Loading...
07/06/1976-CC-Minutes-Regularconsider seven appointments at the next regular Council meeting July 6, 1976. 6. The proposed fire station was discussed briefly and the City Ad- ministrator was directed to place it on the July 6th regular meeting agenda. 7, Councilman Coker brought up the subject of the City Attorney stating that sometime in the future he would bring up the possibi- lity of changing attorneys. Coker had previously requested the City Administrator to present him a written summary of the ser- vices the City Attorney had provided over the past year. The Mayor read the results of that assessment stating that the main problem is contacting the Attorney and getting him to respond in a timely manner. 8. The Council decided to have another study session in August. Items to discuss at that time will be proposed building and plumbing codes and the Sanger Electric System discussion deferred from this meeting. Meeting adjourned at 2:�5 p.m. x if M ayor ATTEST: Minutes: City Council i��eeting July 6, 1976 Present: Mayor Cole, Cooper, Enlow, Coker, PJicDaniel, Moore, City Manager 1. The minutes of the regular meeting of June 21, 1976 and the study session of June 26, 1976 were approved. 2. Disbursements: After questions concerning various items, it was moved by Enlow and seconded by Cooper to approve July disburse- ments in the amount of $12,563.34. Motion carried 5-0. 3. Utility Bond Construction Fund invoices: The City Manager stated that the invoices under consideration covered all engineering and financial services with the exception of about ZP6,000 more for surveying. It was moved by Coker and seconded by Moore to pay these invoices in the amount of $27,601.31. Motion carried 5-0. �, Planning and Zoning Commission appointments: Coker and Cooper presenteA a list of eight names for consideration. The discussion centered around how many new members of appoint. The IVlayor stated for continuity he felt seven new members should not be appointed. After checking with the prospective appointees as to their will- ingness to serve, it was moved by Coker and seconded by Cooper to appoint the following people: Alvin Brown, Jack Armstrong, Cecil Snellgrove, John Cundiff, Norman Cook, Willard Bounds and Carl Ray Higgs. Motion carried 5-0. The City Manager stated he would call a meeting of the Commission in July for the purpose of drawing for places and electing a Chairman. 5• City Manager Ordinance: The Mayor stated that he was not in favor of passing the proposed ordinance as there were certain powers granted he felt gave the City Manager too much autonomy and, in effect, changed the form of government. Several members of the Council agreed. The Mayor stated an ordinance was not needed and recommended officially creating the position of City Manager without an ordinance. It was moved by Coker and se- conded by Cooper to create the title of City Manager and appoint Ed Moore to that position. T�2otion carried 4-0 with Moore ab- staining. It was moved by Coker and seconded by Cooper to appoint ary Jo Stover as City Secretary, Motion carried 5-0, 6, Joint landfill resolution: The City Manager stated the purpose of the resolution requesting Denton County to finance the proposed project. The Council still did not want to fully commit the City to any project without seeing the contracts first. The City Manager assured them that this resolution did not commit the City, It was moved by McDaniel and seconded by Enlow to pass the follow- ing resolution; RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the City of Sanger, a Denton County City, has an inter- est in cooperating with other Cities in developing a regional sani- tary landfill for joint use; and WHEREAS, the City of Sanger,, deems it appropriate for the County of Denton to construct a.nd'develop such sanitary landfill, requests that the Commissioner Court of Denton County issue the necessary Revenue Bonds to purchase and develop said sanitary landfill site; and WHEREAS, the City of Sanger, agrees to execute a mutually a.gree- able contract with the County of Denton to guarantee annual payments in the amount required to retire the principal and interest on the bonded indebtedness in proportion to the percentage of the site used by the City of Sanger; and WHEREAS, the City of Denton will agree that it will sign a con- tract to operate the proposed sanitary landfill in accordance with all ordinances, state statutes, and rules and regulations promulgated by the Texas Department of Health Resources, and WHEREAS, the City of Sanger, is agreeable and desires for the County of Denton to construct a regional sanitary landfill and for the City of Denton to operate same; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BANGER, TEXAS: That the City should be directed to negotiate an agreement with the County of Denton to guarantee payment of a proportion of the cost of a regional sanitary landfill, and bring such agreement to the Council for approval; and that the County should be encouraged to be the sponsor of the regional landfill and to fund same. PASSED and APPROVED this the 6th day of July, A. D. 1976, P�2otion carried 5-0. 7, Resolutions joining Association fo North Texas Cities: Consider- ation of this item was tabled. 8. Proposed fire station: Consideration of this item was tabled pending further study by Moore and the City NTanager. The City P�Ianager was directed to put this item on the next Council agenda. 9, Other Matters a. The Council was notified that Jack Armstrong had resigned as one of Banger's representatives on the Board of Directors of the Collin -Denton County Water & Sar_itation District. b. Coker asked if the City Attorney had turned in the legal. documents for the Brougham quitclaim request, The City Manager stated he had been in the hospital and had not done so, c. With the resignation of Merwyn Tucker as wlectrical inspector, it was moved by Cooper and seconded by Enlow to appoint Guy Bennett as electrical inspector. Motion carried 5-0. Meeting adjourned at 8:38 p.m. ATTESTS Minutes: City Council Meeting July 19, 1976 Present: Mayor Cole, Cooper, Enlow, Coker, McDaniel, Moore, City Manager 1. The minutes of the regular meeting of July 6, 1976 were read and and approved. 2. Sanger Electric System capital improvements: There were several questions to Lindon Carr concerning the invoice, general electric system operations, accounting procedures, and fuel adjustment. The Mayor suggested the Council have a briefing session on these matters. It was moved by Moore and seconded by Cooper to approve May capital improvements in the amount of $1,272.35. Motion carried 5-0. 3. Utility bond construction fund invoice: The first construction invoice for the sewer wrap -around line was received from E. L. Dalton, Bob Shawn, City Engineer, and the City Manager re- commended payment. It was moved by Coker and seconded by McDaniel to approve the invoice in the amount of $3,060. Motion carried 5-0. Resolution; The City Manager stated a resolution needed passage in order to have a permit to construct the water line under the A.T. & S.F. Railway line. It was moved by Cooper and seconded by Coker to approve the required resolution. Motion carried 5-0. 5. Fiscal year 1976-77 operating budget: The City Manager briefed the Council on several changes he had made in the budget figures that had been discussed previously. These changes were primarily due to updated revenue and expenditures estimates. The Mayor suggested the Council table discussion of the budget pending fur- ther study of the changes made. The City Manager was directed to place this item on the agenda for the next meeting. 6. Authorization to advertise bids for new sanitation truck; The City Manager reviewed the reasons for needing a new truck and stated it was a budgeted item and sufficient funds were available. The possible initiation of containers for commercial establishments was discussed, and the City Manager was directed to include a container loading mechanism on the new truck. The Mayor brought up an offer from the Tri.plettst Collection Service of McKinney to contact for garbage collection with an esculator clause in- cluded. A discussion followed concerning public versus private garbage collection. It was the general feeling of the Council that public collection was best. It was moved by Coker and seconded by McDaniel to advertise bids for a new 20 cubic yard rear loading sanitation truck. Motion carried 5-0. 7. Fire station; Councilman Moore stated he had some rough drawings of a proposed fire station. The Council liked the proposed design