702 by October .�8th to confirm your participation. Don't forget, we have the traveling Ghost Trophy won by Sanger Bank for the best decorated business. Wh0000 will win this year???? The Chamber will also be co -sponsoring the Haunted House with the Lions Club this year. The dates will be October 26, 30th and the 31st. If you are interested in helping with this project, contact Karen at the office,. or any Lions Club member. HOMECOMING PARADE -The Chamber was proud to sponsor the Most Original Float in the Homecoming Parade this year. The FFA was this years winner. CRISIS CENTER - In September, we purchased $50.00 worth of groceries for the Bargain Depot/Crisis Center. Please remember they need your help all year round. Stop by and welcome new chamber members, Pam's Dance Workshop, The Fort Dallton Co, Denton, and Sanger Tire and Muffler Center. Election ballots for four board of directors will be coming to you in the mail in November. Please take the time, vote and return your ballot to the Chamber. Let your voice be heard. You will also be receiving your ballot for Citizen of the Year. Please fill it out and return it also. J� },� F,. �` �� �� Until next month.....Happy Halloween. Karen �'` ��� �. DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT NOVEMBER 1, 1991 NEWSLETTER Let's Talk Trash Regional Solid Waste Management Planning Status Report North Central Texas Council of Governments October 1991 Executive Summary of In June 1991, the Executive Board of NCTCOG adopted the 1991-92 Interim Interim Plan Now Regional Solid Waste Management Plan, This 640-plus-page document consists Available of six strategies for integrated solid waste management and is intended to encourage the development of solid waste management plans by local governments. An Executive Summary of the plan has now been completed and is available for distribution. The Summary consists of an overview of the plan, one page summary bulletins for each of the six key strategies, and the full set of action recommendations from the plan. For a copy of the summary, contact Saadia Mai at (817)640-3300. Solicitation Underway NCTCOG has issued a Request for Qualifications to professional consulting firms for Consultant interested in assisting with the development of the long-range Regional Solid Assistance to the Waste Management Plan for the North Central Texas region. Funding for the Regional Solid Waste consultant contract will derive from NCTCOG's planning grant award from the Management Plan State, of which approximately $200,000 are budgeted for this purpose. A task force of NCTCOG's Resource Conservation Council will review the RFQ responses and is expected to select at least three firms to be invited to submit a response to a Request for Proposal. The RCC task force will review the written responses to the RFP, interview the firms and rank them. NCTCOG will then negotiate a contract with the top -ranked firm. The intent is to engage regional consultant assistance on or about January 1, 1992. Household Hazardous NCTCOG will implement an aggressive public education outreach program for Waste Initiative household hazardous waste as approved by the Texas Water Commission and the EPA. The project will initiate serious efforts to implement the best known methods for managing household hazardous wastes to prevent surface runoff contamination and will identify opportunities for reuse and recycling of used oil. Project activities are tentatively scheduled to begin in the fall of 1991 and continue through the fall of 1993; these will involve orientation of volunteer trainers from local communities and implementation of workshops taught by the volunteer trainers. Key information will be transferred to local governments. Part of the funds (up to $8,000) may be passed through to local organization(s) for delivery of specific services. A panel of experts under the guidance of NCTCOG's Resource Conservation Council will be asked to oversee this effort. For information, contact Elaine Karnes at (817)640-3300. Municipal Recycling A Municipal Recycling Coordinators Roundtable is being held by NCTCOG every Coordinators two to three months to give recycling coordinators in the D/FW Metroplex an Roundtable opportunity to network and exchange ideas. A list of cities offering recycling 1 services has been compiled, including municipal contacts and a description of the services provided by each city. For information or a copy of the list, contact Kathleen Graham at (817)640-3300. OAY Will to Site New Dallas -based Occidental Chemical Corporation announced that construction will Plastics Recycling begin this year in the Dallas area on what will be Texas' largest post -consumer Center plastics recycling plant. A site in the region has not yet been selected, and OxyChem has indicated the availability of local curbside collection of plastic bottles may weigh heavily in the site selection. When completed, the plant will have the capacity to process up to 40 million pounds of the most common household plastic containers, primarily made of PET, HDPE, and PVC (plastic codes 1, 2 and 3). OxyChem will rely on comprehensive collection of plastic containers from municipal recycling programs to provide its feedstock. Following collection from Texas households, plastic containers will be delivered to a handling facility where they will be sorted according to type. They then will be ground, washed, extruded and cut into pellets. While about 30 to 50 jobs will be created locally, the intent is to automate all of the facility's processes, especially sortation. OxyChem is aware of its responsibility to be part of the solid waste solution and feels recycling is one of the most positive and practical solutions to the problem of solid waste management. NCTCOG supports this private industry initiative to provide an urgently needed outlet for household plastics and encourages local collection efforts to provide the necessary feedstock. EPA Standards for USEPA Administrator William Reilly has signed the final Subtitle D Criteria for Municipal Solid Waste municipal solid waste landfills. The requirements, issued under the Resource Landfills -Final Rule Conservation and Recovery Act, include location, design, operating, and closure standards, financial assurance requirements, as well as cleanup requirements for existing contamination. EPA also is requiring groundwater monitoring at all municipal landfills (within a 5 year phase -in period). At new and expanding landfills, EPA is setting liner design standards to protect groundwater further. The standards build on current state efforts to protect groundwater and other natural resources from contamination. Nearly 6,000 municipal solid waste landfills are affected by this rule. Annual costs of compliance nationally are estimated at $330 million, or about $4 a year per household. The states are primarily responsible for the implementation and enforcement of the new rules. The law requires states to incorporate the federal standards into current state waste permitting programs. States with EPA - approved permit programs will be able to vary the design requirements. States without EPA -approved permit programs will not be allowed to grant variances and must apply the design requirements as contained in the Criteria. Texas is expected to apply for EPA approval of its landfill permitting program within a short timeframe. Workshops will soon be held by the State to brief affected entities on details of the new rules. The effective date for most of the Criteria requirements is 24 months from date of publication in the Federal Register (expected at anytime). 2 EPA MITE Demonstration Programs MITE (Municipal Solid Waste Innovative Technology Evaluation) is requesting proposals from project developers. The proposal due -date is expected to be around mid -October, 1991. The goal of MITE is to provide municipal solid waste managers with useful information about costs, effectiveness, and limitations of new or developing technologies and systems for managing municipal solid wastes. The MITE program provides the opportunity for technology and/or systems developers to enter into a joint demonstration effort with the EPA. MITE project developers must be capable and willing to finance the system or technology/process demonstration. EPA will provide an objective,third parry evaluation of MITE projects. Emphasis should be on technologies, equipment, processes, or management techniques that are ready for field -scale demonstration and meet one or all of the following criteria: decrease final volume &/or toxicity of the MSW stream, create a marketable product, increase the marketability of recycled goods, are environmentally sound and economically favorable, are useful to local MSW managers in solving waste management r,rnhlomc nnA hown romennokin nntnntini fr%r nnmmerr%1n117ntinn Fnr infnrmatinn I.II %~1 11IV1 N/ IM 11" V V I VMV VI IMIJIV vwkk 11&1M1 1V1 Vv111111v1 v. n..a.v. .v... . % .. .. ►.... ... ►.., contact Lynnann Hitchens, EPA/Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory, 5995 Center Hill Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45224, (513)569-7672. EPA Environmental The EPA will be seeking applicants for cooperative agreements or grants to Education support projects to design, demonstrate, or disseminate practices, methods, or Presolicitation Notice techniques related to environmental education and training as specified in Section 6 of the National Environmental Education Act (Public Law 101-619). The solicitation for proposals will be published in the Federal Register on or after October 1, 1991. Proposals/applications may be submitted by organizations only. Any local education agency, college or university, State education agency or environmental agency, not -for -profit organization (includes community organizations), or noncommercial educational broadcasting entity may submit an application. Federal funds for projects shall not exceed 75 percent of the total cost of the projects. For information, contact EEG -Solicitation, Office of Environmental Education (A107), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street, SW, Washington, DC 20460, (703)847-3036. Asphalt Recycling A hot mix asphalt recycling conference will be held in Dallas on November 21, Conference 1991 at the LeBaron Hotel at 1055 Regal Row. The Texas Hot Mix Asphalt Pavement Association and the Asphalt Institute will sponsor the event which is designed for all those involved in specifying, testing, using and producing hot mix asphalt. Cities, counties, consulting engineers, commercial laboratories, regulatory agencies and contractors are encouraged to attend this course. The fee for the conference is $35 per person paid in advance, $50 at the door. For information, contact the Texas Hot Mix Asphalt Pavement Association, 611 South Congress Ave., #300, Austin, TX 78704, (512)443-1278. What is NCTCOG? The North Central Texas Council of Governments is a voluntary association of cities, counties, school districts, and special districts within the sixteen -county North Central region. It was established in 1966 to assist local governments in planning for common needs, cooperationg for mutual benefit, and coordinating for sound regional development. For information, contact Saadia Mai, Dept. of Environmental Resources, NCTCOG, P.O. Box 5888, Arlington, TX 76005-5888, (817)640-3300. 3 NCTCOG Resource Conservation Council 1991=92 Clarence Daugherty (Chairman) Director of Public Works Collin County Carolyn Corser Bella" (Vice -Chairman) Executive Director Fort Worth Clean City City of Fort Worth Jim Badgett Fire Marshal Dallas County Tom Morton Councilmember City of Coppell Tom Davis Director of City Services City of Fort Worth Larry Baker Director of Environmental Services City of Irving Charles Clawson Director of Community Development City of Arlington Laura Nelson Executive Director Keep Mesquite Beautiful, Inc. Nancy Nevil Manager, Solid Waste Dept. City of Plano Steve Moreno Project Manager McDonald's Corp. Gene Orcutt Regional Landfill Manager -Texas Waste Management, Inc. Attilio Corbo Manager, Sanitation/Landfill City of Carrollton Ken Smith Director of Sanitation City of Garlannd NCTCOG Executive Board 1991-92 Carl Riehn Executive Director North Texas Municipal Water District Mary Scott President, Tarrant Coalition for Environmental Awareness Ken Reneau City Manager City of Weatherford Ivan Johnson Commissioner Kaufman County William McDonald Assistant Director of Streets & Sanitation City of Dallas Dennis Burn Director of Public Works Denton County Elizabeth L. Todd Chief, Environmental & Related Substances, Institute of Forensic Sciences, Dallas County Eleanor Sutherland League of Women Voters of Dallas Romin Khavari Engineer, Dept. of Public Works City of Grand Prairie Loran "Sonny" Wilson, Jr. Director, Environmental Health City of Waxahachie Bob Pickens Regional Marketing Manager BFI Waste Systems, Inc. Sandy Cook Coalition for the Earth's Environment of Dallas (CEED) President Director Jim Alexander John Evans Council member, Denton Mayor Pro Tem, Dallas Vice President Director Lynn Spruill Jewel Woods Mayor Addison Councilmember, Fort Worth SecretaryTreasurer David Doyle Mayor, Desoto Past President Bill Lofland County Judge, Rockwall County Director Dionne Bagsby Commissioner, Tarrant County Director Ed Galligan Councilmember, Grand Prairie Director Gary Slagel Mayor, Richardson Bob Duncan J. C. Duncan Co., Inc. National Solid Waste Mgt, Assn, Jeremy Halbreich Executive Vice-Pres. Dallas Morning News & General Manager Bill Vincent President -CEO Southern Tire Recyclers, Inc. David L. Hildreth Regional landfill Manager Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc. Molly Seay Greater Dallas Sierra Club Arnold Gachman Gachman Metals Co. Institute of Scrap Recycling Ind. Bill Hindman Senior Vice -President HDR Engineering, Inc. AD HOC MEMBER: Boyd Cole Solid Waste Program Manager Texas Dept. of Health, Region 5 NCTCOG STAFF SUPPORT: John Promise Director of Environmental Resources Saadia Mai Manager of Resource Conservation Kathleen Graham Environmental Planner II Elaine Karnes Environmental Planner I Regional Citizen Representative (urban) Jan C011mer, Dallas Dallas County Regional Citizen Representative (non -metro) Wayne Gent, Kaufman Kaufman County General Counsel Jerry Gilmore Attorney at Law, Dallas Executive Director William J. Pitstick