Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
11/06/1989-CC-Agenda Packet-Regular
Fr MONDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 1989 ►+01 BOLIVAR STREET, CITY HAL.T. 7#000 P.11. 3. Disbursements 4. Citizen's Input GEORGE MCCRACKEN Police Service . Consider and Possible Action Re ardfn Community Center RESOLUTION R13-89 GRANT SEWER INFILTRATION DISPOSAL CONTRACT FRONTIER WASTE MANAGEMENT BANK DEPOSITORY CONTRACT DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT SEIZED PROPERTY POLICY DENTON COUNTY QUIT CLAIM DEED ROSENE SEBASTIAN Policies ' • r— r r r s i- • • r MWIVITTIMM 15. City Administration Report 16. Adjournment a ROSALIE GARCIA CITY SECRETARY MINUTES: WIMMAUJUMAIAMINWALM NK go$ r PI PRESENT. Mayor « Armstrong, Councilman Glenn Shaw, Councilman WendallThomas,• Danny McDaniel,r and Councilman Jerry Jenkins I'PRESENT. City ManagerR •n, City Secretary R• Garcia, Mr. Burl Bourland, Benny• onti Waste • a representativefrom Sanger Court and led the pledge to the flag. carriedfl. 4. Citizen's Input -None • proftt use would require approval by • profit uch as fund raisers require approval from Council. City has - right to reject any and all bids. T lictober 16, 1989 ■ I . Disc��ssion. allowgill • Policy Board to review since thit r♦ rd does exist. This would give them the •••• to ,�pprove or disapprove proposed checommended by the Park Board, anges Candidate For •• :•sd • r• • ♦ • McNeill as s candidate for Appraisal• • • ••r Councilmanby Councilman Shaw, Motion carried with one no vote 94 (11.) Any Other Such Matters: 1laoir• •IZFJLJLL JL L ITFJLJLj#JI- II #WX�A4 on Friday afternoon, which was too late to include in the agenda. • thoroughly review• Discussion. capacity. Throughout.. year, repairsbe doa1_ Idober Ili 1989 i ?age vhich would be serving as our community's liaison. epresentatives need to be appointed by the 21st. {, , names { to pleasef .,know by Vednesday or ♦S received from Dan Morales StateRepresentative concerning state to reimburse local units of governments for all costs incurred in implementing state imposed mandates. •:.. Awareness ... . ..:.. Week. IpIrpajam 11. (10.) Consider and Possible Action on Appointment of City Attorney. needed to handle personnel problems, Motion carried. 12. city Administration Report; month.at least a Octobereffective 9 that will be conducted in Houston concerning Grant Application f•r Industrial Development, .next meeting he will adviseregarding this seminar. �..:1 t.}`it .I. #�•1�....f �.:i ?ti 7."'�"i �F'lYl #�.'.#yf ..(..'_f .. _ > `-'- 1_t„ I J�� _��, ;� is _JC'iu��.? `_): �1?f'•'��„'?`::� r.:::l`�lc=.�'tiE�:i''�#(";1•' #=�1_ll'•.#'i:; (:1(:i i:;:t'.?:i i t:#:i'•[ k"Ezi#-�'#.:C:�:(:: #'i.1Ct11.J;� l�;tJn SJ�:J i_,�.; '=' #��:�� #'�##:ll"L: G-'[=i'`4'tril�::!`�'T ._.. tr_;`I'Il '1"E:� F #'��„ l;i:.n (I.�:#''•�.il-:�F:#='hC��:�N..; t14 #.,, � .#.S'4't'.-,�� "i ..!.:�� i G �' t�•# f � F:'. F-i L. ! =' i_a t�.# � i F t_iR C=;#::I:C�##: FF^sf... i�a:. i::a-•i#=?`=�: '�:,s `:�#-;,, L i�J'� (..j >' ,�.}„ �;•.::, (::if:�:I;!#�:.1={t:a#... i=lJ#;#i�7 __ `_i„ i:�k';,, ,.-:.t�� i #_i-_.#='t-1 (�� �l-it=#f-ll'•.# ; ,•r.,•„ r �... i;11'i 1 Uir ` DHh Dig 1;' :lLN CTf.:COUN I I-,'H'T H L.S L. 1 .T HID OF 1 1 .11 O'T' / :': ' 911 618 u 1 t ) I I.TV101 CE AMOUNT D 1 SCCIL1NT 1::,043t)9 lilt_ DI'S F i:r-a.Ji TON +'I t;}`roo %C.NT'OR TOTAL J{�} ��i1�7� �� C(:i L_t°d�.t 1. r=tCar,.lt�f✓i`'T i's"`a!_ }) i SPOISAL. OF t :t�iPAF:1 T 0?E S & DRUf'i1c; [Ij." a_:i N i APii 1 I'���TE-%} 01 t.. VE r�llkf -i F TOTAL. `: 42 o 0 14it} tilt�Ff't��.t;t"i1'�i }�>��I'l', i �(! 1L1 i� �.aaFt�`u /1..}1'aiRl�:itJTiOnl +i:'ni}ti}{} isi;ain';C} I' F S ,t'i:TF 1 t : HOT 5; ! I I"`:= 1iLf�lliFtE'T f;:Nl� N 1 SsTSF�S; P, S;} FA)El S "E N1)0R !'0TF E_ S'�0 n 9Q u _ _�, t }t,a E:i�-il'rtC Fi ��• I F-il'`I_.i_IR I�:i {trjC�(�r�l;f iill_ E)%'STT R,*B J'i I( jll 4Td-,,n i}�L'tea{) L".100I' VENDOR i„ i.ar;-! 0 LI NDF ILL COYE'F' ClCllfn 17 AND 2411I I, Ct'T cci i TV t'n `l flT n `:,*[i t-:-` '}�"'�:�(} I..�.f •IT i{I iL. I S.I...I" 1—'11i_ir�l:. I.�I_)n [i/I._ :D I STR i tiU i l 0h•I 4 ds 3„ I__1=iT (TEt WiTS:E�:1fi!_ ADDING JACKS I="UH F',S';` PFii NFL IER; ,, PI?'[wICE,AMi (L-iIL DIS;TRI BUT ICIN 4u�,v1F C'l G E R Ii.S Fafl,:ilil tviC'i'„ 1,74t NOVn 1,:: L/D t3EPTu t:CTa VI>;t'TI)0F' TC)TA1_. ' 1 E C,1 .— Crt�} (�;1-}(_=trli...1.15; i='I�C7L7(_11�T'S� ItJC:_ Cj.fL I1i'SiR1AU'T I AT t}8() 0 t:; i:_;{_a WATT A— E"1 I_F'r. " SPECIAL. SERVICE CR FRI IGH F:, I �:ai_, l.:I—Ih'arrl:-;�EIF?l`.i-I T3iC:n C,7 ,. Iti"�J�C. C::i f Y C1F ZD H N Uo) L. r, r?M'EN I-HY OL,;: L,IE(T:CfwgU -iii 01. 11.% 4_!t�.`f�i''.e'} f VC! I GE C tz1L�[LiNor D i C;Cif !f~f l iii' {'�t;i11lIC[t.f iti `;ri _v_„'i'(:i f s�El:!ryIIT C;;�UQ (iid E(ILl.. 1.;a'—'?ii'i:,' 1tIf_.f— >,C:t.i_iRE r_tf•[�TEME1wtAT `#-_ ta•`.:r(fi:r C€,•f� J'i ti�.f I TC�F: i (�L_ `�f_l�'�'L.. i E'` P04394 ff:.'3a Uf�TNAI_ TLCE1:K, SINGLEECAA rtlM f[VENDOR TOTAL. C fL I!Iy I'LrIItl,I'f t'_'lj•1 '(1 _'� isM, )0 NOV. FZE��IPL. OF [:ImKE MivIC�HINE VI�aYiI)CI�: TC1�TC��L. �'`:.=�t:ri:r i�+:if'•fal_11�1Ei'�: ifv��[—[(�C��, J „ vU t Cr„ i]t:i f �'l_ 1:7I!3"i'� IC11_tI'II_IfJ (rr (='F�f "f i<i:IF't- TC11t F"l_E rr, } ` to ECi�t UPPER T(:Ihf iY F:I L„ 4a;=i'if F I)IE,�.RIC-j. VLyI'�.f L)OR ! t0T"tL. 17 `:1F•,.-� R f._. L, t S E ELL1C71=t1=. t".1} ':. 'v { _.. c.t(_)�1. lh�.:-�.� I—[..tcr�.as a.t, � r•[_:,. '�P ,. 01.: Tj)IFDAJ 1. N �i E.1.„ i,f;tiii ii ' _ A JF• l :[IiiCltf'3 FOR MAIN Cf�Il=°f_1TC)F: itliffl Ff-ONT i�t'•f'ii 1'10L_LCi<'F:ih1TEF: +�E14I1r1_ii4' 1'1=i•1"C31 f`• e'd�#., I`:! I�t:::r•1iis�'�1 t•E:r,rLr-r��IL i�1='I�'t='i�I;::,r1f_ i!Is_:.T, i`= f`'y_ILi•[�4"54,) r!i.:l :, C1 `t '1 11--4 I C.F Tt�x :.- i ATE160"fd i Ci AND kl:EC;I=::i kJ I r .fin 1.._it7t )i i CITY O t,( t1 j'I:ihd; i�C:i;,`„ t,Jt,Y F't��f=i4� CiF�'E:ha 1 i'�i o l?'irr ,•1:� L j[ Cl€ 't ft1 L,L.Uli(\T E<'H I t=? tL L L. I b I I i`;C; AS OF 74 Aj f Vs_.11i_:[:. (•?Itii!_d_!f`u I )_}1 1L:tJ11It E,!f-?1 _F j � ... j i';',_ji,;t.; �'ti;f'� 1 �_IC',f I��_la L:.�_i..t.� I I�:I,I-••f_t{—'n � €\�(.. n a 47 L 'TRiE_�i A-, `CIG/L 3li•n {_? 131 4 •r` a CLi1�-I DUCK "a L7iP !A11f\ SERVICE !!-C_F'( a . _1E1 45 it 40 f !l_ D;IS T R;LBUT111H 4r,; bn 05C)C) t,r7a 4C} I,. MEET L.T=-I� e!l:_-d? At� SANGERiA�CC� �1 �— [:.'.4• I1_.-. , J._I : i_�/il _-:: It _5 wq 0 ; ,r_i 1 _. „ !-; I.-. i1:;T(:1B117 iC)Cj 4 j., Ct Cs{; *_t "I i<:L:E:"i E_.1'=;1!'i L=;i T=iCiLl1 L_,n.f,�i� !..T)Dr t:ia It! 1-ia f''n is r,rlt i1 `L i}1.,-,"f R { Fit_!T i ON f•� 3„ i_!rt,Ji_J t-_t8n i-:C) CLAE I R1 L.1 L' I u,1(a I 10 C, a VENDOR TO i t"?E_. ; :7'�a i} - c?—• � ,-;t;)t:)i:; I�)R"C�ITi:Jt\( C;Cia l::f�lt+lt�`i1_!f'�J T. Cf�'I T i1F,}�_, liTirlRll:tlJ('i1C\I ' 1_n T.'iitC; 1,oik,5 F+ �GYE AND RVit1;11 r, F? I R .1 J'�r'►-- IBUT f1:.N `iA422rC)30i) �Jai.t("J RL.t I R CC}t�TTRCIL_ V1EiAD 0V-4 t Fi ti)1i[ �'CiLIiL�1t_� CONTROL n .a VENDOR TOTAL 1 ?' is `,{) Cl-- C:i�t1_lt�T•T•\f L_Ay 1_;L3'f L CF', ri1 L-Clt�(Pd7:�: )ETC; ,ETT" VVENi.ii_7R TOTAL C){? i:rSs-:;;i:} Dk=.N"tt:?hd ct.iC;tIrsT TT,tiE1.: FI/L DIS)TRTl31_iTii) 4i'�,iiaQU i}(") URE 4,'CE'df)CJFi: -T Cl"I"��L_ �;a e) J:i _- ��. Ir', C'c:,i�J !' �. ('1!'`f (J�l L7 1�1.i `T 11 F'tt;RT•`.� i.; L i)1':js I R f i_#1!"I 1 UN if, 1'Ja i:) i it;;S 1 '1 a :1 i G/L Df3TRIT:-3ITfOt\i 41.3a ):;C}i) is i.a8,i t3D' JJ;:{ F'L.LIKA4 [=OL_IC;[=: IRVIOCK'�,a HU41L:i=�'Y t-?td%t J1T1iE=R h'i1LtC = tJiy C:I T'`i OF ;;ANGER OPEN AC:+.:;):7rJ!`MS Flt i`t•f-lbt_t I_ +. 4.1-; i 1 NIJ ft tJ°E:r�i�i�r-z ;•�F::rai�i.,r=: raf=�t'�i_: �ra�;c,r.r_:F� f-�r'�c��fsra��r.�=��.;�_a(_r�ir �:il='i�.ra �TRIi_{U1110N 4 1, f)'3t:}0 1= 19 s-3PARP', f='L.L1L WFIE DEATr= R VF:. gDC.,R 1 u f HL, .t a 7= .°,El „ f.}!) 157u __ - - E,�4•'��;i E;r7i~'i-)-iYE�RE rdrl•T"ICti�l�al_ 1'rtC_�= f�:f�= -- 4405 iz?1._ D113 R!,18IITiI. N +: on if_,()tl I IT,- it f �hdi F: u`' ��F�i 4', '€ F'L( LraDCtF.�,E;lt'I�r� i t �(_lhil=tEr 5 .i GA. 4 8zC1C:;t; Fif T B9 f::_; I FAMIllpf.I_L. REPORT n n JL:I'f!_)f_ER TOTAL 00 `:i'- l t�� jt i() 'i--t`•IjJi- r�1:?�i ��=f-i}_� I�I::.li���'}-lra`t� c)tj Ita 43 i= t} ;C;t} '.=',ii, t}t} � ,R.O ='ANE F FIR FIC114C:F-I(,I AlN ;. p(l1}1:;;A 1 c!i„ tic) o(I) RIBUIIi_Jta �.=;i=i:;:.,c?c) ;:` ,oc} PRCIr'ANTE.. F'CIR PIA C:i-1rr1(lN t'l ND0 TOTAL Cr;c) „Cit) 7v' t)C^} ?'+� 1 lc;c) F}f �� P. J C:C?NC*R'ETE C;t71'1C'ANY •J: 41ii}i', tea..}(`,'i:.} t..?t.) i-!{;7� Jt,'t G L, 01.1 R T BI IT I 0N 4 1= 0=;("}c) ?0 = 5t=} I_{F, r'st:?iaT'IIC�i'aAL C:C�I'dC':RETE. AT Co D BOL.IVER !;;'L i�I°}iRlltLi'TIC�r� 4.,1.=t�E(:)c; 5 `i:i} r':LiraC;F:E. T E. Al F!rdia 9• BOL.IVE::R G L_ 1?I'=1'T'RIBtJT I 35 1= t'}` i)c) ' c•t-} I ' D /! L i 11 E �f= C:AN kv)ENY) 0Rl 1413TAL E, 19 Et } n <ic} (,1'=), EEC} IV. . C-1 l.jy G/J. DI i'RI.Fy;IIT%(lt! %;:3;:;= 1.t: it) G le ENTON C Ou I l4.- F e i:.)Z ~PIT m 1JI-10NE L I. i!E: VENDOR T 04fa F1L 15E,= Rr, „ t')C) 56= FiAC i-I c:OMr'AriY •;c j-.'CI!}ta,7:",r! /?�:!„ Et`=) „ t;t,) `;•v.:= r4`�i _ 1" ~ -- ha - "} tit:} VLi�DOR .� CI T AI... :�.F:o 4'i „ t;c; 't2_'n 49 GG= Kr. -if=iLL. C CA, E_ I I Ur- :;r HUIC-r t;C-=i�EL?Ct�t `-'Fttll�)E:E1=; t�Et�l;il: E:1! .-1�'UY TN HCF(�H '�a NU vFi I r'F t ttIt_HINT D I SC11Ilh•1T 1 l"-1IL. DISTRIBUTION 447:3, 0200 — LAFZGE t='1=1:!`,I! L01HIL.IDREN''•"_ DCh WDI ;?EmL?i �fi TCi •'r,' is j 0`) ._ � f�.r; to/L DISITRIBUTIPON 44/st 07t;O LJRKDONE LDN' FLOW RATES AT R PLANT VENDEM TOTAL G/L DInTRI'BUTIF�t! i`;r UIN CLEAN C3{=FOSOL. R• I:EPPINC]i 1~'Ci46 i +m / 1._ i r l: 'B T (; 'i' B Ul ION 415 3t-lI F1 ORE SOLVENT VENDOR T C+' f <<L . Pw .E •iC.:: i�)I�) (,}('t c_l o /,,;I L_ Dl;:, i R1.ilJil�lt'.i c�" i?'._iii 111 51 1?fl_ I)I':nt Fi'11;1_ll 101\1 f, 7,7�' ._�8{?ii `i'j i)rr ±!Gl i_;L14'(r!I FcE:,, Fil fT'ia1 t U'y SLt=:I,i-iEF;4 fit,=' NEUTRAL l-JEirIF tr' 'i=;E:r' I.�F Fit'':> 4 ::,; i i;a[�r, =' Of (1 401 CFiNINECTORS 4lLC)7 68 CK"I l=fl::t_E.. jtd'`EN'UL.I~t'E•� RS, i='If`,1 INE'll.ILATt�1R !1EID t'C+f__E i't�1'' �.'i)i i=: !'If'IS VFkpnR TCiTAL 'W 861 a 0,6 I_.A?`:l ENE-+_+i\+_,i_1r1FN l c�Y:"iTk'.M17 IN( �la G/L DICTEdIBUT,Oki +1.1}i_?:at_rt_) 316� 43 1E50 VOLUNTARY STPITFMI::.�i T F+:.lt�'.t� L11�1DEl� t=iF•'.fi�hL;T t�� SI�II'�'II�F VENDOR TC1T`Ali,, ;�;t��� 45 i:? LUT1O7`I;3 NEWSPAPER, INC Gi'L IIiyTT?ILii_l'T ICIN �'t;^;i-1, (:a1 UQ ask), i::ic:) L_L�CTI �1Et F:kE�' ; ` t UE'=y [T:F'j _ /Ec:f VENDOR TOTALw,i), i"aii I_+?h!(=. ,=;`f't�h� f�t�,:; F:t�l4 C1�'F:ta rvP,irirC, �c,e ir�a t�;A I Y LJE ZDHNLai,� R CJ/L D17sF 1BUT I011 {:,tri 3 f 1! L I B F`fI I-i `r'" =flvl HCUUILJIN (v e'H I HbL.{: L z`:;i'. NLvj i r�Vt_G _i L:E I it'{0LJN T I �E;C ILINT VL:i',�C?CJR TCs i tiL .';.z _- i"i'';�r }..?t..? L Ltld(=: �=, 1•{`1R �'I't �i. LiT ihl jar G/L DISTRIBUTION ._E E+CG;{ E:S; C4,41T.5 RTA i I ON{`tRY i::N?d}Fl..LiPF',S t 4 J! DIS I itiIBU4T410N B/L. L:? 1 i l I BUl I Cl1\1 Galt 01STR14BUT1Oki - (_�/t_ I:?ILSI"IlIBJT i0 kI G11L DP3I*R. IElUTT0N Ci!L L?.t {RIT't_I�! 1�JN t15iC:? [JAL 'UNLEADE.J) GASOLINE . '�11� 4.'-FtJt) (y;lo 0,,i t_} , t_) t ) ;?it=:•- ::�:�Ir��;=�t:, i`it=?'i it�hdt=�l_. 1= If?;:. F'F�GTE:_C i ItJt•� Jt.: ;TR1:E4t_t`(Tt.11`! I1t`)i? 8(.J F I RE I`'RP.Vo- I J�.t_ K r'Jt_t i r -' i / t ? t :t- t-'t VENDOR TOTAL i L i= 5 OSBORNES E�IEY't=if? Gm? 1iifliRJrd IrfsT''taut i='I i; i:t;L11'ICJt.I 4t.:�4'e ?.' I. Z E=:R:J 'Tt=iPE E'L:IR DRUM,, ,, D T k:? I NG TO BE:. SHOWN AT L;L:HL OLS VENDOR 7140 H*ii i „ 5 . TI�tl4Tlalt_tION 4E.4= 1 co VISE AND `J i'J Al R I-It_1rL VENDOR TOT 11jw�;`; DOG FOOD FSO�Ll: i }tj u �JE `c.IiJ rt ci c�v t-c1 C,, 1. i I Ur HP•IR:IL: rt VF=I'dTTi_IR '��Fr�aliCiR i�d�3trt;L= 014I 1�1 AC.,bC niL r*11'r r11'fHOL.1a L I =; I I NO I NV I I CIE i-((r1i_J(_(Id ( D I E�`COLI1`••1T I`d11l::il Ti_TC-11.._ t_C)n t Ct rk tt:,1 f V �tC:1�a ��-F._ _•„r•-,� r-:'rr-R1C.{� "l�r�("a1.Ll�r�, i=(r��) r�11=t'aa C1t'L DIS4TRtI`,UTIUN 4 1, 9 {18t_)0 ), + IRON ;-'Li=iir FOR TR(ITLH HITCH t•`F=ND Et TOTAL. f.:q_i_j'`t'�'t 7t}p {}7 ;;jC} '}.{11 }n ()t) , i tl l k'{iCi1�1't l `� R. WiP!RANT`!' S . VENDOR T U'tAI_. [), {_)(_) i•;�'.._' �°:i)�;{:) F�F's-1Ci i I•,Tt iF':fiC1L(F?[::;E:'�: G/L e 1"SilRINBLV ION =t7..;nt;)-t,0s) =t_)F,k ,.4 (3 PAVIE:RIBACJ{-:. Yli(iitl[=i ADULT 1-1090 iF VEINL)0R T0TAI._ :;i)tr,,, '4 tit.) ;;i)j:, 4•i;- } 3,-- � —1,-? i f) F{ (-1_,I,'=! (•' 1. R�� T. L..) I`=IE'. c�f1(_(I i-I �1t_: ( I-'[�i._;,f,_�' f"`o- C_.J t_1 t_7 t f;=n C.. •_f .. i n i_{IL_ D1STR1.fiUTTt(h`I7G� i� 5 flfYl[:3KI= ;;[Cirfit `. Ft_lFt TRAINING VF:NI E,R, i () ( F?L, C.j { )t) ,�; !} _ �'��.-;�){�) R 1: i F�•_tj�'L.Ii .�;i.11='I='1_Y 1 P•1rr a I}I 7'I'iz;:1ttJ"i 1Uri !+ 1n 1 i:)(:) 1.i)n`J0 G/L DIIS)l RIBU ( IOs''t WE C, 1 I_. ]DISTRIBUTION C r n 1 i {..! {_} G a `s i VL_ r I)CI F I.01" fIL . 1 r n .4)7 n (x) 18 n . ; 7 :. �,_!._. e�.�J._�t!i,? r:,(llJ-ill �.[._[z1-'i i'�`5 }} ,: i'i�1lFt,=!�„)':,} .A i L.�:'`iJn !}�_) „ i�.)i..) .i. q L.�• �..'.y ='}ti G L I) 1 f3j R I Ell _I..I. I, IN 427o- C)i;()t;) 1 q 2. ;a .'t•t-} 1 .t!`4 i''iFTF_F KE; i 4" H}"(" D FCIR. ry11::Ti::F; AT MIDDLE SC,I'IOOL. VENDOR TO }"AI_ 1 q ;=:.;: %;.t!) „ {::)C) 1 )_':'`• ;r 40 r;.6, C;i�ft) GANGEFtCIT%: OF C !I_ 1)1`�;'I•RI�UF10k 4 Ec_'n C:)c°iiC) I;4 9�� C=ii1. DI=�iRID[Ui ICird t iL- DISTRIBUTION 44c�n 04t?C) 11 n P7 ; G/L D1'STR19tJT 10N 4• 4 te)t�:,0 1.q `J,;;i:iF'v46 Fill F)IP;TF,11T I FIN tF"t4 C)i'(')0 ;=' a 8 E,/ i_ l l I iT'!1' L:{t i i If it%! C / L. i} I. '�Ept10 R 11:19I i"i 'F 01v1 0 t_. D1"'',3ofRIDL++ ICHN `iL_RVICE I1__I 10/15/6'D VL hiC)Cil: VE.fdl:}I::IEi r�!'=iPf11 CII)EN C—iCL;O1NPoo E; PHY'AR.F L-.I!�1INI I NVCI I CE {=JhiC{+Jh� i" D l "Mi_+N },/' •.', i.l �}t_J f_) ;'J f1{',y j_I�1"t .1 Ei. l.'J til l I -�� :. lift 3'' `4 fa/L.. .»I1f'IFU'Ili�f! !„t)(f1C) „i:4' ;i1''L•:[NC-E f-CIE' SEW:t.'. FIL(IN'i' I )[:hILaC1R (C€ f3L „'r' 4 „tit) :l IQ G/L 1)I;;IFi�.` L ICIhI %)1.`:�n ii't;fi :)fa,, _',:, PIS+., U.tr-` ALARM AND III It to C;i I p�} 1l I.�...IVI at_)L' +L{14'iI._ 3 6n 1.'3 n t-fit_) w..o In L.:.J ^ G,/1_ DI':,TRJ,BUT10N 4 ;_n(0)r;C)C) Fta._;� 'JI. AND 151JAP & D I SPE.NE,ER AND L tiE. I GI-R C;HGot IG/`1_ L�IIS Rli{+.� 1 ION 442n Li-�t.)tt if„ !.{.t.a i=REIGHT CHARGE Ciil,%L`r' FOR PASIT ORDER V{.ND0R 1CII+C{L. I()Or. /rel t.at_a ttat)n r l :30 `l{•i 0C)0 Soo I Tlf-1 S:) C:0+ lNT'IRY 'zi I CIREe . 4 a`:;'=: ��;_',, 85 to ta(..) 1=1 wDISITUBUTION .,:—„ t.',7 vita Ilt -} L_ 00 - n v.. - .. �, / I_ `%T ta! RIi{I�4 ICJt\f T�.1n'?It to, •�'� 1. ((�� t� /(3 t.lral_. t.�EwR C�/L.. 1_�I iTRIi.{+_1T'IiJri 4u nCis3 n r_ ?3" i=iD STL.F`L`l ECIR RFMFDI?EL oI %/1... :D1CIRIBU1 i101\1 4'.1nC) ii}Ca „'34 1-I I I_ C Lt f=' i hl`h !i'w'rl C j tar% C:1 n G/ l_ E 1 I R1. t.lj1j To ON 41 :n 05t.i0 ::'1n (:/L 1_11..;1 RIE.IIITI CahI ! _„ taC;(}ta�i t:.i/o CCIMa 1{. C'` i,_a i-` to S_} (_a a S, ] t_} looA S': n tom) t„a G/"L,. 13I'3I'RIDUT 10N +31 0500 to aC) n GiL DfSTRIBU1.il�N 44�.'„t,a`_;CiCi :t„Cat:) G!L >):L`i4'Rli+lJi;.iar�i ';Ic:nCa [aii „iIo 11-1I_iR T A RE i-o FIN Pf—i'El: I B, I L L..S/I i-11_i-iE:�."_'� 'r� 7 •_; t_) 4 i�15 413 6 5 .t IiF '_ 1hfC;ER CII�'t::N ACCIs1_IINII` F'f�'r'i+Rti_.t= t_1C F1:F t'HU1= .7 t=d ; O 1 1/ 2i,c,,rs 9s, 1.a10 .Y 1)L TE AND NUPET FC+R LAWN MOWER .El G/ L L J. `.:7 1% I .Iit J T I O[-%l TtC1L`rt; ANM NUPF(S FOR r4,`T{ E"ET SIGNIi 1. i((�_�1�� 1n 05700 t GFk F., 0.5 ltEtt1I}OR TO0111=IL. "..-:! - "'+•�=`.`�t)i:? :�I�JF-iC' �!-iC1}�' ��iRC1CG:R`r' i-'t_I, s 7 El C, 400 txE_LF OFF :BUG BF'R(=Y FOR r:FiLL. AT L.iiNDFIf_L.. VLI'JDOR TOTAL, 1l, 9 7 GSRt-1F'L;, R.A'sa` NO TO DRUG PENCILS FOR C;i=1h1GER SCHOOLS UPS CHGE 'JtrNia?OR TOTAL 95v i F� 1�/i._ D TR'IBUi'I(_ti.1 f—+.=C, C?c'teat:? ::_1.J1F. 4C•RIPT10N ?L:t,1LYOR TOTAL '+2925 ._ 14rl-1'i~ t=' 1 Etl::i+!AN ;., I"1ARSi11(=rl. _ t�I�fnitJi=TL i:JL.if�ts i1L:!'•1DUH TOTAL. 1 1 �ru t.Yi�Y 115o00 t,ji�a o „ tYtY t_Yi;Y t,1.Y f=:, i-s•`=* (-)i_J%Y I Cri Gj l: Fli d f I `ST F;: 11�+ir_'1'T is Qtd �+'+ 1 t:? 2t'ai_Y ! ��2 e 7 I u (( r' 4 (( lid:. pFt 1. 4': CL. EAt�.� /r'yyletl NG 0t'tf L �"}1__.R S it VE.r!1.?OR TOTAL L Le l r t.?t.? 1 L'_:u 17 .t « /#�+,.cis? L+ralj 1 R`:,r �_�tr,r�t='17f�E'IT�.t._Ittf i /L D113TRllUTION '=rr4 45 iiC;00 a„ °�t,Y •Fr C`t"J=iw'.���';;� i'.'Gra f)t„YGr, Oo C/L_ FaI`:3TRit,l.lTlOti 4;';4o tat,t:ara R t, 00 UNIF=C)RM REN T AI. J P, VC.t' NOR TOTAL o :+`,4,Y()i) l E ,f I' Iti?=T t'R :') El ER f ,u rIF riPlNGEF%' UF'EN i=tC;CUUN I D PF,'''HH1.L L_ I On 1 .1 NG 1,"HUE: I C) VENDOR VENDOR NAME I 1OAVO I CE AMOUNT I)ISC:UUNT t PE'N �• -r..°,7�:i �'°4n �{:r � C)t;j r�';tt., ,air G/L. DISTRIBUTION 7n{:)600 c:A+r„ () ",` 1 'D 'ii_._,..�.i••G� C:SS I_'MA s G f.r... a -J1=LIN�� Fihi'fi w a' VALVES �ii�I�E: ., .. �-�. ,� I(_'.AS F'Ui_)OF 1CAL 'ciUBD)VISOI(IN;� ?G/L iJ1S11RIM.1OF rUN 4C)7,(11 [ i`i_ D1Elm T RII'I_I•I I I_IE\, 4{_?; C)300 ,_ n „,, L [:)IC: Fi1:1` T101\1 4(:)7a0/;-00 I`.� „BCr G/L DISTRIBUT 10`1vl `I0In IIC)o ='C _:�i G/L1i1S11RIF4UTICIN 4(. ()500 ,I +U {:)9 -. f It DIC_iI I Fat' IBUOF*10 N 4C)7 t'rC,{r{) n.B7d ` '1 , 1;;`i-_ D It.,i'RI1N;4)! ;.flN +{?f 38a 70 Gr`L. 1):L;�'IIRII::.t.11! IUN y.C)7, C)8, C)Ca �'{=?{,� rfr G/I_. D I .;IFR I BUT I0N 407n 1200 82)u 4�' 1*11ETF Of ON `f(_)(,C94(a)) (•r: tIBU .may Iw:�IE1F 1:Ne VE:C� NCI R Ti E UIL.. 1 c' 7`; C)Cr c 51,2 7 5 r. a 5 ;... 4 , 71. { f i 1 f I S CoiENE.RAL 11B,14 0Rt= iC) NOTEE;OO ~ DIVIDER Ell 01.. i)t'C)i:) L.1r Si.:=iP(`i.l•\!`C IA I::TRIBUT ION 43.°;, 1600 LONG DIS IO7NEON it 581-4 59 j t.�[:rd1iUR TOTAL t r,�3 [ {:)(�) �=�c rr L.,,, n. d t=, �, -- r�st.)l.);J (AlI. r- VERt'IC�. F: �...1l CU�'[YP .S'�111J{={I... r.'r � 7 I . f 140, t:}{:) C){:) 1 ,.0 )o c)} ) . i /L DISTRIBUIFIUN 4111,t:}3;)c) 1.4 {=)C) URFs 'SE ftL:MCiV R FOR PATCHMA'N VENDOR TUIfCIL .14(1)_ C){:) (C) 1111,C), 00 t:)C) VI.KING UFF If OE PRODUCTS I [ /L... I T R I B U F I0N IIn I`flv(OO) iUIE" NUMBE:RIriC; MACHINE INK v / r•- +;/L_ iil5ll ii!fT.r.cN 41.1 I.r,OO 57=356 a' QUARTZ Z t_.L_OCV%S lv 'U4viF7 rD7e 4tt {:.?C) 7a 41 . o r i L. D i, .E : I BI_rr !.+IN 411 1 C)C) 1 48 ALITOMATI+:: Ni ffFIRERING n'11'=ir::f- klE FOR Gn C.:e PACKETS, SHEETS Vtt�i1iC71 {,'F't�11�CJR i�(f-+11t�' iWEPLN AiwCrJf_1N1' i-'fa`,rAb(._t L_!-'�j`I1:tNIL-] AEA' OF 11�'ta;_ l2,`n+ 9 1 ifs" 10 l: h�VO 1 tar: AMOUNT 'D T 13C+ DINT G/L 1 P1w1TR11.*UT10N 439't_?1Ca:a 1:3i.„'`1:_; CT T'i E,EC RETAh`Y E:Q1_11:A T iC:IIAL. REFERENCES FOR C;L+= SS VENDOR TO i AI... 13 1 n 9 5 ;�•,/j,.._ riik.tai�a !�fE::�'iC+J L:i-iL.tJC;I:l�.1c. Ii=!1JIC'rlr:l�l'T' i�;fJn 4;r1 1L'.iai 1:+r'1_ 1�I TRi ,i!T 1C1h,1 „[a't0 1.t:4r}a',Ci RL.PAI TO F:IHI."„ HEAD H!' C,EMER VJU.INT f_t R:[NG E5F.-T, Lipr-:,nR s i:F'V.iCF -'ltla :1.1 IJt='F.'.ttl [3/1. DISTRIBUTION 'al i ii.`;00 5"}2•.3a 44 a r+t`iE4 AS1'Ei[;UL. T Elu'C MI `r COLE:} LAY Vl."_lyDOR TOTAL `i"`'i- ,JC3n +_all_ � 11-,i l R11:i(J I !ON {,44 {j'32 Ca 1{.5a (aC) El1 I Lin;-'01 INN tlE:hlt?r+E, TOTAL. 45a 0(::1 45„ [?C) C;7—• .:ii';-I:-�i:)'��a i�!'it_L.I.f��tri.'' TI:`u`iT'ihlf�! L.i=�c� I r'I._ CliCi'C?sii1JT:Ctta44r„07iiCi 1 GO,00 ;;E'lh1EP (=1NAL`orSP3 VEt`J??t=fE: TCriFil_. 1 F,t';n tat; l�/L D ISTI"tIBUTIC'M c- 4C,1„(_a_!I a(} cr r_r Isr ._}r, i 1 I DLi(�'li �' E t. . i f it.: L'`, rth":;1; 1 EI✓LL. l-thll.f t'� 1 {`_E VE'.Nt.?f_1I : TOTAL I AL ! 1.5G1 5F5 „ (.)C a tr:j, i-: •�Fq 'e�•Jila 1 !�} �• Ijrri_. �_1E:.L-'f�iC•:�ihEtitj•�j::t G T RAT I ON L i BRAF;t' POL.•LL:C: _ 1gCI nnJ.aa } Sr I�FF T c; ? 1 xt;1C; I!A1' K S `3 Es n tic Public Words Adm. _1.Ci =3 j; Vehicle Plaint, (GAF I;2, .3c an41 Mayor & Council (G.F.) i14 C i-z� oO 1�Iayor & Council (E.F.) i �J Es Administration (E.F.) 7.G, Sullivan Sr. Ctr. 1P 1G1.7 ;. Vehicle Maint. (E.F.) :,t, ,;9, .1 r MEMORANDUM #367 T0: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF SANGER P. 0. BOX 578 SANGER, TEXAS 76266 Honorable Mayor &Members of the City Council John Hamilton, City Manager o of November 3, 1989 Request from George McCracken Mr. George McCracken, owner of George's Texaco Service Station, has requested to address the Council concerning police service, JH:es CITY OF SANGER P. 0. BOX 578 SANGER, TEXAS 76266 MEMORANDUM #374 TO: Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council FROM: Jahn Hamilton, City Manager IT DATE: November 3, 1989 SUBJECT: Proposed Changes in Community Center Rules and Regulations The Community Center Policy Committee scheduled for 7 p, m., Thursday, November 2nd, failed to produce a quorum. Four members of the Committee who did contact the City recommended disbanding their committee and empowering the Parks Board to oversee the Community Center. They also expressed concerns that the Wednesday Study Club should be in some way involved with policies affecting the Community Center. Members of the Park Hoard will be present to again present their recommended changes. JH:es CITY OF SANGER P. O. BOX 578 SANGER, TEXAS 76266 . OCTOBER 26, 1959 LI311:4D BELOW ARE THE CURRENT SANGER PARRS BOAfiD ]�4E /1BElS: NAl'�rIE TERM J. W.:Fiuc:klew Place 2 2U1 Kathryn 6/(ICl/89-Ci/30/C1Ci Sanger, TX 76266 Pegt;y Sanfur•a Place �l 301 N. 5th Street. 7/3/0977/3/91. Sanger, TX 76266 Mrs. Kamznie Patten Place 6 P. 0. Hex 51 Sanger, TX 76266 Burl Bcxttz•land Place 3 C117 Kc>aion Rat 7/3/8C1-7/3/C►1 Sanger, TX 76266 Bill Avlt~Clt�iian, Niiliistez� Place 1 1U1 N. nth St, 7/3/C1tl-7/4t/91 Sanger, TX 76266 De17t7ie Sninclle Place S ZCICI DianFx L)z•, 7/Li/Cl9-7/3/91 Sanger, TX 76266 Rtrth McGuffin Place 7 211 Dian`' Dr, 7/3/6c1-7/3/t11 Sanger, TX 76266 :�S t�ITY OF BANGER COMMUNITY CENTER USER PERMIT, TERMS, CONDITIONS The PERMITTER, this being the CITY OF BANGER, hereby entfo' the a permit -arrangement with the USER, use of Community Center under the following stipulations: PROGRAM, ACTIVITY OR EVENT: DATE(S) OF USE: TIME OF DAY: USER CLASSIFICATION: FEE: DEPOSIT: 1} The IjtSER agrees t11s�t in its use of said facility it will indemnify and hold harmless the PERMITTER from any and all neglect or rriisronduct on the part of anyone representing and/or in the employ of the USER. 2) The USER agrees that in its use of said facility it will indemnify and hold harmless the PERMITTER frorn all personal injury, and/or property damage arising from its use of said facility. 3) Extraordinary custodial services, those required in addition to tl:►at which the PERMITTER routinely provides, are to be incurred by tYie USER. This implies leaving said facility in the state it was in prior to usage by the USER. q) N 0 alcohol may be served, consumed or even in the possession of the USER or anyone connected with the USER'S use of said facility and surrovinding premises as per City Ordinance Not 7�)-2. Thank you for not smoking in the building•. The USER agrees to use said facility only for the intents acid purposes specified in this permit• g.) Any other conditions not listed here which rart3 part of the established Rules and Regulations governing the use of t.lhe Community Center do apply to the USER and usage of sadd facility as set forth in this permit arrangement. It. is the resl7onsibility and burden of the USER to become knowledgeable of these other conditions and be in total compliance. CC AGREEMENT -)AGE ? ?) If the USER at any time fails to comply with any of the above terms and conditions, this permit will be immediately cancellM- and with no refund of monies paid prior to cancellation. 13) The PERMITTER reserves the sole right to prFempt any scheduled programs activity, event or otherwise if need be, provided advance notice is given the USER. Cl) If USER gods c7ver` scheduled time for activity, funds tc► cov4�r additional time will be taken out of deposit. 1Gi Available Use Hours: Sunday -Thursday -- II:00 A.M. Friday - Saturday -- MICi A.M. AGREED AND SIGNED THIS DAY OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY CENTER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT t;SER REPRESENTATIVE GI�CiEiI'/,�SSOCIA.TION ADDRESS CITY ?HONE - 1z:3G A. LIc�IES t�UVER�t N THE t�S O TI-� The ftillW,vlrig policies as recorr1rr1ended by tl�e Fark Board ar�d adopted by the City Council, City of Sanger, Texas shall govern the administration and use of the Sanger Community Center. SECTION I: SCHEDULING POLICIES 1. All reservations will be made on a "first come first serve,'' oasis. 2. USERS must make resort►ations in person at the City Offices by completing an Application Form and paying the designated deposit and fees as required by the City. No reservations will be accepted by telephone. �. TYae Community Center will be leased on an hourly rate as listed below: Before 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, $15 minimum charge for 2 hours, $7.50 for ea. additional hr. A $20 kitchen use fee is in addition to the basic rate. After 5 ]7. �xi. at�:d on Saturday and Sunday, $35 minimum charge for 4 hours, $10 for• ea. additional hr. A $20 kitchen use fee is in addition to the basic rate. L>eposit required is fifty dollars ($50.00) breakage fee will be required of the USER. l. Cancellations and refunds will be handled in the fallowing manner: Refunds of the deposit arlcl rental fees will be returnecl to the USER only when cancellations are received fifteen (15) days prior to tl�e USERS scheduled activity. �,1Tllen cancellations are made less than fifteen (15) days prior to the USERS scheduled activity the 11SER shall be entitled to a refund of the breakage deposit. Refunding of the rental fee will be left to the discretion of the Designated City Employee. Refunds on the deposited breakage fee may be picked up at the City CC POLICIES PACE 2 Office three (3) working days after the scheduled activity to allow time for the Cit.y's Designated Staff to make an inspection. 5. All utility costs are included in the rental fee. There tNill be n.o additional charge to the USER for air-conditioning, lights, gas, or heat. Ei. The Community Center will not bE� leased to a USER foi• commercial activities for the purpose of selling a product or service. However, non-profit organizations may use the Community Center for fund raising activities. SECTION II: USER RtILES AND REGULATIONS 1. Represe�t7ta.tives and/oz• employees of the USED. are to concluc-t. themselves in a manner generally acceptable to the local community. 2. The tJSEI� agrees that in its use of the Community Center it will indemnify and hold harmless the PERMITTER (City of Sanger) from anv and (all neglect or misconduct on the part of anyone representing and/or in the employ of the USER. 3. The USER ag�•c�zs that in its use of the Community Center it. will indemnify and hold harmless the PERMITTER (City of Sanger) from- all personal injury and/or property damage arising; from itq iapility, �1. The Designated City Employee or any other City Employeeunder his direction shall lave the authority to stop any program, activity, or event, until the Designated City Employee's directive, written or otherwise with reference to the health, safety, and welfare of persons in the concerned Community Center, has been complied �1rit11, 5. Tlie tISt,R is to staff its own operations (program, activity or event), as well as supervise it., and its employees are to be paid solely from the USER'S resources. CC PC7LICIES PAGE 3 6. No monies are to be left at the Community Center by the USER. 7. Extra fur•nit.ur•e c7r• egLtipinent needed by the USER which the PERMITTER does not typically provide shall be obtained solely at the expense of the USER and shall be moved in and out only upon authorization by the Designated City Employee and or any other City Employee under his direction. II. All seating inside the Community Center shall be arranged to allow for free, adequate movement in and out of the Community Center. All exits are to be left clear and unobstructed. J. All ilecoratioiLs shall be of a temporary nature, easily removable, and of such a type that the Community Center will not be defaced when removed. (Note conditions specified under rule #14). 10. Any defacement by the USER of the Community Center or equipment. beyond that of normal wear shall be chargeable to the USER. 11. All decorations shall be removed immediately following a function. 12. Extraordin�uv custodial/janitorial services, tYiose r�:clulrecl in addition tq that NVALich the PERMITTER rVutirlely provides, are to be provided and Incurred by the USER. This Implies leaving thew Community Center in the state it was in prior to usage by the USER. This irtrludes removing all trash or debris from the Community Center. .13. Cooking is permitted in the Community Center, Including, the preparation of beverages or warming of prepared foods which are served hot. is permitted as long as proper, safe dispensing units are used for such, with the payment of kitchen use fee. 14. The USER shall comply with all of the most up -to -slate Fire Cosies and Standards. The maximum occupancy limit. shall be .14ti pE�.rsons CC POLICIES PAGE 3 0. No monies are to be left at the Community Center by the USER. 7. Extra. furniture oz• egttipznent needed by the USER which the PERMITTER does not typically provide shall be obtained solely �t the expense of the USER and shall be moved in and out only upon authorization by the Designated City Employee and or any other City Employee under his direction. II. All seating inside the Community Center shall be arranged to allow for free, adequate movement in and out of the Community Center. All exits are to be left clear and unobstructed, 90 All dec:oratiozLs shall be of a temporary nature, easily removable, and of such a type that the Community Center will not be defaced when removed. (Note conditions specified under rule #111). 10. An, defacement by the USER of the Community Center or ecjuipment beyond that of normal wear shall be charge:}l)le to the USER. 11. All decorations shall be removed immediately following a function. 12. Extr•aordinary custodial/janitorial services, those rc-quit ecl in CA kill try that �WThich the PERMITTER rVutinely pI VVIlAes, are to be provided and incurred by the USER. This implies knVing the Community Center in the state it was in prior to usage by the USER. This includes removing All trash or debris from the Corrinptunity Center. 13. Cooking is pertnitte:i in the Community Center, including, the preparation of beverages or warming of prepared foods which are served hot is permitted as long as proper, safe dispensing units are used for such, with the payment of kitchen use fee. I . 14. The USER shall comply with all of the most. up-to-date Fire Cosies and Stanriards. The maximum occupancy limit shall be 14tt persons t�C Ft�LICIES PAGE 4 at. one time. Temporary additions ar "decorations" shall be su},� jcct to and contingent upon final inspection and approval by the City Fire Marshall or duly authorized went. 15, i-� lizniterl number of tables and chairs will be made available to the USER. Z'lie use of this equipment will be up to thf3 sole discretion of the PERMITTER. The piano shall be locked at all times and will be availahle for public use only after special provisions have been made with. the PERMITTER. 1�, A religious group or church as a USER shall limit. its use of the Cartimunity Center to only that of a social aridlar recreational r7ature. 17. Th�� USER agrees to use the Community Center` only for• the izitezits and purposes specified 4n the request and agreements. 1(3. NtZ�1c�11o1 znr�y 17e served, cozisumed or even 1ae in the possession oi' the USER or anyone connected with the USER'S use oi' the Community Center and surrounding premises as per City nrdinarice No. 75-2, Smoking is discouraged in the building. 19. If the USER at any time fails to comply �Nith one or more of tli�� a.forernentioned terrr�s and conditions, the USER'S permit will be cancelled and ti,ith rio refund of monies paid prior to cancellation. 70. Tlie PERMITTER reserves the sole right to preempt any sr_liedulc•d pz�ograrr�, activity, event or otherwise if necessary, so long as reasonable advance notice is given to the USER. 21. Any other policies that the City Council, City of Sanger deems necessary to irYs��re that the Community Center is properly and safely us�l and is protected shall apply to its use. ZZ. Corrlrrnzrilty Center shall be availal}le for use during the follot�Ting Hours: CC POLICIES PACE 5 E3:00 a.m. Ei;QU a.m. - 11:00 p. m. - 12.:30 a. rn. Sunday through Thursday Friday through Saturday SECTION III: SPECIAL ARRANGEMENTS 1. Tire Corarnur�ity Center r�r�ay >,e used by cor�7nlunity service argarriz�tlor�s orr a regular acid extenelc-�l basis. �. All organizativt�.s requesting are Anrrrzal Contract n7ay hc. approved ley making application to the Farks Board. .-3. All organizations approved for an Annual Contract must be reviewed and approved annually by the Parks Board prior to January 1st. �. The City Council may enter into additional special ag.rccments tivit.h persons or groups as the Council deems to be beneficial to the community and in accordance with the purpose of the Cornmunit.y Center• facility and with the Parks Board's recommendation. SECTION IV: POLICY 1. The Parks Boar•cl will be responsible for• reviewing all t•cc.om�nendct:1 changes of currant or new policies and making favorable or unfavorable recommendations to the City Council for final act.iori. 2. Tl���• P�3r•1��; Bc�arci reviews, approves or disapl;�roves alI r•ecluF�st}� from. groups 1>etitiontng t'or an Annual Contract. 3. Tire Parks Board leas the authority to restx•ict. or deny i:he ��ls�, of tl�e Co2nnit(I11ty Center t.o USERS who disregard t1SER RULES AND REGULATIONS. . • � � � W it ,C w +i • i' C 3=� C L >� O -i i p v m H •i•... �. v� ai' v A m >, J C 4 m m al U m • •... ' � N U 7 'c1 4 C a Cal C 7 O C A � > ri C > �: � •I �, c m r. o ov x o-1 ro �w m ov � a p p•,� •-• �'' •�' �1 a m -.1 � +1 m .^I .•1 m ro v A m v> u i• •C E � qy u H +� m -i m �C o JJ u C a .i m� 0 0 ' rl 11 .•i "' +i N .-1 N U al al U m y ro .t ro O o n m . ' � .:'•. .r �: .•1 u rl N •q 7 m a C m A m m V .0 .. .. „1 . ' •� '::. •••� m.'; rl O w 1 'f7• U m N W m w m m ..0 U N ^� .t N •- .•, i-�'�. H � i O 3 ro Cal N L O.0 �m •U C L C m N .i .i • m' al >l +i ro O ^J C u ro G. O A >�•y v • 1l :. , L U >r L H C al W -/ N +-1 1/ a +t W U C C »i • . C • C +iNO ^i7 �1mm ro'i HW� +l 0 O N> y ( 1� • m .1 .i •n >, A m N vl m � a 0 +l >� •-c >� •-i O w • %� T CL >�'C L •U m .0 t� .0 LL ••i L v >...{ L L l,l i Y _ , >� • L m E A� .,1 m O A al W L m •-1 •rf C C m a a O• • ' rn A +1 C m +1 .•+ u u y O m m -1 .1 O ro y rl E ' y m w m•• .. r-1 � ri .i -/ C O H H 7 u ..i U ro a a/ -.�i �' � p H O C � .,1 .I m -+ N U p m C ••i m Z O ro a A .0 -1 m w m .0 . m O ,G Ur1.0 U C a O'H+1 m W. mW-i H alv U HA .,.1 00 M m E'' A m � p � aaY aOw ma C7m AA mm +Im C GL > o0 M � yl w m N >� m V >l U✓ •y C A =� a •cf •'1 • Q• p G. W 'p C H v � A > N C rl .. ^i +i 0 11 U O m 1.l al o 0 � .. � � : w m -+ o w , v -+ v m -1 m m -1 m - ro c • - ,a v+ ro w o >l-+ jl m u -1 :. . • w.• Wu .0 y•a -Ia .•.iaa mm.i �a o•• scram .1 0• F roN a H a• m ov^+ uw-1 •-1 ram wml, .0 V_ y,a ��. �.. � m 7,p m.-1 .C-i V oNv. >,'• m Kw H N EA� .Cw, 4 0,� • � . W • 41 � H y M C `� . rl w" JJ• > ro a 4 tl H N O m O � u O� •.t - O m . • N. U p m F w a �c3 w a o_ o w •C o .i ra m m .0 u .+ o «i w .,y •' w w o G. o , H ra m .1 .K > m x a/ :1 •.� H m 'cw tf� @ a E m m a w E .0 >� -i O v O O -i H N ra w o • • 6i >+rj O• �' � m O m O N m ^i 7 u v U 'p o a W 11 7l O/ CI -i . •' O HW N•„�,, 1 NHtT mN7 U>.a .m •.i a m mm0 � rlx �O .. „ p W C p W' +/ r-1 m C .G U w y Jl m 7 +i m U •y O N L L ?+: Z H F ='� S +-1 m > m O y -i ' m C m .i +1 +-1 ra m O i t �' . M 'n �� m(.' /1 m C U H C U U ^I H •U ♦: +i O 'Cf 11 .i ' ^i E a •Q H 'USy •• U? M yW C al W..1 m+1 Sm ^iH .•i -i CMA a4LL mL vp .• ' u LLOH:'mm O '•'Fm "i��,C my>cl R7v0i .raw a��° aai u'Wm ill° �aKi U� yaAj CM m CM O .•1 O aN m m m Or1C •0+ m m H v K '' 1 m Ei +1 Z• H � +i H at H� m a > V a ra m C 7 w al.'d E m -.i m p � L � y ' �'w .1 .-1 H U m +1 to N C m -/ .-1 C m •j. , �• p' [ U u W L W m .al W •d C m m m m 7 J~ m m 7 m �1 L w. O > al 4" V .• N W H a P. T O W m .r.. • m C m ✓ C �' . E 2 1/ E 4 C W N m m 1 d ^I '1 H W ,C A C 11 H m u C m O O m m 0 >l m m W ,p 1.1 N. •- W m S m y •J m lJ �/ -i n t.a -1 m O -i •al , C ^I v ... O+ C C. w N> � H O ?• >l FI ' � � A 11 •V C: •• L C .0 N 7 N '1 >, A U E +1 L C L C X a N O• m m m •-1 O ro N ' i N C C O 2 m al O N V +i U T., O. A m m ••/ a a C H m Y �1 ,., m >l m H E >, m 4 m 'u v' O N m 1J p •V r RJ `� F ' '1m 7 �. � mTC mmA >+W ^/N N O. ram CgLNE d•-/ C>,L OS m H7 O • yAI N H F F H N a 4 N H M U E O l+ +1 O N m O m L 7 tat al N m ' p. 9 M •• � rn v o. m y a m a A b•,. rnw U.i >. v v � ••i w a" W . c� a, > w V 4I a �� w ro .-1 0• C m •-1 N •-1 C C a -/ y -+ u m w •0 m F? a o f � F i V. ^i _ c o o a a u .0 � a-+ A �• � c,w H -i > rn•-1 m F.1 • [C•l u m F� 4M• o , C� O C u E •17 +l H J= 'ti C m m 0. E ^+ 7 0 ai .,.t w .-i I I y ` F H U V M w a 11 W a a li 0 0 4 W O. '0 ro 4 0 •-1 U O � U U• C' ,q • E+N ram^ w N .. to �^.H N_'p 0� +� U07 W N ✓m mUC1 O C W a Wr1 a H I >l O Vf N 7 N O A U .-1 O 7 O G O 0. E � R7 p, m to a .-i r� h y �, al L G "^ 3 C. 'O +t H ../ ^' H a C 4 m m •U C. O L ^_ r�- ...1 7 C •.1 •,y •p � LJ �1 -i � .•. :.1 F m �1 m .•/ L L -,. W O W k ra m >�'•i m W U 1y L m O. . 10 C •.1 W- C N V Z O N O H X S N •-1 O 4l 7 N C .i H, ^ N W •a L N m• w '^1 F. y w W • a� � V w r � H:� H.^_a W au z�Om Fp <am_O-1 NNS Nw�a 1•ill ' E u p, o, N u u a E rn •a -.i m 0. E O F 47 >• 'V 'I) O a m m y H 11 .�, m al y •u p ,./ ,O � W O G N< -•. _ C r. H .. L C .� ... 7 .+ m m C .^. O •-• 0 C .-. H O .•. •O o 4" f+ d u W CI O a •-1 N O ry q 0. n as u •.1 < ,l q vl a v 9 U -+ u v n u a o O. C rn ro .-1 U 1 •r '} O +i L a -•1 U O m m � m � m •L • O•�'lH3 p ' v � v a' K ` W. w • - F ... IW .l " :. • N F • M 4 .. Z Z a w u6 ' W 4. N U � • C O ' !J �. F A O ^tea^ /J��� 0 POLICIES GOVERNING THE USE OF THE SANGER COMMUNITY CENTER The following policies as adopted by the City Council, City of Sanger, Texas on May 21, 1984 shall govern the administration and use of the Sanger Community Center. SECTION is SCHEDULING POLICIES 1. All reservations will be made on a "first come first serve," basis. 2. USERS must make reservations in person at the City Offices by filling out a USER PERMIT and paying fees required by the City. No reservations will be accepted by telephone. 3. The Community Center will be leased on an hourly rate at to five dollars ($5.00)` per hour with a minimum of two (2) hours usage or fifty dollars ($50.00) .per day•. A deposit of one hundred dollars ($100.00)'breakage fee will be required of the USER. _ 4. lCancellations and refunds will be handled'in the following manner: Refunds of the deposit and rental fees will be returned to the USER only when cancellations are received fifteen (15) days prior to the USERS scheduled' activity. _ When cancellations are made lesso than fifteen (15) days prior to the USERS scheduled activity the USER shall be entitled'to a refund of the breakage deposit. Refunding of the rental fee will be left to the discretion of the Designated City Employee. Refunds on the deposited.breadage fee may be picked up at the City Offices three (3) working days after the scheduled activity to allow time for the City's Designated Staff to make an inspection. S. All utility costs are included in the rental fee. There will 14 ;;; I be no additional charge to the USER for air -conditionings lights, gas, or heat. The Community Center will not be leased to a USER for s, 'coa�nercial activities for the purpose of selling a product for service. However, non-profit organizations may use the 'Community Center for fund raising activities. I 7.. }tr -L- • ' � �• 1 SECTION II: USER RULES AND REGULATIONS Representatives and/or employees of the USER are to conduct themselves in a manner generally acceptable to the local community. 2. The USER agrees that in its use of the Community Center it - will indemnify and hold harmless the PERMITTER (City of Sanger) from any and all neglect or misconduct on the part of anyone representing and/or in the employ of the USER. 3. The USER agrees. that in its use of the Community Center it will indemnify and hold harmless the PERMITTER from all personal injury 'and/or property damage artising from its use of said facility. ' 4. The Designated City Employee or any other City Employee. under his direction shall have the authority to stop any program, activity or event. until, the Disignated City Employee's directive, written or otherwise with reference ,to the health, safety and welfare of persons in the concerned Community Center, has been complied with. S. The USER is to staff its own operations (program, activity or event), as well as�supervise it, and its employees are to be paid solely fram the USER'S resources, '' 6. No monies are to be left at the Community Center by the USERf. 7. Extra furniture or equipment needed by the USER which the- PERMITTER does not typically provide shall be obtained solely at the expense of the USER and shall be moved in and out only upon authorization by the Designated City �� Employee and or any other City Employee under his direction. • . 8. All seating inside the Community Center shall be arranged to allow for free, adequate movement in and��out of the Community Center. 9. All decorations shall be of'a temporary nature, easily removeable, and of such a type that the Community Center will not be defaced when removed, (Note conditions specified under rule �14). . 10. Any defacement by the USER of the Community Center or equipment beyond hat of normal wear shall be chargeable to the USER. 11. All decorations shall be removed immediately following a function. . -i �I i .� i �. �' _� __ i -a- ,.xtraordinary custodial/janitorial services those required in addition to that whinrEIRtiniprovides, This implies be provided and icuredb theUSER.to leaving the Community Center in the state it was in prior to usage by the U5ER. This includes removing all trash or debri from the Community Center. i3+ Cooking is not permitted in the Community Center; however. .',Che preparation of beverages or warming of prepared foods tahich;.are served hot is permitted as long as proper. safe dispensing units are used for such, with the exception of F „'catering services. e USER shall comply with all of the most up-to-date Fire Codes and Standards.. The maximum occupancy limit shall be 148 persons at one time. Temporary additions or "decorations" shall be subject to and contingent upon final inspection and approval by the City Fire Marshall `or duly authorized agent. will be 'made available limited number of tables and chairs Ito<the USER. The use of this equipment will be up to the tole discretion of the PERMITTER. The piano shall be locked yAt.al.l times and will be available for public use only after 4ltilffipecial provisions have been made with the PERMITTER* aA religious denomination or church as a USER shall, limit its use of the Community Center to only that of asocial egad/or recreational nature. tA, e USER agrees to use the Community intents and purposes specified in the Center only for the permit. s.lcohal may be served, consumed or even possession of the USER or anyone connected uAt of the Community Center and surtoundin be in the with the USER'S g premises as p+etr City Ordinance No. 75-2. � Lf the USER at any time fails to comply with one or more of;,,the aforementioned terms and conditions. the USER'S i.t will be cancelled and with no refund of monies paid rrior °.to cancellation. PERMITTER reserves the sole right to preempt any ch*duled program, activity, event or otherwise if iftess.ary. so Tong as reasonable advance notice is ' to ;to the USER, t� hnr policies that the City Council, City of Sanger q►acessary to insure that the the Community Center fitly and safely used and is protected shall apply . i7 a'HfIia..'�a.Leat.+it-��r.?U ..P���.a:�. .E�x_. r. ;�°.t� ,e'Gommunity Center ie following hours: shall be available for use during ���"-f ��8:00 'a.m. - 11:00 p.m. � �8.00 a m. - 12:30 a.m. Sunday through Thursday Friday through Saturday �_ ,��S,�x�,-, �. � , i ,��,��� �;�;� k�� � �`�� ' , ',SECTION III : SPECIAL ARRANGEMENTS ,� �,P�{r� `�f��onnnunity Center may be leased by non-profit, community ��'} �,, a� n ��+�i�rice organizations on an annual basis at a cost o one 'r�'`����dol�.ar ($1.00) per -year. `� � y �,���+, organizations. requesting an Annual Lease Contract must '_ "' �ppxoved by the Community Center Policy Committee. " �� ;�i��,�`,A or�ar�izt�tior�s approved for an Annual Lease Contracx ,s����',�a��re�ri.�ewed and approved annually by`: the 'Community ';; ,��°C�t' policy: Committee. . -� r ������ i ai � ,, � f: �$��� ��,�:a �,�,�iti�ans approved for an Annual Lease Contract may ��# �tt'ti8,�:t��r.+� Community Center one (1) time each month. . �. ° � ;_ �tC�L+an�a must be made for the preceeding twelve (12) �� s ' � ��` {"`' `�►t the time of the annual review of the Policy -� ���1¢t t��a.: Additional reservations must be made as out- �;,. k�• �� gad .� Section I: Scheduling Policies. "��� .,}►'Council may enter into additional special agree- '' ����� � ;nth :persons or groups as the Council deems to be • 'F" " '��;ci�il to the community and in accordance with the n,� �� " � � x '"� � >�� �"'' ��R`,of the Community Center faciltiy and' with the ��' , �,; �;��Cotanittee' a recommendation. . 5�""� �� ��j � i SECTION IV: POLICY COMMITTEE g ;, �f• � � R-��;�1� � ; " .• �`"��� lle yCommittee shall consist of one member• of each :,, Y . ' _���� � .the Sanger community. • • � •�, r �.�.��►'",;Couanittee shall be responsible for reviewing �� .coded changes of current or new policies and • `� •�'' - ��.'�►v►�rable or unfavorable recommendations to the `" �� �Ci�"for final action. i '.� '�Cot�nieCee shall review and approve or dis- r ' �i'��requ�ats from groups petitioning for an Annual ''" :� �otmmi�tee shall have the authority to restrict .a '.=5 ���, .,�•�r �``u$e '�f the Corr�nunity Center to USERS who ;; '� 2 t? ►ER RITLES AND REGULATIONS . ' �,�, �; r,: �� a+�" a�r� �,,,�� � ��c � , a „'�+�' �z s� r - °� ���+ � � �� x '�ai�%� � �• f � , '� tea, a� I � 1'+ 1 t� �4�i .�'iE.l �� �:� Y ,��� J• iT �� 1 i�ti � L • �, I � E �' i _ ,. ji 1 ,j •; CITY OF SANGER P. 0. BOX 578 SANGER, TEXAS 76266 MEMORANDUM #373 T0: Honorable Mayor &Members of the City Council FROM: John Hamilton, City Manager It DATE: November 3, 1989 SUBJECT: Resolution to Support Grant Application on Sewer Infiltration G.S.A. telephoned and stated that the resolution Council passed concerning our grant application failed to identify the area along 455 east of I-35. They are sending a draft resolution for your consideration. This resolution is necessary to complete our grant application. CITY OF SANGER P. 0. BOX 578 BANGER, TEXAS 76266 MEMORANDUM #373 T0: Honorable Mayor &Members of the City Council FROM: John Hamilton, City Manager DATE: November 3, 1989 SUBJECT: Resolution to Support Grant Application on Sewer Infiltration G.S.A. telephoned and stated that the resolution Council passed concerning our grant application failed to identify the area along 455 east of I-35. They are sending a draft resolution for your consideration. This resolution is necessary to complete our grant application. JH:es GOVERNMENTAL SERVICE AGENCY, INC 10935 Estate Lane, Suite 475 Has, Texas 75238 214/553-7070 November 2, 1989 Mr. John Hamilton City Manager City of Sanger P.O. Box 578 Sanger, Texas 76266 RE: Sanger 1989 TCDP Crar�± Applicadon. TDOC Requested Revisions Dear Mr, Hamilton: Per our recent conversation regarding the 1989 TCDP application, please take the following actions: (1) Resolution —Please find attached a revised resolution on the grant application. The resolution provides a better description of the work to be performed as the original resolution failed to include the proposed work on FM 455. This needs to be approved by the City Council as soon as possible. (2) Cover Letter from City. Manager —Please sign and date the cover letter provided. In addition, please fill-in the space provided in part (2) regarding the actual daily average flow on the STP. Please be sure to attached a copy of the STP discharge permit which identifies the maximum daily flow permitted by the TWC discharge permit. (3) Mail to All Parties —Please mail the originals to the Texas Department of Commerce at the address indicated on the cover letter. Since this is due in Austin by no later than November loth, you want to express mail it to: Texas Department of Commerce B:::Icl:nIn 410 East Fifth Street, 4th Floor Austin, Texas 78701 512/320=0110 Please be sure to mail copies of the packet to Karen Grady of the NCTCOG and to GSA for our files. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at any time. Sincerely, UVIM NMENTAL ERVICE AGENCY, INC. Rick Jenkins Vice Presiden CI'T'Y OF SANGER P.O. Box 578 Sanger, Texas 76266 817/458-7930 Date. , 1989 Ms. Kimberley Bolles NCTCOG Regional Coordinator Texas Department of Commerce P.O. Box 12728 Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711 RE: Sanger 1989 TCDP Grant Application TDOC Requested Revisions Dear Ms. Bolles: Per your recent request regarding the City of Sanger's 1989 TCDP (Texas Community Development Program) grant application for Sewer System Improvements, please find attached the following items: (1) Resolution — The resolution has been revised to more accurately reflect the proposed scope of work. The revision simply provides a more detailed description of where the work is to be performed. Please find a copy of the revised resolution attached; and (2) STP Permit— Please find attached a copy of the city's discharge permit for the Sewage Treatment Plant (STP). This identifies that the maximum permitted flow is 480,000 gallons per day. The actual daily average flow for the STP is approximately-- 111111111 Wool I The City of Sanger hopes that the above information is satisfactory to the Texas Department ity of Commerce. Should you have additia gal au� ;bons; please feel free to cor►tact the c hall at any time, or you may contact our grant consultant (Governmental Service Agency, Inc. at 214/5534070). Sincerely, John Hamilton City Manager City of Sanger cc: (1) Karen Grady, North Central Texas Council of Governments, P.O. Drawer COG, Arlington, Texas 76005-5888 (2) Governmental Service Agency, Inc., Lyndon Plaza, 10935 Estate Lane, Suite 475, Dallas, Texas 75238 CITY OF SANGER RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION FOR GRANT ASSISTANCE UNDER THE 1989 TEXAS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM` (TCDP), AUTHORIZING A LOCAL MATCH, AND DESIGNATING THE CITY MANAGER TO ACT AS THE CITY'S REPRESENTATIVE IN ALL MATTERS PERTAINING TO THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION IN THE TEXAS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM. Whereas , the City of Sanger desires to develop a viable community, including decent housing, a suitable living environment, and/or expanding economic opportunities, principally for persons of low to moderate income; and Whereas , certain conditions exist in the City of Sanger which represent a threat to the public health, safety, or welfare; and Whereas, funds are available through the 1989 Texas Community Development Program (TCDP) to alleviate such conditions and to meet community development objectives; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANGER, TEXAS: (1) That a 1989 Texas Community Development Program (TCDP) grant application is hereby authorized to be filed with the Texas Department of Commerce (TDOC) in the amount of $175,000.00 under the Community Development Project Fund for the following described project: Replacement of substandard wastewater collection lines with new lines meeting state standards and long term needs of the community in the following locations: Street From To FM 455 I-35 Fourth Locust First Seventh Second Locust Wood Fifth Locust Marshall Seventh Locust Willow (2) That the following local resource authorized to be included as part of the commitment application: I hereby The City of Sanger hereby commits to support the wastewater system improvement project described above with $ 2 6, 2 5 0.0 0 in local funds, which is a minimum of fifteen percent (15%) of the total TCDP grant request. In addition, the City of Sanger commits to fully support with local funds any costs associated with the project which exceed the budget as presented ins the grant application. (3) That -the City Manager is hereby authorized to act representative in all matters in connection with the and the city's participation Development Program and to with the application, in the 1989 Texas execute documents in s the city's application Community conjunction APPROVED and RESOLVED this day the �_�______. November, 1989 by the City Council of the City of Sanger, Texas. APPROVED: Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary of MEMORANDUM #375 T0: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT. CITY OF SANGER P. 0. BOX 578 SANGER, TX 76266 Honorable Mayor &Members of the City Council John Hamilton, City Manager November 3, 1989 Solid Waste Disposal Contract I submitted the proposed solid waste contract presented by Frontier Waste Management Attorneys to Ron Neiman for review. The enclosed letter are his comments regarding the contract. Benny Johtlson will be pt•esent Monday night to discuss this further. JH:es enclosures LAW OFFICES OF RONALD J. NEIMAN RONALD J. NEIMAN MARGARET E. BARNES Mr. John Hamilton City Manager City of Sanger P. 0. Box 578 Sanger, Texas 76266 Dear John: 386 W. MAIN / P. O. Box 77 / LEWISVILLE, TEXAS 75067 214/436-1558 Nove t>ber 2 , 19 8 9 Re: Solid `vVaste Disposal Contract FAX # 2 14-436-1349 I have reviewed the proposed Contract for Services with Frontier Waste Management, Inc., and would make the following comments with respect thereto: 1. In paragraph 3(A) your comment is well taken about the holidays being those des- ignated by the City Council. Addition- ally, in that paragraph, "other acceptable containers" needs to be expanded to spe- cifically include metal and plastic garbage cans, and any other permissible containers. We do not want to run into a dispute at a later time about whether or not garbage cans are acceptable, since many communities are requiring plastic bags only. 2. Concerning liability insurance, paragraph 3(F) should set forth the limits of bility insurance that are going to be required, which should be the same as in your bid specifications. Additionally, there should be a provision that the City of Sanger is named as an additional insured on any such policies as well as a clause that the insurer will not cancel or decrease the coverage without giving the City thirty (30) days' written notice. There should also be a provision that the limits of insurance may be raised in the event liability of municipal governments is raised above the amounts presently required by State or Federal legal requirements. Mr. John Hamilton City Manager City of Sanger November 2, 1989 Page 2 3. Just after paragraph 3(F), there should be a separate paragraph for an "indemnifica- tion" or "hold harmless" clause whereby the Contractor indemnifies the City and its agents against any claims relating to injury to person or property or employees or anyone else under the Contractor's con- trol whose performance or failure to per form causes a claim to be made against the City. This is a "boiler plate" type of paragraph which should be inserted. 4. Paragraphs 4(C) and 5(D) speak to the pay- ment of State and local taxes. I would recommend that these State and local taxes be limited to sales taxes. As you may know, Senate Bill 1519, portions of which go into effect on January 1, 1990, provide that there will be a 50 cent ($.50) per ton solid waste disposal fee charged by the State. I would anticipate that this disposal fee is contemplated by the pro- posed Contract to be borne by the Contractor, but it is not clear. There also may be other taxes which are imposed by the State or Federal Government with respect to solid waste collection in the future, and by limiting the extra expense to sales tax, there should be a savings to the consumer if taxes are implemented prior to renegotiation of rates. 5. I would also suggest the addition of a paragraph with respect to the assigna- bility of this Contract, i anticipate that the City would not want the Contract to be assignable unless the assignee were approved in advance by the City, although this is a negotiable item. 6. I would also recommend a paragraph whereby the City grants the Contractor the right to seek an injunction against any third party which infringes upon the rights of the Contractor. I have been involved in situations wherein a competitor will cut Mr. John Hamilton City Manager City of Sanger November 2, 1989 Page 3 rates to attract commercial customers and ignore the exclusive grant of the solid waste disposal contract. By granting the Contractor the right to enforce the Agreement, the City does not have to ini- tiate such action or become involved in the dispute unless it chooses. 7. The Agreement should be signed by the company's secretary. it is my understanding that you are going to make suggestions which you have, as well as these, to the Contractor and have their counsel make the changes. Please advise if I may be of additional assistance. Sincerely, Ronald J. Neiman RJN:dmy CONTRACT FOR SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT made this by and between FRONTIER WASTE Corporation ("Contractor") and ("City"). _ day of , 1989 MANAGEMENT', INC., a Texas HE CITY OF SANGER, TEXAS WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the Contractor is engaged in the business of providing commercial and residential solid waste removal, and WHEREAS, the City desires to have the Contractor perform such solid waste removal services to the residents and businesses within its legal boundaries; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, agreements and considerations herein contained, the City and the Contractor hereby agree as follows: 1. Exclusive Right. The City hereby grants to the Contractor the exclusive right and obligation to provide solid waste collection services within the City's legal boundaries as they exist as of the date hereof and as may be extended during the term hereof. 2. Term. A. The initial term of this Agreement shall be for a period of five (5) years commencing on January 1, 1990 and terminating on December 31, 1995, subject to prior termination as described in Paragraphs 2 (B) or 6 below and subject to annual review as provided in Paragraph 2 (C) below. B. Notwithstanding the provisions in Paragraph 2 (A) above, either party may terminate this Agreement, during the initial term hereof or any renewal term thereafter, after ninety (90) days written notice to the other party, provided, such early termination shall not relieve either party of its obligations hereunder that have accrued prior to the effective date of such termination. Co The provisions of Paragraph 5 below shall be reviewed annually by each party hereto and may be changed upon the mutual agreement of both parties. D. The initial five (5) year term of this Agreement may be extended by the mutual consent of the parties hereto for a s imi tar f ive ( 5 ) year term; provided, however, that the party desiring to extend this Agreement shall provide the other party with its intention to extend the Agreement at least One Hundred and Twenty (120) days prior to the expiration of the initial five (5) year term. 3. Covenants of Contractor. The Contractor covenants and agrees to the following: A. Residential Collection. Residential collection shall be twice weekly on Monday and Thursday of each week except for Christmas Day and other Holidays as recognized by the Sanger ffi City Council. Hours of collection shall commence not earlier than 7:30 am and conclude not later than'3:30 pm on each collection day. Contractor shall be required to pick-up only solid waste that is in plastic bags (not to exceed 30 gallons) or other acceptable containers or bundles (not to exceed 40 pounds and 3 feet in length each). B. -Commercial Collection. Commercial collection including ultiple dwellings of four (4) or more units and all businesses (commercial and/or industrial establishments) are to be serviced on an "As -Needed" basis. The type of solid waste receptacle used by any commercial customer shall be used at the sole expense of such commercial customer. Hand pick-up customers shall use a 30 gallon container. The hours of collection for commercial services shall commence not prior to 6:00 am and conclude not later than 9:00 pm on each Monday and Thursday, except for Christmas Day and other Holidays (as recognized by theh Sanger City Council. Apartments and/or multi -family residences' ` r will be collected between 8:00 am and 9:00 pm on each collection day. The Contractor will place in the City, at no cost to. the City, 10 gallon receptacles for trash collection at parks in the downtown area. In addition, the Contractor will provide temporary placement of trash containers for special events sponsored by the City and located within the City upon the request of the Sanger City Council, Co Compliance with Laws. All solid waste collected by the Contractor will be disposed of in a landfill other than that owned and/or operated by the City. The Contractor will comply with all applicable State and Federal laws regarding collection and transportation of solid waste material. D. Due Care, The Contractor shall exercise due care and caution to protect and preserve public and private property including City streets and parking areas while performing its obligations hereunder. Vehicles used by the Contractor in performing its residential services hereunder shall only drive down the middle of all residential streets and roads and shall not zig-zag from one side of the street to the other. 2 E. Franchise Fee, The Contractor will pay monthly to the City a Franchise Fee of Seven Percent (7%) of its monthly gross receipts for its residential and commercial collections. This Franchise Fee represents a charge for use of the City's streets. F. Liability Insurance. The Contractor shall maintain general liability insurance in an amount that is reasonable and customary for similar contractors providing similar services in cities of a similar size to that of the City. G. General Conditions. The Contractor shall not deny employment to any person for reasons of race, creed, national origin or religion. Each employee of the Contractor shall at all times carry a valid Texas Operator's Drivers's License applicable to the type of vehicle that he is operating. Wages of all employees of the Contractor will equal or exceed the minimum wage requirements as established by local, state and federal agencies. In addition, the Contractor shall comply with the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Acts, The Contractor shall not litter any residential or commercial dwelling in the process of performing its services hereunder; provided, however, that the Contractor shall not be required to collect any solid waste material that has not been placed in plastic trash bags, approved containers, or is bundled (as described above). In the event of spillage by the Contractor, the Contractor shall properly clean up any and all litter. Hazardous waste, body waste, dead animals, abandoned vehicles, vehicle parked, large equipment and parts thereto will not be required to be collected by the Contractor, unless the Contractor agrees to collect such items. The Contractor shall have on hand at all times in good working order, such equipment that shall permit the Contractor, to adequately and efficiently perform its duties hereunder. Such equipment shall be purchased from nationally known and recognized manufacturers of solid waste collection and disposal equipment. Solid waste collection equipment shall be of the enclosed load packer type and all equipment shall be kept in good repair and appearance and in a sanitary, clean and run ready condition at all times. The Contractor shall have available to it at all times reserve equipment which can be put into service and operation in case of any breakdown of its equipment. 3 The Contractor shall have vested title to all solid waste materials generated within the Municipal Area of the City. 4. Covenants of the City. The City covenants and agrees as follows: } f000, A. To remit all amounts due to the Contractor by the f' th ( 5th ) day of each month commencing in the month of j, February, 1990. Be Provide the contractor with confirmation of the residential and commercial customers on a monthly basis. C. To collect all state and local taxes due on the services provided by the Contractor hereunder and to remit all such amounts due to the appropriate authorities. 5. Pa men the Contractor f above, an amount t for Services or its services based upon the Rendered. rendered following The City shall pay to pursuant to Paragraph 3 structure: A. Residential Services - $6.25 per month (hand pick-up) per individual residence B. Commercial Customers (hand pick-up, 3 containers maximum) i. Two pick-ups per week - $9.50/month ii. Three pick-ups per week - $19.00/month I . Five pick-ups per week - $28.50/month C. Container Services i. One and a Half (1 1/2) yd, containers a. One pick-up per week - $15.00/month c. Two pick-ups per week - Three pick-ups per week $27.00/month $35.00/month i1. Three (3) yd* containers a. One pick-up per week - b. Two pick-ups per week - c. Three pick-ups per week - iii. Four (4) yd. containers a. One pick-up per week - b. Two pick-ups per week - c. Three pick-ups per week - $27.00/month $44.50/month $61.50/month $32.00/month $51.85/month $71.70/month D. P__ayment of Taxes. The amounts represented in Paragraph 5 (A) through (C) above do not include state and local taxes. The amounts of any local or state taxes shall be added to the amounts described in Paragraphs 5 (A) through (C) above and collected by the City. 6. Payment. For services rendered pursuant to Paragraph 3 above and pursuant to the fee schedules provided in Paragraphs 5 (A) through (D) above, the City shall pay the Contractor within five (5) days after the end of each calendar month. In the event the City does not remit any payment to the Contractor within twenty-five ( 25 ) days after the end of any calendar month, the Contractor shall have no further obligation to provide any services hereunder. 7. General Provisions. A. Modification, This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement and understanding between the parties hereto, and shall not be considered modified, altered, changed or amended in any respect unless in writing and signed by both parties hereto. Be Governing Law, This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas. C. Binding Effect, This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties successors and assigns. 5 IN WITNESS WIiEREOF, the City and the Contractor have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. THE CITY OF BANGER, TEXAS By: Mel Armstrong Its: Mayor FRONTIER WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC. By: Benny Johnson Its: President C� ATTEST: By: Its: City Secretary CITY OF SANGER P. 0. BOX 578 SANGER, TX 76266 MEMORANDUM #375 T0: Honorable Mayar &Members of the City Council FROM: John Hamilton, City Manager DATE: November 3, 1989 SUBJECT# Solid Waste Disposal Contract I submitted the proposed solid waste contract presented by Frontier Waste Management Attorneys to Ron Neiman for review. The enclosed letter are his comments regarding the contract. Benny Johnson will be present Monday night to discuss this further. JH:es enclosures LAW OFFICES OF RONALD J. NEIMAN RONALD J. NEIMAN MARGARET E. BARNES Mr. John Hamilton City Manager City of Sanger P. 0. Box 578 Sanger, Texas 76266 Dear John: 386 W. MAIN / P. 0. Box 777 LEWISVILLE, TEXAS 75067 214/436-1558 November 2, 1989 FAX # 214-436-1349 f N c U s ass oil Re: Solid Waste Disposal Contract I have reviewed the proposed Contract for Services with Frontier Waste Management, Inc., and would make the following comments with respect thereto. 1. In paragraph 3(A) your comment is well taken about the holidays being those des- ignated by the City Council. Addition- ally, in that paragraph, "other acceptable containers" needs to be expanded to spe- cifically include metal and plastic garbage cans, and any other permissible containers. We do not want to run into a dispute at a later time about whether or not garbage cans are acceptable, since many communities are requiring plastic bags only. 2. Concerning liability insurance, paragraph 3(F) should set forth the limits of bility insurance that are going to be required, which should be the same as in your bid specifications. Additionally, there should be a provision that the City of Sanger is named as an additional insured on any such policies as well as a clause that the insurer will not cancel or decrease the coverage without giving the City thirty (30) days' written notice. There should also be a provision that the limits of insurance may be raised in the event liability of municipal governments is raised above the amounts presently required by State or Federal legal requirements. Mr. John Hamilton City Manager City of Sanger November 2, 1989 Page 2 3. Just after paragraph 3(F), there should be a separate paragraph for an "indemnifica- tion" or "hold harmless" clause whereby the Contractor indemnifies the City and its agents against any claims relating to injury to person or property or employees or anyone else under the Contractor's con- trol whose performance or failure to per- form causes a claim to be made against the City. This is a "boiler plate" type of paragraph which should be inserted. 4. Paragraphs 4(C) and 5(D) speak to the pay- ment of State and local taxes. I would recommend that these State and local taxes be limited to sales taxes. As you may know, Senate Bill 1519, portions of which go into effect on January 1, 1990, provide that there will be a 50 cent ($.50) per ton solid waste disposal fee charged by the State. I would anticipate that this disposal fee is contemplated by the pro- posed Contract to be borne by the Contractor, but it is not clear. There also may be other taxes which are imposed by the State or Federal Government with respect to solid waste collection in the future, and by limiting the extra expense to sales tax, there should be a savings to the consumer if taxes are implemented prior to renegotiation of rates. 5. I would also suggest the addition of a paragraph with respect to the assigna- bility of this Contract. I anticipate that the City would not want the Contract to be assignable unless the assignee were approved in advance by the City, although this is a negotiable item. 6. I would also recommend a paragraph whereby the City grants the Contractor the right to seek an injunction against any third party which infringes upon the rights of the Contractor. I have been involved in situations wherein a competitor will cut Mr. John Hamilton City Manager City of Sanger November 2, 1989 Page 3 rates to attract commercial customers and ignore the exclusive grant of the solid waste disposal contract. By granting the Contractor the right to enforce the Agreement, the City does not have to ini- tiate such action or become involved in the dispute unless it chooses. 7. The Agreement should be signed by the company's secretary. It is my understanding that you are going to make suggestions which you have, as well as these, to the Contractor and have their counsel make the changes. Please advise if I may be of additional assistance. Sinc rely, 04e�� Ronald J. Neiman RJN:dmy CONTRACT FOR SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT made this day of , 1989 by and between FRONTIER WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC., a Texas Corporation (,"Contractor") and THE CITY OF SANGER, TEXAS ("City"). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the Contractor is engaged in the business of providing commercial and residential solid waste removal, and WHEREAS, the City- desires to have the Contractor perform such solid waste removal services to the residents and businesses within its legal boundaries; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, agreements and considerations herein contained, the City and the Contractor hereby agree as follows: 1. Exclusive Right. The City hereby grants to the Contractor the exclusive right and obligation to provide solid waste collection services within the City's legal boundaries as they exist as of the date hereof and as may be extended during the term hereof. 2. Term. A. The initial term of this Agreement shall be for a period of five' (5) years commencing on January 1, 1990 and terminating on December 31, 1995, subject to prior termination as described in Paragraphs 2 (B) or 6 below and subject to annual review as provided in Paragraph 2 (C) below. Be Notwithstanding the provisions in Paragraph 2 (A) above, either party may terminate this Agreement, during the initial term hereof or any renewal term thereafter, after ninety (90) days written notice to the other party, provided, such early termination shall not relieve either party of its obligations hereunder that have accrued prior to the effective date of such termination. co The provisions of Paragraph 5 below shall be reviewed annually by each party hereto and may be changed upon the mutual agreement of both parties. D. The initial five (5) year term of this Agreement may be extended by the mutual consent of the parties hereto for a similar five %51 year term; provided, however, that the party desiring to extend this Agreement shall provide the other party with its intention to extend the Agreement at least One Hundred and Twenty (120) days prior to the expiration of the initial five (5) year term. 3. Covenants of Contractor. The Contractor covenants and agrees to the following: A. Residential Collection. Residential collection shall be twice weekly on Monday and Thursday of each week except for Christmas Day and other Holidays as recognized by the Sanger City Council. Hours of collection shall commence not earlier than 7:30 am and conclude not later than 3:30 pm on each collection day. Contractor shall. be required to pick-up only solid waste that is in plastic bags (not to exceed 30 gallons) or other acceptable containers or bundles (not to exceed 40 pounds and 3 feet in length each). L�. Commercial Collection. Commercial collection includin ultiple dwellings of four (4) or more units and all businesses (commercial and/or industrial establishments) are to be serviced on an "As -Needed" basis. The type of solid waste receptacle used by any commercial customer shall be used at the sole expense of such commercial customer. Hand pick-up customers shall use a 30 gallon container. The hours of collection for commercial services shall commence not prior to 6:00 am and conclude not later than 9:00 pm on each Monday and Thursday, except for Christmas Day and other Holidays (as recognized by the < Sanger City Council. Apartments and/or multi -family residences will be collected between 8*00 am and 9:00 pm on each collection day. The Contractor will place in the City, at no cost to. the City, 10 gallon receptacles for trash collection at parks in the downtown area. In addition, the Contractor will provide temporary placement of trash containers for special events sponsored by the City and located within the City upon the request of the Sanger City Council, Co Compliance with Laws. All solid waste collected by the Contractor will be disposed of in a landfill other than that owned and/or operated by the City. The Contractor will comply with all applicable State and Federal laws regarding collection and transportation of solid waste material. D. Due Care. The Contractor shall exercise due care and caution to protect and preserve public and private property including City streets and parking areas while performing its obligations hereunder. Vehicles used by the Contractor in performing its residential services hereunder shall only drive down the middle of all residential streets and roads and shall not zig-zaq from one side of the street to the other. E. Franchise Fee, The Contractor will pay monthly to the City a Franchise Fee of Seven Percent (7%) of its monthly gross receipts for its residential and commercial collections. This Franchise Fee represents a charge for use of the City's streets. F. Liability Insurance. The Contractor shall maintain general liability insurance in an amount that is reasonable and customary for similar contractors providing similar services in cities of a similar size to that of the City. G. General Conditions. The Contractor shall not deny employment to any person for reasons of race, creed, national origin or religion. Each employee of the Contractor shall at all times carry a valid Texas Operator's Drivers's License applicable to the type of vehicle that he is operating. Wages of all employees of the Contractor will equal or exceed the minimum wage requirements as established by local, state and federal agencies. In addition, the Contractor shall comply with the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Acts, The Contractor shall not litter any residential or commercial dwelling in the process of performing its services hereunder; provided, however, that the Contractor shall not be required to collect any solid waste material that has not been placed in plastic trash bags, approved containers, or is bundled (as described above). In the event of spillage by the Contractor, the Contractor shall properly clean up any and all litter. hazardous waste, body waste, dead animals, abandoned vehicles, vehicle parked, large equipment and parts thereto will not be required to be collected by the Contractor, unless the Contractor agrees to collect such items. The Contractor shall have on hand at all times in good wor)cing order, such equipment that shall permit the Contractor, to adequately and efficiently perform its duties hereunder. Such equipment shall be purchased from nationally known and recognized manufacturers of solid waste collection and disposal equipment. Solid waste collection equipment shall be of the enclosed load _ packer type and all equipment shall be kept in good repair and appearance and in a sanitary, clean and run ready condition at all times. The Contractor shall have available to it at all times reserve equipment which can be put into service and operation in case of any breakdown of its equipment. 3 The Contractor shall have vested title to all solid waste materials generated within the Municipal Area of the City. a4. Covenants of the City. The City covenants and agrees as follows: A. To remit all amounts due to the Contractor by the th ( 5th ) day of each month commencing in the month of February, 1990. v' i o Be Provide the contractor with confirmation f he t residential and commercial customers on a monthly basis. C. To collect all state and local taxes due on the services provided by the Contractor hereunder and to remit all such amounts due to the appropriate authorities. 5. Payment for Services the Contractor for its services above, an amount based upon the Rendered. The City rendered pursuant to following structure: shall pay to Paragraph 3 A. Residential Services - $6.25 per month (hand pick-up) per individual residence B. Commercial Customers (hand pick-up, 3 containers maximum) i. Two pick-ups per week - $9.50/month ii. Three pick-ups per week - $19.00/month iii. Five pick-ups per week - $28.50/month C. Container Services i. One and a Half (1 1/2) yde containers a. One pick-up per week - $15.00/month L70 c. Two pick-ups per week - Three pick-ups per week 0 $27.00/month $35.00/month ii. Three (3) yde containers a. One pick-up per week - $27.00/month b. Two pick-ups per week - $44.50/month c. Three pick-ups per week - $61.50/month . Four (4) yd. containers a. One pick-up per week - $32.00/month b. Two pick-ups per week - $51.85/month c. Three pick-ups per week - $71.70/month D. P�ment of Taxes. The amounts represented in Paragraph 5 (A) through (C) above do not include state and local taxes. The amounts of any local or state taxes shall be added to the amounts described in Paragraphs 5 (A) through (C) above and collected by the City. 6. Payment. For services rendered pursuant to Paragraph 3 above and pursuant to the fee schedules provided in Paragraphs 5 (A) through (D) above, the City shall pay the Contractor within five (5) days after the end of each calendar month. In the event the City does not remit any payment to the Contractor within twenty-five ( 25 ) days after the end of any calendar month, the Contractor shall have no further obligation to provide any services hereunder. 7. General Provisions. A. Modification, This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement and understanding between the parties hereto, and shall not be considered modified, altered, changed or amended in any respect unless in writing and signed by both parties hereto. B. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas. C. Binding Effect, This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties successors and assigns. 5 IN WITNESS WIIEREOF, the City and the Contractor have executed this Agreement as of the day and year f irst above written. THE CITY OF BANGER, TEXAS By: Mel Armstrong Its: Mayor FRONTIER WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC. By: Benny Johnson Its: President 0 ATTEST: By: Its: City Secretary CITY OF BANGER P. 0. BOX 578 BANGER, TEXAS 76266 MEMORANDUM #370 T0: Honorable Mayor &Members of he City Council FROM: John Hamilton, City Manage gy DATE: November 3, 1989 SUBJECT: Approval of Bank Depository Contract In canjun��tion with the bank depository bid, a draft Depository Agreement is enclosed foil your consideration and comment. The final draft will be presented to Counsel for review and will be presented to the successful bank depository bidder for signature. JH:es enclosure Depository Agreement The State of Texas § County of Denton § City of Sanger § KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: The City of Sanger's investments are invested in accordance with City Investment Policy as required by State Statutes. That, upon authorization of the City Council of the City of Sanger, Texas, on this the day of , 1989, the City of Sanger did designate the as the official depository for City funds for a 'period beginning January 2, 1990, and ending on September 30, 1992, with the following provisions: The City of Sanger, Texas, shall hereafter be referred to as the City. The to as the bank. hereafter will be referred The bank hereby agrees to place in the hands of the or any other mutually approved bank depository, for the use and benefit of the City of Sanger, securities for the pimpose of guaranteeing the City's funds deposited with said bank as City depository from the 2nd day of January, 1990 to the 30th day of September, 1092, and in this connection, the bank hereby agrees to provide the City with the proper joint safe -keeping agreement in the name of the City and the bank. These securities should be in an amount within $1,000 of the.securities and the bank will then pledge additional securities to satisfactorily cover the City deposits. The bank may also reduce the pledge security to within $1,000 of the total of City deposits when the City's funds decrease. The F.D. I. C. limit of $100,000 may be used to reduce the amount of securities pledged. The bank shall receive all earnings from the pledged securities and shall be allowed to exchange securities with approvalo Further, the bank does hereby agree that in case it shall fail to faithfully perform all duties and obligations devolving by Law or Ordinance upon Depository Agreement Page 2 it as City Depository or if it shall fail to pay upon presentation of any and all checks drawn upon said depository by the City, when properly signed and countersigned, whenever any bank shall fail to faithfully keep all funds of said City an account therefore according to Law, or if said bank shall at any time become insolvent, or if the same should, for any reason be taken over by the State Banking Commissioner or by any other duly qualified, legally appointed Liquidating Agent; and the affidavit of every member of the City Council of the City of Sanger, Denton County, Texas, asserting that any one or all of the above contingencies, shall be sufficient to authorize the , or any other mutually approved bank depository, to act hereunder, then and in that event, upon the happening of any of the above contained contingencies, the said shall be authorized, empowered and is hereby directed by the bank to immediately deliver to the City of Sanger or its duly authorized representatives, upon demand by them in writing, the said securities pledged, and be authorized and empowered to immediately advertise the said securities by giving 21 days notice of such sale in three public places in Denton County, Texas, and to apply the proceeds, first to the expenses of said sale; second, to pay into the City Treasury an amount equal to the amount on deposit to the City in the bank, at the time of the happening of such contingencies, the remainder, if any to go to the bank. The City shall determine and designate from time to time the character of the City funds which will be deposited by it that shall be demanded deposits, or to purchase from the bank certificates of deposits as an investment in the amounts they desire. The interest paid by the bank shall be no less than the following on certificates of deposit. "To be in conformity with the accepted bid." The bank further agrees to comply with all the provisions and Laws of the State of Texas relating to City Depositories now in effect or that may hereafter be passed, consistent with banking laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. /••0 • 1 NAME OF BANK BY: NAME & TITLE DATE: ATTEST: NAME & TITLE DATE: The City of Sanger, Texas BY: Nel Armstrong Mayor DATE: ATTEST: Rosalie Garcia' City Secretary DATE: CITY OF BANGER P. 0. BOX 578 BANGER, TEXAS 76266 MEMORANDUM 369 TO: Honorable Mayor &Members of the City Council FROM: John Hamilton, City Manager DATE: November 3, 1989 SUBJECT: Consider and Possible Action on Fire Mutual Aid Agreement Fire Chief Tucker has presented the enclosed mutual aid agreement for your consideration. Chief Tucker and I have reviewed the agreement. and recommend approval by Council. This is an annual requirement. JH:es enclosure r A(ZEIIr1ENT FOR MUTUAL AID IN DISASTER ASSISTANCE THE STAZ� OF TEXAS )( OOUNPY OF D04TON j THIS A(�ZEEMENT entered into this dai- of 198, by and between Aubrey, Carrollton, The Colony, Denton, Flower Mound, Frisco, Highland Village, Justin, Krum, Lake Cities, Lewisville, Denton County Rural Fire Protection District No. 1, Pilot Point, Roanoke, Sanger and Trophy Club, all of which are Texas municipal corporations, or duly authorized Rural Fire Prevention District organized according to article 2351a-6, Section 10 of the Texas Civil Statutes in Denton County, each acting herein through their only authorized officials. WHEREAS the ,governing officials of the governmental entities set forth above, political subdivisions of the State of Texas Lind the United States of America, desire to secure for each such entity the benefits of mutual aid in the protection of life and property from fire and other. di.sastc:r�;, NOW, THF.RFF'OFtE, IT IS At�ZF.FD AS FOLI�JS: 1. That upon the request of the Fire Clii��i' n>� I�i� �a�_•:=,i�'r:ee, �r t:he l�ir? Alarm Operator/Dispatcher of an entity- which is a parry or the Fire Alarm Operator/Dispatcher of an entity- which is a party h(c rt4a, each entity having fire su()pressio�ri, medical, emergency and other disaster t�qui.pment and personnel, Such Eire fighting or medical PmE�rgc�ncy equipment and Pt r snruiel of ar;ot:her entity c:hic•h is a party hereto may be dispat.cho(J, eir.urin,' an emergency condition, to arry point within the geognaphical. limit: of t.ht requesting entity designated Iry the Fire Chief, or his designee, or Fire Al-amil Operator of the requesting entity, subjectto the cc,ncii.tions hereinafter ti(.ated. It is hereby Agreed that an emergency condition shall exist within the geographical limits of a requesting entity at a time when one or more fires are iLk progress, or upon the occurrence of a situation reasonably requiring more equipment or personnel than can be provided by the requesting entity, and that when such condition exists, the chief of the fire department, or his designee, of the requested entity shall determine the advisability of sending or maintaining fire fighting equipment, medical emergency equipment or personnel beyond the geographical limits of the requested entity and the judgment of the fire chief, or his designee, shall be final. 2. Any dispatch of equipment and personnel pursuant to this Agreement is subject to the following conditions: a. Any request for aid hereunder shall include a statement of the amount and type of equipment and number of personnel requested, and shall specify the location to which the equipment and personnel are to be dispatched, but the amount and type of equipment and number of personnel to be furnished, if any, shall be at the sole discretion of the representative of the responding entity. b. The responding entity shall report to the officer in charge of the requesting entity's forces at the location to which the equipment is dispatched and assist in fire suppression or other emergency functions. c. A responding entity shall be released by the requesting entity when the services of the responding entity are no longer required or when the officer in charge of the responding entity's forces determines, in his sole discretion, that further assistance should not be provided. d. Only those entities with first response equipment and personnel can request like aid from other entities. -2- urisdictional boundaries exist, it is 3, In areas where common j ssible upon understood that accurate determination of juY.isdict a n op 1 tP and in the best In such cases, it is deemed pp receipt of the alarm. the alarm to dispatch its forces ublic for entity receiving interest of the p and to render aid at the scene of the emergency until an ac de the dre p nding of jurisdictional responsibility can be made and if out entity is properly relieved by the entity's jurisdiction, until the responding ra ra h entity having jurisdiction. Under the conditions described in this pa g p th e terms and conditions of this contract shall be in effect just as though a request for mutual aid had been initiated. 4. Each entity waives all claim against other entities for compensation damag � pe or death occurring as a consequency of for any loss, e rsonal injury, the performance of this Agreement. Provided, however, that this waiver shall t a ly in those cases in which the claim results from the fail for which no pP for any civil liability requesting entity to accept responsibility the the requesting entity is responsible as determined and required by Interlocal Cooperation Act, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes, Art. 4413 (32c), Sec. 4 (g), and as it may be amended in the future. 5, A responding entity shall not be reimbursed by the requesting entity ursuant to this Agreement. Personnel who are assigned, for costs incurred p body to perform duties, pursuant to designated or ordered by their governing and all other salary, pension, this Agreement, shall receive the same wage, including injury or compensation and rights for the performance of such duties, death benefits, and Worlrn�en's Compe nsation benefits, as though the service had rendered with the limits of the entity where he or she is regularly been ents the requesting entity is employed. Moreover, all wage and disability pa3'm ension required to pay under the Interlocal Cooperation Act cited and vxXpenses of ent and clothing, medical expenses, payments, damage to equipm id by the entity in which the employee in travel, food, and lodging shall be pa question is regularly employed. -3- 6. All equipment used by the responding entity's fire, department in carrying out this Agreement will, during the time response services are being performed, be owned by it; and all personnel acting for the responding entity's fire department under this Agreement will, during the time response services are required, be paid firemen of the fire department of the responding entity or member of an organized volunteer fire department rendering fire fighting services to the responding entity. 7. At all times while equipment and personnel of any responding entity's Fire department are traveling to, from, or within the geographical limits of the requesting entity in accordance with the terms of this agreement, such personnel and equipment shall be deemed to be employed or used, as the case may be, in the full line and cause of duty of the responding entity's fire department. Further, such equipment and personnel shall be deemed to be engaged in a governmental function of its governmental entity. 8. In the event that any individual performing duties subject to this rty to any state or federal civil Agreement shall be cited as a defendant pa performing duties lawsuit, arising out of his or her official acts while p pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, such individual shall be entitled to the same benefits that he or she would be entitled to receive had such civil action arose out of an official act within the scope of his or her duties as a member of the department where regularly employed and occurred within the jurisdiction of the governmental entity where regularly employed. The benefits described in this paragraph shall be supplied by the entity where the individual is regularly employed. However, in situations where the requesting entity may be liable, in whole or in part, for the payment of damages, then the requesting entity may intervene in such cause of action to protect its interests. 9. It is agreed by and between the parties hereto that any party hereto shall have the right to terminate this Ant upon ninety greeme(90) daS-s �rritten notice to the other parties hereto. It is further agreed that additional -4- governmental entities may become parties, and existing parties may be removed as parties, upon the affirmation vote of a majority of the governing bodies of the parties hereto. 10. This Agreement contains all commitments and agreements of the parties hereto and no other oral or written commitments shall have any force or effect if not contained herein. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, it is understood and agreed that certain signatory entities may have heretofore contracted or hereafter contract with each other for fire protection services and it is hereby agreed that this Agreement shall be subordinate to said contracts. 11. Each party agrees that if legal action is brought under this Agreement, exclusive venue shall lie in Denton County, Texas. 12. In ease one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement shall be for any reason held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision thereof and this Agreement shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision had never been contained herein. 13. In order to assist each other in the process of mutual aid response planning, each party hereto shall inform the other parties of all mutual aid agreements which each party has instituted with other municipalities, entities, counties, or other state agencies. 14. This Agreement is made for each respective fire department as mutual aid agreements pursuant to Article 6889-7 of the Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, commonly referred to as the Disaster Act of 1975; and for the purpose of Article 6228f of the Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, Section 3796, et seq. 15. In order to facilitate execution, each party hereto may execute a duplicate original. -5- Effective date of this Agreement shall be on at 12.01 o'clock a.m. Executed by the Cities or Rural Fire Prevention Districts of Aubrey, Carrollton, The Colony, Denton, Flower Mound, Frisco, Highland Village, Justin, wisville, Denton County Rural Fire Prevention District ho. Krum, Lake Cities, Le 1, Pilot Point, Roanoke, Sanger and Trophy Club, in Denton County, each respective governmental entity acting by and through duly authorized officials in the manner required by each respective entity's charter, or otherwise as rired by lawon the date herein specified. equ, Attest: (name of entity) (signature of person executing agreement, and title) Attest: (name of entity) (signature of person executing agreement, a.nd title) CITY GF SANGER P. 0. BOX 578 BANGER, TEXAS 76266 A1IEAt1[_ifiANDUM #365 Tc7: Honorable Ivlayor & lvlembers of tY�e City Council FROM: John Hamilton, City Manager DATE: November 3, 1989 SUBJECT: Mote on Candidates to Board of Directors - Denton Central Appraisal District The enr_:losed letter and resolution address the tvuelve (12� votes the Council is eligible to cast for a member of the Board of Directors for the Central Appraisal District. JH:es enclosures CITY Vr BANGER, TEXAS RE"aOLUTION �R12-$9 At the regular meeting of the Sanger Cifiy Council held November 6, 1989, the City Cast their eligible twelve (12) votes in the following manner: CANDIDATE � VOTES 1). Jon Beck 2). Horace Brock 3). Diane Helms 4). Bradley Moore 5). Clarence Myers 6). Richard Smith 7). Troy White RESOLVED AND PASSED this 6th Day of November, 1989. Nel Armstrong Mayor ATTEST: Rose Garcia, City Secretary JOE .ROGERS,CTA/RPA/RTA Chief Appraiser JOHN D. BROWN, RPA Deputy Chief Appraiser JOE A. FORSYTHE Deputy Chief Appraiser For Finance and Collections October 173 1989 City of Sanger Mayor P.O. Box 578 Sanger, Tx 76266 Dear Mayor: DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT 3911 MOHSE STREET P.O. BOX 2346 TON, TEXAS 76202 617.SW0904 BOARD OF bIRECTORS: TROY WHITE, Chairman JON BECK, Vice -Chairman JERKY GAGE, Secretary CLIIRENCE MYERS RICHARD C. SMITH REIN': Candidates to Board of Directors - Denton Central Appraisal District, The City of Sanger has 12 votes. Candidates to the Denton Central Appraisal District Board of Directors are listed below alphabetically by each candidates last name. Each voting unit must cast its vote by written resolution and submit it to the Chief Appraiser by November 14w The unit may cast all its votes for one candidate or may distribute the votes among any number of candidates. Some voting units may have enough votes to select several directors to the Board. To share representation on the Board, several units may wish to vote for the same candidate. A voting unit must cast its votes for a person nominated and named on the ballot. There is no provision for write-in candidates. The Chief Appraiser may not count votes cast for someone not listed on the official ballot. Candidates nominated by taxing jurisdictions. 1. Beck, Jon 5. Myers, Clarence 2. Brock, Horace 6. Smith, Richard 3. Helms, Diane 7. White, Troy 4. Moore, Bradley Sincerely, Joe D. Rogers Chief Appraiser CITY DF SANGEA P. O. BOX 578 ANGER, TEXAS 76266 Ar1EMO1�ANDUM #366 TO: Honorable Mayor &Members of the City Council F R c Ad: John Hamilton, City Manager If DATE: November 3, 1989 ;TJB.TECT: Consider and Possible Action on seized Propert;F Policy with Denton County District Attorney's Office The enclosed proposed Local Agreement with the Denton County District Attorneys Office covers seized contraband and the distribution of funds resulting in disbursement of forfeited money and property. Attorney lion Neiman in his capacity as Lewisville City Attorney has reviewed and recommended acceptance by the City of Lewisville, Karen Brophy, City Attorney of Carrollton has also recommended acceptance by her City. If acceptable a motion of acceptance would be appropriate. JH:es encIosure MEMORANDUM T0: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF SANGER P. 0. BOX 578 SANGER, TEXAS 76266 Jahn Harniltori, Gity Manager Benny Erwin, Chief of Police ,ice October 20, 1989 Local Agreement Between County and Sanger I�istrxct Attorney ler•r•y �'obb would like for the City of Sanger to react this agreement on disposition of forfeited contraband seized under Chapter 59, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, I would like to get our city attorney to review and instruct the City in regards to this document. BE:es attachment LOCAL AGREEMENT STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DENTON This LOCAL AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between a Law Enforcement Agency, located in Denton County, Texas, and hereinafter called "Agency", and the Criminal District Attorney of Denton County, Texas; hereinafter called "District Attorney". W I T N E S S E T H WHEREAS, the Agency and the District Attorney desire to enter' into an agreement regarding disposition of forfeited contraband seized under Chapter 59 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure; WHEREAS, Chapter 59 of the provides for the forfeiture found to be "contraband" as Code of Criminal Procedure; Texas Code of Criminal to the State of Texas defined by Chapter 59 and WHEREAS, the Criminal District Texas, represents the State of contraband seized pursuant to Criminal Procedure. Procedure of property' of the Texas Attorney of Denton County, Texas regarding forfeiture of Chapter 59 of the Code of NOW THEREFORE, THIS LOCAL AGREEMENT is hereby made and entered into by the Agency and the Criminal District Attorney of Denton County for the mutual considerations stated herein: As article 59.06 of Chapter 59 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure mandates that a local agreement be reached between the attorney representing the State an�l,_the law enforcement agency to effect the disposition. of contraband forfeited to the State, both parties therefore agree that: In consideration for the services associated with the forfeiture of contraband, the Agency agrees that thirty-three and one-third percent (33 1/3%) of all money and property forfeited shall be retained by District Attorney to be used for the official purposes of the office as provided by law. The District Attorney agrees that remaining contraband, after retention of the above stated portion for the District Attorney, shall be retained by the Agency for purposes allowed by law. This Agreement shall apply to money or property seized for forfeiture purposes by the Agency on or after October 18, 1989. Money and property shall be considered forfeited to the State once a forfeiture judgment has become final, and no Motion for New Trial or Notice of Appeal has been taken. Payments to the District Attorney shall be made monthly. Each payment shall be based upon the amount of money, if any, forfeited to the State in that period and upon the proceeds of the sale, if any, of forfeited property sold by the Agency in that period. All costs of court proceedings shall be paid by the Agency including the cost of titles searched and title ' policies issued. The term of this Agreement shall be for a period of one (1) year from October 18, 1989. This Agreement shall automatically be renewed on a yearly basis --after the initial one (1) year term. This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon thirty (30) days prior written notice thereof to the other of its intention to terminate upon the date specified in such notice. Any pending forfeitures under this Agreement filed prior to the termination date, however, shall not be affected by such notices. Any notice, payment, statement, or demand required or permitted to be given hereunder by either party to the other may be effected by personal delivery in writing or by mail, postage prepaid. Mailed notices shall be addressed to the parties at the addresses appearing below, but each party may change its address by written notice in accordance with this section. Mailed notices shall be deemed communicated as of three days after mailing. Criminal District Attorney P.O. Box 234A Denton, Texas 76202 SIGNED, this day of 1989. Jerry Cobb Criminal District Attorney , Texas Denton County, Texas r TIJi FROM* DATE$ SUBJECT: 4 ■ ■ o 04 BOX 578 i NGER, a •_66 ■ose Garcia, . Rosene Sebastian issue and - steps that City Council needsto take if the street is closmf 0 ado Please t��te the minute arder� that are attached referring tc� this matter. LAW OFFICES OF RONALD J. NE(MAN 386 W. MAIN / P. O. Box 777 LEWISVILLE, TEXAS 75067 214/436-1558 RONALD J. NEIMAN MARGARET E. BARNES November 2, 1989 Mr. John Hamilton City Manager City of Sanger P. O. Box 578 Sanger, Texas 76266 Re: Conveyance Never Used Dear John: FAX # 2 14-436-1349 IDu loll � NOV 31989 L'`dTL' of Street Right -of -Way You have requested my input with respect to a street right-of-way which has never been built upon, and for which there I s no apparent future use by the City. Your request is how to proceed with a quit claim of ownership of the property to the adjacent property owners. It would be my suggestion that you obtain a letter from tYie utility companies serving the City, as well as any City Department which might need right-of-way, to the effect that the property in question does not contain any public utility pipe, Line, etc., and that it is anticipated that there will be no need for any use thereof in the future. You should also have a letter in the file frc>nl all prop- erty owners which are immediately adjacent to the ;property in question, requesting that the street be closed ana abandoned forever. Next, the City Council should adopt an ordinance aban- doning the right-of-way and authorize the Mayor or City Manager to convey the property to the adjacent property owners. Next, you should require the property owners who will receive conveyance of the property to prepare the quit claim deed wherein the authorized City official will convey one-half (1/2) of the right-of-way to the party on either side. Mr. John Hamilton City Manager City of Sanger November 2, 1989 Page 2 Then a certified copy of the abandonment ordinance and the quit claim deed can be filed in the Deed Records, and that should conclude the matter. You will need field notes on the entire right-of-way, as well as on each one-half (1/2 ) which is to be conveyed, and the expense of obtaining that should be left to the property owner that will be acquiring it. Please advise if I may be of additional information or assistance in preparation of documents. Sincerely, C Ronald J. Neiman RJN:dmy __ __.._. ,l ----- -- - i „ . 1_ _ , , roc! w , , w. VOL ------ - — + " y These Presents: THE STATE Or r s' Know All Men B • ...-, n couxTY or.......n N:eoN.................... L PflCPL•itT'1 Iiiuutt 5 That I, OPAL LEE Ah1YX, a widow, hereinafter known as Grantor, ,1_' 33 E Texas for and in consideration of Denton ,Staten ------------------ o[ the County o[ ------------------- _ DOLLARS, the sumoE TEN ANll NO/100-------------------------- _ ---i$10.00)--------- and other good and valuable considerations ph1YX, JR., CARROLL in hand paid by COY THODIAS ADtYX, LEE M. to me CIIESLEY SIiIRLENE ttICKS, and CIiERRy ANN llON Ai`tYX, pIARY ROSENE SEBASTIAN, whose address is 100 Ilillcres , BEARll, hereinafter known as Grantees, Fully acknowledged+ 'texas 7G2G6, aof all oftwhichliseherebyffection I bear for m Sanger+ the receipt children, C 1 J (^ ` V/ have Granted, Sold and Conveyed, and by these Presents do Grant, Sell and Convey unto the said RtkS rk tRii! Grantees Stateot Texas of the County of Denton the City of arcel of land situated in conveyed All that certain tract or P art of the Reuben Bebee Survey, A- Denton County, Texas, a P lggl, recorded Sanger in Z7.S3 acre treed dated June 29.Ve and more 29 and being a part IfRa Sullivan, bYof Denton County, Texas, by W•p, Brockman to Deed Records to -wit: e 438, follows, the Bolivar in Volume 45, Fag metes and boundsou t boundary line of fully described hY1 stake in the S the Northtest corner of BEGINNING at about 294 feet Wens ,test Addition to ,the •Town and Sanger public road, of j R. Sullivan N E. Sullivan, to W.S. Block No. 1 326, a lot out of J•R, Sullivan and wife, _ of Sanger, conveyed by ,02 recorded in Volume $3, P g a f son, by aced dated JaCountyf, TeXas; line of said public road 131 'Y Denton Northwest corner Deed Records of South boundary final THENCE West with the25 feet East of the orig street feet a stake for corner, line of a of said 27.53 acre tract; 27 53 acre tract, a stake for 'CI[ENCE South 510 feet with the East boun ary a street, a taken off of the West side of said line of corner; 50 foot THENCE East 175 feet with the North bou dary line of a stake for corner; the Nest TIIENCE North 499 feet inning. street to the Place of Beg the following described tract, to -wit: SAVE AND HXCBPT, HOWEVER, rcel afpartdoL thetReubentBebeetSuconveyed All that certain tract or Texas, in Denton County, 27 53 acre tract out of said Su1891' recorded Sanger, deed dated June 29, 29, and being a part of a by lq,p, Brockman to J.R. Sullivancontinued-- ------------ vo�'� tl ��cac:�S3U in Volume 45, page 438, Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, and also a part of a lot or tract of land described in deed from Mrs. Nannie J. Nance to Lee Ni. Amyx and wife dated February 16, 1943, and recorded in Volume 299, page 223 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, and more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a stake in the South boundary line of the Bolivar and Sanger public road, about 294 feet West of the Northwest corner of a lot out of Block No. 1 of J.R. Sullivan's West Addition to the Town of Sanger, conveyed by J.R. Sullivan and wife, N.E. Sullivan, to W.S. Tyson, by deed dated January 6, 1902, recorded in Volume 83, page 326, Deed Records of Denton County, Texas; THENCE, West with the South boundary line of said public road 131 feet a stake for corner, 25 feet East of the original Northwest corner of said 27.53 acre tract, a stake for corner; THENCE South 210 feet with the East boundary line of a street taken off of the West side of said 27.53 acre tract, a stake for corner; THENCE East 149.12 feet for corner on the East line of said of conveyed by Mrs. Nannie J. Nance to Lee M. Amyx and wife above mentioned; THENCE North with the East line of said lot 210 feet more or less to the Place of Beginning. THIS CONVEYANCE IS SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING: 1. Outstanding and existing restrictions, reservations and easements of record in Denton County, Texas. 2. Any portion of the hereinbefore described property falling within the boundaries of any road or roadway. TO HAV>a AND TO HOLD the above described premises, together with all and singular, the rights and appurtenances thereto in anywise belonging unto the said Grantees, their heirs and assigns [orever; and I do hereby bind my 5 e 1 f , my heirs, executors and administrators, to Warrant and forever Defend all and singular Use said prenuses unto the said Grantees, their heirs and assigns against Query person whomsoever lawfully claiming, or to claim the same, or any part Weteo[. Witness my hand ly X� A.D. 19 8 3 this �' day of Witnesses at Request of Grantor: t5pa Lee Amyx * 14v Ova `®®0@ % A f m61 r c ,m laA _° NJ % , ¥ . ~ ©P, / ©\Ot7vp u a. . # 0 // as ,¥. ~ ~ ; ^ SY41©+a \ j }I VOL ICUS1FAG[UJ1 - ACKNOWLEDGMENT THE STATE OF TEXAS, BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, COUNTY OF..._.._...1)I,NTO.. In and for said County, Texas, on this day personally appeared............................Opal... Lee .... ....... 0.............. ..... known to me to he the person_......whox name.............1.5..........subscrilxd to the foregoing irotrument, and acknowledged to me that .......%e..........execuled the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE, This...........4�..............d of........ �.y......� ................., A. D. f9_g. I, 0(e ....................... .......................................4"GEORGE HOPKIN3 Notary Public fn and for the State of Texas.Ibnry WMS $Irtr d Tual7b COnsik" rat bparr 00.4My Commission Fxpires............................................................... 19.......... ACKNOWLEDGMENT THE STATE OF TEXAS, . .'•'.'..'.... .... ....'.. ..'.... '. . BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, COUNTY OF ................. in and for said County, Texas, on this day personally appeared................................................................................................................................... known to me to be the persan........whox name.............................subscribed to�We'foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that ........ha.........execuled the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL. OF OFFICE, This ..................._......._day of.............._.................................4, A. D. 19............ (L.S.)......................................._.............................................................................. Notary Public In and for the State of Texas. MyCommission Expires............................................................... 19.......... CORPORATION ACKNOWLEDGMENT THE STATE OF TEXAS, BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, COUNTYOF ....................................................... in and for said County, Texas, on this day personally appeared......................................................................................................4............................ ............................................. ................ ...... .............................. ....................... I ... ......... .............. ................... known to me to be the person and officer whose name is subscribed to the foregoing Instrument and acknowledged to me that the same was the act of the said ......................._....... a corporation, and that he executed the same as the act of such corporation for the purposes and consideration therein expressed, and N the capacity therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE, This..............................day of............_....................................I A. D. 19............ (LS.)....................................................................................................................... Notary Public in and for the State of Texas. My Commission Expira............................................................... t9.......... THE STATE OF TEXAS, � COUNTYOF............................................................. 1 County Clerk of the County Court of said County, do hereby certify that the foregoing instrument of writing dated on the ................._. ..............................day oL..........................................., A.D. 19............, with Its Certificate of Authentication, was filed for record in my office on the........................day of........................................ .... I A.D. 19............, at................o'clock..... III ..... .,.At,, and was duly recorded this.................. day ol................................................................... A.D. 19.........., at..........................o'clock................Dt., in the Records of said County, in Vol. ume............................................. on pages............................................... _._ WITNESS my hand and seal of the County Court of said County, at my office in�.41......................................................4..........4.......4..6 .......................................................................................................................the day and year 4t above written. ClerkCounty Court..............................................................................................County, Texas (L.S.) Dy........................................................................................._......., Deputy. nlllvu-re� cir{n�F� At the regular scheduled me et ir,c t� i t� i�;;,r c i City Cc tx;,ci l held February 2U___._..in the City Hull, 201 Bolivar Street, the •following iLF::m w4,s cJi c_,��-;t=d r,dici ctecl upon by the City Council. 6. John Coker met with Council to discuss the possibility of opening the north end of 9th street. 9th now dead ends into Plum Street. The street has been designated but is not open. Coker stated he would like the city to open the street or quit claim it to him. He has property that could be utilitize for additional housing if he could get the street opened. Mayor Cole stated that the city's policy on a quit claim was to give one-half to each property owner on either side of the street. Bridges felt it would be unsafe and hazardous situation if the street was opened all the way through to FM 455. Coker stated that Keith Pate was at the meeting to request the street not be opened to 455 but to the end of Coker's property. Discussion. It was noted that 9th is a 50' street. Council asked Coker if he wanted to build the street. He stated he would build a gravel street but it would not be feasible to pave and gutter. Mayor Cole stated he didn't feel that Council would require curbs since it was in an area where there are..•not curbs. Mayor Cole told Coker that Council would discuss the issue and get back with him. T, f•�osa'1 ie Garcia, City �:iecre.k.�,,�y .t:r;r� •l.t;�: (::i•ty c�•F� 5�:;;�,ra�:r•, dc� hereby certify that thca above: rni;�,�_��l,c_�_> ��f= then r.7h��scr,il.;c_cJ ineca�l-.ir•,�� are a true and correct accOUnto o.f: t hf.E }�r8: :. •F ciir,ri Fie:1rJ tin the, d a y f ._..,Feb ruary_..__...__.._...._.__.._, 1: Given under my hand and seat o•F Li-;N> C:i•Lv o.r_ 1.a,:-;r•,rier-, this ..........._..�h____. d a Y o f ___ June_ 1 •:�.. _ . $ 9_.. _ - R (7SAl_TE GA*If* C!"r`r ;:::If�;tz��:l,'=�It`r h1TtUU fC CiRDE R At the regular_ thescheduled MrnE_et ir tF7t� 8. Spindle made the motion to approve the Quit Claim on property for W. K. Pate (Sanger Motor Co., 9th Street extension). Bridges gave the second. Voted unan. I, Rcsal ie Garcia, City Seeret�,t�y •For the Csity c_•P San,raE�r•, dc herby certify that the abcvEa rnin,_itt��a c•F tl-ie cieecribE�d ri�eEatir,i:� acre a trLte an,d correct accourrt of the. pir... eedir,u held cir•, the ._ 7 th day of w_ May 1 J Given, under my hand and meal of thte ty ci•f' S4zn,rier, this 29th _day of June ROSALIE GARC I A, CITY :afcCRi_'!"i"ahY' CITY OF SANGER P. 0. BOX 578 SANGER, TEXAS 76266 MEMORANDUM #371 T06 Honorable Mayor & Members of City Council FROM: John Hamilton, City Manager DATE: November 3, 1989 SUBJECT: City Administrator's Report 1). At the request of Congressman Dick Armey, Mayor Armstrong has appointed Carl Ray Higgs, Bill McClellan and Gary Lynch to the Lake Ray Roberts Lake Information Exchange Committee. 2). Ashcroft Garage is considering demolishing the storage building south of his business and fencing the lot as a vehicle storage area. Current zoning code does not permit a vehicle repair business at his location; however, he would be utilizing the area for the same purpose as it is currently used. Does Council want a Board of Adjustment hearing on this proposal or is staff authorized to approve the proposed improvements`? 3). The Inspector General's Office has been to Sanger concerning Mr. Ovid Neal's allegations concerning the 1985 operation of the HUD housing program. Staff has not received any correspondence from the Inspector General's Office since their inspection. 4). We are requesting permission to purchase an additional vehicle for the electric department as approved on the budget, Electric, Acct. #471.0% Motor Vehicles, $4,900, Hopefully the vehicle can be purchased at an advantageous price so that safety equipment and a radio purchase can be included in the $4,900 budget allocation. This will be a used pickup. 5). We are scheduled to appear before the Regional Review Committee at the Council of Governments at 9 a.m., Wednesday, November 15th, concerning our grant application on sewer line infiltration. ,IOVEMBER r• PAGE 2 November 17th at • •honor the VolunteerBobbye Robinson a1 r O V I D N E A L ■ POST OFFICE BOX 4 6 0 ■ ■ S A N G L R, T E X A S ■ 7 6 2 6 6 ■ (8 1 7) 4 5 8= 5 0 5 5 Is October 26, 1989 Mr. John Hamilton City Administrator Sanger, TX. 76266 Dear Mr. Hamilton: Pursuant to the Texas Open Records Act, please fiurnish me the following documents: All invoices submitted to the City of Sanger by Sallinger, Nichols, Jackson, Kirk and Dillard during this calender year. Also submit any letters that may discuss this billing in any way from any Sanger official to the law firm and letters from the law firm that may include information on the same subject. Please include a letter of transmittal, stipulating the documents involved in the disclosure on or before November 6, 1989. Sincerely, 0 Ovid Neal P.O. Box 460 Sa 45 nger, TX 76266 M055 ,W.4., it/4 October 26, 1989 Mr. John Hamilton City Administrator Sanger, TX. 76266 Dear Mr. Hamilton: Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, The Texas Open Records Act and my status as president of Senior Citizens' of Sanger, Inc., please furnish me, for viewing and copying, the following documents: 1. All records of correspondence and other forms of communication betweeIn any representative of the City of Sanger and the Women's Club Publishing Co., Inc. of Chicago, IL.. This would include any member of the City appointed "board", as well as any member of the organization that is governed by the "board". This should include any record of telephone conversations to the publishing company number from any official city telephone including the one at the Sullivan Senior Citizens, Center. 2. All records of conversations or any other communication between any official of the City of Sanger or any member of an instrumentality of the City of Sanger with the office of the Comptroller of the State of Texas during this calender year. 3. All tax exemption certificates that have been issued to the organization administered by the city appointed "board" to the City of Sanger on behalf of the organization and copies of any reports sent to the state comptroller since the inception of the city appointed "board". If such documents do not exist, please attach a brief explaination of the city's position in not obtaining such permits. I would appreciate knowing when these documents are ready for viewing at some specific time on or before November 6, 1989 according to law. I would aPHI eciate a transmittal letter to show the degree of compliance with this request. Sincerely, Ovi&Neal ■ O V I D N E A L ■ POST OFFICE BOX 4 G 0 ■ ■ S A N G L R, T E X A S ■ 7 G 2 G G ■ (8 1 7) 4 5 8- 5 0 5 5 ■ October 19, 1989 Mr. John Hamilton City Administrator Sanger, TX. 76266 Dear Mr. Hamilton: Attached for the information of the mayor and the city council, is a copy of NOTICE OF DOCKETING AND ORDER on HUDBCA No. 904328=C1, for your information. Since the City is not a party to the litigation, this is solely for your information, since all allegations involved non-compliance with the contract to which the City of Sanger is a party: TDCA 3550478. If you have any questions, feel free to give me a call. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Washington, D. C. Appeal of: OVID NEAL HUDBCA No. 90-4328-C1 Appellant Contract No. FW-5873 Mr. Ovid Neal Local Operator P. 0. Box 460 Sanger, Texas 76266 Charles M. Farbstein, Esq. Kenneth Markison, Esq. Office of General Counsel Department of Housing and Urban Development Washington, D. Co 20410 NOTICE OF DOCKETING AND ORDER On October 11, 1989, the Board received and filed Appellant's notice of appeal relating to Contract No. FW-5873. The appeal has been given the docket number listed above which is to be inscribed upon each submission to this Board. The Final Rules of this Board as published at 24 C.F.R. §20.10 (50 FR 45912, Nov. 5, 1985), a copy of which is enclosed, shall apply except as otherwise ordered. 1. Within 30 days of the receipt of this Order, the contracting officer shall assemble and file with the Board, through HUD's Office of General Counsel, three copies of an appeal file consisting of all documents pertinent to the appeal which shall be tabbed and indexed. Tab 1 shall be the final decision of the contracting officer. Tab 2 shall be the complete contract, including specifications, drawings, amendments and change orders. All correspondence between the parties relevant to the subject matter of the appeal shall be tabbed sequentially and any other relevant documents, including the contractor's certification for claim of more than $50,000, shall be included. 2. Within 30 days of the receipt Appellant shall file with the Board a simple, concise and direct statements each claim, Appellant shall set forth the amount, if known. of this Order, the Complaint, setting forth of each of its claims. For the contractual basis and, 3. Within 30 days of the receipt of the Complaint, the Government shall file with the Board an Answer, setting forth simple, concise and direct statements of defenses of each claim, including any affirmative defenses. 4. Within 30 days of the receipt of a copy of the appeal file, Appellant shall file with the Board any documents not contained therein which it considers relevant to the appeal. 5. If the claim is for less than $50,000, Appellant may elect to proceed under the Accelerated Procedure, as applicable, described in Rule 12.3, if notice of such election is given, in writing, within 60 days of receiving this Notice of Docketing and Order. (Rule 12.1(c).) 6. If the claim is for less than $10,000, Appellant may elect to proceed under the Small Claims (Expedited) Procedure, as applicable, described in Rule 12.2, if notice of such election is given, in writing, within 60 days of receiving this Notice of Docketing and Order. (Rule 12.1(c).) 7. Each submission filed with the Board must include a certification that a true and exact copy of that submission was served on the other party, with the exception of the appeal file, a copy of which will be sent to Appellant and to the HUD Office of General Counsel by the Board, upon receipt. The address for filing submissions is: HUD Board of Contract Appeals, Room 2131, 451 Seventh Street, S.W., Washington, D. C. 20410. The telephone number of the Board is (202) 275-6233. ORDERED this 12th day of October, 1989. H Enclosure cc: Robert F. Zentell, Contracting Officer Ft. Worth, Texas Office BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS nistrative P.O. Box 2910 Austin, Texas 78768.2910 512.463.0478 John Hamilton City Manager City of Sanger 201 Bolivar St. P.O. Box 578 Sanger, Texas 76266 Dear Mr Hamilton, 3740 North Josey lane Suite 210 Carrollton, Texas 75007.2435 214.394.1994 October 23, 1989 OCT 2 5 I do consider a total reform of the Work>rians Compensation System as the States number one priority, as such I am a co- sponsor of House Bill One. My firm conviction if that reform can only be obtained by taking the Court System out of the process and replacing it with a total Administration System. I will support mandatory Coverage if the exemption for employers with ten or fewer employees will insist upon total restructure of our pooling system so that those employers who have a high loss to premium ratio, will pay for the increase in premiums. Those employers that have good Safety records will no longer have to support those employers that have poor safety records. I am in favor of a plan whereby a Company could provide self insurance, providing the Company meet certain Financial Criterias. I support a reduction in Attorneys fee from 15% to 25% in cases that are uncontested. I fully support all safety regulations included in House Bill One. If further information is needed please direct inquires to my office. Sincerely, Re pre entative Ben Campbell kl Committees: County Affairs, Vice Chairman Science 6i Technology VIC BURGESS COUNTYJUDGE November 1, 1989 City of Sanger Post Office Box 578 Sanger, TX 76266 Ladies and Gentlemen: a Denton County Day for Economic Development turned out to be a tremendous success. We could not have achieved our objectives without the full backing of the business community. On behalf of the Executive Committee, who worked so hard to put the event together, we want you to know that we appreciate your support. The event helped bring our citizens, municipalities, chambers and businesses into better communication with each other. The challenges ahead are great, but the hurdles will be overcome with the kind of cooperation we received for this event. Thank you for your support. .00P VB:gb 6i cerel d 'VIC BURGESS a COUNTY JUDGE COUNTY COURT OF DENTON COUNTY • COURTHOUSE -ON -THE -SQUARE 110 W. HICKORY . DENTON, TEXAS 76201 • (817) 383-0298 • 1-800-346-3189 NO t I LE OF AN AF`F'L I CAT I ON F I LED t1J I TF-1 THE TEXAS WATEF' COMMISSION FOR THE TRANSFER OF THE CERTIFICATE OF CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY OF PERARE, INC. dJb/a WREN WATER SUPPLY TO PERARE WATER SYSTEMS d/bla WREN WATER SUPPLY IN DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS rflINNovember 89 3 1989 i*1r. John Hamilton City Manager City of Sanger F`.O. Box 578 Sanger, TX 762266 bear Mr Hamilton: F'ERARE= INC. �; b!a WREt�I WATER 5UF'i='LY has �i led an alp! icati cin with the Texas plater Commission to transfer its Certificate of Convenience and Necessity to provide water utility service in Denton County to PERARE WATER SYSTEMS dlb/a WREN WATER SUPPLY. The transfer includes the Denton Northwest Estates Subdivision. The area being transferred is approximately 15 miles north and t�.je=_,t of Denton, Texas and is generally bounded by Bowie, Indian Trails, Doyle, Jane Long and Lamar Roads. This transfer will have the following effect on the rates and services presently provided to these customers: service will still be provided using the same physical facilities, Texas Water Company will continue Lo operate the system and the rates will remain at their present level. THE EFFECT OF THIS TRAN5FER APF'LICATIOtd I5 IN SUF�STANCE THAT OF A NAME CHAhl6E. The principle owners remain the same and the Location of the owners is still that of Rt. 5, Box 1 9A, Denton, Texas. Persons who wish to intervene or comment on this application shay �l d write the: Rates Section , Water Ut i 1 i ti es t;i •� i si of 9 9 TEXAS WATER COMMISSION, P.O. Box 1?(.)87, Capitol Station, Austin, Texas 78711-3087 within thirty k'1. days from the date of this notice„ No public hearing will be held on this application unless a request for a hearing is received. Only those individuals who submit a written request to be notified of a i agar i ng schedule will receive notice if a hearing is scheduled. Texas Department of Health Robert Bernstein, Commissioner Robert A. MacLean, M.D. Deputy Commissioner Professional Services , Hernias L. Miller Deputy Commissioner Management and Administration October 26, 1989 Honorable Nel Armstrong, Mayor City of Sanger P. 0. Box 578 Sanger, Texas 76266 Public Health Region 5 2561 Matlock Road Arlington, Texas 76015-1621 (817) 460-3032 D/FW Metro 261-2911 Subject: Solid Waste - Denton County City of Sanger - Permit No. 1424 1.1 Miles NE of IS-35 & FM-455 Int. and 0.4 Mile E of IH-35 Dear Mayor Armstrong: C. R. Allen, Jr., M.D., M.P.H. Regional Director ' ._I..L II NJ (� OCT 3 1 i909 On October 25, 1989, Mr. Boyd M. Cole, P.E., from our regional office, inspected the subject Type.II municipal solid waste disposal facility. During this inspection, our representative was accompanied by three members of your staff. Our inspection report revealed the site being operated in compliance of the Texas Department of Health's "Municipal Solid Waste Management Regulations" (MSWMR). There were some corrective actions to be taken regarding the brush pile, seeding of grass on the filled area and filling in a low area to maintain proper grade and contour. If you have any questions concerning this letter, or if we may be of any assistance to you regarding solid waste management, you may contact Mr. Phil A. Spry, P.E., in Austin at telephone number 512/458-7271 or you may prefer to contact Mr. Boyd M. Cole, P.E. at the above listed telephone number or address. Sincerely, �%0& � Irvin J. urner, P.E. Regional Director for Environmental and Consumer Health Protection IJT/BMC/pgb cc: Division of Solid Waste Management, Austin JOE 9.ROGERS,CTA/RPA/RTA Chief Appraiser JOHN D. BROWN, RPA Deputy Chief Appraiser JOE A. FORSYTHE Deputy Chief Appraiser For Finance and Collections October 173 1989 City of Sanger Rose Garcia P.O. BOx 578 Sanger, Tx 76266 Dear Ms. Garcia: DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT 3911 MORSE STREET P-O. BOX 2346 DENTON, TEXAS 76205 817.666-0904 ' pCS � 9 'g69 BOARD OF DIRECTORS; TROY WHITE, Chairman JON BECK, Vice -Chairman JERKY GAGE, Secretary CIARENCE MYERS RICHARD C. SMITH REP': Candidates to Board of Directors - Denton Central Appraisal District, The City of Sanger has 12 votes. Candidates to the Denton Central Appraisal District Board of Directors are listed below alphabetically by each candidates last name. Each voting unit must cast its vote by written resolution and submit it to the Chief Appraiser by t�a40VAeMber 14tYti. The unit may cast all its votes for one candidate or may distribute the votes among any number of candidates. Some voting units may have enough votes to select several directors to the Board. To share representation on the Board, several units may wish to vote for the same candidate. A voting unit must cast its votes for a person nominated and named on the ballot. There is no provision for write-in candidates. The Chief Appraiser may not count votes cast for someone not .listed on the official ballot. Candidates nominated by taxing jurisdictions. 1. Beck, Jon 5. Myers, Clarence 2. Brock, Horace 6. Smith, Richard 3. Helms, Diane 7. White, Troy 4. Moore, Bradley Sincer ly, co.2 Joe D. ?Rogers Chief Appraiser CITY %J BANGER P. 0. BOX 578 BANGER, TEXAS 78286 MEMORANDUM 388 T0: Honorable Mayor & FROM: John Hamilton, City DATE: November 3, 1989 SUBJECT: Electrical Rates Members of the City Council Manager The Texas Public Power Agency has issued the following Public Utility Commission compiled electrical rates. I thought the information might be useful. Austin $70.61 Bluebonnet Electric Co-op. 65.22 Central Power and Light 64.69 City Public Service (San Antonio) 58.66 Denton County Electric Co-op. 75.14 El Paso Electric 86.11 Gulf States 79.67 Houston Light & Power 86.14 Mid -South Electric Co-op. 74.42 Pedernales Electric Co-op. 69.84 Southwest Texas Electric Co-op. 78.17 Southwestern Public Service 69.67 Southwestern Electric Power 72.05 Texas -New Mexico Power 74.57 Texas Utilities 73.57 Upshur-Rural Electric Co-op. 59.94 Victoria Co. Electric Co-op. 70.77 West Texas Utilities 87.66 Texas Average 73.37 IqOVEMBER 3, 1989 Summer Rate MoM Billing with fuel adjustment `1 f 11 Chic�ga 74.88 Miami 74. 84 Washington, D.C. 71.23 Denver 66.49 Seattle 29952 • • fits tlltfliy�&W • . JH:es �_F.,�tTCN CfitJhlTY ElII*%w:C1TE3� [lr F l C:f. t1_S t S ;t7C [F1TJ:t�!d 37�r,O N. JO SEY LANE, SUITE 210 CARRM.L.TCN, TEXAS 750,717 uflow i ')ear" Elected !:!f•FiCial o 7hie sec+-+r,d r,7c=(at a. r,� ��+f the �r•�irrl,+.+r, C+�<<rr,t y Fr�..tbl :i r_ t3ffi vials will be +_+r, Thu:r sr_'<i,y, Nc+VPmber" "nth, at *7pnOlr pr,i at t:fie Sa7.(r"ern':!5 Restar.rr`ar,%rls in rolower" MC5.4tur,d. The r"estaurar,t is lt:+C':ated inn .3407 9_{:+r,3 Prairie Ellavd, one I*ial'F r,'1ile s<uti-i of SH 11.71. (main str"eet) +=+r, SH 2499 (F(r"cipevivie darf7 road) appr ox,,xma , ly i mi lfes west i+'F L_E}wi!:'N:l. l lt='s (.�t:trflrili_ln ty CenteY'". II, IE! buffc?t 'wall begin at 7.00 prii, at is.u0!1i grit we will heoin ._+tar" r,leet i ng and adj o._r r"r, a;: 9 m OO prn. Cost for" t l'ie buffet is s E,. r. 0 per pEar"si n. er,C+=Ur"age yot..r k.o attend b"iu' .meetin . The r,ieetiY619 ir, CC:'1,+-iber" was well. att(::?r,clr d by a VExr":iecl gr"i!Up across the county. The agr:ar,r.3a wi l. ]. :ir,clude By-L_aws for the a4s+=+C.`.iat7.on, eleC".'i:ion of O'i'I:I.cey%f, altaid r.jener"al t!raaagranizat:l.on. We to i l 1, at this t irrzej (=stabl islvi tea r„ember"ship fee and, those whc+ wish to become Meriisber"S are. er,C+_ UrnalaE?r? t+-i pay 'hat Fee at this time. 1.1 (.? iar"P 11•Clrf� fcieP:ir,I7 yi i1_l. :L-F y+_+lt i-IaV[.° arty el;_(Ps'l;:i+�+r,s, pl�.ase Cali. 1=eenr•e;sc+r,�.atiVe Car;�pbell�� +�+'Ffir�e at t w, l r) 3 94994 S i r,Cer-e l y, Jtct'G(� Repr"eser,t atiVe. Mist. 61 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER BANGER INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT P.O. BOX 188 BANGER, TEXAS 76266 (817) 458=7438 }r NOV 6 VROU9 Jim F. Coulston, Superintendent Mike Rosenberg, Business Manager High School Principal - Jack Biggerstall - (817) 458.7497 Middle School Principal • Kent Crutsinger - (817) 458-7916 Elementary Principal - Travis Underwood - (817) 458-5297 Intermediate School Principal - Alice Madden - (817) 458.7476 Dir. of Educational Dala Services -David L. Moore - (817) 458-7438 Curriculum Coordinator - Greta Miller . (817) 458-7438 November 1, 1989 I would like to take this time to express my gratitude to you for the contribution you have made to our school over the past week- Trying to stress the seriousness of the use of drugs and alcohol was the purpose of Red Ribbon Week. Sometimes actually making an impression in the minds of those who need it most a:s difficult. I feel the movie that was shown did make an impression in the minds of the students. The movie had a great impact on me personallyli and on the student body as a whole. I feel the movie is beneficial and should be seen by people in general. The group discussions at the Middle School were beneficial and may prove to be effective in the High School also. The movie showed the consequences of drinking and driving and the reality of making the wrong choices, which does not only effect you, but those around you. Thanks to concerned people like you, we just might be able to make a difference in someone's Life. Your hard work and devotion to your job is recognized and appreciated. Once again I would like to say thank you for your Red Ribbon Week and your help in trying to make Sanger educated and aware of the importance of decision making drinking and driving. Thank You! contribution to Schools more and the effects of Sincerely, Becky White, President, Student Council "�lrlirnirl to t;durilliun ... (�uuunillrl to C.en•Ilrnrr" CITY OF SANGER P. 0. SOX 578 SANGER, TEXAS 76286 MEMORANDUM #37t3 T0: Honorable Mayor &Members of the City Council FROM: John Hamilton) City Manager DATE: November 8, 1989 SUBJECT: Executive Summary Submitted by Thomas Taylor, Director of Upper Trinity Regional Water District Attached is a summary on the water study for serving Denton County with water for Lake Ray Roberts. I also have available the complete Final Draft of the Water Implementation Plan dated November 2, 1989 if you would like to review the document. During the next ninety (90) days, Council will need to decide Sanger's contract participation in the water plan. The Executive Director of the District, Thomas Taylor, will be available at a Council meeting to discuss the proposed plan with you, JH:es Attachments UPPER TRINITY REGIONAL MATER DISTRICT WATER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In June 1989 the Texas Legislature created the Upper Trinity Regional Water District to provide for the water, wastewater, and solid waste needs of the Denton County Area. This study is an extension of the March 1988 Denton County Water and Wastewater Regional Master Plan. Its objective is to develop a cost-effective and implementable plan that will: 1) meet the immediate needs of 12 entities interested in initially participating in a regional water system and 2) be sufficiently flexible to allow other entities to participate in the future. Each of the 12 entities, known as Participating Agencies (PAs), was asked to update their water use projections so regional facilities could more accurately be planned. The initial participating agencies are of the cities of Denton, Lewisville, Highland Village, Sanger, Pilot Point, Krum, Krugerville, and Aubrey, the Argyle Water Supply Corporation (WSC), the Bartonville WSC, the Mustang WSC, and the Lake Cities Municipal Utility Authority (MUA). Using the Tri-Regional Concept recommended in the Master Plan, several alternatives and options were evaluated to determine the estimated capital cost, annual operating cost, and operational flexibility of improvements required to provide for the projected water demands. Under the Tri-Regional Concept, three separate and individual regions (north, south, and east) were to be established. The District's service area for this Implementation e E-2 Plan included all of Denton County except the southwest corner and limited portions of Collin County for the cities of Frisco, Prosper, and Celina. This study was performed by Alan Plummer and Associates, Inc. in coordination with alt of the 12 Participating Agencies and several other interested entities. Specific Findings and Recoinendations Following the evaluations these were the findings and recommendations: 1. The updated peak -day drought demands (peak day demands x 1.15) for the 12 PAs are projected to increase from approximately 60 million gallons per day (MGDj to approximately 140 MGD, an increase of over 230 percent. 2. The updated peak -day drought demands for the District's entire service area are projected to increase from approximately 70 MGD in 1990 to over 210 MGD in 2010, an increase of over 300 percent. 3. The updated water use projections used for this study are approximately 80 percent of those presented in the 1988 Master Plan, 4. The projected demands for the 12 PAs will exceed the available supply by approximately the year 1992. 5. The 12 PAs have requested 19.5 MGD of treated water to be available in 1992 to meet their needs through 1997. The updated water use projections reveal that over 21 MGD will be required in 1997 if all existing faces are operated at 100 percent capacity. E-3 6. The City of Denton has obtained a site and completed preliminary design for a water treatment plant on Lake Ray Roberts and related pumping and transmission facilities to deliver treated water to Denton. 7. The City of Denton currently has a limited amount of excess capacity available in its system and can make up to 10 MGD available in the south portion of its system when the Lake Ray Roberts WTP and related facilities are completed. 8. Using the Tri-Regional Concept, three alternative development plans were identified: a. Alternative One - Developing each region independently (Stand Alone Plan). b. Alternative Two - Phasing improvements to allow for the planned interregional transfer of treated water (Interregional Transfer Plan). c. Alternative Three - Permanently transferring treated water from the north region to the south region (Permanent Transfer Plan). 9. Four options were evaluated for each alternative development plan: a. Size water lines to meet the projected 2010 demands of the entire service area. b. Size water lines to meet the projected 2010 demands of just the 12 PAs. E-4 c. Size water lines to meet the projected 2002 demands of just the 12 PAs, then parallel the lines to meet projected 2010 demands of the entire service area. d. Size water lines to meet the projected 2002 demands of just the 12 PAs, then parallel the lines to meet projected 2010 demands ofi just the 12 PAs. 10. Two overall level of service scenarios were investigated: 1) provide customer's peak -day rates into customer's ground storage or 2) provide customerIs peak -hour rates directly into customer's water distribution system. 11. Cost-effectiveness evaluations of each for the alternatives and options were performed to determine estimated capital costs. annual operating costs, wholesale cost per 1000 gallons, and operating flexibility. The results revealed that the Interregional Transfer Plan (Alternative 2) is cost-effective and offers the most long-term system flexibility. The Interregional Plan provides a means to meet the short-term needs of the South Region that could not be easily met otherwise. 12. The District should participate with the City of Denton in the development of a 20-MGD water treatment plant on Lake Ray Roberts with related facilities to deliver treated water to Denton, Sanger, Pilot Point, Aubrey, Krugerville, Krum, and the Mustang WSC. Lake Cities MUA would continue to be supplied by the City of Denton through 1997. In order for these facilities to be in-service by the summer of 1993, design work should begin immediately. 13. A new water treatment plant on Lake Lewi svi 11 a to supply the projected water needs of the South Region will take 4 to 5 years to develop, and there could be a short-term water shortage if the Stand Alone Plan were followed. E-5 14. To meet the short-term water needs of the South Region until the Lake Lewisville Water Treatment Plant can be completed, a 21-inch water transmission line between Denton and Lewisville should be constructed by the summer of 1992. This line would supply Lewisville, Highland Village, the Bartonville WSC, and the Argyle WSC and provide the option for a new service point for the Lake Cities MUA near Hickory Creek. In order to be in-service by the summer of 1992, design work on the transmission line should begin immediately. 15. An opinion ofi probable cost for these immediate Phase I improvements is $34.4 million, a portion of which would be shared by Denton. Approximately $400,000, or 1 percent, of the estimated capital cost is for oversizing Phase I water lines to provide for the needs of potential future customers. 16. Engineering planning and regulatory permitting for the development of a new 35-MGD water treatment plant on Lake Lewisville, raw water pump station, and transmission line should begin in the near future in order to be in-service by 1996. 17. A long-term level of service policy of delivering the customer's peak -day amount into the customer's ground storage tank would result in a more economical system than delivering the peak -hour amount directly into the customer's water distribution system. However, depending on system hydraulics and layout, a higher level of service may be more economical in limited cases. 18. The unit cost of water for each participant will depend on the amount of water used by the participant and the overall annual utilization, or load factor, of the regional system. E-6 19. The total annual cost will be made up of two components: fixed cost and variable cost. The fixed cost relates to the amount of system capacity available and the variable cost depends on the actual amount of water supplied by the system. 20. Depending on how the regional facilities are utilized, the estimated wholesale unit cost of water could range from over $3 per thousand gallons to just over $1 per thousand gallons. Based on a typical load factor, a system -wide average cost of approximately $2 per thousand gallons is expected for the initial development of the regional system (Phase I Improvements). 21. Joint use of facilities should be encouraged between the District and its customers to allow development of the most economical regional system. 22. A layout of recommended improvements is shown in Figure I-1. A listing of recommended Phase I Improvements with opinions of probable cost is shown in Table I-1. Gty of ArlingtonTexas Box 231 Zip Code 76004.0231 Arlington Phone (817) 275-3271 Dallas Phone Metro (817) 265-3311 "w� \ EI`#'� October 25, 1989 Off Ice of the City Attorney 200 West Abram Street (81 f) 4bumba l8 TO: ALL CITIES SERVED BY LONE STAR GAS COMPANY FROM: Jay Doegey, Chairman of the Steering Committee of Cities Participating in Railroad Commission Docket 7253 and 7504 Lone Star Gas City Gate Rate Case REz Railroad Commission Gas Utilities Docket 7504 - Inquiry Into Reasonableness of City Gate Rate Case of Lone Star Gas Company The City of Abilene has recently filed an original City gate rate case petitioning the Texas Railroad Commission to conduct an inquiry into the reasonableness of the city gate rate of Lone Star Gas Company. It is alleged that Lone Star's present city gate rate is unreasonable, preferential and discriminatory in that Lone Star continues to charge a city gate rate that does not reflect the impact of a 12% reduction in the Federal Income Tax rate, decreased cost of capital and discriminatory practices in charging various gas costs to different classes of customers. The case seeks a reduction in the gate rate accordingly. A preliminary analysis of the poten- tial changes in conditions since the 1982 gate rate case indicates the existing gate rate as producing excessive revenues of approxi- mately $24 million annually. (See attached report and newspaper articles.) As you know, similar inquiries are currently or are about to be undertaken with respect to other utilities by the Public Utility Commission (Southwestern Bell in PUC Docket 8585, TU Electric in a soon to be filed case, etc.). You may want to bring this to the attention of your respective city councils to see if they want to intervene in Railroad Commission Docket 7504. If you desire further information or your city wishes to participate on the Steering Committee, please contact me at (817) 459-6878. Sincerely, Jay � Doegey Chairman JBD/mcb Attachments Utilities. sai d I -t have overcharged 8r Michael Ramer Staff Wrftw Consumers may have paid millions of, dollars extra to Texas utility companies„ according to the Texas Office of Public Utilities Counsel. The companies may have accumulated hundreds of millions of dollars in excess by not conforming to the federal Tax Reform Act of 1996, which reduced the federal tax rate for corporations from 46 percent to 34 percent, an office spokes- person said. Utility regulatory agencies in Texas are among those in only six states that have not acted to resolve the tax rate Issue, and 42 of The states taking action reduced their statewide utility rates, Carlos Higgins, OPC's deputy public counsel, said Friday. The tax rate 1 issue arid. its .aSfect ®n Texas consumers has ,csughfgthe'attene tion of state Sen: Carlos Truan,_ D�Coc� iii' Christi, who has proposed a resolptio3i Ito o the Senate directing the PUC to. "prom 0t-; ly act upon the matters of , consumer interest," and review the rates of utili- ties that fall under the PUC's ratemaking authority. 1 . The resolution also says these excess. tax payments "that are no longer re• quired ... must be returned to Texas ratepayers" pursuant to Texas law, A Senate hearing on the resolution is scheduled for Wednesday. According to David Shapiro, counsel for Truants office, regulatory agencies in Pennsylvania and Michigan have acted on the tax rate issue by reducing utility rates statewide, saving their respective consumers more than 5300 million. He 'said.' more .than. five other states acted and saved b taxpayers more than $100 `million.,... . In `a: statement Dec. 21, Truan said Texas consumers "are being taken to the cleaners by this failure of the regulatory process." "I am shocked to learn that ratepayers throughout the state have been over* charged hundreds of millions of dollars ." he said. "But the PUC has failed to bring them back to the regulatory table so that their customers could share in this financial benefit handed to them by the US. Congress." However, Senate Resolution 2, the Truan Resolution, does not address the Railroad Commission nor the gas utility companies that fall under its jurisdic- LONGVIEW NEWS — JOURNAL Monday, February 6, 1989 lion. proved Lone Star's present state* Because the commission is an elected wide gas rate in 1982. body, unlike the PUC whose commissions The cities, including Longview, ers are appointed by the governor, Dallas and Arlington are interve- Shapiro said state legislators "do not feel nors in an RRC proceeding comfortable putting heat on them." where the gas company is asking "Their posture is that if the public commissioners to grant a 54.5 elects someone to the Railroad Commis• million rate increase to fund a sion, the public should put the heat on rebate program. • them to change this issue in order to In a "Motion for Hearing" filed impact (consumer) gas rates," he said. with .the RRC Jan. 19, a group of Railroad Commission Chairman Kent 14 cities asks the commission to Hance told the Nevis -Journal Friday the reduce lone Star's current gas commission does not consider changes rate, in gas utility rates unless "a city comes "Such pleadings are predicated in and asks for an evaluation of the rates or a utility company asks for a rate on the reduction of the federal increase." income tax rate from 46 percent to 34 percent ..." the motion said. Sae Utilities, 7-A Hance said the tax rate issue will be considered when the case comes before the commissioners. Utilities said to "If that cone ofissues (the cities) decide press, to Tess, then we will look into it," he said. have overcharged thHiggins, the former director of e Texas Railroad Commission gas utilities division, said he has consumers been interested in this issue since his tenure with the coma From tamA mission. "Until one of those two actions takes place, then we don't usually "Most states have taken posi- do anything, and this has been a tive action and have saved their policy of the Railroad Commis- residents big bucks," Higgins sion in the past," Hance said. said. "However, there has been Hance added that if the gas rate no action by either the Railroad is a big enough issue to a city, Commission or the PUC in the then it is free to file an appeal way of public hearings to consid- concerning its gas rates at any er whether utility rates around time, but that the commission the state are excessive." does not hold a generic hearing A The only way the two regulates zo consider the rates of all utility ry agencies can consider whether companies under its jurisdiction. utility rates in the state are However, the issue has prompt- excessive is to call in the utilities and look at their overall rates, he ed more than 15 cities to bring up said, the issue of excess tax revenues "The utilities argue that all of in a current Railroad Commis• their expenses have increased sion proceeding involving Lone during the time since the Tax Star Gas Co. Reform Act of 1986," Higgins said. In a recent preliminary invest!- "Ali this meant is that by virtue gction commissioned by the cit- of this tax decrease, they didn't ies into Lone Star's gas rates, have to come in and ask for a rate Reed•Stowe & Co, a Dallas -based Increase." governmental consulting firm, ... said the gas utility company may "They consider it offsetting be collecting an excess $2S mil- revenue for their company, but lion from its customers due to the by looking at their rate, it is a federal tax rate change, safe assumption that gas utility The Railroad Commission ape companies are, making too much." Angry legislators blast state's'costliest blunder' By Mary Lsns cover overcharges dating from Jan- ; POST AUs N eUREAU bary 1987 until some future date w en AUSTIN —Texans have lost hundreds of millions of dollars In overcharges by utility companies and angry state lawmakers are call- ing it the "costliest blunder" in state regulatory history. Sen. Carlos Truan, D-Corpus Christi, said Wednesday that "arro- gance" led the Public Utility Com- mission to ignore changes in feder- al tax law that have cost untold millions of dollars in overcharges. since apprgval of the 1986 Tax Re= form Act. • Unlike Texas, utility commis - tons in 44 other states demanded rate cuts after tax law changes that decreased utility companies' feder- al tax payments by 12 percent. There is apparently no way to re" an a Texas ' h the PUC d the Rai1- roa& Commission take action,- 4`1 tome" said. .- Texas' regulatory agencies dew cided not deal with the tax reduc- tion on an industrywide basis. They opted instead to handle it case -by - case during rate hearings in order, to assess all items that make up a utility's cost of doing business. . The PUC belatedly agreed Wednesday to consider the issue• only hours before a Senate com- mittee approved Truan's resolution ordering the commission to do so. Meanwhile, Railroad Commis- sion Chairman Kent Hance said his agency has done nothing to ensure I tax savings by gas companies Please see WINOFAIL A•12 1'he Novsfon Post/ /TI'urcdcy, F Qh vorY 9, 1989 WINDFALL: fficials;d%a/ the blame me From A-1 Asked why the Railroad Coma diately adjourned the meeting over are passed on to consumers mission;•would4A initiate action her strong objection. Truan said allowing utilities to on ►ts'RWn'to: rntect:consumers in reap excess revenues from tax sav the tax windfall matter, Hance said: ings "is one of the most costly 1 cannot answer that because 1 do fiot know. We just never have in blunders in the history of any state. the past." IV agency. It is an act of the: most Asked if that left utilities tree to gross abuse to allow these *is not keep collecting 'excess cash from to keep this money which is not ' rightfully theirs." ratepayers, Hance replied: "That's Ttfully -resolution noted that the right. ,It seems like if there was some problem, we probably would PUC had no idea how much money have heard from the cities." has been lost to consumers, but he Hance said a tariff case involving said hundreds of millions of dollars Lone Star Gas was filed before the are tt stake.. commission recently, and that Attorney Don Butler, who en ral means the commission can get in- Powent68 cities served by Central volved in the issue. Butler said 15 Power s Light, said by the time cities in the Lone Star Gas service action is taken, utility companies area are asking that windfall tax will have been reaping a federal tax dollars be refunded to consumers. windfall for two years. Meanwhile, PUC ' members "That money, is lost forever," moved quickly to blame each oth- Butler said. "There is no retroac- tive ratemaking." er, their slatf and the Office of Pub - Butler said many slates have tak- lic Utility Counsel for toot -dragging en action to make sure consumers on the utility tax windfall. OPUC's get the benfits due them. • '. ' . Kingsbery Ottmers said her office "We're two years,.behind.Okla- has been dealing with the issue on homa," Butler said, calling this the a case -by -case basis: - worst regulatory mistake made Commission Chairman Marta "south of the Red Rivera Greytok said she took office in Sep - "It's been over a year&since oth- tester 1987 and since, then she er states took action tgr*protect their has taken Commissioner Jo Camp- bells word for them fact that the ratepayers," Truan said. "This is „ inexcusable." ;'?? PUC could not engage in piece - Hance said this ts'(irpbably the meal ratemaki mg on tax issues. reason Texas gas utilities have not. Campbell,.t'ibwever, said she had come to the Railroad Commission raised the..issue at several PUC for any rate hikes since July •1987. . 'meetings,, " "We haven't had anybody 'ask PUC traoscript4 show that when for rate increases because* they;' 'Campbell asked that the tax wind - knew they were going to hale too, fan issue be discussed Oct. 5, Wil- address this issue," Hance sa.U,::• liam'B. Cassin and Greytok imme11. - Cassin said Wednesday that the first time he heard about the tax windfall issue was in December, when he read about it in The Hous- ton Post. He blamed the PUC staff for the fact that he was not in- formed. Commissioners said they will oversee a hearing on the issue some time in March. Also Wednesday the PUC de- layed the hearing on HL&P's rate hike request until March 13 in or- der to give the commission staff more time to prepare. ��.-T—��—E'er TLJE 1 � $5 P �� IG� January 14, 1989 L,�. � e ����i��'�ir��a�iY� +►tic �i11. C V�D J�N 1 7 19�� t GOVEANMENTAI CONSULTING SEAVIC6S � GCE' Mr. Don Butler autlar & Casstevens 902 S. Mopac Expressway Building II Suite 525 Austin, Texas TS?46-5?{T ' Dear Mr. Butler, In response to the request of the Lone Star Gas Gate Rates Steering Committee, Reed -Stowe 8c Co. has per#oraaed a preliminary; analy�lis of the potential effect on the existing Gate Rate that may' have re�lulted due to changes in economic and market conditions since tha 1982 Gate Rate case which established the exulting rate$. We have not per#ormed the rigorous analysis and investigation +vhlch would be necessary to develop testimony with supporting evidence. Tha depth of analy3es required could only be accomplished during a full rate case prop=eeding which would require Lone Star Gas to provide sufficient quantity of data of a quality that is unavailable. Bmsed upon availab�,a information, it Ss our opinion that the attached summary of Potential Excessive Revenues Qnder ExistSnq Rates could be readily substantiated in a rate case proceeding. In addition we submit the following issued which could have 8 significant impact upon satiating rates, but arc unquantifiabla at this time due to the absence of available information: * Flow -back of eatcessive deferred federal income taxes. due the rate payer as a result of the reduction in the . federal corporate tax rate.. * Application of the existing Gate Gas Cost Adjustment as it relates to Out�Of-Period Adjustments allowing the Company a return of 14� of the uncollected balance. * The flow -through of contractual "'fake -Or --Pay" settlemants through tha Gates Gas Cost Adjustment. *` Lone Star Gas Company's initiation of inter-st�►te qaa . sales and tr�:nsmission due to federal deregulation. (214) 458-9388 12660 COIT ROAD AT LEL1 FWY, SUITE 200 (81 �j 469-708E n.�� � nc! Tc'Vn4 7r0�1 OCT-24-S9 TIDE 1 4 : 155 P . I e * Inter -company transactions with affiliated company's such as Enserch Gasp Company, Enserch Gas Transmission Company, a::d Exploration Partners Ltd., all of which were established subsequent to the 1982 Gate Case. We trust that this letter and informative and beneficlawl. If you regarding this information or require Jack E. Stowe, Jr. at (214) 495-0788. 1 attachment attached Summary wall be should have any questions clarification, please contact CYOT-24-a9 TIDE 14 :56 P. 1 1 k ,t LONE STAR GAS COMPANY SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL EXCESSIVE RE'YENi7E3 UNDER EXISTING BATE RATE Rate o! Raturn/ Weighted Cost of Capital 1982 pproved 3s a Estimated Var . Long term d ebfi 4.?6X 3.97% (.79%) Short terns debt .69 .91 .22 Preferred Equity .43 483 .40 Common Equity (1) ?.sa 4.09 3.55 Total 13.52% 9.80% (3.72%) Applying the decline in cosfi of capital to the Company►s identified investment results in excessive revenues of $10,920,725, Statutory Tax Rate 1982 1988 Rate Rate Variance as% Sax (124e) Applying the existing statutory rate indicates that existing ra teg are generating excessive revenues of $7,1?1,186., It consolidated tax savings are given due consideration then existing rate payers are subsidizing other Enserch activities by $18,196,.496. As demonstrated above the existing Gate Rate is excessive revenues ranging from $16,118,211 to $24,109,178. {1) 16.5% coat o! equity approved in 1982 12.5% cost o! equity indicated as of January 1989 producing