06/17/1991-CC-Agenda Packet-RegularJUNE 17, 1991
01 BOLIVAR STREET, CITY HA
Nam
CONSENT AGENDA
). Approve Minute of 6/3/91
duct Pudic Ic i r'arir cc cciuc t - 1 ilr d .
. Consider and Possible Action Regarding Variance Request -
212 S. Railroad AVE.
. Consider and Possible Action Regarding Donation - Fountain and
Flag Poles -Downtown Park
`, `cidcr grad Pil lc Acticr Rc rdir WILLOWOOD Additi
Developer Don Sable
S: rz# der d P ilc Acti cry c ardir .cuc t cr atcr S r tca
Improvement - Care Inn of Sanger
l tltr ; ar idcr and Pc ilc A.cticrr I c rdir ScE rcr cilccticar Stc
Ip er ca t
ORDINANCE 09-91 CREATING A BEAUTIFICATION COMMITTEE
1 s.
fir Administration Rcpert
Aj mcnt
n cur rvil I lc leer x a c } act an itc cri tic .cnsent enda lac takcr i
p Ir i di ridual cr idcrati ra.
PRESENT,
MII 1'
yd'ryB 3 iF8y{Ansp
arcia, Electric Supt. Larry Yoast, Public Works
upt. Chuck Tucker, Fire Chief Merwyn Tucker, anx!
arland Thornton
Thomas gave the invocation, Mayor Armstrong
flag,
}, iti Ir t - err
a. 1V11 ULCS f Mayu,
b. Disbursements
c. Consider Payment tc
Tank
lid the pledge to the
i err
'air tir«i - air tir r ur d tc ra
idrw aid Possible Actioneardir O ire earytrr r t Sltirr
arld iv"f . k rl i tar dard
€ztin was
rrrernbership standardsas presented by Chief 'ducker. Seconded by
or.zn it arrThomas.Motion carried.
rl A LA
2
x I
Felemetric Control System for the package as presented. Seconded
)y Councilman Jenkins, Motion carried.
in the amount f 12, 61.00. Seconded by Councilman Thomas,
vq0tion carried.
Regulating Construction in Special Flood Hazard Areas
�� inutes
n' a= / t i
�$�°cx°�sider � ssik�te ctic�r� ,egarding ����. nstru��tin
i"91i:.i.-A E.iS�3t..L.ii�i�l�lt1 i.fl a"9t,4 �s„:R.� St1t 1m4�4,.47abn541 L%4.4,SE/'sl iiL.l t4S4n.SEE{rltlt� E.SSEa: 4.W1 Ei
additional streets, staff was instructed to use their best judgment on
the reconstruction of streets, however, nest to exceed �.Cl0§re�.:3t�,
��, �'�n.sider and Pc�ssi~�le actin regarding ppe�intrnent t yards ����
commissions
staff ��rras instructed. tc� � tl�e f�tl�v�inga
a). To send a letter to those members that are up for
reappointment to see if they would be willing to serve again; and
). Tc write a letter tc those embers who cannot he reapp int;e
due to expiration of their term according to ordinance,
l�`la�=car a.Avrse that sl�.e 3�.rl�l Irlce tl�e �arrer �.9�t�.f�c�at;a�.
ornnLittee to e mace ara official hoard,
1
.v .m inistra.tion eport:
,1 lt-v larlag.T` advised that
�;�en.siean called. for co pletx.on Y��r �a nth, fur ei���=ers
have not contacted him back concerning the rainy dayss4 they
have negotiated with. Calvert Construction,
The Planning and. Zoning is meeting June th to c n.sider a
Specific Permit. for for the Aged, idlence" to be
located at 804 3rd Streets
cA it�g Manager advised he spode withruse Bunn, Region:.):t.
I�Ianager cif acc� t�ffice of �'e�as Pars ildlife e�iartrnent
and Andy Samsom Executive Director of Texas Parrs & Wildlife
has signed Recreational and. Operational Agreement and Dallas
has approved it,
gage, 4 6
Clt vir Manager's Annual Seminar in Corpus Christi.
. or aoil nl ir s the oortt it too tarxdfi3.l
t,3 te4S1A .r 4.% .A U110 Will ffiA116iA 11 49111 1110 ti vnklu11, 1.1 PI 6U_.,X1lJJ:: Uu,
not tale the time to load the du Asters, then, there is aloe of
space that is wasted,
is actUally working,
express her concern with the warding on the weed letters.
Mayor Armstrong stated that she would like a list of people
who would mow lots to he included whenever a geed letter
is sent
`his gill hoofll r o the ityp frori doing all ;ice,
ISCLssiort.
industry will establish 60 jobs and possibly increase to *110 later
). Council discussed the memorandum, Chief rwin sent out
oo xornir g ur lo.ing t l .iol s. It as agr that tl .;
1), Officer is to adjust to the situation, and use his itidolnierot
and use a release form.
Mayor
Armstrong also advised that. Councilwoman Braxton ltad a
00 la.ix t oono i ° g the street patch orx end tr t. h
Match is awfully highand needs to be looped into.
11
_ ._:.,.
tr+ , r
l [ I .
1
:
._.
.._ _.. . _
... t'
II
-[J,
n._[.. f..I
t:v-. Er!,1L
i;t._:, r'
VI
IS
}tr'i
�i `.,.fu
j_{I' I
J J
..
.,
i f .�.
`_`
L
I
I
�kl...i
[,i
!
:-?•F' e
iy,!. ft„i
_
�� r l_.
1.,3 !
i i� '
�;I_! I
i Es';
'! c:;`..11(__
,.�
5'•,
.
._. _
11
i
�_.
I
1__7 ?
_! � ( I Z ! I" [.•
_. !_(,
r c
1,
.
.
T
rl IV
t
r.., .�.. _
tI,
I'!
1[.1
III
it l-` i ill'•{
;,
may; -
�I��•_�c'l��i
sf_tra
r 1. ..,.
: e :rt
i tti
i !t
j_iI_ L t'v
:
f •-:n '� , !'?E-,lU 1 { k �"�. `.-� {�?t-' r:� 7 r•'- tt' i _, :'t •4_.
:r f _1...,,_ir�. ,;!_:14! t sk-; '"•dc'1,'(E.. 1 I•'1'':
,' .y.
It
i F-<l_i i !_IN 4 1.. a Cj a jE:j
itlr'.;-� ,;y=....i }-;t-E..i•+r?i,t_,ti �a_E.;1-�.7
-Dtv. E- R 1%I FITEN Ifi Al. :_>!_..E:.'1 if F il,l._� 1-1u•',:
'•-�".: Cii_;d +.:' t�tI I::s C:,Ft 7Il'Iti-'t i"ti+s T4't P,•.L-Lir`€ C'i""i'."i�,
_,:-z: ,!.._ : ._,, :,,..•ir,.: t...•::. -.- t A. G.)1'i 1 :._• !'t t...':"i`,., i_L_ i "•
a '•..i'— ._.,;',ikli.it-{ t'.-'-i'if?ii!
f't 14 j ', •{'jE\
iiAli�.-.t ii.�t {._ (f i,.[iar Lil ,',i`s
i (�j IjE t !_1JI t` I it
5•'E'' j�jt-!.�i €', i t_i i i—!F_.
3. 1....-_ _�'t.-, t_j E, ii_I �'�. t�. � % �.}}il;'i E.�<�y �✓i..._!a
! :;'}!?j!,!a'!�`! il;wr("jt!':.j
(..l rE j.��� -E..r!1'ih!U ! } ,fDI,.I It3L;
!(: I IG
JJ f (:�� ! ii E. !::I I i 3 l.�iI`? err "_.� '_i/aS i(_:
F r.s ;flit -s-•
-.
�.ftl,T�-;
It
ly
,..._. __. __ :: �. _r
_ tyt
:r f _1...,,_ir�. ,;!_:14! t sk-; '"•dc'1,'(E.. 1 I•'1'':
,' .y.
It
i F-<l_i i !_IN 4 1.. a Cj a jE:j
itlr'.;-� ,;y=....i }-;t-E..i•+r?i,t_,ti �a_E.;1-�.7
-Dtv. E- R 1%I FITEN Ifi Al. :_>!_..E:.'1 if F il,l._� 1-1u•',:
'•-�".: Cii_;d +.:' t�tI I::s C:,Ft 7Il'Iti-'t i"ti+s T4't P,•.L-Lir`€ C'i""i'."i�,
_,:-z: ,!.._ : ._,, :,,..•ir,.: t...•::. -.- t A. G.)1'i 1 :._• !'t t...':"i`,., i_L_ i "•
a '•..i'— ._.,;',ikli.it-{ t'.-'-i'if?ii!
f't 14 j ', •{'jE\
iiAli�.-.t ii.�t {._ (f i,.[iar Lil ,',i`s
i (�j IjE t !_1JI t` I it
5•'E'' j�jt-!.�i €', i t_i i i—!F_.
3. 1....-_ _�'t.-, t_j E, ii_I �'�. t�. � % �.}}il;'i E.�<�y �✓i..._!a
! :;'}!?j!,!a'!�`! il;wr("jt!':.j
(..l rE j.��� -E..r!1'ih!U ! } ,fDI,.I It3L;
!(: I IG
JJ f (:�� ! ii E. !::I I i 3 l.�iI`? err "_.� '_i/aS i(_:
F r.s ;flit -s-•
-.
�.ftl,T�-;
It
ly
,..._. __. __ :: �. _r
_ tyt
a '•..i'— ._.,;',ikli.it-{ t'.-'-i'if?ii!
f't 14 j ', •{'jE\
iiAli�.-.t ii.�t {._ (f i,.[iar Lil ,',i`s
i (�j IjE t !_1JI t` I it
5•'E'' j�jt-!.�i €', i t_i i i—!F_.
3. 1....-_ _�'t.-, t_j E, ii_I �'�. t�. � % �.}}il;'i E.�<�y �✓i..._!a
! :;'}!?j!,!a'!�`! il;wr("jt!':.j
(..l rE j.��� -E..r!1'ih!U ! } ,fDI,.I It3L;
!(: I IG
JJ f (:�� ! ii E. !::I I i 3 l.�iI`? err "_.� '_i/aS i(_:
F r.s ;flit -s-•
-.
�.ftl,T�-;
It
ly
,..._. __. __ :: �. _r
_ tyt
3. 1....-_ _�'t.-, t_j E, ii_I �'�. t�. � % �.}}il;'i E.�<�y �✓i..._!a
! :;'}!?j!,!a'!�`! il;wr("jt!':.j
(..l rE j.��� -E..r!1'ih!U ! } ,fDI,.I It3L;
!(: I IG
JJ f (:�� ! ii E. !::I I i 3 l.�iI`? err "_.� '_i/aS i(_:
F r.s ;flit -s-•
-.
�.ftl,T�-;
It
ly
,..._. __. __ :: �. _r
_ tyt
ly
,..._. __. __ :: �. _r
_ tyt
_ tyt
. !_k.',.", ..l. _.I': _[i • t'(— ___._ . i •_ L i c_� _.
�f+_n_ r: I ' — i —; � 'ti �_ ....,
o
1J(_I',Ei/! 3fyi
J7 i_1lc
i'`?f—ll iE
,€ti
._,
-D , r.,
.._
�J'r i
.t 1 t_ Y_�. . �
i I
-Y41!:.
,
uo
:, _.Y�.
_ _. _:: _..I•i
L_.
t. .... ._.. i,.i �. iE_)!._I !._{. 3!41_ •_� i f"—iit I..}{"E �.1 {..:� �v ("
hhSS i{ :)r`1}__ C�`i, .�t�!`�,. �,?�.+i ..�:.{ [`.f `i ..., `i'r fool If tl'
I tool
[:
.71.i_1 1.1 —'f..11__: i_ i..too,._(._I._il_i—ti? [.i::. ,.1—.:.i—sti U1 L i_1_1
'ft —}0000: 1f- 0i{.. isj
1."r1_ Y_`Ltti1t._t C_I11. N T,let
__, L(`JIJIi
[` L. L.:fool'. ? i". i �p i- i t—;' { ?' I [:. L. iow 1 [.IW�i ` _i
to
+�. i 14—'7or,%fool -�_
o.
-. 1 1.1`=,i%.i.[m(�_�i `:.'y
?�ll k Ft f F-"`.. t 1
_. lI'4Y 1'.� I It'I. L..`)' E: f... n:,[ll'I)
j ( j ( '"'�'Ite[':ii.;0R I'l l—io i
' � 1 I...i t.... i 1 [�i—{ 1` I ...JH � r Ni.�, ..: i':i'"!i._F!_. i f-.i'4 C.
iso
r f i__, t,)'-t•
of
�. , _ t_:, _
oo�j �: i., L.F.:7
., 1: rF
Y''
k )n
I
r•-id
t3
!.JL "t !;;.
a
It v
__
:-t to
S:
..__..:
.
L
).�.i f._fr��!•:
f-''� �4{r,
i-..r• {... �� 1 i''�13
��. 7. ._
[—a:
U�.. Nip-1 tjf.-.. {'i f.vff lfr, ivi {'iifjr. INIoI `+E
Ci+'3i
I'J=!_
;, �{. i.Jr
.__.=�(iC r_��._f•i
._t`f�s}_).::
!s I I fP-ir 1 . i_i
i
t f - I .
r•f
-1 i}? ` tF,;? t ;FL`. i.,,r•f-'(
�i_, l r 4\t,!-
t��t+ ro!
i rti_I�F:k.
—}
__,i
!..
_ r;..:,•_,.
t,t,. : _,_. ,.l
.
py
I _.. t _ .s r
FIN
Ll
''HU (if.l#t1
It ;;n
t_?t-:str.s
w4_.�_>..e' 1. f'J 4,a G_.L?'j
i_?i_f'•i
fV E..tt1
..SrI 1
III`?
;
i 1:\_,I i
III Ell
�. f i
iz'
;,:�!_f
i :-
i-_lr:;
-�} %._.
!_?c-'1 ii„It
,
„
It
iif6e�ki,
�. f-tt,f_tl,`
,
}`''
,?`•ir.'i.:
f:
f'i
i':•
f'l i=s.nq
e
rll FSf i
,',:°:
a.;_.
ij { l
..
t: ,,f
r r_"'r._.
_
_ie.;�,'z
r Nt?L.
(}iL1I.i!t_f.t..:,
i_ _;...- .a.,.-� r'.. it'. �';t( �i-.1-r�:.._i� ! --.� �4_;but�.E_�_•4 ! {�•f�1n
t
hil-t f-jl.f4_oo�:tjl `�_..(i'-(`i' Lt Lf'i().�h
I
H L
� i•_f t_?
;
�.F i t E
l
r...,_,
;•ir}l:._!...''
!.?.:._,#:L;I_,t,;
#
I
1.il_i
I'L I i}%'t_:f-:'1�t�!'�im�
VENY)?s R i Ci f PiI
it
C1 R
1 11I Ht_,
it`-.F
.-:_•,: ram,- -
-:
tj
TN.#E;il"(
l
I
[-„_! !
C_F It,
.I
IP_F•E':1_!T1.0j`a
j
E
't.{ J i
{ };,m,'
-I' i
i+.
a_�!\:
r
(' /E_
D1.
S l
�<:
1�11.1
I f..,(''i
'F(..i•t:',
,(.
t-
i5.—
� i.�
(
!
1 #.J{`•a
r ., .�
:
, c
�W'",•.
'�?I
7i
i#�1j}
::�flw
iif-:i ){4t,
t_.
1.
.H��_(
if
i?:'(.
�_i1•`m
1_%i(__
}.#.Ji'�
it?t`w
ut
1•
�lt
J !
' i
R.0
i i �i j
ipt #':i
'�i' ?
I.:..1 {..' { ?
y5
_
,�.
i u
(_
t )1
'_1
Fal 1.
LE If
I ["i 1`
';
,`_,
�,_1-$,_:J
�'(• �-�a_)i:',t'+(l.�V
_._,
i
_?il-r.� :�t_�f•:r(._!!_.
rn#.e(-'F.i.l
T
:•
-:-
r_J;1
t
1%
1.1F
-IS
i('m
! 00U4;
w :1i t
._[ 3_•f
�'f-.:
::
•_�...,.
a
0 9
I.'= �C_:._._-•.!`!i '�l�l;'J �5I - .TIi`VtJih!
i_i1— i�
�._�.•_,I11'�s,!
;�t_i,:!.�)_,,fE'��
;-Ffr:1L.i_._
!,is.
IL�•t
R,?�
t':v R_jil
!.J�
i-S�
.,�
1.
I J J. i_:L_
=1� EE
!_Ii `I
C;!.i 1. .fl_.;i'.L i
i r-i l is
TI;_`G {'r;.'1
t
•:
L..FY b,^...1i
i f a_I
i t"l L_.
!—'#Jj'l!-'
'
r "CIE-`;.
r..
!1.
�'F-
-!'
J�.i'I_
'.7.ET1°=:i�;=r`';'!�!i`'.i
!x-j'•�
r—i�.Ei}rt
'_.tHi{.,i
i—!'`.°::);E
i
%
(
r i,i
;i!al_tl;!I ';
iJ
VF
;.: (._ .-!.•i�#�:_�t-i
3
i_�L'1
11= +.; i +` {':.
{t.3i�f_.',�.
I-` it {, i-!
�'ir•:�
`.
!
...__.
..__.,
_
;. yy
:a i.f rd_i
Cl
Ilie
F;'
a
t*1
h
Fi I H
h, �
`
1
;-. �
�: •_� �_�
i �, �� __, i`
i ��
1. -j
i u
._.
,
._
S.1 i�,
.._i.
p Po On BOX 578
TE1 June 14, 1991 U
C ' Variance Request e 212 S. Railroad Ave.v
From I-1 t -
residenceand Rosle Moore to c ange the zoning on their property at 212 S. Railroad
kvenue from Industrial I to Single Family 4, in order to construct a new
home to replace their
gal
t t re s a era r I e f' tkai ret et,
The City of Sanger City Council, acting as a Board of Adjustment, will hear a
variance request from Melvin and Rosie Moore on zoning change from
Industrial (I-1) to Single -Family Residential (SF-4) on 1241 B. Tierwester,
Sheet 2, Tract 84, located on 212 S. Railroad Avenue. Public Hearing will be
held in the Council Chambers, 201 Bolivar Street, 7:00 p.m., Monday,
June 17, 1991.
Rosalie Garcia
City Secretary
RUN 5/23/91
- J
... ,
It IL
1
It Ab
16 VIA
V POP VIA 4
.t .f en 0
%'
' L e
It lh
40
4 '11• ,•`
i'
_ ' '
III,' • yss
` \
AMINA
jr LIT
TV
•4v.'a< 1e
---
.f°, i • .der /J:•.
...r..+
TT I
rc .
WA I
iti4 G ! a y
a' • t
saw
J ; + N
y w VooG` A <x%
L i tit*.`•:, ..0 i.
' LY' s
j .S' v ..
' •+ N
wmmw t a c
`.
cTo
wa
.,.Ink _ s r' o'Q w S t-
It Oro s Ob
lor
!\ , d # J • cM• J Y far•'" •S .
R
q M _, .,
IF rot 9
so Ail
o'
III - r •
1r: • fi w 1>>
y
40 PIT
C !AJ r. M \ . S •.M I
. .. •
VOL
Wei
f•y : 1' f C J'ah VIVO
Ito
, = Air
r VVIIL
/J4.1' s JC`ifNl• . • ,
60
0 In
IMP
IMPINOWNIMP It
Vic• "_•' y L : : f
r
IT 4
=' VIA
a T ;
j Ilk
*rJ '
j • t.
separated by an alley or not) in which
mum back yard of ten (10) feet shall be
2. Size of Lot:
a. Minimum Lot Size: None.
b. Mimimum Lot Width: None.
case a mini -
provided.
c. Mimimum Lot De t�h: None.
3. Lot Coverage: The maximum lot coverage by buildings
shall be sixty (60) percent of the lot area.
20.4 Parking Requirements: Off-street parking_ .and loading_ shall
be provided as set forth in Section 28,
SECTION 21
"I-1"-INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
General Purpose and Description: The I-1 District is established
to accommodate those uses which are of a non -nuisance type
located in relative proximity to residential areas, and to pre-
serve and protect lands designated on the comprehensive plan for
industrial development and use from the intrusion of certain
incompatible uses which might impede the development and use of
lands for industrial purpose. Development in the I-1 District is
limited primarily to certain wholesale and jobbing commercial
uses and certain industrial uses, such as the fabrication of
materials, and specialized manufacturing and research institu-
tions, all of a non -nuisance type. No use or types of uses spe-
cifically limited to the I-2 District may be permitted in the I-1
District.
21.1 Use Regulations: Uses permitted in the I-1 District are
subject to the following conditions:
(a) All business, servicing, or processing, except for off-
street parking, off-street loading, display of merchan-
dise for sale to the public, and establishments of the
"drive-in" type, shall be conducted within completely
enclosed areas.
(b) All storage within one hundred feet (1001) of a resi-
dence district, except for motor vehicles in operable
condition, shall be within completely enclosed buildings
or effectively screened with screening not less than six
feet (61) nor more than eight feet (8') in height, pro-
vided no storage located within fifty feet (50') of such
screening shall exceed the maximum height of such
screening.
32
(c) Permitted uses in the I-1 District shall not disseminate
dust, fumes, gas, noxious odor, smoke, glare, or other
atmospheric influence.
(d) Permitted uses in the I-1 District shall produce no
noise exceeding in intensity, at the boundary of the
property, the average intensity of noise of street, traf-
fic.
(e) Permitted uses in the I-1 District shall not create fire
hazards on surrounding property.
_ Permitted uses in the I-1 District include the following:
1. Advertising products, such as signs and billboards
(manufacturing of).
2. Ambulance, bus, train, and taxi stations, truck yards.
-. 3. Awnings, venetian blinds, and windowshades
(manufacturing of).
4. Bakery, candy, dairy and other food products, but not
including fish and meat products, sauerkraut, vinegar,
yeast, alcohol or alcoholic beverages.
5. Building materials yard, contractor's yard, lumberyard.
6. Cameras and other photographic equipment (manufacturing
-- of)*
7. Ceramic products, such as pottery, figurines, and small
glazed tiles.
8. Ice plants, cold storage plants.
9. Jewelry.
10. Machine shops (fabrication of metal not more than ten
(10) gauge in thickness).
11. Metal stamping and extrusion of small products, such as
costume jewelry, pins and needles, razor blades, bottle
caps, buttons, and kitchen utensils.
12. Milk and ice cream processing.
13. Mobile home sales.
14. Musical instruments.
15. Orthopedic and medical appliances, such as artificial
limbs, braces, supports, and stretchers. -
33
16. Repair of farm, household, office machinery or
equipment.
17. Scientific and precision instruments (manufacturing of).
18. Sheet metal shops.
19. Public utility and public service uses as follows:
(a) Bus stations, bus terminals, bus turnaround
(off-street), bus garages, and bus lots;
(b) Electric substations;
(c) Radio and television towers;
(d) Railroad passenger stations;
(e) Telephone exchanges, microwave relay towers,
telephone transmission equipment buildings and ser-
vice yards,
(f) Privately owned water pumping stations and water
reservoirs;
20. Radar installations and towers.
21. Radio and television studios and stations.
__ 22. Schools, trade.
23. Storage and warehousing establishments.
24. Storage yards, but not including junkyards.
25. Swimming pool (manufacturing of).
26. Trailer sales and rental, for use with private passenger
motor vehicles.
27. Weighing stations.
28. Wholesaling establishments.
29. Accessory uses, including but not limited to temporary
buildings for construction purpose for a period no to
exceed the duration of such construction.
30. Other wholesale, light manufacturing, construction or
service uses which are similar in character to those enu-
merated in this subsection, and which will not be
dangerous or otherwise detrimental to persons residing
or working in the vicinity thereof, or to the public
welfare, and will not impair the use, enjoyment, or
value of any property.
34
31. Factory outlet retail or wholesale store for the sales
and servicing of goods or materials on the same premises
_ as the manufacturing company to which they are related,
including sales and service in a separate building or
buildings.
32. Other uses as listed in Section 26 of this ordinance.
The following specific uses shall be permitted in the T-1
District when granted in accordance with Section 27:
1. Railroad freight terminals, railroad switching and
classification yards, repair shops, and roundhouses.
2.
Stad.tims;
audtor_»ms;
and
arenas.
3. Other uses as listed in Section 26 of this ordinance.
21.2 Height Regulations: Maximum height one hundred (100) feet.
21.3 Area Regulations:
1. Size of Yards:
a. Front Yard•
Minimum required, twenty (20) feet.
b. Side Yard: Minimum side yard of ten (10) feet
except a corner lot adjacent to a street shall be
twenty (20) feet. When the industrial district is
adjacent to any residential district, a minimum
side yard of twenty (20) feet shall be observed and
a six (6) foot solid masonry or wood wall shall be
constructed adjacent to the residential district's
property line.
c. Rear Yards: There shall be a rear yard of depth of
twenty (20) feet, unless adjacent to a residential
district, in which case a fifty (50) foot rear set-
back shall be observed.
2. Size of Lot:
a.
Minimum
Lot
Area:
None.
b.
Minimum
Lot
Width:
None.
c. Minimum Lot Depth: None.
3. Lot Coverage: In no case shall more than fifty (50�)
_ percent of the lot area be covered by the aggregate area
of all buildings constructed on the lot.
21.4 Parking Regulations: Required off-street parking shall be
provided in accordance with the specific uses set forth
in Section 28.
35
have double frontage, running through one street to
another, the required front yard shall be provided
on both streets. No required parking shall be
allowed within the required front yard. A sixty
(60) foot setback is required for all accessory
uses.
b. Side Yard: There shall be a side yard on each side
of the lot having a width of not less than eight
(8) feet. A side yard adjacent to a side street
shall be not less than twenty (20) feet. No side
yard for allowable non-residential uses shall be
less than twenty-five (25) feet.
c. Rear Yard: There shall be a rear yard with a depth
of not less than twenty-five (25) feet. Minimum
rear yard for accessory buildings shall be not less
than ten (10) feet.
2. Size of Lot:
a. Lot Area: No building shall be constructed on any
lot of less than eight thousand five hundred (8500)
square feet.
b. Lot Width: The width of the lot shall be not less
than sixty (60) feet at the front street building
line.
c. Lot Depth: The average depth of the lot shall be
not less than one hundred (100) feet.
3. Minimum Dwelling Size: The minimum floor area of any
dwelling shall be one thousand two hundred (1200) square
feet, exclusive of garages and breezeways and porches.
4. Lot Coverage: In no case shall more than forty percent
(40�) of the total lot area be covered by the main
building. No more than sixty percent (60%) of the total
lot may be covered by the main structure, accessory
buildings, driveways and parking.
11.4 Parking Regulations: A minimum of two (2) covered, enclosed
parking spaces shall be provided per unit behind the front
yard line. Off-street parking spaces shall be provided
in accordance with the requirements for specific uses set
forth in Section 28.
SECTION 12
"SF-4 - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT-4
General Purpose and Description: This district is designed to
accommodate single family residential development of somewhat
15
higher density than is most commonly found in the city. This
district is appropriate as a buffer between multi -family residen-
tial areas or even commercial areas and lower density single
family residential areas. Densities in this district will range
from 3.5 to 4.5 units per gross acre.
12.1 Permitted Uses: A building or premise in the,.,"SF-4"
District shall be used only for the following purposes:
1. Any use permitted in the "SF-3" District.
2. Other uses as listed in Section 26 of this ordinance.
The following specific uses shall be permitted in an "SF-4"
District when granted in accordance with Section 27:
1. Uses as listed in section 26 of this ordinance.
12.2 Height Regulations: No building shall exceed thirty (30)
feet in height. Accessory uses shall be a maximum of fif-
teen (15) feet in height.
12.3 Area Regulations:
1. Size of Yards:
a. Front Yard: There shall be a front yard having a
depth of not less than twenty-five (25) feet as
- measured from the front building line. Where lots
. have double frontage, running through one street to
another, the required front yard shall be provided
_ on both streets. No required parking shall be
allowed within the required front yard. A sixty
(60) foot setback is required for all accessory
uses.
. b. Side Yard: There shall be a side yard on each side
of the lot having a width of not less than eight
_. (8) feet. A side yard adjacent to a side street
shall be not less than twenty (20) feet. No side
yard for allowable non-residential uses shall be
less than twenty-five (25) feet,.
c. Rear Yard: There shall be a rear yard with a depth
of not less than twenty-five (25) feet. Minimum
— rear yard for accessory buildings shall be not less
than ten (10) feet.
2. Size of Lot:
a. Lot Area: No building shall be constructed on any
lot of less than six thousand five hundred (6500)
square feet.
16
b. Lot Width: The width of the lot shall be not less
than sixty (60) feet at the front street building
line.
c . Lot Depth : The average depth of the lot shall be
not less than one hundred (1.00) feet.
3. Minimum Dwelling Size: The minimum floor area of any
dwelling shall be one thousand (1000) square feet,
exclusive of garages and breezeways and porches.
4. Lot Coverage: In no case shall more than forty percent
(40%) of the total lot area be covered by the main
building. No more than sixty percent (60%) of the total
1 nt may he rnVerer3 by the rna 1 n strt:Ct':re, accessory
buildings, driveways and parking.
12.4 Parking Regulations: A minimum of two (2) covered, enclosed
parking spaces shall be provided per unit behind the front
yard line. Off-street parking spaces shall be provided
in accordance with the requirements for specific uses set
forth in Section 28,
SECTION 13
"2F" TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (DUPLEX) DISTRICT
General Purpose and Description; The "2F" district is intended
to provide the opportunity for development which is two-family
(duplex) in character, but which encourages individual ownership
of each dwelling unit. The typical duplex lot is divided from
front to back, thus encouraging the sale of each dwelling unit,
together with the land upon which it is situated, to the occu-
pant.
13.1 Use Regulations: A building or premise shall be used for
only the following purposes:
1. Two-family residence (duplex).
2. Other uses as listed in Section 26 of this ordinance.
The following specific uses shall be permitted in a "2F"
District when granted in accordance with Section 27:
1. Uses as listed in Section 26 of this ordinance.
13.2 Height Regulations: No building shall exceed thirty (30)
feet in height. Accessory buildings shall not exceed
teen (15) feet in height.
13.3 Area Regulations:
17
CITY GF SANGER
P. O. BOX 578
SANGER, TEXAS 76266
MEMORANDUM #836i
TO: Honorable Mayor &Members of the City Council
FROIVI: John Hamilton, City Manager
DATE: June 14, 1991
SUBJECT: Donation - Fountain and Flag Pales Downtown Park
Mrs. Chapman will donate $5,475 to the City for the construction of a new
fountain and flag display at the downtown park in memory of her late
husband, Dr. Clyde Chapman. This project has been discussed and
recommended by the Park Board. Park Board Member, Burl Bourland,
arranged for the donation.
The project, as conceived by the Park Board, would construct, in the area
where the flag poles are currently located, a 16 it, long by 3.5 it. wide, by
18 inch deep water pool with two fountains and lighting, see attached
drawing. The three new flag poles would have internal halyard with locked
access for raising and lowering the flags with the center pole a 30 ft and the
two outside poles 25 ft. high.
The cost estimate for the project is:
Concrete Work
Tile
Flagpoles
Fountain/Pump
Lights
- 725
3,000
1,000
400
$5,475
City staff would be responsible for connecting water and electrical service to
the facility,
This would be an impressive addition to our downtown park. Staff
recommends acceptance of this generous and lasting gift
JH:es
Enclosures
F tq& Pt, F, S
s avfritJ heAD
• e.o is • 'i?`-'.. 2S, '`t $. :Y.i.. 4°/ 'u6,5-4 ti tN jL is 4 .. y, is
loy
ATI0
'LAG
S
pnd at
ern'^ss
Ali -tin
strut tior
I ngnrwm
construc
(seamless t
rple anodr,
rvides a s
ilmsh whi
:sill Easily
Imovable I
20 1'1 D
t
)n Be
pod UPS
pq IDs.
Ia. $89.
1G. $80.
ruGPC
i:n nis..
z Jos
all sir .
a 61056
nAGPC
ill" Dia.,
oll till
l
zeal and
cis Y"'9 1
t'quest
Executive
Tapered
Aluminum
Flagpoles
Revolving, non•loul•
ing truck cast aluml•
num body, stainless
stool ball bearings
end nylon sheaves.
Fittings include: Gold aluminum ball, revol-
ving non•fouling truck with one set S6/,r"
polypropylene halyard, chrome snap
hooks, cast polished aluminum cleat and
flash collar. Shafts are uniformly cone
tapered in one piece (up to 35") and highly
polished for maintenance free deep lustre
linish. Shipment is made in hard fibre
tube to protect finish. Instructions included.
.r-anodic Bronze
.tom Nt. Above
No. rrravnd
til
Avllablo on Ragwst
Overall Stott
loapth Ohaeerion
Stipp.
Wt.
Price
loch
22E394T
25'
28'
5Tox3ITx.115"
134lbs.
$
630.00
22E395T
30'
33'
511x3itx.125"
1471bs,
$
729.00
22E396T
35'
38*6"•61Nx3l/2"x.156"
208lbs.
s1o9s.00
22E397T
40'
44'
1"x3l/z"x.156"
275
Ibs.
$1495900
22E392T
50'
55'
8Nox3l/210x.188"
401
lbs.
s2195.o0
22E393T
60'
66'
10itx4Ifx.188"
603lbs.
s4393.00
G R O U N D S ET Includes:
ALUMINUM Bald Anodized
FLAG POLE Double Sheave Truck, Cast /
Alum, Revolving, Non,
• Achiteeturally Fouling Type
Designed A Swivel Snaps, 1
• Highly Polished Chrome Plated .Voodoo
• Uniformly Tapered 1" Two Sets ofHalyards•
for Every 5'6" III
• Seamless 6063•T6
Alloy Ir1CIUdeS: (ExcepiSand
' y b Concrelel
Maintenance free, deep luster Two 9"Cast Alum.
Cleats -•
finish. Cast aluminum, revol- AlummumFlash Collar-
siai non fouling truck with
? stainless steel ball bearings 3000 P51 Concrete
has two 1/t" cast nylon Hardwood Wedges
sheaves. Two sets '/„" water- (Remove After Tamping
;t proof white polypropylene
halyards are equipped with Dry San dTightlyTamped
r two chrome plated flag snaps. Alter Aligning Pole -
Pole wall .188" thick. Black Asphaltum Paint
Inside and Outside Surfaces
of Pole Below Grade
Copy of Warranty
Available on Request Foundation Sleeve -Hot Dip •;r
Galvanized Steel
Allow 30-46 Days for Shipment
Allow 30.15 Days for Shipment :'• • ire y; ' •' 1."
-•oy of Warranty Available on Request r,`t•'"' i'' .Td4 T"t
CONE TAPERED - ;-; •--; -::=---
ALUMINUM '
ZS
OUND
ESTATEET ,
FLAGPOLES
pPzuti!ul cone tapered aluminum made in v
^. no joints or seams to interrupt
1,I,y tapered shape. Manufactured i
strength aluminum alloy tubing. j
Fittings include a 4" gold aluminum ball, r I
cast aluminum truck and cleat, heavy poly-
propylene halyard with cast nylon snap,,
hooks. Ground sleeve and installation in
structions included. 20.30 day shipment.om
,f
Copy of Warranty Available Freight
Roqueal
Allow Shipped
D 30 Days for Shipment -
11t. Above overall Shaft Shpg. Price
Ground length Dimensions Me Each
«E407T 15 ft. 17 ft. 3"x2"x.125" 41 lbs, $223.o0
22E40ST 10 it. 22 ft. 3"x2"x.125" 50 lbs. $2s4.00
22E409T 25 ft, 271/2 It. 3ONx2NOx.125" 61 Ills. i287.o0
22E410T 30 ft. 33 ft. 4"x2"x.125" 89 lbs. $480.00
l 22ElesT 35 It, 381/2 ft, 511x3ofx.125" 143 Ills. tr76s.o0
221431T Flash Collar for 3" Shaft Shpg. wt. I lb, ea. 621.00
22E432T Flash Collar for 4" Shaft Shpg. wt. 1 III. so. 521.o0
221443T Flash Collar for 5" Shaft Shpg. wt. I lb. on. $ 21.00
Isom
Oonll
6pnd
DianroNr
MII
No. d
No.
"right
"eight
felt
Top
Div.
Sec.
22E399T
23'-0"
20'-0"
5"
31h"
5"
1
23E400T
281'0"
25'•0"
51/1"31/1"
6"
1
22E401T
33'-0"
30'-0"
6"
31/r"
6"
1
22E402T
38'•6"
35'-0"
7"
31/2"
8"
1
22E403T
44'-0"
40'•0"
8"
31fz"
8"
2
22E404T
49'•6"
45'•0"
8"
31/z"
8"
2
22E40ST
55'-0"
50••0"
10"
4"
10"
2
22E134T
88'-0"
80'-0"
12"
4"
12"
3
Includes:
Sleet Centering
Wedges
Slsel Base Plate
Steel Support
Plate Welded to
-Ground Spike
bc.
Stipp.
►dco
FIND Sho
Wt,
Each
4'x 6'
141
lbs.
$
799.00
4'x 6'
178lbs.
$
995.00
5'x 8'
218lbs.
s1135o00
5'x 8'
263
lbs,
$149s.o0
6'x10'
323
lbs,
s 1995.00
6'x10'
365Ills,
$239s.00
8'x12'
5011bs,
$3195900
15'x25'
1133lbs.
$79115.00
Vandal &Theft
Resistant
Superior
Strength
Graceful
Design
Maintenance
Free
Fiberglass Flagpoles
With Internal Halyard
Fiberglass poles are lighter in weight than metal poles of
the same size meaning less delivery costs. Internal halyard
system provides a strong deterrent to damage or theft of
flags and halyard. Low cost manual system with no winches
or motors. Poles display a convex profile because upper
half tapers at the rate .150"Ift, and lower half at .050"/ft.
Glossy polyester surface resists soiling and scratching.
Poles are rustproof and resistant to other corrosives. Poles
come in Colonial White or Metallic Bronze. Supplied com-
plete with fiberglass base cover, gold anodized aluminum
ball with spindle, fiberglass truck, cleat polyester halyard
snaphooks, fiberglass sleeve and installation instructions.
Poles also include vinyl covered counterweight, polyester
retaining ring and access door/lock assembly with keys.
His
Above fvlt Top Shp(.
Item No. Ooead Dte- Dill. Wall err -
Gold
Anodized
Aluminum
Ball
Truck
Halyard
and Snaps
Vinyl
Covered
Counter•
weight
Polyester
Retaining
Ring
!n Access
I191 Dodr
Fiberglass
ease
Cover
Fiberglass
Ground
Sleeve
r
.r.. r.
"
Shipped Motor freight
Allow 30•e5 Days for
Specify White or bronze
Flash Collor Available Separately
f,'tinSu - 5
MINIMUM .
ORDER • $2000
CITY OF BANGER
P. O. BOX 578
BANGER, TEXAS 76266
MEMORANDUM #835
TO: Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council
FRUM: John Hamilton, City Manager
DATE: June 14, 1991
SUBJECT: Request By Developer Don Sable to address Council Regarding
Willowood Addition
The l rillo crood Addition, south of t Tayne Drive and, east. of Loop 138, a
platted, undeveloped single-family housing development of approximately
138 lots, has as yet not begun development. In telephone conversations
with the owner, Don Sable, representing Lotus Tool Oil Company, it has not
developed because of their inability to secure a right-of-way from the
McDaniel family to give the subdivision direct access to Loop 138.
I do not. know exactly what Mr. Sable's request to Council will be: howeve , I
believe he will ask you to consider condemnation proceedings against the
McDaniels' in order to extend his proposed street
Staff suggests you table this item for study.
JH:es
Enclosures
25
October 3, 1990
Mr. Tommy McDaniel
140 Amy Road
Henderson, Texas 75652
Dear Mr. McDaniel;
DONALD E. SABLE II
34)0 Santa Monica
Denton, Texas 76205
(817) 383-0345
` nIs 11;11
[�►Y OF :aA[�GC[
We are still very interested in purchasing approximately one-half acre
off of the north corner of your Sanger property. Several times recently,
I have made an offer to your brother Danny, and I would like you to be
knowledgeable of the offer.
In our offer, we have offered to pay for the engineering, appraisal,
survey, title policy, and closing cost along with the full appraised
value of the land, but the appraised value is all we will pay.
When you review the survey of your property, I believe that you will find
that due to the shallow depth of the property on the north end, no real
development can take place. Thus there appears to be little value in
retaining it with the rest of your tract.
We would like to purchase this property to put a street through in order
to give our property additional access and to loop the utility lines back
to the existing mains. I believe that this will greatly enhance the value
of your property by bringing additional utility capacity to your property
along with bringing quality development close to your property.
64e will not start construction of the Willowood Addition until we have
acquired the right of way for our entrance.
I wouuld like to meet with you in the near future.
Sincerely,
Donald E. Sable, II
CC
Danny McDaniel
211 Hillcrest Drive
Sanger, Texas 76266
Nel Armstrong
216 Diane Drive
Sanger, Texas 76266
m
at c
r
Y:T
6:c5[
-. . n:e-t
Te`.ei
912
elaa
a.
oil
8aB
iPTBB
q
BPgRBT7BGTjs
aT
AT:
i'Bel
Ci
a
:LT
1"7.HH"Te
?Hiixitite?s"F
t$
5
d6
CT.-Bia
ty'
B
PeB78e
P9
BB
Peq
YY
i
a
•i..
Y
1
—
J 1 ,
'1 • E,■ Q 6
♦' L 7 T ' i ; tl -P f/ .y•y. 1 I •I s..•u
I ,
MIR
go
or PA LM ... ~
Ob
as j : C _ ° • • :. '--- a uT.0 uYu _
INISOM AD
I. u _ 1l1
9LP
-i.iT t FNi l '
;3o rus
ooeo ti
Q 70-1001 ?=sruo=------- -- -
1p7
7 i If y
}_6
t i tNqea a t ai ij j }
tt}r it a
J rtErp S$ jfail Jt Ct (° x ' ':" " Bt`y
Of] L 4 4 ii'➢ t fi'i $ t i] I itj It iftt,tt -xk xFl 6 L!=!Fr
GI CF %F i ti f ti
I _ I ♦ Sj e jta Srt ' t:►t 7t S' !
J' S'Sr,er"`gtiri'E
jKiiiii `
=,i ,l,t,r t; ill, if loll,
D Mn• r I ,, t i, t t „ f l` E r
D D ift t ' ]' +► ` jS (t p' l'r t sl
t } it ,' ;r tp t, + f 'B .fry +'Yt -f ➢.
t' rl it i i it ttic aS d !
it +
t! k M B ii
1 ;lp "1 1
i k
TV MCDQM
MTSI.HNTS
N v2E95C 71 EE9.70I LA-_
LQ*UAL
,.78
i All
P+IgYpt! f_. !r■ _OIN! M Ttl 1 1
aim
i.. .1 ■i■ -_- INS
NJ on
iS I ' - • L \
S \
win I I
,.• 1 ' I ' 1 . ' '. L2
r •' ."' 1 _ f. i i `C. • ?I 'I; -----•7rr•VIM =" ,Rli -7.-r--- -E G n.m n.
pit
IF
ell wmiI,mImiF Is I
WALL
C; ,". -a 1 •fir ,
I •1
I
r
fit
If
11J f •1
Yrtc—'a
--■la--
1
'
1 .
1 •
-
I
rati
'
w
1
I
, I
I
1
1 -
a
June 129 1991
City of Sanger
P. 0. Box 578
Sanger, Texas 76266
Attn: Mr. John Hamilton
DONALD E. SABLE II
3400 Santa Monica
Denton, Texas 76205
(817) 383-0345
LIV iJ DI
•. SANGER
oil
RE: Purchase of McDaniel property for entrance.
Dear John;
As earlier requested, I have enclosed copies of letters to the McDaniels
in which we have tried to purchase approximately one-half acre to serve
as an entrance to our property. I have also attached a copy of a map of
the approximate piece that we would need.
The letters document our efforts to negotiate with the McDaniels. There
have been a few telephone conversations, but none since a call
acknowledging the receipt of the October 3, 1990 letter. There was no
real substance to any of the telephone conversations.
As we earlier stated, we will not start construction until we have
secured the property for the entrance. We desire to make this a first
class addition to Sanger and we believe that this is an important aspect
of making this a successful project.
Any help that you can give us in acquiring this tract will greatly be
appreciated.
Si rely,
I / 7T
Donald E. Sable, II
Interstate 35
Sanger, Texas 76266
April 12, 1989
Mr. Tommy McDaniel
140 Amy Road
_.Hend-e ,a . Texas 56 2
Dear Tommy:
Enclosed is a map that I believe indicates clearly the
piece of land the Sables would like to acquire in order
to extend a road into their new subdivision on the east
your land. This small parcel should not be any larger
approximately one-half acre.
P.O. Box 1066
Phone 817.458-7483
small
of
than
As you and I have discussed before, the road would be paved,
curbed and guttered according to city requirements. The sub-
division proposed by the Sables will be first class with
alleys and underground utilities. They have already obtained
zoning and their engineer is working on the developement
plans now. The entrance from Loop 138 through the northeast
tip of your land would give excellent access to.the deve.lope-
ment.
Because of the engineering time involved, it is becoming
more and more critical for the Sables to be able to count on
useing your parcel. The benefits to you and Danny would be
the access from your property to other road frontage, the ex-
tension of utilities from the Sable tract to yours for future
developement and the obvious enhancement in value from the
establishment of the subdivision. The city is extending a
new, large capacity sewer line to the Sable tract from the
lift station south of town near the railroad and larger
capacity water lines will be installed also. This added
availability of utilities will be a very positive influence
on your land.
Please arrange to come to Sanger soon to meet with the Sables
and evaluate this proposal. They need to complete their plans
and turn to actually moving dirt. If you have any questions
concerning the map, please call. In the meantime I look forward
to meeting you and hopefully, we can arrange to begin a mutually
beneficial relationship between you and Danny and the Sables.
Si
ncer
��i
�Oli
i
I
U
'"ITY OF SANGER TEXAS
HUNTER ASSOCIATES INC. Engineers
5630 YALE
BOULEVARD It Consultants
DALLAS - TEXAS
LEGEtdD
R-1 Singl
`\_ Q
R-2 Two
R"3 Mulli
Q LR Local
0 LB Local
0 LI • Light
711.5 WP YNS RiEI'ARCD 101 O
MD INIEIL:EO ID B[ 10f.N.RK f•1f ReaV,
PUCE O,IY LK TO OItAN•C
IEODUY YENtJ T'>VE N.EAS MIT S.U.A. Speck
INii HE IO AN EA ICI Sfx[ IUi
/ctuu zulwa nArcE IN x•Rr.s s[[ Public
TlE IN v.esna P; S-P'
UPDATED AS OF
f
i
DONALD E. SABLE II
3400 Santa Monica
Denton, Texas 76205
(817) 383-0345
October 3, 1990
Mr. Tommy McDaniel
140 Amy Road
Henderson, Texas 75652
1lCQL
L'1L .
t'1l..LAnlel
�
Lie -are still very interested in purchasing approximately one-half acre
off of the north corner of your Sanger property. Several times recently,
I have made an offer to your brother Danny, and I would like you to be
knowledgeable of the offer:
In our offer, we have offered to pay for the engineering, appraisal,
survey, title policy, and closing cost along with the full appraised
value of the land, but the appraised value is all we will pay.
When you review the survey of your property, I believe that you will find
that due to the shallow depth of the property on the north end, no real
development can take place. Thus there appears to be little value in
retaining it with the rest of your tract.
We would like to purchase this property to put a street through in order
to give our property additional access and to loop the utility lines back
to the existing mains. I believe that this will greatly enhance the value
of your property by bringing additional utility capacity to your property
along with bringing quality development close to your property.
LJe will not start construction of the Willowood Addition until we have
acquired the right of way for our entrance.
I wouuld like to meet with you in the near future.
Si,�c� erely,
Donald E. Sable,
CC
Danny McDaniel Nel Armstrong
211 Hillcrest Drive 216 Diane Drive
Sanger, Texas 76266 Sanger, Texas 76266
SENDER': Complete items 1 and 2 when additional services are desired, and complete items
3 and 4.
Put your address in the "RETURN TO" Space on the reverse side. Failure to do this will prevent this card
from being returned to you. The return recer t fee will rovide ou the name of the erson delivered to and
the date of deliver . For additional ees the ollowing services are available. onsult postmaster for fees
an c iec ox(es or additional service(s) requested.
1. ❑ Show to whom delivered, date, and addressee's address. 2. ❑ Restricted
es rri tedChar�Dj livery
(Fxrra charge)
3. Article Addressed to: 4. Article Number
W 4:La.1a1 P 815 884 040
140 Amy Road Type of Service:
❑ Registered • ❑ Insured
Hender.�ml, Texas 75652.
(X Certified El COD
❑ Express Mail ❑ Return Receipt
P for Merchandise
Always obtain signature of addressee
or agent and DATE DELIVERED.
5. Si pture [� A s e / 8. Addressee's Address (ONLY if
rgnat re gent
X
7. Date of Delivery
—U
PS Form 3811, Apr. 1989 +r U. S. G. P.U. 79ae•Zaa-aio
-r„nnt DCr'CIDT
DONALD E. SABLE II
3400 Santa Monica
Denton, Texas 76205
(817) 383-0345
April 19, 1991
Mr. Danny McDaniel
211 Hillcrest Drive
Sanger, Texas 76266
Dear Mr. McDaniel:
We are still interested in purchasing approximately one-half acre off of
the the north corner of your Sanger property. I would propose the
following offer for the property.
We will purchase approximately one-half acre off of the north corner of
your Sanger property. The purchase price will be based on $8,000.00 per
acre. The purchase amount will be paid in full by certified funds at the
time of closing. The purchase amount will be paid to and split by both
Danny and Tommy McDaniels. The McDaniels will be required to show proof
A clear title to the property in the form of title insurance.
We will pay for the survey and closing cost. Our engineer will determine
the exact square footage to be purchased along with the exact physical
description of the property.
Closing could occur within thirty days after acceptance of this offer by
both you and your brother. A seperate proposal is being sent at this time
to your brother. You will be required to provide a title policy at time
of closing.
A response within thirty days will be appreciated.
Si erely,
Donald E. Sable,II
Accepted
Witnessed By
Date
''SENDER oM`rrt�T lta ns 1 and 2 when additional services are desired, and complete items
and..4 a
tkui ttr,addresbirL_ FTURN TO" Space on the reverse side. Failure to do this will prevent this card
rfrgrp being returned tq n . The return recei t fee will rovide ou the name of the person delivered to and
the datLf deliverer r�iditlonal fees t e ollowiny services are available, Consult postmaster for fees
`and check box (es)1or�68ddnional service(s) requested.
'-JrV.[J Show to-whofuLctrtlivered, date, and addressee's address. 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery
(Extra charge) (Extra charge)
3. Article Addressed to:ry ; 4. Article Number
I� 11
%lam, �ann ��/ _/ayJie� — 1 —
i/ /"/C Type of Service:
/� � // / w� Registered ❑Insured
C / 1< 4W Certified ❑ COD
'_/ rI vE Return Receipt
El Express Mail ❑ for Merchandise
TX76� Z% / Always obtain signature of addressee
t� or agent and DATE DELIVERED.
5. Sig at re — Addres n 8.E Addressee's Address (ONLY if
X C requested and fee paid)
6,.,Stgpature, gent
X;w. .
7; Pate.p'f Delive y
PS Form 3811, Apr.989u.s.o.Po: sasta�e`>£ts DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT
P 882 304 452
RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL
NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED
NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL
(See Reverse)
Seel to
Street and No.
D,
P.O., State and ZIP Code
Postage ,
S
Certified Fee
Special Delivery Fee
Restncted Delivery Fee
Return Receipt showing
/
to whom and Dale Delivered
Return Receipt she o whore,
Dale, and Add e
TOTAL Po ay IT
�t1
f--•
Postmark ate 1'�, I
N
DONALD E. SABLE II
3400 Santa Monica
Denton, Texas 76205
(817) 383-0345
April 19, 1991
Mr. Tommy McDaniel
140 Amy Road
Henderson, Texas 75652
Dear Mr. McDaniel:
We are still interested in purchasing approximately one-half acre off of
the the north corner of your Sanger property. I would propose the
following offer for the property.
We will purchase approximately one-half acre off of the north corner of
your Sanger property. The purchase price will be based on $8,000.00 per
acre. The purchase amount will be paid in full by certified funds at the
time of closing. The purchase amount will be paid to and split by both
Danny and Tommy McDaniels, The McDaniels will be required to show proof
of clear title to the property in the form of title insurance.
We will pay for the survey and closing cost. Our engineer will determine
the exact square footage to be purchased along with the exact physical
description of the property.
Closing could occur within thirty days after acceptance of this offer by
both you and your brother. A seperate proposal is being sent at this time
to your brother. You will be required to provide a title policy at time
of closing.
A response within thirty days will be appreciated.
Sincerely,
Donald E. Sable jI
Accepted
Witnessed By
Date
SENDER: Complete items 1 and 2 when additional services are desired, and compete item's
3 and 4.
Put your address in the "RETURN TO" Space on the reverse side. Failure to do this will prevent this card
from being returned to you. The return recel t fee will rovide ou the name of the erson delivered to and
the date of delivery. For ad ittonal fees t e following services are available. Consult postmaster for fees
an c eck 6ox(es) for additional servicels) requested.
1. ❑ Show to whom delivered, date, and addressee's address. 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery
(Gttra r•hurge) (Guru rhurye)
3. Article Addressed to: 4. Article Number
�/ n Me ���� Type of Service:
1 O A m ;'''a /'�OG.� ❑Registered ` ❑Insured
Certified ❑COD
.�., Express Mail ❑Return Receipt
{��(/ L for Merchandise
r -� n ��rr" 5 ��1� �X ���p yj' � Always obtain signature of addressee
or agent and DATE DELIVERED.
5. Signature Addressee � 8. ddressee's Address (ONLY if
X ,,._ � •eyuesred aru! fee paid)
lure. — gent
X � r
7. Date of Delivery � ����
PS Form 389�1, Apr. 1989 *U.S.G.P.0.19a9.23a-915 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT
N
M
N
T
m
O
u
N
d
c
-�
0
0
M
E
IL
N
a
P 536 502 �132
RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL
NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED
NOT FORINTERNATIONAI MAIL
(See Reverse)
Sent to
Street and No. _—_L_/.G.LLi�.�
P.O., State ar ZIP ode
Postage
S �
Cenilied Fee
Special Delivery Fee
Restricted Delivery Fee
Return Receipt showing
Date Delivered
U U
'
to whom and
Return Receipts orn,
Date, and Ad a �l ry
TOTAL Pow ag nd Fcyd� rye'
S ; ��� ��
.�=, -�-
Postmark C� t>!��
Utz ti�y .y
V �
,^
�'
I i8-sl_gSw
b= T ►co -►Z
2= 37,oz
F• log, IQ-
: IaG,21
6
0
o
.l f7
NMa
oi
k
ny
50
•"1
a
e—O -0-'t
7 71 70 69 60 7 i66 63 . r3.G.
0- e-0 -A-0
1S/ 74 74
Zso. 99 0 '
^ N
4 `
Q
rr
� y
# •. .» a # S
ohn Hamilton, City Manager
t
CI1L� 4..tAt C !S%%1 iJd iJc�Zl��l
requests the City bear the costsof • + our ydistribution
accommodateto facilitylis statemandated fire
suppression
#,.#n
them from an fwater
southStreet that could be extended west to the nursing home and then, i
north to the # be loopedinto a twelve
wouldinch line, This
theiruse right of Roberts
Associates advised that contracted construction
for bid purposes # be estimated w ` # per r
installedline and $12.00 per linear ft. for six (6) inch line. Any needed fire hydrants
which are normally at 1000 ft. intervalsapproximately
$1200.00 each, plus engineering and permit fees would add about 10% to
the total project cost Staffapproximately #
10th Street to area # and 500 ft. from the nursing
home north to FM455. The two phases of the project are estimated as
followsp
A
1neh 8 Inch
IN
oo$6,000 500' We good
I Fire I���r�ni I,�00 I `ire �Iydr�nt I,?o�
Engineering 720 Engineering 800
$7,920 I00000
VoO, • tJPVilo 500' bVe go S6o
Enineerin� �00 Enineerin �00
6,C00 r8OO
Total $14,520 Total 18,R O.
ibility to extend .�* distribution
obligationiome. We have met our
,,o them. If 'ndeed, as I believe, this request is necessary because of another
evel or agency of government"s rules, I strongly believe that we have no
he Care Inn was required to fund the extension of a line to their
from 10th Street,, in order to ensure
engineer's -he City could fund the new water line north from the nursing home to
FM45,65. Depending on the
in expenditure of up to $10,660
NIA
services
CARE INN SANGER
600 NORTH STEMMONS / SANGER, TEXAS 76266 / 817 458 3202
May 29, 1991
Mr. John Hamilton
City Manager
Sanger, Tx. 76266
Dear
Mr.
Hamilton,
ECEIVEUD
j �. E USLI
This letter is in reference to a problem that currently
exists at Care Inn of Sanger. As you may be aware, this
facility is not presently served by a municipal water link
of sufficient size to accommodate a fire hydrant to service
the facility in case of a fire.
Presently the facility has a 15,000 gal. fire water storage
tank as its only source of fire protection for the facility.
In the past there has been problems with the reliability of
this system (ie, winter of 1989, water froze in tank, disabled
fire pumps, and destroyed the electric transformer serving the
pumps.)
In an effort to improve and insure the safety of the resi-
dents of the facility, ARA Living Centers is requesting the
City of Sanger to explore the possibility of extending munic-
ipal water service of sufficient capacity to serve the fire
requirements of the facility.
I am sure you can see that we are a major employment provider
for the Sanger Community and the service we provide for our
residents enables them to stay in our community, near their
families and loved ones.
Your assistance in helping us to provide a safer environment
for our residents would be greatly appreciated. If more infor-
mation is needed please contact me.
Sincerely,
Rose Marie Cox
Administrator
cc: Sabrina Hammit
Bobby Ray
ANN�/� LIVING CENTER
�' � A w y
® ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS
8140 WALNUT HILL LANE ONEGLENLAKES SUITE500 DALLAS, TX 75231-4350 214/369-9171
1106 CLAYTON LANE SUITE 410E AUSTIN, TEXAS 78723-1033 512/454-8716
June 7, 1991
Mr. John Hamilton,
City Manager
City of Sanger
201 Bolivar Street
Sanger, TX 76266
Re: Care Inn of Sanger
10th Street near I.H. 35
Water Service
Dear Mr. Hamilton:
��ICHnRD c.rnclra, P.E.
J. THAVIS R08ERT" JR , P.E.
PAUL S. BOEDEKER, P.E.
HAL B. JONES, P.E.
SAM C. MCKENZIE, JR,, P.E.
JOHN D. FRIEBELE, P-E.
DAVID J. PREWETT, P.E.
CHARLES W. SCHELER, P.E.
RICHARD K. ST. JOHN, P.E.
CHARLES A. DAVIS, P.E.
JOHN L. MEARS, P.E.
r
lTy OF SANG E
As requested, we have reviewed the existing Sanger Water System Map
and find the following facts:
1. The Care Inn is served by a two inch (2") water line.
2. The apparent need is for fire suppression requirements. No
specific information is available from the Care Inn, but we
typically find that facilities of this type should have a
minimum of two (2) each fire hydrants available within 600
feet in residential areas or within 300 feet in mercantile or
industrial areas.
3. All water mains in residential areas must not be less than six
inches (611) in size and preferably looped. This is a State
Fire Insurance Commission requirement rather than a Texas
Department of Health requirement.
4. We find that the smallest branch pipes (dead ends) with fire
protection (fire hydrants) should be an eight inch (811)
diameter. If a six inch (611) line is used, the longest
spacing for a dead end would be 600 feet for one (1) fire
hydrant.
5. According to the AWWA, fire department use normally calls for
a maximum lineal distance between hydrants along streets in
congested areas of 300 feet and 600 feet for light residential
districts.
A summary of the above facts indicate that it would be desirable to
have a fire hydrant immediately adjacent to the project structure
and that an additional hydrant should be no greater than 600 feet
away by route of a hose lay on the street. This would provide two
(2) supply points for water in times of demand.
June 7, 1991
City of Sanger
Care Inn of Sanger
Water Service
page two.
Apparently the structure is not sprinklered nor includes fire
sprinkler facilities into which the City fire truck could connect
to boost the water pressure.
The apparent need would exist for a looping of the water
distribution system twelve inch (1211) feed line passing under I.H.
35 at F.M. 455. This new line extension along I.H. 35 should be
considered for future extensions along the east Right -of -Way of
I.H. 35 to connect into the project outlined for Care Inn at Pecan
with an extension south to eliminate the dead end at Elm, then
connecting into the existing six inch (611) line in Bolivar, extend
south connecting to the existing two inch (211) line in Wood, thence
south and connecting into the existing dead end six inch (611) line
between Austin and Carolyn.
This is a much greater project than is currently under
consideration, but does give justification to the future need for
an eight inch (811) line with fire hydrants spaced along the east
service road of I.H. 35.
The projected cost for a project of this type would be around $ 16
per foot for eight inch (8") lines including typical valve cost and
some driveway repair. Extensive street bores, services and fire
hydrants could drive this unit cost per foot up.
A review of the letter from Cure Inn of Sanger does not identify
the specifics of their request. We believe that our discussion
outlined herein does provide a general description of the needs to
service their facility.
Should you have any questions, or require additional information,
please feel free to call on us.
Sincerely,
h % HUNTER /ASSOCIAT,ES, INC.
� `�� rasvw�
J. Travis Roberts,
JTR/akh
BSN/SNGRCURE.AKH/BS 1
Jr., P.
NGER,TEXAS 76266
PROM* John Hamilton, City Manager
DjkTEr4 4
June 14, 1991
Used Back~Hoe -Water Department
year,used back~hoe. Earlier in t e budget
requestedtruck for the Street Department for $3,800 even though the budget had
comparable= ided $9,000 for that purchase and
provi
allowance to $10,500 as that seems to be an average market price for an
early 80's model back -hoe
'I"z�i pur•l�a� Sul � a t V�t t� tivfizir it�� t��l� r�cluirir�
l l�- x�, could ► cl CL tl OGrrr�Ie tirIrNe. If u it GLutl ri l l r:Wti 'W,
proposals would be received until 2 p.m., Monday, July 1, 199 1. All
proposals would be submitted. to Council for your consideration at the
regular meeting that evening.
Request For Froposal
The City oP Sanger is seeking proposals for one (1) used back -hoe with
a front end loader. The vehicle must be a 1976 or newer model. Proposals
will be accepted until 2:00 p.m., Monday, July 1, 1991. All proposals must
be returned prior to the listed date and time in a sealed envelope clearly
marked "Back -Hoe Proposal," to the Office of the City Secreta, 201 Bolivar,
P. 0. Box 578, Sanger, Texas 76266.
All proposals will be opened and publicly read in the Cf ty Hall
Conference Room at 2:00 p.m., Monday, July 1, 1991, and forwarded to the
City Council for consideration at 7 p.m., July 1, 1991, at their regular
meeting.
The City of Sanger reserves the right to reject any and all proposals.
Rosalie�arcia
City Secretary
PUBLISH: 6/ 17/91
IMT.P kjlolllvxllwx%
•
!s 04 AI'. 578
w y1. TEXAS
N_ 76266
have sufficient revenue to construct the proposed sewer interceptor line
an
Council'Lower cost project staff is recommending
upperne-tv sewer line from the upper lift station to the lower lift station on Old
Highway 77. This would remove from service the and
could remedy some of the problems with our system in the
Loop 1381'Highway 77 area. The lower lift station
proceedduring the 88 89 Budget Year,
If Council so instructs, staff would
engineers to
prepare
! cost estimate and w
ideration. At that time, if you
w, concur the engineers
d would anticipate construction tkl b4E133 SdS d. 4. B.CAte Au+��L4sin This would
Po Ow BOX 578
AkNGER,
TEXAS
76264
ohn Hamilton, City Manage
une l 1991
ppointment to Local Volunteer Fire Pension Board
McNeill,
.. board.
�.�li.,Ik
POBOX
578
TEXAS
W'Di'lAfid Tr.L•a � �$w9 vawi14-r.vq �d""atcr Tt1Y s•va sw K,r.«
A d4•.J 9.ub.. CJ iAA AAI A A CAA A A Al t.%Jl Alv A 6'dl.1CA64 A VA
DATE. June 114, 1991
Beautification Committee
Board of the Citv of �Sanger, Urainance#has been prepared to address
CITY OF BANGER, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. 6�-� 1
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE
CITY OF SANGER, TEXAS TO ADD SECTION 6 TO CHAPTER 7,
ENTITLED BEAUTIFICATION COMMITTEE, PROVIDING FOR A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANGER, TEXAS:
SECTION I
THAT CHAPTER 7 OFTHE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF
SANGER, TEXAS IS HEREBY AMENDED BY ADDING SECTION 6 ENTITLED
BEAUTIFICATION COMMITTEE, APPOINTMENT OF BOARD, WHICH SHALL
READ AS FOLLOWS,
SECTION 0: BEAUTIFICATION COMMITTEE
A. Appointment of &D
There is hereby created a Beautification Committee to be
composed of seven (7) members, appointed by
the Mayor and confirmed by the City Council. Members shall
serve from July 1 of the year of appointment for staggered terms
of two (2) years and may be appointed to three (3) successive
terms of office. The members of the beautification committee
shall be identified by place numbers one (1) through (7). The
even -numbered places shall expire in the odd -numbered places
shall expire in the odd -numbered years. Newly appointed
members shall be installed at the first regular committee
meeting after their appointment.
Vacancies shall be filled for an unexpired term in the manner in
which original appointments are required to be made.
Continued absence of any member from regular meetings of the
commission shall, at the discretion of the City Council, render
any such member liable to immediate removal from office.
B. EX OFFICIO MEMBERS
The city manager or his designee shall be ex officia members of
the board. They shall attend meetings o,f the board and shall
have the right to discuss any matter that is under consideration
by the board but shall have no vote.
ORD. #�9-91 PAGE 2
�! :. :._.�\ •. :•: �� it U � �_
Members of the Beautification Committee shall be served by the
Sanger Post Office for the delivery of regular mail.
D. OROANIZATION AI�iD SELECTION OF OFFICERS
The committee shall hold an organization rneetin� in Juiv of
each year and shall elect a chair, vice chair, and a secretary from
among its own membership. Any four (4) of the regularly
appointed members shall constitute a quorum. The board shall
determine its own rules and order of business and meet as
needed. All meetings shall be open to the public and shall be
conducted under the Texas Open Meetings Act, Article 6252-17
and a permanent record of proceedings maintained.
E. POVtTERS AND DUTIES OF THE BEAUTIFICATION COMMITTEE
(1) The committee shall serve as a consulting, advisory and
supervisory body to study and recommend policies relating
to the operation and promotion, of beautification
efforts as outlined in the Keep Texas Beautiful Program.
(2) The committee shall submit annually to the city manager,
not less than one hundred twenty (120) days prior to the
beginning of the budget year, a list of recommended
capital improvements, which in the opinion of the
committee ought to be constructed during the
forthcoming five (5) year period. Such list shall be
arranged in order of preference, with recommendations as
to which projects should be constructed in which year.
SECTION II
All Ordinances or parts of Ordinances in conflict herewith ire, to fihe
extent of such conflict, hereby repealed.
SECTION III
It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the
sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, and phrases of this
Ordinance are severable and, if any phrase, clause, sentence,
paragraph, or section of this Ordinance shall be declared
unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of
competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of
the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs, and sections of
O1�.D.PAGE 3
this Ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by Inc
City Council without the incorporation in this Ordinance of any such
unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section.
SECTION IV
This Ordinance will take effect immediately from and after its passage
and the publication of the caption as the law in such cases provides.
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of . 1991,
by the City Council of the City of Sanger, Texas.
APPROVED:
Nel Armstrong
Mayor, City of Sanger
ATTEST:
Rosalie Garcia
City Secretary
r%UIVE John Hamilton, City ivies ag r
DATE, June 14, 1991
:�joards and commissions need to be done this month I have enclosed the
staff memorandum from the June 3rd meeting for reference.
r�l��ag all e��rrent €�c�arcl ��� �� ii�r� e er elii�le fir reappai��trs�et�t
.have been contacted by letter, we received replies from.
tc Lou Morgan - Library Beard - will serve
Sherry Muir - Library Board - will serge
Helen Boards Library Boar. - will serve
Leo jin Sargent - L,i%rary Boar - will serge
Park Board �
ark Board -
Pa
'Park Board �
- Utiliq! ar�i
- utility �e�ar.
�rancile Sullivan - has served her six year
i]tility yard
It1'1
14/ 1 Page
Nre Inspector
icalth Officer
v1unicipal Judge
Cin Conley
�llj
!l
Spindleanny 1
Cr R
- 200 per moot
- 10 per month
5 per month
FROM:
DAEV
T
CST,
TEXAS 76266
ohn Hamilton, City Manager
ppointments to Boards and Commissions
various boards and commissions. The following bers have to
expiring this montha
t I�ee - T3x�� l�i�iei�
Place f - lien Howard
Place 3 - Beverly Howard
Place 1 - Andy Garza
31ace 5 Chuck Trice
lenio #821 Page 2 /31% 1
)articipants, TheirCouncil.
'ouncil so desires a seven or nine member board would be appropriate
ind an enacting ordinance could be prepared and submitted for your
representative. You may P r may not wish to change the ie rsip of
the oard,
s currently serving in this capacity as needed.
�% should notci thaby t the vario s oi=dirxa�ces overnin the Alith confirmation authority reserved to Council.
`EW
SUBJECT.
ohn Hamilton, City Manage
ity Administrator's Report ri
to $6,110.60 for the same period in 1990. The calendar year to Wife
total reflects total collections of $65,251.35, a 49.19% increnase over
1990's $43,738.36. This unusually large monthly total is du&e in part
to a .. Offi.r.
s well as increased retail activitYr.
lire gal
/ 12/ 1 Page
icarings at the July 15th meeting.
;. tc stiff erre�r, reetirig Ttr�e tc� csierw�i°i
Use Permit for a residential home for the aged at 804 Third was not
necessary as the lot in question is zoned 1 -1 and a variance is e aired
to place this type of facility at the location, The variance request will
come to you at your July 1st meeting, You: might note that the p & Z,
with four of seven members present, unanimously recommended
approval of the ;specific use Permit,
Aloes
ml
TO, - ' - - -
- - - - SUBJECT
MESSAGE
eyu
IGNED
(REPLY _ G
SIGNE❑
`' - 1 _e1--
Z----- ------
Cti
INSTRUCTIONS TO
RECEIVER:
1. Wg11E
REPLY.
1
DETACH STUB KECP WHITE
COPY. RETURN
PINK
COPY
TO
SENDER.
North Central Texas
Council of Governments
In Partnership for
the Betterment of the
Trinity River Corridor
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Fort Worth District
Interested parties are hereby notified that since September 1, 1990, the Fort Worth
District Engineer of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, in cooperation with the
North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) and the Dallas -Fort Worth
etroplex area entities, has initiated a feasi
Mbility study of the Upper Trinity River
Basin area. For solicitation of public input, public meetings are scheduled to be held.
7:00 p.m., Monday, June 24, 1991, at the Carrollton City Hall
7:00 p.m., Wednesday, June 26, 1991, at the Fort Worth Botanical Gardens
More information regarding these meetings and their locations can be obtained from
Ms. Nancy Pascale, NCTCOG, at (817) 640-3300.
North Central Texas
4 Council of Governments
In Partnership for
the Betterment of the
Trinity River Corridor
10 June 1991
NOTICE OF STUDY INITIATION
1 i
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Fort Worth District
UPPER I 11LUNIXY RIVER BASIN FEASIBILITY STUDY
DALLAS-FORT WORTH METROPLEX, TEXAS
Interested parties are hereby notified that since September 1, 1990, the Fort
Worth District Engineer of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, in cooperation with
...._____ r..r n....... nyo�rrnrn on.i the Tlallac_Fnrt
the North Central 1cx" CuunCH Vl kJVvci►►►i►iuw �l41U1...Vvj 4+,. .......�...........
Worth Metroplex area entities, has initiated a feasibility study of the Upper Trinity
River Basin area as shown in Figure 1.
STUDY AUTHORITY
This feasibility study is being conducted in response to the authority contained in
the following United States Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works
Resolution dated April 22, 1988, as quoted below:
Resolved by the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the
United States Senate, that the Board of Engineers for Rivers and
Harbors U hereby requested to review the report of the Chief of
Engineers on the Trinity River and Tributaries, Texas, House Document
No. 276, Eighty -Ninth Congress, and other pertinent reports, with a
view to determining the advisability of modifying the recommendations
contained therein, with particular reference to providing improvements
in the interest of flood protection, environmental enhancement, water
quality, recreation, and other allied purposes in the Upper Trinity River
Basin with specific attention on the Dallas -Fort Worth Metroplex.
STUDY BACKGROUND
Since mid-1986, NCTCOG has been serving as convener and facilitator of
affected local governments in pursuit of a Common Vision for the Trinity River
Corridor. A Steering Committee of elected officials is guiding the inteturisdictional
program. The adopted Regional Policy Position on the Trinity River Corridor states,
in part, "Until a major flood control program can be completed to reduce or eliminate
existing flooding threats, the continuing pressure for development of the flood plain
must be managed in the most practical and equitable manner possible to at least
stabilize current levels of flooding risk. Attention must also be placed on meeting
water and other environmental quality goals and implementing desired regional public
facilities."
V
P
P
E
R
T
Y
H
L
1
T
11
NCTCOG, the designated Sponsor for this study, is acting on behalf of nine
Trinity River Corridor communities (Arlington, Carrollton, Coppell, Dallas, Farmers
Branch, Fort Worth, Grand Prairie, Irving, and Lewisville); Denton, Dallas, and
Tarrant Counties, the Tarrant County Water Control and Improvement District
Number One, and the Trinity River Authority. NCTCOG is acting as the single point
of contact with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as affirmed by the Interlocal
Agreement dated November 16, 1989. NCTCOG and the Fort Worth District will
coordinate the study efforts with other local, state, and Federal initiatives affecting the
Trinity River Corridor in pursuit of a Common Vision.
The Federal authorizing legislation for this study defined the area of
investigation as the Upper Trinity River Basin, with specific emphasis on the Dallas -
Fort Worth Metroplex. For this feasibility study, the Upper Trinity River Basin is
�IPfinPtl ae all of the Trinity River watershed upstream of Post Oak Road in southeast
Dallas County. The study area includes the Trinity River Corridor which is defined
as the bed and banks of the river segments downstream from the dams of the lakes of
Lewisville, Grapevine, Lake Worth, Benbrook, Arlington, and Mountain Creek to
Post Oak Road in southeast Dallas County, and all of the adjacent land area and
watercourses contained within the Standard Project Flood (SPF) flood plain boundary.
The upper watershed and the downstream point of Post Oak Road is shown in
Figure 1. Also shown are the approximate locations of the 13 viable structural
alternative areas investigated during the reconnaissance study which are to be
reinvestigated during the feasibility study. Nonstructural flood control alternatives
such as reservoir system operations and real-time floodwarning systems, as well as
the optimization of numerous structural and nonstructural flood control alternatives,
are to be investigated in the feasibility study.
Environmental enhancement, fish and wildlife enhancement, recreational
development, water quality improvement, and open space preservation are
designated purposes of the feasibility study and will be fully considered. Specific
alternatives will be identified and evaluated for these allied purposes. Other
alternatives would be evaluated if approved by the feasibility study's Executive
Committee.
PLANNING PROCESS
With the passage of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public
Law 99-662), new changes to the planning process occurred. The most significant
was the creation of a two-phase planning process: (1) reconnaissance phase and
(2) feasibility phase. The reconnaissance phase was 100 percent Federally funded.
The feasibility phase is cost -shared with 50 percent of the funding from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and 50 percent from the local sponsors represented by
NCTCOG. Of the total study funding, 25 percent is being provided by the
participating local entities, matched with 'an important 25 percent share from the State
through the Texas Water Development Board.
t'
The reconnaissance phase goals were to identify a feasible project with Federal
interest, and a non -Federal Sponsor(s) to share the cost of the feasibility phase and
eventual construction of any viable projects. The March 1990 reconnaissance study
net these goals and determined 13 structural plans, consisting of channel
modifications (widening and/or deepening), levees, and detention structures, were
worthy of further study. Volume 1 (Main Report) and Volume 2 (Technical
Appendixes) of this Study have been mailed to local libraries. For a copy of these
reports, contact Ms. Nancy Pascale, NCTCOG, at (817) 640-3300.
A Feasibility Cost Sharing Agreement was signed between the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers and the NCTCOG on August 29, 1990. The feasibility study was
initiated on September 1, 1990, and is scheduled for completion in September 1995.
During the feasibility phase, data is assembled to determine economic, environmental,
and engineering solutions of the study area problems and their associated
environmental and social impacts on the area. Close contact with interested parties
.,
will be maintained during the course of this feasibility study. Workshops and ocher
public gatherings will also be held throughout the Metroplex area and the Upper
Trinity River Basin to solicit public input and report on the progress of the study.
PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
Active participation by all interested parties will be an important component
throughout this study. Any comments, suggestions, data, etc., relative to the needs
for and feasibility of any water and related land resource problem will be accepted
and appreciated. In addition, suggestions and solutions for environmental
enhancement opportunities will also be appreciated. Specific information related to
flood history, hazardous and toxic waste areas, and cultural resources is also of
particular interest.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Fort Worth District, has the overall
responsibility for completion of this feasibility study, with NCTCOG having primary
responsibility for public coordination. Comments and suggestions should be
addressed to the following.
Mr. Weldon Scrivner, P.E.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Fort Worth District
Attn: CESWF-PL-MS
P.O. Box 17300
Fort Worth, Texas
76102-0300
Telephone: (817) 334-2185
MrJohn'PromisePE
. , ..
Director of Environmental Resources
North Central Texas
Council of Governments
P.O. Drawer COG
Arlington, Texas 76005-5888
Telephone: (817) 640-3300
Project managers are Mr. Weldon Scrivner, P.E., for the Corps of Engineers,
and Mr. Chris Brooks, P.E., for NCTCOG.
' rily to individuals, organizations, and agencies
This notice is being mailed prima
who have expressed interest in previous studies within the Upper Trinity River Basin.
Please pass this information to anyone you know who would be interested in this
feasibility study but may not have received a copy of this notice. Anyone may be
added to the mailing list for future information and notices by sending the name and
address to Nancy Pascale, NCTCOG.
W
Q
W
J
Q
0
W ^ r
cc
OC
o
ON
A
LAoum
H
r 0
IL
DEPARTMENI OF COMMERCE
May 28, 1991
The Honorable Nel Armstrong
Mayor, City of Sanger
P. O. Box 578
: %l 'il--
R ? ` 1 ` ". i i
Lt ,. ..
:
1 1 Uh At GE
Sanger, Texas 76266
RE: Audit Report prepared by John Graves, Certified Public
Accountant, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1988
Dear Mayor Armstrong:
The Texas Department of Commerce (Commerce), Audit Resolution,
has reviewed the audit report referenced above. The purpose of the
review is to ensure that the report complies -with regulatory and
contractual audit requirements, including the Single Audit Act of
1984, and to determine whether funds provided by Commerce were
expended in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
The following contract was included in the review:
Program Contract # Contract Period
Planning 70.6174 12/01/86--03/31/88
Since less than $25,000.00 was received during the fiscal
year, you were not obligated to submit an audit that would comply
with the Single Audit Act.
As a result of the review, it has been determined that there
are no questioned costs or administrative findings associated with
the audit of this contract. Therefore, the audit report is
accepted subject to any subsequent review by the United States
t'
P.O. Box 12728 •Austin, Texas 787ll-2728 • Telephone (512) 472-5059
Printed on 100% Recycled Paper
The Honorable Nel Armstrong
May 28, 1991
Page Two
Department of Housing and Urban Development. Your assistance in
complying with regulatory and contractual audit requirements is
greatly appreciated. Any correspondence or questions'should be
directed to Barry M. Smith, Audit Resolution, telephone (512)
320-9597.
Sincerely,
David S . Pe9 ue"s
CDBG Audit Supervisor
Audit Resolution
DSP:BMS:ag
cc: Ruth Cedillo, Deputy Director, Texas Community Development
Program
Ronald J. Neiman
Morgoret E. Bornes
Mr. John Hamilton,
Neiman & Barnes
a professional corporation
Attorneys At Lout
386 W. Main / P. O. Box 777
Lewisville, iexos 15067
June 4, 1991
City Manager
City of Sanger
201 Bolivar Street
Post Office Box 578
Sanger, Texas 76266
RE: Defective Complaints
Dear John:
Ph.: 214/436-1558
Fax: 214/436-1349
Cl'ry OF SANGER
Having just returned from a prosecutors' seminar hosted
by the Texas Municipal Court's Association, I am unhappy to
announce that there is no current resolution of the "defective
complaint" issue announced in Martin vs. State and Gordan vs.
State.
�IA discussion of the various means to correct the alleged
defects was held. Two alternatives were suggested:
1. Prior to requesting the judge issue a warrant,
attach a probable cause affidavit to the complaint
therein stating sufficient facts upon which a judge could
determine there was a probable cause to issue a warrant,
or
2. Modify the complaint to require the officer sign as
affiant. This prevents the issue of Gordan (which
questioned by what means the court clerk obtained the
information to form the "belief").
Lewisville opted to have the officer sign the complaints.
I have enclosed for your court's use a few complaints which
Lewisville is now using, note the language identifying the police
officer as aff.ant.
In addition, the complaint sent me for review does not
track the traffic statutes adequately to prevent dismissal,
particularly on appeal. The complaint provided me simply lists a
violation of "... to wit: defective equipment ...". The type of
equipment and alleged defect thereof should be spelled out. I have
enclosed a few complaints utilized by Le:�isville which specify what
Mr. John Hamilton, City Manager
City of Sanger
June 4, 1991
Page 2
and where was the defect. Another example of a poor complaint is
one which reads "to wit: speeding" or "speeding 65/55." These
complaints are summarily dismissed on appeal as defective. You may
wish to review all your complaints in accordance with the statute
or penal code. Please advise if you desire our assistance in this
endeavor. Please know that a "solid, dismissal -proof" complaint
has not yet been devised. It seems that once an error has been
corrected, some appellate judge dismisses the ticket on another
ground of defect, but the fight continues!
Lastly, Lewisville and many other cities throughout Texas
are simply not issuing failure to maintain financial responsibility
citations based upon the recent court case of Coit vs. State. I
have enclosed a recitation of suggested questions to violators.
If all answers are "No", the author feels it is safe to issue the
Ni otherwise, no citation is issued. Unless the City of
Sanger has a great commitment to issuing these tickets, it would
be my advice to wait until the legislature amends the law.
Sincerely,
c --
Margare E. Barnes
MEB:dmy
Enclosures
B. J. Wynne, III, Chairman
John E. Birdwell, Commissioner•
Cliff Johnson, Commissioner
TEXAS WATER COMMISSION
Allen Beinke, Executive Director
June 3, 1991
The Honorable Nel Armstrong
Mayor, City of Sanger
P.O. Box 578
Sanger, Texas 76256
Re: FY'91 Community Assistance
City of Sanger's Corrective
Dear Mayor Armstrong:
John J. Vay, General Counsel
Michael E. Field, Chief Hearings Examiner
Gloria A. Vasquez, Chief Clerk
Visit (CAV) - February 19,
Action
On April 25 and May 22, 1991, majority of the corrective
for the City of Sanger were received by this office. This
that the City of Prosper is in the process of complying wit
NFIP's Regulations.
1991
actions
assures
h FEMA' s
It is believed that sufficient guidance was provided during the
Community Assistarice Visit to aid the City in strengthening its
program.
Should you have need of clarification of any of the comments
contained in this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me at
the letterhead address or by calling 521/371-6393.
Sincerely,
Loyd C. Blackmon
Floodplain Specialist
Dam & Floodplain Safety Section
CC*
Jim LeGrotte, Acting Chief, FEMA-Regiomn VI
John Hamilton, City Manager of Sanger, Texas
P. O. 13ox 13087 Capitol Station • 1700 North Congress Ave. •Austin, Texas 78711-3087 •Area Code 512/463-7830
azn-irn ov aecvom Pnoe;
to w
rid 07 0 mpo
a d V c Ox O . 'd
• i Fri •N O O + • C
14
it a QaAEi O F 0 g M'ro M
moIn
Ygp Uo'b ca• +,
"dInInbM
a tit! o w0 °; Cd a oy epi a w ..,
g • t& o di °p. ami l . a ' 0 d O
t y a {a
` j
PA Vok
ru
MIND I
0900
'd Otw
a c4 v N
CIS bo
bo
o vNo"pIoIpdF Uooc d AArd
dc.pIn
$2 rM' In
oMMI
c CIS° ' o 'd+'A rs o o 0
cdd q A p mfiU&In
c PCI m GA m3'SH'5
o
'
b In
In
0
In
11.4.Z
>b
Cmllwm
2.i rm
Poll
'a
o>..0,
opro
xNU>>b
root A •
o'd
i •+iD ,
H
Q bD O
8
a)
o;:; L)
0o
toao>„m
0 Mro
oocz Go
°Qbp° `AZ
tg
In In InCIS O yoft 4)
• '
mPA r In
a O
0
+Z i t A —, c 44 cC
" H Saturday, June 8, 1991 the �alla� �ornittg �'elu¢ 29 A
LEGISLATURE '91
GoVernor signs environmental bills
Associated Press
AUSTIN —Gov. Ann Richards on
Friday signed into law a half -dozen
bills that she called the "most come
prehensicpIe environmental package
ever to come out of the Texas Legis-
lature."
The laws include measures in-
tended tot) increase recycling, cut
the state's production of hazardous
waste and protect the coastline.
She -alsb signed a plan to help
F;bring water and sewer services to
<colonias, unincorporated border
areas with' high rates of disease.
.Texas votE;s this fall must author-
ize the sale of $150 million in bonds
to pay for the measure.
Rio Grtnde valley leaders who
traveled tc EAustin for the bill-sign-
t ing cerenony said the measure
F would improve the health and live
G ing conditions of the 150,000 colonic
residents o lack sanitary plumb-
ing and pot water.
Ms. Ric ards called Friday a
"green -letter day" for Texas.
"The environmental steps taken
during the 72nd legislative session
are the most unbelievable when
you consider Texas history in this
area," she said.
"Nothing that harms the air that
we breathe, or the water that we
drink, or the land that nurtures us,
came out of this session. Not one
single bill. It truly was historic. We
can measure not only in accom-
plishments of what we did pass but
in the accomplishment of what we
did not pass."
The new laws:
■ Place a moratorium on hazard-
ous waste permits until new regula-
tions are adopted and encourage
companies to create less waste.
■ Authorize the General Land
Office to develop a comprehensive
coastal management plan to combat
coastal erosion while protecting
dunes and beach access.
■ Encourage recycling, in part
by requiring governmental agen-
cies to give buying preference to re-
cycled materials; set a goal that 40
percent of the state's municipal
solid waste be recycled by 1994; and
impose a $2 disposing fee on new
tires.
■ Require river authorities to
develop water quality plans in con-
junction with the Texas Water Com-
mission.
■ Order that all new plumbing
fixtures meet water conservation
standards.
Ms. Richards also sent a letter to
federal officials saying Texas would
develop a plan to be included in the
federal Coastal Zone Management
Act.
Texas Land Commissioner Garry
Mauro agreed with Ms. Richards
that the session was the best ever -
he environment.
"We didn't -get everything we
wanted. But when you look at
where we are today ... it's truly an
historic day for Texas," Mr. Mauro
said.
G/r�
Recycling Legislation Gets
Tentative Approval
A plan to dramatic�ily increase recycling
in Texas was tentatively approved May
23rd by the House. The measure, which
would establish a goal of recycling forty
percent of municipal solid waste by 1994,
establishes a $2.00 tax on new fire sales
and criminal penalties for unsafely storing
used oil. It also includes recycling
programs for fire and newsprint, a ban on
the disposal of car batteries in landfills,
and provisions to boost recycling by
governmental entities. The bill would
require local governments to give
preference to products made of recycled
materials and would require state
agencies, courts, universities, counties,
school districts, and cities to separate
their waste for recycling.
The bill which already has passed the
Senate, won preliminary approval on an
88-41 vote. A final vote is pending.
What's Really in Our Trash?
Materials in
millions of tons 1960 1988 Increase
Paper/Paperboard 29.9 71.8 137
Glass 6.7 12.5 87
Metals 10.5 15.3 46
Plastics �. 0.4 14.4 350
Rubber/Leather 2.0 4.6 130
Textiles 1.7 3.9 129
Wood 3.0 6.5 116
Other 0.1 3.1 3l0
Total Nonfood
Product Wastes:
Other Wastes:
54.3 132.1 143
Landfill Brochure Now Available
A free landfill services brochure that
discusses effective planning, siting,
designing, operating and closing of waste
disposal facilities is available from RMT,
Inc., a nationwide engineering and
environmental management consultant
based in Madison, Wisconsin.
The brochure may be obtained by
contacting RMT, Inc., P. O. Box 8923,
Madison, Wisconsin 53708.
Election Workers and City_
Employees Taxed for
Social Security
The 1990 Federal Omnibus Budget Act
extended the Social Security Tax to
persons who are "paid a total of $100 or
more in a calendar year. This legislation
will have an impact on recruiting election
day workers and administering the
payrolls. The changes will go into effect
July 1, 1991.
Two bills (H.R. 1691 and H.R. 1771)
have already been introduced in the
House of Representatives by Rep.
Barney Frank (D-Mass) and Rep. Al
Swift (D-Wash). One bill would exempt
election officials from Social Security
taxes for up to $500, while the other bill
would exclude pay to election officials
entirely.
in addition, local governments employing
workers who are not covered by a
qualified public employee pension plan
will also be required to pay Social
Security taxes effective July 1, 1991.
Food 12.2 13.2 8 Disaster Planning
Yaai 20.0 31.6 58 Training Available
Misc.Inorganic 1.3 2.7 108
Total Other The Federal Emergency Management
Wastes: 33.5 47.5 42 Agency (FEMA) sponsors a disaster
planning training program for local
Total Wastes: 87.8 179.E 105 :government officials. The training
program eu,ibles officials to evaluate
Sowce: Franklin Associates, Ltd. existing e�l�ergenc:y lTliillagement plans
Governmental Service Agency, Inc. 2 '1'MIS Newsletter (May, 1991)
w
DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT
AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OECEMBER 31, 1990
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Report of Independent Auditor .
General Purpose Financial Statements:
Combined Balance Sheet .
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and
Changes in Fund Balance Compared to Budget .
Notes to Financial Statements. . . . . .
Supplemental Schedule
Schedule of Revenues and Expenditures -
Collections Account. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Page No.
E�
2-3
L!
5-8
10
MEMBERS
TEXAS SOCIETY OF
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
HANKINS, POWERS, EASTUP, DEATON & TONN
A Professional Corporation
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
902 NORTH LOCUST • P.O. BOX 977
DENTON, TEXAS 76202-0977
817.387-8563
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
Board of Directors
Denton Central Appraisal District
(,cnt 1 cmcn
MEMBERS
AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
We have audited the accompanying combined balance sheet of the Denton Central
Appraisal District as of December 31, 1990, and the related statement of revenues,
expenditures and changes in fund balance compared to budget for the year then ended.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the District. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.
An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of the Denton Central Appraisal District as
of December 31, 1990, and the results of its operations for the year then ended in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
42v-coo
Hankins, Powers, Eastup, Deaton & Tonn
A Professional Corporation
Certified Public Accountants
March 4, 1991
DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT
ASSETS
Cash on hand
Cash in bank
Temporary investments
Accounts receivable
Other receivables
Prepaid insurance
Other prepaid expense
( at cost )
COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
DECEMBER 31, 1990
Land, Building and Equipment:
Land
Building
Computer system
Furniture and fixtures
Amount to be provided for retirement of
general long-term debt
Total Assets
LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Note payable
Capitalized leases payable
Accounts payable
Accrued interest payable
Deferred revenue
Total Current Liabilities
Long -Term Liabilities:
Note payable - non -current (Note C)
Capitalized leases payable -
.long-term portion (Note C)
Total Long -Term Liabilities
Fund Equity:
- = Investment in
Fund balance
`Total Fund
"Total
fixed assets
unreserved
Equity
Liabilities and Fund
Governmental
Fund Types
General
Fund
$ 1,152.00
34,154.02
790,000.00
1,286.71
i37.33
5,408.00
26,415.50
General
Fixed
Assets
$ 169,992.30
551,158.91
463,439.59
178,531.89
$ 858,553.56 $1,363,122.69
$ 6,865.97
2,583.21
327,993.36
3375442.54
$1,363,122.69
521,111.02
`-`521,111.02 1363,122.69
Equity $ 858,553.56 $1"363,122.69
Account
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements. -
2
Groups
General Total
Long -Term (Memorandum
Debt Only)
$ 1,152.00
. 34,154.02
790,000.00
1,286.71
137.33
5,408.00
26,415.50
169,992.30
551,158.91
463,439.59
178,531.89
$ 397,577.80 397,577.80
$ 397,577.80 $2,619,254.05
$ 26,508.47
1,819.60
28,328.07
368,744.25
505.48
369,249.73
$ 397,577.80
$ 26,508.47
1,819.60
6,865.97
2,583.21
327,993.36
365,770.61
368,744.25
505.48
369.249.73
1,363,122.69 __
521,111.02
1,884,233.71
$2,619,254.05
��t�..
3
3
DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT
STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE COMPARED TO BUDGET
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1990
Revenues:
Local support
Other services
Interest income
Tax collection fees
Miscellaneous income
Total revenues
Expenditures:
Salaries
Lonqevity pay
Professional services - valuations
Deed and sales information
Auto allowances
Retirement
General insurance
Payroll taxes
Travel, conference and training
Hospitalization insurance
Telephone and utilities
Supplies and materials
Postage
Accounting and auditing
Board of review
Computer maintenance
Attorney fees and court costs
Assets purchased
Workmens compensation insurance
Equipment maintenance
Contingent expenses
Legal notices and advertising
Janitorial and building maintenanc
Registration and dues
Miscellaneous
Printing services
Debt service
Total expenditures
Excess expenditures over revenues
Other resources
Excess expenditures over revenues
and other resources
Fund balance beginning
Fund balance ending
General Fund
Over
Actual Budget Under
$1,732,849.26
305990.96
51,263.99
56,036.42
15258917
1,872,398.80
952,729.54
71148.00
211750.00
23,849.67
89,595920
47,265.28
55539.84
65,776.62
17,899.46
78,125.84
459535.60
70,373.03
51,907.26
4,000.00
155347.00
785535.97
739373.35
1011352.73
16,848.50
81114.10
4,784.91
e 34,736.32
4,560.76
85103olO
39,160.64
61,807.85
149284220.57
(55,821577)
3,500.00
(52,321.77)
$1,732,843.00 $ 6.26
305990.96
20,000.00 314)263.99
34,880.00 21,156.42
11258.17
1,7874723.00 84,675.80
965,273.82 (12,544.28)
8,648.00 (11500eOO)
2243000.00 (250oOO)
521130.00 (289280.33)
92,084.80 (21,489.60)
485696.09 (11430.81)
14,105.00 (81565.16)
649469.66 11306.96
16,900.00 999.46
60,564.00 175561.84
43,323.75 21211.85
56,040.00 14,333.03
41,747.62 10,159.64
45575.00 (575.00)
19,500.00 (49153.00)
869908.00 (89372.03)
65,000.00 89373.35
64,921.32 369431.41
149070.24 2,778.26
89008.00 106.10
219500.00 (215500.00)
41748.92 35.99
24,968.00 95768.32
45851.45 (290.69)
61680.11 11422.99
41,833.21 (21672.57)
59,088.00 25719985
1,912,634.99 159585.58
(1241911.99) 69,090.22
3,500.00
(1241911.99)
573,432.79
5739432.79
72,590.22
$ 521,111.02 $ 448,520.80 $ 72
-0-
See accompanying Notes. to Financial Statements.
0
DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 1990
NOTE A - SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The Denton Central Appraisal District was created under the provisions of the
State of Texas. The Appraisal District is responsible for appraising property in
Denton County. These appraisals are used by all the taxing jurisdictions in the
County to levy their ad -valorem taxes. The District also serves as collection agent
for some of these jurisdictions which elect to use the District for a set fee. The
revenues of the District come primarily from the jurisdictions which it serves. The
accounting policies of the District conform to generally accepted accounting prin-
ciples as applicable to state and local governmental units.
1. The Reporting Entity
The District, for financial purposes, includes all the- funds and account
groups which are relevant to the operation of the Denton Central Appraisal
District.
2. Fund Accounting
The accounts of the District are organized on the basis of funds or account
groups, each of which is considered to be a separate accounting entity, The
operations of each fund are accounted for by providing a separate set of self -
balancing accounts which are compromised of each fund's assets, liabilities, fund
equity, revenues and expenditures.
Governmental Fund Types
General Fund
The General Fund is the general operating fund of the District. It is
used to account for all financial resources except those required to be
accounted for in another fund.
Account Groups
General Fixed Assets Account Group
This account group is established to record the acquisition and dis-
posal of the general fixed assets used by the district in governmental
fund type operations. Expenditure transactions to acquire general
fixed assets occur in the General Fund.
General Long -Term Debt Account Group
This account group records the principal outstanding on all general
long-term debt expected to be financed from governmental funds and is
offset by the amount to be prov ided in future years. _:_
- 3. Basis of Accounting_
The modified accrual basis of accounting is used for the Governmental Fund
Types. This basis of accounting recognizes revenues in the accounting period in
which .they become available and measurable, and expenditures in the .accounting
period in which the fund liability is incurred, if measurable, except for
unmatured interest on General Long -Term Debt,.which is recognized when due.
5
DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Contintued)
DECEMBER 31, 1990
4. Investments
Statutes authorize the District to invest in certificates of deposit;
securities are pledged to secure those funds on deposit in an amount equal to the
amount of those funds.
Investments at December 31, 1990 were all Certificates of Deposit.
5. Total Column
The total column on the combined balance sheet is captioned "Memorandum
Only" to indicate that it is presented on the facilitate financial analysis.
Data in this column does not present financial position in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles. Neither is such data comparable
to a consolidation.
6. The Budget
The budget was prepared for adoption for all Governmental Fund Types in
1989. The budget was approved by a majority of the taxing jurisdictions.
NOTE B - GENERAL FIXED ASSETS ACCOUNT GROUP
The following is a summary of the changes in general fixed assets:
L and
Building
Computer System
Furniture
& Fixtures
Balance
January 1
1990
$ 167,851.50
551,158.91
399,153.22
143,606.33
$1,261,769.96
Additions
$ 2,140.80
64,286.37
34,925.56
$101,352.73
Deletions
Balance
December 31
1990
$ 169,992.30
551,158.91
463,439.59
178,531.89
$1,363,122.69
0
DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Contintued)
DECEMBER 31, 1990
NOTE C - CHANGES IN GENERAL LONG-TERM DEBT ACCOUNT GROUP
The following is a summary of the changes in general long-term debt:
Interest Balance
Rate January 1, 1990
Note -First
State Bank 8.5% $419,434.98
Lease -Aloha
Leasing 17.5% 1,431.99
Lease-Gravbar
Financial 17.2%
$420,866.97
Balance
Issues Retirements December 31, 1990
$24,182.26
1,431.99
$3,500.00 1,174.92
$3,500.00 $26,789.17
$395,252.72
2,325.08
$397,577.80
The annual requirements to retire general long-term debt as of December 31,
1990, for each of the next five years, are as follows:
Year Ending
December 31,
Principal
1991 $ 28,328.07
1992 29,357.04
1993 31,401.78
1994 34,177.42
1995 37,198.40
$160,462.71
NOTE D - DEFERRED REVENUE
Interest
$ 32,840.01
30,250.98
27,686.22
24,910.58
21,889.60
$137,577.39
Total
$ 61,168.08
59,608.02
59,088.00
59,088.00
59.088.00
$298,040.10
The District billed jurisdictions for the first quarter of 1991 in December
1990. $327,993.36 was paid in 1990 for the year 1991 and is shown as deferred rev-
enue in the accompanying financial statements.
NOTE E - FEDERAL INCOME TAX
Since the District is :a state agency created by the State of Texas, it is not
_ subject to Federal income taxation, therefore no provisions for Federal income taxes
is made.
NOTE F - COMMITTMENTS
On October 19, 1989 the District accepted a contract with Capital Appraisal
Group, Inc. for appraisal services, which provides for industrial and utilities
valuation services. The contract provides for payments of $21,750 per year for
1990, and 1991.
��
7
DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Contintued)
DECEMBER 31, 1990
NOTE G - PENSION PLAN
The district provides pension, disability, and death benefits for all of its
fulltime employees through a nontraditional, joint contributory, defined contribu-
tion plan in the state-wide Texas County and District Retirement System (TCDRS), one
of over 400 administered by TCDRS, an agent multiple -employer public employee re-
tirement system. It is the opinion of the TCDRS management that the plans in TCDRS
are substantially defined contribution plans, but they have elected to provide
additional voluntary disclosure to help foster a better understanding of some of the
nontraditional characteristics of the plan.
Under the state law governing TCDRS, the contribution rate of the district is a
fixed percent equal to the contribution rate payable by the employee member, which
is 5% as adopted by the governing body of the district. This rate is not
actuarially determined and is one of the rates that can be adopted in accordance
with the TCDRS Act. However, the plan of benefits adopted by the employer at the
time of plan inception and when benefit increases are adopted is limited by statute
to what the actuary determines can be adequately financed by the commitment of the
employer to contribute the same amount as the employees. The statute specifies that
the actuary's determination is based on a maximum period for amortizing the unfunded
pension benefit obligation of 30 years.
The plan provisions are adopted by the governing body of the district, within
the options available in the state statutes governing TCDRS. Members can retire at
ages 60 and above with 10 or more years of service or with 30 years regardless of
age or when the sum of their age and years of service equals 80 or more. A member
is vested after 10 years but must leave his accumulated contributions in the plan.
If a member withdraws his personal contributions in a lump -sum, he is not entitled
to any amounts contributed by the employer.
Benfit amounts are determined by the sum of the employee's contributions to the
plan, with interest, and employer -financed monetary credits, with interest. The
level of these monetary credits is adopted by the governing body of the district
conditioned by the actuarial constraints imposed by statute that the resulting
benefits can be expected to be adequately financed by the commitment of the district
to contribute the same amount as the member employees. The district's current
benefit plan provides for employer -financed monetary credits for service since the
plan began of 200% of the employee's accumulated contributions and for employer -
financed monetary credits for service before the plan began of 150% of a theoretical
amount equal to twice what would have been contributed by the employee, with
interest, prior to establishment of the plan. At retirement, the benefit is calcu-
lated as if the sum of the employee's accumulated contributions and the employer.
financed monetary credits were used to purchase an annuity within TCDRS.
The district's total payroll in calendar year 1990 was $959,877.54, and the
.district's contribution were based on a covered payroll of $945,305.60. Employer
and employee contributions for the year were made as required and are detailed
below. Employee contributions may include the purchase of credits for military or
legislative service or the buyback of previously forfeited service credit. There
were no related -party transactions.
Employee Contributions
Employer .Contributions
$47,265.28
$47,265.28
MEMBERS
TEXAS SOCIETY OF
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
HANKINS, POWERS, EASTUP, DEATON
A Professional Corporation
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
902 NORTH LOCUST • P.O. BOX 977
DENTON, TEXAS 76202.0977
817.387.8563
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
Denton Central Appraisal District
Denton, Texas
MEMBERS
AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF
& TON N CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
We nave dUU I I.CU l.{IC yCiIC► Q 1 FJUI"l.lUJC I I Ildlll. 1 d 1 JLQLC111CIIt,J UI LIIC UCIILUII
Central Appraisal District, for the year ended December 31, 1990, and have
issued our report thereon dated March 4, 1991. Our audit of such general
purpose financial statements was made in accordance with generally accepted
auditing standards, and accordingly, included such tests of the accounting
records and such other auditing procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances.
Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the general
purpose financial statements taken as a whole. The accompanying Schedule of
Revenues and Expenditures - Collections Account is presented for purposes of
additional analysis and is not a required part of the general purpose finan-
cial statements. The information in that schedule has been subjected to the
same auditing procedures applied in the audit of the general purpose finan-
cial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material re-
spects in relation to the general purpose financial statements taken as a
whole.
Hankins, Powers, Eastup, Deaton & Tonn
A Professional Corporation
Certified Public Accountants
March 4, 1991
OENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT
SCHEDULE OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES - COLLECTIONS ACCOUNT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1990
Revenues:
Tax collections fees $ 56,036.42
Miscellaneous income 1,258.17
Total Revenue 57,294.59
Expenditures:
Salaries 21,611.04
Auto allowances 4,757.83
Retirement 1,080.56
General insurance 675.00
Payroll taxes 1,653.24
Supplies and materials 19,178.78
Postage 16,606.49
Accounting and auditing 300.00
Computer maintenance 2,055.97
Assets purchased 1,155.00
Workmens compensation insurance 125.36
Registration and dues 50.00
Miscellaneous 41.49
Printing services 532.65
Total Expenditures 69,823.41
Excess Expenditures over Revenues $ 12,528.82
��a
10
I
t
A
111
•
1
1
-IR•1 •/-
1
11-
1
13.
I5
/Iee/Ir1111en
i
1 1-Ire
r
er1
11:
1{rr
d
If.
_I
.1
•et
•1..
It•
S
1:
a
1
:1•c:-
-:I:rena
{t
1
eel,'It No Nacoatan wmmaoI%
Y . 1
to Loom
N +
,•'-rrtr-•t rca • r _ r»R f ♦ /i e', I q
RI' IR _ r
' _ nit,
I.. _ I
—IV
/
— 1
Cap I so sit W all 11
CA
40
1 "li—ITITiS1 1-- 1Te - 1
_CA• I...r 1-_ _ _1
+.ria . N / [i. , !I. •1 6 Is
T 1 Q1
• 1 : j _ R711 j .. ... L
'tea w+{r- u l ur. —
k CIA
p Viz... - I
1 •Hall
/ —^
' » ,_ I _ I Ip Z.ii3-- 1 I , / ; 1. 1. 1 1 • —{II _
son
ps AM
DO
/ I L _'{y _ / -' {•1,J j 1 • ' Tu1i->, 7—IF .iI't-- V 17P` a r9i ' b S 1 L —
PC ;t: l—.—.,.j•a; 1-- ---'I 1 irs,J j 7 ,'_ I Y ` 4 b l •coo ml[n
4too. oo owl
»"Mal Ir1
me I
CIA
a 1 1! y•' "7 v- 1:i %% J'. PE D mow —
N marls ty` • j L 1 t. ■ •I--_—
e x - - ...
40
All
CAP
owl
I 1 1!
10
, i D 1• ! 1 ` p1,! ' -'9 'fle o , • II .-- b- _ _ •v_ Ir
• 1fO J
o 0 W;,;l0rer ). '
. I
I
-- 1--+ a•UI/nU L .Iwt O" .nyDl ,lOf>bl+
b iq s j'4 d I a j''illro 1E11 lxtl°Ir 11 1r1
bl ,,a t 1 • a 1' I ,4• ,4 44 4e 144!!! !!I I ! I IIf i
Itt 1 r, , is A jiEip aq
fi11! I( r t,7 !2. .fL IVa F 7 1 1
IAO 1); (116ri 7ti)Ij s+ ``" fell 7 fir
aCIO ;` IFg.I •1[1{(((Its` IP
ya l a ;I,i10 (•'rrl, Jtll IC` •fo111111t
tl li t1` 1Q e 't1 11/` 1(Aiil 'I .IiiA 111• ( 'aY
AM
1 1 !; ll Ir 11 lAi. ,( •{lA'rl; Jr,.i ' Y!.
1 it )'J,1 a 11 l11 j 1 ➢:1
It
It
1 ,'1/ • • J
Executive
Tapered
Aluminum
Flagpoles
Revolving, non•loul•
Inp IrucF cnf aiurnl•
num body s1alNaaa
aNsl ball' burinpa
and nylon shoves.
Fdtinot inrindo• CnIA eh,... i...,.., r..0 .._r
�•••e- •�•�����. � ,u luminulll wall, IeVUh
ving non•louling truck with one eel '/„"
polypropylene halyard, chrome snap
hooks, cast polished aluminum cleat and
Ilash collar, Shalls are uniformly cone
tapered in one piece (up to 35")and highly
polished for maintenance tree deep lustre
linish. Shipment is made in hard Ilbre
Nbe to protect linish. Instructions included.
I•znodlc Bronze Anllabb on Raqueel
.lain
71E394T
72Ea9ST
77E396T
77EJ97T
72E392T
27E393T
NI. Abr, OranN 1Mt p,Ff t*�
GnreJ 1. nita Din.n,iaa, Nr. lad
25' 18' S"x3"x.125" 1341bs. s eao.00
30' 33' S"x3"x.125" 1471bs. t 729.00
35' 38'6" •6"x31/r"x.156" 106 lbs. s to9s.00
40' 44' 1"x31/r"x.156" 2751bs. sla9s,00
50' 55' 8"x3'/r"x.188" 401 lbs. :2 t 9s.00
60' 66' 10"x4"x 188" 603 Ibs fsa39s o0
Allow 30•IS Days ror Shipment P�
^ov of Warranty Available on Raqunt �';
G
:I
4
1, r
�.-�
���
CONE TAPERED ;,. ._' .,,;:_...
ALUMINUM
GROVNp .
ESTATE SE' � _
FLAGPOLES ! . - .� ,�
Peru?i!ul cone tapered aluminum made in �''��
�^ no joints or seams to interrupt
illy tapered shape. Manufaclure0
;�, sbenglh aluminum alloy tubing. i �
l ubngs include a 4" gold aluminum ball, I '�.�
cast aluminum (ruck and cleat, heavy poly ' r
propylene halyard with call nylon snap- I
nooks. Ground sleeve and insfallalion in- •• "
structions included. ?0 30 day shipment. ,;
Copy of Wamnly Avallabls an Rsqusst
AllowhYO JD Days Io�ShPpmanl r
-- - 4:.
HI. A6ors Orenll Shd4 fhpp, ►ric•
Ground length Dlmemlone Wt. hch
«lao7T 1511. I111. 3"x2"x.l?5" 41 Ibs. •773.00
72EaoeT 101t. 2211. 3"x1"x.125" 501bs. a7sa.00
77E4D9T ?511. 271/r It. 3"x2"x.115" 61 lbs. s<7e7.00
� 72E410T 301t. 3311. 4"x2"x.125" 891bs. >;aeo,00
177[IesT 3511. 38t/� II. 5"x3"x.115" 1431bs. s7es.00
27Eaa TT Flash Collar for 3" Shall Shpg, wl. 1 Ib..o. •7 t.o0
27[a37t Flash Collar for 4" Shall Shpg, wl. 1 Ib..a. •21.00
77Eaa3T Flash Collar for 5"Shall Shov wl I Ih _.. .�, ��
G�ouN� sET
ALUMINUM
FLAG POLE
• Achitecturallr
Designed
• Highly Polished
• Uniformly Topered 1"
for Every S't3"
• Seamles:6063-T6
Alloy
Maintenance tree, deep luster
finish. Cast aluminum, revol-
ving non•louling truck with
stainless steel ball bearings
has two 'l," cast nylon
sheaves. Two eels sI„" water•
prool while polypropylene
halyards are equipped with
two chrome plated Ilag snaps.
Pole wall .188" thick.
Copyy of Wenanly
Avalhble on Requsat
Allow ]e•IS Days for Shipment
Includes:
Gold Anodlred --
Ball
Doubk Sheavt TrucA, Cast /
Alum, Revolving, Non rf
Fouling Type
A Swivel Snaps, � I
CtnomGPlased
Two StIs01 Halyards
InCIUdeS: IEscepl Sand
1 Concrelq
Two 9" Casl Alum. Cleats -
Aluminum FIiSh Coital � -
3000PSI Concrete �-,
Hardwood Wedges
(Remove After Tamping
Sand!• .�
Dry $and Tlghlly Tamped
After Aligning Pole -_
BIaCM Asphaltum Paint
�•'•�"�� -id ilu is ltl! Jur is ClS
of Pole Bebw Grade -
Foundatan Sleeve�Hot Dlp�
Galvamred Steel
Iply
Ovnll
6Nu1
D41rH1N
MN
M., d
_N._
Naieht
N.MN
e.tt
Iq
Dies,
fez.
22EJ99T
23'•0"
10.0"
5"
3'/,"
5"
1
73E40DT
28'.p"
25'•0"
51h"
3'/r"
6"
I
27Ea01T
33'-0"
30'-0"
6"
31/�"
6"
1
I22Eao7T
38'•6"
35'•0"
7"
3'h"
8"
1
77E403T
44 -0"
40'•0"
B"
3'/r"
8"
1
22EaoaT
49'•6"
45'-0"
8"
3th"
8"
2
22Faosr
55'-0"
50'•0"
10"
4"
10"
2
27E134T
86' 0"
80'-0"
11"
4"
12"
3
�.
- Includes:
- ;•.
�• SteelCentermg
yr - vredges
' Steel Base Plate
tr � Stoat Su
pport
Plate Welded to
('.. r,,,.,n c..,,o
eat, seM, r,;ra
rl.a sr,. wt. L,f,
4'x 6'
141
lbs.
s
799.00
4'x 6'
1781bs.
s
99s.00
5'x 8'
2181bs.
stt3s.00
5'x 8'
?631bs.
sta9s.00
6'x10'
3231bs.
st99s.00
6'x10'
3651bs.
s239s.00
8'x12'
S01
lbs.
:3
T 9s.00
5'x25'
11331bs.
s79es.00
Vandal & Tfteft
Resistant
Superior
Strength
Gracelul
Desfgn
Maintenance
Free
�;'�� Fiberglass Flagpoles
����� With Internal Halyard
'. Fiberglass poles are lighter in weigh) than metal poles of
�� the same site meaning less delivery costs. Internal halyard
' system provides a strong deterrent to damage or Ihelt of
(lags and halyard. low cost manual system with no winches
or motors. Poles display a convex prolile because upper
•.l hall tapers al the rate .150"lit. and lower half al .050'YI1.
_ ��. Glossy polyester surface resists soiling and scratching,
��'� Poles are rustprool and resistant to other corrosives. Poles
come in Colonial While or Metallic Bronze. Supplied cony
plete with liberglass base cover, gold anodized aluminum
ball with spindle. liberglass truck, cleat polyester halyard
snaphooks, liberglass sleeve and insfallalion instructions.
Poles also include vinyl covered counterweight. polyester
retaining ring and access doorllock assembly with keys.
Nt,
A 1.w bH L is
It.w N.. W.v.1 nl. n� r.a M•
Gold
Anodized
Alum(num
Ball
Truck
. Hafyud
and Snaps
Vinyl
Covsnd
Counter•
walphl
PolyasUr
Retaining
Rlnp
Access
- Door
Fiberphss
Base
Corer
i' Flberplass
' Ground
Sleeve
27F110T
_25'
6.0"
0'�
_
.180" 97
.
Ibs.
-• ._.
I = e9e.00
71E711T
30
_6.5"
"
.100" 138
Ibs.
t ioe7,00
�sE7i7r
35'
7.0"
3.25"
.200" 1161bs.
ii3al.00
I 91FstaT
39'
7.0"I
3.15"
I .100"I 2021bs.)
stsas.00
ehlppod Motor FrolDht
Allow ]d•aS Deya for ihlpment
MINIMUM ORDER • $20.00
f p�Aly While or hove
Iluh Collor Avalls6b bperotely
(tin-tirr I s
NIEMORAIVI7UM #830
TO:
FROM:
in T c.:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF' SAIVGER
P. O. BOX 578
BANGER, TEXAS 76266
Chief Benny Erwin
Jahn Hamilton, City ManagerUl l
June 7, i991
Unlocking Vehicles For Citizens
I forwarded your memo to Council for their information concerning
unlocking of vehicles, Since there are no locksmiths based in Sanger, there
was some concern about a complete ban on unlocking vehicles.
I am suggesting that as a general rule, your employees not unlock vehicles,
except under the circumstances stated in your memorandum 91-20 of
May 31st. However as a safeguard for circumstances which might require an
exception to the guidelines, please develop a simple release form for use
when, at their own discretion, your officers feel compelled to unlock a
citizen's vehicle. Please discuss this policy with each officer so that we are
consistent with our application of this policy.
JH:es
cc: Mayor and City Council
T0: CORPORAL AMYX,
FROM: BENNY ERWIN
DATE: 5-31-91
SUBJECT: USAGE OF
5ERGEA
CHIEF
91-20
YARHROUGH
LOCK -JOCKS
Effective 5-31-91 it will be the policy of this Department
that no vehicle will be unlocked by any officer of this
department unless, a child a_ inside the vehi cl p �r thea .►ems; ,.� e
,_ av �a as �_vtaJtriV�J ���
�Ui��::►� U r:
TO:
FROM:
DATE.
SUBJECT.
CITY OF SANDER
P. O. BOX 578
BANGER, TEXAS 76266
Honorable Mayor &Members
John Hamilton, City Manager
June 14, 1991
Budget Report 5/31/91
of the City Council
u
The attached Revenue and Expenditure Summaries are for your review and
indicate our budget through 66.7% of the fiscal year 90/91. You will note
that expenditures exceed revenue by 0.2%. This is due to a $177,146 bond
payment for the Enterprise Fund Debt Service as well as three pay periods
falling within the month of May. The City operates on 26 pay periods per
vear, every other Friday; consequently, two months out of the year have
three pay periods.
Considering the short -fall in Electric sales; overall. the btadget is on track.
Our summer rates for electric have come on line with the June 1st billing;
and if it will stop raining, our water and sewer revenues should also
increase, There are four months remaining in this fiscal year.
JH:es
Enclosures
;l:"I'Y Of `SANGE:R
P.O. BOX b/8
NGER, TEXAS 76266
!IEVkNUI_ SUMMARY
FOR CURRENT PERIOD FROM 05 01, 91 1'0 05 31 91
OF YEAR C(
1=:CSCAII TO DATE
APPI'WRIATION AMOUNT AMOUNT OF DUDGE"!
GLNERAL FUND REVENUES
AO VALOREM TAXES :;46,219 9,b55.%6 3321804.6z; 96.1
PLNALTY & INTEREST TAXES 10, 2.50 1,435.68 9,820.45 9bt 8
SALES TAX 91,000 10,077.10 70,382o34 %7.3
FRANCHISE FEES 8!>, 400 00 46, 47 02,. 48 !i4 . 4
FIRE SERVICE - DENTON COUNTY 17,500 55355.00 14,a81.25 85.0
SOLID WASTE COLLECTION IS90400 13,5b7.20 103,253.88 64.8
IAmur- .LL t$LlQli.i5 15,200 7:i2.00 3095LI E)o 76.0
cONsTRucTION PERMITS lor000 107.00 30481.80 34.8
MUNICIPAL COURT 180500 4,511.26 13,490.88 72.9
LIBRARY - DENTON COUNTY 90950 64.00 12,:378.50 124.4
OTFIL:R INCOME 14,800 4,473.65 15,977.86 1.08.0
INTEREST INCOME 50150 629.87 2,886.45 50.2
SUE3T'O1"AL (REVE:NUES) 773,9Ei9 49,99�.52 629,785.02 81.4
"('BANS(=ERS 8/,s391 .00 46,386.9:3 52.:;
'f0'FAL FUNDS AVAIL. TU G.F'. 861,Et60 49,<���<<.52 6%6,171.95 %23.5
LN'CERPRISE FUND
WA'I"CR SALES :317,%00 24,605.08 194,311.85 61.
WASTEWATER SERVICES 264,480 ';�0,526.77 163,899.0'1 62.0
PENALTIES BILLED - WA 179.37 2,685*86
PENALTIE:; UTILITIES 300500 3,016t46 25,997.J7 85.2
4JATER/'SEWER TAP'S 6, 500 .00 1 , 300.00 20 4 0
CONNECT/TRAN'SFER FEE, 7,Ioo 990.00 150770.00 931.:3
ELECTRIC 'SERVICE 1,9309000 140,942.41. 9949354950 51.5
OTHER INCOME 1) 9 el 350 485.40 11,0:5.40 117.0
IN"I'E REST INCOME: 6eo
30100 5 o 095. 83 4 3, 987.13 69. 7
sup --TOTAL 2,628,815 195,691.95 104400655.98 54.8
l'RANSFEFiS (870891) .00 (46,386.93) 52.8
TOTAL FUNDS AVAIL. 'FO E.F. 2,540,924 1959691.95 1,394,269.05 54.9
'i0'i'AL REVENUES 3,402,784 245,690.47 290709441.00 60.8
EXPENDITURE SUI�11�1AKT Play 31, 1991
Fiscal Monthly To Data n,
Appropriation Amount Amoul'It of Budget
GENERAL FUND
Mayor & Councii 110390000 603.88 6,994.68 61810
Administration 810920,00 2,887.64 71,887.67 87.80
Public works Adm. 31 j021,00 194.70 33,537,28 90 60
1.41, i_, I.n 1 1it.
YGIIIGIe I Ii11L 101 1 b /.uu �Dbbabb 15160b.91 94, 70
Library 20,679.00 1,556.92 12,169.46 o 00
police 226,750.00 28,987037 164,636087 72,60
Sanitation 148,243.00 15,411.67 107,686.23 72.60
Street 97,236.00 14101127 69,861422 71.80
Contractual Services -Taxes 5,600.00 116,00 : ,740,57 66.60
Ambulance 131525
7.00 0.00 ,216.75 38 ijt;
r�ontractual Services Health 1,800.00 0.00 625.00 34.70
`: �anror Center 3,650000 198.33 1,723020 47.?10
Fire Dept, 44,120,00 3,189.46 Z9,1 167.41 7.70
Parks 91518000 1,044,99 6,618017 (,9 514
1
U�onwtuntty Center 4,825.00 79.47 1,126,16
Sub -Total 7 i 9,436.00 69,OS2.28 530,997.58 73.1�0
RFpuired Savings . 5,100.00 425.00 3,400.00 rr,�,.rin
Cyr 81'Y Ii U 137,324.00 0.00 2 I 1204.65 i 5.40
T0091 (i F. Exprirlditrar'ec, nr'a1,£�r,(.r,0i) F,C),All .2�5 jrt�,F�112.�? f'ra,fr(!
ENTERPRISE FUND
tiNater 185,501.00 39,093.58 142,218.80 76.70
Wastewater 92,314.00 5,963.42 7.3,966.63 80.10
Wastewater Collection 1380397.00 21689011 16,224865 1 1.70
Electric 11587,178000 88,964.11 891,190077 56.30
Utility Billing 84,383000 61180429 59,276887 70.20
Mayor Council 1 1,390000 1,527,67 91063287 79.60
Administration 81,920,00 14,1 18.95 51 ,598.16 63.00
Vehicle Haint, 16,157.00 3,514.98 9/150003 56.60
Public Works Adm. 34,021.00 6,292.57 16,416,83 48.3G
Cont
irigency Fund 44,390.00 0.00 1 1,390.OG 216 00
fequired Savings 5,484.00 457.00 3,656.00 66 0�;
DrGt Ser-vice 259,489.00 177,146.99 2S 1,120.72 96.vG
To1a1 E.F. Expenditures 2IS40,924.00 345,948.66 1,5'271183.33 6.rI.�;►(i
Total Expenditures 31402,784100 115,425.94 2,082,785.56 1.tiiJ